e10vk
Table of Contents

 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
x   
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
OR
o   
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     .
Commission File Number 1-12846
 
PROLOGIS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Maryland
  74-2604728
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
14100 East 35th Place
Aurora, Colorado 80011
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(303) 375-9292
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
         
    Name of each exchange
Title of Each Class   on which registered
     
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $0.01 per share
    New York Stock Exchange  
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $0.01 per share
    New York Stock Exchange  
Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest par value $0.01 per share
    New York Stock Exchange  
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:     NONE
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ  No o
     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     Yes þ  No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).     Yes þ  No o
     Based on the closing price of the registrant’s shares on June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $5,957,143,121.
     At March 11, 2005, there were outstanding approximately 186,306,321 common shares of beneficial interest of the registrant.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
     Portion of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2005 annual meeting of its shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.
 
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
                   
Item   Description   Page
         
 PART I
 1.       1  
              1  
              3  
              11  
              18  
              18  
 2.       19  
              19  
              19  
              23  
              30  
              31  
 3.       38  
 4.       39  
 PART II
 5.       39  
              39  
              39  
              41  
              41  
 6.       43  
 7.       47  
              48  
              49  
              50  
              52  
              66  
              66  
              75  
              78  
 7A.       84  
 8.       86  
 9.       86  
 9A.       86  
 9B.       87  
 PART III
 10.       88  
 11.       88  
 12.       88  
 13.       88  
 14.       88  
 PART IV
 15.       89  
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings - Fixed Charges
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings - Combined Fixed
 Subsidiaries
 Consent of KPMG LLP - Los Angeles, California
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer - Section 906
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer - Section 906


Table of Contents

PART I
ITEM 1. Business
ProLogis
      ProLogis (collectively with its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, “ProLogis”) is a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that operates a global network of industrial distribution properties. ProLogis’ business strategy is designed to achieve long-term sustainable growth in cash flow and sustain its return on equity at a high level for its shareholders. ProLogis manages its business by utilizing the ProLogis Operating System®, an organizational structure and service delivery system that ProLogis built around its customers. When combined with ProLogis’ international network of distribution properties, the ProLogis Operating System enables ProLogis to meet its customers’ distribution space needs on a global basis. ProLogis believes that, by integrating international scope and expertise with a strong local presence in its markets, it has become an attractive choice for its targeted customer base, the largest global users of distribution space.
      ProLogis is organized under Maryland law and has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). ProLogis’ world headquarters are located in Aurora, Colorado. ProLogis’ European headquarters are located in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg while its European customer service headquarters are located in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ProLogis has offices in Asia in Tokyo, Japan and Shanghai, China. ProLogis’ common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Shares”) were first listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in March 1994.
      This report on Form 10-K includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these expectations due to changes in global economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory factors. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Factors.”
      A copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as ProLogis’ Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, on the Internet in the Investor Relations section of ProLogis’ website (www.prologis.com). All required reports are made available on the website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Any references to ProLogis’ website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the website and such information should not be considered to be part of this document.
      Business Strategy and Global Presence
      ProLogis’ business strategy has evolved over time in response to changes in the environment in which it operates. Throughout this evolution, ProLogis’ focus has continued to be on its customers’ needs. ProLogis was formed in 1991 as an industrial distribution operating company in the United States with a primary objective of differentiating itself from its competition. To do this, ProLogis needed to be able to meet a corporate customer’s distribution space requirements on a national, regional and local basis while providing customers with consistent levels of service throughout the country. As such, ProLogis’ initial business strategy involved the acquisition and development of industrial distribution properties across the United States and the building of a management team that would operate throughout the United States. These operating properties represented one operating segment — the property operations segment — as ProLogis’ intent was, and continues to be, to hold certain investments on a long-term basis while generating income from leasing the properties to customers.
      As ProLogis’ customers’ needs expanded to markets outside the United States, so did ProLogis’ portfolio and its management team. ProLogis expanded its operations to Mexico in 1996 and to Europe in 1997, and now has operations in 11 European countries. In 2001, ProLogis again expanded its operations, this time to Asia with the initiation of operations in Japan. ProLogis opened a representative office in China in 2003 and,

1


Table of Contents

in 2004, acquired its first real estate assets in China. Further expansion in 2004 included ProLogis’ entry into Singapore, with the acquisition of an operating property, and Canada, with the acquisition of land for future development.
      In 1995, ProLogis expanded its business to include the corporate distribution facilities services (“CDFS business”) operating segment. The CDFS business segment began utilizing ProLogis’ existing development capabilities, which had been primarily focused on the development of properties for direct, long-term investment, to develop properties for sale to third parties. As a REIT, ProLogis must distribute rather than reinvest substantial amounts of its internally generated capital. Accordingly, the CDFS business segment’s sales to third parties provided ProLogis with funds that it could use as an alternative to public capital (debt and equity markets).
      The ability to recycle funds in the CDFS business segment became a more integral part of ProLogis’ business strategy in early 1999 when the public equity markets became an increasingly costly method of raising capital. As such, it was necessary for ProLogis to increase the volume of its CDFS business segment transactions so that it could self-fund its development activities. Therefore, ProLogis shifted the focus of its CDFS business segment from developing and selling properties to third parties to developing properties that would be contributed to property funds — property funds that would be formed by ProLogis with private equity capital sources, in which ProLogis would maintain an ownership position and that would each be managed by ProLogis. And, to supplement the private equity investments in each property fund, the property funds were positioned to obtain secured debt financing by using their properties as security. Today, the property funds’ leverage ratios typically range from 40% to 75%. As ProLogis’ property funds grew, ProLogis expanded its CDFS business segment activities to also include the acquisition of properties that would be rehabilitated and/or repositioned within the CDFS business segment prior to contribution to a property fund.
      ProLogis’ property fund strategy:
  •  Allows ProLogis to realize, for financial reporting purposes, a portion of the development profits from its CDFS business activities by contributing its stabilized development properties to property funds (profits are recognized to the extent of third party investment in the property fund);
 
  •  Provides diversified sources of private capital to ProLogis thereby allowing ProLogis to have less overall capital invested;
 
  •  Allows ProLogis to earn fees for providing services to the property funds;
 
  •  Allows ProLogis to maintain a long-term ownership position in the properties; and
 
  •  Allows ProLogis, as the manager of the property funds, to maintain the market presence and customer relationships that are the key drivers of the ProLogis Operating System (see “— ProLogis Management — ProLogis Operating System”).
      ProLogis’ first property fund was formed in August 1999 primarily with operating properties from ProLogis’ property operations segment, however subsequent property funds formed by ProLogis have primarily included properties developed by ProLogis in the CDFS business segment. ProLogis’ fifteen property funds have been formed in several ways illustrating the flexibility that this business strategy affords ProLogis:
  •  Five of ProLogis’ property funds, all in the United States, were formed with an initial amount of private capital that allowed the property fund to generally make one portfolio acquisition from ProLogis;
 
  •  ProLogis European Properties Fund, ProLogis Japan Properties Fund and ProLogis North American Properties Fund V were all formed with partners who have provided capital commitments to acquire properties on a continuing basis after formation;
 
  •  ProLogis and affiliates of four investment funds formed five property funds with the objective of acquiring properties from an established REIT in a business combination. These property funds also acquired properties from ProLogis; and

2


Table of Contents

  •  Interests in two established property funds were acquired by ProLogis as part of a business combination.
      As ProLogis’ business strategy has evolved, the primary driver in this evolution has been ProLogis’ focus on its customers’ global needs for distribution space. After 13 years in operation, that focus has enabled ProLogis to become a leading global provider of distribution space operating on three continents.
ProLogis’ Operating Segments
      ProLogis’ business is organized into two operating segments: property operations and the CDFS business.
      Property Operations
           Investments
      The property operations segment represents the long-term ownership, management and leasing of industrial distribution properties. ProLogis’ property operations segment at December 31, 2004 (including assets owned by 15 property funds in which ProLogis has ownership interests) consisted of 1,936 operating properties aggregating 282.8 million square feet in North America (the United States and Mexico), 11 countries in Europe and in Asia (Japan and Singapore). Of the total operating properties, ProLogis directly owned 1,228 operating properties aggregating 133.6 million square feet and its property funds owned 708 properties aggregating 149.2 million square feet. ProLogis presents its investments in the property funds under the equity method. ProLogis’ ownership interests in its 15 property funds ranged from 11.5% to 50% at December 31, 2004. ProLogis’ investment strategy in the property operations segment focuses primarily on generic industrial distribution properties in key distribution markets.
      ProLogis develops distribution properties in its other operating segment, the CDFS business segment, with the intent to contribute the properties to property funds or to sell the properties to third parties. ProLogis also acquires properties in the CDFS business segment, with the intent to contribute them to a property fund, generally after rehabilitation and/or repositioning activities have been completed. These CDFS business properties, along with their operations, are included in the property operations segment after they are completed or acquired through the date they are contributed or sold. The gains and losses realized from the contributions or sales of these properties are included in the CDFS business segment’s income because they were developed or acquired in that segment. At December 31, 2004, there were 90 CDFS business segment operating properties aggregating 18.0 million square feet at a total investment of $897.9 million that were included in the property operations segment’s investments pending contribution or sale.
      Property operations segment investment activities in 2004 included:
  •  Formation of five new United States property funds in which ProLogis has a 20% ownership interest (125 properties; 25.5 million square feet; $1.51 billion total investment).
 
  •  Disposition of 14 properties that were direct, long-term investments in the property operations segment aggregating 1.1 million square feet generating aggregate net proceeds of $40.6 million.
 
  •  In North America, ProLogis North American Properties Fund V acquired 32 properties aggregating 7.6 million square feet at a total investment of $313.8 million, including 25 properties aggregating 4.9 million square feet at a total investment of $215.0 million that were acquired from ProLogis.
 
  •  In Europe, ProLogis European Properties Fund acquired 33 properties aggregating 7.4 million square feet at a total investment of $599.3 million, all of which were acquired from ProLogis except for one 0.2 million square foot property at a total investment of $9.5 million.
 
  •  ProLogis Japan Properties Fund acquired eight properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet at a total investment of $359.1 million, including three properties aggregating 1.2 million square feet at a total investment of $220.2 million that were acquired from ProLogis.
 
  •  Acquired 20% ownership interests in two property funds as part of the Keystone Transaction (26 properties; 7.7 million square feet; $496.4 million total investment).

3


Table of Contents

  •  Acquisition of nine properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet at a total investment of $126.6 million as part of the keystone Transaction with the intent to own these properties directly in the property operations segment rather than to contribute these properties to property funds.
      See “Item 2. Properties — Properties,” “Item 2. Properties — Unconsolidated Investees — Property Operations”, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Keystone Transaction” and Notes 5 and 12 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
           Operations
      The property operations segment generates income from rents and reimbursements of property operating expenses from unaffiliated customers who lease ProLogis’ distribution space. Also, the operating income of the property operations segment includes ProLogis’ proportionate share of the net earnings or losses each of the property funds recognized under the equity method, along with the fee income that ProLogis earns for managing the properties owned by the property funds. In addition to property and asset management fees, ProLogis also earns fees for performing other services for the property funds, including, but not limited to, development, leasing and acquisition activities.
      The net earnings or losses generated by operating properties developed or acquired in the CDFS business segment that are included in the property operations segment on an interim basis prior to their contribution or sale are also included in the net operating income of the property operations segment. The gains or losses from the contributions or sales of these properties are included in the net operating income of the CDFS business segment.
      In 2004, 2003 and 2002, the property operations segment’s net operating income was $496.1 million, $478.5 million and $475.7 million, respectively. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Property Operations” and Note 12 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
      Operational information about this operating segment for 2004 includes:
  •  ProLogis’ stabilized operating portfolio of 276.2 million square feet (including properties owned by the property funds) was 92.3% leased and 91.4% occupied at December 31, 2004. ProLogis’ total operating portfolio of 282.8 million square feet (including properties owned by the property funds) was 91.0% leased and 89.8% occupied at December 31, 2004. ProLogis defines its stabilized properties as those properties where the capital improvements, repositioning efforts, new management and new marketing programs for acquisitions, or the marketing programs in the case of newly developed properties, have been in effect for a sufficient period of time. A property enters the stabilized pool at the earlier of 12 months or when it is substantially leased, which is defined by ProLogis generally as 93%. Overall occupancy levels increased in 2004 from 2003. ProLogis’ leased percentage for the stabilized portfolio at December 31, 2004 increased to 92.3% from 90.2% at December 31, 2003.
 
  •  ProLogis leased 66.0 million square feet of distribution space in 1,614 leasing transactions in its properties and in the properties owned by the property funds. Rental rates decreased by 4.7% for 2004 transactions involving previously leased space (49.5 million square feet). ProLogis’ weighted average customer retention rate was 68.7% for all properties in 2004. In 2003, ProLogis’ rental rates decreased by 4.8% for transactions involving previously leased space and its weighted average customer retention rate was 71.4%.
 
  •  ProLogis’ same store portfolio of operating properties (properties owned by ProLogis and the property funds that were operating throughout all of 2004 and 2003) aggregated 206.3 million square feet. Rental income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees, less rental expenses of the same store portfolio increased by 0.15% in 2004 from 2003. For the same store portfolio applicable to 2003, rental income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees, less rental expenses increased by 0.09% in 2003 from 2002. See the discussion of ProLogis’ same store portfolio at “Item 7. Management’s Discussion

4


Table of Contents

  and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Property Operations.”
 
  •  ProLogis earned termination and renegotiation fees of $2.5 million related to leases in its directly owned properties in 2004. Such fees in 2003 were $5.6 million. In certain leasing situations, ProLogis finds it advantageous to negotiate lease terminations with a customer, particularly when the customer is experiencing financial difficulties or when ProLogis believes that it can re-lease the space at rates that, when combined with the termination fee, provide a total return to ProLogis in excess of that which was being earned under the original lease terms.
 
  •  ProLogis earned various fees from the property funds, primarily from property management and asset management services, of $50.8 million in 2004 as compared to $44.2 million in 2003.
           Market Presence
      At December 31, 2004, the 1,228 properties aggregating 133.6 million square feet in the property operations segment that are owned directly by ProLogis are located in 39 markets in the United States, four markets in Mexico, 12 markets in five countries in Europe, in Osaka, Japan (one property that was developed in the CDFS business segment that is approximately 27% leased at December 31, 2004) and in Singapore (one property acquired in 2004). ProLogis’ largest property operations segment markets in the United States (based on investment in directly owned properties) are Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas/ Fort Worth, Houston and San Francisco (Central Valley, East Bay and South Bay markets). ProLogis’ largest holdings in the property operations segment in Europe are in the United Kingdom, primarily the London and Southeast market. Property operations segment properties in Europe are primarily properties that were developed or acquired in the CDFS business segment that have not yet been contributed or sold. See “— CDFS Business” and “Item 2. Properties — Geographic Distribution” and “Item 2. Properties — Properties.”
      The operating properties owned by the property funds at December 31, 2004 were as follows (square feet in thousands):
                   
    Number   Square Feet
         
ProLogis California(1)
    81       14,204  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I(2)
    36       9,406  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund II(3)
    27       4,477  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund III(4)
    34       4,380  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV(5)
    17       3,475  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund V(6)
    119       28,267  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI(7)
    22       8,648  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII(8)
    29       6,055  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII(9)
    24       3,065  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX(10)
    21       3,504  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund X(11)
    29       4,191  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI(12)
    14       4,315  
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII(13)
    12       3,364  
ProLogis European Properties Fund(14)
    230       47,921  
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund(15)
    13       3,869  
             
 
Totals
    708       149,141  
             
 
(1)  All properties are located in the Los Angeles/ Orange County market.
 
(2)  Properties are located in 17 markets in the United States.
 
(3)  Properties are located in 13 markets in the United States.

5


Table of Contents

  (4)  Properties are located in 15 markets in the United States.
 
  (5)  Properties are located in 10 markets in the United States.
 
  (6)  Properties are located in 24 markets in the United States and in four markets in Mexico.
 
  (7)  Properties are located in eight markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004).
 
  (8)  Properties are located in nine markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004).
 
  (9)  Properties are located in 10 markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004).
(10)  Properties are located in eight markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004).
 
(11)  Properties are located in 11 markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004).
 
(12)  Properties are located in three markets in the United States (ProLogis acquired an ownership interest in this existing property Fund in 2004).
 
(13)  Properties are located in two New Jersey markets (ProLogis acquired an ownership interest in this existing property Fund in 2004).
 
(14)  Properties are located in 26 markets in 11 countries in Europe (70 properties, 12.6 million square feet located in the Central France market, primarily in Paris).
 
(15)  Properties are located in the Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka markets in Japan.
      See “Item 2. Properties — Geographic Distribution” for a discussion of ProLogis’ defined markets and “Item 2. Properties — Unconsolidated Investees — Property Operations” for additional information on the operating properties owned by the property funds.
           Competition
      In general, numerous other industrial distribution properties are located in close proximity to ProLogis’ properties. The amount of rentable distribution space available in any market could have a material effect on ProLogis’ ability to rent space and on the rents that ProLogis can charge. In addition, in many of ProLogis’ submarkets, institutional investors and owners and developers of industrial distribution properties (including other REITs) compete for the acquisition, development and leasing of distribution space. Many of these entities have substantial resources and experience. Competition in acquiring existing distribution properties and land, both from institutional capital sources and from other REITs, has been very strong over the past several years.
           Property Management
      ProLogis’ business strategy includes a customer service focus that requires ProLogis to provide responsive, professional and effective property management services at the local level. To enhance its management services, ProLogis has developed and implemented proprietary operating and training systems to achieve consistent levels of performance and professionalism in all markets and to enable its property management team members to give the proper level of attention to ProLogis’ customers throughout its network. ProLogis manages substantially all of its directly owned operating properties and all of the operating properties owned by the property funds.
           Customers
      ProLogis has developed a customer base that is diverse in terms of industry concentration and that represents a broad spectrum of international, national, regional and local distribution space users. At December 31, 2004, ProLogis and the property funds had 4,114 customers occupying 254.0 million square feet of distribution space. Including customers leasing space in properties owned by the property funds, the largest customer and the 25 largest customers accounted for 2.25% and 22.1%, respectively, of the annualized collected base rents of ProLogis and the property funds at December 31, 2004. When the customers leasing space in the properties owned by the property funds are excluded, ProLogis’ largest customer and its 25 largest customers accounted for 1.35% and 15.6%, respectively, of ProLogis’ annualized collected base rents at December 31, 2004.

6


Table of Contents

           Employees
      ProLogis directly employs approximately 830 persons. ProLogis’ employees work in North America (approximately 560 persons), in nine countries in Europe (approximately 210 persons) and in three countries in Asia (approximately 60 persons). Of the total, approximately 360 employees are assigned to the property operations segment. ProLogis’ other employees may assist with property operations segment activities. ProLogis believes that its relationships with its employees are good. ProLogis’ employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
           Seasonal Nature of the Business
      The demand for industrial distribution space is not seasonal.
           Future Plans
      The growth in ProLogis’ property operations segment in 2004 was primarily through ProLogis’ property fund portfolios, rather than in ProLogis’ direct investments. ProLogis’ current business plan with respect to direct investments in the property operations segment allows for the expansion of its network of operating properties as necessary to: (i) facilitate larger transactions completed by property funds; (ii) address the specific expansion needs of a customer; (iii) initiate or enhance its market presence in a specific country, market or submarket; or (iv) take advantage of opportunities where ProLogis believes it has the ability to achieve favorable returns.
      ProLogis expects to continue to increase the assets held by its property funds. ProLogis expects to achieve this growth through the property funds’ acquisition of properties that have been developed or acquired by ProLogis in the CDFS business segment, but also by the property funds’ direct acquisition of properties from third parties as was done in 2004 with the formation of five new property funds. ProLogis expects that the fee income it earns from the property funds will increase in 2005 over the 2004 level as the sizes of the portfolios of operating properties in the property funds increase. And, depending on capital availability, ProLogis could also form new property funds in 2005.
      ProLogis intends to fund its investment activities in the property operations segment in 2005 primarily with operating cash flow from this operating segment, its lines of credit and short-term borrowing facilities and the proceeds from contributions and sales of properties (properties that have been directly owned, long-term investments in the property operations segment, as well as CDFS business segment properties that are included in the property operations segment on an interim basis prior to their contribution or sale).
      See the discussion of factors that could affect the future plans of ProLogis and the property funds in the property operations segment at “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Factors.”
      CDFS Business
      The CDFS business segment encompasses those activities that ProLogis engages in that are not primarily associated with the long-term ownership, management and leasing of industrial distribution properties. Within this operating segment, ProLogis develops distribution properties that are either contributed to property funds or sold to third parties and acquires distribution properties that are contributed to property funds. ProLogis maintains an ownership in, and acts as manager of the property funds. Properties that are acquired by ProLogis in this segment are generally rehabilitated and/or repositioned prior to their contribution to a property fund.
           Investments
      At December 31, 2004, ProLogis had 58 distribution properties aggregating 15.1 million square feet under development at a total expected cost at completion of $1.08 billion. These properties are all being developed

7


Table of Contents

with the objective that they will be contributed to a property fund or sold to a third party. ProLogis’ properties under development at December 31, 2004 include:
  •  North America: 20 properties; 5.7 million square feet; $228.2 million total expected cost (approximately 21% of the total);
 
  •  Europe: 30 properties in nine countries; 5.7 million square feet; $448.6 million total expected cost (approximately 41% of the total); and
 
  •  Asia: eight properties; 3.7 million square feet; $407.8 million total expected cost (approximately 38% of the total).
      In addition to the properties under development that ProLogis owns directly, CDFS joint ventures in which ProLogis has 50% ownership interests had three properties under development aggregating 1.0 million square feet at a total expected cost at completion of $30.5 million (one property in the United States and two properties in China).
      At December 31, 2004 ProLogis and its unconsolidated investees had land positions, including land controlled through contracts, options or letters of intent, aggregating 4,954 acres with the capacity for the development of approximately 84.5 million square feet of distribution properties. Of these land positions, ProLogis directly owned 2,991 acres with the capacity for the development of approximately 52.0 million square feet of distribution properties. ProLogis’ land positions owned at December 31, 2004 included:
  •  North America: 1,952 acres with the capacity for the development of approximately 33.7 million square feet of distribution properties (1,719 acres, 29.4 million buildable square feet in the United States, 99 acres, 1.9 million buildable square feet in Mexico and 134 acres, 2.4 million buildable square feet in Canada) and
 
  •  Europe: 1,039 acres in 10 countries with the capacity for the development of approximately 18.3 million square feet of distribution properties.
      CDFS business segment investment activities in 2004 included the following:
  •  ProLogis began development on three properties aggregating 0.5 million square feet in Shanghai, China at a total expected cost at completion of $18.1 million. Also, a joint venture in which ProLogis has a 50% ownership interest, acquired four operating properties aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total acquisition cost of $7.3 million in Shanghai and began development on two properties aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total expected cost at completion of $7.8 million in Shanghai. This joint venture’s future activities will include both the acquisition of properties that will be rehabilitated and/ or positioned as well as the development of properties that will be operated in this joint venture or in a property fund. This joint venture operates solely in the Suzhou province of the Shanghai market.
 
