Maryland
|
74-2604728 | |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
Name of each exchange | ||||
Title of Each Class | on which registered | |||
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $0.01 per share
|
New York Stock Exchange | |||
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of
Beneficial Interest, par value $0.01 per share
|
New York Stock Exchange | |||
Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of
Beneficial Interest par value $0.01 per share
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Item | Description | Page | |||||||
PART I | |||||||||
1. | 1 | ||||||||
1 | |||||||||
3 | |||||||||
11 | |||||||||
18 | |||||||||
18 | |||||||||
2. | 19 | ||||||||
19 | |||||||||
19 | |||||||||
23 | |||||||||
30 | |||||||||
31 | |||||||||
3. | 38 | ||||||||
4. | 39 | ||||||||
PART II | |||||||||
5. | 39 | ||||||||
39 | |||||||||
39 | |||||||||
41 | |||||||||
41 | |||||||||
6. | 43 | ||||||||
7. | 47 | ||||||||
48 | |||||||||
49 | |||||||||
50 | |||||||||
52 | |||||||||
66 | |||||||||
66 | |||||||||
75 | |||||||||
78 | |||||||||
7A. | 84 | ||||||||
8. | 86 | ||||||||
9. | 86 | ||||||||
9A. | 86 | ||||||||
9B. | 87 | ||||||||
PART III | |||||||||
10. | 88 | ||||||||
11. | 88 | ||||||||
12. | 88 | ||||||||
13. | 88 | ||||||||
14. | 88 | ||||||||
PART IV | |||||||||
15. | 89 | ||||||||
Computation of Ratio of Earnings - Fixed Charges | |||||||||
Computation of Ratio of Earnings - Combined Fixed | |||||||||
Subsidiaries | |||||||||
Consent of KPMG LLP - Los Angeles, California | |||||||||
Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |||||||||
Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |||||||||
Certification of Chief Executive Officer - Section 906 | |||||||||
Certification of Chief Financial Officer - Section 906 |
Business Strategy and Global Presence |
1
| Allows ProLogis to realize, for financial reporting purposes, a portion of the development profits from its CDFS business activities by contributing its stabilized development properties to property funds (profits are recognized to the extent of third party investment in the property fund); | |
| Provides diversified sources of private capital to ProLogis thereby allowing ProLogis to have less overall capital invested; | |
| Allows ProLogis to earn fees for providing services to the property funds; | |
| Allows ProLogis to maintain a long-term ownership position in the properties; and | |
| Allows ProLogis, as the manager of the property funds, to maintain the market presence and customer relationships that are the key drivers of the ProLogis Operating System (see ProLogis Management ProLogis Operating System). |
| Five of ProLogis property funds, all in the United States, were formed with an initial amount of private capital that allowed the property fund to generally make one portfolio acquisition from ProLogis; | |
| ProLogis European Properties Fund, ProLogis Japan Properties Fund and ProLogis North American Properties Fund V were all formed with partners who have provided capital commitments to acquire properties on a continuing basis after formation; | |
| ProLogis and affiliates of four investment funds formed five property funds with the objective of acquiring properties from an established REIT in a business combination. These property funds also acquired properties from ProLogis; and |
2
| Interests in two established property funds were acquired by ProLogis as part of a business combination. |
Property Operations |
Investments |
| Formation of five new United States property funds in which ProLogis has a 20% ownership interest (125 properties; 25.5 million square feet; $1.51 billion total investment). | |
| Disposition of 14 properties that were direct, long-term investments in the property operations segment aggregating 1.1 million square feet generating aggregate net proceeds of $40.6 million. | |
| In North America, ProLogis North American Properties Fund V acquired 32 properties aggregating 7.6 million square feet at a total investment of $313.8 million, including 25 properties aggregating 4.9 million square feet at a total investment of $215.0 million that were acquired from ProLogis. | |
| In Europe, ProLogis European Properties Fund acquired 33 properties aggregating 7.4 million square feet at a total investment of $599.3 million, all of which were acquired from ProLogis except for one 0.2 million square foot property at a total investment of $9.5 million. | |
| ProLogis Japan Properties Fund acquired eight properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet at a total investment of $359.1 million, including three properties aggregating 1.2 million square feet at a total investment of $220.2 million that were acquired from ProLogis. | |
| Acquired 20% ownership interests in two property funds as part of the Keystone Transaction (26 properties; 7.7 million square feet; $496.4 million total investment). |
3
| Acquisition of nine properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet at a total investment of $126.6 million as part of the keystone Transaction with the intent to own these properties directly in the property operations segment rather than to contribute these properties to property funds. |
Operations |
| ProLogis stabilized operating portfolio of 276.2 million square feet (including properties owned by the property funds) was 92.3% leased and 91.4% occupied at December 31, 2004. ProLogis total operating portfolio of 282.8 million square feet (including properties owned by the property funds) was 91.0% leased and 89.8% occupied at December 31, 2004. ProLogis defines its stabilized properties as those properties where the capital improvements, repositioning efforts, new management and new marketing programs for acquisitions, or the marketing programs in the case of newly developed properties, have been in effect for a sufficient period of time. A property enters the stabilized pool at the earlier of 12 months or when it is substantially leased, which is defined by ProLogis generally as 93%. Overall occupancy levels increased in 2004 from 2003. ProLogis leased percentage for the stabilized portfolio at December 31, 2004 increased to 92.3% from 90.2% at December 31, 2003. | |
| ProLogis leased 66.0 million square feet of distribution space in 1,614 leasing transactions in its properties and in the properties owned by the property funds. Rental rates decreased by 4.7% for 2004 transactions involving previously leased space (49.5 million square feet). ProLogis weighted average customer retention rate was 68.7% for all properties in 2004. In 2003, ProLogis rental rates decreased by 4.8% for transactions involving previously leased space and its weighted average customer retention rate was 71.4%. | |
| ProLogis same store portfolio of operating properties (properties owned by ProLogis and the property funds that were operating throughout all of 2004 and 2003) aggregated 206.3 million square feet. Rental income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees, less rental expenses of the same store portfolio increased by 0.15% in 2004 from 2003. For the same store portfolio applicable to 2003, rental income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees, less rental expenses increased by 0.09% in 2003 from 2002. See the discussion of ProLogis same store portfolio at Item 7. Managements Discussion |
4
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Results of Operations Property Operations. | ||
| ProLogis earned termination and renegotiation fees of $2.5 million related to leases in its directly owned properties in 2004. Such fees in 2003 were $5.6 million. In certain leasing situations, ProLogis finds it advantageous to negotiate lease terminations with a customer, particularly when the customer is experiencing financial difficulties or when ProLogis believes that it can re-lease the space at rates that, when combined with the termination fee, provide a total return to ProLogis in excess of that which was being earned under the original lease terms. | |
| ProLogis earned various fees from the property funds, primarily from property management and asset management services, of $50.8 million in 2004 as compared to $44.2 million in 2003. |
Market Presence |
Number | Square Feet | ||||||||
ProLogis California(1)
|
81 | 14,204 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I(2)
|
36 | 9,406 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund II(3)
|
27 | 4,477 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund III(4)
|
34 | 4,380 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV(5)
|
17 | 3,475 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund V(6)
|
119 | 28,267 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI(7)
|
22 | 8,648 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII(8)
|
29 | 6,055 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII(9)
|
24 | 3,065 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX(10)
|
21 | 3,504 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund X(11)
|
29 | 4,191 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI(12)
|
14 | 4,315 | |||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII(13)
|
12 | 3,364 | |||||||
ProLogis European Properties Fund(14)
|
230 | 47,921 | |||||||
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund(15)
|
13 | 3,869 | |||||||
Totals
|
708 | 149,141 | |||||||
(1) | All properties are located in the Los Angeles/ Orange County market. |
(2) | Properties are located in 17 markets in the United States. |
(3) | Properties are located in 13 markets in the United States. |
5
(4) | Properties are located in 15 markets in the United States. | |
(5) | Properties are located in 10 markets in the United States. | |
(6) | Properties are located in 24 markets in the United States and in four markets in Mexico. | |
(7) | Properties are located in eight markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004). | |
(8) | Properties are located in nine markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004). | |
(9) | Properties are located in 10 markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004). |
(10) | Properties are located in eight markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004). |
(11) | Properties are located in 11 markets in the United States (property fund was formed in 2004). |
(12) | Properties are located in three markets in the United States (ProLogis acquired an ownership interest in this existing property Fund in 2004). |
(13) | Properties are located in two New Jersey markets (ProLogis acquired an ownership interest in this existing property Fund in 2004). |
(14) | Properties are located in 26 markets in 11 countries in Europe (70 properties, 12.6 million square feet located in the Central France market, primarily in Paris). |
(15) | Properties are located in the Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka markets in Japan. |
Competition |
Property Management |
Customers |
6
Employees |
Seasonal Nature of the Business |
Future Plans |
CDFS Business |
Investments |
7
| North America: 20 properties; 5.7 million square feet; $228.2 million total expected cost (approximately 21% of the total); | |
| Europe: 30 properties in nine countries; 5.7 million square feet; $448.6 million total expected cost (approximately 41% of the total); and | |
| Asia: eight properties; 3.7 million square feet; $407.8 million total expected cost (approximately 38% of the total). |
| North America: 1,952 acres with the capacity for the development of approximately 33.7 million square feet of distribution properties (1,719 acres, 29.4 million buildable square feet in the United States, 99 acres, 1.9 million buildable square feet in Mexico and 134 acres, 2.4 million buildable square feet in Canada) and | |
| Europe: 1,039 acres in 10 countries with the capacity for the development of approximately 18.3 million square feet of distribution properties. |
| ProLogis began development on three properties aggregating 0.5 million square feet in Shanghai, China at a total expected cost at completion of $18.1 million. Also, a joint venture in which ProLogis has a 50% ownership interest, acquired four operating properties aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total acquisition cost of $7.3 million in Shanghai and began development on two properties aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total expected cost at completion of $7.8 million in Shanghai. This joint ventures future activities will include both the acquisition of properties that will be rehabilitated and/ or positioned as well as the development of properties that will be operated in this joint venture or in a property fund. This joint venture operates solely in the Suzhou province of the Shanghai market. | |
| ProLogis acquired land in Toronto for development of its first property in Canada. | |
| Direct development starts by ProLogis aggregated 18.9 million square feet at a total expected cost at completion of $1.21 billion including: |
| North America: 8.0 million square feet at a total expected cost of $313.4 million; | |
| Europe: 7.2 million square feet at a total expected cost of $493.2 million; and | |
| Asia: 3.7 million square feet at a total expected cost of $407.8 million (including the three direct development starts in China). |
| Direct development completions by ProLogis aggregated 13.6 million square feet at a total cost of $862.8 million including: |
| North America: 5.4 million square feet at a total cost of $186.2 million; | |
| Europe: 5.6 million square feet at a total cost of $345.4 million; and | |
| Asia: 2.6 million square feet at a total cost of $331.2 million. |
8
| Direct acquisition of 21 operating properties by ProLogis aggregating 4.6 million square feet at a total acquisition cost of $196.2 million with the intent to contribute the properties to a property fund (including properties where rehabilitation and/or repositioning efforts are needed prior to contribution). | |
| Contributions and sales of 91 properties aggregating 19.5 million square feet that were developed or acquired by ProLogis in the CDFS business segment. These transactions along with dispositions of land parcels that no longer fit in ProLogis development plans generated net proceeds to ProLogis of $1.56 billion. | |
| Direct acquisitions of land by ProLogis included 1,313 acres of land: 521 acres in North America (387 acres in the United States and 134 acres in Canada), 717 acres in eight countries in Europe and 75 acres in Asia (including 26 acres in China acquired under ground lease). This land can be used for the development of approximately 25.7 million square feet of distribution properties. |
Operations |
| Recognition of net gains of $177.0 million (including amounts that had been previously deferred and contingent proceeds); $130.7 million related to sales and contributions of developed properties, $20.1 million related to contributions of acquired properties and $26.2 million related to dispositions of land parcels. | |
| Earned $2.7 million of fees from the development activities performed for customers and other income. | |
| Incurred expenses and other charges of $5.5 million |
Market Presence |
9
Competition |
Customers |
Employees |
Seasonal Nature of the Business |
Future Plans |
10
11
ProLogis Operating System |
Capital Management and Capital Deployment |
12
Customer Service |
Trustees |
13
14
Senior Officers |
15
16
17
18
United States:
|
||||
Northern Ohio
|
Akron, Bellevue, Fremont and Green | |||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
