Edgar Filing: PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP INC

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-Accelerated Filer

Smaller Reporting Company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2012

Commission file number 000-29599

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Connecticut 06-1559137

(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

900 Bedford Street, Stamford, Connecticut 06901

(Address of principal executive offices)

(203) 324-7500

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Check whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes ¨ No x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 38,467,073 shares outstanding as of the close of business July 31, 2012.

Table of Contents


	Page
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements		3

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		45

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		61

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		62

Part II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		63

Item 1A. Risk Factors		63

Item 6. Exhibits		63

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Consolidated Financial Statements

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks:
Noninterest bearing deposits and cash	$	3,720,985		$	4,241,552
Interest bearing deposits		58,456,392			50,474,257
Short-term investments		710,157			709,567

Total cash and cash equivalents		62,887,534			55,425,376

Securities:
Available for sale securities, at fair value (Note 2)		56,342,630			66,469,972
Other Investments		3,500,000			3,500,000
Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost		1,719,550			1,707,000
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		4,343,800			4,508,300

Total securities		65,905,980			76,185,272
Loans receivable (net of allowance for loan losses: 2012: $6,673,648 2011: $9,384,672) (Note 3)		483,858,072			501,227,297
Loans held for sale		—			250,000
Accrued interest and dividends receivable		2,289,346			2,453,179
Premises and equipment, net		4,712,520			4,108,318
Cash surrender value of life insurance		21,247,568			20,984,604
Other real estate owned		1,517,755			2,762,640
Deferred tax asset (Note 6)		—			—
Other assets		1,848,344			2,419,592

Total assets	$	644,267,119		$	665,816,278


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits (Note 4):
Noninterest bearing deposits	$	71,722,494		$	65,613,374
Interest bearing deposits		450,373,261			479,296,019

Total deposits		522,095,755			544,909,393

Borrowings:
Repurchase agreements		7,000,000			7,000,000
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		50,000,000			50,000,000

Total borrowings		57,000,000			57,000,000
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trust		8,248,000			8,248,000
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,164,509			5,109,225

Total liabilities		592,508,264			615,266,618


Commitments (Note 9)

Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 2012: 38,478,778 shares issued; 38,467,073 shares outstanding. 2011: 38,374,432 shares issued; 38,362,727, shares outstanding		384,787			383,744
Additional paid-in capital		105,182,518			105,050,433
Accumulated deficit		(53,968,019	)		(54,858,831	)
Less: Treasury stock, at cost: 2012 and 2011 11,705 shares		(160,025	)		(160,025	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		319,594			134,339

Total shareholders’ equity		51,758,855			50,549,660

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	644,267,119		$	665,816,278

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	5,811,733		$	6,538,593		$	12,477,525		$	13,495,154
Interest on investment securities		426,658			486,738			903,688			760,921
Dividends on investment securities		31,879			80,728			65,160			150,629
Interest on federal funds sold		—			2,385			—			6,411
Other interest income		40,160			58,363			50,638			120,253

Total interest and dividend income		6,310,430			7,166,807			13,497,011			14,533,368

Interest Expense
Interest on deposits		1,421,170			1,553,745			2,938,014			3,419,094
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		354,591			423,529			711,428			842,404
Interest on subordinated debt		74,677			71,219			151,244			141,617
Interest on other borrowings		76,927			76,927			153,853			153,009

Total interest expense		1,927,365			2,125,420			3,954,539			4,556,124

Net interest income		4,383,065			5,041,387			9,542,472			9,977,244
								—
Provision for Loan Losses		(1,713,425	)		1,482,798			(2,558,827	)		8,464,427

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,096,490			3,558,589			12,101,299			1,512,817

Non-interest Income
Mortgage brokerage referral fees		22,117			1,610			34,537			14,610
Loan application, inspection & processing fees		15,986			23,966			30,713			40,765
Deposit fees and service charges		227,064			248,039			455,732			528,940
Gain on sale of loans		—			79,729			263,646			79,729
Loss on sale of investment securities		—			—			(8,042	)
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance		120,294			152,985			262,963			321,245
Other income		69,639			203,984			165,548			307,874

