David A. Hearth, Esq. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 (415) 856-7000 |
John A. MacKinnon, Esq. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10019 (212) 839-5300 |
Proposed Maximum | Proposed Maximum | Amount of | ||||||
Title of Securities | Amount Being | Offering Price | Aggregate | Registration | ||||
Being Registered | Registered | Per Unit(1) | Offering Price(1) | Fee(2) | ||||
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
40,000 | $25.00 | $1,000,000 | $117.70 | ||||
(1) | Estimated pursuant to Rule 457 solely for the purpose of determining the registration fee. |
(2) | Previously paid. |
Facing Sheet | |
Contents of the Registration Statement | |
Part A Prospectus of the Registrant | |
Part B Statement of Additional Information of the Registrant | |
Part C Other Information | |
Signature Page | |
Exhibits |
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Per Share | Total(3) | |||||
Public Offering Price
|
$ | $ | ||||
Sales Load (1)
|
$ | $ | ||||
Proceeds, Before Expenses, To Us (2)
|
$ | $ |
(1) | The aggregate compensation to the underwriters will be $ , which will consist solely of the sales load. |
(2) | We estimate that we will incur approximately $ in expenses in connection with this offering. |
(3) | The underwriters also may purchase up to an additional shares at the public offering price, less the sales load, within 45 days from the date of this prospectus to cover over-allotments. If all such shares are purchased, the total public offering price will be $ , the total sales load will be $ and the total proceeds, before expenses, to us will be $ . |
Page | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
51 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
61 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
65 | ||||||||
68 | ||||||||
70 | ||||||||
73 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
76 | ||||||||
76 | ||||||||
76 | ||||||||
77 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 99.N |
i
Adjusted | ||||||||
Net Asset | Net Asset | |||||||
Valuation Date | Value | Value(2) | ||||||
September 28, 2004(1)
|
$ | 23.70 | $ | 23.70 | ||||
October 31, 2004
|
23.73 | 23.73 | ||||||
November 30, 2004
|
23.91 | 23.91 | ||||||
December 31, 2004
|
24.25 | 24.25 | ||||||
January 31, 2005
|
25.03 | 25.28 | ||||||
February 28, 2005
|
25.27 | 25.52 | ||||||
March 31, 2005
|
24.90 | 25.15 | ||||||
April 30, 2005
|
24.92 | 25.58 | ||||||
May 31, 2005
|
25.19 | 25.85 | ||||||
June 30, 2005
|
26.01 | 26.67 | ||||||
July 31, 2005
|
26.86 | 27.94 | ||||||
August 31, 2005
|
26.63 | 27.71 |
1
(1) | The initial public offering price of our common stock was $25.00 per share. After the deduction of offering expenses and underwriting discounts, our beginning per share net asset value was $23.70. |
(2) | Adjusted net asset value equals our net asset value plus cumulative dividends paid. |
2
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Acquisition | at | Value Per | Percent of | Month Freely | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Security | Units | Date | Cost | 8/31/2005 | Unit | Total Assets | Tradable(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Investments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clearwater Natural Resources, LP(2)(3)
|
2,650,000 | 08/01/05 | $ | 53.0 | $ | 53.0 | $ | 20.00 | 4.0 | % | NA(3) | |||||||||||||||||
Copano Energy, L.L.C. Class B Units(2)
|
1,656,248 | 08/01/05 | 46.5 | 62.9 | 37.98 | 4.7 | March 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Copano Energy, L.L.C. Common Units(2)
|
470,557 | 08/01/05 | 13.5 | 18.3 | 38.80 | 1.4 | March 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P.(2)
|
1,046,787 | 06/24/05 | 35.0 | 40.6 | 38.75 | 3.0 | February 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.(2)
|
32,100 | 07/08/05 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 40.12 | 0.1 | January 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
3,478,261 | 04/13/05 | 100.0 | 110.4 | 31.73 | 8.3 | February 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 249.3 | $ | 286.4 | 21.4 | % |
3
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Acquisition | at | Value Per | Percent of | Month Freely | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Security | Units | Date | Cost | 8/31/2005 | Unit | Total Assets | Tradable(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Investments Now Freely Tradable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
|
1,503,900 | 02/11/05 | $ | 75.0 | $ | 81.1 | $ | 53.94 | 6.1 | % | May 2005 | |||||||||||||||||
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|
4,444,444 | 01/26/05 | 120.0 | 164.4 | 36.99 | 12.3 | April 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
4,427,878 | 12/29/04 | 101.1 | 107.5 | 24.28 | 8.0 | April 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
1,203,600 | 04/01/05 | 30.0 | 29.2 | 24.28 | 2.2 | June 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
|
2,098,623 | 11/09/04 | 40.1 | 46.0 | 21.92 | 3.4 | February 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Inergy, L.P.
|
2,946,955 | 12/17/04 | 75.0 | 87.7 | 29.77 | 6.6 | August 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan Management LLC
|
1,300,000 | 11/04/04 | 52.6 | 64.0 | (4) | 47.58 | 4.7 | February 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 493.8 | $ | 580.0 | 43.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investments in Restricted Securities
|
$ | 743.1 | $ | 866.3 | 64.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Anticipated month in which our investment becomes or became freely tradable. |
(2) | Units purchased are not yet registered for resale. |
(3) | Clearwater Natural Resources, LP is a privately-held company. |
(4) | Includes value attributable to paid-in-kind distributions. |
| MLPs provide steady distributions with attractive growth profiles. During the period from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2004, publicly-traded energy-related master limited partnerships provided an average annual yield of 8.5%. Additionally, during that same time period, distributions from these master limited partnerships increased at a compounded average annual rate of 6.6%. Currently, these master limited partnerships provide a 6.0% average yield. This information is for the energy-related master limited partnerships that were traded publicly as of August 31, 2005 (36 partnerships), and is derived by us from financial industry databases and public filings. We believe that current market conditions are conducive for continued growth in distributions. However, there can be no assurance that these levels will be maintained in the future. | |
| MLPs operate strategically important assets that typically generate stable cash flows. MLPs operate in businesses that are necessary for providing consumers with access to energy resources. We believe that due to the fee-based nature and long-term importance of their midstream energy assets, MLPs typically generate stable cash flows throughout economic cycles. Additionally, certain businesses operated by MLPs are regulated by federal and state authorities that ensure that rates charged are fair and just. In most cases, such regulation provides for highly predictable cash flows. | |
| The midstream energy sector has high barriers to entry. Due to the high cost of constructing midstream energy assets and the difficulty of developing the expertise necessary to comply with the regulations governing the operation of such assets, the barriers to enter the midstream energy sector |
4
are high. Therefore, currently existing MLPs with large asset bases and significant operations enjoy a competitive advantage over other entities seeking to enter the sector. | ||
| Due to a lack of broad institutional following and limited retail focus, the MLP market experiences inefficiencies which can be exploited by a knowledgeable investor. Historically, there have been potential adverse consequences of MLP ownership for many institutional investors, including registered investment companies. Further, because MLPs generate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI), typically they are not held by tax-exempt investors such as pension plans, endowments, employee benefit plans, or individual retirement accounts. Also, income and gains from MLPs are subject to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA), limiting the investment by non-U.S. investors in the sector. As a result, MLPs are held predominantly by taxable U.S. retail investors. Further, due to the limited public market float for MLP common units and tax-reporting burdens and complexities associated with MLP investments, MLPs appeal only to a segment of such retail investors. Due to this limited, retail-oriented focus, the market for MLPs can experience inefficiencies which can be exploited by a knowledgeable investor. |
| MLPs are well-positioned to capitalize on the ongoing divestitures of midstream energy assets. As major oil and gas companies continue to focus on international opportunities and core exploration and production activities, such companies continue to sell many of their North American midstream energy assets. Additionally, certain utilities and energy merchants are selling their midstream energy assets, in part to improve their credit profiles. MLPs, as tax pass-through entities, have cost of capital advantages over corporate purchasers. As a result, MLPs have been active acquirors of midstream energy assets over the last several years. We believe this large pool of midstream energy assets should provide MLPs with significant acquisition opportunities to augment their internal growth prospects. | |
| Many MLPs have significant available capacity which allows them to benefit disproportionately from a growing economy. As the overall economy expands, energy demand increases and in certain cases, rates for assets owned by MLPs increase. Many of the MLPs in which we intend to invest have significant additional available operating capacity. As a result, these MLPs benefit from significant economies of scale and can expand production at relatively low cost levels. Small increases in energy demand can result in significant growth in the distributable cash flows for such MLPs. We believe this internal growth is an important component of MLPs ability to increase distributions. |
Substantial MLP Market Knowledge and Industry Relationships. Through its activities as a leading investor in MLP securities, Kayne Anderson has developed broad expertise and important relationships with industry managers in the MLP sector. We believe that Kayne Andersons industry knowledge and relationships will enable us to capitalize on opportunities to source investments in MLPs that may not be readily available to other investors. Such investment opportunities include purchasing larger blocks of limited partner interests, often at discounts to market prices, non-controlling general partner interests and positions in companies expected to form an MLP. We believe that Kayne Andersons substantial MLP |
5
market knowledge provides it with the ability to recognize long-term trends in the industry and to identify differences in value among individual MLPs, which abilities benefit our portfolio of public investments in MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. | |
Extensive Transaction Structuring Expertise and Capability. Kayne Anderson has industry-leading experience identifying and structuring investments in MLP securities. This experience, combined with Kayne Andersons ability to engage in regular dialogue with industry participants and other large holders of MLP securities to better understand the capital needs of prospective portfolio companies, give it an advantage in structuring transactions mutually attractive to us and the portfolio company. Further, our ability to fund a meaningful amount of the capital needs of prospective portfolio companies provides us an advantage over other potential investors with less capital to employ in the sector. These investments may include purchases of subordinated units, restricted common units or general partner interests. | |
Ability to Trade Efficiently in a Relatively Illiquid Market. We believe that Kayne Andersons ability to generate favorable returns on public investments in MLPs is aided by its substantial experience actively trading MLPs and similar securities. Through its affiliated broker-dealer, Kayne Anderson maintains its own trading desk, providing it with the ability to understand day-to-day market conditions for MLP securities, which have historically been characterized by lower daily trading volumes than comparable corporate equities. We believe that Kayne Andersons direct equity market access enables it to make better informed investment decisions and to execute its investment strategy with greater efficiency. |
| We provide, through a single investment vehicle, an investment in a portfolio of securities issued by MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. | |
| Under normal market conditions, we intend to invest up to 50% (but not more than 60%) of our total assets in unregistered or otherwise restricted securities of MLPs. We believe that we can make such purchases of securities at discounts or with other beneficial terms. Such investment opportunities are typically only available to a limited number of knowledgeable investors with a large amount of capital available for investment in any particular security or issuer. | |
| Our common stockholders will receive a single tax reporting statement (on Form 1099) and will only be required to file income tax returns in states in which they would ordinarily file. In contrast, a person who invests directly in MLPs receives a statement of partnership items (on Schedule K-1) from each MLP owned and may be required to file income tax returns in each state in which such MLPs generate income. | |
| Our common stock dividends are treated as qualifying income for each of our common stockholders that is an investment company (including mutual funds) that have elected to be taxed as regulated investment companies. Subject to certain holding period requirements, corporate investors in our common stock generally will be entitled to dividends-received deduction treatment on our dividends. | |
| Our common stock dividends will be excluded from treatment as UBTI (except for those stockholders who debt-finance the purchase of our common stock). Accordingly, tax-exempt investors, including pension plans, employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts, will not have UBTI upon receipt of dividends from us, whereas a tax-exempt limited partners allocable share of income of an MLP is generally treated as UBTI. |
6
7
Common stock offered by us | shares, excluding shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. | |
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering | shares, excluding shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. | |
Use of proceeds | The net proceeds of this offering will be approximately $ ($ if the underwriters exercise the over-allotment option in full) after payment of the estimated offering expenses and the deduction of the underwriting discount. We will invest the net proceeds of the offering in accordance with our investment objective and policies. | |
Dividends | We paid dividends to our common stockholders on January 14, 2005, April 15, 2005 and July 15, 2005 in the amounts of $0.25, $0.41 and $0.415 per share, respectively. We intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends to our common stockholders, funded in part by our distributable cash flow. On September 13, 2005, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share payable on October 14, 2005. Our cash and other income from investments is the amount received by us as cash or paid-in-kind distributions from MLPs or other Midstream Energy Companies, interest payments received on debt securities owned by us and other payments on securities owned by us, less current or anticipated operating expenses, current (but not deferred) taxes on our taxable income, and our leverage costs. | |
Because the cash distributions received from the MLPs in our portfolio are expected to exceed the earnings and profits associated with owning such MLPs, we expect that a significant portion of our future dividends will be treated as a return of capital to stockholders for tax purposes. | ||
There is no assurance we will continue to pay regular dividends or that we will do so at a particular rate. Our quarterly dividends will be authorized by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. See Dividends at page 39. | ||
Taxation | We have not, and we will not, elect to be treated as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, we will pay federal and applicable state corporate taxes on our taxable income. The types of MLPs in which we invest historically have made cash distributions to limited partners that exceed the amount of taxable income allocable to limited partners, due to a variety of factors, including significant non-cash deductions, such as depreciation. If the cash distributions exceed the taxable income reported in a particular tax year, such excess cash distributions would not be taxed as income to us in that tax year but rather would be treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes to the extent of our basis in our MLP units. See Tax Matters at page 70. |
8
Stockholder tax features | We have paid, and we expect to continue to pay cash distributions to our common stockholders in excess of our taxable income per share. If we distribute cash from current and accumulated earnings and profits as computed for federal income tax purposes, such distributions will generally be taxable to stockholders in the current period as dividend income for federal income tax purposes. Subject to certain holding period requirements, such dividend income generally will qualify for treatment as qualified dividend income eligible for taxation at reduced rates under current law. If our distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits as computed for federal income tax purposes, such excess distributions will constitute a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of a common stockholders basis in our common stock and will result in a reduction of such basis. To the extent such excess exceeds a common stockholders basis in our common stock, such excess will be taxed as capital gain. We expect that a significant portion of our future distributions will be treated as a return of capital to stockholders for tax purposes. Upon the sale of common stock, a common stockholder generally will recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale proceeds received by our common stockholder and our common stockholders federal income tax basis in our common stock sold, as adjusted to reflect return of capital. See Tax Matters at page 70. | |
Risk considerations | An investment in our common stock involves substantial risks, including the risks summarized below. | |
Under normal conditions, we intend to invest at least 85% of our assets in the MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies, which are subject to certain additional risks, such as supply and demand risk, interest rate risk, depletion and exploration risk, commodity pricing risk, acquisition risk, and the risk associated with the hazards inherent in midstream energy industry activities. In addition, the cash flow we receive from our investments is dependent on the amount of cash that each MLP in our portfolio has available for distributions and the tax character of such distributions, which are largely dependent on factors affecting the MLPs operations and factors affecting the energy industry in general. | ||
Although we intend to invest the proceeds of this offering in accordance with our investment objective as soon as practicable, such investments may be delayed if suitable investments are unavailable at the time or if we are unable to secure firm commitments for direct placements. | ||
Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a discount to their net asset value; accordingly, our common stock may trade at a price that is less than the offering price or at a discount from our net asset value. | ||
Certain of the publicly-traded securities in our portfolio, particularly those with smaller capitalizations, may trade less frequently than other common stocks. Securities with limited trading volumes may display volatile or erratic price movements, and it may be more difficult for us to buy and sell significant amounts of such |
9
securities without an unfavorable impact on prevailing market prices. Also, restricted securities in our portfolio may be more difficult to value and we may have difficulty disposing of such assets either in a timely manner or for a reasonable price. | ||
Market prices may not be readily available for some or all of the restricted or unregistered securities in our portfolio. The difficulty in valuing these securities and the absence of an active trading market for these investments may adversely affect our ability to determine our net asset value. Also, we may not be able to realize these securities true value or may have to delay their sale in order to do so. | ||
Because we select our public investments from a small pool of publicly traded MLPs, a change in the value of the securities of any one of these MLPs could have a significant impact on our portfolio. In addition, we are a non-diversified investment company and we are not subject to any regulatory requirements under the 1940 Act or the Internal Revenue Code on the minimum number or size of securities we hold. As of August 31, 2005, we held investments in 38 issuers. | ||
Interest rate risk is the risk that equity and debt securities will decline in value because of changes in market interest rates. Our portfolio investments may be susceptible in the short-term to fluctuations in interest rates. The prices of MLP securities, and thus our net asset value and the market price of our common stock, may decline when interest rates rise. | ||
We are dependent upon Kayne Andersons key personnel for our future success and upon their access to certain individuals and investments in the midstream energy industry. In addition, conflicts of interest may arise because Kayne Anderson and its affiliates generally carry on substantial investment activities for other clients, in which we will have no interest. | ||
Our Charter, Bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law include provisions that could limit the ability of other entities or persons to acquire control of us, to convert us to open-end status, or to change the composition of our Board of Directors. These provisions could have the effect of discouraging, delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. | ||
See Risk Factors beginning on page 25 and the other information included in this prospectus for information on these and other risk factors, all of which you should carefully consider before deciding whether to invest in our common stock. |
10
Tax risks | In addition to other risk considerations, an investment in our common stock will involve certain tax risks, including the following: the risk that an MLP is classified as a corporation rather than a partnership for federal income tax purposes, which may reduce our after-tax return and negatively affect the value of our common stock; the risk of changes in tax laws or regulations, or interpretations thereof, which could adversely affect us or the MLPs in which we invest; the risk of increased current tax liability to us due to the fluctuation in the percentage of an MLPs income and gains which is offset by tax deductions and losses; the risk that upon our sale of an MLP security, we will be liable for previously deferred taxes; and the risk of a reduction in the percentage of a distribution offset by tax deductions or an increase in our portfolio turnover, which will reduce that portion of our common stock dividend treated as a tax-deferred return of capital and increase that portion treated as dividend income, resulting in lower after-tax dividends to our common stockholders. | |
See Risk Factors Tax Risks at page 28 for more information on these risks. | ||
Dividend reinvestment plan | We have a dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. This is an opt out dividend reinvestment plan. As a result, if we declare a dividend, then our common stockholders cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they specifically elect to receive cash dividends. Common stockholders who receive dividends in the form of stock will be subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as common stockholders who elect to receive their dividends in cash. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan at page 40. | |
New York Stock Exchange symbol | KYN | |
Trading at a discount | Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a discount to their net asset value. The possibility that our common stock may trade at a discount to our net asset value is separate and distinct from the risk that our common stocks net asset value may decline. We cannot predict whether our common stock will trade above, at or below its net asset value. | |
Management arrangements | Kayne Anderson serves as our investment adviser and provides certain administrative services to us. See Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company About Kayne Anderson at page 41 and Management Investment Management Agreement at page 58. | |
Service providers | American Stock Transfer & Trust Company is our transfer agent and dividend paying agent. See Transfer Agent and Dividend-Paying Agent on page 76. The Custodial Trust Company is custodian of our securities and other assets. Bear Stearns Funds Management Inc. provides certain administrative services to us. Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC is our fund accountant. See Administrator, Custodian and Fund Accountant on page 76. |
11
12
Stockholder Transaction Expenses:
|
||
Sales Load Paid by You (as a percentage of offering price)
|
[ ]% | |
Offering Expenses Borne by Us (as a percentage of offering
price)(1)
|
[ ]% | |
Dividend Reinvestment Plan Fees
|
None(2) |
Annual Expenses:
|
|||
Management Fees(3)
|
2.73% | ||
Leverage Costs(4)(7)
|
1.83% | ||
Other Expenses (exclusive of current and deferred income tax
expenses)
|
0.35% | ||
Annual Expenses (exclusive of current and deferred income tax
expenses)
|
4.92% | ||
Current Income Tax Expense(5)
|
0.11% | ||
Deferred Income Tax Expense(6)
|
3.84% | ||
Total Annual Expenses (including current and deferred income tax
expenses)
|
8.87% |
(1) | We may choose to offer additional Senior Notes or ARP Shares subsequent to this offering of common stock. Offering costs of the ARP Shares are expensed in the year of issuance. Offering costs of the Senior Notes are capitalized and amortized over the life of the Senior Notes (currently, 40 years). If we offer additional ARP Shares, the costs of that offering, estimated to be approximately 1.0% of the total dollar amount of such offering (including the sales load paid to the underwriters in connection with such offering), will be borne immediately by holders of common stock and result in a reduction of net asset value of the common stock. Assuming the issuance of ARP Shares in an amount that will increase our total outstanding leverage to 30% of our capital (after their issuance) these offering costs (including the sales load paid to the underwriters in connection with such offering) are estimated to be approximately $1.6 million, or $0.04 per share of common stock. These offering costs are not included among the expenses shown in the Annual Expense table. |
(2) | You will pay brokerage charges if you direct American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as agent for our common stockholders, to sell your common stock held in a dividend reinvestment account. |
(3) | Represents the basic fee payable to Kayne Anderson (i.e., 1.75%). The Management Fees as a percentage of average net assets attributable to our common stock may be as low as 1.17% or as high as 4.30%, based on our relative investment performance. See Management Investment Management Agreement at page 58. |
(4) | Leverage Costs in the table reflect the offering expense borne by us in connection with issuance of leverage, as well as the weighted average cost to us of the Senior Notes and ARP Shares, expressed as a percentage of our net assets, based on interest rates and dividend rates in effect as of August 31, 2005, which rates were as follows: Senior Notes Series A, 3.53%; Senior Notes Series B, 3.52%; Senior Notes Series C, 3.53%; and ARP Shares, 3.60%. Because interest payment obligations on the Senior Notes and dividend payment obligations on the ARP Shares have been hedged in part by interest rate swap agreements, and the interest payable under the swap agreements currently exceeds the interest payment obligations on the Senior Notes and the dividend payment obligations on the ARP Shares, the estimated Leverage Costs are adjusted for the rates expected to be payable under the interest rate swap agreements. |
13
(5) | We pay current income taxes based on our net investment income/(loss) and our realized gains. As this expense is based on the amount of realized gains in the portfolio, which cannot be accurately forecast for the remainder of the fiscal year, the current tax expense in the table above is calculated based on actual income taxes paid as of May 31, 2005. If this expense is annualized, based on the six months ended May 31, 2005, the current tax expense would be 0.23%. |
(6) | We accrue deferred taxes on our unrealized gains. For the most recent fiscal year, which began September 28, 2004 and ended November 30, 2004, our net increase in unrealized gains (before taxes) was $9.5 million and we accrued $3.8 million in deferred taxes on our unrealized gains and deferred tax benefit from organizational expenses. For the six months ended May 31, 2005, our net increase in unrealized gains (before taxes) was $104.7 million and we accrued $40.2 million in deferred taxes on our unrealized gains (also includes the tax impact of amortization of capitalized organizational expenses). As this expense is based on the amount of unrealized gains in the portfolio, which cannot be accurately forecast for the remainder of the fiscal year, the deferred tax expense in the table above is calculated based on actual gains for the six months ended May 31, 2005, assuming a total income tax rate of 38.5%. If this expense is annualized, based on the six months ended May 31, 2005, the deferred tax expense would be 7.68%. |
(7) | The table presented in this footnote estimates what our annual expenses would be, stated as percentages of our net assets attributable to our common stock but, unlike the table above, assumes that we do not add any additional leverage to the amount currently outstanding. In accordance with these assumptions, our expenses would be estimated as follows: |
Annual Expenses:
|
|||
Management Fees(1)
|
2.47% | ||
Leverage Costs(2)
|
1.31% | ||
Other Expenses (exclusive of current and deferred income tax
expenses)
|
0.31% | ||
Annual Expenses (exclusive of current and deferred income tax
expenses)
|
4.09% | ||
Current Income Tax Expense(3)
|
0.11% | ||
Deferred Income Tax Expense(4)
|
3.84% | ||
Total Annual Expenses (including current and deferred income tax
expenses)
|
8.05% |
|
(1) | Represents the basic fee payable to Kayne Anderson (i.e., 1.75%). The Management Fees as a percentage of average net assets attributable to our common stock may be as low as 1.06% or as high as 3.89% at August 31, 2005 leverage levels, based on our relative investment performance. See Management Investment Management Agreement at page 58. | |
(2) | Leverage Costs in the table reflect the offering expense borne by us in connection with issuance of leverage, as well as the weighted average cost to us of the Senior Notes and ARP Shares, expressed as a percentage of our net assets, based on interest rates and dividend rates in effect as of August 31, 2005, which rates were as follows: Senior Notes Series A, 3.53%; Senior Notes Series B, 3.52%; Senior Notes Series C, 3.53%; and ARP Shares, 3.60%. Because interest payment obligations on the Senior Notes and dividend payment obligations on the ARP Shares have been hedged in part by interest rate swap agreements, and the interest payable under the swap agreements currently exceeds the interest payment obligations on the Senior Notes and the dividend payment obligations on the ARP Shares, the estimated Leverage Costs are adjusted for the rates expected to be payable under the interest rate swap agreements. Offering costs of the ARP Shares are expensed in the year of their issuance. Offering costs of the Senior Notes are capitalized and amortized over the life of the Senior Notes (currently, 40 years). | |
14
(3) | We pay current income taxes based on our net investment income/(loss) and our realized gains. As this expense is based on the amount of realized gains in the portfolio, which cannot be accurately forecast for the remainder of the fiscal year, the current tax expense in the table above is calculated based on actual income taxes paid as of May 31, 2005. If this expense is annualized, based on the six months ended May 31, 2005, the current tax expense would be 0.23%. | |
(4) | We accrue deferred taxes on our unrealized gains. For the most recent fiscal year, which began September 28, 2004 and ended November 30, 2004, our net increase in unrealized gains (before taxes) was $9.5 million and we accrued $3.8 million in deferred taxes on our unrealized gains and deferred tax benefit from organizational expenses. For the six months ended May 31, 2005, our net increase in unrealized gains (before taxes) was $104.7 million and we accrued $40.2 million in deferred taxes on our unrealized gains (also includes the tax impact of amortization of capitalized organizational expenses). As this expense is based on the amount of unrealized gains in the portfolio, which cannot be accurately forecast for the remainder of the fiscal year, the deferred tax expense in the table above is calculated based on actual gains for the six months ended May 31, 2005, assuming a total income tax rate of 38.5%. If this expense is annualized, based on the six months ended May 31, 2005, the deferred tax expense would be 7.68%. | |
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | |||||
Before
tax(1)
|
$[ ] | $[ ] | $[ ] | $[ ] | ||||
After
tax(1)(2)
|
$[ ] | $[ ] | $[ ] | $[ ] |
|
(1) | Expenses include basic Management Fee payable to Kayne Anderson (i.e., 1.75%). The Management Fee as a percentage of average net assets attributable to our common stock may be as low as 1.17% or as high as 4.30%, based on our relative investment performance. | |
(2) | Taxes calculated based on an assumed 5% annual increase in net assets. | |
15
For the Six | For the Period | |||||||||
Months Ended | September 28, 2004(1) | |||||||||
May 31, 2005 | through | |||||||||
(unaudited) | November 30, 2004 | |||||||||
($ amounts in 000s, | ||||||||||
except per share data) | ||||||||||
Per Share Performance of Common Stock
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$ | 23.91 | $ | 23.70 | (2) | |||||
Underwriting discounts and offering costs on the issuance of
preferred stock
|
(0.03 | ) | | |||||||
Income from investment operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss)
|
(0.04 | )(3) | 0.02 | (4) | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments, securities sold
short, options and interest rate swap contracts
|
2.02 | (3) | 0.19 | (4) | ||||||
Total income from investment operations
|
1.98 | 0.21 | ||||||||
Dividends Preferred Stockholders
|
||||||||||
Dividends
|
(0.01 | )(5) | | |||||||
Dividends Common Stockholders
|
||||||||||
Dividends
|
(0.66 | )(5) | | |||||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$ | 25.19 | $ | 23.91 | ||||||
Per share of common stock market value, end of period
|
$ | 26.00 | $ | 24.90 | ||||||
Total investment return based on common stock market
value(6)
|
7.26 | % | (0.40 | )% | ||||||
Total investment return based on net asset
value(7)
|
20.13 | % | 5.05 | % | ||||||
Supplemental Data and Ratios
|
||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common stockholders, end of period
|
$ | 848,342 | $ | 792,836 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets (including current and
deferred income tax
expenses)(8)
|
11.84 | %(9) | 4.73 | %(9) | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets (exclusive of current
and deferred income tax
expenses)(8)
|
1.76 | %(9) | 1.20 | %(9) | ||||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding non-recurring organizational
expenses, to average net assets
|
1.76 | %(9) | 1.08 | %(9) | ||||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding taxes and interest expenses, to
average net assets
|
1.26 | %(9) | | |||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets, after taxes
|
(0.21 | )%(9) | 0.50 | %(9) | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate
|
13.72 | %(10) | 11.78 | %(10) | ||||||
Auction Rate Senior Notes outstanding, end of period
|
$ | 260,000 | | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Stock, end of period
|
$ | 75,000 | | |||||||
Borrowings outstanding per share of common stock, end of period
|
$ | 7.72 | | |||||||
Common stock per share, excluding borrowings, end of period
|
$ | 32.91 | | |||||||
Asset coverage, per $1,000 of principal amount of Auction Rate
Senior Notes
|
||||||||||
Series A, B and C
|
426.22 | % | | |||||||
Asset coverage, per $25,000 of liquidation value per share of
Auction Rate Preferred Stock
|
353.19 | % | | |||||||
Average amount of borrowings outstanding per share of common
stock during the period
|
$ | 3.57 | (3) | |
(1) | Commencement of operations. |
(2) | Initial public offering price of $25.00 per share less underwriting discounts of $1.25 per share and offering costs of $0.05 per share. |
(3) | Based on average shares of common stock outstanding of 33,400,589. |
(4) | Information presented relates to a share of common stock outstanding for the entire period. |
(5) | The character of dividends made during the year may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. We are unable to make final determinations as to the character of the dividend until after the calendar year. |
(6) | Not annualized. Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock at the market price on the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of the period reported. The calculation also assumes reinvestment of dividends and distributions, if any, at actual prices pursuant to the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. |
(7) | Assumes re-investment of dividends. |
(8) | For the period from September 28, 2004 through November 30, 2004, our current income tax expense was $0.8 million and we accrued $3.8 million in deferred taxes on our unrealized gains and deferred tax benefit from organizational expenses. For the first six months of this fiscal year, which began on December 1, 2004, we accrued $40.2 million in deferred taxes on our unrealized gains. |
(9) | Annualized. |
(10) | Amount not annualized. Calculated based on the sales of $115,606 and $16,880, respectively, of long-term investments divided by the average long-term investment balance of $842,413 and $143,328 respectively. |
16
12/1/2004 - | 9/28/2004 - | |||||||||
5/31/2005 | 11/30/2004 | |||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||
($ in 000s, except per | ||||||||||
share data) | ||||||||||
Selected Statement of Operations Items
|
||||||||||
Income
|
||||||||||
Dividends and Distributions
|
$ | 21,029 | $ | 2,210 | ||||||
Return of Capital
|
(18,212 | ) | (1,670 | ) | ||||||
Net Dividends and Distributions
|
2,817 | 540 | ||||||||
Interest
|
3,008 | 2,068 | ||||||||
Total Investment Income
|
5,825 | 2,608 | ||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)
|
(850 | ) | 645 | |||||||
Net Realized Gains
|
2,777 | 414 | ||||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Gains
|
64,531 | 5,717 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
from Operations
|
66,131 | 6,776 |
As of | As of | |||||||
5/31/2005 | 11/30/2004 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Selected Statement of Assets and Liabilities Items
|
||||||||
Total Investments
|
$ | 1,234,071 | $ | 804,646 | ||||
Total Assets
|
1,244,452 | 807,797 | ||||||
Total Debt
|
260,000 | | ||||||
Preferred Stock
|
75,000 | | ||||||
Total Net Assets
|
848,342 | 792,836 |
9/28/2004 - | ||||||||
5/31/2005 | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Per Share Net Asset Value and Market Value Information
|
||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
|
$ | 25.00 | ||||||
Less: Initial Public Offering Expenses and Underwriting Discounts
|
(1.28 | ) | ||||||
Less: Underwriting Discounts and Offering Expenses on Issuance
of Preferred Stock
|
(0.03 | ) | ||||||
Less: Net Investment Loss
|
(0.01 | ) | ||||||
Plus: Net Realized and Unrealized Gains
|
2.18 | |||||||
Less: Dividends Paid on Common Stock
|
(0.66 | ) | ||||||
Less: Dividends Paid on Preferred Stock
|
(0.01 | ) | ||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period
|
$ | 25.19 | ||||||
Market Value of Common Stock, End of Period
|
$ | 26.00 | ||||||
Total Investment Return Based on Market Value(1)
|
6.8% |
(1) | Not annualized. We calculate total investment return assuming a purchase of common stock at the market price on the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of the period reported. The calculation also assumes reinvestment of dividends and distributions, if any, at actual prices pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. |
17
No. of | |||||||||||
Description | Shares/Units | Value | |||||||||
(amounts in 000s) | |||||||||||
Long-Term Investments 130.2%
|
|||||||||||
Equity Investments 129.3%
|
|||||||||||
Pipeline MLP(a) 100.8%
|
|||||||||||
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
162 | $ | 6,770 | ||||||||
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
|
173 | 7,698 | |||||||||
Copano Energy, L.L.C.