Allentown, Bethlehem, Harrisburg | |||
Central New Jersey
|
Cranbury, Edison, Trenton | |||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
Newark and Secaucus | |||
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
|
Los Angeles metropolitan area, Orange County, San Bernardino County and Riverside County | |||
Europe:
|
||||
France:
|
||||
Central
|
Orleans, Paris, Vatry | |||
East
|
Metz | |||
North
|
Lille, Le Havre | |||
South
|
Lyon, Marseille |
19
Germany:
|
|||
North
|
Hamburg, Hanover | ||
Rhine/ Main
|
Frankfurt | ||
Rhine/ Ruhr
|
Cologne, Dortmund, Dusseldorf | ||
South
|
Munich | ||
Netherlands:
|
|||
South
|
Haaften, Tilburg, Veghel, Venlo | ||
Poland:
|
|||
Central
|
Piotrkow | ||
South
|
Bedzin | ||
West
|
Poznan | ||
United Kingdom:
|
|||
East Midlands
|
Bedfordshire, Coalville, Corby, Daventry, Leicester, Northampton | ||
London and Southeast
|
London, Hemel Hempstead, Thurrock | ||
North
|
Leeds, Wakefield, Crewe | ||
West Midlands
|
Banbury, Birmingham, Coventry, Rugby |
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of | Percentage of | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Assets Based | Number of | Assets Based | ||||||||||||||
Properties | on Cost(1) | Properties | on Cost(1) | ||||||||||||||
North American Markets(2)(3):
|
|||||||||||||||||
United States:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
81 | 4.79 | % | 80 | 4.89 | % | |||||||||||
Austin, Texas
|
27 | 1.12 | 27 | 1.24 | |||||||||||||
Central New Jersey(4)
|
18 | 1.66 | | | |||||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
30 | 1.94 | 33 | 2.58 | |||||||||||||
Chattanooga, Tennessee
|
5 | 0.28 | 5 | 0.29 | |||||||||||||
Chicago, Illinois
|
64 | 5.88 | 61 | 6.26 | |||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
43 | 2.39 | 42 | 2.19 | |||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
28 | 2.68 | 32 | 3.38 | |||||||||||||
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
|
120 | 7.10 | 125 | 8.09 | |||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
25 | 1.47 | 25 | 1.46 | |||||||||||||
El Paso, Texas
|
16 | 1.02 | 18 | 1.34 | |||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
12 | 0.87 | 14 | 1.19 | |||||||||||||
Houston, Texas
|
91 | 4.17 | 91 | 4.58 | |||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
11 | 2.49 | 3 | 0.87 | |||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey(3)
|
10 | 1.35 | 26 | 2.50 | |||||||||||||
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
43 | 2.59 | 43 | 2.45 | |||||||||||||
Kansas City, Kansas/ Missouri
|
29 | 1.06 | 29 | 1.15 |
20
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage of | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||||
Number of | Assets Based | Number of | Assets Based | |||||||||||||||
Properties | on Cost(1) | Properties | on Cost(1) | |||||||||||||||
Las Vegas, Nevada
|
18 | 1.72 | 17 | 1.72 | ||||||||||||||
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California(2)
|
3 | 1.24 | 2 | 0.70 | ||||||||||||||
Louisville, Kentucky
|
8 | 0.81 | 7 | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||
Memphis, Tennessee
|
48 | 3.50 | 47 | 3.48 | ||||||||||||||
Nashville, Tennessee
|
38 | 1.72 | 41 | 2.06 | ||||||||||||||
Northern Ohio
|
1 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
|
6 | 0.20 | 6 | 0.22 | ||||||||||||||
Orlando, Florida
|
21 | 1.27 | 19 | 1.25 | ||||||||||||||
Phoenix, Arizona
|
29 | 1.14 | 30 | 1.25 | ||||||||||||||
Portland, Oregon
|
21 | 0.89 | 20 | 0.88 | ||||||||||||||
Reno, Nevada
|
23 | 1.61 | 23 | 1.77 | ||||||||||||||
Salt Lake City, Utah
|
7 | 0.77 | 7 | 0.84 | ||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
51 | 1.96 | 53 | 2.29 | ||||||||||||||
San Francisco (Central Valley), California(4)
|
14 | 1.84 | | | ||||||||||||||
San Francisco (East Bay), California(4)
|
40 | 2.03 | 54 | 4.23 | ||||||||||||||
San Francisco (South Bay), California
|
71 | 3.88 | 71 | 4.25 | ||||||||||||||
Seattle, Washington
|
14 | 0.96 | 14 | 1.05 | ||||||||||||||
St. Louis, Missouri
|
13 | 0.65 | 13 | 0.71 | ||||||||||||||
Tampa, Florida
|
60 | 2.50 | 61 | 2.54 | ||||||||||||||
Tulsa, Oklahoma
|
9 | 0.22 | 9 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
|
38 | 2.66 | 38 | 2.92 | ||||||||||||||
Other(5)
|
1 | 0.07 | 2 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||
Mexico:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Juarez
|
11 | 0.61 | 12 | 0.67 | ||||||||||||||
Monterrey
|
8 | 0.54 | 8 | 0.59 | ||||||||||||||
Reynosa
|
14 | 1.10 | 12 | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||
Tijuana
|
3 | 0.21 | 3 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal North America
|
1,223 | 76.98 | 1,224 | 80.05 | ||||||||||||||
European Markets(6):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Czech Republic:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Prague
|
2 | 0.26 | | | ||||||||||||||
France:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Central
|
3 | 0.74 | 3 | 0.58 | ||||||||||||||
East
|
1 | 0.13 | 1 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||
North
|
1 | 0.26 | 1 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||||
South
|
4 | 0.93 | 4 | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||
Germany:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Rhine/ Main
|
1 | 0.38 | 2 | 0.58 | ||||||||||||||
Rhine/ Ruhr
|
1 | 0.22 | 2 | 0.49 | ||||||||||||||
South
|
3 | 0.34 | 2 | 0.30 |
21
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage of | Percentage of | |||||||||||||||||
Number of | Assets Based | Number of | Assets Based | |||||||||||||||
Properties | on Cost(1) | Properties | on Cost(1) | |||||||||||||||
Hungary:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Budapest
|
1 | 0.29 | 2 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||
Italy:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Milan
|
3 | 0.71 | 1 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||||
Netherlands:
|
||||||||||||||||||
South
|
| | 2 | 0.87 | ||||||||||||||
Poland:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Central
|
| | 1 | 0.29 | ||||||||||||||
South
|
3 | 0.43 | 1 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||
Warsaw
|
3 | 0.63 | 2 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||||
West
|
| | 2 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||
Spain:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Madrid
|
3 | 0.84 | 2 | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||
Sweden:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Stockholm
|
2 | 0.73 | | | ||||||||||||||
United Kingdom:
|
||||||||||||||||||
East Midlands
|
2 | 0.60 | 6 | 2.10 | ||||||||||||||
London and Southeast
|
11 | 3.87 | 9 | 3.07 | ||||||||||||||
North
|
| | 2 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||||
West Midlands
|
9 | 2.07 | 6 | 2.46 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal Europe
|
53 | 13.43 | 51 | 13.98 | ||||||||||||||
Asian Markets:
|
||||||||||||||||||
China:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shanghai
|
3 | 0.29 | | | ||||||||||||||
Japan(7):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Nagoya
|
| | 1 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||||
Osaka
|
2 | 4.27 | 2 | 3.33 | ||||||||||||||
Tokyo
|
4 | 4.84 | 1 | 2.02 | ||||||||||||||
Singapore
|
1 | 0.19 | | | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal Asia
|
10 | 9.59 | 4 | 5.97 | ||||||||||||||
Total(8)
|
1,286 | 100.00 | % | 1,279 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Properties under development are reflected at their total expected cost at completion, rather than at the cost incurred as of the dates presented. |
(2) | ProLogis California has the right of first offer with respect to properties that ProLogis develops, excluding properties developed under build to suit agreements, in certain counties included in ProLogis Los Angeles/ Orange County market, subject to the property meeting certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria. |
(3) | ProLogis North American Properties Fund V has the right of first offer to all of ProLogis stabilized development properties that ProLogis desires to sell in North America (except those properties that are subject to an agreement with ProLogis California) through December 31, 2005. Properties subject to the |
22
right of first offer must meet certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria. Rights under the agreement will terminate if ProLogis North American Properties Fund V does not acquire a property that meets the specified criteria. | |
(4) | Previously, ProLogis considered all of its properties in New Jersey to be in one market. For 2004, ProLogis reflects two New Jersey markets, I-95 Corridor and Central New Jersey. Also, for 2004, ProLogis has divided the properties previously presented in the San Francisco (East Bay) market between that market and the San Francisco (Central Valley) market. |
(5) | For 2004, includes on property in the Brownsville, Texas market. For 2003, includes one property in each of the Birmingham, Alabama and Brownsville, Texas markets. Neither of these markets are considered to be target markets of ProLogis. |
(6) | ProLogis is committed to offer to contribute all of its stabilized development properties in specific markets in Europe to ProLogis European Properties Fund through September 2019, and ProLogis European Properties Fund is committed to acquire such properties, subject to the property meeting certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria. |
(7) | ProLogis is committed to offer to contribute all of its stabilized development properties in Japan to ProLogis Japan Properties Fund through June 2006, and ProLogis Japan Properties Fund is committed to acquire such properties, subject to the property meeting certain specified criteria, including leasing criteria. |
(8) | Includes 58 properties under development at December 31, 2004 with a total expected cost at completion of $1.08 billion and 27 properties under development at December 31, 2003 with a total expected cost at completion of $678.5 million. |
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Percentage | Square | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Occupancy(1) | Footage | Investment(2) | Encumbrances(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating Properties Owned at December 31, 2004(4):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
North American Markets(5):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
United States:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
80 | 88.43 | % | 8,504,171 | $ | 276,569,274 | $ | 35,061,297 | ||||||||||||||
Austin, Texas
|
27 | 86.71 | 1,759,309 | 68,888,270 | | |||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
17 | 95.33 | 2,013,741 | 62,659,234 | 10,256,804 | |||||||||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
30 | 93.26 | 3,801,070 | 119,117,964 | 40,702,305 | |||||||||||||||||
Chattanooga, Tennessee
|
5 | 97.58 | 1,147,872 | 17,312,734 | | |||||||||||||||||
Chicago, Illinois
|
62 | 84.15 | 8,358,896 | 345,414,680 | 43,863,054 | |||||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
42 | 77.98 | 4,742,763 | 130,163,906 | 40,016,846 | |||||||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
28 | 81.04 | 5,062,250 | 164,317,252 | 25,395,015 | |||||||||||||||||
Dallas/ Fort Worth, Texas
|
120 | 86.34 | 12,960,122 | 436,023,103 | 62,364,972 | |||||||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
24 | 93.06 | 2,760,534 | 78,699,003 | | |||||||||||||||||
El Paso, Texas
|
16 | 74.31 | 2,166,169 | 62,586,842 | 1,495,567 |
23
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Percentage | Square | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Occupancy(1) | Footage | Investment(2) | Encumbrances(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
12 | 100.00 | 945,689 | 53,520,288 | 7,336,327 | |||||||||||||||||
Houston, Texas
|
88 | 88.63 | 7,674,522 | 237,534,629 | 44,435,918 | |||||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
11 | 78.66 | 2,799,148 | 152,956,453 | 12,847,461 | |||||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
10 | 100.00 | 1,729,312 | 82,865,793 | 17,376,194 | |||||||||||||||||
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
43 | 88.07 | 4,716,151 | 158,914,326 | | |||||||||||||||||
Kansas City, Kansas/ Missouri
|
29 | 97.19 | 1,578,487 | 64,896,371 | 5,281,254 | |||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas, Nevada
|
17 | 100.00 | 2,061,291 | 95,490,974 | 12,336,148 | |||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
|
2 | 22.03 | 1,131,513 | 38,744,504 | | |||||||||||||||||
Louisville, Kentucky
|
8 | 69.21 | 1,907,488 | 49,632,843 | 6,266,529 | |||||||||||||||||
Memphis, Tennessee
|
46 | 81.76 | 7,209,879 | 192,376,060 | 9,434,141 | |||||||||||||||||
Nashville, Tennessee
|
38 | 88.67 | 4,093,240 | 105,778,654 | 6,821,477 | |||||||||||||||||
Northern Ohio
|
1 | 100.00 | 71,723 | 1,085,819 | | |||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
|
6 | 75.39 | 639,942 | 12,542,345 | | |||||||||||||||||
Orlando, Florida
|
21 | 87.84 | 1,937,151 | 78,157,661 | 6,748,344 | |||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, Arizona
|
29 | 95.47 | 1,983,856 | 70,161,519 | | |||||||||||||||||
Portland, Oregon
|
20 | 93.87 | 1,330,215 | 49,553,937 | 278,132 | |||||||||||||||||
Reno, Nevada
|
23 | 93.83 | 2,702,923 | 98,969,884 | 10,155,504 | |||||||||||||||||
Salt Lake City, Utah
|
7 | 98.08 | 1,643,468 | 47,014,900 | | |||||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
50 | 88.40 | 4,044,441 | 117,660,285 | | |||||||||||||||||
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
|
14 | 86.64 | 2,948,792 | 112,974,450 | 74,262 | |||||||||||||||||
San Francisco (East Bay), California
|
40 | 91.83 | 3,015,829 | 124,628,424 | 31,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
San Francisco (South Bay), California
|
71 | 85.76 | 3,695,747 | 238,573,019 | 6,007,570 | |||||||||||||||||
Seattle Washington
|
14 | 98.27 | 1,272,827 | 59,142,977 | 4,442,873 | |||||||||||||||||
St. Louis, Missouri
|
13 | 84.70 | 1,251,825 | 40,166,842 | 6,331,945 | |||||||||||||||||
Tampa, Florida
|
58 | 94.34 | 3,640,856 | 140,389,591 | 9,479,358 | |||||||||||||||||
Tulsa, Oklahoma
|
9 | 91.72 | 523,623 | 13,386,508 | | |||||||||||||||||
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
|
38 | 96.32 | 3,938,023 | 163,457,125 | 35,737,167 | |||||||||||||||||
Other(6)
|
1 | 66.67 | 144,000 | 4,004,652 | | |||||||||||||||||
Mexico:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Juarez
|
10 | 100.00 | 835,380 | 32,569,066 | | |||||||||||||||||
Monterrey
|
8 | 75.53 | 825,001 | 33,111,337 | | |||||||||||||||||
Reynosa
|
12 | 88.61 | 1,299,091 | 55,038,684 | | |||||||||||||||||
Tijuana
|
3 | 63.80 | 365,110 | 12,681,475 | | |||||||||||||||||
Subtotal North America(5)
|
1,203 | 87.18 | 127,233,440 | 4,499,733,657 | 491,546,464 | |||||||||||||||||
24
Rentable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Percentage | Square | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Occupancy(1) | Footage | Investment(2) | Encumbrances(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
European Markets(7):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
France:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Central
|
1 | 72.04 | 356,654 | 20,536,184 | | ||||||||||||||||||
East
|
1 | 100.00 | 190,643 | 7,977,894 | | ||||||||||||||||||
North
|
1 | | 344,760 | 15,833,999 | | ||||||||||||||||||
South
|
