UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT
OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-05379
Name of Registrant: Royce Focus Trust, Inc.
Address of Registrant: 745 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10151
Name and address of agent for service: | John E. Denneen, Esquire |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 508-4500
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: January 1, 2011 June 30, 2011
Item 1. Reports to Shareholders.
Royce Value Trust Royce Micro-Cap Trust Royce Focus Trust |
SEMIANNUAL |
|||||
REVIEW AND REPORT | ||||||
TO STOCKHOLDERS |
||||||
| ||||||
|
||||||
A Few Words on Closed-End Funds |
Royce & Associates, LLC manages three closed-end funds: Royce Value Trust, the first small-cap value closed-end fund offering; Royce Micro-Cap Trust, the only micro-cap closed-end fund; and Royce Focus Trust, a closed-end fund that invests in a limited number of primarily small-cap companies. |
||
A closed-end fund is an investment company
whose shares are listed and traded on a stock exchange. Like all
investment companies, including open-end mutual funds, the assets of
a closed-end fund are professionally managed in accordance with the
investment objectives and policies approved by the Funds Board of
Directors. A closed-end fund raises cash for investment by issuing a
fixed number of shares through initial and other public offerings
that may include shelf offerings and periodic rights offerings.
Proceeds from the offerings are invested in an actively managed
portfolio of securities. Investors wanting to buy or sell shares of a
publicly traded closed-end fund after the offerings must do so on a
stock exchange, as with any publicly traded stock. This is in
contrast to open-end mutual funds, in which the fund sells and
redeems its shares on a continuous basis. |
||
A Closed-End Fund Offers Several Distinct Advantages Not Available From An Open-End Fund Structure
• | Since a closed-end fund does not issue redeemable securities
or offer its securities on a continuous basis, it does not need to
liquidate securities or hold uninvested assets to meet investor
demands for cash redemptions, as an open-end fund
must. |
• | In a closed-end fund, not having to meet investor redemption
requests or invest at inopportune times is ideal for value managers
who attempt to buy stocks when prices are depressed and sell
securities when prices are high.
|
• | A closed-end fund may invest more freely in less liquid
portfolio securities because it is not subject to potential
stockholder redemption demands. This is particularly beneficial for
Royce-managed closed-end funds, which invest in small- and micro-cap
securities. |
• | The fixed capital structure allows permanent leverage to
be employed as a means to enhance capital appreciation
potential. |
• | Unlike Royces open-end funds, our closed-end funds are
able to distribute capital gains on a quarterly basis. The Funds
resumed the quarterly distribution policies for their common stock,
at a 5% annual rate, in March 2011. Please see page 18-20 for more
details. |
We believe that the
closed-end fund structure is very suitable for the long-term investor
who understands the benefits of a stable pool of capital.
|
Why Dividend Reinvestment Is Important | ||
A very important component of an investors total return
comes from the reinvestment of distributions. By reinvesting
distributions, our investors can maintain an undiluted investment in
a Fund. To get a fair idea of the impact of reinvested distributions,
please see the charts on pages 13, 15 and 17. For additional
information on the Funds Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase
Options and the benefits for stockholders, please see page 20 or
visit our website at www.roycefunds.com. |
||
This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
Semiannual Review |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
For more than 35 years, we have used a value approach to invest in small-cap securities. We focus primarily on the quality of a companys balance sheet, its ability to generate free cash flow and other measures of profitability or sound financial condition. We then use these factors to assess the companys current worth, basing the assessment on either what we believe a knowledgeable buyer might pay to acquire the entire company, or what we think the value of the company should be in the stock market.
This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 1
Performance Table | |
NAV Average Annual Total Returns | Through June 30, 2011 |
Royce | Royce | Royce | Russell | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Value Trust | Micro-Cap Trust | Focus Trust | 2000 Index | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date1 |
5.39 | % | 3.12 | % | 3.71 | % | 6.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
One-Year |
41.59 | 34.62 | 37.02 | 37.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three-Year |
6.92 | 6.23 | 2.89 | 7.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Five-Year |
4.33 | 3.18 | 6.03 | 4.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10-Year |
7.78 | 8.46 | 11.02 | 6.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
15-Year |
10.60 | 10.34 | n.a. | 7.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
20-Year |
11.70 | n.a. | n.a. | 9.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Since Inception |
11.06 | 11.05 | 11.42 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Inception Date |
11/26/86 | 12/14/93 | 11/1/962 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Not annualized |
2 Date Royce & Associates, LLC assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund. |
2 | This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
Déjà vu All Over Again? |
Some have suggested that the first half of 2011 looked
uncannily like that of 2010. We admit that there are some striking
similarities. As 2010 began, the stock market briefly stumbled out of
the gate before regaining its feet, and the highly charged rally that
began early in March of 2009 resumed its brisk pace. However, the
month of April brought a more serious correction that lingered into
early July, precipitated by fears of sovereign debt crises in Europe,
anxiety over the U.S. and Chinese economies and an environmental
disaster. In 2011, a sluggish January quickly yielded to an extension
of the dynamic market that had characterized 2010 as a whole. This
segment of the bull run then quickly reversed direction in
Apriltruly the cruelest month for equity investors over the last two
yearsas renewed concerns over European fiscal solvency, another
round of hand-wringing over the rate of growth in the U.S. and China,
and a series of catastrophic events in Japan combined to rouse the
bear. However superficially close, the parallels between the first halves of 2010 and 2011 were never quite as neat as some observers suggested. Any resemblance began to break down decisively in the middle of June, when the market shook off its doldrums with a rally that lasted through most of July. Unlike the first six months of 2010, the market bore |
We still believe that stocks can
generate positive returns over the
next two or three years, though we
are not anticipating a rally in the
second half of 2011 like the very dynamic run that ushered out 2010. |
This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 3 |
Charles M. Royce, President | |
We have spent a lot of time talking about dividends lately, but they have been important to us as an investment theme since Chuck Royce assumed full investment control of Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund in November 1972. However, our work with dividend-paying small-cap stocks became particularly focused in 1979, when we agreed to create a portfolio for an institutional client who informed us at the last minute that every stock in the portfolio had to pay a dividend. That experience eventually led us to introduce Royce Total Return Fund in 1993, Royce Dividend Value Fund in 2004 and Royce Global Dividend Value Fund in 2011, all of which seek both long-term growth and current income. |
|
Our long history of finding what we think are undervalued, fundamentally strong dividend payers in the small-cap world makes us a bit bemused as to why so many other investors ignore small- cap dividend-paying companies; they simply do not associate the small-cap asset class with dividends. However, we have long maintained that dividends can be an integral part of a successful long- term investment strategy in the small- cap asset class. Our experience suggests that including dividend-paying smaller companies in an equity portfolio |
|
Continued on page 6... | |
Letter to Our Stockholders
|
|
only slightly ill effects by the end of 2011s first half,
despite the relentless flow of negative news and pervasive feeling of
economic anxiety that have distinguished both years. The stock
markets greater resilience thus far through 2011 can be seen by
measuring each years respective spring-summer downturn. June 2010
ended in the midst of a correction that would ultimately drop
small-cap stock prices by more than 20% by early July, while 2011s
first down period, which lasted from the interim small-cap high on
April 29 to the next small-cap low on June 13, saw the small-cap
Russell 2000 Index lose less than half that amount. All of this makes the question of what may happen next perplexing. What bemuses us as we look back on both periods is that the first half of 2011 was arguably, if not worse, then at least more uncertain, in terms of headline-making developments. For example, in addition to those events already mentioned, we have been through a series of natural disasters here in the States, brinkmanship in Washington over raising the debt ceiling, and ongoing debates about how to deal with deficits and jobs, the latter two made worse because the beckoning election year has been encouraging even larger doses of partisanship than usual. So while the correction was not at all surprisingbull market interruptions have been very common historicallywe are concerned about what looks like an almost casual shrugging off of significant events by large numbers of investors, some of whom are likely the same people who sold at the first sign of trouble. On the one hand, then, our contrarian perspective makes us skeptical of the rally that closed out the first half. On the other hand, our long-term view of both the equity market and the economy remains reasonably bright. We still believe that stocks can generate positive returns over the next two or three years, though we are not anticipating a rally in the second half of 2011 like the very dynamic run that ushered out 2010. In all, we remain modestly bullish and cautiously optimistic about the years ahead. Seen It All Before Year-to-date results for the major stock indexes were positive, though they were muted by the second quarters higher volatility. From our perspective, the most notable development in the first half of 2011 was seeing small-caps seemingly unassailable market leadership contested. For the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2011, the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.2%, while the large-cap S&P 500 Index was up 6.0%, the Russell 1000 Index climbed 6.4%, and the more tech-oriented Nasdaq Composite returned 4.6%. These results were the combined effect of the years very different quarters. The first, while |
4 | This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second quarter, while offering a distinctly mixed bag for equities, saw small-caps cede leadership to their large-cap siblings. The Russell 2000 fell 1.6% in the second quarter versus a slender gain of 0.1% for both the S&P 500 and Russell 1000, and a loss of 0.3% for the Nasdaq Composite. One-year returns remained very strong for all four domestic indexes, and were led by small-caps. The Russell 2000 climbed 37.4%, the S&P 500 rose 30.7%, the Russell 1000 was up 31.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite gained 31.5%. Small-caps also led over longer-term periods, as the Russell 2000 outperformed each of its large-cap counterparts, the S&P 500 and Russell 1000, for the trailing three-, five-, 10-, 15- and 20-year periods ended June 30, 2011. |
|
|
Year-to-date results for non-U.S. equity indexes were somewhat in line with their domestic cousins, with the Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap Index finishing further behind its large-cap counterpart, the Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index, up 0.8% versus a gain of 4.1%. The lower year-to-date results relative to U.S. indexes were attributable to significantly lower first-quarter returns, with the Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap gaining 3.6%, while its non-U.S. small-cap equivalent gained 1.0%. While non-U.S. indexes generally enjoyed slightly better performance than the domestic indexes in the second quarter, it was not enough to overcome the first quarters relative disadvantage. For the second quarter, the Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap was up 0.4%, while the Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap declined 0.2%. |
|
|
Arguably the markets unsung heroes, domestic mid-cap stocks, as measured by the Russell Midcap Index, outpaced their small-cap and large-cap equivalents for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2011, up 8.1%. Micro-caps, as measured by the Russell Microcap Index, were the worst performers along the market cap spectrum, up 3.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Within small-cap, value, as measured by the Russell 2000 Value Index, fell behind growth, as measured by the Russell 2000 Growth Index for the year-to-date period (+3.8% versus +8.6%). In addition, small-cap growth led its value sibling in the trailing one-, three- and five-year periods, while trailing 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year returns belonged to small-cap value. |
|
|
This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 5
potentially offers both an effective cushion against market volatility and a strong component of an investments total return, especially during lower-return periods. | |
We also believe that a companys practice of paying dividends is an excellent measure of its underlying quality and an intelligent form of corporate governance. From our perspective within the small-cap world, where the words dividend and quality are often considered synonymous, adopting a dividend- paying investment strategy could be a key to long-term outperformance. We believe that this is more than usually relevant today, as we believe a shift to higher quality companies may be at hand. |
|
Understanding a companys capital allocation decisions is a critical element in our investment process. This is especially important in a market when corporate balance sheets are generally in excellent condition and, in many cases, flush with cash. Dividends are by nature the byproduct of healthy free cash flow generation. Of the more than 4,140 domestic small-cap companies (those with market capitalizations up to $2.5 billion), 1,181 were dividend payers as of the end of the first half of 2011; of these dividend-paying companies, 757 had a dividend yield of at least 2%. Not surprisingly, the number of dividend-paying companies located outside of the United States is even larger. In many foreign public |
|
Continued on page 8... | |
Letter to Our Stockholders
|
|
2011 YEAR-TO-DATE NAV TOTAL RETURNS FOR THE ROYCE FUNDS VS. RUSSELL 2000 as of 6/30/11 | |
Seeing Things While these mood swings were the top story in equities during the first half, the return of volatility was not a development that struck us as unusual, especially considering that the market had previously been on a very dynamic run from the interim small-cap low on July 6, 2010. Some retreat from its recent highs was therefore to be expected at some point. The correction has so far been fairly modest and mostly painless, particularly in the wider context of the bull market that began following the bottom on March 9, 2009. Our thought is that, for all the surface similarities to last years first half, there are cyclical forces at work that are as much a factor as investors unease with the U.S. or global economies. It is also worth remembering that, though growth has decelerated, the economy is still growing. In addition, it should be kept in mind that growth in both the stock market and the economy seldom takes place in uninterrupted straight lines or in lock-stepped tandem. The recent pauses in both are very much in the range of what we consider normal. In addition, as contrarian, bargain-hunting value investors, we see opportunity when the markets correct. Our discipline entails thinking about the present and about the years ahead when positioning our portfolios. So while we never look forward to corrections, we accept them as a fact of investment life, and then some. We see downturns as vital opportunities to re-evaluate and re-stock our portfolios. Even a brief reversal in the market can create ample chances to find what we see as well-managed, financially strong businesses with attractively low share prices. |
6 | This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
The most recent downturn offers a typical example. Between
the 2011 high on April 29 and the most recent small-cap low on June
13, the Russell 2000 Index fell 10.1%. During this span, 50% of the
companies in the Russell 2000 were down more than 10%; 18% (360
companies) of the Indexs constituents were off more than 20%; and 5%
(100 stocks) declined by more than 30%. Not all of these companies
were worth buying. It usually takes at least a 30% discount to our
estimate of a companys worth for us to consider a purchase. However,
even brief and not particularly dramatic downturns create chances for
us to find what we think are great companies trading at alluringly
reduced prices. Sights Unseen The issues of unemployment and housing continue to dominate the headlines, though we still maintain that there is far more good news about the economy on a company by company basis. In fact, from the standpoint of balance sheets, cash flows, revenues and profits, corporations have seldom been in better shape. However, as long as unemployment remains high and housing continues to correct, the focus will remain on those two. The latter is, we think, less of a problem. Real estate cycles tend to unwind very slowly, and this one shows no signs of being any different. It may actually take years because the run-up in housing prices was so extreme. Any expectation that a correction would be quick was entirely misplaced. Unemployment is a more significant issue, and we have no good answer as to why the much-discussed and hoped-for pick-up in employment has not yet materialized. Certainly any increase in jobs would be a huge benefit to the economy and society as a whole. Yet companies seem much more focused on continuing to improve revenues and profits than they are on hiring, at least here in the U.S., something that we do not necessarily see changing in the intermediate future. So the economy is by no means out of the woods yet. This observation can be balanced, however, by our contention that it is closer to recovery than it has been since the recession began in 2007. Clearly, it has been a long, unhappy ride for many. And there have been numerous instances in history when the market was either ahead of the economy or, as we think is currently the case, when headlines are fixated on bad news while many individual companies have been doing well. Ultimately, we are throwing our lot in with companies, and the message that we have been receiving lately in our meetings with management is far more optimistic than what we see in the headlines. |
As contrarian, bargain-hunting value investors, we see opportunity when the markets correct. Our discipline entails thinking about the present and about the years ahead when positioning our portfolios. |
This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 7 |
Letter to Our Stockholders
|
||||||
Still, we would not be surprised if the coming months brought another downturn.
We did not become too excited by the rally that closed out June,
which, though welcome, did little to convince us that the downturn
was over. While we continue to believe that stocks can generate
positive returns over the next two or three years, we are not
anticipating a rally in the second half of 2011 such as the one we
had in the final six months of 2010. As stated, our bullishness and
optimism are real, but low key. We believe that the fortunes of
quality companies in all asset classes will resemble the growth in
the economyslow and steady, not very dramatic, but in retrospect
more than satisfying. Sincerely, |
||||||
Charles M. Royce President |
W. Whitney George Vice President |
Jack E. Fockler, Jr. Vice President |
||||
|
8 | This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Decisions, Decisions | |
Not to decide is to decide. Theologian Harvey Cox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington DC has mostly been in a
state of gridlock since the mid-term elections of 2010. While there
has been no deficit in the number of potential solutions, policy
prescriptions and bold new ideaseach one sure to both jump start the
slow-growing economy and to keep it rolling along at a steady pace in
the years to comethis proliferation of ideas has produced few actual
decisions. |
|
market cap scale that are eager to move up or from larger players
looking to consolidate their market share of a business. |
||||||
investment
staff must make decisions that not only concern individual companies,
but industries and sectors as well. There is an ever-present need to
make choices about how to best position the portfolios for long-term
capital appreciation. |
|
|
|
that can render small-cap stocks so vulnerable. Finding companies with these characteristics does not eliminate the risks mentioned
above, but it is one of the primary methods that we use to manage
volatility in our portfolios. |
||||
Playing such a role, in fact, is a common step in our stock evaluation process. We think about risk all the time, about the possibility of what we refer to as permanent capital impairment. Its an important consideration when investing in small-cap stocks. In general, smaller companies are more fragile than their large-cap counterparts. They are more likely to be reliant on a single customer, usually involved in a single line of business and as such may be subject to a potentially fatal level of competition from insurgents beneath them on the |
|
Our business is obviously quite different from the process of legislating or policymaking. To state two of the most obvious reasons, our decisions are not nearly as momentous and their implementation is far less contentious. However, with all due respect to Harvey Cox, in our business, not deciding is never an optionthere is really no such thing as not deciding when managing assets. Which suits us just fine. |
This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 9 |
We believe strongly in the idea that a long-term investment perspective is crucial for determining the success of a particular investment approach. Flourishing in an up market is wonderful. Surviving a bear market by losing less (or not at all) is at least as good. However, the true test of a portfolios mettle is performance over full market cycle periods, which include both up and down market periods. We believe that providing full market cycle results is more appropriate even than showing three- to five-year standardized returns because the latter periods may not include the up and down phases that constitute a full market cycle.
Since the Russell 2000 Indexs inception on 12/31/78,
valueas measured by the Russell 2000 Value Indexoutperformed
growthas measured by the Russell 2000 Growth Indexin six of the
small-cap indexs eight full market cycles. The most recently
concluded cycle, which ran from 3/9/00 through 7/13/07, was the
longest in the indexs history, and represented what we believe was a
return to more historically typical performance in that value
provided a significant advantage during its downturn (3/9/00
10/9/02) and for the full cycle. In contrast, the new market cycle
that began on 7/13/07 has so far favored growth over value, an
unsurprising development when one considers how thoroughly value
dominated growth in the previous full cycle. |
|
Peak-to-Peak (3/9/007/13/07) | For the full cycle, value provided a sizable margin over
growth, which finished the period with a loss. Each of our closed-end
funds held a large performance advantage over the Russell 2000 on
both an NAV (net asset value) and market price basis. On an NAV
basis, Royce Focus Trust (+264.2%) was our best performer by a wide
margin, followed by Royce Micro-Cap Trust (+175.9%) and Royce Value
Trust (+161.3%). The latter two funds in particular benefited from
their use of leverage during this, as well as in subsequent, bullish
periods. |
Peak-to-Current (7/13/076/30/11) | |
During the difficult, volatile decline that ended 3/9/09,
both value and growth posted similarly negative returns. Events in
the financial markets immediately preceding the end of 2008s third
quarter caused the Russell 2000 to decline significantly. After a
brief rally at the end of 2008, the index continued
to |
|
SMALL-CAP MARKET CYCLE: RUSSELL 2000 INDEXES TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||||||||
ROYCE FUNDS NAV TOTAL RETURNS VS. RUSSELL 2000 INDEX: | ||||||||||||||||
MARKET CYCLE RESULTS | ||||||||||||||||
Peak-to- | Peak-to- | Trough-to- | Peak-to- | |||||||||||||
Peak | Trough | Current | Current | |||||||||||||
3/9/00- | 7/13/07- | 3/9/09- | 7/13/07- | |||||||||||||
7/13/07 | 3/9/09 | 6/30/11 | 6/30/11 | |||||||||||||
Russell 2000 | 54.8 | % | -58.9 | % | 148.5 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||||||
Russell 2000 Value | 189.4 | -61.1 | 143.0 | -5.5 | ||||||||||||
Russell 2000 Growth | -14.8 | -56.8 | 153.7 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||
Royce Value Trust | 161.3 | -65.6 | 191.6 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | 175.9 | -66.3 | 183.5 | -4.6 | ||||||||||||
Royce Focus Trust | 264.2 | -58.3 | 147.1 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
fall, though it has since recovered
significantly, gaining 148.5% from 3/9/09 through 6/30/11. Royce
Focus Trust outperformed the index during the decline, while Royce
Value Trust and Royce Micro-Cap Trust trailed. This pattern was
reversed in the bullish phase from the bottom on 3/9/09 through
6/30/11. Royce Value Trust and Royce Micro-Cap Trust substantially
outperformed the Russell 2000 in this period, while Royce Focus Trust
narrowly trailed the benchmark. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. See page 2 for important performance information for all of the above funds. |
10 | This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Table of Contents | ||
Managers’ Discussions of Fund Performance |
||
Royce Value Trust | 12 | |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | 14 | |
Royce Focus Trust | 16 | |
18 | ||
20 | ||
Schedules of Investments and Other Financial Statements |
||
21 | ||
35 | ||
47 | ||
56 | ||
57 | ||
58 | ||
The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 11 |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Through 6/30/11 | ||||||||||
Jan-June 20111 | 5.39 | % | ||||||||
One-Year | 41.59 | |||||||||
Three-Year | 6.92 | |||||||||
Five-Year | 4.33 | |||||||||
10-Year | 7.78 | |||||||||
15-Year | 10.60 | |||||||||
20-Year | 11.70 | |||||||||
Since Inception (11/26/86) | 11.06 | |||||||||
1Not annualized | ||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Year | RVT | Year | RVT | |||||||
2010 | 30.3 | % | 2000 | 16.6 | % | |||||
2009 | 44.6 | 1999 | 11.7 | |||||||
2008 | -45.6 | 1998 | 3.3 | |||||||
2007 | 5.0 | 1997 | 27.5 | |||||||
2006 | 19.5 | 1996 | 15.5 | |||||||
2005 | 8.4 | 1995 | 21.6 | |||||||
2004 | 21.4 | 1994 | 0.1 | |||||||
2003 | 40.8 | 1993 | 17.3 | |||||||
2002 | -15.6 | 1992 | 19.3 | |||||||
2001 | 15.2 | 1991 | 38.4 | |||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
||||||||||
Coherent | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
Oil States International | 1.1 | |||||||||
Sapient Corporation | 1.0 | |||||||||
HEICO Corporation | 1.0 | |||||||||
Nordson Corporation | 1.0 | |||||||||
Rofin-Sinar Technologies | 0.9 | |||||||||
Alleghany Corporation | 0.8 | |||||||||
Newport Corporation | 0.8 | |||||||||
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers | 0.8 | |||||||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum | 0.8 | |||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN | ||||||||||
% of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders | ||||||||||
Industrials | 26.3 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | 20.3 | |||||||||
Financials | 19.8 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 11.7 | |||||||||
Materials | 10.2 | |||||||||
Health Care | 7.8 | |||||||||
Energy | 6.7 | |||||||||
Consumer Staples | 2.2 | |||||||||
Diversified Investment Companies | 0.4 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous | 3.8 | |||||||||
Bond and Preferred Stocks | 0.1 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 9.8 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Managers Discussion Economic data for the first half of 2011 was uneven, with global growth being affected by stubbornly high commodity prices, including a spike in oil following civil unrest in major oil producing areas and the toll of natural disasters such as the floods in New Zealand and tsunami in Japan. Corporate earnings continued to be a bright spot as companies effectively managed costs while experiencing solid revenue growth, boosting margins. Royce Value Trust (RVT), with its broadly diversified portfolio of small- and micro-cap stocks, performed reasonably well in 2011s volatile first half. Over the period, RVT gained 5.4% on an NAV basis, and 5.3% based on the market price of its shares, trailing its unleveraged small-cap benchmarks, the Russell 2000 Index, which added 6.2%, and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, which rose 7.5%. The Funds relative performance in each of the first two quarters of 2011 was largely in line with its benchmarks as well. During the bullish first quarter, which garnered strength from continued solid corporate earnings reports, the Fund rose 8.2% and 7.1% on an NAV and market price basis, respectively, while the Russell 2000 gained 7.9%, and the S&P SmallCap 600 advanced 7.7%. During the volatile second quarter, when small-cap stock prices suffered a 10% correction following renewed concerns over Greek sovereign finances, only to be followed by a sharp rally as European policy makers sought to control the contagion, RVT generated an NAV decline of 2.6% and a market price loss of 1.8% compared to the Russell 2000s drop of 1.6%, and the S&P SmallCap 600s decline of 0.2%. |
|||||||||||
Now more than two years removed from the market lows on March 9, 2009, there has been substantial progress in the healing of financial markets and the investor confidence that ultimately supports them. While risk managers first and foremost, we were quite pleased that RVT was able to maintain its impressive lead over its benchmarks in this volatile but bullish period. While not without periodic setbacks, RVT performed admirably, outpacing both of its benchmarks from the small-cap low on March 9, 2009 through June 30, 2011, with gains of 191.6% (NAV) and 210.5% (market price) compared to the Russell 2000 and the S&P 600, which advanced 148.6% and 151.4%, respectively. On an NAV basis, the Fund beat both its benchmarks for the one-year, 15-year, 20-year and since inception (11/26/86) periods ended June 30, 2011 and also added an advantage over the Russell 2000 for the five-year and 10-year periods. RVTs NAV average annual total
return since inception was 11.1%. |
|||||||||||
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED | |||||||||||
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/111 |
|||||||||||
CARBO Ceramics | 0.24 | % | |||||||||
Oil States International | 0.23 | ||||||||||
SRA International Cl. A | 0.22 | ||||||||||
HEICO Corporation | 0.22 | ||||||||||
Coherent | 0.21 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends | |||||||||||
Investors seemed to grow more
comfortable focusing on company specific fundamentals as opposed to
the constant barrage of macroeconomic risks that had so consumed them
in the period following the financial crisis. This trend was evident
in the Funds sector results. Six of the Funds 11 equity sectors
contributed positively to returns in the first half, two detracted
from returns, and the remaining three were essentially flat.
