Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form N-CSR

 

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act File Number: 811-22269

 

 

Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

 

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

 

Maureen A. Gemma

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Name and Address of Agent for Services)

 

 

(617) 482-8260

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

March 31

Date of Fiscal Year End

September 30, 2017

Date of Reporting Period

 

 

 


Item 1. Reports to Stockholders

 


LOGO

 

 

Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust (EOT)

Semiannual Report

September 30, 2017

 

 

 

LOGO


 

 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission Registration. Effective December 31, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted certain regulatory changes that subject registered investment companies and advisers to regulation by the CFTC if a fund invests more than a prescribed level of its assets in certain CFTC-regulated instruments (including futures, certain options and swap agreements) or markets itself as providing investment exposure to such instruments. The Fund has claimed an exclusion from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act. Accordingly, neither the Fund nor the adviser with respect to the operation of the Fund is subject to CFTC regulation. Because of its management of other strategies, the Fund’s adviser is registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator and a commodity trading advisor.

Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.


Semiannual Report September 30, 2017

Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

Table of Contents

 

Performance

     2  

Fund Profile

     2  

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

     3  

Financial Statements

     4  

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval

     18  

Officers and Trustees

     21  

Important Notices

     22  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Performance1,2

 

Portfolio Manager Cynthia J. Clemson

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      Six Months      One Year      Five Years    

Since

Inception

 

Fund at NAV

     05/29/2009        3.41      0.88      4.48     7.38

Fund at Market Price

            7.89        3.00        4.81       7.82  

Bloomberg Barclays Long (22+) Year Municipal Bond Index

            4.02      0.59      4.12     6.54
             

% Premium/Discount to NAV3

                                           
                3.47
             

Distributions4

                                           

Total Distributions per share for the period

                $0.515  

Distribution Rate at NAV

                4.70

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

                8.30

Distribution Rate at Market Price

                4.54

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

                8.02
             

% Total Leverage5

                                           

Residual Interest Bond (RIB) Financing

                11.08

Fund Profile

 

Credit Quality (% of total investments)6,7

 

 

LOGO

 

    

 

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested and include management fees and other expenses. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than or equal to one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month-end, please refer to eatonvance.com.

 

  2  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

 

 

1 

Bloomberg Barclays Long (22+) Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or more. Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

 

2 

Performance results reflect the effects of leverage. Performance since inception for an index, if presented, is the performance since the Fund’s or oldest share class’ inception, as applicable.

 

3 

The shares of the Fund often trade at a discount or premium from their net asset value. The discount or premium of the Fund may vary over time and may be higher or lower than what is quoted in this report. For up-to-date premium/discount information, please refer to http://eatonvance.com/closedend.

 

4 

The Distribution Rate is based on the Fund’s last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) divided by the Fund’s NAV or market price at the end of the period. The Fund’s distributions may be comprised of amounts characterized for federal income tax purposes as tax-exempt income, qualified and non-qualified ordinary dividends, capital gains and nondividend distributions, also known as return of capital. The Fund will determine the federal income tax character of distributions paid to a shareholder after the end of the calendar year. This is reported on the IRS form 1099-DIV and provided to the shareholder shortly after each year-end. For information about the tax character of distributions made in prior calendar years, please refer to Performance-Tax Character of Distributions on the Fund’s webpage available at eatonvance.com. The Fund’s distributions are determined by the investment adviser based on its current assessment of the Fund’s long-term return potential. Fund distributions may be affected by numerous factors including changes in Fund performance, the cost of financing for leverage, portfolio holdings, realized and projected returns, and other factors. As portfolio and market conditions change, the rate of distributions paid by the Fund could change. Taxable-equivalent performance is based on the highest combined federal and state income tax rates, where applicable. Lower tax rates would result in lower tax-equivalent performance. Actual tax rates will vary depending on your income, exemptions and deductions. Rates do not include local taxes.

5 

Fund employs RIB financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of NAV). The cost of leverage rises and falls with changes in short-term interest rates. See “Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held” in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding at period end as a percentage of Fund net assets plus Floating Rate Notes.

 

6 

Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. If securities are rated differently by the ratings agencies, the higher rating is applied. Ratings, which are subject to change, apply to the creditworthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not to the Fund or its shares. Credit ratings measure the quality of a bond based on the issuer’s creditworthiness, with ratings ranging from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P’s measures. Ratings of BBB or higher by S&P or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody’s) are considered to be investment-grade quality. Credit ratings are based largely on the ratings agency’s analysis at the time of rating. The rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition and does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. Holdings designated as “Not Rated” are not rated by the national ratings agencies stated above.

 

7 

The chart includes the municipal bonds held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds, consistent with the Portfolio of Investments.

 

   Fund profile subject to change due to active management.

   Important Notice to Shareholders

   Effective September 30, 2017, the Fund’s benchmark was changed to the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index.
 

 

  3  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited)

 

 

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 108.3%  
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Education — 5.6%

 

Maine Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Bowdoin College), 5.00%, 7/1/39(1)

  $ 10,440     $ 11,088,428  

New York Dormitory Authority, (Brooklyn Law School), 5.75%, 7/1/33

    1,500       1,596,390  

New York Dormitory Authority, (The New School), 5.00%, 7/1/36

    1,405       1,620,738  

New York Dormitory Authority, (The New School), Prerefunded to 7/1/20, 5.75%, 7/1/50

    3,000       3,377,550  

Oregon Facilities Authority, (Lewis & Clark College), 5.625%, 10/1/36

    750       860,228  
                 
    $ 18,543,334  
                 

Electric Utilities — 9.1%

 

Apache County Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 4.50%, 3/1/30

  $ 340     $ 369,872  

Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric), 5.875%, 1/1/34

    3,650       3,921,232  

Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas and Electric), 5.875%, 2/15/34

    2,815       3,024,183  

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric Co.), 6.50%, 7/1/39

    4,540       4,893,257  

Indiana Financing Authority, (Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.), 6.00%, 8/1/39