|
86 | 2,552 | |||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P.
|
258 | 9,463 | |||||||||
Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C.(b)
|
413 | 20,347 | |||||||||
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
|
1,943 | 100,250 | |||||||||
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|
4,556 | 143,929 | |||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
5,229 | 134,397 | |||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.(c)
|
1,204 | 30,309 | |||||||||
Genesis Energy, L.P.(d)
|
134 | 1,263 | |||||||||
Hiland Partners, LP(e)
|
37 | 1,298 | |||||||||
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
|
109 | 4,444 | |||||||||
Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P.
|
614 | 37,675 | |||||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
1 | 67 | |||||||||
Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(b)
|
2,608 | 116,230 | |||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
486 | 15,258 | |||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.(c)
|
3,478 | 102,697 | |||||||||
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
193 | 9,307 | |||||||||
Northern Border Partners, L.P.
|
620 | 29,522 | |||||||||
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
458 | 14,244 | |||||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
921 | 38,885 | |||||||||
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P.
|
26 | 955 | |||||||||
TC PipeLines, LP
|
231 | 7,699 | |||||||||
TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
|
447 | 18,467 | |||||||||
TransMontaigne Partners L.P.(e)
|
59 | 1,448 | |||||||||
855,174 | |||||||||||
Propane MLP 15.8%
|
|||||||||||
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
|
1,947 | 42,845 | |||||||||
Inergy, L.P.
|
34 | 1,062 | |||||||||
Inergy, L.P.(c)
|
2,947 | 90,496 | |||||||||
134,403 | |||||||||||
Shipping MLP 2.4%
|
|||||||||||
K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P.
|
70 | 2,344 | |||||||||
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
|
113 | 3,546 | |||||||||
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.(e)
|
172 | 4,530 | |||||||||
U.S. Shipping Partners L.P.
|
392 | 10,035 | |||||||||
20,455 | |||||||||||
18
No. of | ||||||||||
Description | Shares/Units | Value | ||||||||
(amounts in 000s) | ||||||||||
Coal MLP 1.1%
|
||||||||||
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
|
33 | $ | 1,931 | |||||||
Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.
|
150 | 7,027 | ||||||||
8,958 | ||||||||||
Other MLP 0.1%
|
||||||||||
Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
|
43 | 929 | ||||||||
MLP Affiliates 7.7%
|
||||||||||
Atlas America, Inc.(f)
|
127 | 3,968 | ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc.
|
417 | 19,072 | ||||||||
Holly Corporation
|
90 | 3,445 | ||||||||
Kaneb Services LLC
|
424 | 18,266 | ||||||||
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
|
85 | 6,629 | ||||||||
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.(d)
|
257 | 5,619 | ||||||||
Resource America, Inc.
|
40 | 1,369 | ||||||||
TransCanada Corporation
|
28 | 687 | ||||||||
TransMontaigne Inc.
|
766 | 6,345 | ||||||||
65,400 | ||||||||||
Other Midstream Energy Companies 1.4%
|
||||||||||
Arlington Tankers Ltd.
|
189 | 3,710 | ||||||||
Diana Shipping Inc.
|
276 | 4,272 | ||||||||
DryShips Inc.(e)
|
96 | 1,783 | ||||||||
Nordic American Tanker Shipping Limited
|
23 | 932 | ||||||||
Ship Finance International Limited
|
44 | 851 | ||||||||
11,548 | ||||||||||
Total Equity Investments (Cost $978,505)
|
1,096,867 | |||||||||
Principal | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Maturity | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate | Date | (in 000s) | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Income Investments 0.9%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline MLP 0.7%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
7.750 | % | 10/15/12 | $ | 5,000 | 5,814 | ||||||||||||||
MLP Affiliates 0.2%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
TransMontaigne Inc.
|
9.125 | 06/01/10 | 2,000 | 2,040 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Income Investments (Cost $7,836)
|
7,854 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Long-Term Investments (Cost $986,341)
|
1,104,721 | |||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term Investment 15.3%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreement 15.3%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (Agreement dated 05/31/05 to
be repurchased at $129,361), collateralized by $132,819 in U.S.
Government and Agency Securities (Cost $129,350)
|
2.970 | 06/01/05 | 129,350 | 129,350 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Investments 145.5%
(Cost $1,115,691)
|
1,234,071 | |||||||||||||||||||
19
No. of | |||||||||||||
Description | Shares/Units | Value | |||||||||||
(amounts in 000s) | |||||||||||||
Liabilities (36.7)%
|
|||||||||||||
Securities Sold Short (0.2)%
|
|||||||||||||
Propane MLP (0.1)%
|
|||||||||||||
AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
|
8 | $ | (249 | ) | |||||||||
Suburban Propane Partners, L.P.
|
25 | (825 | ) | ||||||||||
(1,074 | ) | ||||||||||||
Coal MLP (0.1)%
|
|||||||||||||
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
|
7 | (507 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Securities Sold Short (cash proceeds received
$1,571)
|
(1,581 | ) | |||||||||||
Auction Rate Senior Notes (30.7)%
|
(260,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Unrealized Depreciation on Interest Rate Swap
Contracts (0.5)%
|
(3,991 | ) | |||||||||||
Deferred Taxes (5.2)%
|
(43,927 | ) | |||||||||||
Other Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets
(0.1)%
|
(1,230 | ) | |||||||||||
Total Liabilities
|
(310,729 | ) | |||||||||||
Preferred Stock at Redemption Value
(8.8)%
|
(75,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
100.0%
|
$ | 848,342 | |||||||||||
(a) | Includes Limited Liability Companies or L.L.C.s. | |
(b) | Distributions made are paid in-kind. | |
(c) | Fair valued security. These securities are restricted from public sale. See Notes 2 and 6 in the accompany notes to the financial statements for further details. The Company negotiates certain aspects of the method and timing of the disposition of these investments, including registration rights and related costs. | |
(d) | Security or a portion thereof is segregated as collateral on interest rate swap contracts and securities sold short. | |
(e) | Currently non-income producing; security is expected to pay distributions within the next 12 months. | |
(f) | Security is non-income producing. |
Number of | Fair Value at | Percent of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Units | Acquisition | Cost | 05/31/05 | Value Per | Net | Percent of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partnership | Security | (in 000s) | Date | ($ in 000s) | ($ in 000s) | Unit | Assets | Total Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.
|
Common Units | 1,204 | 04/01/05 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,309 | $ | 25.18 | 3.6 | % | 2.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Inergy, L.P.
|
Common Units | 2,947 | 12/17/04 | 75,034 | 90,496 | 30.71 | 10.7 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
Subordinated Units | 3,478 | 04/13/05 | 100,007 | 102,697 | 29.53 | 12.1 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 205,041 | $ | 223,502 | 26.4 | % | 18.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
20
Gross unrealized appreciation of investments (including
securities sold short)
|
$ | 120,732 | ||
Gross unrealized depreciation of investments (including
securities sold short)
|
(2,362 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation before tax and interest rate swap
contracts
|
118,370 | |||
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts
|
(4,144 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation before tax
|
$ | 114,226 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation after tax
|
$ | 70,248 | ||
21
Net Asset | Premium/(Discount) to | |||||||||||
Date | Market Price | Value(1) | Net Asset Value | |||||||||
September 28, 2004
|
$ | 25.00 | $ | 23.70 | 5.5 | % | ||||||
October 31, 2004
|
25.08 | 23.73 | 5.7 | |||||||||
November 30, 2004
|
24.90 | 23.91 | 4.1 | |||||||||
December 31, 2004
|
25.00 | 24.25 | 3.1 | |||||||||
January 31, 2005
|
25.00 | 25.03 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
February 28, 2005
|
26.05 | 25.27 | 3.1 | |||||||||
March 31, 2005
|
26.22 | 24.90 | 5.3 | |||||||||
April 30, 2005
|
26.00 | 24.92 | 4.3 | |||||||||
May 31, 2005
|
26.00 | 25.19 | 3.2 | |||||||||
June 30, 2005
|
26.75 | 26.01 | 2.8 | |||||||||
July 31, 2005
|
27.97 | 26.86 | 4.1 | |||||||||
August 31, 2005
|
27.60 | 26.63 | 3.6 |
(1) | Based on our net asset value calculated on the close of business on the last business day of each prior calendar month. |
22
23
Actual | As Adjusted | |||||||
($ in 000s, except per | ||||||||
share data) | ||||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT:
|
||||||||
Senior Notes Series A(1)
|
$ | 85,000 | $ | 85,000 | ||||
Senior Notes Series B(1)
|
85,000 | 85,000 | ||||||
Senior Notes Series C(1)
|
90,000 | 90,000 | ||||||
TOTAL DEBT
|
260,000 | 260,000 | ||||||
PREFERRED STOCK:
|
||||||||
Series D Auction Rate Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per
share, liquidation preference $25,000 per share (3,000 shares
issued and outstanding, 10,000 shares authorized)(1)
|
75,000 | 75,000 | ||||||
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share, 199,990,000 shares
authorized (33,676,442 shares issued and outstanding as of
May 31, 2005;
[ ] shares
issued and outstanding as adjusted(2))(1)
|
34 | |||||||
Paid-in capital
|
797,382 | |||||||
Distributions in excess of net investment loss, net of income
taxes
|
(22,513 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated realized gains on investments, securities sold short
and interest rate swap contracts, net of income taxes
|
3,191 | |||||||
Net unrealized gains on investments, securities sold short and
interest rate swap contracts, net of income taxes
|
70,248 | |||||||
Net assets applicable to common stockholders
|
$ | 848,342 | $ | |||||
(1) | We do not hold any of these outstanding securities for our account. |
(2) | This does not include shares that may be issued in connection with the underwriters over-allotment option. |
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
| our operating results; | |
| our business prospects; | |
| the impact of investments that we expect to make; | |
| our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties; | |
| the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest; | |
| our ability to source favorable private investments; | |
| the ability of the MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies in which we invest to achieve their objectives; | |
| our expected financings and investments; | |
| our use of financial leverage; | |
| our tax status; | |
| the tax status of the MLPs in which we intend to invest; | |
| the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and | |
| the timing and amount of distributions and dividends from the MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies in which we intend to invest. |
38
39
(1) If our common stock is trading at or above net asset value at the time of valuation, we will issue new shares at a price equal to the greater of (i) our common stocks net asset value on that date or (ii) 95% of the market price of our common stock on that date. | |
(2) If our common stock is trading below net asset value at the time of valuation, the Plan Agent will receive the dividend or distribution in cash and will purchase common stock in the open market, on the NYSE or elsewhere, for the participants accounts. It is possible that the market price for our common stock may increase before the Plan Agent has completed its purchases. Therefore, the average purchase price per share paid by the Plan Agent may exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the purchase of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid in common stock issued by us. The Plan Agent will use all dividends and distributions received in cash to purchase common stock in the open market within 30 days of the valuation date except where temporary curtailment or suspension of purchases is necessary to comply with federal securities laws. Interest will not be paid on any uninvested cash payments. |
40
| For as long as the word MLP is in our name, it shall be our policy, under normal market conditions, to invest at least 80% of our total assets in MLPs. | |
| Under normal market conditions, we intend to invest at least 50% of our total assets in publicly traded securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. | |
| Under normal market conditions, we intend to invest up to 50% (but not more than 60%) of our total assets in unregistered or otherwise restricted securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. The types of unregistered or otherwise restricted securities that we may purchase include common units, subordinated units, preferred units, and convertible units of, and general partner interests in, MLPs, and securities of other public and private Midstream Energy Companies. | |
| We may invest up to 15% of our total assets in any single issuer. | |
| We may invest up to 20% of our total assets in debt securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies, including below investment grade debt securities rated, at the time of investment, at least B3 by Moodys, B- by Standard & Poors or Fitch, comparably rated by another rating agency or, if unrated, determined by Kayne Anderson to be of comparable quality. In addition, up to one-quarter of our permitted investments in debt securities (or up to 5% of our total assets) may include unrated debt securities of private companies. | |
| We may issue or use Leverage Instruments in an aggregate amount up to 30% of our total assets inclusive of such Leverage Instruments. | |
| We may, but are not required to, use derivative investments and engage in short sales to hedge against interest rate and market risks. |
41
Substantial MLP Market Knowledge and Industry Relationships. Through its activities as a leading investor in MLP securities, Kayne Anderson has developed broad expertise and important relationships with industry managers in the MLP sector. We believe that Kayne Andersons industry knowledge and relationships enable us to capitalize on opportunities to source investments in MLPs that may not be readily available to other investors. Such investment opportunities include purchasing larger blocks of limited partner interests, often at discounts to market prices, non-controlling general partner interests and positions in companies expected to form an MLP. We believe that Kayne Andersons substantial MLP market knowledge provides it with the ability to recognize long-term trends in the industry and to identify differences in value among individual MLPs, which abilities benefit our portfolio of public investments in MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. | |
Extensive Transaction Structuring Expertise and Capability. Kayne Anderson has industry-leading experience identifying and structuring investments in MLP securities. This experience, combined with Kayne Andersons ability to engage in regular dialogue with industry participants and other large holders of MLP securities to better understand the capital needs of prospective portfolio companies, give it an advantage in structuring transactions mutually attractive to us and the portfolio company. Further, our ability to fund a meaningful amount of the capital needs of prospective portfolio companies provides us an advantage over other potential investors with less capital to employ in the sector. These investments may include purchases of subordinated units, restricted common units or general partner interests. | |
Ability to Trade Efficiently in a Relatively Illiquid Market. We believe that Kayne Andersons ability to generate favorable returns on public investments in MLPs is aided by its substantial experience actively trading MLPs and similar securities. Through its affiliated broker-dealer, Kayne Anderson maintains its own trading desk, providing it with the ability to understand day-to-day market conditions for MLP securities, which have historically been characterized by lower daily trading volumes than comparable corporate equities. We believe that Kayne Andersons direct equity market access enables it to make better informed investment decisions and to execute its investment strategy with greater efficiency. |
42
| MLPs provide steady distributions with attractive growth profiles. During the period from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2004, publicly-traded energy-related master limited partnerships provided an average annual yield of 8.5%. Additionally, during that same time period, distributions from these master limited partnerships increased at a compounded average annual rate of 6.6%. Currently, these master limited partnerships provide a 6.0% average yield. This information is for the energy-related master limited partnerships that were traded publicly as of August 31, 2005 (36 partnerships), and is derived by us from financial industry databases and public filings. We believe that current market conditions are conducive for continued growth in distributions. However, there can be no assurance that these levels will be maintained in the future. | |
| MLPs operate strategically important assets that typically generate stable cash flows. MLPs operate in businesses that are necessary for providing consumers with access to energy resources. We believe that due to the fee-based nature and long-term importance of their midstream energy assets, MLPs typically generate stable cash flows throughout economic cycles. Additionally, certain businesses operated by MLPs are regulated by federal and state authorities that ensure that rates charged are fair and just. In most cases, such regulation provides for highly predictable cash flows. | |
| The MLP midstream energy sector has high barriers to entry. Due to the high cost of constructing midstream energy assets and the difficulty of developing the expertise necessary to comply with the regulations governing the operation of such assets, the barriers to enter the midstream energy sector are high. Therefore, currently existing MLPs with large asset bases and significant operations enjoy a competitive advantage over other entities seeking to enter the sector. |
43
| Due to a lack of broad institutional following and limited retail focus, the MLP market experiences inefficiencies which can be exploited by a knowledgeable investor. Historically, there have been potential adverse consequences of MLP ownership for many institutional investors, including regulated investment companies. Further, because MLPs generate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI), typically they are not held by tax-exempt investors such as pension plans, endowments, employee benefit plans, or individual retirement accounts. Also, income and gains from MLPs are subject to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA), limiting the investment by non-U.S. investors in the sector. As a result, MLPs are held predominantly by taxable U.S. retail investors. Further, due to the limited public market float for MLP common units and tax-reporting burdens and complexities associated with MLP investments, MLPs appeal only to a segment of such retail investors. Due to this limited, retail-oriented focus, the market for MLPs can experience inefficiencies which can be exploited by a knowledgeable investor. |
| MLPs are well-positioned to capitalize on the ongoing divestitures of midstream energy assets. As major oil and gas companies continue to focus on international opportunities and core exploration and production activities, such companies continue to sell many of their North American midstream energy assets. Additionally, certain utilities and energy merchants are selling their midstream energy assets, in part to improve their credit profiles. MLPs, as tax pass-through entities, have cost of capital advantages over corporate purchasers. As a result, MLPs have been active acquirors of midstream energy assets over the last several years. We believe this large pool of midstream energy assets should provide MLPs with significant acquisition opportunities to augment their internal growth prospects. | |
| Many MLPs have significant available capacity which allows them to benefit disproportionately from a growing economy. As the overall economy expands, energy demand increases and in certain cases, rates for assets owned by MLPs increase. Many of the MLPs in which we intend to invest have significant additional available operating capacity. As a result, these MLPs benefit from significant economies of scale and can expand production at relatively low cost levels. Small increases in energy demand can result in significant growth in the distributable cash flows for such MLPs. We believe this internal growth is an important component of MLPs ability to increase distributions. |
| We provide, through a single investment vehicle, an investment in a portfolio of securities issued by MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. | |
| Under normal market conditions, we intend to invest up to 50% (but not more than 60%) of our total assets in private investments in MLPs. We believe that we can make private purchases of securities at discounts or with other beneficial terms. Such investment opportunities are typically only available to a limited number of knowledgeable investors with a large amount of capital available for investment in any particular security or issuer. | |
| Our common stockholders will receive a single tax reporting statement (on Form 1099) and will only be required to file income tax returns in states in which they would ordinarily file. In contrast, a person who invests directly in MLPs receives a statement of partnership items (on Schedule K-1) from each MLP owned and may be required to file income tax returns in each state in which such MLPs generate income. |
44
| Our common stock dividends are treated as qualifying income for each of our common stockholders that is an investment company (including mutual funds) that have elected to be taxed as regulated investment companies. Subject to certain holding period requirements, corporate investors in our common stock generally will be entitled to dividends-received deduction treatment on our dividends. | |
| Our common stock dividends will be excluded from treatment as UBTI (except for those stockholders who debt-finance the purchase of our common stock). Accordingly, tax-exempt investors, including pension plans, employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts, will not have UBTI upon receipt of dividends from us, whereas a tax-exempt limited partners allocable share of income of an MLP is generally treated as UBTI. |
45
| Pipeline MLPs are engaged in (a) the treating, gathering, compression, processing, transmission and storage of natural gas and the transportation, fractionation and storage of natural gas liquids (primarily propane, ethane, butane and natural gasoline); (b) the gathering, transportation, storage and terminalling of crude oil; and (c) the transportation (usually via pipelines, barges, rail cars and trucks), storage and terminalling of refined petroleum products (primarily gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel) and other hydrocarbon by-products. MLPs may also operate ancillary businesses including the marketing of the products and logistical services. | |
| Propane MLPs are engaged in the distribution of propane to homeowners for space and water heating and to commercial, industrial and agricultural customers. Propane serves approximately 3% of the household energy needs in the United States, largely for homes beyond the geographic reach of natural gas distribution pipelines. Volumes are weather dependent and a majority of annual cash flow is earned during the winter heating season (October through March). | |
| Coal MLPs are engaged in the owning, leasing, managing, production and sale of coal and coal reserves. Electricity generation is the primary use of coal in the United States. Demand for electricity and supply of alternative fuels to generators are the primary drivers of coal demand. |
46
SUBORDINATED | GENERAL PARTNER | |||||||
COMMON UNITS | UNITS | I-SHARES | INTERESTS | |||||
VOTING RIGHTS | Limited to certain significant decisions; no annual election of directors | Same as common units | No direct MLP voting rights | Typically Board participation; votes on MLP operating strategy and direction | ||||
DISTRIBUTION PRIORITY | First right to minimum quarterly distribution (MQD) specified in partnership agreement; arrearage rights | Second right to MQD; no arrearage rights | Equal in amount and priority to common units but paid in additional I-Shares at current market value of I-Shares | Same as common units; entitled to incentive distribution rights | ||||
DISTRIBUTION RATE | Minimum as set in partnership agreement; participate pro rata with subordinated unit holders after MQDs are met | Equal in amount to common units; participate pro rata with common units above the MQD | Equal in amount to common units | Participate pro rata partly with common units and partly with subordinated units up to MQD; entitled to incentive distribution at target levels above MQD | ||||
TRADING
|
Listed on NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ | Typically not publicly traded | Listed on NYSE | Typically not publicly traded; can be owned by publicly traded entity | ||||
TAXES
|
Ordinary income to the extent of taxable income allocated to holder; tax-free return of capital thereafter to extent of holders basis; remainder as capital gain | Same as common units | Full distribution treated as return of capital; since distribution is in shares, total basis is not reduced | Ordinary income to extent that (1) taxable income is allocated to holder (including all incentive distributions) and (2) tax depreciation is insufficient to cover fair market value depreciation owed to limited partners | ||||
INVESTORS
|
Primarily retail | Founders and sponsoring parent entities, corporate general partners of MLPs, entities that sell assets to MLPs, and investors such as us | Primarily institutional | Founders and sponsoring parent entities, corporate general partners of MLPs, entities that sell assets to MLPs, and investors such as us | ||||
LIQUIDATION PRIORITY | Intended to receive return of all capital first | Second right to return of capital; pro rata with common units thereafter | Same as common units (indirect right through I-Share issuer) | Pro rata with limited partners | ||||
CONVERSION RIGHTS | Not applicable | One-to-one ratio into common units | None | None | ||||
47
48
49
50
51
52
Assumed Portfolio Total Return (Net of Expenses)
|
(10 | )% | (5 | )% | 0 | % | 5 | % | 10 | % | ||||||||||
Common Stock Total Return
|
(17.5 | )% | (9.7 | )% | (1.9 | )% | 5.9 | % | 13.7 | % |
53
Other | ||||||||||||||
Position(s) | Directorships | |||||||||||||
Held with | Term of Office/ | Held by | ||||||||||||
Name (Year Born) | Registrant | Time of Service | Principal Occupations During Past Five Years | Director/Officer | ||||||||||
Independent Directors | ||||||||||||||
Anne K.