  •  ProLogis acquired land in Toronto for development of its first property in Canada.
 
  •  Direct development starts by ProLogis aggregated 18.9 million square feet at a total expected cost at completion of $1.21 billion including:
  •  North America: 8.0 million square feet at a total expected cost of $313.4 million;
 
  •  Europe: 7.2 million square feet at a total expected cost of $493.2 million; and
 
  •  Asia: 3.7 million square feet at a total expected cost of $407.8 million (including the three direct development starts in China).
  •  Direct development completions by ProLogis aggregated 13.6 million square feet at a total cost of $862.8 million including:
  •  North America: 5.4 million square feet at a total cost of $186.2 million;
 
  •  Europe: 5.6 million square feet at a total cost of $345.4 million; and
 
  •  Asia: 2.6 million square feet at a total cost of $331.2 million.

8


Table of Contents

  •  Direct acquisition of 21 operating properties by ProLogis aggregating 4.6 million square feet at a total acquisition cost of $196.2 million with the intent to contribute the properties to a property fund (including properties where rehabilitation and/or repositioning efforts are needed prior to contribution).
 
  •  Contributions and sales of 91 properties aggregating 19.5 million square feet that were developed or acquired by ProLogis in the CDFS business segment. These transactions along with dispositions of land parcels that no longer fit in ProLogis’ development plans generated net proceeds to ProLogis of $1.56 billion.
 
  •  Direct acquisitions of land by ProLogis included 1,313 acres of land: 521 acres in North America (387 acres in the United States and 134 acres in Canada), 717 acres in eight countries in Europe and 75 acres in Asia (including 26 acres in China acquired under ground lease). This land can be used for the development of approximately 25.7 million square feet of distribution properties.
           Operations
      The operating income of the CDFS business segment consists primarily of the net gains and losses recognized from the contributions and sales of developed properties to property funds and third parties and from the contributions to property funds of operating properties that were acquired with that intent. ProLogis uses its development and leasing expertise to rehabilitate and/ or reposition certain of the properties that it acquires such that the subsequent contribution of the property is expected to generate a profit to ProLogis. ProLogis also earns fees from customers for development activities performed on their behalf and recognizes gains and losses from sales of land parcels when ProLogis’ development plans no longer include these parcels.
      In 2004, 2003 and 2002, the CDFS business segment’s net operating income was $174.3 million, $124.8 million and $152.3 million, respectively. In 2004, 27% of the net operating income of this operating segment was generated in North America, 53% was generated in Europe and 20% was generated in Asia. In 2003, 39% of the net operating income of this operating segment was generated in North America, 39% was generated in Europe and 22% was generated in Asia (all in Japan). For 2002, 37% of the net operating income of this operating segment was generated in North America, 59% was generated in Europe and 4% was generated in Asia (all in Japan).
      Operational information about this operating segment for 2004 includes:
  •  Recognition of net gains of $177.0 million (including amounts that had been previously deferred and contingent proceeds); $130.7 million related to sales and contributions of developed properties, $20.1 million related to contributions of acquired properties and $26.2 million related to dispositions of land parcels.
 
  •  Earned $2.7 million of fees from the development activities performed for customers and other income.
 
  •  Incurred expenses and other charges of $5.5 million
      See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — CDFS Business” and Note 12 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
           Market Presence
      ProLogis’ CDFS business segment operates in substantially all of ProLogis’ property operations segment’s markets. At December 31, 2004, ProLogis had properties under development in 14 markets in North America (12 markets in the United States and two markets in Mexico), 12 markets in nine countries in Europe and three markets in Asia (Tokyo and Osaka in Japan and in Shanghai, China). At December 31, 2004, the land positions owned by ProLogis were located in 31 markets in North America (27 markets in the United States, three markets in Mexico and in Toronto, Canada) and 18 markets in 10 countries in Europe. At December 31, 2004, ProLogis had begun development on all of its land holdings in Japan and China.

9


Table of Contents

           Competition
      ProLogis believes it has differentiated itself from its competitors as it is the only owner of distribution properties and provider of services with significant global operations and holdings in many key global distribution markets that allow it to operate on a consistent basis in many global markets.
      North America — There are a number of other national, regional and local developers engaged in the industrial distribution property development markets where ProLogis conducts business. ProLogis competes with these developers for land acquisition and development opportunities. The disposition market in North America is very competitive and is driven by the supply of new developments, access to capital and interest rate levels. A key component of ProLogis’ success in the CDFS business segment in North America will continue to be its ability to develop and timely lease properties that will generate profits when contributed or sold and its ability to continue to access private capital that allows for the continued acquisition of ProLogis’ properties by the property funds.
      Europe — ProLogis’ competition in the CDFS business segment in Europe generally comes from local and regional developers in its target markets as opposed to pan-European real estate companies. As in North America, the disposition market in Europe is very competitive and is driven by the supply of new developments, access to capital and interest rate levels. With respect to its development activities in Europe, ProLogis believes that it has additional competitive advantages due to the strategic locations of its land positions owned or under control in Europe and due to its personnel who are experienced in the land entitlement process.
      Asia — ProLogis’ competition in the CDFS business segment in Asia generally comes from local and regional developers as opposed to real estate companies operating in several countries, as does ProLogis. ProLogis believes that it has additional competitive advantages over the local development companies in Japan and China due to its global experience in the development of distribution properties, its relationships with key customers established by its local personnel and its global customer base.
           Customers
      ProLogis uses the customer relationships that it has developed through its property operations segment activities and the ProLogis Operating System in marketing its CDFS business. See “— Property Operations — Customers” and “— ProLogis Management.” In 2004, approximately 49% of the customers that leased distribution space in ProLogis’ CDFS business segment properties were repeat customers of ProLogis.
           Employees
      ProLogis directly employs approximately 830 persons. ProLogis’ employees work in North America (approximately 560 persons), in nine countries in Europe (approximately 210 persons) and in three countries in Asia (approximately 60 persons). Of the total, approximately 145 employees are assigned to the CDFS business segment. ProLogis’ other employees may assist with CDFS business segment activities. ProLogis believes that its relationships with its employees are good. ProLogis’ employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
           Seasonal Nature of the Business
      The demand for industrial distribution properties that are developed or acquired in the CDFS business segment is not seasonal in nature. However, the development process can be impeded by weather in certain markets, particularly during the winter months, affecting the scheduling of development activities and potentially delaying construction starts and completions.
           Future Plans
      ProLogis intends to continue to conduct the business of the CDFS business segment as it has in the past. To be successful in the CDFS business segment, ProLogis must be able to: (i) develop, acquire and rehabilitate or reposition and timely lease properties and (ii) access private capital through third party

10


Table of Contents

transactions or that can be used by a property fund to acquire CDFS business properties. With respect to the first requirement for success, ProLogis has demonstrated that it has the ability to develop and acquire properties that can be disposed of in this operating segment and generate profits. The ability to lease its properties is dependent on the demand for industrial distribution space. Properties contributed to property funds must generally meet specified leasing criteria. ProLogis experienced stronger leasing activity in 2004 than in 2003 and 2002. ProLogis expects some improvement in leasing for 2005 based on its expectations for economic conditions in it target markets. ProLogis’ market research and customer feedback indicate that consolidation and reconfiguration of supply chains driven by the need for distribution space users to add efficiencies within their distribution networks will continue to favorably impact the demand for distribution properties and the distribution-related services that ProLogis offers in the CDFS business segment in 2005. Also, the limited supply of state-of-the-art distribution space in Europe and Asia and ProLogis’ position of being a single-source provider of distribution space could also provide opportunities within this operating segment. ProLogis believes that it has differentiated itself from its competitors by providing high quality customer service which can partially mitigate the impact of declines in market leasing activities over time. For the past two years, approximately 49% of the customers that leased distribution space in ProLogis’ CDFS business segment properties were repeat customers of ProLogis.
      ProLogis intends to utilize the capital generated through the contributions and sales of properties, the proceeds from public debt and equity offerings that take advantage of favorable market conditions and its short-term borrowing facilities to fund its future CDFS business activities. Further, ProLogis intends to actively pursue other sources of committed capital to form new property funds that will acquire ProLogis’ CDFS business properties.
      ProLogis is committed to offer to contribute all of its stabilized development properties available in specific markets in Europe to ProLogis European Properties Fund through September 2019 and all of its stabilized development properties available in Japan to ProLogis Japan Properties Fund through June 2006. These property funds are committed to acquire such properties, subject to the property meeting certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria, and having available capital. ProLogis believes that, while the current capital commitments and borrowing capacities of these property funds may be expended prior to the expiration dates of these commitments, each property fund does have sufficient capital to acquire the properties that ProLogis expects to have available during 2005.
      ProLogis North American Properties Fund V has the right of first offer to all of ProLogis’ stabilized development properties that ProLogis desires to sell in North America (except those properties that are subject to an agreement with ProLogis California) through the end of 2005. Properties subject to the right of first offer must meet certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria. While ProLogis North American Properties Fund V’s majority owner is a listed property trust in Australia that is able to raise capital in the public market, there can be no assurance that ProLogis North American Properties Fund V will have the available capital to acquire additional properties from ProLogis in 2005 or, if capital is available, that ProLogis North American Properties Fund V will want to use its capital to acquire properties from ProLogis. Should ProLogis North American Properties Fund V choose not to acquire, or not have sufficient capital available to acquire, a property that meets the specified criteria, its rights under the agreement will terminate.
      There can be no assurance that if existing property funds do not continue to acquire the properties that ProLogis has available, that ProLogis will be able to secure other sources of private equity capital such that it can contribute or sell these properties in a timely manner and allow ProLogis to continue to generate profits from its development activities in a particular reporting period.
      See the discussion of factors that could affect the future plans of ProLogis, in the CDFS business segment at “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Factors.”
ProLogis Management
      ProLogis’ management team is headed by its Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey H. Schwartz and its President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Walter C. Rakowich. Mr. Schwartz and

11


Table of Contents

Mr. Rakowich also serve as Trustees on ProLogis’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”). On December 31, 2004, K. Dane Brooksher relinquished his role as Chief Executive Officer of ProLogis. Mr. Brooksher remains ProLogis’ Chairman and he continues to serve ProLogis as a Trustee. Also on December 31, 2004, Irving F. Lyons III relinquished his role as Chief Investment Officer of ProLogis. Mr. Lyons remains ProLogis’ Vice Chairman and he continues to serve ProLogis as a Trustee and as Chairman of the Board’s Investment Committee.
      In addition to the leadership and oversight provided by Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Rakowich, ProLogis’ investments and operations are overseen by John W. Seiple, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer — North America, Robert J. Watson, President of North America Operations and Steven K. Meyer, President and Chief Operating Officer — Europe. Further, in North America, each of ProLogis’ five regions (Northeast, Mid-West, Southeast, Central/ Mexico and Pacific) is led by two senior members of the management team — one who is responsible for capital management and one who is responsible for capital deployment. The three regions in Europe (Northern and Central Europe, Southern Europe and the United Kingdom) are each led by a senior officer who has both capital management and capital deployment responsibilities. In Asia, ProLogis’ capital management and capital deployment responsibilities are handled by four senior officers (two in Japan and two in China).
      ProLogis maintains a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to its Board and all of its officers and employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer, the controller or persons performing similar functions. A copy of ProLogis’ Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on ProLogis’ website, www.prologis.com. In addition to being accessible through ProLogis’ website, copies of ProLogis’ Code of Ethics and Business Conduct can be obtained, free of charge, upon written request to Investor Relations, 14100 East 35th Place, Aurora, Colorado 80011. Any amendments to or waivers of ProLogis’ Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that apply to the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer, the controller or persons performing similar functions and that relate to any matter enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, will be disclosed on ProLogis’ website.
      The reference to ProLogis’ website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the website and such information should not be considered to be part of this document.
      ProLogis’ Operating System
      ProLogis’ management team is responsible for overseeing the use the ProLogis Operating System, the cornerstone of ProLogis’ business strategy, to allow ProLogis to achieve long-term sustainable growth in cash flow and sustain a high level of return on equity for its shareholders. The ProLogis Operating System is a proprietary property management and customer service delivery system that has been designed to assist ProLogis’ professional management team in providing a unique and disciplined approach to serving existing and prospective customers. ProLogis believes that, through the ProLogis Operating System, it is, and will continue to be, well positioned to leverage its customer relationships to generate additional business opportunities.
           Capital Management and Capital Deployment
      Within the ProLogis Operating System, ProLogis has a team of professionals who are responsible for managing and leasing the properties owned by ProLogis and the property funds. These capital management team members are part of the Market Services Group. ProLogis has 38 Market Officers who are primarily responsible for understanding and meeting the needs of existing and prospective customers in their respective markets. In addition, the Market Officers, along with their team of property management and leasing professionals, use their knowledge of local market conditions to assist the Global Services Group in identifying and accommodating those customers with multiple market requirements and assist in the marketing efforts directed at those customers. The Market Officers’ ability to serve customers in the local market is enhanced by their access to ProLogis’ national and international resources. The focus of the Market Officers has been, and

12


Table of Contents

continues to be, on: (i) managing the capital invested in their markets; (ii) creating and maintaining relationships with customers, potential customers and industrial brokers; (iii) leasing ProLogis’ properties; and (iv) identifying potential acquisition and development opportunities in their markets.
      Capital deployment is the responsibility of a team of professionals who focus on ensuring that ProLogis’ capital resources are deployed in an efficient and productive manner that will best serve ProLogis’ long-term objective of increasing shareholder value. The team members responsible for capital deployment evaluate both acquisition and development opportunities in light of the market conditions in their respective regions and ProLogis’ overall goals and objectives. Capital deployment officers work closely with the Global Development Group to create master-planned distribution parks utilizing the extensive experience of the Global Development team members. The Global Development Group incorporates the latest technology with respect to building design and systems and has developed standards and procedures that it strictly adheres to in the development of all properties to ensure that properties developed by ProLogis are of a consistent quality.
           Customer Service
      The Global Services Group provides services to a group of the largest users of distribution space that ProLogis has identified as its targeted customer base. The Global Services Group’s primary focus is to position ProLogis as the preferred provider of distribution space to these targeted customers. The professionals in the Global Services Group also seek to build long-term relationships with ProLogis’ existing customers by addressing their distribution and logistics needs. The Global Services Group provide ProLogis’ customers with network optimization tools, strategic site selection assistance, business location services (including tax incentive analysis and tax negotiation consulting), material handling equipment and design consulting services.
      Trustees
      K. Dane Brooksher — 66 — Mr. Brooksher has served as a Trustee since October 1993. Mr. Brooksher has been Chairman of ProLogis since March 1999 and he was Chief Executive Officer from March 1999 to December 2004. From November 1993 to March 1999, Mr. Brooksher was Co-Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of ProLogis. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Brooksher was Area Managing Partner and Chicago Office Managing Partner of KPMG Peat Marwick (now KPMG LLP), independent public accountants, where he served on the Board of Directors and Management Committee and as International Development Partner for Belgium and The Netherlands. Mr. Brooksher is a Director of Pactiv Corporation and Qwest Communications International Inc. Mr. Brooksher serves as an Advisory Board Member of the J.L. Kellogg School of Management of Northwestern University. Mr. Brooksher’s term as Trustee expires in 2005.
      Irving F. Lyons, III — 55 — Mr. Lyons has served as a Trustee since March 1996. Mr. Lyons has been Vice Chairman of ProLogis since December 2001 and he was Chief Investment Officer of ProLogis from March 1997 to December 2004. Mr. Lyons was President of ProLogis from March 1999 to December 2001, Co-Chairman of ProLogis from March 1997 to March 1999 and Managing Director of ProLogis from December 1993 to March 1997. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Lyons was the Managing Partner of King & Lyons, a San Francisco Bay Area industrial real estate development and management company, since its inception in 1979. Mr. Lyons’ term as Trustee expires in 2006.
      Jeffrey H. Schwartz — 45 — Chief Executive Officer of ProLogis since January 2005. Mr. Schwartz was President of International Operations of ProLogis from March 2003 to December 2004 and he was President and Chief Operating Officer — Asia from March 2002 to December 2004. Mr. Schwartz was President and Chief Executive Officer of Vizional Technologies, Inc. (“Vizional Technologies”), previously an unconsolidated investee of ProLogis from September 2000 to February 2002. From October 1994 to August 2000, Mr. Schwartz was with ProLogis, most recently as Vice Chairman for International Operations. Prior to originally joining ProLogis in October 1994, Mr. Schwartz was a founder and managing partner of The Krauss/ Schwartz Company, an industrial real estate developer in Florida. Mr. Schwartz was appointed to the

13


Table of Contents

Board in August 2004 and he will stand for election as a Trustee at ProLogis’ 2005 annual meeting of shareholders.
      Walter C. Rakowich — 47 — President and Chief Operating Officer of ProLogis since January 2005 and Chief Financial Officer of ProLogis since December 1998. Mr. Rakowich was Managing Director of ProLogis from December 1998 to December 2004. Mr. Rakowich will relinquish his role as Chief Financial Officer at the time a new Chief Financial Officer is named (expected to be in the second quarter of 2005). Mr. Rakowich has been with ProLogis in various capacities since July 1994. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Rakowich was a consultant to ProLogis in the area of due diligence and acquisitions and he was a Principal with Trammell Crow Company, a diversified commercial real estate company in North America. Mr. Rakowich was appointed to the Board in August 2004 and he will stand for election as a Trustee at ProLogis’ 2005 annual meeting of shareholders.
      Stephen L. Feinberg — 60 — Mr. Feinberg has served as a Trustee since January 1993. Mr. Feinberg has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Dorsar Investment Co., Inc., a diversified holding company with interests in real estate and venture capital, since 1970. Mr. Feinberg is also a Director of Security Capital Preferred Growth, an affiliate of Security Capital Group Incorporated (“Security Capital”), previously ProLogis’ largest shareholder, Continental Transmission Corporation, MetaMetrics, Inc., St. John’s College and The Feinberg Foundation, Inc. He was formerly Chairman of the Board of St. John’s College and a former Director of Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, Inc. (a private publishing company), Molecular Informatics, Inc., Border Steel Mills, Inc., Springer Building Materials Corporation, Circle K Corporation, EnerServ Products, Inc. and Texas Commerce Bank-First State. Mr. Feinberg’s term as Trustee expires in 2007.
      George L. Fotiades — 51 — Mr. Fotiades has served as a Trustee since December 2001. Mr. Fotiades is President and Chief Operating Officer of Cardinal Health, Inc., a provider of services supporting the health-care industry. Prior thereto, Mr. Fotiades was President and Chief Executive Officer of Life Services Products and Services, a unit of Cardinal Health Inc. Mr. Fotiades was President and Chief Operating Officer of R. P. Scherer Corporation (which was merged into Cardinal Health, Inc. in August 1998), Executive Vice President and Group President from 1996 to 1998 and Group President of the Americas and Asia Pacific from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Fotiades’ term as Trustee expires in 2006.
      Donald P. Jacobs — 77 — Mr. Jacobs has served as a Trustee since February 1996. Mr. Jacobs has been a faculty member of the J.L. Kellogg School of Management of Northwestern University since 1957 and Mr. Jacobs is currently Dean Emeritus, having served as Dean from 1975 until 2001. Mr. Jacobs is a Director of Terex Corporation and CDW Computer Centers. Mr. Jacobs was formerly a Director of Commonwealth Edison and its parent company, Unicom and he was formerly the Chairman of the Public Review Board of Andersen Worldwide. Mr. Jacobs was Chairman of the Advisory Committee of the Oversight Board of the Resolution Trust Corporation for the third region from 1990 to 1992, Chairman of the Board of AMTRAK from 1975 to 1979, Co-Staff Director of the Presidential Commission on Financial Structure and Regulation from 1970 to 1971 and Senior Economist for the Banking and Currency Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1963 to 1964. Mr. Jacobs’ term as Trustee expires in 2007.
      Kenneth N. Stensby — 65 — Mr. Stensby has served as a Trustee since March 1999. Mr. Stensby was Senior Vice President, Mortgage Origination, with Heitman Real Estate Investment Management from September 2003 to August 2004. Mr. Stensby was a Director of Meridian Industrial Trust Inc. from 1996 to March 1999, when it was merged with and into ProLogis. Mr. Stensby was President and Chief Executive Officer of United Properties, a Minneapolis-based diversified real estate company, from 1974 until his retirement in January 1995. Mr. Stensby is past President of the National Association of Industrial and Office Parks and was a Director of First Asset Realty Advisors, a pension advisory subsidiary of First Bank of Minneapolis. Mr. Stensby’s term as Trustee expires in 2005.
      D. Michael Steuert — 56 — Mr. Steuert has served as a Trustee since September 2003. Mr. Steuert has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fluor Corporation, a publicly owned engineering and construction firm, since 2001. Mr. Steuert was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Litton Industries, Inc. from 1999 to 2001. Prior thereto, Mr. Steuert was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for GenCorp, Inc. Mr. Steuert has served as a Trustee of the Mental Health Association of Summit

14


Table of Contents

County (Ohio), regional director of the Financial Executive’s Institute and Director of GenCorp, Inc. board of directors. Mr. Steuert is a Director of Weyerhaeuser Corporation. Mr. Steuert’s term as Trustee expires in 2007.
      J. André Teixeira — 52 — Mr. Teixeira has served as a Trustee since February 1999. Mr. Teixeira was Vice President, Global Innovation and Development of InBev, formerly Interbrew, a publicly traded brewer in Belgium, from February 2003 to October 2004. He was Chairman and Senior Partner with BBL Partners LLC, Moscow, Russia, a consulting and trading company specializing in the food and food ingredient industry, from 2001 to 2002 and he was the President of Coca-Cola for the Russia and Ukraine region, General Manager of Coca-Cola Russia, Ukraine and Belarus and Head of Representation for the Coca-Cola Export Corporation, Moscow from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Teixeira was General Manager/ President of the Coca-Cola Ukraine and Belarus region, Kiev from 1998 to 2000 and was with Coca-Cola in various capacities since 1978. Mr. Teixeira’s term as Trustee expires in 2007.
      William D. Zollars — 57 — Mr. Zollars has served as a Trustee since June 2001. Mr. Zollars has been Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Yellow Roadway Corporation, a holding company specializing in transportation of industrial, commercial and retail goods, since 1999. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Zollars was President of Yellow Freight System Inc., Yellow Roadway Corporation’s principal operating subsidiary, and he was a Senior Vice President of Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Zollars is a Director of CIGNA Corporation. Mr. Zollars’ term as Trustee expires in 2006.
      Senior Officers
      John W. Seiple, Jr. — 45 — President — North America since December 2001 and Chief Executive Officer — North America since August 2004. Mr. Seiple was ProLogis’ Chief Investment Officer — North America from February 2004 to August 2004 and he was ProLogis’ Chief Operating Officer — North America from December 1998 to February 2004. Mr. Seiple has been with ProLogis in various capacities since October 1993. Mr. Seiple is a Director of Insight Inc. (an unconsolidated investee of ProLogis — see Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8). Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Seiple was a Senior Vice President with Trammell Crow Company, a diversified commercial real estate company in North America.
      Robert J. Watson — 55 — President of North America Operations since January 2004. Mr. Watson was President and Chief Operating Officer — Europe of ProLogis from December 1998 to January 2004 and has been with ProLogis in various capacities since November 1992. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Watson was the Regional Partner for Southwest United States Real Estate with Trammell Crow Company, a diversified commercial real estate company in North America.
      Steven K. Meyer — 56 — President and Chief Operating Officer — Europe since January 2004. Mr. Meyer was Managing Director of ProLogis from December 1998 to January 2004, where he had capital deployment responsibilities for the Central/ Mexico region and has been with ProLogis in various capacities since September 1994. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Meyer was an Executive Vice President with Trammell Crow Company, a diversified commercial real estate company in North America.
      Paul C. Congleton — 50 — Managing Director — North American Fund Management and Real Estate Research of ProLogis since September 1999, where he has fund management and research responsibilities in North America. Mr. Congleton has been with ProLogis in various capacities since January 1995. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Congleton was Managing Principal with Overland Company, a property management, leasing and consulting company based in Arizona.
      Alan J. Curtis — 57 — Managing Director — Market Services and Global Development — United Kingdom of ProLogis since December 2002, where he has capital management and deployment responsibilities for the United Kingdom. Mr. Curtis has been with ProLogis or an investee of ProLogis in various capacities since June 1997. Prior thereto, Mr. Curtis was with Gazely Properties as a Senior Development Surveyor with responsibilities for the Midlands market of the United Kingdom.