    7,600       8,192,116  

Matagorda County Navigation District No. 1, TX, (Central Power and Light Co.), 6.30%, 11/1/29

    6,000       6,617,760  

Pima County Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 4.00%, 9/1/29

    715       753,817  

Pima County Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 5.25%, 10/1/40

    2,500       2,681,575  
                 
    $ 30,453,812  
                 

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 14.9%

 

Atlanta, GA, Water and Wastewater Revenue, Prerefunded to 11/1/19, 6.25%, 11/1/34

  $ 3,000     $ 3,325,410  

Bexar County Health Facilities Development Corp., TX, (Army Retirement Residence Foundation), Prerefunded to 7/1/20, 6.20%, 7/1/45

    2,000       2,274,880  

Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., NY, (Barclays Center), Prerefunded to 1/15/20, 6.00%, 7/15/30

    510       568,166  

Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., NY, (Barclays Center), Prerefunded to 1/15/20, 6.25%, 7/15/40

    575       643,833  

Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., NY, (Barclays Center), Prerefunded to 1/15/20, 6.375%, 7/15/43

    315       353,600  

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), Prerefunded to 7/1/19, 6.00%, 7/1/34

    980       1,065,946  

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), Prerefunded to 7/1/19, 6.00%, 7/1/39

    1,000       1,087,700  
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Escrowed / Prerefunded (continued)

 

Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, Prerefunded to 12/1/19, 5.625%, 12/1/29

  $ 1,625     $ 1,783,795  

Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, Prerefunded to 12/1/19, 5.75%, 12/1/34

    1,020       1,122,398  

Illinois Finance Authority, (Provena Healthcare), Prerefunded to 8/15/19, 7.75%, 8/15/34

    2,970       3,337,656  

Illinois Finance Authority, (Rush University Medical Center), Prerefunded to 5/1/19, 6.625%, 11/1/39

    2,300       2,502,193  

Marco Island, FL, Utility System, Prerefunded to 10/1/20, 5.00%, 10/1/40

    2,425       2,705,766  

Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Charlestown Community, Inc.), Prerefunded to 1/1/21, 6.125%, 1/1/30

    470       543,677  

New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority, (Dartmouth College), Prerefunded to 6/1/19, 5.25%, 6/1/39(1)

    12,000       12,848,640  

Onondaga Civic Development Corp., NY, (St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center), Prerefunded to 7/1/22, 5.00%, 7/1/42

    2,425       2,825,877  

Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, AZ, Prerefunded to 1/1/18, 5.00%, 1/1/38(1)

    9,000       9,094,500  

Southwestern Illinois Development Authority, (Memorial Group, Inc.), Prerefunded to 11/1/23, 7.25%, 11/1/33

    770       1,022,822  

Washington Housing Finance Commission, (Wesley Homes), Prerefunded to 1/1/18, 6.20%, 1/1/36

    2,500       2,533,500  
                 
    $ 49,640,359  
                 

General Obligations — 5.8%

 

California, 5.00%, 10/1/33

  $ 4,035     $ 4,779,175  

California, 6.00%, 4/1/38

    5,750       6,173,833  

Commerce Charter Township, MI, 4.00%, 12/1/38

    1,030       1,116,870  

Commerce Charter Township, MI, 4.00%, 12/1/39

    1,075       1,157,850  

Illinois, 5.00%, 5/1/36

    3,500       3,682,210  

Will County Community Unit School District No. 365-U, IL, (Valley View), 5.75%, 11/1/32

    2,210       2,545,655  
                 
    $ 19,455,593  
                 

Hospital — 11.9%

 

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (St. Joseph Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/37

  $ 165     $ 186,318  

Camden County Improvement Authority, NJ, (Cooper Health System), 5.75%, 2/15/42

    665       745,006  

Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (Texas Children’s Hospital), 5.50%, 10/1/39(1)

    12,300       13,261,491  

Illinois Finance Authority, (Presence Health Network), 3.75%, 2/15/34

    2,000       1,990,240  

Illinois Finance Authority, (Presence Health Network), 4.00%, 2/15/36

    2,500       2,570,875  
 

 

  4   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Hospital (continued)

 

Illinois Finance Authority, (Rush University Medical Center), 4.00%, 11/15/39

  $ 1,000     $ 1,015,090  

Johnson City Health & Educational Facilities Board, TN, (Mountain States Health Alliance), 6.00%, 7/1/38

    1,665       1,807,108  

Kansas Development Finance Authority, (Adventist Health System), 5.75%, 11/15/38

    5,915       6,447,231  

Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Catholic Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39

    3,400       3,627,868  

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lowell General Hospital), 4.75%, 7/1/25

    1,450       1,543,902  

New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 12/1/35(2)

    900       986,688  

South Lake County Hospital District, FL, (South Lake Hospital), 6.25%, 4/1/39

    1,365       1,449,562  

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (Cook Children’s Medical Center), 5.25%, 12/1/39(1)

    3,500       3,955,280  
                 
    $ 39,586,659  
                 

Housing — 0.4%

 

New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (CHF-Collegiate Housing Stephenville III, LLC - Tarleton State University), 5.00%, 4/1/47

  $ 445     $ 478,384  

New York City Housing Development Corp., NY, 3.85%, 11/1/42

    1,000       1,014,950  
                 
    $ 1,493,334  
                 

Industrial Development Revenue — 11.7%

 

Alabama Industrial Development Authority, (Pine City Fiber Co.), (AMT), 6.45%, 12/1/23

  $ 5,000     $ 5,000,900  

Brazos River Harbor Navigation District of Brazoria County, TX, (Dow Chemical Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/15/33

    3,000       3,132,570  

Campbell County, WY, (Basin Electric Power Cooperative), 5.75%, 7/15/39

    3,000       3,192,300  

Clayton County Development Authority, GA, (Delta Air Lines, Inc.), 8.75%, 6/1/29

    3,420       3,970,654  

Essex County Improvement Authority, NJ, (Covanta), (AMT), 5.25%, 7/1/45(2)