Industrials and Information Technology |
|||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund invests primarily in securities of small- and micro-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2011. |
12 | The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
|
|||||||
were the top gainers followed by Energy and Health Care. Materials was the worst performer, joined by a modest loss in Consumer Staples. Performance in each demonstrated that even typically defensive areas of the market exhibited pockets of weakness. At the industry level, energy equipment & services, machinery, and electronic equipment, instruments & components, each from different sectors, contributed most. Metals & mining, automobiles, and diversified consumer services were the worst performing industries, as a sharp second-quarter drop in silver prices hurt mining companies, while a spike in oil prices dented an already bruised consumer.
CARBO Ceramics, a long-time Royce holding, was the best performer in the period. This leading producer and supplier of ceramic proppants used in horizontal shale drilling activity has benefited from extremely strong pricing in this supply constrained commodity critical to the success of shale wells. Oil States International was another top performer for the Fund. This leading provider of specialty products and services to oil and gas drilling and exploration companies, saw a jump in its shares as a rising tide of increasing oil prices and subsequent high levels of demand for each of the companys four primary business unitsaccommodations, offshore products, tubular services and well site servicesled to high earnings and cash flow growth. |
|||||||
On the negative side, one notable loser was also one of our longstanding favorites, Patriot Transportation Holding. Hailing from the Industrial sector, its unique combination of transportation and real estate businesses reported lackluster earnings that were uninspiring to investors. However, with strong balance sheet, gradual improvement in its various lines of business and our view that the market substantially undervalues its assets, we continue to maintain our positive stance on the company. E-House China Holdings, a Shanghai-based real estate services operation with strong national brand recognition, was adversely affected by Chinese tightening on interest rates and more specific measures instituted by the Chinese government (and municipal governments) to discourage real estate speculation. Like many small-cap and micro-cap U.S. listed companies that are based in China or derive a
large portion of their business from China, E-House China Holdings was also pressured due to the accounting irregularities at another U.S. listed Chinese firm during the period. |
|||||||
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME | |||||||
Top Detractors from Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/111 |
|||||||
Patriot Transportation Holding | -0.16 | % | |||||
E-House China Holdings ADR | -0.13 | ||||||
Winnebago Industries | -0.11 | ||||||
Hawkins | -0.11 | ||||||
Hecla Mining | -0.10 | ||||||
1Net of dividends | |||||||
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (11/26/86) through 6/30/11 |
|||||||
1 | Reflects the cumulative total return of an investment made by a stockholder who purchased one share at inception ($10.00 IPO), reinvested all annual distributions and fully participated in primary subscriptions
of the Funds rights offerings. |
||||||
2 | Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on the NYSE. |
FUND INFORMATION AND | ||||||||||||||||
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS | ||||||||||||||||
Average Market Capitalization1 | $1,476 million | |||||||||||||||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio2 | 16.3x | |||||||||||||||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio | 1.9x | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) | 81.3% | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) | 28.0% | |||||||||||||||
Fund Total Net Assets | $1,371 million | |||||||||||||||
Net Leverage3 | 9% | |||||||||||||||
Turnover Rate | 12% | |||||||||||||||
Number of Holdings | 581 | |||||||||||||||
Symbol | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
RVT | |||||||||||||||
NAV |
XRVTX | |||||||||||||||
Geometrically calculated | ||||||||||||||||
3 Net leverage is the percentage, in excess of 100%, of the total value of equity type investments, divided by net assets applicable to Common Stockholders. |
||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL STRUCTURE | ||||||||||||||||
Publicly Traded Securities Outstanding at 6/30/11 at NAV or Liquidation Value | ||||||||||||||||
67.0 million shares |
$1,151 million | |||||||||||||||
5.90% Cumulative |
$220 million | |||||||||||||||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON | ||||||||||||||||
All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater Over the Last 7 Years, in Percentages(%) |
||||||||||||||||
The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 13 |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Through 6/30/11 | ||||||||||
Jan-June 20111 | 3.12 | % | ||||||||
One-Year | 34.62 | |||||||||
Three-Year | 6.23 | |||||||||
Five-Year | 3.18 | |||||||||
10-Year | 8.46 | |||||||||
15-Year | 10.34 | |||||||||
Since Inception (12/14/93) | 11.05 | |||||||||
1 Not annualized | ||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Year | RMT | Year | RMT | |||||||
2010 | 28.5 | % | 2001 | 23.4 | % | |||||
2009 | 46.5 | 2000 | 10.9 | |||||||
2008 | -45.5 | 1999 | 12.7 | |||||||
2007 | 0.6 | 1998 | -4.1 | |||||||
2006 | 22.5 | 1997 | 27.1 | |||||||
2005 | 6.8 | 1996 | 16.6 | |||||||
2004 | 18.7 | 1995 | 22.9 | |||||||
2003 | 55.5 | 1994 | 5.0 | |||||||
2002 | -13.8 | |||||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
||||||||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
Sapient Corporation | 1.7 | |||||||||
Tennant Company | 1.2 | |||||||||
Seneca Foods | 1.1 | |||||||||
Epoch Holding Corporation | 1.1 | |||||||||
Richardson Electronics | 1.1 | |||||||||
Raven Industries | 1.0 | |||||||||
Drew Industries | 1.0 | |||||||||
America’s Car-Mart | 1.0 | |||||||||
HEICO Corporation | 0.9 | |||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN | ||||||||||
% of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders | ||||||||||
Industrials | 25.9 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | 18.8 | |||||||||
Financials | 16.9 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 12.6 | |||||||||
Materials | 8.9 | |||||||||
Health Care | 7.1 | |||||||||
Energy | 4.4 | |||||||||
Consumer Staples | 3.1 | |||||||||
Telecommunication Services | 0.5 | |||||||||
Utilities | 0.1 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous | 4.0 | |||||||||
Preferred Stock | 0.4 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 16.2 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Managers Discussion Following two stellar years for micro-cap stocks in 2009 and 2010, our mean reversion sensibilities anticipated some moderation in the pace of gains as we entered 2011. Interestingly, the first half of 2011 contained many of the same headlinesdeteriorating European sovereign finances, Chinese inflation, developed markets currency debasement, U.S. economic slowdownthat had worried investors in 2010. Focused exclusively on the fortunes of individual companies, we continue to be pleased with the progress businesses are making in this less than ideal macroeconomic backdrop. While returns did moderate in the first half of 2011, earnings are growing at a healthy pace and the already strong financial position of many companies continues to build. Over the first six months of 2011, RMT gained 3.1% on an NAV (net asset value) basis, and 3.3% based on the market price of its shares, underperforming its unleveraged small-cap benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index, which advanced 6.2%, and performing in line with the Russell Microcap Index, which rose 3.1%, for the same period. |
|||||||||||
During the more bullish first quarter, RMT gained a respectable 6.5% on an NAV basis and 5.8% based on market price, compared to respective advances of 7.9% and 6.8% for the Russell 2000 and Russell Microcap Indexes. When stock prices turned volatile in the second quarter, the Fund lost 3.2% on an NAV basis and 2.4% on a market price basis. For the same period, the Russell 2000 fell 1.6%, and the Russell Microcap retrenched 3.5%. So though it gave up a bit of ground from the market low on March 9, 2009 through June 30, 2011, RMT maintained its impressive lead, up 183.5% (NAV) and 200.3% (market price) compared to the Russell 2000, which was up 148.6%, and the Russell Microcap, which rose 147.1%. On an NAV basis, the Fund outpaced the Russell Microcap Index for the one-, five- and 10-year periods ended June 30, 2011. (Returns for the Russell Microcap Index only go back to 2000.) On both an NAV and market price basis, RMT was ahead of the
Russell 2000 for the 10-year, 15-year and since inception (12/14/93) periods ended June 30, 2011. RMTs NAV average annual total return since inception was 11.1%. |
|||||||||||
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED | |||||||||||
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/111 |
|||||||||||
Heritage-Crystal Clean | 0.44 | % | |||||||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings | 0.35 | ||||||||||
Sapient Corporation | 0.32 | ||||||||||
Frequency Electronics | 0.25 | ||||||||||
Tejon Ranch | 0.24 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends | |||||||||||
For the first half of 2011, eight of the Funds ten equity sectors made positive contributions to performance, with Information Technology and Industrials leading the way. Consumer Staples and Utilities were the only detractors in the period. At the industry level, electronic equipment, instruments & components was the top performer. Two industries from the Industrials sector, commercial services & supplies and machinery, came next, both benefiting from the continued renaissance in U.S. manufacturing that has long been a theme at Royce. Food products from within the Consumer Staples sector put a notable drag on performance, as higher commodity costs dug into margins in this typically defensive area of the market. Cyclical companies broadly were under pressure, especially in the second quarter, as risk aversion resurfaced following uneven economic data and
increased headline anxieties. |
|||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund normally invests in micro-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2011. |
14 | The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
|
|||||||
Correlation in the market continued to decline in the first half of 2011, which was a welcome reprieve from the highly correlated characteristics that defined much of the recovery period off the bear market lows in March 2009. This was a gratifying turn of events as our process is focused on the successes and failures of individual companies. Not surprisingly, we had some of each in the first half. On the positive side, Heritage-Crystal Clean, a leading provider of industrial and hazardous waste services, was RMTs top gainer. Benefiting from continued positive trends in environmental services, broadly, the company also continued to expand its network of small- and mid-sized customers that generally have more limited resources to dedicate to waste remediation, and look to companies like Heritage-Crystal to fulfill this highly regulated area of their business. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings is
a vertically integrated international real estate and investment services company that expanded its footprint to include Europe (along with existing business in the U.S. and Japan) through the acquisition of Bank of Irelands real estate investment management business. In the U.S., the company continued to source attractive deals through its extensive network of real estate partners. |
|||||||
Patriot Transportation Holding detracted most from first-half returns. Hailing from the Industrials sector and possessed of a unique combination of transportation and real estate businesses, it reported lackluster earnings. A long-term holding in the portfolio, Patriot boasts a very strong balance sheet, is seeing gradual improvement in its various lines of business and continues to have what we believe are substantially undervalued assets. Another notable loser was Origin Agritech, a U.S. listed company headquartered in China that is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of hybrid and genetically modified crop seeds. The company reported earnings that missed analyst expectations mostly as a result of a drop in revenues due to changing planting schedules of farmers. R&D expenses were also higher than expected as the company continued to invest in developing their product
portfolio. Its share price also suffered in the wake of accounting fraud revelations at another U.S. listed Chinese business. This development depressed the stocks of many U.S. listed Chinese companies in June, even those with no relation to the original firm. |
|||||||
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME | |||||||
Top Detractors from Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/111 |
|||||||
Patriot Transportation Holding | -0.28 | % | |||||
Origin Agritech | -0.26 | ||||||
Fushi Copperweld | -0.19 | ||||||
Rentrak Corporation | -0.18 | ||||||
Flexsteel Industries | -0.17 | ||||||
1 Net of dividends | |||||||
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (12/14/93) through 6/30/11 | |||||||
1 | Reflects the cumulative total return of an investment made by a stockholder who purchased one share at inception ($7.50 IPO), reinvested distributions and fully participated in the primary subscription of the 1994 rights offering. |
||||||
2 | Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on the NYSE and, prior to 12/1/03, on Nasdaq. |
FUND INFORMATION AND | ||||||||||||||||
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS | ||||||||||||||||
Average Market Capitalization1 | $341 million | |||||||||||||||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio | 1.6x | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) | 86.0% | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) | 16.7% | |||||||||||||||
Fund Total Net Assets | $377 million | |||||||||||||||
Net Leverage2 | 3% | |||||||||||||||
Turnover Rate | 13% | |||||||||||||||
Number of Holdings | 334 | |||||||||||||||
Symbol | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
RMT | |||||||||||||||
NAV |
XOTCX | |||||||||||||||
1 Geometrically calculated | ||||||||||||||||
CAPITAL STRUCTURE | ||||||||||||||||
Publicly Traded Securities Outstanding at 6/30/11 at NAV or Liquidation Value | ||||||||||||||||
27.8 million shares of Common Stock |
$317 million | |||||||||||||||
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
$60 million | |||||||||||||||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON | ||||||||||||||||
All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater Over the Last 7 Years, in Percentages(%) |
||||||||||||||||
The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 15 |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||||
Through 6/30/11 | ||||||||||||
Jan-June 20111 | 3.71 | % | ||||||||||
One-Year | 37.02 | |||||||||||
Three-Year | 2.89 | |||||||||||
Five-Year | 6.03 | |||||||||||
10-Year | 11.02 | |||||||||||
Since Inception (11/1/96)2 | 11.42 | |||||||||||
2 Royce & Associates assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund on 11/1/96. |
||||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||||
Year | FUND | Year | FUND | |||||||||
2010 | 21.8 | % | 2003 | 54.3 | % | |||||||
2009 | 54.0 | 2002 | -12.5 | |||||||||
2008 | -42.7 | 2001 | 10.0 | |||||||||
2007 | 12.2 | 2000 | 20.9 | |||||||||
2006 | 16.3 | 1999 | 8.7 | |||||||||
2005 | 13.3 | 1998 | -6.8 | |||||||||
2004 | 29.3 | 1997 | 20.5 | |||||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
||||||||||||
Franklin Resources | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||
Western Digital | 3.3 | |||||||||||
Berkshire Hathaway Cl. B | 3.3 | |||||||||||
Allied Nevada Gold | 3.2 | |||||||||||
Analog Devices | 3.1 | |||||||||||
GameStop Corporation Cl. A | 2.9 | |||||||||||
Microsoft Corporation | 2.9 | |||||||||||
Trican Well Service | 2.9 | |||||||||||
Buckle (The) | 2.9 | |||||||||||
Seabridge Gold | 2.5 | |||||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN | ||||||||||||
% of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders | ||||||||||||
Materials | 25.9 | % | ||||||||||
Financials | 20.8 | |||||||||||
Information Technology | 18.1 | |||||||||||
Energy | 13.4 | |||||||||||
Industrials | 9.0 | |||||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 7.5 | |||||||||||
Consumer Staples | 5.6 | |||||||||||
Health Care | 0.9 | |||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 12.9 | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Manager’s Discussion A highly volatile market, particularly for many hard asset and industrial stocks, made for a disappointing first half for Royce Focus Trust (FUND). The Fund was up 3.7% on an NAV (net asset value) basis and 5.5% on a market price basis for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2011, in each case behind the 6.2% gain of its unleveraged small-cap benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index, for the same period. The Fund began the year on a high note, with very strong absolute and relative results in the first quarter. Between January and March, it rose 8.5% on an NAV basis and 11.7% on a market price basis, in both instances ahead of the benchmark, which climbed 7.9% in the first quarter. The reversal arrived with the onset of higher volatility in late April. The Fund fell 10.9% on an NAV basis and 11.5% on a market price basis from the first halfs small-cap high on April 29 through its subsequent low on June 13, while the small-cap index declined 10.1%. Needless to say, we were hoping for a better result on both an absolute and relative basis. We were more discouraged by the portfolios failure to hold its value during the downdraft than we were in its relatively lackluster showing in the rally that closed out the first half. For the second quarter as a whole, FUNDs NAV return fell 4.4%, and its market price was off 5.6%, compared to a drop of 1.6% for the Russell 2000. |
|||||||||||
This pattern mostly held in recent market cycle periods. Measuring from the small-cap peak on July 13, 2007 through the end of 2011s first half, FUND gained 3.2% on an NAV basis, while it fell 9.8% on a market price basis. The Russell 2000 was up 2.2% for the same period. From the small-cap bottom on March 9, 2009 through June 30, 2011, the Fund rose 147.1% on an NAV basis and 134.2% on a market price basis compared to a gain of 148.6% for the small-cap index. Finally, from the interim small-cap low on July 6, 2010 though the end of June 2011, FUND gained 40.0% on an NAV basis and 42.6% on a market price basis versus a 41.9% return for the benchmark. On a market price basis, the Fund outperformed the Russell 2000 for the one-year, 10-year and since inception of our management (11/1/96) periods ended June 30, 2011. The Fund outpaced its benchmark on an NAV basis for the five-year, 10-year and since inception periods ended June 30, 2011. The Funds NAV average annual total return since the inception of our management was 11.4%. |
|||||||||||
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED | |||||||||||
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/111 |
|||||||||||
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates | 1.79 | % | |||||||||
Timberland Company (The) Cl. A | 0.82 | ||||||||||
Allied Nevada Gold | 0.80 | ||||||||||
Unit Corporation | 0.64 | ||||||||||
Helmerich & Payne | 0.63 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends | |||||||||||
The Materials sector detracted most from first-half results, and within the sector the most substantial losses by far came from holdings in the metals & mining industry. Many of these stocks did very well in 2010, including the Funds largest detractor in 2011s first half, Pan American Silver, a Canadian company with operating mines in Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia and Peru. Its stock was punished by both the sharp reversal in silver prices and the negative effect of the president-elect of Peru campaigning on threats to nationalize or highly tax the countrys |
|||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund normally invests primarily in small-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2011. |
16 | The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
|
|||||||
mining industries, a position he considerably moderated once he was elected. We thought that the company was eminently capable of effectively managing its comparatively low Peruvian exposure and thus bought more shares in April. While the Arab Spring was a momentous event, unrest in Egypt had little effect on the gold mining business of Centamin Egypt. Its name alone, however, appeared to be enough to drive investors away. Seeing that operations at its primary mine in Egypt were continuing largely unaffected by political events, we added to our position in March.
Also in the Materials sector, Allied Nevada Gold reflected the volatility of both the stock market and precious metals prices, though it ended the first half as the Funds third-largest positive contributor. A stock that we have held since 2007, we were drawn to its pristine balance sheet and skill at moving from exploration to production in several gold mines. We rebuilt our position in FUNDs portfolio during 2010s fourth quarter. The first halfs top performer came from the IT sector, Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates. We were impressed by its strong balance sheet and impressive market leadership in the semiconductor capital equipment business. Like many small-cap businesses of late, it was subject to M&A (mergers & acquisitions) activityits acquisition at a substantial premium was announced in May, when we sold our shares as its price rose. |
|||||||
In June, the acquisition of The Timberland Company by a large apparel company was announced. We had long loved the strong brand and balance sheet of the New Hampshire-based footwear and apparel business. The stock traded very cheaply over the last few years as a result of reduced consumer demand, some earnings disappointments, rising leather costs and import tax issues that hampered its business in Europe, so we were very pleased to see it acquired at a sizable premium, which prompted us to begin selling our position in earnest in June. Unit Corporation, which we have owned in the portfolio since 2006, is a hybrid company in the oil and natural gas industry that offers services to other exploration and production firms and that conducts its own activities in those areas. Its share price was quite volatile in the first half, but ended June on a high note. We took some gains during the first
half. |
|||||||
GOOD IDEAS AT THE TIME | |||||||
Top Detractors from Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/111 |
|||||||
Pan American Silver | -0.66 | % | |||||
Centamin Egypt | -0.46 | ||||||
Patriot Transportation Holding | -0.44 | ||||||
Teradyne | -0.37 | ||||||
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A | -0.36 | ||||||
1 Net of dividends | |||||||
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (11/1/96)3 through 6/30/11 |
|||||||
1 | Reflects the cumulative total return experience of a continuous common stockholder who reinvested all
distributions and fully participated in the primary subscription of the 2005 rights offering. |
||||||
2 | Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on Nasdaq. |
||||||
3 | Royce & Associates assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund on 11/1/96. |
FUND INFORMATION AND | ||||||||||||||||
PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS | ||||||||||||||||
Average Market Capitalization1 | $4,107 million | |||||||||||||||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio2 | 13.3x | |||||||||||||||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio | 2.0x | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) | 70.1% | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) | 31.1% | |||||||||||||||
Fund Total Net Assets | $202 million | |||||||||||||||
Net Leverage3 | 1% | |||||||||||||||
Turnover Rate | 22% | |||||||||||||||
Number of Holdings | 57 | |||||||||||||||
Symbol | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
FUND | |||||||||||||||
NAV |
XFUNX | |||||||||||||||
CAPITAL STRUCTURE | ||||||||||||||||
Publicly Traded Securities Outstanding at 6/30/11 at NAV or Liquidation Value |
||||||||||||||||
20.1 million shares of Common Stock |
$177 million | |||||||||||||||
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
$25 million | |||||||||||||||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON | ||||||||||||||||
All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater Over the Last 7 Years, in Percentages(%) |
||||||||||||||||
The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 17 |
|
The following table details the share accumulations by an initial investor in the Funds who reinvested all distributions and participated fully in primary subscriptions for each of the rights offerings. Full participation in distribution reinvestments and rights offerings can maximize the returns available to a long-term investor. This table should be read in conjunction with the Performance and Portfolio Reviews of the Funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
History |
|
Amount |
|
Purchase |
|
Shares |
|
NAV |
|
Market |
|
|||||||
Royce Value Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
11/26/86 |
|
Initial Purchase |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
$ |
10.000 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
$ |
9,280 |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
10/15/87 |
|
Distribution $0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.000 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/87 |
|
Distribution $0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.125 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
8,578 |
|
|
7,250 |
|
12/27/88 |
|
Distribution $0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.625 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
10,529 |
|
|
9,238 |
|
9/22/89 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
405 |
|
|
9.000 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/89 |
|
Distribution $0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.125 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
12,942 |
|
|
11,866 |
|
9/24/90 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
457 |
|
|
7.375 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/90 |
|
Distribution $0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.000 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
11,713 |
|
|
11,074 |
|
9/23/91 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
638 |
|
|
9.375 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/91 |
|
Distribution $0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.625 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
17,919 |
|
|
15,697 |
|
9/25/92 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
825 |
|
|
11.000 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/92 |
|
Distribution $0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.500 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
21,999 |
|
|
20,874 |
|
9/27/93 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
13.000 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/93 |
|
Distribution $1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.000 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
26,603 |
|
|
25,428 |
|
10/28/94 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
11.250 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/19/94 |
|
Distribution $1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.375 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
27,939 |
|
|
24,905 |
|
11/3/95 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
12.500 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/7/95 |
|
Distribution $1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.125 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
35,676 |
|
|
31,243 |
|
12/6/96 |
|
Distribution $1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.250 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
41,213 |
|
|
36,335 |
|
1997 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.374 |
|
|
230 |
|
|
52,556 |
|
|
46,814 |
|
1998 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
14.311 |
|
|
347 |
|
|
54,313 |
|
|
47,506 |
|
1999 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.616 |
|
|
391 |
|
|
60,653 |
|
|
50,239 |
|
2000 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.972 |
|
|
424 |
|
|
70,711 |
|
|
61,648 |
|
2001 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
15.072 |
|
|
437 |
|
|
81,478 |
|
|
73,994 |
|
2002 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
14.903 |
|
|
494 |
|
|
68,770 |
|
|
68,927 |
|
1/28/03 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
10.770 |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
14.582 |
|
|
516 |
|
|
106,216 |
|
|
107,339 |
|
2004 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.604 |
|
|
568 |
|
|
128,955 |
|
|
139,094 |
|
2005 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
18.739 |
|
|
604 |
|
|
139,808 |
|
|
148,773 |
|
2006 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.696 |
|
|
693 |
|
|
167,063 |
|
|
179,945 |
|
2007 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.687 |
|
|
787 |
|
|
175,469 |
|
|
165,158 |
|
2008 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.307 |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
95,415 |
|
|
85,435 |
|
3/11/09 |
|
Distribution $0.323 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.071 |
|
|
537 |
|
|
137,966 |
|
|
115,669 |
|
12/2/10 |
|
Distribution $0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.850 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
179,730 |
|
|
156,203 |
|
2011 |
|
Year-to-date distribution total $0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
14.492 |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/11 |
|
|
|
$ |
21,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,019 |
|
$ |
189,417 |
|
$ |
164,403 |
|
|
|
The purchase price used for annual distribution totals is a weighted average of the distribution reinvestment prices for the year. |
|
Other than for initial purchase, values are stated as of December 31 of the year indicated, after reinvestment of distributions. |
|
Includes a return of capital. |
18 | The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
|
|
The following table details the share accumulations by an initial investor in the Funds who reinvested all distributions and participated fully in primary subscriptions for each of the rights offerings. Full participation in distribution reinvestments and rights offerings can maximize the returns available to a long-term investor. This table should be read in conjunction with the Performance and Portfolio Reviews of the Funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History |
|
Amount |
|
Purchase |
|
Shares |
|
NAV |
|
Market |
|
|||||||
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
12/14/93 |
|
Initial Purchase |
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
$ |
7.500 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
$ |
7,250 |
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
10/28/94 |
|
Rights Offering |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
7.000 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/19/94 |
|
Distribution $0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.750 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9,163 |
|
|
8,462 |
|
12/7/95 |
|
Distribution $0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.500 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
11,264 |
|
|
10,136 |
|
12/6/96 |
|
Distribution $0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.625 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
13,132 |
|
|
11,550 |
|
12/5/97 |
|
Distribution $1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.000 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
16,694 |
|
|
15,593 |
|
12/7/98 |
|
Distribution $0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.625 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
16,016 |
|
|
14,129 |
|
12/6/99 |
|
Distribution $0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.781 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
18,051 |
|
|
14,769 |
|
12/6/00 |
|
Distribution $1.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.469 |
|
|
333 |
|
|
20,016 |
|
|
17,026 |
|
12/6/01 |
|
Distribution $0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.880 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
21,924 |
|
2002 |
|
Annual distribution total $0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.518 |
|
|
180 |
|
|
21,297 |
|
|
19,142 |
|
2003 |
|
Annual distribution total $0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.004 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
33,125 |
|
|
31,311 |
|
2004 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.350 |
|
|
257 |
|
|
39,320 |
|
|
41,788 |
|
2005 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.848 |
|
|
383 |
|
|
41,969 |
|
|
45,500 |
|
2006 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
14.246 |
|
|
354 |
|
|
51,385 |
|
|
57,647 |
|
2007 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.584 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
51,709 |
|
|
45,802 |
|
2008 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.237 |
|
|
578 |
|
|
28,205 |
|
|
24,807 |
|
3/11/09 |
|
Distribution $0.223 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.260 |
|
|
228 |
|
|
41,314 |
|
|
34,212 |
|
12/2/10 |
|
Distribution $0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.400 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
53,094 |
|
|
45,884 |
|
2011 |
|
Year-to-date distribution total $0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.424 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/11 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
$ |
54,725 |
|
|
47,397 |
|
Royce Focus Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
10/31/96 |
|
Initial Purchase |
|
$ |
4,375 |
|
$ |
4.375 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
$ |
5,280 |
|
$ |
4,375 |
|
12/31/96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
4,594 |
|
12/5/97 |
|
Distribution $0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.250 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
5,574 |
|
12/31/98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
5,367 |
|
12/6/99 |
|
Distribution $0.145 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.750 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
5,356 |
|
12/6/00 |
|
Distribution $0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.563 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
8,151 |
|
|
6,848 |
|
12/6/01 |
|
Distribution $0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.010 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
8,969 |
|
|
8,193 |
|
12/6/02 |
|
Distribution $0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.640 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
7,844 |
|
|
6,956 |
|
12/8/03 |
|
Distribution $0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.250 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
12,105 |
|
|
11,406 |
|
2004 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.325 |
|
|
259 |
|
|
15,639 |
|
|
16,794 |
|
5/6/05 |
|
Rights offering |
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
8.340 |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.470 |
|
|
249 |
|
|
21,208 |
|
|
20,709 |
|
2006 |
|
Annual distribution total $1.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.860 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
24,668 |
|
|
27,020 |
|
2007 |
|
Annual distribution total $2.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.159 |
|
|
573 |
|
|
27,679 |
|
|
27,834 |
|
2008 |
|
Annual distribution total $0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.535 |
|
|
228 |
|
|
15,856 |
|
|
15,323 |
|
3/11/09 |
|
Distribution $0.093 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.830 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
24,408 |
|
|
21,579 |
|
2011 |
|
Year-to-date distribution total $0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.491 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/30/11 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
$ |
30,835 |
|
$ |
27,234 |
|
|
|
The purchase price used for annual distribution totals is a weighted average of the distribution reinvestment prices for the year. |
|
Other than for initial purchase, values are stated as of December 31 of the year indicated, after reinvestment of distributions. |
|
Includes a return of capital. |
The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 19
|
Have the Funds resumed their managed distribution policies
for common stockholders?