2 | 14.30 | 560,718 | 29,132,732 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rhine/ Main
|
1 | | 223,536 | 23,289,153 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Rhine/ Ruhr
|
1 | | 180,469 | 13,250,767 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Poland:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
South
|
1 | 93.47 | 123,000 | 4,350,388 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Warsaw
|
1 | | 266,797 | 12,679,664 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Spain:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Madrid
|
1 | 100.00 | 390,270 | 24,448,945 | | ||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
East Midlands
|
2 | 82.09 | 805,241 | 37,207,836 | | ||||||||||||||||||
London and Southeast
|
7 | | 808,998 | 137,227,808 | | ||||||||||||||||||
West Midlands
|
4 | 60.33 | 630,164 | 50,403,972 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal Europe(7):
|
23 | 42.49 | 4,881,250 | 376,339,342 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asian Markets(8):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka
|
1 | 27.25 | 1,365,116 | 169,534,679 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Singapore
|
1 | 100.00 | 150,000 | 11,599,592 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal Asia(8)
|
2 | 34.45 | 1,515,116 | 181,134,271 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Properties Owned at December 31,
2004(4)
|
1,228 | 84.95 | % | 133,629,806 | $ | 5,057,207,270 | $ | 491,546,464 | |||||||||||||||
25
Rentable | |||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Total Expected | |||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Investment(2) | Cost(9) | ||||||||||||||||
Properties Under Development at December 31,
2004(10)(11):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
North American Markets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
United States:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
1 | 678,000 | $ | 5,026,676 | $ | 17,765,983 | |||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
1 | 750,005 | 20,578,181 | 39,085,752 | |||||||||||||||
Chicago, Illinois
|
2 | 398,800 | 10,408,887 | 16,004,082 | |||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
1 | 483,000 | 6,555,344 | 16,608,128 | |||||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
1 | 283,666 | 1,857,293 | 11,675,860 | |||||||||||||||
Houston, Texas
|
3 | 495,000 | 10,422,803 | 18,507,008 | |||||||||||||||
Las Vegas, Nevada
|
1 | 214,200 | 2,244,702 | 10,074,122 | |||||||||||||||
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
|
1 | 849,054 | 14,524,433 | 37,651,370 | |||||||||||||||
Memphis, Tennessee
|
2 | 776,900 | 18,457,749 | 22,398,421 | |||||||||||||||
Portland, Oregon
|
1 | 100,350 | 4,299,823 | 5,098,893 | |||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
1 | 54,000 | 1,890,537 | 2,536,861 | |||||||||||||||
Tampa, Florida
|
2 | 231,120 | 3,521,791 | 13,334,482 | |||||||||||||||
Mexico:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Juarez
|
1 | 121,870 | 3,602,629 | 5,160,177 | |||||||||||||||
Reynosa
|
2 | 296,935 | 6,204,757 | 12,314,734 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal North America
|
20 | 5,732,900 | 109,595,605 | 228,215,873 | |||||||||||||||
European Markets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Czech Republic:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Prague
|
2 | 247,626 | 10,553,258 | 15,807,042 | |||||||||||||||
France:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Central
|
2 | 434,694 | 19,318,193 | 25,066,429 | |||||||||||||||
South
|
2 | 508,004 | 10,915,013 | 27,812,143 | |||||||||||||||
Germany:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
South
|
3 | 268,637 | 17,884,268 | 20,656,265 | |||||||||||||||
Hungary:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Budapest
|
1 | 250,338 | 16,650,419 | 17,609,499 | |||||||||||||||
Italy:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Milan
|
3 | 691,972 | 22,954,971 | 43,592,619 | |||||||||||||||
Poland:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
South
|
2 | 504,089 | 4,421,237 | 21,943,891 | |||||||||||||||
Warsaw
|
2 | 553,485 | 3,981,493 | 26,263,955 | |||||||||||||||
Spain:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Madrid
|
2 | 370,583 | 8,904,705 | 27,033,002 |
26
Rentable | |||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Total Expected | |||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Investment(2) | Cost(9) | ||||||||||||||||
Sweden:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stockholm
|
2 | 491,129 | 28,281,030 | 44,868,402 | |||||||||||||||
United Kingdom:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
London and Southeast
|
4 | 601,600 | 69,056,363 | 100,671,450 | |||||||||||||||
West Midlands
|
5 | 775,629 | 53,328,952 | 77,302,193 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal Europe
|
30 | 5,697,786 | 266,249,902 | 448,626,890 | |||||||||||||||
Asian Markets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
China:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Shanghai
|
3 | 520,416 | 4,832,195 | 18,065,468 | |||||||||||||||
Japan:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Osaka
|
1 | 785,211 | 11,506,716 | 92,635,000 | |||||||||||||||
Tokyo
|
4 | 2,411,483 | 183,518,285 | 297,106,554 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal Asia
|
8 | 3,717,110 | 199,857,196 | 407,807,022 | |||||||||||||||
Total Properties Under Development at December 31,
2004(10)(11)
|
58 | 15,147,796 | $ | 575,702,703 | $ | 1,084,649,785 | |||||||||||||
Acreage | Investment(2) | Encumbrances(3) | ||||||||||||
Land Held for Development at December 31, 2004(12):
|
||||||||||||||
North American Markets:
|
||||||||||||||
United States:
|
||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
181.5 | $ | 13,524,081 | $ | | |||||||||
Austin, Texas
|
7.2 | 918,357 | | |||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
6.0 | 634,208 | | |||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
35.2 | 3,844,666 | | |||||||||||
Chicago, Illinois
|
62.6 | 12,959,711 | | |||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
63.7 | 5,583,848 | | |||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
15.9 | 938,766 | | |||||||||||
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
|
119.6 | 12,375,011 | | |||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
110.4 | 7,413,867 | | |||||||||||
El Paso, Texas
|
85.1 | 5,462,246 | | |||||||||||
Houston, Texas
|
62.2 | 5,729,612 | | |||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
326.8 | 28,829,991 | | |||||||||||
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
92.7 | 7,440,169 | | |||||||||||
Kansas City, Kansas/ Missouri
|
16.6 | 1,526,602 | | |||||||||||
Las Vegas, Nevada
|
13.2 | 1,933,538 | 97,009 | |||||||||||
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
|
91.1 | 22,316,372 | | |||||||||||
Louisville, Kentucky
|
60.6 | 4,898,604 | | |||||||||||
Memphis, Tennessee
|
78.1 | 5,014,491 | | |||||||||||
Orlando, Florida
|
16.1 | 1,628,533 | | |||||||||||
Portland, Oregon
|
7.2 | 1,641,574 | | |||||||||||
Reno, Nevada
|
26.2 | 3,914,690 | | |||||||||||
Salt Lake City, Utah
|
30.8 | 2,062,465 | |
27
Acreage | Investment(2) | Encumbrances(3) | |||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
47.5 | 3,429,680 | | ||||||||||||
San Francisco (East Bay) California
|
77.6 | 7,239,885 | | ||||||||||||
Seattle, Washington
|
10.6 | 2,073,601 | | ||||||||||||
Tampa, Florida
|
43.9 | 2,882,320 | | ||||||||||||
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
|
31.1 | 5,448,092 | | ||||||||||||
Canada:
|
|||||||||||||||
Toronto, Canada
|
133.9 | 50,905,763 | | ||||||||||||
Mexico:
|
|||||||||||||||
Juarez, Mexico
|
41.5 | 6,735,898 | | ||||||||||||
Monterrey, Mexico
|
12.8 | 1,759,700 | | ||||||||||||
Reynosa, Mexico
|
44.3 | 6,027,824 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal North America
|
1,952.0 | 237,094,165 | 97,009 | ||||||||||||
European Markets:
|
|||||||||||||||
Belgium
|
34.2 | 12,762,876 | | ||||||||||||
Czech Republic:
|
|||||||||||||||
Prague
|
17.0 | 5,942,493 | | ||||||||||||
France:
|
|||||||||||||||
Central
|
168.6 | 26,169,786 | | ||||||||||||
North
|
19.8 | 1,390,380 | | ||||||||||||
South
|
20.8 | 3,827,368 | | ||||||||||||
Germany:
|
|||||||||||||||
Rhine/ Main
|
12.4 | 9,996,934 | | ||||||||||||
Rhine/ Ruhr
|
6.3 | 2,147,138 | | ||||||||||||
Hungary:
|
|||||||||||||||
Budapest
|
57.7 | 10,266,723 | | ||||||||||||
Italy:
|
|||||||||||||||
Milan
|
95.5 | 22,794,517 | | ||||||||||||
Netherlands:
|
|||||||||||||||
Rotterdam
|
5.0 | 2,071,629 | | ||||||||||||
Poland:
|
|||||||||||||||
Central
|
5.7 | 1,860,988 | | ||||||||||||
South
|
100.1 | 18,471,008 | | ||||||||||||
Warsaw
|
39.0 | 5,027,607 | | ||||||||||||
Spain:
|
|||||||||||||||
Madrid
|
11.2 | 4,415,392 | | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom:
|
|||||||||||||||
East Midlands
|
224.0 | 89,037,385 | | ||||||||||||
London and Southeast
|
79.3 | 81,702,329 | | ||||||||||||
North
|
70.6 | 17,119,084 | | ||||||||||||
West Midlands
|
72.0 | 45,731,848 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal Europe
|
1,039.2 | 360,735,485 | | ||||||||||||
Total Land Held for Development at December 31,
2004(12)
|
2,991.2 | $ | 597,829,650 | $ | 97,009 | ||||||||||
28
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Total Expected | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Acreage | Footage | Investment(2) | Cost(9) | Encumbrances(3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Grand Totals at
December 31, 2004: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating properties(4)(5)(7)(8)
|
1,228 | n/a | 133,629,806 | $ | 5,057,207,270 | n/a | $ | 491,546,464 | ||||||||||||||||||
Properties under development(10)(11)
|
58 | n/a | 15,147,796 | 575,702,703 | $ | 1,084,649,785 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
Land held for development(12)
|
n/a | 2,991.2 | n/a | 597,829,650 | n/a | 97,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other investments(13)
|
n/a | n/a | n/a | 102,991,608 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
1,286 | 2,991.2 | 148,777,602 | $ | 6,333,731,231 | (12) | $ | 1,084,649,785 | $ | 491,643,473 | ||||||||||||||||
n/a | Not Applicable |
(1) | The percentage occupancy presented is the physical occupancy at December 31, 2004. Operating properties at December 31, 2004 include recently completed development properties that may be in the initial lease-up phase, including properties aggregating 5.1 million square feet that were completed in 2004. The inclusion of properties in the initial lease-up phase can reduce the overall occupancy percentage. | |
(2) | Investment represents ProLogis carrying value of the properties, before depreciation, at December 31, 2004. | |
(3) | Certain properties are pledged as security under ProLogis secured debt and assessment bonds at December 31, 2004. For purposes of this table, the total principal balance of a debt issuance that is secured by a pool of properties is allocated among the properties in the pool based on each propertys investment balance. See Schedule III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional identification of the properties pledged. | |
(4) | All operating properties are included in the property operations segment. See Item 1. Business ProLogis Operating Segments Property Operations. | |
(5) | Includes 70 properties aggregating 12.7 million square feet at total investment of $404.7 million that were developed in the CDFS business segment that are pending contribution to a property fund or sale to a third party or that were acquired in the CDFS business segment that are pending contribution to a property fund. See Item 1. Business ProLogis Operating Segments CDFS Business. | |
(6) | Includes one property in Brownsville, Texas which is not considered to be a target market of ProLogis. | |
(7) | Includes 19 properties aggregating 3.9 million square feet at a total investment of $323.7 million that were developed in the CDFS business segment that are pending contribution to a property fund or sale to a third party. See Item 1. Business ProLogis Operating Segments CDFS Business. | |
(8) | Includes a 1.4 million square foot property at a total investment of $169.5 million that was developed in the CDFS business segment that is pending contribution to ProLogis Japan Properties Fund. See Item 1. Business ProLogis Operating Segments CDFS Business. | |
(9) | Represents the total expected cost at completion for properties under development, including the cost of land, fees, permits, payments to contractors, architectural and engineering fees and interest and property taxes to be capitalized during construction, rather than actual costs incurred to date. |
(10) | All of the properties under development are included in the CDFS business segment. See Item 1. Business ProLogis Operating Segments CDFS Business. |
(11) | Includes 16 properties aggregating 3.3 million square feet that are in the design and permit stage. |
(12) | All of the land held for future development is included in the CDFS business segment. The land owned can be used for the development of approximately 52.0 million square feet of distribution properties. See Item 1. Business ProLogis Operating Segments CDFS Business. Does not include 1,167 acres of land controlled directly by ProLogis under option, letter of intent or contingent contract with the |
29
capacity for the development of approximately 20.8 million square feet of distribution properties. Does not include 796 acres of land owned or controlled by unconsolidated investees of ProLogis with the capacity for the development of approximately 11.7 million square feet of distribution properties. See Unconsolidated Investees CDFS Business. | |
(13) | Other investments include: (i) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions; (ii) costs incurred during the pre-acquisition due diligence process; and (iii) costs incurred during the pre-construction phase related to future development projects. |
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Square Footage | Real Estate | ||||||||||||||||||
Formation | Operating | of Operating | Assets | ProLogis | ||||||||||||||||
Date | Properties | Properties | (in millions)(1) | Ownership | ||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Limited Partnership-I(2)
|
1993 | 74 | 3,904,336 | $ | 220.4 | (3)(4) | 68.65 | % | ||||||||||||
ProLogis Limited Partnership-III(5)
|
1994 | 16 | 993,730 | 36.2 | (6) | 95.18 | % | |||||||||||||
ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV(5)(7)
|
1994 | 42 | 2,441,834 | 94.9 | (8) | 98.98 | % | |||||||||||||
Meridian Realty Partners Limited Partnership
|
(9 | ) | 1 | 249,283 | 11.1 | (10) | 91.33 | % | ||||||||||||
ProLogis Fraser L.P.(11)
|
2004 | 9 | 2,329,880 | 151.2 | (12) | 87.46 | % | |||||||||||||
142 | 9,919,063 | $ | 513.8 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | Real estate assets are presented before depreciation. | |
(2) | Irving F. Lyons, III, ProLogis Vice Chairman and former Chief Investment Officer, had an effective ownership in ProLogis Limited Partnership-I of 1.8% at December 31, 2004. | |
(3) | These properties cannot be sold, prior to the occurrence of certain events, without the consent of the limited partners, other than in tax-deferred exchanges. The applicable partnership agreement provides |
30
that a minimum level of debt must be maintained within this partnership, which can include intercompany debt to ProLogis. | ||