    1,950       1,962,753  

Maine Finance Authority, (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), (AMT), 5.125% to 8/1/25 (Put Date), 8/1/35(2)

    725       745,924  

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Covanta Energy), 4.875%, 11/1/42(2)

    2,695       2,696,105  

Nevada Department of Business and Industry, (Republic Services, Inc.), (AMT), 5.625% to 6/1/18
(Put Date), 12/1/26

    1,800       1,846,854  

New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), (AMT), 4.00% to 10/1/19
(Put Date), 4/1/29(2)

    1,500       1,500,570  

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 5.125%, 9/15/23

    630       693,498  
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Industrial Development Revenue (continued)

 

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 5.25%, 9/15/29

  $ 1,900     $ 2,088,556  

New York Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35

    2,560       3,282,202  

Owen County, KY, (Kentucky-American Water Co., Inc.), 6.25%, 6/1/39

    3,000       3,201,690  

Phenix City Industrial Development Board, AL, (MeadWestvaco Coated Board), (AMT), 4.125%, 5/15/35

    3,935       3,986,430  

Selma Industrial Development Board, AL, (International Paper Co.), 5.80%, 5/1/34

    850       935,042  

Washington Economic Development Finance Authority, (Columbia Pulp I, LLC), (AMT), 7.50%, 1/1/32(2)

    790       877,761  
                 
    $ 39,113,809  
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 1.0%

 

Atlantic City, NJ, (AGM), 4.00%, 3/1/42(3)

  $ 145     $ 148,194  

McHenry County Community Unit School District No. 12, IL, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/1/30

    2,910       3,225,561  
                 
    $ 3,373,755  
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 3.7%

 

Hesperia Public Financing Authority, CA, (Redevelopment and Housing Projects), (XLCA), 5.00%, 9/1/37

  $ 295     $ 295,372  

Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 6.875%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/34

    4,000       4,850,160  

Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 7.00%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/39

    6,000       7,237,380  
                 
    $ 12,382,912  
                 

Insured – Transportation — 5.0%

 

Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), (AGM), 5.50%, 1/1/43

  $ 710     $ 804,906  

Clark County, NV, (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport), (AGM), 5.25%, 7/1/39

    2,885       3,126,676  

New York Transportation Development Corp., (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment), (AGM), (AMT), 4.00%, 7/1/35

    460       479,904  

New York Transportation Development Corp., (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment), (AGM), (AMT), 4.00%, 7/1/37

    1,295       1,343,873  

New York Transportation Development Corp., (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment), (AGM), (AMT), 4.00%, 7/1/41

    1,185       1,220,325  

New York Transportation Development Corp., (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment), (AGM), (AMT), 4.00%, 1/1/51

    1,000       1,017,140  
 

 

  5   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Insured – Transportation (continued)

 

North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System), (AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/35

  $ 4,000     $ 2,124,960  

North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System), (AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/36

    13,000       6,610,240  
                 
    $ 16,728,024  
                 

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 2.9%

 

Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., NY, 4.00%, 2/15/36

  $ 4,000     $ 4,274,080  

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hospital Asset Transformation Program), 5.75%, 10/1/31

    5,000       5,342,300  
                 
    $ 9,616,380  
                 

Other Revenue — 0.4%

 

Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/37

  $ 1,245     $ 1,493,378  
                 
    $ 1,493,378  
                 

Senior Living / Life Care — 5.9%

 

ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations, CA, (Episcopal Senior Communities), 6.00%, 7/1/31

  $ 1,295     $ 1,472,907  

Atlantic Beach, FL, (Fleet Landing), 5.00%, 11/15/37

    3,405       3,661,022  

District of Columbia, (Ingleside at Rock Creek), 3.875%, 7/1/24

    220       220,040  

District of Columbia, (Ingleside at Rock Creek), 5.00%, 7/1/32

    175       186,678  

Douglas County Hospital Authority No. 2, NE, (Immanuel Obligated Group), 5.50%, 1/1/30

    465       496,025  

Douglas County Hospital Authority No. 2, NE, (Immanuel Obligated Group), 5.625%, 1/1/40

    925       978,983  

Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (Brazos Presbyterian Homes, Inc.), 5.75%, 1/1/28

    165       182,129  

Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., TX, (Brazos Presbyterian Homes, Inc.), 6.375%, 1/1/33

    345       390,481  

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Kahala Senior Living Community, Inc.), 5.125%, 11/15/32

    300       328,884  

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Kahala Senior Living Community, Inc.), 5.25%, 11/15/37

    275       300,096  

Lee County Industrial Development Authority, FL, (Shell Point Village/Alliance Community), 6.125%, 11/15/26

    500       577,500  

Lee County Industrial Development Authority, FL, (Shell Point Village/Alliance Community), 6.50%, 11/15/31

    1,600       1,846,064  

Multnomah County Hospital Facilities Authority, OR, (Mirabella at South Waterfront), 5.00%, 10/1/24

    835       916,838  

Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority, FL, (Sinai Residences of Boca Raton), 7.25%, 6/1/39

    550       663,690  

Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority, FL, (Sinai Residences of Boca Raton), 7.50%, 6/1/49

    2,560       3,116,954  
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Senior Living / Life Care (continued)

 

Public Finance Authority, WI, (Mary’s Woods at Marylhurst), 5.25%, 5/15/37(2)

  $ 630     $ 677,773  

Tempe Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Friendship Village of Tempe), 6.00%, 12/1/32

    255       273,289  

Tempe Industrial Development Authority, AZ, (Friendship Village of Tempe), 6.25%, 12/1/42

    735       787,126  

Tulsa County Industrial Authority, OK, (Montereau, Inc.), 5.25%, 11/15/37

    1,000       1,128,030  

Washington Housing Finance Commission, (Bayview Manor Homes),
5.00%, 7/1/51(2)

    1,335       1,349,044  
                 
    $ 19,553,553  
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 0.2%

 

New York Urban Development Corp., Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 3/15/34

  $ 680     $ 809,805  
                 
    $ 809,805  
                 

Student Loan — 1.2%

 

Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, 6.00%, 1/1/28

  $ 2,245     $ 2,375,838  

New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, (AMT), 4.75%, 12/1/43

    1,445       1,483,553  
                 
    $ 3,859,391  
                 

Transportation — 22.3%

 

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, 5.00%, 1/1/45

  $ 750     $ 833,865  

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Prerefunded to 1/1/21, 5.75%, 1/1/31

    325       371,732  

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Prerefunded to 1/1/21, 6.00%, 1/1/41

    35       40,311  

Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), 5.00%, 1/1/33

    1,500       1,729,080  

Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), 5.00%, 1/1/38

    1,630       1,877,450  

Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/25

    1,345       1,536,649  

Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/26

    1,140       1,299,395  

Dallas and Fort Worth, TX, (Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport), 5.25%, 11/1/30

    1,125       1,334,891  

Dallas and Fort Worth, TX, (Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport), 5.25%, 11/1/31

    1,735       2,056,704  

Dallas and Fort Worth, TX, (Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/38

    5,225       5,683,389  

Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., TX, 5.125%, 10/1/43

    875       975,984  

Hawaii, Airports System Revenue, (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/41

    1,065       1,203,493  

Houston, TX, (United Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/29

    2,060       2,266,474  

Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority, TN, (AMT), 5.75%, 7/1/24

    350       389,595  
 

 

  6   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Transportation (continued)

 

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, 4.00%, 11/15/41

  $ 3,000     $ 3,171,540  

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, 5.00%, 11/15/31

    1,000       1,136,670  

Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), 5.00%, 10/1/41

    1,360       1,468,610  

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (The Goethals Bridge Replacement), (AMT), 5.125%, 1/1/34

    1,250       1,360,237  

New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 0.00%, 12/15/38

    20,000       7,512,400  

New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 4.00%, 1/1/37

    1,000       1,063,130  

New Orleans Aviation Board, LA, (AMT), 5.00%, 1/1/48

    750       847,110  

New York Transportation Development Corp., (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/46

    2,115       2,328,065  

North Texas Tollway Authority, 5.50%, 9/1/41(1)

    2,660       3,055,382  

North Texas Tollway Authority, Prerefunded to 1/1/18, 5.75%, 1/1/38

    5,000       5,060,900  

Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, FL, 5.00%, 7/1/35

    155       169,324  

Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, FL, Prerefunded to 7/1/20, 5.00%, 7/1/35

    595       657,463  

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 5.00%, 11/15/36

    3,000       3,468,090  

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, 5.00%, 1/15/50

    6,400       7,028,096  

St. Louis, MO, (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport), 6.625%, 7/1/34

    5,000       5,447,250  

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (LBJ Express Managed Lanes Project), 7.00%, 6/30/34

    2,625       2,956,275  

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (North Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project), 6.875%, 12/31/39

    1,520       1,690,255  

Texas Transportation Commission, (Central Texas Turnpike System), 5.00%, 8/15/37

    3,500       3,895,185  

Texas Transportation Commission, (Central Texas Turnpike System), 5.00%, 8/15/42

    445       492,348  
                 
    $ 74,407,342  
                 

Water and Sewer — 6.3%

 

Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, 5.00%, 7/1/32

  $ 1,450     $ 1,594,449  

Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, 5.25%, 7/1/39

    1,405       1,551,935  

Detroit, MI, Water Supply System, 5.25%, 7/1/41

    2,725       2,953,219  

Michigan Finance Authority, (Detroit Water and Sewerage Department), 5.00%, 7/1/34

    2,070       2,305,297  

New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, NY, (Water and Sewer System), 5.25%, 6/15/40(1)

    11,700       12,514,671  
                 
    $ 20,919,571  
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 108.3%
(identified cost $323,825,634)

 

  $ 361,431,011  
                 
Taxable Municipal Securities — 2.4%  
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

General Obligations — 1.1%

 

Chicago, IL, 7.375%, 1/1/33

  $ 1,750     $ 2,002,875  

Chicago, IL, 7.781%, 1/1/35

    1,400       1,665,902  
                 
    $ 3,668,777  
                 

Hospital — 1.3%

 

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Loma Linda University Medical Center), 6.00%, 12/1/24

  $ 4,000     $ 4,238,280  
                 
    $ 4,238,280  
                 

Total Taxable Municipal Securities — 2.4%
(identified cost $7,218,280)

 

  $ 7,907,057  
                 
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 0.2%  
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Hospital — 0.2%

 

NYU Hospitals Center, 4.368%, 7/1/47

  $ 730     $ 773,499  
                 

Total Corporate Bonds & Notes — 0.2%
(identified cost $730,000)

 

  $ 773,499  
                 

Total Investments — 110.9%
(identified cost $331,773,914)

 

  $ 370,111,567  
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (10.9)%

 

  $ (36,426,678
                 

Net Assets — 100.0%

 

  $ 333,684,889  
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.

At September 30, 2017, the concentration of the Trust’s investments in the various states and territories, determined as a percentage of total investments, is as follows:

 

Texas      16.5%  
New York      13.2%  
Others, representing less than 10% individually      70.3%  

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2017, 8.8% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial

 

 

  7   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

institution or financial guaranty assurance agency ranged from 0.1% to 5.6% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1G).

 

(2) 

Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be sold in certain transactions in reliance on an exemption from registration (normally to qualified institutional buyers). At September 30, 2017, the aggregate value of these securities is $10,796,618 or 3.2% of the Trust’s net assets.

 

(3) 

When-issued security.