The
Funds resumed their quarterly distribution policy for Common Stockholders in
March 2011, at the annual rate of 5%.
Why should I reinvest my distributions?
By
reinvesting distributions, a stockholder can maintain an undiluted investment
in the Fund. The regular reinvestment of distributions has a significant impact
on stockholder returns. In contrast, the stockholder who takes distributions in
cash is penalized when shares are issued below net asset value to other
stockholders.
How does the reinvestment of distributions from the Royce
closed-end funds work?
The
Funds automatically issue shares in payment of distributions unless you
indicate otherwise. The shares are generally issued at the lower of the market
price or net asset value on the valuation date.
How does this apply to registered stockholders?
If
your shares are registered directly with a Fund, your distributions are
automatically reinvested unless you have otherwise instructed the Funds
transfer agent, Computershare, in writing. A registered stockholder also has
the option to receive the distribution in the form of a stock certificate or in
cash if Computershare is properly notified.
What if my shares are held by a brokerage firm or a bank?
If
your shares are held by a brokerage firm, bank, or other intermediary as the
stockholder of record, you should contact your brokerage firm or bank to be
certain that it is automatically reinvesting distributions on your behalf. If
they are unable to reinvest distributions on your behalf, you should have your
shares registered in your name in order to participate.
What other features are available for registered
stockholders?
The
Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plans also allow registered
stockholders to make optional cash purchases of shares of a Funds common stock
directly through Computershare on a monthly basis, and to deposit certificates
representing your Fund shares with Computershare for safekeeping. The Funds
investment adviser is absorbing all commissions on optional cash purchases
under the Plans through December 31, 2011.
How do the Plans work for registered stockholders?
Computershare
maintains the accounts for registered stockholders in the Plans and sends
written confirmation of all transactions in the account. Shares in the account
of each participant will be held by Computershare in non-certificated form in
the name of the participant, and each participant will be able to vote those
shares at a stockholder meeting or by proxy. A participant may also send other
stock certificates held by them to Computershare to be held in non-certificated
form. There is no service fee charged to participants for reinvesting
distributions. If a participant elects to sell shares from a Plan account,
Computershare will deduct a $2.50 fee plus brokerage commissions from the sale
transaction. If a nominee is the registered owner of your shares, the nominee
will maintain the accounts on your behalf.
How can I get more information on the Plans?
You
can call an Investor Services Representative at (800) 221-4268 or you can
request a copy of the Plan for your Fund from Computershare. All correspondence
(including notifications) should be directed to: [Name of Fund] Distribution
Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan, c/o Computershare, PO Box 43010,
Providence, RI 02940-3010, telephone (800)
426-5523.
20 | The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
|
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
COMMON STOCKS 109.2% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Discretionary 11.7% |
|||||||
Auto Components - 0.6% |
|||||||
Autoliv |
|
|
14,800 |
|
$ |
1,161,060 |
|
|
|
69,500 |
|
|
292,595 |
|
|
Gentex Corporation |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1,511,500 |
|
Hirotako Holdings |
|
|
286,000 |
|
|
187,720 |
|
Minth Group |
|
|
1,136,000 |
|
|
1,843,476 |
|
|
|
524,000 |
|
|
24,578 |
|
|
|
|
81,592 |
|
|
367,164 |
|
|
Superior Industries International |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
884,400 |
|
Williams Controls |
|
|
37,499 |
|
|
431,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,703,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Automobiles - 0.3% |
|||||||
Thor Industries |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1,442,000 |
|
|
|
222,500 |
|
|
2,149,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,591,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributors - 0.7% |
|||||||
LKQ Corporation 2 |
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
6,000,700 |
|
Weyco Group |
|
|
97,992 |
|
|
2,410,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,411,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diversified Consumer Services - 1.7% |
|||||||
Anhanguera Educacional Participacoes |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
1,702,880 |
|
Benesse Holdings |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
1,377,125 |
|
ChinaCast Education 2 |
|
|
181,400 |
|
|
939,652 |
|
|
|
59,500 |
|
|
253,470 |
|
|
ITT Educational Services 2 |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
704,160 |
|
MegaStudy |
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
3,257,305 |
|
Regis Corporation |
|
|
233,800 |
|
|
3,581,816 |
|
Sotheby's |
|
|
157,500 |
|
|
6,851,250 |
|
Universal Technical Institute |
|
|
43,600 |
|
|
861,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,529,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure - 0.3% |
|||||||
Abu Dhabi National Hotels 3 |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
88,837 |
|
Ajisen China Holdings |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
625,233 |
|
Benihana 2 |
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
34,386 |
|
CEC Entertainment |
|
|
64,100 |
|
|
2,571,051 |
|
Fairwood Holdings |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
52,376 |
|
Kangwon Land |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
201,168 |
|
REXLot Holdings |
|
|
4,176,800 |
|
|
403,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,976,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Household Durables - 1.9% |
|||||||
Allan International Holdings |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
138,532 |
|
Desarrolladora Homex ADR 2 |
|
14,100 |
|
|
355,743 |
|
|
Ekornes |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
1,243,751 |
|
Ethan Allen Interiors |
|
|
345,800 |
|
|
7,362,082 |
|
Hanssem |
|
|
49,100 |
|
|
617,943 |
|
Harman International Industries |
|
|
22,950 |
|
|
1,045,831 |
|
Hunter Douglas |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
489,577 |
|
Mohawk Industries 2 |
|
|
128,200 |
|
|
7,690,718 |
|
NVR 2 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
362,740 |
|
Universal Electronics 2 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
252,600 |
|
Woongjin Coway |
|
|
59,400 |
|
|
2,118,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,678,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Discretionary (continued) |
|||||||
Internet & Catalog Retail - 0.4% |
|||||||
Manutan International |
|
|
27,500 |
|
$ |
2,121,783 |
|
Takkt |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
2,101,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,223,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Leisure Equipment & Products - 0.5% |
|||||||
Beneteau |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1,076,782 |
|
Sturm, Ruger & Co. |
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
4,842,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,918,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Media - 0.8% |
|||||||
Global Sources 2 |
|
|
27,621 |
|
|
253,837 |
|
Lamar Advertising Cl. A 2 |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
1,395,870 |
|
Morningstar |
|
|
109,800 |
|
|
6,673,644 |
|
Pico Far East Holdings |
|
|
6,785,000 |
|
|
1,404,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,727,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Multiline Retail - 0.1% |
|||||||
New World Department Store China |
|
|
1,559,000 |
|
|
1,231,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Specialty Retail - 1.7% |
|||||||
|
|
48,700 |
|
|
852,250 |
|
|
Ascena Retail Group 2 |
|
|
68,280 |
|
|
2,324,934 |
|
CarMax 2 |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
1,355,870 |
|
Charming Shoppes 2 |
|
|
475,900 |
|
|
1,979,744 |
|
Dickson Concepts (International) |
|
|
711,600 |
|
|
557,025 |
|
|
|
17,821 |
|
|
83,224 |
|
|
|
|
24,400 |
|
|
650,748 |
|
|
Genesco 2 |
|
|
8,100 |
|
|
422,010 |
|
Hengdeli Holdings |
|
|
485,250 |
|
|
258,693 |
|
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers 2 |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
1,550,310 |
|
Lewis Group |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
2,503,186 |
|
Luk Fook Holdings (International) |
|
|
95,500 |
|
|
463,719 |
|
Stein Mart |
|
|
167,800 |
|
|
1,617,592 |
|
Systemax 2 |
|
|
224,000 |
|
|
3,346,560 |
|
West Marine 2 |
|
|
131,100 |
|
|
1,359,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,325,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods - 2.7% |
|||||||
Anta Sports Products |
|
|
323,200 |
|
|
579,207 |
|
Burberry Group |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1,162,500 |
|
Carter's 2 |
|
|
236,000 |
|
|
7,259,360 |
|
|
|
45,700 |
|
|
133,444 |
|
|
Columbia Sportswear |
|
|
19,122 |
|
|
1,212,335 |
|
Daphne International Holdings |
|
|
2,115,800 |
|
|
1,889,803 |
|
Grendene |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
1,441,707 |
|
J.G. Boswell Company 4 |
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
1,719,000 |
|
K-Swiss Cl. A 2 |
|
|
163,600 |
|
|
1,739,068 |
|
|
|
95,437 |
|
|
129,794 |
|
|
Pacific Textiles Holdings |
|
|
2,420,000 |
|
|
1,616,881 |
|
Stella International Holdings |
|
|
806,800 |
|
|
2,046,133 |
|
Texwinca Holdings |
|
|
401,000 |
|
|
477,006 |
|
Unifi 2 |
|
|
40,333 |
|
|
556,596 |
|
Van De Velde |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
852,341 |
|
Warnaco Group (The) 2 |
|
|
73,200 |
|
|
3,824,700 |
|
Wolverine World Wide |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
4,175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,814,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total (Cost $101,361,451) |
|
|
|
|
|
135,132,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 21 |
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Staples 2.2% |
|||||||
Beverages - 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
$ |
302,000 |
|
|
MGP Ingredients |
|
|
127,400 |
|
|
1,109,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,411,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Food & Staples Retailing - 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FamilyMart |
|
|
125,900 |
|
|
4,627,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Food Products - 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alico |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
691,740 |
|
Asian Citrus Holdings |
|
|
587,800 |
|
|
537,024 |
|
Binggrae |
|
|
22,415 |
|
|
1,297,025 |
|
BW Plantation |
|
|
875,100 |
|
|
121,507 |
|
Cal-Maine Foods |
|
|
49,900 |
|
|
1,594,804 |
|
China Green (Holdings) |
|
|
2,272,000 |
|
|
1,466,724 |
|
First Resources |
|
|
1,506,700 |
|
|
1,705,134 |
|
Grupo Herdez |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
644,916 |
|
Hershey Creamery 4 |
|
|
709 |
|
|
1,240,750 |
|
|
|
76,800 |
|
|
305,664 |
|
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
2,813,800 |
|
|
Seneca Foods Cl. B 2 |
|
|
13,251 |
|
|
330,745 |
|
Super Group |
|
|
735,000 |
|
|
857,032 |
|
Tootsie Roll Industries |
|
|
198,566 |
|
|
5,810,041 |
|
Westway Group 2 |
|
|
31,500 |
|
|
152,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,569,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $22,330,427) |
|
|
|
|
|
25,609,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Investment Companies 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed-End Funds - 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Fund of Canada Cl. A |
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
4,827,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $2,076,233) |
|
|
|
|
|
4,827,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy 6.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services - 5.9% |
|||||||
Atwood Oceanics 2 |
|
|
15,300 |
|
|
675,189 |
|
Cal Dive International 2 |
|
|
456,250 |
|
|
2,728,375 |
|
Calfrac Well Services |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
1,482,347 |
|
CARBO Ceramics |
|
|
44,700 |
|
|
7,283,865 |
|
Ensco ADR |
|
|
37,600 |
|
|
2,004,080 |
|
Ensign Energy Services |
|
|
225,100 |
|
|
4,462,556 |
|
|
|
103,600 |
|
|
2,054,388 |
|
|
Helmerich & Payne |
|
|
100,900 |
|
|
6,671,508 |
|
ION Geophysical 2 |
|
|
361,500 |
|
|
3,419,790 |
|
Lufkin Industries |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
5,335,100 |
|
Oil States International 2 |
|
|
158,500 |
|
|
12,665,735 |
|
Pason Systems |
|
|
101,800 |
|
|
1,534,732 |
|
SEACOR Holdings |
|
|
23,760 |
|
|
2,375,049 |
|
ShawCor Cl. A |
|
|
104,500 |
|
|
3,209,384 |
|
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
492,660 |
|
|
TETRA Technologies 2 |
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
865,640 |
|
TGS-NOPEC Geophysical |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
2,243,683 |
|
Tidewater |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
1,937,160 |
|
Trican Well Service |
|
|
99,900 |
|
|
2,347,176 |
|
Unit Corporation 2 |
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
2,619,990 |
|
Willbros Group 2 |
|
|
103,800 |
|
|
886,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,294,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy (continued) |
|||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 0.8% |
|||||||
Bill Barrett 2 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
$ |
2,317,500 |
|
Cimarex Energy |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
4,496,000 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
298,586 |
|
|
HRT Participacoes em Petroleo 2 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
179,412 |
|
|
|
141,134 |
|
|
2,280,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,572,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $36,445,183) |
|
|
|
|
|
76,867,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials 19.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets - 10.3% |
|||||||
A.F.P. Provida ADR |
|
|
22,100 |
|
|
1,579,045 |
|
ABG Sundal Collier Holding |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
125,589 |
|
Affiliated Managers Group 2 |
|
|
47,600 |
|
|
4,829,020 |
|
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. |
|
|
344,600 |
|
|
6,699,024 |
|
AP Alternative Assets L.P. |
|
|
233,200 |
|
|
2,869,215 |
|
Artio Global Investors Cl. A |
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
2,655,500 |
|
Ashmore Group |
|
|
777,500 |
|
|
4,969,343 |
|
Azimut Holding |
|
|
72,183 |
|
|
673,152 |
|
Banca Generali |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
1,191,832 |
|
Bank Sarasin & Co. Cl. B |
|
|
33,120 |
|
|
1,311,599 |
|
Banque Privee Edmond de Rothschild |
|
|
23 |
|
|
649,717 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
165,100 |
|
|
BT Investment Management |
|
|
207,000 |
|
|
555,194 |
|
Close Brothers Group |
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
532,804 |
|
Coronation Fund Managers |
|
|
526,000 |
|
|
1,502,209 |
|
|
|
708,600 |
|
|
2,664,336 |
|
|
Daewoo Securities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
84,155 |
|
Eaton Vance |
|
|
85,300 |
|
|
2,578,619 |
|
Egyptian Financial Group-Hermes Holding 2 |
|
|
774,500 |
|
|
2,607,791 |
|
Epoch Holding Corporation |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
446,250 |
|
Equity Trustees |
|
|
36,709 |
|
|
547,169 |
|
F&C Asset Management |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
72,189 |
|
FBR & Company 2 |
|
|
249,600 |
|
|
848,640 |
|
Federated Investors Cl. B |
|
|
307,700 |
|
|
7,335,568 |
|
Fiducian Portfolio Services |
|
|
227,000 |
|
|
324,516 |
|
GAMCO Investors Cl. A |
|
|
90,575 |
|
|
4,192,717 |
|
GFI Group |
|
|
166,247 |
|
|
763,074 |
|
GIMV |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
1,432,774 |
|
Gleacher & Company 2 |
|
|
293,000 |
|
|
597,720 |
|
GP Investments BDR 2 |
|
|
15,604 |
|
|
60,290 |
|
HQ 2 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
43,638 |
|
Investec |
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
955,500 |
|
IOOF Holdings |
|
|
123,592 |
|
|
878,614 |
|
KKR & Co. L.P. |
|
|
415,000 |
|
|
6,772,800 |
|
Lazard Cl. A |
|
|
109,300 |
|
|
4,055,030 |
|
MF Global Holdings 2 |
|
|
749,000 |
|
|
5,797,260 |
|
Mizuho Securities 2 |
|
|
492,300 |
|
|
1,186,316 |
|
MVC Capital |
|
|
214,200 |
|
|
2,833,866 |
|
Oppenheimer Holdings Cl. A |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
2,115,750 |
|
Paris Orleans et Cie |
|
|
183,785 |
|
|
5,199,691 |
|
Partners Group Holding |
|
|
11,300 |
|
|
1,999,965 |
|
Perpetual |
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
362,222 |
|
Phatra Capital |
|
|
775,000 |
|
|
732,084 |
|
|
|
22 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (continued) |
|||||||
Capital Markets (continued) |
|||||||
Platinum Asset Management |
|
|
149,000 |
|
$ |
658,660 |
|
Rathbone Brothers |
|
|
35,400 |
|
|
642,597 |
|
Reinet Investments 2 |
|
|
133,127 |
|
|
2,414,411 |
|
Schroders |
|
|
41,100 |
|
|
1,020,497 |
|
SEI Investments |
|
|
352,900 |
|
|
7,943,779 |
|
SHUAA Capital 2 |
|
|
485,000 |
|
|
125,565 |
|
SPARX Group 2 |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
131,957 |
|
Sprott |
|
|
269,600 |
|
|
2,065,782 |
|
Teton Advisors Cl. A 4 |
|
|
723 |
|
|
12,219 |
|
Treasury Group |
|
|
51,500 |
|
|
219,162 |
|
Trust Company (The) |
|
|
97,283 |
|
|
576,035 |
|
UOB-Kay Hian Holdings |
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
250,777 |
|
Value Partners Group |
|
|
7,407,800 |
|
|
6,366,914 |
|
Vontobel Holding |
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
691,314 |
|
VZ Holding |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
1,434,321 |
|
Waddell & Reed Financial Cl. A |
|
|
139,300 |
|
|
5,063,555 |
|
Westwood Holdings Group |
|
|
23,460 |
|
|
893,826 |
|
Woori Investment & Securities |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
177,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,486,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial Banks - 1.4% |
|||||||
Ameriana Bancorp |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
942,504 |
|
|
1,319,505 |
|
|
BCB Holdings 2 |
|
|
598,676 |
|
|
518,857 |
|
Center Bancorp |
|
|
44,868 |
|
|
468,422 |
|
CNB Financial |
|
|
11,116 |
|
|
154,401 |
|
Commercial National Financial |
|
|
54,900 |
|
|
1,056,825 |
|
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beach |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
5,088,000 |
|
Fauquier Bankshares |
|
|
160,800 |
|
|
1,960,152 |
|
Hawthorn Bancshares |
|
|
49,944 |
|
|
382,570 |
|
M&T Bank |
|
|
20,027 |
|
|
1,761,375 |
|
Mauritius Commercial Bank |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
266,195 |
|
Mechanics Bank |
|
|
200 |
|
|
2,320,000 |
|
Old Point Financial |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
293,250 |
|
Peapack-Gladstone Financial |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
123,690 |
|
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings |
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
411,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,324,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consumer Finance - 0.3% |
|||||||
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
2,753,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diversified Financial Services - 1.0% |
|||||||
Banca Finnat Euramerica |
|
|
870,000 |
|
|
549,165 |
|
Hellenic Exchanges |
|
|
169,613 |
|
|
1,209,863 |
|
Interactive Brokers Group Cl. A |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
1,565,000 |
|
KKR Financial Holdings LLC |
|
|
381,404 |
|
|
3,741,573 |
|
PICO Holdings 2 |
|
|
106,100 |
|
|
3,076,900 |
|
RHJ International 2 |
|
|
102,500 |
|
|
738,875 |
|
State Bank of Mauritius |
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
156,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,037,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Insurance - 5.1% |
|||||||
Alleghany Corporation 2 |
|
|
29,230 |
|
|
9,736,805 |
|
Argo Group International Holdings |
|
|
64,751 |
|
|
1,924,400 |
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings |
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
1,209,310 |
|
Brown & Brown |
|
|
300,100 |
|
|
7,700,566 |
|
Crawford & Company Cl. B |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
8,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (continued) |
|||||||
Insurance (continued) |
|||||||
Discovery Holdings |
|
|
255,000 |
|
$ |
1,454,869 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
427,520 |
|
|
E-L Financial |
|
|
17,900 |
|
|
8,166,313 |
|
Enstar Group 2 |
|
|
20,217 |
|
|
2,112,474 |
|
Erie Indemnity Cl. A |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
3,536,000 |
|
First American Financial |
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
688,600 |
|
Gallagher (Arthur J.) & Co. |
|
|
111,200 |
|
|
3,173,648 |
|
Hilltop Holdings 2 |
|
|
290,400 |
|
|
2,567,136 |
|
Independence Holding |
|
|
317,658 |
|
|
3,316,350 |
|
Markel Corporation 2 |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
1,666,602 |
|
Montpelier Re Holdings |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
576,000 |
|
Platinum Underwriters Holdings |
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
3,124,560 |
|
ProAssurance Corporation 2 |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
1,540,000 |
|
RLI |
|
|
80,724 |
|
|
4,998,430 |
|
Validus Holdings |
|
|
16,300 |
|
|
504,485 |
|
White Mountains Insurance Group |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
441,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,873,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real Estate Management & Development - 1.1% |
|||||||
Altisource Portfolio Solutions 2 |
|
|
41,199 |
|
|
1,516,123 |
|
Consolidated-Tomoka Land |
|
|
13,564 |
|
|
387,930 |
|
E-House China Holdings ADR |
|
|
346,100 |
|
|
3,395,241 |
|
Forestar Group 2 |
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
1,774,440 |
|
|
|
90,452 |
|
|
132,965 |
|
|
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
1,837,500 |
|
Midland Holdings |
|
|
927,800 |
|
|
543,489 |
|
Soho China |
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
673,666 |
|
Tejon Ranch 2 |
|
|
80,996 |
|
|
2,761,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,023,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance - 0.6% |
|||||||
CFS Bancorp |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
402,750 |
|
HopFed Bancorp |
|
|
106,590 |
|
|
843,127 |
|
Kearny Financial |
|
|
70,862 |
|
|
645,553 |
|
MyState |
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
572,565 |
|
Ocwen Financial 2 |
|
|
123,600 |
|
|
1,577,136 |
|
|
|
469,200 |
|
|
2,772,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,814,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $225,543,590) |
|
|
|
|
|
227,313,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care 7.8% |
|||||||
Biotechnology - 0.2% |
|||||||
|
|
158,746 |
|
|
1,657,308 |
|
|
|
|
35,249 |
|
|
73,671 |
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
392,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,123,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies - 2.1% |
|||||||
|
|
180,512 |
|
|
714,827 |
|
|
Analogic Corporation |
|
|
40,135 |
|
|
2,110,700 |
|
Atrion Corporation |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
3,115,350 |
|
bioMerieux |
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
1,021,699 |
|
Carl Zeiss Meditec |
|
|
163,700 |
|
|
3,646,237 |
|
Cochlear |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
578,932 |
|
CONMED Corporation 2 |
|
|
81,500 |
|
|
2,321,120 |
|
DiaSorin |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
960,038 |
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 23 |
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care (continued) |
|||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies (continued) |
|||||||
DynaVox Cl. A 2 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
$ |
418,000 |
|
IDEXX Laboratories 2 |
|
|
40,201 |
|
|
3,117,990 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
363,069 |
|
|
Kossan Rubber Industries |
|
|
200,600 |
|
|
207,470 |
|
Nihon Kohden |
|
|
43,100 |
|
|
1,068,052 |
|
Straumann Holding |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
1,568,838 |
|
Top Glove |
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
452,165 |
|
|
|
445,500 |
|
|
423,225 |
|
|
Young Innovations |
|
|
62,550 |
|
|
1,783,926 |
|
Zoll Medical 2 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
22,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,894,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health Care Providers & Services - 0.6% |
|||||||
Cross Country Healthcare 2 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
228,000 |
|
Landauer |
|
|
75,500 |
|
|
4,650,045 |
|
MWI Veterinary Supply 2 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
807,700 |
|
VCA Antech 2 |
|
|
74,500 |
|
|
1,579,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,265,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Life Sciences Tools & Services - 3.1% |
|||||||
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
79,300 |
|
|
Albany Molecular Research 2 |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
408,850 |
|
EPS |
|
|
683 |
|
|
1,608,101 |
|
Furiex Pharmaceuticals 2 |
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
148,244 |
|
ICON ADR 2 |
|
|
262,350 |
|
|
6,180,966 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
418,000 |
|
|
Mettler-Toledo International 2 |
|
|
33,500 |
|
|
5,650,445 |
|
PAREXEL International 2 |
|
|
312,400 |
|
|
7,360,144 |
|
PerkinElmer |
|
|
185,800 |
|
|
4,999,878 |
|
Pharmaceutical Product Development |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
2,684,000 |
|
Techne Corporation |
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