Total non-interest income		455,100			710,313			1,205,097			1,293,163

Non-interest Expense
Salaries and benefits		2,725,721			3,189,311			5,616,445			6,403,826
Occupancy and equipment expense		1,135,113			1,291,826			2,258,697			2,646,393
Data processing		345,704			336,005			691,725			663,809
Advertising and promotional expense		8,234			271,781			25,963			429,755
Professional and other outside services		854,268			1,234,958			1,469,350			2,116,665
Loan administration and processing expense		45,624			48,159			53,904			85,218
Regulatory assessments		462,153			628,476			872,154			1,239,744
Insurance expense		108,775			228,637			278,020			459,411
Other real estate operations		16,351			774,450			(133,896	)		1,044,957
Material and communications		132,734			164,115			263,912			364,253
Restructuring charges and asset disposals (Note 12)		126,730			2,986,441			495,207			2,986,441
Other operating expense		244,901			290,111			524,103			523,474

Total non-interest expense		6,206,308			11,444,270			12,415,584			18,963,946


Income (loss) before income taxes		345,282			(7,175,368	)		890,812			(16,157,966	)

Provision for Income Taxes		—			—			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	345,282		$	(7,175,368	)	$	890,812		$	(16,157,966	)

Basic and diluted income (loss) per share (Note 7)	$	0.01		$	(0.19	)	$	0.02		$	(0.42	)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011			2012			2011
Net income (loss)	$	345,282	$	(7,175,368	)	$	890,812		$	(16,157,966	)
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized holding gains on securities, net of taxes:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period		122,856		247,521			190,241			250,746
Less reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income		—		—			(4,986	)		—

Total		122,856		247,521			185,255			250,746

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	468,138	$	(6,927,847	)	$	1,076,067		$	(15,907,220	)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)


	Number of Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total
Six months ended June 30, 2011

Balance at December 31, 2010		38,362,727	$	383,744	$	105,050,433		$	(39,399,345	)	$	(160,025	)	$	1,297,381	$	67,172,188

Comprehensive loss
Net loss		—		—		—			(16,157,966	)		—			—		(16,157,966	)
Unrealized holding gain on available for sale securities, net of taxes		—		—		—			—			—			250,746		250,746

Total comprehensive loss																	(15,907,220	)

Balance, June 30, 2011		38,362,727	$	383,744	$	105,050,433		$	(55,557,311	)	$	(160,025	)	$	1,548,127	$	51,264,968


Six months ended June 30, 2012

Balance at December 31, 2011		38,362,727	$	383,744	$	105,050,433		$	(54,858,831	)	$	(160,025	)	$	134,339	$	50,549,660

Comprehensive income
Net income		—		—		—			890,812			—			—		890,812
Unrealized holding gain on available for sale securities, net of taxes		—		—		—			—			—			185,255		185,255

Total comprehensive income																	1,076,067

Share-based compensation expense						133,128											133,128
Issuance of restricted stock		104,346		1,043		(1,043	)										—

Balance, June 30, 2012		38,467,073	$	384,787	$	105,182,518		$	(53,968,019	)	$	(160,025	)	$	319,594	$	51,758,855

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income (loss)	$	890,812		$	(16,157,966	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
Restructuring charges and asset disposals		(5,049	)		1,996,441
Amortization and accretion of investment premiums and discounts, net		213,178			116,431
Amortization and accretion of purchase loan premiums and discounts, net		7,272			5,028
Provision for loan losses		(2,558,827	)		8,464,427
Gain on sale of loans		(263,646	)		(79,729	)
Loss on sale of investment securities		8,042			—
Amortization of core deposit intangible		6,963			7,506
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance		(262,964	)		(321,245	)
Depreciation and amortization		606,350			684,904
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned		(201,355	)		58,215
Impairment writedown on other real estate owned		—			165,764
Share-based compensation		133,128			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in deferred loan costs		36,089			100,958
Decrease in accrued interest and dividends receivable		163,833			182,723
Decrease in other assets		564,285			6,717,760
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(61,423	)		457,203