Abbreviations:

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMT     Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 

 

  8   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Statement of Assets and Liabilities (Unaudited)

 

 

Assets   September 30, 2017  

Investments, at value (identified cost, $331,773,914)

  $ 370,111,567  

Interest receivable

    5,443,284  

Receivable for investments sold

    925,000  

Total assets

  $ 376,479,851  
Liabilities        

Payable for floating rate notes issued

  $ 41,580,000  

Payable for when-issued securities

    147,271  

Due to custodian

    567,261  

Payable to affiliate:

 

Investment adviser and administration fee

    185,796  

Interest expense and fees payable

    202,249  

Accrued expenses

    112,385  

Total liabilities

  $ 42,794,962  

Net Assets

  $ 333,684,889  
Sources of Net Assets        

Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized

  $ 152,197  

Additional paid-in capital

    290,265,875  

Accumulated net realized gain

    2,922,671  

Accumulated undistributed net investment income

    2,006,493  

Net unrealized appreciation

    38,337,653  

Net Assets

  $ 333,684,889  
Common Shares Outstanding     15,219,664  
Net Asset Value        

Net assets ÷ common shares issued and outstanding

  $ 21.92  

 

  9   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

 

 

Investment Income   Six Months Ended
September 30, 2017
 

Interest

  $ 9,130,679  

Total investment income

  $ 9,130,679  
Expenses        

Investment adviser and administration fee

  $ 1,127,946  

Trustees’ fees and expenses

    10,386  

Custodian fee

    48,882  

Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees

    9,070  

Legal and accounting services

    35,554  

Printing and postage

    17,466  

Interest expense and fees

    320,787  

Miscellaneous

    24,118  

Total expenses

  $ 1,594,209  

Net investment income

  $ 7,536,470  
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)        

Net realized gain (loss) —

 

Investment transactions

  $ 522,082  

Net realized gain

  $ 522,082  

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —

 

Investments

  $ 3,178,278  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  $ 3,178,278  

Net realized and unrealized gain

  $ 3,700,360  

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 11,236,830  

 

  10   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets  

Six Months Ended

September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)

   

Year Ended

March 31, 2017

 

From operations —

   

Net investment income

  $ 7,536,470     $ 15,456,912  

Net realized gain

    522,082       2,952,311  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

    3,178,278       (17,607,149

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 11,236,830     $ 802,074  

Distributions to shareholders —

   

From net investment income

  $ (7,842,802   $ (15,673,514

From net realized gain

          (3,144,615

Total distributions to shareholders

  $ (7,842,802   $ (18,818,129

Capital share transactions —

   

Reinvestment of distributions

  $ 108,285     $ 53,331  

Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions

  $ 108,285     $ 53,331  

Net increase (decrease) in net assets

  $ 3,502,313     $ (17,962,724
Net Assets                

At beginning of period

  $ 330,182,576     $ 348,145,300  

At end of period

  $ 333,684,889     $ 330,182,576  
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
included in net assets
               

At end of period

  $ 2,006,493     $ 2,312,825  

 

  11   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities  

Six Months Ended

September 30, 2017

 

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 11,236,830  

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

Investments purchased

    (24,752,349

Investments sold

    26,655,235  

Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)

    (521,293

Increase in interest receivable

    (82,005

Decrease in payable to affiliate for investment adviser and administration fee

    (3,034

Increase in interest expense and fees payable

    27,697  

Increase in accrued expenses

    6,926  

Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments

    (3,178,278

Net realized gain from investments

    (522,082

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $ 8,867,647  
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        

Distributions paid, net of reinvestments

  $ (7,734,517

Decrease in due to custodian

    (1,133,130

Net cash used in financing activities

  $ (8,867,647

Cash at beginning of period

  $  

Cash at end of period

  $  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        

Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:

 

Reinvestment of dividends and distributions

  $ 108,285  

Cash paid for interest and fees

  $ 293,090  

 

  12   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Financial Highlights

 

 

    Six Months Ended
September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
    Year Ended March 31,  
      2017     2016     2015     2014     2013  

Net asset value — Beginning of period

  $ 21.700     $ 22.890     $ 23.050     $ 21.510     $ 22.700     $ 21.640  
Income (Loss) From Operations                                                

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.495     $ 1.016     $ 1.065     $ 1.087     $ 1.096     $ 1.106  

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    0.240       (0.969     (0.190     1.479       (1.270     1.029  

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 0.735     $ 0.047     $ 0.875     $ 2.566     $ (0.174   $ 2.135  
Less Distributions                                                

From net investment income

  $ (0.515   $ (1.030   $ (1.030   $ (1.030   $ (1.030   $ (1.075

From net realized gain

          (0.207     (0.005                  

Total distributions

  $ (0.515   $ (1.237   $ (1.035   $ (1.030   $ (1.030   $ (1.075

Anti-dilutive effect of share repurchase program (see Note 5)(1)

  $     $     $     $ 0.004     $ 0.014     $  

Net asset value — End of period

  $ 21.920     $ 21.700     $ 22.890     $ 23.050     $ 21.510     $ 22.700  

Market value — End of period

  $ 22.680     $ 21.520     $ 22.310     $ 21.200     $ 19.390     $ 22.250  

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    3.41 %(3)      0.29     4.27     12.68     (0.02 )%      10.03

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    7.89 %(3)      2.04     10.50     14.96     (8.05 )%      7.06
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                                

Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)

  $ 333,685     $ 330,183     $ 348,145     $ 350,611     $ 327,723     $ 347,887  

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

           

Expenses excluding interest and fees(4)

    0.76 %(5)      0.75     0.76     0.77     0.79     0.78

Interest and fee expense(6)

    0.19 %(5)      0.16     0.08     0.09     0.11     0.10

Total expenses(4)

    0.95 %(5)      0.91     0.84     0.86     0.90     0.88

Net investment income

    4.51 %(5)      4.50     4.70     4.83     5.17     4.90

Portfolio Turnover

    6 %(3)      11     6     13     12     14

 

(1) 

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Distributions are assumed to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Trust’s dividend reinvestment plan.

 

(3) 

Not annualized.

 

(4) 

Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. Effective September 1, 2015, custody fee credits, which were earned on cash deposit balances, were discontinued by the custodian.

 

(5) 

Annualized.

 

(6) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1G).

 

  13   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

1  Significant Accounting Policies

Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Trust will, as a secondary investment objective, seek to achieve capital appreciation.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The Trust is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946.