15


Table of Contents

      Ranald A. Hahn — 49 — Managing Director — Southern Europe of ProLogis since December 2002, where he has capital management and deployment responsibilities for Southern Europe. Mr. Hahn has been with ProLogis in various capacities since March 1999. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Hahn was the International Business Development Director of GSE, a French logistics construction company.
      Luke A. Lands — 48 — Managing Director since December 2004 and Controller of ProLogis since August 2000. Mr. Lands was Senior Vice President of ProLogis from August 2000 to December 2004. As Controller, Mr. Lands supervises ProLogis’ accounting, financial reporting and financial forecasting functions. Mr. Lands will relinquish his role as Controller at the time a new Controller is named (expected to occur in the second quarter of 2005) and will become ProLogis’ Chief Financial Officer for Europe. Mr. Lands has been with ProLogis in various capacities since January 1996. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Lands was Vice President of SCG Realty Services, an affiliate of Security Capital. Prior thereto, Mr. Lands was Vice President and Controller for Lincoln Property Company, a diversified national real estate operating company. Mr. Lands is a Certified Public Accountant.
      Masato Miki — 40 — Managing Director — Japan of ProLogis since December 2004, where he is responsible for acquisitions, finance operations and fund management in Japan. Mr. Miki was Senior Vice President of ProLogis from January 2004 to December 2004 with similar responsibilities in Japan and he has been with ProLogis since August 2002. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Miki was Vice President of Mitsui Fudosan Investment Advisors, Inc., an affiliate of Mitsui Fudosa Co., Ltd., a comprehensive real estate company in Japan.
      Edward S. Nekritz — 39 — Managing Director of ProLogis since December 2002, General Counsel of ProLogis since December 1998 and Secretary of ProLogis since March 1999, where he oversees the provision of all legal services for ProLogis and is responsible for ProLogis’ Risk Management and Asset Services departments. Mr. Nekritz has been with ProLogis in various capacities since September 1995. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Nekritz was an attorney with Mayer, Brown & Platt (now Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP).
      John R. Rizzo — 55 — Managing Director — Global Development — North America/Asia of ProLogis since December 2000, where he is responsible for the Global Development Group in North America and Asia. Mr. Rizzo has been with ProLogis in various capacities since January 1999. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Rizzo was Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Perini Management Services Incorporated, an affiliate of Perini Corporation which is a construction management and general contracting firm.
      Robin P. R. von Weiler — 48 — Managing Director — Market Services and Global Development — Northern and Central Europe of ProLogis since December 1999, where he has capital management and deployment responsibilities for Northern and Central Europe. Mr. von Weiler has been with ProLogis in various capacities since October 1997. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. von Weiler was with DTZ Zadelhoff V.O.F., part of DTZ Debenham Tie Lung, in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, most recently as Vice Managing Director, Real Estate Agent and Corporate Advisor.
      Mike Yamada — 51 — Managing Director — Japan of ProLogis since December 2004, where he is responsible for development and leasing activities in Japan. Mr. Yamada was a Senior Vice President of ProLogis from January 2004 to December 2004 with similar responsibilities in Japan and he has been with ProLogis since April 2002. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Yamada was a Senior Officer of Fujita Corporation, a construction company in Japan.
      Gary E. Anderson — 39 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since May 2003, where he has capital deployment responsibilities for the Central/ Mexico region. Previously, Mr. Anderson was a Market Officer for ProLogis’ New Jersey markets and he has been with ProLogis in various capacities since August 1994. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Anderson was with Security Capital, previously ProLogis’ largest shareholder, as a member of its Management Development Program.
      Bert Angel — 47 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2003, where he oversees the Global Solutions Group in Europe. Mr. Angel has been with ProLogis in various capacities since May 1998. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Angel was the International Marketing and Sales Director for the Port of Rotterdam, one of the largest ports in the world.

16


Table of Contents

      Gregory J. Arnold — 49 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2001, where he oversees the Global Solutions Group in North America. Mr. Arnold has been with ProLogis in various capacities since May 1994. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Arnold was an Equity Vice President with LaSalle Partners (now Jones Lang LaSalle), a corporate real estate advisory firm.
      Patrick J. Boot — 40 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since January 2003, where he has responsibility for real estate research in Asia and has certain responsibilities for ProLogis’ China operations. Mr. Boot was responsible for establishing ProLogis’ office in Shanghai, China. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Boot was Executive Vice President and Executive Director of Property Investment Advisors Indonesia/ P.T. Sanggraha Daksamitra, a real estate development and leasing company in Indonesia.
      Eric D. Brown — 44 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since January 2004, where he has capital management responsibilities for the Central/ Mexico region. Mr. Brown has been with ProLogis in capacities since May 1994. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Brown was a Partner and Vice President of Crow Barshop Properties, Inc., an industrial real estate management and leasing company in San Antonio, Texas.
      Ken R. Hall — 54 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2002, where he oversees the Global Development Group in Europe. Mr. Hall has been with ProLogis or an investee of ProLogis in various capacities since July 1998. Prior thereto, Mr. Hall was a Managing Director of Birse Construction, a development company in the United Kingdom.
      Larry H. Harmsen — 44 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2001, where he has capital deployment responsibilities for the Pacific region. Mr. Harmsen has been with ProLogis in various capacities since February 1995. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Harmsen was a Vice President and General Partner with Lincoln Property Company, a diversified national real estate operating company.
      M. Gordon Keiser, Jr. — 60 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since October 1995 and Treasurer of ProLogis since December 1998, where he is responsible for relationships with ProLogis’ lenders. Mr. Keiser has been with ProLogis in various capacities since October 1995. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Keiser was Senior Vice President of JMB Realty Corporation with responsibilities for corporate finance and capital markets financing.
      Douglas A. Kiersey, Jr. — 44 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2001, where he has capital deployment responsibilities for the Mid-West region. Mr. Kiersey has been with ProLogis in various capacities since May 1994. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Kiersey was a member of the Industrial/ Technology Group at Cushman & Wakefield of Oregon, Inc., a real estate brokerage and services company.
      W. Scott Lamson — 42 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since February 2003, where he has capital management responsibilities for the Pacific region. Mr. Lamson has been with ProLogis in various capacities since June 1995. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Lamson was a Vice President with Commercial Property Services, a commercial real estate company with responsibilities in the San Francisco market.
      Brian N. Marsh — 40 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since January 2004, where he has capital management responsibilities for the Mid-West region. Mr. Marsh has been with ProLogis in various capacities since January 1995. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Marsh was an Associate with The Pizzuti Companies, an industrial real estate company in Columbus, Ohio.
      Debra A. McRight — 45 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 1999, where she is responsible for client services and property management operations in North America. Ms. McRight has been with ProLogis in various capacities since September 1995. Prior to joining ProLogis, Ms. McRight was with Paragon Group, Inc., a full service real estate company, where she was responsible for property management operations in St. Louis, Missouri.
      Ming Z. Mei — 32 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2004, where he is responsible for capital management and development activities in China. Previously, Mr. Mei was First Vice President of ProLogis with similar responsibilities. Prior to joining ProLogis in March 2003, Mr. Mei was Director of Finance and Business Development for the Asia Pacific Region of Owens Corning, a global building materials manufacturing company.

17


Table of Contents

      Richard H. Strader — 45 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since March 2004, where he has capital deployment responsibilities for the Southeast region. Mr. Strader was a Vice President and Market Officer for ProLogis from June 1994 to February 1999. Prior to re-joining ProLogis in 2004, Mr. Strader was Co-Managing Partner with Craig Davis Properties, a commercial real estate company in North Carolina.
      Charles E. Sullivan — 47 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2001, where he has capital management responsibilities for the Southeast and Northeast regions. Mr. Sullivan has been with ProLogis in various capacities since October 1994. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Sullivan was an Industrial Broker with Cushman & Wakefield of Florida, a real estate brokerage and services company.
      Neville D. E. Teagarden — 41 — Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of ProLogis since September 2003, where he is responsible for development and implementation of ProLogis’ global business technology systems. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Teagarden was the Chief Information Officer of Navigant International, a provider of travel management services.
      Peter R. S. Wittendorp — 39 — Senior Vice President of ProLogis since December 2003 where he has Global Capital and Fund Management responsibilities in Europe. Mr. Wittendorp has been with ProLogis since September 2001. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Wittendorp was an independent real estate consultant and he also served as Coordinating Fund Manager and Executive Vice President of the real estate investment group of ABP Investments.
Environmental Matters
      Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner, developer or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, under or in its property. The costs of removal or remediation of such substances could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such hazardous substances. The presence of such substances may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell such real estate or to borrow funds by using such real estate as collateral. ProLogis has not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim in connection with any of the properties owned (directly or through investments in unconsolidated entities), or being acquired, as of December 31, 2004, and ProLogis is not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of its properties that is likely to have a material adverse effect on ProLogis’ business, financial condition or results of operations. ProLogis or the predecessor owners have subjected each of its properties to an environmental assessment (which may not involve invasive procedures such as soil sampling or ground water analysis) by independent consultants. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of these environmental assessments have revealed, nor is ProLogis aware of, any environmental liability (including asbestos-related liability) that ProLogis believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. No assurance can be given, however, that these assessments and investigations have revealed or will reveal all potential environmental liabilities, that no prior owner or operator created any material environmental condition not known to ProLogis or the independent consultants or that future uses or conditions (including, without limitation, customer actions or changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations) will not result in unreimbursed costs relating to environmental liabilities. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Factors.”
Insurance Coverage
      ProLogis and its unconsolidated investees carry comprehensive insurance coverage. ProLogis determines the type of coverage and the policy specifications and limits based on what it deems to be the risks associated with its ownership of properties and other of its business operations in specific markets. Such coverage includes property, liability, fire, flood, earthquake, environmental, terrorism, extended coverage and rental loss. ProLogis believes that its insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits that are customary for similar properties, business activities and markets and ProLogis believes its properties and the properties of its unconsolidated investees are adequately insured. However, an uninsured loss could result in

18


Table of Contents

loss of capital investment and anticipated profits. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Risk Factors.”
ITEM 2. Properties
Industrial Distribution Properties
      ProLogis has directly invested in real estate assets that are primarily generic industrial distribution properties. Due to the costs associated with retrofitting service center space for new customers, ProLogis has acquired properties containing service center space on a very limited basis. Generally, service center space has been acquired as part of portfolio acquisitions in which the majority of the properties being acquired were generic industrial distribution properties. In Japan, ProLogis’ distribution properties will generally be multi-level centers, which is common in Japan due to the high cost and limited availability of land. ProLogis’ properties are typically used for storage, packaging, assembly, distribution and light manufacturing of consumer and industrial products. Based on the square footage of operating properties directly owned by ProLogis at December 31, 2004, 86% of ProLogis’ properties are used for bulk distribution with the remaining properties used for light manufacturing and assembly (11%) and for other purposes, primarily service centers (3%).
Geographic Distribution
      ProLogis has direct ownership of 1,286 distribution properties (operating and under development) in North America, Europe and Asia at December 31, 2004. In North America, properties that are owned directly by ProLogis are located in 39 markets in 22 states and the District of Columbia in the United States and in four markets in Mexico. In Europe, the properties that are owned directly by ProLogis are located in 17 markets in nine countries. In Asia, the properties that are owned directly by ProLogis are located in Japan (Tokyo and Osaka), in Shanghai, China and in Singapore.
      ProLogis defines its markets based on the concentration of properties in a specific area. A market, as defined by ProLogis, can be a metropolitan area, a city, a subsection of a metropolitan area, a subsection of a city or a region of a state or country. Accordingly, the actual location of each market may not be easily identifiable by the name given to the market by ProLogis. Such markets are identified below along with the major metropolitan areas or cities located in that market to assist in understanding the information presented in the tables that follow in Item 2.
         
United States:
   
 
Northern Ohio
  Akron, Bellevue, Fremont and Green
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
  Allentown, Bethlehem, Harrisburg
 
Central New Jersey
  Cranbury, Edison, Trenton
 
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
  Newark and Secaucus
 
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
  Los Angeles metropolitan area, Orange County, San Bernardino County and Riverside County
Europe:
   
 
France:
   
   
Central
  Orleans, Paris, Vatry
   
East
  Metz
   
North
  Lille, Le Havre
   
South
  Lyon, Marseille

19


Table of Contents

       
Germany:
   
 
North
  Hamburg, Hanover
 
Rhine/ Main
  Frankfurt
 
Rhine/ Ruhr
  Cologne, Dortmund, Dusseldorf
 
South
  Munich
Netherlands:
   
 
South
  Haaften, Tilburg, Veghel, Venlo
Poland:
   
 
Central
  Piotrkow
 
South
  Bedzin
 
West
  Poznan
United Kingdom:
   
 
East Midlands
  Bedfordshire, Coalville, Corby, Daventry, Leicester, Northampton
 
London and Southeast
  London, Hemel Hempstead, Thurrock
 
North
  Leeds, Wakefield, Crewe
 
West Midlands
  Banbury, Birmingham, Coventry, Rugby
      The table below illustrates the geographic distribution of ProLogis’ portfolio of directly owned operating properties and properties under development. The table excludes land held for future development. The table includes properties owned by ProLogis and its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, which may not be 100% owned by ProLogis (see “— Real Estate Partnerships”). The table does not include properties that are owned by the property funds or ProLogis’ other unconsolidated investees which are discussed under “— Unconsolidated Investees.”
                                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
        Percentage of       Percentage of
    Number of   Assets Based   Number of   Assets Based
    Properties   on Cost(1)   Properties   on Cost(1)
                 
North American Markets(2)(3):
                               
United States:
                               
 
Atlanta, Georgia
    81       4.79 %     80       4.89 %
 
Austin, Texas
    27       1.12       27       1.24  
 
Central New Jersey(4)
    18       1.66              
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
    30       1.94       33       2.58  
 
Chattanooga, Tennessee
    5       0.28       5       0.29  
 
Chicago, Illinois
    64       5.88       61       6.26  
 
Cincinnati, Ohio
    43       2.39       42       2.19  
 
Columbus, Ohio
    28       2.68       32       3.38  
 
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
    120       7.10       125       8.09  
 
Denver, Colorado
    25       1.47       25       1.46  
 
El Paso, Texas
    16       1.02       18       1.34  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    12       0.87       14       1.19  
 
Houston, Texas
    91       4.17       91       4.58  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    11       2.49       3       0.87  
 
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey(3)
    10       1.35       26       2.50  
 
Indianapolis, Indiana
    43       2.59       43       2.45  
 
Kansas City, Kansas/ Missouri
    29       1.06       29       1.15  

20


Table of Contents

                                     
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
        Percentage of       Percentage of
    Number of   Assets Based   Number of   Assets Based
    Properties   on Cost(1)   Properties   on Cost(1)
                 
 
Las Vegas, Nevada
    18       1.72       17       1.72  
 
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California(2)
    3       1.24       2       0.70  
 
Louisville, Kentucky
    8       0.81       7       0.66  
 
Memphis, Tennessee
    48       3.50       47       3.48  
 
Nashville, Tennessee
    38       1.72       41       2.06  
 
Northern Ohio
    1       0.02       1       0.02  
 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    6       0.20       6       0.22  
 
Orlando, Florida
    21       1.27       19       1.25  
 
Phoenix, Arizona
    29       1.14       30       1.25  
 
Portland, Oregon
    21       0.89       20       0.88  
 
Reno, Nevada
    23       1.61       23       1.77  
 
Salt Lake City, Utah
    7       0.77       7       0.84  
 
San Antonio, Texas
    51       1.96       53       2.29  
 
San Francisco (Central Valley), California(4)
    14       1.84              
 
San Francisco (East Bay), California(4)
    40       2.03       54       4.23  
 
San Francisco (South Bay), California
    71       3.88       71       4.25  
 
Seattle, Washington
    14       0.96       14       1.05  
 
St. Louis, Missouri
    13       0.65       13       0.71  
 
Tampa, Florida
    60       2.50       61       2.54  
 
Tulsa, Oklahoma
    9       0.22       9       0.23  
 
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
    38       2.66       38       2.92  
 
Other(5)
    1       0.07       2       0.24  
Mexico:
                               
 
Juarez
    11       0.61       12       0.67  
 
Monterrey
    8       0.54       8       0.59  
 
Reynosa
    14       1.10       12       0.77  
 
Tijuana
    3       0.21       3       0.25  
                         
   
Subtotal North America
    1,223       76.98       1,224       80.05  
                         
European Markets(6):
                               
Czech Republic:
                               
 
Prague
    2       0.26              
France:
                               
 
Central
    3       0.74       3       0.58  
 
East
    1       0.13       1       0.23  
 
North
    1       0.26       1       0.26  
 
South
    4       0.93       4       0.77  
Germany:
                               
 
Rhine/ Main
    1       0.38       2       0.58  
 
Rhine/ Ruhr
    1       0.22       2       0.49  
 
South
    3       0.34       2       0.30  

21


Table of Contents

                                     
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
        Percentage of       Percentage of
    Number of   Assets Based   Number of   Assets Based
    Properties   on Cost(1)   Properties   on Cost(1)
                 
Hungary:
                               
 
Budapest
    1       0.29       2       0.24  
Italy:
                               
 
Milan
    3       0.71       1       0.27  
Netherlands:
                               
 
South
                2       0.87  
Poland:
                               
 
Central
                1       0.29  
 
South
    3       0.43       1       0.06  
 
Warsaw
    3       0.63       2       0.33  
 
West
                2       0.13  
Spain:
                               
 
Madrid
    3       0.84       2       0.64  
Sweden:
                               
 
Stockholm
    2       0.73              
United Kingdom:
                               
 
East Midlands
    2       0.60       6       2.10  
 
London and Southeast
    11       3.87       9       3.07  
 
North
                2       0.31  
 
West Midlands
    9       2.07       6       2.46  
                         
   
Subtotal Europe
    53       13.43       51       13.98  
                         
Asian Markets:
                               
China:
                               
 
Shanghai
    3       0.29              
Japan(7):
                               
 
Nagoya
                1       0.62  
 
Osaka
    2       4.27       2       3.33  
 
Tokyo
    4       4.84       1       2.02  
Singapore
    1       0.19              
                         
 
Subtotal Asia
    10       9.59       4       5.97  
                         
   
Total(8)
    1,286       100.00 %     1,279       100.00 %
                         
 
(1)  Properties under development are reflected at their total expected cost at completion, rather than at the cost incurred as of the dates presented.
 
(2)  ProLogis California has the right of first offer with respect to properties that ProLogis develops, excluding properties developed under build to suit agreements, in certain counties included in ProLogis’ Los Angeles/ Orange County market, subject to the property meeting certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria.
 
(3)  ProLogis North American Properties Fund V has the right of first offer to all of ProLogis’ stabilized development properties that ProLogis desires to sell in North America (except those properties that are subject to an agreement with ProLogis California) through December 31, 2005. Properties subject to the

22


Table of Contents

right of first offer must meet certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria. Rights under the agreement will terminate if ProLogis North American Properties Fund V does not acquire a property that meets the specified criteria.
 
(4)  Previously, ProLogis considered all of its properties in New Jersey to be in one market. For 2004, ProLogis reflects two New Jersey markets, I-95 Corridor and Central New Jersey. Also, for 2004, ProLogis has divided the properties previously presented in the San Francisco (East Bay) market between that market and the San Francisco (Central Valley) market.
 