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(723,312	)		2,398,420

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Principal repayments on available for sale securities		5,039,296			3,976,411
Proceeds from the sale (purchases) of available for sale securities		5,165,626			(51,995,480	)
Redemptions of Federal Reserve Bank Stock		—			455,500
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank Stock		(12,550	)		(1,174,100	)
Proceeds from repurchase of excess Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		164,500			—
Proceeds from sale of loans		67,126,928			55,089,794
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(47,966,735	)		16,308,380
Purchase of other real estate owned		—			(481,165	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		1,823,435			15,715,973
Capital improvements of other real estate owned		(89,051	)		—
Purchase of bank premises and equipment		(252,341	)		(218,522	)

Net cash provided by investing activities		30,999,108			37,676,791

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net increase (decrease) in demand, savings and money market deposits		7,813,928			(9,443,954	)
Net decrease in time certificates of deposits		(30,627,566	)		(112,860,038	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(22,813,638	)		(122,303,992	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		7,462,158			(82,228,781	)

Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Beginning		55,425,376			146,777,658

Ending	$	62,887,534		$	64,548,877

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, Continued

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Interest paid	$	3,807,140	$	4,432,799

Income taxes paid	$	—	$	10,534

Supplemental disclosures of noncash operating, investing and financing activities:
Unrealized holding gain on available for sale securities arising during the period	$	306,842	$	459,133

Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	1,238,144	$	2,661,330

Transfer of other real estate owned to premises and equipment	$	950,000	$	—

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1: Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited financial statements of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp” or “the Company”) at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.

The accompanying unaudited financial statements and related notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of Bancorp and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The information furnished reflects, in the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the remainder of 2012.

Note 2: Investment Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and approximate fair values of available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
June 30, 2012:

U. S. Government agency bonds	$	5,000,000	$	16,920	$	—		$	5,016,920
U. S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities		38,624,381		1,020,326		(1,942	)		39,642,765
Corporate bonds		12,202,773		8,553		(528,381	)		11,682,945

	$	55,827,154	$	1,045,799	$	(530,323	)	$	56,342,630

December 31, 2011:

U. S. Government agency bonds	$	5,000,000	$	37,085	$	—		$	5,037,085
U. S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities		49,004,232		1,051,097		(5,900	)		50,049,429
Corporate bonds		12,249,064		25,338		(890,944	)		11,383,458

	$	66,253,296	$	1,113,520	$	(896,844	)	$	66,469,972

The following table presents the gross unrealized loss and fair value of Bancorp’s available-for-sale securities, aggregated by the length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
June 30, 2012:

U. S. Government mortgage - backed securities	$	67,729	$	(160	)	$	285,040	$	(1,782	)	$	352,769	$	(1,942	)
Corporate bonds		5,814,060		(185,940	)		2,657,559		(342,441	)		8,471,619		(528,381	)

Totals	$	5,881,789	$	(186,100	)	$	2,942,599	$	(344,223	)	$	8,824,388	$	(530,323	)

December 31, 2011:

U. S. Government mortgage - backed securities	$	4,941,662	$	(5,492	)	$	68,309	$	(408	)	$	5,009,971	$	(5,900	)
Corporate bonds		8,358,120		(890,944	)		—		—			8,358,120		(890,944	)

Totals	$	13,299,782	$	(896,436	)	$	68,309	$	(408	)	$	13,368,091	$	(896,844	)

At June 30, 2012, eight securities had unrealized holding losses with aggregate depreciation of 5.7% from the amortized cost. At December 31, 2011, nine securities had unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 6.3% from the amortized cost.

Bancorp performs a quarterly analysis of those securities that are in an unrealized loss position to determine if those losses qualify as other-than-temporary impairments. This analysis considers the following criteria in its determination: the ability of the issuer to meet its obligations, an impairment due to a deterioration in credit, management’s plans and ability to maintain its investment in the security, the length of time and the amount by which the security has been in a loss position, the interest rate environment, the general economic environment and prospects or projections for improvement or deterioration.

