10-Q
FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission
file number 001-15185
CIK number 0000036966
FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
62-0803242 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
165 Madison Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee
|
|
38103 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(901) 523-4444
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act)
Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding on March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.625 par value
|
|
211,594,836 |
FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
INDEX
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
This financial information reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the
interim periods presented.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(Dollars in thousands)(Unaudited) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
438,181 |
|
|
$ |
851,875 |
|
|
$ |
552,423 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
515,858 |
|
|
|
898,615 |
|
|
|
772,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
954,039 |
|
|
|
1,750,490 |
|
|
|
1,324,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing cash |
|
|
1,174,442 |
|
|
|
46,382 |
|
|
|
207,792 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
933,316 |
|
|
|
1,553,053 |
|
|
|
945,766 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
643,518 |
|
|
|
3,616,018 |
|
|
|
566,654 |
|
Loans held for sale-divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale (Note 3) |
|
|
3,016,013 |
|
|
|
3,034,558 |
|
|
|
3,125,153 |
|
Securities
held to maturity (fair value of $ - on March 31, 2009) (Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income (Note 4) |
|
|
20,572,477 |
|
|
|
21,932,020 |
|
|
|
21,278,190 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
940,932 |
|
|
|
483,203 |
|
|
|
849,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans |
|
|
19,631,545 |
|
|
|
21,448,817 |
|
|
|
20,428,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights (Note 5) |
|
|
381,024 |
|
|
|
895,923 |
|
|
|
376,844 |
|
Goodwill (Note 6) |
|
|
192,408 |
|
|
|
192,408 |
|
|
|
192,408 |
|
Other intangible assets, net (Note 6) |
|
|
43,446 |
|
|
|
52,017 |
|
|
|
45,082 |
|
Capital markets receivables |
|
|
1,502,033 |
|
|
|
1,680,057 |
|
|
|
1,178,932 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
330,299 |
|
|
|
382,488 |
|
|
|
333,931 |
|
Real estate acquired by foreclosure |
|
|
132,653 |
|
|
|
106,018 |
|
|
|
125,538 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,273,288 |
|
|
|
2,293,045 |
|
|
|
2,170,120 |
|
Other assets-divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
31,208,024 |
|
|
$ |
37,267,945 |
|
|
$ |
31,021,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
4,396,213 |
|
|
$ |
4,217,215 |
|
|
$ |
4,824,939 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
2,152,837 |
|
|
|
2,648,339 |
|
|
|
2,294,644 |
|
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,868,902 |
|
|
|
1,986,556 |
|
|
|
1,783,362 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits-divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more |
|
|
1,583,928 |
|
|
|
2,222,016 |
|
|
|
1,382,236 |
|
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more-divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
10,001,880 |
|
|
|
11,174,649 |
|
|
|
10,285,181 |
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
|
4,908,175 |
|
|
|
4,995,696 |
|
|
|
3,956,633 |
|
Deposits-divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
14,910,055 |
|
|
|
16,188,542 |
|
|
|
14,241,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,264,077 |
|
|
|
3,678,217 |
|
|
|
1,751,079 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
288,029 |
|
|
|
531,259 |
|
|
|
359,502 |
|
Other short-term borrowings and commercial paper |
|
|
3,827,278 |
|
|
|
4,753,582 |
|
|
|
4,279,689 |
|
Term borrowings |
|
|
3,353,464 |
|
|
|
6,060,795 |
|
|
|
4,022,297 |
|
Other collateralized borrowings |
|
|
736,172 |
|
|
|
809,273 |
|
|
|
745,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
4,089,636 |
|
|
|
6,870,068 |
|
|
|
4,767,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets payables |
|
|
1,383,447 |
|
|
|
1,688,870 |
|
|
|
1,115,428 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
937,826 |
|
|
|
1,136,461 |
|
|
|
932,176 |
|
Other liabilities-divestiture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
27,700,348 |
|
|
|
34,860,441 |
|
|
|
27,447,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Horizon National Corporation Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock no par value (shares authorized - 5,000,000; shares
issued series CPP 866,540 on March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008) (Note 12) |
|
|
786,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782,680 |
|
Common stock $.625 par value (shares authorized - 400,000,000; shares
issued - 211,594,836 on March 31, 2009; 136,617,661 on
March 31, 2008; and 210,758,319 on
December 31, 2008) * |
|
|
132,247 |
|
|
|
79,242 |
|
|
|
128,302 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
1,087,252 |
|
|
|
362,823 |
|
|
|
1,048,602 |
|
Capital surplus common stock warrant CPP (Note 12) |
|
|
83,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,860 |
|
Undivided profits |
|
|
1,265,073 |
|
|
|
1,704,559 |
|
|
|
1,387,854 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net |
|
|
(142,503 |
) |
|
|
(34,397 |
) |
|
|
(151,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total First Horizon National Corporation Shareholders Equity |
|
|
3,212,511 |
|
|
|
2,112,227 |
|
|
|
3,279,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest (Note 12) |
|
|
295,165 |
|
|
|
295,277 |
|
|
|
295,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
3,507,676 |
|
|
|
2,407,504 |
|
|
|
3,574,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
31,208,024 |
|
|
$ |
37,267,945 |
|
|
$ |
31,021,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation. |
|
* |
|
Outstanding shares have been restated to reflect stock dividends declared through March 31, 2009. |
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)(Unaudited) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
205,739 |
|
|
$ |
331,676 |
|
Interest on investment securities |
|
|
40,102 |
|
|
|
40,735 |
|
Interest on loans held for sale |
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
58,438 |
|
Interest on trading securities |
|
|
15,655 |
|
|
|
35,896 |
|
Interest on other earning assets |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
270,093 |
|
|
|
476,443 |
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
|
15,404 |
|
|
|
25,888 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
18,244 |
|
|
|
31,502 |
|
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
5,906 |
|
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more |
|
|
9,459 |
|
|
|
31,068 |
|
Interest on trading liabilities |
|
|
5,468 |
|
|
|
9,615 |
|
Interest on short-term borrowings |
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
70,049 |
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
|
19,600 |
|
|
|
74,323 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
73,506 |
|
|
|
248,351 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
196,587 |
|
|
|
228,092 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
Net interest (expense) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(103,413 |
) |
|
|
(11,908 |
) |
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets |
|
|
214,224 |
|
|
|
131,457 |
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
115,749 |
|
|
|
158,712 |
|
Deposit transactions and cash management |
|
|
39,032 |
|
|
|
42,553 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
6,918 |
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
Trust services and investment management |
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
9,109 |
|
Gains/(losses) from loan sales and securitizations |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(4,097 |
) |
Equity securities gains/(losses), net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
65,015 |
|
Debt securities gains/(losses), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
931 |
|
Losses on divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
All other income and commissions |
|
|
24,159 |
|
|
|
38,247 |
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
407,869 |
|
|
|
449,076 |
|
|
Adjusted gross income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
304,456 |
|
|
|
437,168 |
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits |
|
|
248,511 |
|
|
|
287,470 |
|
Operations services |
|
|
16,539 |
|
|
|
18,964 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
16,050 |
|
|
|
28,591 |
|
Legal and professional fees |
|
|
14,108 |
|
|
|
15,021 |
|
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance |
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
15,011 |
|
Communications and courier |
|
|
7,204 |
|
|
|
11,004 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
All other expense |
|
|
104,582 |
|
|
|
55,715 |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
417,328 |
|
|
|
434,216 |
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(112,872 |
) |
|
|
2,952 |
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(47,777 |
) |
|
|
(8,146 |
) |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(65,095 |
) |
|
|
11,098 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(65,095 |
) |
|
$ |
11,981 |
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
2,750 |
|
|
$ |
4,061 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) attributable to controlling interest |
|
$ |
(67,845 |
) |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
14,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(82,801 |
) |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per share from continuing operations (Note 8) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share from continuing operations
(Note 8) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per share available to common shareholders
(Note 8) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share available to common
shareholders (Note 8) |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (Note 8) |
|
|
210,413 |
|
|
|
135,896 |
|
|
Diluted average common shares (Note 8) |
|
|
210,413 |
|
|
|
136,496 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)(Unaudited) |
|
Controlling Interest |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
Controlling Interest |
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
3,279,467 |
|
|
$ |
295,165 |
|
|
$ |
3,574,632 |
|
|
$ |
2,135,596 |
|
|
$ |
295,277 |
|
|
$ |
2,430,873 |
|
Adjustment to reflect adoption of
measurement date
provisions for SFAS No. 157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,502 |
) |
Adjustment to reflect change in accounting for split dollar
life insurance arrangements (EITF Issue
No. 06-4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,530 |
) |
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
(67,845 |
) |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
(65,095 |
) |
|
|
7,920 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
11,981 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized fair value adjustments, net of
tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Securities available for sale |
|
|
15,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,060 |
|
|
|
13,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,179 |
|
Recognized pension and other employee
benefit
plans net periodic benefit costs |
|
|
(5,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,732 |
) |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
|
(58,517 |
) |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
(55,767 |
) |
|
|
21,624 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
25,685 |
|
|
Preferred stock (CPP) accretion |
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (CPP) dividends |
|
|
(14,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,220 |
) |
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Common stock issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
Excess tax benefit (shortfall) from
stock-based
compensation arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest of
subsidiary preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,061 |
) |
|
|
(4,061 |
) |
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
3,212,511 |
|
|
$ |
295,165 |
|
|
$ |
3,507,676 |
|
|
$ |
2,112,227 |
|
|
$ |
295,277 |
|
|
$ |
2,407,504 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(65,095 |
) |
|
$ |
11,981 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash
provided/(used) by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
Benefit for deferred income tax |
|
|
(79,844 |
) |
|
|
(8,146 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization of premises and
equipment |
|
|
8,502 |
|
|
|
11,815 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
Net other amortization and accretion |
|
|
11,420 |
|
|
|
12,809 |
|
Decrease/(increase) in derivatives, net |
|
|
132,651 |
|
|
|
(372,772 |
) |
Market value adjustment on mortgage servicing
rights |
|
|
(26,734 |
) |
|
|
259,041 |
|
Provision for foreclosure reserve |
|
|
17,623 |
|
|
|
2,759 |
|
Loss on divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
Excess tax benefit (shortfall) from stock-based
compensation arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
Equity securities (gains)/losses, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(65,015 |
) |
Debt securities (gains)/losses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(931 |
) |
Gains on repurchases of debt |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net losses on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
3,827 |
|
Net (increase)/decrease in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
30,665 |
|
|
|
200,493 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
(76,864 |
) |
|
|
(122,806 |
) |
Capital markets receivables |
|
|
(323,101 |
) |
|
|
(1,155,638 |
) |
Interest receivable |
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
13,929 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(216,541 |
) |
|
|
167,879 |
|
Net increase/(decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital markets payables |
|
|
268,019 |
|
|
|
1,102,512 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
|
|
(11,387 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
61,466 |
|
|
|
(279,058 |
) |
Trading liabilities |
|
|
(71,473 |
) |
|
|
(24,885 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
29,260 |
|
|
|
(18,870 |
) |
|
Net cash used by operating activities |
|
|
(35,835 |
) |
|
|
(6,889 |
) |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
8,566 |
|
|
|
80,590 |
|
Maturities |
|
|
149,505 |
|
|
|
237,946 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
(21,833 |
) |
|
|
(230,535 |
) |
Premises and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(6,430 |
) |
|
|
(8,019 |
) |
Net (increase)/decrease in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization retained interests classified as
trading securities |
|
|
(18,215 |
) |
|
|
14,889 |
|
Loans |
|
|
476,224 |
|
|
|
88,162 |
|
Interest-bearing cash |
|
|
(966,650 |
) |
|
|
(6,960 |
) |
Cash payments related to divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,656 |
) |
|
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities |
|
|
(378,833 |
) |
|
|
160,417 |
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,220 |
) |
Repurchase of shares |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Cash dividends
paid preferred stock CPP |
|
|
(10,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
preferred stock
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(4,209 |
) |
|
|
(4,679 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock-based
compensation arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
Payments/Maturities |
|
|
(664,929 |
) |
|
|
(47,264 |
) |
Cash paid for repurchase of debt |
|
|
(4,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
668,249 |
|
|
|
(758,816 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
60,587 |
|
|
|
169,812 |
|
|
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities |
|
|
43,927 |
|
|
|
(662,753 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(370,741 |
) |
|
|
(509,225 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,324,780 |
|
|
|
2,259,715 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
954,039 |
|
|
$ |
1,750,490 |
|
|
Total interest paid |
|
$ |
84,023 |
|
|
$ |
258,300 |
|
Total income taxes paid |
|
$ |
106,246 |
|
|
$ |
146,027 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
Note 1 Financial Information
The unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements of First Horizon National
Corporation (FHN), including its subsidiaries, have been prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within
the industries in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the financial
statements and could differ from actual results. In the opinion of management, all necessary
adjustments have been made for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations
for the periods presented. The operating results for the interim 2009 periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected going forward. For further information, refer to
the audited consolidated financial statements in the 2008 Annual Report to shareholders.
Investment Securities. Securities that FHN has the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity
are classified as securities held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The amortized cost
of all securities is adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount to maturity, or
earlier call date if appropriate, using the level yield method. Such amortization and accretion is
included in interest income from securities. Investment securities are reviewed quarterly for
possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and
circumstances of each individual investment such as the degree of loss, the length of time the fair
value has been below cost, the expectation for that securitys performance, the creditworthiness of
the issuer and FHNs intent and ability to hold the security. Upon adoption of FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
(FSP FAS 115-2) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the intent and ability to hold to recovery
indicator was replaced for debt securities with a requirement that FHNs management assert that it
does not intend to sell a security and that it is not more-likely-than-not that it will have to
sell the security prior to recovery for the debt security not to be considered
other-than-temporarily impaired. Realized gains and losses for investment securities are determined
by the specific identification method and reported in noninterest income. Declines in value judged
to be other-than-temporary based on FHNs analysis of the facts and circumstances related to an
individual investment, including securities that FHN has the intent to sell, are also determined by
the specific identification method and reported in noninterest income. After adoption of FSP FAS
115-2, for impaired debt securities that FHN does not intend to sell and that it is not
more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery but for which credit losses
exist, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized has been separated between the total
impairment related to credit losses which is reported in noninterest income, and the impairment
related to all other factors which is excluded from earnings and reported, net of tax, as a
component of other comprehensive income within shareholders equity.
Securities that may be sold prior to maturity and equity securities are classified as securities
available for sale and are carried at fair value. The unrealized gains and losses on securities
available for sale, including debt securities for which no credit impairment exists, are excluded
from earnings and are reported, net of tax, as a component of other comprehensive income within
shareholders equity.
Loans Held for Sale and Securitization. In conjunction with the adoption of FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS
157-4), FHN revised its methodology for determining the fair value of certain loans within its
mortgage warehouse. FHN now determines the fair value of the applicable loans using a discounted
cash flow model using observable inputs, including current mortgage rates for similar products,
with adjustments for differences in loan characteristics reflected in the models discount rates.
This change in methodology had a minimal effect on the valuation of the applicable loans.
Previously, fair values of these loans were determined through reference to recent security trade
prices for similar products, published third party bids or observable whole loan sale prices with
adjustments for differences in loan characteristics.
Accounting Changes. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 which replaces the intent and
ability to hold to recovery indicator of other-than-temporary impairment in FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments (FSP FAS 115-1) for debt securities. FSP FAS 115-2 specifies that for a debt
security not to be considered other-than-temporarily impaired, an entitys management must assert
that it does not intend to sell the security and that it is not more-likely-than-not that the
entity will have to sell the security prior to recovery of its cost basis. FSP FAS 115-2 requires
that for impaired held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities that an entity does not
intend to sell and that it is not more-likely-than-not that it will have to sell prior to recovery
but for which credit losses exist, the other-than-temporary impairment should be separated between
the total impairment related to credit losses, which should be recognized in current earnings, and
the amount of impairment related to all other factors, which should be recognized in other
comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 discusses the proper interaction of its guidance with other
authoritative guidance, including FSP FAS 115-1, which provide additional factors that must be
considered in an other-than-temporary
Note 1 Financial Information (continued)
impairment analysis. FSP FAS 115-2 also provides that in periods in which other-than-temporary
impairments are recognized, the total impairment must be presented in the investors income
statement with an offset for the amount of total impairment that is recognized in other
comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 requires additional disclosures including a rollforward of
amounts recognized in earnings for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment has
been recognized and the noncredit portion of the other-than-temporary impairment that has been
recognized in other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 is effective prospectively for periods
ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009,
provided that the provisions of FSP FAS 157-4 are early adopted as well. FHN applied the guidance
of FSP FAS 115-2 when assessing debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment as of March 31,
2009 and the effects of adoption were not material.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4 which provides factors that an entity should consider
when determining whether a market for an asset is not active. If after evaluating the relevant
factors, the evidence indicates that a market is not active, FSP FAS 157-4 provides an additional
list of factors that an entity must consider when determining whether events and circumstances
indicate that a transaction which occurred in such inactive market is orderly. FSP FAS 157-4
requires that entities place more weight on observable transactions determined to be orderly and
less weight on transactions for which there is insufficient information to determine whether the
transaction is orderly when determining the fair value of an asset or liability under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). FSP FAS 157-4
requires enhanced disclosures, including disclosure of a change in valuation technique which
results from
its application and disclosure of fair value measurements for debt and equity securities by major
security types. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective prospectively for periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009, provided that the provisions
of FSP FAS 115-2 are early adopted as well. FHN applied the guidance of FSP FAS 157-4 in its fair
value measurements as of March 31, 2009 and the effects of adoption were not significant.
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for existing fair value
measurement requirements related to non-financial assets and liabilities which are recognized at
fair value on a non-recurring basis. The effective date for the application of SFAS No. 157s
measurement framework to such non-financial assets and liabilities was previously delayed under
FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. SFAS No. 157
establishes a hierarchy to be used in performing measurements of fair value. Additionally, SFAS
No. 157 emphasizes that fair value should be determined from the perspective of a market
participant while also indicating that valuation methodologies should first reference available
market data before using internally developed assumptions. SFAS No. 157 also provides expanded
disclosure requirements regarding the effects of fair value measurements on the financial
statements. The effect of adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and
liabilities which are recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis on January 1, 2009, was not
significant to FHN. Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted SFAS No. 157 for existing fair value
measurement requirements related to financial assets and liabilities as well as to non-financial
assets and liabilities which are remeasured at least annually. Upon the adoption of the provisions
of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities as well as non-financial assets and
liabilities remeasured at least annually on January 1, 2008, a negative after-tax cumulative-effect
adjustment of $12.5 million was made to the opening balance of undivided profits for interest rate
lock commitments which FHN previously measured under the guidance of EITF 02-3, Issues Involved in
Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy
Trading and Risk Management Activities (EITF 02-3). The effect of the change in accounting for
these interest rate lock commitments produced a $15.7 million negative effect on first quarter 2008
earnings as the $14.2 million positive effect of delivering the loans associated with the
commitments existing at the beginning of that quarter was more than offset by a negative impact of
$29.9 million for commitments remaining on the balance sheet at the end of that quarter that was
previously deferred under EITF 02-3 until delivery of the associated loans. Substantially all
commitments existing at August 31, 2008 were sold to MetLife Bank, N.A. (MetLife).
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141-R,
Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141-R) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS
No. 160). SFAS No. 141-R requires that an acquirer recognize the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination, as well as any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at their
fair values as of the acquisition date, with limited exceptions. Additionally, SFAS No. 141-R
provides that an acquirer cannot specify an effective date for a business combination that is
separate from the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141-R also provides that acquisition-related costs
which an acquirer incurs should be expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred and the
services are received. SFAS No. 160 requires that acquired assets and liabilities be measured at
full fair value without consideration to ownership percentage. Under SFAS No. 160, any
noncontrolling interests in an acquiree should be presented as a separate component of equity
rather than on a mezzanine level. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 provides that net income or loss
should be reported in the consolidated income statement at its consolidated amount, with disclosure
on the face of
the consolidated income statement of the amount of consolidated net income which is attributable to
the parent and noncontrolling interests, respectively. Upon adoption, the retrospective
application of SFAS No. 160s presentation and disclosure requirements resulted in an
Note 1 Financial Information (continued)
increase to consolidated net income of $4.1 million for first quarter 2008. FHN also recognized an
increase of total shareholders equity of $295.2 million upon adoption of SFAS No. 160 as a result
of reclassifying the noncontrolling interest previously recognized on the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Condition as Preferred stock of subsidiary as a separate component of equity.
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (FSP FAS
141(R)-1). FSP FAS 141(R)-1 amends SFAS No. 141-R to require that an acquirer recognize at fair
value as of the acquisition date an asset acquired or liability assumed in a business combination
that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of the asset or liability can be
determined during the measurement period. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 provides that if the acquisition-date
fair value of an asset acquired or liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a
contingency cannot be determined during the measurement period, the asset or liability should be
recognized at the acquisition date if information available before the end of the measurement
period indicates that it is probable that an asset existed or a liability had been incurred at the
acquisition date and the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated.
Additionally, FSP FAS 141(R)-1 requires enhanced disclosures regarding assets and liabilities
arising from contingencies which are recognized at the acquisition date of a business combination,
including the nature of the contingencies, the amounts recognized at the acquisition date and the
measurement basis applied. The adoption of FSP FAS 141(R)-1 had no effect on FHNs statement of
condition or results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2009,
FHN adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures related to derivatives
accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133 and reconsiders existing disclosure requirements for
such derivatives and any related hedging items. The disclosures provided in SFAS No. 161 are
required for both interim and annual reporting periods. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 161, FHN revised
its disclosures accordingly.
FHN also adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets
and Repurchase Financing Transactions (FSP FAS 140-3) as of January 1, 2009, for initial transfers
of financial assets executed after such date. FSP FAS 140-3 permits a transferor and transferee to
separately account for an initial transfer of a financial asset and a related repurchase financing
that are entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, one another if certain
specified conditions are met at the inception of the transaction. FSP FAS 140-3 requires that the
two transactions have a valid and distinct business or economic purpose for being entered into
separately and that the repurchase financing not result in the initial transferor regaining control
over the previously transferred financial asset. The effect of adopting FSP FAS 140-3 was
immaterial to FHN.
Effective December 31, 2008, FHN adopted FASB Staff Position No. EITF 99-20-1, Amendments to the
Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20 (FSP EITF 99-20-1). FSP EITF 99-20-1 amends EITF
Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and
Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in
Securitized Financial Assets (EITF 99-20) to align its impairment model with the impairment model
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115), resulting in a consistent determination of whether
other-than-temporary impairments of available for sale or held to maturity debt securities have
occurred. Since FHN recognizes all retained interests from securitization transactions at fair
value as trading securities and as all of its beneficial interests classified as available for sale
securities are outside the scope of EITF 99-20, the effect of adopting FSP EITF 99-20-1 was
immaterial to FHN.
Effective December 31, 2008, FHN adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8,
Disclosures by Public Entities about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable
Interest Entities (FSP FAS 140-4) which requires additional disclosures related to transfers of
financial assets as well as FHNs involvement with variable interest entities and qualifying
special purpose entities. Upon adoption of FSP FAS 140-4, FHN revised its disclosures accordingly.
Effective December 31, 2008, FHN adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4,
Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No.
133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
161 (FSP FAS 133-1). FSP FAS 133-1 requires sellers of credit derivatives and similar guarantee
contracts to make disclosures regarding the nature, term, fair value, potential losses and recourse
provisions for those contracts. Since FHN is not a seller of credit derivatives or similar
financial guarantees, the effect of adopting FSP FAS 133-1 was immaterial to FHN.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted SFAS No. 159 which allows an irrevocable election to measure
certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with
unrealized gains and losses recognized currently in earnings. Under SFAS No. 159, the fair value
option may only be elected at the time of initial recognition of a financial asset or liability or
upon the occurrence of certain
Note 1 Financial Information (continued)
specified events. Additionally, SFAS No. 159 provides that application of the fair value option
must be based on the fair value of an entire financial asset or liability and not selected risks
inherent in those assets or liabilities. SFAS No. 159 requires that assets and liabilities which
are measured at fair value pursuant to the fair value option be reported in the financial
statements in a manner that separates those fair values from the carrying amounts of similar assets
and liabilities which are measured using another measurement attribute. SFAS No. 159 also provides
expanded disclosure requirements regarding the effects of electing the fair value option on the
financial statements. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, FHN elected the fair value option on a
prospective basis for almost all types of mortgage loans originated for sale purposes.
Additionally, in accordance with SFAS No. 159s amendment of SFAS No. 115, FHN began prospectively
classifying cash flows associated with its retained interests in securitizations recognized as
trading securities within investing activities in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash
Flows.
Effective January 1,
2008, FHN adopted SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan
Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings (SAB No. 109) prospectively for derivative loan
commitments issued or modified after that date. SAB No. 109 rescinds SAB No. 105s prohibition on
inclusion of expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities in the fair value
measurement of a written loan commitment. SAB No. 109 also applies to any loan commitments for
which fair value accounting is elected under SFAS No. 159. FHN did not elect fair value accounting
for any other loan commitments under SFAS No. 159. The prospective application of SAB No. 109 and
the prospective election to recognize substantially all new mortgage loan originations at fair
value under SFAS No. 159 resulted in a positive impact of $58.1 million on first quarter 2008
pre-tax earnings. Such impact represented the estimated value of mortgage servicing rights
included in (1) interest rate lock commitments entered into in first quarter 2008 that remained on
the balance sheet at the end of that quarter and (2) mortgage warehouse loans originated in first
quarter 2008 accounted for at elected fair value which remained on the balance sheet at the end of
that quarter.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB
Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair
Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (FSP FAS
157-1), which amends SFAS No. 157 to exclude Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13,
Accounting for Leases (SFAS No. 13), and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value
measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13 from its scope.
The adoption of FSP FAS 157-1 had no effect on FHNs statement of condition or results of
operations.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted EITF Issue No. 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation
and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements (EITF
06-4). EITF 06-4 requires that a liability be recognized for contracts written to employees which
provide future postretirement benefits that are covered by endorsement split-dollar life insurance
arrangements because such obligations are not considered to be effectively settled upon entering
into the related insurance arrangements. FHN recognized a decrease to undivided profits of $8.5
million, net of tax, upon adoption of EITF 06-4.
Effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted FASB Staff Position No. FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB
Interpretation No. 39 (FSP FIN 39-1). FSP FIN 39-1 permits the offsetting of fair value amounts
recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral
against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same
counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. Upon adoption of FSP FIN 39-1, entities
were permitted to change their previous accounting policy election to offset or not offset fair
value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements. FSP FIN
39-1 requires additional
disclosures for derivatives and collateral associated with master netting arrangements, including
the separate disclosure of amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the
obligation to return cash collateral under master netting arrangements as of the end of each
reporting period for entities that made an accounting policy decision to not offset fair value
amounts. FHN retained its previous accounting policy election to not offset fair value amounts
recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements upon adoption of FSP FIN
39-1, and has revised disclosure accordingly.
FHN also adopted FASB Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. E23, Issues Involving the Application
of the Shortcut Method under Paragraph 68 (DIG E23) as of January 1, 2008, for hedging
relationships designated on or after such date. DIG E23 amends SFAS No. 133 to explicitly permit
use of the shortcut method for hedging relationships in which an interest rate swap has a nonzero
fair value at inception of the hedging relationship which is attributable solely to the existence of a
bid-ask spread in the
entitys principal market under SFAS No. 157. Additionally, DIG E23 allows an entity to apply the
shortcut method to a qualifying fair value hedge when the hedged item has a trade date that differs
from its settlement date because of generally established conventions in the marketplace in which
the transaction to acquire or issue the hedged item is executed. Preexisting shortcut hedging
relationships were analyzed as of DIG E23s adoption date to determine
Note 1 Financial Information (continued)
whether they complied with the revised shortcut criteria at their inception or should be
dedesignated prospectively. The adoption of DIG E23 had no effect on FHNs financial position or
results of operations as all of FHNs preexisting hedging relationships met the requirements of DIG
E23 at their inception.
Accounting Changes Issued but Not Currently Effective. In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1). FSP FAS 107-1 amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS No. 107) to require disclosures
about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 requires
that disclosures be included in both interim and annual financial statements of the methods and
significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 is
effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with comparative disclosures required only for
periods ending subsequent to initial adoption. FHN is currently assessing the effects of adopting
FSP FAS 107-1.
In December 2008, FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1), was issued. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 provides
detailed disclosure requirements to enhance the disclosures about an employers plan assets
currently required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132(R), Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS No. 132(R)). FSP FAS 132(R)-1
is effective prospectively for annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. FHN is currently
assessing the effects of adopting FSP FAS 132(R)-1.
Note 2 Acquisitions/Divestitures
Effective August 31, 2008, FHN sold more than 230 retail and wholesale mortgage origination offices
nationwide, the loan origination and servicing platform, substantially all of FHNs mortgage
origination pipeline and related hedges, certain fixed assets and other associated assets to
MetLife. MetLife did not acquire any portion of FHNs mortgage loan warehouse. FHN retained its
mortgage operations in and around Tennessee, continuing to originate home loans for customers in
its regional banking market footprint. FHN also sold servicing assets, and related hedges, on
$19.1 billion of first lien mortgage loans and associated custodial deposits. Additionally, FHN
entered into a subservicing agreement with MetLife for the remainder of FHNs servicing portfolio.