(4) | One operating property is located in the Tampa market; all other properties are located in San Francisco (the East Bay and South Bay markets). | |
(5) | Jeffrey H. Schwartz, ProLogis Chief Executive Officer, owned all of the minority interest outstanding at December 31, 2004 (4.82% of ProLogis Limited Partnership-III and 1.02% of ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV). | |
(6) | The operating properties are located in the Chicago, Orlando, San Antonio and Tampa markets. Real estate assets also include 16 acres of land held for future development located in the Tampa market with a book basis of $0.8 million. | |
(7) | ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV was formed through a cash contribution from a wholly owned subsidiary of ProLogis, ProLogis IV, Inc., and through the contribution of properties from the limited partner. ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV and ProLogis IV, Inc. are legal entities that are separate and distinct from ProLogis, its affiliates and each other, and each has separate assets, liabilities, business functions and operations. At December 31, 2004, the sole asset of ProLogis IV, Inc. was its interest in ProLogis Limited Partnership-IV. At December 31, 2004, ProLogis IV, Inc. had outstanding borrowings from ProLogis of $0.6 million. | |
(8) | The operating properties are located in the Cincinnati, Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, I-95 Corridor (New Jersey), Northern Ohio, Orlando and Tampa markets. In addition, this partnerships real estate assets include $11.0 million of cash held in escrow pending the completion of a deferred tax exchange transaction. | |
(9) | This partnership was formed by another REIT that was merged with and into ProLogis in 1999. |
(10) | This property is located in the Los Angeles/ Orange County market |
(11) | This limited partnership was formed on August 4, 2004 in connection with the Keystone Transaction to directly acquire certain net assets of Keystone. In addition to the real estate assets owned, this partnership owns interests in two property funds that own real estate assets (ProLogis North American Properties Funds XI and XII) and interests in two CDFS Joint Ventures (one that owns a recently completed 0.8 million square foot development property and one that has a 0.8 million square foot property under development). See Unconsolidated Investees Property Operations and Unconsolidated Investees CDFS Business. Also, see Note 3 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. |
(12) | Real estate assets of this partnership include nine operating properties located in the I-81 Corridor (Pennsylvania) and Indianapolis markets with an undepreciated cost of $126.6 million, a 0.8 million square foot property under development in the Central New Jersey market with a total expected cost at completion of $39.1 million, and land parcels and land option rights primarily in the Indianapolis market. |
31
Property Operations |
Rentable | |||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Percentage | Entitys | ||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Occupancy(1) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||
North America:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis California(3):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
|
81 | 14,203,899 | 99.42 | % | $ | 685,971,094 | |||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund I(4):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
5 | 1,615,688 | 98.40 | % | 53,856,179 | ||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
4 | 925,600 | 100.00 | 46,329,568 | |||||||||||||||
Chicago, Illinois
|
1 | 249,576 | 100.00 | 14,813,173 | |||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
2 | 297,720 | 100.00 | 15,187,118 | |||||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
2 | 888,691 | 100.00 | 30,280,864 | |||||||||||||||
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
|
3 | 1,221,934 | 69.90 | 49,392,204 | |||||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
2 | 198,892 | 100.00 | 9,186,376 | |||||||||||||||
El Paso, Texas
|
1 | 354,159 | 100.00 | 13,629,971 | |||||||||||||||
Houston, Texas
|
2 | 238,450 | 84.98 | 10,890,317 | |||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
1 | 174,720 | 100.00 | 12,952,203 | |||||||||||||||
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
2 | 719,829 | 100.00 | 21,487,540 | |||||||||||||||
Louisville, Kentucky
|
3 | 905,800 | 96.69 | 33,571,633 | |||||||||||||||
Nashville, Tennessee
|
1 | 412,800 | 100.00 | 14,988,729 | |||||||||||||||
Phoenix, Arizona
|
1 | 156,410 | 0.00 | 6,770,282 | |||||||||||||||
Salt Lake City, Utah
|
3 | 396,600 | 100.00 | 17,145,977 | |||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
1 | 244,800 | 100.00 | 9,101,959 | |||||||||||||||
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
|
2 | 404,400 | 100.00 | 16,997,187 | |||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund I
|
36 | 9,406,069 | 93.45 | % | 376,581,280 | ||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund II(5):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Austin, Texas
|
4 | 324,800 | 100.00 | % | 17,848,580 | ||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
1 | 501,400 | 100.00 | 26,359,798 | |||||||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
2 | 178,000 | 45.88 | 7,870,523 | |||||||||||||||
Chicago, Illinois
|
4 | 510,725 | 100.00 | 38,516,720 | |||||||||||||||
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
|
4 | 669,416 | 100.00 | 26,142,026 |
32
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Percentage | Entitys | |||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Occupancy(1) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
1 | 104,400 | 100.00 | 5,435,610 | ||||||||||||||
El Paso, Texas
|
1 | 239,131 | 100.00 | 10,318,866 | ||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
3 | 383,650 | 80.82 | 23,757,762 | ||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
1 | 528,670 | 100.00 | 25,427,547 | ||||||||||||||
Reno, Nevada
|
1 | 169,625 | 100.00 | 7,178,416 | ||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
1 | 160,000 | 84.00 | 6,769,006 | ||||||||||||||
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
|
1 | 89,626 | 100.00 | 4,368,792 | ||||||||||||||
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
|
3 | 617,225 | 100.00 | 35,577,510 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund II
|
27 | 4,476,668 | 95.63 | % | 235,571,156 | |||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund III(5):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
2 | 151,600 | 85.49 | % | 7,220,189 | |||||||||||||
Austin, Texas
|
6 | 282,100 | 97.45 | 15,773,175 | ||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
1 | 204,000 | 100.00 | 10,565,600 | ||||||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
1 | 136,000 | 74.19 | 5,407,328 | ||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
5 | 1,044,390 | 89.41 | 45,868,562 | ||||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
1 | 289,280 | 100.00 | 8,580,685 | ||||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
1 | 104,400 | 100.00 | 5,365,810 | ||||||||||||||
Houston, Texas
|
1 | 140,000 | 58.57 | 5,776,303 | ||||||||||||||
Las Vegas, Nevada
|
1 | 235,520 | 100.00 | 9,874,422 | ||||||||||||||
Orlando, Florida
|
4 | 361,866 | 100.00 | 18,585,371 | ||||||||||||||
Portland, Oregon
|
2 | 200,600 | 86.89 | 10,762,036 | ||||||||||||||
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
|
1 | 351,788 | 100.00 | 15,395,249 | ||||||||||||||
Seattle, Washington
|
1 | 117,620 | 100.00 | 6,232,909 | ||||||||||||||
St. Louis, Missouri
|
2 | 370,000 | 91.84 | 15,296,361 | ||||||||||||||
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
|
5 | 391,325 | 54.05 | 29,577,783 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund III
|
34 | 4,380,489 | 89.29 | % | 210,281,783 | |||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV(5):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
3 | 252,800 | 74.21 | % | 13,274,388 | |||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
1 | 181,370 | 100.00 | 8,977,780 | ||||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
1 | 1,014,592 | 100.00 | 27,508,871 | ||||||||||||||
Dallas/ Ft. Worth, Texas
|
1 | 180,440 | 100.00 | 10,799,887 | ||||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
2 | 357,400 | 100.00 | 15,041,195 | ||||||||||||||
El Paso, Texas
|
1 | 153,034 | 100.00 | 5,590,981 | ||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
1 | 421,101 | 100.00 | 16,163,189 | ||||||||||||||
Phoenix, Arizona
|
1 | 273,586 | 100.00 | 9,627,468 | ||||||||||||||
Portland, Oregon
|
4 | 426,780 | 93.63 | 24,673,130 | ||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
2 | 213,800 | 100.00 | 10,087,826 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV
|
17 | 3,474,903 | 97.34 | % | 141,744,715 | |||||||||||||
33
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Percentage | Entitys | |||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Occupancy(1) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund V(6):
|
||||||||||||||||||
United States:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
14 | 1,966,183 | 98.68 | % | 60,317,304 | |||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
3 | 1,012,972 | 100.00 | 52,963,304 | ||||||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
3 | 802,900 | 100.00 | 30,218,891 | ||||||||||||||
Chicago, Illinois
|
2 | 582,220 | 21.39 | 35,634,953 | ||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
3 | 594,000 | 94.40 | 22,108,918 | ||||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
7 | 1,352,590 | 98.30 | 50,513,231 | ||||||||||||||
Dallas/ Fort Worth, Texas
|
10 | 2,587,545 | 94.90 | 93,323,493 | ||||||||||||||
Denver, Colorado
|
2 | 142,077 | 100.00 | 5,989,413 | ||||||||||||||
El Paso, Texas
|
7 | 848,548 | 100.00 | 33,746,323 | ||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
3 | 354,151 | 94.64 | 21,861,364 | ||||||||||||||
Houston, Texas
|
6 | 1,333,229 | 100.00 | 46,148,561 | ||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
2 | 1,514,645 | 100.00 | 65,970,568 | ||||||||||||||
Los Angeles/ Orange County, California
|
4 | 2,738,029 | 100.00 | 138,855,220 | ||||||||||||||
Louisville, Kentucky
|
2 | 877,250 | 94.30 | 33,202,740 | ||||||||||||||
Memphis, Tennessee
|
5 | 2,329,468 | 100.00 | 63,651,644 | ||||||||||||||
Nashville, Tennessee
|
2 | 516,240 | 100.00 | 17,135,005 | ||||||||||||||
Orlando, Florida
|
3 | 492,801 | 100.00 | 17,095,334 | ||||||||||||||
Portland, Oregon
|
1 | 127,420 | 100.00 | 6,670,860 | ||||||||||||||
Reno, Nevada
|
2 | 820,006 | 100.00 | 35,121,878 | ||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
9 | 1,213,020 | 100.00 | 50,475,946 | ||||||||||||||
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
|
1 | 401,536 | 100.00 | 15,980,582 | ||||||||||||||
St. Louis, Missouri
|
1 | 1,262,648 | 100.00 | 44,556,562 | ||||||||||||||
Tampa, Florida
|
2 | 172,000 | 100.00 | 10,652,702 | ||||||||||||||
Washington D.C./ Baltimore, Maryland
|
6 | 1,389,092 | 100.00 | 65,173,005 | ||||||||||||||
Mexico:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Juarez
|
1 | 131,538 | 100.00 | 8,692,456 | ||||||||||||||
Monterrey
|
5 | 684,940 | 96.45 | 36,783,544 | ||||||||||||||
Reynosa
|
6 | 950,046 | 100.00 | 53,548,986 | ||||||||||||||
Tijuana
|
7 | 1,070,200 | 86.80 | 53,601,559 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund V
|
119 | 28,267,294 | 96.79 | % | 1,169,994,346 | |||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI(7):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
4 | 3,229,104 | 95.13 | % | 236,151,097 | |||||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
2 | 600,960 | 83.34 | 24,014,348 | ||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
6 | 926,568 | 79.91 | 57,901,451 | ||||||||||||||
Greenville, South Carolina
|
2 | 737,889 | 99.51 | 27,177,491 | ||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
4 | 2,470,610 | 64.41 | 133,492,983 | ||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
1 | 93,948 | 100.00 | 12,587,024 | ||||||||||||||
Northern Ohio
|
2 | 324,750 | 100.00 | 12,262,458 |
34
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Percentage | Entitys | |||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Occupancy(1) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||
San Francisco (Central Valley), California
|
1 | 264,418 | 100.00 | 9,852,273 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI
|
22 | 8,648,247 | 84.66 | % | 513,439,125 | |||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII(7):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
1 | 585,510 | 100.00 | % | 36,384,785 | |||||||||||||
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
3 | 500,800 | 96.01 | 20,962,980 | ||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
4 | 683,482 | 95.75 | 60,401,112 | ||||||||||||||
Greenville, South Carolina
|
7 | 390,000 | 61.54 | 12,212,768 | ||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
5 | 1,631,311 | 85.29 | 90,375,360 | ||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
3 | 1,060,998 | 59.05 | 119,251,780 | ||||||||||||||
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
1 | 799,344 | 100.00 | 32,386,789 | ||||||||||||||
Nashville, Tennessee
|
1 | 70,000 | 100.00 | 2,544,638 | ||||||||||||||
Northern Ohio
|
4 | 333,136 | 90.95 | 13,703,639 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII
|
29 | 6,054,581 | 85.07 | % | 388,223,851 | |||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII(7):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
1 | 67,200 | 74.36 | % | 3,840,817 | |||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
2 | 537,433 | 100.00 | 41,494,503 | ||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
1 | 167,270 | 91.18 | 5,850,958 | ||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
4 | 360,474 | 100.00 | 33,368,848 | ||||||||||||||
Greenville, South Carolina
|
1 | 143,119 | 100.00 | 4,879,153 | ||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
6 | 934,945 | 83.02 | 43,159,617 | ||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
6 | 412,611 | 93.98 | 38,310,927 | ||||||||||||||
Nashville, Tennessee
|
1 | 88,000 | 100.00 | 2,869,559 | ||||||||||||||
Northern Ohio
|
1 | 255,000 | 58.82 | 10,699,695 | ||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
1 | 98,400 | 100.00 | 6,797,618 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII
|
24 | 3,064,452 | 89.54 | % | 191,271,695 | |||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX(7):
|
||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
1 | 54,400 | 100.00 | % | 3,886,090 | |||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
2 | 385,000 | 96.06 | 34,232,359 | ||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
2 | 196,434 | 93.47 | 7,318,861 | ||||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
1 | 200,000 | 100.00 | 6,393,264 | ||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
2 | 348,600 | 100.00 | 31,875,394 | ||||||||||||||
Greenville, South Carolina
|
5 | 662,000 | 27.19 | 18,409,697 | ||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
6 | 1,255,475 | 75.47 | 61,106,427 | ||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
2 | 402,460 | 83.24 | 34,298,383 | ||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX
|
21 | 3,504,369 | 74.73 | % | 197,520,475 | |||||||||||||
35
