UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
☑ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 |
or
|
|
|
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 001-35435
Proto Labs, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
||
Minnesota |
|
41-1939628 |
||
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
||
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
||
|
|
|
||
5540 Pioneer Creek Drive |
|
|
||
Maple Plain, Minnesota |
|
55359 |
||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(763) 479-3680
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
____________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of June 28, 2013 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $1.1 billion.
As of February 21, 2014, there were 25,580,699 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference to Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Table of Contents | ||||
Page | ||||
PART I |
||||
Item 1. |
Business |
5 | ||
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
15 | ||
Item 1B. |
Unresolved Staff Comments |
29 | ||
Item 2. |
Properties |
29 | ||
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
30 | ||
Item 4. |
Mine Safety Disclosures |
30 | ||
PART II |
||||
Item 5. |
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
31 | ||
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
33 | ||
Item 7. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
37 | ||
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
51 | ||
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
52 | ||
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
77 | ||
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
77 | ||
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
77 | ||
PART III |
||||
Item 10. |
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
78 | ||
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
78 | ||
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
78 | ||
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence |
78 | ||
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
78 | ||
PART IV |
||||
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
79 | ||
Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding matters that are not historical or current facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the following words: “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue,” “ongoing” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our results to be materially different than those expressed or implied in such statements. In particular, some of the risks associated with our business include:
|
• |
|
the level of competition in our industry and our ability to compete; |
|
• |
|
our ability to continue to sell to existing customers and sell to new customers; |
|
• |
|
our ability to respond to changes in our industry; |
|
• |
|
our ability to meet the needs of product developers; |
|
• |
|
our ability to meet product developers’ expectations regarding quick turnaround time and price; |
|
• |
|
any failure to maintain and enhance our brand; |
|
• |
|
our ability to process a large volume of designs and identify significant opportunities in our business; |
|
• |
|
the adoption rate of e-commerce and 3D CAD software by product developers; |
|
• |
|
the loss of key personnel or failure to attract, integrate and retain additional personnel; |
|
• |
|
our ability to effectively grow our business and manage our growth; |
|
• |
|
system interruptions at our operating facilities, in particular our Maple Plain, Minnesota location; |
|
• |
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property and not infringe others’ intellectual property; and |
|
• |
|
our ability to effectively operate as a public company. |
Certain of these factors and others are described in the discussion on risk factors that appear in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and uncertainties detailed in this and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on our future results. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Finally, we expressly disclaim any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Proto Labs, Inc. was incorporated in Minnesota in 1999. The terms “Proto Labs,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” as used herein refer to the business and operations of Proto Labs, Inc. and its subsidiaries. We are a leading online and technology-enabled quick-turn manufacturer of custom parts for prototyping and short-run production. We provide “Real Parts, Really Fast” to product developers worldwide, who are under increasing pressure to bring their finished products to market faster than their competition. We utilize computer numerical control (CNC) machining and injection molding to manufacture custom parts for our customers. Our proprietary technology eliminates most of the time-consuming and expensive skilled labor conventionally required to quote and manufacture parts in low volumes. Our customers conduct nearly all of their business with us over the Internet. We target our services to the millions of product developers who use three-dimensional computer-aided design (3D CAD) software to design products across a diverse range of end-markets. We have established our operations in the United States, Europe and Japan, which we believe are three of the largest geographic markets where these product developers are located. We believe our use of advanced technology enables us to offer significant advantages at competitive prices to many product developers and is the primary reason we have become a leading supplier of low-volume custom parts.
We believe low-volume manufacturing has historically been an underserved market due to the inefficiencies inherent in the quotation, equipment set-up and non-recurring engineering processes required to produce custom parts. Our customers typically order low volumes of custom parts because they need a prototype to confirm the form, fit and function of one or more components of a product under development, or because they need an initial supply of parts to support pilot production while their high-volume production mold is being prepared, or because their product will only be released in a limited quantity. In each of these instances, we believe our solution provides product developers with an exceptional combination of speed, competitive pricing, ease of use and reliability that they typically cannot find among conventional custom parts manufacturers. Our technology enables us to ship parts in as little as one business day after receipt of a customer’s design submission.
Our proprietary technology enables us to automate and integrate the majority of activities involved in procuring custom low-volume parts, starting with our web interface through which a product developer submits a 3D CAD part design. We have developed complex algorithms to quickly analyze the geometry of the design to analyze its manufacturability. In many cases, our software provides suggested design modifications to enhance manufacturability, presented to the product developer in a color-coded 3D representation of the part. Our automated pricing algorithm generates a firm price that is incorporated into a highly interactive web-based quotation, which allows the product developer to change a variety of parameters and instantly receive an updated price. Once the order is entered online, our manufacturing software calculates the required instructions for a CNC machine to make the part or related mold. Our system is highly scalable and capable of processing a large number of design submissions. As a result of the factors described above, we have significantly reduced many of the inefficiencies involved in serving the low-volume manufacturing market, while scaling our business to generate quotations on over 390,000 design submissions in 2013. And, as a further result, many of our customers tend to return to Proto Labs to meet their ongoing needs, with approximately 86%, 84% and 81% of our revenue in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, derived from existing customers who had placed orders with us in prior years.
Our manufacturing services currently include CNC machining and injection molding. We continually seek to expand the range of size and geometric complexity of the parts we can make with these processes, to extend the variety of materials we are able to support and to identify additional manufacturing processes to which we can apply our technology in order to better serve the evolving preferences and needs of product developers. See “Risk Factors—If our present single or limited source suppliers become unavailable or inadequate, our customer relationships, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected” for a discussion of the sourcing and availability of materials. We also plan to grow our business by further penetrating the universe of product developers at the customer companies we have already served, attracting new customer companies in the geographic markets in which we already have an established presence, and selectively entering new geographic markets.
We have experienced significant growth since our inception in 1999. We have grown our total revenue from $43.8 million in 2009 to $163.1 million in 2013. We have grown our income from operations from $7.9 million in 2009 to $51.3 million in 2013.
Industry Overview
Our Industry
We serve product developers worldwide who bring new ideas to market in the form of products containing one or more custom mechanical parts. Many of these product developers use 3D CAD software to create digital models representing their custom part designs that are then used to create physical parts for prototyping, functional testing, market evaluation or eventual production. Custom prototype parts play a critical role in the product development process, as they provide product developers with the ability to confirm their intended performance requirements and explore design alternatives. From the inception of our company in 1999 through December 31, 2013, we have filled orders for approximately 36,000 product developers.
Early in the product development process, “additive rapid prototyping” processes such as stereolithography, selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling or 3D printing can be used to quickly produce an approximate physical representation of a part, but these representations often do not meet product developers’ requirements for dimensional accuracy, cosmetics and material properties. As an alternative or supplement to additive rapid prototyping, CNC machining can be used to produce low volumes of high-quality custom parts in either metal or plastic, while for follow-on functional testing, market evaluation and production runs, parts are typically manufactured using injection molding. Both CNC machining and injection molding yield a part with the look, feel and performance of the finished product.
Trends Affecting the Product Development Process
There are several important trends impacting product developers worldwide.
Increasing E-Commerce Expectations
The Internet is a tool that is deeply integrated into the everyday activities of product developers, many of whom have come to expect a comprehensive set of integrated web-based capabilities and 24 hours a day, seven days a week access from their vendors. As product developers increasingly work with partners and vendors across various geographies and time zones, the Internet allows them to work collaboratively and immediately access information at any time and from anywhere in the world.
Accelerating Time to Market
Product developers are facing increased pressure from global competitors to be first to market with their finished products. In addition, rapid advances in technology and consumer demand for the latest products are driving shorter product life cycles in many industries. This makes it ever more critical to obtain prototype parts quickly and identify problems in a product design early to minimize delays.
Increasing Adoption of 3D CAD Software
For product developers involved in mechanical part design, 3D CAD has inherent advantages over 2D CAD because it provides a complete description of the part’s geometric design. As a result, many of these product developers continue to migrate from using 2D CAD to using 3D CAD for their design needs.
Challenges Confronting Product Developers
The trends affecting our industry create a variety of challenges for product developers.
Inadequate Turnaround Time
We believe most conventional custom parts manufacturers do not have the automated capability to analyze a design and then quote, manufacture and ship custom parts fast enough to satisfy the time-to-market needs of many product developers. Quotation and order placement from these custom parts manufacturers can take anywhere from a few days to weeks, and frequently require face-to-face interaction. In addition, once an order is placed, conventional custom parts manufacturers typically require a significant amount of manual engineering before manufacturing can begin.
Difficulty in Sourcing Low-Volume Custom Parts
We believe many custom parts manufacturers prefer the higher asset utilization inherent in high-volume production and therefore may decline or assign a lower priority to low-volume orders. In addition, those custom parts manufacturers that do take low-volume orders often lack the scale to produce significant numbers of different parts at the same time. This is particularly problematic for product developers with products requiring multiple custom parts, as these developers consequently may need to disperse and coordinate orders among several manufacturers.
Most Custom Parts Manufacturers Lack an Interactive Web-Based Interface
We believe most custom parts manufacturers lack the technology to offer an interactive web-based interface and quoting system, which can result in significant inconveniences for product developers. Business can typically be transacted only during the business day, frequently requires face-to-face interactions and is generally conducted without the web-centric convenience that product developers have come to expect in other aspects of their professional and personal lives.
High Cost
Many product developers find low-volume custom parts manufacturing to be expensive due to the manufacturer’s significant up-front non-recurring engineering costs and the additional costs incurred to support high-volume production, both of which must be absorbed over a small quantity of parts. Therefore, we believe most custom parts manufacturers are not well equipped to fulfill significant numbers of low-volume orders at competitive prices.
Our Solution
We have developed proprietary software and advanced manufacturing processes that automate much of the skilled labor conventionally required in quoting, production engineering and manufacturing custom parts. We believe our interactive web-based interface and highly automated processes address the desires of many product developers for a fast, efficient and cost-effective means of obtaining low-volume custom parts. We also believe the use of our advanced technology to bring speed and efficiency at competitive prices to product developers is the primary reason we have become a leading supplier of low-volume custom CNC-machined and injection-molded parts.
Key elements of our solution include:
Sophisticated Technology that Reduces Turnaround Time
Our web-based interface and proprietary software automate many of the manual and time-consuming processes typically required to obtain custom CNC-machined or injection-molded parts from conventional suppliers. Our platform automates many aspects of the entire process from design submission through manufacturability analysis and feedback, quotation, order submission, mold design, tool path generation and mold or part manufacture. Our prospective customers upload a 3D CAD file of their required part through our website, and often within minutes our software analyzes the manufacturability of the product and, if we are able to make the part, returns a firm price quotation with any recommendations for design modifications. Our quoting system is highly interactive, enabling our prospective customers to change the material, finish, quantity or shipping schedule of orders, and to instantly receive an updated quotation. Once an order is received, our software automates much of the mold design, tool path generation and mold or part manufacture that normally require skilled labor. As a result, in many cases we are able to quote orders in minutes and ship parts in as little as one business day.