5,919,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,457,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pharmaceuticals - 1.8% |
|||||||
Adcock Ingram Holdings |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
1,581,545 |
|
Almirall |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
1,074,703 |
|
Boiron |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
2,234,717 |
|
Bukwang Pharmaceutical |
|
|
55,300 |
|
|
613,422 |
|
China Animal Healthcare |
|
|
2,140,000 |
|
|
481,473 |
|
Daewoong Pharmaceutical |
|
|
17,070 |
|
|
613,747 |
|
Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings 2 |
|
|
144,400 |
|
|
5,800,548 |
|
Green Cross |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
680,283 |
|
Hikma Pharmaceuticals |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
731,883 |
|
Kalbe Farma |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
196,924 |
|
Questcor Pharmaceuticals 2 |
|
|
51,300 |
|
|
1,236,330 |
|
Recordati |
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
2,089,946 |
|
Santen Pharmaceutical |
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
2,317,080 |
|
Virbac |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
1,538,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,190,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $55,643,169) |
|
|
|
|
|
89,930,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrials 26.3% |
|||||||
Aerospace & Defense - 1.6% |
|||||||
AerCap Holdings 2 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
585,450 |
|
Ducommun |
|
|
117,200 |
|
|
2,410,804 |
|
HEICO Corporation |
|
|
168,281 |
|
|
9,211,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Industrials (continued) |
|||||||
Aerospace & Defense (continued) |
|||||||
HEICO Corporation Cl. A |
|
|
51,718 |
|
$ |
2,056,307 |
|
Hexcel Corporation 2 |
|
|
47,500 |
|
|
1,039,775 |
|
Moog Cl. A 2 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
1,088,000 |
|
Teledyne Technologies 2 |
|
|
31,630 |
|
|
1,592,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,984,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Air Freight & Logistics - 1.8% |
|||||||
C. H. Robinson Worldwide |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
3,942,000 |
|
Forward Air |
|
|
209,750 |
|
|
7,087,453 |
|
Hub Group Cl. A 2 |
|
|
164,400 |
|
|
6,191,304 |
|
UTi Worldwide |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
3,445,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,666,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Airlines - 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
134,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Building Products - 1.2% |
|||||||
American Woodmark |
|
|
123,335 |
|
|
2,136,162 |
|
Burnham Holdings Cl. B 4 |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
513,000 |
|
NCI Building Systems 2 |
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
31,664 |
|
Simpson Manufacturing |
|
|
258,400 |
|
|
7,718,408 |
|
Sung Kwang Bend |
|
|
125,700 |
|
|
2,595,768 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
717,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,712,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial Services & Supplies - 2.8% |
|||||||
Brink's Company (The) |
|
|
206,320 |
|
|
6,154,526 |
|
Cintas Corporation |
|
|
79,300 |
|
|
2,619,279 |
|
CompX International Cl. A |
|
|
185,300 |
|
|
2,442,254 |
|
Copart 2 |
|
|
110,386 |
|
|
5,143,987 |
|
Kimball International Cl. B |
|
|
286,180 |
|
|
1,840,137 |
|
Moshi Moshi Hotline |
|
|
118,450 |
|
|
1,922,877 |
|
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers |
|
|
337,700 |
|
|
9,283,373 |
|
Societe BIC |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
869,775 |
|
US Ecology |
|
|
101,000 |
|
|
1,727,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,003,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction & Engineering - 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMCOR Group 2 |
|
|
199,400 |
|
|
5,844,414 |
|
|
|
355,400 |
|
|
1,115,956 |
|
|
Jacobs Engineering Group 2 |
|
|
81,400 |
|
|
3,520,550 |
|
KBR |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
6,595,750 |
|
Raubex Group |
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
1,252,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,328,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Electrical Equipment - 4.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AZZ |
|
|
57,500 |
|
|
2,633,500 |
|
Belden |
|
|
57,800 |
|
|
2,014,908 |
|
Brady Corporation Cl. A |
|
|
94,600 |
|
|
3,032,876 |
|
Franklin Electric |
|
|
104,600 |
|
|
4,910,970 |
|
Fushi Copperweld 2 |
|
|
244,445 |
|
|
1,400,670 |
|
GrafTech International 2 |
|
|
388,190 |
|
|
7,868,611 |
|
Jinpan International |
|
|
169,684 |
|
|
1,897,067 |
|
Powell Industries 2 |
|
|
92,400 |
|
|
3,372,600 |
|
Preformed Line Products |
|
|
91,600 |
|
|
6,520,088 |
|
Regal-Beloit |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
8,079,170 |
|
Woodward |
|
|
231,600 |
|
|
8,073,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,804,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrials (continued) |
|||||||
Industrial Conglomerates - 0.5% |
|||||||
Raven Industries |
|
|
96,200 |
|
$ |
5,359,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Machinery - 8.2% |
|||||||
Armstrong Industrial |
|
|
2,533,200 |
|
|
715,083 |
|
Burckhardt Compression Holding |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
3,661,747 |
|
China Automation Group |
|
|
494,800 |
|
|
347,434 |
|
CLARCOR |
|
|
92,500 |
|
|
4,373,400 |
|
|
|
101,500 |
|
|
1,822,940 |
|
|
Decker Manufacturing 4 |
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
206,253 |
|
Donaldson Company |
|
|
92,800 |
|
|
5,631,104 |
|
FAG Bearings India |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
746,140 |
|
Gardner Denver |
|
|
25,900 |
|
|
2,176,895 |
|
Graco |
|
|
116,376 |
|
|
5,895,608 |
|
Hardinge |
|
|
26,193 |
|
|
285,766 |
|
IDEX Corporation |
|
|
67,400 |
|
|
3,090,290 |
|
Industrea |
|
|
437,400 |
|
|
633,734 |
|
Kennametal |
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
6,542,550 |
|
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
|
|
188,360 |
|
|
6,752,706 |
|
Mueller Water Products Cl. A |
|
|
72,500 |
|
|
288,550 |
|
NN 2 |
|
|
197,100 |
|
|
2,948,616 |
|
Nordson Corporation |
|
|
204,200 |
|
|
11,200,370 |
|
Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology |
|
|
24,300 |
|
|
3,047,015 |
|
|
|
314,900 |
|
|
6,250,765 |
|
|
Rational |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
1,581,296 |
|
RBC Bearings 2 |
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
1,774,720 |
|
Rotork |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
676,523 |
|
Semperit AG Holding |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
2,992,798 |
|
Spirax-Sarco Engineering |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
1,284,664 |
|
Valmont Industries |
|
|
47,500 |
|
|
4,578,525 |
|
WABCO Holdings 2 |
|
|
103,800 |
|
|
7,168,428 |
|
Wabtec Corporation |
|
|
112,825 |
|
|
7,414,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,088,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Marine - 0.5% |
|||||||
Kirby Corporation 2 |
|
|
111,000 |
|
|
6,290,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Professional Services - 2.0% |
|||||||
Advisory Board (The) 2 |
|
|
128,500 |
|
|
7,437,580 |
|
CRA International 2 |
|
|
57,187 |
|
|
1,549,196 |
|
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
297,829 |
|
|
JobStreet Corporation |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
48,518 |
|
ManpowerGroup |
|
|
78,600 |
|
|
4,216,890 |
|
Michael Page International |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
1,073,367 |
|
On Assignment 2 |
|
|
375,400 |
|
|
3,690,182 |
|
Robert Half International |
|
|
139,600 |
|
|
3,773,388 |
|
SFN Group 2 |
|
|
162,800 |
|
|
1,479,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,566,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Road & Rail - 1.2% |
|||||||
Frozen Food Express Industries 2 |
|
|
286,635 |
|
|
1,023,287 |
|
Landstar System |
|
|
129,900 |
|
|
6,037,752 |
|
Patriot Transportation Holding 2 |
|
|
212,958 |
|
|
4,763,870 |
|
Universal Truckload Services 2 |
|
|
129,476 |
|
|
2,217,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,042,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trading Companies & Distributors - 0.6% |
|||||||
Lawson Products |
|
|
161,431 |
|
|
3,175,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrials (continued) |
|||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors |
|||||||
MSC Industrial Direct Cl. A |
|
|
58,448 |
|
$ |
3,875,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,051,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $176,001,478) |
|
|
|
|
303,032,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology 20.3% |
|||||||
Communications Equipment - 2.0% |
|||||||
AAC Acoustic Technologies Holdings |
|
|
224,700 |
|
|
529,806 |
|
ADTRAN |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
2,516,150 |
|
Arris Group 2 |
|
|
140,350 |
|
|
1,629,464 |
|
Bel Fuse Cl. A |
|
|
36,672 |
|
|
850,790 |
|
Black Box |
|
|
43,798 |
|
|
1,369,563 |
|
|
|
173,615 |
|
|
927,104 |
|
|
Comba Telecom Systems Holdings |
|
|
487,928 |
|
|
515,138 |
|
Comtech Telecommunications |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
841,200 |
|
|
|
415,000 |
|
|
3,569,000 |
|
|
EVS Broadcast Equipment |
|
|
27,500 |
|
|
1,861,537 |
|
Globecomm Systems 2 |
|
|
233,700 |
|
|
3,636,372 |
|
|
|
704,000 |
|
|
2,280,960 |
|
|
Sycamore Networks |
|
|
48,100 |
|
|
1,069,744 |
|
VTech Holdings |
|
|
49,050 |
|
|
585,388 |
|
Zhone Technologies 2 |
|
|
324,000 |
|
|
767,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,950,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Computers & Peripherals - 1.0% |
|||||||
|
|
1,568,800 |
|
|
4,706,400 |
|
|
Avid Technology 2 |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
1,243,440 |
|
China Digital TV Holding Co. ADR |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
25,500 |
|
Diebold |
|
|
151,600 |
|
|
4,701,116 |
|
|
|
8,517 |
|
|
146,663 |
|
|
Intermec 2 |
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
253,920 |
|
Intevac 2 |
|
|
57,450 |
|
|
586,564 |
|
SMART Technologies Cl. A 2 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
427,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,091,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components - 8.7% |
|||||||
Agilysys 2 |
|
|
165,125 |
|
|
1,377,142 |
|
Anixter International |
|
|
61,795 |
|
|
4,037,685 |
|
Benchmark Electronics 2 |
|
|
165,200 |
|
|
2,725,800 |
|
China 3C Group 2 |
|
|
6,600 |
|
|
792 |
|
China High Precision Automation Group |
|
|
1,685,700 |
|
|
1,321,788 |
|
Chroma Ate |
|
|
139,406 |
|
|
444,143 |
|
Cognex Corporation |
|
|
236,200 |
|
|
8,368,566 |
|
Coherent 2 |
|
|
235,500 |
|
|
13,016,085 |
|
Dolby Laboratories Cl. A 2 |
|
|
30,700 |
|
|
1,303,522 |
|
FLIR Systems |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
3,539,550 |
|
Hana Microelectronics |
|
|
685,000 |
|
|
520,362 |
|
Hollysys Automation Technologies 2 |
|
|
73,727 |
|
|
687,136 |
|
Image Sensing Systems 2 |
|
|
8,310 |
|
|
93,903 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
363,550 |
|
|
Kingboard Chemical Holdings |
|
|
66,900 |
|
|
311,886 |
|
Mercury Computer Systems 2 |
|
|
40,500 |
|
|
756,540 |
|
Molex |
|
|
72,600 |
|
|
1,870,902 |
|
National Instruments |
|
|
251,850 |
|
|
7,477,427 |
|
Newport Corporation 2 |
|
|
523,500 |
|
|
9,511,995 |
|
Perceptron 2 |
|
|
357,700 |
|
|
2,274,972 |
|
|
|
195,700 |
|
|
6,812,317 |
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 25 |
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology (continued) |
|||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components (continued) |
|||||||
Pulse Electronics |
|
|
286,200 |
|
$ |
1,265,004 |
|
Richardson Electronics |
|
|
495,712 |
|
|
6,736,726 |
|
Rofin-Sinar Technologies 2 |
|
|
293,500 |
|
|
10,023,025 |
|
Tech Data 2 |
|
|
136,500 |
|
|
6,673,485 |
|
TTM Technologies 2 |
|
|
211,400 |
|
|
3,386,628 |
|
Vaisala Cl. A |
|
|
176,000 |
|
|
5,701,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,602,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Internet Software & Services - 0.5% |
|||||||
Monster Worldwide 2 |
|
|
36,800 |
|
|
539,488 |
|
NetEase.com ADR 2 |
|
|
14,300 |
|
|
644,787 |
|
Perficient 2 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
102,600 |
|
RealNetworks 2 |
|
|
245,400 |
|
|
834,360 |
|
Sohu.com 2 |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
758,835 |
|
ValueClick 2 |
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
2,407,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,287,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
IT Services - 4.3% |
|||||||
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
373,750 |
|
|
Convergys Corporation 2 |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
1,650,440 |
|
CoreLogic 2 |
|
|
284,000 |
|
|
4,745,640 |
|
Forrester Research |
|
|
40,300 |
|
|
1,328,288 |
|
Gartner 2 |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
4,875,090 |
|
Hackett Group 2 |
|
|
655,000 |
|
|
3,333,950 |
|
ManTech International Cl. A |
|
|
35,400 |
|
|
1,572,468 |
|
MAXIMUS |
|
|
103,600 |
|
|
8,570,828 |
|
MoneyGram International 2 |
|
|
646,900 |
|
|
2,147,708 |
|
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
3,117,800 |
|
|
Sapient Corporation 2 |
|
|
756,602 |
|
|
11,371,728 |
|
SRA International Cl. A 2 |
|
|
67,100 |
|
|
2,074,732 |
|
Total System Services |
|
|
171,500 |
|
|
3,186,470 |
|
|
|
11,800 |
|
|
303,260 |
|
|
Yucheng Technologies 2 |
|
|
175,646 |
|
|
574,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,226,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 2.1% |
|||||||
Aixtron ADR |
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
1,160,080 |
|
Analog Devices |
|
|
16,004 |
|
|
626,397 |
|
ASM Pacific Technology |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
1,382,511 |
|
BE Semiconductor Industries 4 |
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
493,580 |
|
Cymer 2 |
|
|
113,000 |
|
|
5,594,630 |
|
Diodes 2 |
|
|
252,450 |
|
|
6,588,945 |
|
|
|
562,700 |
|
|
663,986 |
|
|
Exar Corporation 2 |
|
|
157,576 |
|
|
997,456 |
|
Himax Technologies ADR |
|
|
221,900 |
|
|
488,180 |
|
International Rectifier 2 |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
3,356,400 |
|
Power Integrations |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
1,883,070 |
|
Vimicro International ADR 2 |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
568,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,804,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Software - 1.7% |
|||||||
ACI Worldwide 2 |
|
|
181,150 |
|
|
6,117,435 |
|
Advent Software 2 |
|
|
68,500 |
|
|
1,929,645 |
|
ANSYS 2 |
|
|
95,600 |
|
|
5,226,452 |
|
Aspen Technology 2 |
|
|
42,100 |
|
|
723,278 |
|
Aveva Group |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
549,878 |
|
Blackbaud |
|
|
41,890 |
|
|
1,161,191 |
|
JDA Software Group 2 |
|
|
49,900 |
|
|
1,541,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology (continued) |
|||||||
Software (continued) |
|||||||
|
|
38,000 |
|
$ |
83,600 |
|
|
|
|
36,255 |
|
|
109,490 |
|
|
Net 1 UEPS Technologies 2 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
434,000 |
|
SimCorp |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
1,578,198 |
|
THQ 2 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
72,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,526,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $173,472,382) |
|
|
|
|
|
233,488,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials 10.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals - 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agrium |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
491,456 |
|
Cabot Corporation |
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
2,312,460 |
|
CF Industries Holdings |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
637,515 |
|
Fufeng Group |
|
|
2,456,400 |
|
|
1,596,683 |
|
Hanfeng Evergreen 2 |
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
36,007 |
|
Hawkins |
|
|
156,178 |
|
|
5,656,767 |
|
Huchems Fine Chemical |
|
|
30,056 |
|
|
727,437 |
|
Intrepid Potash 2 |
|
|
85,227 |
|
|
2,769,878 |
|
OM Group 2 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
3,657,600 |
|
Victrex |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
1,083,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,969,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction Materials - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ash Grove Cement Cl. B 4 |
|
|
50,518 |
|
|
8,082,880 |
|
Mardin Cimento Sanayii |
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
1,397,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,480,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Containers & Packaging - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadway Industrial Group |
|
|
1,558,300 |
|
|
526,517 |
|
Greif Cl. A |
|
|
93,944 |
|
|
6,109,178 |
|
Mayr-Melnhof Karton |
|
|
22,600 |
|
|
2,666,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,302,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Metals & Mining - 6.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Technologies |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
222,145 |
|
Aquarius Platinum |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
1,786,476 |
|
AuRico Gold 2 |
|
|
218,300 |
|
|
2,399,117 |
|
Centamin Egypt 2 |
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
1,408,056 |
|
Central Steel & Wire 4 |
|
|
6,062 |
|
|
3,849,370 |
|
Cliffs Natural Resources |
|
|
29,500 |
|
|
2,727,275 |
|
Commercial Metals |
|
|
36,600 |
|
|
525,210 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
718,544 |
|
|
Endeavour Mining (Warrants) 2 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
46,659 |
|
Franco-Nevada Corporation |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
373,270 |
|
Fresnillo |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
2,366,636 |
|
Haynes International |
|
|
14,500 |
|
|
897,985 |
|
Hecla Mining 2 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
2,307,000 |
|
Hidili Industry International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
52,079 |
|
Hochschild Mining |
|
|
375,500 |
|
|
2,773,408 |
|
IAMGOLD Corporation |
|
|
95,620 |
|
|
1,793,831 |
|
|
|
560,000 |
|
|
924,000 |
|
|
Maharashtra Seamless |
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
2,233,034 |
|
Major Drilling Group International |
|
|
384,100 |
|
|
4,998,139 |
|
Medusa Mining |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
4,258,875 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
1,389,150 |
|
|
Northam Platinum |
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
2,171,259 |
|
|
|
26 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Materials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northgate Minerals 2 |
|
|
160,000 |
|
$ |
416,000 |
|
Nucor Corporation |
|
|
156,050 |
|
|
6,432,381 |
|
Orbit Garant Drilling 2 |
|
|
36,100 |
|
|
207,740 |
|
Pan American Silver |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
308,900 |
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum |
|
|
176,920 |
|
|
8,784,078 |
|
Royal Gold |
|
|
34,400 |
|
|
2,014,808 |
|
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
5,760,000 |
|
Sims Metal Management ADR |
|
|
295,475 |
|
|
5,611,070 |
|
Synalloy Corporation 2 |
|
|
198,800 |
|
|
2,697,716 |
|
Worthington Industries |
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
4,273,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,727,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Paper & Forest Products - 0.2% |
|||||||
|
|
3,563,800 |
|
|
675,509 |
|
|
Duratex |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
1,354,307 |
|
|
|
3,296,000 |
|
|
436,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $78,517,605) |
|
|
|
|
|
116,945,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous6 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (Cost $43,668,565) |
|
|
|
|
|
44,182,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
|||||||
(Cost $915,060,083) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,257,330,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCKS 0.1% |
|||||||
Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son 0.00% Conv.3 |
|
|
39,800 |
|
|
41,445 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
1,247,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL PREFERRED STOCKS |
|||||||
(Cost $844,625) |
|
|
1,289,340 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE BOND 0.0% |
|||||||
GAMCO Investors (Debentures) 0.00% |
|||||||
(Cost $289,840) |
|
$ |
289,800 |
|
$ |
193,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 10.3% |
|||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
|
|
118,464,000 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES |
|||||||
LOANED 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
17,036,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 121.1% |
|||||||
(Cost $1,051,695,345) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,394,314,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES LESS CASH |
|||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (2.0)% |
|
|
(22,952,208 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK (19.1)% |
|
|
(220,000,000 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON |
|||||||
STOCKHOLDERS 100.0% |
|
$ |
1,151,362,146 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
New additions in 2011. |
|
All or a portion of these securities were on loan at June 30, 2011. Total market value of loaned securities at June 30, 2011, was $16,556,866. |
|
Non-income producing. |
|
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available represent 0.3% of net assets. These securities have been valued at their fair value under procedures approved by the Fund's Board of Directors. These securities are defined as Level 3 securities due to the use of significant unobservable inputs in the determination of fair value. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
These securities are defined as Level 2 securities due to fair value being based on quoted prices for similar securities. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
At June 30, 2011, the Fund owned 5% or more of the Company's outstanding voting securities thereby making the Company an Affiliated Company as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
|
Includes securities first acquired in 2011 and less than 1% of net assets applicable to Common Stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
Bold indicates the Fund's 20 largest equity holdings in terms of June 30, 2011, market value. |
|
|
|
TAX INFORMATION: The cost of total investments for Federal income tax purposes was $1,052,688,720. At June 30, 2011, net unrealized appreciation for all securities was $341,625,634, consisting of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation of $438,680,593 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation of $97,054,959. The primary difference between book and tax basis cost is the timing of the recognition of losses on securities sold. |
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 27 |
|
|
Royce Value Trust |
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
Investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) |
|
|
|
|
Non-Affiliated Companies (cost $927,493,029) |
|
$ |
1,273,077,382 |
|
Affiliated Companies (cost $5,738,316) |
|
|
2,772,972 |
|
Total investments at value |
|
|
1,275,850,354 |
|
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) |
|
|
118,464,000 |
|
Cash and foreign currency |
|
|
58,863 |
|
Receivable for investments sold |
|
|
891,280 |
|
Receivable for dividends and interest |
|
|
906,035 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
410,325 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
1,396,580,857 |
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Payable for collateral on loaned securities |
|
|
17,036,797 |
|
Payable for investments purchased |
|
|
6,670,703 |
|
Payable for investment advisory fee |
|
|
952,563 |
|
Preferred dividends accrued but not yet declared |
|
|
288,451 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
270,197 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
25,218,711 |
|
PREFERRED STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
5.90% Cumulative Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value, $25 liquidation value per share; 8,800,000 shares outstanding |
|
|
220,000,000 |
|
Total Preferred Stock |
|
|
220,000,000 |
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
1,151,362,146 |
|
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 66,967,780 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) |
|
$ |
797,746,402 |
|
Undistributed net investment income (loss) |
|
|
4,400,832 |
|
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
37,902,431 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
342,625,152 |
|
Unallocated and accrued distributions |
|
|
(31,312,671 |
) |
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders (net asset value per share - $17.19) |
|
$ |
1,151,362,146 |
|
Investments at identified cost (including $17,036,797 of collateral on loaned securities) |
|
$ |
933,231,345 |
|
Market value of loaned securities |
|
|
16,556,866 |
|
|
|
28 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
|
Royce Value Trust |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
Dividends1 |
|
$ |
8,413,744 |
|
Interest |
|
|
64,577 |
|
Securities lending |
|
|
98,619 |
|
Total income |
|
|
8,576,940 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
|
5,906,512 |
|
Custody and transfer agent fees |
|
|
191,950 |
|
Stockholder reports |
|
|
184,290 |
|
Administrative and office facilities |
|
|
64,012 |
|
Directors fees |
|
|
61,661 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
52,645 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
62,949 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
6,524,019 |
|
Compensating balance credits |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net expenses |
