SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☑ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ________ TO ________ |
Commission file number 0-24751
SALISBURY BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Connecticut | 06-1514263 | |
(State or other jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer | |
of incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
5 Bissell Street, Lakeville, CT | 06039 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(860) 435-9801
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☑ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☑
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of May 10, 2018 is 2,786,566.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements (unaudited) | ||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 2018 (unaudited) and DECEMBER 31, 2017 | 3 | ||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 (unaudited) | 4 | ||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 (unaudited) | 5 | ||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 ( unaudited) | 5 | ||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 (unaudited) |
6 | ||||
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 8 | ||||
Item 2. | MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 28 | |||
Item 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 43 | |||
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 45 | |||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |||||
Item 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 45 | |||
Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS | 45 | |||
Item 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 45 | |||
Item 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | 45 | |||
Item 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 46 | |||
Item 5. | OTHER INFORMATION | 46 | |||
Item 6. | EXHIBITS | 46 | |||
SIGNATURES | 46 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except share data) | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
ASSETS | (unaudited) | |||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 5,781 | $ | 9,357 | ||||
Interest bearing demand deposits with other banks | 39,198 | 39,129 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 44,979 | 48,486 | ||||||
Securities | ||||||||
Available-for-sale at fair value | 79,906 | 78,212 | ||||||
CRA mutual fund | 826 | 835 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock at cost | 4,146 | 3,813 | ||||||
Loans held-for-sale | — | 669 | ||||||
Loans receivable, net (allowance for loan losses: $7,058 and $6,776) | 830,370 | 801,703 | ||||||
Other real estate owned | 667 | 719 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net | 18,197 | 16,401 | ||||||
Goodwill | 13,815 | 13,815 | ||||||
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization: $4,164 and $4,043) | 1,716 | 1,837 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 2,704 | 2,665 | ||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies | 14,462 | 14,381 | ||||||
Deferred taxes | 905 | 677 | ||||||
Other assets | 2,241 | 2,771 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,014,934 | $ | 986,984 | ||||
LIABILITIES and SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||
Demand (non-interest bearing) | $ | 220,796 | $ | 220,536 | ||||
Demand (interest bearing) | 146,312 | 142,575 | ||||||
Money market | 185,955 | 190,953 | ||||||
Savings and other | 155,630 | 144,600 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit | 123,144 | 116,831 | ||||||
Total deposits | 831,837 | 815,495 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements | 3,962 | 1,668 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances | 62,480 | 54,422 | ||||||
Subordinated debt | 9,817 | 9,811 | ||||||
Note payable | 305 | 313 | ||||||
Capital lease liability | 3,179 | 1,835 | ||||||
Accrued interest and other liabilities | 5,257 | 5,926 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 916,837 | 889,470 | ||||||
Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||
Common stock - $0.10 per share par value | ||||||||
Authorized: 5,000,000; | ||||||||
Issued: 2,872,578 and 2,872,578 | ||||||||
Outstanding: 2,786,566 and 2,785,216 | 279 | 279 | ||||||
Unearned compensation - restricted stock awards | (493 | ) | (606 | ) | ||||
Paid-in capital | 43,040 | 42,998 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 55,883 | 54,664 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net | (612 | ) | 179 | |||||
Total Shareholders' Equity | 98,097 | 97,514 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 1,014,934 | $ | 986,984 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3 |
Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, (in thousands except per share amounts) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Interest and dividend income | ||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 8,649 | $ | 8,221 | ||||
Interest on debt securities | ||||||||
Taxable | 460 | 317 | ||||||
Tax exempt | 32 | 164 | ||||||
Other interest and dividends | 159 | 83 | ||||||
Total interest and dividend income | 9,300 | 8,785 | ||||||
Interest expense | ||||||||
Deposits | 777 | 515 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Capital lease | 35 | 17 | ||||||
Note payable | 5 | 2 | ||||||
Subordinated debt | 156 | 156 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances | 332 | 262 | ||||||
Total interest expense | 1,306 | 953 | ||||||
Net interest and dividend income | 7,994 | 7,832 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 326 | 352 | ||||||
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses | 7,668 | 7,480 | ||||||
Non-interest income | ||||||||
Trust and wealth advisory | 894 | 854 | ||||||
Service charges and fees | 868 | 962 | ||||||
Gains on sales of mortgage loans, net | 18 | 49 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing, net | 83 | 45 | ||||||
Losses on CRA mutual fund | (13 | ) | — | |||||
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net | (2 | ) | — | |||||
Other | 126 | 113 | ||||||
Total non-interest income | 1,974 | 2,023 | ||||||
Non-interest expense | ||||||||
Salaries | 2,846 | 2,769 | ||||||
Employee benefits | 1,159 | 1,088 | ||||||
Premises and equipment | 1,024 | 895 | ||||||
Data processing | 486 | 472 | ||||||
Professional fees | 619 | 717 | ||||||
OREO gains, losses and write-downs | 52 | 144 | ||||||
Collections and other real estate owned | 82 | 157 | ||||||
FDIC insurance | 130 | 149 | ||||||
Marketing and community support | 242 | 251 | ||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangibles | 120 | 126 | ||||||
Other | 422 | 538 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense | 7,182 | 7,306 | ||||||
Income before income taxes | 2,460 | 2,197 | ||||||
Income tax provision | 445 | 593 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 2,015 | $ | 1,604 | ||||
Net income allocated to common stock | $ | 1,995 | $ | 1,594 | ||||
Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.58 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding, to calculate basic earnings per share | 2,759 | 2,749 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.58 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding, to calculate diluted earnings per share | 2,780 | 2,768 | ||||||
Common dividends per share | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.28 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4 |
Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, (in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 2,015 | $ | 1,604 | ||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income | ||||||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale | (1,019 | ) | 16 | |||||
Reclassification of net realized (losses) gains in net income(1) | 2 | — | ||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale | (1,017 | ) | 16 | |||||
Income tax benefit (expense) | 210 | (6 | ) | |||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale, net of tax | (807 | ) | 10 | |||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 1,208 | $ | 1,614 |
(1) Reclassification adjustments include realized security gains and losses. The gains and losses have been reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and have affected certain lines in the consolidated statements of income as follows: The pre-tax amount is reflected as gains on sales and calls of available-for-sale securities, net, the tax effect is included in the income tax provision and the after tax amount is included in net income.
Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (unaudited)
(dollars in thousands) | Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Unearned compensation restricted stock | Accumulated other comp- rehensive | Total shareholders' | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | capital | earnings | awards | income | equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2016 | 2,758,086 | $ | 276 | $ | 42,085 | $ | 51,521 | $ | (352 | ) | $ | 477 | $ | 94,007 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 1,604 | — | — | 1,604 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends declared | — | — | — | (774 | ) | — | — | (774 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 12,150 | 1 | 312 | — | — | — | 313 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock awards | (200 | ) | — | (3 | ) | — | 3 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation-restricted stock awards | — | — | — | — | 61 | — | 61 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at March 31, 2017 | 2,770,036 | $ | 277 | $ | 42,394 | $ | 52,351 | $ | (288 | ) | $ | 487 | $ | 95,221 | ||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2017 | 2,785,216 | $ | 279 | $ | 42,998 | $ | 54,664 | $ | (606 | ) | $ | 179 | $ | 97,514 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 2,015 | — | — | 2,015 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of ASU 2016-01 | — | — | — | (16 | ) | — | 16 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | (807 | ) | (807 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends declared | — | — | — | (780 | ) | — | — | (780 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 1,350 | — | 42 | — | — | — | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation-restricted stock awards | — | — | — | — | 113 | — | 113 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at March 31, 2018 | 2,786,566 | $ | 279 | $ | 43,040 | $ | 55,883 | $ | (493 | ) | $ | (612 | ) | $ | 98,097 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5 |
Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, (in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,015 | $ | 1,604 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
(Accretion), amortization and depreciation: | ||||||||
Securities | 19 | 42 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment | 371 | 327 | ||||||
Core deposit intangible | 121 | 126 | ||||||
Modification fees on Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances | 58 | 57 | ||||||
Subordinated debt issuance costs | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 11 | 68 | ||||||
Fair value adjustment on loans | (285 | ) | (495 | ) | ||||
Fair value adjustment on deposits | (11 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
(Gains) and losses, including write-downs | ||||||||
Loss on CRA mutual fund | 13 | — | ||||||
Loss on securities available-for-sale, net | 2 | — | ||||||
Gain on sales of loans, excluding capitalized servicing rights | (10 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||
Write-downs of other real estate owned | 52 | 144 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 326 | 352 | ||||||
Proceeds from loans sold | 679 | 1,881 | ||||||
Loans originated for sale | — | (1,898 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in deferred loan origination fees and costs, net | (92 | ) | 152 | |||||
Mortgage servicing rights originated | (6 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Increase in mortgage servicing rights impairment reserve | — | 2 | ||||||
Increase in interest receivable | (39 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax benefit | (18 | ) | — | |||||
Increase in prepaid expenses | (170 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies | (81 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||
Decrease in income tax receivable | 625 | 293 | ||||||
Decrease in other assets | 70 | 813 | ||||||
Decrease in accrued expenses | (821 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||
Increase in interest payable | 208 | 149 | ||||||
Decrease in other liabilities | (56 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||
Stock based compensation-restricted stock awards | 113 | 61 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,100 | 3,041 | ||||||
Investing Activities | ||||||||
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock | (333 | ) | (299 | ) | ||||
Purchases of securities available-for-sale | (7,999 | ) | (5,016 | ) | ||||
Reinvestment of CRA mutual fund | (4 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from calls of securities available-for-sale | 500 | 2,990 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale | 4,767 | 4,774 | ||||||
Loan originations and principal collections, net | (28,630 | ) | (1,777 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off | 14 | 83 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (794 | ) | (503 | ) | ||||
Net cash (utilized) provided by investing activities | (32,479 | ) | 252 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6 |
Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited) (Continued)
Three months ended March 31, (in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Financing Activities | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deposit transaction accounts, net | 10,029 | (6,920 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in time deposits, net | 6,324 | (2,410 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase, net | 2,294 | (3,185 | ) | |||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances | 35,000 | 15,500 | ||||||
Principal payments on Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances | (27,000 | ) | — | |||||
Principal payments on note payable | (8 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Decrease in capital lease obligation | (29 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Stock options exercised | 42 | 313 | ||||||
Common stock dividends paid | (780 | ) | (774 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 25,872 | 2,514 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (3,507 | ) | 5,807 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 48,486 | 35,485 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 44,979 | $ | 41,292 | ||||
Cash paid (received) during period | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 1,045 | $ | 765 | ||||
Income taxes | (162 | ) | 300 | |||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities | ||||||||
Capital lease obligation | 1,373 | — | ||||||
Transfer from loans to other real estate owned | — | 204 | ||||||
Adoption of ASU 2016-01 | 16 | — |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7 |
Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The interim (unaudited) consolidated financial statements of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. ("Salisbury") include those of Salisbury and its wholly owned subsidiary, Salisbury Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank"). In the opinion of management, the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of Salisbury and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the interim periods presented.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make extensive use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statement of condition, and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, expected cash flows from loans acquired in a business combination, other-than-temporary impairment of securities and impairment of goodwill and intangibles.
Certain financial information, which is normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but which is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted. Operating results for the interim period ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018. The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Salisbury's 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The allowance for loan losses is a significant accounting policy and is presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which provides information on how significant assets are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses to be the accounting area that requires the most subjective judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements Issued
In May 2014, August 2015, May 2016, and December 2016, respectively, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, 2015-14, 2016-12, and 2016-20, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to clarify principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Since the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other GAAP, the new guidance did not have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with financial instruments, including interest income and expense. The Bank completed its overall assessment of revenue streams and review of related contracts potentially affected by the ASU, including trust and asset management fees, deposit related fees, interchange fees, and merchant income. Salisbury’s revenue recognition policies conformed to Topic 606. As a result, no changes were required to prior period financial statements due to the adoption of this ASU and no changes in revenue recognition were required in the three month period ending March 31, 2018.
8 |
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – overall (subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." This ASU addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments by making targeted improvements to GAAP as follows: (1) require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer; (2) simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value; (3) eliminate the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (4) eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (5) require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (6) require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (7) require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (8) clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on Salisbury’s financial statements. In accordance with (1) above, the Bank now presents its investments in equity securities separate from available-for-sale securities on the balance sheet with changes in fair value recognized in the statement of income ($13 thousand loss for the three month period ended March 31, 2018). In accordance with (5) above, Salisbury measured the fair value of its loan portfolio as of March 31, 2018 using an exit price notion (see note 10 Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities).