Enhanced Customer Experience
Our web-based customer interface provides a straightforward means of submitting 3D CAD part designs. Our proprietary manufacturability analysis then quickly analyzes whether a part design falls within our manufacturing capabilities. In many cases, our software provides suggested design modifications to enhance manufacturability, presented to the product developer in an interactive quotation containing a color-coded 3D representation of the part. This allows product developers to quickly determine the manufacturability of their parts, what they will cost and when they can be shipped. Our interactive quotations provide instant visibility into the impact of changing an order’s various parameters such as material, finish, quantity or shipping schedule. As a result, we provide product developers with an easy-to-use and consistent means of obtaining custom parts.
Attractive Low-Volume Pricing
Based on internal market research, we believe we generally have competitive pricing on low-volume orders. We believe this is a direct result of our technology and the efficiency of our operations, both of which were designed specifically for low-volume production. By automating and integrating many of the manual processes conventionally involved in quoting and manufacturing low-volume custom CNC-machined and injection-molded parts, we have significantly reduced or eliminated most of the non-recurring engineering labor costs associated with these processes. These costs are typically a significant portion of the total costs in the low-volume custom parts manufacturing environment, and as a result, we can typically offer product developers competitive prices on low-volume custom manufactured parts.
Scale to Process Large Numbers of Unique Part Designs
Our proprietary, highly scalable quoting technology addresses the manual processes conventionally involved in submitting a design, analyzing its manufacturability, making design revision recommendations and generating price quotations. This enables us to quickly analyze high volumes of 3D CAD part design submissions and provide feedback to our prospective product developer customers. In 2013 alone, we generated quotations for over 390,000 design submissions. Our proprietary manufacturing automation technology is also highly scalable, enabling us to process large numbers of unique designs and efficiently manufacture the related parts to meet the needs of product developers.
Our Competitive Advantages
We believe our leadership position is based on a number of distinct competitive advantages:
Advanced Proprietary Technology
Our proprietary technology automates much of the skilled labor conventionally required to quote and manufacture low-volume custom parts, including the often time-consuming steps of design submission, manufacturability analysis and feedback, quotation, order submission, mold design, tool path generation, mold or part manufacture, and production management. This technology has been developed and continually expanded and refined over our 14 years of providing custom mold and part manufacturing services to our customers. We believe our proprietary technology gives us significant advantages over our competitors, who typically lack the expertise and resources to develop similar technology.
Turnaround Speed
We believe we are generally the fastest provider of low-volume custom CNC-machined or injection-molded parts.
By automating many of the manual and time-consuming steps conventionally required to obtain low-volume custom parts, we have established a unique advantage over our competitors that lack similar capabilities. Our proprietary technology and advanced manufacturing processes allow product developers to submit designs at any time and enable us to ship parts to our customers in as little as one business day. Our competitors often require several days just to generate a price quotation and may take even more time if the order parameters are subsequently changed by the product developer.
Operations Designed for Low-Volume Manufacturing
Unlike conventional custom parts manufacturers, our operating model is specifically designed for efficient low- volume production. Our customer interactions occur primarily online, and our proprietary technology eliminates much of the skilled labor conventionally required for manufacturability analysis and feedback, quotation, order submission, mold design, tool path generation and mold or part manufacture. These functions typically account for a significant portion of the total costs in the low-volume custom parts manufacturing environment. Our automation enables us to quote many thousands of CNC-machined or injection-molded part designs per month, which we believe few of our competitors can match.
Marketing and Sales Strength
We have developed expertise in marketing to product developers, both within our existing customer companies and at companies we have not yet served. We attract customers by using a variety of marketing tactics, resulting in both lead generation and brand reinforcement. Through December 31, 2013, we have generated a database of over 370,000 product developers that represent current or potential future users of our services.
We have also built a professionally-led international sales organization focused on quickly following up on marketing leads and quotation requests, understanding our customers’ internal initiatives, converting prospects into customers by conveying our value proposition, and finding additional leads within our existing customer companies. We believe that our marketing and sales organization is a key competitive advantage and that most of our competitors lack the expertise and resources to establish and maintain an organized, international program of similar scale.
Deep Industry Knowledge
We believe that the volume of new custom part designs we process and the size and diversity of our customer base give us unique insight into the needs of our prospective customers. This has allowed us to focus our development resources on areas that we believe represent significant opportunities for our business. Through December 31, 2013, we have received over 1,400,000 uploaded part designs, sent over 1,200,000 part quotations and shipped over 300,000 unique parts to approximately 36,000 product developers representing over 16,000 customer companies across a wide range of industries.
Our Growth Strategy
The principal elements of our growth strategy are to:
Increase Penetration of Existing Customer Companies
We plan to expand our customer base to include more product developers within the companies that have already used our services. Individual product developers typically make or influence the choice of vendor when sourcing low-volume custom parts. We believe a significant opportunity exists for us to leverage highly satisfied product developers to encourage others within the same organization to utilize our services. We have historically generated a significant number of new customers through word-of-mouth referrals from other product developers, and we plan to combine these referrals with the efforts of our marketing and sales force to identify and market our services to the colleagues of our existing customers.
Gain New Customer Companies in Existing Geographic Markets
We plan to use our marketing and sales capabilities to continue to pursue product developers within companies who have not yet used our services. Our presence in geographic regions that have high populations of 3D CAD users provides us with a broad universe of potential new customer companies on which to focus our marketing and sales efforts.
Expand the Range of Parts We Offer
We regularly analyze the universe of customer design submissions that we are currently unable to manufacture and focus a significant portion of our research and development efforts on expanding the range of parts that we can produce. Since we first introduced our Protomold injection molding service in 1999, we have steadily expanded the size and geometric complexity of the injection-molded parts we are able to manufacture, and we continue to extend the diversity of materials we are able to support. Similarly, since first introducing our Firstcut CNC machining service in 2007, we have expanded the range of part sizes, design geometries and materials we can support. For example, during 2012 we expanded the number of materials we offer to include a variety of high temperature resins available through our Protomold injection molding service and steel, stainless steel, magnesium and copper in our Firstcut machining service. As we continue to expand the range of our existing process capabilities, we believe we will meet the needs of a broader set of product developers and consequently convert a higher number of quotation requests into orders.
Introduce New Manufacturing Processes
We seek to identify additional manufacturing processes to which we can apply our technology and expertise to meet a greater range of product developers’ needs. Introducing new manufacturing processes can both attract new customers and provide us with a significant opportunity to cross-sell with our existing services to our existing customer base. As an example of a new manufacturing process, our Firstcut service was first introduced in the United States in 2007 and has grown to represent 30% of our total revenue in the year ended December 31, 2013. We regularly evaluate new manufacturing processes to offer product developers and introduce such new processes when we are confident that a sufficient market need exists and that we can offer the same advantages our customers have come to expect from us. For example, recently our largest research and development initiatives have revolved around thixomolding of magnesium, metal injection molding of steel alloys and liquid silicone rubber injection molding. During 2013, we made progress on each of these initiatives towards commercialization as service offerings to our customers. See Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” for disclosure of our historical research and development expenses.
Expand into New Geographic Markets
We believe there may be opportunities to grow by identifying and expanding into select additional geographic markets. We currently operate in the United States, Europe and Japan, where we believe a substantial portion of the world’s product developers are located. We entered the European market in 2005, and by 2013, this region represents approximately 19% of our total revenue. We launched operations in Japan in late 2009 and have achieved enough growth there to prompt a move into a larger facility in early 2012. While we currently do not have specific plans to expand into any particular geographic markets, we believe opportunities exist to serve the needs of product developers in select new geographic regions and we will continue to evaluate such opportunities if and when they arise. For discussion of our financial information about the geographic markets where we operate, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Note 17 – Segment and Geographic Information” in our consolidated financial statements.
Capitalize on Increasing Customer Expectations for 24/7 Access to Comprehensive, User-Friendly E- Commerce Capabilities
We plan to further enhance the functionality and ease of use of our platform and expand the capabilities of our technology in order to further increase automation and meet the evolving needs of product developers worldwide. We believe product developers have come to expect advanced web-based tools and a fully integrated Internet platform from their vendors. We will continue to use the Internet to provide product developers with a standardized interface through which they can upload their 3D CAD models and obtain firm, interactive quotations quickly and efficiently.
Our Services
Our Firstcut and Protomold services offer many product developers the ability to quickly and efficiently outsource their low-volume, quick-turn custom parts manufacturing. See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for the historical revenue generated by each of Firstcut and Protomold.
Firstcut
Our Firstcut service uses commercially-available CNC machines to cut plastic or metal blocks into one or more custom parts based on the 3D CAD model uploaded by the product developer. Our efficiencies derive from the automation of the programming of these machines and a proprietary fixturing process. The Firstcut service is well suited to produce small quantities, typically in the range of one to ten parts.
Protomold
Our Protomold service uses our 3D CAD-to-CNC machining technology for the automated design and manufacture of aluminum injection molds, which are then used to produce custom injection-molded parts on commercially-available equipment. Our Protomold service is used for both prototype and short-run production. Prototype quantities typically range from 25 to 100 parts. Because we retain possession of the molds, customers who need short-run production often come back to Protomold for additional quantities typically ranging up to 10,000 parts. They do so either to support pilot production while their tooling for high-volume production is being prepared or because their product will only be released in a limited quantity. These additional part orders typically occur on approximately half of the molds that we make, typically accounting for approximately half of our total Protomold revenue.
The process for both Firstcut and Protomold begins when the product developer uploads one or more 3D CAD models representing the desired part geometry. Our proprietary software uses complex algorithms to analyze the 3D CAD geometry, analyze its manufacturability and support the creation of an interactive, web-based quotation containing pricing and manufacturability information. A link to the quotation is then e-mailed to the product developer, who can access the quotation, change a variety of order parameters and instantly see the effect on price before finalizing the order. For Firstcut, the tool paths are then reviewed and routed to our high-speed CNC machining centers for execution. In the case of Protomold, our proprietary software supports the creation of the mold design and the tool paths required to manufacture the mold components, which are then routed to our CNC machining centers for execution. Once the mold is assembled, it is placed in one of our injection molding presses to create the required parts. For both our Firstcut and Protomold services, we ship parts in as little as one business day from design submission. We ship our parts via small parcel common carriers on standard terms and conditions.
The following diagram summarizes the technology-enabled processes described above:
Our Technology
Our technology eliminates much of the skilled labor conventionally associated with quoting and preparing a new part design for manufacture. Our proprietary software largely automates the areas of manufacturability analysis and feedback, price quotation, order submission, mold design, tool path generation, mold or part manufacture and production management. The more computationally intensive aspects of this software utilize a proprietary parallel processing software environment running on our in-house compute cluster servers.
Manufacturability Analysis
Our proprietary software analyzes the 3D CAD models submitted by our customers to determine the extent to which they are suitable for our standardized manufacturing processes. In the case of CNC machining, this manufacturability analysis identifies features that may be too fragile to be machined and areas that cannot be machined at all. For injection molding, problematic features such as undercuts, thin areas, thick areas and areas requiring geometry adjustments to allow the part to be ejected from the mold are identified. Many of our customers find this analysis particularly helpful, as it diagnoses and prevents potential problems prior to manufacturing. We can also provide a flow analysis to identify parts that may be so thin and large that plastic will solidify before the mold can be completely filled. Our manufacturability analysis plays a major role in our automated pricing algorithms.