Costin(1)
(born 1950) |
Director | 3-year term/served since July 2004 | Ms. Costin is currently an Adjunct Professor in the Finance and Economics Department of Columbia University Graduate School of Business in New York City. As of March 1, 2005, Ms. Costin retired after a 28-year career at Citigroup. From July 2003 to her retirement, she held the position of Managing Director and, for the 3 years prior to July 2003, she held the position of Managing Director and Global Deputy Head of the Project & Structured Trade Finance product group within Citigroups Investment Banking Division. | Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc. | ||||||||||
Steven C. Good
(born 1942) |
Director | 2-year term/ served since July 2004 | Mr. Good is a senior partner at Good Swartz Brown & Berns LLP, which offers accounting, tax and business advisory services to middle market private and publicly-traded companies, their owners and their management. Mr. Good founded Block, Good and Gagerman in 1976, which later evolved in stages into Good Swartz Brown & Berns LLP. | Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc.; Arden Realty, Inc.; OSI Systems, Inc.; and Big Dog Holdings, Inc. | ||||||||||
Terrence J. Quinn
(born 1951) |
Director | 3-year term/served since July 2004 | Mr. Quinn is Chairman and CEO of Total Capital Corp., a start-up specialty commercial finance company. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Quinn was a co-founder and managing partner of MTS Health Partners, a private merchant bank providing services to publicly traded and privately held small to mid-sized companies in the healthcare industry. | Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc. |
54
Other | ||||||||||||||
Position(s) | Directorships | |||||||||||||
Held with | Term of Office/ | Held by | ||||||||||||
Name (Year Born) | Registrant | Time of Service | Principal Occupations During Past Five Years | Director/Officer | ||||||||||
Gerald I. Isenberg
(born 1940) |
Director | 3-year term/served since June 2005 | Since 1995, Mr. Isenberg has served as a Professor at the University of Southern California School of Cinema-Television. Since 2004 he has been a member of the board of trustees of Partners for Development, a non-governmental organization dedicated to developmental work in third-world countries. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Isenberg was a board member of Kayne Anderson Rudnick Mutual Funds(2). From 1989 to 1995, he was President of Hearst Entertainment Productions, a producer of television movies and programming for major broadcast and cable networks. | Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc.; Partners for Development. | ||||||||||
Interested Director And Officers | ||||||||||||||
Kevin S.
McCarthy(3)
(born 1959) |
Chairman of the Board of Directors; President and Chief Executive Officer | 2-year term as a director, elected annually as an officer/served since July 2004 | Mr. McCarthy has served as a Senior Managing Director of Kayne Anderson since June 2004. From November 2000 to May 2004, Mr. McCarthy was at UBS Securities LLC where he was Global Head of Energy. In this role, he had senior responsibility for all of UBS energy investment banking activities, including direct responsibility for securities underwriting and mergers and acquisitions in the MLP industry. From July 1997 to November 2000, Mr. McCarthy led the energy investment banking activities of PaineWebber Incorporated. From July 1995 to March 1997, he was head of the Energy Group at Dean Witter Reynolds. | Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc.; Range Resources Corporation. | ||||||||||
Ralph Collins Walter
(born 1946) |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | elected annually/served since inception | Mr. Walter has served as the Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of Kayne Anderson since 2000. Before joining Kayne Anderson, he was the Chief Administrative Officer at ABN AMRO Inc., the U.S.-based, investment-banking arm of ABN-AMRO Bank. | Knox College | ||||||||||
David J. Shladovsky
(born 1960) |
Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer | elected annually/served since inception | Mr. Shladovsky has served as a Managing Director and General Counsel of Kayne Anderson since 1997. | None | ||||||||||
J.C. Frey
(born 1968) |
Vice President, Assistant Treasurer, Assistant Secretary | Elected annually/served since June 2005 | Mr. Frey has served as a Senior Managing Director of Kayne Anderson since 2004 and as a Managing Director since 2001. Mr. Frey has served as a Portfolio Manager of Kayne Anderson since 2000 and of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company since 2004. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Frey was a Research Analyst at Kayne Anderson. | None |
55
Other | ||||||||||||||
Position(s) | Directorships | |||||||||||||
Held with | Term of Office/ | Held by | ||||||||||||
Name (Year Born) | Registrant | Time of Service | Principal Occupations During Past Five Years | Director/Officer | ||||||||||
James C. Baker
(born 1972) |
Vice President | Elected annually/served since June 2005 | Mr. Baker has been a Managing Director of Kayne Anderson December 2004. From April 2004 to December 2004, he was a Director in Planning and Analysis at El Paso Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Baker worked in the energy investment banking group at UBS Securities LLC as a Director from 2002 to 2004 and as an Associate Director from 2000 to 2002. Prior to joining UBS in 2000, Mr. Baker was an Associate in the energy investment banking group at PaineWebber Incorporated. | None |
(1) | Due to her ownership of securities issued by one of the underwriters in this offering, Ms. Costin is expected to be treated as an interested person of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company, as defined in the 1940 Act, during and until the completion of this offering and, in the future, may be treated as an interested person during subsequent offerings of our securities if the relevant offering is underwritten by the underwriter in which Ms. Costin owns securities. |
(2) | The investment adviser to the Kayne Anderson Rudnick Mutual Funds, Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management, LLC, may be deemed an affiliate of Kayne Anderson. |
(3) | Mr. McCarthy is an interested person of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company by virtue of his employment relationship with Kayne Anderson, our investment adviser. |
56
57
58
Benchmark | ||||||||
(Standard & Poors | ||||||||
Standard & Poors | 400 Utilities Index | |||||||
Year | 400 Utilities Index | plus 6.00%) | ||||||
1995
|
31.3 | % | 37.3 | % | ||||
1996
|
9.2 | % | 15.2 | % | ||||
1997
|
29.6 | % | 35.6 | % | ||||
1998
|
7.6 | % | 13.6 | % | ||||
1999
|
(11.7 | )% | (5.7 | )% | ||||
2000
|
55.9 | % | 61.9 | % | ||||
2001
|
(9.3 | )% | (3.3 | )% | ||||
2002
|
(11.5 | )% | (5.5 | )% | ||||
2003
|
26.2 | % | 32.2 | % | ||||
2004
|
18.9 | % | 24.9 | % | ||||
Average annual return, 1995 to 2004
|
14.6 | % | 20.6 | % |
(1) | Returns for the period shown are annualized estimates. |
Benchmark | |||||||||||||||||
(Standard & Poors | Basic | Performance | Total | ||||||||||||||
Performance of our | 400 Utilities Index | Management | Fee | Management | |||||||||||||
Portfolio (1) | plus 6.00%) | Fee | Adjustment | Fee | |||||||||||||
20.00% or higher
|
15.00% | 1.75% | 1.00 | % | 2.75% | ||||||||||||
18.00%
|
15.00% | 1.75% | 0.60 | % | 2.35% | ||||||||||||
15.00%
|
15.00% | 1.75% | 0.00 | % | 1.75% | ||||||||||||
12.00%
|
15.00% | 1.75% | (0.60 | )% | 1.15% | ||||||||||||
10.00% or lower
|
15.00% | 1.75% | (1.00 | )% | 0.75% |
(1) | We calculate our performance for a given period on a per share basis as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of (W) our net asset value at the end of the period minus our net asset value at the beginning of the period, (X) any dividends or distributions paid by us during the period, (Y) taxes paid during or accrued (on a net basis) for the period, and (Z) management fees paid for the period, and the denominator of which is our net asset value at the beginning of the period. |
59
60
| Investment Team Valuation. The applicable investments are initially valued by Kayne Andersons investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investments. | |
| Investment Team Valuation Documentation. Preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with senior management of Kayne Anderson. Such valuations generally are submitted to the Valuation Committee (a committee of our Board of Directors) or our Board of Directors on a monthly basis, and stand for intervening periods of time. | |
| Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee meets on or about the end of each month to consider new valuations presented by Kayne Anderson, if any, which were made in accordance with the Valuation Procedures in such month. Between meetings of the Valuation Committee, a senior officer of Kayne Anderson is authorized to make valuation determinations. The Valuation Committees valuations stand for intervening periods of time unless the Valuation Committee meets again at the request of Kayne Anderson, our Board of Directors or the Committee itself. The Valuation Committees valuation determinations are subject to ratification by our Board at its next regular meeting. | |
| Valuation Firm. No less than quarterly, a third-party valuation firm engaged by our Board of Directors reviews the valuation methodologies and calculations employed for these securities. | |
| Board of Directors Determination. Our Board of Directors meets quarterly to consider the valuations provided by Kayne Anderson and the Valuation Committee, if applicable, and ratify valuations for the applicable securities. Our Board of Directors considers the reports, if any, provided by the third-party valuation firm in reviewing and determining in good faith the fair value of the applicable portfolio securities. |
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Underwriter | Number of shares | |||
Total
|
||||
Paid by Us | ||||||||
No Exercise | Full Exercise | |||||||
Per share
|
$ | $ | ||||||
Total
|
$ | $ |
74
75
76
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
|
1 | |||
INVESTMENT POLICIES
|
1 | |||
OUR INVESTMENTS
|
3 | |||
MANAGEMENT
|
13 | |||
INVESTMENT ADVISER
|
14 | |||
CODE OF ETHICS
|
16 | |||
PROXY VOTING PROCEDURES
|
16 | |||
PORTFOLIO MANAGER INFORMATION
|
18 | |||
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS AND BROKERAGE
|
18 | |||
LIMITATION ON LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
|
19 | |||
NET ASSET VALUE
|
20 | |||
TAX MATTERS
|
21 | |||
PERFORMANCE RELATED AND COMPARATIVE INFORMATION
|
25 | |||
EXPERTS
|
25 | |||
TRANSFER AGENT AND DIVIDEND-PAYING AGENT
|
26 | |||
OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS
|
26 | |||
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
|
26 | |||
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
27 | |||
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-1 | |||
APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF RATINGS
|
A-1 |
77
The information in this statement of additional information is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is effective. This statement of additional information is not an offer to sell these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION,
DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company (referred to herein as we, our, us, or the Company), a Maryland corporation, is a recently organized, non-diversified closed-end management investment company. Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P. (referred to herein as Kayne Anderson or Adviser) is our investment adviser.
This statement of additional information relating to our common stock, is not a prospectus, but should be read in conjunction with our prospectus relating thereto dated [___], 2005. This statement of additional information does not include all information that a prospective investor should consider before purchasing our common stock. Investors should obtain and read our prospectus prior to purchasing our common stock. A copy of our prospectus may be obtained from us without charge by calling (877) 657-3863/MLP-FUND or on the SECs web site (http://www.sec.gov). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this statement of additional information have the meanings ascribed to them in the prospectus.
This statement of additional information is dated [___], 2005.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
3 | ||||
13 | ||||
14 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
18 | ||||
18 | ||||
19 | ||||
20 | ||||
21 | ||||
25 | ||||
25 | ||||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | ||||
F-1 | ||||
A-1 |
-i-
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
Our investment objective is to obtain a high after-tax total return by investing at least 85% of our total assets in public and private investments in energy-related master limited partnerships and their affiliates (collectively, MLPs), and in other companies that, as their principal business, operate assets used in the gathering, transporting, processing, storing, refining, distributing, mining or marketing natural gas, natural gas liquids (including propane), crude oil, refined petroleum products or coal (collectively with MLPs, Midstream Energy Companies). There can be no assurance that we will achieve our investment objective. Midstream energy assets refers to assets used in the gathering, transporting, processing, storing, refining, distributing, mining or marketing natural gas, natural gas liquids (including propane), crude oil, refined petroleum products or coal.
Our investment objective is considered fundamental and may not be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority of our voting securities. When used with respect to our particular voting securities, a majority of the outstanding voting securities means (i) 67% or more of the outstanding voting securities present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities are present or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities, whichever is less.
INVESTMENT POLICIES
Except as described below, we, as a fundamental policy, may not, without the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities:
(1) Purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments and provided that this restriction does not prevent us from investing in issuers which invest, deal, or otherwise engage in transactions in real estate or interests therein, or investing in securities that are secured by real estate or interests therein.
(2) Purchase or sell commodities as defined in the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments and provided that this restriction does not prevent us from engaging in transactions involving futures contracts and options thereon or investing in securities that are secured by physical commodities.
(3) Borrow money or issue senior securities, except to the extent permitted by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act), or any rules, exemptions or interpretations thereunder that may be adopted, granted or issued by the SEC. See Use of Financial Leverage and Risk Factors Leverage Risk in the prospectus.
(4) Make loans to other persons except (a) through the lending of our portfolio securities, (b) through the purchase of debt obligations, loan participations and/or engaging in direct corporate loans in accordance with our investment objectives and policies, and (c) to the extent the entry into a repurchase agreement is deemed to be a loan. We may also make loans to other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act or any exemptions therefrom which may be granted by the SEC.
(5) Act as an underwriter except to the extent that, in connection with the disposition of portfolio securities, we may be deemed to be an underwriter under applicable securities laws.
(6) Concentrate our investments in a particular industry, as that term is used in the 1940 Act and as interpreted, modified, or otherwise permitted by regulatory authority having jurisdiction, from time to time; provided, however, that this concentration limitation does not apply to (a) our investments in MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies, which will be concentrated in the midstream energy industry in particular, and the energy industry in general,
-1-
and (b) our investments in securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities.
The remainder of our investment policies, including our investment strategy, are considered non-fundamental and may be changed by the Board of Directors without the approval of the holders of a majority of our voting securities, provided that our securities holders receive at least 60 days prior written notice of any change. We have adopted the following non-fundamental investment policies:
| For as long as the word MLP is in our name, it shall be our policy, under normal market conditions, to invest at least 80% of our total assets in MLPs. | |||
| Under normal market conditions, we intend to invest at least 50% of our total assets in publicly traded securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. | |||
| Under normal market conditions, we intend to invest up to 50% (but not more than 60%) of our total assets in unregistered or otherwise restricted securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies. The types of unregistered or otherwise restricted securities that we may purchase include common units, subordinated units, preferred units, and convertible units of, and general partner interests in, MLPs, and securities of other public and private Midstream Energy Companies. | |||
| We may invest up to 15% of our total assets in any single issuer. | |||
| We may invest up to 20% of our total assets in debt securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies, including below investment grade debt securities rated, at the time of investment, at least B3 by Moodys Investors Service, Inc., B- by Standard & Poors or Fitch Ratings, comparably rated by another rating agency or, if unrated, determined by Kayne Anderson to be of comparable quality. In addition, up to one-quarter of our permitted investments in debt securities (or up to 5% of our total assets) may include unrated debt securities of private companies. | |||
| We may issue or use Leverage Instruments in an aggregate amount up to 30% of our total assets inclusive of such Leverage Instruments. | |||
| We may, but are not required to, use derivative investments and engage in short sales to hedge against interest rate, market and issuer risks. |
Unless otherwise stated, all investment restrictions apply at the time of purchase and we will not be required to reduce a position due solely to market value fluctuations.
For purposes of the temporary investment positions that we take (see Investment Objective and Policies Our Portfolio Temporary Defensive Position in our prospectus), and in general (unless otherwise noted), cash and cash equivalents are defined to include, without limitation, the following:
(1) U.S. Government securities, which are obligations of, or securities guaranteed by, the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities.
(2) Certificates of Deposit issued against funds deposited in a bank or a savings and loan association. Such certificates are for a definite period of time, earn a specified rate of return, and are normally negotiable. The issuer of a certificate of deposit agrees to pay the amount deposited plus interest to the bearer of the certificate on the date specified thereon. Under current FDIC regulations, the maximum insurance payable as to any one certificate of deposit is $100,000, therefore, certificates of deposit we purchased may not be fully insured.
(3) Repurchase agreements, which involve purchases of debt securities. At the time we purchase securities pursuant to a repurchase agreement, we simultaneously agree to resell and redeliver such securities to the seller, who also simultaneously agrees to buy back the securities at a fixed price and time. This assures us a predetermined yield during the holding period, since the
-2-
resale price is always greater than the purchase price and reflects an agreed-upon market rate. Such actions afford an opportunity for us to invest temporarily available cash.
(4) Commercial paper, which consists of short-term unsecured promissory notes, including variable rate master demand notes issued by corporations to finance their current operations. Master demand notes are direct lending arrangements between us and a corporation. There is no secondary market for such notes. However, they are redeemable by us at any time. The Adviser will consider the financial condition of the corporation (e.g., earning power, cash flow, and other liquidity measures) and will continuously monitor the corporations ability to meet all its financial obligations, because our liquidity might be impaired if the corporation were unable to pay principal and interest on demand. To be characterized by us as cash or cash equivalents, investments in commercial paper will be limited to commercial paper rated in the highest categories by a rating agency and which mature within one year of the date of purchase or carry a variable or floating rate of interest.
(5) Bankers acceptances, which are short-term credit instruments used to finance commercial transactions. Generally, an acceptance is a time draft drawn on a bank by an exporter or an importer to obtain a stated amount of funds to pay for specific merchandise. The draft is then accepted by a bank that, in effect, unconditionally guarantees to pay the face value of the instrument on its maturity date. The acceptance may then be held by the accepting bank as an asset or it may be sold in the secondary market at the going rate of interest for a specific maturity.
(6) Bank time deposits, which are monies kept on deposit with banks or savings and loan associations for a stated period of time at a fixed rate of interest. There may be penalties for the early withdrawal of such time deposits, in which case the yields of these investments will be reduced.
(7) Shares of money market funds in accordance with the applicable provisions of the 1940 Act.
OUR INVESTMENTS
Some Midstream Energy Companies operate as public utilities or local distribution companies, and are therefore subject to rate regulation by state or federal utility commissions. However, Midstream Energy Companies may be subject to greater competitive factors than utility companies, including competitive pricing in the absence of regulated tariff rates, which could cause a reduction in revenue and which could adversely affect profitability. Most MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies with pipeline assets are subjected to government regulation concerning the construction, pricing and operation of pipelines. In many cases, the rates and tariffs charged by these pipelines are monitored by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) or various state regulatory agencies.
MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies typically achieve distribution growth by internal and external means. MLPs achieve growth internally by experiencing higher commodity volume driven by the economy and population, and through the expansion of existing operations, including increasing the use of underutilized capacity, pursuing projects that can leverage and gain synergies with existing operations and pursuing so called greenfield projects, which involve building and operating facilities on undeveloped land that is generally cheaper and more flexible in its use than developed urban properties. External growth is achieved by making accretive acquisitions.
MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies operating interstate pipelines and storage facilities are subject to substantial regulation by the FERC, which regulates interstate transportation rates, services and other matters regarding natural gas pipelines including: the establishment of rates for service; regulation of pipeline storage and liquified natural gas facility construction; issuing certificates of need for companies intending to provide energy services or constructing and operating interstate pipeline and storage facilities; and certain other matters. FERC also regulates the interstate transportation of crude oil, including: regulation of rates and practices of oil
-3-
pipeline companies; establishing equal service conditions to provide shippers with equal access to pipeline transportation; and establishment of reasonable rates for transporting petroleum and petroleum products by pipeline.
MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies may be subject to liability relating to the release of substances into the environment, including liability under federal Superfund and similar state laws for investigation and remediation of releases and threatened releases of hazardous materials, as well as liability for injury and property damage for accidental events, such as explosions or discharges of materials causing personal injury and damage to property. Such potential liabilities could have a material adverse effect upon the financial condition and results of operations of MLPs.
MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies are subject to numerous business related risks, including: deterioration of business fundamentals reducing profitability due to development of alternative energy sources, changing demographics in the markets served, unexpectedly prolonged and precipitous changes in commodity prices and increased competition which takes market share; the lack of growth of markets requiring growth through acquisitions; disruptions in transportation systems; the dependence of certain MLPs upon the energy exploration and development activities of unrelated third parties; availability of capital for expansion and construction of needed facilities; a significant decrease in natural gas production due to depressed commodity prices or otherwise; the inability of MLPs to successfully integrate recent or future acquisitions; and the general level of the economy.
Additional Information About MLPs
An MLP is structured as a limited partnership, the interests in which (known as units) are traded on securities exchanges or over-the-counter. Organization as a partnership eliminates tax at the entity level.
An MLP has one or more general partners (who may be individuals, corporations, or other partnerships) which manage the partnership, and limited partners, which provide capital to the partnership but have no role in its management. Typically, the general partner is owned by company management or another publicly traded sponsoring corporation. When an investor buys units in a MLP, the investor becomes a limited partner.
MLPs are formed in several ways. A nontraded partnership may decide to offer its securities to the public. Several nontraded partnerships may roll up into a single MLP. A corporation may spin-off a group of assets or part of its business into a MLP of which it is the general partner in order to realize the assets full value on the marketplace by selling the assets and use the cash proceeds received from the MLP to address debt obligations or to invest in higher growth opportunities, while retaining control of the MLP. A corporation may fully convert to a MLP, although since 1986 the tax consequences have made this an unappealing option for most corporations. Also, a newly formed company may operate as a MLP from its inception.
The sponsor or general partner of MLPs, Midstream Energy Companies, and utilities may sell assets to MLPs in order to generate cash to fund expansion projects or repay debt. The MLP structure essentially transfers cash flows generated from these acquired assets directly to MLP limited partner unit holders.
In the case of an MLP buying assets from its sponsor or general partner the transaction is intended to be based upon comparable terms in the acquisition market for similar assets. To help insure that appropriate protections are in place, the board of the MLP generally creates an independent committee to review and approve the terms of the transaction. The committee often obtains a fairness opinion and can retain counsel or other experts to assist its evaluation. Since both parties normally have a significant equity stake in the MLP, both parties generally have an incentive to see that the transaction is accretive and fair to the MLP.
As a motivation for the general partner to successfully manage the MLP and increase cash flows, the terms of MLPs typically provide that the general partner receives a larger portion of the net income as distributions reach higher target levels. As cash flow grows, the general partner receives a greater interest in the incremental income compared to the interest of limited partners. Although the percentages vary among MLPs, the general partners marginal interest in distributions generally increases from 2% to 15% at the first designated distribution target level moving up to 25% and ultimately 50% as pre-established distribution per unit thresholds are met. Nevertheless, the aggregate amount distributed to limited partners will increase as MLP distributions reach higher target levels. Given
-4-
this incentive structure, the general partner has an incentive to streamline operations and undertake acquisitions and growth projects in order to increase distributions to all partners.