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)”. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases): 1) a lease liability, which is the present value of a lessee's obligation to make lease payments, and 2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Lessor accounting under the new guidance remains largely unchanged as it is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. Leveraged leases have been eliminated, although lessors can continue to account for existing leveraged leases using the current accounting guidance. Other limited changes were made to align lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and the new revenue recognition standard. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures will be required by lessees and lessors to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The intention is to require enough information to supplement the amounts recorded in the financial statements so that users can understand more about the nature of an entity’s leasing activities. ASU 2016-02 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. All entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. They have the option to use certain relief; full retrospective application is prohibited. Salisbury does not expect ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
9 |
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” This ASU includes provisions intended to simplify various aspects related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. Some of the key provisions of this new ASU include: (1) companies will no longer record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement, and APIC pools will be eliminated. The guidance also eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies can recognize them. In addition, the guidance requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity; (2) increase the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. The new guidance will also require an employer to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on its statement of cash flows (current guidance did not specify how these cash flows should be classified); and (3) permit companies to make an accounting policy election for the impact of forfeitures on the recognition of expense for share-based payment awards. Forfeitures can be estimated, as required today, or recognized when they occur. Salisbury has opted to recognize forfeitures as they occur as the impact is not expected to be material. Salisbury adopted ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017. Adoption contributed a $105 thousand benefit to the tax provision in the second quarter 2017 and did not have a material effect on the financial results for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2017.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which adds a new Topic 326 to the Codification and removes the thresholds that companies apply to measure credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost, such as loans, receivables, and held-to-maturity debt securities. Under current U.S. GAAP, companies generally recognize credit losses when it is probable that the loss has been incurred. The revised guidance will remove all recognition thresholds and will require companies to recognize an allowance for credit losses for the difference between the amortized cost basis of a financial instrument and the amount of amortized cost that the company expects to collect over the instrument’s contractual life. ASU 2016-13 also amends the credit loss measurement guidance for available-for-sale debt securities and beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The guidance in ASU 2016-13 is effective for “public business entities,” as defined, that are SEC filers for fiscal years and for interim periods with those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Salisbury is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-13 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." This ASU is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how eight particular transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. Entities are required to apply the guidance retrospectively. If it is impracticable to apply the guidance retrospectively for an issue, the amendments related to that issue would be applied prospectively. Salisbury adopted ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018. ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business." This ASU is intended to add guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this update provide a screen to determine when a set of inputs, processes, and outputs is not a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for transactions for which the acquisition date occurs before the issuance date or effective date of the amendments, only when the transaction has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance, or for transactions in which a subsidiary is deconsolidated or a group of assets is derecognized that occur before the issuance date or effective date of the amendments, only when the transaction has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. Entities should apply the guidance prospectively on or after the effective date. Salisbury adopted ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2018. ASU 2017-01 did not impact Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
10 |
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” This ASU is intended to allow companies to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The FASB is researching whether similar amendments should be considered for other entities, including public business entities. ASU 2017-04 is effective for public business entities that are SEC filers for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Entities should apply the guidance prospectively. Salisbury is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2017-04 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.” This ASU will amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The Board is shortening the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. Under current generally accepted accounting principles, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. ASU 2017-08 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. Entities should apply the guidance on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Salisbury is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2017-08 and does not expect that the adoption of the new standard will have a material impact on Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” This ASU provides clarity in the accounting guidance regarding a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. ASU 2017-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Entities should apply the guidance prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. Salisbury adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018. ASU 2017-09 did not impact Salisbury’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
11 |
NOTE 2 - SECURITIES
The composition of securities is as follows:
(in thousands) | Amortized cost basis (1) | Gross un- realized gains | Gross un- realized losses | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | $ | 2,972 | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | 2,978 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government- sponsored enterprises | 44,315 | 65 | 643 | 43,737 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies | 10,160 | 10 | 288 | 9,882 | ||||||||||||
Non-agency | 1,714 | 365 | 13 | 2,066 | ||||||||||||
SBA bonds | 18,020 | — | 256 | 17,764 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 3,500 | 58 | 79 | 3,479 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale | $ | 80,681 | $ | 504 | $ | 1,279 | $ | 79,906 | ||||||||
CRA mutual fund | $ | 826 | — | — | 826 | |||||||||||
Non-marketable securities | ||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock | $ | 4,146 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,146 | ||||||||
(in thousands) | Amortized cost basis (1) | Gross un- realized gains | Gross un- realized losses | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | $ | 3,476 | $ | 11 | $ | 1 | $ | 3,486 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government- sponsored enterprises | 45,983 | 152 | 267 | 45,868 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies | 10,462 | 2 | 87 | 10,377 | ||||||||||||
Non-agency | 2,271 | 410 | 17 | 2,664 | ||||||||||||
SBA bonds | 12,278 | 9 | 20 | 12,267 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 3,500 | 59 | 9 | 3,550 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale | $ | 77,970 | $ | 643 | $ | 401 | $ | 78,212 | ||||||||
CRA mutual fund | $ | 835 | — | — | 835 | |||||||||||
Non-marketable securities | ||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock | $ | 3,813 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,813 |
(1) | Net of other-than-temporary impairment write-downs recognized in earnings. |
Salisbury did not sell any available-for-sale securities during the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017.
