Sign In  |  Register  |  About Menlo Park  |  Contact Us

Menlo Park, CA
September 01, 2020 1:28pm
7-Day Forecast | Traffic
  • Search Hotels in Menlo Park

  • CHECK-IN:
  • CHECK-OUT:
  • ROOMS:

Health officials classify aspartame 'possibly carcinogenic' despite 'limited evidence' it causes cancer

While the evidence of an association between the consumption of aspartame and cancer in humans is "not convincing" global health experts agree that more research needs to be done.

Health officials said Thursday there was "limited evidence" to suggest that there is an association between the consumption of aspartame, one of the most common artificial sweeteners in the world, and cancer. 

The World Health Organization's (WHO) cancer research agency, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), classified aspartame as "possibly carcinogenic" even though it cited "limited evidence for cancer in humans (specifically, for hepatocellular carcinoma, which is a type of liver cancer)," according to documents released Thursday from WHO.

At the same time, the Joint WHO and Food and Agriculture Organization's Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake for consumers at current levels. American Beverage Interim President and CEO Kevin Keane said is "another strong testament to aspartame’s safety."

On Thursday, the IARC and JECFA released independent, but complimentary, assessments on the health impacts associated with the consumption of aspartame, which is found in a wide variety of products like Coca-Cola diet sodas, sugar-free Ricola cough drops and certain sugar-free Extra chewing gum products.

BYPRODUCT OF SUCRALOSE, A CHEMICAL IN SPLENDA, FOUND TO CAUSE 'SIGNIFICANT HEALTH EFFECTS' IN NEW STUDY

The IARC evaluated the potential carcinogenic effect of aspartame while JECFA reviewed the acceptable daily intake and dietary exposure of the artificial sweetener. It was the first time that IARC evaluated aspartame and the third time for JECFA.

"After reviewing the available scientific literature, both evaluations noted limitations in the available evidence for cancer (and other health effects)," the documents from IARC and JECFA said. 

The IARC conducted studies in which the consumption of artificially sweetened beverages was considered a good proxy for aspartame exposure. In three studies, officials observed a positive association between the "consumption of artificially sweetened beverages and risk of liver cancer, either overall or in important subgroups of the studied populations," according to the documents. 

However, "chance, bias or confounding could not be ruled out as an explanation for the positive findings," the documents continued. 

ASPARTAME SWEETENER USED IN DIET COKE, SOME CHEWING GUM, MAY BE DEEMED 'POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC': REPORT

IARC further noted that "there was also limited evidence for cancer in experimental animals and limited evidence related to the possible mechanisms for causing cancer." 

Immediately following the release of the report, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said in a statement that it disagrees with IARC's conclusion to classify aspartame as a possible carcinogen to people based on these studies. It also tried to quell concerns saying that "aspartame is being labeled by IARC as ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’ does not mean that aspartame is actually linked to cancer."

The FDA first approved aspartame in 1974 for use as a tabletop sweetener and in various products. Since then, the FDA has approved aspartame for other uses, including as a general-purpose sweetener in 1996. 

Aside from people who have a rare genetic disorder called phenylketonuria (PKU), the FDA had concluded that aspartame — which is one of the most studied food additives in the human food supply — "is safe for the general population when made under good manufacturing practices and used under the approved conditions of use," according to its website. 

The FDA also continues to monitor the scientific literature for any new information on aspartame. 

SUGAR SUBSTITUTES NOT ADVISED FOR WEIGHT LOSS OR DISEASE PREVENTION, SAYS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

Still, global health experts are in agreement that more research needs to be conducted in order to better understand whether consumption of aspartame poses a carcinogenic hazard. 

Dr. Moez Sanaa, the head of WHO’s Standards and Scientific Advice on Food and Nutrition Unit, said that while JECFA "concluded that the evidence of an association between aspartame consumption and cancer in humans is not convincing," more studies need to be conducted. 

Sanaa said the studies need to be "better" and suggested that they, in part, have longer follow-up and repeated dietary questionnaires in existing cohorts. 

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Dr. Francesco Branca, WHO director of the Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, agreed saying "the assessments of aspartame have indicated that, while safety is not a major concern at the doses which are commonly used, potential effects have been described that need to be investigated by more and better studies."

Branca underscored the importance of additional research saying that cancer is one of the leading causes of death globally. 

Data & News supplied by www.cloudquote.io
Stock quotes supplied by Barchart
Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes.
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.
 
 
Copyright © 2010-2020 MenloPark.com & California Media Partners, LLC. All rights reserved.