Because the MLP itself does not pay tax, its income or loss is allocated to its investors, irrespective of whether the investors receive any cash payment from the MLP. An MLP typically makes quarterly cash distributions. Although they resemble corporate dividends, MLP distributions are treated differently for tax purposes. The MLP distribution is treated as a return of capital to the extent of the investors basis in his MLP interest and, to the extent the distribution exceeds the investors basis in the MLP, capital gain. The investors original basis is the price paid for the units. The basis is adjusted downwards with each distribution and allocation of deductions (such as depreciation) and losses, and upwards with each allocation of taxable income.
When the units are sold, the differences between the sales price and the investors adjusted basis equals taxable gain. The limited partner will not be taxed on distributions until (1) the limited partner sells the MLP units and pays tax on the gain, which gain is increased due to the basis decrease due to prior distributions; or (2) the limited partners basis reaches zero.
For a further discussion and a description of MLP-related tax matters, see Tax Matters.
Below Investment Grade and Unrated Debt Securities
The below investment grade debt securities in which we may invest are rated from B3 to Ba1 by Moodys Investors Service, Inc., from B- to BB+ by Standard & Poors or Fitch Ratings, comparably rated by another rating agency or, if unrated, determined by Kayne Anderson to be of comparable quality.
Investment in below investment grade and unrated debt securities involves substantial risk of loss. Below investment grade debt securities or comparable unrated securities are commonly referred to as junk bonds and are considered predominantly speculative with respect to the issuers ability to pay interest and principal and are susceptible to default or decline in market value due to adverse economic and business developments. The market values for high yield securities tend to be very volatile, and these securities are less liquid than investment grade debt securities. For these reasons, to the extent we invest in below investment grade and unrated debt securities, an investment us is subject to the following specific risks: increased price sensitivity to changing interest rates and to a deteriorating economic environment; greater risk of loss due to default or declining credit quality; adverse company specific events are more likely to render the issuer unable to make interest and/or principal payments; and if a negative perception of the below investment grade debt market develops, the price and liquidity of below investment grade debt securities may be depressed. This negative perception could last for a significant period of time.
Adverse changes in economic conditions are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of a below investment grade or unrated debt issuer to make principal payments and interest payments than an investment grade issuer. The principal amount of below investment grade or unrated debt securities outstanding has proliferated in the past decade as an increasing number of issuers have used below investment grade or unrated debt securities for corporate financing. An economic downturn could severely affect the ability of highly leveraged issuers to service their debt obligations or to repay their obligations upon maturity. Similarly, downturns in profitability in specific industries, such as the Midstream Energy Company industry, could adversely affect the ability of below investment grade or unrated debt issuers in that industry to meet their obligations. The market values of lower quality debt securities tend to reflect individual developments of the issuer to a greater extent than do higher quality securities, which react primarily to fluctuations in the general level of interest rates. Factors having an adverse impact on the market value of lower quality securities may have an adverse effect on our net asset value and the market value of our common stock. In addition, we may incur additional expenses to the extent we are required to seek recovery upon a default in payment or principal or interest on our portfolio holdings. In certain circumstances, we may be required to foreclose on an issuers assets and take possession of its property or operations. In such circumstances, we would incur additional costs in disposing of such assets and potential liabilities from operating any business acquired.
The secondary market for below investment grade and unrated debt securities may not be as liquid as the secondary market for investment grade debt securities, a factor which may have an adverse effect on our ability to dispose of a particular security when necessary to meet our liquidity needs. There are fewer dealers in the market
-5-
for below investment grade and unrated debt securities than investment grade obligations. The prices quoted by different dealers may vary significantly and the spread between the bid and asked price is generally much larger than higher quality instruments. Under adverse market or economic conditions, the secondary market for below investment grade and unrated debt securities could contract further, independent of any specific adverse changes in the conditions of a particular issuer, and these instruments may become illiquid. As a result, we could find it more difficult to sell these securities or may be able to sell the securities only at prices lower than if such securities were widely traded.
We will not invest in distressed, below investment grade securities (those that are in default or the issuers of which are in bankruptcy). If a debt security becomes distressed while in our possession, we may be required to bear certain extraordinary expenses in order to protect and recover our investment if it is recoverable at all.
See Appendix A to this statement of additional information for a description of the ratings used by Moodys Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poors.
Thinly-Traded Securities
We may also invest in securities that may not be restricted, but are thinly-traded. Although common units of MLPs and common stock of energy companies trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the American Stock Exchange (AMEX), the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ) or other securities exchanges or markets, such securities may trade less than those of larger companies due to their relatively smaller capitalizations. Such securities may be difficult to dispose of at a fair price during times when we believe it is desirable to do so. Thinly-traded securities are also more difficult to value and the Advisers judgment as to value will often be given greater weight than market quotations, if any exist. If market quotations are not available, thinly-traded securities will be valued in accordance with procedures established by the Board of Directors. Investment of our capital in thinly-traded securities may restrict our ability to take advantage of market opportunities. The risks associated with thinly-traded securities may be particularly acute in situations in which our operations require cash and could result in borrowing to meet our short-term needs or incurring losses on the sale of thinly-traded securities.
Margin Borrowing
We may in the future use margin borrowing of up to 30% of total assets for investment purposes when the Adviser believes it will enhance returns. Our margin borrowings create certain additional risks. For example, should the securities that are pledged to brokers to secure margin accounts decline in value, or should brokers from which we borrowed increase their maintenance margin requirements (i.e., reduce the percentage of a position that can be financed), then we could be subject to a margin call, pursuant to which we must either deposit additional funds with the broker or suffer mandatory liquidation of the pledged securities to compensate for the decline in value. In the event of a precipitous drop in the value of our assets, we might not be able to liquidate assets quickly enough to pay off the margin debt and might suffer mandatory liquidation of positions in a declining market at relatively low prices, thereby incurring substantial losses. For these reasons, the use of borrowings for investment purposes is considered a speculative investment practice.
Our Use of Derivatives, Options and Hedging Transactions
We may, but are not required to, use various hedging and other risk management transactions to seek to manage interest rate and market risks.
Certain of these hedging and risk management transactions involve derivative instruments. A derivative is a financial instrument whose performance is derived at least in part from the performance of an underlying index, security or asset. The specific derivative instruments to be used, or other transactions to be entered into, for such hedging purposes may include options on common equities, energy-related commodities, equity, fixed income and interest rate indices, swap agreements and related instruments.
Hedging or derivative instruments on securities generally are used to hedge against price movements in one or more particular securities positions that we own or intend to acquire. Such instruments may also be used to
-6-
lock-in recognized but unrealized gains in the value of portfolio securities. Hedging strategies, if successful, can reduce the risk of loss by wholly or partially offsetting the negative effect of unfavorable price movements in the investments being hedged. However, hedging strategies can also reduce the opportunity for gain by offsetting the positive effect of favorable price movements in the hedged investments. In addition, hedging transactions have other risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying assets, the possible default of the other party to the transactions or illiquidity of the derivative investments. Further, the ability to successfully employ these transactions depends on our ability to predict pertinent market movements. Thus, their use may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require us to sell or purchase portfolio securities at inopportune times or for prices other than current market values, may limit the amount of appreciation we can realize on an investment, or may cause us to hold a security that we might otherwise sell. Additionally, amounts paid by us as premiums and cash or other assets held in margin accounts with respect to these transactions are not otherwise available to us for investment purposes.
The use of hedging instruments is subject to applicable regulations of the SEC, the several options and futures exchanges upon which they are traded, the CFTC and various state regulatory authorities. In addition, our ability to use hedging instruments may be limited by tax considerations. Market conditions will determine whether and in what circumstances we would employ any of the hedging and techniques described below. We will incur brokerage and other costs in connection with our hedging transactions.
Options on Securities and Securities Indices. We may purchase and write (sell) call and put options on any securities and securities indices.
An option on a security (or an index) is a contract that gives the holder of the option, in return for a premium, the right to buy from (in the case of a call) or sell to (in the case of a put) the writer of the option the security underlying the option (or the cash value of the index) at a specified exercise price at any time during the term of the option. The writer of an option on a security has the obligation upon exercise of the option to deliver the underlying security upon payment of the exercise price or to pay the exercise price upon delivery of the underlying security. Upon exercise, the writer of an option on an index is obligated to pay the difference between the cash value of the index and the exercise price multiplied by the specified multiplier for the index option. A put option is in the money if the exercise price exceeds the value of the futures contract that is the subject of the option.
Call options are contracts representing the right to purchase a common stock at a specified price (the strike price) at a specified future date (the expiration date). The price of the option is determined from trading activity in the broad options market, and generally reflects the relationship between the current market price for the underlying common stock and the strike price, as well as the time remaining until the expiration date. We will write call options only if they are covered. A covered call option is a call option with respect to which we own the underlying security. When a covered call option is sold by us, we receive a fee for the option, but it exposes us during the term of the option to the possible loss of opportunity to realize appreciation in the market price of the underlying security beyond the strike price of that option or to possible continued holding of a security that might otherwise have been sold to protect against depreciation in the market price of the security.
Options on securities indices are similar to options on securities, except that the exercise of securities index options requires cash settlement payments and does not involve the actual purchase or sale of securities. In addition, securities index options are designed to reflect price fluctuations in a group of securities or segment of the securities market rather than price fluctuations in a single security. These options may be listed on national domestic securities exchanges or foreign securities exchanges or traded in the over-the-counter market.
All call and put options we will write will be covered. A written call option or put option may be covered by (i) maintaining cash or liquid securities in a segregated account with a value at least equal to our obligation under the option, (ii) entering into an offsetting forward commitment and/or (iii) purchasing an offsetting option or any other option which, by virtue of its exercise price or otherwise, reduces our net exposure on our written option position. A written call option on securities is typically covered by maintaining the securities that are subject to the option in a segregated account. We may cover call options on a securities index by owning securities whose price changes are expected to be similar to those of the underlying index.
-7-
We may terminate our obligations under an exchange traded call or put option by purchasing an option identical to the one we have written. Obligations under over-the-counter options may be terminated only by entering into an offsetting transaction with the counterparty to such option. Our ability to enter into a closing sale transaction depends on the existence of a liquid secondary market. There can be no assurance that a closing purchase or sale transaction can be effected when we so desire.
We would normally purchase call options in anticipation of an increase, or put options in anticipation of a decrease (protective puts), in the market value of securities of the type in which we may invest. We may also sell call and put options to close out our purchased options.
Our options transactions will be subject to limitations established by each of the exchanges, boards of trade or other trading facilities on which such options are traded. These limitations govern the maximum number of options in each class which may be written or purchased by a single investor or group of investors acting in concert, regardless of whether the options are written or purchased on the same or different exchanges, boards of trade or other trading facilities or are held or written in one or more accounts or through one or more brokers. Thus, the number of options we may write or purchase may be affected by options written or purchased by other investment advisory clients of the Adviser. An exchange, board of trade or other trading facility may order the liquidation of positions found to be in excess of these limits, and it may impose certain other sanctions.
The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying securities are traded. To the extent that the options markets close before the markets for the underlying securities, significant price and rate movements can take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets.
There is no assurance that a liquid secondary market on a domestic or foreign options exchange will exist for any particular exchange-traded option or at any particular time. If we are unable to effect a closing purchase transaction with respect to covered options we have written, we will not be able to sell the underlying securities or dispose of assets held in a segregated account until the options expire or are exercised. Similarly, if we are unable to effect a closing sale transaction with respect to options we have purchased, we would have to exercise the options in order to realize any profit and will incur transaction costs upon the purchase or sale of underlying securities or currencies. Reasons for the absence of a liquid secondary market on an exchange include the following: (i) there may be insufficient trading interest in certain options; (ii) restrictions may be imposed by an exchange on opening transactions or closing transactions or both; (iii) trading halts, suspensions or other restrictions may be imposed with respect to particular classes or series of options; (iv) unusual or unforeseen circumstances may interrupt normal operations on an exchange; (v) the facilities of an exchange or The Options Clearing Corporation may not at all times be adequate to handle current trading volume; or (vi) one or more exchanges could, for economic or other reasons, decide or be compelled at some future date to discontinue the trading of options (or a particular class or series of options). If trading were discontinued, the secondary market on that exchange (or in that class or series of options) would cease to exist. However, outstanding options on that exchange that had been issued by The Options Clearing Corporation as a result of trades on that exchange would continue to be exercisable in accordance with their terms.
The writing and purchase of options is a highly specialized activity which involves investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The successful use of options depends in part on the Advisers ability to predict future price fluctuations and, for hedging transactions, the degree of correlation between the options and securities or currency markets.
Swap Agreements. Swap agreements are two-party contracts entered into for periods ranging from a few weeks to more than one year. A swap agreement is a financial instrument that typically involves the exchange of cash flows between two parties on specified dates (settlement dates), where the cash flows are based on agreed-upon prices, rates, indices, etc. The nominal amount on which the cash flows are calculated is called the notional amount. Swaps are individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors, such as interest rates, commodity prices, non-U.S. currency rates, mortgage securities, corporate borrowing rates, security prices, indexes or inflation rates.
-8-
The gross returns to be exchanged or swapped between the parties are generally calculated with respect to a notional amount, i.e., the return on or increase in value of a particular dollar amount invested at a particular interest rate or in a basket of securities representing a particular index.
Swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of our investments and share price. The performance of swap agreements may be affected by a change in the specific interest rate, currency, or other factors that determine the amounts of payments due to and from us. If a swap agreement calls for payments by us, we must be prepared to make such payments when due. In addition, if the counterpartys creditworthiness declines, the value of a swap agreement would be likely to decline, potentially resulting in losses.
Generally, swap agreements have fixed maturity dates that are agreed upon by the parties to the swap. The agreement can be terminated before the maturity date only under limited circumstances, such as default by one of the parties or insolvency, among others, and can be transferred by a party only with the prior written consent of the other party. We may be able to eliminate our exposure under a swap agreement either by assignment or by other disposition, or by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same party or a similarly creditworthy party. If the counterparty is unable to meet its obligations under the contract, declares bankruptcy, defaults or becomes insolvent, we may not be able to recover the money we expected to receive under the contract.
A swap agreement can be a form of leverage, which can magnify our gains or losses. In order to reduce the risk associated with leveraging, we may cover our current obligations under swap agreements according to guidelines established by the SEC. If we enter into a swap agreement on a net basis, we will be required to segregate assets with a daily value at least equal to the excess, if any, of our accrued obligations under the swap agreement over the accrued amount we are entitled to receive under the agreement. If we enter into a swap agreement on other than a net basis, we will be required to segregate assets with a value equal to the full amount of our accrued obligations under the agreement.
Equity Index Swap Agreements. In a typical equity swap agreement, one party agrees to pay another party the return on a security, security index or basket of securities in return for a specified interest rate. By entering into an equity index swap agreement, for example, the index receiver can gain exposure to securities making up the index of securities without actually purchasing those securities. Equity index swap agreements involve not only the risk associated with investment in the securities represented in the index, but also the risk that the performance of such securities, including dividends, will not exceed the interest that we will be committed to pay under the swap agreement.
Credit Default Swap Agreements. We may enter into credit default swap agreements. The buyer in a credit default contract is obligated to pay the seller a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no event of default on an underlying reference obligation has occurred. If an event of default occurs, the seller must pay the buyer the par value (full notional value) of the reference obligation in exchange for the reference obligation. We may be either the buyer or seller in the transaction. If we are a buyer and no event of default occurs, we lose our investment and recover nothing. However, if an event of default occurs, the buyer receives full notional value for a reference obligation that may have little or no value. As a seller, we receive a fixed rate of income throughout the term of the contract, which typically is between six months and three years, provided that there is no default event. If an event of default occurs, the seller must pay the buyer the full notional value of the reference obligation.
Credit default swaps involve greater risks than if we had invested in the reference obligation directly. In addition to general market risks, credit default swaps are subject to illiquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risks. We will enter into swap agreements only with counterparties who are rated investment grade quality by at least one rating agency at the time of entering into such transaction or whose creditworthiness is believed by the Adviser to be equivalent to such rating. A buyer also will lose its investment and recover nothing should no event of default occur. If an event of default were to occur, the value of the reference obligation received by the seller, coupled with the periodic payments previously received, may be less than the full notional value we pay to the buyer, resulting in a loss of value to us. When we act as a seller of a credit default swap agreement we are exposed to the risks of leverage, since if an event of default occurs the seller must pay the buyer the full notional value of the reference obligation.
-9-
If we enter into a credit default swap, we may be required to report the swap as a listed transaction for tax shelter reporting purposes on our federal income tax return. If the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) were to determine that the credit default swap is a tax shelter, we could be subject to penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.
We may in the future employ new or additional investment strategies and hedging instruments if those strategies and instruments are consistent with our investment objective and are permissible under applicable regulations governing us.
Additional Risks and Special Considerations Concerning Derivatives. In addition to the risks described above and in our prospectus, the use of derivative instruments involves certain general risks and considerations as described below.
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk that the value of the underlying assets may go up or down. Adverse movements in the value of an underlying asset can expose us to losses. Market risk is the primary risk associated with derivative transactions. Derivative instruments may include elements of leverage and, accordingly, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instrument in relation to the underlying asset may be magnified. The successful use of derivative instruments depends upon a variety of factors, particularly the Advisers ability to predict correctly changes in the relationships of such hedge instruments to our portfolio holdings, and there can be no assurance the Advisers judgment in this respect will be accurate. Consequently, the use of derivatives for hedging purposes might result in a poorer overall performance for us, whether or not adjusted for risk, than if we had not hedged our portfolio holdings.
Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk that a loss is sustained as a result of the failure of a counterparty to comply with the terms of a derivative instrument. The counterparty risk for exchange-traded derivatives is generally less than for privately-negotiated or over-the-counter derivatives, since generally a clearing agency, which is the issuer or counterparty to each exchange-traded instrument, provides a guarantee of performance. For privately-negotiated instruments, there is no similar clearing agency guarantee. In all transactions, we will bear the risk that the counterparty will default, and this could result in a loss of the expected benefit of the derivative transactions and possibly other losses to us. We will enter into transactions in derivative instruments only with counterparties that the Adviser reasonably believes are capable of performing under the contract.
Correlation Risk. Correlation risk is the risk that there might be an imperfect correlation, or even no correlation, between price movements of a derivative instrument and price movements of investments being hedged. When a derivative transaction is used to completely hedge another position, changes in the market value of the combined position (the derivative instrument plus the position being hedged) result from an imperfect correlation between the price movements of the two instruments. With a perfect hedge, the value of the combined position remains unchanged with any change in the price of the underlying asset. With an imperfect hedge, the value of the derivative instrument and its hedge are not perfectly correlated. For example, if the value of a derivative instrument used in a short hedge (such as buying a put option or selling a futures contract) increased by less than the decline in value of the hedged investments, the hedge would not be perfectly correlated. This might occur due to factors unrelated to the value of the investments being hedged, such as speculative or other pressures on the markets in which these instruments are traded. In addition, our success in using hedging instruments is subject to the Advisers ability to correctly predict changes in relationships of such hedge instruments to our portfolio holdings, and there can be no assurance that the Advisers judgment in this respect will be accurate. An imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge or expose us to a risk of loss.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk that a derivative instrument cannot be sold, closed out, or replaced quickly at or very close to its fundamental value. Generally, exchange contracts are liquid because the exchange clearinghouse is the counterparty of every contract. OTC transactions are less liquid than exchange-traded derivatives since they often can only be closed out with the other party to the transaction. We might be required by applicable regulatory requirements to maintain assets as cover, maintain segregated accounts and/or make margin payments when we take positions in derivative instruments involving obligations to third parties (i.e., instruments other than purchase options). If we are unable to close out our positions in such instruments, we might be required to continue to maintain such accounts or make such payments until the position expires, matures, or is closed out. These requirements might impair our ability to sell a security or make an investment at a time when it would
-10-
otherwise be favorable to do so, or require that we sell a portfolio security at a disadvantageous time. Our ability to sell or close out a position in an instrument prior to expiration or maturity depends upon the existence of a liquid secondary market or, in the absence of such a market, the ability and willingness of the counterparty to enter into a transaction closing out the position. Due to liquidity risk, there is no assurance that any derivatives position can be sold or closed out at a time and price that is favorable us.
Legal Risk. Legal risk is the risk of loss caused by the unenforceability of a partys obligations under the derivative. While a party seeking price certainty agrees to surrender the potential upside in exchange for downside protection, the party taking the risk is looking for a positive payoff. Despite this voluntary assumption of risk, a counterparty that has lost money in a derivative transaction may try to avoid payment by exploiting various legal uncertainties about certain derivative products.
Systemic or Interconnection Risk. Systemic or interconnection risk is the risk that a disruption in the financial markets will cause difficulties for all market participants. In other words, a disruption in one market will spill over into other markets, perhaps creating a chain reaction. Much of the OTC derivatives market takes place among the OTC dealers themselves, thus creating a large interconnected web of financial obligations. This interconnectedness raises the possibility that a default by one large dealer could create losses for other dealers and destabilize the entire market for OTC derivative instruments.
Legislation and Regulatory Risk
At any time after the date of the prospectus and this statement of additional information, legislation may be enacted that could negatively affect our assets or the issuers of such assets. Changing approaches to regulation may have a negative impact on entities in which we invest. There can be no assurance that future legislation, regulation or deregulation will not have a material adverse effect on us or will not impair the ability of the issuers of the assets we hold to achieve their business goals, and hence, for us to achieve our investment objective.
When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions
We may buy and sell securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, making payment or taking delivery at a later date, normally within 15 to 45 days of the trade date. On such transactions, the payment obligation and the interest rate are fixed at the time the buyer enters into the commitment. Beginning on the date we enter into a commitment to purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, we are required under rules of the SEC to maintain in a separate account liquid assets, consisting of cash, cash equivalents or liquid securities having a market value at all times of at least equal to the amount of the commitment. Income generated by any such assets which provide taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes is includable in our taxable income. We may enter into contracts to purchase securities on a forward basis (i.e., where settlement will occur more than 60 days from the date of the transaction) only to the extent that we specifically collateralize such obligations with a security that is expected to be called or mature within sixty days before or after the settlement date of the forward transaction. The commitment to purchase securities on a when-issued, delayed delivery or forward basis may involve an element of risk because at the time of delivery the market value may be less than cost.
Repurchase Agreements
As temporary investments, we may invest in repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement is a contractual agreement whereby the seller of securities agrees to repurchase the same security at a specified price on a future date agreed upon by the parties. The agreed-upon repurchase price determines the yield during our holding period. Repurchase agreements are considered to be loans collateralized by the underlying security that is the subject of the repurchase contract. Income generated from transactions in repurchase agreements will be taxable. We will only enter into repurchase agreements with registered securities dealers or domestic banks that, in the opinion of the Adviser, present minimal credit risk. Our risk is limited to the ability of the issuer to pay the agreed-upon repurchase price on the delivery date; however, although the value of the underlying collateral at the time the transaction is entered into always equals or exceeds the agreed-upon repurchase price, if the value of the collateral declines there is a risk of loss of both principal and interest. In the event of default, the collateral may be sold, but we may incur a loss if the value of the collateral declines, and may incur disposition costs or experience delays in connection with liquidating the collateral. In addition, if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with respect to the
-11-
seller of the security, realization upon the collateral by us may be delayed or limited. The Adviser will monitor the value of the collateral at the time the transaction is entered into and at all times subsequent during the term of the repurchase agreement in an effort to determine that such value always equals or exceeds the agreed-upon repurchase price. In the event the value of the collateral declines below the repurchase price, we will demand additional collateral from the issuer to increase the value of the collateral to at least that of the repurchase price, including interest.
Lending of Portfolio Securities
We may lend our portfolio securities to broker-dealers and banks. Any such loan must be continuously secured by collateral in cash or cash equivalents maintained on a current basis in an amount at least equal to the market value of the securities loaned by us. We would continue to receive the equivalent of the interest or dividends paid by the issuer on the securities loaned, and would also receive an additional return that may be in the form of a fixed fee or a percentage of the collateral. We may pay reasonable fees for services in arranging these loans. We would have the right to call the loan and obtain the securities loaned at any time on notice of not more than five (5) business days. We would not have the right to vote the securities during the existence of the loan but would call the loan to permit voting of the securities, if, in the Advisers judgment, a material event requiring a stockholder vote would otherwise occur before the loan was repaid. In the event of bankruptcy or other default of the borrower, we could experience both delays in liquidating the loan collateral or recovering the loaned securities and losses, including (a) possible decline in the value of the collateral or in the value of the securities loaned during the period while we seek to enforce its rights thereto, (b) possible subnormal levels of income and lack of access to income during this period, and (c) expenses of enforcing its rights.
-12-
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Officers
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, including the duties performed for us under the Investment Management Agreement. The Directors set broad policies for us and choose our officers. The members of our Board of Directors are as follows: Anne K. Costin, Steven C. Good, Gerald I. Isenberg, Terrence J. Quinn and Kevin S. McCarthy. The Directors who are not interested persons of Kayne Anderson or our underwriters as defined in the 1940 Act are referred to herein as Independent Directors. Due to a relationship with one of the underwriters in our initial public offering and this offering, Ms. Costin is expected to be considered an interested person of the Company, as defined in the 1940 Act, until after the completion of this offering and, in the future, may be treated as an interested person during subsequent offerings of our securities if the relevant offering is underwritten by the underwriter in which Ms. Costin owns securities. Unless noted otherwise, references to our Independent Directors include Ms. Costin.