12 |
The following table summarizes, for all available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position, including debt securities for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) has been recognized in other comprehensive loss, the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss of securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of the date presented:
March 31, 2018 (in thousands) | Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value | Unrealized losses | Fair value | Unrealized losses | Fair value | Unrealized losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | 22,537 | $ | 303 | $ | 16,091 | $ | 340 | $ | 38,628 | $ | 643 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agencies | 8,860 | 288 | — | — | 8,860 | 288 | ||||||||||||||||||
SBA bonds | 15,652 | 256 | — | — | 15,652 | 256 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 1,421 | 79 | — | — | 1,421 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total -temporarily impaired securities | $ | 48,470 | $ | 926 | $ | 16,091 | $ | 340 | $ | 64,561 | $ | 1,266 | ||||||||||||
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency | 93 | 13 | — | — | 93 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired and other-than-temporarily impaired securities | $ | 48,563 | $ | 939 | $ | 16,091 | $ | 340 | $ | 64,654 | $ | 1,279 |
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 (in thousands) | Fair value | Unrealized losses | Fair value | Unrealized losses | Fair value | Unrealized losses | ||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | $ | 479 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 479 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 15,914 | 99 | 17,892 | 168 | 33,806 | 267 | ||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agencies | 9,317 | 87 | — | — | 9,317 | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency | — | — | 77 | 3 | 77 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
SBA bonds | 8,519 | 20 | — | — | 8,519 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds | 1,491 | 9 | — | — | 1,491 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities | 35,720 | 216 | 17,969 | 171 | 53,689 | 387 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency | 101 | 14 | — | — | 101 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired and other-than-temporarily impaired securities | $ | 35,821 | $ | 230 | $ | 17,969 | $ | 171 | $ | 53,790 | $ | 401 |
13 |
The amortized cost, fair value and tax equivalent yield of securities, by maturity, are as follows:
March 31, 2018 (in thousands) | Maturity | Amortized cost | Fair value | Yield(1) | ||||||||||
Municipal bonds | Within 1 year | $ | 529 | $ | 530 | 5.01 | % | |||||||
After 1 year but within 5 years | 259 | 260 | 3.84 | |||||||||||
After 10 years but within 15 years | 2,184 | 2,188 | 6.09 | |||||||||||
After 15 years | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Total | 2,972 | 2,978 | 5.70 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises | 44,315 | 43,737 | 2.38 | ||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | U.S. Government agency and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises | 10,160 | 9,882 | 2.80 | ||||||||||
Non-agency | 1,714 | 2,066 | 3.58 | |||||||||||
SBA bonds | 18,020 | 17,764 | 3.00 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds | After 5 years but within 10 years | 3,500 | 3,479 | 5.57 | ||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale | $ | 80,681 | $ | 79,906 | 2.85 | % |
(1) Yield is based on amortized cost.
Salisbury evaluates securities for OTTI where the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. As part of this process, Salisbury considers whether it has the intent to sell each debt security and whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, Salisbury recognizes an OTTI charge to earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. For securities that meet neither of these conditions, an analysis is performed to determine if any of these securities are at risk for OTTI.
The following summarizes, by security type, the basis for evaluating if the applicable securities were OTTI at March 31, 2018.
U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations: The contractual cash flows are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. Forty-three securities had unrealized losses at March 31, 2018, which approximated 1.95% of their amortized cost. Changes in fair values are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest rate movements and not changes in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Furthermore, Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in these securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Therefore, management does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2018.
SBA bonds: The contractual cash flows are guaranteed by the U.S. government. Eleven securities had unrealized losses at March 31, 2018, which approximated 1.61% of their amortized cost. Changes in fair values are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest rate movements and not changes in credit quality since time of purchase. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Furthermore, Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in these securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Management evaluated the impairment status of these debt securities, and concluded that the gross unrealized losses were temporary in nature. Therefore, management does not consider these investments to be other-than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2018.
Corporate bonds: Salisbury regularly monitors and analyzes its corporate bond portfolio for credit quality. Two securities had unrealized losses at March 31, 2018, which approximated 5.24% of their amortized cost. Management believes the unrealized loss position is attributable to interest rate and spread movements and not changes in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Furthermore, Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and may reduce its position in these securities, although it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be maturity, and does not intend to sell these securities. Management evaluated the impairment status of these debt securities, and concluded that the gross unrealized losses were temporary in nature. Therefore management does not consider these investments to be other-than temporarily impaired at March 31, 2018.
14 |
Non-agency CMOs: Salisbury performed a detailed cash flow analysis of its non-agency CMOs at March 31, 2018, to assess whether any of the securities were OTTI. One security had unrealized losses at March 31, 2018, which approximated 12.16% of its amortized cost. Salisbury uses cash flow forecasts for each security based on a variety of market driven assumptions and securitization terms, including prepayment speed, default or delinquency rate, and default severity for losses including interest, legal fees, property repairs, expenses and realtor fees, that, together with the loan amount are subtracted from collateral sales proceeds to determine severity. In 2009, Salisbury determined that five non-agency CMO securities reflected OTTI and recognized losses for deterioration in credit quality of $1,128,000. Salisbury judged the other non-agency CMO securities not to have additional OTTI and all other CMO securities not to be OTTI as of March 31, 2018. It is possible that future loss assumptions could change necessitating Salisbury to recognize future OTTI for further deterioration in credit quality. Salisbury evaluates these securities for strategic fit and depending upon such factor could reduce its position in these securities, although it has no present intention to do so, and it is not more likely than not that Salisbury will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis.
The following table presents activity related to credit losses recognized into earnings on the non-agency CMOs held by Salisbury for which a portion of an OTTI charge was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income:
Three months ended March 31 (in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 1,128 | $ | 1,128 | ||||
Credit component on debt securities in which OTTI was not previously recognized | — | — | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 1,128 | $ | 1,128 |
The Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLBB) is a cooperative that provides services, including funding in the form of advances, to its member banking institutions. As a requirement of membership, the Bank must own a minimum amount of FHLBB stock, calculated periodically based primarily on its level of borrowings from the FHLBB. No market exists for shares of the FHLBB and therefore, they are carried at par value. FHLBB stock may be redeemed at par value five years following termination of FHLBB membership, subject to limitations which may be imposed by the FHLBB or its regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Board, to maintain capital adequacy of the FHLBB. While the Bank currently has no intentions to terminate its FHLBB membership, the ability to redeem its investment in FHLBB stock would be subject to the conditions imposed by the FHLBB. Based on the capital adequacy and the liquidity position of the FHLBB, management believes there is no impairment related to the carrying amount of the Bank’s FHLBB stock as of March 31, 2018. Deterioration of the FHLBB’s capital levels may require the Bank to deem its restricted investment in FHLBB stock to be OTTI. If evidence of impairment exists in the future, the FHLBB stock would reflect fair value using either observable or unobservable inputs. The Bank will continue to monitor its investment in FHLBB stock.