A  Investment Valuation — The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or fair value of investments.

Debt Obligations. Debt obligations are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, interest rates, anticipated prepayments, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less for which a valuation from a third party pricing service is not readily available may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.

Fair Valuation. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Trust in a manner that fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Trust might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.

B  Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.

C  Federal Taxes — The Trust’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in non-taxable municipal securities, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.

As of September 30, 2017, the Trust had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. The Trust files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.

D  Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.

E  Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F  Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Trust shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Trust shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Trust property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred.

G  Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Trust may invest in residual interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate securities, whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate bond for cash to a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a

 

  14  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

trust), while at the same time, buying a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of the SPV. The bond is deposited into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the SPV by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held by the Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the Bond held by the SPV transferred to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Trust exercise such right, it would generally pay the SPV the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Trust accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the SPV for redemption at par at each reset date. Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rate notes issued approximates its carrying value. If measured at fair value, the payable for floating rate notes would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 7) at September 30, 2017. Interest expense related to the Trust’s liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Trust, as noted above, or by the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At September 30, 2017, the amount of the Trust’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were $41,580,000 and $65,818,392, respectively. The range of interest rates on the Floating Rate Notes outstanding at September 30, 2017 was 0.96% to 0.97%. For the six months ended September 30, 2017, the Trust’s average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate (annualized) including fees were $41,580,000 and 1.54%, respectively.

In certain circumstances, the Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with brokers by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the broker for the difference between the liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls as of September 30, 2017.

The Trust may also purchase residual interest bonds in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.

The Trust’s investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Trust’s investment policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Trust’s restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Trust’s restrictions apply. Residual interest bonds held by the Trust are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.

Final rules implementing section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Volcker Rule”) prohibit banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading of certain instruments and limit such entities’ investments in, and relationships with, covered funds (such as SPVs), as defined in the rules. The compliance date for the Volcker Rule for certain covered funds was July 21, 2015 while for other covered funds the compliance date was July 21, 2017, as announced on July 7, 2016. The Volcker Rule precludes banking entities and their affiliates from (i) sponsoring residual interest bond programs and (ii) continuing relationships with or services for existing residual interest bond programs. All residual interest bonds held by the Trust during the six months ended September 30, 2017 were Volcker Rule compliant. The effects of the Volcker Rule may make it more difficult for the Trust to maintain current or desired levels of leverage and may cause the Trust to incur additional expenses to maintain its leverage.

H  When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Trust may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Trust maintains cash and/or security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.

I  Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Trust is the amount included in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the unrestricted cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.

J  Interim Financial Statements — The interim financial statements relating to September 30, 2017 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Trust’s management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.

 

  15  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

2  Distributions to Shareholders and Income Tax Information

The Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income to common shareholders. In addition, at least annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to shareholders are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. As required by U.S. GAAP, only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits are reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.

The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Trust at September 30, 2017, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:

 

Aggregate cost

  $ 288,933,570  

Gross unrealized appreciation

  $ 39,676,465  

Gross unrealized depreciation

    (78,468

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 39,597,997  

3  Investment Adviser and Administration Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

The investment adviser and administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory and administrative services rendered to the Trust. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.60% of the Trust’s average daily gross assets up to $1.5 billion and 0.59% of average daily gross assets of $1.5 billion or more, and is payable monthly. Average daily gross assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the Trust. Average daily gross assets are calculated by adding to net assets the amount payable by the Trust to floating rate note holders. For the six months ended September 30, 2017, the investment adviser and administration fee incurred by the Trust and the effective annual rate, as a percentage of average daily gross assets, were $1,127,946 and 0.60%, respectively.

Trustees and officers of the Trust who are members of EVM’s organization receive remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the investment adviser and administration fee. Trustees of the Trust who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended September 30, 2017, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Trust are officers of EVM.

4  Purchases and Sales of Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $20,674,259 and $27,580,235, respectively, for the six months ended September 30, 2017.

5  Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

The Trust may issue common shares pursuant to its dividend reinvestment plan. Common shares issued by the Trust pursuant to its dividend reinvestment plan for the six months ended September 30, 2017 and the year ended March 31, 2017 were 4,941 and 2,390, respectively.

On November 11, 2013, the Board of Trustees of the Trust authorized the repurchase by the Trust of up to 10% of its then currently outstanding common shares in open-market transactions at a discount to net asset value (NAV). The repurchase program does not obligate the Trust to purchase a specific amount of shares. There were no repurchases of common shares by the Trust for the six months ended September 30, 2017 and the year ended March 31, 2017.

6  Overdraft Advances

Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT may, in its discretion, advance funds to the Trust to make properly authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft, the Trust is obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, the Federal Funds rate plus 2%). This obligation is payable on demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on the Trust’s assets to the extent of any overdraft. At September 30, 2017, the Trust had a payment due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of $567,261. Based on the short-term nature of these payments and the variable interest rate, the carrying value of the overdraft advances approximated its fair value at September 30, 2017. If measured at fair value, overdraft advances would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 7) at September 30, 2017. The Trust’s average overdraft advances during the six months ended September 30, 2017 were not significant.

 

  16  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued

 

 

7  Fair Value Measurements

Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.

 

 

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

 

 

Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

 

 

Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

At September 30, 2017, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Trust’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:

 

Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities

  $         —      $ 361,431,011      $         —      $ 361,431,011  

Taxable Municipal Securities

           7,907,057               7,907,057  

Corporate Bonds & Notes

           773,499               773,499  

Total Investments

  $      $ 370,111,567      $      $ 370,111,567  

The Trust held no investments or other financial instruments as of March 31, 2017 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. At September 30, 2017, there were no investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months then ended.

 

  17  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval

 

 

Overview of the Contract Review Process

The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuation is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.