MetLife generally paid book value for the assets and liabilities it acquired, less a purchase price
reduction. The assets and liabilities related to the mortgage operations divested were included in
the Mortgage Banking segment and were reflected as divestiture on the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Condition for the reporting period ending June 30, 2008. FHN recognized a loss on
divestiture of $17.5 million in the third quarter 2008 and a gain on divestiture of $0.9 million in
the fourth quarter of 2008. Gains and losses related to this transaction were included in the
noninterest income section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income as gains/losses on
divestitures.
Due to efforts initiated by FHN in 2007 to improve profitability, FHN sold 34 branches in Atlanta,
Baltimore, Dallas, and Northern Virginia which were outside the Regional Banks footprint. The
First Horizon Bank branch sales were completed in 2008 resulting in losses of $1.0 million, $0.4
million, and $1.0 million in the first, second, and fourth quarters of 2008. Aggregate gains of
$15.7 million were recognized in fourth quarter 2007 from the disposition of 15 of the branches.
These transactions resulted in the transfer of certain loans, certain fixed assets (including
branch locations), and assumption of all the deposit relationships of the First Horizon Bank
branches that were divested. The assets and liabilities related to the First Horizon Bank branches
were included in the Regional Banking segment and were reflected as divestiture on the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition for reporting periods ending prior to June 30, 2008.
The gains and losses realized on the disposition of First Horizon Bank branches were included in
the noninterest income section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income as gains and
losses on divestitures.
In addition to the divestitures mentioned above, FHN acquires or divests assets from time to time
in transactions that are considered business combinations or divestitures but are not material to
FHN individually or in the aggregate.
Note 3 Investment Securities
The following tables summarize FHNs securities held to maturity and available for sale on March
31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
$ |
47,932 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,502 |
|
Government agency issued MBS (a) |
|
|
1,156,691 |
|
|
|
49,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,205,963 |
|
Government agency issued CMO (a) |
|
|
1,232,844 |
|
|
|
38,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,271,545 |
|
Other U.S. government agencies (a) |
|
|
127,735 |
|
|
|
5,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,111 |
|
States and municipalities |
|
|
62,220 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,238 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
2,157 |
|
Equity (b) |
|
|
292,484 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
292,497 |
|
|
Total securities available for sale (c) |
|
$ |
2,922,118 |
|
|
$ |
94,046 |
|
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
$ |
3,016,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes securities issued by government sponsored entities. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes FHLB and FRB stock, venture capital, money market, and cost method investments. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes $2.5 billion of securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes. As of
March 31, 2009, FHN had pledged $1.2 billion of available for sale securities as collateral for securities sold under repurchase agreements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and municipalities |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
$ |
43,042 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43,074 |
|
Government agency issued MBS (a) |
|
|
1,351,601 |
|
|
|
21,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,372,733 |
|
Government agency issued CMO (a) |
|
|
1,177,684 |
|
|
|
32,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,209,927 |
|
Other U.S. government agencies (a) |
|
|
139,842 |
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
141,548 |
|
States and municipalities |
|
|
26,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
26,511 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,556 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
3,527 |
|
Equity (b) |
|
|
237,252 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
237,237 |
|
|
Total securities available for sale (c) |
|
$ |
2,979,507 |
|
|
$ |
55,231 |
|
|
$ |
(181 |
) |
|
$ |
3,034,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes securities issued by government sponsored entities. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes FHLB and FRB stock, venture capital, money market, and cost method investments. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes $2.7 billion of securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes. As of
March 31, 2008, FHN had pledged $1.6 billion of available for sale securities as collateral for securities sold under repurchase agreements. |
Note 3 Investment Securities (continued)
The following tables provide information on investments within the available for sale portfolio
that have unrealized losses on March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 Months or Longer |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Government agency issued MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency issued CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and municipalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
718 |
|
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
$ |
718 |
|
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
FHN has reviewed investment securities that are in unrealized loss positions in accordance with its
accounting policy for other-than-temporary impairment and does not consider them
other-than-temporarily impaired. FHN does not intend to sell the debt securities and it is not
more-likely-than-not that FHN will be required to sell the securities prior to recovery and the
decline in value is not attributable to credit losses. For equity securities, FHN has both the
ability and intent to hold these securities for the time necessary to recover the amortized cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 Months or Longer |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Government agency issued MBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency issued CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,868 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
23,868 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
States and municipalities |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Other |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
Total debt securities |
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
24,319 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
26,296 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Equity |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
24,319 |
|
|
$ |
(135 |
) |
|
$ |
26,505 |
|
|
$ |
(181 |
) |
|
Note 4 Loans
The composition of the loan portfolio is detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and industrial |
|
$ |
7,716,733 |
|
|
$ |
7,238,630 |
|
|
$ |
7,863,727 |
|
Real estate commercial |
|
|
1,501,964 |
|
|
|
1,345,526 |
|
|
|
1,454,040 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
1,550,158 |
|
|
|
2,602,968 |
|
|
|
1,778,140 |
|
Retail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential |
|
|
8,016,018 |
|
|
|
7,858,109 |
|
|
|
8,161,435 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
772,982 |
|
|
|
1,814,863 |
|
|
|
980,798 |
|
Other retail |
|
|
132,452 |
|
|
|
138,253 |
|
|
|
135,779 |
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
180,282 |
|
|
|
191,119 |
|
|
|
189,554 |
|
Real estate loans pledged against other collateralized
borrowings |
|
|
701,888 |
|
|
|
742,552 |
|
|
|
714,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
20,572,477 |
|
|
|
21,932,020 |
|
|
|
21,278,190 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
940,932 |
|
|
|
483,203 |
|
|
|
849,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans |
|
$ |
19,631,545 |
|
|
$ |
21,448,817 |
|
|
$ |
20,428,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
FHN has a significant concentration of loans secured by residential real estate (52 percent of
total loans) primarily in three portfolios. The retail real estate residential portfolio including
real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings (42 percent of total loans) was
primarily comprised of home equity lines and loans. While this portfolio has been stressed by the
downturn in the housing market and rising unemployment, it contains loans extended to strong
borrowers with high credit scores and is geographically diversified. The OTC portfolio (4 percent
of total loans) has been negatively impacted by the downturn in the housing industry, certain
discontinued product types, and the decreased availability of permanent mortgage financing. The
Residential CRE portfolio (6 percent of total loans) has also been negatively impacted by the
housing industry downturn as builder liquidity has been severely stressed.
As of March 31, 2009, FHN had trust preferred loans to banks and insurance related businesses
totaling $.5 billion (2 percent of total loans) that are included within the Commercial, Financial,
and Industrial portfolio. Due to higher credit losses experienced throughout the financial
services industry and the limited availability of market liquidity, these loans have experienced
some stress during the current economic downturn.
On
March 31, 2009, FHN did not have any concentrations of 10 percent or more of total Commercial,
Financial, and Industrial loans in any single industry.
Nonperforming loans consist of loans which management has identified as impaired, other nonaccrual
loans and loans which have been restructured. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no
significant outstanding commitments to advance additional funds to customers whose loans had been
restructured. The following table presents nonperforming loans on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
526,282 |
|
|
$ |
263,671 |
|
|
$ |
474,090 |
|
Other nonaccrual loans* |
|
|
606,826 |
|
|
|
273,581 |
|
|
|
579,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
$ |
1,133,108 |
|
|
$ |
537,252 |
|
|
$ |
1,053,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
On March 31, 2009 and 2008, and on December 31, 2008, other
nonaccrual loans included $14.5 million, $9.7 million, and $8.5
million, respectively, of
loans held for sale. |
Note 4 Loans (continued)
Generally, interest payments received on impaired loans are applied to principal. Once all
principal has been received, additional payments are recognized as interest income on a cash basis.
The following table presents information concerning impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Total
interest income on impaired loans |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
Average balance of impaired loans |
|
|
500,186 |
|
|
|
222,034 |
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses related to non-impaired and impaired loans for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-impaired |
|
Impaired |
|
Total |
|
Balance on December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
325,883 |
|
|
$ |
16,458 |
|
|
$ |
342,341 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
199,615 |
|
|
|
40,385 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(50,678 |
) |
|
|
(51,078 |
) |
|
|
(101,756 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(48,068 |
) |
|
|
(51,070 |
) |
|
|
(99,138 |
) |
|
Balance on March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
477,430 |
|
|
$ |
5,773 |
|
|
$ |
483,203 |
|
|
Balance on December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
836,907 |
|
|
$ |
12,303 |
|
|
$ |
849,210 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
231,936 |
|
|
|
68,064 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(140,655 |
) |
|
|
(76,506 |
) |
|
|
(217,161 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
6,981 |
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(133,674 |
) |
|
|
(74,604 |
) |
|
|
(208,278 |
) |
|
Balance on March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
935,169 |
|
|
$ |
5,763 |
|
|
$ |
940,932 |
|
|
Note 5 Mortgage Servicing Rights
FHN recognizes all its classes of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) at fair value. Classes of MSR
are determined in accordance with FHNs risk management practices and market inputs used in
determining the fair value of the servicing asset. The balance of MSR included on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Condition represents the rights to service approximately $64 billion of
mortgage loans on March 31, 2009, for which a servicing right has been capitalized.
Since sales of MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of
the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining
the fair value of MSR. As such, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate
the fair value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant
risk characteristics of MSR, such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age
(new, seasoned, or moderate), agency type and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that
it believes are comparable to those used by brokers and other service providers. Due to ongoing
disruptions in the mortgage market, more emphasis has been placed on third party broker price
discovery and, when available, observable market trades in valuing MSR. FHN also periodically
compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions with brokers, service providers, and recent
market activity and against its own experience.
Following is a summary of changes in capitalized MSR related to proprietary securitization
activities utilizing qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) as of March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Liens |
|
Liens |
|
HELOC |
|
Fair value on January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
230,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,429 |
|
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Reductions due to loan payments |
|
|
(5,606 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
Fair value on March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
224,705 |
|
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
|
$ |
1,835 |
|
|
Fair value on January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
102,993 |
|
|
$ |
981 |
|
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Reductions due to loan payments |
|
|
(5,485 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions |
|
|
15,670 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value on March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
113,178 |
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
Servicing, late and other ancillary fees recognized within mortgage banking income were $18.8
million and $22.0 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to
securitization activity. Servicing, late and other ancillary fees recognized within revenue from
loan sales and securitizations were $.3 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
related to securitization activity.
Note 5 Mortgage Servicing Rights (continued)
Following is a summary of changes in capitalized MSR related to loan sale activity as of March 31,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Liens |
|
Liens |
|
HELOC |
|
Fair value on January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
892,104 |
|
|
$ |
24,403 |
|
|
$ |
9,313 |
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
78,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
834 |
|
Reductions due to loan payments |
|
|
(31,842 |
) |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
Reductions due to sale |
|
|
(43,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions |
|
|
(254,076 |
) |
|
|
(2,975 |
) |
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
Fair value on March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
641,150 |
|
|
$ |
18,887 |
|
|
$ |
8,107 |
|
|
Fair value on January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
251,404 |
|
|
$ |
12,576 |
|
|
$ |
7,419 |
|
Addition of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions due to loan payments |
|
|
(11,997 |
) |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions |
|
|
11,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
Fair value on March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
248,165 |
|
|
$ |
10,101 |
|
|
$ |
7,257 |
|
|
Servicing, late and other ancillary fees recognized within mortgage banking income were $16.4
million and $52.4 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to
loan sale activity. Servicing, late and other ancillary fees recognized within revenue from loan
sales and securitizations were $3.5 million and $4.3 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively, related to loan sale activity.
FHN services a portfolio of mortgage loans related to transfers performed by other parties
utilizing QSPEs. FHNs MSR represents its sole interest in these transactions. The total MSR
recognized by FHN related to these transactions was $7.4 million and $72.3 million at March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The aggregate principal balance serviced by FHN for these
transactions was $1.1 billion and $5.8 billion at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. FHN has
no obligation to provide financial support and has not provided any
form of support to the related trusts. The MSR recognized by FHN has been included in the first lien mortgage loans
column within the rollforward of MSR resulting from loan sales activity.
As of March 31, 2009, FHN had transferred $143.4 million of MSR to third parties in transactions
that did not qualify for sales treatment due to certain recourse provisions that were included
within the sale agreements. These MSR are included within the first liens mortgage loans column
within the rollforward of MSR resulting from loan sales activity. The proceeds from these
transfers have been recognized within commercial paper and other short term borrowings in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as of March 31, 2009. Since MSR are recognized at
fair value and since changes in the fair value of related financing liabilities will exactly mirror
the change in fair value of the associated servicing assets, management elected to account for the
financing liabilities at fair value under SFAS No. 159.
Note 6 Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, included in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Goodwill |
|
Assets* |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
$ |
56,907 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,440 |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,434 |
) |
Divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
$ |
52,017 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
$ |
45,082 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,636 |
) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
$ |
43,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents customer lists, acquired contracts, premium on purchased deposits, and covenants
not to compete. |
The gross carrying amount of other intangible assets subject to amortization is $133.6 million on
March 31, 2009, net of $90.2 million of accumulated amortization. Estimated aggregate amortization
expense is expected to be $4.5 million for the remainder of 2009, and $5.9 million, $5.7 million,
$4.2 million, $3.9 million and $3.6 million for the twelve-month periods of 2010, 2011, 2012,
2013 and 2014, respectively.
The following is a summary of goodwill detailed by reportable segments for the three months ended
March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional |
|
Capital |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Markets |
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
77,342 |
|
|
$ |
115,066 |
|
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
77,342 |
|
|
$ |
115,066 |
|
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
77,342 |
|
|
$ |
115,066 |
|
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
77,342 |
|
|
$ |
115,066 |
|
|
$ |
192,408 |
|
|
There is no associated goodwill with the Mortgage Banking, National Specialty Lending, and
Corporate segments.
Note 7 - Regulatory Capital
FHN is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and
possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on FHNs financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain derivatives as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices must be met. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to
qualitative judgment by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require FHN to maintain
minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1
capital to average assets (leverage). Management believes, as of March 31, 2009, that FHN met all
capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.
The actual capital amounts and ratios of FHN and FTBNA are presented in the table below. In
addition, FTBNA must also calculate its capital ratios after excluding financial subsidiaries as
defined by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Based on this calculation, FTBNAs Total Capital,
Tier 1 Capital, and Leverage ratios were 18.20 percent, 13.86 percent and 11.41 percent,
respectively, on March 31, 2009, and were 11.69 percent, 7.61 percent and 6.24 percent,
respectively, on March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Horizon National |
|
First Tennessee Bank |
|
|
Corporation |
|
National Association |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio |
|
On March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
$ |
5,004,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.20 |
% |
|
$ |
4,731,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.27 |
% |
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
3,708,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.97 |
|
|
|
3,518,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.33 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
3,708,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.23 |
|
|
|
3,518,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
1,981,748 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
1,963,701 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
990,874 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
981,851 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
1,213,301 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
1,204,230 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action Provisions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,454,626 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,472,776 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505,287 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
On March 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
$ |
3,864,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.01 |
% |
|
$ |
3,667,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.42 |
% |
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
2,443,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.23 |
|
|
|
2,348,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.95 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
2,443,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.62 |
|
|
|
2,348,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
2,376,745 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
2,362,202 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
1,188,373 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
1,181,101 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
1,476,794 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
1,466,461 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action Provisions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,952,753 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771,652 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,833,076 |
|
|
|
> |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
Note 8 Earnings per Share
The following table shows a reconciliation of the numerators used in calculating earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(65,095 |
) |
|
$ |
11,098 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(65,095 |
) |
|
$ |
11,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(65,095 |
) |
|
$ |
11,098 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
14,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(82,801 |
) |
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(65,095 |
) |
|
$ |
11,981 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
14,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(82,801 |
) |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of weighted average common to diluted shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average common shares |
|
|
210,413 |
|
|
|
135,896 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
Diluted average common shares |
|
|
210,413 |
|
|
|
136,497 |
|
|
The following tables provide a reconciliation of earnings per share from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
Earnings/(loss)
per common share from continuing operations: |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per common share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
Note 8 Earnings per Share (continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of earnings per share from net income available to
common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
March 31 |
Earnings/(loss)
per common share: |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
Due to the net loss attributable to common shareholders for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
no potentially dilutive shares were included in the loss per share calculations as including such
shares would have been antidilutive. Stock options of 14.4 million and 17.3 million with a
weighted average exercise price of $32.06 and $33.14 per share for the three months ended March 31,
2009, and 2008, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted loss per common share
because such shares would have had an antidilutive effect on earnings per common share. Other
equity awards of 1.3 million and .3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, and 2008,
respectively, were also excluded because inclusion would have been antidilutive. 13.3 million
potentially dilutive shares related to the CPP common stock warrant were excluded from the first
quarter 2009, computation of diluted loss per common share because such shares would have had an
antidilutive effect on loss per common share.
Note 9 Contingencies and Other Disclosures
Contingencies. Contingent liabilities arise in the ordinary course of business, including those
related to litigation. Various claims and lawsuits are pending against FHN and its subsidiaries. In
view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal matters, particularly where the
claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the cases present novel legal theories
or involve a large number of parties, FHN cannot state with confidence what the eventual outcome of
the pending matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be,
or what the eventual loss or impact related to each pending matter may be. FHN establishes loss
contingency reserves for litigation matters when estimated loss is both probable and estimable as
prescribed by applicable financial accounting guidance. A reserve generally is not established when
a loss contingency either is not probable or its amount is not estimable. If loss for a matter is
probable and a range of possible loss outcomes is the best estimate available, accounting guidance
generally requires a reserve to be established at the low end of the range. Based on current
knowledge, and after consultation with counsel, management is of the opinion that loss
contingencies related to pending matters should not have a material adverse effect on the
consolidated financial condition of FHN, but may be material to FHNs operating results for any
particular reporting period.
Other disclosures Indemnification agreements and guarantees. In the ordinary course of business,
FHN enters into indemnification agreements for legal proceedings against its directors and officers
and standard representations and warranties for underwriting agreements, merger and acquisition
agreements, loan sales, contractual commitments, and various other business transactions or
arrangements. The extent of FHNs obligations under these agreements depends upon the occurrence
of future events; therefore, it is not possible to estimate a maximum potential amount of payouts
that could be required with such agreements.
FHN is a member of the Visa USA network. On October 3, 2007, the Visa organization of affiliated
entities completed a series of global restructuring transactions to combine its affiliated
operating companies, including Visa USA, under a single holding company, Visa Inc. (Visa). Upon
completion of the reorganization, the members of the Visa USA network remained contingently liable
for certain Visa litigation matters. Based on its proportionate membership share of Visa USA, FHN
recognized a contingent liability of $55.7 million within noninterest expense in fourth quarter
2007 related to this contingent obligation.
In March 2008, Visa completed its initial public offering (IPO). Visa funded an escrow account from
IPO proceeds that will be used to make payments related to the Visa litigation matters. Upon
funding of the escrow, FHN reversed $30.0 million of the contingent liability previously recognized
with a corresponding credit to noninterest expense for its proportionate share of the escrow
account. A portion of FHNs Class B shares of Visa were redeemed as part of the IPO resulting in
$65.9 million of equity securities gains in first quarter 2008.
In October 2008, Visa announced that it had agreed to settle litigation with Discover Financial
Services (Discover) for $1.9 billion. $1.7 billion of this settlement amount has funded from the
escrow account established as part of Visas IPO. In connection with this settlement, FHN
recognized additional expense of $11.0 million within noninterest expense in third quarter 2008.
In December 2008, Visa deposited additional funds into the escrow account and FHN recognized a
corresponding credit to noninterest expense of $11.0 million for its proportionate share of the
amount funded. As of March 31, 2009, FHNs contingent liability for Visa litigation matters was
$25.7 million.
After the partial share redemption in conjunction with the IPO, FHN holds approximately 2.4 million
Class B shares of Visa, which are included in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition at
their historical cost of $0. Conversion of these shares into Class A shares of Visa and, with
limited exceptions, transfer of these shares are restricted until the later of the third
anniversary of the IPO and the final resolution of the covered litigation. The final conversion
ratio, which is currently estimated to approximate 63 percent, will fluctuate based on the ultimate
settlement of the Visa litigation matters for which FHN has a proportionate contingent obligation.
Future funding of the escrow will dilute this exchange rate by an amount that is yet to be
determined.
FHN services a mortgage loan portfolio of approximately $64 billion on March 31, 2009; a
significant portion of which is held by GNMA, FNMA, FHLMC or private security holders. In
connection with its servicing activities, FHN guarantees the receipt of the scheduled principal and
interest payments on the underlying loans. In the event of customer non-performance on the loan,
FHN is obligated to make the payment to the security holder. Under the terms of the servicing
agreements, FHN can utilize payments received from other prepaid loans in order to make the
security holder whole. In the event payments are ultimately made by FHN to satisfy this
obligation, for loans sold with no recourse, all funds are recoverable from the government agency
at foreclosure sale. See Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations for additional information on
loans sold with recourse.
FHN is also subject to losses in its loan servicing portfolio due to loan foreclosures and other
recourse obligations. Certain agencies have the authority to limit their repayment guarantees on
foreclosed loans resulting in certain foreclosure costs being borne by servicers. In addition, FHN
has exposure on all loans sold with recourse. FHN has various claims for reimbursement, repurchase
obligations, and/or indemnification requests outstanding with government agencies or private
investors. FHN has evaluated all of its exposure under recourse
Note 9 Contingencies and Other Disclosures (continued)
obligations based on factors, which include loan delinquency status, foreclosure expectancy rates
and claims outstanding. Accordingly, FHN had an allowance for losses on the mortgage servicing
portfolio of approximately $37.8 million and $20.6 million on March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. FHN has sold certain mortgage loans with an agreement to repurchase the loans upon
default. For the single-family residential loans, in the event of borrower nonperformance, FHN
would assume losses to the extent they exceed the value of the collateral and private mortgage
insurance, FHA insurance or VA guarantees. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, FHN had single-family
residential loans with outstanding balances of $76.9 million and $99.0 million, respectively, that
were serviced on a full recourse basis. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, the outstanding principal
balance of loans sold with limited recourse arrangements where some portion of the principal is at
risk and serviced by FHN was $3.4 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively. Additionally, on March
31, 2009 and 2008, $1.5 billion and $5.7 billion, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding
which were sold under limited recourse arrangements where the risk is limited to interest and
servicing advances.
FHN has securitized and sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages which are held by private security
holders, and on March 31, 2009, the outstanding principal balance of these loans was $199.2 million
and $50.2 million, respectively. On March 31, 2008, the outstanding principal balance of
securitized and sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages was $247.8 million and $66.7 million,
respectively. In connection with its servicing activities, FTBNA does not guarantee the receipt of
the scheduled principal and interest payments on the underlying loans but does have residual
interests of $8.0 million and $17.1 million on March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are
available to make the security holder whole in the event of credit losses. FHN has projected
expected credit losses in the valuation of the residual interest.
FHN has also sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages without recourse through whole loan sales. On
March 31, 2009, the outstanding principal balance of these loans was $1.1 billion and $1.8 billion,
respectively. On March 31, 2008, the outstanding principal balance of these HELOC and second-lien
mortgages was $1.2 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. FHN does not guarantee the receipt of
the scheduled principal and interest payments on the underlying loans but does have an obligation
to repurchase the loans for which there is a breach of warranties provided to the buyers. As of
March 31, 2009, FHN has recognized a liability of $17.2 million related to these repurchase
obligations.
In conjunction with the sale of its servicing platform to MetLife, FHN entered into a three year
subservicing arrangement with MetLife for the remaining portion of its servicing portfolio. As
part of the subservicing agreement, FHN has agreed to a make-whole arrangement whereby if the
number of loans subserviced by MetLife and the direct servicing cost per loan (determined using
loans serviced on behalf of both FHN and MetLife) both fall below specified levels, FHN will make a
payment to MetLife according to a contractually specified formula. The make-whole payment is
subject to a cap, which is $19.4 million if determined in the four quarters immediately following
the transaction, and which declines to $15.0 million if triggered in later periods. As part of the
divestiture transaction with MetLife, FHN recognized a contingent liability of $1.2 million
representing the estimated fair value of its performance obligation under the make-whole
arrangement.
Note 10 Pension and Other Employee Benefits
Pension plan. FHN closed participation in the noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension
plan to employees hired or re-hired on September 1, 2007 or later. This did not impact the
benefits of employees currently participating in the plan. Certain employees of FHNs insurance
subsidiaries are not covered by the pension plan. Pension benefits are based on years of service,
average compensation near retirement, and estimated social security benefits at age 65. FHN
contributions are based upon actuarially determined amounts necessary to fund the total benefit
obligation. FHN made a $30.0 million contribution in December 2008 to the qualified pension plan.
A second contribution may be made in 2009 attributable to the 2008 plan year. This decision will
be based upon pension funding requirements under the Pension Protection Act, the maximum deductible
under the Internal Revenue Code, and the actual performance of plan assets during 2009. Given
these uncertainties, we cannot estimate the amount of a future contribution at this time. The
non-qualified pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans are unfunded. Contributions to
these plans cover all benefits paid under the non-qualified plans. This amount was $6.2 million
for 2008. FHN anticipates this amount will be $5.6 million in 2009.
FHN also maintains nonqualified plans including a supplemental retirement plan that covers certain
employees whose benefits under the pension plan have been limited. Additionally, a program was
added under the FHN savings plan that is provided only to employees who are not eligible for the
pension plan. FHN intends to make a contribution for this plan in 2009 related to the 2008 plan
year.
Other employee benefits. FHN provides post-retirement life insurance benefits to certain
employees. FHN also provides postretirement medical insurance to retirement-eligible employees.
The postretirement medical plan is contributory with retiree contributions adjusted annually and is
based on criteria that are a combination of the employees age and years of service. For any
employee retiring on or after January 1, 1995, FHN contributes a fixed amount based on years of
service and age at the time of retirement. FHNs post-retirement benefits include prescription
drug benefits. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act)
introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D as well as a federal subsidy to
sponsors of retiree health care that provide a benefit that is actuarially equivalent to Medicare
Part D. FHN anticipates receiving a prescription drug subsidy under the Act through 2012.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Other Benefits |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4,401 |
|
|
$ |
4,208 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7,926 |
|
|
|
7,340 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(11,582 |
) |
|
|
(11,791 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(439 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Prior service cost/(credit) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Actuarial loss/(gain) |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
The 2009 net periodic benefit costs of Other Benefits includes the first quarter 2009 expense
related to company-paid life insurance benefits offered to certain employees beyond retirement. A
liability for these benefits was not previously recorded as premiums were expensed when incurred.
A $10.7 million cumulative adjustment related to prior periods is not included in the 2009 net
periodic benefit cost. See Note 18 Other Events for more details.
Note 11 Business Segment Information
FHN has five business segments, Regional Banking, Capital Markets, National Specialty Lending,
Mortgage Banking and Corporate. The Regional Banking segment offers financial products and
services, including traditional lending and deposit taking, to retail and commercial customers in
Tennessee and surrounding markets. Additionally, Regional Banking provides investments, insurance,
financial planning, trust services and asset management, credit card, cash management, and check
clearing services. The Capital Markets segment consists of traditional capital markets securities
activities, equity research, loan sales, portfolio advisory, structured finance and correspondent
banking. The National Specialty Lending segment consists of traditional consumer and construction
lending activities in other national markets. The Mortgage Banking segment consists of core
mortgage banking elements including originations and servicing and the associated ancillary
revenues related to these businesses. In August 2008, FHN completed the divestiture of certain
mortgage banking operations to MetLife. FHN continues to originate loans in and around the
Tennessee banking footprint and to service the remaining servicing portfolio. The Corporate segment
consists of restructuring, repositioning and efficiency initiatives, unallocated corporate
expenses, expense on subordinated debt issuances and preferred stock, bank- owned life insurance,
unallocated interest income associated with excess equity, net impact of raising incremental
capital, revenue and expense associated with deferred compensation plans, funds management, and
venture capital. Periodically, FHN adapts its segments to reflect changes in expense allocations
among segments. Previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current
presentation.