Rentable | |||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Percentage | Entitys | ||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Occupancy(1) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund X(7):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, Georgia
|
1 | 51,200 | 100.00 | % | 3,322,878 | ||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
1 | 40,000 | 0.00 | 3,862,727 | |||||||||||||||
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
1 | 136,184 | 100.00 | 5,080,241 | |||||||||||||||
Columbus, Ohio
|
1 | 237,500 | 100.00 | 5,386,600 | |||||||||||||||
Ft. Lauderdale/ Miami, Florida
|
3 | 340,143 | 100.00 | 30,116,012 | |||||||||||||||
Greenville, South Carolina
|
10 | 769,400 | 59.71 | 21,032,515 | |||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
6 | 1,554,074 | 96.67 | 75,090,740 | |||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
3 | 651,880 | 100.00 | 60,733,514 | |||||||||||||||
Nashville, Tennessee
|
1 | 187,930 | 100.00 | 6,429,042 | |||||||||||||||
Northern Ohio
|
1 | 181,838 | 100.00 | 7,254,504 | |||||||||||||||
San Antonio, Texas
|
1 | 40,800 | 100.00 | 1,713,823 | |||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund X
|
29 | 4,190,949 | 90.41 | % | 220,022,596 | ||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI(8):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
1 | 203,404 | 100.00 | % | 13,251,528 | ||||||||||||||
I-81 Corridor, Pennsylvania
|
5 | 1,267,956 | 87.95 | 74,673,232 | |||||||||||||||
Indianapolis, Indiana
|
8 | 2,843,601 | 98.54 | 139,346,518 | |||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI
|
14 | 4,314,961 | 95.50 | % | 227,271,278 | ||||||||||||||
ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII(8):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Central New Jersey
|
7 | 2,606,962 | 100.00 | % | 191,561,859 | ||||||||||||||
I-95 Corridor, New Jersey
|
5 | 756,848 | 100.00 | 77,549,877 | |||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII
|
12 | 3,363,810 | 100.00 | % | 269,111,736 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal ProLogis North American
|
465 | 97,350,691 | 93.43 | % | 4,827,005,130 | ||||||||||||||
Europe:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis European Properties Fund(9):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Belgium
|
2 | 468,535 | 100.00 | % | 25,754,915 | ||||||||||||||
Czech Republic:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Prague
|
7 | 1,342,066 | 100.00 | 102,969,187 | |||||||||||||||
France:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Central
|
70 | 12,633,688 | 90.33 | 964,375,652 | |||||||||||||||
East
|
3 | 939,697 | 100.00 | 57,248,555 | |||||||||||||||
North
|
8 | 1,704,984 | 100.00 | 97,231,087 | |||||||||||||||
South
|
18 | 4,587,640 | 88.54 | 240,433,170 |
36
Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||||
No. of | Square | Percentage | Entitys | |||||||||||||||||
Bldgs. | Footage | Occupancy(1) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||||
Germany:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
North
|
2 | 438,515 | 100.00 | 39,786,400 | ||||||||||||||||
Rhine/ Main
|
3 | 405,847 | 100.00 | 39,947,740 | ||||||||||||||||
Rhine/ Ruhr
|
5 | 1,026,863 | 99.57 | 98,891,366 | ||||||||||||||||
South
|
4 | 581,590 | 100.00 | 51,578,113 | ||||||||||||||||
Hungary:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Budapest
|
3 | 527,047 | 90.60 | 35,468,772 | ||||||||||||||||
Italy:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Milan
|
15 | 4,820,031 | 100.00 | 291,363,724 | ||||||||||||||||
Netherlands:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Amsterdam
|
4 | 633,289 | 100.00 | 70,575,577 | ||||||||||||||||
Rotterdam
|
9 | 1,785,424 | 99.16 | 122,340,656 | ||||||||||||||||
South
|
8 | 2,510,013 | 100.00 | 174,041,555 | ||||||||||||||||
Poland:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Central
|
2 | 656,848 | 100.00 | 37,956,302 | ||||||||||||||||
South
|
1 | 366,880 | 100.00 | 23,365,899 | ||||||||||||||||
Warsaw
|
11 | 2,048,633 | 93.78 | 150,693,010 | ||||||||||||||||
West
|
4 | 463,949 | 99.54 | 27,761,853 | ||||||||||||||||
Spain:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Barcelona
|
7 | 1,806,865 | 99.53 | 159,147,614 | ||||||||||||||||
Madrid
|
2 | 342,951 | 85.68 | 33,234,217 | ||||||||||||||||
Sweden:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholm
|
2 | 710,839 | 100.00 | 46,484,923 | ||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
East Midlands
|
17 | 3,443,970 | 100.00 | 414,525,500 | ||||||||||||||||
London and Southeast
|
8 | 1,158,185 | 100.00 | 219,594,032 | ||||||||||||||||
North
|
3 | 434,122 | 100.00 | 46,390,462 | ||||||||||||||||
West Midlands
|
12 | 2,082,798 | 89.25 | 285,151,336 | ||||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis European Properties Fund
|
230 | 47,921,269 | 95.35 | % | 3,856,311,617 | |||||||||||||||
Asia:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis Japan Properties Fund(5):
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Nagoya, Japan
|
1 | 346,069 | 100.00 | % | 48,410,003 | |||||||||||||||
Osaka, Japan
|
2 | 468,931 | 100.00 | 41,815,381 | ||||||||||||||||
Tokyo, Japan
|
10 | 3,054,469 | 98.85 | 641,494,379 | ||||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis Japan Properties Fund
|
13 | 3,869,469 | 99.09 | % | 731,719,763 | |||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Investees
|
708 | 149,141,429 | 94.19 | % | $ | 9,415,036,510 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | The percentage occupancy presented is the physical occupancy at December 31, 2004. |
(2) | Investment represents 100% of the carrying value of the properties, before depreciation, of each entity at December 31, 2004, except with respect to ProLogis North American Properties Funds XI and XII. ProLogis acquired its ownership interest in these entities as part of the Keystone Transaction in August 2004. For this presentation, the investment represents 100% of the fair values of the operating properties owned by these entities that were determined as part of the associated purchase accounting adjustments, |
37
not just ProLogis share of the fair values, as adjusted for subsequent activity. See Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsKeystone Transaction. | |
(3) | ProLogis had a 50% ownership interest in ProLogis California at December 31, 2004. |
(4) | ProLogis had a 41.3% ownership interest in ProLogis North American Properties Fund I at December 31, 2004. |
(5) | ProLogis had a 20% ownership interest in each of ProLogis North American Properties Fund II, ProLogis North American Properties Fund III, ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV and ProLogis Japan Properties Fund at December 31, 2004. |
(6) | ProLogis had an effective ownership interest of 11.5% in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V at December 31, 2004. |
(7) | ProLogis formed this property fund in 2004 as part of the Keystone Transaction (see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsKeystone Transaction). ProLogis ownership interest in each of ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through X was 20% at December 31, 2004. |
(8) | ProLogis acquired a 20% ownership interest in each of ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI and ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII as part of the Keystone Transaction (see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Keystone Transaction). |
(9) | ProLogis had a 21.8% ownership interest in ProLogis European Properties Fund at December 31, 2004. |
CDFS Business |
| United States: two entities in which ProLogis ownership interest is 50% in each; ownership interests were acquired as part of the Keystone Transaction (see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Keystone Transaction); one entity recently completed a 0.8 million square foot property in Indianapolis with a total investment of $39.1 million and one entity that began development of another 0.8 million square foot property in Indianapolis with a total expected cost at completion of $22.7 million. | |
| Europe: three entities in the United Kingdom in which ProLogis ownership interest is 50% in each, including one entity in which ProLogis no longer actively participates and two entities that own land parcels (10 acres, 0.2 million buildable square feet) and control land parcels through contract, option or letter of intent (396 acres, 7.5 million buildable square feet) but do not have any projects currently under development. | |
| Asia: one entity in China that has two properties under development aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total expected cost at completion of $7.8 million; both properties are in Shanghai. This entity also owns four operating properties in Shanghai aggregating 0.2 million square feet at a total acquisition cost of $7.3 million. |
ITEM 3. | Legal Proceedings |
38
ITEM 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
ITEM 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
High Sale | Low Sale | ||||||||||||
Price | Price | Per Common Share Distribution | |||||||||||
2003:
|
|||||||||||||
First Quarter
|
$ | 26.60 | $ | 23.63 | $ | 0 | .36 | ||||||
Second Quarter
|
28.60 | 25.60 | 0 | .36 | |||||||||
Third Quarter
|
30.39 | 26.97 | 0 | .36 | |||||||||
Fourth Quarter
|
32.62 | 28.34 | 0 | .36 | |||||||||
2004:
|
|||||||||||||
First Quarter
|
36.00 | 30.80 | 0 | .365 | |||||||||
Second Quarter
|
36.39 | 27.62 | 0 | .365 | |||||||||
Third Quarter
|
36.95 | 32.74 | 0 | .365 | |||||||||
Fourth Quarter
|
43.33 | 35.30 | 0 | .365 | |||||||||
2005:
|
|||||||||||||
First Quarter (through March 11)
|
$ | 43.50 | $ | 37.40 | $ | 0 | .37 |
39
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
Per Common Share:
|
||||||||||||||
Ordinary income
|
$ | 0.94 | $ | 1.23 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||
Capital gains
|
0.17 | 0.05 | 0.06 | |||||||||||
Return of capital
|
0.35 | 0.16 | 0.41 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1.46 | $ | 1.44 | $ | 1.42 | ||||||||
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Series C(1)
|
$ | 4.27 | $ | 4.27 | $ | 4.27 | ||||||
Series D(2)(3)
|
| 1.98 | 1.98 | |||||||||
Series E(4)
|
| 1.09 | 2.19 | |||||||||
Series F(5)
|
1.69 | 0.15 | | |||||||||
Series G (6)
|
1.69 | | |
(1) | For federal income tax purposes, $3.62 of the 2004 dividend, $4.11 of the 2003 dividend and $4.04 of the 2002 dividend are estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders with the remaining portions of each dividend estimated to represent capital gains. |
(2) | For federal income tax purposes, of the $1.98 per share dividend paid in 2003 on shares that were not redeemed, $1.90 is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders and of the total 2002 dividend, |
40
$1.87 is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders. The remaining portions in each year are estimated to represent capital gains. | |
(3) | ProLogis redeemed all of its 10,000,000 outstanding Series D Preferred Shares (5,000,000 shares on January 12, 2004 and 5,000,000 shares on December 1, 2003). No Series D Preferred Share dividends were declared and paid in 2004, although the total redemption value included accrued and unpaid dividends of $0.066 per share. For 2003, the total dividends paid on the 5,000,000 shares redeemed in that year were $1.82 per share, of which $1.48 was declared and paid prior to the redemption and $0.34 represented accrued and unpaid dividends that were included in the redemption value. Of the dividend declared and paid in 2003 of $1.48 per share, $1.26 is estimated to be ordinary income to the holders, $0.16 is estimated to be qualified dividends and $0.06 is estimated to represent capital gains |
(4) | ProLogis redeemed all of its 2,000,000 outstanding Series E Preferred Shares on July 1, 2003. The total dividends paid on the redeemed shares in 2003 were $1.46 per share, of which $1.09 was declared and paid prior to the redemption and $0.37 represented accrued and unpaid dividends that were included in the redemption value. Of the dividend declared and paid in 2003 of $1.09 per share, $0.93 is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders, $0.12 is estimated to be qualified dividends and $0.04 is estimated to represent capital gains. |
(5) | The Series F Preferred Shares were issued on November 28, 2003. For federal income tax purposes, $1.43 of the 2004 dividend and $0.14 of the 2003 dividend are estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders with the remainder estimated to represent capital gains. |
(6) | The Series G Preferred Shares were issued on December 30, 2003. For federal income tax purposes, $1.43 of the 2004 dividend is estimated to represent ordinary income to the holders with the remainder estimated to represent capital gains. |
Other Issuances of Common Shares |
41
Common Share Repurchase Program |
Common Share Plans |
| 1999 Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan, amended in November 2002 (the 1999 Common Share Plan): Allows holders of Common Shares to automatically reinvest Common Share distributions and certain holders and persons who are not holders of Common Shares to purchase a limited number of additional Common Shares by making optional cash payments, without payment of any brokerage commission or service charge. Common Shares that are acquired under the 1999 Common Share Plan, either through reinvestment of distributions or through optional cash payments, are acquired at a price ranging from 98% to 100% of the market price of such Common Shares, as determined by ProLogis. ProLogis generated net proceeds of $35.2 million from the issuance of 1,021,000 Common Shares in 2004 under the 1999 Common Share Plan. | |
| Continuous equity offering plan: Allows ProLogis to sell up to 7,400,000 Common Shares through two designated agents in at-the-market offerings who earn a fee of between 2.0% and 2.25% of the gross proceeds. In 2004, ProLogis sold 1,430,000 Common Shares under this plan generating net proceeds to ProLogis of $53.3 million. | |
| ProLogis Trust Employee Share Purchase Plan (the Employee Share Plan): Employees of ProLogis and its participating entities may purchase Common Shares, through payroll deductions only, at a discounted price of 85% of the market price of the Common Shares. The aggregate fair value of Common Shares that an individual employee can acquire in a calendar year under the Employee Share Plan is $25,000. Subject to certain provisions, the aggregate number of Common Shares that may be issued under the Employee Share Plan may not exceed 5,000,000. ProLogis began issuing Common Shares under the Employee Share Plan in January 2002. In 2004, ProLogis generated net proceeds of $1.1 million from the sale of 43,000 Common shares under the Employee Share Plan. |
42
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating Data:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income
|
$ | 544,663 | $ | 542,840 | $ | 539,575 | $ | 560,052 | $ | 570,279 | |||||||||||
Property management and other property fund fees
|
50,778 | 44,184 | 34,536 | 18,075 | 9,442 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
598,139 | 589,373 | 578,620 | 581,170 | 584,009 | ||||||||||||||||
Rental expenses
|
142,280 | 135,779 | 124,629 | 123,977 | 118,360 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses
|
82,147 | 65,907 | 53,893 | 50,274 | 44,954 | ||||||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