At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the registered investment companies advised by either Eaton Vance Management or its affiliate, Boston Management and Research, (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 25, 2017, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of its Contract Review Committee, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished by each adviser to the Eaton Vance Funds (including information specifically requested by the Board) for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between February and April 2017. The Contract Review Committee also considered information received at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, as relevant to its annual evaluation of the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

The information that the Board considered included, among other things, the following (for funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolio(s), references to “each fund” in this section may include information that was considered at the portfolio-level):

Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses

 

 

A report from an independent data provider comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds as identified by the independent data provider (“comparable funds”);

 

 

A report from an independent data provider comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds;

 

 

A report from an independent data provider comparing the investment performance of each fund (including, where relevant, yield data, Sharpe ratios and information ratios) to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods;

 

 

Data regarding investment performance in comparison to benchmark indices, as well as customized groups of peer funds and blended indices identified by the adviser in consultation with the Board;

 

 

For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing other accounts (including mutual funds, other collective investment funds and institutional accounts) using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund;

 

 

Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund;

Information about Portfolio Management and Trading

 

 

Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes it employs;

 

 

The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;

 

 

Information about each adviser’s policies and practices with respect to trading, including each adviser’s processes for monitoring best execution of portfolio transactions;

 

 

Information about the allocation of brokerage transactions and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through client commission arrangements and policies with respect to “soft dollars”;

 

 

Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;

Information about each Adviser

 

 

Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser;

 

 

Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts;

 

 

The Code of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes;

 

 

Policies and procedures relating to proxy voting and the handling of corporate actions and class actions;

 

 

Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance;

 

 

Information concerning the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates;

 

 

A description of Eaton Vance Management’s procedures for overseeing third party advisers and sub-advisers, including with respect to regulatory and compliance issues, investment management and other matters;

 

  18  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

 

 

Other Relevant Information

 

 

Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment advisory services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;

 

 

Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and

 

 

The terms of each investment advisory agreement.

Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2017, with respect to one or more funds, the Board met ten times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, thirteen, six, eight and ten times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees participated in investment and performance reviews with the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each investment adviser relating to each fund, and considered various investment and trading strategies used in pursuing each fund’s investment objective, such as the use of derivative instruments, as well as risk management techniques. The Board and its Committees also evaluated issues pertaining to industry and regulatory developments, compliance procedures, fund governance and other issues with respect to the funds, and received and participated in reports and presentations provided by Eaton Vance Management and other fund advisers with respect to such matters. In addition to the formal meetings of the Board and its Committees, the Independent Trustees hold regular teleconferences in between meetings to discuss, among other topics, matters relating to the continuation of investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements.

For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of investment advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.

The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, independent legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement. In evaluating each investment advisory and sub-advisory agreement, including the specific fee structures and other terms of the agreements, the Contract Review Committee was informed by multiple years of analysis and discussion among the Independent Trustees and the Eaton Vance Funds’ advisers and sub-advisers.

Results of the Process

Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuation of the investment advisory and administrative agreement of Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee based on the material factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory and administrative agreement for the Fund.

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services

In considering whether to approve the investment advisory and administrative agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.

The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund. In particular, the Board considered, where relevant, the abilities and experience of the Adviser’s investment professionals in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal obligations, Treasury securities and other securities backed by the U.S. government or its agencies. The Board considered the Adviser’s municipal bond team, which includes investment professionals and credit specialists who provide services to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, as well as the compensation methods of the Adviser and other factors, such as the reputation and resources of the Adviser to recruit and retain highly qualified research, advisory and supervisory investment professionals. In addition, the Board considered the time and attention devoted to the Eaton Vance Funds, including the Fund, by senior management, as well as the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio management and operations of the Fund, including the provision of administrative services. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Adviser or its affiliates may be subject in managing the Fund.

 

  19  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

 

 

The Board considered the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment professionals, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also considered the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

The Board was aware that on April 24, 2017 a former employee of the Adviser agreed to plead guilty to fraud charges arising from the individual’s prior activities as an equity options trader for certain Eaton Vance Funds. The Board was informed that the Adviser became aware of the matter on April 18, 2017, at which time management contacted federal authorities, alerted the Board and began an internal investigation. The Adviser represented to the Board that, based on information available as of April 25, 2017, management had no reason to believe that any other employee of the Adviser or its affiliates was involved in any wrongful activities or that any fund had been materially harmed. The Adviser agreed to keep the Board fully apprised as additional information is learned, and assured the Board that any fund harmed by the former employee’s wrongful activities will be made whole, as determined in consultation with the Board. The Board concluded that the Adviser’s actions in response to these events are appropriate and consistent with the Adviser’s commitment to protect and provide quality services to the Eaton Vance Funds.

The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large fund complex offering exposure to a variety of asset classes and investment disciplines.

After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory and administrative agreement.

Fund Performance

The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to that of comparable funds and appropriate benchmark indices and assessed the Fund’s performance on the basis of total return and current income return. The Board’s review included comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2016 for the Fund. The Board considered, among other things, the Adviser’s efforts to generate competitive levels of tax exempt current income over time. In considering the Fund’s performance, the Board noted the adverse impact of the Fund’s limited use of leverage relative to comparable funds and considered related information.

Management Fees and Expenses

The Board considered contractual fee rates payable by the Fund for advisory and administrative services (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the one year period ended September 30, 2016, as compared to those of comparable funds, before and after giving effect to any undertaking to waive fees or reimburse expenses. The Board also considered factors that had an impact on Fund expense ratios relative to comparable funds.

After considering the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.

Profitability and Other “Fall-Out” Benefits

The Board considered the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to marketing support or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect fall-out benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationships with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.

The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are deemed not to be excessive.

Economies of Scale

In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from economies of scale, if any, with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Fund currently shares in any benefits from economies of scale. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Fund, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at certain asset levels, will allow the Fund to continue to benefit from any economies of scale in the future.