15 |
NOTE 3 – LOANS
The composition of loans receivable and loans held-for-sale is as follows:
March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | |||||||
(In thousands) | Total Loans | Total Loans | ||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 323,425 | $ | 317,639 | ||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 23,557 | 18,108 | ||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 11,451 | 11,197 | ||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 33,162 | 33,771 | ||||||
Residential real estate | 391,595 | 380,715 | ||||||
Commercial | 261,600 | 249,311 | ||||||
Construction of commercial | 10,737 | 9,988 | ||||||
Commercial real estate | 272,337 | 259,299 | ||||||
Farm land | 4,366 | 4,274 | ||||||
Vacant land | 7,945 | 7,883 | ||||||
Real estate secured | 676,243 | 652,171 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial | 137,291 | 132,731 | ||||||
Municipal | 17,994 | 17,494 | ||||||
Consumer | 4,519 | 4,794 | ||||||
Loans receivable, gross | 836,047 | 807,190 | ||||||
Deferred loan origination fees and costs, net | 1,381 | 1,289 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (7,058 | ) | (6,776 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net | $ | 830,370 | $ | 801,703 | ||||
Loans held-for-sale | ||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | — | $ | 669 |
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Salisbury's loans consist primarily of residential and commercial real estate loans located principally in Litchfield County, Connecticut, Dutchess, Ulster and Orange Counties, New York and Berkshire County, Massachusetts, which constitute Salisbury's service area. Salisbury offers a broad range of loan and credit facilities to borrowers in its service area, including residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, working capital loans, equipment loans, and a variety of consumer loans, including home equity lines of credit, installment loans and collateral loans. All residential and commercial mortgage loans are collateralized by first or second mortgages on real estate. The ability of single family residential and consumer borrowers to honor their repayment commitments is generally dependent on the level of overall economic activity within the market area and real estate values. The ability of commercial borrowers to honor their repayment commitments is dependent on the general economy as well as the health of the real estate economic sector in Salisbury’s market area.
Credit Quality
Salisbury uses credit risk ratings as part of its determination of the allowance for loan losses. Credit risk ratings categorize loans by common financial and structural characteristics that measure the credit strength of a borrower. The rating model has eight risk rating grades, with each grade corresponding to a progressively greater risk of default. Grades 1 through 4 are pass ratings and 5 through 8 are criticized as defined by the regulatory agencies. Risk ratings are assigned to differentiate risk within the portfolio and are reviewed on an ongoing basis and revised, if needed, to reflect changes in the borrowers' current financial position and outlook, risk profiles and the related collateral and structural positions.
Loans rated as "special mention" possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention that if left uncorrected may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loans at some future date.
Loans rated as "substandard" are loans where the Bank’s position is clearly not protected adequately by borrower current net worth or payment capacity. These loans have well defined weaknesses based on objective evidence and include loans where future losses to the Bank may result if deficiencies are not corrected, and loans where the primary source of repayment such as income is diminished and the Bank must rely on sale of collateral or other secondary sources of collection.
16 |
Loans rated "doubtful" have the same weaknesses as substandard loans with the added characteristic that the weakness makes collection or liquidation in full, given current facts, conditions, and values, to be highly improbable. The possibility of loss is high, but due to certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to strengthen the loan, its reclassification as an estimated loss is deferred until its exact status can be determined.
Loans classified as "loss" are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as Bank assets is unwarranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may be made in the future.
Management actively reviews and tests its credit risk ratings against actual experience and engages an independent third-party to annually validate its assignment of credit risk ratings. In addition, the Bank’s loan portfolio is examined periodically by its regulatory agencies, the FDIC and the Connecticut Department of Banking.
The composition of loans receivable by risk rating grade is as follows:
(in thousands) | Pass | Special mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 313,049 | $ | 5,956 | $ | 4,420 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 323,425 | ||||||||||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 21,610 | 933 | 1,014 | — | — | 23,557 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 11,451 | — | — | — | — | 11,451 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 32,298 | 339 | 525 | — | — | 33,162 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 378,408 | 7,228 | 5,959 | — | — | 391,595 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 246,598 | 4,257 | 10,745 | — | — | 261,600 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | 10,373 | — | 364 | — | — | 10,737 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 256,971 | 4,257 | 11,109 | — | — | 272,337 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | 4,125 | — | 241 | — | — | 4,366 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 7,870 | 75 | — | — | — | 7,945 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 647,374 | 11,560 | 17,309 | — | — | 676,243 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 134,025 | 2,525 | 741 | — | — | 137,291 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal | 17,994 | — | — | — | — | 17,994 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 4,486 | 33 | — | — | — | 4,519 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, gross | $ | 803,879 | $ | 14,118 | $ | 18,050 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 836,047 |
(in thousands) | Pass | Special mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 307,240 | $ | 6,452 | $ | 3,947 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 317,639 | ||||||||||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 16,129 | 957 | 1,022 | — | — | 18,108 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 11,197 | — | — | — | — | 11,197 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 32,891 | 710 | 170 | — | — | 33,771 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 367,457 | 8,119 | 5,139 | — | — | 380,715 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 232,492 | 4,456 | 12,363 | — | — | 249,311 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | 9,622 | — | 366 | — | — | 9,988 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 242,114 | 4,456 | 12,729 | — | — | 259,299 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | 4,024 | — | 250 | — | — | 4,274 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 7,806 | 77 | — | — | — | 7,883 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 621,401 | 12,652 | 18,118 | — | — | 652,171 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 129,219 | 2,536 | 976 | — | — | 132,731 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal | 17,494 | — | — | — | — | 17,494 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 4,744 | 50 | — | — | — | 4,794 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, gross | $ | 772,858 | $ | 15,238 | $ | 19,094 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 807,190 |
17 |
The composition of loans receivable by delinquency status is as follows:
Past due | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180 | 30 | Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | days | days | 90 days | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 | 60-89 | 90-179 | and | and | and | Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | days | days | days | over | over | over | accrual | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 320,999 | $ | 622 | $ | 716 | $ | — | $ | 1,088 | $ | 2,426 | $ | — | $ | 2,001 | ||||||||||||||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 23,557 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 11,451 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 33,015 | 71 | 42 | 34 | — | 147 | 34 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 389,022 | 693 | 758 | 34 | 1,088 | 2,573 | 34 | 2,211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 257,734 | 1,434 | 548 | 1,088 | 796 | 3,866 | — | 1,884 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | 10,480 | — | — | — | 257 | 257 | — | 257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 268,214 | 1,434 | 548 | 1,088 | 1,053 | 4,123 | — | 2,141 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | 4,366 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 7,945 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 669,547 | 2,127 | 1,306 | 1,122 | 2,141 | 6,696 | 34 | 4,593 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 136,640 | 240 | 51 | — | 360 | 651 | — | 467 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal | 17,994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 4,513 | 6 | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, gross | $ | 828,694 | $ | 2,373 | $ | 1,357 | $ | 1,122 | $ | 2,501 | $ | 7,353 | $ | 34 | $ | 5,060 |
Past due | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
180 | 30 | Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | days | days | 90 days | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 | 60-89 | 90-179 | and | and | and | Non- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | days | days | days | over | over | over | accrual | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 314,798 | $ | 1,410 | $ | 165 | $ | 156 | $ | 1,110 | $ | 2,841 | $ | — | $ | 2,045 | ||||||||||||||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 18,108 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 11,197 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 33,219 | 75 | 477 | — | — | 552 | — | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 377,322 | 1,485 | 642 | 156 | 1,110 | 3,393 | — | 2,262 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 244,869 | 1,888 | 758 | — | 1,796 | 4,442 | — | 3,364 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | 9,730 | — | — | — | 258 | 258 | — | 258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 254,599 | 1,888 | 758 | — | 2,054 | 4,700 | — | 3,622 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | 4,032 | 242 | — | — | — | 242 | — | 250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 7,883 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 643,836 | 3,615 | 1,400 | 156 | 3,164 | 8,335 | — | 6,134 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 131,991 | 131 | 218 | 391 | — | 740 | 31 | 470 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal | 17,494 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 4,752 | 34 | 8 | — | — | 42 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans receivable, gross | $ | 798,073 | $ | 3,780 | $ | 1,626 | $ | 547 | $ | 3,164 | $ | 9,117 | $ | 31 | $ | 6,604 |
There were no troubled debt restructurings in the first quarter of 2018 or 2017.