|
|
6,524,014 |
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
2,052,926 |
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: |
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
32,841,930 |
|
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
(40,379 |
) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): |
|
|
|
|
Investments and foreign currency translations |
|
|
28,994,852 |
|
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
|
|
14,664 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
61,811,067 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
63,863,993 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
(6,490,000 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
57,373,993 |
|
1 Net of foreign withholding tax of $442,142.
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 29 |
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Year ended |
|
||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,052,926 |
|
$ |
15,554,527 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
32,801,551 |
|
|
111,092,900 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
29,009,516 |
|
|
143,429,334 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations |
|
|
63,863,993 |
|
|
270,076,761 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(12,980,000 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(6,490,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
|
|
(6,490,000 |
) |
|
(12,980,000 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
57,373,993 |
|
|
257,096,761 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,980,699 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(24,534,221 |
) |
|
|
|
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
(24,534,221 |
) |
|
(1,980,699 |
) |
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
12,643,237 |
|
|
986,327 |
|
Total capital stock transactions |
|
|
12,643,237 |
|
|
986,327 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
45,483,009 |
|
|
256,102,389 |
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
1,105,879,137 |
|
|
849,776,748 |
|
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $4,400,832 at 6/30/11 and $2,347,906 at 12/31/10) |
|
$ |
1,151,362,146 |
|
$ |
1,105,879,137 |
|
1 To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end.
|
|
30 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
16.73 |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
$ |
19.74 |
|
$ |
20.62 |
|
$ |
18.87 |
|
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
0.13 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
(8.50 |
) |
|
1.13 |
|
|
3.63 |
|
Total investment operations |
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
(8.36 |
) |
|
1.22 |
|
|
3.76 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
(0.21 |
) |
Return of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
(0.23 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
(8.57 |
) |
|
1.00 |
|
|
3.53 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
(0.14 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.18 |
) |
|
(1.76 |
) |
|
(1.64 |
) |
Return of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
(0.48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
(1.72 |
) |
|
(1.85 |
) |
|
(1.78 |
) |
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
Total capital stock transactions |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
17.19 |
|
$ |
16.73 |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
$ |
19.74 |
|
$ |
20.62 |
|
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
14.92 |
|
$ |
14.54 |
|
$ |
10.79 |
|
$ |
8.39 |
|
$ |
18.58 |
|
$ |
22.21 |
|
TOTAL RETURN:2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
5.25 |
%3 |
|
35.05 |
% |
|
35.39 |
% |
|
(48.27 |
)% |
|
(8.21 |
)% |
|
20.96 |
% |
Net Asset Value |
|
|
5.39 |
%3 |
|
30.27 |
% |
|
44.59 |
% |
|
(45.62 |
)% |
|
5.04 |
% |
|
19.50 |
% |
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.14 |
%6 |
|
0.23 |
% |
|
0.16 |
% |
|
1.39 |
% |
|
1.38 |
% |
|
1.29 |
% |
|
Investment advisory fee expense7 |
|
|
1.03 |
%6 |
|
0.11 |
% |
|
0.00 |
% |
|
1.27 |
% |
|
1.29 |
% |
|
1.20 |
% |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
0.11 |
%6 |
|
0.12 |
% |
|
0.16 |
% |
|
0.12 |
% |
|
0.09 |
% |
|
0.09 |
% |
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
0.36 |
%6 |
|
1.69 |
% |
|
1.66 |
% |
|
0.94 |
% |
|
0.43 |
% |
|
0.62 |
% |
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
1,151,362 |
|
$ |
1,105,879 |
|
$ |
849,777 |
|
$ |
603,234 |
|
$ |
1,184,669 |
|
$ |
1,180,428 |
|
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
|
31 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
|
21 |
% |
PREFERRED STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares outstanding |
|
|
8,800,000 |
|
|
8,800,000 |
|
|
8,800,000 |
|
|
8,800,000 |
|
|
8,800,000 |
|
|
8,800,000 |
|
Asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
155.84 |
|
$ |
150 .67 |
|
$ |
121.57 |
|
$ |
93.55 |
|
$ |
159 .62 |
|
$ |
159.14 |
|
Liquidation preference per share |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Average month-end market value per share |
|
$ |
25.18 |
|
$ |
25.06 |
|
$ |
23.18 |
|
$ |
22.51 |
|
$ |
23.68 |
|
$ |
23.95 |
|
|
|
To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
|
The Market Value Total Return is calculated assuming a purchase of Common Stock on the opening of the first business day and a sale on the closing of the last business day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed for the purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan. Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated on the same basis, except that the Funds net asset value is used on the purchase and sale dates instead of market value. | |
Not annualized | |
Expense ratios based on total average net assets including liquidation value of Preferred Stock were 0.96%, 0.18%, 0.12%, 1.13%, 1.17% and 1.08% for the periods ended June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |
Expense ratios based on average net assets applicable to Common Stockholders before waiver of fees and after earnings credits would have been 1.14%, 0.23%, 0.16%, 1.39%, 1.38% and 1.29% for the periods ended June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |
Annualized | |
The investment advisory fee is calculated based on average net assets over a rolling 60-month basis, while the above ratios of investment advisory fee expenses are based on the average net assets applicable to Common Stockholders over a 12-month basis. |
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 31 |
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Royce
Value Trust, Inc. (the Fund), was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Maryland on July 1, 1986, as a diversified closed-end investment company. The
Fund commenced operations on November 26, 1986.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Under
the Funds organizational documents, the officers and directors are indemnified
against certain liabilities that may arise out of the performance of their
duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund
enters into contracts with service providers that contain general
indemnification clauses. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements
is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the
Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Fund expects
the risk of loss to be remote.
Valuation of Investments:
Securities
are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
(generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on the valuation date. Securities that trade
on an exchange, and securities traded on Nasdaqs Electronic Bulletin Board,
are valued at their last reported sales price or Nasdaq official closing price
taken from the primary market in which each security trades or, if no sale is
reported for such day, at their bid price. Other over-the-counter securities
for which market quotations are readily available are valued at their highest
bid price, except in the case of some bonds and other fixed income securities
which may be valued by reference to other securities with comparable ratings,
interest rates and maturities, using established independent pricing services.
The Fund values its non-U.S. dollar denominated securities in U.S. dollars
daily at the prevailing foreign currency exchange rates as quoted by a major
bank. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are
valued at their fair value under procedures approved by the Funds Board of
Directors. In addition, if, between the time trading ends on a particular
security and the close of the customary trading session on the NYSE, events
occur that are significant and may make the closing price unreliable, the Fund
may fair value the security. The Fund uses an independent pricing service to
provide fair value estimates for relevant non-U.S. equity securities on days
when the U.S. market volatility exceeds a certain threshold. This pricing
service uses proprietary correlations it has developed between the movement of
prices of non-U.S. equity securities and indices of U.S.-traded securities,
futures contracts and other indications to estimate the fair value of relevant
non-U.S. securities. When fair value pricing is employed, the prices of
securities used by the Fund may differ from quoted or published prices for the
same security. Investments in money market funds are valued at net asset value
per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds investments, as noted above. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below:
|
Level |
1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
|
Level |
2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all Level 2 securities. Any Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar securities would be noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
|
Level |
3 significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
The inputs or
methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of
the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments as of June 30, 2011.
For a detailed breakout of common stocks by sector classification, please refer
to the Schedule of Investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
||||
Common stocks |
|
$ |
996,828,494 |
|
$ |
257,957,451 |
|
$ |
2,544,694 |
|
$ |
1,257,330,639 |
|
Preferred stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289,340 |
|
|
1,289,340 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
193,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
193,578 |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
17,036,797 |
|
|
118,464,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
135,500,797 |
|
Level 3 Reconciliation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Purchases |
|
Transfers In |
|
Transfers Out |
|
Sales |
|
Realized and |
|
Balance as of |
|
|||||||
Common stocks |
|
$ |
1,925,934 |
|
$ |
1,777,190 |
|
$ |
1,741,414 |
|
$ |
1,251,677 |
|
$ |
66,625 |
|
$ |
(1,581,542 |
) |
$ |
2,544,694 |
|
Preferred stocks |
|
|
1,372,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,174 |
) |
|
1,289,340 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
197,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is included in the accompanying Statement of Operations. Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) includes net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) resulting from changes in investment values during the reporting period and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation (depreciation) when gains or losses are realized. Net realized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions is included in the accompanying Statement of Operations. |
|
32 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Repurchase Agreements:
The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that the
Funds investment adviser has determined are creditworthy. The Fund restricts
repurchase agreements to maturities of no more than seven days. Securities
pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements, which are held until maturity
of the repurchase agreements, are marked-to-market daily and maintained at a
value at least equal to the principal amount of the repurchase agreement
(including accrued interest). Repurchase agreements could involve certain risks
in the event of default or insolvency of the counter-party, including possible
delays or restrictions upon the ability of the Fund to dispose of its
underlying securities.
Foreign Currency:
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales and
maturities of short-term securities, sales of foreign currencies, expiration of
currency forward contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade
and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the
amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the
Fund's books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or
paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in
the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities at the
end of the reporting period, as a result of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates.
Securities Lending:
The Fund loans securities to qualified institutional investors for the
purpose of realizing additional income. Collateral for the Fund on all
securities loaned is accepted in cash and cash equivalents and invested
temporarily by the custodian. The collateral maintained is at least 100% of the
current market value of the loaned securities. The market value of the loaned
securities is determined at the close of business of the Fund and any
additional required collateral is delivered to the Fund on the next business
day. The Fund retains the risk of any loss on the securities on loan as well as
incurring the potential loss on investments purchased with cash collateral
received for securities lending.
Taxes:
As a qualified regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the
Internal Revenue Code, the Fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent
that it distributes substantially all of its taxable income for its fiscal
year. The Schedule of Investments includes information regarding income taxes
under the caption Tax Information.
Distributions:
Commencing March 2011, the Fund pays quarterly distributions on the
Funds Common Stock at the annual rate of 5% of the rolling average of the
prior four calendar quarter-end NAVs of the Funds Common Stock, with the
fourth quarter distribution being the greater of 1.25% of the rolling average
or the distribution required by IRS regulations. Distributions to Preferred
Stockholders are accrued daily and paid quarterly and distributions to Common
Stockholders are recorded on ex-dividend date. Distributable capital gains
and/or net investment income are first allocated to Preferred Stockholder
distributions, with any excess allocable to Common Stockholders. If capital
gains and/or net investment income are allocated to both Preferred and Common
Stockholders, the tax character of such allocations is proportional. To the
extent that distributions are not paid from long-term capital gains, net
investment income or net short-term capital gains, they will represent a return
of capital. Distributions are determined in accordance with income tax
regulations that may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Permanent book and tax differences relating to
stockholder distributions will result in reclassifications within the capital
accounts. Undistributed net investment income may include temporary book and
tax basis differences, which will reverse in a subsequent period. Any taxable income
or gain remaining undistributed at fiscal year end is distributed in the
following year.
Investment Transactions and Related Investment Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Dividend
income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividend income is
recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Interest income
is recorded on an accrual basis. Premium and discounts on debt securities are
amortized using the effective yield-to-maturity method. Realized gains and
losses from investment transactions are determined on the basis of identified
cost for book and tax purposes.
Expenses:
The Fund incurs direct and indirect expenses. Expenses directly
attributable to the Fund are charged to the Funds operations, while expenses
applicable to more than one of the Royce Funds are allocated equitably. Certain
personnel, occupancy costs and other administrative expenses related to The
Royce Funds are allocated by Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce) under an
administration agreement and are included in administrative and office
facilities and professional fees. The Fund has adopted a deferred fee agreement
that allows the Directors to defer the receipt of all or a portion of
directors fees otherwise payable. The deferred fees are invested in certain
Royce Funds until distributed in accordance with the agreement.
Compensating Balance Credits:
The Fund has an arrangement with its custodian bank, whereby a portion
of the custodian's fee is paid indirectly by credits earned on the Fund's cash
on deposit with the bank. This deposit arrangement is an alternative to
purchasing overnight investments. Conversely, the Fund pays interest to the
custodian on any cash overdrafts, to the extent they are not offset by credits
earned on positive cash balances.
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 33
|
Royce Value Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Capital Stock:
The Fund issued 873,255 and 71,215 shares of Common Stock as reinvestment
of distributions by Common Stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011,
and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.
At June 30, 2011, 8,800,000 shares of 5.90%
Cumulative Preferred Stock were outstanding. The Fund, at its option, may
redeem the Cumulative Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at the redemption
price. The Cumulative Preferred Stock is classified outside of permanent equity
(net assets applicable to Common Stockholders) in the accompanying financial
statements in accordance with accounting for redeemable equity instruments,
that requires preferred securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets
to be classified outside of permanent equity to the extent that the redemption
is at a fixed or determinable price and at the option of the holder or upon the
occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the issuer.
The Fund is required to meet certain asset
coverage tests with respect to the Cumulative Preferred Stock as required by
the 1940 Act. In addition, pursuant to the Rating Agency Guidelines established
by Moodys, the Fund is required to maintain a certain discounted asset
coverage. If the Fund fails to meet these requirements and does not correct
such failure, the Fund may be required to redeem, in part or in full, the
Cumulative Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus an
amount equal to the accumulated and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared
on such shares, in order to meet these requirements. Additionally, failure to
meet the foregoing asset coverage requirements could restrict the Fund's
ability to pay dividends to Common Stockholders and could lead to sales of
portfolio securities at inopportune times. The Fund has met these requirements
since issuing the Cumulative Preferred Stock.
Investment Advisory Agreement:
As compensation for
its services under the Investment Advisory Agreement, Royce receives a fee
comprised of a Basic Fee (Basic Fee) and an adjustment to the Basic Fee based
on the investment performance of the Fund in relation to the investment record
of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (S&P 600).
The Basic Fee is a monthly
fee equal to 1/12 of 1% (1% on an annualized basis) of the average of the
Funds month-end net assets applicable to Common Stockholders, plus the
liquidation value of Preferred Stock, for the rolling 60-month period ending
with such month (the performance period). The Basic Fee for each month is
increased or decreased at the rate of 1/12 of .05% for each percentage point
that the investment performance of the Fund exceeds, or is exceeded by, the
percentage change in the investment record of the S&P 600 for the
performance period by more than two percentage points. The performance period
for each such month is a rolling 60-month period ending with such month. The
maximum increase or decrease in the Basic Fee for any month may not exceed 1/12
of .5%. Accordingly, for each month, the maximum monthly fee rate as adjusted
for performance is 1/12 of 1.5% and is payable if the investment performance of
the Fund exceeds the percentage change in the investment record of the S&P
600 by 12 or more percentage points for the performance period, and the minimum
monthly fee rate as adjusted for performance is 1/12 of .5% and is payable if
the percentage change in the investment record of the S&P 600 exceeds the
investment performance of the Fund by 12 or more percentage points for the
performance period.
Notwithstanding the
foregoing, Royce is not entitled to receive any fee for any month when the
investment performance of the Fund for the rolling 36-month period ending with
such month is negative. In the event that the Funds investment performance for
such a performance period is less than zero, Royce will not be required to
refund to the Fund any fee earned in respect of any prior performance period.
Royce has voluntarily committed to waive the portion of its investment advisory
fee attributable to an issue of the Funds Preferred Stock for any month in
which the Funds average annual NAV total return since issuance of the
Preferred Stock fails to exceed the applicable Preferred Stock's dividend rate.
For the six rolling 60-month periods ended June 2011, the Funds investment
performance ranged from 1% above to 3% below the investment performance of the
S&P 600. Accordingly, the net investment advisory fee consisted of a Basic
Fee of $6,006,751 and a net downward adjustment of $100,239 for the performance
of the Fund relative to that of the S&P 600. For the six months ended June 30,
2011, the Fund accrued and paid Royce investment advisory fees totaling
$5,906,512.
Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities:
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the costs of purchases and proceeds from
sales of investment securities, other than short-term securities and collateral
received for securities loaned, amounted to $152,513,320 and $147,515,548,
respectively.
Transactions in Affiliated Companies:
An Affiliated Company as
defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, is a company in which a fund
owns 5% or more of the companys outstanding voting securities at any time
during the period. The Fund effected the following transactions in shares of
such companies for the six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated Company |
|
Shares |
|
Market Value |
|
Cost of |
|
Cost of |
|
Realized |
|
Dividend |
|
Shares |
|
Market Value |
|
||||||||
Timberland Bancorp |
|
|
469,200 |
|
$ |
1,731,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469,200 |
|
$ |
2,772,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,731,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,772,972 |
|
34 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
|
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON STOCKS 102.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Discretionary 12.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Components - 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
$ |
90,515 |
|
|
Drew Industries |
|
|
127,000 |
|
|
3,139,440 |
|
|
|
771,500 |
|
|
36,187 |
|
|
|
|
58,913 |
|
|
265,109 |
|
|
Williams Controls |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
1,437,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,968,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Distributors - 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weyco Group |
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
1,180,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diversified Consumer Services - 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChinaCast Education 2 |
|
|
134,500 |
|
|
696,710 |
|
Lincoln Educational Services |
|
|
21,300 |
|
|
365,295 |
|
|
|
6,925 |
|
|
19,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure - 0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,200 |
|
|
600,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Household Durables - 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cavco Industries 2 |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
139,095 |
|
CSS Industries |
|
|
20,243 |
|
|
423,686 |
|
Ethan Allen Interiors |
|
|
81,600 |
|
|
1,737,264 |
|
Flexsteel Industries |
|
|
172,500 |
|
|
2,509,875 |
|
Hanssem |
|
|
33,400 |
|
|
420,352 |
|
Koss Corporation |
|
|
73,400 |
|
|
455,080 |
|
Natuzzi ADR 2 |
|
|
409,800 |
|
|
1,442,496 |
|
Universal Electronics 2 |
|
|
47,200 |
|
|
1,192,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,320,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Internet & Catalog Retail - 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,500 |
|
|
2,338,000 |
|
|
NutriSystem |
|
|
21,800 |
|
|
306,508 |
|
US Auto Parts Network 2 |
|
|
140,900 |
|
|
1,079,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,723,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Leisure Equipment & Products - 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leapfrog Enterprises Cl. A 2 |
|
|
123,200 |
|
|
519,904 |
|
Sturm, Ruger & Co. |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
702,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Media - 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Sources 2 |
|
|
23,411 |
|
|
215,147 |
|
Rentrak Corporation 2 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
798,300 |
|
Value Line |
|
|
32,487 |
|
|
435,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Specialty Retail - 4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America's Car-Mart 2 |
|
|
92,800 |
|
|
3,062,400 |
|
Charming Shoppes 2 |
|
|
667,200 |
|
|
2,775,552 |
|
Dickson Concepts (International) |
|
|
604,700 |
|
|
473,346 |
|
Kirkland's 2 |
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
306,510 |
|
Le Chateau Cl. A |
|
|
72,800 |
|
|
641,609 |
|
Lewis Group |
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
713,408 |
|
Shoe Carnival 2 |
|
|
12,752 |
|
|
384,473 |
|
Stein Mart |
|
|
178,900 |
|
|
1,724,596 |
|
Systemax 2 |
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
1,523,880 |
|
West Marine 2 |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
891,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Discretionary (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wet Seal (The) Cl. A 2 |
|
|
87,579 |
|
$ |
391,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,889,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods - 1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
116,800 |
|
|
J.G. Boswell Company 4 |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
1,867,500 |
|
K-Swiss Cl. A 2 |
|
|
72,400 |
|
|
769,612 |
|
Movado Group |
|
|
77,633 |
|
|
1,328,300 |
|
True Religion Apparel 2 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
436,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,518,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $29,213,765) |
|
|
|
|
|
39,953,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Staples 3.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages - 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
1,208,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Food & Staples Retailing - 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Winn-Dixie Stores 2 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
422,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Food Products - 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asian Citrus Holdings |
|
|
1,060,000 |
|
|
968,434 |
|
Binggrae |
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
561,282 |
|
BW Plantation |
|
|
744,900 |
|
|
103,429 |
|
Farmer Bros. 1 |
|
|
51,400 |
|
|
521,196 |
|
Griffin Land & Nurseries |
|
|
46,473 |
|
|
1,509,908 |
|
Origin Agritech 2 |
|
|
121,488 |
|
|
483,522 |
|
Seneca Foods Cl. A 2 |
|
|
51,400 |
|
|
1,314,812 |
|
Seneca Foods Cl. B 2 |
|
|
42,500 |
|
|
1,060,800 |
|
Westway Group 2 |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
1,067,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,590,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Household Products - 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil-Dri Corporation of America |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
214,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Personal Products - 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schiff Nutrition International Cl. A |
|
|
27,803 |
|
|
311,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $7,945,225) |
|
|
|
|
|
9,746,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy 4.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services - 3.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CE Franklin 2 |
|
|
37,750 |
|
|
362,778 |
|
Dawson Geophysical 2 |
|
|
53,213 |
|
|
1,817,224 |
|
Global Geophysical Services 2 |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
623,000 |
|
Gulf Island Fabrication |
|
|
29,116 |
|
|
939,864 |
|
Lamprell |
|
|
202,400 |
|
|
1,226,056 |
|
North American Energy Partners 2 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
383,000 |
|
OYO Geospace 2 |
|
|
7,130 |
|
|
713,000 |
|
Pason Systems |
|
|
139,200 |
|
|
2,098,572 |
|
Pioneer Drilling 2 |
|
|
57,500 |
|
|
876,300 |
|
|
|
103,200 |
|
|
427,248 |
|
|
Tesco Corporation 2 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
970,500 |
|
Willbros Group 2 |
|
|
131,100 |
|
|
1,119,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,557,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approach Resources 2 |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
272,040 |
|
|
|
164,000 |
|
|
537,920 |
|
|
|
|
98,000 |
|
|
918,260 |
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
88,500 |
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 35 |
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Energy (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
$ |
87,580 |
|
|
VAALCO Energy 2 |
|
|
98,900 |
|
|
595,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,499,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $8,727,847) |
|
|
|
|
|
14,056,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials 16.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets - 7.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASA Gold and Precious Metals |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
858,000 |
|
|
|
130,200 |
|
|
165,354 |
|
|
Cohen & Steers |
|
|
27,900 |
|
|
924,885 |
|
|
|
367,834 |
|
|
1,383,056 |
|
|
Diamond Hill Investment Group |
|
|
34,479 |
|
|
2,802,798 |
|
Duff & Phelps Cl. A |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
641,500 |
|
Edelman Financial Group (The) |
|
|
209,000 |
|
|
1,649,010 |
|
Epoch Holding Corporation |
|
|
196,500 |
|
|
3,507,525 |
|
FBR & Company 2 |
|
|
326,600 |
|
|
1,110,440 |
|
Fiera Sceptre |
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
586,345 |
|
|
|
24,910 |
|
|
603,071 |
|
|
JZ Capital Partners |
|
|
343,999 |
|
|
2,186,750 |
|
MVC Capital |
|
|
126,200 |
|
|
1,669,626 |
|
NGP Capital Resources |
|
|
99,225 |
|
|
813,645 |
|
Queen City Investments 4 |
|
|
948 |
|
|
933,780 |
|
U.S. Global Investors Cl. A |
|
|
91,500 |
|
|
658,800 |
|
Urbana Corporation 2 |
|
|
237,600 |
|
|
305,484 |
|
Virtus Investment Partners 2 |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
2,731,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,531,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial Banks - 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCB Holdings 2 |
|
|
806,207 |
|
|
698,718 |
|
Chemung Financial |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
916,000 |
|
Commercial National Financial |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
385,000 |
|
Fauquier Bankshares |
|
|
135,800 |
|
|
1,655,402 |
|
Financial Institutions |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
591,120 |
|
First Bancorp |
|
|
40,200 |
|
|
597,372 |
|
LCNB Corporation |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
357,600 |
|
Mechanics Bank |
|
|
5 |
|
|
58,000 |
|
Orrstown Financial Services |
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
334,137 |
|
Peapack-Gladstone Financial |
|
|
64,316 |
|
|
757,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,350,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consumer Finance - 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World Acceptance 2 |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
452,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diversified Financial Services - 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banca Finnat Euramerica |
|
|
1,010,118 |
|
|
637,611 |
|
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
602,639 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
170,250 |
|
|
PICO Holdings 2 |
|
|
45,700 |
|
|
1,325,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,735,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Insurance - 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hilltop Holdings 2 |
|
|
101,400 |
|
|
896,376 |
|
Independence Holding |
|
|
95,800 |
|
|
1,000,152 |
|
Presidential Life |
|
|
188,100 |
|
|
1,963,764 |
|
SeaBright Holdings |
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
1,009,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,870,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) - 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colony Financial |
|
|
139,717 |
|
$ |
2,524,686 |
|
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
1,325,600 |
|
Vestin Realty Mortgage II 2 |
|
|
214,230 |
|
|
297,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,148,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real Estate Management & Development - 2.9% |
|||||||
Consolidated-Tomoka Land |
|
|
57,506 |
|
|
1,644,672 |
|
IFM Investments ADR 2 |
|
|
58,885 |
|
|
86,561 |
|
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
|
|
465,358 |
|
|
5,700,635 |
|
Tejon Ranch 2 |
|
|
44,985 |
|
|
1,533,988 |
|
ZipRealty 2 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
57,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,023,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania |
|
|
41,344 |
|
|
453,957 |
|
|
|
88,362 |
|
|
1,273,296 |
|
|
CFS Bancorp |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
402,750 |
|
HopFed Bancorp |
|
|
56,100 |
|
|
443,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,573,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $49,830,059) |
|
|
|
|
|
53,686,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care 7.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology - 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3SBio ADR 2 |
|
|
26,280 |
|
|
458,060 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
494,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