Total revenue, expense and asset levels reflect those which are specifically identifiable or which
are allocated based on an internal allocation method. Because the allocations are based on
internally developed assignments and allocations, they are to an extent subjective. This assignment
and allocation has been consistently applied for all periods presented. The following table
reflects the amounts of consolidated revenue, expense, tax, and assets for each segment for the
three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
196,587 |
|
|
$ |
228,092 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
407,869 |
|
|
|
449,076 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
417,328 |
|
|
|
434,216 |
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(112,872 |
) |
|
|
2,952 |
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(47,777 |
) |
|
|
(8,146 |
) |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(65,095 |
) |
|
|
11,098 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(65,095 |
) |
|
$ |
11,981 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
30,467,211 |
|
|
$ |
37,162,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
105,969 |
|
|
$ |
120,483 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
97,826 |
|
|
|
75,265 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
76,290 |
|
|
|
87,204 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
173,725 |
|
|
|
151,154 |
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(89,292 |
) |
|
|
(18,732 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(38,930 |
) |
|
|
(15,409 |
) |
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(50,362 |
) |
|
|
(3,323 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(50,362 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,440 |
) |
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
11,727,644 |
|
|
$ |
12,226,460 |
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
Note 11 Business Segment Information (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Capital Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
23,407 |
|
|
$ |
19,783 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
14,009 |
|
|
|
15,031 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
216,690 |
|
|
|
133,905 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
151,830 |
|
|
|
115,812 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
74,258 |
|
|
|
22,845 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
27,911 |
|
|
|
8,446 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
46,347 |
|
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
4,505,502 |
|
|
$ |
5,810,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Specialty Lending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
33,361 |
|
|
$ |
54,221 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
188,573 |
|
|
|
149,482 |
|
Noninterest income/(loss) |
|
|
(6,670 |
) |
|
|
552 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
30,588 |
|
|
|
26,495 |
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(192,470 |
) |
|
|
(121,204 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(72,523 |
) |
|
|
(46,964 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(119,947 |
) |
|
|
(74,240 |
) |
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
7,186,586 |
|
|
$ |
9,364,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
7,563 |
|
|
$ |
30,045 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
222 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
122,912 |
|
|
|
168,014 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
47,627 |
|
|
|
149,587 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
83,256 |
|
|
|
48,250 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
31,371 |
|
|
|
17,472 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
51,885 |
|
|
|
30,778 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
2,560,903 |
|
|
$ |
6,104,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
26,287 |
|
|
$ |
3,560 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
(1,353 |
) |
|
|
59,401 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
13,558 |
|
|
|
(8,832 |
) |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
11,376 |
|
|
|
71,793 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
28,309 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,982 |
|
|
$ |
43,484 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
4,486,576 |
|
|
$ |
3,657,353 |
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
Note 12 Preferred Stock and Other Capital
FHN Preferred Stock and Warrant
On November 14, 2008, FHN issued and sold 866,540 preferred shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series CPP (Capital Purchase Program), along with a Warrant to
purchase common stock. The issuance occurred in connection with, and is governed by, the Treasury
Capital Purchase Program administered by the U.S. Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program
(TARP). The Preferred Shares have an annual 5% cumulative preferred dividend rate, payable
quarterly. The dividend rate increases to 9% after five years. Dividends compound if they accrue
in arrears. Preferred Shares have a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share plus accrued
dividends. The Preferred Shares have no redemption date and are not subject to any sinking fund.
The Preferred Shares carry certain restrictions. The Preferred Shares have a senior rank and also
provide limitations on certain compensation arrangements of executive officers. During the first
three years, FHN may not reinstate a cash dividend on its common shares nor purchase equity shares
without the approval of the U.S. Treasury, subject to certain limited exceptions. FHN may not
reinstate a cash dividend on its common shares to the extent preferred dividends remain unpaid.
Generally, the Preferred Shares are non-voting. However, should FHN fail to pay six quarterly
dividends, the holder may elect two directors to FHNs Board of Directors until such dividends are
paid. In connection with the issuance of the Preferred Shares, a Warrant to purchase 12,743,235
common shares was issued with an exercise price of $10.20 per share. The Warrant is immediately
exercisable and expires in ten years. The Warrant is subject to proportionate anti-dilution
adjustment in the event of stock dividends or splits, among other things. As a result of the stock
dividends paid on January 1, 2009 and April 1, 2009, the Warrant was adjusted to cover 13,323,473
common shares at a purchase price of $9.76 per share.
The Preferred Shares and Warrant qualify as Tier 1 capital and are presented in permanent equity on
the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition in the amounts of $786.6 million and $83.9
million, respectively.
Subsidiary Preferred Stock
On September 14, 2000, FT Real Estate Securities Company, Inc. (FTRESC), an indirect subsidiary of
FHN, issued 50 shares of 9.50% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Class B (Class B Preferred Shares), with
a liquidation preference of $1.0 million per share. An aggregate total of 47 Class B Preferred
Shares have been sold privately to nonaffiliates. These securities qualify as Tier 2 capital and
are presented in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as Long-term debt. FTRESC is
a real estate investment trust (REIT) established for the purpose of acquiring, holding and
managing real estate mortgage assets. Dividends on the Class B Preferred Shares are cumulative and
are payable semi-annually.
The Class B Preferred Shares are mandatorily redeemable on March 31, 2031, and redeemable at the
discretion of FTRESC in the event that the Class B Preferred Shares cannot be accounted for as Tier
2 regulatory capital or there is more than an insubstantial risk that dividends paid with respect
to the Class B Preferred Shares will not be fully deductible for tax purposes. They are not subject
to any sinking fund and are not convertible into any other securities of FTRESC, FHN or any of its
subsidiaries. The shares are, however, automatically exchanged at the direction of the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency for preferred stock of FTBNA, having substantially the same terms
as the Class B Preferred Shares in the event FTBNA becomes undercapitalized, insolvent or in danger
of becoming undercapitalized.
Effective January 1, 2009, FHN adopted SFAS No. 160 which provides that noncontrolling interests
should be presented as a separate component of equity rather than on a mezzanine level. In
accordance with SFAS No. 160, the balance for noncontrolling interests associated with preferred
stock previously issued by the following indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of FHN has been
included in the equity section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition
for all periods presented.
First Horizon Preferred Funding, LLC and First Horizon Preferred Funding II, LLC have each issued
$1.0 million of Class B Units of preferred stock. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, the amount of Class
B Preferred Shares and Units that are perpetual in nature that was recognized as Noncontrolling
interest on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition was $.3 million and $.5 million,
respectively. The remaining balance has been eliminated in consolidation. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 160, the balance for these preferred shares was recognized as Preferred stock of
subsidiary on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition.
On March 23, 2005, FTBNA issued 300,000 shares of Class A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock
(Class A Preferred Stock) with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. These securities
qualify as Tier 1 capital. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, $294.8 million of Class A Preferred Stock
was recognized as Noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 160, the balance of FTBNAs Class A Preferred Stock was
recognized as Preferred stock of subsidiary on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition.
Note 12 Preferred Stock and Other Capital (continued)
Due to the nature of the subsidiary preferred stock issued by First Horizon Preferred Funding, LLC,
First Horizon Preferred Funding II, LLC, and FTBNA, all components of other comprehensive
income/(loss) included in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Shareholders Equity have been
attributed solely to FHN as the controlling interest holder. The table below presents the amounts
included in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 which are attributable to FHN as controlling interest holder for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(67,845 |
) |
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(67,845 |
) |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations
FHN historically utilized loan sales and securitizations as a significant source of liquidity for
its mortgage banking operations. With FHNs current focus on origination of mortgages within its
regional banking footprint and the sale of national mortgage origination offices to
MetLife, loan sale and securitization activity has decreased significantly since third quarter
2008. Subsequent to the MetLife transaction, FHN generally does not
retain financial
interests in loans it transfers to third parties. In accordance with applicable accounting
standards, loan sale and securitization activity for which FHN has retained an interest in the
related transfers is included in this disclosure. For classification purposes, all loans
transferred to GSE (e.g., FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA), including those subsequently securitized by an
agency, are considered loan sales while transfers attributed to securitizations consist solely of
proprietary securitizations executed by FHN.
During first quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN transferred $.4 billion and $7.3 billion, respectively, of
single-family residential mortgage loans in sales that were not securitizations.
In 2009, these transactions primarily reflect sales to non-GSE third
parties. In 2008, these transactions primarily reflect sales to GSE. In first quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN recognized net
pre-tax gains of $10.8 million and $85.0 million, respectively, from the sale of single-family
residential mortgage loans which includes gains recognized on the capitalization of MSR associated
with these loans.
During first quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN transferred $3.3 million and $5.7 million, respectively, of
home equity loans and HELOC related to proprietary securitization transactions. In first quarter
2009 and 2008, FHN recognized net pre-tax gains of $.1 million related to HELOC securitizations
which include gains recognized on the capitalization of MSR associated with these loans.
In first quarter 2009 and 2008, FHN capitalized approximately $.2 million and $79.7 million,
respectively, in originated MSR related to loan sales. In first quarter 2009, there were no
significant additions to MSR and in first quarter 2008, FHN capitalized approximately $.1 million
in originated MSR related to securitizations. These MSR, as well as other MSR held by FHN, are
discussed further in Note 5 Mortgage Servicing Rights. In certain cases, FHN continues to service
and receive servicing fees related to the transferred loans, and has also retained interests in
loan sales and securitizations including residual interest certificates and financial assets
including excess interest (structured as interest-only strips), principal-only strips,
interest-only strips, or subordinated bonds. FHN received annual servicing fees approximating .28
percent in first quarter 2009 and .29 percent in 2008 of the outstanding balance of underlying
single-family residential mortgage loans. FHN received annual servicing fees approximating .50
percent in first quarter 2009 and 2008 of the outstanding balance of underlying loans for HELOC and
home equity loans transferred. The investors and the securitization trusts have no recourse to
other assets of FHN for failure of debtors to pay when due. FHN is obligated to repurchase loans
under standard representations and warranties provided to the buyers, which include evidence of
borrower fraud and failure to adhere to underwriting guidelines.
Interests retained from loan sales, including agency securitizations, include MSR and excess
interest. Interests retained from proprietary securitizations include MSR and various financial
assets. MSR are initially valued at fair value, and the remaining retained interests are
initially valued by allocating the remaining cost basis of the loan between the security or loan
sold and the remaining retained interests based on their relative fair values at the time of sale
or securitization. MSR are recognized at fair value in periods subsequent to the related sale or
securitization with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a
component of noninterest income on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
Financial assets retained in a proprietary or GSE securitization may include certificated residual
interests, excess interest (structured as interest-only strips), interest-only strips,
principal-only strips, or subordinated bonds. Residual interests represent rights to receive
earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the underlying loans. Excess interest
represents rights to receive interest from serviced assets that exceed contractually specified
rates. Principal-only strips are principal cash flow tranches, and interest-only strips are
interest cash flow tranches. Subordinated bonds are bonds with junior priority. All financial
assets retained from a securitization are recognized on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition in trading securities at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses
included in current earnings as a component of noninterest income on the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Income.
As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, $113.2 million and $224.7 million, respectively, of first lien MSR
are associated with proprietary securitization transactions with the remainder associated with loan
sales. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008,
Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
second lien MSR includes $.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of MSR related to prior
securitization activity with the remainder related to loan sales. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008,
HELOC MSR included $1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of MSR related to prior securitization activity with the remainder related to loan
sales. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, $60.0 million and $97.7 million, respectively, of excess
interest IO are associated with proprietary securitization transactions with the remainder
associated with loan sales. All other retained interests relate to securitization activity.
The sensitivity of the fair value of all retained or purchased interests for MSR to immediate 10
percent and 20 percent adverse changes in assumptions on March 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
|
except for annual cost to service) |
|
Liens |
|
Liens |
|
HELOC |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
361,343 |
|
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
$ |
8,652 |
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(18,810 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,275 |
) |
|
$ |
(710 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(35,686 |
) |
|
|
(2,423 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual discount rate on servicing cash flows |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(6,265 |
) |
|
$ |
(253 |
) |
|
$ |
(258 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(12,200 |
) |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual cost to service (per loan)* |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(6,392 |
) |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual earnings on escrow |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
.5 |
% |
|
|
.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(4,485 |
) |
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(8,999 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The annual cost to service includes an incremental cost to service delinquent loans.
Historically, this fair value sensitivity disclosure has not included this incremental cost. The
annual cost to service first-lien mortgage loans without the incremental cost to service delinquent
loans was $44 as of March 31, 2009. |
Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
The sensitivity of the fair value of all retained or purchased interests for MSR to immediate 10
percent and 20 percent adverse changes in assumptions on March 31, 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
|
except for annual cost to service) |
|
Liens |
|
Liens |
|
HELOC |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
865,855 |
|
|
$ |
20,126 |
|
|
$ |
9,942 |
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(48,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,458 |
) |
|
$ |
(780 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(92,794 |
) |
|
|
(2,771 |
) |
|
|
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual discount rate on servicing cash flows |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(27,982 |
) |
|
$ |
(510 |
) |
|
$ |
(260 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(54,171 |
) |
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual cost to service (per loan)* |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
(11,494 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(22,988 |
) |
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual earnings on escrow |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(17,569 |
) |
|
$ |
(368 |
) |
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(35,137 |
) |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The annual cost to service includes an incremental cost to service delinquent loans.
Historically, this fair value sensitivity disclosure has not included this incremental cost. The
annual cost to service first-lien mortgage loans without the incremental cost to service delinquent
loans was $49 as of March 31, 2008. |
The sensitivity of the fair value of retained interests for other residuals to immediate 10 percent
and 20 percent adverse changes in assumptions on March 31, 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual |
|
Residual |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Interest |
(Dollars in thousands |
|
Interest |
|
Certificated |
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated |
|
Certificates |
|
Certificates |
except for annual cost to service) |
|
IO |
|
PO |
|
IO |
|
Bonds |
|
2nd Liens |
|
HELOC |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
142,735 |
|
|
$ |
12,165 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
$ |
3,193 |
|
|
$ |
4,757 |
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(8,031 |
) |
|
$ |
(619 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
$ |
(383 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(15,292 |
) |
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual discount rate on residual cash flows |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
34.8 |
% |
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
33.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(2,770 |
) |
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
|
$ |
(130 |
) |
|
$ |
(437 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(5,391 |
) |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
The sensitivity of the fair value of retained interests for other residuals to immediate 10 percent
and 20 percent adverse changes in assumptions on March 31, 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual |
|
Residual |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Interest |
(Dollars in thousands |
|
Interest |
|
Certificated |
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated |
|
Certificates |
|
Certificates |
except for annual cost to service) |
|
IO |
|
PO |
|
IO |
|
Bonds |
|
2nd Liens |
|
HELOC |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
308,467 |
|
|
$ |
14,517 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
21,939 |
|
|
$ |
4,506 |
|
|
$ |
12,555 |
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
83.1 |
% |
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(19,972 |
) |
|
$ |
(607 |
) |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
(352 |
) |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(476 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(36,223 |
) |
|
|
(1,167 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual discount rate on residual cash flows |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
39.4 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
33.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(10,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(511 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
$ |
(157 |
) |
|
$ |
(521 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(20,522 |
) |
|
|
(986 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(2,623 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future
performance. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in
assumptions generally cannot necessarily be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in
assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a
variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated
independently from any change in another assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result
in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Furthermore, the
estimated fair values as disclosed should not be considered indicative of future earnings on these
assets.
FHN uses assumptions and estimates in determining the fair value allocated to retained interests at
the time of initial securitization. The key economic assumptions used to measure the fair value of
the MSR at the date of securitization or loan sale were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
Liens |
|
Liens |
|
HELOC |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
5.0 - 6.1 |
|
|
|
2.7 - 3.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 - 1.8 |
|
Annual prepayment rate |
|
|
17.1% - 25.2% |
|
|
|
26%-30% |
|
|
|
43% - 44% |
|
Annual discount rate |
|
|
9.3% |
|
|
|
14.0% |
|
|
|
18.0% |
|
Annual cost to service (per loan)* |
|
|
$52 |
|
|
|
$50 |
|
|
|
$50 |
|
Annual earnings on escrow |
|
|
1.9% - 2.0% |
|
|
|
3.80%-5.32% |
|
|
|
5.32% |
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
4.9-5.5 |
|
|
|
2.7-3.1 |
|
|
|
1.7-1.8 |
|
Annual prepayment rate |
|
|
15.7%-18.7% |
|
|
|
26%-30% |
|
|
|
43%-44% |
|
Annual discount rate |
|
|
9.9%-10.1% |
|
|
|
14.0% |
|
|
|
18.0% |
|
Annual cost to service (per loan)* |
|
|
$57-$61 |
|
|
|
$50 |
|
|
|
$50 |
|
Annual earnings on escrow |
|
|
2.8%-3.1% |
|
|
|
3.80%-5.32% |
|
|
|
5.32% |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The annual cost to service includes an incremental cost to service delinquent loans.
Historically, the disclosure of annual cost to service assumptions
has not included this incremental cost. The annual cost to service loans without the
incremental cost to service delinquent loans was $44
for MSR capitalized during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. |
Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
The key economic assumptions used to measure the fair value of other retained interests at the date
of securitization were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Certificated |
|
Subordinated |
|
|
IO |
|
PO |
|
Bond |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
4.7-5.9 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Annual prepayment rate |
|
|
13.7%-19.7% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Annual discount rate |
|
|
11.8%-11.83% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
There were no securitizations in which FHN retained an interest during the period-ended March 31,
2009.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, cash flows received and paid related to loan
sales were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Proceeds from initial sales |
|
$ |
381,030 |
|
|
$ |
7,320,567 |
|
Servicing fees retained* |
|
|
19,887 |
|
|
|
56,717 |
|
Purchases of GNMA guaranteed mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,434 |
|
Purchases of delinquent or foreclosed assets |
|
|
4,699 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Other cash flows received on retained interests |
|
|
7,578 |
|
|
|
9,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes servicing fees on MSR associated with loan sales and purchased MSR. |
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, cash flows received and paid related to
securitizations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Proceeds from initial securitizations |
|
$ |
3,287 |
|
|
$ |
5,727 |
|
Servicing fees retained |
|
|
19,011 |
|
|
|
22,329 |
|
Purchases of delinquent or foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
Other cash flows received on retained interests |
|
|
10,637 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
As of March 31, 2009, the principal amount of loans transferred through loan sales and
securitizations and other loans managed with them, and the principal amount of delinquent loans, in
addition to net credit losses during the three months ended March 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Principal |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Net Credit |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount of Loans |
|
|
of Delinquent Loans (a) |
|
|
Losses (b) (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
On March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Type of loan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential |
|
$ |
48,111,299 |
|
|
$ |
920,343 |
|
|
$ |
128,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans managed or transferred (d) |
|
$ |
48,111,299 |
|
|
$ |
920,343 |
|
|
$ |
128,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold (e) |
|
|
(39,300,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale (e) |
|
|
(438,160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans securitized and sold |
|
|
(356,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held in portfolio |
|
$ |
8,016,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due include $.2 million of GNMA guaranteed
mortgages. $493.3 million of delinquent loans have been securitized while $148.5 million have
been sold. |
|
(b) |
|
Principal amount of loans securitized and sold includes $34.7 billion of loans securitized
through GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC. FHN retains interests other than servicing rights on a portion
of these securitized loans. No delinquency or net credit loss data is included for the loans
securitized through FNMA or FHMLC because these agencies retain credit risk. The
remainder of loans securitized and sold were securitized through proprietary trusts,
where FHN retained interests other than servicing rights. |
|
(c) |
|
$56.6 million associated with loan sales and $18.6 million associated with securitizations. |
|
(d) |
|
Transferred loans are real estate residential loans in which FHN has a retained
interest other than servicing rights. |
|
(e) |
|
$35.5 billion associated with loan sales and $4.6 billion associated with securitizations. |
Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations (continued)
As of March 31, 2008, the principal amount of loans transferred through loan sales and
securitizations and other loans managed with them, and the principal amount of delinquent loans, in
addition to net credit losses during the three months ended March 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Principal |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
|
Net Credit |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount of Loans |
|
|
of Delinquent Loans (a) |
|
|
Losses (b) (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
On March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Type of loan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential |
|
$ |
84,306,861 |
|
|
$ |
360,338 |
|
|
$ |
50,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans managed or transferred (d) |
|
$ |
84,306,861 |
|
|
$ |
360,338 |
|
|
$ |
50,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans sold (e) |
|
|
(73,293,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale (e) |
|
|
(3,155,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held in portfolio |
|
$ |
7,858,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due include $.2 million of GNMA guaranteed
mortgages. $149.3 million of delinquent loans have been securitized while $84.2 million have
been sold. |
|
(b) |
|
Principal amount of loans securitized and sold includes $68.0 billion of loans securitized
through GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC. FHN retains interests other than servicing rights on a portion
of these securitized loans. No delinquency or net credit loss data is included for the loans
securitized through FNMA or FHMLC because these agencies retain credit risk. The
remainder of loans securitized and sold were securitized through proprietary trusts,
where FHN retained interests other than servicing rights. |
|
(c) |
|
$27.7 million associated with loan sales and $2.6 million associated with securitizations. |
|
(d) |
|
Transferred loans are real estate residential loans in which FHN has a retained
interest other than servicing rights. |
|
(e) |
|
$71.0 billion associated with loan sales and $5.3 billion associated with securitizations. |
Secured Borrowings. In 2007 and 2006, FTBNA executed several securitizations of retail real estate
residential loans for the purpose of engaging in secondary market financing. Since the related
trusts did not qualify as QSPE and since the cash flows on the loans are pledged to the holders of
the trusts securities, FTBNA recognized the proceeds as secured borrowings in accordance with SFAS
No. 140. As of March 31, 2009, FTBNA had recognized $701.9 million of loans net of unearned income
and $687.1 million of other collateralized borrowings in its
Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Condition related to these transactions. As of March 31, 2008, FTBNA had recognized $742.6 million
of loans net of unearned income and $730.3 million of other collateralized borrowings in its
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition related to these transactions. See Note 14 -
Variable Interest Entities for additional information.
Note 14 Variable Interest Entities
Under the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities -
revised December 2003 (FIN 46-R), FHN is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and required to
consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE) if it has a variable interest that will absorb the
majority of the VIEs expected losses, receive the majority of expected residual returns, or both.
A VIE exists when equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial
interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities by
itself. A variable interest is a contractual, ownership or other interest that changes with changes
in the fair value of the VIEs net assets or the VIEs cash flows. Expected losses and expected
residual returns are measures of variability in the expected cash flow of a VIE.
Consolidated Variable Interest Entities. In 2007 and 2006, FTBNA established several Delaware
statutory trusts (Trusts), for the purpose of engaging in secondary market financing. Except for
recourse due to breaches of standard representations and warranties made by FTBNA in connection
with the sale of the retail real estate residential loans by FTBNA to the Trusts, the creditors of
the Trusts hold no recourse to the assets of FTBNA. Additionally, FTBNA has no contractual
requirements to provide financial support to the Trusts. Since the Trusts did not qualify as QSPE,
FTBNA treated the proceeds as secured borrowings in accordance with SFAS No. 140. FTBNA determined
that the Trusts were VIEs because the holders of the equity investment at risk did not have
adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. Thus, FTBNA assessed whether it was
the primary beneficiary of the associated trusts. Since there was an overcollateralization of the
Trusts, any excess of cash flows received on the transferred loans above the amounts passed through
to the security holders would revert to FTBNA. Accordingly, FTBNA determined that it was the
primary beneficiary of the Trusts because it absorbed a majority of the expected losses of the
Trusts.
FTBNA holds variable interests in trusts which have issued mandatorily redeemable preferred capital
securities (trust preferreds) for smaller banking and insurance enterprises. FTBNA has no voting
rights for the trusts activities. The trusts only assets are junior subordinated debentures of
the issuing enterprises. The creditors of the trusts hold no recourse to the assets of FTBNA.
These trusts meet the definition of a VIE because the holders of the equity investment at risk do
not have adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. In situations where FTBNA
holds a majority of the trust preferreds issued by a trust, it is considered the primary
beneficiary of that trust because FTBNA will absorb a majority of the trusts expected losses.
FTBNA has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts. In situations
where FTBNA holds a majority, but less than all, of the trust preferreds for a trust, consolidation
of the trust results in recognition of amounts received from other parties as debt.
FHN has established certain rabbi trusts related to deferred compensation plans offered to its
employees. FHN contributes employee cash compensation deferrals to the trusts and directs the
underlying investments made by the trusts. The assets of these trusts are available to FHNs
creditors only in the event that FHN becomes insolvent. These trusts are considered VIEs because
either there is no equity at risk in the trusts or because FHN provided the equity interest to its
employees in exchange for services rendered. Given that the trusts were created in exchange for
the employees services, FHN is considered the primary beneficiary of the rabbi trusts because it
is most closely related to their purpose and design. FHN has the obligation to fund any
liabilities to employees that are in excess of a rabbi trusts assets.
Note 14 Variable Interest Entities (continued)
The following table summarizes VIEs consolidated by FHN:
As of March 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Type |
|
Value |
|
Classification |
|
Value |
|
Classification |
|
On balance sheet consumer loan securitizations |
|
$ |
701,888 |
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
687,087 |
|
|
Other collateralized borrowings |
Small issuer trust preferred holdings |
|
|
465,350 |
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
30,500 |
|
|
Term borrowings |
Rabbi trusts used for deferred compensation plans |
|
|
85,424 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
51,990 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
As of March 31, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Type |
|
Value |
|
Classification |
|
Value |
|
Classification |
|
On balance sheet consumer loan securitizations
|
|
$ |
742,552 |
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
$ |
730,275 |
|
|
Other collateralized borrowings |
Small issuer trust preferred holdings
|
|
|
61,900 |
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
Term borrowings |
Rabbi trusts used for deferred compensation plans
|
|
|
152,572 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
152,160 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities. Since 1997, First Tennessee Housing Corporation
(FTHC), a wholly-owned subsidiary, makes equity investments as a limited partner, in various
partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit
(LIHTC) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to
achieve a satisfactory return on capital and to support FHNs community reinvestment initiatives.
The activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation
of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants generally within FHNs
primary geographic region. LIHTC partnerships are considered VIEs because FTHC, as the holder of
the equity investment at risk, does not have the ability to significantly affect the success of the
entity through voting rights. FTHC is not considered the primary beneficiary of the LIHTC
partnerships because an agent relationship exists between FTHC and the general partners, whereby
the general partners cannot sell, transfer or otherwise encumber their ownership interest without
the approval of FTHC. Because this results in a de facto agent relationship between the partners,
the general partners are considered the primary beneficiaries because their operations are most
closely associated with the LIHTC partnerships operations. FTHC has no contractual requirements
to provide financial support to the LIHTC partnerships beyond its initial funding commitments.
FTBNA holds variable interests in trusts which have issued mandatorily redeemable trust preferreds
for smaller banking and insurance enterprises. FTBNA has no voting rights for the trusts
activities. The trusts only assets are junior subordinated debentures of the issuing enterprises.
These trusts meet the definition of a VIE because the holders of the equity investment at risk do
not have adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. In situations where FTBNA
did not intend to hold the trust preferreds for more than a brief period and situations where FTBNA
did not hold a majority of the trust preferreds issued by a trust, it is not considered the primary
beneficiary of that trust because FTBNA does not absorb a majority of the expected losses of the
trust. FTBNA has no contractual requirements to provide financial support to the trusts.
In third quarter 2007, FTBNA executed a securitization of certain small issuer trust preferreds for
which the underlying trust did not qualify as a QSPE under SFAS No. 140. This trust was determined
to be a VIE because the holders of the equity investment at risk do not have adequate decision
making ability over the trusts activities. FTBNA determined that it was not the primary
beneficiary of the trust due to the size and priority of the interests it retained in the
securities issued by the trust. Accordingly, FTBNA has accounted for the funds received through
the securitization as a collateralized borrowing in its Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Condition. FTBNA has no contractual requirement to provide financial support to the trust.
Note 14 Variable Interest Entities (continued)
In 1996 FHN issued junior subordinated debt to Capital I and Capital II totaling $309.0 million.
Both Capital I and Capital II are considered VIEs because FHNs capital contributions to these
trusts are not considered at risk in evaluating whether the equity investments at risk in the
trusts have adequate decision making ability over the trusts activities. Capital I and Capital II
are not consolidated by FHN because the holders of the securities issued by the trusts absorb a
majority of expected losses and residual returns.
Wholly-owned subsidiaries of FHN serve as investment advisor and administrator of certain fund of
funds investment vehicles, whereby the subsidiaries receive fees for management of the funds
operations and through revenue sharing agreements based on the funds performance. The funds are
considered VIEs because the holders of the equity at risk do not have voting rights or the ability
to control the funds operations. The subsidiaries have not made any investment in the funds.
Further, the subsidiaries are not obligated to provide any financial support to the funds. The
funds are not consolidated by FHN because its subsidiaries do not absorb a majority of expected
losses or residual returns.
The following table summarizes VIEs that are not consolidated by FHN:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Maximum |
|
Liability |
|
|
Type |
|
Loss Exposure |
|
Recognized |
|
Classification |
|
Low Income Housing Partnerships (a) (b) |
|
$ |
125,863 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other assets |
Small Issuer Trust Preferred Holdings |
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
On Balance Sheet Trust Preferred Securitization |
|
|
65,088 |
|
|
|
49,086 |
|
|
(c) |
Proprietary Trust Preferred Issuances |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
309,000 |
|
|
Term borrowings |
Management of Fund of Funds |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Maximum loss exposure represents $111.9 million of current investments and $13.9 million of contractual funding commitments.