Our Board of Directors has three standing committees, the Nominating Committee, the Valuation Committee and the Audit Committee. The Nominating Committee is responsible for appointing and nominating independent persons to our Board of Directors. Ms. Costin and Messrs. Good, Quinn, and Isenberg are members of the Nominating Committee. If there is no vacancy on the Board, the Board of Directors will not actively seek recommendations from other parties, including stockholders. When a vacancy on the Board of Directors occurs and nominations are sought to fill such vacancy, the Nominating Committee may seek nominations from those sources it deems appropriate in its discretion, including our stockholders. To submit a recommendation for nomination as a candidate for a position on the Board, stockholders shall mail such recommendation to David Shladovsky, Secretary, at our address, 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067. Such recommendation shall include the following information: (a) evidence of stock ownership of the person or entity recommending the candidate (if submitted by one of our stockholders), (b) a full description of the proposed candidates background, including their education, experience, current employment, and date of birth, (c) names and addresses of at least three professional references for the candidate, (d) information as to whether the candidate is an interested person in relation to us, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act and such other information that may be considered to impair the candidates independence and (e) any other information that may be helpful to the Committee in evaluating the candidate. If a recommendation is received with satisfactorily completed information regarding a candidate during a time when a vacancy exists on the Board of Directors or during such other time as the Nominating Committee is accepting recommendations, the recommendation will be forwarded to the Chair of the Nominating Committee and counsel to the Independent Directors. Recommendations received at any other time will be kept on file until such time as the Nominating Committee is accepting recommendations, at which point they may be considered for nomination. The Valuation Committee is responsible for the oversight of our pricing procedures and the valuation of our securities in accordance with such procedures. Ms. Costin and Messrs. McCarthy and Quinn are members of the Valuation Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial reporting process, our system of internal controls, audit process and evaluating and appointing our independent auditors (subject also to Board of Director approval). Messrs. Good, Quinn, and Isenberg serve on the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met twice during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004.
Our Directors and officers who are interested persons by virtue of their employment by Kayne Anderson serve without any compensation from us. Each of our Independent Directors receives a $25,000 annual retainer for serving as a Director. In addition, our Independent Directors receive fees for each meeting attended, as follows: $2,500 per Board meeting; $1,500 per Audit Committee meeting; and $500 for other committee meetings. Committee meeting fees are not paid unless the meeting is more than 15 minutes in length. The Independent Directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred as a result of attendance at meetings of the Board and its committees. The following table sets forth estimated compensation to be paid by us during our first full fiscal year to the Independent Directors. We have no retirement or pension plans.
-13-
Estimated Total | ||||||||
Estimated Aggregate | Compensation From Us and | |||||||
Director | Compensation From Us | Fund Complex(1) | ||||||
Anne K. Costin
|
$41,000 | $82,000 | ||||||
Steven C. Good
|
$41,000 | $82,000 | ||||||
Gerald I. Isenberg
|
$41,000 | $82,000 | ||||||
Terrence
J. Quinn
|
$41,000 | $82,000 | ||||||
(1) | The Directors also oversee Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc., an investment company managed by our Adviser. |
None of our Independent Directors (other than Mr. Isenberg) nor any of their immediate family members, has ever been a director, officer or employee of Kayne Anderson or its affiliates. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Isenberg was a board member of the Kayne Anderson Rudnick Mutual Funds, whose investment adviser, Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management, LLC, may be deemed an affiliate of Kayne Anderson. We have no employees. Our officers are compensated by our Adviser. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. The initial term of the first class expired in 2005. The initial terms of the second and third classes will expire in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Upon expiration of their current terms, directors of each class will be elected to serve for three-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualify and each year one class of directors will be elected by our stockholders.
Certain officers of Kayne Anderson, including all of our officers, own, in the aggregate, approximately $5 million of our common stock.
The following table sets forth the dollar range of our equity securities beneficially owned by our Directors as of December 31, 2004:
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity | ||||||||
Securities in All Registered | ||||||||
Dollar Range of Our Equity | Investment Companies Overseen by | |||||||
Director | Securities Owned by Director | Director in Fund Complex (1) | ||||||
Anne K. Costin
|
$10,000-$50,000 | $10,000-$50,000 | ||||||
Steven C. Good
|
$10,000-$50,000 | $10,000-$50,000 | ||||||
Gerald I. Isenberg
|
None | None | ||||||
Terrence
J. Quinn
|
$10,000-$50,000 | $10,000-$50,000 | ||||||
Kevin S. McCarthy
|
Over $100,000 | Over $100,000 | ||||||
(1) | The Directors also oversee Kayne Anderson Energy Total Return Fund, Inc., an investment company managed by our Adviser. |
Except as described in the table below, as of the date of this Statement of Additional Information, our Independent Directors (and their immediate family members) do not beneficially own securities in entities directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, our Adviser. The information in the table is as of December 31, 2004.
Name of Owners and | |||||||||||||||||||
Relationships to | Title of | Value of | Percent of | ||||||||||||||||
Director | Director | Company | Class | Securities | Class | ||||||||||||||
Gerald I. Isenberg
|
Self | Kayne Anderson Capital Income Partners (QP), L.P.(1) | Partnership units | $2,041,614 | 0.39% | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Kayne Anderson may be deemed to control this fund by virtue of its role as the funds general partner. |
As of the date of this Statement of Additional Information, our Independent Directors (excluding Ms. Costin) and their immediate family members do not beneficially own securities in entities directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, our underwriters. Due to her ownership of securities issued by one of the underwriters in this offering, Ms. Costin is expected to be treated as an interested person of the Company, as defined in the 1940 Act, during and until the completion of this offering, and, in the future, may be treated as an interested person during subsequent offerings of our securities if the relevant offering is underwritten by the underwriter in which Ms. Costin owns securities.
INVESTMENT ADVISER
Kayne Anderson, 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Second Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067, our investment adviser, is registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Our Adviser provides us with professional investment supervision and management and permits any of its officers or employees to serve without compensation as our Directors or officers if elected to such positions.
Kayne Anderson acts as our investment adviser pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement. The Investment Management Agreement will continue in effect from year to year after its initial two-year term so long as its continuation is approved at least annually by our Directors including a majority of Independent Directors or the vote of a majority of our outstanding voting securities. The Investment Management Agreement may be terminated at any time without the payment of any penalty upon 60 days written notice by either party, or by action of the Board of Directors or by a majority vote of our outstanding voting securities (accompanied by appropriate notice), and will terminate automatically upon assignment. The Investment Management Agreement may also be terminated, at any time, without payment of any penalty, by the Board of Directors or by vote of a majority of our
-14-
outstanding voting securities (as defined under the 1940 Act), in the event that it shall have been established by a court of competent jurisdiction that the Adviser or any officer or director of the Adviser has taken any action which results in a breach of the covenants of the Adviser set forth in the Investment Management Agreement. The Investment Management Agreement provides that the Adviser shall not be liable for any loss sustained by reason of the purchase, sale or retention of any security, whether or not such purchase, sale or retention shall have been based upon the investigation and research made by any other individual, firm or corporation, if such recommendation shall have been selected with due care and in good faith, except loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the Adviser in performance of its obligations and duties, or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the Investment Management Agreement. As compensation for the Advisers services, we pay the Adviser a fee as described in our prospectus. See Management Investment Management Agreement in our prospectus.
In addition to the Advisers fee, we pay all other costs and expenses of our operations, such as compensation of our Directors (other than those affiliated with our Adviser), custodian, transfer agency, administrative, accounting and dividend disbursing expenses, legal fees, leverage expenses, expenses of independent auditors, expenses of personnel including those who are affiliates of the Adviser reasonably incurred in connection with arranging or structuring portfolio transactions for us, expenses of repurchasing our securities, expenses of preparing, printing and distributing stockholder reports, notices, proxy statements and reports to governmental agencies, and taxes, if any. All fees and expenses are accrued and deducted before payment of dividends to investors.
On July 12, 2004, at the initial meeting of the Board of Directors, the Board considered the approval of an Investment Management Agreement with Kayne Anderson. In determining whether to approve the Investment Management Agreement, the Board of Directors reviewed and evaluated information provided by the Adviser in accordance with Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act. At the meeting, the Board considered a number of factors in reviewing and recommending approval of the new Investment Management Agreement, including the nature and quality of the services to be provided. The Board also considered the fees and expenses estimated to be borne by us, and the profitability of the relationship for the Adviser.
In reviewing the quality of services to be provided to us, the Board of Directors considered performance information for other investment companies managed by Kayne Anderson. The Board considered the quality and depth of Kayne Andersons organization in general and of the investment professionals that would provide services to us. The Board reviewed the fees and expenses to be borne by us and noted, among other things, that Kayne Anderson is committed to managing and monitoring our operating expenses. The Board also reviewed the fees charged for closed-end investment companies that have relevant comparable characteristics. The Board noted that some closed-end investment companies that primarily invest in public securities of Midstream Energy Companies were on the lower end of the proposed fulcrum fee. Because we invest approximately 50% of our total assets in unregistered or otherwise restricted securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies, the Board also considered the management fees of closed-end investment companies that invest a substantial portion of their assets in private placements, and found that their management fees were on the higher end of the proposed maximum fulcrum fee, and had incentive fees that potentially would substantially exceed the proposed fulcrum fee. On balance, because we have a blend of the characteristics and portfolio composition of both peer groups, the Board determined that the fees to be received by Kayne Anderson were reasonable in relation to the services to be provided. Further, the Board determined that the proposed fulcrum fee would be in the best interests of our stockholders because the management fee rate will not reach the higher end of the fulcrum unless our returns substantially outperform our benchmark index (the Standard & Poors 400 Utilities Index) by more than 6.00%.
The Board examined the ability of the Adviser to provide an appropriate level of support and resources to us and whether the Adviser had sufficiently qualified personnel. The Board reviewed the costs and profitability to the Adviser in providing services to us and reviewed the benefits to be derived by the Adviser from its relationship with us, including the Advisers use of soft dollars. The Board also considered the indirect benefits that might be received by the Adviser in advising us.
Based on the review, the Board, including the Independent Directors, concluded that the proposed management fees and other expenses to be borne by us under the Investment Management Agreement are fair, both absolutely and in comparison with those of other investment companies in the industry, and that stockholders should
-15-
receive reasonable value in return for paying such fees and expenses. The Board therefore concluded that approving the management arrangement with the Adviser was in the best interests of stockholders and the Company.
CODE OF ETHICS
We and the Adviser have each adopted a code of ethics, as required by federal securities laws. Under both codes of ethics, employees who are designated as access persons may engage in personal securities transactions, including transactions involving securities that are being considered for our portfolio or that are currently held by us, subject to certain general restrictions and procedures. The personal securities transactions of our access persons and those of the Adviser will be governed by the applicable code of ethics.
The Adviser and its affiliates manage other investment companies and accounts. The Adviser may give advice and take action with respect to any of the other funds it manages, or for its own account, that may differ from action taken by the Adviser on our behalf. Similarly, with respect to our portfolio, the Adviser is not obligated to recommend, buy or sell, or to refrain from recommending, buying or selling any security that the Adviser and access persons, as defined by applicable federal securities laws, may buy or sell for its or their own account or for the accounts of any other fund. The Adviser is not obligated to refrain from investing in securities held by us or other funds it manages.
We and the Adviser have text-only versions of the codes of ethics that will be available on the EDGAR Database on the SECs internet web site at www.sec.gov. You may also review and copy those documents by visiting the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 202-942-8090. In addition, copies of the codes of ethics may be obtained from us free of charge at (877) 657-3863/MLP-FUND, or by mailing the appropriate duplicating fee and writing to the SECs Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549 or submitting an e-mail request at publicinfo@sec.gov.
PROXY VOTING PROCEDURES
SEC-registered advisers that have the authority to vote (client) proxies (which authority may be implied from a general grant of investment discretion) are required to adopt policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the adviser votes proxies in the best interests of its clients. Registered advisers also must maintain certain records on proxy voting. In many cases, we will invest in securities that do not generally entitle us to voting rights in our portfolio companies. When we do have voting rights, we will delegate the exercise of such rights to our Adviser, to whom our Board has delegated the authority to develop policies and procedures relating to proxy voting. Our Advisers proxy voting policies and procedures are summarized below.
In determining how to vote, officers of our Adviser will consult with each other and our other investment professionals, taking into account the interests of us and our investors as well as any potential conflicts of interest. When the Advisers investment professionals identify a potentially material conflict of interest regarding a vote, the vote and the potential conflict will be presented to the Advisers Proxy Voting Committee for a final decision. If the Advisor determines that such conflict prevents the Advisor from determining how to vote on the proxy proposal in the best interests of the Company, the Advisor shall either (1) vote in accordance with a predetermined specific policy to the extent that the Advisors policies and procedures include a pre-determined voting policy for such proposal or (2) disclose the conflict to our Board and obtain the Boards consent prior to voting on such proposal.
An officer of our Adviser will keep a written record of how all such proxies are voted. Our Adviser will retain records of (1) its proxy voting policies and procedures, (2) all proxy statements received regarding investors securities (or it may rely on proxy statements filed on the SECs EDGAR system in lieu thereof), (3) all votes cast on behalf of investors, (4) investor written requests for information regarding how the Adviser voted proxies of that investor and any written response to any (written or oral) investor requests for such information, and (5) any documents prepared by the Adviser that are material to making a decision on a proxy vote or that memorialized such decision. The aforementioned proxy voting records will be maintained, preserved and easily accessible for a period of not less than five years. The Adviser may rely on one or more third parties to make and retain the records of proxy statements and votes cast.
-16-
Information regarding how proxies relating to our portfolio securities are voted during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2005 will be made available on or around August 30, 2005, (i) without charge, upon request, by calling (877) 657-3863/MLP-FUND (toll-free/collect); and (ii) on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Our Adviser has adopted proxy voting guidelines that provide general direction regarding how the Adviser will vote on a number of significant and recurring ballot proposals. These guidelines are not mandatory voting policies, but rather are an indication of general voting preferences. The following are a few examples of these guidelines:
| The Adviser generally votes against proposals to classify the board and for proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect directors annually. | |||
| The Adviser generally votes against proposals to ratify a poison pill and for proposals that ask a company to submit its poison pill for shareholder ratification. | |||
| The Adviser generally votes against proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve charter and bylaw amendments and for proposals to lower such supermajority shareholder vote requirements. | |||
| The Adviser generally votes for management proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issue provided management demonstrated a satisfactory reason for the potential issuance of the additionally authorized shares. | |||
| The Adviser generally votes for proposals to increase common share authorization for a stock split provided management demonstrates a reasonable basis for the split and for proposals to implement a reverse stock split provided management demonstrates a reasonable basis for the reverse split. | |||
| Absent special circumstances (e.g., actions taken in the context of a hostile takeover attempt) indicating an abusive purpose, the Adviser, on a case-by-case basis, votes proposals that would authorize the creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend and distribution, and other rights. | |||
| Proposals to change a companys state of incorporation area examined on a case-by-case basis. | |||
| The Adviser, on a case-by-case basis, votes on mergers and acquisitions taking into account at least the following: |
| anticipated financial and operating benefits; | |||
| offer price (cost vs. premium); | |||
| prospects of the combined companies, | |||
| how the deal was negotiated; and | |||
| changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights. |
| The Adviser generally supports shareholder social and environmental proposals, and votes such matters, on a case-by-case basis, where the proposal enhances the long-term value of the shareholder and does not diminish the return on investment. |
-17-
PORTFOLIO MANAGER INFORMATION
The following section discusses the accounts managed by our portfolio managers, the structure and method of our portfolio managers compensation, and their ownership of our securities. This information is current as of our fiscal year-end, November 30, 2004. We are the only registered investment company managed by our portfolio managers, Kevin McCarthy and J.C. Frey. Currently, Mr. McCarthy does not provide day-to-day portfolio management to any other accounts. Accordingly, there are no material conflicts of interest with respect to other accounts. The management fee we pay to Kayne Anderson is adjusted based on our performance in comparison to an Index. See Management Investment Management Agreement in our prospectus and Investment Adviser in our statement of additional information. Our net assets, $792.8 million as of November 30, 2004, are the registered investment company assets and total assets managed by Mr. McCarthy that are subject to a performance-based fee. Mr. Frey provides day-to-day portfolio management to 8 other accounts (6 pooled investment vehicles with total assets of approximately $776 million; and 2 separate accounts with total assets of $115 million), all of which have advisory fees that are based on the performance of the account. In combination with our assets, Mr. Frey manages approximately $1.6 billion. Messrs. McCarthy and Frey are compensated by the Adviser through distributions based on the amount of assets they manage and receive a portion of the advisory fees applicable to those accounts, which, as noted above, are based in part, on the performance of those accounts, which in the case of our performance, is measured against an Index. Some of the other accounts managed by Mr. Frey may have investment strategies that are similar to ours. However, Kayne Anderson manages potential conflicts of interest by allocating investment opportunities in accordance with its allocation policies and procedures. Mr. McCarthy owns more than $500,000 and Mr. Frey owns more than $250,000 of our common stock.
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS AND BROKERAGE
Subject to the oversight of the Board of Directors, the Adviser is responsible for decisions to buy and sell securities for us and for the placement of our securities business, the negotiation of the commissions to be paid on brokered transactions, the prices for principal trades in securities, and the allocation of portfolio brokerage and principal business. It is the policy of the Adviser to seek the best execution at the best security price available with respect to each transaction, and with respect to brokered transactions in light of the overall quality of brokerage and research services provided to the Adviser and its advisees. The best price to the us means the best net price without regard to the mix between purchase or sale price and commission, if any. Purchases may be made from underwriters, dealers, and, on occasion, the issuers. Commissions will be paid on our futures and options transactions, if any. The purchase price of portfolio securities purchased from an underwriter or dealer may include underwriting commissions and dealer spreads. We may pay mark-ups on principal transactions. In selecting broker/dealers and in negotiating commissions, the Adviser considers, among other things, the firms reliability, the quality of its execution services on a continuing basis and its financial condition. The selection of a broker-dealer may take into account the sale of products sponsored or advised by the Adviser and/or its affiliates. If approved by our Board, the Adviser may select an affiliated broker-dealer to effect transactions in our fund, so long as such transactions are consistent with Rule 17e-1 under the 1940 Act.
Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Section 28(e)), permits an investment adviser, under certain circumstances, to cause an account to pay a broker or dealer who supplies brokerage and research services a commission for effecting a transaction in excess of the amount of commission another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting the transaction. Brokerage and research services include (a) furnishing advice as to the value of securities, the advisability of investing, purchasing or selling securities, and the availability of securities or purchasers or sellers of securities; (b) furnishing analyses and reports concerning issuers, industries, securities, economic factors and trends, portfolio strategy, and the performance of accounts; and (c) effecting securities transactions and performing functions incidental thereto (such as clearance, settlement, and custody).
In light of the above, in selecting brokers, the Adviser may consider investment and market information and other research, such as economic, securities and performance measurement research, provided by such brokers, and the quality and reliability of brokerage services, including execution capability, performance, and financial responsibility. Accordingly, the commissions charged by any such broker may be greater than the amount another firm might charge if the Adviser determines in good faith that the amount of such commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the research information and brokerage services provided by such broker to the Adviser or to us. The Adviser believes that the research information received in this manner provides us with benefits by supplementing the research otherwise available to us. The investment advisory fees paid by us to the Adviser under the Investment Management Agreement are not reduced as a result of receipt by the Adviser of research services.
The Adviser may place portfolio transactions for other advisory accounts that it advises, and research services furnished by firms through which we effect our securities transactions may be used by the Adviser in
-18-
servicing some or all of its accounts; not all of such services may be used by the Adviser in connection with us. Because the volume and nature of the trading activities of the accounts are not uniform, the amount of commissions in excess of those charged by another broker paid by each account for brokerage and research services will vary. However, the Adviser believes such costs to us will not be disproportionate to the benefits received by us on a continuing basis. The Adviser seeks to allocate portfolio transactions equitably whenever concurrent decisions are made to purchase or sell securities by us and another advisory account. In some cases, this procedure could have an adverse effect on the price or the amount of securities available to us. In making such allocations between the us and other advisory accounts, the main factors considered by the Adviser are the investment objective, the relative size of portfolio holding of the same or comparable securities, the availability of cash for investment and the size of investment commitments generally held, and the opinions of the persons responsible for recommending investments to us and such other accounts and funds.
LIMITATION ON LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. Our Charter contains such a provision which eliminates directors and officers liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act.
Our Charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to obligate us to indemnify any present or former Director or officer or any individual who, while serving as our Director or officer and, at our request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee, from and against any claim or liability to which that individual may become subject or which that individual may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding.
Our Bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former Director or officer or any individual who, while serving as our Director or officer and, at our request, serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee and who is made, or threatened to be made, a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in any such capacity from and against any claim or liability to which that individual may become subject or which that individual may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity and to pay or reimburse his or her reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our Charter and Bylaws also permit us to indemnify and advance expenses to any individual who served a predecessor of us in any of the capacities described above and any employee or agent of ours or our predecessor.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provide otherwise, which is not the case for our Charter) to indemnify a director or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits a corporation to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses to a director or officer in advance of final disposition of a proceeding upon the corporations receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct
-19-
necessary for indemnification by the corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
In accordance with the 1940 Act, we will not indemnify any person for any liability to which such person would be subject by reason of such persons willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office.
NET ASSET VALUE
Our net asset value is calculated as set forth in Net Asset Value in our prospectus. In addition, in fair valuing our investments, consideration is given to several factors, which may include, among others, the following:
| the projected cash flows for the issuer or borrower; | |||
| the fundamental business data relating to the issuer or borrower; | |||
| an evaluation of the forces which influence the market in which these securities are purchased and sold; | |||
| the type, size and cost of holding; | |||
| the financial statements of the issuer or borrower; | |||
| the credit quality and cash flow of issuer, based on the Advisers or external analysis; | |||
| the information as to any transactions in or offers for the holding; | |||
| the price extent of public trading in similar securities (or equity securities) of the issuer/borrower, or comparable companies; | |||
| the distributions and coupon payments; | |||
| the quality, value and saleability of collateral securing the security or loan; | |||
| the business prospects of the issuer/borrower, including any ability to obtain money or resources from a parent or affiliate and an assessment of the issuers or borrowers management; | |||
| any decline in value over time due to the nature of the assets for example, an entity that has a finite-life concession agreement with a government agency to provide a service (e.g., toll roads and airports); | |||
| the liquidity or illiquidity of the market for the particular portfolio instrument; and | |||
| other factors deemed relevant. |
Although a trading discount will not normally be applied to freely tradable securities, Kayne Anderson may recommend to the Valuation Committee that such a discount be applied when the relevant trading market is unusually illiquid or limited, or the size of our position is large compared to normal trading volumes over time.
We may rely to some extent on information provided by the MLPs, which may not necessarily be timely, to estimate taxable income allocable to the MLP units held in our portfolio and to estimate the associated deferred tax
-20-
liability. Such estimates will be made in good faith and reviewed in accordance with the Valuation Procedures approved by our Board of Directors. From time to time we will modify our estimates and/or assumptions regarding our deferred tax liability as new information becomes available. To the extent we modify our estimates and/or assumptions, our net asset value would likely fluctuate.
Publicly traded securities with a readily available market price are valued as described below. Readily marketable portfolio securities listed on any exchange other than the NASDAQ are valued, except as indicated below, at the last sale price on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the mean of the most recent bid and asked prices on such day. Securities admitted to trade on the NASDAQ are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Portfolio securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price on the business day as of which such value is being determined at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities.
Equity securities traded in the over-the-counter market, but excluding securities admitted to trading on the NASDAQ, are valued at the closing bid prices. Fixed income securities with a remaining maturity of 60 days or more are valued by us using a pricing service. When price quotes are not available, fair market value is based on prices of comparable securities. Fixed income securities maturing within 60 days are valued on an amortized cost basis.
Any derivative transaction that we enter into may, depending on the applicable market environment, have a positive or negative value for purposes of calculating our net asset value. Any option transaction that we enter into may, depending on the applicable market environment, have no value or a positive value. Exchange traded options and futures contracts are valued at the closing price in the market where such contracts are principally traded.
Because we are obligated to pay corporate income taxes, we accrue tax liability. As with any other liability, our net asset value is reduced by the accruals of our current and deferred tax liabilities (and any tax payments required in excess of such accruals). The allocation between current and deferred income taxes is determined based upon the value of assets reported for book purposes compared to the respective net tax bases of assets recognized for federal income tax purposes. It is anticipated that cash distributions from MLPs in which we invest will not equal the amount of our taxable income because of the depreciation and amortization recorded by the MLPs in our portfolio. As a result, a portion of such cash distributions may not be treated by us as income for federal income tax purposes. The relative portion of such distributions not treated as income for tax purposes will vary among the MLPs, and also will vary year by year for each MLP. We will be able to confirm the portion of each distribution recognized as taxable income as we receive annual tax reporting information from each MLP.
TAX MATTERS
The following discussion of federal income tax matters is based on the advice of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, our counsel.
Matters Addressed
This section and the discussion in our prospectus (see Tax Matters) provide a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to the persons who purchase, own and dispose of shares of our common stock. It does not address all federal income tax consequences that may apply to an investment in our common stock or to particular categories of investors, some of which may be subject to special rules. Unless otherwise indicated, this discussion is limited to taxpayers who are U.S. persons, as defined herein. The discussion that follows is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue Code) and Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder as in effect on the date hereof and on existing judicial and administrative interpretations thereof. These authorities are subject to change and to differing interpretations, which could apply retroactively. Potential investors should consult their own tax advisors in determining the federal, state, local, foreign and any other tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock. This discussion does not address all tax consequences that may be applicable to a U.S. person that is a beneficial owner of our common stock, nor does it address, unless specifically indicated, the tax consequences to, among others, (i) persons that may be subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law, including, but
-21-
not limited to, banks, insurance companies, thrift institutions, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, tax-exempt organizations and dealers in securities or currencies, (ii) persons that will hold our common stock as part of a position in a straddle or as part of a hedging, conversion or other integrated investment transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (iii) persons whose functional currency is not the United States dollar or (iv) persons that do not hold our common stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code.