408,984 | 373,585 | 335,487 | 321,113 | 320,121 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains on certain dispositions of CDFS business assets, net
|
176,967 | 126,526 | 122,264 | 96,847 | 71,284 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
366,122 | 342,314 | 365,397 | 356,904 | 335,172 | ||||||||||||||||
Income from unconsolidated property funds
|
42,899 | 27,265 | 26,186 | 21,405 | 30,638 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (losses) from other unconsolidated investees, net(1)
|
(801 | ) | (12,231 | ) | 35,659 | (89,124 | ) | 38,778 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
153,334 | 155,475 | 152,958 | 163,629 | 172,191 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings before certain net gains and net foreign currency
exchange gains (expenses/losses)
|
253,018 | 198,797 | 271,144 | 125,260 | 234,901 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains recognized on dispositions of certain non-CDFS business
assets, net
|
6,072 | 1,638 | 6,648 | 10,008 | 1,314 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains on partial dispositions of investments in property funds(2)
|
3,328 | 74,716 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange gains (expenses/losses), net
|
14,686 | (10,587 | ) | (2,031 | ) | (3,721 | ) | (17,927 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total income tax expense
|
(43,562 | ) | (15,374 | ) | (28,169 | ) | (4,725 | ) | (5,130 | ) | |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations
|
233,542 | 249,190 | 247,592 | 126,822 | 213,158 | ||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations(3)
|
(747 | ) | 1,485 | 1,289 | 1,322 | 1,320 | |||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
232,795 | 250,675 | 248,881 | 128,144 | 214,478 |
43
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less preferred share dividends(4)
|
25,746 | 30,485 | 32,715 | 37,309 | 56,763 | |||||||||||||||||||
Less excess of redemption values over carrying values of
Preferred Shares redeemed(5)
|
4,236 | 7,823 | | 4,797 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares
|
$ | 202,813 | $ | 212,367 | $ | 216,166 | $ | 86,038 | $ | 157,715 | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Common Shares per
share Basic: Continuing operations
|
$ | 1.12 | $ | 1.17 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares per share
Basic
|
$ | 1.11 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Common Shares per
share Diluted: Continuing operations
|
$ | 1.09 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.01 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares per share
Diluted
|
$ | 1.08 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.96 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
182,226 | 179,245 | 177,813 | 172,755 | 163,651 | |||||||||||||||||||
Diluted(6)
|
191,801 | 187,222 | 184,869 | 175,197 | 164,401 | |||||||||||||||||||
Common Share Distributions:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Share cash distributions paid
|
$ | 266,135 | $ | 258,187 | $ | 252,270 | $ | 237,691 | $ | 219,333 | ||||||||||||||
Common Share distributions paid per share
|
$ | 1.46 | $ | 1.44 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.38 | $ | 1.34 | ||||||||||||||
Funds From Operations(7):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of net earnings to funds from operations as
defined by ProLogis:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to Common Shares
|
$ | 202,813 | $ | 212,367 | $ | 216,166 | $ | 86,038 | $ | 157,715 | ||||||||||||||
Add (Deduct) NAREIT defined adjustments:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis direct adjustments
|
157,943 | 127,875 | 137,934 | 126,408 | 144,960 | |||||||||||||||||||
Items attributable to discontinued operations
|
(1,202 | ) | 678 | 651 | 617 | 585 | ||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis share of reconciling items of unconsolidated
investees
|
39,738 | 30,228 | 39,531 | 68,367 | 56,622 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total NAREIT defined adjustments
|
196,479 | 158,781 | 178,116 | 195,392 | 202,167 | |||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal NAREIT defined funds from operations
|
399,292 | 371,148 | 394,282 | 281,430 | 359,882 |
44
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Add (Deduct) ProLogis defined adjustments:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis direct adjustments
|
2,102 | 18,379 | 16,917 | 3,742 | 23,799 | |||||||||||||||||||
Items attributable to discontinued operations
|
(1,075 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
ProLogis share of reconciling items of unconsolidated
investees
|
84 | 11,218 | (18,150 | ) | (3,969 | ) | (6,963 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total ProLogis defined adjustments
|
1,111 | 29,597 | (1,233 | ) | (227 | ) | 16,836 | |||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations attributable to Common Shares as defined
by ProLogis
|
$ | 400,403 | $ | 400,745 | $ | 393,049 | $ | 281,203 | $ | 376,718 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average Common Shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
182,226 | 179,245 | 177,813 | 172,755 | 163,651 | |||||||||||||||||||
Diluted(8)
|
191,801 | 187,222 | 184,869 | 180,284 | 178,166 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$ | 481,332 | $ | 328,531 | $ | 377,235 | $ | 343,272 | $ | 321,091 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(612,495 | ) | (77,066 | ) | (94,568 | ) | 103,952 | (376,945 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
$ | 36,189 | $ | (30,771 | ) | $ | (199,847 | ) | $ | (477,105 | ) | $ | 44,386 |
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
Financial Position:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate owned, excluding land held for development, before
depreciation
|
$ | 5,735,902 | $ | 5,342,884 | $ | 5,008,707 | $ | 4,387,456 | $ | 4,502,087 | |||||||||||
Land held for development
|
597,829 | 511,163 | 386,820 | 200,737 | 187,405 | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees
|
908,513 | 677,293 | 809,286 | 1,308,856 | 1,453,148 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
7,097,799 | 6,367,466 | 5,911,380 | 5,557,984 | 5,946,334 | ||||||||||||||||
Lines of credit and short-term borrowings (9)
|
960,002 | 699,468 | 545,906 | 375,875 | 439,822 | ||||||||||||||||
Senior unsecured debt
|
1,962,316 | 1,776,789 | 1,630,094 | 1,670,359 | 1,699,989 | ||||||||||||||||
Secured debt and assessment bonds
|
491,643 | 514,412 | 555,978 | 532,106 | 537,925 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
3,929,033 | 3,270,757 | 2,994,571 | 2,838,225 | 2,972,333 | ||||||||||||||||
Minority interest
|
66,273 | 37,777 | 42,467 | 45,639 | 46,630 | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemable preferred shares
|
350,000 | 475,000 | 400,000 | 400,000 | 691,403 | ||||||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity
|
$ | 3,102,493 | $ | 3,058,932 | $ | 2,874,342 | $ | 2,674,120 | $ | 2,927,371 | |||||||||||
Number of Common Shares outstanding
|
185,789 | 180,183 | 178,146 | 175,888 | 165,287 |
45
(1) | Income (losses) from other unconsolidated investees includes, in addition to the operations of the investees, ProLogis proportionate share of these items: |
| 2003: Impairment charge recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($38.3 million); net gains recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($5.2 million); a charge representing an adjustment to the amount recognized in 2002 as a result of the disposition of all of the operations and a significant portion of the assets of a temperature-controlled distribution investee ($2.3 million). | |
| 2002: Impairment charge recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investees ($42.9 million), net gains recognized by its temperature-controlled distribution investees ($1.6 million) and charges recognized from the write-downs of technology related investments of unconsolidated investees ($2.1 million). | |
| 2001: Impairment charges recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($88.4 million); net losses recognized by temperature-controlled distribution investee ($4.4 million), net losses resulting from the write-off of technology related investments of its two investees ($5.8 million) and charges recognized from the write-downs of technology related investments of unconsolidated investees ($37.0 million). |
See Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Results of Operations Other Components of Operating Income Income (Losses) from Other Unconsolidated Investees. | |
(2) | In 2004, ProLogis recognized a $3.3 million gain from the partial disposition of its investment in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V. In 2003, ProLogis recognized a $74.7 million gain on the partial redemption of its investment in ProLogis European Properties Fund, including a foreign currency exchange gain of $47.9 million resulting from the repatriation of the cash redemption proceeds to the United States. |
(3) | In 2004, discontinued operations includes a loss from assets held for sale of $36.7 million (including an impairment charge of $50.6 million), operating income attributable to assets disposed of $1.7 million and net gains recognized on the disposition of assets of $34.3 million. Amounts for the years 2000 through 2003 represent the operating income attributable to assets disposed of in 2004 that are classified as discontinued operations. See Note 6 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 and in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Other Components of Operating Income Discontinued Operations. |
(4) | In 2004, ProLogis redeemed $125.0 million of Preferred Shares (January 12, 2004). In 2003, ProLogis redeemed $175.0 million of Preferred Shares ($50.0 million on July 1, 2003 and $125.0 million on December 1, 2003). In 2001, ProLogis redeemed $139.6 million of Preferred Shares ($4.6 million on March 20, 2001 and $135.0 million on May 8, 2001) and $151.8 million of Preferred Shares were converted into Common Shares during the period from January 1, 2001 to March 20, 2001. In 2003, ProLogis issued $250.0 million of Preferred Shares ($125.0 million each on November 28, 2003 and December 30, 2003). |
(5) | The recognition of these charges is discussed in Note 2 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 and in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Other Components of Operating Income Excess of Redemption Values over Carrying Values of Preferred Shares Redeemed. |
(6) | The calculations of basic and dilutive earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are presented in Note 11 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. For 2001, the weighted average effect of converting ProLogis outstanding limited partnership units was antidilutive. For 2000, the weighted average effects of converting ProLogis outstanding convertible preferred shares and outstanding limited partnership units were antidilutive. |
(7) | Funds from operations is a financial measure that is commonly used in the real estate industry. Although the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) has published a definition of |
46
funds from operations, modifications to the NAREIT calculation of funds from operations are common among REITs, as companies seek to provide performance measures that meaningfully reflect their business. Funds from operations, as defined by ProLogis, is presented as a supplemental performance measure. Funds from operations is not used by ProLogis as, nor should it be considered to be, an alternative to net earnings computed under GAAP as an indicator of ProLogis operating performance or as an alternative to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP as an indicator of ProLogis ability to fund its cash needs. | |
Funds from operations is not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not present, nor does ProLogis intend it to present, a complete picture of its financial condition and operating performance. ProLogis believes that net earnings computed under GAAP remains the primary measure of performance and that funds from operations is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net earnings. Further, ProLogis believes that its consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of its financial condition and its operating performance. The funds from operations measure presented by ProLogis will not necessarily be comparable to similarly titled measures of other REITs. | |
At the same time that NAREIT created and defined its funds from operations concept for the REIT industry, it also recognized that management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community. ProLogis believes that financial analysts, potential investors and shareholders who review its operating results are best served by a defined funds from operations measure that includes other adjustments to net earnings computed under GAAP in addition to those included in the NAREIT defined measure of funds from operations. ProLogis funds from operations measure is discussed in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Funds from Operations. | |
(8) | For purposes of calculating the weighted average Common Shares used for funds from operations purposes, the effects of converting ProLogis outstanding convertible preferred shares and outstanding weighted average limited partnership units were dilutive for each year. The weighted average convertible preferred shares (which were fully converted during 2001) applicable to this calculation are 1,544,000 and 8,417,000 for 2001 and 2000, respectively, and the applicable convertible preferred share dividends are $81,000 and $11,358,000 for 2001 and 2000, respectively. The weighted average limited partnership units applicable to this calculation are 5,035,000, 4,773,000, 4,938,000, 5,087,000 and 5,348,000 for 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The minority interest shares in earnings associated with these limited partnership units are $4,875,000, $4,959,000, $5,508,000, $5,968,000 and $5,586,000 for 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. |
(9) | At March 11, 2005, ProLogis had $1.11 million of total borrowings outstanding under its revolving lines of credit resulting in $693.0 million of borrowing capacity available (total capacity of $1.84 billion reduced by $34.6 million of letters of credit outstanding with lending banks at March 11, 2005). |
ITEM 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
47
Results of Operations: |
| ProLogis net earnings attributable to Common Shares were $202.8 million in 2004 and $212.4 million in 2003. | |
| Net operating income of ProLogis property operations segment increased by $17.6 million in 2004 over 2003; stabilized leased percentage at December 31, 2004 (92.3%) was higher than at December 31, 2003 (90.2%); rental rates on new leases of previously leased space decreased 4.7% in 2004; and same store net operating income, as defined, was 0.15% higher than in 2003. | |
| ProLogis income from property funds increased by $22.2 million in 2004, including an increase in fees earned from property funds of $6.6 million. Five new property funds were formed in 2004 and ProLogis acquired interests in two additional property funds in 2004. | |