Only the current investment amount is included in Other Assets. |
|
(b) |
|
A liability is not recognized because investments are written down over the life of the related tax credit. |
|
(c) |
|
$112.5 million was classified as Loans, net of unearned income and $1.7 million was classified as Trading securities which are offset by
$49.1 million classified as Other collateralized borrowings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Maximum |
|
Liability |
|
|
Type |
|
Loss Exposure |
|
Recognized |
|
Classification |
|
Low Income Housing Partnerships (a) (b) |
|
$ |
126,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other assets |
Small Issuer Trust Preferred Holdings |
|
|
438,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
On Balance Sheet Trust Preferred Securitization |
|
|
65,006 |
|
|
|
49,140 |
|
|
(d) |
Proprietary Trust Preferred Issuances |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
309,000 |
|
|
Term borrowings |
Management of Fund of Funds |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Maximum loss exposure represents $121.1 million of current investments and $5.5 million of contractual funding commitments.
Only the current investment amount is included in Other Assets. |
|
(b) |
|
A liability is not recognized because investments are written down over the life of the related tax credit. |
|
(c) |
|
$395.5 million was classified as Loans held for sale and $43.0 million was classified as Loans, net of unearned income. |
|
(d) |
|
$112.5 million was classified as Loans, net of unearned income and $1.6 million was classified as Trading securities which are offset by $49.1 million
classified as Other collateralized borrowings. |
Note 15 Derivatives
In the normal course of business, FHN utilizes various financial instruments, through its mortgage
banking, capital markets and risk management operations, which include derivative contracts and
credit-related arrangements, as part of its risk management strategy and as a means to meet
customers needs. These instruments are subject to credit and market risks in excess of the amount
recorded on the balance sheet in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The
contractual or notional amounts of these financial instruments do not necessarily represent credit
or market risk. However, they can be used to measure the extent of involvement in various types of
financial instruments. Controls and monitoring procedures for these instruments have been
established and are routinely reevaluated. The Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) monitors the usage
and effectiveness of these financial instruments.
Credit risk represents the potential loss that may occur because a party to a transaction fails to
perform according to the terms of the contract. The measure of credit exposure is the replacement
cost of contracts with a positive fair value. FHN manages credit risk by entering into financial
instrument transactions through national exchanges, primary dealers or approved counterparties, and
using mutual margining agreements whenever possible to limit potential exposure. With
exchange-traded contracts, the credit risk is limited to the clearinghouse used. For non-exchange
traded instruments, credit risk may occur when there is a gain in the fair value of the financial
instrument and the counterparty fails to perform according to the terms of the contract and/or when
the collateral proves to be of insufficient value. Market risk represents the potential loss due
to the decrease in the value of a financial instrument caused primarily by changes in interest
rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds or the prices of debt instruments. FHN manages market risk
by establishing and monitoring limits on the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken. FHN
continually measures this risk through the use of models that measure value-at-risk and
earnings-at-risk.
Derivative Instruments. FHN enters into various derivative contracts both in a dealer capacity, to
facilitate customer transactions, and also as a risk management tool. Where contracts have been
created for customers, FHN enters into transactions with dealers to offset its risk exposure.
Derivatives are also used as a risk management tool to hedge FHNs exposure to changes in interest
rates or other defined market risks.
Derivative instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition as other
assets or other liabilities measured at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would
be received to sell a derivative asset or paid to transfer a derivative liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the transaction date. Fair value is determined using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. For a fair value hedge,
changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged
asset or liability are recognized currently in earnings. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the
fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent that it is effective, are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to earnings as the hedged
transaction impacts net income. Any ineffective portion of a cash flow hedge is recognized
currently in earnings. For freestanding derivative instruments, changes in fair value are
recognized currently in earnings. Cash flows from derivative contracts are reported as operating
activities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows.
Interest rate forward contracts are over-the-counter contracts where two parties agree to purchase
and sell a specific quantity of a financial instrument at a specified price, with delivery or
settlement at a specified date. Futures contracts are exchange-traded contracts where two parties
agree to purchase and sell a specific quantity of a financial instrument at a specific price, with
delivery or settlement at a specified date. Interest rate option contracts give the purchaser the
right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a specified quantity of a financial instrument, at a
specified price, during a specified period of time. Caps and floors are options that are linked to
a notional principal amount and an underlying indexed interest rate. Interest rate swaps involve
the exchange of interest payments at specified intervals between two parties without the exchange
of any underlying principal. Swaptions are options on interest rate swaps that give the purchaser
the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap agreement during a specified
period of time.
On March 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively, FHN had approximately $146.5 million and $36.3 million of
cash receivables and $125.1 million and $238.8 million of cash payables related to collateral
posting under master netting arrangements with derivative counterparties. Certain of FHNs
agreements with derivative counterparties contain provisions that require that FTBNAs debt
maintain minimum credit ratings from specified credit rating agencies. If FTBNAs debt were to fall
below these minimums, these provisions would be triggered, and the counterparties could terminate
the agreements and request immediate settlement of all derivative contracts under the agreements.
The net fair value, determined by individual counterparty, of all derivative instruments with
credit-risk-related contingent accelerated termination provisions were $3.9 million of assets and
$15.4 million of liabilities on March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, FHN had posted
collateral of $11.4 million in the normal course of business related to these contracts.
Note 15 Derivatives (continued)
Additionally, certain of FHNs derivative agreements contain provisions whereby the collateral
posting thresholds under the agreements adjust based on the credit ratings of the counterparties.
If the credit rating of FHN and/or FTBNA is lowered, FHN would be required to post additional
collateral with the counterparties. The net fair value, determined by individual counterparty, of
all derivative instruments with adjustable collateral posting thresholds were $167.8 million of
assets and $117.7 million of liabilities on March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, FHN had received
collateral of $136.5 million and posted collateral of $106.5 million in the normal course of
business related to these agreements.
Mortgage Banking
As a result of the MetLife transaction, mortgage banking origination activity was significantly
reduced in the period after third quarter 2008 as FHN focuses on origination within its regional
banking footprint. Accordingly, the following discussion of pipeline and warehouse related
derivatives is primarily applicable to reporting periods occurring through the third quarter 2008.
Mortgage banking interest rate lock commitments are short-term commitments to fund mortgage loan
applications in process (the pipeline) for a fixed term at a fixed price. During the term of an
interest rate lock commitment, FHN has the risk that interest rates will change from the rate
quoted to the borrower. FHN enters into forward sales contracts with respect to fixed rate loan
commitments and futures contracts with respect to adjustable rate loan commitments as economic
hedges designed to protect the value of the interest rate lock commitments from changes in value
due to changes in interest rates. Under SFAS No. 133, interest rate lock commitments qualify as
derivative financial
instruments and as such do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. As a result, the interest
rate lock commitments were recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current
earnings as gain or loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income. Prior to the
adoption of SAB No. 109 fair value excluded the value of associated servicing rights.
Additionally, on January 1, 2008, FHN adopted SFAS No. 157 which affected the valuation of interest
rate lock commitments previously measured under the guidance of EITF 02-03 by requiring recognition
of concessions upon entry into the lock. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives that serve
as economic hedges of interest rate lock commitments are also included in current earnings as a
component of gain or loss on the sale of loans in
mortgage banking noninterest income. Due to the reduction of mortgage banking origination
operations after the MetLife transaction, the fair value of interest rate lock commitments was
immaterial as of March 31, 2009.
FHNs warehouse (mortgage loans held for sale) is subject to changes in fair value, due to
fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into
the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest
rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, FHN enters
into forward sales contracts and futures contracts to provide an economic hedge against those
changes in fair value on a significant portion of the warehouse. These derivatives are recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of the gain or
loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159,
FHN elected to prospectively account for substantially all of its mortgage loan warehouse products
at fair value upon origination and correspondingly discontinued the application of SFAS No. 133
hedging relationships for all new originations.
In accordance with SFAS No. 156, FHN revalues MSR to current fair value each month. Changes in
fair value are included in servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income. FHN also enters
into economic hedges of the MSR to minimize the effects of loss in value of MSR associated with
increased prepayment activity that generally results from declining interest rates. In a rising
interest rate environment, the value of the MSR generally will increase while the value of the
hedge instruments will decline. FHN enters into interest rate contracts (potentially including
swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales contracts) to hedge against the effects of changes in
fair value of its MSR. Substantially all capitalized MSR are hedged for economic purposes.
FHN utilizes derivatives (potentially including swaps, swaptions, and mortgage forward sales
contracts) that change in value inversely to the movement of interest rates to protect the value of
its interest-only securities as an economic hedge. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives
are recognized currently in earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of
servicing income. Interest-only securities are included in trading securities with changes in fair
value recognized currently in earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of
servicing income.
Note 15 Derivatives (continued)
The following table summarizes FHNs derivatives associated with Mortgage Banking activities for
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Condition Presentation |
|
Gains/(Losses) |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Amount |
Description |
|
Notional |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Recognized |
Pipeline and Warehouse Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
|
|
Forwards and Futures |
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
income |
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Warehouse |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
308,468 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
income |
|
$ |
1,777 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Pipeline |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
(b |
) |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(b |
) |
|
income |
|
$ |
(233 |
) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Interests Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
|
|
Forwards and Futures |
|
$ |
1,750,000 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
32,784 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
income |
|
$ |
22,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps and Swaptions |
|
$ |
2,085,000 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
32,511 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
Mortgage banking
income |
|
$ |
19,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
rights |
|
$ |
361,216 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
income |
|
$ |
27,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
|
|
Other Retained Interests |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Trading securities |
|
$ |
161,458 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
income |
|
$ |
15,456 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Economic hedging is attempted for only a small portion of warehouse loans and pipeline. |
|
(b) |
|
Due to the reduction of mortgage banking origination operations after the MetLife transaction, the fair value of interest rate lock commitments was immaterial as of March 31, 2009. |
Capital Markets
Capital Markets trades U.S. Treasury, U.S. Agency, mortgage-backed, corporate and municipal fixed
income securities, and other securities principally for distribution to customers. When these
securities settle on a delayed basis, they are considered forward contracts. Capital Markets also
enters into interest rate contracts, including options, caps, swaps and floors for its customers.
In addition, Capital Markets enters into futures contracts to economically hedge interest rate risk
associated with a portion of its securities inventory. These transactions are measured at fair
value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in capital markets noninterest income.
Related assets and
liabilities are recorded on the balance sheet as other assets and other liabilities. Credit risk
related to these transactions is controlled through credit approvals, risk control limits and
ongoing monitoring procedures through the Credit Risk Management Committee. Total trading revenues
related to fixed income sales, which constitutes substantially all of FHNs trading activities,
were $197.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, inclusive of both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments.
Trading revenues are included in capital markets noninerest income.
Note 15 Derivatives (continued)
The following table summarizes FHNs derivatives associated with Capital Markets trading activities
as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Condition Presentation |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
Description |
|
Notional |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
Customer Interest Rate Contracts |
|
$ |
1,700,233 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
62,986 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
19,100 |
|
Offsetting Upstream Interest Rate Contracts |
|
$ |
1,700,233 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
19,107 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
62,995 |
|
Forwards and Futures Purchased |
|
$ |
4,786,130 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
43,258 |
|
Forwards and Futures Sold |
|
$ |
5,045,124 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
44,844 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
3,073 |
|
Capital Markets hedged held-to-maturity trust preferred loans with principal balances of $244.6
million and $47.5 million as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which have an initial fixed
rate term of five years before conversion to a floating rate. Capital Markets has entered into pay
fixed, receive floating interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk associated with this
initial five year term. These hedge relationships qualify as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133.
The balance sheet impact of those swaps was $26.9 million and $3.6 million in other liabilities on
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest paid or received for these swaps was recognized as
an adjustment of the interest income of the assets whose risk is being hedged. The following table
summarizes FHNs derivative activities associated with these loans for the three months ended March
31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Condition Presentation |
|
Gains/(Losses) |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Amount |
Description |
|
Notional |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Recognized |
Loan Portfolio Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other income |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
244,583 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
26,918 |
|
|
and commissions |
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other income |
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Loans |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
unearned |
|
$ |
244,583 |
(a) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
and commissions |
|
$ |
(770 |
) (b) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents principal balance being hedged. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents gains and losses attributable to changes in fair value due to interest rate risk as designated in SFAS No. 133 hedging relationships. |
Interest Rate Risk Management
FHNs ALCO focuses on managing market risk by controlling and limiting earnings volatility
attributable to changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk exists to the extent that
interest-earning assets and liabilities have different maturity or repricing characteristics. FHN
uses derivatives, including swaps, caps, options, and collars, that are designed to moderate the
impact on earnings as interest rates change.
FHNs interest rate risk management policy is to use derivatives not to speculate but to hedge
interest rate risk or market value of assets or liabilities. In addition, FHN has entered into
certain interest rate swaps and caps as a part of a product offering to commercial customers with
customer derivatives paired with offsetting market instruments that, when completed, are designed
to eliminate market risk. These contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and are measured at
fair value with gains or losses included in current earnings in noninterest income.
FHN has entered into pay floating, receive fixed interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate
risk of certain long-term debt obligations, totaling $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion on March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. These swaps have been accounted for as fair value hedges under the
shortcut method. The balance sheet impact of these swaps was $135.0 million and $77.0 million in
other assets on March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest paid or received for these swaps was recognized as an
adjustment of the interest expense of the
liabilities whose risk is being managed.
Note 15 Derivatives (continued)
FHN designates derivative transactions in hedging strategies to manage interest rate risk on
subordinated debt related to its trust preferred securities. These qualify for hedge accounting
under SFAS No. 133 using the long haul method. FHN entered into pay floating, receive fixed
interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk of certain subordinated debt totaling $.2
billion on March 31, 2009 and $.3 billion on March 31, 2008. The balance sheet impact of these
swaps was $.3 million in other assets on March 31, 2009 and $6.2 million in other liabilities on
March 31 2008. There was no ineffectiveness related to these hedges. Interest paid or received for
these swaps was recognized as an adjustment of the interest expense of the liabilities whose risk
is being managed. In first quarter 2009, FHNs counterparty called the swap associated with $.1
billion of subordinated debt. Accordingly, hedge accounting was discontinued on the date of
settlement and the cumulative basis adjustments to the associated subordinated debt are being
prospectively amortized as an adjustment to yield over its remaining term.
The following table summarizes FHNs derivatives associated with interest rate risk management
activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Condition Presentation |
|
Gains/(Losses) |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Amount |
Description |
|
Notional |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Amount |
|
Classification |
|
Recognized |
Customer Interest Rate Contracts Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments and Hedged Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other income |
|
|
|
|
Customer Interest Rate Contracts |
|
$ |
1,163,012 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
113,486 |
|
|
and commissions |
|
$ |
5,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other income |
|
|
|
|
Offsetting Upstream Interest Rate Contracts |
|
$ |
1,163,012 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
113,491 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
and commissions |
|
$ |
(5,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other income |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
135,355 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
and commissions |
|
$ |
(10,607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other income |
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
(a) |
|
and commissions |
|
$ |
10,607 |
(b) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents par value of long term debt being hedged. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents gains and losses attributable to changes in fair value due to interest rate risk as designated in SFAS No. 133 hedging relationships. |
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities
Effective January 1, 2008, upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, FHN elected the fair value option on a
prospective basis for almost all types of mortgage loans originated for sale purposes. FHN
determined that the election reduced certain timing differences and better matched changes in the
value of such loans with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these
assets. No transition adjustment was required upon adoption of SFAS No. 159 as FHN continued to
account for mortgage loans held for sale which were originated prior to 2008 at the lower of cost
or market value. Mortgage loans originated for sale are included in loans held for sale on the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition. Other interests retained in relation to
residential loan sales and securitizations are included in trading securities on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Condition. Additionally, effective January 1, 2008, FHN adopted SFAS No.
157 for existing fair value measurement requirements related to financial assets and liabilities as
well as to non-financial assets and liabilities which are re-measured at least annually. Effective
January 1, 2009, FHN adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for existing fair value measurement
requirements related to non-financial assets and liabilities which are recognized at fair value on
a non-recurring basis.
In accordance with SFAS No. 157, FHN groups its assets and liabilities measured at fair value in
three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the
reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. This hierarchy requires FHN to
maximize the use of observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when determining fair value. Each fair value measurement is placed into the proper level
based on the lowest level of significant input. These levels are:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in
active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active,
and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable
in the market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant
assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own
estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow
models, and similar techniques. |
For applicable periods, all divestiture-related line items in the Consolidated Condensed Statements
of Condition have been combined with the related non-divestiture line items in preparation of the
disclosure tables in this footnote. The table below presents the balances of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009. Derivatives in an
asset position are included within Other Assets while derivatives in a liability position are
included within Other Liabilities. Derivative positions constitute the only recurring Level 3
measurements within Other Assets and Other Liabilities.
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Trading securities Capital Markets |
|
$ |
767,101 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
766,120 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
Trading securities Mortgage Banking |
|
|
166,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,166 |
|
|
|
154,049 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
308,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,768 |
|
|
|
240,700 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
2,846,954 |
|
|
|
43,602 |
|
|
|
2,666,019 |
|
|
|
137,333 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
381,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,024 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
467,601 |
|
|
|
58,639 |
|
|
|
408,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,937,363 |
|
|
$ |
102,951 |
|
|
$ |
3,921,035 |
|
|
$ |
913,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities Capital Markets |
|
$ |
288,029 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
288,029 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other short-term borrowings and
commercial paper |
|
|
143,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,377 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
269,085 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
268,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
700,491 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
556,885 |
|
|
$ |
143,377 |
|
|
In accordance with FSP FAS 157-4, effective January 1, 2009 FHN revised the definition of its
major categories of equity and debt securities to be consistent with the major security types as
described in SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
The following table provides a detail of Capital Markets trading securities and trading liabilities
as well as securities available for sale that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Trading securities Capital Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
$ |
100,538 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
100,538 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Government agency issued MBS |
|
|
416,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency issued CMO |
|
|
34,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies |
|
|
17,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
States and municipalities |
|
|
13,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt |
|
|
180,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,640 |
|
|
|
259 |
(a) |
Equity, mutual funds and other |
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
767,101 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
766,120 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
$ |
48,502 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,502 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Government agency issued MBS |
|
|
1,205,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,205,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency issued CMO |
|
|
1,271,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,271,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies |
|
|
133,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,630 |
|
|
|
110,481 |
|
States and municipalities |
|
|
62,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,720 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
Corporate and other debt |
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
Equity, mutual funds and other |
|
|
123,438 |
|
|
|
42,809 |
|
|
|
56,659 |
|
|
|
23,970 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,846,954 |
|
|
$ |
43,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,666,019 |
|
|
$ |
137,333 |
|
|
Trading liabilities Capital Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
$ |
26,131 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,131 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Government agency issued MBS |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency issued CMO |
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other U.S. government agencies |
|
|
10,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
States and municipalities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt |
|
|
245,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity, mutual funds and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
288,029 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
288,029 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents collateralized debt obligations |
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of March 31, 2008. Derivatives in an asset position are included within Other
Assets while derivatives in a liability position are included within Other Liabilities. Derivative
positions constitute the only recurring Level 3 measurements within Other Assets and Other
Liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Trading securities |
|
$ |
1,553,052 |
|
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,587 |
|
|
$ |
392,196 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,302,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,297,508 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
2,910,971 |
|
|
|
39,218 |
|
|
|
2,718,377 |
|
|
|
153,376 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
895,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895,923 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
811,373 |
|
|
|
121,861 |
|
|
|
207,840 |
|
|
|
481,672 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,473,580 |
|
|
$ |
163,348 |
|
|
$ |
6,382,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,927,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities |
|
$ |
531,259 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
531,201 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
234,109 |
|
|
|
67,160 |
|
|
|
150,344 |
|
|
|
16,605 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
765,368 |
|
|
$ |
67,218 |
|
|
$ |
681,545 |
|
|
$ |
16,605 |
|
|
In conjunction with the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4, FHN revised its methodology for determining the
fair value of certain loans within its mortgage warehouse. FHN now determines the fair value of
the applicable loans using a discounted cash flow model using observable inputs, including current
mortgage rates for similar products, with adjustments for differences in loan characteristics
reflected in the models discount rates. This change in methodology had a minimal effect on the
valuation of the applicable loans. Previously, the fair values of these loans was determined
through reference to recent security trade prices for similar products, published third party bids
or observable whole loan sale prices with adjustments for differences in loan characteristics.
Consistent with the change in methodology, the applicable amounts are presented as a transfer into
Level 3 loans held for sale in the following rollforward for the three month period ended March 31,
2009.
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
Mortgage |
|
Net derivative |
|
Other short-term |
|
|
Trading |
|
Loans held |
|
Investment |
|
Venture |
|
servicing |
|
assets and |
|
borrowings and |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
securities (a) |
|
for sale |
|
portfolio |
|
Capital |
|
rights |
|
liabilities |
|
commercial paper |
|
Balance, beginning of quarter |
|
$ |
153,542 |
|
|
$ |
11,330 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
137,147 |
|
|
$ |
376,844 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
27,957 |
|
Total net gains/(losses)
for the quarter included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
19,059 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(25,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,662 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances
and settlements, net |
|
|
(18,281 |
) |
|
|
(13,953 |
) |
|
|
(3,088 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
29,397 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
117,082 |
|
Net transfers into/out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of quarter |
|
$ |
154,320 |
|
|
$ |
240,700 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
137,175 |
|
|
$ |
381,024 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses)
included in net income for
the quarter relating to assets
and liabilities held at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
14,510 |
(b) |
|
$ |
1,777 |
(c) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) (d) |
|
$ |
(25,166 |
) (e) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,662 |
) (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Mortgage |
|
Net derivative |
|
Other short-term |
|
|
Trading |
|
Loans held |
|
available |
|
servicing |
|
assets and |
|
borrowings and |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
securities |
|
for sale |
|
for sale |
|
rights |
|
liabilities |
|
commercial paper |
|
Balance, beginning of quarter |
|
$ |
476,404 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
159,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,159,820 |
|
|
$ |
81,517 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total net gains/(losses)
for the quarter included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(59,184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
(262,165 |
) |
|
|
361,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, issuances
and settlements, net |
|
|
(46,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
|
|
22,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfers into/out of Level 3 |
|
|
21,939 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of quarter |
|
$ |
392,196 |
|
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
|
$ |
153,376 |
|
|
$ |
895,923 |
|
|
$ |
465,067 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains/(losses)
included in net income for
the quarter relating to assets
and liabilities held at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(75,567 |
) (f) |
|
$ |
(2,243 |
) (c) |
|
$ |
305 |
(d) |
|
$ |
(242,339 |
) (g) |
|
$ |
321,668 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
- Primarily represents Mortgage Banking trading securities. Capital Markets Level 3 trading securities are not significant. |
|
(b) |
|
- Includes $(1.9) million included in Capital Markets noninterest income, $16.7 million included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income, and $(.3) million included in Revenue
from loan sales and securitizations. |
|
(c) |
|
- Included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income. |
|
(d) |
|
- Represents recognized gains and losses attributable to venture capital investments classified within securities available for sale that are included in Securities gains/(losses)
in noninterest income. |
|
(e) |
|
- Includes $22.4 million included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income and $2.7 million included in Revenue from loan sales and securitizations. |
|
(f) |
|
- Includes $(.6) million included in Capital Markets noninterest income, $(74.0) million included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income, and $(.9) million included in Revenue
from loan sales and securitizations. |
|
(g) |
|
- Includes $234.4 million included in Mortgage Banking noninterest income and $7.9 million included in Revenue from loan sales and securitizations. |
Additionally, FHN may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually
result from the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual
assets. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the first three months of 2009
and 2008 which were still held in the balance sheet at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the
following table provides the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment and
the carrying value of the related individual assets or portfolios at March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
96,897 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
44,287 |
|
|
$ |
52,610 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (a) |
|
|
492,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,747 |
|
|
|
73,572 |
|
Real estate acquired by
foreclosure (b) |
|
|
132,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,653 |
|
|
|
10,033 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
111,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,936 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
905,314 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500,019 |
|
|
$ |
405,295 |
|
|
$ |
53,166 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
528 |
(c) |
Loans, net of unearned income (a) |
|
|
263,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,671 |
|
|
|
39,798 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
121,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,067 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
95,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
- Represents carrying value of loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral. Writedowns on
these loans are recognized as part of provision. |
|
(b) |
|
- Represents the fair value and related losses of foreclosed properties that were measured subsequent to their initial classification as
foreclosed assets |
|
(c) |
|
- Represents recognition of other than temporary impairment for cost method investments classified within securities available for sale. |
In first quarter 2008, FHN recognized a lower of cost or market reduction in value of $36.2 million
for its warehouse of trust preferred loans, which was classified within level 3 for loans held for
sale at March 31, 2008. The determination of estimated market value for the warehouse was based on
a hypothetical securitization transaction for the warehouse as a whole. FHN used observable data
related to prior securitization transactions as well as changes in credit spreads in the
collateralized debt obligation (CDO) market since the most recent transaction. FHN also
incorporated significant internally developed assumptions within its valuation of the warehouse,
including estimated prepayments and estimated defaults. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, FHN
excluded transaction costs related to the hypothetical securitization in determining fair value.
In first quarter 2008, FHN recognized a lower of cost or market reduction in value of $17.0 million
relating to mortgage warehouse loans. Approximately $10.5 million was attributable to increased
delinquencies or aging of loans. The market values for these loans were estimated using
historical sales prices for these type loans, adjusted for incremental price concessions that a
third party investor is assumed to require due to tightening credit markets and deteriorating
housing prices. These assumptions were based on published information about actual and projected
deteriorations in the housing market as well as changes in credit spreads. The remaining reduction
in value of $6.5 million was attributable to lower investor prices, due primarily to credit spread
widening. This reduction was calculated by comparing the total fair value of loans (using the same
methodology that is used for fair value option loans) to carrying value for the aggregate
population of loans that were not delinquent or aged.
Fair Value Option
As described above, upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, management elected fair value accounting for
substantially all forms of mortgage loans originated for sale. In 2009 and 2008, agreements were
reached for the transfer of certain servicing assets and delivery of the servicing assets occurred.
However, due to certain recourse provisions, these transactions did not qualify for sale treatment
and the associated
proceeds have been recognized within commercial paper and other short term borrowings in the
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Condition as of March 31, 2009. Since servicing assets are
recognized at fair value and since changes in the fair value of related financing liabilities will
exactly mirror the change in fair value of the associated servicing assets, management elected to
account for the financing
liabilities at fair value under SFAS No. 159. Additionally, as the servicing assets have already
been delivered to the
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
buyer, the fair value of the financing liabilities associated with the transaction does not reflect
any instrument-specific credit risk.
The following table reflects the differences between the fair value carrying amount of mortgages
held for sale measured at fair value under SFAS No. 159 and the aggregate unpaid principal amount
FHN is contractually entitled to receive at maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
Aggregate |
|
carrying amount |
|
|
carrying |
|
unpaid |
|
less aggregate |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
amount |
|
principal |
|
unpaid principal |
|
Loans held for sale reported at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
308,468 |
|
|
$ |
343,560 |
|
|
$ |
(35,092 |
) |
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
6,578 |
|
|
|
11,796 |
|
|
|
(5,218 |
) |
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing |
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
9,814 |
|
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
Aggregate |
|
carrying amount |
|
|
carrying |
|
unpaid |
|
less aggregate |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
amount |
|
principal |
|
unpaid principal |
|
Loans held for sale reported at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
2,302,261 |
|
|
$ |
2,267,034 |
|
|
$ |
35,227 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities accounted for under SFAS No. 159 are initially measured at fair value. Gains
and losses from initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in
earnings. The change in fair value related to initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair
value for mortgage loans held for sale and other short term borrowings for which FHN elected the
fair value option are included in current period earnings with classification in the income
statement line item shown below.
For the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the amounts for loans held for sale includes
approximately $8.8 million and 9.5 million, respectively, of losses included in earnings that are
attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk, which was determined based on both a
quality adjustment for delinquencies and the full credit on the non-conforming loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
Changes in fair value included in net income: |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(1,662 |
) |
Estimated changes in fair value due to credit risk |
|
|
(8,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
Changes in fair value included in net income: |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking noninterest income |
|
$ |
19,688 |
|
Estimated changes in fair value due to credit risk |
|
|
(9,461 |
) |
|
Interest income on mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value is calculated based on the
note rate of the loan and is recorded in the interest income section of the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Income as interest on loans held for sale.
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
Determination of Fair Value
In accordance with SFAS No. 157, fair values are based on the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. The following describes the assumptions and methodologies
used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments and MSR recorded at fair value in the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition and for estimating the fair value of financial
instruments for which fair value is disclosed under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
107, Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS No. 107).
Short-term financial assets. Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell
and interest bearing deposits with other financial institutions are carried at historical cost.
The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the relatively short time
between the origination of the instrument and its expected realization.
Trading securities and trading liabilities. Trading securities and trading liabilities are
recognized at fair value through current earnings. Trading inventory held for broker-dealer
operations is included in trading securities and trading liabilities. Broker-dealer long positions
are valued at bid price in the bid-ask spread. Short positions are valued at the ask price.
Inventory positions are valued using observable inputs including current market transactions, LIBOR
and U.S. treasury curves, credit spreads and consensus prepayment speeds.