Management believes that none of the unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities noted above are other than temporary due to the fact that they relate to market interest rate changes on corporate debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. Government agencies. Management considers the issuers of the securities to be financially sound, the corporate bonds are investment grade and the Company expects to receive all contractual principal and interest related to these investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments, and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2012.

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale debt securities at June 30, 2012 by contractual maturity are presented below. Actual maturities of mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be prepaid without any penalties. Because mortgage-backed securities are not due at a single maturity date, they are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary:


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Maturity:
Over 10 years	$	—	$	—
Corporate bonds < 5 years		3,202,773		3,211,326
Corporate bonds 5 to 10 years		9,000,000		8,471,619
U.S. Government bonds 5 to 10 years		5,000,000		5,016,920
Mortgage-backed securities		38,624,381		39,642,765

Total	$	55,827,154	$	56,342,630

Note 3: Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses

A summary of the Company’s loan portfolio at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Real Estate
Commercial	$	237,217,702		$	215,659,837
Residential		149,905,067			188,108,855
Construction		6,217,516			12,306,922
Construction to permanent		8,287,915			10,012,022
Commercial		32,379,945			31,810,735
Consumer home equity		53,587,509			49,694,546
Consumer installment		2,125,347			2,164,972

Total Loans		489,721,001			509,757,889
Premiums on purchased loans		223,853			231,125
Net deferred costs		586,866			622,955
Allowance for loan losses		(6,673,648	)		(9,384,672	)

Loans receivable, net	$	483,858,072		$	501,227,297

On March 29, 2012, the Bank completed the sale of $66.4 million of residential loans consummated for a cash purchase price of $66.7 million, which represented 101% of the Bank’s net book value for these assets.

The changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods shown are as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Balance, beginning of period	$	8,460,943		$	12,208,476		$	9,384,672		$	15,374,101
Provision for loan losses		(1,713,425	)		1,482,798			(2,558,827	)		8,464,427
Loans charged-off		(90,739	)		(3,034,591	)		(193,223	)		(7,188,138	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off		16,869			743,044			41,026			763,650
Transferred to loans held-for-sale		—			—			—			(6,014,313	)

Balance, end of period	$	6,673,648		$	11,399,727		$	6,673,648		$	11,399,727

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the unpaid balances of loans 90 days or more past maturity, and still accruing interest were $4,234,926 and $9,461,106, respectively. All of the borrowers of said loans at June 30, 2012 continue to make interest payments, but are past maturity where payoff is pending or are in the process of being renewed.

The unpaid principal balances of loans on nonaccrual status and considered impaired were $17.5 million at June 30, 2012 and $20.7 million at December 31, 2011.

If non-accrual loans had been performing in accordance with their contractual terms, the Company would have recorded approximately $274,000 of additional income during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and $0.5 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. If non-accrual loans had been performing in accordance with their contractual terms, the Company would have recorded approximately $584,000 of additional income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the interest collected and recognized as income on impaired loans, which includes non-accrual loans, TDRs and loans that were previously classified as TDRs that have been upgraded, was approximately $0 and $30,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the interest income collected and recognized on impaired loans was approximately $180,000 and $461,000 respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $34.0 million and $34.1 million respectively.

At June 30, 2012, there were ten loans totaling $22.9 million that were considered “troubled debt restructurings,” as compared to December 31, 2011 when there were twelve loans totaling $25.5 million, all of which were included in impaired loans. At June 30, 2012, six of the ten loans aggregating $16.0 million were accruing loans and four loans aggregating $6.8 million were non-accruing loans.

The Company’s lending activities are conducted principally in Fairfield and New Haven Counties in Connecticut and Westchester County, New York City and Long Island, New York. The Company originates commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and a variety of consumer loans. In addition, the Company had originated loans for the construction of residential homes, residential developments and for land development projects. A moratorium on all new speculative construction loans was instituted by management in July 2008. All residential and commercial mortgage loans are collateralized primarily by first or second mortgages on real estate. The ability and willingness of borrowers to satisfy their loan obligations is dependent to some degree on the status of the regional economy as well as upon the regional real estate market. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the loan portfolio and the recovery of a substantial portion of any resulting real estate acquired is susceptible to changes in market conditions.