952,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies - 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allied Healthcare Products 2 |
|
|
226,798 |
|
|
898,120 |
|
Atrion Corporation |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
1,285,700 |
|
CryoLife 2 |
|
|
50,573 |
|
|
283,209 |
|
DynaVox Cl. A 2 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
152,000 |
|
Exactech 2 |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
2,179,210 |
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
1,091,200 |
|
|
|
|
42,078 |
|
|
1,061,628 |
|
|
Medical Action Industries 2 |
|
|
125,250 |
|
|
1,020,787 |
|
|
|
118,500 |
|
|
972 |
|
|
STRATEC Biomedical Systems |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
622,036 |
|
|
|
69,200 |
|
|
839,396 |
|
|
Theragenics Corporation 2 |
|
|
306,900 |
|
|
540,144 |
|
Utah Medical Products |
|
|
42,300 |
|
|
1,110,798 |
|
Young Innovations |
|
|
61,450 |
|
|
1,752,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,837,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health Care Providers & Services - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gentiva Health Services 2 |
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
479,090 |
|
LHC Group 2 |
|
|
14,800 |
|
|
341,288 |
|
|
|
65,383 |
|
|
463,566 |
|
|
PharMerica Corporation 2 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
510,400 |
|
Psychemedics Corporation |
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
356,625 |
|
U.S. Physical Therapy |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
247,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Health Care Technology - 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transcend Services 2 |
|
|
37,200 |
|
|
1,093,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Life Sciences Tools & Services - 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS |
|
|
710 |
|
|
1,671,671 |
|
Furiex Pharmaceuticals 2 |
|
|
23,758 |
|
|
422,655 |
|
|
|
36 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Health Care (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAREXEL International 2 |
|
|
28,800 |
|
$ |
678,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,772,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pharmaceuticals - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adolor Corporation 2 |
|
|
460,500 |
|
|
916,395 |
|
Bukwang Pharmaceutical |
|
|
44,700 |
|
|
495,840 |
|
Daewoong Pharmaceutical |
|
|
11,904 |
|
|
428,005 |
|
|
|
21,700 |
|
|
627,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $17,782,065) |
|
|
|
|
|
22,522,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrials 25.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense - 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ducommun |
|
|
72,100 |
|
|
1,483,097 |
|
HEICO Corporation |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
2,873,850 |
|
Innovative Solutions and Support 2 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
547,000 |
|
SIFCO Industries |
|
|
45,800 |
|
|
748,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,652,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Air Freight & Logistics - 0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Air |
|
|
50,700 |
|
|
1,713,153 |
|
Pacer International 2 |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
165,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,878,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Building Products - 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAON |
|
|
109,500 |
|
|
2,391,480 |
|
American Woodmark |
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
1,247,040 |
|
Apogee Enterprises |
|
|
57,900 |
|
|
741,699 |
|
Burnham Holdings Cl. A 4 |
|
|
113,000 |
|
|
1,610,250 |
|
Griffon Corporation 2 |
|
|
89,500 |
|
|
902,160 |
|
NCI Building Systems 2 |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
95,676 |
|
Sung Kwang Bend |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
578,214 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
2,203,200 |
|
|
WaterFurnace Renewable Energy |
|
|
48,400 |
|
|
1,114,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,883,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial Services & Supplies - 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CompX International Cl. A |
|
|
107,500 |
|
|
1,416,850 |
|
Courier Corporation |
|
|
30,450 |
|
|
336,473 |
|
Heritage-Crystal Clean 2 |
|
|
113,301 |
|
|
2,173,113 |
|
Interface Cl. A |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
522,990 |
|
Team 2 |
|
|
107,040 |
|
|
2,582,875 |
|
US Ecology |
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
1,402,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,434,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction & Engineering - 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comfort Systems USA |
|
|
27,096 |
|
|
287,488 |
|
Integrated Electrical Services 2 |
|
|
305,090 |
|
|
957,983 |
|
MYR Group 2 |
|
|
28,500 |
|
|
666,900 |
|
Pike Electric 2 |
|
|
73,900 |
|
|
653,276 |
|
Sterling Construction 2 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
344,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,909,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Electrical Equipment - 2.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AZZ |
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
835,713 |
|
Deswell Industries |
|
|
564,371 |
|
|
1,636,676 |
|
Encore Wire |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
363,300 |
|
Fushi Copperweld 2 |
|
|
204,063 |
|
|
1,169,281 |
|
Jinpan International |
|
|
124,124 |
|
|
1,387,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSI Industries |
|
|
79,812 |
|
$ |
633,707 |
|
Powell Industries 2 |
|
|
40,600 |
|
|
1,481,900 |
|
Preformed Line Products |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
1,138,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,647,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Industrial Conglomerates - 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raven Industries |
|
|
58,400 |
|
|
3,253,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Machinery - 6.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Armstrong Industrial |
|
|
2,166,800 |
|
|
611,654 |
|
Cascade Corporation |
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
409,102 |
|
CIRCOR International |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
599,620 |
|
Columbus McKinnon 2 |
|
|
26,050 |
|
|
467,858 |
|
Eastern Company (The) |
|
|
39,750 |
|
|
637,987 |
|
FAG Bearings India |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
631,554 |
|
Force Protection 2 |
|
|
126,700 |
|
|
629,066 |
|
Foster (L.B.) Company Cl. A |
|
|
69,700 |
|
|
2,293,827 |
|
FreightCar America 2 |
|
|
42,900 |
|
|
1,087,086 |
|
Graham Corporation |
|
|
46,100 |
|
|
940,440 |
|
Hurco Companies 2 |
|
|
45,966 |
|
|
1,480,565 |
|
NN 2 |
|
|
114,300 |
|
|
1,709,928 |
|
PMFG 2 |
|
|
143,800 |
|
|
2,854,430 |
|
Semperit AG Holding |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
623,499 |
|
Sun Hydraulics |
|
|
58,925 |
|
|
2,816,615 |
|
Tennant Company |
|
|
92,300 |
|
|
3,685,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,478,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Professional Services - 3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acacia Research-Acacia Technologies 2 |
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
862,215 |
|
Advisory Board (The) 2 |
|
|
41,400 |
|
|
2,396,232 |
|
CBIZ 2 |
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
345,920 |
|
Exponent 2 |
|
|
58,400 |
|
|
2,540,984 |
|
GP Strategies 2 |
|
|
41,385 |
|
|
565,319 |
|
Heidrick & Struggles International |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
452,800 |
|
JobStreet Corporation |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
48,518 |
|
Kforce 2 |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
784,800 |
|
On Assignment 2 |
|
|
41,100 |
|
|
404,013 |
|
SFN Group 2 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
2,727,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,127,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Road & Rail - 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frozen Food Express Industries 2 |
|
|
157,000 |
|
|
560,490 |
|
Patriot Transportation Holding 2 |
|
|
111,681 |
|
|
2,498,304 |
|
Universal Truckload Services 2 |
|
|
134,200 |
|
|
2,298,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,357,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Trading Companies & Distributors - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aceto Corporation |
|
|
72,219 |
|
|
484,590 |
|
Houston Wire & Cable |
|
|
67,375 |
|
|
1,047,681 |
|
Lawson Products |
|
|
50,269 |
|
|
988,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,521,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $54,212,842) |
|
|
|
|
|
82,145,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology 18.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment - 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anaren 2 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
170,000 |
|
Bel Fuse Cl. A |
|
|
67,705 |
|
|
1,570,756 |
|
Cogo Group 2 |
|
|
104,275 |
|
|
556,829 |
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 37 |
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Information Technology (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PC-Tel 2 |
|
|
44,100 |
|
$ |
285,768 |
|
Zhone Technologies 2 |
|
|
316,320 |
|
|
749,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,333,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Computers & Peripherals - 1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imation Corporation 2 |
|
|
112,312 |
|
|
1,060,225 |
|
Intevac 2 |
|
|
31,400 |
|
|
320,594 |
|
Rimage Corporation |
|
|
79,200 |
|
|
1,063,656 |
|
Super Micro Computer 2 |
|
|
55,754 |
|
|
897,082 |
|
TransAct Technologies 2 |
|
|
78,600 |
|
|
919,620 |
|
Xyratex 2 |
|
|
31,500 |
|
|
323,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,584,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components - 6.1% |
|||||||
Agilysys 2 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
750,600 |
|
Diguang International Development 2 |
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
4,600 |
|
Diploma |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
301,105 |
|
Domino Printing Sciences |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
875,685 |
|
Frequency Electronics 2 |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
1,092,500 |
|
Hana Microelectronics |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
379,826 |
|
Hollysys Automation Technologies 2 |
|
|
252,100 |
|
|
2,349,572 |
|
Inficon Holding |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
751,942 |
|
Mercury Computer Systems 2 |
|
|
20,900 |
|
|
390,412 |
|
Mesa Laboratories |
|
|
48,267 |
|
|
1,528,133 |
|
Methode Electronics |
|
|
28,400 |
|
|
329,724 |
|
Newport Corporation 2 |
|
|
80,900 |
|
|
1,469,953 |
|
Park Electrochemical |
|
|
15,400 |
|
|
430,430 |
|
Pulse Electronics |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
663,000 |
|
|
|
30,150 |
|
|
137,786 |
|
|
Richardson Electronics |
|
|
250,900 |
|
|
3,409,731 |
|
Rogers Corporation 2 |
|
|
58,400 |
|
|
2,698,080 |
|
TTM Technologies 2 |
|
|
114,400 |
|
|
1,832,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,395,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Internet Software & Services - 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
|
88,300 |
|
|
131,567 |
|
|
Marchex Cl. B |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
843,600 |
|
Support.com 2 |
|
|
215,000 |
|
|
1,032,000 |
|
WebMediaBrands 2 |
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
703,500 |
|
|
|
72,920 |
|
|
306,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,406,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
IT Services - 4.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cass Information Systems |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
566,400 |
|
Computer Task Group 2 |
|
|
161,100 |
|
|
2,121,687 |
|
Forrester Research |
|
|
54,900 |
|
|
1,809,504 |
|
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
1,325,184 |
|
|
Innodata Isogen 2 |
|
|
593,832 |
|
|
1,573,655 |
|
Integral Systems 2 |
|
|
123,000 |
|
|
1,496,910 |
|
Sapient Corporation 2 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
5,260,500 |
|
|
|
181,980 |
|
|
909,900 |
|
|
Yucheng Technologies 2 |
|
|
138,244 |
|
|
452,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,515,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 1.5% |
|||||||
Advanced Analogic Technologies 2 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
484,400 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
251,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (continued) |
|
||||||
Exar Corporation 2 |
|
|
311,208 |
|
$ |
1,969,947 |
|
Himax Technologies ADR |
|
|
118,968 |
|
|
261,729 |
|
Integrated Silicon Solution 2 |
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
899,310 |
|
PLX Technology 2 |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
381,700 |
|
Rudolph Technologies 2 |
|
|
58,900 |
|
|
630,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,879,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Software - 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACI Worldwide 2 |
|
|
69,600 |
|
|
2,350,392 |
|
Actuate Corporation 2 |
|
|
210,800 |
|
|
1,233,180 |
|
American Software Cl. A |
|
|
67,200 |
|
|
558,432 |
|
Fundtech |
|
|
73,500 |
|
|
1,467,060 |
|
Pegasystems |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
2,280,950 |
|
S1 Corporation 2 |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
448,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,338,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $38,345,174) |
|
|
|
|
|
59,454,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials 8.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals - 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balchem Corporation |
|
|
63,375 |
|
|
2,774,558 |
|
Hawkins |
|
|
54,697 |
|
|
1,981,125 |
|
Landec Corporation 2 |
|
|
60,300 |
|
|
397,980 |
|
Quaker Chemical |
|
|
53,700 |
|
|
2,309,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,463,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction Materials - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ash Grove Cement 4 |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
1,280,000 |
|
Monarch Cement |
|
|
52,303 |
|
|
1,297,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,577,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Metals & Mining - 4.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AuRico Gold 2 |
|
|
74,636 |
|
|
820,250 |
|
Aurizon Mines 2 |
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
262,730 |
|
Central Steel & Wire 4 |
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
690,880 |
|
Chesapeake Gold 2 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
226,865 |
|
|
|
618,200 |
|
|
1,480,680 |
|
|
Endeavour Mining (Warrants) 2 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
31,106 |
|
Exeter Resource 2 |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
585,200 |
|
Extorre Gold Mines 2 |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
1,790,600 |
|
Haynes International |
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
706,002 |
|
Horsehead Holding Corporation 2 |
|
|
43,700 |
|
|
582,084 |
|
MAG Silver 2 |
|
|
74,750 |
|
|
746,005 |
|
Materion Corporation 2 |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
998,190 |
|
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
676,200 |
|
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
468,360 |
|
|
Northgate Minerals 2 |
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
702,000 |
|
RTI International Metals 2 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
959,250 |
|
Seabridge Gold 2 |
|
|
16,700 |
|
|
471,107 |
|
Sprott Resource 2 |
|
|
104,400 |
|
|
496,860 |
|
Synalloy Corporation 2 |
|
|
58,200 |
|
|
789,774 |
|
|
|
36,299 |
|
|
1,697,341 |
|
|
Victoria Gold 2 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
124,423 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
141,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,447,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Paper & Forest Products - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pope Resources L.P. |
|
|
51,205 |
|
|
2,330,339 |
|
|
|
38 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
VALUE |
|
||
Materials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper & Forest Products (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
$ |
198,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $16,655,110) |
|
|
|
|
|
28,016,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunication Services 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services - 0.5% |
|
||||||
Neutral Tandem 2 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
1,567,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $1,163,871) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,567,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders - 0.1% |
|||||||
|
|
83,100 |
|
|
339,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $664,490) |
|
|
|
|
|
339,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous5 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (Cost $13,021,512) |
|
|
|
|
|
12,781,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $237,561,960) |
|
|
|
|
|
324,269,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK 0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $578,719) |
|
|
45,409 |
|
|
1,156,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VALUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 16.6% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
|
$ |
52,666,000 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES LOANED 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds |
|
|
|
|
Federated Government Obligations Fund |
|
|
|
|
(7 day yield-0.009864%) |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $10,869,503) |
|
|
10,869,503 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 122.7% |
|
|
|
|
(Cost $301,676,182) |
|
|
388,961,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES LESS CASH |
|
|
|
|
AND OTHER ASSETS (3.8)% |
|
|
(12,013,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK (18.9)% |
|
|
(60,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON |
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS 100.0% |
|
$ |
316,947,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New additions in 2011. |
||
All or a portion of these securities were on loan at June 30, 2011. Total market value of loaned securities at June 30, 2011, was $10,560,798. |
||
Non-income producing. |
||
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available represent 0.1% of net assets. These securities have been valued at their fair value under procedures approved by the Fund's Board of Directors. These securities are defined as Level 3 securities due to the use of significant unobservable inputs in the determination of fair value. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
These securities are defined as Level 2 securities due to fair value being based on quoted prices for similar securities. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
||
Includes securities first acquired in 2011 and less than 1% of net assets applicable to Common Stockholders. |
||
|
|
|
|
Bold indicates the Fund's 20 largest equity holdings in terms of June 30, 2011, market value. |
|
|
|
|
|
TAX INFORMATION: The cost of total investments for Federal income tax purposes was $302,239,388. At June 30, 2011, net unrealized appreciation for all securities was $86,722,153, consisting of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation of $114,347,581 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation of $27,625,428. The primary difference between book and tax basis cost is the timing of the recognition of losses on securities sold. |
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 39 |
|
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
Total investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) |
|
$ |
336,295,541 |
|
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) |
|
|
52,666,000 |
|
Cash and foreign currency |
|
|
3,777 |
|
Receivable for investments sold |
|
|
143,405 |
|
Receivable for dividends and interest |
|
|
306,749 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
24,538 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
389,440,010 |
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Payable for collateral on loaned securities |
|
|
10,869,503 |
|
Payable for investments purchased |
|
|
1,219,389 |
|
Payable for investment advisory fee |
|
|
203,522 |
|
Preferred dividends accrued but not yet declared |
|
|
80,000 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
119,771 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
12,492,185 |
|
PREFERRED STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value, $25 liquidation value per share; 2,400,000 shares outstanding |
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
Total Preferred Stock |
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
316,947,825 |
|
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 27,823,031 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) |
|
$ |
229,856,846 |
|
Undistributed net investment income (loss) |
|
|
(1,328,983 |
) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
9,911,219 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
87,273,829 |
|
Unallocated and accrued distributions |
|
|
(8,765,086 |
) |
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders (net asset value per share - $11.39) |
|
$ |
316,947,825 |
|
Investments at identified cost (including $10,869,503 of collateral on loaned securities) |
|
$ |
249,010,182 |
|
Market value of loaned securities |
|
|
10,560,798 |
|
|
|
40 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
Dividends1 |
|
$ |
1,649,476 |
|
Interest |
|
|
8,812 |
|
Securities lending |
|
|
50,572 |
|
Total income |
|
|
1,708,860 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
|
1,125,541 |
|
Stockholder reports |
|
|
58,241 |
|
Custody and transfer agent fees |
|
|
55,303 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
33,042 |
|
Directors' fees |
|
|
31,872 |
|
Administrative and office facilities |
|
|
17,870 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
30,163 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
1,352,032 |
|
Compensating balance credits |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Net expenses |
|
|
1,352,021 |
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
356,839 |
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: |
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
7,050,577 |
|
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
(9,291 |
) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): |
|
|
|
|
Investments and foreign currency translations |
|
|
3,412,535 |
|
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
|
|
35,868 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
10,489,689 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
10,846,528 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
(1,800,000 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
9,046,528 |
|
1 Net of foreign withholding tax of $32,922.
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 41 |
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Year ended |
|
||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
$ |
356,839 |
|
$ |
2,194,992 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
7,041,286 |
|
|
43,946,229 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
3,448,403 |
|
|
26,663,923 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations |
|
|
10,846,528 |
|
|
72,805,144 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,832,980 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
(767,020 |
) |
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(1,800,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
|
|
(1,800,000 |
) |
|
(3,600,000 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
9,046,528 |
|
|
69,205,144 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,720,810 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
(465,903 |
) |
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(6,885,086 |
) |
|
|
|
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
(6,885,086 |
) |
|
(2,186,713 |
) |
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
3,507,568 |
|
|
1,104,264 |
|
Total capital stock transactions |
|
|
3,507,568 |
|
|
1,104,264 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
5,669,010 |
|
|
68,122,695 |
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
311,278,815 |
|
|
243,156,120 |
|
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $(1,328,983) at 6/30/11 and $(1,685,821) at 12/31/10) |
|
$ |
316,947,825 |
|
$ |
311,278,815 |
|
|
1 To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
|
|
42 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Fund's performance for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
11.34 |
|
$ |
8.90 |
|
$ |
6.39 |
|
$ |
13.48 |
|
$ |
14.77 |
|
$ |
13.43 |
|
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
0.01 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
(5.70 |
) |
|
0.24 |
|
|
3.04 |
|
Total investment operations |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
(5.68 |
) |
|
0.24 |
|
|
3.05 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
(0.14 |
) |
Return of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
(0.16 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
(5.82 |
) |
|
0.09 |
|
|
2.89 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.20 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
|
(1.27 |
) |
|
(1.35 |
) |
Return of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
(1.19 |
) |
|
(1.35 |
) |
|
(1.55 |
) |
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
Total capital stock transactions |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
11.39 |
|
$ |
11.34 |
|
$ |
8.90 |
|
$ |
6.39 |
|
$ |
13.48 |
|
$ |
14.77 |
|
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
9.86 |
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
$ |
5.62 |
|
$ |
11.94 |
|
$ |
16.57 |
|
TOTAL RETURN:2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
3.29 |
%3 |
|
34.10 |
% |
|
37.91 |
% |
|
(45.84 |
)% |
|
(20.54 |
)% |
|
26.72 |
% |
Net Asset Value |
|
|
3.12 |
%3 |
|
28.50 |
% |
|
46.47 |
% |
|
(45.45 |
)% |
|
0.64 |
% |
|
22.46 |
% |
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.86 |
%6 |
|
1.12 |
% |
|
1.59 |
% |
|
1.55 |
% |
|
1.56 |
% |
|
1.64 |
% |
|
Investment advisory fee expense7 |
|
|
0.72 |
%6 |
|
0.97 |
% |
|
1.38 |
% |
|
1.39 |
% |
|
1.44 |
% |
|
1.49 |
% |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
0.14 |
%6 |
|
0.15 |
% |
|
0.21 |
% |
|
0.16 |
% |
|
0.12 |
% |
|
0.15 |
% |
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
0.23 |
%6 |
|
0.84 |
% |
|
0.02 |
% |
|
0.15 |
% |
|
(0.07 |
)% |
|
0.05 |
% |
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, End of Period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
316,948 |
|
$ |
311,279 |
|
$ |
243,156 |
|
$ |
169,854 |
|
$ |
331,476 |
|
$ |
343,682 |
|
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
27 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
|
42 |
% |
|
41 |
% |
|
34 |
% |
PREFERRED STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares outstanding |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
Asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
157.06 |
|
$ |
154.70 |
|
$ |
126.32 |
|
$ |
95.77 |
|
$ |
163.11 |
|
$ |
168.20 |
|
Liquidation preference per share |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Average month-end market value per share |
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
$ |
25.11 |
|
$ |
23.47 |
|
$ |
23.08 |
|
$ |
24.06 |
|
$ |
24.15 |
|
|
|
To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
|
The Market Value Total Return is calculated assuming a purchase of Common Stock on the opening of the first business day and a sale on the closing of the last business day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed for the purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund's Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan. Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated on the same basis, except that the Fund's net asset value is used on the purchase and sale dates instead of market value. |
|
Not annualized |
|
Expense ratios based on total average net assets including liquidation value of Preferred Stock were 0.72%, 0.91%, 1.21%, 1.26%, 1.33% and 1.38% for the periods ended June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
Expense ratios based on average net assets applicable to Common Stockholders before waiver of fees by the investment adviser would have been 1.17%, 1.74% and 1.58% for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively; before waiver of fees and after earnings credits would have been 0.86%, 1.17%, 1.74%, 1.58%, 1.56% and 1.64% for the periods ended June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
Annualized |
|
The investment advisory fee is calculated based on average net assets over a rolling 36-month basis, while the above ratios of investment advisory fee expenses are based on the average net assets applicable to Common Stockholders over a 12-month basis. |
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 43 |
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Royce
Micro-Cap Trust, Inc. (the Fund), was incorporated under the laws of the
State of Maryland on September 9, 1993, as a diversified closed-end investment
company. The Fund commenced operations on December 14, 1993.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Under the Funds organizational documents, the
officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities that may
arise out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal
course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with service providers that
contain general indemnification clauses. The Funds maximum exposure under
these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be
made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience,
the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
Valuation of Investments:
Securities
are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
(generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on the valuation date. Securities that trade on an exchange, and
securities traded on Nasdaq's Electronic Bulletin Board, are valued at their
last reported sales price or Nasdaq official closing price taken from the
primary market in which each security trades or, if no sale is reported for
such day, at their bid price. Other over-the-counter securities for which
market quotations are readily available are valued at their highest bid price,
except in the case of some bonds and other fixed income securities which may be
valued by reference to other securities with comparable ratings, interest rates
and maturities, using established independent pricing services. The Fund values
its non-U.S. dollar denominated securities in U.S. dollars daily at the prevailing
foreign currency exchange rates as quoted by a major bank. Securities for which
market quotations are not readily available are valued at their fair value
under procedures approved by the Funds Board of Directors. In addition, if,
between the time trading ends on a particular security and the close of the
customary trading session on the NYSE, events occur that are significant and
may make the closing price unreliable, the Fund may fair value the security.
The Fund uses an independent pricing service to provide fair value estimates
for relevant non-U.S. equity securities on days when the U.S. market volatility
exceeds a certain threshold. This pricing service uses proprietary correlations
it has developed between the movement of prices of non-U.S. equity securities
and indices of U.S.-traded securities, futures contracts and other indications
to estimate the fair value of relevant non-U.S. securities. When fair value
pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by the Fund may differ from
quoted or published prices for the same security. Investments in money market
funds are valued at net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds investments, as noted above. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below:
|
Level |
1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
|
Level |
2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all Level 2 securities. Any Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar securities would be noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
|
Level |
3 significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
The
inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an
indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used to
value the Funds investments as of June 30, 2011. For a detailed breakout of
common stocks by sector classification, please refer to the Schedule of
Investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Common stocks |
|
$ |
286,239,391 |
|
$ |
37,795,804 |
|
$ |
234,730 |
|
$ |
324,269,925 |
|
Preferred stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
1,156,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,156,113 |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
10,869,503 |
|
|
52,666,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
63,535,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Reconciliation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Purchases |
|
Transfers Out |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Common stocks |
|
$ |
36,229 |
|
$ |
459,067 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(260,566 |
) |
$ |
234,730 |
|
|
|
The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is included in the accompanying Statement of Operations. Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) includes net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) resulting from changes in investment values during the reporting period and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation (depreciation) when gains or losses are realized. Net realized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions is included in the accompanying Statement of Operations. |
44 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Repurchase Agreements:
The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that the
Funds investment adviser has determined are creditworthy. The Fund restricts
repurchase agreements to maturities of no more than seven days. Securities
pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements, which are held until maturity
of the repurchase agreements, are marked-to-market daily and maintained at a
value at least equal to the principal amount of the repurchase agreement
(including accrued interest). Repurchase agreements could involve certain risks
in the event of default or insolvency of the counter-party, including possible
delays or restrictions upon the ability of the Fund to dispose of its
underlying securities.