Trading securities also includes retained interests in prior securitizations that qualify as
financial assets which may include certificated residual interests, excess interest (structured as
interest-only strips), interest-only strips, principal-only strips, or subordinated bonds. Residual
interests represent rights to receive earnings to the extent of excess income generated by the
underlying loans. Excess interest represents rights to receive interest from serviced assets that
exceed contractually specified rates. Principal-only strips are principal cash flow tranches, and
interest-only strips are interest cash flow tranches. Subordinated bonds are bonds with junior
priority. All financial assets retained from a securitization are recognized on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Condition in trading securities at fair value with realized and unrealized
gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of noninterest income on the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
The fair values of the certificated residual interests and the excess interest are determined using
market prices from closely comparable assets such as MSR that are tested against prices determined
using a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future cash flows. The fair
value of these retained interests typically changes based on changes in the discount rate and
differences between modeled prepayment speeds and credit losses and actual experience. In some
instances, FHN retains interests in the loans it securitized by retaining certificated principal
only strips or subordinated bonds. Subsequent to the MetLife transaction, FHN uses observable
inputs such as trades of similar instruments, yield curves, credit spreads and consensus prepayment
speeds to determine the fair value of principal only strips. Prior to the MetLife transaction, FHN
used the market prices from comparable assets such as publicly traded FNMA trust principal only
strips that are adjusted to reflect the relative risk difference between readily marketable
securities and privately issued securities in valuing the principal only strips. The fair value of
subordinated bonds is determined using the best available market information, which may
include trades of comparable securities, independently provided spreads to other marketable
securities, and published market research. Where no market information is available, the company
utilizes an internal valuation model. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, no market information was
available, and the subordinated bonds were valued using an internal model which includes
assumptions about timing, frequency and severity of loss, prepayment speeds of the underlying
collateral, and the yield that a market participant would require.
Securities available for sale. Securities available for sale includes the investment portfolio
accounted for as available-for-sale under SFAS No. 115, federal bank stock holdings, short-term
investments in mutual funds and venture capital investments. Valuations of available-for-sale
securities are performed using observable inputs obtained from market transactions in similar
securities. Typical inputs include LIBOR
and U.S. treasury curves, consensus prepayment estimates and credit spreads. When available,
broker quotes are used to support these valuations.
Stock held in the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Banks are recognized at historical
cost in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition which is considered to approximate fair
value. Short-term investments in mutual funds are measured at the funds reported closing net
asset values. Venture capital investments are typically measured using significant internally
generated inputs including adjustments to referenced transaction values and discounted cash flows
analysis.
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
Securities held to maturity. Valuations are performed using observable inputs obtained from market
transactions in similar securities. Typical inputs include LIBOR and U.S. treasury curves,
consensus prepayment estimates and credit spreads.
Loans held for sale. In conjunction with the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4, FHN revised its
methodology for determining the fair value of certain loans within its mortgage warehouse. FHN now
determines the fair value of the applicable loans using a discounted cash flow model using
observable inputs, including current mortgage rates for similar products, with adjustments for
differences in loan characteristics reflected in the models discount rates. For all other loans
held in the warehouse (and in prior periods for the loans converted to the discounted cash flow
methodology), the fair value of loans whose principal market is the securitization market is based
on recent security trade prices for similar product with a similar delivery date, with necessary
pricing adjustments to convert the security price to a loan price. Loans whose principal market is
the whole loan market are priced based on recent observable whole loan trade prices or published
third party bid prices for similar product, with necessary pricing adjustments to reflect
differences in loan characteristics. Typical adjustments to security prices for whole loan prices
include adding the value of MSR to the security price or to the whole loan price if the price is
servicing retained, adjusting for interest in excess of (or less than) the required coupon or note
rate, adjustments to reflect differences in the characteristics of the loans being valued as
compared to the collateral of the security or the loan characteristics in the benchmark whole loan
trade, adding interest carry, reflecting the recourse obligation that will remain after sale, and
adjusting for changes in market liquidity or interest rates if the benchmark security or loan price
is not current. Additionally, loans that are delinquent or otherwise significantly aged are
discounted to reflect the less marketable nature of these loans.
The fair value of non-mortgage loans held for sale is approximated by their carrying values based
on current transaction values.
Loans, net of unearned income. Loans, net of unearned income are recognized at the amount of funds
advanced, less charge offs and an estimation of credit risk represented by the allowance for loan
losses. The fair value estimates for SFAS No. 107 disclosure purposes differentiate loans based on
their financial characteristics, such as product classification, loan category, pricing features
and remaining maturity.
The fair value of floating rate loans is estimated through comparison to recent market activity in
loans of similar product types, with adjustments made for differences in loan characteristics. In
situations where market pricing inputs are not available, fair value is considered to approximate
book value due to the monthly repricing for commercial and consumer loans, with the exception of
floating rate 1-4 family residential mortgage loans which reprice annually and will lag movements
in market rates. The fair value for floating rate 1-4 family mortgage loans is calculated by
discounting future cash flows to their present value. Future cash flows are discounted to their
present value by using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with
similar credit ratings and for the same time period. Prepayment assumptions based on historical
prepayment speeds and industry speeds for similar loans have been applied to the floating rate 1-4
family residential mortgage portfolio.
The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated through comparison to recent market activity in
loans of similar product types, with adjustments made for differences in loan characteristics. In
situations where market pricing inputs are not available, fair value is estimated by discounting
future cash flows to their present value. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value
by using the current rates at which similar
loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same time period.
Prepayment assumptions based on historical prepayment speeds and industry speeds for similar loans
have been applied to the fixed rate mortgage and installment loan portfolios.
Mortgage servicing rights. FHN recognizes all its classes of MSR at fair value. Since sales of
MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are
typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair
value of MSR. As such, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair
value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant risk
characteristics of MSR such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age (new,
seasoned, or moderate), agency type and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that it
believes are comparable to those used by brokers and other service providers. FHN also periodically
compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions with brokers,
service providers, and recent market activity and against its own experience. Due to ongoing
disruptions in the mortgage market, more emphasis has been placed on third party broker price
discovery and, when available, observable market trades in valuing MSR.
Derivative assets and liabilities. Derivatives include interest rate lock commitments from
mortgage banking operations and other derivative instruments primarily used in risk management
activities. Interest rate lock commitments are derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133 and are
therefore recorded at estimates of fair value. Effective January 1, 2008, FHN applied the
provisions of SAB No. 109 prospectively for derivative loan commitments issued or modified after
that date. SAB No. 109 requires inclusion of expected net future cash
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
flows related to loan servicing activities in the fair value measurement of a written loan
commitment. Also on January 1, 2008, FHN adopted SFAS No. 157, which affected the valuation of
interest rate lock commitments previously measured under the guidance of EITF 02-3. The interest
rate lock commitment does not bind the potential borrower to entering into the loan, nor does it
guarantee that First Horizon Home Loans will approve the potential borrower for the loan.
Therefore, when determining fair value, FHN makes estimates of expected fallout
(locked pipeline loans not expected to close), using models, which consider cumulative historical
fallout rates and other factors. Other valuation inputs associated with interest rate lock
commitments are determined in a manner consistent with that used for mortgage loans held for sale
described above.
Fair value for forwards and futures contracts used to hedge the mortgage pipeline and warehouse are
based on current transactions involving identical securities. Valuations of other derivatives are
based on inputs observed in active markets for similar instruments. Typical inputs include the
LIBOR curve, option volatility and option skew.
Real estate acquired by foreclosure. Real estate acquired by foreclosure primarily consists of
properties that have been acquired in satisfaction of debt. These properties are carried at the
lower of the outstanding loan amount or estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell the real
estate. Estimated fair value is determined using appraised values with subsequent adjustments for
deterioration in values that are not reflected in the most recent appraisal. Real estate acquired
by foreclosure also includes properties acquired in compliance with HUD servicing guidelines which
are carried at the estimated amount of the underlying government assurance or guarantee.
Nonearning assets. For the purposes of SFAS No. 107 disclosures, nonearning assets include cash and
due from banks, accrued interest receivable, and capital markets receivables. Due to the
short-term nature of cash and due from banks, accrued interest receivable and capital markets
receivables, the fair value is approximated by the book value.
Other assets. For purposes of SFAS No. 107 disclosures, other assets consists of investments in low
income housing partnerships and deferred compensation assets that are considered financial assets.
Investments in low income housing partnerships are written down to estimated fair value quarterly
based on the estimated value of the associated tax credits. Deferred compensation assets are
recognized at fair value, which is based on quoted prices in active markets.
Defined maturity deposits. The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows to their
present value. Future cash flows are discounted by using the current market rates of similar
instruments applicable to the remaining maturity. For the purpose of SFAS No. 107 disclosures,
defined maturity deposits include all certificates of deposit and other time deposits.
Undefined maturity deposits. In accordance with SFAS No. 107, the fair value is approximated by
the book value. For the purpose of this disclosure, undefined maturity deposits include demand
deposits, checking interest accounts, savings accounts, and money market accounts.
Short-term financial liabilities. The fair value of federal funds purchased, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, commercial paper and other short-term borrowings is approximated by the
book value. The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the relatively
short time between the origination of the instrument and its expected realization. Commercial
paper and short-term borrowings includes a liability associated with transfers of mortgage
servicing rights that did not qualify for sale accounting. This liability is accounted for at
elected fair value, which is measured consistent with the related MSR, as described above.
Long-term debt. The fair value is approximated by the present value of the contractual cash flows
discounted by the investors yield which considers FHNs and FTBNAs debt ratings.
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities. For the purpose of SFAS No. 107 disclosures, other
noninterest-bearing liabilities include accrued interest payable and capital markets payables. Due
to the short-term nature of these liabilities, the book value is considered to approximate fair
value.
Note 16 Fair Value of Assets & Liabilities (continued)
Loan Commitments. Fair values are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements taking
into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standing.
Other Commitments. Fair values are based on fees charged to enter into similar agreements.
Note 17 Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency
In 2007, FHN began conducting a company-wide review of business practices with the goal
of improving its overall profitability and productivity. In order to redeploy capital to
higher-return businesses, FHN concluded the sale of 34 full-service First Horizon Bank branches in
its national banking markets in the second quarter 2008 while also taking actions to right size
First Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking operations and to downsize FHNs national lending
operations. Additionally, in January 2008, FHN discontinued national homebuilder and commercial
real estate lending through its First Horizon Construction Lending offices. FHN also repositioned
First Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking operations through various MSR sales.
Additionally, on August 31, 2008, FHN and MetLife completed the sale of substantially all of FHNs
mortgage origination pipeline, related hedges, certain fixed assets and other associated assets.
MetLife did not acquire any portion of FHNs mortgage loan warehouse. FHN retained its mortgage
operations in and around Tennessee, continuing to originate home loans for customers in its banking
market footprint. FHN also agreed with MetLife for the sale of servicing assets and related hedges
on $19.1 billion of first lien mortgage loans and associated custodial deposits. FHN also entered
into a subservicing agreement with MetLife for the remainder of FHNs servicing portfolio. MetLife
generally paid book value for the assets and liabilities it acquired, less a purchase price
reduction.
Net costs recognized by FHN in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 related to restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency activities were $4.7 million. Of this amount, $2.8 million
represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No.
146).
Significant expenses recognized in first quarter 2009 resulted from the following actions:
|
|
Transaction costs of $1.1 million from the contracted sale of mortgage servicing rights. |
|
|
|
Severance and related employee costs of $2.7 million related to discontinuation of national
lending operations. |
|
|
|
Loss of $.8 million related to asset impairments from branch closures. |
Net costs recognized by FHN in the quarter ended March 31, 2008 related to restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency activities were $21.3 million. Of this amount, $15.1 million
represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No.
146).
Significant expenses recognized in first quarter 2008 resulted from the following actions:
|
|
Expense of $15.1 million associated with organizational and compensation changes due to
right sizing operating segments, the divestiture of certain First Horizon Bank branches, and
consolidating functional areas. |
|
|
|
Losses of approximately $1.0 million from the sales of certain First Horizon Bank branches. |
|
|
|
Transaction costs of $2.7 million from the sale of mortgage servicing rights. |
|
|
|
Expense of $2.5 million for the write-down of certain intangibles and other assets
resulting from the change in FHNs national banking strategy. |
Losses from the disposition of certain First Horizon Bank branches incurred during the periods
presented are included in losses on divestitures in the noninterest income section of the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income. Transaction costs recognized in the periods presented
from selling mortgage servicing rights are recorded as a reduction of mortgage banking income in
the noninterest income section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income. All other costs
associated with the restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives implemented by
management are included in the noninterest expense section of the Consolidated Condensed Statements
of Income, including severance and other employee-related costs recognized in relation to such
initiatives which are recorded in employee compensation, incentives, and benefits; facilities
consolidation costs and related asset impairment costs are included in occupancy; costs associated
with the impairment of premises and equipment are included in equipment rentals; depreciation and
maintenance and other costs associated with such initiatives, including professional fees, and
intangible asset impairment costs are included in all other expense.
Activity in the restructuring and repositioning liability for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 is presented in the following table, along with other restructuring and repositioning
expenses recognized. All costs associated with the restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency
initiatives are recorded as unallocated corporate charges within the Corporate segment.
Note 17 Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Expense |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,167 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,675 |
|
Severance and other employee related costs |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
Facility consolidation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
Other exit costs, professional fees and other |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
6,832 |
|
|
|
6,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accrued |
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
26,933 |
|
|
|
15,113 |
|
|
|
34,788 |
|
Payments* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,475 |
|
Accrual reversals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and Repositioning Reserve Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Restructuring & Repositioning (Income) and Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking expense on servicing sales |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of premises and equipment |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Restructuring and Repositioning Income
and Expense |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructuring, Repositioning Charges |
|
$ |
4,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes payments related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Severance and other employee
related costs |
|
$ |
4,074 |
|
|
$ |
6,655 |
|
Facility consolidation costs |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Other exit costs, professional
fees and other |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,707 |
|
|
$ |
11,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative amounts incurred to date as of March 31, 2009, for costs associated with FHNs
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Expense |
|
Severance and other employee related costs* |
|
$ |
52,634 |
|
Facility consolidation costs |
|
|
29,882 |
|
Other exit costs, professional fees and other |
|
|
17,221 |
|
Other restructuring & repositioning (income) and expense: |
|
|
|
|
Loan portfolio divestiture |
|
|
7,672 |
|
Mortgage banking expense on servicing sales |
|
|
20,237 |
|
Net loss on divestitures |
|
|
3,325 |
|
Impairment of premises and equipment |
|
|
15,769 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
18,029 |
|
Impairment of other assets |
|
|
30,101 |
|
|
Total Restructuring, Repositioning Charges Incurred to Date as
of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
194,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes $1.2 million of deferred severance-related payments that will be paid after 2009. |
Note 18 Other Events
In first quarter 2009, FHN determined that company-paid life insurance benefits offered to certain
employees extended to post-retirement periods and an associated liability should be reflected
within its financial statements. FHN had previously expensed the associated premiums over the
appropriate insurance period. Therefore, in first quarter 2009, FHN recorded an adjustment to
current earnings to recognize the cumulative impact of recognizing the employee benefit liability
which resulted in a $10.7 million negative impact to employee compensation, incentives, and
benefits. FHN has evaluated the financial impact of not recognizing the liability and associated
expenses for all quarterly and annual periods since inception and concluded that the impact was
immaterial in each period.
On April 1, 2009, FHN sold mortgage servicing rights to approximately $14 billion of first lien
mortgage loans owned or securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. After the sale, the unpaid
principal amount of FHNs loan servicing portfolio was reduced to approximately $48 billion.
FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
GENERAL INFORMATION
From a small community bank chartered in 1864, First Horizon National Corporation (FHN) has grown
to be one of the 40 largest bank holding companies in the United States in terms of asset size.
FHNs 6,000 employees provide financial services through approximately 200 bank locations in and
around Tennessee and 19 capital markets offices in the U.S. and abroad.
The corporations two major brands First Tennessee and FTN Financial provide customers with a
broad range of products and services. First Tennessee has the leading combined deposit market
share in the 17 Tennessee counties where it does business and one of the highest customer retention
rates of any bank in the country. FTN Financial (FTNF) is an industry leader in fixed income
sales, trading and strategies for institutional clients in the U.S. and abroad.
AARP and Working Mother magazine have recognized FHN as one of the nations best employers.
FHN is composed of the following operating segments:
|
§
|
|
Regional Banking offers financial products and services, including traditional lending
and deposit-taking, to retail and commercial customers in Tennessee and surrounding
markets. Additionally, Regional Banking provides investments, insurance, financial
planning, trust services and asset management, credit card, cash management, and check
clearing services. |
|
|
§ |
|
Capital Markets provides a broad spectrum of financial services for the investment and
banking communities through the integration of traditional capital markets securities
activities, equity research, loan sales, portfolio advisory services, structured finance,
and correspondent banking services. |
|
|
§ |
|
National Specialty Lending consists of traditional consumer and construction lending
activities outside the regional banking footprint. In January 2008, FHN announced the
discontinuation of national home builder and commercial real estate lending through its
First Horizon Construction Lending offices. |
|
|
§ |
|
Mortgage Banking now consists of the origination of mortgage loans in and around the
regional banking footprint and servicing activities related to the remaining portfolio.
Prior to the August 31, 2008, sale of its servicing platform and origination offices
outside Tennessee to MetLife Bank, N.A., (MetLife), this division provided mortgage loans
and servicing to consumers and operated in approximately 40 states. |
|
|
§ |
|
Corporate consists of unallocated corporate expenses including restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency initiatives, gains and losses on repurchases of debt, expense
on subordinated debt issuances and preferred stock, bank-owned life insurance, unallocated
interest income associated with excess equity, net impact of raising incremental capital,
revenue and expense associated with deferred compensation plans, funds management, and
venture capital. |
For the purpose of this managements discussion and analysis (MD&A), earning assets have been
expressed as averages, unless otherwise noted, and loans have been disclosed net of unearned
income. The following financial discussion should be read with the accompanying unaudited
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and notes.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This MD&A contains forward-looking statements with respect to FHNs beliefs, plans, goals,
expectations, and estimates. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not a
representation of historical information but rather are related to future operations, strategies,
financial results or other developments. The words believe,
expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, should, is likely, will, going forward, and
other expressions that indicate future events and trends identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently
subject to significant business, operational, economic and competitive uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond a companys control, and many of which, with respect to
future business decisions and actions (including acquisitions and divestitures), are subject to
change. Examples of uncertainties and contingencies include, among other important factors,
general and local economic and business conditions; recession or other economic downturns;
expectations of and actual timing and amount of interest rate movements, including the slope of the
yield curve (which can have a significant impact on a financial services institution); market and
monetary fluctuations; inflation or deflation; customer and investor responses to these conditions;
the financial condition of borrowers and other counterparties; competition within and outside the
financial services industry; geopolitical developments including possible terrorist activity;
recent and future legislative and regulatory developments; natural disasters; effectiveness of
FHNs hedging practices; technology; demand for FHNs product offerings; new products and services
in the industries in which FHN operates; and critical accounting estimates. Other factors are
those inherent in originating, selling, and servicing loans including prepayment risks, pricing
concessions, fluctuation in U.S. housing prices, fluctuation of collateral values, and changes in
customer profiles. Additionally, the actions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC),
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve), Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (FINRA), U.S. Department of the Treasury (UST), and other regulators and
agencies; regulatory and judicial proceedings and changes in laws and regulations applicable to
FHN; and FHNs success in executing its business plans and strategies and managing the risks
involved in the foregoing, could cause actual results to differ. FHN assumes no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements that are made from time to time. Actual results could differ
because of several factors, including those presented in this Forward-Looking Statements section,
in other sections of this MD&A, and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
In the first quarter 2009, FHN reported a net loss available to common shareholders of $82.8
million, or $.39 diluted loss per share compared to net income available to common shareholders of
$7.9 million, or $.06 diluted earnings per share in 2008. In 2009, net income available to common
shareholders reflected $15.0 million of dividends on the CPP preferred shares.
The results of operations for the first quarter 2009 were negatively affected by increased
provisioning for loan losses, charges related to repurchase and foreclosure reserves, expenses for
PMI reinsurance reserves, charges related to an employee life insurance obligation, and expenses
related to restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives. Results were positively
impacted by strong fixed income sales in Capital Markets and positive hedging results within
Mortgage Banking. Market volatility resulted in higher Capital Markets fixed income sales and a
favorable interest rate environment positively impacted MSR hedging gains in 2009 compared to 2008.
Provisioning for loan losses increased $60.0 million from first quarter 2008 to $300.0 million due
to downward credit grading and deterioration in the commercial portfolio and continued
deterioration in the national consumer lending portfolio. Earnings in the first quarter 2008 were
positively affected by the adoption of new accounting standards and the completion of Visas IPO
which resulted in a $95.9 million benefit in 2008 from the redemption of shares totaling $65.9
million and the reversal of $30.0 million of the contingent liability for certain Visa litigation
matters. First quarter 2008 was also negatively affected by a $36.2 million LOCOM adjustment on
the trust preferred warehouse. Additionally, net charges related to restructuring, repositioning
and efficiency efforts were $21.3 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $4.7 million in
the first quarter of 2009.
Return on average common equity and return on average assets for first quarter 2009 was (13.44)
percent and (.87) percent, respectively, compared to 1.47 percent and .13 percent in first quarter
2008. Tier 1 capital ratio was 14.97 percent as of March 31, 2009 compared to 8.23 percent on
March 31, 2008. Total assets were $31.2 billion and total equity was $3.5 billion on March 31,
2009, compared to $37.3 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively, on March 31, 2008.
BUSINESS LINE REVIEW
Regional Banking
The Regional Banking segment had a pre-tax loss of $89.3 million in the first quarter 2009 compared
to a pre-tax loss of $18.7 million in the first quarter 2008. Total revenues decreased 12 percent,
or $25.4 million, in first quarter 2009. The provision for loan losses increased to $97.8 million
in the first quarter 2009 from $75.3 million in the first quarter 2008. This increase primarily
reflects deterioration and downward credit grading of the commercial loan portfolio.
Net interest income decreased 12 percent to $106.0 million in first quarter 2009 from $120.5
million in first quarter 2008. Net interest margin was 3.88 percent in first quarter 2009 compared
to 4.39 percent in first quarter 2008. The decrease in net interest income and NIM was primarily
attributable to a decline in deposit spreads from the low interest rate environment.
Noninterest income declined 13 percent, or $10.9 million, in first quarter 2009 to $76.3 million.
Deposit fees were down $3.8 million mainly due to a decline in retail NSF fees while trust income
decreased by $2.3 million due to a decline in market value of managed trust assets. Noninterest
expense increased to $173.7 million in first quarter 2009 from $151.2 million in first quarter
2008. The increase is primarily due to the Regional Banks proportionate share of the adjustment
to an employee life insurance reserve, higher technology and credit-related costs, and an increase
in FDIC premiums.
Capital Markets
Pre-tax income increased from $22.8 million in first quarter 2008 to $74.3 million in first quarter
2009. Total revenues were $240.1 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to $153.7 million in
the first quarter 2008.
Net interest income was $23.4 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to $19.8 million in the
first quarter 2008. This increase is primarily attributable to wider spreads on the trading
portfolio due to the steeper yield curve.
Income from fixed income sales increased to $197.0 million in the first quarter 2009 from $152.2
million in the first quarter 2008, resulting from Capital Markets extensive distribution network
combined with market volatility and illiquidity experienced in the first quarter 2009. Other
product revenues increased to $19.7 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to a loss of $18.3
million in first quarter 2008 as the prior year included a $36.2 million LOCOM adjustment on the
trust preferred warehouse. The trust preferred loans were transferred to the portfolio in the
second quarter of 2008. Revenues from other products include fee income from activities such as
equity research, loan sales, portfolio advisory, structured finance, and correspondent banking
services.
Provision expense decreased slightly to $14.0 million in first quarter 2009 compared to $15.0
million in the first quarter 2008. Provision expense reflects deterioration of commercial loans,
including loans to banks, and trust preferred loans as the housing market and general economic
decline impacted financial institutions and businesses to which FHN extended credit.
Noninterest expense increased by $36.0 million, to $151.8 million in first quarter 2009, primarily
due to increased personnel costs related to higher production levels in the first quarter 2009 as
compared to the first quarter 2008.
Mortgage Banking
Effective August 31, 2008, FHN completed the sale of Mortgage Bankings servicing operations and
national mortgage origination offices outside Tennessee to MetLife. Additionally, in an effort to reduce balance
sheet risk, FHN has reduced the size of the servicing portfolio through bulk and flow sales
beginning in 2007. As a result of these transactions, components of origination activity,
servicing fees, and operating expenses for 2009 are significantly lower when compared to 2008.
Pre-tax income was $83.3 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to $48.3 million in first
quarter 2008. Total revenues decreased by $67.6 million to $130.5 million in first quarter 2009.
Net interest income decreased to $7.6 million in first quarter 2009 from $30.0 million in the first
quarter 2008 due to the large decline in the average balance of the mortgage warehouse as a result
of the sale of national mortgage origination offices to MetLife.
Subsequent to the sale of certain mortgage banking operations to MetLife in the third quarter 2008,
noninterest income consists primarily of servicing-related income such as servicing fees,
adjustment to the fair value of servicing assets, and gains or losses from hedging servicing
assets. Origination income primarily consists of fees from originating mortgages through the
regional banking footprint and secondary marketing income from loans that were originated through
the national platform.
Noninterest income decreased to $122.9 million in the first quarter 2009 from $168.0 million in the
first quarter 2008. Total servicing income increased $31.9 million to $101.2 million in the first
quarter 2009 primarily from positive net hedging results. Servicing fees were down $37.1 million
consistent with the decline in the size of the servicing portfolio. Hedging gains were $84.7
million in 2009 compared to $32.7 million in 2008 due to a widening of spreads between mortgage and
swap rates. Net revenue from origination activity decreased to $14.5 million in the first quarter
2009 from $84.1 million in the first quarter 2008 due to the sale of national mortgage origination
offices.
Noninterest expense was $47.6 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to $149.6 million in the
first quarter 2008. The decline is a result of the divestiture of certain mortgage banking
operations in the third quarter 2008. Offsetting the broad declines was $14.3 million in charges
to increase the private mortgage insurance reserves due to increasing mortgage default
expectations, expenses of $12.3 million to increase the foreclosure reserve due to higher
repurchase activity, and a $4.5 million increase in contract employment expenses from costs related
to the transition service agreement between FHN and MetLife.
National Specialty Lending
National Specialty Lending had a pre-tax loss of $192.5 million in the first quarter 2009 compared
to a pre-tax loss of $121.2 million in the first quarter 2008. Provision for loan losses increased
$39.1 million to $188.6 million in the first quarter 2009 as a result of deterioration in the
national construction and the national home equity loan portfolios.
Net interest income declined to $33.4 million in the first quarter 2009 as compared to $54.2
million in the first quarter 2008 as a result of the increase in nonaccrual and charged-off
construction loans.
Noninterest income was a loss of $6.7 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to a gain of $.6
million in the first quarter 2008. Noninterest expense increased $4.1 million from $26.5 million
in 2008 primarily from higher foreclosure costs.
Corporate
The Corporate segments pre-tax income was $11.4 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to
$71.8 million in the first quarter 2008. Net interest income was $26.3 million in the first
quarter 2009 compared to $3.6 million in the first quarter 2008 principally due to the effect of
excess capital in the corporate segment. Noninterest income was negative $1.4 million in first
quarter 2009 compared to positive $59.4 million in the first quarter 2008 as 2008 included a $65.9
million securities gain from redemption of Visa Inc. shares in connection with the IPO.
Noninterest expense increased $22.4 million to $13.6 million in the first quarter 2009. First
quarter 2008 was positively impacted by the reversal of $30.0 million of the contingent liability
related to Visa litigation matters. Charges within noninterest expense that related to
restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives decreased by $14.0 million from 2008.
RESTRUCTURING, REPOSITIONING, AND EFFICIENCY INITIATIVES
In 2007, FHN began conducting a company-wide review of business practices with the goal
of improving its overall profitability and productivity. In order to redeploy capital to
higher-return businesses, FHN concluded the
sale of 34 full-service First Horizon Bank branches in its national banking markets in the second
quarter 2008 while also taking actions to right size First Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking
operations and to downsize FHNs national lending operations. Additionally, in January 2008, FHN
discontinued national homebuilder and commercial real estate lending through its First Horizon
Construction Lending offices. FHN also repositioned First Horizon Home Loans mortgage banking
operations through various MSR sales.
On August 31, 2008, FHN and MetLife completed the sale of substantially all of FHNs mortgage
origination pipeline, related hedges, certain fixed assets and other associated assets. MetLife
did not acquire any portion of FHNs mortgage loan warehouse. FHN retained its mortgage operations
in and around Tennessee, continuing to originate home loans for customers in its banking market
footprint. As part of this transaction, FHN also agreed with MetLife for the sale of servicing
assets and related hedges on $19.1 billion of first lien mortgage loans and associated custodial
deposits. FHN also entered into a subservicing agreement with MetLife for the remainder of FHNs
servicing portfolio. MetLife generally paid book value for the assets and liabilities it acquired,
less a purchase price reduction.
Net costs recognized by FHN in the quarter ended March 31, 2009 related to restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency activities were $4.7 million. Of this amount, $2.8 million
represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No.
146).