(5)  For 2004, includes on property in the Brownsville, Texas market. For 2003, includes one property in each of the Birmingham, Alabama and Brownsville, Texas markets. Neither of these markets are considered to be target markets of ProLogis.
 
(6)  ProLogis is committed to offer to contribute all of its stabilized development properties in specific markets in Europe to ProLogis European Properties Fund through September 2019, and ProLogis European Properties Fund is committed to acquire such properties, subject to the property meeting certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria.
 
(7)  ProLogis is committed to offer to contribute all of its stabilized development properties in Japan to ProLogis Japan Properties Fund through June 2006, and ProLogis Japan Properties Fund is committed to acquire such properties, subject to the property meeting certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria.
 
(8)  Includes 58 properties under development at December 31, 2004 with a total expected cost at completion of $1.08 billion and 27 properties under development at December 31, 2003 with a total expected cost at completion of $678.5 million.
Properties
      The information in the following tables is as of December 31, 2004 for the operating properties, properties under development and land directly owned by ProLogis and its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, which may not be 100% owned by ProLogis (see “— Real Estate Partnerships”). No individual property or group of properties operated as a single business unit amounted to 10% or more of ProLogis’ consolidated total assets at December 31, 2004 or generated income equal to 10% or more of ProLogis’ consolidated gross revenues or total income for the year ended December 31, 2004. The table does not include properties that are owned by property funds or by ProLogis’ other unconsolidated investees which are discussed under “— Unconsolidated Investees.”
                                             
            Rentable        
    No. of   Percentage   Square        
    Bldgs.   Occupancy(1)   Footage   Investment(2)   Encumbrances(3)
                     
Operating Properties Owned at December 31, 2004(4):
                                       
 
North American Markets(5):
                                       
 
United States:
                                       
   
Atlanta, Georgia
    80       88.43 %     8,504,171     $ 276,569,274     $ 35,061,297  
   
Austin, Texas
    27       86.71       1,759,309       68,888,270        
   
Central New Jersey
    17       95.33       2,013,741       62,659,234       10,256,804  
   
Charlotte, North Carolina
    30       93.26       3,801,070       119,117,964       40,702,305  
   
Chattanooga, Tennessee
    5       97.58       1,147,872       17,312,734        
   
Chicago, Illinois
    62       84.15       8,358,896       345,414,680       43,863,054  
   
Cincinnati, Ohio
    42       77.98       4,742,763       130,163,906       40,016,846  
   
Columbus, Ohio
    28       81.04       5,062,250       164,317,252       25,395,015  
   
Dallas/ Fort Worth, Texas
    120       86.34       12,960,122       436,023,103       62,364,972  
   
Denver, Colorado
    24       93.06       2,760,534       78,699,003        
   
El Paso, Texas
    16       74.31       2,166,169       62,586,842       1,495,567  

23


Table of Contents

                                             
            Rentable        
    No. of   Percentage   Square        
    Bldgs.   Occupancy(1)   Footage   Investment(2)   Encumbrances(3)
                     
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    12       100.00       945,689       53,520,288       7,336,327  
 
Houston, Texas
    88       88.63       7,674,522       237,534,629       44,435,918  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    11       78.66       2,799,148       152,956,453       12,847,461  
 
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    10       100.00       1,729,312       82,865,793       17,376,194  
 
Indianapolis, Indiana
    43       88.07       4,716,151       158,914,326        
 
Kansas City, Kansas/ Missouri
    29       97.19       1,578,487       64,896,371       5,281,254  
 
Las Vegas, Nevada
    17       100.00       2,061,291       95,490,974       12,336,148  
 
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
    2       22.03       1,131,513       38,744,504        
 
Louisville, Kentucky
    8       69.21       1,907,488       49,632,843       6,266,529  
 
Memphis, Tennessee
    46       81.76       7,209,879       192,376,060       9,434,141  
 
Nashville, Tennessee
    38       88.67       4,093,240       105,778,654       6,821,477  
 
Northern Ohio
    1       100.00       71,723       1,085,819        
 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    6       75.39       639,942       12,542,345        
 
Orlando, Florida
    21       87.84       1,937,151       78,157,661       6,748,344  
 
Phoenix, Arizona
    29       95.47       1,983,856       70,161,519        
 
Portland, Oregon
    20       93.87       1,330,215       49,553,937       278,132  
 
Reno, Nevada
    23       93.83       2,702,923       98,969,884       10,155,504  
 
Salt Lake City, Utah
    7       98.08       1,643,468       47,014,900        
 
San Antonio, Texas
    50       88.40       4,044,441       117,660,285        
 
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
    14       86.64       2,948,792       112,974,450       74,262  
 
San Francisco (East Bay), California
    40       91.83       3,015,829       124,628,424       31,000,000  
 
San Francisco (South Bay), California
    71       85.76       3,695,747       238,573,019       6,007,570  
 
Seattle Washington
    14       98.27       1,272,827       59,142,977       4,442,873  
 
St. Louis, Missouri
    13       84.70       1,251,825       40,166,842       6,331,945  
 
Tampa, Florida
    58       94.34       3,640,856       140,389,591       9,479,358  
 
Tulsa, Oklahoma
    9       91.72       523,623       13,386,508        
 
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
    38       96.32       3,938,023       163,457,125       35,737,167  
 
Other(6)
    1       66.67       144,000       4,004,652        
Mexico:
                                       
 
Juarez
    10       100.00       835,380       32,569,066        
 
Monterrey
    8       75.53       825,001       33,111,337        
 
Reynosa
    12       88.61       1,299,091       55,038,684        
 
Tijuana
    3       63.80       365,110       12,681,475        
                               
   
Subtotal North America(5)
    1,203       87.18       127,233,440       4,499,733,657       491,546,464  
                               

24


Table of Contents

                                               
            Rentable        
    No. of   Percentage   Square        
    Bldgs.   Occupancy(1)   Footage   Investment(2)   Encumbrances(3)
                     
European Markets(7):
                                       
 
France:
                                       
   
Central
    1       72.04       356,654       20,536,184        
   
East
    1       100.00       190,643       7,977,894        
   
North
    1             344,760       15,833,999        
   
South
    2       14.30       560,718       29,132,732        
 
Germany:
                                       
   
Rhine/ Main
    1             223,536       23,289,153        
   
Rhine/ Ruhr
    1             180,469       13,250,767        
 
Poland:
                                       
   
South
    1       93.47       123,000       4,350,388        
   
Warsaw
    1             266,797       12,679,664        
 
Spain:
                                       
   
Madrid
    1       100.00       390,270       24,448,945        
 
United Kingdom:
                                       
   
East Midlands
    2       82.09       805,241       37,207,836        
   
London and Southeast
    7             808,998       137,227,808        
   
West Midlands
    4       60.33       630,164       50,403,972        
                               
     
Subtotal Europe(7):
    23       42.49       4,881,250       376,339,342        
                               
Asian Markets(8):
                                       
 
Japan:
                                       
   
Osaka
    1       27.25       1,365,116       169,534,679        
 
Singapore
    1       100.00       150,000       11,599,592        
                               
     
Subtotal Asia(8)
    2       34.45       1,515,116       181,134,271        
                               
     
Total Operating Properties Owned at December 31, 2004(4)
    1,228       84.95 %     133,629,806     $ 5,057,207,270     $ 491,546,464  
                               

25


Table of Contents

                                       
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square       Total Expected
    Bldgs.   Footage   Investment(2)   Cost(9)
                 
Properties Under Development at December 31, 2004(10)(11):
                               
North American Markets:
                               
 
United States:
                               
   
Atlanta, Georgia
    1       678,000     $ 5,026,676     $ 17,765,983  
   
Central New Jersey
    1       750,005       20,578,181       39,085,752  
   
Chicago, Illinois
    2       398,800       10,408,887       16,004,082  
   
Cincinnati, Ohio
    1       483,000       6,555,344       16,608,128  
   
Denver, Colorado
    1       283,666       1,857,293       11,675,860  
   
Houston, Texas
    3       495,000       10,422,803       18,507,008  
   
Las Vegas, Nevada
    1       214,200       2,244,702       10,074,122  
   
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
    1       849,054       14,524,433       37,651,370  
   
Memphis, Tennessee
    2       776,900       18,457,749       22,398,421  
   
Portland, Oregon
    1       100,350       4,299,823       5,098,893  
   
San Antonio, Texas
    1       54,000       1,890,537       2,536,861  
   
Tampa, Florida
    2       231,120       3,521,791       13,334,482  
 
Mexico:
                               
   
Juarez
    1       121,870       3,602,629       5,160,177  
   
Reynosa
    2       296,935       6,204,757       12,314,734  
                         
     
Subtotal North America
    20       5,732,900       109,595,605       228,215,873  
                         
European Markets:
                               
 
Czech Republic:
                               
   
Prague
    2       247,626       10,553,258       15,807,042  
 
France:
                               
   
Central
    2       434,694       19,318,193       25,066,429  
   
South
    2       508,004       10,915,013       27,812,143  
 
Germany:
                               
   
South
    3       268,637       17,884,268       20,656,265  
 
Hungary:
                               
   
Budapest
    1       250,338       16,650,419       17,609,499  
 
Italy:
                               
   
Milan
    3       691,972       22,954,971       43,592,619  
 
Poland:
                               
   
South
    2       504,089       4,421,237       21,943,891  
   
Warsaw
    2       553,485       3,981,493       26,263,955  
 
Spain:
                               
   
Madrid
    2       370,583       8,904,705       27,033,002  

26


Table of Contents

                                       
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square       Total Expected
    Bldgs.   Footage   Investment(2)   Cost(9)
                 
 
Sweden:
                               
   
Stockholm
    2       491,129       28,281,030       44,868,402  
 
United Kingdom:
                               
   
London and Southeast
    4       601,600       69,056,363       100,671,450  
   
West Midlands
    5       775,629       53,328,952       77,302,193  
                         
     
Subtotal Europe
    30       5,697,786       266,249,902       448,626,890  
                         
Asian Markets:
                               
 
China:
                               
   
Shanghai
    3       520,416       4,832,195       18,065,468  
 
Japan:
                               
   
Osaka
    1       785,211       11,506,716       92,635,000  
   
Tokyo
    4       2,411,483       183,518,285       297,106,554  
                         
     
Subtotal Asia
    8       3,717,110       199,857,196       407,807,022  
                         
     
Total Properties Under Development at December 31, 2004(10)(11)
    58       15,147,796     $ 575,702,703     $ 1,084,649,785  
                         
                             
    Acreage   Investment(2)   Encumbrances(3)
             
Land Held for Development at December 31, 2004(12):
                       
 
North American Markets:
                       
 
United States:
                       
   
Atlanta, Georgia
    181.5     $ 13,524,081     $  
   
Austin, Texas
    7.2       918,357        
   
Central New Jersey
    6.0       634,208        
   
Charlotte, North Carolina
    35.2       3,844,666        
   
Chicago, Illinois
    62.6       12,959,711        
   
Cincinnati, Ohio
    63.7       5,583,848        
   
Columbus, Ohio
    15.9       938,766        
   
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
    119.6       12,375,011        
   
Denver, Colorado
    110.4       7,413,867        
   
El Paso, Texas
    85.1       5,462,246        
   
Houston, Texas
    62.2       5,729,612        
   
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    326.8       28,829,991        
   
Indianapolis, Indiana
    92.7       7,440,169        
   
Kansas City, Kansas/ Missouri
    16.6       1,526,602        
   
Las Vegas, Nevada
    13.2       1,933,538       97,009  
   
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
    91.1       22,316,372        
   
Louisville, Kentucky
    60.6       4,898,604        
   
Memphis, Tennessee
    78.1       5,014,491        
   
Orlando, Florida
    16.1       1,628,533        
   
Portland, Oregon
    7.2       1,641,574        
   
Reno, Nevada
    26.2       3,914,690        
   
Salt Lake City, Utah
    30.8       2,062,465        

27


Table of Contents

                               
    Acreage   Investment(2)   Encumbrances(3)
             
   
San Antonio, Texas
    47.5       3,429,680        
   
San Francisco (East Bay) California
    77.6       7,239,885        
   
Seattle, Washington
    10.6       2,073,601        
   
Tampa, Florida
    43.9       2,882,320        
   
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
    31.1       5,448,092        
 
Canada:
                       
   
Toronto, Canada
    133.9       50,905,763        
 
Mexico:
                       
   
Juarez, Mexico
    41.5       6,735,898        
   
Monterrey, Mexico
    12.8       1,759,700        
   
Reynosa, Mexico
    44.3       6,027,824        
                   
     
Subtotal North America
    1,952.0       237,094,165       97,009  
                   
European Markets:
                       
 
Belgium
    34.2       12,762,876        
 
Czech Republic:
                       
   
Prague
    17.0       5,942,493        
 
France:
                       
   
Central
    168.6       26,169,786        
   
North
    19.8       1,390,380        
   
South
    20.8       3,827,368        
 
Germany:
                       
   
Rhine/ Main
    12.4       9,996,934        
   
Rhine/ Ruhr
    6.3       2,147,138        
 
Hungary:
                       
   
Budapest
    57.7       10,266,723        
 
Italy:
                       
   
Milan
    95.5       22,794,517        
 
Netherlands:
                       
   
Rotterdam
    5.0       2,071,629        
 
Poland:
                       
   
Central
    5.7       1,860,988        
   
South
    100.1       18,471,008        
   
Warsaw
    39.0       5,027,607        
 
Spain:
                       
   
Madrid
    11.2       4,415,392        
 
United Kingdom:
                       
   
East Midlands
    224.0       89,037,385        
   
London and Southeast
    79.3       81,702,329        
   
North
    70.6       17,119,084        
   
West Midlands
    72.0       45,731,848        
                   
     
Subtotal Europe
    1,039.2       360,735,485        
                   
     
Total Land Held for Development at December 31, 2004(12)
    2,991.2     $ 597,829,650     $ 97,009  
                   

28


Table of Contents

                                                     
            Rentable            
    No. of       Square       Total Expected    
    Bldgs.   Acreage   Footage   Investment(2)   Cost(9)   Encumbrances(3)
                         
Grand Totals at
December 31, 2004:
                                               
 
Operating properties(4)(5)(7)(8)
    1,228       n/a       133,629,806     $ 5,057,207,270       n/a     $ 491,546,464  
 
Properties under development(10)(11)
    58       n/a       15,147,796       575,702,703     $ 1,084,649,785       n/a  
 
Land held for development(12)
    n/a       2,991.2       n/a       597,829,650       n/a       97,009  
 
Other investments(13)
    n/a       n/a       n/a       102,991,608       n/a       n/a  
                                     
   
Totals
    1,286       2,991.2       148,777,602     $ 6,333,731,231 (12)   $ 1,084,649,785     $ 491,643,473  
                                     
 
n/a Not Applicable
  (1)  The percentage occupancy presented is the physical occupancy at December 31, 2004. Operating properties at December 31, 2004 include recently completed development properties that may be in the initial lease-up phase, including properties aggregating 5.1 million square feet that were completed in 2004. The inclusion of properties in the initial lease-up phase can reduce the overall occupancy percentage.
 
  (2)  Investment represents ProLogis’ carrying value of the properties, before depreciation, at December 31, 2004.
 
  (3)  Certain properties are pledged as security under ProLogis’ secured debt and assessment bonds at December 31, 2004. For purposes of this table, the total principal balance of a debt issuance that is secured by a pool of properties is allocated among the properties in the pool based on each property’s investment balance. See Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional identification of the properties pledged.
 
  (4)  All operating properties are included in the property operations segment. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — Property Operations.”
 
  (5)  Includes 70 properties aggregating 12.7 million square feet at total investment of $404.7 million that were developed in the CDFS business segment that are pending contribution to a property fund or sale to a third party or that were acquired in the CDFS business segment that are pending contribution to a property fund. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business.”
 
  (6)  Includes one property in Brownsville, Texas which is not considered to be a target market of ProLogis.
 
  (7)  Includes 19 properties aggregating 3.9 million square feet at a total investment of $323.7 million that were developed in the CDFS business segment that are pending contribution to a property fund or sale to a third party. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business.”
 
  (8)  Includes a 1.4 million square foot property at a total investment of $169.5 million that was developed in the CDFS business segment that is pending contribution to ProLogis Japan Properties Fund. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business.”
 
  (9)  Represents the total expected cost at completion for properties under development, including the cost of land, fees, permits, payments to contractors, architectural and engineering fees and interest and property taxes to be capitalized during construction, rather than actual costs incurred to date.
(10)  All of the properties under development are included in the CDFS business segment. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business.”
 
(11)  Includes 16 properties aggregating 3.3 million square feet that are in the design and permit stage.
 
(12)  All of the land held for future development is included in the CDFS business segment. The land owned can be used for the development of approximately 52.0 million square feet of distribution properties. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business.” Does not include 1,167 acres of land controlled directly by ProLogis under option, letter of intent or contingent contract with the

29


Table of Contents

capacity for the development of approximately 20.8 million square feet of distribution properties. Does not include 796 acres of land owned or controlled by unconsolidated investees of ProLogis with the capacity for the development of approximately 11.7 million square feet of distribution properties. See “— Unconsolidated Investees — CDFS Business.”
 
(13)  Other investments include: (i) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions; (ii) costs incurred during the pre-acquisition due diligence process; and (iii) costs incurred during the pre-construction phase related to future development projects.
Real Estate Partnerships
      At December 31, 2004, ProLogis held a majority ownership interest in and controlled five real estate partnerships (collectively, the “Partnerships”). For financial reporting purposes, the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of each of the Partnerships are included in ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements and in the preceding real estate tables. The interests of the limited partners are reflected as minority interest in ProLogis’ Consolidated Balance Sheet.
      Pursuant to the partnership agreements, ProLogis or a wholly owned subsidiary of ProLogis is the sole controlling general partner of each of the five real estate partnerships with all management powers over the business and affairs of the partnership. The limited partners of each of the partnerships generally do not have the authority to transact business for, or participate in the management decisions of, the partnerships. The general partner in each of the partnerships may not, without the written consent of all of the limited partners: (i) take any action that would prevent the partnership from conducting its business; (ii) possess the property of the partnership; (iii) admit an additional partner; or (iv) subject a limited partner to the liability of a general partner. In each partnership, ProLogis or a wholly owned subsidiary may not voluntarily withdraw from the partnership or transfer or assign its interests in the partnership without the consent of all of the limited partners. The limited partners may freely transfer their partnership units to their affiliates, provided that the transfer does not cause a termination of the partnership under the Code and does not cause ProLogis to cease to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code. The limited partners in each of the partnerships are entitled to redeem their partnership units for Common Shares.
      See Note 8 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
      The five real estate partnerships are as follows at December 31, 2004:
                                         
            Rentable        
        Number of   Square Footage   Real Estate    
    Formation   Operating   of Operating   Assets   ProLogis’
    Date   Properties   Properties   (in millions)(1)   Ownership
                     
ProLogis Limited Partnership-I(2)
    1993       74       3,904,336     $ 220.4 (3)(4)     68.65 %
ProLogis Limited Partnership-III(5)
    1994       16       993,730       36.2 (6)     95.18 %
ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV(5)(7)
    1994       42       2,441,834       94.9 (8)     98.98 %
Meridian Realty Partners Limited Partnership
    (9 )     1       249,283       11.1 (10)     91.33 %
ProLogis Fraser L.P.(11)
    2004       9       2,329,880       151.2 (12)     87.46 %
                               
              142       9,919,063     $ 513.8          
                               
 
  (1)  Real estate assets are presented before depreciation.
 
  (2)  Irving F. Lyons, III, ProLogis’ Vice Chairman and former Chief Investment Officer, had an effective ownership in ProLogis Limited Partnership-I of 1.8% at December 31, 2004.
 
  (3)  These properties cannot be sold, prior to the occurrence of certain events, without the consent of the limited partners, other than in tax-deferred exchanges. The applicable partnership agreement provides

30


Table of Contents

  that a minimum level of debt must be maintained within this partnership, which can include intercompany debt to ProLogis.
 
  (4)  One operating property is located in the Tampa market; all other properties are located in San Francisco (the East Bay and South Bay markets).
 
  (5)  Jeffrey H. Schwartz, ProLogis’ Chief Executive Officer, owned all of the minority interest outstanding at December 31, 2004 (4.82% of ProLogis Limited Partnership-III and 1.02% of ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV).
 
  (6)  The operating properties are located in the Chicago, Orlando, San Antonio and Tampa markets. Real estate assets also include 16 acres of land held for future development located in the Tampa market with a book basis of $0.8 million.
 
  (7)  ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV was formed through a cash contribution from a wholly owned subsidiary of ProLogis, ProLogis IV, Inc., and through the contribution of properties from the limited partner. ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV and ProLogis IV, Inc. are legal entities that are separate and distinct from ProLogis, its affiliates and each other, and each has separate assets, liabilities, business functions and operations. At December 31, 2004, the sole asset of ProLogis IV, Inc. was its interest in ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV. At December 31, 2004, ProLogis IV, Inc. had outstanding borrowings from ProLogis of $0.6 million.
 
  (8)  The operating properties are located in the Cincinnati, Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, I-95 Corridor (New Jersey), Northern Ohio, Orlando and Tampa markets. In addition, this partnership’s real estate assets include $11.0 million of cash held in escrow pending the completion of a deferred tax exchange transaction.
 