Web-Based Quotation
We have branded our Firstcut and Protomold automated quotation systems as FirstQuote and ProtoQuote. Both deliver an interactive graphical quotation to the customer in the form of a web page that includes a color-coded 3D representation of the part highlighting features relevant to manufacturability. In some cases, features are indicated that must be changed to be compatible with our process. We also highlight and recommend design improvements that might be made to improve the manufacturability of the part, or to indicate any possible deviations between the part as it was designed and how it will be manufactured. The web-based quotation allows the customer to change material, finish, quantity or shipping schedule of orders. Pricing indicated on the web-based quote instantly updates after each of these changes.
Mold Design
Our software technology and mold manufacturing system have co-evolved over more than 14 years of development, resulting in a standardized and efficient process for taking a customer’s 3D CAD model and creating the physical mold needed to make plastic parts. Our software enables our mold designers to quickly create the mold geometry specific to the customer’s part and automates the design of most other mold features, thus eliminating much of the skilled labor normally associated with mold design in a conventional environment.
Automated Tool Path Generation
In support of both our Firstcut and Protomold services, our proprietary software automates much of the skilled labor conventionally needed to generate the tool paths necessary to machine the required parts and mold components. Our software automation allows our users to do in minutes what can often require hours or days of labor for manufacturers using commercial computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) software.
Parallel Processing
The mathematical algorithms required to analyze manufacturability and generate tool paths are computationally intensive. We have developed a proprietary parallel processing software environment to accelerate the processing of individual jobs and allow straightforward scalability to a large number of jobs. This software system typically runs on a cluster of industry-standard 64-bit computers connected to each other and to our internal users’ computers over an isolated gigabit Ethernet local area network. We currently have clusters in multiple manufacturing facilities, two in the United States and one each in the United Kingdom and Japan.
Monitoring and Control
We have developed a proprietary, intranet-based monitoring and control system that allows us to monitor key aspects of our entire worldwide operations in real time using an easy to understand management dashboard. This system provides us with the ability to quickly react to new information across our organization.
Marketing
Our international, integrated marketing effort generates leads for our sales teams and seeks to strengthen our reputation as a leader in the field of quick turn, low-volume custom manufacturing. Much of our marketing activities occur over the Internet. We use marketing automation software to enhance the productivity of our sales and marketing teams and to track results of all campaigns to enhance our marketing return on investment.
We maintain brand awareness with product developers through the regular distribution of technical information including design guidelines, engineering white papers and a quarterly journal targeted at product developers. We also send out product giveaways that highlight technical aspects of injection molding we feel would be of interest to product developers. We believe these educational materials are key aspects of our lead generation efforts. In our Cool Idea! marketing program, we plan to award up to a total of $250,000 of our services to entrepreneurs with a “cool idea.” In addition to supporting entrepreneurs and innovative product development, we believe this program can generate good will, press coverage and word-of-mouth brand awareness.
Sales and Customer Service
We maintain an internal sales team trained in the basics of part design and the capabilities of our manufacturing services, as well as the key advantages of our services over alternative methods of low-volume custom parts manufacturing. We organize our sales team into two complementary roles: business development and account management, the former focused on selling to new customer companies and the latter focused on expanding sales within existing customer companies. We believe our sales staff is adept at researching customer companies and networking to find additional product developers that may have a need for our services. We also have a team of customer service engineers who can support highly technical engineering discussions with product developers as required during the sales process. Our revenue is generated from a diverse customer base, with no single customer company representing more than 2% of our total revenue in 2013.
Competition
The market for low-volume custom parts manufacturing is fragmented, highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our potential competitors include:
|
• |
|
Captive in-house services. Many larger companies undertaking product development have established CNC machining, injection molding or additive rapid prototyping capabilities internally to support the prototyping requirements of their product developers. |
|
• |
|
Other custom manufacturers. There are thousands of machine shops and injection molding suppliers worldwide. The size and scale of these businesses range from very small specialty shops to large, high-volume production manufacturers. |
|
• |
|
Alternative manufacturing vendors. Various manufacturing processes, other than CNC machining and injection molding, are offered by other vendors. We generically refer to the most well known of these processes as “additive rapid prototyping,” which have been commercialized under labels such as stereolithography, selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling and 3D printing. |
We believe that the key competitive factors in our industry include:
|
• |
|
Speed: turnaround time for quotations and parts; |
|
• |
|
Price: mold and piece part pricing; | |
|
• |
|
Quality: dimensional accuracy, surface finish, material properties, color and cleanliness; |
|
• |
|
Capability: size and dimensional complexity of the part, materials supported and post-processing provided; |
|
• |
|
Capacity: ability to support multiple part designs in parallel; and |
|
• |
|
Service: overall customer experience, from web interface to post-sales support. |
We believe that we have competitive strengths that position us favorably and have enabled us to become a leader in our markets. We also believe that substantially all of our current direct competitors are relatively small in terms of size of operations, revenue, number of customers and volume of parts sold, and generally lack our technological capabilities. However, our industry is evolving rapidly and other companies, including potentially larger and more established companies with developed technological capabilities, may begin to focus on low-volume custom parts manufacturing. These companies could more directly compete with us, along with our existing competitors, and both could also launch new products and services that we do not offer that may quickly gain market acceptance. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our ability to attract customers.
Intellectual Property
We regard our patents, trademarks, service marks, trade dress, trade secrets, copyrights, domain names and other intellectual property as valuable to our business and rely on patent, trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, customers, vendors and others to protect our proprietary rights. We register our patents, trademarks and service marks in the United States and other jurisdictions as we deem appropriate. As of December 31, 2013, we own and have applications pending for patents relating to various aspects of our quoting and manufacturing processes as follows:
Jurisdiction |
Issued Patents |
Applications Pending | ||
United States |
15 |
1 | ||
United Kindgom |
2 |
0 | ||
Germany |
0 |
2 | ||
Our patents have expiration dates ranging from 2022 to 2031. We also own approximately 11 registered United States trademarks or service marks as of December 31, 2013, with corresponding registered protection in Europe and Japan for the most important of these marks such as PROTO LABS, PROTOMOLD, FIRSTCUT, PROTOQUOTE, FIRSTQUOTE and PROTOFLOW and corresponding registered protection in Australia, Canada and Mexico for PROTOMOLD. There can be no assurance that the steps we take to protect our proprietary rights will be adequate or that third parties will not infringe or misappropriate such rights. We have been subject to claims and expect to be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. In particular, we may face claims from third parties that we have infringed their patents, trademarks or other intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. Any unauthorized disclosure or use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and harm our operating results.
Employees
As of December 31, 2013, we had 749 full-time employees. None of our employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our current relationship with our employees to be good. We also regularly use independent contractors and other temporary employees across the organization to augment our regular staff. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel.
Available Information
Our principal executive offices are located 5540 Pioneer Creek Drive, Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 and our telephone number is (763) 479-3680. Our website address is www.protolabs.com. Information on our website does not constitute part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report we file or furnish with the SEC. We provide free access to various reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed or furnished. These reports include, but are not limited to, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports. Our SEC reports can be accessed through the investor relations section of our website or through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Set forth below are the names of our current executive officers, their ages, titles, the year first appointed as an executive officer, and employment for the past five years:
Victoria M. Holt |
|
|
56 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Robert Bodor |
41 |
Chief Technology Officer | ||||
John R. Judd |
|
|
57 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Donald G. Krantz |
|
|
58 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
Jacqueline D. Schneider |
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President of Sales and Customer Service |
John B. Tumelty |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Managing Director of Proto Labs, Limited |
Executive officers of the Company are elected at the discretion of the board of directors with no fixed terms. There are no family relationships between or among any of the executive officers or directors of the Company.
Victoria M. Holt. Ms. Holt has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2014. Prior to joining us, Ms. Holt served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Spartech Corporation, a leading producer of plastic sheet, compounds and packaging products, from September 2010 until Spartech was purchased by PolyOne Corporation in March 2013. Prior to Spartech, Ms. Holt worked at PPG Industries, a leading coatings and specialty products company, serving as Senior Vice President, Glass and Fiber Glass, from May 2005 until September 2010. Ms. Holt also is a member of the Board of Directors of Waste Management, Inc.
Robert Bodor. Dr. Bodor has served as our Chief Technology Officer since July 2013. From December 2012 to June 2013, Dr. Bodor served as our Director of Business Development. Prior to joining Proto Labs, from January 2011 to December 2012, Dr. Bodor held several roles at Honeywell, most recently leading SaaS business offerings for Honeywell’s Life Safety Division. From August 2009 to October 2010, Dr. Bodor served as Chief Technology Officer for Luma, LLC (formerly known as Inveni LLC), a web-based technology company. From September 2005 to August 2009, Dr. Bodor held various positions with McKinsey & Company, advising Fortune 500 companies in the high technology, industrial, and medical sectors, most recently as Engagement Manager.
John R. Judd. Mr. Judd has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2011. From June 2006 to June 2011, Mr. Judd served as Chief Financial Officer of Compellent Technologies, Inc., a network-storage company. From October 2003 to July 2006, Mr. Judd served as Chief Financial Officer of ATS Medical, Inc., a medical device manufacturer. From June 2000 to October 2003, Mr. Judd served as Controller of American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., a medical device manufacturer. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Judd served as Chief Financial Officer of the Autoglass Division of Apogee Enterprises, Inc., a glass technology company.
Donald G. Krantz. Dr. Krantz has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2007. From November 2005 to January 2007, Dr. Krantz served as our Vice President of Development. Prior to joining our company, Dr. Krantz served in various roles at MTS Systems, Inc., a builder of custom precision testing and advanced manufacturing systems, including as a business unit Vice President, Vice President of Engineering, and most recently, Chief Technology Officer. Dr. Krantz was an Engineering Fellow at Alliant Techsystems and Honeywell, Inc., and was named the 2005 Distinguished Alumnus of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota.
Jacqueline D. Schneider. Ms. Schneider has served as our Vice President of Sales and Customer Service since February 2007. From November 2005 to February 2007, Ms. Schneider served as National Sales Director for Comm-Works, LLC, a global technology provider.
John B. Tumelty. Mr. Tumelty has served as the Managing Director of Proto Labs, Limited, our subsidiary in the United Kingdom, since its inception in July 2005. Mr. Tumelty leads our company’s operations in Europe. From March 1997 to June 2005, Mr. Tumelty held various positions at Western Thomson Plastics Ltd, an automotive systems supplier, most recently as Managing Director.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following are the significant factors that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results, as well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our common stock.
Risks Relating to Our Business
We face significant competition and expect to face increasing competition in many aspects of our business, which could cause our operating results to suffer.
The market for low-volume custom parts manufacturing is fragmented and highly competitive. We compete for customers with a wide variety of custom parts manufacturers and methods. Some of our current and potential competitors include captive in-house services, other custom manufacturers, and alternative manufacturing vendors such as those utilizing stereolithography, selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling and 3D printing. Moreover, some of our existing and potential competitors are researching, designing, developing and marketing other types of products and services. We also expect that future competition may arise from the development of allied or related techniques for custom parts manufacturing that are not encompassed by our patents, from the issuance of patents to other companies that may inhibit our ability to develop certain products and from improvements to existing technologies. And our competitors may attempt to adopt and improve upon key aspects of our business model, such as development of technology that automates much of the manual labor conventionally required to quote and manufacture low-volume custom parts, implementation of interactive web-based and automated user interface and quoting systems and/or building scalable operating models specifically designed for efficient low-volume production. Third-party CAD software companies may develop software that mold-makers, injection molders and CNC machine shops could use to compete with our business model. Additive manufacturers may develop stronger, higher temperature resins or introduce other improvements that could more effectively compete with us on part quality. We may also, from time to time, establish alliances or relationships with other competitors or potential competitors. To the extent companies terminate such relationships and establish alliances and relationships with our competitors, our business could be harmed.