18 |
Allowance for Loan Losses
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows:
Three months ended March 31, 2018 | Three months ended March 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Beginning balance | Provision | Charge- offs | Reco- veries | Ending balance | Beginning balance | Provision | Charge- offs | Reco- veries | Ending balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 1,862 | $ | 129 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 1,982 | $ | 1,925 | $ | 107 | $ | (43 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 1,990 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 155 | 61 | — | — | 216 | 62 | 22 | — | — | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 75 | (1 | ) | — | — | 74 | 91 | (14 | ) | — | — | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 236 | (3 | ) | — | — | 233 | 348 | (19 | ) | — | 1 | 330 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2,328 | 186 | (10 | ) | 1 | 2,505 | 2,426 | 96 | (43 | ) | 2 | 2,481 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,547 | 119 | — | — | 2,666 | 1,919 | 230 | (188 | ) | 28 | 1,989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | 80 | 13 | — | — | 93 | 38 | (5 | ) | — | — | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 2,627 | 132 | — | — | 2,759 | 1,957 | 225 | (188 | ) | 28 | 2,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | 32 | 1 | — | — | 33 | 28 | 26 | (15 | ) | — | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 131 | — | — | — | 131 | 170 | (20 | ) | — | — | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 5,118 | 319 | (10 | ) | 1 | 5,428 | 4,581 | 327 | (246 | ) | 30 | 4,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 984 | (42 | ) | (9 | ) | 5 | 938 | 1,080 | (208 | ) | (1 | ) | 45 | 916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Municipal | 30 | — | — | — | 30 | 53 | 1 | — | — | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 81 | 12 | (40 | ) | 8 | 61 | 76 | 39 | (30 | ) | 8 | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated | 563 | 38 | — | — | 601 | 337 | 193 | — | — | 530 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 6,776 | $ | 327 | $ | (59 | ) | $ | 14 | $ | 7,058 | $ | 6,127 | $ | 352 | $ | (277 | ) | $ | 83 | $ | 6,285 |
The composition of loans receivable and the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
(in thousands) | Collectively evaluated 1 | Individually evaluated | Total portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 318,121 | $ | 1,820 | $ | 5,304 | $ | 162 | $ | 323,425 | $ | 1,982 | ||||||||||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 21,868 | 216 | 1,689 | — | 23,557 | 216 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 11,451 | 74 | — | — | 11,451 | 74 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 33,051 | 232 | 111 | 1 | 33,162 | 233 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 384,491 | 2,343 | 7,104 | 163 | 391,595 | 2,505 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 257,398 | 2,566 | 4,202 | 100 | 261,600 | 2,666 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | 10,373 | 93 | 364 | — | 10,737 | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 267,771 | 2,659 | 4,566 | 100 | 272,337 | 2,759 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | 4,125 | 33 | 241 | — | 4,366 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 7,748 | 128 | 197 | 3 | 7,945 | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 664,135 | 5,162 | 12,108 | 266 | 676,243 | 5,428 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 136,778 | 931 | 513 | 7 | 137,291 | 938 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal | 17,994 | 30 | — | — | 17,994 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 4,519 | 61 | — | — | 4,519 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated allowance | — | 601 | — | — | — | 601 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 823,426 | $ | 6,785 | $ | 12,621 | $ | 273 | $ | 836,047 | $ | 7,058 |
19 |
(in thousands) | Collectively evaluated 1 | Individually evaluated | Total portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1-4 family | $ | 312,456 | $ | 1,759 | $ | 5,183 | $ | 103 | $ | 317,639 | $ | 1,862 | ||||||||||||
Residential 5+ multifamily | 16,361 | 154 | 1,747 | 1 | 18,108 | 155 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of residential 1-4 family | 11,197 | 75 | — | — | 11,197 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 33,658 | 235 | 113 | 1 | 33,771 | 236 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 373,672 | 2,223 | 7,043 | 105 | 380,715 | 2,328 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 243,602 | 2,432 | 5,709 | 115 | 249,311 | 2,547 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | 9,622 | 80 | 366 | — | 9,988 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 253,224 | 2,512 | 6,075 | 115 | 259,299 | 2,627 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | 4,024 | 32 | 250 | — | 4,274 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 7,684 | 129 | 199 | 3 | 7,883 | 132 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 638,604 | 4,896 | 13,567 | 223 | 652,171 | 5,119 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 132,212 | 952 | 519 | 32 | 132,731 | 984 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal | 17,494 | 30 | — | — | 17,494 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 4,794 | 80 | — | — | 4,794 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated allowance | — | 563 | — | — | — | 563 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 793,104 | $ | 6,521 | $ | 14,086 | $ | 255 | $ | 807,190 | $ | 6,776 |
1 Includes amounts reflecting ASC 310-30 accounting for purchased loans with deteriorated credit quality with respect to deterioration in credit quality that occurs subsequent to origination and which makes it probable that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments from the borrower. ASC 310-30 loans and allowance of $2.3 million and $71,000, respectively for March 31, 2018 and $2.4 million and $92,000, respectively for December 31, 2017.