  (9)  This partnership was formed by another REIT that was merged with and into ProLogis in 1999.
(10)  This property is located in the Los Angeles/ Orange County market
 
(11)  This limited partnership was formed on August 4, 2004 in connection with the Keystone Transaction to directly acquire certain net assets of Keystone. In addition to the real estate assets owned, this partnership owns interests in two property funds that own real estate assets (ProLogis North American Properties Funds XI and XII) and interests in two CDFS Joint Ventures (one that owns a recently completed 0.8 million square foot development property and one that has a 0.8 million square foot property under development). See “— Unconsolidated Investees — Property Operations” and “— Unconsolidated Investees — CDFS Business”. Also, see Note 3 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
 
(12)  Real estate assets of this partnership include nine operating properties located in the I-81 Corridor (Pennsylvania) and Indianapolis markets with an undepreciated cost of $126.6 million, a 0.8 million square foot property under development in the Central New Jersey market with a total expected cost at completion of $39.1 million, and land parcels and land option rights primarily in the Indianapolis market.
Unconsolidated Investees
      At December 31, 2004, ProLogis’ investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees (entities that ProLogis presents under the equity method rather than on a consolidated basis) totaled $908.5 million. ProLogis’ investments in and advances to property funds discussed below under “— Property Operations” totaled $839.7 million at December 31, 2004. ProLogis’ investments in and advances to its entities operating in the CDFS business segment totaled $40.5 million at December 31, 2004 discussed below under “— CDFS Business”. ProLogis’ investment in and advances to a temperature-controlled distribution company was $5.1 million at December 31, 2004. ProLogis’ investments in and advances to other companies totaled $23.2 million at December 31, 2004. ProLogis’ unconsolidated investees are discussed in Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. See also “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments.”
      The property fund component of ProLogis’ business strategy allows ProLogis to: (i) realize, for financial reporting purposes, a portion of the profits from its CDFS business activities upon contribution of a property to

31


Table of Contents

a property fund; (ii) earn fees from the property funds; (iii) raise private capital to fund its future CDFS business activities; (iv) maintain an ownership interest in its developed properties; and (v) maintain relationships with its customers. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis — Business Strategy and Global Presence.”
      Property Operations
      At December 31, 2004, ProLogis had ownership interests ranging from 11.5% to 50% in 15 property funds that are presented under the equity method. The property funds primarily own operating properties and ProLogis’ investments in the property funds are included in its property operations segment. The information provided in the table below is for the total entity in which ProLogis has an ownership interest, not ProLogis’ proportionate share of the entity. ProLogis acts as manager of each property fund. See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — Property Operations” and Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
                                       
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square   Percentage   Entity’s
    Bldgs.   Footage   Occupancy(1)   Investment(2)
                 
North America:
                               
 
ProLogis California(3):
                               
   
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
    81       14,203,899       99.42 %   $ 685,971,094  
                         
 
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I(4):
                               
   
Atlanta, Georgia
    5       1,615,688       98.40 %     53,856,179  
   
Central New Jersey
    4       925,600       100.00       46,329,568  
   
Chicago, Illinois
    1       249,576       100.00       14,813,173  
   
Cincinnati, Ohio
    2       297,720       100.00       15,187,118  
   
Columbus, Ohio
    2       888,691       100.00       30,280,864  
   
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
    3       1,221,934       69.90       49,392,204  
   
Denver, Colorado
    2       198,892       100.00       9,186,376  
   
El Paso, Texas
    1       354,159       100.00       13,629,971  
   
Houston, Texas
    2       238,450       84.98       10,890,317  
   
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    1       174,720       100.00       12,952,203  
   
Indianapolis, Indiana
    2       719,829       100.00       21,487,540  
   
Louisville, Kentucky
    3       905,800       96.69       33,571,633  
   
Nashville, Tennessee
    1       412,800       100.00       14,988,729  
   
Phoenix, Arizona
    1       156,410       0.00       6,770,282  
   
Salt Lake City, Utah
    3       396,600       100.00       17,145,977  
   
San Antonio, Texas
    1       244,800       100.00       9,101,959  
   
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
    2       404,400       100.00       16,997,187  
                         
     
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund I
    36       9,406,069       93.45 %     376,581,280  
                         
 
ProLogis North American Properties Fund II(5):
                               
   
Austin, Texas
    4       324,800       100.00 %     17,848,580  
   
Central New Jersey
    1       501,400       100.00       26,359,798  
   
Charlotte, North Carolina
    2       178,000       45.88       7,870,523  
   
Chicago, Illinois
    4       510,725       100.00       38,516,720  
   
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
    4       669,416       100.00       26,142,026  

32


Table of Contents

                                     
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square   Percentage   Entity’s
    Bldgs.   Footage   Occupancy(1)   Investment(2)
                 
 
Denver, Colorado
    1       104,400       100.00       5,435,610  
 
El Paso, Texas
    1       239,131       100.00       10,318,866  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    3       383,650       80.82       23,757,762  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    1       528,670       100.00       25,427,547  
 
Reno, Nevada
    1       169,625       100.00       7,178,416  
 
San Antonio, Texas
    1       160,000       84.00       6,769,006  
 
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
    1       89,626       100.00       4,368,792  
 
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
    3       617,225       100.00       35,577,510  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund II
    27       4,476,668       95.63 %     235,571,156  
                         
ProLogis North American Properties Fund III(5):
                               
 
Atlanta, Georgia
    2       151,600       85.49 %     7,220,189  
 
Austin, Texas
    6       282,100       97.45       15,773,175  
 
Central New Jersey
    1       204,000       100.00       10,565,600  
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
    1       136,000       74.19       5,407,328  
 
Cincinnati, Ohio
    5       1,044,390       89.41       45,868,562  
 
Columbus, Ohio
    1       289,280       100.00       8,580,685  
 
Denver, Colorado
    1       104,400       100.00       5,365,810  
 
Houston, Texas
    1       140,000       58.57       5,776,303  
 
Las Vegas, Nevada
    1       235,520       100.00       9,874,422  
 
Orlando, Florida
    4       361,866       100.00       18,585,371  
 
Portland, Oregon
    2       200,600       86.89       10,762,036  
 
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
    1       351,788       100.00       15,395,249  
 
Seattle, Washington
    1       117,620       100.00       6,232,909  
 
St. Louis, Missouri
    2       370,000       91.84       15,296,361  
 
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
    5       391,325       54.05       29,577,783  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund III
    34       4,380,489       89.29 %     210,281,783  
                         
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV(5):
                               
 
Atlanta, Georgia
    3       252,800       74.21 %     13,274,388  
 
Central New Jersey
    1       181,370       100.00       8,977,780  
 
Columbus, Ohio
    1       1,014,592       100.00       27,508,871  
 
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
    1       180,440       100.00       10,799,887  
 
Denver, Colorado
    2       357,400       100.00       15,041,195  
 
El Paso, Texas
    1       153,034       100.00       5,590,981  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    1       421,101       100.00       16,163,189  
 
Phoenix, Arizona
    1       273,586       100.00       9,627,468  
 
Portland, Oregon
    4       426,780       93.63       24,673,130  
 
San Antonio, Texas
    2       213,800       100.00       10,087,826  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV
    17       3,474,903       97.34 %     141,744,715  
                         

33


Table of Contents

                                     
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square   Percentage   Entity’s
    Bldgs.   Footage   Occupancy(1)   Investment(2)
                 
ProLogis North American Properties Fund V(6):
                               
United States:
                               
 
Atlanta, Georgia
    14       1,966,183       98.68 %     60,317,304  
 
Central New Jersey
    3       1,012,972       100.00       52,963,304  
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
    3       802,900       100.00       30,218,891  
 
Chicago, Illinois
    2       582,220       21.39       35,634,953  
 
Cincinnati, Ohio
    3       594,000       94.40       22,108,918  
 
Columbus, Ohio
    7       1,352,590       98.30       50,513,231  
 
Dallas/ Fort Worth, Texas
    10       2,587,545       94.90       93,323,493  
 
Denver, Colorado
    2       142,077       100.00       5,989,413  
 
El Paso, Texas
    7       848,548       100.00       33,746,323  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    3       354,151       94.64       21,861,364  
 
Houston, Texas
    6       1,333,229       100.00       46,148,561  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    2       1,514,645       100.00       65,970,568  
 
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
    4       2,738,029       100.00       138,855,220  
 
Louisville, Kentucky
    2       877,250       94.30       33,202,740  
 
Memphis, Tennessee
    5       2,329,468       100.00       63,651,644  
 
Nashville, Tennessee
    2       516,240       100.00       17,135,005  
 
Orlando, Florida
    3       492,801       100.00       17,095,334  
 
Portland, Oregon
    1       127,420       100.00       6,670,860  
 
Reno, Nevada
    2       820,006       100.00       35,121,878  
 
San Antonio, Texas
    9       1,213,020       100.00       50,475,946  
 
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
    1       401,536       100.00       15,980,582  
 
St. Louis, Missouri
    1       1,262,648       100.00       44,556,562  
 
Tampa, Florida
    2       172,000       100.00       10,652,702  
 
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
    6       1,389,092       100.00       65,173,005  
Mexico:
                               
 
Juarez
    1       131,538       100.00       8,692,456  
 
Monterrey
    5       684,940       96.45       36,783,544  
 
Reynosa
    6       950,046       100.00       53,548,986  
 
Tijuana
    7       1,070,200       86.80       53,601,559  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund V
    119       28,267,294       96.79 %     1,169,994,346  
                         
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI(7):
                               
 
Central New Jersey
    4       3,229,104       95.13 %     236,151,097  
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
    2       600,960       83.34       24,014,348  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    6       926,568       79.91       57,901,451  
 
Greenville, South Carolina
    2       737,889       99.51       27,177,491  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    4       2,470,610       64.41       133,492,983  
 
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    1       93,948       100.00       12,587,024  
 
Northern Ohio
    2       324,750       100.00       12,262,458  

34


Table of Contents

                                     
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square   Percentage   Entity’s
    Bldgs.   Footage   Occupancy(1)   Investment(2)
                 
 
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
    1       264,418       100.00       9,852,273  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI
    22       8,648,247       84.66 %     513,439,125  
                         
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII(7):
                               
 
Central New Jersey
    1       585,510       100.00 %     36,384,785  
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
    3       500,800       96.01       20,962,980  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    4       683,482       95.75       60,401,112  
 
Greenville, South Carolina
    7       390,000       61.54       12,212,768  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    5       1,631,311       85.29       90,375,360  
 
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    3       1,060,998       59.05       119,251,780  
 
Indianapolis, Indiana
    1       799,344       100.00       32,386,789  
 
Nashville, Tennessee
    1       70,000       100.00       2,544,638  
 
Northern Ohio
    4       333,136       90.95       13,703,639  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII
    29       6,054,581       85.07 %     388,223,851  
                         
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII(7):
                               
 
Atlanta, Georgia
    1       67,200       74.36 %     3,840,817  
 
Central New Jersey
    2       537,433       100.00       41,494,503  
 
Cincinnati, Ohio
    1       167,270       91.18       5,850,958  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    4       360,474       100.00       33,368,848  
 
Greenville, South Carolina
    1       143,119       100.00       4,879,153  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    6       934,945       83.02       43,159,617  
 
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    6       412,611       93.98       38,310,927  
 
Nashville, Tennessee
    1       88,000       100.00       2,869,559  
 
Northern Ohio
    1       255,000       58.82       10,699,695  
 
San Antonio, Texas
    1       98,400       100.00       6,797,618  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII
    24       3,064,452       89.54 %     191,271,695  
                         
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX(7):
                               
 
Atlanta, Georgia
    1       54,400       100.00 %     3,886,090  
 
Central New Jersey
    2       385,000       96.06       34,232,359  
 
Cincinnati, Ohio
    2       196,434       93.47       7,318,861  
 
Columbus, Ohio
    1       200,000       100.00       6,393,264  
 
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    2       348,600       100.00       31,875,394  
 
Greenville, South Carolina
    5       662,000       27.19       18,409,697  
 
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    6       1,255,475       75.47       61,106,427  
 
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    2       402,460       83.24       34,298,383  
                         
   
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX
    21       3,504,369       74.73 %     197,520,475  
                         

35


Table of Contents

                                       
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square   Percentage   Entity’s
    Bldgs.   Footage   Occupancy(1)   Investment(2)
                 
 
ProLogis North American Properties Fund X(7):
                               
   
Atlanta, Georgia
    1       51,200       100.00 %     3,322,878  
   
Central New Jersey
    1       40,000       0.00       3,862,727  
   
Cincinnati, Ohio
    1       136,184       100.00       5,080,241  
   
Columbus, Ohio
    1       237,500       100.00       5,386,600  
   
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
    3       340,143       100.00       30,116,012  
   
Greenville, South Carolina
    10       769,400       59.71       21,032,515  
   
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    6       1,554,074       96.67       75,090,740  
   
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    3       651,880       100.00       60,733,514  
   
Nashville, Tennessee
    1       187,930       100.00       6,429,042  
   
Northern Ohio
    1       181,838       100.00       7,254,504  
   
San Antonio, Texas
    1       40,800       100.00       1,713,823  
                         
     
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund X
    29       4,190,949       90.41 %     220,022,596  
                         
 
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI(8):
                               
   
Central New Jersey
    1       203,404       100.00 %     13,251,528  
   
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
    5       1,267,956       87.95       74,673,232  
   
Indianapolis, Indiana
    8       2,843,601       98.54       139,346,518  
                         
     
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI
    14       4,314,961       95.50 %     227,271,278  
                         
 
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII(8):
                               
   
Central New Jersey
    7       2,606,962       100.00 %     191,561,859  
   
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
    5       756,848       100.00       77,549,877  
                         
     
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII
    12       3,363,810       100.00 %     269,111,736  
                         
     
Subtotal ProLogis North American
    465       97,350,691       93.43 %     4,827,005,130  
                         
Europe:
                               
 
ProLogis European Properties Fund(9):
                               
   
Belgium
    2       468,535       100.00 %     25,754,915  
   
Czech Republic:
                               
     
Prague
    7       1,342,066       100.00       102,969,187  
   
France:
                               
     
Central
    70       12,633,688       90.33       964,375,652  
     
East
    3       939,697       100.00       57,248,555  
     
North
    8       1,704,984       100.00       97,231,087  
     
South
    18       4,587,640       88.54       240,433,170  

36


Table of Contents

                                         
        Rentable        
    No. of   Square   Percentage   Entity’s
    Bldgs.   Footage   Occupancy(1)   Investment(2)
                 
   
Germany:
                               
     
North
    2       438,515       100.00       39,786,400  
     
Rhine/ Main
    3       405,847       100.00       39,947,740  
     
Rhine/ Ruhr
    5       1,026,863       99.57       98,891,366  
     
South
    4       581,590       100.00       51,578,113  
   
Hungary:
                               
     
Budapest
    3       527,047       90.60       35,468,772  
   
Italy:
                               
     
Milan
    15       4,820,031       100.00       291,363,724  
   
Netherlands:
                               
     
Amsterdam
    4       633,289       100.00       70,575,577  
     
Rotterdam
    9       1,785,424       99.16       122,340,656  
     
South
    8       2,510,013       100.00       174,041,555  
   
Poland:
                               
     
Central
    2       656,848       100.00       37,956,302  
     
South
    1       366,880       100.00       23,365,899  
     
Warsaw
    11       2,048,633       93.78       150,693,010  
     
West
    4       463,949       99.54       27,761,853  
   
Spain:
                               
     
Barcelona
    7       1,806,865       99.53       159,147,614  
     
Madrid
    2       342,951       85.68       33,234,217  
   
Sweden:
                               
     
Stockholm
    2       710,839       100.00       46,484,923  
   
United Kingdom:
                               
     
East Midlands
    17       3,443,970       100.00       414,525,500  
     
London and Southeast
    8       1,158,185       100.00       219,594,032  
     
North
    3       434,122       100.00       46,390,462  
     
West Midlands
    12       2,082,798       89.25       285,151,336  
                         
       
Total ProLogis European Properties Fund
    230       47,921,269       95.35 %     3,856,311,617  
                         
Asia:
                               
 
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund(5):
                               
     
Nagoya, Japan
    1       346,069       100.00 %     48,410,003  
     
Osaka, Japan
    2       468,931       100.00       41,815,381  
     
Tokyo, Japan
    10       3,054,469       98.85       641,494,379  
                         
       
Total ProLogis Japan Properties Fund
    13       3,869,469       99.09 %     731,719,763  
                         
       
Total Unconsolidated Investees
    708       149,141,429       94.19 %   $ 9,415,036,510  
                         
 
(1)  The percentage occupancy presented is the physical occupancy at December 31, 2004.
 
(2)  Investment represents 100% of the carrying value of the properties, before depreciation, of each entity at December 31, 2004, except with respect to ProLogis North American Properties Funds XI and XII. ProLogis acquired its ownership interest in these entities as part of the Keystone Transaction in August 2004. For this presentation, the investment represents 100% of the fair values of the operating properties owned by these entities that were determined as part of the associated purchase accounting adjustments,

37


Table of Contents

not just ProLogis’ share of the fair values, as adjusted for subsequent activity. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Keystone Transaction”.
 
(3)  ProLogis had a 50% ownership interest in ProLogis California at December 31, 2004.
 
(4)  ProLogis had a 41.3% ownership interest in ProLogis North American Properties Fund I at December 31, 2004.
 
(5)  ProLogis had a 20% ownership interest in each of ProLogis North American Properties Fund II, ProLogis North American Properties Fund III, ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV and ProLogis Japan Properties Fund at December 31, 2004.
 
(6)  ProLogis had an effective ownership interest of 11.5% in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V at December 31, 2004.
 
(7)  ProLogis formed this property fund in 2004 as part of the Keystone Transaction (see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Keystone Transaction”). ProLogis’ ownership interest in each of ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through X was 20% at December 31, 2004.
 
(8)  ProLogis acquired a 20% ownership interest in each of ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI and ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII as part of the Keystone Transaction (see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Keystone Transaction”).
 
(9)  ProLogis had a 21.8% ownership interest in ProLogis European Properties Fund at December 31, 2004.
      CDFS Business
      At December 31, 2004, ProLogis had ownership interests in six entities that perform CDFS business activities and are presented by ProLogis under the equity method. These entities are as follows at December 31, 2004:
  •  United States: two entities in which ProLogis’ ownership interest is 50% in each; ownership interests were acquired as part of the Keystone Transaction (see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Keystone Transaction”); one entity recently completed a 0.8 million square foot property in Indianapolis with a total investment of $39.1 million and one entity that began development of another 0.8 million square foot property in Indianapolis with a total expected cost at completion of $22.7 million.
 
  •  Europe: three entities in the United Kingdom in which ProLogis’ ownership interest is 50% in each, including one entity in which ProLogis no longer actively participates and two entities that own land parcels (10 acres, 0.2 million buildable square feet) and control land parcels through contract, option or letter of intent (396 acres, 7.5 million buildable square feet) but do not have any projects currently under development.
 
  •  Asia: one entity in China that has two properties under development aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total expected cost at completion of $7.8 million; both properties are in Shanghai. This entity also owns four operating properties in Shanghai aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total acquisition cost of $7.3 million.
      See “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business.”
ITEM 3.  Legal Proceedings
      From time to time, ProLogis and its unconsolidated investees are parties to a variety of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of their businesses. ProLogis believes that, with respect to any such matters that it is currently a party to, the ultimate disposition of any such matters will not result in a material adverse effect on ProLogis’ business, financial position or results of operations.

38


Table of Contents

ITEM 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
      Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information and Holders
      ProLogis’ Common Shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “PLD”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of the Common Shares, as reported in the NYSE Composite Tape, and distributions per Common Share, for the periods indicated.
                           
    High Sale   Low Sale    
    Price   Price   Per Common Share Distribution
             
2003:
                       
 
First Quarter
  $ 26.60     $ 23.63     $ 0 .36
 
Second Quarter
    28.60       25.60       0 .36
 
Third Quarter
    30.39       26.97       0 .36
 
Fourth Quarter
    32.62       28.34       0 .36
2004:
                       
 
First Quarter
    36.00       30.80       0 .365
 
Second Quarter
    36.39       27.62       0 .365
 
Third Quarter
    36.95       32.74       0 .365
 
Fourth Quarter
    43.33       35.30       0 .365
2005:
                       
 
First Quarter (through March 11)
  $ 43.50     $ 37.40     $ 0 .37
      On March 11, 2005, ProLogis had approximately 186,306,321 Common Shares outstanding, which were held of record by approximately 9,300 shareholders.
Distributions and Dividends
      In order to comply with the REIT requirements of the Code, ProLogis is generally required to make Common Share distributions and Preferred Share dividends (other than capital gain distributions) to its shareholders in amounts that together at least equal to (i) the sum of (a) 90% of its “REIT taxable income” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and its net capital gains and (b) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (ii) certain excess noncash income. ProLogis’ Common Share distribution policy is to distribute a percentage of its cash flow that ensures that ProLogis will meet the distribution requirements of the Code and that allows ProLogis to maximize the cash retained to meet other cash needs, such as capital improvements and other investment activities.
      ProLogis announces the following year’s projected annual Common Share distribution level after the Board performs its annual budget review and approves a Common Share distribution level, generally in December of each year. In December 2004, the Board announced an increase in the annual distribution level for 2005 from $1.46 to $1.48 per Common Share. The payment of Common Share distributions is subject to the discretion of the Board, is dependent on ProLogis’ financial condition and operating results and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year. A distribution of $0.37 per Common Share for the first quarter of 2005 was declared on February 1, 2005. This distribution was paid on February 28, 2005 to holders of Common Shares on February 15, 2005.

39


Table of Contents

      Common Share distributions to shareholders are characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income, capital gains, non-taxable return of capital or a combination of the three. Common Share distributions that exceed ProLogis’ current and accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for tax purposes) constitute a return of capital rather than a dividend and generally reduce the shareholders’ basis in the Common Shares. To the extent that a distribution exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the shareholder’s basis in the Common Shares, it will generally be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that shareholder’s Common Shares. At the beginning of each year, ProLogis notifies its shareholders of the taxability of the Common Share distributions paid during the preceding year. The following table summarizes the taxability of Common Share distributions for the periods indicated (in U.S. dollars; taxability for 2004 is estimated):
                             
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
Per Common Share:
                       
 
Ordinary income
  $ 0.94     $ 1.23     $ 0.95  
 
Capital gains
    0.17       0.05       0.06  
 
Return of capital
    0.35       0.16       0.41  
                   
   
Total
  $ 1.46     $ 1.44     $ 1.42  
                   
      In addition to Common Shares, ProLogis has issued cumulative redeemable preferred shares of beneficial interest (“Preferred Shares”). At December 31, 2004, ProLogis had three series of Preferred Shares outstanding (“Series C Preferred Shares”, “Series F Preferred Shares” and “Series G Preferred Shares”). Previously, ProLogis had three other series of Preferred Shares (“Series A Preferred Shares”, “Series D Preferred Shares” and “Series E Preferred Shares”) and one series of cumulative convertible redeemable preferred shares of beneficial interest (“Series B Convertible Preferred Shares”) outstanding, all of which have been redeemed. Holders of each series of Preferred Shares outstanding have, subject to certain conditions, limited voting rights, and are entitled to receive cumulative preferential dividends based upon each series’ respective liquidation preference. Such dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December. Dividends on Preferred Shares are payable when, and if, they have been declared by the Board, out of funds legally available for payment of dividends. After the respective redemption dates, each series of Preferred Shares can be redeemed at ProLogis’ option. The cash redemption price (other than the portion consisting of accrued and unpaid dividends) with respect to Series C Preferred Shares is payable solely out of the cumulative sales proceeds of other capital shares of ProLogis, which may include shares of other series of Preferred Shares. With respect to the payment of dividends, each series of Preferred Shares ranks on parity with ProLogis’ other series of Preferred Shares. Annual per share dividends paid on each series of Preferred Shares were as follows for the periods indicated (in U.S. dollars):
                         
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
Series C(1)
  $ 4.27     $ 4.27     $ 4.27  
Series D(2)(3)
          1.98       1.98  
Series E(4)
          1.09       2.19  
Series F(5)
    1.69       0.15        
Series G (6)
    1.69              
 
(1)  For federal income tax purposes, $3.62 of the 2004 dividend, $4.11 of the 2003 dividend and $4.04 of the 2002 dividend are estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders with the remaining portions of each dividend estimated to represent capital gains.
 