Existing and potential competitors may have substantially greater financial, technical, sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution and other resources and name recognition than us, as well as experience and expertise in intellectual property rights and operating within certain international locations, any of which may enable them to compete effectively against us.
Though we plan to continue to expend resources to develop new technologies, processes and services, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our current position or continue to compete successfully against current and future sources of competition. Our challenge in developing new services is finding services for which our automated quotation and manufacturing processes offer an attractive value proposition, and we may not be able to find any new services with potential economies of scale similar to our molding and machining services. If we do not keep pace with technological change and introduce new technologies, processes and services, the demand for our products and services may decline and our operating results may suffer.
Our success depends on our ability to deliver products and services that meet the needs of product developers and to effectively respond to changes in our industry.
We derive almost all of our revenue from the manufacture and sale to product developers of quick-turn low volumes of custom parts for prototyping, support of internal manufacturing and limited quantity product release. Our business has been and we believe will continue to be affected by changes in product developer requirements and preferences, rapid technological change, new product and service introductions and the emergence of new standards and practices, any of which could render our technology, products and services less attractive, uneconomical or obsolete. To the extent that our customers’ need for quick-turn parts decreases for any reason, it would likely have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results and harm our competitive position. In addition, CAD simulation and other technologies may reduce the demand for physical prototype parts. Therefore, we believe that to remain competitive, we must continually expend resources to enhance and improve our technology, product offerings and services.
In particular, we plan to increase our research and development efforts and to continue to focus a significant portion of those efforts to further develop our technology in areas such as our interactive user interface and manufacturing processes, potentially introduce new manufacturing processes within the research and development initiative we refer to as Protoworks, and broaden the range of parts that we are able to manufacture. We believe successful execution of this part of our business plan is critical for our ability to compete in our industry and grow our business, and there are no guarantees we will be able to do so in a timely fashion, or at all. Broadening the range of parts we offer is of particular importance since limitations in manufacturability are the primary reason we are not able to fulfill many quotation requests. There are no guarantees that the resources devoted to executing on this aspect of our business plan will improve our business and operating results or result in increased demand for our products and services. Failures in this area could adversely impact our operating results and harm our reputation and brand. And even if we are successful in executing in these areas, our industry is subject to rapid and significant technological change, and our competitors may develop new technologies, processes and services that are superior to ours. Research and development costs were approximately $11.9 million, $9.1 million and $5.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion related to research and development costs.
Any failure to properly meet the needs of product developers or respond to changes in our industry on a cost-effective and timely basis, or at all, would likely have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results and harm our competitive position.
Our failure to meet our product developers’ expectations regarding quick turnaround time would adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We believe many product developers are facing increased pressure from global competitors to be first to market with their finished products, often resulting in a need for quick turnaround of custom parts. We believe our ability to quickly quote, manufacture and ship custom parts has been an important factor in our results to date. There are no guarantees we will be able to meet product developers’ increasing expectations regarding quick turnaround time, especially as we increase the scope of our operations. If we fail to meet our customers’ expectations regarding turnaround time in any given period, our business and results of operations will likely suffer.
Our failure to meet our product developers’ price expectations would adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Demand for our services is sensitive to price. We believe our competitive pricing has been an important factor in our results to date. Therefore, changes in our pricing strategies can have a significant impact on our business and ability to generate revenue. Many factors, including our production and personnel costs and our competitors’ pricing and marketing strategies, can significantly impact our pricing strategies. If we fail to meet our customers’ price expectations in any given period, demand for our products and services could be negatively impacted and our business and results of operations could suffer.
The strength of our brand is important to our business, and any failure to maintain and enhance our brand would hurt our ability to retain and expand our customer base as well as further penetrate existing customers.
Since our products and services are sold primarily through our websites, the success of our business depends upon our ability to attract new and repeat customers to our websites in order to increase business and grow our revenue. Customer awareness of, and the perceived value of, our brand will depend largely on the success of our marketing efforts, as well as our ability to consistently provide quality custom parts within the required timeframes and positive customer experiences, which we may not do successfully. A primary component of our business strategy is the continued promotion and strengthening of our brand, and we have incurred and plan to continue to incur substantial expense related to advertising and other marketing efforts directed toward enhancing our brand. We have initiated marketing efforts through social media, but this method of marketing may not be successful and subjects us to a greater risk of inconsistent messaging and bad publicity. We may choose to increase our branding expense materially, but we cannot be sure that this investment will be profitable. If we are unable to successfully maintain and enhance our brand, this could have a negative impact on our business and ability to generate revenue.
Our business depends in part on our ability to process a large volume of new part designs from a diverse group of product developers and successfully identify significant opportunities for our business based on those submissions.
We believe the volume of new part designs we process and the size and diversity of our customer base give us valuable insight into the needs of our prospective customers. We utilize this industry knowledge to determine where we should focus our development resources. If the number of new part designs we process or the size and diversity of our customer base decrease, our ability to successfully identify significant opportunities for our business and meet the needs of product developers could be negatively impacted. In addition, even if we do continue to process a large number of new part designs and work with a significant and diverse customer base, there are no guarantees that any industry knowledge we extract from those interactions will be successfully utilized to help us identify significant business opportunities or better understand the needs of product developers.
The loss of one or more key members of our management team or personnel, or our failure to attract, integrate and retain additional personnel in the future, could harm our business and negatively affect our ability to successfully grow our business.
We are highly dependent upon the continued service and performance of the key members of our management team and other personnel. The loss of any of these individuals, each of whom is “at will” and may terminate his or her employment relationship with us at any time, could disrupt our operations and significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives. We believe that our future success will also depend in part on our continued ability to identify, hire, train and motivate qualified personnel. We conduct our operations in the United States at our facilities located in the greater metropolitan areas of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. A possible shortage of qualified individuals in this region might require us to pay increased compensation to attract and retain key employees, thereby increasing our costs. In addition, we face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous companies, many of whom have substantially greater financial and other resources and name recognition than us. We may be unable to attract and retain suitably qualified individuals who are capable of meeting our growing operational, managerial and other requirements, or we may be required to pay increased compensation in order to do so. Our failure to attract, hire, integrate and retain qualified personnel could impair our ability to achieve our business objectives.
If we fail to grow our business as anticipated, our net sales, gross margin and operating margin will be adversely affected.
We are attempting to grow our business substantially. To this end, we have made and expect to continue to make significant investments in our business, including investments in our infrastructure, technology, and sales and marketing efforts. These investments include dedicated facilities expansion and increased staffing, both domestic and international. If our business does not generate the level of revenue required to support our investment, our net sales and profitability will be adversely affected.
If we are unable to manage our growth and expand our operations successfully, our reputation and brand may be damaged, and our business and results of operations may be harmed.
Over the past several years, we have experienced rapid growth. For example, we have grown from 277 full-time employees as of January 1, 2009 to 749 full-time employees as of December 31, 2013. We have expanded internationally, including establishing manufacturing operations in Europe in 2005 and in Japan in late 2009. In 2011, we added a number of key individuals to our organization. We expect this growth to continue and the number of countries and facilities from which we operate to continue to increase in the future. Our ability to effectively manage our anticipated growth and expansion of our operations will require us to do, among other things, the following:
|
• |
|
enhance our operational, financial and management controls and infrastructure, human resource policies, and reporting systems and procedures, in particular as we continue our transition as a public company; |
|
• |
|
effectively scale our operations, including accurately predicting the need for additional staffing; |
|
• |
|
successfully identify, recruit, hire, train, maintain, motivate and integrate additional employees; |
|
• |
|
expand our international resources; and |
|
• |
|
expand our facilities and equipment. |
These enhancements and improvements will require significant capital expenditures and allocation of valuable management and employee resources. And our growth, combined with the geographical dispersion of our operations, has placed, and will continue to place, a strain on our operational, financial and management infrastructure. Our future financial performance and our ability to execute on our business plan will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively manage any future growth and expansion. There are no guarantees we will be able to do so in an efficient or timely manner, or at all. Our failure to effectively manage growth and expansion could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects, and reputation and brand, including impairing our ability to perform to our customers’ expectations.
We may not timely and effectively scale and adapt our existing technology, processes and infrastructure to meet the needs of our business.
A key element to our continued growth is the ability to quickly and efficiently quote an increasing number of product developer submissions across geographies and to manufacture the related parts. This will require us to timely and effectively scale and adapt our existing technology, processes and infrastructure to meet the needs of our business. With respect to our websites and quoting technology, it may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve their performance, especially during periods of heavy usage and as our solutions become more complex and our user traffic increases across geographies. Similarly, our manufacturing automation technology may not enable us to process the large numbers of unique designs and efficiently manufacture the related parts in a timely fashion to meet the needs of product developers as our business continues to grow. Any failure in our ability to timely and effectively scale and adapt our existing technology, processes and infrastructure could negatively impact our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers, damage our reputation and brand, result in lost revenue, and otherwise substantially harm our business and results of operations.
Numerous factors may cause us not to maintain the revenue growth that we have historically experienced.
Although our revenue has grown from $43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $163.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, we likely will not be able to maintain our historical rate of revenue growth. We believe that our continued revenue growth will depend on many factors, a number of which are out of our control, including among others, our ability to:
|
• |
|
retain and further penetrate existing customer companies, as well as attract new customer companies; |
|
• |
|
consistently execute on custom part orders in a manner that satisfies product developers’ needs and provides them with a superior experience; |
|
• |
|
develop new technologies or manufacturing processes, and broaden the range of parts we offer; |
|
• |
|
successfully execute on our international strategy and expand into new geographic markets; |
|
• |
|
capitalize on product developer expectations for access to comprehensive, user-friendly e-commerce capabilities 24 hours per day/7 days per week; |
|
• |
|
increase the strength and awareness of our brand across geographies; |
|
• |
|
respond to changes in product developer needs, technology and our industry; and |
|
• |
|
react to challenges from existing and new competitors. |
We cannot assure you that we will be successful in continuing to grow our business and revenue, and in addressing the factors above.
Our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis.
Our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year, and are likely to continue to vary due to a number of factors, some of which are outside of our control. In addition, our actual or projected operating results may fail to match our past performance. These events could in turn cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate. If our operating results do not meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, who may derive their expectations by extrapolating data from recent historical operating results, the market price of our common stock will likely decline.