The credit quality segments of loans receivable and the allowance for loan losses are as follows:
March 31, 2018 (in thousands) | Collectively evaluated | Individually evaluated | Total portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||||
Performing loans | $ | 813,011 | $ | 5,943 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 813,011 | $ | 5,943 | ||||||||||||
Potential problem loans 1 | 10,415 | 241 | — | — | 10,415 | 241 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans | — | — | 12,621 | 273 | 12,621 | 273 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated allowance | — | 601 | — | — | — | 601 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 823,426 | $ | 6,785 | $ | 12,621 | $ | 273 | $ | 836,047 | $ | 7,058 |
December 31, 2017 (in thousands) | Collectively evaluated | Individually evaluated | Total portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||||
Performing loans | $ | 783,206 | $ | 5,619 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 783,206 | $ | 5,619 | ||||||||||||
Potential problem loans 1 | 9,898 | 339 | — | — | 9,898 | 339 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans | — | — | 14,086 | 255 | 14,086 | 255 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated allowance | — | 563 | — | — | — | 563 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 793,104 | $ | 6,521 | $ | 14,086 | $ | 255 | $ | 807,190 | $ | 6,776 |
1 Potential problem loans consist of performing loans that have been assigned a substandard credit risk rating and are not classified as impaired.
20 |
A specific valuation allowance is established for the impairment amount of each impaired loan, calculated using the fair value of expected cash flows or collateral, in accordance with the most likely means of recovery. Certain data with respect to loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows as of and for the three months ended:
Impaired loans with specific allowance | Impaired loans with no specific allowance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Loan balance | Specific | Income | Loan balance | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book | Note | Average | allowance | recognized | Book | Note | Average | recognized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | $ | 4,724 | $ | 5,008 | $ | 3,884 | $ | 162 | $ | 30 | $ | 2,270 | $ | 3,020 | $ | 3,015 | $ | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 47 | 47 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 63 | 116 | 64 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 4,771 | 5,055 | 3,931 | 163 | 31 | 2,333 | 3,136 | 3,079 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,847 | 2,080 | 2,258 | 100 | 40 | 2,355 | 3,447 | 3,138 | 47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | — | — | 27 | — | — | 364 | 386 | 338 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | — | — | — | — | — | 241 | 447 | 244 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 44 | 44 | 44 | 3 | 1 | 153 | 176 | 154 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 6,662 | 7,179 | 6,260 | 266 | 72 | 5,446 | 7,592 | 6,953 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 106 | 115 | 108 | 7 | — | 407 | 498 | 408 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 6,768 | $ | 7,294 | $ | 6,368 | $ | 273 | $ | 72 | $ | 5,853 | $ | 8,095 | $ | 7,361 | $ | 81 |
Impaired loans with specific allowance | Impaired loans with no specific allowance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Loan balance | Specific | Income | Loan balance | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book | Note | Average | allowance | recognized | Book | Note | Average | recognized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | $ | 3,450 | $ | 3,608 | $ | 3,493 | $ | 140 | $ | 34 | $ | 3,640 | $ | 3,965 | $ | 3,594 | $ | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit | 48 | 47 | 137 | 1 | 1 | 152 | 182 | 214 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 3,498 | 3,655 | 3,630 | 141 | 35 | 3,792 | 4,147 | 3,808 | 38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,022 | 2,415 | 3,712 | 222 | 40 | 3,761 | 4,838 | 2,868 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction of commercial | — | — | — | — | — | 371 | 392 | 372 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farm land | — | — | — | — | — | 994 | 1,153 | 976 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vacant land | 45 | 45 | 45 | 4 | 1 | 162 | 186 | 163 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate secured | 5,565 | 6,115 | 7,387 | 367 | 76 | 9,080 | 10,716 | 8,187 | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | — | — | — | — | — | 81 | 104 | 129 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 7 | 4 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 5,565 | $ | 6,115 | $ | 7,387 | $ | 367 | $ | 76 | $ | 9,165 | $ | 10,827 | $ | 8,320 | $ | 85 |
NOTE 4 - MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
(in thousands) | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others | $ | 116,096 | $ | 117,538 | ||||
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights | 1,048 | 1,010 |
Changes in mortgage servicing rights are as follows:
Three months ended March 31, (in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Mortgage Servicing Rights | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 233 | $ | 339 | ||||
Originated | 6 | 25 | ||||||
Amortization (1) | (11 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 228 | $ | 296 | ||||
Valuation Allowance | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | — | $ | (23 | ) | |||
Increase in impairment reserve (1) | — | (2 | ) | |||||
Balance, end of period | — | (25 | ) | |||||
Mortgage servicing rights, net | $ | 228 | $ | 271 |
(1) | Amortization expense and changes in the impairment reserve are recorded in mortgage servicing, net, in the consolidated statements of income. |
21 |
NOTE 5 - PLEDGED ASSETS
(in thousands) | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale (at fair value) | $ | 63,562 | $ | 67,377 | ||||
Loans receivable | 206,225 | 204,354 | ||||||
Total pledged assets | $ | 269,787 | $ | 271,731 |
At March 31, 2018, securities were pledged as follows: $59.3 million to secure public deposits, $4.2 million to secure repurchase agreements and $0.1 million to secure FHLBB advances. Additionally, loans receivable were pledged to secure FHLBB advances and credit facilities.
NOTE 6 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company defines unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends as participating securities that are included in computing earnings per share (EPS) using the two-class method.
The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each share of common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in Salisbury’s earnings.
The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share (basic and diluted) for the periods indicated:
Three months ended March 31, (in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 2,015 | $ | 1,604 | ||||
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities | (20 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Net income allocated to common stock | $ | 1,995 | $ | 1,594 | ||||
Weighted-average common shares issued | 2,786 | 2,765 | ||||||
Less: Unvested restricted stock awards | (27 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding used to calculate basic earnings per common share | 2,759 | 2,749 | ||||||
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options | 21 | 19 | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share | 2,780 | 2,768 | ||||||
Earnings per common share (basic) | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.58 | ||||
Earnings per common share (diluted) | $ | 0.72 | $ | 0.58 |
NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Capital Requirements
Salisbury and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional and discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Salisbury’s and the Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Salisbury and the Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Salisbury and the Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
22 |
In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries. On July 9, 2013, the FDIC also approved, as an interim final rule, the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, following the actions of the FRB. On April 8, 2014, the FDIC adopted as final its interim final rule, which is identical in substance to the final rules issued by the FRB in July 2013. Under the final rules, minimum requirements increased for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Bank and Company. The rules include a common equity Tier 1 capital risk-weighted assets minimum ratio of 4.5%, minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0%, require a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, and require a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%. A capital conservation buffer, comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital, is also established above the regulatory minimum capital requirements. The initial implementation of the capital conservation buffer began phasing in January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increases each subsequent January 1, by an additional 0.625% until reaching its final level of 2.5% on January 1, 2019. As of March 31, 2018, the Bank exceeded the fully phased in regulatory requirement for the capital conservation buffer. Strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments were also implemented under the final rules.