(2)  For federal income tax purposes, of the $1.98 per share dividend paid in 2003 on shares that were not redeemed, $1.90 is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders and of the total 2002 dividend,

40


Table of Contents

$1.87 is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders. The remaining portions in each year are estimated to represent capital gains.
 
(3)  ProLogis redeemed all of its 10,000,000 outstanding Series D Preferred Shares (5,000,000 shares on January 12, 2004 and 5,000,000 shares on December 1, 2003). No Series D Preferred Share dividends were declared and paid in 2004, although the total redemption value included accrued and unpaid dividends of $0.066 per share. For 2003, the total dividends paid on the 5,000,000 shares redeemed in that year were $1.82 per share, of which $1.48 was declared and paid prior to the redemption and $0.34 represented accrued and unpaid dividends that were included in the redemption value. Of the dividend declared and paid in 2003 of $1.48 per share, $1.26 is estimated to be ordinary income to the holders, $0.16 is estimated to be qualified dividends and $0.06 is estimated to represent capital gains
 
(4)  ProLogis redeemed all of its 2,000,000 outstanding Series E Preferred Shares on July 1, 2003. The total dividends paid on the redeemed shares in 2003 were $1.46 per share, of which $1.09 was declared and paid prior to the redemption and $0.37 represented accrued and unpaid dividends that were included in the redemption value. Of the dividend declared and paid in 2003 of $1.09 per share, $0.93 is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders, $0.12 is estimated to be qualified dividends and $0.04 is estimated to represent capital gains.
 
(5)  The Series F Preferred Shares were issued on November 28, 2003. For federal income tax purposes, $1.43 of the 2004 dividend and $0.14 of the 2003 dividend are estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders with the remainder estimated to represent capital gains.
 
(6)  The Series G Preferred Shares were issued on December 30, 2003. For federal income tax purposes, $1.43 of the 2004 dividend is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders with the remainder estimated to represent capital gains.
      Pursuant to the terms of its Preferred Shares, ProLogis is restricted from declaring or paying any distribution with respect to its Common Shares unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the Preferred Shares have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the then-current dividend period with respect to the Preferred Shares.
      ProLogis’ tax return for the year ended December 31, 2004 has not been filed. The taxability information presented for ProLogis’ distributions and dividends paid in 2004 is based upon the best available data. ProLogis’ tax returns for previous tax years have not been examined by the Internal Revenue Service. Consequently, the taxability of distributions and dividends is subject to change.
      ProLogis’ earnings and profits are first allocated to the Preferred Shares, which increases the portion of the Common Share distribution that is characterized as return of capital. The portion of the Common Share distribution that is characterized as return of capital represents the excess of distributions over the earnings and profits, and primarily results because non-cash charges such as depreciation are not considered in determining distribution levels. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations.”
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
      For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under ProLogis’ equity compensation plans see Note 15 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. The other information required by this Item 5 is incorporated herein by reference to the description under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in ProLogis’ definitive proxy statement for its 2005 annual meeting of shareholders (“2005 Proxy Statement”).
Other Shareholder Matters
      Other Issuances of Common Shares
      In 2004, ProLogis issued 16,000 Common Shares upon exchange of limited partnership units in two of ProLogis’ majority-owned and controlled real estate partnerships. See “Item 2. Properties — Real Estate

41


Table of Contents

Partnerships” and Note 8 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. These Common Shares were issued in transactions exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
      On August 4, 2004, ProLogis issued 879,283 limited partnership units in a majority-owned and controlled real estate partnership. The units were issued, and the limited partnership was formed, as part of the Keystone Transaction. Each limited partnership unit is convertible into one Common Share and is entitled to receive quarterly distributions of available cash, as defined in the limited partnership agreement. See “Item 2. Properties — Real Estate Partnerships” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Keystone Transaction.” The Keystone Transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
      Common Share Repurchase Program
      ProLogis may repurchase up to $215.0 million of Common Shares under a Common Share repurchase program that began in January 2001. Through December 31, 2004, a total of 5,571,100 Common Shares have been repurchased at a total cost, including fees and commissions paid, of $130.9 million. ProLogis did not repurchase any Common Shares during 2004 and has not made any Common Share repurchases through March 11, 2005. The Common Shares that have been repurchased to date were purchased through open market and privately negotiated transactions, depending on market prices and other conditions. Future repurchases, if any, are expected to be through similar transactions.
      Common Share Plans
      ProLogis sells Common Shares under various Common Share plans as follows:
  •  1999 Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan, amended in November 2002 (the “1999 Common Share Plan”): Allows holders of Common Shares to automatically reinvest Common Share distributions and certain holders and persons who are not holders of Common Shares to purchase a limited number of additional Common Shares by making optional cash payments, without payment of any brokerage commission or service charge. Common Shares that are acquired under the 1999 Common Share Plan, either through reinvestment of distributions or through optional cash payments, are acquired at a price ranging from 98% to 100% of the market price of such Common Shares, as determined by ProLogis. ProLogis generated net proceeds of $35.2 million from the issuance of 1,021,000 Common Shares in 2004 under the 1999 Common Share Plan.
 
  •  Continuous equity offering plan: Allows ProLogis to sell up to 7,400,000 Common Shares through two designated agents in at-the-market offerings who earn a fee of between 2.0% and 2.25% of the gross proceeds. In 2004, ProLogis sold 1,430,000 Common Shares under this plan generating net proceeds to ProLogis of $53.3 million.
 
  •  ProLogis Trust Employee Share Purchase Plan (the “Employee Share Plan”): Employees of ProLogis and its participating entities may purchase Common Shares, through payroll deductions only, at a discounted price of 85% of the market price of the Common Shares. The aggregate fair value of Common Shares that an individual employee can acquire in a calendar year under the Employee Share Plan is $25,000. Subject to certain provisions, the aggregate number of Common Shares that may be issued under the Employee Share Plan may not exceed 5,000,000. ProLogis began issuing Common Shares under the Employee Share Plan in January 2002. In 2004, ProLogis generated net proceeds of $1.1 million from the sale of 43,000 Common shares under the Employee Share Plan.
      Holders of Common Shares who do not participate in the 1999 Common Share Plan continue to receive Common Share distributions as declared and paid. The amount of Common Share distributions that can be reinvested is limited to those distributions earned on no more than 300,000 Common Shares per quarter. Purchases under the 1999 Common Share Plan can be made by holders of Common Shares that are registered on the share transfer books of ProLogis in the shareholder’s name, as well as persons who are not holders of Common Shares.

42


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
      The following table sets forth selected financial data relating to the historical financial condition and results of operations of ProLogis for 2004 and the four preceding years. Certain amounts for the years prior to 2004 presented in the table below have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 financial statement presentation. The financial data in the tables is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes in Item 8.
      ProLogis began presenting its investments in previously unconsolidated investees on a consolidated basis when such presentation change was required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) based on either changes in applicable GAAP, or changes in ProLogis’ ownership interest. Previously reported financial information is not required to be restated under GAAP when the reporting method is changed to consolidation from the equity method under these circumstances. ProLogis’ consolidated shareholders’ equity and its consolidated net earnings are the same under the two reporting methods. See Note 2 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
      The amounts in the table below are in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts.
                                           
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                     
Operating Data:
                                       
 
Rental income
  $ 544,663     $ 542,840     $ 539,575     $ 560,052     $ 570,279  
 
Property management and other property fund fees
    50,778       44,184       34,536       18,075       9,442  
 
Total revenues
    598,139       589,373       578,620       581,170       584,009  
 
Rental expenses
    142,280       135,779       124,629       123,977       118,360  
 
General and administrative expenses
    82,147       65,907       53,893       50,274       44,954  
 
Total expenses
    408,984       373,585       335,487       321,113       320,121  
 
Gains on certain dispositions of CDFS business assets, net
    176,967       126,526       122,264       96,847       71,284  
 
Operating income
    366,122       342,314       365,397       356,904       335,172  
 
Income from unconsolidated property funds
    42,899       27,265       26,186       21,405       30,638  
 
Income (losses) from other unconsolidated investees, net(1)
    (801 )     (12,231 )     35,659       (89,124 )     38,778  
 
Interest expense
    153,334       155,475       152,958       163,629       172,191  
 
Earnings before certain net gains and net foreign currency exchange gains (expenses/losses)
    253,018       198,797       271,144       125,260       234,901  
 
Gains recognized on dispositions of certain non-CDFS business assets, net
    6,072       1,638       6,648       10,008       1,314  
 
Gains on partial dispositions of investments in property funds(2)
    3,328       74,716                    
 
Foreign currency exchange gains (expenses/losses), net
    14,686       (10,587 )     (2,031 )     (3,721 )     (17,927 )
 
Total income tax expense
    (43,562 )     (15,374 )     (28,169 )     (4,725 )     (5,130 )
 
Earnings from continuing operations
    233,542       249,190       247,592       126,822       213,158  
 
Discontinued operations(3)
    (747 )     1,485       1,289       1,322       1,320  
                               
 
Net earnings
    232,795       250,675       248,881       128,144       214,478  

43


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                     
 
Less preferred share dividends(4)
    25,746       30,485       32,715       37,309       56,763  
 
Less excess of redemption values over carrying values of Preferred Shares redeemed(5)
    4,236       7,823             4,797        
                               
 
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares
  $ 202,813     $ 212,367     $ 216,166     $ 86,038     $ 157,715  
                               
 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Common Shares per share — Basic: Continuing operations
  $ 1.12     $ 1.17     $ 1.21     $ 0.49     $ 0.95  
   
Discontinued operations
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.01     $ 0.01     $ 0.01  
                               
 
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares per share — Basic
  $ 1.11     $ 1.18     $ 1.22     $ 0.50     $ 0.96  
                               
 
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Common Shares per share — Diluted: Continuing operations
  $ 1.09     $ 1.15     $ 1.19     $ 0.48     $ 0.95  
   
Discontinued operations
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.01     $ 0.01     $ 0.01     $ 0.01  
                               
 
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares per share — Diluted
  $ 1.08     $ 1.16     $ 1.20     $ 0.49     $ 0.96  
                               
 
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding:
                                       
     
Basic
    182,226       179,245       177,813       172,755       163,651  
     
Diluted(6)
    191,801       187,222       184,869       175,197       164,401  
Common Share Distributions:
                                       
 
Common Share cash distributions paid
  $ 266,135     $ 258,187     $ 252,270     $ 237,691     $ 219,333  
 
Common Share distributions paid per share
  $ 1.46     $ 1.44     $ 1.42     $ 1.38     $ 1.34  
Funds From Operations(7):
                                       
 
Reconciliation of net earnings to funds from operations as defined by ProLogis:
                                       
 
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares
  $ 202,813     $ 212,367     $ 216,166     $ 86,038     $ 157,715  
 
Add (Deduct) NAREIT defined adjustments:
                                       
     
ProLogis direct adjustments
    157,943       127,875       137,934       126,408       144,960  
     
Items attributable to discontinued operations
    (1,202 )     678       651       617       585  
     
ProLogis’ share of reconciling items of unconsolidated investees
    39,738       30,228       39,531       68,367       56,622  
                               
       
Total NAREIT defined adjustments
    196,479       158,781       178,116       195,392       202,167  
                               
 
Subtotal — NAREIT defined funds from operations
    399,292       371,148       394,282       281,430       359,882  

44


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                     
 
Add (Deduct) ProLogis defined adjustments:
                                       
     
ProLogis direct adjustments
    2,102       18,379       16,917       3,742       23,799  
     
Items attributable to discontinued operations
    (1,075 )                        
     
ProLogis’ share of reconciling items of unconsolidated investees
    84       11,218       (18,150 )     (3,969 )     (6,963 )
                               
       
Total ProLogis defined adjustments
    1,111       29,597       (1,233 )     (227 )     16,836  
                               
 
Funds from operations attributable to Common Shares as defined by ProLogis
  $ 400,403     $ 400,745     $ 393,049     $ 281,203     $ 376,718  
                               
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding:
                                       
   
Basic
    182,226       179,245       177,813       172,755       163,651  
   
Diluted(8)
    191,801       187,222       184,869       180,284       178,166  
Cash Flow Data:
                                       
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 481,332     $ 328,531     $ 377,235     $ 343,272     $ 321,091  
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (612,495 )     (77,066 )     (94,568 )     103,952       (376,945 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  $ 36,189     $ (30,771 )   $ (199,847 )   $ (477,105 )   $ 44,386  
                                           
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                     
Financial Position:
                                       
 
Real estate owned, excluding land held for development, before depreciation
  $ 5,735,902     $ 5,342,884     $ 5,008,707     $ 4,387,456     $ 4,502,087  
 
Land held for development
    597,829       511,163       386,820       200,737       187,405  
 
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees
    908,513       677,293       809,286       1,308,856       1,453,148  
 
Total assets
    7,097,799       6,367,466       5,911,380       5,557,984       5,946,334  
 
Lines of credit and short-term borrowings (9)
    960,002       699,468       545,906       375,875       439,822  
 
Senior unsecured debt
    1,962,316       1,776,789       1,630,094       1,670,359       1,699,989  
 
Secured debt and assessment bonds
    491,643       514,412       555,978       532,106       537,925  
 
Total liabilities
    3,929,033       3,270,757       2,994,571       2,838,225       2,972,333  
 
Minority interest
    66,273       37,777       42,467       45,639       46,630  
 
Redeemable preferred shares
    350,000       475,000       400,000       400,000       691,403  
 
Total shareholders’ equity
  $ 3,102,493     $ 3,058,932     $ 2,874,342     $ 2,674,120     $ 2,927,371  
 
Number of Common Shares outstanding
    185,789       180,183       178,146       175,888       165,287  

45


Table of Contents

 
(1)  Income (losses) from other unconsolidated investees includes, in addition to the operations of the investees, ProLogis’ proportionate share of these items:
  •  2003: Impairment charge recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($38.3 million); net gains recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($5.2 million); a charge representing an adjustment to the amount recognized in 2002 as a result of the disposition of all of the operations and a significant portion of the assets of a temperature-controlled distribution investee ($2.3 million).
 
  •  2002: Impairment charge recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investees ($42.9 million), net gains recognized by its temperature-controlled distribution investees ($1.6 million) and charges recognized from the write-downs of technology related investments of unconsolidated investees ($2.1 million).
 
  •  2001: Impairment charges recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($88.4 million); net losses recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($4.4 million), net losses resulting from the write-off of technology related investments of its two investees ($5.8 million) and charges recognized from the write-downs of technology related investments of unconsolidated investees ($37.0 million).
     See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Other Components of Operating Income — Income (Losses) from Other Unconsolidated Investees.”
 
(2)  In 2004, ProLogis recognized a $3.3 million gain from the partial disposition of its investment in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V. In 2003, ProLogis recognized a $74.7 million gain on the partial redemption of its investment in ProLogis European Properties Fund, including a foreign currency exchange gain of $47.9 million resulting from the repatriation of the cash redemption proceeds to the United States.
 
(3)  In 2004, discontinued operations includes a loss from assets held for sale of $36.7 million (including an impairment charge of $50.6 million), operating income attributable to assets disposed of $1.7 million and net gains recognized on the disposition of assets of $34.3 million. Amounts for the years 2000 through 2003 represent the operating income attributable to assets disposed of in 2004 that are classified as discontinued operations. See Note 6 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 and in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Other Components of Operating Income — Discontinued Operations.”
 
(4)  In 2004, ProLogis redeemed $125.0 million of Preferred Shares (January 12, 2004). In 2003, ProLogis redeemed $175.0 million of Preferred Shares ($50.0 million on July 1, 2003 and $125.0 million on December 1, 2003). In 2001, ProLogis redeemed $139.6 million of Preferred Shares ($4.6 million on March 20, 2001 and $135.0 million on May 8, 2001) and $151.8 million of Preferred Shares were converted into Common Shares during the period from January 1, 2001 to March 20, 2001. In 2003, ProLogis issued $250.0 million of Preferred Shares ($125.0 million each on November 28, 2003 and December 30, 2003).
 
(5)  The recognition of these charges is discussed in Note 2 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 and in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Other Components of Operating Income — Excess of Redemption Values over Carrying Values of Preferred Shares Redeemed.”
 
(6)  The calculations of basic and dilutive earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are presented in Note 11 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. For 2001, the weighted average effect of converting ProLogis’ outstanding limited partnership units was antidilutive. For 2000, the weighted average effects of converting ProLogis’ outstanding convertible preferred shares and outstanding limited partnership units were antidilutive.
 
(7)  Funds from operations is a financial measure that is commonly used in the real estate industry. Although the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) has published a definition of

46


Table of Contents

funds from operations, modifications to the NAREIT calculation of funds from operations are common among REITs, as companies seek to provide performance measures that meaningfully reflect their business. Funds from operations, as defined by ProLogis, is presented as a supplemental performance measure. Funds from operations is not used by ProLogis as, nor should it be considered to be, an alternative to net earnings computed under GAAP as an indicator of ProLogis’ operating performance or as an alternative to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP as an indicator of ProLogis’ ability to fund its cash needs.
 
     Funds from operations is not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not present, nor does ProLogis intend it to present, a complete picture of its financial condition and operating performance. ProLogis believes that net earnings computed under GAAP remains the primary measure of performance and that funds from operations is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net earnings. Further, ProLogis believes that its consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of its financial condition and its operating performance. The funds from operations measure presented by ProLogis will not necessarily be comparable to similarly titled measures of other REITs.
 
     At the same time that NAREIT created and defined its funds from operations concept for the REIT industry, it also recognized that “management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.” ProLogis believes that financial analysts, potential investors and shareholders who review its operating results are best served by a defined funds from operations measure that includes other adjustments to net earnings computed under GAAP in addition to those included in the NAREIT defined measure of funds from operations. ProLogis’ funds from operations measure is discussed in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Funds from Operations.”
 
(8)  For purposes of calculating the weighted average Common Shares used for funds from operations purposes, the effects of converting ProLogis’ outstanding convertible preferred shares and outstanding weighted average limited partnership units were dilutive for each year. The weighted average convertible preferred shares (which were fully converted during 2001) applicable to this calculation are 1,544,000 and 8,417,000 for 2001 and 2000, respectively, and the applicable convertible preferred share dividends are $81,000 and $11,358,000 for 2001 and 2000, respectively. The weighted average limited partnership units applicable to this calculation are 5,035,000, 4,773,000, 4,938,000, 5,087,000 and 5,348,000 for 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The minority interest shares in earnings associated with these limited partnership units are $4,875,000, $4,959,000, $5,508,000, $5,968,000 and $5,586,000 for 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
 
(9)  At March 11, 2005, ProLogis had $1.11 million of total borrowings outstanding under its revolving lines of credit resulting in $693.0 million of borrowing capacity available (total capacity of $1.84 billion reduced by $34.6 million of letters of credit outstanding with lending banks at March 11, 2005).
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
      The following discussion should be read in conjunction with ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in Item 8 of this report.
      Some statements contained in this discussion are not historical facts but are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Because these forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which ProLogis operates, management’s beliefs and assumptions made by management, they involve uncertainties that could significantly impact ProLogis’ financial results. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include discussions of strategy, plans or intentions of management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. The discussions concerning ProLogis’ expectations with respect to economic conditions in the geographic areas where it has operations

47


Table of Contents

and its ability to raise private capital and generate income in the CDFS business segment (including the discussions with respect to ProLogis’ expectations as to the availability of capital in its existing property funds such that these property funds will be able to acquire ProLogis’ stabilized developed properties that are expected to be available for contribution in the future) contain forward-looking statements. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Factors that may affect outcomes and results include: (i) changes in general economic conditions in ProLogis’ markets that could adversely affect demand for ProLogis’ properties and the creditworthiness of ProLogis’ customers; (ii) changes in financial markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates that could adversely affect ProLogis’ cost of capital, its ability to meet its financial needs and obligations and its results of operations; (iii) increased or unanticipated competition for distribution properties in ProLogis’ markets; (iv) the availability of private capital to ProLogis; (v) geopolitical concerns and uncertainties; and (vi) those additional factors discussed under “— Risk Factors.”
Overview
      A summary of the discussions that follow in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is presented below.
      Results of Operations:
  •  ProLogis’ net earnings attributable to Common Shares were $202.8 million in 2004 and $212.4 million in 2003.
 
  •  Net operating income of ProLogis’ property operations segment increased by $17.6 million in 2004 over 2003; stabilized leased percentage at December 31, 2004 (92.3%) was higher than at December 31, 2003 (90.2%); rental rates on new leases of previously leased space decreased 4.7% in 2004; and same store net operating income, as defined, was 0.15% higher than in 2003.
 
  •  ProLogis’ income from property funds increased by $22.2 million in 2004, including an increase in fees earned from property funds of $6.6 million. Five new property funds were formed in 2004 and ProLogis acquired interests in two additional property funds in 2004.
 
  •  Operating income of ProLogis’ CDFS business segment was $49.5 million higher in 2004 than in 2003 due to higher transaction volume in Europe and Asia in 2004, while transaction volume in North America decreased slightly. Transaction volume in Europe in 2003 was lower than previous years as a result of slower leasing activity in the CDFS business segment’s properties.
 