Our operating results and financial condition may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including those listed below and those identified throughout this “Risk Factors” section:
|
• |
|
the development of new competitive systems or processes by others; |
|
• |
|
the entry of new competitors into our market whether by established companies or by new companies; |
|
• |
|
changes in the size and complexity of our organization, including our international operations; |
|
• |
|
levels of sales of our products and services to new and existing customers; |
|
• |
|
the geographic distribution of our sales; |
|
• |
|
changes in product developer preferences or needs; |
|
• |
|
changes in the amount that we invest to develop, acquire or license new technologies and processes, which we anticipate will generally increase and may fluctuate in the future; |
|
• |
|
delays between our expenditures to develop, acquire or license new technologies and processes, and the generation of sales related thereto; |
|
• |
|
our ability to timely and effectively scale our business during periods of sequential quarterly or annual growth; |
|
• |
|
limitations or delays in our ability to reduce our expenses during periods of declining sequential quarterly or annual revenue; |
|
• |
|
changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors, including our responses to price competition; |
|
• |
|
changes in the amount we spend in our marketing and other efforts; |
|
• |
|
unexpected increases in expenses as compared to our related accounting accruals or operating plan; |
|
• |
|
the volatile global economy; |
|
• |
|
general economic and industry conditions that affect customer demand and product development trends; |
|
• |
|
interruptions to or other problems with our website and interactive user interface, information technology systems, manufacturing processes or other operations; |
|
• |
|
changes in accounting rules and tax and other laws; and |
|
• |
|
plant shutdowns due to a health pandemic or weather conditions. |
Due to all of the foregoing factors and the other risks discussed in this “Risk Factors” section, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year comparisons of our operating results as an indicator of future performance.
Interruptions to or other problems with our website and interactive user interface, information technology systems, manufacturing processes or other operations could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and results of operations.
The satisfactory performance, reliability, consistency, security and availability of our websites and interactive user interface, information technology systems, manufacturing processes and other operations are critical to our reputation and brand, and our ability to effectively service product developers. Any interruptions or other problems that cause any of our websites, interactive user interface or information technology systems to malfunction or be unavailable, or negatively impact our manufacturing processes or other operations, may damage our reputation and brand, result in lost revenue, cause us to incur significant costs seeking to remedy the problem and otherwise substantially harm our business and results of operations.
A number of factors or events could cause such interruptions or problems, including among others: human and software errors, design faults, challenges associated with upgrades, changes or new facets of our business, power loss, telecommunication failures, fire, flood, extreme weather, political instability, acts of terrorism, war, break-ins and security breaches, contract disputes, labor strikes and other workforce related issues, capacity constraints due to an unusually large number of product developers accessing our websites or ordering parts at the same time, and other similar events. These risks are augmented by the fact that our customers come to us largely for our quick-turn manufacturing capabilities and that accessibility and turnaround speed are often of critical importance to these product developers. We are dependent upon our facilities through which we satisfy all of our production demands and in which we house all of the computer hardware necessary to operate our websites and systems as well as managerial, customer service, sales, marketing and other similar functions, and we have not identified alternatives to these facilities or established fully redundant systems in multiple locations. However, we have back-up computing systems for each of our United States, United Kingdom and Japanese operations. In addition, we are dependent in part on third parties for the implementation and maintenance of certain aspects of our communications and production systems, and therefore preventing, identifying and rectifying problems with these aspects of our systems is to a large extent outside of our control.
Moreover, the business interruption insurance that we carry may not be sufficient to compensate us for the potentially significant losses, including the potential harm to the future growth of our business, that may result from interruptions in our service as a result of system failures.
We depend on the continued growth of product developers’ e-commerce expectations when working with their custom parts manufacturers and their migration from 2D to 3D CAD software.
The business of selling custom parts over the Internet via an interactive web-based and automated user interface and quoting system is not widespread in our industry. Moreover, many product developers still utilize 2D CAD software. Concerns about privacy and technological and other problems may discourage some product developers from adopting the Internet as the medium for procuring their custom parts or adopting 3D CAD software, particularly in countries where e-commerce and 3D CAD software are not as prevalent as they are in our current markets or with product developers in industries not well suited to utilize our services, such as architecture. In order to expand our customer base, we must appeal to and procure customers who historically have used more traditional means of commerce and/or 2D CAD drawings to purchase their customer parts. If product developers are not sufficiently attracted to the value proposition of or satisfied with our web-based interface and quotation system, or product developers do not continue to migrate to 3D CAD software as we currently anticipate, our business could be adversely impacted.
Our business depends on the development and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure.
The success of our services will depend largely on the development and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure. This includes maintenance of a reliable network backbone with the necessary speed, data capacity, and security, as well as timely development of complementary products, for providing reliable Internet access and services. The Internet has experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the numbers of users and amount of traffic. The Internet infrastructure may be unable to support such demands. In addition, increasing numbers of users, increasing bandwidth requirements, or problems caused by “viruses,” “worms,” malware and similar programs may harm the performance of the Internet. The backbone computers of the Internet have been the targets of such programs. The Internet has experienced a variety of outages and other delays as a result of damage to portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and delays in the future. These outages and delays could reduce the level of Internet usage generally as well as the level of usage of our services, which could adversely impact our business.
If the security of our customers’ confidential information stored in our systems is breached or otherwise subjected to unauthorized access, our reputation or brand may be harmed, and we may be exposed to liability.
Our system stores, processes and transmits our customers’ confidential information, including the intellectual property in their part designs, credit card information and other sensitive data. We rely on encryption, authentication and other technologies licensed from third parties, as well as administrative and physical safeguards, to secure such confidential information. Any compromise of our information security could damage our reputation and brand and expose us to a risk of loss, costly litigation and liability that would substantially harm our business and operating results. We may not have adequately assessed the internal and external risks posed to the security of our company’s systems and information and may not have implemented adequate preventative safeguards or take adequate reactionary measures in the event of a security incident. In addition, most states have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals and often state authorities of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our existing and prospective customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our data security measures. Any security breach, whether successful or not, would harm our reputation and brand and could cause the loss of customers.
Global economic conditions may harm our ability to do business, increase our costs and negatively affect our stock price.
The prospects for economic growth in the United States and other countries remain uncertain and could worsen. Economic concerns and other issues such as reduced access to capital for businesses may cause product developers to further delay or reduce the product development projects that our business supports. Given the continued uncertainty concerning the global economy, we face risks that may arise from financial difficulties experienced by our suppliers and product developers and other related risks to our business.
We operate a global business that exposes us to additional risks.
We have established our operations in the United States, Europe and Japan and are seeking to further expand our international operations. As of December 31, 2013, we had sold products into more than 50 countries. In addition to English, our website is available in British English, French, German, Italian, Japanese and Spanish. Our international revenue accounted for approximately 27%, 25% and 26% of our total revenue in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The future growth and profitability of our international business is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Many of the following factors have adversely affected our international operations and sales to customers located outside of the United States and may again in the future:
|
• |
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, particularly in new geographic locations; |
|
• |
|
challenges in providing solutions across a significant distance, in different languages and among different cultures; |
|
• |
|
rapid changes in government, economic and political policies and conditions, political or civil unrest or instability, terrorism or epidemics, and other similar outbreaks or events; |
|
• |
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; |
|
• |
|
differences in product developer preferences and means of procuring parts; |
|
• |
|
compliance with and changes in foreign laws and regulations, as well as U.S. laws affecting the activities of U.S. companies abroad, including those associated with export controls, tariffs and embargoes, other trade restrictions and antitrust and data privacy concerns; |
|
• |
|
different, complex and changing laws governing intellectual property rights, sometimes affording companies lesser protection in certain areas; |
|
• |
|
lower levels of use of the Internet or 3D CAD software; |
|
• |
|
seasonal reductions in business activity in certain parts of the world, particularly during the summer months in Europe; |
|
• |
|
higher costs of doing business internationally; |
|
• |
|
interruptions resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; |
|
• |
|
protectionist laws and business practices that favor local producers and service providers; |
|
• |
|
taxation; |
|
• |
|
energy costs; |
|
• |
|
restrictions imposed by local labor practices and laws on our business and operations; |
|
• |
|
workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States; |
|
• |
|
transportation delays; and |
|
• |
|
increased payment risk and higher levels of payment fraud. |
Our business depends on product developers’ demand for our services, the general economic health of current and prospective customers, and companies’ desire or ability to make investments in new products. A deterioration of global, regional or local political, economic or social conditions could affect potential customers in ways that reduce demand for our services, disrupt our manufacturing and sales plans and efforts or otherwise negatively impact our business. Acts of terrorism, wars, public health issues and increased energy costs could disrupt commerce in ways that could impair our ability to get products to our customers and increase our manufacturing and delivery costs. We have not undertaken hedging transactions to cover our foreign currency exposure, and changes in foreign currency exchange rates may negatively impact reported revenue and expenses. In addition, our sales are often made on unsecured credit terms, and a deterioration of political, economic or social conditions in a given country or region could reduce or eliminate our ability to collect accounts receivable in that country or region. In any of these events, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
If a natural or man-made disaster strikes any of our manufacturing facilities, we will be unable to manufacture our products for a substantial amount of time and our sales will decline.
We manufacture all of our products in six manufacturing facilities, three of which are located in Maple Plain, Minnesota and one of which is located in each of Rosemount, Minnesota, Telford, United Kingdom, and Yamato-Shi, Kanagawa, Japan. These facilities and the manufacturing equipment we use would be costly to replace and could require substantial lead time to repair or replace. Our facilities may be harmed by natural or man-made disasters, including, without limitation, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, fires, tsunamis and nuclear disasters.
In the event any of our facilities are affected by a disaster, we may: | |||
|
• |
|
be unable to meet the shipping deadlines of our customers; |
|
• |
|
experience disruptions in our ability to process submissions and generate quotations, manufacture and ship parts, provide sales and marketing support and customer service, and otherwise operate our business, any of which could negatively impact our business; |
|
• |
|
be forced to rely on third-party manufacturers; |
|
• |
|
need to expend significant capital and other resources to address any damage caused by the disaster; and |
|
• |
|
lose customers and be unable to regain those customers. |
Although we possess insurance for damage to our property and the disruption of our business from casualties, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses and may not continue to be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
If our present single or limited source suppliers become unavailable or inadequate, our customer relationships, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
We acquire substantially all of the manufacturing equipment and certain of our materials that are critical to the ongoing operation and future growth of our business from just a few third parties. We do not have long-term supply contracts with any of our suppliers and operate on a purchase-order basis. While most manufacturing equipment and materials for our products are available from multiple suppliers, certain of those items are only available from single or limited sources. Should any of our present single or limited source suppliers for manufacturing equipment or materials become unavailable or inadequate, or impose terms unacceptable to us such as increased pricing terms, we could be required to spend a significant amount of time and expense to develop alternate sources of supply, and we may not be successful in doing so on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, may affect our supply of materials, particularly resins, from time to time, and we may purchase larger amounts of certain materials in anticipation of future shortages or increases in pricing. In addition, if we were unable to find a suitable supplier for a particular type of manufacturing equipment or material, we could be required to modify our existing business processes and offerings to accommodate the situation. As a result, the loss of a single or limited source supplier could adversely affect our relationship with our customers and our results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could impair our competitive position.
Our success and future revenue growth will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We rely primarily on patents, licenses, trademarks and trade secrets, as well as non-disclosure agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies and processes globally. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary technologies and processes, it is possible that competitors or other unauthorized third parties may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies and processes. We cannot assure you that any of our existing or future patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. As such, any rights granted under these patents may not provide us with meaningful protection. We may not be able to obtain foreign patents corresponding to our United States patents. Even if foreign patents are granted, effective enforcement in foreign countries may not be available. If our patents and other intellectual property do not adequately protect our technology, our competitors may be able to offer services similar to ours. Our competitors may also be able to develop similar technology independently or design around our patents. Any of the foregoing events would lead to increased competition and lower revenue or gross margin, which would adversely affect our net income.
We may be subject to infringement claims.