Foreign Currency:
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales and
maturities of short-term securities, sales of foreign currencies, expiration of
currency forward contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade
and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the
amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the
Fund's books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or
paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in
the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities at the
end of the reporting period, as a result of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates.
Securities Lending:
The Fund loans securities to qualified institutional investors for the
purpose of realizing additional income. Collateral for the Fund on all
securities loaned is accepted in cash and cash equivalents and invested
temporarily by the custodian. The collateral maintained is at least 100% of the
current market value of the loaned securities. The market value of the loaned
securities is determined at the close of business of the Fund and any additional
required collateral is delivered to the Fund on the next business day. The Fund
retains the risk of any loss on the securities on loan as well as incurring the
potential loss on investments purchased with cash collateral received for
securities lending.
Taxes:
As a qualified regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the
Internal Revenue Code, the Fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent
that it distributes substantially all of its taxable income for its fiscal
year. The Schedule of Investments includes information regarding income taxes
under the caption Tax Information.
Distributions:
Commencing March 2011, the Fund pays quarterly distributions on the
Funds Common Stock at the annual rate of 5% of the rolling average of the
prior four calendar quarter-end NAVs of the Funds Common Stock, with the
fourth quarter distribution being the greater of 1.25% of the rolling average
or the distribution required by IRS regulations. Distributions to Preferred
Stockholders are accrued daily and paid quarterly and distributions to Common
Stockholders are recorded on ex-dividend date. Distributable capital gains
and/or net investment income are first allocated to Preferred Stockholder
distributions, with any excess allocable to Common Stockholders. If capital
gains and/or net investment income are allocated to both Preferred and Common
Stockholders, the tax character of such allocations is proportional. To the
extent that distributions are not paid from long- term capital gains, net investment
income or net short-term capital gains, they will represent a return of
capital. Distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations
that may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Permanent book and tax differences relating to stockholder
distributions will result in reclassifications within the capital accounts.
Undistributed net investment income may include temporary book and tax basis
differences, which will reverse in a subsequent period. Any taxable income or
gain remaining undistributed at fiscal year end is distributed in the following
year.
Investment Transactions and Related Investment Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Dividend
income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividend income is
recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Interest income
is recorded on an accrual basis. Premium and discounts on debt securities are
amortized using the effective yield-to-maturity method. Realized gains and
losses from investment transactions are determined on the basis of identified
cost for book and tax purposes.
Expenses:
The Fund incurs direct and indirect expenses. Expenses directly
attributable to the Fund are charged to the Funds operations, while expenses
applicable to more than one of the Royce Funds are allocated equitably. Certain
personnel, occupancy costs and other administrative expenses related to The
Royce Funds are allocated by Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce) under an
administration agreement and are included in administrative and office
facilities and professional fees. The Fund has adopted a deferred fee agreement
that allows the Directors to defer the receipt of all or a portion of
directors fees otherwise payable. The deferred fees are invested in certain
Royce Funds until distributed in accordance with the agreement.
Compensating Balance Credits:
The Fund has an arrangement with its custodian bank, whereby a portion
of the custodian's fee is paid indirectly by credits earned on the Fund's cash
on deposit with the bank. This deposit arrangement is an alternative to
purchasing overnight investments. Conversely, the Fund pays interest to the
custodian on any cash overdrafts, to the extent they are not offset by credits
earned on positive cash balances.
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 45
|
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Capital Stock:
The Fund issued 371,641 and 117,475 shares of Common Stock as
reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders for the six months ended
June 30, 2011, and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.
At June 30, 2011, 2,400,000 shares of 6.00%
Cumulative Preferred Stock were outstanding. The Fund, at its option, may
redeem the Cumulative Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at the redemption
price. The Cumulative Preferred Stock is classified outside of permanent equity
(net assets applicable to Common Stockholders) in the accompanying financial
statements in accordance with accounting for redeemable equity instruments,
that requires preferred securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets
to be classified outside of permanent equity to the extent that the redemption
is at a fixed or determinable price and at the option of the holder or upon the
occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the issuer.
The Fund is required to meet certain asset
coverage tests with respect to the Cumulative Preferred Stock as required by
the 1940 Act. In addition, pursuant to the Rating Agency Guidelines established
by Moodys, the Fund is required to maintain a certain discounted asset
coverage. If the Fund fails to meet these requirements and does not correct
such failure, the Fund may be required to redeem, in part or in full, the
Cumulative Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus an
amount equal to the accumulated and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared
on such shares, in order to meet these requirements. Additionally, failure to
meet the foregoing asset coverage requirements could restrict the Fund's
ability to pay dividends to Common Stockholders and could lead to sales of
portfolio securities at inopportune times. The Fund has met these requirements
since issuing the Cumulative Preferred Stock.
Investment Advisory Agreement:
As compensation for its services under the Investment Advisory
Agreement, Royce receives a fee comprised of a Basic Fee (Basic Fee) and an
adjustment to the Basic Fee based on the investment performance of the Fund in
relation to the investment record of the Russell 2000.
The Basic Fee is a monthly fee equal to 1/12 of
1% (1% on an annualized basis) of the average of the Funds month-end net
assets applicable to Common Stockholders, plus the liquidation value of
Preferred Stock, for the rolling 36-month period ending with such month (the
performance period). The Basic Fee for each month is increased or decreased
at the rate of 1/12 of .05% for each percentage point that the investment
performance of the Fund exceeds, or is exceeded by, the percentage change in
the investment record of the Russell 2000 for the performance period by more
than two percentage points. The performance period for each such month is a
rolling 36-month period ending with such month. The maximum increase or
decrease in the Basic Fee for any month may not exceed 1/12 of .5%.
Accordingly, for each month, the maximum monthly fee rate as adjusted for
performance is 1/12 of 1.5% and is payable if the investment performance of the
Fund exceeds the percentage change in the investment record of the Russell 2000
by 12 or more percentage points for the performance period, and the minimum
monthly fee rate as adjusted for performance is 1/12 of .5% and is payable if
the percentage change in the investment record of the Russell 2000 exceeds the
investment performance of the Fund by 12 or more percentage points for the
performance period.
Royce has voluntarily committed to waive the
portion of its investment advisory fee attributable to an issue of the Funds
Preferred Stock for any month in which the Funds average annual NAV total
return since issuance of the Preferred Stock fails to exceed the applicable
Preferred Stock's dividend rate.
For the six rolling 36-month periods ended June
2011, the Funds investment performance ranged from 5% to 10% below the
investment performance of the Russell 2000. Accordingly, the net investment
advisory fee consisted of a Basic Fee of $1,517,526 and a net downward
adjustment of $391,985 for the performance of the Fund relative to that of the
Russell 2000. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund accrued and paid
Royce investment advisory fees totaling $1,125,541.
Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities:
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the costs of purchases and
proceeds from sales of investment securities, other than short-term securities
and collateral received for securities loaned, amounted to $40,508,082 and
$40,927,150, respectively.
46 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
|
|
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
|
VALUE |
|
COMMON STOCKS 101.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Discretionary 7.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobiles - 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thor Industries |
|
|
100,000 |
|
$ |
2,884,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Specialty Retail - 5.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckle (The) |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
5,124,000 |
|
GameStop Corporation Cl. A 1 |
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
5,200,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,324,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $11,319,256) |
|
|
|
|
|
13,208,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Staples 5.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food Products - 4.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cal-Maine Foods |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
2,397,000 |
|
Industrias Bachoco ADR |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
2,169,000 |
|
Sanderson Farms |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
3,105,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,671,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Personal Products - 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nu Skin Enterprises Cl. A |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
2,253,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $7,619,440) |
|
|
|
|
|
9,924,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy 13.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services - 11.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ensco ADR |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
3,997,500 |
|
Helmerich & Payne |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
3,306,000 |
|
Pason Systems |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
2,261,393 |
|
Tesco Corporation 1 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
1,941,000 |
|
Trican Well Service |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
5,168,956 |
|
Unit Corporation 1 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
3,046,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,721,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exxon Mobil |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
4,069,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $15,043,210) |
|
|
|
|
|
23,790,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financials 20.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets - 14.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
2,029,000 |
|
|
Ashmore Group |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
4,154,435 |
|
Franklin Resources |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
5,908,050 |
|
INTL FCStone 1 |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
1,573,650 |
|
Knight Capital Group Cl. A 1 |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
1,928,500 |
|
Partners Group Holding |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
1,769,880 |
|
Sprott |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
2,681,839 |
|
U.S. Global Investors Cl. A |
|
|
147,849 |
|
|
1,064,513 |
|
Value Partners Group |
|
|
4,800,000 |
|
|
4,125,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,235,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diversified Financial Services - 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PICO Holdings 1 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Insurance - 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Cl. B 1 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
5,804,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Real Estate Management & Development - 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
|
|
349,170 |
|
|
4,277,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $30,888,381) |
|
|
|
|
|
36,766,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
|
VALUE |
|
Health Care 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology - 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Myriad Genetics 1 |
|
|
70,000 |
|
$ |
1,589,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $1,757,953) |
|
|
|
|
|
1,589,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrials 9.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building Products - 1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simpson Manufacturing |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1,493,500 |
|
WaterFurnace Renewable Energy |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
1,611,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,104,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Construction & Engineering - 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacobs Engineering Group 1 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
2,162,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Electrical Equipment - 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GrafTech International 1 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
2,027,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Machinery - 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
1,792,500 |
|
Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
1,880,873 |
|
Semperit AG Holding |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
2,992,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,666,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Road & Rail - 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patriot Transportation Holding 1 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
2,013,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $11,294,092) |
|
|
|
|
|
15,973,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology 18.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals - 4.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
2,490,000 |
|
|
Western Digital 1 |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
5,820,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,310,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 10.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aixtron ADR 2 |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
2,217,800 |
|
Analog Devices |
|
|
142,000 |
|
|
5,557,880 |
|
MKS Instruments |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
4,227,200 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
4,144,000 |
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
2,420,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,567,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Software - 2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft Corporation |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
5,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $30,368,842) |
|
|
|
|
|
32,078,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials 25.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals - 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mosaic Company (The) |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
4,063,800 |
|
Westlake Chemical |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
3,114,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,177,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Metals & Mining - 21.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alamos Gold |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
1,987,039 |
|
Allied Nevada Gold 1 |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
5,659,200 |
|
Centamin Egypt 1 |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
2,413,811 |
|
Endeavour Mining 1 |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
2,634,662 |
|
Fresnillo |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
1,690,454 |
|
Major Drilling Group International |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
2,862,772 |
|
Newmont Mining |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
3,238,200 |
|
Nucor Corporation |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
2,061,000 |
|
Pan American Silver |
|
|
118,500 |
|
|
3,660,465 |
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 47 |
|
|
Royce Focus Trust |
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
Schedule of Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
|
VALUE |
|
Materials (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum |
|
|
75,000 |
|
$ |
3,723,750 |
|
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
4,320,000 |
|
Seabridge Gold 1 |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
4,513,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,764,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total (Cost $35,842,053) |
|
|
|
|
|
45,942,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $144,133,227) |
|
|
|
|
|
179,275,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 13.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Clearing Corp., |
|
|
|
|
|
24,148,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES LOANED 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federated Government Obligations Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
1,689,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 115.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $169,970,773) |
|
|
|
|
|
205,112,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES LESS CASH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AND OTHER ASSETS (1.7)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(3,050,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK (14.1)% |
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
$ |
177,062,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New additions in 2011. |
||
Non-income producing. |
||
All or a portion of these securities were on loan at June 30, 2011. Total market value of loaned securities at June 30, 2011, was $1,678,953. |
||
|
|
|
|
Bold indicates the Fund's 20 largest equity holdings in terms of June 30, 2011, market value. |
|
|
|
|
|
TAX INFORMATION: The cost of total investments for Federal income tax purposes was $169,970,773. At June 30, 2011, net unrealized appreciation for all securities was $35,141,849, consisting of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation of $42,826,537 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation of $7,684,688. |
|
|
|
48 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
|
Royce Focus Trust |
June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
Total investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) |
|
$ |
180,964,622 |
|
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) |
|
|
24,148,000 |
|
Cash and foreign currency |
|
|
36 |
|
Receivable for investments sold |
|
|
1,788,452 |
|
Receivable for dividends and interest |
|
|
138,684 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
27,960 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
207,067,754 |
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
Payable for collateral on loaned securities |
|
|
1,689,546 |
|
Payable for investments purchased |
|
|
3,053,033 |
|
Payable for investment advisory fee |
|
|
161,674 |
|
Preferred dividends accrued but not yet declared |
|
|
33,324 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
67,922 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
5,005,499 |
|
PREFERRED STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value, $25 liquidation value per share; 1,000,000 shares outstanding |
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
Total Preferred Stock |
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
177,062,255 |
|
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 20,073,105 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) |
|
$ |
131,248,399 |
|
Undistributed net investment income (loss) |
|
|
(1,108,707 |
) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
16,327,378 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
35,146,908 |
|
Unallocated and accrued distributions |
|
|
(4,551,723 |
) |
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders (net asset value per share - $8.82) |
|
$ |
177,062,255 |
|
Investments at identified cost (including $1,689,546 of collateral on loaned securities) |
|
$ |
145,822,773 |
|
Market value of loaned securities |
|
|
1,678,953 |
|
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 49 |
|
|
Royce Focus Trust |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
|
|
Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
Dividends1 |
|
$ |
1,294,819 |
|
Interest |
|
|
3,702 |
|
Securities lending |
|
|
73,795 |
|
Total income |
|
|
1,372,316 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
|
1,011,068 |
|
Stockholder reports |
|
|
36,057 |
|
Custody and transfer agent fees |
|
|
32,143 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
20,424 |
|
Directors' fees |
|
|
19,103 |
|
Administrative and office facilities |
|
|
9,472 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
34,208 |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
1,162,475 |
|
Compensating balance credits |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net expenses |
|
|
1,162,472 |
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
209,844 |
|
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: |
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
15,532,593 |
|
Foreign currency transactions |
|
|
(19,712 |
) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): |
|
|
|
|
Investments and foreign currency translations |
|
|
(8,805,394 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
|
|
2,408 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
6,709,895 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
6,919,739 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
(750,000 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
6,169,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
Royce Focus Trust |
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Year ended |
|
||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
$ |
209,844 |
|
$ |
(214,447 |
) |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
15,512,881 |
|
|
13,893,721 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
(8,802,986 |
) |
|
18,614,471 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations |
|
|
6,919,739 |
|
|
32,293,745 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(941,621 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
(558,379 |
) |
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(750,000 |
) |
|
|
|
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
|
|
(750,000 |
) |
|
(1,500,000 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
6,169,739 |
|
|
30,793,745 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(3,768,391 |
) |
|
|
|
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
(3,768,391 |
) |
|
|
|
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment of distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
2,370,134 |
|
|
|
|
Total capital stock transactions |
|
|
2,370,134 |
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
4,771,482 |
|
|
30,793,745 |
|
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
172,290,773 |
|
|
141,497,028 |
|
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $(1,108,707) at 6/30/11 and $(1,318,551) at 12/31/10) |
|
$ |
177,062,255 |
|
$ |
172,290,773 |
|
|
1 To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
|
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 51 |
|
Royce Focus Trust |
|
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Fund's performance for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
8.72 |
|
$ |
7.16 |
|
$ |
4.76 |
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
$ |
9.75 |
|
$ |
9.76 |
|
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
0.03 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
0.16 |
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
(3.67 |
) |
|
1.12 |
|
|
1.50 |
|
Total investment operations |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
(3.60 |
) |
|
1.27 |
|
|
1.66 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
(0.09 |
) |
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
(0.10 |
) |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
(3.68 |
) |
|
1.18 |
|
|
1.56 |
|
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
(0.20 |
) |
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.37 |
) |
|
(1.57 |
) |
|
(1.37 |
) |
Return of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated distributions1 |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
(0.47 |
) |
|
(2.01 |
) |
|
(1.57 |
) |
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
Total capital stock transactions |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
(0.00 |
) |
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
8.82 |
|
$ |
8.72 |
|
$ |
7.16 |
|
$ |
4.76 |
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
$ |
9.75 |
|
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
7.79 |
|
$ |
7.57 |
|
$ |
6.33 |
|
$ |
4.60 |
|
$ |
8.97 |
|
$ |
10.68 |
|
TOTAL RETURN:2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value |
|
|
5.51 |
%3 |
|
19.59 |
% |
|
40.84 |
% |
|
(44.94 |
)% |
|
3.02 |
% |
|
30.50 |
% |
Net Asset Value |
|
|
3.71 |
%3 |
|
21.79 |
% |
|
53.95 |
% |
|
(42.71 |
)% |
|
12.22 |
% |
|
16.33 |
% |
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.31 |
%6 |
|
1.37 |
% |
|
1.42 |
% |
|
1.34 |
% |
|
1.32 |
% |
|
1.36 |
% |
|
Investment advisory fee expense |
|
|
1.14 |
%6 |
|
1.17 |
% |
|
1.16 |
% |
|
1.13 |
% |
|
1.14 |
% |
|
1.16 |
% |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
0.17 |
%6 |
|
0.20 |
% |
|
0.26 |
% |
|
0.21 |
% |
|
0.18 |
% |
|
0.20 |
% |
Net investment income (loss) |
|
|
0.24 |
%6 |
|
(0.15 |
)% |
|
0.49 |
% |
|
0.72 |
% |
|
1.13 |
% |
|
1.54 |
% |
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, End of Period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
177,062 |
|
$ |
172,291 |
|
$ |
141,497 |
|
$ |
92,550 |
|
$ |
165,807 |
|
$ |
158,567 |
|
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, End of Period (in thousands) |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
36 |
% |
|
46 |
% |
|
51 |
% |
|
62 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
PREFERRED STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares outstanding |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
Asset coverage per share |
|
$ |
202.06 |
|
$ |
197.29 |
|
$ |
166.48 |
|
$ |
117.55 |
|
$ |
190.81 |
|
$ |
183.57 |
|
Liquidation preference per share |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Average month-end market value per share |
|
$ |
25.42 |
|
$ |
25.38 |
|
$ |
23.56 |
|
$ |
22.89 |
|
$ |
24.37 |
|
$ |
24.98 |
|
|
|
To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
|
The Market Value Total Return is calculated assuming a purchase of Common Stock on the opening of the first business day and a sale on the closing of the last business day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions are assumed for the purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund's Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan. Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated on the same basis, except that the Fund's net asset value is used on the purchase and sale dates instead of market value. |
|
Not annualized |
|
Expense ratios based on total average net assets including liquidation value of Preferred Stock were 1.15% 1.17%, 1.16%, 1.14%, 1.15% and 1.17% for the periods ended June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
Expense ratios based on average net assets applicable to Common Stockholders before waiver of fees by the investment adviser would have been 1.48% and 1.39% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively; before waiver of fees and after earnings credits would have been 1.31%, 1.37%, 1.48%, 1.39%, 1.31% and 1.36% for the periods ended June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
Annualized |
|
|
52 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
|
Royce Focus Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Royce
Focus Trust, Inc. (the Fund), is a diversified closed-end investment company
incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland. The Fund commenced
operations on March 2, 1988, and Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce) assumed
investment management responsibility for the Fund on November 1, 1996.
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Under the Funds organizational documents, the
officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities that may
arise out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the
normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with service
providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Funds maximum
exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future
claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However,
based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
At June 30, 2011, officers, employees of Royce,
Fund directors, the Royce retirement plans and other affiliates owned 24% of
the Fund.
Valuation of Investments:
Securities
are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
(generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on the valuation date. Securities that trade
on an exchange, and securities traded on Nasdaqs Electronic Bulletin Board,
are valued at their last reported sales price or Nasdaq official closing price
taken from the primary market in which each security trades or, if no sale is
reported for such day, at their bid price. Other over-the-counter securities
for which market quotations are readily available are valued at their highest
bid price, except in the case of some bonds and other fixed income securities
which may be valued by reference to other securities with comparable ratings,
interest rates and maturities, using established independent pricing services.
The Fund values its non-U.S. dollar denominated securities in U.S. dollars
daily at the prevailing foreign currency exchange rates as quoted by a major
bank. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are
valued at their fair value under procedures approved by the Funds Board of
Directors. In addition, if, between the time trading ends on a particular
security and the close of the customary trading session on the NYSE, events
occur that are significant and may make the closing price unreliable, the Fund
may fair value the security. The Fund uses an independent pricing service to
provide fair value estimates for relevant non-U.S. equity securities on days
when the U.S. market volatility exceeds a certain threshold. This pricing
service uses proprietary correlations it has developed between the movement of
prices of non-U.S. equity securities and indices of U.S.-traded securities,
futures contracts and other indications to estimate the fair value of relevant
non-U.S. securities. When fair value pricing is employed, the prices of
securities used by the Fund may differ from quoted or published prices for the
same security. Investments in money market funds are valued at net asset value
per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds investments, as noted above. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below:
|
Level |
1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
|
Level |
2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all Level 2 securities. Any Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar securities would be noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
|
Level |
3 significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). |
The inputs or
methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of
the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments as of June 30, 2011.
For a detailed breakout of common stocks by sector classification, please refer
to the Schedule of Investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
Common stocks |
$141,039,341 |
$38,235,735 |
|
$179,275,076 |
Cash equivalents |
1,689,546 |
24,148,000 |
|
25,837,546 |
Repurchase Agreements:
The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that the
Funds investment adviser has determined are creditworthy. The Fund restricts
repurchase agreements to maturities of no more than seven days. Securities
pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements, which are held until maturity
of the repurchase agreements, are marked-to-market daily and maintained at a
value at least equal to the principal amount of the repurchase agreement (including
accrued interest). Repurchase agreements could involve certain risks in the
event of default or insolvency of the counter-party, including possible delays
or restrictions upon the ability of the Fund to dispose of its underlying
securities.
Foreign Currency:
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales and
maturities of short-term securities, sales of foreign currencies, expiration of
currency forward contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade
and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the
amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the
Funds books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or
paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in
the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities at the
end of the reporting period, as a result of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates.
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 53
|
Royce Focus Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Securities Lending:
The
Fund loans securities to qualified institutional investors for the purpose of
realizing additional income. Collateral for the Fund on all securities loaned
is accepted in cash and cash equivalents and invested temporarily by the
custodian. The collateral maintained is at least 100% of the current market
value of the loaned securities. The market value of the loaned securities is
determined at the close of business of the Fund and any additional required
collateral is delivered to the Fund on the next business day. The Fund retains
the risk of any loss on the securities on loan as well as incurring the
potential loss on investments purchased with cash collateral received for
securities lending.
Taxes:
As a qualified regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the
Internal Revenue Code, the Fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent
that it distributes substantially all of its taxable income for its fiscal
year. The Schedule of Investments includes information regarding income taxes
under the caption Tax Information.
Distributions:
Commencing March 2011, the Fund pays quarterly distributions on the
Funds Common Stock at the annual rate of 5% of the rolling average of the
prior four calendar quarter-end NAVs of the Funds Common Stock, with the
fourth quarter distribution being the greater of 1.25% of the rolling average
or the distribution required by IRS regulations. Distributions to Preferred
Stockholders are accrued daily and paid quarterly and distributions to Common
Stockholders are recorded on ex-dividend date. Distributable capital gains
and/or net investment income are first allocated to Preferred Stockholder distributions,
with any excess allocable to Common Stockholders. If capital gains and/or net
investment income are allocated to both Preferred and Common Stockholders, the
tax character of such allocations is proportional. To the extent that
distributions are not paid from long-term capital gains, net investment income
or net short-term capital gains, they will represent a return of capital.
Distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may
differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Permanent book and tax differences relating to stockholder
distributions will result in reclassifications within the capital accounts.
Undistributed net investment income may include temporary book and tax basis differences,
which will reverse in a subsequent period. Any taxable income or gain remaining
undistributed at fiscal year end is distributed in the following year.
Investment Transactions and Related Investment Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Dividend
income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividend income is
recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Interest income
is recorded on an accrual basis. Premium and discounts on debt securities are
amortized using the effective yield-to-maturity method. Realized gains and
losses from investment transactions are determined on the basis of identified
cost for book and tax purposes.
Expenses:
The Fund incurs direct and indirect expenses. Expenses directly
attributable to the Fund are charged to the Funds operations, while expenses
applicable to more than one of the Royce Funds are allocated equitably. Certain
personnel, occupancy costs and other administrative expenses related to The Royce
Funds are allocated by Royce under an administration agreement and are included
in administrative and office facilities and professional fees. The Fund has
adopted a deferred fee agreement that allows the Directors to defer the receipt
of all or a portion of directors fees otherwise payable. The deferred fees are
invested in certain Royce Funds until distributed in accordance with the
agreement.
Compensating Balance Credits:
The Fund has an arrangement with its custodian bank, whereby a portion of
the custodians fee is paid indirectly by credits earned on the Funds cash on
deposit with the bank. This deposit arrangement is an alternative to purchasing
overnight investments. Conversely, the Fund pays interest to the custodian on
any cash overdrafts, to the extent they are not offset by credits earned on
positive cash balances.