  •  ProLogis recognized an impairment loss of $50.6 million related to the French operations of its temperature-controlled company that are held for sale at December 31, 2004. In 2003, ProLogis recognized a net loss under the equity method (including an impairment loss recognized prior to the sale) of $10.7 million related to the United Kingdom operations of this same company that were sold in December 2003.
 
  •  ProLogis recognized a gain of $3.3 million in 2004 from the partial disposition of its investment in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V. In 2003, ProLogis recognized a gain of $74.7 million on the partial redemption of its investment in ProLogis European Properties Fund, including a foreign currency exchange gain of $47.9 million resulting from the repatriation of the cash redemption proceeds to the United States.
 
  •  ProLogis initiated operations in China in 2004 by acquiring properties (through an unconsolidated investee) and by beginning development activities (both direct starts and through an unconsolidated investee).
 
  •  ProLogis acquired an operating property in Singapore and acquired land for future development in Canada in 2004.

48


Table of Contents

      Liquidity and Capital Resources:
  •  Generated net cash flow from operating activities in 2004 of $481.3 million.
 
  •  Used net cash in its investing activities of $612.5 million in 2004 (used $1.73 billion for real estate investments, used $333.5 million for the Keystone Transaction on a net basis and generated $1.41 billion from contributions and sales of properties and land parcels).
 
  •  ProLogis issued 350.0 million euro of senior notes that are registered on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (the currency equivalent of approximately $464.2 million at December 31, 2004). Cash proceeds to ProLogis were $420.6 million as of the issuance date in April 2004.
 
  •  Sales and issuances of Common Shares under various Common Share plans generated net cash of $146.8 million.
 
  •  Redeemed $125.0 million of Preferred Shares.
 
  •  Distributed $1.46 per Common Share in 2004 for aggregate distributions paid of $266.1 million ; set the distribution level for 2005 at $1.48 per Common Share. ProLogis has increased its Common Share distribution level every year since its Common Shares became publicly traded in 1994.
 
  •  Increased the total borrowing capacity under its lines of credit by 25.0 billion yen (approximately $241.1 million at December 31, 2003), total borrowing capacity was in excess of $1.8 billion at December 31, 2004.
Critical Accounting Policies
      A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of an entity’s financial condition and results of operations and requires judgment on the part of management. Generally, the judgment requires management to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Of the accounting policies discussed in Note 2 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, those presented below have been identified by ProLogis as critical accounting policies.
      Consolidation
      ProLogis’ consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ProLogis and all entities that ProLogis controls, either through ownership of a majority voting interest, as the primary beneficiary, or otherwise. Investments in entities in which ProLogis does not own a majority voting interest but over which ProLogis does have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are presented under the equity method. Investments in entities in which ProLogis does not own a majority voting interest and over which ProLogis does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, as appropriate. Management’s judgments with respect to its level of influence or control of an entity and whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity involve consideration of various factors including the form of ProLogis’ ownership interest, its representation on the entity’s board of directors, the size of its investment (including loans) and ProLogis’ ability to participate in policy making decisions. Management’s ability to correctly assess its influence or control over an entity affects the presentation of these investments in ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements and, consequently, its financial position and specific items in its results of operations that are used by its shareholders, potential investors, industry analysts and lenders in their evaluation of ProLogis.
      Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
      ProLogis and its unconsolidated investees assess the carrying values of their respective long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be recoverable and, with respect to goodwill, at least annually applying a fair-value-based test. The determination of the fair values of long-lived assets, including goodwill, involves significant judgment. This judgment is based on management’s analysis and estimates of the future operating results and resulting cash flows of each long-

49


Table of Contents

lived asset. Management’s ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows impacts the determination of fair value.
      If there is a decline in the fair value of a long-lived asset combined with a history of the asset generating operating losses, ProLogis or its unconsolidated investees will be required to determine whether the operating losses associated with the asset will continue. Management’s assessment as to the nature of a decline in fair value is primarily based on estimates of future operating results, the resulting cash flows and ProLogis’ intent to either hold or dispose of the long-lived asset. If an investment is considered impaired, a write-down is recognized based on these analyses.
      Revenue Recognition
      ProLogis recognizes gains and losses from the contributions and sales of real estate assets, generally at the time the title is transferred and ProLogis has no future involvement as a direct owner of the real estate asset contributed or sold. In many of its transactions, an entity in which ProLogis has an ownership interest will acquire a real estate asset from ProLogis. Management makes judgments based on the specific terms of each transaction as to the amount of the total profit from the transaction that ProLogis can recognize given its continuing ownership interest and its level of future involvement with the investee that acquires the assets. Management’s ability to accurately assess the provisions of each transaction under the accounting guidelines for profit recognition could impact ProLogis’ financial position and specific items in its results of operations that are used by shareholders, potential investors, industry analysts and lenders in their evaluation of ProLogis.
      Depreciation and Useful Lives of Real Estate Assets
      ProLogis estimates the depreciable portion of its real estate assets and their related useful lives in order to record depreciation expense. Management’s ability to accurately estimate the depreciable portions of its real estate assets and their useful lives is critical to the determination of the appropriate amount of depreciation expense recorded and the carrying values of the underlying assets. Any change to the estimated depreciable lives of these assets would have an impact on the depreciation expense recognized by ProLogis.
Keystone Transaction
      On May 3, 2004, ProLogis and affiliates of four investment funds managed by Eaton Vance Management (the “Fund Affiliates”) established five property funds (the “Acquiring Property Funds” and also referred to by ProLogis as ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI, VII, VIII, IX and X — see Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8). ProLogis has a 20% ownership interest in each of the Acquiring Property Funds with the remainder owned by the Fund Affiliates. Also on May 3, 2004, ProLogis and the Acquiring Property Funds entered into an agreement to acquire the outstanding equity of Keystone Property Trust (“Keystone”), a publicly traded REIT, and the operating units of Keystone Operating Partnership, L.P., a subsidiary of Keystone (the “Keystone Transaction”). Keystone owned and leased industrial distribution properties located in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Florida, South Carolina and Ohio. The acquisition of Keystone by ProLogis and the Acquiring Property Funds was approved by Keystone’s shareholders on July 30, 2004 and was closed on August 4, 2004. Prior to the closing of the Keystone Transaction, ProLogis contributed 21 operating properties aggregating 3.0 million square feet to the Acquiring Property Funds. Total proceeds from these contributions, which were completed on June 30, 2004, were $127.4 million. See Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
      At closing, ProLogis and the Acquiring Property Funds paid $23.80 per Keystone common share outstanding and retired approximately $567 million of Keystone’s outstanding debt. On September 3, 2004, ProLogis and the Acquiring Property Funds paid a cash liquidation distribution of approximately $125 million, including accrued dividends, to the holders of the outstanding preferred shares of Keystone and Keystone was liquidated. Including these payments, assumed liabilities (including the issuance of limited partnership units to certain of Keystone’s limited partners) and estimated transaction costs, the total consideration for the Keystone Transaction was approximately $1.7 billion. ProLogis’ share of the total consideration was approximately $579 million, including its investment in the Acquiring Property Funds of approximately

50


Table of Contents

$279 million and its direct acquisition of certain assets and direct assumption of certain liabilities aggregating on a net basis approximately $300 million.
      ProLogis’ direct acquisition, completed through a limited partnership in which limited partnership units were issued, included:
  •  nine operating properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet, one 0.8 million square foot property under development, 14 acres of land and land option rights that were valued on a combined basis at approximately $145 million;
 
  •  ownership interests in two unconsolidated property funds (20% interest in each) that own on a combined basis 7.7 million square feet of operating properties that were valued at approximately $102 million (including the proportionate assumption of approximately $26 million of secured debt of the property funds);
 
  •  ownership interests in two unconsolidated CDFS business joint ventures (50% interest in each); one entity owns a recently completed 0.8 million square foot operating property and one entity in the planning stage for the development of a 0.8 million square foot property that were valued on a combined basis at approximately $15 million (including the proportionate assumption of approximately $6 million of secured debt);
 
  •  a preferred equity interest in an unconsolidated entity that owns office properties that was valued at approximately $21 million; and
 
  •  certain other assets, net of certain other liabilities that were valued at approximately $7 million.
      In addition to the net assets acquired through the limited partnership, ProLogis, through its wholly owned subsidiary ProLogis Logistics Services Incorporated (“ProLogis Logistics”), directly acquired an interest in a management company owned by Keystone. The management company has the contractual rights to earn fees for providing property management and other services to the unconsolidated entities directly acquired by ProLogis through the limited partnership. These contractual rights were valued at approximately $13 million, of which approximately $10 million is attributable to ProLogis’ ownership interest. The management company is a variable interest entity. Accordingly, ProLogis, as the primary beneficiary, presents the management company on a consolidated basis in its financial statements. The total value of the contractual rights is reflected as a part of other assets and the Acquiring Property Funds’ portion of these rights, approximately $3 million, is reflected as a minority interest liability.
      ProLogis’ share of the total consideration of approximately $579 million was funded through:
  •  the issuance of approximately 879,000 limited partnership units that are redeemable for cash or, at ProLogis’ election, into one share of Common Shares; valued at approximately $30 million;
 
  •  the direct assumption of secured debt, valued at approximately $13 million;
 
  •  the indirect assumption of secured debt of unconsolidated investees, valued at approximately $32 million; and
 
  •  cash of approximately $504 million, including approximately $177 million that was funded on a short-term basis at closing pending the completion of long-term, secured financing arrangements by the Acquiring Property Funds.
      In addition, both ProLogis and the Fund Affiliates advanced cash to the Acquiring Property Funds to meet their initial working capital and liquidity requirements, of which ProLogis’ share was approximately $6 million.
      The allocation of the total consideration to the net assets acquired in the Keystone Transaction is based on a preliminary assessment and is subject to change as additional information becomes available.
      The Acquiring Property Funds completed secured financing arrangements in the fourth quarter of 2004. The total proceeds from these financing arrangements of approximately $892 million were returned to the

51


Table of Contents

Fund Affiliates (approximately $715 million) and ProLogis (approximately $177 million). On a combined basis, the financing arrangements have an average term of eight years and provide for an average annual interest rate of 5.48%.
Results of Operations
      ProLogis’ net earnings attributable to Common Shares were $202.8 million in 2004, $212.4 million in 2003 and $216.2 million in 2002. Basic and diluted net earnings attributable to Common Shares were $1.11 and $1.08 per share, respectively, in 2004, $1.18 and $1.16 per share, respectively, in 2003 and $1.22 and $1.20 per share, respectively, in 2002.
      Property Operations
      In addition to its directly owned operating properties, ProLogis includes its investments in property funds that are presented under the equity method in its property operations segment. See Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. ProLogis owned operating properties directly or had ownership interests in operating properties through its investments in property funds as follows as of the dates indicated (square feet in thousands):
                                                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
        Square       Square       Square
    Number   Feet   Number   Feet   Number   Feet
                         
Direct ownership
    1,228       133,630       1,252       133,141       1,230       127,956  
Property funds(1)
    708       149,141       485       97,219       444       82,633  
                                     
 
Totals
    1,936       282,771       1,737       230,360       1,674       210,589  
                                     
 
(1)  ProLogis’ ownership interests in the property funds ranged from 11.5% to 50% at December 31, 2004.
      See “Item 2. Properties — Properties” and “Item 2. Properties — Unconsolidated Investees.”
      The net operating income of ProLogis’ property operations segment consists of: (i) rental income and rental expenses from the operating properties that are directly owned by ProLogis; (ii) income recognized by ProLogis under the equity method from its investments in the property funds; (iii) fees and other income earned by ProLogis for services performed on behalf of the property funds, primarily property management and asset management services; and (iv) interest earned on advances to the property funds, if any. The net earnings or losses generated by operating properties that were developed or acquired in the CDFS business segment are included in the property operations segment during the interim period from the date of completion or acquisition through the date the properties are contributed or sold. See “Item 1. “Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — Property Operations”, “Item 1. Business — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business” and Note 12 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
      The amounts recognized under the equity method represent ProLogis’ proportionate share of the net earnings or loss of each property fund based on its ownership interest in the property fund. The net earnings or losses of the property funds includes the following income and expense items of the property funds, in addition to rental income and rental expenses: (i) interest income and interest expense; (ii) depreciation and amortization expenses; (iii) general and administrative expenses; (iv) income taxes; and (v) foreign currency exchange gains and losses, with respect to ProLogis European Properties Fund. See Notes 5 and 12 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. ProLogis’ net operating income from the property operations segment was as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands of U.S. dollars).

52


Table of Contents

                                 
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
Properties directly owned by ProLogis:
                       
 
Rental income(1)(2)
  $ 544,663     $ 542,840     $ 539,575  
 
Rental expenses(1)(3)
    142,280       135,779       124,629  
                   
   
Net operating income
    402,383       407,061       414,946  
                   
Property funds(4):
                       
 
Income from ProLogis California(5)
    15,971       14,229       14,379  
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund I(5)
    4,768       5,177       5,997  
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund II(5)
    3,287       2,381       3,645  
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund III(5)
    2,452       2,827       2,779  
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV(5)
    1,913       1,924       1,977  
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund V(6)
    13,049       12,500       7,544  
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI(7)
    1,489              
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII(7)
    1,052              
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII(7)
    849              
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX(7)
    603              
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund X(7)
    975              
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI(8)
    816              
 
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII(8)
    813              
 
Income from ProLogis European Properties Fund(9)
    37,886       30,190       24,162  
 
Income from ProLogis Japan Properties Fund(10)
    7,754       2,221       239  
                   
       
Subtotal property funds
    93,677       71,449       60,722  
                   
     
Total property operations segment
  $ 496,060     $ 478,510     $ 475,668  
                   
 
  (1)  Amounts do not include rental income and rental expenses associated with 20 properties that are presented as discontinued operations in ProLogis’ Consolidated Statements of Earnings in Item 8. The amounts are:
  •  Rental income of $2,949,000 in 2004; $3,224,000 in 2003 and $2,627,000 in 2002, including rental expense recoveries of $0.2 million in 2004, $0.4 million in 2003 and $0.3 million in 2002.
 
  •  Rental expenses of $777,000 in 2004; $1,061,000 in 2003 and $687,000 in 2002.
  (2)  The number and composition of operating properties that are directly owned by ProLogis throughout the periods presented impact rental income for each period. Rental income includes net termination and renegotiation fees of $2.4 million in 2004, $4.5 million in 2003 and $14.6 million in 2002. In certain leasing situations, ProLogis finds it advantageous to negotiate lease terminations with a customer,

53


Table of Contents

  particularly when the customer is experiencing financial difficulties or when ProLogis believes that it can re-lease the space at rates that, when combined with the termination fee, provides a total return to ProLogis in excess of what was being earned under the original lease terms. ProLogis cannot predict the level of such fees that will be earned in the future or whether ProLogis will be successful in re-leasing, in a timely manner, the vacant space associated with the lease terminations.
 
       Rental expense recoveries from customers, a component of rental income, were $101.0 million in 2004, $99.0 million in 2003 and $92.4 million in 2002.
 
       Rental income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees and rental expense recoveries and including discontinued operations, was $444.0 million in 2004, $442.1 million in 2003 and, $434.9 million in 2002. In 2004, the average occupancy levels were higher than in 2003. In 2003, the average occupancy levels were lower than 2002 levels; however, the increase in the number of properties in the directly owned portfolio in 2003 was sufficient to mitigate this effect.
 
  (3)  The number and composition of operating properties that are directly owned by ProLogis throughout the periods presented impacts rental expenses for each period. Rental expenses, including discontinued operations were $143.1 million in 2004, $136.9 million in 2003 and $125.3 million in 2002. Rental expenses are presented before any recoveries from customers, which are a component of rental income. Also, ProLogis reports the costs of managing the properties owned by property funds as part of rental expenses. When a property is contributed to a property fund, ProLogis begins reporting its share of the earnings of the property under the equity method along with fee income earned for services provided to the property funds, and no longer reports the operations of the property as part of its rental income and rental expenses. However, the overhead costs to provide the management services to the property fund continues to be reported as part of rental expenses.
 
       Rental expenses as a percentage of rental income, before rental expense recoveries and termination and renegotiation fees and including discontinued operations, were 32.2% in 2004, 31.0% in 2003 and 28.8% in 2002. Total rental expense recoveries were 71.0%, 72.9% and 74.2% of total rental expenses in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These trends are the result of lower average occupancy levels that have been experienced over this three-year period and due to the inclusion of the property management expenses associated with a higher number of managed properties in rental expenses. Lower occupancy levels will result in certain fixed costs being borne directly by ProLogis in instances where customers are not occupying the space to which the expenses relate. Additionally, ProLogis will absorb a higher percentage of common area costs when occupancy levels are lower because there are fewer customers available from whom these costs can be recovered.
 
  (4)  The income from property funds includes fees earned by ProLogis for providing services to the property funds of $50.8 million in 2004, $44.2 million in 2003 and $34.5 million in 2002. As part of the Keystone Transaction (see “— Keystone Transaction”), ProLogis began earning fees from ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through XII in 2004. These fees aggregated $3.6 million.
 
  (5)  ProLogis’ ownership interest in the property fund was the same for all periods presented and each of the property funds was in operation with substantially the same portfolio of properties for all periods presented. ProLogis’ ownership interests are: ProLogis California (50%); ProLogis North American Properties Fund I (41.3%); ProLogis North American Properties Fund II (20%); ProLogis North American Properties Fund III (20%) and ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV (20%). With respect to each property fund, fluctuations between years in the amount that ProLogis recognizes under the equity method are generally due to occupancy levels and the amount of termination and renegotiation fees earned by the property fund. Additionally, fees earned by ProLogis for providing services to the property fund for other than property management and asset management services can fluctuate from year to year. ProLogis’ share of the net earnings of ProLogis California for 2004 includes $0.7 million of net gains from property dispositions.
 
  (6)  ProLogis North American Properties Fund V has continued to acquire properties (generally from ProLogis) and increase its portfolio size since its inception on March 28, 2002. ProLogis’ ownership interest in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V was 11.5% at December 31, 2004, 14.0% at

54


Table of Contents

  December 31, 2003 and 16.1% at December 31, 2002. ProLogis earned fees other than for property management, asset management and leasing of $1.5 million in 2004, $3.9 million in 2003 and $5.2 million in 2002. Excluding these fees, ProLogis recognized income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund V of $11.5 million, $8.6 million and $2.3 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These amounts correspond with the growth in the portfolio over the three years (119 properties, 28.3 million square feet at December 31, 2004; 90 properties, 20.7 million square feet at December 31, 2003; 57 properties, 12.0 million square feet at December 31, 2002).
 
  (7)  ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through X began operations on June 20, 2004 when ProLogis contributed 21 properties aggregating 3.0 million square feet to the five property funds. Upon completion of the Keystone Transaction, ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through X collectively acquired an additional 22.5 million square feet of properties. ProLogis has a 20% ownership interest in each property fund. (see “ — Keystone Transaction).
 
  (8)  ProLogis North American Properties Funds XI and XII were formed by Keystone. ProLogis acquired Keystone’s 20% ownership interest in each of these property funds as part of the Keystone Transaction. These property funds own a combined 26 properties aggregating 7.7 million square feet (see “— Keystone Transaction”).
 
  (9)  ProLogis European Properties Fund has continued to acquire properties, generally from ProLogis, and increase its portfolio size since it began operations in 1999. ProLogis’ ownership interest in ProLogis European Properties Fund was 21.8% at December 31, 2004, 21.9% at December 31, 2003 and 29.6% at December 31, 2002.
 