We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims from individuals, vendors and other companies who have acquired or developed patents in the fields of CNC machining, injection molding or part production for purposes of developing competing products or for the sole purpose of asserting claims against us. Any claims that our products or processes infringe the intellectual property rights of others, regardless of the merit or resolution of such claims, could cause us to incur significant costs in responding to, defending and resolving such claims, and may prohibit or otherwise impair our ability to commercialize new or existing products. If we are unable to effectively defend our processes, our market share, sales and profitability could be adversely impacted.
Our failure to expand our intellectual property portfolio could adversely affect the growth of our business and results of operations.
Expansion of our intellectual property portfolio is one of the available methods of growing our revenue and our profits. This involves a complex and costly set of activities with uncertain outcomes. Our ability to obtain patents and other intellectual property can be adversely affected by insufficient inventiveness of our employees, by changes in intellectual property laws, treaties, and regulations, and by judicial and administrative interpretations of those laws treaties and regulations. Our ability to expand our intellectual property portfolio could also be adversely affected by the lack of valuable intellectual property for sale or license at affordable prices. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain valuable intellectual property in the jurisdictions where we and our competitors operate or that we will be able to use or license that intellectual property.
We may be subject to product liability claims, which could result in material expense, diversion of management time and attention and damage to our business and reputation and brand.
The prototype parts we manufacture and the parts we manufacture in low volumes may contain undetected defects or errors that are not discovered until after the products have been installed and used by customers. This could result in claims from customers or others, damage to our business and reputation and brand, or significant costs to correct the defect or error.
We attempt to include provisions in our agreements with customers that are designed to limit our exposure to potential liability for damages arising from defects or errors in our products. However, it is possible that these limitations may not be effective as a result of unfavorable judicial decisions or laws enacted in the future.
The sale and support of our products entails the risk of product liability claims. Any product liability claim brought against us, regardless of its merit, could result in material expense, diversion of management time and attention, damage to our business and reputation and brand, and cause us to fail to retain existing customers or to fail to attract new customers.
Government regulation of the Internet and e-commerce is evolving, and unfavorable changes or failure by us to comply with these regulations could substantially harm our business and results of operations.
We are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the Internet and e-commerce. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede the growth of the Internet or other online services. These regulations and laws may cover taxation, restrictions on imports and exports, customs, tariffs, user privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, the provision of online payment services, broadband residential Internet access and the characteristics and quality of products and services. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property use and ownership, sales and other taxes, fraud, libel and personal privacy apply to the Internet and e-commerce, especially where these laws were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet and do not contemplate or address the unique issues raised by the Internet or e-commerce. Those laws that do reference the Internet are being interpreted by the courts and their applicability and reach are therefore uncertain. The costs of compliance with these regulations may increase in the future as a result of changes in the regulations or the interpretation of them. Further, any failures on our part to comply with these regulations may subject us to significant liabilities. Those current and future laws and regulations or unfavorable resolution of these issues may substantially harm our business and results of operations.
Changes in, or interpretation of, tax rules and regulations may impact our effective tax rate and future profitability.
We are a multinational company based in the United States and subject to tax in multiple tax jurisdictions, both domestic and abroad. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in statutory tax rates or interpretation of tax rules and regulations in jurisdictions in which we do business, changes in the amount of revenue or earnings in the countries with varying statutory tax rates, or by changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
In addition, we are subject to audits and examinations of previously filed income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and other domestic and foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential impact of such examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations. We believe such estimates to be reasonable; however, there is no assurance that the final determination of any examination will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position.
We may require additional capital to support business growth, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all.
We intend to continue to make investments to support our business growth and may require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to complement our growth strategy, increase market share in our current markets or expand into other markets, or broaden our technology, intellectual property or service capabilities. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing shareholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing we secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be harmed.
Any acquisition, strategic relationship, joint venture or investment could disrupt our business and harm our operating results and financial condition.
Our business and our customer base have been built primarily through organic growth. However, from time to time, we may selectively pursue acquisitions, strategic relationships, joint ventures or investments that we believe may allow us to complement our growth strategy, increase market share in our current markets or expand into other markets, or broaden our technology, intellectual property or service capabilities. We cannot forecast the number, timing or size of such transactions, or the effect that any such transactions might have on our operating or financial results. We have very limited experience engaging in these types of transactions. And such transactions may be complex, time consuming and expensive, and may present numerous challenges and risks including:
|
• |
|
an acquired company, asset or technology not furthering our business strategy as anticipated; |
|
• |
|
difficulties entering and competing in new product or geographic markets and increased competition, including price competition; |
|
• |
|
integration challenges; |
|
• |
|
challenges in working with strategic partners and resolving any related disagreements or disputes; |
|
• |
|
overpayment for a company, asset or technology, or changes in the economic or market conditions or assumptions underlying our decision to make an acquisition; |
|
• |
|
significant problems or liabilities, including increased intellectual property and employment related litigation exposure, associated with acquired businesses, assets or technologies; and |
|
• |
|
requirements to record substantial charges and amortization expense related to certain purchased intangible assets, deferred stock compensation and other items, as well as other charges or expenses. |
Any one of these challenges or risks could impair our ability to realize any benefit from our acquisitions, strategic relationships, joint ventures or investments after we have expended resources on them, as well as divert our management’s attention. And any failure to successfully address these challenges or risks could disrupt our business and harm our operating results and financial condition. Moreover, any such transaction may not be viewed favorably by investors or analysts.
In addition, from time to time we may enter into negotiations for acquisitions, relationships, joint ventures or investments that are not ultimately consummated. These negotiations could result in significant diversion of management time, as well as substantial out-of-pocket costs.
We depend in part on licenses of technologies from third parties in order to deliver our solutions, and, as a result, our business is dependent in part on the availability of such licenses on commercially reasonable terms.
We currently, and will continue to, license certain technologies from third parties. While these licenses are not material to our financial results, their function in our business is integral to our operations. We cannot be certain that these third-party content licenses will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or that we will be able to successfully integrate the technology into our solutions. These third-party in-licenses may expose us to increased risk, including risks associated with the assimilation of new technology sufficient to offset associated acquisition and maintenance costs. The inability to obtain any of these licenses could result in delays in solution development until equivalent technology can be identified and integrated. Any such delays in services could cause our business, operating results and financial condition to suffer.
Our business involves the use of hazardous materials, and we and our suppliers must comply with environmental laws and regulations, which can be expensive and restrict how we do business.
Our business involves the controlled storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials. We and our suppliers are subject to federal, state and local as well as foreign laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials. Although we believe that the safety procedures utilized by us and our suppliers for handling and disposing of these materials comply with the standards prescribed by these laws and regulations, we cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of an accident, state, federal or foreign authorities may curtail the use of these materials and interrupt our business operations. We do not currently maintain hazardous materials insurance coverage. If we are subject to any liability as a result of activities involving hazardous materials, our business and financial condition may be adversely affected and our reputation and brand may be harmed.
If we are unable to meet regulatory quality standards applicable to our manufacturing and quality processes for the parts we manufacture, our business, financial condition or operating results could be harmed.
As a manufacturer of CNC-machined and injection-molded custom parts, we are required to meet certain regulatory standards, including International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, 9001:2008 for our manufacturing facilities in Minnesota. If any regulatory inspection reveals that we are not in compliance with applicable standards, regulators may take action against us, including issuing a warning letter, imposing fines on us, requiring a recall of the parts we manufactured or closing our manufacturing facilities. If any of these actions were to occur, it could harm our reputation as well as our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, we may need to obtain additional certifications in the future and there are no guarantees we would be able to do so on a timely basis, if at all. Moreover, obtaining and maintaining required regulatory certifications can be costly and divert management’s attention.
We are subject to payment-related risks.
We accept payments using a variety of methods, including credit card, customer invoicing, physical bank check and payment upon delivery. As we offer new payment options to our customers, we may be subject to additional regulations, compliance requirements and fraud risk. For certain payment methods, including credit and debit cards, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs and lower profitability. We rely on third parties to provide payment processing services, including the processing of credit cards, debit cards or electronic checks, and it could disrupt our business if these companies become unwilling or unable to provide these services to us. We are also subject to payment card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply. If we fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and lose our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from our customers, process electronic funds transfers, or facilitate other types of online payments, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile.
In the year ended December 31, 2013, our common stock had traded as high as $89.97 and as low as $37.23. The market for our common stock may become less active, liquid or orderly, which could depress the trading price of our common stock. Some of the factors, many of which are outside of our control, that may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate include:
|
• |
|
fluctuations in our financial condition and operating results; |
|
• |
|
our ability to retain and attract customers and increase net sales; |
|
• |
|
pricing pressures due to competition or otherwise and changes in gross margins; |
|
• |
|
changes in general economic and market conditions, economic uncertainty and changes in product development activity levels; |
|
• |
|
announcements by us or our competitors of technological innovations or new product or service offerings or significant acquisitions; |
|
• |
|
timing, effectiveness, and costs of expansion and upgrades of our offerings, systems and infrastructure; |
|
• |
|
changes in key personnel; |
|
• |
|
success in entry into new markets and expansion efforts; |
|
• |
|
the public’s response to press releases or other public announcements by us or third parties, including our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and announcements relating to litigation; |
|
• |
|
the projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections; |
|
• |
|
the issuance of new or updated research or reports by any securities or industry analysts who follow our common stock, changes in analysts’ financial estimates or ratings, and failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our common stock; |
|
• |
|
changes in the market valuations of similar companies; |
|
• |
|
significant lawsuits, including patent or shareholder litigation; |
|
• |
|
general economic and market conditions; |
|
• |
|
changes in laws or regulations applicable to us; |
|
• |
|
changes in accounting principles; |
|
• |
|
the sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock; |
|
• |
|
future sales of our common stock by us or our shareholders, including sales by our officers, directors and significant shareholders; |
|
• |
|
share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading levels of our shares; |
|
• |
|
the expiration of contractual lock-up agreements; and |
|
• |
|
other events or factors, including those resulting from war, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or responses to these events. |
In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. In the past, shareholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.
If securities or industry analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable research or reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our common stock, changes their opinion of our shares or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease and we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
Our failure to maintain proper and effective internal controls over financial reporting and otherwise comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or prevent or detect misstatements in our financial statements in the future could harm our business and cause a decrease in our stock price.
Ensuring that we have internal financial and accounting controls and procedures adequate to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, we are required to perform annual system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management and our independent registered public accounting firm to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in the future, or if we fail to prevent or detect misstatements in the financial statements we include in our reports filed with the SEC, our business could be harmed and the market price of our common stock could decline.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Minnesota law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that you might consider favorable.
Our third amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions:
|
• |
|
permit our board of directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with any rights, preferences and privileges as our board may designate, including the right to approve an acquisition or other change in our control; |
|
• |
|
provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed by resolution of the board of directors; |
|
• |
|
provide that all vacancies, including newly created directorships, may, except as otherwise required by law, be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum; |
|
• |
|
provide that shareholders seeking to present proposals before a meeting of shareholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at a meeting of shareholders must provide notice in writing in a timely manner, and also specify requirements as to the form and content of a shareholder’s notice; and |
|
• |
|
do not provide for cumulative voting rights. |
We are subject to the provisions of Section 302A.673 of the Minnesota Statutes, which regulates business combinations. Section 302A.673 generally prohibits any business combination by an issuing public corporation, or any of its subsidiaries, with an interested shareholder, which means any shareholder that purchases 10% or more of the corporation’s voting shares within four years following the date the person became an interested shareholder, unless the business combination is approved by a committee composed solely of one or more disinterested members of the corporation’s board of directors before the date the person became an interested shareholder.