| Operating income of ProLogis CDFS business segment was $49.5 million higher in 2004 than in 2003 due to higher transaction volume in Europe and Asia in 2004, while transaction volume in North America decreased slightly. Transaction volume in Europe in 2003 was lower than previous years as a result of slower leasing activity in the CDFS business segments properties. | |
| ProLogis recognized an impairment loss of $50.6 million related to the French operations of its temperature-controlled company that are held for sale at December 31, 2004. In 2003, ProLogis recognized a net loss under the equity method (including an impairment loss recognized prior to the sale) of $10.7 million related to the United Kingdom operations of this same company that were sold in December 2003. | |
| ProLogis recognized a gain of $3.3 million in 2004 from the partial disposition of its investment in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V. In 2003, ProLogis recognized a gain of $74.7 million on the partial redemption of its investment in ProLogis European Properties Fund, including a foreign currency exchange gain of $47.9 million resulting from the repatriation of the cash redemption proceeds to the United States. | |
| ProLogis initiated operations in China in 2004 by acquiring properties (through an unconsolidated investee) and by beginning development activities (both direct starts and through an unconsolidated investee). | |
| ProLogis acquired an operating property in Singapore and acquired land for future development in Canada in 2004. |
48
Liquidity and Capital Resources: |
| Generated net cash flow from operating activities in 2004 of $481.3 million. | |
| Used net cash in its investing activities of $612.5 million in 2004 (used $1.73 billion for real estate investments, used $333.5 million for the Keystone Transaction on a net basis and generated $1.41 billion from contributions and sales of properties and land parcels). | |
| ProLogis issued 350.0 million euro of senior notes that are registered on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (the currency equivalent of approximately $464.2 million at December 31, 2004). Cash proceeds to ProLogis were $420.6 million as of the issuance date in April 2004. | |
| Sales and issuances of Common Shares under various Common Share plans generated net cash of $146.8 million. | |
| Redeemed $125.0 million of Preferred Shares. | |
| Distributed $1.46 per Common Share in 2004 for aggregate distributions paid of $266.1 million ; set the distribution level for 2005 at $1.48 per Common Share. ProLogis has increased its Common Share distribution level every year since its Common Shares became publicly traded in 1994. | |
| Increased the total borrowing capacity under its lines of credit by 25.0 billion yen (approximately $241.1 million at December 31, 2003), total borrowing capacity was in excess of $1.8 billion at December 31, 2004. |
Consolidation |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
49
Revenue Recognition |
Depreciation and Useful Lives of Real Estate Assets |
50
| nine operating properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet, one 0.8 million square foot property under development, 14 acres of land and land option rights that were valued on a combined basis at approximately $145 million; | |
| ownership interests in two unconsolidated property funds (20% interest in each) that own on a combined basis 7.7 million square feet of operating properties that were valued at approximately $102 million (including the proportionate assumption of approximately $26 million of secured debt of the property funds); | |
| ownership interests in two unconsolidated CDFS business joint ventures (50% interest in each); one entity owns a recently completed 0.8 million square foot operating property and one entity in the planning stage for the development of a 0.8 million square foot property that were valued on a combined basis at approximately $15 million (including the proportionate assumption of approximately $6 million of secured debt); | |
| a preferred equity interest in an unconsolidated entity that owns office properties that was valued at approximately $21 million; and | |
| certain other assets, net of certain other liabilities that were valued at approximately $7 million. |
| the issuance of approximately 879,000 limited partnership units that are redeemable for cash or, at ProLogis election, into one share of Common Shares; valued at approximately $30 million; | |
| the direct assumption of secured debt, valued at approximately $13 million; | |
| the indirect assumption of secured debt of unconsolidated investees, valued at approximately $32 million; and | |
| cash of approximately $504 million, including approximately $177 million that was funded on a short-term basis at closing pending the completion of long-term, secured financing arrangements by the Acquiring Property Funds. |
51
Property Operations |
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Square | Square | Square | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Feet | Number | Feet | Number | Feet | ||||||||||||||||||||
Direct ownership
|
1,228 | 133,630 | 1,252 | 133,141 | 1,230 | 127,956 | |||||||||||||||||||
Property funds(1)
|
708 | 149,141 | 485 | 97,219 | 444 | 82,633 | |||||||||||||||||||
Totals
|
1,936 | 282,771 | 1,737 | 230,360 | 1,674 | 210,589 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) | ProLogis ownership interests in the property funds ranged from 11.5% to 50% at December 31, 2004. |
52
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Properties directly owned by ProLogis:
|
||||||||||||||||
Rental income(1)(2)
|
$ | 544,663 | $ | 542,840 | $ | 539,575 | ||||||||||
Rental expenses(1)(3)
|
142,280 | 135,779 | 124,629 | |||||||||||||
Net operating income
|
402,383 | 407,061 | 414,946 | |||||||||||||
Property funds(4):
|
||||||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis California(5)
|
15,971 | 14,229 | 14,379 | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund I(5)
|
4,768 | 5,177 | 5,997 | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund II(5)
|
3,287 | 2,381 | 3,645 | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund III(5)
|
2,452 | 2,827 | 2,779 | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV(5)
|
1,913 | 1,924 | 1,977 | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund V(6)
|
13,049 | 12,500 | 7,544 | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund VI(7)
|
1,489 | | | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund VII(7)
|
1,052 | | | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund VIII(7)
|
849 | | | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund IX(7)
|
603 | | | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund X(7)
|
975 | | | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund XI(8)
|
816 | | | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund XII(8)
|
813 | | | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis European Properties Fund(9)
|
37,886 | 30,190 | 24,162 | |||||||||||||
Income from ProLogis Japan Properties Fund(10)
|
7,754 | 2,221 | 239 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal property funds
|
93,677 | 71,449 | 60,722 | |||||||||||||
Total property operations segment
|
$ | 496,060 | $ | 478,510 | $ | 475,668 | ||||||||||
(1) | Amounts do not include rental income and rental expenses associated with 20 properties that are presented as discontinued operations in ProLogis Consolidated Statements of Earnings in Item 8. The amounts are: |
| Rental income of $2,949,000 in 2004; $3,224,000 in 2003 and $2,627,000 in 2002, including rental expense recoveries of $0.2 million in 2004, $0.4 million in 2003 and $0.3 million in 2002. | |
| Rental expenses of $777,000 in 2004; $1,061,000 in 2003 and $687,000 in 2002. |
(2) | The number and composition of operating properties that are directly owned by ProLogis throughout the periods presented impact rental income for each period. Rental income includes net termination and renegotiation fees of $2.4 million in 2004, $4.5 million in 2003 and $14.6 million in 2002. In certain leasing situations, ProLogis finds it advantageous to negotiate lease terminations with a customer, |
53
particularly when the customer is experiencing financial difficulties or when ProLogis believes that it can re-lease the space at rates that, when combined with the termination fee, provides a total return to ProLogis in excess of what was being earned under the original lease terms. ProLogis cannot predict the level of such fees that will be earned in the future or whether ProLogis will be successful in re-leasing, in a timely manner, the vacant space associated with the lease terminations. | ||
Rental expense recoveries from customers, a component of rental income, were $101.0 million in 2004, $99.0 million in 2003 and $92.4 million in 2002. | ||
Rental income, excluding termination and renegotiation fees and rental expense recoveries and including discontinued operations, was $444.0 million in 2004, $442.1 million in 2003 and, $434.9 million in 2002. In 2004, the average occupancy levels were higher than in 2003. In 2003, the average occupancy levels were lower than 2002 levels; however, the increase in the number of properties in the directly owned portfolio in 2003 was sufficient to mitigate this effect. | ||
(3) | The number and composition of operating properties that are directly owned by ProLogis throughout the periods presented impacts rental expenses for each period. Rental expenses, including discontinued operations were $143.1 million in 2004, $136.9 million in 2003 and $125.3 million in 2002. Rental expenses are presented before any recoveries from customers, which are a component of rental income. Also, ProLogis reports the costs of managing the properties owned by property funds as part of rental expenses. When a property is contributed to a property fund, ProLogis begins reporting its share of the earnings of the property under the equity method along with fee income earned for services provided to the property funds, and no longer reports the operations of the property as part of its rental income and rental expenses. However, the overhead costs to provide the management services to the property fund continues to be reported as part of rental expenses. | |
Rental expenses as a percentage of rental income, before rental expense recoveries and termination and renegotiation fees and including discontinued operations, were 32.2% in 2004, 31.0% in 2003 and 28.8% in 2002. Total rental expense recoveries were 71.0%, 72.9% and 74.2% of total rental expenses in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These trends are the result of lower average occupancy levels that have been experienced over this three-year period and due to the inclusion of the property management expenses associated with a higher number of managed properties in rental expenses. Lower occupancy levels will result in certain fixed costs being borne directly by ProLogis in instances where customers are not occupying the space to which the expenses relate. Additionally, ProLogis will absorb a higher percentage of common area costs when occupancy levels are lower because there are fewer customers available from whom these costs can be recovered. | ||
(4) | The income from property funds includes fees earned by ProLogis for providing services to the property funds of $50.8 million in 2004, $44.2 million in 2003 and $34.5 million in 2002. As part of the Keystone Transaction (see Keystone Transaction), ProLogis began earning fees from ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through XII in 2004. These fees aggregated $3.6 million. | |
(5) | ProLogis ownership interest in the property fund was the same for all periods presented and each of the property funds was in operation with substantially the same portfolio of properties for all periods presented. ProLogis ownership interests are: ProLogis California (50%); ProLogis North American Properties Fund I (41.3%); ProLogis North American Properties Fund II (20%); ProLogis North American Properties Fund III (20%) and ProLogis North American Properties Fund IV (20%). With respect to each property fund, fluctuations between years in the amount that ProLogis recognizes under the equity method are generally due to occupancy levels and the amount of termination and renegotiation fees earned by the property fund. Additionally, fees earned by ProLogis for providing services to the property fund for other than property management and asset management services can fluctuate from year to year. ProLogis share of the net earnings of ProLogis California for 2004 includes $0.7 million of net gains from property dispositions. | |
(6) | ProLogis North American Properties Fund V has continued to acquire properties (generally from ProLogis) and increase its portfolio size since its inception on March 28, 2002. ProLogis ownership interest in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V was 11.5% at December 31, 2004, 14.0% at |
54
December 31, 2003 and 16.1% at December 31, 2002. ProLogis earned fees other than for property management, asset management and leasing of $1.5 million in 2004, $3.9 million in 2003 and $5.2 million in 2002. Excluding these fees, ProLogis recognized income from ProLogis North American Properties Fund V of $11.5 million, $8.6 million and $2.3 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These amounts correspond with the growth in the portfolio over the three years (119 properties, 28.3 million square feet at December 31, 2004; 90 properties, 20.7 million square feet at December 31, 2003; 57 properties, 12.0 million square feet at December 31, 2002). | ||
(7) | ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through X began operations on June 20, 2004 when ProLogis contributed 21 properties aggregating 3.0 million square feet to the five property funds. Upon completion of the Keystone Transaction, ProLogis North American Properties Funds VI through X collectively acquired an additional 22.5 million square feet of properties. ProLogis has a 20% ownership interest in each property fund. (see Keystone Transaction). | |
(8) | ProLogis North American Properties Funds XI and XII were formed by Keystone. ProLogis acquired Keystones 20% ownership interest in each of these property funds as part of the Keystone Transaction. These property funds own a combined 26 properties aggregating 7.7 million square feet (see Keystone Transaction). | |
(9) | ProLogis European Properties Fund has continued to acquire properties, generally from ProLogis, and increase its portfolio size since it began operations in 1999. ProLogis ownership interest in ProLogis European Properties Fund was 21.8% at December 31, 2004, 21.9% at December 31, 2003 and 29.6% at December 31, 2002. | |
Amounts presented for ProLogis European Properties Fund include ProLogis proportionate share of net foreign currency exchange gains and losses. These amounts were net losses of $0.4 million in 2004, $13.4 million in 2003 and $4.5 million in 2002. Excluding these net foreign currency exchange losses, ProLogis proportionate share of the net earnings of ProLogis European Properties Fund was $38.3 million, $43.6 million and $28.7 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The fluctuations in the income recognized by ProLogis from its ownership in this property fund, excluding net foreign currency exchange losses, are the result of the following factors; (i) the size of the portfolio and occupancy levels in each period; (ii) increases in the fees earned by ProLogis for services provided to the property fund due to the increase in the number of properties managed by ProLogis; (iii) higher interest costs associated with the higher debt levels that primarily result from the use of debt to acquire the additional properties; (iv) decreases in ProLogis ownership interest in each year and (v) variances in the average foreign currency exchange rate at which ProLogis translates its share of the net earnings of the ProLogis European Properties Fund to U.S. dollars. |