       Amounts presented for ProLogis European Properties Fund include ProLogis’ proportionate share of net foreign currency exchange gains and losses. These amounts were net losses of $0.4 million in 2004, $13.4 million in 2003 and $4.5 million in 2002. Excluding these net foreign currency exchange losses, ProLogis’ proportionate share of the net earnings of ProLogis European Properties Fund was $38.3 million, $43.6 million and $28.7 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The fluctuations in the income recognized by ProLogis from its ownership in this property fund, excluding net foreign currency exchange losses, are the result of the following factors; (i) the size of the portfolio and occupancy levels in each period; (ii) increases in the fees earned by ProLogis for services provided to the property fund due to the increase in the number of properties managed by ProLogis; (iii) higher interest costs associated with the higher debt levels that primarily result from the use of debt to acquire the additional properties; (iv) decreases in ProLogis’ ownership interest in each year and (v) variances in the average foreign currency exchange rate at which ProLogis translates its share of the net earnings of the ProLogis European Properties Fund to U.S. dollars.
(10)  ProLogis Japan Properties Fund portfolio has grown to 13 properties aggregating 3.9 million square feet at December 31, 2004 from five properties aggregating 1.6 million square feet at December 31, 2003 and from one 0.2 million square foot property at December 31, 2002. ProLogis’ ownership interest in ProLogis Japan Properties Fund has been 20% since its inception on September 24, 2002. The increases in the amounts recognized by ProLogis under the equity method from its ownership in this property fund correspond with the growth in the portfolio over the three years.
      The stabilized operating properties owned by ProLogis and the property funds were 92.3% leased at December 31, 2004, 90.2% leased at December 31, 2003 and 91.2% leased at December 31, 2002. A property enters the stabilized pool at the earlier of 12 months from acquisition or completion or when it becomes substantially leased, which is defined by ProLogis generally as 93%. Therefore, ProLogis’ stabilized properties are generally those properties where the capital improvements, repositioning efforts, new management and new marketing programs for acquisitions or the marketing programs in the case of newly developed properties, have been completed and in effect for a sufficient period of time.
      Changes in economic conditions will generally impact customer leasing decisions and absorption of new distribution properties. Weakening economic conditions in the United States and certain Western European countries and certain geopolitical concerns and uncertainties, primarily in Europe, negatively impacted ProLogis’ stabilized occupancy levels in the last half of 2002 and in 2003. ProLogis observed improvements in North American absorption and occupancy levels beginning in the second quarter of 2004. At that same time,

55


Table of Contents

ProLogis began to experience improvements in leasing activity in Europe, primarily with respect to its existing pipeline of CDFS business assets that were included in the property operations segment prior to being contributed or sold. With respect to Japan, ProLogis has not observed similar negative trends in economic conditions and continues to experience consistent demand for distribution space in its properties. ProLogis expects that the overall economic improvements experienced in 2004 will continue in 2005.
      ProLogis believes that the positive trends in occupancies in North America and Europe will continue in 2005. However, ProLogis does not believe that occupancies will improve to the levels experienced in the 1999 to 2001 period, when occupancies were as high as 96.5%. ProLogis continues to believe that shifts in distribution patterns of its customers throughout the world and their needs to reduce their distribution costs have been, and will continue to be, key drivers of leasing decisions. ProLogis believes that the diversification of its global operating platform and the ProLogis Operating System have somewhat mitigated the effects of market occupancy decreases.
      Rental rates in 2004 for both new and renewed leases for previously leased space (49.5 million square feet) for all properties, including those owned by the property funds, decreased by 4.7% as compared to a rental rate decrease of 4.8% in 2003 and rental rate growth of 2.0% in 2002 on similar transactions. ProLogis believes that the negative rental rate growth experienced in 2004 continues to be the result of economic conditions that have depressed current market rents such that they are generally below the rents that ProLogis was earning on expiring leases. ProLogis believes that this trend in rental rates will continue, although at a decreasing rate, through mid-2005.
      ProLogis’ management evaluates the operating performance of its property operations segment, its management personnel and individual markets using a “same store” analysis because the population of properties in this analysis is consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of changes in the composition of the portfolio on performance measures. ProLogis includes properties owned directly and properties owned by its property funds in the same store analysis. Accordingly, ProLogis defines its same store portfolio of operating properties for each quarter as those properties that have been in operation throughout the full quarter in both the current year and the prior year. When a property is disposed of to a third party it will be removed from the population for the current quarter and the corresponding quarter of the prior year only. ProLogis’ same store portfolio ranged from 207.2 million square feet to 206.3 million square feet (ProLogis adjusts its same-store portfolio for dispositions on a quarterly basis). Net operating income generated by the same store portfolio, defined for the same store analysis as rental income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees, less rental expenses, increased by 0.15% for 2004 from 2003. For 2003, the net operating income of the same store portfolio applicable to that period increased by 0.09% over 2002. The same store portfolio’s rental rates decreased in 2004 by 5.8%. ProLogis believes that the factors that result in decreases in net operating income and decreases in rental rates in the same store portfolio are the same as for its total portfolio. The percentage change presented is the weighted average of the measure computed separately for ProLogis and each of the property funds with the weighting based on each entity’s proportionate share of the combined component on which the change is computed. In order to derive an appropriate measure of period-to-period operating performance, the percentage change computation removes the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements by computing each property’s components in that property’s functional currency.
      Rental income computed under GAAP applicable to the properties included in the same store portfolio is adjusted to remove the net termination and renegotiation fees recognized in each period. Net termination and renegotiation fees excluded from rental income for the same store portfolio (including properties directly owned and properties owned by the property funds) were $3.7 million for 2004 and $5.6 million for 2003. Net termination and renegotiation fees represent the gross fee negotiated to allow a customer to terminate or renegotiate their lease, offset by that customer’s rent leveling asset that has been previously recognized under GAAP, if any. Removing the net termination fees from the same store calculation of rental income allows ProLogis’ management to evaluate the growth or decline in each property’s rental income without regard to items that are not indicative of the property’s recurring operating performance. Customer terminations are negotiated under specific circumstances and are not subject to specific provisions or rights allowed under the lease agreements.

56


Table of Contents

      In computing the percentage change in rental expenses, the rental expenses applicable to the properties in the same store portfolio include property management expenses for ProLogis’ directly owned properties. These expenses are based on the property management fee that is provided for in the individual agreements under which ProLogis’ wholly owned management company provides property management services to each property (generally the fee is based on a percentage of revenues). On consolidation, the management fee income earned by the management company and the management fee expense recognized by the properties are eliminated and the direct costs of providing property management services are recognized as part of ProLogis’ rental expenses reported under GAAP.
      CDFS Business
      Net operating income from ProLogis’ CDFS business segment consists primarily of: (i) gains and losses resulting from the contributions and sales of developed properties and from the contributions of properties that were acquired with the intent to contribute the properties to a property fund, including properties that have been rehabilitated and/or repositioned; (ii) gains and losses from the dispositions of land parcels; (iii) development management fees earned by ProLogis for services provided to third parties; and (iv) land holding costs and pursuit cost write-offs associated with CDFS business assets.
      Income from the CDFS business segment is dependent on ProLogis’ ability to develop and timely lease properties, or to acquire properties that eventually can be contributed to property funds or sold to third parties, generating profits to ProLogis, and ProLogis’ success in raising private capital that can be used to acquire its properties, generally accomplished through the formation of property funds, but also from other sources. For 2004, ProLogis’ net operating income in this segment increased from 2003 by $49.5 million (an increase of $82.3 million when the gains from dispositions of CDFS business properties that are presented as discontinued operations are included). The net operating income in 2004 includes a net gain of $4.7 million as a result of recognizing net contingent proceeds related to a 2003 contribution.
      The increase in the gains recognized in 2004 from 2003 reflects higher gross margins, particularly associated with the 2004 transactions in the United Kingdom and Japan, a higher volume of transactions (based on cost) in 2004, including more sales of land parcels in 2004, and increases in the foreign currency exchange rates that were used to translate gains recognized in Europe and Japan to U.S. dollars in 2004. ProLogis attributes the volume of transactions in 2004 to improved leasing activity for CDFS business properties, mostly in Europe, but also in Asia, and also to its ability to raise private capital. ProLogis believes that the increase in leasing activity results from improvements in economic conditions that have positively impacted its customers’ decision-making processes with respect to changes in their distribution networks. There can be no assurance that ProLogis will be able to maintain or increase the current level of net operating income in this segment. ProLogis cannot predict the effects that economic conditions or other uncertainties, including geopolitical concerns, will have on its ability to lease its properties. If ProLogis is unable to timely lease its completed developments and repositioned acquisitions, it will be unable to contribute these properties to property funds or otherwise dispose of the properties and would be unable to recognize profits from its CDFS business activities in the anticipated reporting period. See “Item 1. ProLogis — ProLogis’ Operating Segments — CDFS Business — Future Plans,” “— Risk Factors — General Real Estate Risks — Risks Associated with the Contribution and Sale of Properties” and “— Risk Factors — Financing and Capital Risks — Access to Capital.”

57


Table of Contents

      The CDFS business segment’s net operating income includes the following components for the periods indicated (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
                                       
        Year Ended
    Years Ended December 31,   December 31,
        2002(1)
    2004   2003   2002(1)   (ProForma)
                 
CDFS transactions:
                               
 
Net proceeds from dispositions(2)
  $ 1,322,084     $ 894,853     $ 972,623     $ 1,118,989  
 
Contingent proceeds realized(3)
    5,871                    
 
Proceeds deferred and not recognized(3)(4)
    (43,433 )     (20,991 )     (41,775 )     (46,765 )
 
Recognition of previously deferred amounts(4)
    4,143       27,116       10,155       11,614  
 
Costs of assets disposed of(2)
    (1,111,698 )     (774,452 )     (818,739 )     (946,734 )
                         
     
Net gains
    176,967       126,526       122,264       137,104  
Development management fees and other CDFS income
    2,698       2,349       4,509       10,222  
Income from CDFS Joint Ventures(5)
    189       730       551       551  
Income from Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC(1)
                29,531        
Other expenses and charges(6)
    (5,519 )     (4,808 )     (4,541 )     (4,592 )
Other(7)
                      9,029  
                         
   
Total CDFS business segment
  $ 174,335     $ 124,797     $ 152,314     $ 152,314  
                         
CDFS transactions recognized as discontinued operations(8):
                               
 
Net proceeds from dispositions
  $ 240,983     $     $     $  
 
Costs of assets disposed of
    (208,264 )                  
                         
     
Net CDFS gains in discontinued operations
  $ 32,719     $     $     $  
                         
 
(1)  ProLogis began presenting its investment in ProLogis UK Holdings S.A., formerly Kingspark Holding S.A., (collectively with its subsidiaries “Kingspark S.A.”), a Luxembourg company that performs CDFS business activities in the United Kingdom, and its investment in Kingspark LLC, a holding company that held the voting ownership interests of Kingspark S.A., on a consolidated basis on July 1, 2002. These investments were previously presented under the equity method. The changes in the reporting methods applicable to these entities occurred when ProLogis acquired (directly or indirectly) 100% of the ownership interests (voting and non-voting) of Kingspark S.A. To allow for comparability between periods, ProLogis also presents the components of the CDFS business segment’s net operating income on a proforma basis as if Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC were presented on a consolidated basis for all of 2002.
 
(2)  The net proceeds and costs of assets disposed of related to transactions for the following assets (proceeds in 2003 include $35.9 million generated by the significant reduction of investment in a CDFS joint venture):
  •  2004: 180 acres; 17.2 million square feet;
 
  •  2003: 208 acres; 14.2 million square feet; and
 
  •  2002: 45 acres; 16.9 million (68 acres, 18.1 million square feet on a proforma basis).
  Also in 2003, ProLogis included charges of $6.3 million in its cost of assets disposed of that related to properties that were previously contributed to property funds. These charges were primarily associated

58


Table of Contents

  with the settlement of customer balances and additional costs associated with the transfers of certain properties in Mexico.
(3)  A contribution to ProLogis Japan Properties Fund in 2003 provided for an additional $5.9 million of proceeds, the receipt of which was contingent on the satisfactory performance of certain activities by ProLogis. These activities were completed in 2004. The receipt of these proceeds resulted in the recognition of an additional gain in 2004 of $4.7 million, after deferral.
 
(4)  When ProLogis contributes a property to a property fund in which it has an ownership interest, ProLogis does not recognize a portion of the proceeds in its computation of the gain resulting from the contribution. The amount of the proceeds that cannot be recognized is determined based on ProLogis’ continuing ownership interest in the contributed property that arises due to ProLogis’ ownership interest in the property fund that acquires the property. ProLogis defers this portion of the proceeds by recognizing a reduction to its investment in the respective property fund. ProLogis adjusts its proportionate share of the earnings or loss that it recognizes under the equity method from the property fund in later periods to reflect the property fund’s depreciation expense as if the depreciation expense was computed on ProLogis’ lower basis in the contributed property rather than on the property fund’s basis in the contributed property. If a loss results when a property is contributed to a property fund, the entire loss is recognized.
 
     When a property that ProLogis originally contributed to a property fund is disposed of to a third party by the property fund, ProLogis recognizes the net amount of the proceeds that it had previously deferred in results of operations in the period that the disposition to the third party occurs. Further, during periods when ProLogis’ ownership interest in a property fund decreases, ProLogis will recognize gains to the extent that previously deferred proceeds are recognized to coincide with ProLogis’ new ownership interest in the property fund. ProLogis’ ownership interests in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V and ProLogis European Properties Fund decreased from time to time. When this occurs, previously deferred proceeds are recognized as gains in the period the ownership decrease occurs. Of the total for 2004, $3.3 million related to an ownership decrease in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V from the partial disposition of ProLogis’ investment. Of the total for 2003, $25.9 million related to an ownership decrease in ProLogis European Properties Fund resulting from the partial redemption of ProLogis’ investment.
 
(5)  Represents the income that ProLogis recognizes under the equity method from the CDFS Joint Ventures. ProLogis’ ownership interest in each of the CDFS Joint Ventures is 50%. See Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
 
(6)  Includes land holding costs of $2.7 million, $2.9 million and $2.8 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and the write-off of previously capitalized pursuit costs related to potential CDFS business segment projects of $2.8 million, $1.9 million and $1.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
 
(7)  The income recognized by ProLogis under the equity method from its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC for the six months in 2002 includes items that, when presented on a consolidated basis, would not be included in the CDFS business segment’s operating income. Such items include:
  •  Net rental income of $1.7 million ;
 
  •  General and administrative expenses of $1.6 million;
 
  •  Interest income of $0.2 million;
 
  •  Current income tax expense of $2.6 million;
 
  •  Gross interest expense of $0.9 million and additional capitalized interest of $8.0 million;
 
  •  Depreciation and amortization expense of $0.2 million; and
 
  •  Net foreign currency exchange gains of $4.4 million.
(8)  Ten CDFS business properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet that were sold to third parties in 2004 met the criteria to be presented as discontinued operations in 2004. See Note 6 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

59


Table of Contents

      ProLogis continues to monitor leasing activity and general economic conditions as it pertains to its CDFS business segment. In the United States, ProLogis observed the early signs of economic recovery in 2004 and believes that continued improvement could provide increased CDFS business opportunities to ProLogis given its portfolio of properties available and under development. ProLogis acquired land for development in Toronto, Ontario and believes that this market along with its existing Mexico markets will provide opportunities within in the CDFS business segment in the future. In Europe, ProLogis believes that the continued demand for state-of-the-art distribution properties, improvement in economic conditions and lessening of geopolitical concerns resulted in its improved leasing activity in 2004. Such factors could continue to provide opportunities for ProLogis in the CDFS business segment. In Asia, as in Europe, ProLogis believes that demand for state-of-the-art distribution properties will continue to provide opportunities for ProLogis in the CDFS business segment. In Japan, the CDFS business opportunities available to ProLogis will be limited if ProLogis is unable to acquire adequate land parcels for development. In China, ProLogis is positioning itself to meet what it believes will be significant future demand for distribution space.
      Other Components of Operating Income
           General and Administrative Expenses
      General and administrative expenses were $82.1 million in 2004, $65.9 million in 2003 and $53.9 million in 2002. Had ProLogis presented its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC on a consolidated basis for all of 2002, ProLogis would have recognized total general and administrative expenses of $55.5 million for 2002. General and administrative expenses are primarily a function of the various business initiatives being undertaken in a given period. Increases in general administrative expenses in 2004 over 2003 and 2002 levels are the result of: (i) the international expansion of ProLogis’ operating platform; (ii) increases in share compensation expense (the value of share compensation awards is a function of the trading price of ProLogis’ Common Shares, which has increased from 2002 levels); and (iii) the average foreign currency exchange rate used to translate to U.S. dollars the general and administrative expenses recognized by ProLogis’ foreign subsidiaries prior to consolidation was significantly higher in 2004 as compared to 2003 and 2002.
      For a discussion of the presentation of ProLogis’ investment in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC, see Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
           Relocation Expenses
      ProLogis is relocating its information technology and corporate accounting functions from El Paso, Texas to Denver, Colorado and its Denver-based employees to a new corporate headquarters. The relocation from El Paso will be completed in the first quarter of 2005 and the relocation to the new corporate headquarters, which is located in Denver and is currently under development, is expected to be completed by the end of 2005.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004, ProLogis recognized total relocation expenses of $6.8 million, including $2.6 million of employee termination benefits, $1.8 million of accelerated depreciation associated with non-real estate assets whose useful life has been shortened due to the relocation plans and $2.4 million of costs associated with the hiring and training of new personnel and other costs, including travel and temporary facility costs. ProLogis expects that the cost of its relocation activities to be expensed in 2005 will be between $6 million and $8 million.

60


Table of Contents

           Income (Losses) from Other Unconsolidated Investees, Net
      ProLogis recognized its proportionate share of the net earnings or losses of each of its unconsolidated investees that are not included in one of its operating segments, including interest income, if any, as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
                               
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
Temperature-controlled distribution investees:
                       
 
CSI/Frigo LLC(1)
  $     $ (1,694 )   $ (1,824 )
 
TCL Holding(2)
          (9,050 )     4,765  
 
Wiener Kuhlhaus(3)
    1,188              
 
ProLogis Logistics(1)(4)
    (1,703 )     (2,269 )     4,131  
                   
   
Subtotals
    (515 )     (13,013 )     7,072  
                   
Other investees:
                       
 
Insight
    (475 )     (5 )     4  
 
ProLogis Equipment Services(5)
          57       574  
 
GoProLogis(6)
                (2,073 )
                   
   
Subtotals
    (475 )     52       (1,495 )
                   
     
Totals
  $ (990 )   $ (12,961 )   $ 5,577  
                   
 
(1)  This investment is presented on a consolidated basis in 2004. CSI/ Frigo LLC is a limited liability company that owns 100% of the voting common stock of TCL Holding, representing 5% of its net earnings or losses. ProLogis owns 89% of the membership interests of this entity but recognizes 95% of its net earnings or losses through a participating note agreement. CSI/Frigo LLC and TCL Holding are presented on a consolidated basis in 2004. CSI/Frigo also had an ownership interest in ProLogis Logistics, representing 5% of its net earnings or losses. ProLogis acquired this interest on October 23, 2002. See Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
 
(2)  This investment is presented on a consolidated basis in 2004. For 2003 and 2002, ProLogis’ effective ownership interest in TCL Holding was in excess of 99%, including its ownership in CSI/Frigo LLC. TCL Holding owns TCL Holding AB (formerly Frigoscandia Holding AB), a temperature-controlled distribution company that operates in Europe. During the years 2002 to 2003, TCL Holding and TCL Holding AB recognized net gains and losses from the dispositions of TCL Holding AB’s operations and operating assets in 10 countries. ProLogis’ proportionate share of the aggregate net gains from these asset dispositions was $0.5 million (a $5.2 million net gain in 2003 and a $4.7 million net loss in 2002). Also related to these dispositions, TCL Holding and TCL Holding AB recognized impairment charges associated with TCL Holdings’ investment in TCL Holding AB and the carrying value of TCL Holding AB’s property, plant and equipment. Through its investment in TCL Holding, ProLogis’ proportionate share of impairment charges recorded by TCL Holding and TCL Holding AB was $38.3 million in 2003 and $5.7 million in 2002. See Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
 
(3)  TCL Holding has an investment in a temperature-controlled distribution company operating in Austria. While ProLogis’ investment in TCL Holding was presented under the equity method, this investment was not separately reported by ProLogis. See Note 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
 
(4)  ProLogis invested in ProLogis Logistics, which owns CS Integrated LLC (“CSI”), previously a temperature-controlled distribution company operating in the United States. Through October 2002, ProLogis effectively owned in excess of 99% of ProLogis Logistics. In October 2002, all of the operations and a significant portion of the assets of CSI were sold. ProLogis’ proportionate share of the aggregate net loss from this transaction was $88.2 million, consisting of cumulative impairment charges of $90.5 million recognized in 2002 ($37.2 million) and 2001 ($53.3 million) offset by a net gain of $2.3 million (a

61


Table of Contents

$6.3 million net gain recognized upon closing the transaction in October 2002 and additional losses of $4.0 million recognized in 2004 and 2003 upon settlement of the prorations of CSI’s accounts as of the sale date). Subsequent to the October 2002 transaction, ProLogis’ ownership interests changed such that ProLogis owned 100% of ProLogis Logistics. Accordingly, ProLogis began consolidating its investment in ProLogis Logistics in October 2002. Certain assets that were retained by CSI after the sale (three operating properties and three tracts of land at December 31, 2004) are included with ProLogis’ real estate assets in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
 
(5)  The assets of this investee were sold in 2002.
 
(6)  ProLogis had an indirect investment in a technology company that ceased operations in 2001. The amount recognized by ProLogis in 2002 represents ProLogis’ proportionate share of charges that this company recognized when it wrote down its remaining investments to zero.
           Interest Expense
      Interest expense is a function of the level of borrowings outstanding, interest rates charged on borrowings and the amount of interest capitalization that is calculated based on the volume of ProLogis’ development activities. Interest expense for the periods indicated includes the following components (in thousands of U.S. dollars):
                           
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
Gross interest expense
  $ 184,729     $ 185,638     $ 178,210  
Premium/discount recognized, net
    252       371       315  
Amortization of deferred loan costs
    5,741       5,891       4,967  
                   
 
Subtotal interest expense before capitalization(1)
    190,722       191,900       183,492  
Less: capitalized amounts(2)
    37,388       36,425       30,534  
                   
 
Net interest expense(3)
  $ 153,334     $ 155,475     $ 152,958  
                   
 
(1)  Had ProLogis presented its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC on a consolidated basis for all of 2002, ProLogis would have recognized interest expense before capitalization of $184.4 million for 2002. The change in gross interest expense in each year is primarily a function of ProLogis’ weighted average borrowings and weighted average interest rates, but is also impacted by the average foreign currency exchange rate used to translate to U.S. dollars the interest expense recognized by ProLogis’ foreign subsidiaries prior to consolidation.
 
(2)  Gross interest expense incurred on borrowings outstanding during the period is offset by the amount of interest that is capitalized based on ProLogis’ qualifying development expenditures. Had ProLogis presented its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC on a consolidated basis for all of 2002, ProLogis’ capitalized interest would have been $38.5 million for 2002. Capitalized interest levels are reflective of ProLogis’ average cost of debt and the volume of development activities in each year.
 
(3)  Had ProLogis presented its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC on a consolidated basis for all of 2002, ProLogis would have recognized net interest expense of $145.9 million for 2002.
      For a discussion of the presentation of ProLogis’ investment in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC, see Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis’ Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
           Gains Recognized on Dispositions of Non-CDFS Business Assets, Net
      From time to time, ProLogis has contributed or sold properties that were held and used in the property operations segment. Certain sales to third parties will occur when a property is determined to have become non-strategic. Non-strategic properties are assets located in markets or submarkets that are no longer considered to be target markets or assets that were acquired as part of previous portfolio acquisitions that are

62


Table of Contents

not consistent with ProLogis’ core portfolio based on the asset’s size or configuration. Also, ProLogis contributes properties to property funds that have been held for direct, long-term investment in the property operations segment to complement the portfolio of CDFS business properties that are contributed to the property funds. In 2004, such properties that were sold to third parties have been classified as discontinued operations. The net gains or losses recognized from contributions of properties that were held and used in the property operations segment to a property fund are included in income from continuing operations due to ProLogis’ continuing involvement with the properties. In 2003 and 2002, ProLogis did not classify any sales or contributions of properties that were held and used in the property operations segment as discontinued operations, as the effect of such reclassification would not have had a material effect on ProLogis’ consolidated financial statements. See “— Discontinued Operations.”
      Contributions of long-term investment properties during 2004 and sales and contributions of long-term investment properties during the 2003 and 2002 were as follows:
  •  2004: 0.4 million square feet of properties generating net proceeds of $17.5 million and an aggregate net gain of $6.1 million;
 
  •  2003: 0.8 million square feet of properties generating net proceeds of $60.2 million and an aggregate net gain of $1.6 million; and