 

  20  


Eaton Vance

National Municipal Opportunities Trust

September 30, 2017

 

Officers and Trustees

 

 

Officers of Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust

 

 

Payson F. Swaffield

President

Maureen A. Gemma

Vice President, Secretary and

Chief Legal Officer

James F. Kirchner

Treasurer

Richard F. Froio

Chief Compliance Officer

 

 

Trustees of Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust

 

 

William H. Park

Chairperson

Thomas E. Faust Jr.*

Mark R. Fetting

Cynthia E. Frost

George J. Gorman

Valerie A. Mosley

Helen Frame Peters

Susan J. Sutherland

Harriett Tee Taggart

Scott E. Wennerholm

 

 

* Interested Trustee

 

 

Number of Employees

The Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end management investment company and has no employees.

Number of Shareholders

As of September 30, 2017, Trust records indicate that there are 4 registered shareholders and approximately 9,856 shareholders owning the Trust shares in street name, such as through brokers, banks, and financial intermediaries.

If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust reports directly, which contain important information about the Trust, please write or call:

Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

1-800-262-1122

New York Stock Exchange symbol

The New York Stock Exchange symbol is EOT.

 

  21  


Eaton Vance Funds

 

IMPORTANT NOTICES

 

 

Privacy.  The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:

 

 

Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.

 

 

None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker-dealers.

 

 

Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.

 

 

We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.

Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton Vance Management (International) Limited, Eaton Vance Management’s Real Estate Investment Group and Boston Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such advisor’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.

Delivery of Shareholder Documents.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (“AST”), the closed-end funds transfer agent, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct AST, or your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact AST or your financial advisor. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will typically be effective within 30 days of receipt by AST or your financial advisor.

Portfolio Holdings.  Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).

Proxy Voting.  From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Share Repurchase Program.  The Fund’s Board of Trustees has approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Fund to repurchase up to 10% of its outstanding common shares as of the approved date in open-market transactions at a discount to net asset value. The repurchase program does not obligate the Fund to purchase a specific amount of shares. The Fund’s repurchase activity, including the number of shares purchased, average price and average discount to net asset value, is disclosed in the Fund’s annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.

Additional Notice to Shareholders.  If applicable, a Fund may also redeem or purchase its outstanding preferred shares in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, borrowing or rating agency requirements or for other purposes as it deems appropriate or necessary.

Closed-End Fund Information.  Eaton Vance closed-end funds make fund performance data and certain information about portfolio characteristics available on the Eaton Vance website shortly after the end of each month. Other information about the funds is available on the website. The funds’ net asset value per share is readily accessible on the Eaton Vance website. Portfolio holdings for the most recent month-end are also posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of the month. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com on the fund information pages under “Individual Investors — Closed-End Funds”.

 

 

  22  


 

 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


 

 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


Investment Adviser and Administrator

Eaton Vance Management

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company

State Street Financial Center, One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

Transfer Agent

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC

6201 15th Avenue

Brooklyn, NY 11219

Fund Offices

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

 


 

 

LOGO

7765    9.30.17


Item 2. Code of Ethics

Not required in this filing.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert

Not required in this filing.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Rule 2-01(c)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (the “Loan Rule”) prohibits an accounting firm, such as the Trust’s principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), from having certain financial relationships with their audit clients and affiliated entities. Specifically, the Loan Rule provides, in relevant part, that an accounting firm generally would not be independent if it or a “covered person” of the accounting firm (within the meaning of applicable SEC rules relating to auditor independence) receives a loan from a lender that is a “record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the audit client’s equity securities.” Based on information provided to the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees (the “Audit Committee”) of the Eaton Vance family of funds by D&T, certain relationships between D&T and its affiliates (“Deloitte Entities”) and one or more lenders who are record owners of shares of one or more funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds (the “Funds”) implicate the Loan Rule, calling into question D&T’s independence with respect to the Funds. The Funds are providing this disclosure to explain the facts and circumstances as well as D&T’s conclusions concerning D&T’s objectivity and impartiality with respect to the audits of the Funds notwithstanding the existence of one or more breaches of the Loan Rule.

On June 20, 2016, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued no-action relief to another mutual fund complex (see Fidelity Management & Research Company et al., No-Action Letter (June 20, 2016) (the “No-Action Letter”)) related to an auditor independence issue arising under the Loan Rule. In the No-Action Letter, the SEC indicated that it would not recommend enforcement action against the fund group if the auditor is not in compliance with the Loan Rule provided that: (1) the auditor has complied with PCAOB Rule 3526(b)(1) and 3526(b)(2); (2) the auditor’s non-compliance under the Loan Rule is with respect to certain lending relationships; and (3) notwithstanding such non-compliance, the auditor has concluded that it is objective and impartial with respect to the issues encompassed within its engagement as auditor of the funds. The SEC has indicated that the no-action relief will expire 18 months from its issuance.

Based on information provided by D&T to the Audit Committee, the requirements of the No-Action Letter appear to be met with respect to D&T’s lending relationships described above. Among other things, D&T has advised the Audit Committee of its conclusion that the consequences of the breach of the Loan Rule have been satisfactorily addressed, that D&T’s objectivity and impartiality in the planning and conduct of the audits of the Fund’s financial statements has not been compromised and that, notwithstanding the breach, D&T is in a position to continue as the auditor for the Funds and D&T does not believe any actions need to be taken with respect to previously issued reports by D&T. D&T has advised the Audit Committee that these conclusions were based in part on its consideration of the No-Action Letter and other relevant information communicated to the Audit Committee.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not required in this filing.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments

Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.


Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not required in this filing.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not required in this filing.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

No such purchases this period.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No material changes.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures

(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits

 

(a)(1)   Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2).
(a)(2)(i)   Treasurer’s Section 302 certification.
(a)(2)(ii)   President’s Section 302 certification.
(b)   Combined Section 906 certification.


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Eaton Vance National Municipal Opportunities Trust

 

By:

 

/s/ Payson F. Swaffield

 

Payson F. Swaffield

 

President

Date:

 

November 27, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:

 

/s/ James F. Kirchner

 

James F. Kirchner

 

Treasurer

Date:

 

November 27, 2017

By:

 

/s/ Payson F. Swaffield

 

Payson F. Swaffield

 

President

Date:

 

November 27, 2017