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. person is (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation or partnership organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia (other than a partnership that is not treated as a United States person under any applicable Treasury regulations), (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of such trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all the substantial decisions of such trust. Notwithstanding clause (iv) above, to the extent provided in regulations, certain trusts in existence on August 20, 1996, and treated as U.S. persons prior to such date that elect to continue to be so treated also shall be considered U.S. persons.
Tax Characterization for U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes
We are treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, we are subject to U.S. corporate income tax on our taxable income. Such taxable income would generally include all of our net income from our limited partner investments in MLPs. The current U.S. federal maximum graduated income tax rate for corporations is 35%. In addition, the United States also imposes a 20% alternative minimum tax on the recalculated alternative minimum taxable income of an entity treated as a corporation. Any such U.S. corporate income tax or alternative minimum tax could materially reduce cash available to make interest payments on our common stock. We are also obligated to pay state income tax on our taxable income, either because the states follow our federal classification as a corporation or because the states separately impose a tax on us.
The MLPs in which we invest are generally treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partner in the MLPs, we are required to report our allocable share of partnership income, gain, loss, deduction and expense, whether or not any cash is distributed from the MLPs.
The MLPs in which we invest are in the energy sector, primarily operating midstream energy assets, therefore, we anticipate that the majority of our items of income, gain, loss, deduction and expense is related to energy ventures. However, some items are likely to relate to the temporary investment of our capital, which may be unrelated to energy ventures.
In general, energy ventures have historically generated taxable income less than the amount of cash distributions that they produced at least for periods of the investments life cycle. We anticipate that we will not incur U.S. federal income tax on a significant portion of our cash flow received, particularly after taking into account our current operating expenses. However, our particular investments may not perform consistently with historical patterns in the industry, and additional tax may be incurred by us.
Although we hold our interests in MLPs for investment purposes, we are likely to sell interests in a particular MLP from time to time. On any such sale, we will recognize gain or loss based upon the difference between the consideration received for tax purposes on the sale and our tax basis in the interest sold. The consideration received is generally the amount paid by the purchaser plus any debt of the MLP allocated to us that will shift to the purchaser on the sale. Our tax basis in an MLP starts with the amount paid for the interest, but is decreased for any distributions of cash received by us in excess of our allocable share of taxable income and decreased by our allocable share of net losses. Thus, although cash in excess of taxable income and net tax losses may create a temporary economic benefit to us, they will increase the amount of gain (or decrease the amount of loss) on the sale of an interest in an MLP. Favorable federal income tax rates do not apply to our long-term capital gains. Thus, we are subject to federal income tax on our long-term capital gains at ordinary income rates of up to 35%.
-22-
In calculating our alternative minimum taxable income, certain percentage depletion deductions and intangible drilling costs may be treated as items of tax preference. Items of tax preference increase alternative minimum taxable income and increase the likelihood that we may be subject to the alternative minimum tax.
We have not, and we will not, elect to be treated as a regulated investment company for federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a regulated investment company, the income and assets of the company must meet certain minimum threshold tests. Because we invest principally in MLPs, we cannot meet such tests. In contrast to the tax rules that will apply to us, a regulated investment company generally does not pay corporate income tax, taking into consideration a deduction for dividends paid to its stockholders. At the present time, the regulated investment company taxation rules have no application to us.
Distributions. Our distributions will be treated as dividends to our common stockholders to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined for federal income tax purposes.
As discussed in greater detail below, dividends that qualify as qualified dividend income are generally taxed to individuals at a maximum 15% rate. Corporations are generally subject to tax on dividends at a maximum 35% rate, but corporations may be eligible to deduct 70% (or more) of the dividends if certain holding period requirements are met. Common stockholders that are not U.S. persons are generally subject to a 30% withholding tax, unless (i) the common stockholders interest is effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business and the common stockholder provides us with a Form W-8ECI signed under penalties of perjury (in which case, the common stockholder will be subject to the normal U.S. graduated rates) or (ii) the common stockholder is eligible for the benefits of a U.S. income tax treaty and provides us with a Form W-8BEN signed under penalties of perjury (in which case, the common stockholder will be subject to the rate of withholding provided for in the relevant treaty).
If our distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be treated as a non-taxable adjustment to the basis of the common stock to the extent of such basis, and then as capital gain to the extent of the excess distribution. Such gain will be long-term capital gain if the holding period for the common stock is more than one year. Individuals are currently subject to a maximum tax rate of 15% on long-term capital gains. This rate is currently scheduled to increase to 20% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2008. Corporations are taxed on capital gains at their ordinary graduated rates.
Because unsevered natural resources are viewed as interests in real property for some purposes of the Internal Revenue Code, depending upon the nature and location of the MLPs assets, we could from time to time be classified as a U.S. real property holding company. If we are classified as a U.S. real property holding company, dispositions of interests in us by a non-U.S. common stockholder and distributions in excess of a non-U.S. common stockholders basis may be subject to 10% withholding.
A corporations earnings and profits are generally calculated by making certain adjustments to the corporations reported taxable income. Based upon the historic performance of similar MLPs, we anticipate that the distributed cash from the MLPs in our portfolio will exceed our earnings and profits. Thus, we anticipate that only a portion of our distributions will be treated as dividends to our common stockholders for federal income tax purposes.
Special rules apply to the calculation of earnings and profits for corporations invested in energy ventures. Our earnings and profits will be calculated using (i) straight-line depreciation rather than a percentage depletion method and (ii) five-year and ten-year amortization of drilling costs and exploration and development costs, respectively. Thus, these deductions may be significantly lower for purposes of calculating earnings and profits than they are for purposes of calculating taxable income. Because of these differences, we may make distributions out of earnings and profits, treated as dividends, in years in which our distributions exceed our taxable income.
Under current law, the maximum federal income tax rate for individuals on qualified dividend income is generally 15% although such favorable treatment could be repealed by new legislation. The portion of our distributions treated as a dividend for federal income tax purposes should be treated as qualified dividend income for federal income tax purposes, subject to certain holding period and other requirements. This rate of tax on dividends is currently scheduled to revert to ordinary income rates for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008, with
-23-
the maximum marginal federal income tax rate being 35% at such time with another increase to 39.6% currently scheduled to be effective after December 31, 2010.
A common stockholder participating in our automatic dividend reinvestment plan will be taxed upon the reinvested amount as if the dividend were actually received by the participating common stockholder and the participating common stockholder reinvested such amount in additional shares of our common stock.
We will notify common stockholders annually as to the federal income tax status of our distributions to them.
Sale of Stock. Upon the sale of common stock, a common stockholder will generally recognize capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount received (or deemed received) on the sale and the common stockholders tax basis in the common stock sold. As discussed above, such tax basis may be less than the price paid for the common stock as a result of our distributions in excess of our earnings and profits. Such capital gain or loss will generally be long-term capital gain or loss, if such common stock were capital assets held for more than one year.
Because unsevered natural resources are viewed as interests in real property for some purposes of the Internal Revenue Code, depending upon the nature and location of the MLPs assets, we could from time to time be classified as a U.S. real property holding company. If we are classified as a U.S. real property holding company, dispositions of interests in us by a non-U.S. common stockholder and distributions in excess of a non-U.S. common stockholders basis, may be subject to 10% income tax withholding.
Information Reporting and Withholding. We will be required to report annually to the IRS, and to each common stockholder, the amount of distributions and consideration paid in redemptions, and the amount withheld for federal income taxes, if any, for each calendar year, except as to exempt holders (including certain corporations, tax-exempt organizations, qualified pension and profit-sharing trusts, and individual retirement accounts). Each common stockholder (other than common stockholders who are not subject to the reporting requirements without supplying any documentation) will be required to provide to us, under penalties of perjury, an IRS Form W-9, Form W-8BEN, Form W-8ECI or an equivalent form containing the common stockholders name, address, correct federal taxpayer identification number and a statement that the common stockholder is not subject to backup withholding. Should a non-exempt common stockholder fail to provide the required certification, backup withholding will apply. The current backup withholding rate for domestic persons is 28%, but such rate is scheduled to increase to 31% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010. As mentioned above, non-U.S. persons may be subject to withholding tax at a rate of 30%, if appropriate documentation demonstrating eligibility for a lower rate is not provided. Any such withholding will be allowed as a credit against the common stockholders federal income tax liability provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Tax Consequences of Certain Investments
Federal Income Taxation of MLPs. MLPs are generally intended to be taxed as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, an MLP is treated as a pass-through entity for federal income tax purposes. This means that the federal income items of the MLP, though calculated and determined at the partnership level, are allocated among the partners in the MLP and are included directly in the calculation of the taxable income of the partners whether or not cash flow is distributed from the MLP. The MLP files an information return, but normally pays no federal income tax.
MLPs are often publicly traded. Publicly traded partnerships (PTPs) are generally treated as corporations for federal income tax purposes. However, if a PTP satisfies certain income character requirements, the PTP will generally continue to be treated as partnership for federal income tax purposes. Under these requirements, a PTP must receive at least 90% of its gross income from certain qualifying income sources.
Qualifying income for most PTPs includes interest, dividends, real property rents, real property gains, and income and gain from the exploration, development, mining or production, processing, refining, transportation or marketing of any mineral or natural resource (including fertilizer, geothermal energy, and timber).
-24-
For this reason, PTPs are generally structured such that they would not qualify as regulated investment companies under the Internal Revenue Code if they had been formed as corporations.
As discussed above, the tax items of an MLP are allocated through to the partners of the MLP whether or not an MLP makes any distributions of cash. In part because estimated tax payments are payable quarterly, partnerships often make quarterly cash distributions. A distribution from a partnership is generally treated as a non-taxable adjustment to the basis of our interest in the partnership to the extent of such basis, and then as gain to the extent of the excess distribution. The gain is generally capital gain, but a variety of rules could potentially recharacterize the gain as ordinary income. Our tax basis is the price paid for the MLP interest plus any debt of the MLP allocated to us. The tax basis is decreased for distributions and allocations of deductions (such as percentage depletion) and losses, and increased for capital contributions and allocations of net income and gains.
When interests in a partnership are sold, the difference between (i) the sum of the sales price and our share of debt of the partnership that will be allocated to the purchaser and (ii) our adjusted tax basis will be taxable gain or loss, as the case may be.
We receive a Schedule K-1 from each MLP, showing our share of each item of MLP income, gain, loss, deductions and expense. We use that information to calculate our taxable income and our earnings and profits.
Because we are taxed as a corporation, we report the tax items of the MLPs and any gain or loss on the sale of interests in the MLPs.
As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice, you are hereby advised that any written tax advice contained herein was not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The advice was prepared to support the promotion or marketing of the transactions or matters addressed by the written advice.
Any person reviewing this discussion should seek advice based on such persons particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
PERFORMANCE RELATED AND COMPARATIVE INFORMATION
We may quote certain performance-related information and may compare certain aspects of our portfolio and structure to other substantially similar closed-end funds. In reports or other communications to our stockholders or in advertising materials, we may compare our performance with that of (i) other investment companies listed in the rankings prepared by Lipper, Inc., Morningstar Inc. or other independent services; publications such as Barrons, Business Week, Forbes, Fortune, Institutional Investor, Kiplingers Personal Finance, Money, Morningstar Mutual Fund Values, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and USA Today; or other industry or financial publications or (ii) the Standard and Poors Index of 500 Stocks, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, NASDAQ Composite Index and other relevant indices and industry publications. Comparison of ourselves to an alternative investment should be made with consideration of differences in features and expected performance. We may obtain data from sources or reporting services, such as Bloomberg Financial and Lipper, Inc., that we believe to be generally accurate.
Our performance will vary depending upon market conditions, the composition of our portfolio and our operating expenses. Consequently any given performance quotation should not be considered representative of our performance in the future. In addition, because performance will fluctuate, it may not provide a basis for comparing an investment in our portfolio with certain bank deposits or other investments that pay a fixed yield for a stated period of time. Investors comparing our performance with that of other investment companies should give consideration to the quality and type of the respective investment companies portfolio securities.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. At the time stockholders sell their stock, it may be worth more or less than their original investment.
EXPERTS
Our financial statements dated November 30, 2004, appearing in this statement of additional information has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and is included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provides auditing
-25-
services to us. The principal business address of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is 350 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071.
TRANSFER AGENT AND DIVIDEND-PAYING AGENT
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (AST) acts as our transfer agent and dividend-paying agent. Please send all correspondence to American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, which is located at 59 Maiden Lane, New York, New York 10038. For its services, AST receives a fixed fee per account. We will reimburse AST for certain out-of-pocket expenses, which may include payments by AST to entities, including affiliated entities, that provide sub-stockholder services, recordkeeping and/or transfer agency services to our beneficial owners. The amount of reimbursements for these services per benefit plan participant fund account per year will not exceed the per account fee payable by us to AST in connection with maintaining common stockholder accounts.
OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS
The Custodial Trust Company, 101 Carnegie Center, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, is our custodian. Bear Stearns Funds Management Inc., located at 383 Madison Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New York 10179, provides certain administrative services to us. Ultimus Fund Solutions, LLC, 225 Pictoria Drive, Suite 450, Cincinnati, Ohio 45246, is our fund accountant.
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
A Registration Statement on Form N-2, including amendments thereto, relating to our common stock offered hereby, has been filed by us with the SEC, Washington, D.C. Our prospectus and this statement of additional information do not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement, including any exhibits and schedules thereto. For further information with respect to us and our common stock offered hereby, reference is made to our Registration Statement. Statements contained in our prospectus and this statement of additional information as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. Copies of the Registration Statement may be inspected without charge at the SECs principal office in Washington, D.C., and copies of all or any part thereof may be obtained from the SEC upon the payment of certain fees prescribed by the SEC.
-26-
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company:
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company (the Company) at November 30, 2004, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, its cash flows and its financial highlights for the period September 28, 2004 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Companys management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at November 30, 2004 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 21, 2005
-27-
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2004,
FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30,
2004
F-1
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
ASSETS | ||||||||||
Investments, at fair value (Cost
$370,133,985)
|
$ | 380,071,793 | ||||||||
Investments in repurchase agreements
(Cost $424,574,278)
|
424,574,278 | |||||||||
Total investments (Cost $794,708,263)
|
804,646,071 | |||||||||
Cash
|
47,329 | |||||||||
Receivable for securities sold
|
347,300 | |||||||||
Interest receivable
|
1,477,944 | |||||||||
Dividends and distributions receivable
|
1,124,007 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses
|
153,984 | |||||||||
Total Assets
|
807,796,635 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||||
Payable for securities purchased
|
7,792,693 | |||||||||
Investment management fee payable
|
971,040 | |||||||||
Call options written, at fair value (premiums
received $200,995)
|
610,000 | |||||||||
Accrued directors fees and expenses
|
29,808 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
1,039,363 | |||||||||
Current taxes
|
763,047 | |||||||||
Deferred taxes
|
3,754,521 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities
|
14,960,472 | |||||||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS
|
$ | 792,836,163 | ||||||||
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF: | ||||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value
(33,165,900 shares issued and outstanding,
200,000,000 shares authorized)
|
$ | 33,166 | ||||||||
Paid-in capital
|
786,026,645 | |||||||||
Undistributed net investment income, net of
income taxes
|
645,381 | |||||||||
Accumulated realized gains on investments and
securities sold short, net of income taxes
|
413,689 | |||||||||
Net unrealized gains on investments and options,
net of income taxes
|
5,717,282 | |||||||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS
|
$ | 792,836,163 | ||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
|
$23.91 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-2
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
INVESTMENT INCOME
|
||||||||
Income
|
||||||||
Dividends and distributions
|
$ | 2,210,157 | ||||||
Return of capital
|
(1,670,253 | ) | ||||||
Net dividends and distributions
|
539,904 | |||||||
Interest
|
2,067,733 | |||||||
Total Investment Income
|
2,607,637 | |||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||
Advisory fees
|
971,040 | |||||||
Organizational expenses
|
150,000 | |||||||
Custodian fees and expenses
|
122,827 | |||||||
Administration fees
|
99,156 | |||||||
Audit fees
|
59,077 | |||||||
Insurance
|
34,192 | |||||||
Directors fees
|
29,808 | |||||||
Fund accounting fees
|
21,982 | |||||||
Reports to stockholders
|
16,739 | |||||||
Legal fees
|
10,520 | |||||||
Other expenses
|
16,661 | |||||||
Total Expenses Before Taxes
|
1,532,002 | |||||||
Net Investment Income Before Tax
Expense
|
1,075,635 | |||||||
Current tax expense
|
(487,254 | ) | ||||||
Deferred tax benefit
|
57,000 | |||||||
Net Investment Income
|
645,381 | |||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS,
SECURITIES SOLD SHORT AND OPTIONS
|
||||||||
Realized Gains
|
||||||||
Investments
|
679,542 | |||||||
Securities sold short
|
9,940 | |||||||
Current tax expense
|
(275,793 | ) | ||||||
Net Realized Gains on Investments and Securities
Sold Short
|
413,689 | |||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Gain/(Loss)
|
||||||||
Investments
|
10,089,808 | |||||||
Options
|
(561,005 | ) | ||||||
Deferred tax expense
|
(3,811,521 | ) | ||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Gain on Investments and
Options
|
5,717,282 | |||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on
Investments, Securities Sold Short and Options
|
6,130,971 | |||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM
OPERATIONS
|
$ | 6,776,352 | ||||||
(1) | Commencement of operations. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-3
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
OPERATIONS
|
||||||
Net investment income
|
$ | 645,381 | ||||
Net realized gain on investments and securities
sold short
|
413,689 | |||||
Net change in unrealized gain on investments and
options
|
5,717,282 | |||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from
Operations
|
6,776,352 | |||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
|
||||||
Proceeds from initial public offering of
30,000,000 shares of common stock
|
750,000,000 | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of 3,161,900 shares of
common stock in connection with exercising an overallotment
option granted to underwriters of the initial public offering
|
79,047,500 | |||||
Underwriting discounts and offering costs
associated with the issuance of common stock
|
(43,087,689 | ) | ||||
Net Increase in Net Assets from Capital Stock
Transactions
|
785,959,811 | |||||
Total Increase in Net Assets
|
792,736,163 | |||||
NET ASSETS
|
||||||
Beginning of period
|
100,000 | |||||
End of period (includes undistributed net
investment income of $645,381)
|
$ | 792,836,163 | ||||
(1) | Commencement of operations. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-4
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from
operations
|
$ | 6,776,352 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net
assets resulting from operations to net cash used in operating
activities
|
|||||||
Deferred taxes
|
3,754,521 | ||||||
Amortization for bond premium
|
58,562 | ||||||
Increase in interest receivable
|
(1,477,944 | ) | |||||
Increase in dividends and distributions receivable
|
(1,124,007 | ) | |||||
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
(153,984 | ) | |||||
Increase in investment management fee payable
|
971,040 | ||||||
Increase in accrued directors fees and
expenses
|
29,808 | ||||||
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
1,039,363 | ||||||
Increase in current taxes
|
763,047 | ||||||
Premiums received from call options written
|
200,995 | ||||||
Purchase of investments
|
(380,098,571 | ) | |||||
Net purchase of short-term investments
|
(424,574,278 | ) | |||||
Purchase of put options
|
(162,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
16,532,646 | ||||||
Gain on investments
|
(689,482 | ) | |||||
Return of capital distributions
|
1,670,253 | ||||||
Unrealized appreciation on investments and options
|
(9,528,803 | ) | |||||
Net Cash Used in Operating
Activities
|
(786,012,482 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
829,047,500 | ||||||
Underwriting discount and offering costs from the
issuance of common stock
|
(43,087,689 | ) | |||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing
Activities
|
785,959,811 | ||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH
|
(52,671 | ) | |||||
CASH BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
100,000 | ||||||
CASH END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 47,329 | |||||
(1) | Commencement of operations. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-5
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
Per Share Operating
Performance(2)
|
||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$ | 23.70 | (3) | |||
Income from investment operations
|
||||||
Net investment income
|
0.02 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments,
securities sold short and options
|
0.19 | |||||
Total income from investment operations
|
0.21 | |||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$ | 23.91 | ||||
Per common stock market value, end of period
|
$ | 24.90 | ||||
Total investment return based on market
value(4)
|
(0.40 | )% | ||||
Supplemental Data and Ratios
|
||||||
Net assets, end of period (000s)
|
$ | 792,836 | ||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets, before
taxes
|
1.20 | % (5) | ||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding non-recurring
organizational expenses,
to average net assets |
1.08 | % (5) | ||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net
assets, after taxes
|
0.50 | % (5) | ||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from
operations to average net assets
|
5.30 | % (5) | ||||
Portfolio turnover rate
|
11.78 | % (6) |
(1) | Commencement of operations. |
(2) | Information presented relates to a share of common stock outstanding for the entire period. |
(3) | Initial public offering price of $25.00 per share less underwriting discounts of $1.25 per share and offering costs of $0.05 per share. |
(4) | Not annualized. Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock at the market price on the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of the period reported. The calculation also assumes reinvestment of dividends and distributions, if any, at actual prices pursuant to the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. |
(5) | Ratios are annualized since period is less than one full year. |
(6) | Amount not annualized. Calculated based on the sales of $16,879,946 of long-term investments divided by the average long-term investment balance of $143,328,309. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-6
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
No. of | |||||||||||
Description | Shares/Units | Value | |||||||||
Long-Term Investments
47.9%
|
|||||||||||
Equity Investments 40.0%
|
|||||||||||
Pipeline MLP(a) 29.7%
|
|||||||||||
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
|
162,800 | $ | 6,686,196 | ||||||||
Copano Energy, L.L.C.(b)
|
66,400 | 1,638,752 | |||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P.
|
66,000 | 2,047,980 | |||||||||
Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C.(c)
|
312,768 | 14,887,763 | |||||||||
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
|
338,000 | 16,788,460 | |||||||||
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|
98,700 | 5,327,826 | |||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
740,515 | 18,135,212 | |||||||||
Genesis Energy, L.P.
|
53,800 | 657,436 | |||||||||
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.(b)
|
35,200 | 1,171,808 | |||||||||
Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P.
|
307,900 | 18,458,605 | |||||||||
Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(c)
|
1,203,923 | 49,180,241 | |||||||||
Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(c)(d)
|
1,300,000 | 52,196,300 | |||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
266,100 | 15,492,342 | |||||||||
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
71,300 | 3,389,602 | |||||||||
Northern Border Partners, L.P.
|
188,300 | 8,948,016 | |||||||||
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
277,200 | 7,786,548 | |||||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
122,000 | 4,505,460 | |||||||||
TC PipeLines, LP
|
7,785 | 299,723 | |||||||||
TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
|
178,700 | 7,013,975 | |||||||||
Valero L.P.
|
21,000 | 1,254,540 | |||||||||
235,866,785 | |||||||||||
Propane MLP 5.6%
|
|||||||||||
AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
|
17,600 | 526,064 | |||||||||
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
|
125,200 | 2,582,876 | |||||||||
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
Unregistered(d)
|
2,098,623 | 40,539,310 | |||||||||
Inergy, L.P.
|
21,600 | 633,312 | |||||||||
44,281,562 | |||||||||||
Shipping MLP 1.3%
|
|||||||||||
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
|
62,600 | 1,802,880 | |||||||||
U.S. Shipping Partners L.P.(b)
|
328,900 | 8,206,055 | |||||||||
10,008,935 | |||||||||||
Coal MLP 0.2%
|
|||||||||||
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
|
29,900 | 1,578,720 | |||||||||
F-7
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED)
No. of | ||||||||||
Description | Shares/Units | Value | ||||||||
MLP Affiliates 2.9%
|
||||||||||
Atlas America, Inc.(e)
|
54,100 | $ | 1,717,134 | |||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc.
|
100,885 | 4,062,639 | ||||||||
Holly Corporation
|
40,000 | 1,126,800 | ||||||||
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
|
166,800 | 11,559,240 | ||||||||
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.
|
241,900 | 4,247,764 | ||||||||
22,713,577 | ||||||||||
Other Midstream Companies
0.3%
|
||||||||||
Arlington Tankers Ltd.(b)
|
122,000 | 2,802,340 | ||||||||
Total Equity Investments (Cost
$306,609,767)
|
317,251,919 | |||||||||
Principal | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Maturity | Amount | |||||||||||||||||
Rate | Date | (000s) | |||||||||||||||||
Fixed Income Investments
7.9%
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline MLP 7.9%
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Products Operating L.P.
|
6.375 | % | 02/01/13 | $ | 10,000 | 10,615,460 | |||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
5.000 | 12/15/13 | 10,000 | 9,885,430 | |||||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
5.125 | 11/15/14 | 5,000 | 4,936,610 | |||||||||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
5.650 | 10/15/16 | 12,000 | 11,978,544 | |||||||||||||||
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
6.875 | 11/01/14 | 2,100 | 2,147,250 | |||||||||||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
7.750 | 10/15/12 | 20,000 | 23,246,580 | |||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Income Investments (Cost
$63,362,218) |
62,809,874 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Long-Term Investments (Cost
$369,971,985) |
380,061,793 | ||||||||||||||||||
No. of | |||||||||||||||||
Contracts | |||||||||||||||||
Short-Term Investments
53.6%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Put Options Purchased
0.0%
|
|||||||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan, Inc., expiring 01/21/05 @ $60.00(e) | 1,000 | 5,000 | |||||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan, Inc., expiring 02/18/05 @ $60.00(e) | 500 | 5,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total Put Options Purchased (Cost
$162,000) |
10,000 | ||||||||||||||||
F-8
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (CONCLUDED)
Interest | Maturity | Principal | ||||||||||||||||
Description | Rate | Date | Amount | Value | ||||||||||||||
(000s) | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreement
53.6%
|
||||||||||||||||||
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (Agreement
dated 11/30/04 to be repurchased at $424,597,276),
collateralized by $436,888,298 in U.S. Government and Agencies
(Cost $424,574,278)
|
1.950 | 12/01/04 | $ | 424,574 | $ | 424,574,278 | ||||||||||||
Total Short-Term Investments (Cost $424,736,278) | 424,584,278 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Investments Before Options Written 101.5% (Cost $794,708,263) | 804,646,071 | |||||||||||||||||
No. of | ||||||||||||||||
Contracts | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities in Excess of Cash and Other Assets (1.5)% | ||||||||||||||||
Call Options Written (0.1)% | ||||||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan, Inc., expiring 01/21/05 @ $65.00(e) | 1,000 | (520,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan, Inc., expiring 02/18/05 @ $70.00(e) | 500 | (90,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Call Options Written (premiums received $200,995) | (610,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other Liabilities in Excess of Cash and Other Assets (1.4)% | (11,199,908 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities in Excess of Cash and Other Assets | (11,809,908 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets 100.0% | $ | 792,836,163 | ||||||||||||||
(a) | Includes Limited Liability Companies or L.L.C.s. |
(b) | Non-income producing; security is expected to pay distributions within the next 12 months. |
(c) | Distributions made are paid-in kind. |
(d) | Fair valued security. These securities are restricted from public sale. The Company negotiates certain aspects of the method and timing of the disposition of these investments, including registration rights and related costs (See Notes 2 and 6). |
(e) | Security is non-income producing. |
F-9
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
November 30, 2004
1. Organization
Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company (the Company) was organized as a Maryland corporation on June 4, 2004, and is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Companys investment objective is to obtain a high after-tax total return by investing at least 85% of its net assets plus any borrowings (total assets) in energy-related master limited partnerships and their affiliates (collectively, MLPs), and in other companies that, as their principal business, operate assets used in the gathering, transporting, processing, storing, refining, distributing, mining or marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids (including propane), crude oil, refined petroleum products or coal (collectively with MLPs, Midstream Energy Companies). The Company commenced operations on September 28, 2004. The Companys shares of common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (NYSE) under the symbol KYN.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
A. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
B. Calculation of Net Asset Value The Company determines its net asset value as of the close of regular session trading on the NYSE (normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) no less frequently than the last business day of each month, and makes its net asset value available for publication monthly. Net asset value is computed by dividing the value of the Companys assets (including accrued interest and dividends), less all of its liabilities (including accrued expenses, dividends payable, current and deferred and other accrued income taxes, and any borrowings) and the liquidation value of any outstanding preferred stock, by the total number of common shares outstanding.