(10) | ProLogis Japan Properties Fund portfolio has grown to 13 properties aggregating 3.9 million square feet at December 31, 2004 from five properties aggregating 1.6 million square feet at December 31, 2003 and from one 0.2 million square foot property at December 31, 2002. ProLogis ownership interest in ProLogis Japan Properties Fund has been 20% since its inception on September 24, 2002. The increases in the amounts recognized by ProLogis under the equity method from its ownership in this property fund correspond with the growth in the portfolio over the three years. |
55
56
CDFS Business |
57
Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
Years Ended December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2002(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002(1) | (ProForma) | ||||||||||||||||
CDFS transactions:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from dispositions(2)
|
$ | 1,322,084 | $ | 894,853 | $ | 972,623 | $ | 1,118,989 | |||||||||||
Contingent proceeds realized(3)
|
5,871 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds deferred and not recognized(3)(4)
|
(43,433 | ) | (20,991 | ) | (41,775 | ) | (46,765 | ) | |||||||||||
Recognition of previously deferred amounts(4)
|
4,143 | 27,116 | 10,155 | 11,614 | |||||||||||||||
Costs of assets disposed of(2)
|
(1,111,698 | ) | (774,452 | ) | (818,739 | ) | (946,734 | ) | |||||||||||
Net gains
|
176,967 | 126,526 | 122,264 | 137,104 | |||||||||||||||
Development management fees and other CDFS income
|
2,698 | 2,349 | 4,509 | 10,222 | |||||||||||||||
Income from CDFS Joint Ventures(5)
|
189 | 730 | 551 | 551 | |||||||||||||||
Income from Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC(1)
|
| | 29,531 | | |||||||||||||||
Other expenses and charges(6)
|
(5,519 | ) | (4,808 | ) | (4,541 | ) | (4,592 | ) | |||||||||||
Other(7)
|
| | | 9,029 | |||||||||||||||
Total CDFS business segment
|
$ | 174,335 | $ | 124,797 | $ | 152,314 | $ | 152,314 | |||||||||||
CDFS transactions recognized as discontinued operations(8):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from dispositions
|
$ | 240,983 | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||
Costs of assets disposed of
|
(208,264 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||
Net CDFS gains in discontinued operations
|
$ | 32,719 | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||
(1) | ProLogis began presenting its investment in ProLogis UK Holdings S.A., formerly Kingspark Holding S.A., (collectively with its subsidiaries Kingspark S.A.), a Luxembourg company that performs CDFS business activities in the United Kingdom, and its investment in Kingspark LLC, a holding company that held the voting ownership interests of Kingspark S.A., on a consolidated basis on July 1, 2002. These investments were previously presented under the equity method. The changes in the reporting methods applicable to these entities occurred when ProLogis acquired (directly or indirectly) 100% of the ownership interests (voting and non-voting) of Kingspark S.A. To allow for comparability between periods, ProLogis also presents the components of the CDFS business segments net operating income on a proforma basis as if Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC were presented on a consolidated basis for all of 2002. |
(2) | The net proceeds and costs of assets disposed of related to transactions for the following assets (proceeds in 2003 include $35.9 million generated by the significant reduction of investment in a CDFS joint venture): |
| 2004: 180 acres; 17.2 million square feet; | |
| 2003: 208 acres; 14.2 million square feet; and | |
| 2002: 45 acres; 16.9 million (68 acres, 18.1 million square feet on a proforma basis). |
Also in 2003, ProLogis included charges of $6.3 million in its cost of assets disposed of that related to properties that were previously contributed to property funds. These charges were primarily associated |
58
with the settlement of customer balances and additional costs associated with the transfers of certain properties in Mexico. |
(3) | A contribution to ProLogis Japan Properties Fund in 2003 provided for an additional $5.9 million of proceeds, the receipt of which was contingent on the satisfactory performance of certain activities by ProLogis. These activities were completed in 2004. The receipt of these proceeds resulted in the recognition of an additional gain in 2004 of $4.7 million, after deferral. |
(4) | When ProLogis contributes a property to a property fund in which it has an ownership interest, ProLogis does not recognize a portion of the proceeds in its computation of the gain resulting from the contribution. The amount of the proceeds that cannot be recognized is determined based on ProLogis continuing ownership interest in the contributed property that arises due to ProLogis ownership interest in the property fund that acquires the property. ProLogis defers this portion of the proceeds by recognizing a reduction to its investment in the respective property fund. ProLogis adjusts its proportionate share of the earnings or loss that it recognizes under the equity method from the property fund in later periods to reflect the property funds depreciation expense as if the depreciation expense was computed on ProLogis lower basis in the contributed property rather than on the property funds basis in the contributed property. If a loss results when a property is contributed to a property fund, the entire loss is recognized. |
When a property that ProLogis originally contributed to a property fund is disposed of to a third party by the property fund, ProLogis recognizes the net amount of the proceeds that it had previously deferred in results of operations in the period that the disposition to the third party occurs. Further, during periods when ProLogis ownership interest in a property fund decreases, ProLogis will recognize gains to the extent that previously deferred proceeds are recognized to coincide with ProLogis new ownership interest in the property fund. ProLogis ownership interests in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V and ProLogis European Properties Fund decreased from time to time. When this occurs, previously deferred proceeds are recognized as gains in the period the ownership decrease occurs. Of the total for 2004, $3.3 million related to an ownership decrease in ProLogis North American Properties Fund V from the partial disposition of ProLogis investment. Of the total for 2003, $25.9 million related to an ownership decrease in ProLogis European Properties Fund resulting from the partial redemption of ProLogis investment. | |
(5) | Represents the income that ProLogis recognizes under the equity method from the CDFS Joint Ventures. ProLogis ownership interest in each of the CDFS Joint Ventures is 50%. See Note 5 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. |
(6) | Includes land holding costs of $2.7 million, $2.9 million and $2.8 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and the write-off of previously capitalized pursuit costs related to potential CDFS business segment projects of $2.8 million, $1.9 million and $1.7 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002. |
(7) | The income recognized by ProLogis under the equity method from its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC for the six months in 2002 includes items that, when presented on a consolidated basis, would not be included in the CDFS business segments operating income. Such items include: |
| Net rental income of $1.7 million ; | |
| General and administrative expenses of $1.6 million; | |
| Interest income of $0.2 million; | |
| Current income tax expense of $2.6 million; | |
| Gross interest expense of $0.9 million and additional capitalized interest of $8.0 million; | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense of $0.2 million; and | |
| Net foreign currency exchange gains of $4.4 million. |
(8) | Ten CDFS business properties aggregating 2.3 million square feet that were sold to third parties in 2004 met the criteria to be presented as discontinued operations in 2004. See Note 6 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. |
59
Other Components of Operating Income |
General and Administrative Expenses |
Relocation Expenses |
60
Income (Losses) from Other Unconsolidated Investees, Net |
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Temperature-controlled distribution investees:
|
|||||||||||||||
CSI/Frigo LLC(1)
|
$ | | $ | (1,694 | ) | $ | (1,824 | ) | |||||||
TCL Holding(2)
|
| (9,050 | ) | 4,765 | |||||||||||
Wiener Kuhlhaus(3)
|
1,188 | | | ||||||||||||
ProLogis Logistics(1)(4)
|
(1,703 | ) | (2,269 | ) | 4,131 | ||||||||||
Subtotals
|
(515 | ) | (13,013 | ) | 7,072 | ||||||||||
Other investees:
|
|||||||||||||||
Insight
|
(475 | ) | (5 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||
ProLogis Equipment Services(5)
|
| 57 | 574 | ||||||||||||
GoProLogis(6)
|
| | (2,073 | ) | |||||||||||
Subtotals
|
(475 | ) | 52 | (1,495 | ) | ||||||||||
Totals
|
$ | (990 | ) | $ | (12,961 | ) | $ | 5,577 | |||||||
(1) | This investment is presented on a consolidated basis in 2004. CSI/ Frigo LLC is a limited liability company that owns 100% of the voting common stock of TCL Holding, representing 5% of its net earnings or losses. ProLogis owns 89% of the membership interests of this entity but recognizes 95% of its net earnings or losses through a participating note agreement. CSI/Frigo LLC and TCL Holding are presented on a consolidated basis in 2004. CSI/Frigo also had an ownership interest in ProLogis Logistics, representing 5% of its net earnings or losses. ProLogis acquired this interest on October 23, 2002. See Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. |
(2) | This investment is presented on a consolidated basis in 2004. For 2003 and 2002, ProLogis effective ownership interest in TCL Holding was in excess of 99%, including its ownership in CSI/Frigo LLC. TCL Holding owns TCL Holding AB (formerly Frigoscandia Holding AB), a temperature-controlled distribution company that operates in Europe. During the years 2002 to 2003, TCL Holding and TCL Holding AB recognized net gains and losses from the dispositions of TCL Holding ABs operations and operating assets in 10 countries. ProLogis proportionate share of the aggregate net gains from these asset dispositions was $0.5 million (a $5.2 million net gain in 2003 and a $4.7 million net loss in 2002). Also related to these dispositions, TCL Holding and TCL Holding AB recognized impairment charges associated with TCL Holdings investment in TCL Holding AB and the carrying value of TCL Holding ABs property, plant and equipment. Through its investment in TCL Holding, ProLogis proportionate share of impairment charges recorded by TCL Holding and TCL Holding AB was $38.3 million in 2003 and $5.7 million in 2002. See Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. |
(3) | TCL Holding has an investment in a temperature-controlled distribution company operating in Austria. While ProLogis investment in TCL Holding was presented under the equity method, this investment was not separately reported by ProLogis. See Note 5 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. |
(4) | ProLogis invested in ProLogis Logistics, which owns CS Integrated LLC (CSI), previously a temperature-controlled distribution company operating in the United States. Through October 2002, ProLogis effectively owned in excess of 99% of ProLogis Logistics. In October 2002, all of the operations and a significant portion of the assets of CSI were sold. ProLogis proportionate share of the aggregate net loss from this transaction was $88.2 million, consisting of cumulative impairment charges of $90.5 million recognized in 2002 ($37.2 million) and 2001 ($53.3 million) offset by a net gain of $2.3 million (a |
61
$6.3 million net gain recognized upon closing the transaction in October 2002 and additional losses of $4.0 million recognized in 2004 and 2003 upon settlement of the prorations of CSIs accounts as of the sale date). Subsequent to the October 2002 transaction, ProLogis ownership interests changed such that ProLogis owned 100% of ProLogis Logistics. Accordingly, ProLogis began consolidating its investment in ProLogis Logistics in October 2002. Certain assets that were retained by CSI after the sale (three operating properties and three tracts of land at December 31, 2004) are included with ProLogis real estate assets in its Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Notes 2 and 5 to ProLogis Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. | |
(5) | The assets of this investee were sold in 2002. |
(6) | ProLogis had an indirect investment in a technology company that ceased operations in 2001. The amount recognized by ProLogis in 2002 represents ProLogis proportionate share of charges that this company recognized when it wrote down its remaining investments to zero. |
Interest Expense |
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
Gross interest expense
|
$ | 184,729 | $ | 185,638 | $ | 178,210 | |||||||
Premium/discount recognized, net
|
252 | 371 | 315 | ||||||||||
Amortization of deferred loan costs
|
5,741 | 5,891 | 4,967 | ||||||||||
Subtotal interest expense before capitalization(1)
|
190,722 | 191,900 | 183,492 | ||||||||||
Less: capitalized amounts(2)
|
37,388 | 36,425 | 30,534 | ||||||||||
Net interest expense(3)
|
$ | 153,334 | $ | 155,475 | $ | 152,958 | |||||||
(1) | Had ProLogis presented its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC on a consolidated basis for all of 2002, ProLogis would have recognized interest expense before capitalization of $184.4 million for 2002. The change in gross interest expense in each year is primarily a function of ProLogis weighted average borrowings and weighted average interest rates, but is also impacted by the average foreign currency exchange rate used to translate to U.S. dollars the interest expense recognized by ProLogis foreign subsidiaries prior to consolidation. |
(2) | Gross interest expense incurred on borrowings outstanding during the period is offset by the amount of interest that is capitalized based on ProLogis qualifying development expenditures. Had ProLogis presented its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC on a consolidated basis for all of 2002, ProLogis capitalized interest would have been $38.5 million for 2002. Capitalized interest levels are reflective of ProLogis average cost of debt and the volume of development activities in each year. |
(3) | Had ProLogis presented its investments in Kingspark S.A. and Kingspark LLC on a consolidated basis for all of 2002, ProLogis would have recognized net interest expense of $145.9 million for 2002. |
Gains Recognized on Dispositions of Non-CDFS Business Assets, Net |
62
| 2004: 0.4 million square feet of properties generating net proceeds of $17.5 million and an aggregate net gain of $6.1 million; | |
| 2003: 0.8 million square feet of properties generating net proceeds of $60.2 million and an aggregate net gain of $1.6 million; and | |