Actual regulatory capital position and minimum capital requirements as defined "To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions" and "For Capital Adequacy Purposes" for Salisbury and the Bank are as follows:
To be Well Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | $ | 100,870 | 12.70 | % | $ | 63,523 | 8.0 | % | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||
Bank | 97,862 | 12.32 | 63,523 | 8.0 | $ | 79,404 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | 83,708 | 10.54 | 47,643 | 6.0 | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank | 90,700 | 11.42 | 47,643 | 6.0 | 63,523 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | 83,708 | 10.54 | 35,732 | 4.5 | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank | 90,700 | 11.42 | 35,732 | 4.5 | 51,613 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | 83,708 | 8.56 | 39,125 | 4.0 | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank | 90,700 | 9.27 | 39,125 | 4.0 | 48,906 | 5.0 |
To be Well Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | For Capital Adequacy Purposes | Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | $ | 98,920 | 12.94 | % | $ | 61,154 | 8.0 | % | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||
Bank | 95,810 | 12.54 | 61,130 | 8.0 | $ | 76,413 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | 82,034 | 10.73 | 45,865 | 6.0 | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank | 88,924 | 11.64 | 45,848 | 6.0 | 61,130 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | 82,034 | 10.73 | 34,399 | 4.5 | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank | 88,924 | 11.64 | 34,386 | 4.5 | 49,668 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salisbury | 82,034 | 8.53 | 38,461 | 4.0 | n/a | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank | 88,924 | 9.25 | 38,461 | 4.0 | 48,076 | 5.0 |
23 |
Cash Dividends to Common Shareholders
Salisbury's ability to pay cash dividends is substantially dependent on the Bank's ability to pay cash dividends to Salisbury. There are certain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends and other payments by the Bank to Salisbury. Under Connecticut law, the Bank cannot declare a cash dividend except from net profits, defined as the remainder of all earnings from current operations. The total of all cash dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year shall not, unless specifically approved by the Banking Commissioner, exceed the total of its net profits of that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years.
FRB Supervisory Letter SR 09-4, February 24, 2009, revised March 30, 2009, notes that, as a general matter, the Board of Directors of a Bank Holding Company (“BHC”) should inform the Federal Reserve and should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce dividends if (1) net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (2) the prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (3) the BHC will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. Moreover, a BHC should inform the Federal Reserve reasonably in advance of declaring or paying a dividend that exceeds earnings for the period (e.g., quarter) for which the dividend is being paid or that could result in a material adverse change to the BHC capital structure.
NOTE 8 –BENEFITS
Salisbury’s 401(k) Plan expense was $282 thousand and $285 thousand, respectively, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. Other post-retirement benefit obligation expense for endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements was $26 thousand and $18 thousand for the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
ESOP
Salisbury offers an ESOP to eligible employees. Under the Plan, Salisbury may make discretionary contributions to the Plan, which generally vests in full upon six years of qualified service. Salisbury’s ESOP expense was $60 thousand and $34 thousand, respectively, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
Other Retirement Plans
A Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") was adopted effective January 1, 2013. This Plan was adopted by the Bank for the benefit of certain key employees ("Executive" or "Executives") who have been selected and approved by the Bank to participate in this Plan and who have evidenced their participation by execution of a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Participation Agreement ("Participation Agreement") in a form provided by the Bank. This Plan is intended to comply with Internal Revenue Code ("Code") Section 409A and any regulatory or other guidance issued under such Section. Salisbury’s expense for this plan was $28 thousand and $21 thousand, respectively, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
On January 19, 2018, the Compensation Committee granted a total of 53,500 Phantom Stock Appreciation Units pursuant to the 2013 Phantom Stock Appreciation Unit and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), including 20,000 units to three Named Executive Officers. Mr. Cantele received 10,000 units, Mr. Davies received 5,000 units and Mr. Albero received 5,000 units. The units will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. Salisbury’s expense for all Phantom Stock Appreciation Units was $60 thousand and $43 thousand, respectively, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
Grants of Restricted Stock and Options
Restricted stock
Expense in first quarter 2018 and 2017 related to stock based compensation totaled $113 thousand and $61 thousand respectively. Unrecognized compensation cost relating to the awards as of March 31, 2018 and 2017 totaled $493 thousand and $288 thousand, respectively. Forfeitures in the first quarter 2018 and 2017 totaled 0 and 200 shares, respectively.
24 |
Options
Salisbury issued stock options in conjunction with its acquisition of Riverside Bank in 2014. In the first quarter 2018, 1,350 stock options were exercised at $31.11 per share by one former Riverside Bank executive. In the first quarter 2017, 12,150 stock options were exercised at $25.93 by former Riverside Bank executives.
NOTE 9 –ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income are as follows:
(in thousands) | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax | $ | (612 | ) | $ | 179 | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net | $ | (612 | ) | $ | 179 |
NOTE 10 – FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Salisbury uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, other assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, collateral dependent impaired loans, property acquired through foreclosure or repossession and mortgage servicing rights. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Salisbury adopted ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurement - Overall,” which provides a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with ASC 820-10, Salisbury groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. GAAP specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the types of valuation information (“inputs”) are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect Salisbury’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:
• | Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. |
• | Level 2. Significant other observable inputs. Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities. |
• | Level 3. Significant unobservable inputs. Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, are not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets and liabilities. |
Salisbury adopted ASC 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – overall (subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which requires the exit price to be used when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure. Salisbury estimated the fair value of its loan portfolio based on a loan-level assessment that incorporated probabilities of default by loan type and internal risk rating, product-level loss given defaults and prepayment rates as well as discount rates.
25 |
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Salisbury did not have any significant transfers of assets between levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the three month period ended March 31, 2018.
Assets measured at fair value are as follows:
Fair Value Measurements Using | Assets at | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | fair | ||||||||||||
value | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets at fair value on a recurring basis | ||||||||||||||||
Municipal bonds | $ | — | $ | 2,978 | $ | — | $ | 2,978 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises | — | 43,737 | — | 43,737 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies | — | 9,882 |