The Company has established credit policies applicable to each type of lending activity in which it engages, evaluates the creditworthiness of each customer and, in most cases, extends credit of up to 75% of the market value of the collateral for commercial real estate at the date of the credit extension depending on the Company’s evaluation of the borrowers’ creditworthiness and type of collateral and up to 80% for residential 1-4 family real estate. In the case of construction loans, the maximum loan-to-value was 65% of the “as completed” market value. The market value of collateral is monitored on an ongoing basis and additional collateral is obtained when warranted. Real estate is the primary form of collateral. Other important forms of collateral are accounts receivable, inventory, other business assets, marketable securities and time deposits. While collateral provides assurance as a secondary source of repayment, the Company ordinarily requires the primary source of repayment to be based on the borrower’s ability to generate continuing cash flows on all loans not related to construction.

Risk characteristics of the Company’s portfolio classes include the following:

Commercial Real Estate Loans – In underwriting commercial real estate loans, the Company evaluates both the prospective borrower’s ability to make timely payments on the loan and the value of the property securing the loans. Repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted should the borrower default or should there be a substantial decline in the value of the property securing the loan or a decline in the general economic conditions. Where the owner occupies the property, the Company also evaluates the business’s ability to repay the loan on a timely basis. In addition, the Company may require personal guarantees, lease assignments and/or the guarantee of the operating company when the property is owner occupied. These types of loans may involve some additional risks than in investor owned commercial real estate lending, because payments on such loans are dependent upon the successful operation of the business involved, therefore, repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in economic conditions affecting the borrowers’ businesses.

Construction Loans – Construction loans are short-term loans (generally up to 18 months) secured by land for both residential and commercial development. The loans are generally made for acquisition and improvements. Funds are disbursed as phases of construction are completed.

In the past, the Company funded construction of single family homes, when no contract of sale existed, based upon the experience of the builder, the financial strength of the owner, the type and location of the property and other factors. Construction loans are generally personally guaranteed by the principal(s). Repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted by the builders’ inability to complete construction, by a downturn in the new construction market, by a significant increase in interest rates or by a decline in general economic conditions. The Company has had a moratorium in place since mid-2008 on new speculative construction loans.

Residential Real Estate Loans – Various loans secured by residential real estate properties are offered by the Company, including 1-4 family residential mortgages, multi-family residential loans and a variety of home equity line of credit products. Repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted should the borrower default, should there be a significant decline in the value of the property securing the loan or should there be a decline in general economic conditions.

Commercial and Industrial Loans – The Company’s commercial and industrial loan portfolio consists primarily of commercial business loans and lines of credit to businesses and professionals. These loans are usually made to finance the purchase of inventory, new or used equipment or other short or long-term working capital purposes. These loans are generally secured by corporate assets, often with real estate as secondary collateral, but are also occasionally offered on an unsecured basis. In granting this type of loan, the Company primarily looks to the borrower’s cash flow as the source of repayment with collateral and personal guarantees, where obtained, as a secondary source. Commercial loans are often larger and may involve greater risks than other types of loans offered by the Company. Payments on such loans are often dependent upon the successful operation of the underlying business involved and, therefore, repayment of such loans may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in economic conditions, management’s inability to effectively manage the business, claims of others against the borrower’s assets which may take priority over the Company’s claims against assets, death or disability of the borrower or loss of market for the borrower’s products or services.

Other Loans – The Company also offers installment loans and reserve lines of credit to individuals. Repayments of such loans are often dependent on the personal income of the borrower which may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in economic conditions. The Company does not place an emphasis on originating these types of loans.

The Company does not have any lending programs commonly referred to as subprime lending. Subprime lending generally targets borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burdened ratios.

The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses, by loan type, for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The following table also details the amount of loans receivable, net, that are evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and the related portion of the allowance for loan losses that is allocated to each loan portfolio segment.