Capital Stock:
The Fund issued 314,042 shares of Common Stock as reinvestment of
distributions by Common Stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
At June 30, 2011, 1,000,000 shares of 6.00%
Cumulative Preferred Stock were outstanding. The Fund, at its option, may
redeem the Cumulative Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at the redemption
price. The Cumulative Preferred Stock is classified outside of permanent equity
(net assets applicable to Common Stockholders) in the accompanying financial
statements in accordance with accounting for redeemable equity instruments,
that requires preferred securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets
to be classified outside of permanent equity to the extent that the redemption
is at a fixed or determinable price and at the option of the holder or upon the
occurrence of an event that is not solely within the control of the issuer.
The Fund is required to meet certain asset
coverage tests with respect to the Cumulative Preferred Stock as required by
the 1940 Act. In addition, pursuant to the Rating Agency Guidelines established
by Moodys, the Fund is required to maintain a certain discounted asset coverage.
If the Fund fails to meet these requirements and does not correct such failure,
the Fund may be required to redeem, in part or in full, the Cumulative
Preferred
54 | 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
|
Royce Focus Trust |
|
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Capital Stock (continued):
Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus an amount equal to
the accumulated and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared on such shares,
in order to meet these requirements. Additionally, failure to meet the
foregoing asset coverage requirements could restrict the Funds ability to pay
dividends to Common Stockholders and could lead to sales of portfolio
securities at inopportune times. The Fund has met these requirements since issuing
the Cumulative Preferred Stock.
Investment Advisory Agreement:
The Investment Advisory Agreement between Royce and the Fund provides
for fees to be paid at an annual rate of 1.0% of the Funds average daily net
assets applicable to Common Stockholders plus the liquidation value of
Preferred Stock. Royce has voluntarily committed to waive the portion of its
investment advisory fee attributable to an issue of the Funds Preferred Stock
for any month in which the Funds average annual NAV total return since
issuance of the Preferred Stock fails to exceed the applicable Preferred
Stocks dividend rate. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund accrued
and paid Royce investment advisory fees totaling $1,011,068.
Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities:
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the costs of purchases and
proceeds from sales of investment securities, other than short-term securities
and collateral received for securities loaned, amounted to $39,357,009 and
$42,403,191, respectively.
2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 55
|
All Directors and Officers may be reached c/o The Royce Funds, 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151
Charles M. Royce, Trustee1,
President
Age: 71 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1982
Non-Royce Directorships: Director of TICC Capital Corp.
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years: President,
Co-Chief Investment Officer and Member of Board of Managers of Royce &
Associates, LLC (Royce), the Trusts investment adviser.
Mark R. Fetting, Trustee1
Age: 56 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 51 | Tenure: Since 2001
Non-Royce Directorships: Director of Legg Mason,
Inc. and Director/Trustee of registered investment companies constituting the 16 Legg Mason Funds.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years: President, CEO, Chairman and Director of Legg Mason, Inc. and Chairman of Legg Mason Funds. Mr. Fettings prior business experience includes having served as a member of the Board of Managers of Royce; President of all Legg Mason Funds; Senior Executive Vice President of Legg Mason, Inc.; Director and/or officer of various Legg Mason, Inc. affiliates; Division President and Senior Officer of Prudential Financial Group, Inc. and related companies.
Patricia W. Chadwick, Trustee
Age: 62 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 2009
Non-Royce Directorships: Trustee of ING Mutual Funds and Director of Wisconsin Energy Corp.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years: Consultant and President of Ravengate Partners LLC (since 2000).
Richard M. Galkin, Trustee
Age: 73 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1982
Non-Royce Directorships: None
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Private investor. Mr. Galkins prior business experience includes having served as President of Richard M. Galkin Associates, Inc., telecommunications consultants, President of Manhattan Cable Television (a subsidiary of Time, Inc.), President of Haverhills Inc. (another Time, Inc. subsidiary), President of Rhode Island Cable Television and Senior Vice President of Satellite Television Corp. (a subsidiary of Comsat).
Stephen L. Isaacs, Trustee
Age: 71 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1989
Non-Royce Directorships: None
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: President of The Center for Health and Social Policy (since September 1996); Attorney and President of Health Policy Associates, Inc., consultants. Mr. Isaacss prior business experience includes having served as Director of Columbia University Development Law and Policy Program and Professor at Columbia University (until August 1996).
Arthur S. Mehlman, Trustee
Age: 69 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 51 | Tenure: Since 2004
Non-Royce Directorships: Director/Trustee of registered investment companies
constituting the 16 Legg Mason Funds.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Director of The League for People with Disabilities, Inc.; Director of University of Maryland Foundation (non-profits). Formerly: Director of Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC (from October 2004 to April 1, 2011); Director of University of Maryland College Park Foundation (non-profit) (from 1998 to 2005); Partner, KPMG LLP (international accounting firm) (from 1972 to 2002); Director of Maryland Business Roundtable for Education (from July 1984 to June 2002).
David L. Meister, Trustee
Age: 71 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1982
Non-Royce Directorships: None
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Consultant. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Tennis Channel (from June 2000 to March 2005). Mr. Meisters prior business experience includes having served as Chief Executive Officer of Seniorlife.com, a consultant to the communications industry, President of Financial News Network, Senior Vice President of HBO, President of Time-Life Films and Head of Broadcasting for Major League Baseball.
G. Peter OBrien, Trustee
Age: 65 | Number of Funds
Overseen: 51 | Tenure: Since 2001
Non-Royce Directorships: Director/Trustee of registered investment companies
constituting the 16 Legg Mason Funds; Director of TICC Capital Corp.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Trustee Emeritus of Colgate University (since 2005); Board Member of Hill House, Inc. (since 1999); Formerly: Trustee of Colgate University (from 1996 to 2005), President of Hill House, Inc. (from 2001 to 2005) and Managing Director/Equity Capital Markets Group of Merrill Lynch & Co. (from 1971 to 1999).
John D. Diederich, Vice
President and Treasurer
Age: 59 | Tenure: Since 2001
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Chief Operating Officer, Managing Director and member of the Board of Managers of Royce; Chief Financial Officer of Royce; Director of Administration of the Trust; and President of RFS, having been employed by Royce since April 1993.
Jack E. Fockler, Jr., Vice
President
Age: 52 | Tenure: Since 1995
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Managing Director and Vice President of Royce, and Vice President of RFS, having been employed by Royce since October 1989.
W. Whitney George, Vice
President
Age: 53 | Tenure: Since 1995
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Co-Chief Investment Officer, Managing Director and Vice President of Royce, having been employed by Royce since October 1991.
Daniel A. OByrne, Vice
President and Assistant Secretary
Age: 49 | Tenure: Since 1994
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Principal and Vice President of Royce, having been employed by Royce since October 1986.
John E. Denneen, Secretary
and Chief Legal Officer
Age: 44 | Tenure: 1996-2001
and Since April 2002
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: General Counsel, Principal, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Secretary of Royce; Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of The Royce Funds.
Lisa Curcio, Chief Compliance
Officer
Age: 51 | Tenure: Since 2004
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Chief Compliance Officer of The Royce Funds (since October 2004) and Compliance Officer of Royce (since June 2004).
1 Interested Trustee.
Trustees will hold office until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. The Statement of Additional Information, which contains additional information about the Trusts trustees and officers, is available and can be obtained without charge at www.roycefunds.com or by calling (800) 221-4268.
|
56 | The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
The
thoughts expressed in this Review and Report
concerning recent market movements and future prospects for small company
stocks are solely the opinion of Royce at June 30, 2011, and, of course,
historical market trends are not necessarily indicative of future market
movements. Statements regarding the future prospects for particular securities
held in the Funds portfolios and Royces investment intentions with respect to
those securities reflect Royces opinions as of June 30, 2011 and are subject
to change at any time without notice. There can be no assurance that securities
mentioned in this Review and Report
will be included in any Royce-managed portfolio in the future. Investments in
securities of micro-cap, small-cap and/or mid-cap companies may involve
considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap companies.
All publicly released material information is always disclosed by the Funds on
the website at www.roycefunds.com.
Sector
weightings are determined using the Global Industry Classification Standard
(GICS). GICS was developed by, and is the exclusive property of, Standard
& Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P) and MSCI Inc. (MSCI). GICS is
the trademark of S&P and MSCI. Global Industry Classification Standard
(GICS) and GICS Direct are service marks of S&P and MSCI.
All indexes referred to are unmanaged and
capitalization weighted. Each indexs returns include net reinvested dividends
and/or interest income. Russell Investment Group is the source and owner of the
trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes.
Russell® is a trademark of Russell Investment Group. The Russell 2000 Index is
an index of domestic small-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 2,000
smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell
2000 Value and Growth Indexes consist of the respective value and growth stocks
within the Russell 2000 as determined by Russell Investments. The Russell
Microcap Index includes 1,000 of the smallest securities in the Russell 2000
Index. The Russell Midcap Index measures the performance of the mid-cap segment
of the U.S. equity universe. It includes approximately 800 of the smallest
securities in the Russell 1000 Index. The Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap
Index is an index of global large-cap stocks, excluding the United States. The
Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap Index is an index of global small-cap stocks,
excluding the United States. The S&P 500 and SmallCap 600 are indexes of
U.S. large- and small-cap stocks, respectively, selected by Standard & Poors
based on market size, liquidity and industry grouping, among other factors. The
Nasdaq Composite is an index of the more than 3,000 common equities listed on
the Nasdaq stock exchange. Returns for the market indexes used in this report
were based on information supplied to Royce by Russell Investments. Royce has
not independently verified the above described information.
Forward-Looking Statements
This material contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), that involve risks and uncertainties,
including, among others, statements as to:
|
|
|
the Funds future operating results |
|
the prospects of the Funds portfolio companies |
|
the impact of investments that the Funds have made or may make |
|
the dependence of the Funds future success on the general economy and its impact on the companies and industries in which the Funds invest, and |
|
the ability of the Funds portfolio companies to achieve their objectives. |
This Review and Report uses words such as
anticipates, believes, expects, future, intends, and similar
expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for any
reason.
The Royce Funds have based the forward-looking
statements included in this Review and
Report on information available to us on the date of the report, and
we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although
The Royce Funds undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise,
you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make through
future stockholder communications or reports.
Authorized Share Transactions
Royce Value Trust, Royce
Micro-Cap Trust and Royce Focus Trust may each repurchase up to 5% of the
issued and outstanding shares of its respective common stock and up to 10% of
the issued and outstanding shares of its respective preferred stock during the
year ending December 31, 2011. Any such repurchases would take place at then
prevailing prices in the open market or in other transactions. Common stock
repurchases would be effected at a price per share that is less than the shares
then current net asset value, and preferred stock repurchases would be effected
at a price per share that is less than the shares liquidation value.
Royce
Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap Trust and Royce Focus Trust are also authorized to
offer their common stockholders an opportunity to subscribe for additional
shares of their common stock through rights offerings at a price per share that
may be less than the shares then current net asset value. The timing and terms
of any such offerings are within each Boards discretion.
Annual Certifications
As required, the Funds
have submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) for Royce Value Trust
and Royce Micro-Cap Trust and to Nasdaq for Royce Focus Trust, respectively,
the annual certification of the Funds Chief Executive Officer that he is not
aware of any violation of the NYSEs or Nasdaqs Corporate Governance listing
standards. The Funds also have included the certification of the Funds Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as exhibits to the Funds form N-CSR for the period
ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Proxy Voting |
|
The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 57 |
|
At
meetings held on June 1-2, 2011, each of the Funds respective Boards of
Directors, including all of the non-interested directors, approved the
continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreements between Royce &
Associates, LLC (R&A) and each of Royce Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap
Trust and Royce Focus Trust (the Funds). In reaching these decisions, the
Board reviewed the materials provided by R&A, which included, among other
things, information prepared internally by R&A and independently by
Morningstar Associates, LLC (Morningstar) containing detailed expense ratio
and investment performance comparisons for the Funds with other funds in their
peer group, information regarding the past performance of Funds managed by
R&A and a memorandum outlining the legal duties of the Board prepared by
independent counsel to the non-interested directors. R&A also provided the
directors with an analysis of its profitability with respect to providing
investment advisory services to each of the Funds. In addition, the Board took
into account information furnished throughout the year at regular Board
meetings, including reports on investment performance, stockholder services,
regulatory compliance, brokerage commissions and research, and brokerage and
execution products and services provided to the Funds. The Board also
considered other matters they deemed important to the approval process such as
allocation of Fund brokerage commissions and other direct and indirect benefits
to R&A and its affiliates, from their relationship with the Funds. The directors
also met throughout the year with investment advisory personnel from R&A.
The Board, in its deliberations, recognized that, for many of the Funds
stockholders, the decision to purchase Fund shares included a decision to
select R&A as the investment adviser and that there was a strong
association in the minds of Fund stockholders between R&A and each Fund. In
considering factors relating to the approval of the continuance of the
Investment Advisory Agreements, the non-interested directors received assistance
and advice from, and met separately with, their independent counsel. While the
Investment Advisory Agreements were considered at the same Board meetings, the
Board dealt with each agreement separately. Among other factors, the directors
considered the following:
The nature, extent and quality
of services provided by R&A: The Board considered the following factors to be of fundamental
importance to their consideration of whether to approve the continuance of the
Funds Investment Advisory Agreements: (i) R&As more than 35 years of
value investing experience and track record; (ii) the history of long-tenured
R&A portfolio managers managing the Funds; (iii) R&As focus on
mid-cap, small-cap and micro-cap value investing; (iv) the consistency of
R&As approach to managing both the Funds and open-end mutual funds over
more than 35 years; (v) the integrity and high ethical standards adhered to at
R&A; (vi) R&As specialized experience in the area of trading small-
and micro-cap securities; (vii) R&As historical ability to attract and
retain portfolio management talent and (viii) R&As focus on stockholder
interests as exemplified by its voluntary fee waiver policy on preferred stock
assets in certain circumstances where the Funds total return performance from
the issuance of the preferred does not exceed the coupon rate on the preferred,
and expansive stockholder reporting and communications. The Board reviewed the
services that R&A provides to the Funds, including, but not limited to,
managing each Funds investments in accordance with the stated policies of each
Fund. The Board considered the fact that R&A provided certain
administrative services to the Funds at cost pursuant to the Administration
Agreement between the Funds and R&A which went into effect on January 1,
2008. The Board determined that the services to be provided to each Fund by
R&A would be the same as those it previously provided to the Funds. They
also took into consideration the histories, reputations and backgrounds of
R&As portfolio managers for the Funds, finding that these would likely
have an impact on the continued success of the
Funds.
Lastly, the Board noted R&As ability to attract and retain quality and
experienced personnel. The directors concluded that the investment advisory
services provided by R&A to each Fund compared favorably to services
provided by R&A to other R&A client accounts, including other funds, in
both nature and quality, and that the scope of services provided by R&A
would continue to be suitable for the Funds.
Investment performance of the
Funds and R&A: In
light of R&As risk-averse approach to investing, the Board believes that
risk-adjusted performance continues to be an appropriate measure of each Funds
investment performance. One measure of risk-adjusted performance the Board has
historically used in its review of the Funds performance is the Sharpe Ratio.
The Sharpe Ratio is a risk-adjusted measure of performance developed by Nobel
Laureate William Sharpe. It is calculated by dividing a funds annualized
excess returns by its annualized standard deviation to determine reward per
unit of risk. The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better a funds historical
risk-adjusted performance. The Board attaches primary importance to
risk-adjusted performance over relatively long periods of time, typically three
to ten years. Using Morningstar data, Royce Value Trusts Sharpe Ratio placed
in the middle quintile within the Small Blend category assigned by Morningstar
for the three-year period and in the second quartile for the five-year and
ten-year periods ended December 31, 2010. As measured against its open-end
peers, Royce Micro-Cap Trusts Sharpe Ratio placed in the middle quintile for
the three-year period and the second quartile within the Small Blend, Growth
or Value category assigned by Morningstar for the five-year and ten-year
periods ended December 31, 2010. Finally, Royce Focus Trusts Sharpe Ratio
placed in the top quartile within the Small Growth category assigned by
Morningstar for the three-year, five-year and ten-year periods ended December
31, 2010.
The Board noted that R&A manages a number of
funds that invest in small-cap and micro-cap issuers, many of which were
outperforming the Russell 2000 Index and their competitors. Although the Board
recognized that past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future
results, they found that R&A had the necessary qualifications, experience
and track record in managing small-cap and micro-cap securities to manage the
Funds. The directors determined that R&A continued to be an appropriate
investment adviser for the Funds and concluded that each Funds performance
supported the renewal of its Investment Advisory Agreement.
Cost of the
services provided and profits realized by R&A from its relationship with
the Funds: The Board considered the cost of the services provided by
R&A and profits realized by R&A from its relationship with each Fund.
As part of the analysis, the Board discussed with R&A its methodology in
allocating its costs to each Fund and concluded that its allocations were
reasonable. The Board concluded that R&As profits were reasonable in
relation to the nature and quality of services provided.
The extent to
which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow and whether fee
levels would reflect such economies of scale: The Board considered
whether there have been economies of scale in respect of the management of the
Funds, whether the Funds have appropriately benefited from any economies of
scale and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies
of scale. The Board noted the time and effort involved in managing portfolios of
small- and micro-cap stocks and that they did not involve the same efficiencies
as do portfolios of large cap stocks. The Board concluded that the current fee
structure for each Fund was reasonable, and that no changes were currently
necessary.
Comparison of services to be rendered and fees to be
paid to those under other investment advisory contracts, such as contracts of
the same and other investment advisers or other clients: The Board
reviewed the investment
|
58 | The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
advisory fee paid by each
Fund and compared both the services to be rendered and the fees to be paid
under the Investment Advisory Agreements to other contracts of R&A and to
contracts of other investment advisers to registered investment companies
investing in small- and micro-cap stocks, as provided by Morningstar. The Board
noted that, in the case of Royce Value Trust, the Fund had a 1.00% basic fee
that is subject to adjustment up or down (up to 0.50% in either direction)
based on the Funds performance versus the S&P 600 SmallCap Index over a
rolling period of sixty months. The fee is charged on average net assets over
that rolling period. As a result, in a rising market, the fee will be smaller
than a fee calculated on the current years average net assets, and vice versa.
The Board determined that the performance adjustment feature continued to serve
as an appropriate incentive to R&A to manage the Fund for the benefit of
its long-term common stockholders. The Board noted that R&A had also agreed
to waive its management fee on that portion of the Funds assets equal to the
liquidation preference of the Funds outstanding preferred stock if the Funds
total return from issuance of the preferred on such amount is less than the
preferreds fixed dividend rate. The Board also noted that the fee arrangement,
which also includes a provision for no fee in periods where the Funds trailing
three-year performance is negative, requires R&A to measure the Funds
performance monthly against the S&P 600, an unmanaged index. Instead of
receiving a set fee regardless of its performance, R&A is penalized for poor
performance. The Board noted that the Funds performance earned R&A no fee
during the period January 1, 2010 through November 30, 2010.
In the case of Royce Micro-Cap Trust, the
directors noted that the Fund had a 1.00% basic fee subject to adjustment up or
down based on the Funds performance versus the Russell 2000 Index over a
rolling 36 month period. The fee is charged on average net assets over that
rolling period. As a result,
in a rising market, the fee will be smaller than a
fee calculated on the current years average net assets, and visa versa. The
Board determined that the performance adjustment feature continued to serve as
an incentive to R&A to manage the Fund for the benefit of its long-term
stockholders. The Board also noted R&As voluntary waiver of its fee on the
liquidation value of the outstanding preferred stock in circumstances where the
Funds total return performance from the issuance of the preferred is less than
the fixed dividend rate on the preferred for each month during the year. The
Board noted that if the Funds expense ratio were based on total average net
assets including net assets applicable to Preferred Stock, it would rank in the
second quartile when compared against its Morningstar-assigned open-end peer
group.
Finally,
in the case of Royce Focus Trust, the Board noted that R&A had agreed to
waive its management fee on the liquidation value of outstanding preferred
stock if the Funds total return from issuance of the preferred is less than
the preferreds fixed dividend rate. The Board noted that if the Funds expense
ratio were based on total average net assets including net assets applicable to
Preferred Stock, it would place within the median of its Morningstar-assigned
open-end peer group.
The Board also considered fees charged by R&A to
institutional and other clients and noted that, given the greater levels of
services that R&A provides to registered investment companies such as the
Funds as compared to other accounts, the Funds base advisory fees compared
favorably to the advisory fees charged to those other accounts.
The
entire Board, including all the non-interested directors, approved the renewal
of the existing Investment Advisory Agreements, concluding that a contract
renewal on the existing terms was in the best interest of the stockholders of
each Fund and that each investment advisory fee rate was reasonable in relation
to the services provided.
|
The Royce Funds 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 59 |
|
|
|
Between 2000 and 2010 Chinas demand for oil doubled on a per day basis from 4.5 million barrels a day to nine million barrels per day. Over the same period of time, the U.S. is basically unchanged at about 19 million barrels per day. In the past year and a half, Asia has surpassed North America in demand of oil per day; a fundamental structural change. |
|
Robert Rodriguez, First Pacific Advisors, No-Load Fund Analyst, June 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Points
To Ponder Jason Trennert, Investment Strategy Viewpoint, February 4, 2011 Usually the first third of a bull market is led by stocks bouncing back from getting crushed in the prior bear. But the last two-thirds of bulls are usually led by high-quality stocks, and particularly ones that werent perceived to be high quality early on. Ken Fisher, Forbes, May 9, 2011 Statisticians deal with things that repeat themselves. This housing boom and bust is so historic and unprecedented, you cant forecast the future because you have no comparison. Robert Shiller, Yale University, Bloomberg, June 9, 2011 The central irony of financial crisis is that while it is caused by too much confidence, borrowing and lending, and spending, it is resolved only by increases in confidence, borrowing and lending, and spending. Larry Summers, CNN Money, June 13, 2011 |
|
In
Absolute Agreement Jeremy Grantham, GMO Quarterly Letter, January 2011 During the dot-com bubble, you met lots of people with tech stocks. Taxi drivers told you what dot-coms they owned. During the housing bubble you met normal, ordinary people who were trading up to expensive homes using adjustable-rate mortgages, buying new condos off plan to flip, and cashing out their fictional equity through a refinance mortgage. But who actually owns gold? I keep hearing about the gold bubble, but every time I ask people if they own any themselves, they say, no, no, of course not, its a bubble. Brett Arends, MarketWatch.com, May 4, 2011 The genius of investing is recognizing the direction of a trendnot catching highs and lows. Anonymous As long as inflation doesnt ramp up to the double-digit levels of the 1970s and early 1980sa scenario I consider extremely unlikelystocks will act as an excellent hedge. The reason is simple: Stocks are claims on real assets, such as land and plant and equipment, which appreciate in value as overall prices increase. Jeremy J. Siegel, Kiplingers Personal Finance, June 2011 |
|
To the extent that some managers are trying to replace active security selection with active allocation across sectors, that is another name for market timing. History suggests that is rarely a durable strategy. Edward Bernard, T. Rowe Price Vice Chairman, Bloomberg, June 9, 2011 Cocktail
Conversation Norm Rothery, The Globe and Mail, We have to realize that the world is a different place and that the number of consumers in the world is in the process of doubling. That means that resources are going to be scarce. That means energy is going to be scarce, and the prices of energy in general and commodities in particular are going to be high. Dennis Stattman, Barrons, May 28, 2011 Timeless Tidbits Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than successful men with talent. Calvin Coolidge Talent hits a target no one else can hit; genius hits a target no one else can see. Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
|
The thoughts expressed above represent solely the opinions of the persons quoted and, of course, there can be no assurance of future market trends or performance. |
|
|
|
60 | This page is not part of the 2011 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
About The Royce Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth Of Experience |
|
Consistent Discipline |
|
|
|
With approximately $41 billion in open- and closed-end fund assets under management, Royce & Associates is committed to the same small-company investing principles that have served us well for more than 35 years. Charles M. Royce, our President and Co-Chief Investment Officer, enjoys one of the longest tenures of any active mutual fund manager. Royces investment staff also includes Co-Chief Investment Officer W. Whitney George, 18 Portfolio Managers, five assistant portfolio managers and analysts, and nine traders. Multiple
Funds, Common Focus |
|
Our approach emphasizes paying close attention to risk and maintaining the same discipline, regardless of market movements and trends. The price we pay for a security must be significantly below our appraisal of its current worth. This requires a thorough analysis of the financial and business dynamics of an enterprise, as though we were purchasing the entire company. Co-Ownership Of Funds |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Information |
RIA Services |
|
Broker/Dealer Services |
Computershare |
|
|
|
Additional Report Copies |
Fund Materials and |
|
Fund Materials and |
Transfer Agent |
CE-REP-0611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Code(s) of Ethics. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) See Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Principal Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant's Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on their evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no significant changes in Registrant's internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control subsequent to the date of the evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report.
Item 12. Exhibits. Attached hereto.
(a)(1) Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
(a)(2) Separate certifications by the Registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable
(b) Separate certifications by the Registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ROYCE FOCUS TRUST, INC.
BY: /s/Charles M. Royce
Charles M. Royce
President
Date: August 22, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
ROYCE FOCUS TRUST, INC.
ROYCE FOCUS TRUST, INC.
BY: /s/Charles M. Royce
BY: /s/John D. Diederich
Charles M. Royce
John D. Diederich
President
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 22, 2011
Date: August 22, 2011