These anti-takeover provisions could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company, even if doing so would benefit our shareholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.
We do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate that we will pay any such cash dividends for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our board of directors deems relevant.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
United States
Our corporate headquarters are located in Maple Plain, Minnesota in a facility we own encompassing approximately 95,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space. We also own a nearby facility encompassing approximately 35,000 square feet of manufacturing space. We lease an additional facility on a property adjacent to our headquarters that encompasses approximately 40,000 square feet of manufacturing space. The lease for this facility expires in 2017, subject to our option to renew for up to two additional five-year terms. We also own a facility in Rosemount, Minnesota that encompasses approximately 130,000 square feet of manufacturing and office space. In August 2013, we purchased a facility in Plymouth, Minnesota that includes approximately 175,000 square feet of manufacturing and office space. This property is currently undergoing renovations to accommodate the growth of our operations and we expect to begin manufacturing in this facility in 2014.
Europe
Our European operations are headquartered in Telford, United Kingdom in a leased facility encompassing approximately 135,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space. The lease for this facility expires in 2016.
We also lease office space in Mosbach, Germany, Chambery, France and Novara, Italy for sales and customer service and technical support staff. We expect that the existing European production facilities will provide sufficient space for our European operations for the foreseeable future.
Japan
Our Japan operations are headquartered in Yamato-Shi, Kanagawa, Japan (southwest of Tokyo) in a leased facility encompassing approximately 30,000 square feet of office and manufacturing space. The lease expires in November 2021 and has a cancellation clause with six months’ prior notice without penalty. We believe that this facility will provide sufficient space for our Japan operations for the foreseeable future.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business activities. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we do not believe we are party to any litigation the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would individually or in the aggregate be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our business.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “PRLB” since February 24, 2012. Our initial public offering was priced at $16.00 per share. Prior to that date, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low intraday sales prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE:
Fiscal 2013 |
Fiscal 2012 |
|||||||||||||||
High |
Low |
High |
Low |
|||||||||||||
First Quarter (1) |
$ | 53.91 | $ | 37.23 | $ | 35.93 | $ | 25.00 | ||||||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 67.40 | $ | 43.61 | $ | 39.08 | $ | 24.90 | ||||||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 80.66 | $ | 61.46 | $ | 41.10 | $ | 28.76 | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 89.97 | $ | 65.52 | $ | 39.80 | $ | 27.96 | ||||||||
(1) The period reported for first quarter of 2012 is from February 24, 2012 through March 31, 2012.
On February 21, 2014, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE was $79.70 per share. As of February 21, 2014, we had 13 holders of record of our common stock. The actual number of shareholders is greater than this number of record holders, and includes shareholders who are beneficial owners, but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to support our operations and finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then-existing conditions, including our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, unless waived, the terms of our existing debt facilities prohibit us from paying dividends on our common stock.
Outstanding Equity Awards
The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2013, information about shares of our common stock that may be issued under equity compensation plans approved by shareholders and plans not approved by shareholders:
Plan Category |
Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, |
Number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans first column) |
||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders(1)(2) |
1,143,250 | $ | 19.03 | 4,449,205(3) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders |
|
None |
|
N/A | None |
(1) Includes the 2000 Stock Option Plan, the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(2) The 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan contains an "evergreen" provision, pursuant to which the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan shall be increased on January 1 of each year beginning in 2012 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2021 in an amount equal to the lesser of 3% of the total number of our shares outstanding as of December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year or a number of shares determined by our board of directors.
(3) Includes 1,382,891 shares remaining available for issuance as of December 31, 2013 under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Performance Graph
The following graph shows a comparison from February 24, 2012 (the date our common stock commenced trading on the NYSE) through December 31, 2013 of the cumulative total return for our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Russell 2000 Index. We have selected the Russell 2000 Index because the Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the small market capitalization segment of U.S. equity instruments and we are a member company included in the Russell 2000 Index. Such returns are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance. Data for the S&P 500 Index and the Russell 2000 Index assume reinvestment of dividends.
Period Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index |
02/23/12 |
03/31/12 |
06/30/12 |
09/30/12 |
12/31/12 |
03/31/13 |
06/30/13 |
09/30/13 |
12/31/13 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proto Labs, Inc. |
100.00 | 213.06 | 179.75 | 211.38 | 246.38 | 306.88 | 406.06 | 477.44 | 444.88 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 |
100.00 | 103.30 | 99.90 | 105.66 | 104.60 | 115.09 | 117.81 | 123.33 | 135.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Russell 2000 |
100.00 | 100.13 | 96.29 | 100.99 | 102.43 | 114.75 | 117.88 | 129.49 | 140.33 |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not sell any unregistered equity securities or purchase any of our securities during the year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial data for the periods and at the dates indicated. The selected consolidated statements of comprehensive income data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and selected consolidated balance sheets data as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated statements of comprehensive income data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report.
The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. You should read this selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 163,112 | $ | 125,991 | $ | 98,939 | $ | 64,919 | $ | 43,833 | ||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
61,410 | 49,853 | 39,324 | 25,443 | 18,559 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
101,702 | 76,138 | 59,615 | 39,476 | 25,274 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and sales | 22,386 | 18,098 | 15,752 | 10,867 | 8,262 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development | 11,863 | 9,137 | 5,222 | 4,281 | 3,140 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
16,154 | 13,957 | 11,772 | 7,629 | 5,965 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on impairment of foreign subsidiary assets |
- | - | - | 773 | - | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
50,403 | 41,192 | 32,746 | 23,550 | 17,367 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
51,299 | 34,946 | 26,869 | 15,926 | 7,907 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
279 | 23 | (114 | ) | (213 | ) | (517 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
51,578 | 34,969 | 26,755 | 15,713 | 7,390 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
16,301 | 10,944 | 8,783 | 4,762 | 3,167 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
35,277 | 24,025 | 17,972 | 10,951 | 4,223 | |||||||||||||||
Less: dividends on redeemable preferred stock |
- | - | (4,179 | ) | (4,179 | ) | (4,180 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to preferred shareholders |
- | - | (4,507 | ) | (2,377 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to common shareholders(1) |
$ | 35,277 | $ | 24,025 | $ | 9,286 | $ | 4,395 | $ | 27 | ||||||||||
Net income per share(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.40 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.36 | $ | 0.98 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
25,198,556 | 23,373,593 | 12,352,004 | 11,079,432 | 10,564,946 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
25,859,741 | 24,443,665 | 13,939,072 | 13,051,458 | 13,201,762 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
$ | (163 | ) | $ | (190 | ) | $ | (280 | ) | $ | (214 | ) | $ | 152 | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 35,114 | $ | 23,835 | $ | 17,692 | $ | 10,737 | $ | 4,375 | ||||||||||
Other Financial Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP net income (unaudited)(2) |
$ | 37,891 | $ | 26,220 | $ | 18,764 | $ | 11,226 | $ | 4,435 |
Stock-based compensation expense included in the statements of comprehensive income data above is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|||||||||||||||
Stock options and grants |
$ | 3,084 | $ | 2,539 | $ | 1,130 | $ | 331 | $ | 245 | ||||||||||
Employee stock purchase plan |
377 | 500 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 3,461 | $ | 3,039 | $ | 1,130 | $ | 331 | $ | 245 | ||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 316 | $ | 335 | $ | 78 | $ | 39 | $ | 29 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and sales |
610 | 418 | 215 | 84 | 70 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development |
754 | 486 | 274 | 73 | 53 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,781 | 1,800 | 563 | 135 | 93 | |||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 3,461 | $ | 3,039 | $ | 1,130 | $ | 331 | $ | 245 |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 43,039 | $ | 36,759 | $ | 8,135 | $ | 6,101 | $ | 2,703 | ||||||||||
Working capital |
96,132 | 78,617 | 18,138 | 10,424 | 4,533 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
230,175 | 172,722 | 62,326 | 38,354 | 28,797 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
18,532 | 16,023 | 15,675 | 11,730 | 13,297 | |||||||||||||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock and redeemable common stock |
- | - | 66,894 | 62,715 | 58,536 | |||||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) |
$ | 211,643 | $ | 156,699 | $ | (20,243 | ) | $ | (36,091 | ) | $ | (43,036 | ) |
(1) |
See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of the method used to calculate net income per basic and diluted share attributable to common shareholders and weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
|
|
(2) |
The measure of non-GAAP net income presented is net income adjusted for stock-based compensation expense. See “Non-GAAP Net Income” below for more information and for a reconciliation of non-GAAP net income to net income, the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. |
Non-GAAP Net Income
To provide investors with additional information regarding our financial results, we have disclosed in the table above non-GAAP net income, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. We have provided a reconciliation below of non-GAAP net income, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, to net income, the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
We have included non-GAAP net income, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate operating performance and trends and provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business. Accordingly, we believe that non-GAAP net income, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors.
The following table presents a reconciliation of non-GAAP net income, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense, to net income for each of the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
(unaudited) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP net income, adjusted for stock-based compensation expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP net income |
$ | 35,277 | $ | 24,025 | $ | 17,972 | $ | 10,951 | $ | 4,223 | ||||||||||
Add back: Stock-based compensation expense |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
316 | 335 | 78 | 39 | 29 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing and sales |
610 | 418 | 215 | 84 | 70 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development |
754 | 486 | 274 | 73 | 53 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,781 | 1,800 | 563 | 135 | 93 | |||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
3,461 | 3,039 | 1,130 | 331 | 245 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Tax benefit on stock-based compensation |
(847 | ) | (844 | ) | (338 | ) | (56 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-GAAP net income |
$ | 37,891 | $ | 26,220 | $ | 18,764 | $ | 11,226 | $ | 4,435 |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward- looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a leading online and technology-enabled manufacturer of quick-turn CNC-machined and injection-molded custom parts for prototyping and short-run production. We provide “Real Parts, Really Fast” to product developers worldwide, who are under increasing pressure to bring their finished products to market faster than their competition. We believe low-volume manufacturing has historically been an underserved market due to the inefficiencies inherent in the quotation, equipment set-up and non-recurring engineering processes required to produce custom parts. Our proprietary technology eliminates most of the time-consuming and expensive skilled labor conventionally required to quote and manufacture parts in low volumes, and our customers conduct nearly all of their business with us over the Internet. We target our services to the millions of product developers who use 3D CAD software to design products across a diverse range of end-markets. Our primary manufacturing services currently include Firstcut, which is our CNC machining service, and Protomold, which is our injection molding service. Through December 31, 2013, we have received over 1,400,000 uploaded part designs, sent over 1,200,000 part quotations and shipped over 300,000 unique parts to approximately 36,000 product developers representing over 16,000 customer companies across a wide range of industries.