Significant expenses recognized in first quarter 2009 resulted from the following actions:
|
|
Transaction costs of $1.1 million from the contracted sale of mortgage servicing rights. |
|
|
|
Severance and related employee costs of $2.7 million related to discontinuation of national
lending operations. |
|
|
|
Loss of $.8 million related to asset impairments from branch closures. |
Net costs recognized by FHN in the quarter ended March 31, 2008 related to restructuring,
repositioning, and efficiency activities were $21.3 million. Of this amount, $15.1 million
represented exit costs that were accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No.
146).
Significant expenses recognized in first quarter 2008 resulted from the following actions:
|
|
Expense of $15.1 million associated with organizational and compensation changes due to
right sizing operating segments, the divestiture of certain First Horizon Bank branches, and
consolidating functional areas. |
|
|
|
Losses of approximately $1.0 million from the sales of certain First Horizon Bank branches. |
|
|
|
Transaction costs of $2.7 million from the sale of mortgage servicing rights. |
|
|
|
Expense of $2.5 million for the write-down of certain intangibles and other assets
resulting from the change in FHNs national banking strategy. |
Settlement of the obligations arising from current initiatives will be funded from operating cash
flows. The effect of suspending depreciation on assets held for sale was immaterial to FHNs
results of operations for all periods. As a result of the change in FHNs national banking
strategy, a write-down of other intangibles of $2.4 million was recognized in first quarter 2008
related to certain banking licenses. The recognition of these impairment losses will have no
effect on FHNs debt covenants. The impairment loss related to the intangible asset was recorded
as an unallocated corporate charge within the Corporate segment and is included in all other
expense on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income. Due to the broad nature of the actions
being taken, all components of income and expense will be affected from the efficiency benefits.
Charges related to restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives for the three months
ended March 31, 2009, and 2008 are presented in the following table based on the income statement
line item affected. See Note 17 Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency Charges and Note 2
- Acquisitions/Divestitures for additional information.
Table 1 Restructuring, Repositioning, and Efficiency Initiatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
$ |
(1,142 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,667 |
) |
Losses on divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
(3,662 |
) |
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
7,412 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
Legal and professional fees |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
Communications and courier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
All other expense |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
6,062 |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
3,597 |
|
|
|
17,624 |
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
$ |
(4,739 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,286 |
) |
|
Activity in the restructuring and repositioning liability for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Expense |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,167 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,675 |
|
Severance and other employee related costs |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
Facility consolidation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
Other exit costs, professional fees and other |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
6,832 |
|
|
|
6,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accrued |
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
26,933 |
|
|
|
15,113 |
|
|
|
34,788 |
|
Payments* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,475 |
|
Accrual reversals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and Repositioning Reserve Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Restructuring & Repositioning (Income) and Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking expense on servicing sales |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on divestitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of premises and equipment |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Restructuring and Repositioning Income
and Expense |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructuring, Repositioning Charges |
|
$ |
4,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes payments related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Severance and other employee related costs |
|
$ |
4,074 |
|
|
$ |
6,655 |
|
Facility consolidation costs |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Other exit costs, professional fees and other |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,707 |
|
|
$ |
11,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT
Total consolidated revenue decreased 11 percent to $604.5 million from $677.2 million in the first
quarter 2008, primarily from decreases in mortgage banking income, securities gains, and net
interest income.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income declined to $196.6 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to $228.1 million
in the first quarter 2008 as average earning assets declined 16 percent to $27.4 billion and
average interest-bearing liabilities declined 22 percent to $25.9 billion in the first quarter
2009.
The consolidated net interest margin was 2.89 percent for first quarter 2009 compared to 2.81
percent for first quarter 2008. The widening in the margin occurred as the net interest spread
increased to 2.60 percent from 2.35 percent in the first quarter 2009 while the impact of free
funding decreased from 46 basis points to 29 basis points. The increase in the margin is largely
attributable to a decrease in interest-bearing assets, increased spreads on capital markets trading
inventory, and a reduced need for higher cost short-term funding. The positive effects more than
offset the negative impact of an increase in nonaccrual loans.
Table 2 Net Interest Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Consolidated yields and rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
6.07 |
% |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
|
Capital markets securities inventory |
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
Mortgage banking trading securities |
|
|
12.79 |
|
|
|
13.18 |
|
Other earning assets |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
Yields on earning assets |
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
Interest-bearing core deposits |
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and more |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
Capital markets trading liabilities |
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
Short-term borrowings and commercial paper |
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
Rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
Effect of interest-free sources |
|
|
.29 |
|
|
|
.46 |
|
|
FHN NIM |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to agree with current presentation.
In the short term, the net interest margin is expected to remain under pressure as deposit pricing
remains challenging. In the longer term, net interest margin should be positively influenced by
the reduction of lower margin national businesses.
NONINTEREST INCOME
Capital Markets Noninterest Income
The major component of capital markets revenue is generated from the purchase and sale of
securities as both principal and agent, and from other fee sources including equity research, loan
sales, portfolio advisory activities, and structured finance. Securities inventory positions are
generally procured for distribution to customers by the sales staff. A portion of the inventory is
hedged to protect against movements in fair value due to changes in interest rates.
Capital markets noninterest income increased to $214.2 million in first quarter 2009 from $131.5
million in first quarter 2008. Revenues from fixed income sales increased by $44.8 million to
$197.0 as market volatility and illiquidity positively affected trading volumes. Other product
revenues increased $38.0 million to $17.2 million as 2008 included a $36.2 million LOCOM adjustment
on the trust preferred warehouse.
Table 3 Capital Markets Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
Growth |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Rate (%) |
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
197,005 |
|
|
$ |
152,208 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
+ |
Other product revenue |
|
|
17,219 |
|
|
|
(20,751 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital markets noninterest income |
|
$ |
214,224 |
|
|
$ |
131,457 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
NM not meaningful
Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income
Effective August 31, 2008, FHN completed the sale of Mortgage Bankings servicing operations and
national mortgage origination offices outside Tennessee to MetLife. Additionally, in an effort to reduce balance
sheet risk, FHN has reduced the size of the servicing portfolio
through bulk and flow sales beginning in
2007. As a result of these transactions, components of origination activity, servicing fees, and
operating expenses for 2009 are significantly lower when compared to 2008.
Mortgage banking noninterest income decreased by $43.0 million in the first quarter 2009 to $115.7
million as shown in Table 4.
Table 4 Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
Percent |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
Noninterest income (thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination income |
|
$ |
14,454 |
|
|
$ |
84,056 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
- |
Servicing income |
|
|
101,202 |
|
|
|
69,344 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
+ |
Other |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage banking noninterest income |
|
$ |
115,749 |
|
|
$ |
158,712 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking statistics (millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinance originations |
|
$ |
377.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,776.0 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
- |
Home-purchase originations |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
2,733.5 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan originations |
|
$ |
408.4 |
|
|
$ |
7,509.5 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing portfolio owned |
|
$ |
60,132.0 |
|
|
$ |
99,021.5 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Total servicing income increased $31.9 million to $101.2 million in the first quarter 2009
primarily from positive net hedging results. Servicing fees were down $37.1 million consistent
with the decline in the size of the servicing portfolio. Hedging gains were $84.7 million in 2009
compared to $32.7 million in 2008 due to a widening of spreads between mortgage and swap rates.
Net revenue from origination activity decreased to $14.5 million in the first quarter 2009 from
$84.1 million in the first quarter 2008 due to the sale of national mortgage origination offices.
Other Noninterest Income
Other noninterest income includes deposit transactions and cash management fees, revenue from loan
sales and securitizations, insurance commissions, trust services and investment management fees,
net securities gains and losses and other noninterest income. Securities gains decreased by $65.9
million as 2008 included the redemption
of Visa shares as a result of Visas IPO. Fees from
deposit transactions and cash management were down $3.5 million primarily due to a volume decline
in transactions resulting in lower retail NSF fees and trust fees decreased $2.3 million consistent
with market declines of managed trust assets. Revenue from loan sales and securitizations was $1.0
million in 2009 compared to a loss of $4.1 million in 2008 and is primarily composed of servicing
fees and MSR value adjustments from prior HELOC and second lien loan sales and securitizations.
Other noninterest income decreased $14.0 million and included a $10.0 million charge to increase
the repurchase reserve for prior consumer loan sales.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Total noninterest expense for first quarter 2009 decreased 4 percent to $417.3 million from $434.2
million in first quarter 2008.
Employee compensation, incentives and benefits (personnel expense), the largest component of
noninterest expense, decreased $39.0 million from $287.5 million in first quarter 2008, primarily
as a result of headcount reduction. In first quarter 2009, personnel expense included $2.7 million
of charges related to restructuring, repositioning, and efficiency initiatives, and includes
increased personnel costs due to higher production at capital markets. First quarter 2009 also
included a $10.7 million charge to adjust a reserve for employee life insurance benefits.
All other noninterest expense increased $48.9 million in the first quarter 2009 compared to the
first quarter 2008. The private mortgage reinsurance reserve was increased due to increasing
mortgage default expectations resulting in $14.3 million additional expense. The Mortgage Banking
foreclosure reserve was increased due to higher repurchase activity resulting in charges of $12.3
million. FDIC premiums increased $4.8 million to $7.6 million in the first quarter 2009. All
other expense categories decreased consistent with FHNs focus on efficiency initiatives and
reduction of non-core businesses. First quarter 2008 included the reversal of $30.0 million of the
contingent liability related to certain Visa Inc. legal matters.
INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate for the first quarter 2009 was 42 percent reflecting tax benefits due to the
reported loss in 2009. The rate cannot be compared to first quarter 2008 due to the level of net
income reported in first quarter 2008. The effective tax rates for both quarters were favorably
impacted by affordable housing tax credits and increases in cash surrender value of life insurance.
No valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets has been recorded as of March 31, 2009 other
than a full valuation reserve related to state net operating losses that are not expected to be
realized primarily as a result of FHNs strategy of exiting the national mortgage business.
Management believes that it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will be
fully realized because of taxable income available in the two year carryback period, reversals of
existing temporary differences, tax planning strategies which accelerate the realization of
deferred tax assets, and future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES / ASSET QUALITY
The provision for loan losses is the charge to earnings that management determines to be necessary
to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) at a sufficient level reflecting
managements estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Analytical models based
on loss experience adjusted for current events, trends, and economic conditions are used by
management to determine the amount of provision to be recognized and to assess the adequacy of the
loan loss allowance. The provision for loan losses increased 25 percent to $300.0 million in first
quarter 2009 from $240.0 million in first quarter 2008. While all portfolios were affected by the
weakening real estate markets and the general decline in economic conditions, the increase
primarily reflects deterioration in the national residential and commercial real estate
construction portfolios (one-time close retail real estate construction loans extended to
consumers, loans to homebuilders and loans to real estate developers). Net charge offs increased
to $208.3 million in the first quarter 2009 from $99.1 million in 2008 and the net charge off ratio
was 3.97 percent in 2009 compared to 1.81 percent in 2008. The increase in net charge-offs is due
to problem loans in the consumer real estate (home equity installment and HELOC), residential CRE
(homebuilder and condominium construction), and OTC portfolios.
While charge-offs increased due to deteriorating economic conditions, FHNs methodology of charging
down collateral dependent commercial loans to net realizable value (NRV) also impacted charge-off
trends, especially in comparison to applicable ALLL. Generally, classified nonaccrual loans over
$1 million are deemed to be impaired in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS No. 114) and are
assessed for impairment measurement. A majority of these SFAS No. 114 loans (generally commercial
loans over $1 million that are not expected to pay all contractually due principal and interest)
are included in the Residential CRE (Homebuilder and Condominium Construction) portfolio. Once
impairment is detected, loans are then written down to the fair value of the underlying collateral,
less costs to sell (net realizable value). Fair value is based on recent appraisals of collateral.
Collateral values are monitored and further charge-offs are taken if it is determined that the
collateral values have continued to decline. Historically, as problem loans had been identified,
estimated probable losses were reserved for in the ALLL and these loans were subsequently
charged-off as appropriate. Given the deterioration in the real estate markets and the growing
number of loans determined to be collateral dependent under SFAS No. 114, charge-offs of these
loans have been accelerated to the time when the impairments are initially detected as opposed to
historical trends which reflected additions to the ALLL for probable inherent losses.
Also impacting increased charge-offs related to SFAS No. 114 loans are the dramatic declines in
collateral values experienced due to the prevailing real estate market conditions. Therefore,
charge-offs are not only higher due to the increased credit deterioration related to these loans,
but also due to the increased rate at which loans are charged down to net realizable value because
of rapidly declining collateral values. Net charge-offs related to collateral dependent SFAS 114
loans were $73.6 million or 35 percent of total net charge-offs during the first quarter of 2009.
Because of the accelerated recognition of impairment of these loans, the elevated charge-offs
decrease the ALLL. Compression occurs in the ALLL to net charge-offs ratio as the ALLL is
generally not replenished for charge-offs related to SFAS No. 114 collateral dependent loans because
reserves are not carried for these loans.
Additionally, OTC loans are generally written down to appraised value if, when the loan becomes 90
days past due or is considered substandard, recently obtained appraisals indicate a decline in fair
value. Subsequent charge downs are taken thereafter in accordance with regulatory guidelines. In
the first quarter 2009, net charge-offs related to OTC loans were $46.5 million, approximately 22
percent of total net charge-offs.
As included in Table 5, non-performing loans in the loan portfolio were $1.1 billion on March 31,
2009, compared to $527.6 million on March 31, 2008. The ratio of nonperforming loans in the loan
portfolio to total loans was 5.44 percent on March 31, 2009, and 2.41 percent on March 31, 2008.
The increase in nonperforming loans is primarily attributable to deterioration in the OTC,
Residential CRE, and Income CRE (Income-producing commercial real estate) due primarily to the
significant slowdown in the real estate market. Nonperforming OTC loans increased to $426.6
million as of March 31, 2009 from $199.7 million as of March 31, 2008. Nonperforming Residential
CRE loans increased to $411.6 million on March 31, 2009 from $238.9 million on March 31, 2008 and
Income CRE nonperforming loans increased to $122.0 million from $39.8 million in 2008.
Nonperforming assets were $1.3 billion on March 31, 2009, compared to $620.9 million on March 31,
2008. The nonperforming assets ratio was 5.98 percent on March 31, 2009 and 2.78 percent last
year. In addition to the increase in nonperforming loans, foreclosed assets increased to $119.0
million in the first quarter 2009 compared to $83.7 million in 2008 which was primarily
attributable to deterioration in the national construction and permanent mortgage portfolios.
Foreclosed assets are recognized at net realizable value, including estimated costs of disposal at
foreclosure. The nonperforming asset ratio is expected to remain under pressure throughout the
current economic downturn.
The ratio of ALLL to nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio decreased to .84 times in the first
quarter 2009 compared to .92 times in the first quarter of 2008. While nonperforming loans
increased from the same period last year, a portion of these loans does not carry reserves. As of
March 31, 2009, the total amount of SFAS No. 114 commercial loans was $526.3 million; $504.8
million of these loans are carried at NRV and do not carry reserves. The SFAS No. 114 loans
mentioned above that are charged down to NRV represent 45 percent of nonperforming loans in the
loan portfolio as of March 31, 2009. This compresses the ALLL to nonperforming loans
ratio because SFAS No. 114 loans are included in nonperforming loans, but reserves for these loans are
not carried in the
ALLL. Residential CRE loans were $350.5 million or 67 percent of all SFAS No.
114 loans while the remainder is included in the C&I and Income CRE portfolios. Additionally,
charged-down OTC loans are included in nonperforming loans. As of March 31, 2009, OTC loans
accounted for 38 percent of nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio. The ALLL related to OTC
loans was $183.5 million which provides a coverage ratio of 24 percent for inherent losses in the
portfolio. Because of the methodologies described above, the ALLL to NPL ratio is negatively
impacted. Nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio for which reserves are actually carried were
approximately $439.8 million as of March 31, 2009.
Potential problem assets in the loan portfolio, which are not included in nonperforming assets,
represent those assets where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused
management to have serious doubts about the borrowers ability to comply with present repayment
terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established
by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for loans classified substandard. In total,
potential problem assets were $1.4 billion on March 31, 2009, up from $475.3 million on March 31,
2008. The significant increase in potential problem assets reflects downward credit grading and
deterioration in the commercial portfolio. Also, loans 30 to 89 days past due increased to $404.7
million on March 31, 2009, up from $257.8 million on March 31, 2008. This increase was primarily
driven by the slowdown in the housing markets and the general economic decline and its impact on
the loan portfolios. Loans 90 days past due were also impacted by some administrative
delinquencies that were resolved after quarter end. Loans held for sale that were 90 days past due
declined primarily as a result of loans transferred in connection with a bulk servicing sale that
occurred in 2008 and overall declines in the amount of loans held for sale. The current
expectation of losses from both potential problem assets and loans 30 to 89 days past due has been
included in managements analysis for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Asset quality is expected to remain stressed in 2009 due to the expectation that the housing
industry and broader economic conditions may continue to deteriorate. Actual results could differ
because of several factors, including those presented in the Forward-Looking Statements section of
this MD&A discussion.
Table 5 Asset Quality Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance on December 31 |
|
$ |
849,210 |
|
|
$ |
342,341 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(217,161 |
) |
|
|
(101,756 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
Ending balance on March 31 |
|
$ |
940,932 |
|
|
$ |
483,203 |
|
|
Reserve for off-balance sheet commitments |
|
|
19,511 |
|
|
|
11,786 |
|
Total allowance for loan losses and reserve for off-balance
sheet commitments |
|
$ |
960,443 |
|
|
$ |
494,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
Nonperforming Assets by Segment |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Regional Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
$ |
193,191 |
|
|
$ |
81,244 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
31,305 |
|
|
|
38,019 |
|
|
Total Regional Banking |
|
|
224,496 |
|
|
|
119,263 |
|
|
Capital Markets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
|
40,383 |
|
|
|
13,030 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
Total Capital Markets |
|
|
41,024 |
|
|
|
13,630 |
|
|
National Specialty Lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
|
845,964 |
|
|
|
433,285 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
64,586 |
|
|
|
29,680 |
|
|
Total National Specialty Lending |
|
|
910,550 |
|
|
|
462,965 |
|
|
Mortgage Banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans including held for sale (a) |
|
|
53,569 |
|
|
|
9,693 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
22,514 |
|
|
|
15,373 |
|
|
Total Mortgage Banking |
|
|
76,083 |
|
|
|
25,066 |
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
1,252,153 |
|
|
$ |
620,924 |
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
20,572,477 |
|
|
$ |
21,932,020 |
|
Insured loans |
|
|
(528,025 |
) |
|
|
(808,606 |
) |
|
Loans excluding insured loans |
|
$ |
20,044,452 |
|
|
$ |
21,123,414 |
|
|
Foreclosed real estate from GNMA loans |
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
$ |
22,346 |
|
Potential problem assets (b) |
|
|
1,399,899 |
|
|
|
475,302 |
|
Loans 30 to 89 days past due |
|
|
404,739 |
|
|
|
257,798 |
|
Loans 30 to 89 days past due guaranteed portion (c) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Loans 90 days past due |
|
|
203,746 |
|
|
|
74,380 |
|
Loans 90 days past due guaranteed portion (c) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due |
|
|
44,170 |
|
|
|
65,082 |
|
Loans held for sale 30 to 89 days past due guaranteed
portion (c) |
|
|
43,577 |
|
|
|
65,082 |
|
Loans held for sale 90 days past due |
|
|
47,055 |
|
|
|
225,805 |
|
Loans held for sale 90 days past due guaranteed portion (c) |
|
|
39,960 |
|
|
|
223,383 |
|
Off-balance sheet commitments (d) |
|
$ |
6,076,977 |
|
|
$ |
6,826,000 |
|
|
Allowance to total loans |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
2.20 |
% |
Allowance to nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio |
|
|
0.84 |
x |
|
|
0.92 |
x |
Allowance to loans excluding insured loans |
|
|
4.69 |
% |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
Allowance to annualized net charge-offs |
|
|
1.13 |
x |
|
|
1.22 |
x |
Nonperforming assets to loans and foreclosed real estate (e) |
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
Nonperforming loans in the loan portfolio to total loans,
net of unearned income |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
Total commercial net charge-offs (f) |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
1.93 |
% |
Retail real estate net charge-offs (f) |
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
Other retail net charge-offs (f) |
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
Credit card receivables net charge-offs (f) |
|
|
6.06 |
% |
|
|
3.92 |
% |
Total net charge-offs to average loans (f) |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
1Q 2009 includes $39,057 of loans held-to-maturity. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes 90 days past due loans. |
|
(c) |
|
Guaranteed loans include FHA, VA, student and GNMA loans repurchased through the
GNMA repurchase program. |
|
(d) |
|
Amount of off-balance sheet commitments for which a reserve has been provided. |
|
(e) |
|
Ratio is non-performing assets related to the loan portfolio to total loans plus
foreclosed real estate and other assets. |
|
(f) |
|
Net charge-off ratios are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income. |
The following table provides additional asset quality data by loan portfolio:
Table 6 Asset Quality by Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Key Portfolio Details |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial (C&I & Other) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions) |
|
$ |
7,676 |
|
|
$ |
7,225 |
|
|
30+ Delinq. % |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
.93 |
% |
NPL % |
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
.64 |
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized) |
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
.83 |
|
|
Allowance / Loans % |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
1.59 |
% |
Allowance / Charge-offs |
|
|
1.89 |
x |
|
|
2.31 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income CRE (Income-producing Commercial Real Estate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions) |
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
1,982 |
|
|
30+ Delinq. % |
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
.57 |
% |
NPL % |
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized) |
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
|
|
Allowance / Loans % |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Allowance / Charge-offs |
|
|
1.53 |
x |
|
|
1.28 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential CRE (Homebuilder and Condominium Construction) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions) |
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
|
$ |
1,980 |
|
|
30+ Delinq. % |
|
|
10.43 |
% |
|
|
2.73 |
% |
NPL % |
|
|
36.34 |
|
|
|
12.07 |
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized) |
|
|
18.10 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
Allowance / Loans % |
|
|
8.59 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
Allowance / Charge-offs |
|
|
.44 |
x |
|
|
.58 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Real Estate (Home Equity Installment and HELOC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions) |
|
$ |
7,609 |
|
|
$ |
7,964 |
|
|
30+ Delinq. % |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
NPL % |
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized) |
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
.93 |
|
|
Allowance / Loans % |
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
Allowance / Charge-offs |
|
|
1.27 |
x |
|
|
1.28 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC (Consumer Residential Construction Loans) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions) |
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
1,815 |
|
|
30+ Delinq. % |
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
NPL % |
|
|
55.19 |
|
|
|
11.01 |
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized) |
|
|
21.10 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
Allowance / Loans % |
|
|
23.74 |
% |
|
|
6.49 |
% |
Allowance / Charge-offs |
|
|
.99 |
x |
|
|
1.33 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions) |
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
|
30+ Delinq. % |
|
|
10.11 |
% |
|
|
7.73 |
% |
NPL % |
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized) |
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
.41 |
|
|
Allowance / Loans % |
|
|
7.06 |
% |
|
|
.20 |
% |
Allowance / Charge-offs |
|
|
2.04 |
x |
|
|
1.75 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Card and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end loans ($ millions) |
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
30+ Delinq. % |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
NPL % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs % (qtr. annualized) |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
Allowance / Loans % |
|
|
6.04 |
% |
|
|
4.58 |
% |
Allowance / Charge-offs |
|
|
1.26 |
x |
|
|
.89 |
x |
|
Loans are expressed net of unearned income. All data is based on internal loan classification.
STATEMENT OF CONDITION REVIEW
EARNING ASSETS
Earning assets consist of loans, loans held for sale, investment securities, trading securities and
other earning assets. Earning assets averaged $27.4 billion and $32.7 billion in the first quarter
2009 and first quarter 2008, respectively.
Loans
Average loans were $21.0 billion in the first quarter 2009 compared to $22.0 billion in the first
quarter 2008, a decline of 5 percent. The decrease was driven by elevated charge-offs and declines
in both commercial and consumer construction portfolios as FHN discontinued loan origination
through its national construction lending channel. Average commercial real estate construction and
consumer real estate construction loan portfolios each declined by $1.0 billion from the first
quarter 2008. Partially offsetting the declines were increases in C&I loans due to modest growth
and approximately $.3 billion of small issuer trust preferred loans that were
transferred net of LOCOM from held for sale to the loan portfolio during 2008. Also partially offsetting the
decline in construction loans was an increase in residential real estate loans driven by $.6
billion of permanent mortgages that were transferred from held for sale to the portfolio. Average
loans represented 76 percent of average earning assets in first quarter 2009 and 67 percent in
first quarter 2008. Additional loan information is provided in Table 7 Average Loans and Note 4
- Loans.
The commercial and retail construction and home equity portfolios are expected to continue to
contract in 2009 due to conditions in the housing market and FHNs strategic goal to reduce real
estate concentrations in general. This contraction will likely more than offset new loan
production.
Table 7 Average Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
Growth |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
of Total |
|
Rate |
|
2008 |
|
of Total |
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and industrial |
|
$ |
7,781.7 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
$ |
7,121.9 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Real estate commercial (a) |
|
|
1,492.9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
1,347.4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Real estate construction (b) |
|
|
1,689.9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
2,713.2 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
10,964.5 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
11,182.5 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate residential (c) |
|
|
8,095.1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
7,774.4 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Real estate construction (d) |
|
|
880.5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(53.9 |
) |
|
|
1,909.0 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other retail |
|
|
135.6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
184.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
195.1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Real estate loans pledged
against other collateralized borrowings (e) |
|
|
709.1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
755.1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail |
|
|
10,004.6 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
10,775.6 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned |
|
$ |
20,969.1 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
21,958.1 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes nonconstruction income property loans and land loans not involving development. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes homebuilder, condominium, and income property construction and land development loans. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes primarily home equity loans and lines of credit (average for first quarter 2009 and 2008 $3.8 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively). |
|
(d) |
|
Includes one-time close product. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes on-balance sheet securitizations of home equity loans. |
Loans Held for Sale / Loans Held for Sale Divestiture
Loans held for sale consists of mortgage warehouse and student, small business, and home equity
loans. Loans held for sale represented 2 percent of total earning assets in first quarter 2009
compared with 12 percent in first quarter 2008. During first quarter 2009 loans held for sale
averaged $.6 billion, a decrease of 84 percent, or $3.4 billion from first quarter 2008. The
majority of the decrease relates to the mortgage warehouse which contracted by $2.8 billion
primarily as a result of the sale of the national mortgage
origination offices to MetLife in August 2008.
Small issuer trust preferred loans decreased by $.3 billion as the loans were moved
to the portfolio net of LOCOM during 2008. First quarter 2008 included $.2 billion of loans held for
sale-divestiture which were sold during 2008. Since mortgage warehouse loans and other loans held
for sale are generally held in inventory for a short period of time, there may be significant
differences between average and period-end balances.
Other
The average balance of trading securities decreased from $2.4 billion during the first quarter 2008
to $1.3 billion in 2009. Capital Markets trading inventory contributed to $.8 billion of
the decline while mortgage trading securities decreased by $.2 billion.
Deposits / Other Sources of Funds
During the first quarter 2009, core deposits decreased 5 percent or $.7 billion and averaged $13.0
billion as custodial deposits were transferred when the related serviced loans were sold in 2008
and also due to increased competition for deposits. Interest-bearing core deposits decreased 3
percent or $.3 billion to an average balance of $8.6 billion in first quarter 2009.
Average
short-term purchased funds decreased to $8.6 billion in the
first quarter 2009 from $12.6 billion in the first quarter 2008 driven by a decline in purchased federal funds as lending
among financial institutions tightened during 2008 and a decline in purchased CDs as FHN focused
on lower cost funding sources. Average long-term borrowings decreased by $2.5 billion consistent
with balance sheet contraction as long term bank notes matured or were repurchased and extendable
notes were not renewed.
CAPITAL
Managements objectives are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks inherent in FHNs
businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards, and to assure ready access to
the capital markets.
Average equity increased to $3.6 billion in the first quarter 2009 from $2.5 billion in the first
quarter 2008. Period-end equity was $3.5 billion on March 31, 2009, an increase of 46 percent from
first quarter 2008. The increase is a result of the issuance of 69 million shares of common stock
in the second quarter 2008 which generated $659.8 million net proceeds and the issuance of
preferred stock and a common stock warrant in the third quarter 2008 though participation in the
UST CPP which generated $866.5 million of proceeds. Pursuant to board authority, FHN may
repurchase shares from time to time and will evaluate the level of capital and take action designed
to generate or use capital, as appropriate, for the interests of the shareholders, subject to
legal, regulatory, and CPP constraints.