C. Investment Valuation Readily marketable portfolio securities listed on any exchange other than the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (NASDAQ) are valued, except as indicated below, at the last sale price on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the mean of the most recent bid and asked prices on such day, except for short sales and call options written, for which the last quoted asked price is used. Securities admitted to trade on the NASDAQ are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Portfolio securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price on the business day as of which such value is being determined at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities.
Equity securities traded in the over-the-counter market, but excluding securities admitted to trading on the NASDAQ, are valued at the closing bid prices. Fixed income securities with a remaining maturity of 60 days or more are valued by the Company using a pricing service. Fixed income securities maturing within 60 days will be valued on an amortized cost basis.
The Company holds securities that are privately issued or otherwise restricted. For these securities, as well as any other portfolio security held by the Company for which reliable market quotations are not readily available, valuations are determined in a manner that most fairly reflects fair value of the security on the
F-10
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
valuation date. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, the following valuation process is used for such securities:
| Investment Team Valuation. The applicable investments are initially valued by Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.s (Kayne Anderson or the Adviser) investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investments; | |
| Investment Team Valuation Documentation. Preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with senior management of Kayne Anderson; | |
| Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee, a committee of the Companys Board of Directors, meets on an as-needed basis when valuations are not readily determinable. The Valuation Committees valuations stands for intervening periods of time unless the Valuation Committee meets again at the request of Kayne Anderson, the Board of Directors, or the Committee itself. All valuation determinations of the Valuation Committee are subject to ratification by the Board at its next regular meeting. | |
| Valuation Firm. No less than quarterly, a third-party valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors reviews the valuation methodologies and calculations employed for these securities. | |
| Board of Directors Determination. The Board of Directors meets quarterly to consider the valuations provided by Kayne Anderson and the Valuation Committee, if applicable, and set valuations for the applicable securities. The Board of Directors considers the report provided by the third-party valuation firm in reviewing and determining in good faith the fair value of the applicable portfolio securities. |
At November 30, 2004, the Company held 11.70% of its net assets in securities valued at fair value as determined pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, with an aggregate cost of $92,678,477 and fair value of $92,735,610. Although these securities may be resold in privately negotiated transactions, these values may differ from the values that would have been used had a ready market for these securities existed, and the differences could be material.
Any option transaction that the Company enters into may, depending on the applicable market environment, have no value or a positive/negative value. Exchange traded options and futures contracts are valued at the closing price in the market where such contracts are principally traded.
D. Repurchase Agreements The Company has agreed to purchase securities from financial institutions subject to the sellers agreement to repurchase them at an agreed-upon time and price (repurchase agreements). The financial institutions with whom the Company enters into repurchase agreements are banks and broker/dealers which Kayne Anderson considers creditworthy. The seller under a repurchase agreement is required to maintain the value of the securities as collateral, subject to the agreement, at not less than the repurchase price plus accrued interest. Kayne Anderson monitors daily the mark-to-market of the value of the collateral, and, if necessary, requires the seller to maintain additional securities, so that the value of the collateral is not less than the repurchase price. Default by or bankruptcy of the seller would, however expose the Company to possible loss because of adverse market action or delays in connection with the disposition of the underlying securities.
E. Short Sales A short sale is a transaction in which the Company sells securities it does not own (but has borrowed) in anticipation of a decline in the market price of the securities. To complete a short sale, the Company may arrange through a broker to borrow the securities to be delivered to the buyer. The proceeds received by the Company for the short sale are retained by the broker until the Company replaces the borrowed securities. In borrowing the securities to be delivered to the buyer, the Company becomes obligated to replace the securities borrowed at their market price at the time of replacement, whatever the price may be.
All short sales are fully collateralized. The Company maintains assets consisting of cash or liquid securities equal in amount to the liability created by the short sale. These assets are adjusted daily to reflect
F-11
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
changes in the value of the securities sold short. The Company is liable for any dividends or distributions paid on securities sold short.
The Company may also sell short against the box (i.e., the Company enters into a short sale as described above while holding an offsetting long position in the security which it sold short). If the Company enters into a short sale against the box, the Company segregates an equivalent amount of securities owned as collateral while the short sale is outstanding.
The Company had no open short sales at November 30, 2004.
F. Option Writing When the Company writes an option, an amount equal to the premium received by the Company is recorded as a liability and is subsequently adjusted to the current fair value of the option written. Premiums received from writing options that expire unexercised are treated by the Company on the expiration date as realized gains from investments. The difference between the premium and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium is less than the amount paid for the closing purchase transaction, as a realized loss. If a call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security in determining whether the Company has realized a gain or loss. If a put option is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the securities purchased by the Company. The Company, as the writer of an option, bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security underlying the written option.
G. Security Transactions and Investment Income Security transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date). Realized gains and losses are reported on an identified cost basis. Dividend and distribution income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions received from the Companys investments in MLPs generally are comprised of income and return of capital. For the period from September 28, 2004 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2004, the Company recorded as return of capital the amount of $1,670,253 of dividends and distributions received from MLPs. This resulted in a reduction in the cost basis of the associated MLP investments. Net Realized Gains on Investments and Securities Sold Short and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation of Investments and Options on the accompanying Statement of Operations includes $82,088 and $1,588,165, respectively, attributable to such dividends and distributions. The Company records investment income and return of capital based on estimates made at the time such distributions are received. Such estimates are based on historical information available from each MLP and other industry sources. These estimates may subsequently be revised based on information received from MLPs after their tax reporting periods are concluded. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
H. Dividends to Stockholders Dividends to stockholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The character of dividends made during the year may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. The Companys dividends, for book purposes, will be comprised of return of capital and ordinary income, which is based on the operating results of the Company. The Company is unable to make final determinations as to the character of the dividend until after the end of the calendar year. Since the first dividend paid to stockholders was in January 2005, the Company will inform stockholders of the final character of the dividend during January 2006.
I. Federal and State Income Taxation The Company, as a corporation, is obligated to pay federal and state income tax on its taxable income. The Company invests its assets primarily in MLPs, which generally are treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. As a limited partner in the MLPs, the Company reports its allocable share of the MLPs taxable income in computing its own taxable income. The Companys tax expense or benefit is included in the Statement of Operations based on the component of income or gains/(losses) to which such expense or benefit relates. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. To the extent the Company has a net deferred tax
F-12
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
asset, a valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset is not realized. Future realization of deferred income tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in either the carryback or carryforward period under the tax law.
The Company may rely to some extent on information provided by the MLPs, which may not necessarily be timely, to estimate taxable income allocable to the MLP units held in the portfolio and to estimate the associated deferred tax liability. Such estimates are made in good faith and reviewed in accordance with the valuation process approved by the Board of Directors. From time to time the Company modifies its estimates or assumptions regarding the deferred tax liability as new information becomes available. To the extent such estimates or assumptions are modified, the net asset value may fluctuate.
J. Organization Expenses and Offering Costs The Company is responsible for paying all organization expenses, which were expensed when the shares were issued. Such costs approximated $150,000. Offering costs related to the issuance of common stock were charged to additional paid-in capital when the shares were issued. Such costs approximated $1,635,000.
K. Indemnifications Under the Companys organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Company. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company enters into contracts that provide general indemnification to other parties. The Companys maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred, and may not occur. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
3. | Concentration of Risk |
The Companys investment objective is to seek a high level of total return with an emphasis on current dividends paid to its stockholders. Under normal circumstances, the Company intends to invest at least 85% of its total assets in securities of MLPs and other Midstream Energy Companies, and to invest at least 80% of its total assets in MLPs, which are subject to certain risks, such as supply and demand risk, depletion and exploration risk, commodity pricing risk, acquisition risk, and the risk associated with the hazards inherent in midstream energy industry activities. A substantial portion of the cash flow received by the Company will be derived from the investment in equity securities of MLPs. The amount of cash that an MLP has available for distributions and the tax character of such distributions are dependent upon the amount of cash generated by the MLPs operations. The Company may invest up to 15% of its total assets in any single issuer and a decline in value of the securities of such an issuer could significantly impact the net asset value of the Company. The Company may invest up to 20% of its total assets in debt securities, which may include below investment grade securities. The Company may, for defensive purposes, temporarily invest all or a significant portion of its assets in investment grade securities, short-term debt securities and cash or cash equivalents. To the extent the Company uses this strategy, it may not achieve its investment objectives.
4. | Agreements and Affiliations |
The Company has entered into an Investment Management Agreement with Kayne Anderson under which the Adviser, subject to the overall supervision of the Companys Board of Directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provide investment advisory services to, the Company. For providing these services, the Adviser receives a management fee from the Company.
Pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement the Company has agreed to pay the Adviser a basic management fee at an annual rate of 1.75% of the Companys average total assets, adjusted upward or downward (by up to 1.00% of the Companys average total assets, as defined), depending on to what extent, if
F-13
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
any, the Companys investment performance for the relevant performance period exceeds or trails the Companys Benchmark over the same period. The Companys Benchmark is the total return (capital appreciation and reinvested dividends) of the Standard & Poors 400 Utilities Index plus 600 basis points (6.00%). Each 0.01% of difference of the Companys performance compared to the performance of the Benchmark is multiplied by a performance fee adjustment of 0.002%, up to a maximum adjustment of 1.00% (as an annual rate). The Company calculates the total management fee based on the average total assets for the prior 12 months. For the period beginning with the commencement of the Companys operations through the end of the Companys first 12 months of operations (the Initial Period), on a quarterly fiscal basis the Company pays the Adviser a minimum management fee calculated at an annual rate of 0.75%. After this Initial Period, the basic management fee and the performance fee adjustment will be calculated and paid quarterly beginning with the quarter ending November 30, 2005, using a rolling 12-month performance period. Management fees in excess of those paid will be accrued monthly.
The performance record for the Benchmark is based on the change in value of the Benchmark during the relevant performance period. During the Companys first fiscal year, for purposes of calculating the performance fee adjustment, the Companys initial net asset value is calculated net of the underwriter discount. At November 30, 2004, the Company has recorded accrued management fees at the annual rate of 0.75% based on the Companys investment performance for the period September 28, 2004 through November 30, 2004.
For purposes of calculating the management fee, the Companys total assets are equal to the Companys average monthly gross asset value (which includes assets attributable to or proceeds from the Companys use of preferred stock, commercial paper or notes issuances and other borrowings), minus the sum of the Companys accrued and unpaid dividends on any outstanding common stock and accrued and unpaid dividends on any outstanding preferred stock and accrued liabilities (other than liabilities associated with borrowing or leverage by the Company and any accrued taxes). Liabilities associated with borrowing or leverage by the Company include the principal amount of any borrowings, commercial paper or notes issued by the Company, the liquidation preference of any outstanding preferred stock, and other liabilities from other forms of borrowing or leverage such as short positions and put or call options held or written by the Company.
For the period September 28, 2004 through November 30, 2004, KA Associates, an affiliate of the Adviser, earned approximately $5,057 in brokerage commissions from portfolio transactions executed on behalf of the Company.
5. Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and tax purposes. Components of the Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities as of November 30, 2004 are as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
|
|||||
Organization costs
|
$ | (57,000 | ) | ||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|||||
Unrealized gains on investment securities
|
3,176,229 | ||||
Distributions received from MLPs
|
635,292 | ||||
Total net deferred tax liability
|
$ | 3,754,521 | |||
The components of income tax expense include $3,285,206 and $469,315 for deferred federal income taxes and state income taxes (net of the federal tax benefit), respectively.
F-14
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Total income taxes have been computed by applying the Federal statutory income tax rate plus a blended state income tax rate totaling 40% to net investment income and realized and unrealized gains on investments before taxes.
At November 30, 2004, the cost basis of investments for Federal income tax purposes was $794,507,268. At November 30, 2004, gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for Federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Gross unrealized appreciation
|
$ | 11,271,707 | ||
Gross unrealized depreciation
|
(1,742,904 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation
|
$ | 9,528,803 | ||
6. Restricted Securities
Certain of the Companys investments are restricted as to resale and are valued as determined in accordance with procedures established by the Board of Directors and more fully described in Note 2. The table below shows the number of units/shares held, the acquisition dates, aggregate costs, fair value as of November 30, 2004, value per unit/shares of such securities and percent of net assets which the securities comprise.
Number of | Acquisition | Fair Value at | Value Per | Percent of | ||||||||||||||||||||
Security | Units/Shares | Date | Cost | 11/30/04 | Unit/Share | Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. Unregistered
|
2,098,623 | 11/09/04 | $ | 40,050,017 | $ | 40,539,310 | $ | 19.32 | 5.11 | % | ||||||||||||||
Kinder Morgan Management, LLC
|
1,300,000 | 11/04/04 | 52,628,460 | 52,196,300 | 40.15 | 6.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 92,678,477 | $ | 92,735,610 | 11.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
7. Call Options Written
Transactions in written options for the period ended November 30, 2004 were as follows:
Number of | Premiums | |||||||
Contracts | Received | |||||||
Options outstanding at beginning of period
|
| | ||||||
Options written
|
1,500 | $ | 200,995 | |||||
Options terminated in closing purchase
transactions
|
| | ||||||
Options expired
|
| | ||||||
Options outstanding at end of period
|
1,500 | $ | 200,995 | |||||
F-15
KAYNE ANDERSON MLP INVESTMENT COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED)
8. Investment Transactions
For the period ended November 30, 2004, the Company purchased and sold securities in the amount of $387,891,264 and $16,879,946 (excluding short-term investments and options), respectively.
9. Subsequent Events
On January 14, 2005, the Company paid a dividend to its stockholders in the amount of $0.25 per share. The dividend resulted in a dividend reinvestment of $5,400,602 being reinvested into the Company and the addition of 222,522 shares of common stock being issued.
10. Contingent Investment
On November 29, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Inergy, L.P. to purchase 2,946,955 common units for $75 million, contingent upon Inergy, L.P. closing the purchase of certain assets of Star Gas Partners, L.P. The conditions precedent for the consummation of the transaction were fulfilled and the transaction settled on December 17, 2004.
F-16
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AS OF MAY 31, 2005
F-17
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Investments, at fair value (Cost $986,341)
|
$ | 1,104,721 | |||||
Repurchase agreement (Cost $129,350)
|
129,350 | ||||||
Total investments (Cost $1,115,691)
|
1,234,071 | ||||||
Deposits with broker for securities sold short
|
2,530 | ||||||
Receivable for securities sold
|
4,169 | ||||||
Interest, dividends and distributions receivable
|
515 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses
|
3,167 | ||||||
Total Assets
|
1,244,452 | ||||||
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||
Payable for securities purchased
|
8,226 | ||||||
Investment management fee payable
|
2,119 | ||||||
Securities sold short, at fair value (Proceeds
$1,571)
|
1,581 | ||||||
Accrued directors fees and expenses
|
14 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
1,252 | ||||||
Deferred taxes
|
43,927 | ||||||
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts
|
3,991 | ||||||
Total Liabilities before Senior Notes
|
61,110 | ||||||
Auction rate senior notes:
|
|||||||
Series A, due April 3, 2045
|
85,000 | ||||||
Series B, due April 5, 2045
|
85,000 | ||||||
Series C, due March 31, 2045
|
90,000 | ||||||
Total Senior Notes
|
260,000 | ||||||
Total Liabilities
|
321,110 | ||||||
PREFERRED STOCK
|
|||||||
$25,000 liquidation value per share applicable to 3,000
outstanding shares (10,000 shares authorized)
|
75,000 | ||||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
$ | 848,342 | |||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS CONSIST OF
|
|||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value (33,676,442 shares
issued and outstanding, 200,000,000 shares authorized)
|
$ | 34 | |||||
Paid-in capital
|
797,382 | ||||||
Distributions in excess of net investment loss, net of tax
benefit
|
(22,513 | ) | |||||
Accumulated realized gains on investments, securities sold
short, options and interest rate swap contracts, net of income
taxes
|
3,191 | ||||||
Net unrealized gain on investments, securities sold short and
interest rate swap contracts, net of income taxes
|
70,248 | ||||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
$ | 848,342 | |||||
NET ASSET VALUE PER COMMON SHARE
|
$ | 25.19 | |||||
F-18
INVESTMENT INCOME
|
||||||||
Income
|
||||||||
Dividends and distributions
|
$ | 21,029 | ||||||
Return of capital
|
(18,212 | ) | ||||||
Net dividends and distributions
|
2,817 | |||||||
Interest
|
3,008 | |||||||
Total Investment Income
|
5,825 | |||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||
Investment management fees
|
3,711 | |||||||
Professional fees
|
328 | |||||||
Administration fees
|
315 | |||||||
Reports to stockholders
|
159 | |||||||
Custodian fees
|
147 | |||||||
Directors fees
|
132 | |||||||
Insurance
|
98 | |||||||
Dividends on securities sold short
|
69 | |||||||
Other expenses
|
215 | |||||||
Total Expenses Before Interest Expense, Auction
Agent Fees and Taxes
|
5,174 | |||||||
Interest expense
|
1,944 | |||||||
Auction agent fees
|
89 | |||||||
Total Expenses Before Tax Benefit
|
7,207 | |||||||
Net Investment Loss Before Tax Benefit
|
(1,382 | ) | ||||||
Current tax benefit
|
538 | |||||||
Deferred tax expense
|
(6 | ) | ||||||
Net Investment Loss
|
(850 | ) | ||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS
|
||||||||
Net Realized Gains/(Losses)
|
||||||||
Investments
|
4,599 | |||||||
Securities sold short
|
450 | |||||||
Options
|
(162 | ) | ||||||
Interest rate swap contracts
|
(371 | ) | ||||||
Current tax expense
|
(1,739 | ) | ||||||
Net Realized Gains
|
2,777 | |||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Gains/(Losses)
|
||||||||
Investments
|
108,290 | |||||||
Securities sold short
|
(10 | ) | ||||||
Options
|
561 | |||||||
Interest rate swap contracts
|
(4,144 | ) | ||||||
Deferred tax expense
|
(40,166 | ) | ||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Gains
|
64,531 | |||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains
|
67,308 | |||||||
DIVIDENDS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS
|
(327 | ) | ||||||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS
|
$ | 66,131 | ||||||
F-19
For the Six | For the Period | |||||||||
Months Ended | September 28, 2004(1) | |||||||||
May 31, 2005 | through | |||||||||
(unaudited) | November 30, 2004 | |||||||||
OPERATIONS
|
||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss)
|
$ | (850 | ) | $ | 645 | |||||
Net realized gains
|
2,777 | 414 | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains
|
64,531 | 5,717 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
|
66,458 | 6,776 | ||||||||
DIVIDENDS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS
|
||||||||||
Dividends from net capital gains
|
(327 | ) | | |||||||
DIVIDENDS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
||||||||||
Dividends
|
(21,981 | ) | | |||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS
|
||||||||||
Proceeds from initial public offering of 30,000,000 shares
of common stock
|
| 750,000 | ||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of 3,161,900 shares of common stock
in connection with exercising an overallotment option granted to
underwriters of the initial public offering
|
| 79,048 | ||||||||
Underwriting discounts and offering expenses associated with the
issuance of common stock
|
| (43,088 | ) | |||||||
Underwriting discounts and offering expenses associated with the
issuance of preferred stock
|
(1,087 | ) | | |||||||
Issuance of 510,542 shares of common stock from
reinvestment of distributions
|
12,443 | | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
from Capital Stock Transactions
|
11,356 | 785,960 | ||||||||
Total Increase in Net Assets Applicable to Common
Stockholders
|
55,506 | 792,736 | ||||||||
NET ASSETS
|
||||||||||
Beginning of period
|
792,836 | 100 | ||||||||
End of period (includes cumulative distributions in excess of
net investment loss of $22,513 and undistributed net investment
income of $645, respectively)
|
$ | 848,342 | $ | 792,836 | ||||||
(1) | Commencement of operations. |
F-20
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
$ | 66,131 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting
from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|||||||
Purchase of investments
|
(745,672 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
115,606 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale short-term investments
|
295,224 | ||||||
Realized gains
|
(4,516 | ) | |||||
Return of capital distributions
|
18,212 | ||||||
Unrealized gains
|
(104,697 | ) | |||||
Increase in deferred taxes
|
40,172 | ||||||
Amortization for bond premium
|
163 | ||||||
Increase in deposits with brokers for short sales
|
(2,530 | ) | |||||
Increase in receivable for securities sold
|
(3,822 | ) | |||||
Decrease in interest, dividend and distributions receivable
|
2,087 | ||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses
|
(3,013 | ) | |||||
Increase in payable for securities purchased
|
433 | ||||||
Increase in investment management fee payable
|
1,148 | ||||||
Increase in securities sold short
|
1,571 | ||||||
Decrease in accrued directors fees and expenses
|
(16 | ) | |||||
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
61 | ||||||
Decrease in current taxes
|
(763 | ) | |||||
Decrease in call options written
|
(201 | ) | |||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
(324,422 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Issuance of auction rate senior notes
|
260,000 | ||||||
Issuance of auction rate preferred stock
|
75,000 | ||||||
Underwriting discount and offering expenses associated with the
issuance of preferred stock
|
(1,087 | ) | |||||
Cash distributions paid to common stockholders
|
(9,538 | ) | |||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
324,375 | ||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH
|
(47 | ) | |||||
CASH BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
47 | ||||||
CASH END OF PERIOD
|
$ | | |||||
F-21
For the Six | For the Period | |||||||||
Months Ended | September 28, 2004(1) | |||||||||
May 31, 2005 | through | |||||||||
(unaudited) | November 30, 2004 | |||||||||
Per Share of Common Stock
|
||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$ | 23.91 | $ | 23.70 | (2) | |||||
Underwriting discounts and offering costs on the issuance of
preferred stock
|
(0.03 | ) | | |||||||
Income from investment operations
|
||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss)
|
(0.04 | )(3) | 0.02 | (4) | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments, securities sold
short, options and interest rate swap contracts
|
2.02 | (3) | 0.19 | (4) | ||||||
Total income from investment operations
|
1.98 | 0.21 | ||||||||
Dividends Preferred Stockholders
|
||||||||||
Distributions from net capital gains
|
(0.01 | ) | | |||||||
Dividends Common Stockholders
|
||||||||||
Dividends
|
(0.66 | ) | | |||||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$ | 25.19 | $ | 23.91 | ||||||
Per share of common stock market value, end of period
|
$ | 26.00 | $ | 24.90 | ||||||
Total investment return based on common stock market
value(5)
|
7.26 | % | (0.40 | )% | ||||||
Supplemental Data and Ratios
|
||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common stockholders, end of period
|
$ | 848,342 | $ | 792,836 | ||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets, before taxes
|
1.76 | %(6) | 1.20 | %(6) | ||||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding non-recurring organizational
expenses, to average net assets
|
1.76 | %(6) | 1.08 | %(6) | ||||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding taxes and interest expenses, to
average net assets
|
1.26 | %(6) | | |||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets, after taxes
|
(0.32 | )%(6) | 0.50 | %(6) | ||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations to average
net assets
|
16.13 | %(6) | 5.30 | %(6) | ||||||
Portfolio turnover rate
|
13.72 | %(7) | 11.78 | %(7) | ||||||
Auction Rate Senior Notes outstanding, end of period
|
$ | 260,000 | | |||||||
Auction Rate Preferred Stock, end of period
|
$ | 75,000 | | |||||||
Borrowings outstanding per share of common stock, end of period
|
$ | 7.72 | | |||||||
Common stock per share, excluding borrowings, end of period
|
$ | 32.91 | | |||||||
Asset coverage, per $1,000 of principal amount of Auction Rate
Senior Notes
|
||||||||||
Series A, B and C
|
426.22% | | ||||||||
Asset coverage, per $25,000 of liquidation value per share of
Auction Rate Preferred Stock
|
353.19% | | ||||||||
Average amount of borrowings outstanding per share of common
stock during the period
|
$ | 3.57 | (3) | |
(1) | Commencement of operations. |
(2) | Initial public offering price of $25.00 per share less underwriting discounts of $1.25 per share and offering costs of $0.05 per share. |
(3) | Based on average shares of common stock outstanding of 33,400,589. |
(4) | Information presented relates to a share of common stock outstanding for the entire period. |
(5) | Not annualized. Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock at the market price on the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of the period reported. The calculation also assumes reinvestment of dividends and distributions, if any, at actual prices pursuant to the Companys dividend reinvestment plan. |
(6) | Ratios are annualized since period is less than one full year. |
(7) | Amount not annualized. Calculated based on the sales of $115,606 and $16,880, respectively, of long-term investments divided by the average long-term investment balance of $842,413 and $143,328 respectively. |
F-22
No. of | |||||||||||
Description | Shares/Units | Value | |||||||||
Long-Term Investments 130.2%
|
|||||||||||
Equity Investments 129.3%
|
|||||||||||
Pipeline MLP(a) 100.8%
|
|||||||||||
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
162 | $ | 6,770 | ||||||||
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
|
173 | 7,698 | |||||||||
Copano Energy, L.L.C.