Three months ended June 30, 2012	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Construction to Permanent			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance	$	1,094,736		$	4,645,248		$	842,636		$	236,313		$	1,049,555		$	413,724		$	178,731		$	8,460,943
Charge-offs		(44,471	)		—			—			—			(32,150	)		(14,118	)		—			(90,739	)
Recoveries		1,500			14,988			—			—			—			381			—			16,869
Provision		(316,423	)		(877,846	)		(592,125	)		(114,863	)		192,498			103,345			(108,011	)		(1,713,425	)

Ending Balance	$	735,342		$	3,782,390		$	250,511		$	121,450		$	1,209,903		$	503,332		$	70,720		$	6,673,648
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	37,330		$	139,851		$	31,520		$	110,045		$	30,291		$	151,501		$	—		$	500,538

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	698,012		$	3,642,539		$	218,991		$	11,405		$	1,179,612		$	351,831		$	70,720		$	6,173,110

Total Allowance for Loan Losses	$	735,342		$	3,782,390		$	250,511		$	121,450		$	1,209,903		$	503,332		$	70,720		$	6,673,648

Total Loans ending balance	$	32,379,945		$	237,217,702		$	6,217,516		$	8,287,915		$	149,905,067		$	55,712,856		$	—		$	489,721,001

Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	191,375		$	9,406,325		$	3,081,562		$	6,192,645		$	14,400,401		$	1,417,742		$	—		$	34,690,050

Ending balance :
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	32,188,570		$	227,811,377		$	3,135,954		$	2,095,270		$	135,504,666		$	54,295,114		$	—		$	455,030,951

The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses, by loan type, for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The following table also details the amount of loans receivable, net, that are evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and the related portion of the allowance for loan losses that is allocated to each loan portfolio segment.


Six months ended June 30, 2012	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Construction to Permanent			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance	$	882,062		$	4,018,746		$	867,159		$	547,333		$	2,550,588		$	458,762		$	60,022	$	9,384,672
Charge-offs		(44,471	)		(49,922	)		—			—			(84,711	)		(14,119	)		—		(193,223	)
Recoveries		2,500			36,976			—			—			—			1,550			—		41,026
Provision		(104,751	)		(223,410	)		(616,648	)		(425,883	)		(1,255,972	)		57,139			10,698		(2,558,827	)

Ending Balance	$	735,340		$	3,782,390		$	250,511		$	121,450		$	1,209,905		$	503,332		$	70,720	$	6,673,648
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	37,330		$	139,851		$	31,520		$	110,045		$	30,291		$	151,501		$	—	$	500,538

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	698,010		$	3,642,539		$	218,991		$	11,405		$	1,179,614		$	351,831		$	70,720	$	6,173,110

Total Allowance for Loan Losses	$	735,340		$	3,782,390		$	250,511		$	121,450		$	1,209,905		$	503,332		$	70,720	$	6,673,648

Total Loans ending balance	$	32,379,945		$	237,217,702		$	6,217,516		$	8,287,915		$	149,905,067		$	55,712,856		$	—	$	489,721,001

Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment	$	191,375		$	9,406,325		$	3,081,562		$	6,192,645		$	14,400,401		$	1,417,742		$	—	$	34,690,050

Ending balance :
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	32,188,570		$	227,811,377		$	3,135,954		$	2,095,270		$	135,504,666		$	54,295,114		$	—	$	455,030,951

The Company monitors the credit quality of its loans receivable in an ongoing manner. Credit quality is monitored by reviewing certain credit quality indicators. Management has determined that internally assigned risk ratings and loan-to-value ratios (“LTVs”), at period end, are the key credit quality indicators that best help management monitor the credit quality of the Company’s loans receivable. Loan-to-value ratios used by management in monitoring credit quality are based on current period loan balances and original values at time of originations (unless a current appraisal has been obtained as a result of the loan being deemed impaired or the loan is a maturing construction loan).

Appraisals on properties securing impaired loans and Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) are updated annually. Additionally, appraisals on construction loans are updated four months in advance of scheduled maturity dates. We update our impairment analysis monthly based on the most recent appraisal as well as other factors (such as senior lien positions, e.g. property taxes). We are subscribers to a national real estate valuation database service and use published information regarding home sales prices in the towns/counties where our collateral is located in CT and NY.