Table 8 Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
(Volume in thousands) |
|
Purchased |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Announced Programs |
|
Under the Programs |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 to January 31 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
10.33 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
38,090 |
|
February 1 to February 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,090 |
|
March 1 to March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
10.33 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Plan Programs:
|
|
|
- |
|
A consolidated compensation plan share purchase program was
announced on August 6, 2004. This plan consolidated into a
single share purchase program all of the previously
authorized compensation plan share programs as well as the
renewal of the authorization to purchase shares for use in
connection with two compensation plans for which the share
purchase authority had expired. The total amount originally
authorized under this consolidated compensation plan share
purchase program is 25.1 million shares. On April 24,
2006, an increase to the authority under this purchase
program of 4.5 million shares was announced for a new total
authorization of 29.6 million shares. The authority has
been increased to reflect the reflect the 3.0615% stock
dividend effective on October 1, 2008 and the 1.837% stock
dividend effective on January 1, 2009. The shares may be
purchased over the option exercise period of the various
compensation plans on or before December 31, 2023. Stock
options granted after January 2, 2004, must be exercised no
later than the tenth anniversary of the grant date. On
March 31, 2009, the maximum number of shares that may be
purchased under the program was 30.2 million shares. |
|
Other Programs: |
|
- |
|
On October 16, 2007, the board of directors approved a 7.5
million share purchase authority that will expire on
December 31, 2010. The authority has been increased to
reflect the 3.0615% stock dividend effective on October 1,
2008 and the 1.837% stock dividend effective on January 1,
2009. Purchases will be made in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions and will be subject to
market conditions, accumulation of excess equity, prudent
capital management, and legal and regulatory constraints.
Until the third anniversary of the sale of the preferred
shares issued in the CPP, FHN may not repurchase common or
other equity shares (subject to certain limited exceptions)
without the USTs approval. This authority is not tied to
any compensation plan, and replaces an older non-plan share
purchase authority which was terminated. On March 31,
2009, the maximum number of shares that may be purchased
under the program was 7.8 million shares. |
Banking regulators define minimum capital ratios for bank holding companies and their bank
subsidiaries. Based
on the capital rules and definitions prescribed by the banking regulators, should any depository
institutions capital ratios decline below predetermined levels, it would become subject to a
series of increasingly restrictive regulatory actions. The system categorizes a depository
institutions capital position into one of five categories ranging from well-capitalized to
critically under-capitalized. For an institution to qualify as well-capitalized, Tier 1 Capital,
Total Capital, and Leverage capital ratios must be at least 6 percent, 10 percent and 5 percent,
respectively. As of March 31, 2009, and March 31, 2008, FHN and FTBNA had sufficient capital to
qualify as well-capitalized institutions as shown in Note 7 Regulatory Capital.
RISK MANAGEMENT
FHN has an enterprise-wide approach to risk governance, measurement, management, and reporting
including an economic capital allocation process that is tied to risk profiles used to measure
risk-adjusted returns. The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee oversees risk
management governance. Committee membership includes the CEO and other executive officers of FHN.
The Chief Risk Officer oversees reporting for
the committee. Risk management objectives include evaluating risks inherent in business
strategies, monitoring proper balance of risks and returns, and managing risks to minimize the
probability of future negative outcomes. The Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee
oversees and receives regular reports from the Credit Risk Management Committee, Asset/Liability
Committee (ALCO), Capital Management Committee, Compliance Risk Committee, Operational Risk
Committee, and the Executive Program Governance Forum. The Chief Credit Officer, EVP Funds
Management and Corporate Treasurer (chairs both ALCO and Capital Management Committee), SVP
Corporate Compliance, Chief Risk Officer, and EVP and Chief Information Officer chair these
committees respectively. Reports regarding Credit, Asset/Liability Management, Market Risk,
Capital
Management, Compliance, and Operational Risks are provided to the Credit Policy and Executive
Committee, and/or Audit Committee of the Board and to the full Board. In response to FHNs
participation in the U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), the Compensation
Committee, Chief Risk Officer, and Chief Credit Officer convene periodically to review and assess
key business risks and the relation of those risks to compensation and incentives plans in which
named executives participate. The first of such meetings occurred in January 2009.
Risk management practices include key elements such as independent checks and balances, formal
authority limits, policies and procedures, and portfolio management all executed through
experienced personnel. The Internal Audit Department, Credit Risk Assurance Group, Credit Policy
and Regulations Group, and Credit Portfolio Management Group also evaluate risk management
activities. These evaluations are reviewed with management and the Audit Committee, as
appropriate.
MARKET UNCERTAINTIES AND PROSPECTIVE TRENDS
Given the significant current uncertainties that exist within the housing and credit markets, it is
anticipated that 2009 will continue to be challenging for FHN. While the reduction of mortgage
banking operations is expected to significantly decrease sensitivity to market pricing uncertainty,
FHN will continue to be affected by market factors as it addresses the remaining mortgage loan
warehouse and attempts to reduce the remaining servicing portfolio. In addition, current
volatility and reduced liquidity in the capital markets may adversely impact market execution
putting continued pressure on revenues. As difficulties in the credit markets persist, FHN will
continue to adapt its liquidity management strategies. Further deterioration of general economic
conditions could result in increased credit costs depending on the length and depth of this market
cycle.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in prevailing interest rates will adversely affect
assets, liabilities, capital, income, and/or expense at different times or in different amounts.
ALCO, a committee consisting of senior management that meets regularly, is responsible for
coordinating the financial management of interest rate risk. FHN primarily manages interest rate
risk by structuring the balance sheet to attempt to maintain the desired level of associated
earnings while operating within prudent risk limits and thereby preserving the value of FHNs
capital.
Net interest income and the financial condition of FHN are affected by changes in the level of
market interest rates as the repricing characteristics of loans and other assets do not necessarily
match those of deposits, other borrowings, and capital. When earning assets reprice more quickly
than liabilities, net interest income will benefit in a rising interest rate environment and will
be negatively impacted when interest rates decline. In the case of floating rate assets and
liabilities with similar repricing frequencies, FHN may also be exposed to basis risk which results
from changing spreads between earning and borrowing rates. Generally, when interest rates decline,
Mortgage Banking faces increased prepayment risk associated with MSR.
Due to the third quarter 2008 sale of certain mortgage banking operations, Mortgage Banking revenue
mix was significantly impacted. Through August 2008, Mortgage Banking revenue was primarily
generated by originating, selling, and servicing residential mortgage loans and was highly
sensitive to changes in interest rates due to the direct effect changes in interest rates have on
loan demand. After the 2008 divestiture, Mortgage Banking income was primarily composed of
servicing residential mortgage loans and fair value adjustments to the remaining warehouse. Given
the repositioning of mortgage banking operations, origination activity has been significantly
reduced thereby reducing interest rate risk exposure in periods after the divestiture. In general,
low or declining interest rates typically lead to increased origination fees and profit from the
sale of loans but potentially lower servicing-related income due to the impact of higher loan
prepayments on the value of mortgage servicing assets. Conversely, high or rising interest rates
typically reduce mortgage loan demand and hence income from originations and sales of loans while
servicing-related income may rise due to lower prepayments. Net interest income earned on
warehouse loans held for sale and on swaps and similar derivative instruments used to protect the
value of MSR increases when the yield curve steepens and decreases when the yield curve flattens or
inverts.
Lastly, a steepening yield curve positively impacts the demand for fixed income securities and,
therefore, Capital Markets revenue. Generally, the effects of a steepening yield curve on FHNs
consolidated pre-tax income are
positive, especially when driven by falling short term rates, benefiting Capital Markets and
Mortgage Bankings results.
As a result of the MetLife transaction, mortgage banking origination activity was significantly
reduced in periods after third quarter 2008 as FHN focuses on origination within its regional
banking footprint. Accordingly, the following discussion of pipeline and warehouse related
derivatives is primarily applicable to reporting periods occurring through the third quarter 2008.
In certain cases, derivative financial instruments are used to aid in managing the exposure of the
balance sheet and related net interest income and noninterest income to changes in interest rates.
As discussed in Critical Accounting Policies, derivative financial instruments are used by mortgage
banking for two purposes. First, forward sales contracts and futures contracts are used to protect
against changes in fair value of the pipeline and mortgage warehouse, primarily used from the time
an interest rate is committed to the customer until the mortgage is sold into the secondary market
due to increases in interest rates. Second, interest rate contracts, forward sales contracts, and
futures contracts, are utilized to protect against MSR prepayment risk that generally accompanies
declining interest rates. As interest rates fall, the value of MSR should decrease and the value
of the servicing hedge should increase. The converse is also true.
Derivative instruments are also used to protect against the risk of loss arising from adverse
changes in the fair value of a portion of Capital Markets securities inventory due to changes in
interest rates. FHN does not use derivative instruments to protect against changes in fair value
of loans or loans held for sale other than the mortgage pipeline, warehouse and certain small
issuer trust preferred loans.
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
ALCO focuses on the funding of assets with liabilities of the appropriate duration, while
mitigating the risk of not meeting unexpected cash needs. The objective of liquidity management is
to ensure the continuous availability of funds to meet the demands of depositors, other creditors,
and borrowers, and the requirements of ongoing operations. This objective is met by maintaining
liquid assets in the form of trading securities and securities available for sale, growing core
deposits, and the repayment of loans. ALCO is responsible for managing these needs by taking into
account the marketability of assets; the sources, stability and availability of funding; and the
level of unfunded commitments. See Note 15 Derivatives for additional information. Subject to
market conditions and compliance with applicable regulatory requirements from time to time, funds
are available from a number of sources, including core deposits, the securities available for sale
portfolio, the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), the Federal Reserve Banks, access to Federal Reserve
Bank programs such as the Term Auction Facility (TAF), availability to the overnight and term
Federal Funds markets, and dealer and commercial customer repurchase agreements.
Core deposits are a significant source of funding and have been a stable source of liquidity for
banks. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures these deposits to the extent authorized
by law. Generally, these limits were temporarily increased to $250 thousand per account owner
through January 1, 2010. Total loans, excluding loans held for sale and real estate loans pledged
against other collateralized borrowings, to core deposits ratio was 149 percent in first quarter
2009 and 153 percent in first quarter 2008. Should loan growth exceed core deposit growth,
alternative sources of funding loan growth may be necessary in order to maintain an adequate
liquidity position. The ratio is expected to continue to decline as the national loan portfolios
decrease.
In 2005, FTBNA established a bank note program providing additional liquidity of $5.0 billion. On
March 31, 2009, $1.8 billion was outstanding through the bank note program with $.9 billion
scheduled to mature later in 2009. During 2008 and continuing into early 2009, market and other
conditions have been such that FTBNA has not been able to utilize the bank note program, and
instead has obtained less credit sensitive sources of funding including secured sources such as
Federal Reserve Term Auction Facility (TAF). FTBNA expects that its inability to use the bank note
program will continue for some time, and cannot predict when that inability will end.
FHN and FTBNA have the ability to generate liquidity by issuing preferred or common equity or
incurring other debt subject to market conditions and compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements from time to time. FHN also evaluates alternative sources of funding, including loan
sales, syndications, and FHLB borrowings in its management of liquidity.
Parent company liquidity is maintained by cash flows stemming from dividends and interest payments
collected from subsidiaries along with net proceeds from stock sales through employee plans, which
represent the primary sources of funds to pay cash dividends to shareholders and interest to debt
holders. The amount paid to the parent company through FTBNA common dividends is managed as part
of FHNs overall cash management process, subject to applicable regulatory restrictions described
in the next paragraph. As discussed above, the parent company also has the ability to enhance its
liquidity position by raising equity or incurring debt subject to market conditions and compliance
with applicable regulatory requirements from time to time.
Certain regulatory restrictions exist regarding the ability of FTBNA to transfer funds to FHN in
the form of cash, common dividends, loans, or advances. At any given time, the pertinent portions
of those regulatory restrictions allow FTBNA to declare preferred or common dividends without prior
regulatory approval in an amount equal to FTBNAs retained net income for the two most recent
completed years plus the current year to date. For any period, FTBNAs retained net income
generally is equal to FTBNAs regulatory net income reduced by the preferred and common dividends
declared by FTBNA. Excess dividends in either of the two most recent completed years may be offset
with available retained net income in the two years immediately preceding it. Applying the
applicable rules, FTBNAs total amount available for dividends was negative $283 million at March
31, 2009. Earnings (or losses) and dividends declared during 2009 will change the amount available
during 2009 until December 31.
FTBNA has requested approval from the OCC to declare and pay dividends on its preferred stock
outstanding payable in July 2009. FTBNA has not requested approval to pay common dividends to its
sole common stockholder, FHN. Although FHN has funds available for dividends even without FTBNA
dividends, availability of funds is not the sole factor considered by FHNs Board in deciding
whether or not to declare a dividend of any particular size; the Board also must consider FHNs
current and prospective capital, liquidity and other needs. Under the terms of the CPP FHN is not
permitted to increase its cash common dividend rate for a period of three years without permission
of the Treasury. At the time of the preferred share and common stock warrant issuance, FHN did not
pay a common cash dividend.
On April 21, 2009, the Board declared a dividend in shares of common stock at a rate of 1.5782% to
be distributed on July 1, 2009 to shareholders of record on June 12, 2009. The Board currently
intends to reinstate a cash dividend at an appropriate and prudent level once earnings and other
conditions improve sufficiently, consistent with legal, regulatory, CPP, and other constraints.
The Board has also approved the payment of the 5% dividend on the CPP preferred payable on May 15,
2009.
The Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows provide information on cash flows from
operating, investing, and financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2009, and 2008.
In the first quarter 2009, positive cash flows from financing
activities were exceeded by negative
cash flows from investing and operating activities, primarily as a result of an increase in
interest-bearing cash balances. For the first quarter 2009, net cash used by investing and
operating activities was $.4 billion, and $35.8 million, respectively, which was partially offset
by $43.9 million positive cash flows from financing activities.
Negative
cash flows from investing activities were primarily affected by a $1.0 billion increase in
interest-bearing cash, mainly Federal Reserve balances, and were partially offset by cash provided
through a decrease in the loan and securities portfolio as the national loan portfolio balance
continues to decline. Cash used by operating activities was $35.8 million primarily driven by an
increase in capital markets, tax, and other receivables. Additionally, an increase in loans held
for sale due to higher refinance activity and increase in student loans negatively affected cash
flows from operating activities. Cash provided by financing activities was $43.9 million as cash
flows from deposits increased $668.2 million and funds from short-term borrowings were $60.6
million. Funding from long-term debt decreased by $669.6 million as bank notes matured consistent
with balance sheet contraction.
In the
first quarter 2008, negative cash flows from financing activities
exceeded cash provided by
operating and investing activities. Financing activities were primarily impacted by a decrease in
wholesale deposits. Positive investing cash flows resulted from the decrease in the loan portfolio
as well as the prospective classification of retained interests in securitizations within investing
activities. Cash flows from operating activities were relatively flat as FHN benefited from a
decrease in capital markets trading securities.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Contractual Obligations
First Horizon Home Loans, the former mortgage banking division of FHN, originated conventional
conforming and federally insured single-family residential mortgage loans. Likewise, FTN Financial
Capital Assets Corporation purchases the same types of loans from customers. Substantially all of
these mortgage loans were exchanged for securities, which are issued through investors, including
government sponsored enterprises (GSE), such as Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) for
federally insured loans and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) for conventional loans, and then sold in the secondary markets. Each
GSE has specific guidelines and criteria for sellers and servicers of loans backing their
respective securities. Many private investors were also active in the secondary market as issuers
and investors. The risk of credit loss with regard to the principal amount of the loans sold was
generally transferred to investors upon sale to the secondary market. To the extent that
transferred loans were subsequently determined not to meet the agreed upon qualifications or
criteria, the purchaser had the right to return those loans to FHN. In addition, certain mortgage
loans were sold to investors with limited or full recourse in the event of mortgage foreclosure
(refer to discussion of foreclosure reserves under Critical Accounting Policies). After sale,
these loans were not reflected on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition.
FHNs use of government agencies as an efficient outlet for mortgage loan production was an
essential source of liquidity for FHN and other participants in the housing industry in recent
years. The use of origination and subsequent sale or securitization of these loans to government
agencies has significantly declined due to FHNs sale of national mortgage origination offices in
third quarter 2008. During first quarter 2009 and first quarter 2008, approximately $21.6 million
and $4.3 billion, respectively, of conventional and federally insured mortgage loans were
securitized and sold by FHN through these investors.
Historically, certain of FHNs originated loans, including non-conforming first-lien mortgages,
second-lien mortgages and HELOC originated primarily through FTBNA, did not conform to the
requirements for sale or securitization through government agencies. FHN pooled and securitized
these non-conforming loans in proprietary transactions. After securitization and sale, these loans
were not reflected on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition. These transactions,
which were conducted through single-purpose business trusts, were an efficient way for FHN to
monetize these assets. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, the outstanding principal amount of loans in
these off-balance sheet business trusts was $21.5 billion and $24.7 billion, respectively. FHN has
substantially reduced its origination of these loans in response to disruptions in the credit
markets and did not execute a securitization of these loans in 2008 and through the first quarter
of 2009. Given the historical significance of FHNs origination of non-conforming loans, the use
of single-purpose business trusts to securitize these loans was an important source of liquidity to
FHN. See Note 13 Loan Sales and Securitizations for additional information.
FHN has also sold HELOC and second-lien mortgages without recourse through whole loan sales. On
March 31, 2009, the outstanding principal balance of these loans was $1.1 billion and $1.8 billion,
respectively. On March 31, 2008, the outstanding principal balance of these HELOC and second-lien
mortgages was $1.2 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. FHN does not guarantee the receipt of
the scheduled principal and interest payments on the underlying loans but does have an obligation
to repurchase the loans for which there is a breach of warranties provided to the buyers. As of
March 31, 2009, FHN has recognized a liability of $17.2 million related to these repurchase
obligations.
FHN has various other financial obligations, which may require future cash payments. Purchase
obligations represent obligations under agreements to purchase goods or services that are
enforceable and legally binding on FHN and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or
minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions, and the
approximate timing of the transaction. In addition, FHN enters into commitments to extend credit
to borrowers, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of
credit. These commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these
commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Capital markets buys and sells various types of securities for its customers. When these
securities settle on a delayed basis, they are considered forward contracts. Securities inventory
positions are generally procured for distribution to customers by the sales staff, and ALCO
policies and guidelines have been established with the objective of limiting the risk in managing
this inventory.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The capital management objectives of FHN are to provide capital sufficient to cover the risks
inherent in FHNs businesses, to maintain excess capital to well-capitalized standards and to
assure ready access to the capital markets. Management has a Capital Management committee that is
responsible for capital management oversight and provides a forum for addressing management issues
related to capital adequacy. The committee reviews sources and uses of capital, key capital
ratios, segment economic capital allocation methodologies, and other factors in monitoring and
managing current capital levels, as well as potential future sources and uses of capital. The
committee also recommends capital management policies, which are submitted for approval to the
Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management Committee and the Board.
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Operational risk is the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and
systems or from external events. This risk is inherent in all businesses. Management,
measurement, and reporting of operational risk are overseen by the Operational Risk Committee,
which is chaired by the Chief Risk Officer. Key representatives from the business segments, legal,
risk management, information technology risk, corporate real estate, employee services, records
management, bank operations, funds management, and insurance are represented on the committee.
Subcommittees manage and report on business continuity planning, information technology risk,
insurance, records management, customer complaint, and reputation risks. Summary reports of the
committees activities and decisions are provided to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management
Committee. Emphasis is dedicated to refinement of processes and tools to aid in measuring and
managing material operational risks and providing for a culture of awareness and accountability.
COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT
Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material financial loss, or loss to
reputation as a result of failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory
organization standards, and codes of conduct applicable to banking activities. Management,
measurement, and reporting of compliance risk are overseen by the Compliance Risk Committee, which
is chaired by the SVP of Corporate Compliance. Key executives from the business segments, legal,
risk management, and service functions are represented on the committee. Summary reports of the
committees activities and decisions are provided to the Enterprise-wide Risk/Return Management
Committee, and to the Audit Committee of the Board, as applicable. Reports include the status of
regulatory activities, internal compliance program initiatives, and evaluation of emerging
compliance risk areas.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in a borrower or counterpartys ability to
meet its financial obligations under agreed upon terms. FHN is subject to credit risk in lending,
trading, investing, liquidity/funding, and asset management activities. The nature and amount of
credit risk depends on the types of transactions, the structure of those transactions and the
parties involved. In general, credit risk is incidental to trading, liquidity/funding and asset
management activities, while it is central to the profit strategy in lending. As a result, the
majority of credit risk is associated with lending activities.
FHN assesses and manages credit risk through a series of policies, processes, measurement systems,
and controls. The Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC) is responsible for overseeing the
management of existing and emerging credit risks in the company within the broad risk tolerances
established by the Board of Directors.
The Credit Risk Management function, led by the Chief Credit Officer, provides strategic and
tactical credit leadership by maintaining policies, overseeing credit approval and servicing, and
managing portfolio composition and performance.
A series of regularly scheduled portfolio review meetings are in place to provide oversight
regarding the accuracy of credit risk grading and the adequacy of commercial credit servicing. A
series of watch list meetings are in place to oversee the management of emerging potential problem
commercial assets. The Credit Risk Management function assesses the portfolio trends and the
results of these meetings and utilizes this information to inform management regarding the current
state of credit quality as part of the estimation process for determining the allowance for loan
losses.
All of the above activities are subject to independent review by FHNs Credit Risk Assurance Group,
which encompasses both Credit Review and Credit Quality Control functions. The EVP of Credit Risk
Assurance is appointed by and reports to the Credit Policy & Executive Committee of the Board.
Credit Risk Assurance is charged with providing the Board and executive management with
independent, objective, and timely assessments of FHNs portfolio quality, adequacy of credit
policies, and credit risk management processes.
Management strives to identify potential problem loans and nonperforming loans early enough to
correct the deficiencies and prevent further credit deterioration. It is managements objective
that both charge-offs and asset write-downs are recorded promptly, based on managements
assessments of current collateral values and the borrowers ability to repay.
FHN has a significant concentration of loans secured by residential real estate (52 percent of
total loans) primarily in three portfolios. The retail real estate residential portfolio including
real estate loans pledged against other collateralized borrowings (42 percent of total loans) was
primarily comprised of home equity lines and loans. While this portfolio has been stressed by the
downturn in the housing market and rising unemployment, it contains loans extended to strong
borrowers with high credit scores and is geographically diversified. The OTC portfolio (4 percent
of total loans) has been negatively impacted by the downturn in the housing industry, certain
discontinued product types, and the decreased availability of permanent mortgage financing. The
Residential CRE portfolio (6 percent of total loans) has also been negatively impacted by the
housing industry downturn as builder liquidity has been severely stressed.
As of March 31, 2009, loans to bank and bank holding companies, loans secured by bank stock, and
trust preferred loans were approximately $1.0 billion (5 percent of total loans) and are included
within the C&I portfolio. Due to the higher credit losses experienced throughout the financial
services industry and the limited availability of market liquidity, these loans have experienced
increased deterioration in recent quarters.
As of March 31, 2009, FHN had trust preferred loans to banks and insurance related businesses
totaling $.5 billion (2 percent of total loans) that are included within the Commercial, Financial,
and Industrial portfolio. Due to higher credit losses experienced throughout the financial
services industry and the limited availability of market liquidity, these loans have experienced
some stress during the economic downturn.
On March 31, 2009, FHN did not have any concentrations of 10 percent or more of total commercial,
financial, and industrial loans in any single industry.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
FHNs accounting policies are fundamental to understanding managements discussion and analysis of
results of operations and financial condition. The consolidated condensed financial statements of
FHN are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. The
preparation of the financial statements requires management to make certain judgments and
assumptions in determining accounting estimates. Accounting estimates are considered critical if
(a) the estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain
at the time the accounting estimate was made, and (b) different estimates reasonably could have
been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate are reasonably likely to
occur from
period to period, that would have a material impact on the presentation of FHNs financial
condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.
It is managements practice to discuss critical accounting policies with the Board of Directors
Audit Committee including the development, selection and disclosure of the critical accounting
estimates. Management believes the following critical accounting policies are both important to
the portrayal of the companys financial condition and results of operations and require subjective
or complex judgments. These judgments about critical accounting estimates are based on information
available as of the date of the financial statements.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Managements policy is to maintain the ALLL at a level sufficient to absorb estimated probable
incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management performs periodic and systematic detailed
reviews of its loan portfolio to identify trends and to assess the overall collectibility of the
loan portfolio. Accounting standards require that loan losses be recorded when management
determines it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. Management believes the accounting estimate related to the ALLL is a
critical accounting estimate because: changes in it can materially affect the provision for loan
losses and net income, it requires management to predict borrowers likelihood or capacity to
repay, and it requires management to distinguish between losses incurred as of a balance sheet date
and losses expected to be incurred in the future. Accordingly, this is a highly subjective process
and requires significant judgment since it is often difficult to determine when specific loss
events may actually occur. The ALLL is increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries
and is decreased by charged-off loans. This critical accounting estimate applies to all of FHNs
business line segments. The Credit Policy and Executive Committee of FHNs board of directors
reviews quarterly the level of the ALLL.
FHNs methodology for estimating the ALLL is not only critical to the accounting estimate, but to
the credit risk management function as well. Key components of the estimation process are as
follows: (1) commercial loans determined by management to be individually impaired loans are
evaluated individually and specific reserves are determined based on the difference between the
outstanding loan amount and the estimated net realizable value of the collateral (if collateral
dependent) or the present value of expected future cash flows; (2) individual commercial loans not
considered to be individually impaired are segmented based on similar credit risk characteristics
and evaluated on a pool basis; (3) reserve rates for the commercial segment are calculated based on
historical charge-offs and are adjusted by management to reflect current events, trends and
conditions (including economic factors and trends); (4) managements estimate of probable incurred
losses reflects the reserve rate applied against the balance of loans in the commercial segment of
the loan portfolio; (5) retail loans are segmented based on loan type; (6) reserve amounts for each
retail portfolio segment are calculated using analytical models based on loss experience adjusted
by management to reflect current events, trends and conditions (including economic factors and
trends); and (7) the reserve amount for each retail portfolio segment reflects managements
estimate of probable incurred losses in the retail segment of the loan portfolio.
Principal loan amounts are charged off against the ALLL in the period in which the loan or any
portion of the loan is deemed to be uncollectible.
Given the substantial instability in the current housing market and significant deterioration
experienced in the commercial, OTC and home equity portfolios, FHN proactively reviews and analyzes
these portfolios to more promptly identify and resolve problem loans.
For commercial loans, reserves are established using historical loss factors by grade level.
Relationship managers risk rate each loan using grades that reflect both the probability of default
and estimated loss severity in the event of default. Portfolio reviews are conducted to provide
independent oversight of risk grading decisions for larger credits. Loans with emerging weaknesses
receive increased oversight through our Watch List process. For new Watch List loans, senior
credit management reviews risk grade appropriateness and action plans. After initial
identification, relationship managers prepare regular updates for review and discussion by more
senior business line and credit officers. This oversight is intended to bring consistent grading
and allow timely identification of loans that need to be further downgraded or placed on
non-accrual status. When a loan becomes classified, the asset generally transfers to the
specialists in our Loan Rehab and Recovery group where the accounts receive more
detailed monitoring; at this time, new appraisals are typically ordered for real estate collateral
dependent credits. Loans are placed on non-accrual if it becomes evident that full collection of
principal and interest is at risk or if the loans become 90 days or more past due.
Generally, classified commercial non-accrual loans over $1 million are deemed to be impaired in
accordance with SFAS No. 114 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan and are assessed
for impairment measurement. For impaired assets viewed as collateral dependent, fair value
estimates are obtained from a recently received and reviewed appraisal. Appraised values are
adjusted down for costs associated with asset disposal and for our estimate of any further
deterioration in values since the most recent appraisal. Upon the determination of impairment, FHN
charges off the full difference between book value and our best estimate of the assets net
realizable value. As of March 31, 2009, the total amount of SFAS No. 114 commercial loans was
$526.3 million; $504.8 million of these loans are carried at NRV and do not carry reserves.
For OTC real estate construction loans, reserve levels are established based on portfolio modeling
and monthly portfolio reviews. The inherent risk in credits is examined and evaluated based on
factors such as draw inactivity and borrower conditions, often recognizing problems prior to
delinquency. In addition, OTC loans that reach 90 days past due are placed on non-accrual. A new
appraisal is ordered for loans that reach 90 days past due or are classified as substandard during
the monthly portfolio review. Loans are initially written down to current appraised value.
Periodically, loans are assessed for further charge down.
For home equity loans and lines, reserve levels are established through the use of segmented
roll-rate models. Loans are classified substandard at 90 days delinquent. Our collateral position
is assessed prior to the asset becoming 180 days delinquent. If the value does not support
foreclosure, balances are charged-off and other avenues of recovery are pursued. If the value
supports foreclosure, the loan is charged down to net realizable value and is placed on non-accrual
status. When collateral is taken to OREO, the asset is assessed for further write down relative to
appraised value.
FHN believes that the critical assumptions underlying the accounting estimate made by management
include: (1) the commercial loan portfolio has been properly risk graded based on information about
borrowers in specific industries and specific issues with respect to single borrowers; (2) borrower
specific information made available to FHN is current and accurate; (3) the loan portfolio has been
segmented properly and individual loans have similar credit risk characteristics and will behave
similarly; (4) known significant loss events that have occurred were considered by management at
the time of assessing the adequacy of the ALLL; (5) the economic factors utilized in the allowance
for loan losses estimate are used as a measure of actual incurred losses; (6) the period of history
used for historical loss factors is indicative of the current environment; and (7) the reserve
rates, as well as other adjustments estimated by management for current events, trends, and
conditions, utilized in the process reflect an estimate of losses that have been incurred as of the
date of the financial statements.