|
86 | 2,552 | |||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P.
|
258 | 9,463 | |||||||||
Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C.(b)
|
413 | 20,347 | |||||||||
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P.
|
1,943 | 100,250 | |||||||||
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|
4,556 | 143,929 | |||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
5,229 | 134,397 | |||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.(c)
|
1,204 | 30,309 | |||||||||
Genesis Energy, L.P.(d)
|
134 | 1,263 | |||||||||
Hiland Partners, LP(e)
|
37 | 1,298 | |||||||||
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
|
109 | 4,444 | |||||||||
Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P.
|
614 | 37,675 | |||||||||
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
1 | 67 | |||||||||
Kinder Morgan Management, LLC(b)
|
2,608 | 116,230 | |||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
486 | 15,258 | |||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.(c)
|
3,478 | 102,697 | |||||||||
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
193 | 9,307 | |||||||||
Northern Border Partners, L.P.
|
620 | 29,522 | |||||||||
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
458 | 14,244 | |||||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
921 | 38,885 | |||||||||
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P.
|
26 | 955 | |||||||||
TC PipeLines, LP
|
231 | 7,699 | |||||||||
TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
|
447 | 18,467 | |||||||||
TransMontaigne Partners L.P.(e)
|
59 | 1,448 | |||||||||
855,174 | |||||||||||
Propane MLP 15.8%
|
|||||||||||
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.
|
1,947 | 42,845 | |||||||||
Inergy, L.P.
|
34 | 1,062 | |||||||||
Inergy, L.P.(c)
|
2,947 | 90,496 | |||||||||
134,403 | |||||||||||
Shipping MLP 2.4%
|
|||||||||||
K-Sea Transportation Partners L.P.
|
70 | 2,344 | |||||||||
Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
|
113 | 3,546 | |||||||||
Teekay LNG Partners L.P.(e)
|
172 | 4,530 | |||||||||
U.S. Shipping Partners L.P.
|
392 | 10,035 | |||||||||
20,455 | |||||||||||
Coal MLP 1.1%
|
|||||||||||
Natural Resource Partners L.P.
|
33 | 1,931 | |||||||||
Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.
|
150 | 7,027 | |||||||||
8,958 | |||||||||||
F-23
No. of | ||||||||||
Description | Shares/Units | Value | ||||||||
Other MLP 0.1%
|
||||||||||
Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
|
43 | $ | 929 | |||||||
MLP Affiliates 7.7%
|
||||||||||
Atlas America, Inc.(f)
|
127 | 3,968 | ||||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc.
|
417 | 19,072 | ||||||||
Holly Corporation
|
90 | 3,445 | ||||||||
Kaneb Services LLC
|
424 | 18,266 | ||||||||
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
|
85 | 6,629 | ||||||||
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.(d)
|
257 | 5,619 | ||||||||
Resource America, Inc.
|
40 | 1,369 | ||||||||
TransCanada Corporation
|
28 | 687 | ||||||||
TransMontaigne Inc.
|
766 | 6,345 | ||||||||
65,400 | ||||||||||
Other Midstream Energy Companies 1.4%
|
||||||||||
Arlington Tankers Ltd.
|
189 | 3,710 | ||||||||
Diana Shipping Inc.
|
276 | 4,272 | ||||||||
DryShips Inc.(e)
|
96 | 1,783 | ||||||||
Nordic American Tanker Shipping Limited
|
23 | 932 | ||||||||
Ship Finance International Limited
|
44 | 851 | ||||||||
11,548 | ||||||||||
Total Equity Investments (Cost $978,505)
|
1,096,867 | |||||||||
Principal | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Maturity | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate | Date | (in 000s) | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Income Investments 0.9%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline MLP 0.7%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
7.750 | % | 10/15/12 | $ | 5,000 | 5,814 | ||||||||||||||
MLP Affiliates 0.2%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
TransMontaigne Inc.
|
9.125 | 06/01/10 | 2,000 | 2,040 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Income Investments (Cost $7,836)
|
7,854 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Long-Term Investments (Cost $986,341)
|
1,104,721 | |||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term Investment 15.3%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreement 15.3%
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. (Agreement dated 05/31/05 to
be repurchased at $129,361), collateralized by $132,819 in U.S.
Government and Agency Securities (Cost $129,350)
|
2.970 | 06/01/05 | 129,350 | 129,350 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Investments 145.5%
(Cost $1,115,691)
|
1,234,071 | |||||||||||||||||||
F-24
No. of | |||||||||||||
Shares/ Units | Value | ||||||||||||
Liabilities (36.7)%
|
|||||||||||||
Securities Sold Short (0.2)%
|
|||||||||||||
Propane MLP (0.1)%
|
|||||||||||||
AmeriGas Partners, L.P.
|
8 | $ | (249 | ) | |||||||||
Suburban Propane Partners, L.P.
|
25 | (825 | ) | ||||||||||
(1,074 | ) | ||||||||||||
Coal MLP (0.1)%
|
|||||||||||||
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
|
7 | (507 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Securities Sold Short (cash proceeds received
$1,571)
|
(1,581 | ) | |||||||||||
Auction Rate Senior Notes (30.7)%
|
(260,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Unrealized Depreciation on Interest Rate Swap
Contracts (0.5)%
|
(3,991 | ) | |||||||||||
Deferred Taxes (5.2)%
|
(43,927 | ) | |||||||||||
Other Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets
(0.1)%
|
(1,230 | ) | |||||||||||
Total Liabilities
|
(310,729 | ) | |||||||||||
Preferred Stock at Redemption Value
(8.8)%
|
(75,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders
100.0%
|
$ | 848,342 | |||||||||||
(a) | Includes Limited Liability Companies or L.L.C.s. |
(b) | Distributions made are paid in-kind. |
(c) | Fair valued security. These securities are restricted from public sale. See Notes 2 and 6 in the accompany notes to the financial statements for further details. The Company negotiates certain aspects of the method and timing of the disposition of these investments, including registration rights and related costs. |
(d) | Security or a portion thereof is segregated as collateral on interest rate swap contracts and securities sold short. |
(e) | Currently non-income producing; security is expected to pay distributions within the next 12 months. |
(f) | Security is non-income producing. |
F-25
1. | Organization |
2. | Significant Accounting Policies |
F-26
| Investment Team Valuation. The applicable investments are initially valued by Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.s (Kayne Anderson or the Adviser) investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investments; | |
| Investment Team Valuation Documentation. Preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and discussed with senior management of Kayne Anderson. Such valuations generally are submitted to the Valuation Committee (a committee of the Companys Board of Directors) or the Board of Directors on a monthly basis, and stand for intervening periods of time. | |
| Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee meets on or about the end of each month to consider new valuations presented by Kayne Anderson, if any, which were made in accordance with the Valuation Procedures in such month. Between meetings of the Valuation Committee, a senior officer of Kayne Anderson is authorized to make valuation determinations. The Valuation Committees valuations stands for intervening periods of time unless the Valuation Committee meets again at the request of Kayne Anderson, the Board of Directors, or the Committee itself. All valuation determinations of the Valuation Committee are subject to ratification by the Board at its next regular meeting. | |
| Valuation Firm. No less than quarterly, a third-party valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors reviews the valuation methodologies and calculations employed for these securities. | |
| Board of Directors Determination. The Board of Directors meets quarterly to consider the valuations provided by Kayne Anderson and the Valuation Committee, if applicable, and ratify valuations for the applicable securities. The Board of Directors considers the report provided by the third-party valuation firm in reviewing and determining in good faith the fair value of the applicable portfolio securities. |
F-27
F-28
F-29
3. | Concentration of Risk |
4. | Agreements and Affiliations |
F-30
5. | Income Taxes |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|||||
Organization costs
|
$ | (51 | ) | ||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|||||
Unrealized gains on investment securities
|
36,620 | ||||
Distributions received from MLPs
|
7,358 | ||||
Total net deferred tax liability
|
$ | 43,927 | |||
Gross unrealized appreciation of investments (including
securities sold short)
|
$ | 120,732 | ||
Gross unrealized depreciation of investments (including
securities sold short)
|
(2,362 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation before tax and interest rate swap
contracts
|
118,370 | |||
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts
|
(4,144 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation before tax
|
$ | 114,226 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation after tax
|
$ | 70,248 | ||
F-31
6. | Restricted Securities |
Number of | Percent of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Units | Acquisition | Value Per | Net | Percent of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partnership | Security | (in 000s) | Date | Cost | Fair Value | Unit | Assets | Total Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.
|
Common Units | 1,204 | 04/01/05 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 30,309 | $ | 25.18 | 3.6 | % | 2.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Inergy, L.P.
|
Common Units | 2,947 | 12/17/04 | 75,034 | 90,496 | 30.71 | 10.7 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
Subordinated Units | 3,478 | 04/13/05 | 100,007 | 102,697 | 29.53 | 12.1 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 205,041 | $ | 223,502 | 26.4 | % | 18.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7. | Call Options Written |
Number of | ||||||||
Contracts | Premiums | |||||||
(in 000s) | Received | |||||||
Options outstanding at beginning of period
|
2 | $ | 201 | |||||
Options written
|
| | ||||||
Options terminated in closing purchase transactions
|
(1 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||
Options expired
|
(1 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
Options outstanding at end of period
|
| $ | | |||||
8. | Investment Transactions |
9. | Bank Loan Outstanding |
10. | Auction Rate Senior Notes |
F-32
11. | Preferred Stock |
12. | Interest Rate Swap Contracts |
F-33
Fixed Rates | Floating Rate | |||||||||||||||||
Termination | Notional | Paid by the | Received by the | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
Dates | Amounts | Company | Company | Depreciation | ||||||||||||||
03/25/08-05/09/12 | $ | 250,000 | 4.12-4.65 | % | 1 month U.S. | $ | 3,991 | |||||||||||
Dollar LIBOR |
13. | Common Stock |
Shares at November 30, 2004
|
33,165,900 | |||
Shares issued through reinvestment of distributions
|
510,542 | |||
Shares at May 31, 2005
|
33,676,442 | |||
14. | Subsequent Events |
F-34
APPENDIX A
DESCRIPTION OF RATINGS
Following is a description of the debt securities rating categories used by Moodys Investors Service, Inc., Standard & Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (Standard & Poors) and Fitch Ratings.
Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
Corporate and Municipal Bond Ratings
Aaa: Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, with minimal credit risk.
Aa: Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.
A: Obligations rated A are considered upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.
Baa: Obligations rated Baa are subject to moderate credit risk. They are considered medium-grade and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics
Ba: Obligations rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements and are subject to substantial credit risk.
B: Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.
Caa: Obligations rated Caa are judged to be of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.
Ca: Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
C: Obligations rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal and interest.
Note: Moodys appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.
Description of Moodys Highest Ratings of State and Municipal Notes and Other Short-Term Loans
Moodys ratings for state and municipal notes and other short-term loans are designated Moodys Investment Grade (MIG or, for variable or floating rate obligations, VMIG). Such ratings recognize the differences between short- term credit risk and long-term risk. Factors affecting the liquidity of the borrower and short-term cyclical elements are critical in short-term ratings. Symbols used will be as follows:
MIG-1: This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.
MIG-2: This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group.
MIG-3: This designation acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established.
SG: This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.
VMIG 1: This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
VMIG 2: This designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
A-1
VMIG 3: This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the satisfactory short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
SG: This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Demand features rated in this category may be supported by a liquidity provider that does not have an investment grade short-term rating or may lack the structural and/or legal protections necessary to ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
Description of Moodys Short Term Ratings
Moodys short-term ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to honor short-term financial obligations. Ratings may be assigned to issuers, short-term programs or to individual short-term debt instruments. Such obligations generally have an original maturity not exceeding thirteen months, unless explicitly noted.
P-1: Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 have a superior ability to repay short-term debt obligations.
P-2: Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations.
P-3: Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.
NP: Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
Standard & Poors
Issue Credit Rating Definitions
A Standard & Poors issue credit rating is a current opinion of the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations, or a specific financial program (including ratings on medium term note programs and commercial paper programs). It takes into consideration the creditworthiness of guarantors, insurers, or other forms of credit enhancement on the obligation and takes into account the currency in which the obligation is denominated. The issue credit rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold a financial obligation, inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor.
Issue credit ratings are based on current information furnished by the obligors or obtained by Standard & Poors from other sources it considers reliable. Standard & Poors does not perform an audit in connection with any credit rating and may, on occasion, rely on unaudited financial information. Credit ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information, or based on other circumstances.
Issue credit ratings can be either long-term or short-term. Short-term ratings are generally assigned to those obligations considered short-term in the relevant market. In the U.S., for example, that means obligations with an original maturity of no more than 365 days including commercial paper. Short-term ratings are also used to indicate the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to put features on long-term obligations. The result is a dual rating, in which the short-term rating addresses the put feature, in addition to the usual long-term rating. Medium-term notes are assigned long-term ratings.
Issue credit ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations: likelihood of payment capacity and willingness of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on an obligation in accordance with the terms of the obligation; nature of and provisions of the obligation; protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors rights.
The issue rating definitions are expressed in terms of default risk. As such, they pertain to senior obligations of an entity. Junior obligations are typically rated lower than senior obligations, to reflect the lower
A-2
priority in bankruptcy, as noted above. (Such differentiation applies when an entity has both senior and subordinated obligations, secured and unsecured obligations, or operating company and holding company obligations.) Accordingly, in the case of junior debt, the rating may not conform exactly with the category definition.
Corporate and Municipal Bond Ratings
Investment Grade
AAA: An obligation rated AAA has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poors. The obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.
AA: An obligation rated AA differs from the highest rated obligations only in small degree. The obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.
A: An obligation rated A is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rated categories. However, the obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong.
BBB: An obligation rated BBB exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
Speculative Grade
Obligations rated BB, B, CCC, CC, and C are regarded as having predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal. BB indicates the least degree of speculation and C the highest. While such debt will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.
BB: An obligation rated BB is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to the obligors inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
B: An obligation rated B is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated BB, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligors capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
CCC: An obligation rated CCC is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
CC: An obligation rated CC is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment.
C: A subordinated debt or preferred stock obligation rated C is CURRENTLY HIGHLY VULNERABLE to nonpayment. The C rating may be used to cover a situation where a bankruptcy petition has been filed or similar action taken, but payments on this obligation are being continued. A C also will be assigned to a preferred stock issue in arrears on dividends or sinking fund payments, but that is currently paying.
CI: The rating CI is reserved for income bonds on which no interest is being paid.
D: An obligation rated D is in payment default. The D rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless Standard & Poors believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. The D rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized.
A-3
Plus (+) or Minus (-): The ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.
Provisional ratings: The letter p indicates that the rating is provisional. A provisional rating assumes the successful completion of the project being financed by the debt being rated and indicates that payment of debt service requirements is largely or entirely dependent upon the successful and timely completion of the project. This rating, however, while addressing credit quality subsequent to completion of the project, makes no comment on the likelihood of, or the risk of default upon failure of, such completion. The investor should exercise his own judgment with respect to such likelihood and risk.
r: This symbol is attached to the ratings of instruments with significant noncredit risks. It highlights risks to principal or volatility of expected returns which are not addressed in the credit rating. Examples include: obligations linked or indexed to equities, currencies, or commodities; obligations exposed to severe prepayment risk such as interest-only or principal-only mortgage securities; and obligations with unusually risky interest terms, such as inverse floaters.
The absence of an r symbol should not be taken as an indication that an obligation will exhibit no volatility or variability in total return.
N.R.: This indicates that no rating has been requested, that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that Standard & Poors does not rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy.
Debt obligations of issuers outside the United States and its territories are rated on the same basis as domestic corporate and municipal issues. The ratings measure the creditworthiness of the obligor but do not take into account currency exchange and related uncertainties.
Commercial Paper Rating Definitions
A Standard & Poors commercial paper rating is a current assessment of the likelihood of timely payment of debt having an original maturity of no more than 365 days. Ratings are graded into several categories, ranging from A for the highest quality obligations to D for the lowest. These categories are as follows:
A-1: A short-term obligation rated A-1 is rated in the highest category by Standard & Poors. The obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.
A-2: A short-term obligation rated A-2 is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligors capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.
A-3: A short-term obligation rated A-3 exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
B: A short-term obligation rated B is regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties which could lead to the obligors inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
C: A short-term obligation rated C is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
D: A short-term obligation rated D is in payment default. The D rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless Standard &
A-4
Poors believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. The D rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized.
A commercial paper rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold a security inasmuch as it does not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. The ratings are based on current information furnished to Standard & Poors by the issuer or obtained from other sources it considers reliable. Standard & Poors does not perform an audit in connection with any rating and may, on occasion, rely on unaudited financial information. The ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of changes in or unavailability of such information.
Fitch Ratings
Long-Term Credit Ratings
Investment Grade
AAA Highest credit quality. AAA ratings denote the lowest expectation of credit risk. They are assigned only in case of exceptionally strong capacity for timely payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be affected adversely by foreseeable events.
AA Very high credit quality. AA ratings denote a very low expectation of credit risk. They indicate very strong capacity for timely payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.
A High credit quality. A ratings denote a low expectation of credit risk. The capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to changes in circumstances or in economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.
BBB Good credit quality. BBB ratings indicate that there is currently a low expectation of credit risk. The capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is considered adequate, but adverse changes in circumstances and in economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity. This is the lowest investment-grade category.
Speculative Grade
BB Speculative. BB ratings indicate that there is a possibility of credit risk developing, particularly as the result of adverse economic change over time; however, business or financial alternatives may be available to allow financial commitments to be met. Securities rated in this category are not investment grade.
B Highly speculative. B ratings indicate that significant credit risk is present, but a limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met; however, capacity for continued payment is contingent upon a sustained, favorable business and economic environment.
CCC, CC, C High default risk. Default is a real possibility. Capacity for meeting financial commitments is solely reliant upon sustained, favorable business or economic developments. A CC rating indicates that default of some kind appears probable. C ratings signal imminent default.
DDD, DD, And D Default The ratings of obligations in this category are based on their prospects for achieving partial or full recovery in a reorganization or liquidation of the obligor. While expected recovery values are highly speculative and cannot be estimated with any precision, the following serve as general guidelines. DDD obligations have the highest potential for recovery, around 90%-100% of outstanding amounts and accrued interest. DD indicates potential recoveries in the range of 50%-90%, and D the lowest recovery potential, i.e., below 50%. Entities rated in this category have defaulted on some or all of their obligations. Entities rated DDD have the highest prospect for resumption of performance or continued operation with or without a formal reorganization process. Entities rated DD and D are generally undergoing a formal reorganization or liquidation process; those rated DD are likely to satisfy a higher portion of their outstanding obligations, while entities rated D have a poor prospect for repaying all obligations.
Short-Term Credit Ratings
A short-term rating has a time horizon of less than 12 months for most obligations, or up to three years for U.S. public finance securities, and thus places greater emphasis on the liquidity necessary to meet financial commitments in a timely manner.
F1 Highest credit quality. Indicates the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added + to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature.
F2 Good credit quality. A satisfactory capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, but the margin of safety is not as great as in the case of the higher ratings.
F3 Fair credit quality. The capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate; however, near-term adverse changes could result in a reduction to non-investment grade.
B Speculative. Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus vulnerability to near-term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.
C High default risk. Default is a real possibility. Capacity for meeting financial commitments is solely reliant upon a sustained, favorable business and economic environment.
D Default. Denotes actual or imminent payment default.
Notes to Long-term and Short-term ratings:
+ or may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the AAA Long-term rating category, to categories below CCC, or to Short-term ratings other than F1.
NR indicates that Fitch Ratings does not rate the issuer or issue in question.
Withdrawn A rating is withdrawn when Fitch Ratings deems the amount of information available to be inadequate for rating purposes, or when an obligation matures, is called, or refinanced.
Rating Watch Ratings are placed on Rating Watch to notify investors that there is a reasonable probability of a rating change and the likely direction of such change. These are designated as Positive, indicating a potential upgrade, Negative, for a potential downgrade, or Evolving, if ratings may be raised, lowered or maintained. Rating Watch typically is resolved over a relatively short period.
A Rating Outlook indicates the direction a rating is likely to move over a one to two year period. Outlooks may be positive, stable, or negative. A positive or negative Rating Outlook does not imply a rating change is inevitable. Similarly, ratings for which outlooks are stable could be downgraded before an outlook moves to positive or negative if circumstances warrant such an action. Occasionally, Fitch Ratings may be unable to identify the fundamental trend. In these cases, the Rating Outlook may be described as evolving.
A-5
Item 24. | Financial Statements and Exhibits |
(a) Charter |
(1) Articles of Incorporation* | ||
(2) Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation dated August 11, 2004.*** | ||
(3) Articles of Amendment and Restatement | ||
(4) Articles Supplementary |
(b) | (1) Bylaws of Registrant* |
(2) Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant |
(c) Voting Trust Agreement none. |
(d) | (1) Articles of Amendment and Restatement. |
(2) Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant |
(e) Form of Dividend Reinvestment Plan | |
(f) Long-Term Debt Instruments none. | |
(g) Form of Investment Management Agreement between Registrant and Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P. |
(h) | (1) Form of Underwriting Agreement. to be filed by amendment. |
(2) Form of Master Agreement Among Underwriters | ||
(3) Form of Master Selected Dealer Agreement |
(i) Bonus, Profit Sharing, Pension Plans not applicable. | |
(j) Form of Custody Agreement. | |
(k) Other Material Contracts |
(1) Administrative Services Agreement | ||
(2) Transfer Agency Agreement | ||
(3) Accounting Services Agreement |
(l) Form of Opinion and Consent of Venable LLP to be filed by amendment. | |
(m) Non-Resident Officers/ Directors none. | |
(n) Other Opinions and Consents consent of independent registered public accounting firm filed herewith. | |
(o) Omitted Financial Statements none. | |
(p) Subscription Agreement none. | |
(q) Model Retirement Plans none. | |
(r) Code of Ethics |
(1) Code of Ethics of Registrant. | ||
(2) Code of Ethics of Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P. |
(s) (1) | Power of Attorney for Ms. Costin and Messrs. Good, Quinn and McCarthy dated July 12, 2004.** |
(2) | Power of Attorney for Mr. Isenberg dated June 15, 2005. | |
(3) | Power of Attorney for Mr. Walter dated August 19, 2005. | |
C-1
* | Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-116479) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. |
** | Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-116479) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. |
*** | Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-116479) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-116479) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 1, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-116479) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-116479) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-122380) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| Previously filed as an exhibit to Registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-123595) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. |
Item 25. | Marketing Arrangements Reference is made to the underwriting agreement to be filed by amendment as exhibit (h)(1) to the Registrants Registration Statement. |
Item 26. | Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution |
Securities and Exchange Commission Fees
|
$ | * | ||
Printing and Engraving Expenses
|
$ | * | ||
Legal Fees
|
$ | * | ||
Marketing Expenses
|
$ | * | ||
Accounting Expenses
|
$ | * | ||
Transfer Agent Fees
|
$ | * | ||
Miscellaneous Expenses
|
$ | * | ||
Total
|
$ | * |
* | To be filed by amendment. |
Item 27. | Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with Registrant none. |
Item 28. | Number of Holders of Securities as of July 31, 2005 |
Title of Class | Number of Record Holders | |||
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
25 |
C-2
Item 29. | Indemnification. |
C-3
Item 30. | Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser. |
Item 31. | Location of Accounts and Records. |
Item 32. | Management Services not applicable. |
Item 33. | Undertakings. |
(a) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form of prospectus filed by the Registrant under Rule 497(h) under the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective; and | |
(b) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of the securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
C-4
Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company |
By: | /s/ Kevin S. McCarthy* |
|
|
Kevin McCarthy | |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Signature | Title | Date | ||||
/s/ Kevin S. McCarthy* |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | September 29, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Ralph Collins
Walter* |
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer | September 29, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Anne K. Costin* |
Director | September 29, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Steven C. Good* |
Director | September 29, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Terrence J. Quinn* |
Director | September 29, 2005 | ||||
/s/ Gerald I. Isenberg* |
Director | September 29, 2005 | ||||
*By: /s/ David A.
Hearth (Pursuant to Powers of Attorney previously filed) |
C-5
LIST OF EXHIBITS
(n)
|
| Consent of independent registered public accounting firm. |