The majority of the Company’s impaired loans have been resolved through courses of action other than via bank liquidations of real estate collateral through OREO. These include normal loan payoffs, the traditional workout process, triggering personal guarantee obligations, and troubled debt restructurings. However, as loan workout efforts progress to a point where the bank’s liquidation of real estate collateral is the likely outcome, the impairment analysis is updated to reflect recent actual experience with bank sales of OREO properties.

A disposition discount is built into our impairment analysis and reflected in our allowance once a property is determined to be a likely OREO (e.g. foreclosure is probable). To determine the discount, we compare the actual sales prices of our OREO properties to the appraised value that was obtained as of the date when we took title to the property. The difference is the bank-owned disposition discount.

The Company has a risk rating system as part of the risk assessment of its loan portfolio. The Company’s lending officers are required to assign an Obligor and a Facility risk rating to each loan in their portfolio at origination, which is ratified or modified by the Committee to which the loan is submitted for approval. When the lender learns of important financial developments, the risk rating is reviewed accordingly, and adjusted if necessary. All loans are reviewed annually. Similarly, the Loan Committee can adjust a risk rating.

In addition, the Company engages a third party independent loan reviewer that performs quarterly reviews of a sample of loans, validating the Bank’s risk ratings assigned to such loans. The risk ratings play an important role in the establishment of the loan loss provision and to confirm the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Any upgrades to criticized loans must be approved by the Board Loan Committee.

When assigning a risk rating to a loan, management utilizes the Bank’s internal eleven-point risk rating system.

An asset is considered “special mention” when it has a potential weakness based on objective evidence, but does not currently expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the following categories. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is not adequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets have well defined weaknesses based on objective evidence, and are characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the Company will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.”

As of this quarter, the Bank implemented enhancements to the allowance methodology, resulting in a reduction of the allowance for loan losses of $1.1 million. In making this transition, the changes serve to update and enhance the methodology to reflect the direction of the current loan portfolio. The changes are threefold:

•

First, the Bank adopted a two year, instead of a three year, weighted average historical loss factor as the basis for the calculation of its historical loss experience. This is used to calculate expected losses in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) (Topic 450-20), “Loss Contingencies” pools prior to the application of qualitative risk adjustment factors. This change was made to be more responsive to the changing credit environment. Net charge-offs have declined, especially in 2012 when they averaged $76,000 per quarter. This shorter average historical loss period will produce results more indicative of the current and expected behavior of the portfolio.

•

Second, the Bank adopted an Internal Risk Ratings Based (IRB) approach to calculating historical loss rates. This approach calibrates expected losses with actual risk assessment and equates the likelihood of loss to the level of risk in a credit facility rating. Previously, loss history was applied to categories of loans and qualitative adjustments were apportioned by risk rating within the categories.

•

Third, the Bank increased the detail of analysis within the segments, particularly within Commercial Real Estate lending, which is currently the Bank’s largest concentration overall, by expanding the number of ASC 450-20 pools. In all, ten sub-concentrations have been added to the analysis. The greater level of detail enables the Bank to better apply qualitative risk adjustment factors to the segments affected and to monitor changes in credit risk within the portfolio.

Charge-off generally commences in the month that the loan is classified “doubtful” and is fully charged off within six months of such classification. If the account is classified “loss” the full balance is charged off immediately. The full balance is charged off regardless of the potential recovery from the sale of the collateral. This amount is recognized as a recovery once the collateral is sold.

In accordance with FFIEC (“Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council”) published policies establishing uniform criteria for the classification of retail credit based on delinquency status, “Open-end” credits are charged-off when 180 days delinquent and “Closed-end” credits are charged-off when 120 days delinquent. Typically, consumer installment loans are charged off no later than 90 days past due.