While management uses the best information available to establish the ALLL, future adjustments to
the ALLL and methodology may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ substantially from
the assumptions used in making the estimates or, if required by regulators, based upon information
at the time of their examinations. Such adjustments to original estimates, as necessary, are made
in the period in which these factors and other relevant considerations indicate that loss levels
vary from previous estimates.
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS AND OTHER RELATED RETAINED INTERESTS
When FHN sold mortgage loans in the secondary market to investors, it generally retained the right
to service the loans sold in exchange for a servicing fee that is collected over the life of the
loan as the payments are received from the borrower. An amount was capitalized as MSR on the
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition at current fair value. The changes in fair value of
MSR are included as a component of Mortgage Banking Noninterest Income on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income.
MSR Estimated Fair Value
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, Accounting for Servicing
of Financial Assets an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, FHN elected fair value accounting
for all classes of mortgage servicing rights. The fair value of MSR typically rises as market
interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates decrease; however, the extent to
which this occurs depends in part on (1) the magnitude of
changes in market interest rates, and (2) the differential between the then current market interest
rates for mortgage loans and the mortgage interest rates included in the mortgage-servicing
portfolio.
Since sales of MSR tend to occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of
the sales are typically not readily available, there is a limited market to refer to in determining
the fair value of MSR. As such, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate
the fair value of its MSR. This model calculates estimated fair value of the MSR using predominant
risk characteristics of MSR, such as interest rates, type of product (fixed vs. variable), age
(new, seasoned, moderate), agency type and other factors. FHN uses assumptions in the model that
it believes are comparable to those used by other participants in the mortgage banking business and
reviews estimated fair values and assumptions with third-party brokers and other service providers
on a quarterly basis. FHN also compares its estimates of fair value and assumptions to recent
market activity and against its own experience.
Estimating the cash flow components of net servicing income from the loan and the resultant fair
value of the MSR requires FHN to make several critical assumptions based upon current market and
loan production data.
Prepayment Speeds: Generally, when market interest rates decline and other factors
favorable to prepayments occur, there is a corresponding increase in prepayments as customers
refinance existing mortgages under more favorable interest rate terms. When a mortgage loan is
prepaid the anticipated cash flows associated with servicing that loan are terminated, resulting in
a reduction of the fair value of the capitalized MSR. To the extent that actual borrower
prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed
in the model does not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment
model could fail to accurately predict mortgage prepayments and could result in significant
earnings volatility. To estimate prepayment speeds, FHN utilizes a third-party prepayment model,
which is based upon statistically derived data linked to certain key principal indicators involving
historical borrower prepayment activity associated with mortgage loans in the secondary market,
current market interest rates and other factors. For purposes of model valuation, estimates are
made for each product type within the MSR portfolio on a monthly basis.
Table 9 Mortgage Banking Prepayment Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Prepayment speeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
Estimated* |
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Estimated prepayment speeds represent monthly average prepayment
speed estimates for each of the periods presented. |
Discount Rate: Represents the rate at which expected cash flows are discounted to arrive at
the net present value of servicing income. Discount rates will change with market conditions
(i.e., supply vs. demand) and be reflective of the yields expected to be earned by market
participants investing in MSR.
Cost to Service: Expected costs to service are estimated based upon the incremental costs
that a market participant would use in evaluating the potential acquisition of MSR.
Float Income: Estimated float income is driven by expected float balances (principal,
interest and escrow payments that are held pending remittance to the investor or other third party)
and current market interest rates, including the thirty-day London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
and five-year swap interest rates, which are updated on a monthly basis for purposes of estimating
the fair value of MSR.
FHN engages in a process referred to as price discovery on a quarterly basis to assess the
reasonableness of the estimated fair value of MSR. Price discovery is conducted through a process
of obtaining the following information: (a) quarterly informal (and an annual formal) valuation of
the servicing portfolio by prominent independent
mortgage-servicing brokers, and (b) a collection of surveys and benchmarking data made available by
independent third parties that include peer participants in the mortgage banking business.
Although there is no single source of
market information that can be relied upon to assess the fair
value of MSR, FHN reviews all information obtained during price discovery to determine whether the
estimated fair value of MSR is reasonable when compared to market information. On March 31, 2009,
and 2008, FHN determined that its MSR valuations and assumptions were reasonable based on the price
discovery process.
The FHN Earnings at Risk Committee reviews the overall assessment of the estimated fair value of
MSR monthly and is responsible for approving the critical assumptions used by management to
determine the estimated fair value of FHNs MSR. In addition, the MSR Committee reviews the
initial capitalization rates for newly originated MSR, if any, the assessment of the fair value of
MSR, and the source of significant changes to the MSR carrying value each quarter.
Hedging the Fair Value of MSR
FHN enters into financial agreements to hedge MSR in order to minimize the effects of loss in value
of MSR associated with increased prepayment activity that generally results from declining interest
rates. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of the MSR generally will increase while
the value of the hedge instruments will decline. Specifically, FHN enters into interest rate
contracts (including swaps, swaptions and mortgage forward sales contracts) to hedge against the
effects of changes in fair value of its MSR. Substantially all capitalized MSR are hedged. The
hedges are economic hedges only, and are terminated and reestablished as needed to respond to
changes in market conditions. Changes in the value of the hedges are recognized as a component of
net servicing income in mortgage banking noninterest income. Successful economic hedging will help
minimize earnings volatility that may result from carrying MSR at fair value. Subsequent to the
sale of certain mortgage banking operations to MetLife, FHN determines the fair value of the
derivatives used to hedge MSR (and excess interests as discussed below) using inputs observed in
active markets for similar instruments with typical inputs including the LIBOR curve, option
volatility and option skew. Prior to the MetLife transaction, fair values of these derivatives
were obtained through proprietary pricing models which were compared to market value quotes
received from third party broker-dealers in the derivative markets.
In conjunction with the repositioning of its mortgage banking operations, FHN no longer retains
servicing on the loans it sells. In prior periods, FHN generally experienced increased loan
origination and production in periods of low interest rates which resulted in the capitalization of
new MSR associated with new production. This provided for a natural hedge in the
mortgage-banking business cycle. New production and origination did not prevent FHN from
recognizing losses due to reduction in carrying value of existing servicing rights as a result of
prepayments; rather, the new production volume resulted in loan origination fees and the
capitalization of MSR as a component of realized gains related to the sale of such loans in the
secondary market, thus the natural hedge, which tended to offset a portion of the reduction in MSR
carrying value during a period of low interest rates. In a period of increased borrower
prepayments, these losses could have been significantly offset by a strong replenishment rate and
strong net margins on new loan originations. To the extent that First Horizon Home Loans was
unable to maintain a strong replenishment rate, or in the event that the net margin on new loan
originations declined from historical experience, the value of the natural hedge might have
diminished, thereby significantly impacting the results of operations in a period of increased
borrower prepayments.
FHN does not specifically hedge the change in fair value of MSR attributed to other risks,
including unanticipated prepayments (representing the difference between actual prepayment
experience and estimated prepayments derived from the model, as described above), discount rates,
cost to service, and other factors. To the extent that these other factors result in changes to
the fair value of MSR, FHN experiences volatility in current earnings due to the fact that these
risks are not currently hedged.
Excess Interest (Interest-Only Strips) Fair Value Residential Mortgage Loans
In certain cases, when FHN sold mortgage loans in the secondary market, it retained an interest in
the mortgage loans sold primarily through excess interest. These financial assets represent rights
to receive earnings from serviced assets that exceed contractually specified servicing fees and are
legally separable from the base servicing rights. Consistent with MSR, the fair value of excess
interest typically rises as market interest rates increase and declines as market interest rates
decrease. Additionally, similar to MSR, the market for excess interest is limited,
and the precise terms of transactions involving excess interest are not typically readily
available. Accordingly, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair
value of its excess interest.
Estimating the cash flow components and the resultant fair value of the excess interest requires
FHN to make certain critical assumptions based upon current market and loan production data. The
primary critical assumptions used by FHN to estimate the fair value of excess interest include
prepayment speeds and discount rates, as discussed above. FHNs excess interest is included as a
component of trading securities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition, with
realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of mortgage
banking income on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.
Hedging the Fair Value of Excess Interest
FHN utilizes derivatives (including swaps, swaptions and mortgage forward sales contracts) that
change in value inversely to the movement of interest rates to protect the value of its excess
interest as an economic hedge. Realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with the change
in fair value of derivatives used in the economic hedge of excess interest are included in current
earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income. Excess
interest is included in trading securities with changes in fair value recognized currently in
earnings in mortgage banking noninterest income as a component of servicing income.
The extent to which the change in fair value of excess interest is offset by the change in fair
value of the derivatives used to hedge this asset depends primarily on the hedge coverage ratio
maintained by FHN. Also, as noted above, to the extent that actual borrower prepayments do not
react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the historical data observed in the model does
not correspond to actual market activity), it is possible that the prepayment model could fail to
accurately predict mortgage prepayments, which could significantly impact FHNs ability to
effectively hedge certain components of the change in fair value of excess interest and could
result in significant earnings volatility.
Principal Only and Subordinated Bond Certificates
In some instances, FHN retained interests in the loans it securitized by retaining certificated
principal only strips or subordinated bonds. Subsequent to the MetLife transaction, FHN uses
observable inputs such as trades of similar instruments, yield curves, credit spreads, and
consensus prepayment speeds to determine the fair value of principal only strips. Prior to the
MetLife transaction, FHN used the market prices from comparable assets such as publicly traded FNMA
trust principal only strips that were adjusted to reflect the relative risk difference between
readily marketable securities and privately issued securities in valuing the principal only strips.
The fair value of subordinated bonds is determined using the best available market information,
which may include trades of comparable securities, independently provided spreads to other
marketable securities, and published market research. Where no market information is available,
the company utilizes an internal valuation model. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, no market
information was available, and the subordinated bonds were valued using an internal model which
includes assumptions about timing, frequency and severity of loss, prepayment speeds of the
underlying collateral, and the yield that a market participant would require. FHN does not utilize
derivatives to hedge against changes in the fair value of these certificates.
Residual-Interest Certificates Fair Value HELOC and Second-lien Mortgages
In certain cases, when FHN sold HELOC or second-lien mortgages in the secondary market, it retained
an interest in the loans sold primarily through a residual-interest certificate. Residual-interest
certificates are financial assets which represent rights to receive earnings to the extent of
excess income generated by the underlying loan collateral of certain mortgage-backed securities,
which is not needed to meet contractual obligations of senior security holders. The fair value of a
residual-interest certificate typically changes based on the differences between modeled prepayment
speeds and credit losses and actual experience. Additionally, similar to MSR and interest-only
certificates, the market for residual-interest certificates is limited, and the precise terms of
transactions involving residual-interest certificates are not typically readily available.
Accordingly, FHN relies primarily on a discounted cash flow model, which is prepared monthly, to
estimate the fair value of its residual-interest certificates.
Estimating the cash flow components and the resultant fair value of the residual-interest
certificates requires FHN to make certain critical assumptions based upon current market and loan
production data. The primary critical assumptions used by FHN to estimate the fair value of
residual-interest certificates include prepayment speeds, credit losses and discount rates, as
discussed above. FHNs residual-interest certificates are included as a
component of trading securities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Condition, with
realized and unrealized gains and losses included in current earnings as a component of other
income on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Income. FHN does not utilize derivatives to
hedge against changes in the fair value of residual-interest certificates.
PIPELINE AND WAREHOUSE
As a result of the MetLife transaction, mortgage banking origination activity was significantly
reduced in periods after third quarter 2008 as FHN focuses on origination within its regional
banking footprint. Accordingly, the following discussion of pipeline and warehouse related
derivatives is primarily applicable to reporting periods in 2008.
During the period of loan origination and prior to the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary
market, FHN has exposure to mortgage loans that are in the mortgage pipeline and the mortgage
warehouse. The mortgage pipeline consists of loan applications that have been received, but have
not yet closed as loans. Pipeline loans are either floating or locked. A floating pipeline
loan is one on which an interest rate has not been locked by the borrower. A locked pipeline loan
is one on which the potential borrower has set the interest rate for the loan by entering into an
interest rate lock commitment. Once a mortgage loan is closed and funded, it is included within
the mortgage warehouse, or the inventory of mortgage loans that are awaiting sale and delivery
into the secondary market.
Interest rate lock commitments are derivatives pursuant to SFAS 133 and are therefore recorded at
estimates of fair value. Effective January 1, 2008, FHN applied the provisions of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings (SAB No. 109)
prospectively for derivative loan commitments issued or modified after that date. SAB No. 109
requires inclusion of expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities in the
fair value measurement of a written loan commitment. Also on January 1, 2008, FHN adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157),
which affected the valuation of interest rate lock commitments previously measured under the
guidance of EITF 02-3, Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading
Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities.
FHN adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS No. 159) on January 1, 2008. Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 159, all warehouse loans were
carried at the lower of cost or market, where carrying value was adjusted for successful hedging
under SFAS No. 133 and the comparison of carrying value to market was performed for aggregate loan
pools. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, FHN elected to prospectively account for substantially all
of its mortgage loan warehouse products at fair value upon origination and correspondingly
discontinued the application of SFAS No. 133 hedging relationships for these new originations.
The fair value of interest rate lock commitments and the fair value of warehouse loans are impacted
principally by changes in interest rates, but also by changes in borrowers credit, and changes in
profit margins required by investors for perceived risks (i.e., liquidity). FHN does not hedge
against credit and liquidity risk in the pipeline or warehouse. Third party models are used to
manage the interest rate risk.
In conjunction with the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4, FHN revised its methodology for determining the
fair value of certain loans within its mortgage warehouse. FHN now determines the fair value of
the applicable loans using a discounted cash flow model using observable inputs, including current
mortgage rates for similar products, with adjustments for differences in loan characteristics
reflected in the models discount rates. This change in methodology had a minimal effect on the
valuation of the applicable loans. For all other loans held in the warehouse (and in prior periods
for the loans converted to the discounted cash flow methodology), the fair value of loans whose
principal market is the securitization market is based on recent security trade prices for similar
product with a similar delivery date, with necessary pricing adjustments to convert the security
price to a loan price. Loans whose principal market is the whole loan market are priced based on
recent observable whole loan trade prices or published third party bid prices for similar product,
with necessary pricing adjustments to reflect differences in loan characteristics. Typical
adjustments to security prices for whole loan prices include adding the value of MSR to the
security price or to the whole loan price if the price is servicing retained, adjusting for
interest in excess of (or less than) the required coupon or note rate, adjustments to reflect
differences in the characteristics of the loans being
valued as compared to the collateral of the
security or the loan characteristics in the benchmark whole loan trade, adding interest carry,
reflecting the recourse obligation that will remain after sale, and adjusting for changes in market
liquidity or interest rates if the benchmark security or loan price is not current. Additionally,
loans that are delinquent or otherwise significantly aged are discounted to reflect the less
marketable nature of these loans.
The fair value of FHNs warehouse (first-lien mortgage loans held for sale) changes with
fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into
the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of the warehouse declines in value when interest
rates increase and rises in value when interest rates decrease. To mitigate this risk, FHN entered
into forward sales contracts and futures contracts to provide an economic hedge against those
changes in fair value on a significant portion of the warehouse. These derivatives are recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value recorded in current earnings as a component of the gain or
loss on the sale of loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.
Interest rate lock commitments generally have a term of up to 60 days before the closing of the
loan. During this period, the value of the lock changes with changes in interest rates. The
interest rate lock commitment does not bind the potential borrower to entering into the loan, nor
does it guarantee that FHN will approve the potential borrower for the loan. Therefore, when
determining fair value, FHN makes estimates of expected fallout (locked pipeline loans not
expected to close), using models, which consider cumulative historical fallout rates and other
factors. Fallout can occur for a variety of reasons including falling rate environments when a
borrower will abandon an interest rate lock commitment at one lender and enter into a new lower
interest rate lock commitment at another, when a borrower is not approved as an acceptable credit
by the lender, or for a variety of other non-economic reasons. Changes in the fair value of
interest rate lock commitments are recorded in current earnings as gain or loss on the sale of
loans in mortgage banking noninterest income.
Because interest rate lock commitments are derivatives, they do not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment under SFAS 133. However, FHN economically hedges the risk of changing interest rates by
entering into forward sales and futures contracts. The extent to which FHN is able to economically
hedge changes in the mortgage pipeline depended largely on the hedge coverage ratio that was
maintained relative to mortgage loans in the pipeline. The hedge coverage ratio could change
significantly due to changes in market interest rates and the associated forward commitment prices
for sales of mortgage loans in the secondary market. Increases or decreases in the hedge coverage
ratio could result in significant earnings volatility to FHN.
Due to the
reduced level of origination activity after the sale of national
mortgage origination offices to
MetLife, interest rate commitments are immaterial as of March 31, 2009. For the period ended March
31, 2008, the valuation model utilized to estimate the fair value of loan applications locked
recognizes the full fair value of the ultimate loan adjusted for estimated fallout and estimated
cost assumptions a market participant would use to convert the lock into a loan. The fair value of
interest rate lock commitments as of March 31, 2008 was $7.8 million.
FORECLOSURE RESERVES
As discussed above, FHN originated mortgage loans with the intent to sell those loans to GSE and
other private investors in the secondary market. Certain of the mortgage loans were sold with
limited or full recourse in the event of foreclosure. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, the outstanding
principal balance of mortgage loans sold with limited recourse arrangements where some portion of
the principal is at risk and serviced by FHN was $3.4 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively.
Additionally, on March 31, 2009 and 2008, $1.5 billion and $5.7 billion, respectively, of mortgage
loans were outstanding which were sold under limited recourse arrangements where the risk is
limited to interest and servicing advances. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, $76.9 million and $99.0
million, respectively, of mortgage loans were outstanding which were serviced under full recourse
arrangements.
Loans sold with limited recourse include loans sold under government guaranteed mortgage loan
programs including the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Veterans Administration (VA). FHN
continues to absorb losses due to uncollected interest and foreclosure costs and/or limited risk of
credit losses in the event of foreclosure of the mortgage loan sold. Generally, the amount of
recourse liability in the event of foreclosure is determined based upon the respective government
program and/or the sale or disposal of the foreclosed property collateralizing the mortgage loan.
Another instance of limited recourse is the VA/No bid. In this case, the VA
guarantee is limited and FHN may be required to fund any deficiency in excess of the VA guarantee
if the loan goes to foreclosure.
Loans sold with full recourse generally include mortgage loans sold to investors in the secondary
market which are uninsurable under government guaranteed mortgage loan programs, due to issues
associated with underwriting activities, documentation, or other concerns.
Management closely monitors historical experience, borrower payment activity, current economic
trends and other risk factors, and establishes a reserve for foreclosure losses for loans sold with
limited recourse, loans serviced with full recourse, and loans sold with general representations
and warranties, including early payment defaults. Management believes the foreclosure reserve is
sufficient to cover incurred foreclosure losses relating to loans being serviced as well as loans
sold where the servicing was not retained. The reserve for foreclosure losses is based upon a
historical progression model using a rolling 12-month average, which predicts the probability or
frequency of a mortgage loan entering foreclosure. In addition, other factors are considered,
including qualitative and quantitative factors (e.g., current economic conditions, past collection
experience, risk characteristics of the current portfolio and other factors), which are not defined
by historical loss trends or severity of losses. On March 31, 2009 and 2008, the foreclosure
reserve was $37.8 million and $20.6 million, respectively. Table 10 provides a summary of reserves
for foreclosure losses for the periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The servicing portfolio has
decreased from $106.8 billion on March 31, 2008, to approximately $64 billion on March 31, 2009 as
FHN has reduced its servicing portfolio through sales through the end of 2008, while the
foreclosure reserve has experienced increases primarily due to increases in both frequency and
severity of projected losses.
Table 10 Reserves for Foreclosure Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
36,956 |
|
|
$ |
16,160 |
|
Provision for foreclosure losses |
|
|
8,886 |
|
|
|
6,681 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(8,154 |
) |
|
|
(2,510 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
37,836 |
|
|
$ |
20,614 |
|
|
GOODWILL AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPAIRMENT
FHNs policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or
between annual assessments if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than
not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Impairment is the
condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
Accounting standards require management to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit in making
the assessment of impairment at least annually. As of October 1, 2008, FHN engaged an independent
valuation firm to assist in the computation of the fair value estimates of each reporting unit as
part of its annual impairment assessment. The valuation utilized three separate methodologies and
applied a weighted average to each in order to determine fair value for each reporting unit. The
valuation as of October 1, 2008 indicated no goodwill impairment in any of the reporting units.
Based on further analysis and events subsequent to the measurement date of October 1, 2008, no
additional goodwill impairment was indicated as of December 31, 2008 or March 31, 2009.
Management believes the accounting estimates associated with determining fair value as part of the
goodwill impairment test is a critical accounting estimate because estimates and assumptions are
made about FHNs future performance and cash flows, as well as other prevailing market factors
(interest rates, economic trends, etc.). FHNs policy allows management to make the determination
of fair value using appropriate valuation methodologies and inputs, including utilization of market
observable data and internal cash flow models. Independent third parties
may be engaging to assist in the valuation process. If a charge to operations for impairment
results, this amount would be reported separately as a component of noninterest expense. This
critical accounting estimate applies to the Regional Banking and Capital Markets business segments.
The National Specialty Lending, Mortgage Banking, and Corporate segments have no associated
goodwill. Reporting units have been defined as the same level as the operating business segments.
The impairment testing process conducted by FHN begins by assigning net assets and goodwill to each
reporting unit. FHN then completes step one of the impairment test by comparing the fair value
of each reporting unit (as determined based on the discussion below) with the recorded book value
(or carrying amount) of its net assets, with goodwill included in the computation of the carrying
amount. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of that
reporting unit is not considered impaired, and step two of the impairment test is not necessary.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, step two of the impairment test
is performed to determine the amount of impairment. Step two of the impairment test compares the
carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill to the implied fair value of that goodwill. The
implied fair value of goodwill is computed by assuming all assets and liabilities of the reporting
unit would be adjusted to the current fair value, with the offset as an adjustment to goodwill.
This adjusted goodwill balance is the implied fair value used in step two. An impairment charge is
recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.
In connection with obtaining the independent valuation, management provided certain data and
information that was utilized in the estimation of fair value. This information included
budgeted and forecasted earnings of FHN at the reporting unit level. Management believes that
this information is a critical assumption underlying the estimate of fair value. Other
assumptions critical to the process were also made, including discount rates, asset and liability
growth rates, and other income and expense estimates.
While management uses the best information available to estimate future performance for each
reporting unit, future adjustments to managements projections may be necessary if conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the estimates.
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
A liability is contingent if the amount or outcome is not presently known, but may become known in
the future as a result of the occurrence of some uncertain future event. FHN estimates its
contingent liabilities based on managements estimates about the probability of outcomes and their
ability to estimate the range of exposure. Accounting standards require that a liability be
recorded if management determines that it is probable that a loss has occurred and the loss can be
reasonably estimated. In addition, it must be probable that the loss will be confirmed by some
future event. As part of the estimation process, management is required to make assumptions about
matters that are by their nature highly uncertain.
The assessment of contingent liabilities, including legal contingencies and income tax liabilities,
involves the use of critical estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Managements estimates are
based on their belief that future events will validate the current assumptions regarding the
ultimate outcome of these exposures. However, there can be no assurance that future events, such
as court decisions or I.R.S. positions, will not differ from managements assessments. Whenever
practicable, management consults with third party experts (attorneys, accountants, claims
administrators, etc.) to assist with the gathering and evaluation of information related to
contingent liabilities. Based on internally and/or externally prepared evaluations, management
makes a determination whether the potential exposure requires accrual in the financial statements.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1). FSP FAS 107-1 amends Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(SFAS No. 107) to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 requires that disclosures be included in both interim and
annual financial statements of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair
value of financial instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with comparative disclosures required only for periods ending subsequent to initial adoption. FHN
is currently assessing the effects of adopting FSP FAS 107-1.
In December 2008, FASB Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1), was issued. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 provides
detailed disclosure requirements to enhance the disclosures about an employers plan assets
currently required by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 132(R), Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS No. 132(R)). FSP FAS 132(R)-1
is effective prospectively for annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. FHN is currently
assessing the effects of adopting FSP FAS 132(R)-1.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The information called for by this item is contained in (a) Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as Item 2 of Part I of this report at pages
59-90, (b) the section entitled Risk Management Interest Rate Risk Management of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition section of
FHNs 2008 Annual Report to shareholders, and (c) the Interest Rate Risk Management subsection of
Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in FHNs 2008 Annual Report to
shareholders.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. FHNs management, with the participation
of FHNs chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness
of the design and operation of FHNs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that FHNs disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material
information relating to FHN and FHNs consolidated subsidiaries is made known to such officers
by others within these entities, particularly during the period this quarterly report was
prepared, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in
FHNs internal control over financial reporting during FHNs last fiscal quarter that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, FHNs internal control
over financial reporting. |
Item 4(T). Controls and Procedures
Not applicable
Part II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Items 1, 1A, 3, 4, and 5
As of the end of the first quarter 2009, the answers to Items 1, 1A, 3, 4, and 5 were either
inapplicable or negative, and therefore these items are omitted.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
(a) |
|
None |
|
|
(b) |
|
Not applicable |
|
|
(c) |
|
The Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities Table is incorporated herein by reference to
the table included in Item 2 of
Part I First Horizon National Corporation Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations at page 74. |
Item 6 Exhibits
(a) Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Charter of First Horizon National Corporation, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed April
24, 2009. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of First Horizon National Corporation, as amended and restated April 20,
2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporations Current
Report on Form 8-K filed April 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
4
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.* |
|
|
|
10.4(f)**
|
|
Form of Performance Stock Units Notice of Grant [2009]. |
|
|
|
10.5(k)**
|
|
Sections of Director Policy pertaining to compensation, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed April
24, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.5(o)**
|
|
Form of Executive Restricted Stock Notice of Grant [2009]. |
|
|
|
10.5(p)**
|
|
Form of Executive Special Restricted Stock Notice of Grant [2009]. |
|
|
|
10.5(q)**
|
|
Form of Bonus Restricted Stock Notice of Grant (associated with bonuses under
Capital Markets Incentive Compensation Plan) [2009]. |
|
|
|
13
|
|
The Risk Management-Interest Rate Risk Management subsection of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis section and the Interest Rate Risk Management
subsection of Note 26 to the Corporations consolidated financial statements,
contained, respectively, at pages 29-32 and pages 140-141 in the Corporations 2008
Annual Report to shareholders furnished to shareholders in connection with the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders on April 21, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be
filed with the Commission with this report. |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
* |
|
The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of the instruments, including indentures,
defining the rights of the holders of the long-term debt of the Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
|
** |
|
This is a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit. |
In many agreements filed as exhibits, each party makes representations and warranties to other
parties. Those representations and warranties are made only to and for the benefit of those other
parties in the context of a business contract. Exceptions to such representations and warranties
may be partially or fully waived by such parties, or not enforced by such parties, in their
discretion. No such representation or warranty may be relied upon by any other person for any
purpose.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION |
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
DATE: May 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ William C. Losch III
|
|
|
Name: |
William C. Losch III |
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice
President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer
and Principal Financial
Officer) |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Charter of First Horizon National Corporation, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed April
24, 2009. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of First Horizon National Corporation, as amended and restated April 20,
2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporations Current
Report on Form 8-K filed April 24, 2009. |
|
|
|
4
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures.* |
|
|
|
10.4(f)**
|
|
Form of Performance Stock Units Notice of Grant [2009]. |
|
|
|
10.5(k)**
|
|
Sections of Director Policy pertaining to compensation, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed April
24, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.5(o)**
|
|
Form of Executive Restricted Stock Notice of Grant [2009]. |
|
|
|
10.5(p)**
|
|
Form of Executive Special Restricted Stock Notice of Grant [2009]. |
|
|
|
10.5(q)**
|
|
Form of Bonus Restricted Stock Notice of Grant (associated with bonuses under
Capital Markets Incentive Compensation Plan) [2009]. |
|
|
|
13
|
|
The Risk Management-Interest Rate Risk Management subsection of the
Managements Discussion and Analysis section and the Interest Rate Risk Management
subsection of Note 26 to the Corporations consolidated financial statements,
contained, respectively, at pages 29-32 and pages 140-141 in the Corporations 2008
Annual Report to shareholders furnished to shareholders in connection with the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders on April 21, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
Portions of the Annual Report not incorporated herein by reference are deemed not to be
filed with the Commission with this report. |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CEO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
18 USC 1350 Certifications of CFO (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) |
|
|
|
* |
|
The Corporation agrees to furnish copies of the instruments, including indentures,
defining the rights of the holders of the long-term debt of the Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
|
** |
|
This is a management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit. |
In many agreements filed as exhibits, each party makes representations and warranties to other
parties. Those representations and warranties are made only to and for the benefit of those other
parties in the context of a business contract. Exceptions to such representations and warranties
may be partially or fully waived by such parties, or not enforced by such parties, in their
discretion. No such representation or warranty may be relied upon by any other person for any
purpose.