We have experienced significant growth since our inception. Since we first introduced our Protomold injection molding service in 1999, we have steadily expanded the size and geometric complexity of the injection-molded parts we are able to manufacture, and we continue to extend the diversity of materials we are able to support. Similarly, since first introducing our Firstcut CNC machining service in 2007, we have expanded the range of part sizes, design geometries and materials we can support. We are also continually seeking to enhance other aspects of our technology and manufacturing processes, including our interactive web-based and automated user interface and quoting system. We intend to continue to invest significantly in enhancing our technology and manufacturing processes and expanding the range of our existing capabilities with the aim of meeting the needs of a broader set of product developers. As a result of the factors described above, many of our customers tend to return to Proto Labs to meet their ongoing needs, with approximately 86%, 84% and 81% of our revenue in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, derived from existing customers who had placed orders with us in prior years.
We have established our operations in the United States, Europe and Japan, which we believe are three of the largest geographic markets where product developers are located. We entered the European market in 2005 and launched operations in Japan in late 2009. As of December 31, 2013, we had sold products into more than 50 countries. Our revenue outside of the United States accounted for approximately 27%, 25% and 26% of our consolidated revenue in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We intend to continue to expand our international sales efforts and believe opportunities exist to serve the needs of product developers in select new geographic regions.
We have grown our total revenue from $43.8 million in 2009 to $163.1 million in 2013. During this period, our operating expenses increased from $17.4 million in 2009 to $50.4 million in 2013. We have grown our income from operations from $7.9 million in 2009 to $51.3 million in 2013. Our recent growth in revenue and income from operations has been accompanied by increased operating expenses, with the two most significant components being marketing and sales and general and administrative expenses. We expect to increasingly invest in our operations to support anticipated future growth as discussed more fully below.
In addition, we believe that a number of trends affecting our industry have affected our results of operations and may continue to do so. For example, we believe that many of our target product developer customers have increasing e-commerce expectations, are facing increased pressure to accelerate the time to market for their products and continue to migrate from using 2D CAD to using 3D CAD for their design needs. We believe we continue to be well positioned to benefit from these trends, given our proprietary technology that enables us to automate and integrate the majority of activities involved in procuring custom low-volume parts, starting with our elegant web interface through which a product developer submits a 3D CAD part design. While our business may be positively affected by these trends, our results may also be favorably or unfavorably impacted by other trends that affect product developer orders for custom parts in low volumes, including, among others, changes in product developer preferences or needs, developments in our industry and among our competitors and factors impacting new product development volume such as economic conditions. For a more complete discussion of the risks facing our business, see “Risk Factors.”
Key Financial Measures and Trends
Revenue
Our operations are comprised of three geographic business units in the United States, Europe and Japan. Revenue within each of our subsidiaries is derived from our Firstcut and Protomold services. Firstcut revenue consists of sales of CNC-machined custom parts. Protomold revenue consists of sales of custom injection molds and injection-molded parts. Our revenue is generated from a diverse customer base, with no single customer company representing more than 2% of our total revenue in 2013. Our historical and current efforts to increase revenue have been directed at gaining new customers and selling to our existing customer base by increasing marketing and selling activities, offering additional services such as the introduction of our Firstcut service in 2007, expanding internationally such as the opening of our Japanese office in 2009, improving the usability of our services such as our web-centric applications, and expanding the breadth and scope of our products such as by adding more sizes and materials to our offerings.
During 2013, we sold our services to approximately 5,730 customer companies from our existing customer base, an increase of 20% over the comparable period in 2012, and to approximately 3,020 new customer companies, an increase of 1% over the comparable period in 2012. During 2012, we sold our services to approximately 4,760 customer companies from our existing customer base, an increase of 39% over the comparable period in 2011, and to approximately 2,990 new customer companies, an increase of 15% over the comparable period in 2011. During 2011, we sold our services to approximately 3,430 customer companies from our existing customer base, an increase of 38% over the comparable period in 2010, and to approximately 2,600 new customer companies, an increase of 36% over the comparable period in 2010.
During 2013, we served approximately 7,820 existing product developers, an increase of 30% over the comparable period in 2012, and approximately 8,300 new product developers, an increase of 12% over the comparable period in 2012. During 2012, we served approximately 6,020 existing product developers, an increase of 38% over the comparable period in 2011, and approximately 7,430 new product developers, an increase of 23% over the comparable period in 2011. During 2011, we served approximately 4,360 existing product developers, an increase of 44% over the comparable period in 2010, and approximately 6,060 new product developers, an increase of 48% over the comparable period in 2010.
Cost of Revenue, Gross Profit and Gross Margin
Cost of revenue consists primarily of raw materials, equipment depreciation, employee compensation, benefits, stock-based compensation and overhead allocations associated with the manufacturing process for molds and custom parts. We expect cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars, but remain relatively constant as a percentage of total revenue.
Our business model requires that we invest in our capacity well in advance of demand to ensure we can fulfill the expectations for quick service from our customers. Therefore, during each of 2013 and 2012 we made significant investments in additional factory space and infrastructure in the United States and Japan. We expect to continue to grow in future periods, which will result in the need for additional investments in factory space and equipment. We expect that these additional costs for factory and equipment expansion can be absorbed by revenue growth, and allow gross margins to remain relatively consistent over time.
We define gross profit as our revenue less our cost of revenue, and we define gross margin as gross profit expressed as a percentage of revenue. Our gross profit and gross margin are affected by many factors, including our pricing, sales volume and manufacturing costs, the costs associated with increasing production capacity, the mix between domestic and foreign revenue sources and foreign exchange rates.
Our gross margins vary between geographic markets due primarily to the costs associated with starting new factories and our operating maturity in these markets. We believe that over time and with growth and maturity of our international business, gross margins will be generally consistent through all our markets.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of marketing and sales, research and development and general and administrative expenses. Personnel-related costs are the most significant component of the marketing and sales, research and development and general and administrative expense categories.
Our recent growth in operating expenses is mainly due to higher headcounts to support our growth and expansion, and we expect that trend to continue. Our business strategy is to continue to be a leading online and technology-enabled manufacturer of quick-turn CNC-machined and injection-molded custom parts for prototyping and short-run production. For us to achieve our goals, we anticipate continued substantial investments in technology and personnel, resulting in increased operating expenses.
Marketing and sales. Marketing and sales expense consists primarily of employee compensation, benefits, commissions, stock-based compensation, marketing programs such as print and pay-per-click advertising, trade shows, direct mail and other related overhead. We expect sales and marketing expense to increase in the future as we increase the number of marketing and sales professionals and marketing programs targeted to increase our customer base.
Research and development. Research and development expense consists primarily of employee compensation, benefits, stock-based compensation, depreciation on equipment, outside services and other related overhead. All of our research and development costs have been expensed as incurred. We expect research and development expense to increase in the future as we seek to enhance and expand our service offerings.
General and administrative. General and administrative expense consists primarily of employee compensation, benefits, stock-based compensation, professional service fees related to accounting, tax and legal and other related overhead. We expect general and administrative expense to increase on an absolute basis and as a percentage of revenue as we continue to grow and expand our operations and develop the infrastructure necessary to operate as a public company. These expenses will include increased audit and legal fees, costs of compliance with securities and other regulations and implementation costs for compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net primarily consists of foreign currency-related gains and losses, interest income on cash balances and investments, and interest expense on borrowings. Our foreign currency-related gains and losses will vary depending upon movements in underlying exchange rates. Our interest income will vary each reporting period depending on our average cash balances during the period, composition of our marketable security portfolio and the current level of interest rates. Our interest expense will vary based on borrowings and interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes is comprised of federal, state, local and foreign taxes based on pre-tax income. We expect income taxes to increase as our taxable income increases and our effective tax rate to remain relatively constant.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth a summary of our results of operations and the related changes for the periods indicated. The results below are not necessarily indicative of the results for future periods.
Year Ended |
Change |
Year Ended |
Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
2013 |
2012 |
$ |
% |
2012 |
2011 |
$ |
% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 163,112 | 100.0 | % | $ | 125,991 | 100.0 | % | $ | 37,121 | 29.5 | % | $ | 125,991 | 100.0 | % | $ | 98,939 | 100.0 | % | $ | 27,052 | 27.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
61,410 | 37.6 | 49,853 | 39.6 | 11,557 | 23.2 | 49,853 | 39.6 | 39,324 | 39.7 | 10,529 | 26.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
101,702 | 62.4 | 76,138 | 60.4 | 25,564 | 33.6 | 76,138 | 60.4 | 59,615 | 60.3 | 16,523 | 27.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and sales | 22,386 | 13.7 | 18,098 | 14.4 | 4,288 | 23.7 | 18,098 | 14.4 | 15,752 | 15.9 | 2,346 | 14.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 11,863 | 7.3 | 9,137 | 7.2 | 2,726 | 29.8 | 9,137 | 7.2 | 5,222 | 5.3 | 3,915 | 75.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 16,154 | 9.9 | 13,957 | 11.1 | 2,197 | 15.7 | 13,957 | 11.1 | 11,772 | 11.9 | 2,185 | 18.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 50,403 | 30.9 | 41,192 | 32.7 | 9,211 | 22.4 | 41,192 | 32.7 | 32,746 | 33.1 | 8,446 | 25.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
51,299 | 31.5 | 34,946 | 27.7 | 16,353 | 46.8 | 34,946 | 27.7 | 26,869 | 27.2 | 8,077 | 30.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
279 | 0.1 | 23 | 0.1 | 256 | * | 23 | 0.1 | (114 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 137 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
51,578 | 31.6 | 34,969 | 27.8 | 16,609 | 47.5 | 34,969 | 27.8 | 26,755 | 27.0 | 8,214 | 30.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
16,301 | 10.0 | 10,944 | 8.7 | 5,357 | 48.9 | 10,944 | 8.7 | 8,783 | 8.8 | 2,161 | 24.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 35,277 | 21.6 | % | $ | 24,025 | 19.1 | % | $ | 11,252 | 46.8 | % | $ | 24,025 | 19.1 | % | $ | 17,972 | 18.2 | % | $ | 6,053 | 33.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Percentage change not meaningful
Stock-based compensation expense included in the statements of comprehensive income data above is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||||
Stock options and grants |
$ | 3,084 | $ | 2,539 | $ | 1,130 | ||||||
Employee stock purchase plan |
377 | 500 | - | |||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 3,461 | $ | 3,039 | $ | 1,130 | ||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 316 | $ | 335 | $ | 78 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Marketing and sales | 610 | 418 | 215 | |||||||||
Research and development | 754 | 486 | 274 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 1,781 | 1,800 | 563 | |||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 3,461 | $ | 3,039 | $ | 1,130 | ||||||
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
Revenue
Revenue and the related changes for 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
$ |
% of Total Revenue |
$ |
% of Total Revenue |
$ |
% |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protomold | $ | 115,069 | 70.5 | % | $ | 90,371 | 71.7 | % | $ | 24,698 | 27.3 | % | ||||||||||||
First Cut | 48,043 | 29.5 | 35,620 | 28.3 | 12,423 | 34.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 163,112 | 100.0 | % | $ | 125,991 | 100.0 | % | $ | 37,121 | 29.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenue by geographic region, based on the billing location of the end customer, is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
$ |
% of Total Revenue |
$ |
% of Total Revenue |
$ |
% |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States | $ | 119,870 | 73.5 | % | $ | 94,866 | 75.3 | % | $ | 25,004 | 26.4 | % | ||||||||||||
International | 43,242 | 26.5 | 31,125 | 24.7 | 12,117 | 38.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 163,112 | 100.0 | % | $ | 125,991 | 100.0 | % | $ | 37,121 | 29.5 | % | ||||||||||||