The following table details the credit risk exposure of loans receivable, by loan type and credit quality indicator at June 30, 2012:

CREDIT RISK PROFILE BY CREDITWORTHINESS CATEGORY


	Commercial				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Construction to Permanent				Residential Real Estate				Consumer
LTVs:	< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		Other		Total
Internal Risk Rating
Pass	$	24,850,034	$	1,456,449	$	176,063,752	$	9,310,101	$	—	$	—	$	2,095,269	$	—	$	100,682,616	$	26,642,690	$	49,265,371	$	1,519,501	$	699,679	$	392,585,462
Special Mention		369,025		170,214		14,315,821		5,683,817		3,135,953		—		—		—		5,313,385		—		99,532		2,711,032		—		31,798,779
Substandard & Doubtful		4,611,015		923,208		18,170,351		13,673,860		1,219,528		1,862,035		—		6,192,646		5,197,208		12,069,168		—		1,417,741		—		65,336,760

	$	29,830,074	$	2,549,871	$	208,549,924	$	28,667,778	$	4,355,481	$	1,862,035	$	2,095,269	$	6,192,646	$	111,193,209	$	38,711,858	$	49,364,903	$	5,648,274	$	699,679	$	489,721,001

CREDIT RISK PROFILE


	Commercial		Commercial Real Estate		Construction		Construction to Permanent		Residential Real Estate		Consumer		Totals
Performing	$	32,188,570	$	229,248,655	$	3,135,953	$	7,000,270	$	145,976,052	$	54,719,115	$	472,268,615
Non Performing		191,375		7,969,047		3,081,563		1,287,645		3,929,015		993,741		17,452,386

Total	$	32,379,945	$	237,217,702	$	6,217,516	$	8,287,915	$	149,905,067	$	55,712,856	$	489,721,001

The following table details the credit risk exposure of loans receivable, by loan type and credit quality indicator at December 31, 2011:

CREDIT RISK PROFILE BY CREDITWORTHINESS CATEGORY


	Commercial				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Construction to Permanent				Residential Real Estate				Consumer
LTVs:	< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		< 75%		>= 75%		Other		Total
Internal Risk Rating
Pass	$	23,822,200	$	1,737,893	$	151,392,526	$	11,680,310	$	—	$	—	$	903,035	$	—	$	129,132,494	$	34,895,858	$	44,969,963	$	1,531,223	$	636,863	$	400,702,365
Special Mention		1,544,420		170,575		22,426,235		4,585,523		9,210,344		—		—		—		5,316,201		2,400,000		274,365		3,029,362		—		48,957,025
Substandard & Doubtful		4,480,440		55,207		15,981,747		9,593,496		1,243,579		1,852,999		—		9,108,987		3,587,607		12,776,695		—		1,417,742		—		60,098,499

	$	29,847,060	$	1,963,675	$	189,800,508	$	25,859,329	$	10,453,923	$	1,852,999	$	903,035	$	9,108,987	$	138,036,302	$	50,072,553	$	45,244,328	$	5,978,327	$	636,863	$	509,757,889

CREDIT RISK PROFILE


	Commercial		Commercial Real Estate		Construction		Construction to Permanent		Residential Real Estate		Consumer		Totals
Performing	$	31,521,175	$	206,322,032	$	10,928,343	$	5,808,035	$	183,629,363	$	50,865,776	$	489,074,724
Non Performing		289,560		9,337,805		1,378,579		4,203,987		4,479,492		993,742		20,683,165

Total	$	31,810,735	$	215,659,837	$	12,306,922	$	10,012,022	$	188,108,855	$	51,859,518	$	509,757,889

Included in loans receivable are loans for which the accrual of interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrowers. The recorded balance of these non-accrual loans was $17.5 million and $20.7 million at June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011 respectively. Generally, loans are placed on non-accruing status when they become 90 days or more delinquent, or earlier if deemed appropriate, and remain on non-accrual status until they are brought current, have six months of performance under the loan terms, and factors indicating reasonable doubt about the timely collection of payments no longer exist. Therefore, loans may be current in accordance with their loan terms, or may be less than 90 days delinquent and still be on a non-accruing status. Additionally, certain loans that cannot demonstrate sufficient global cash flow to continue loan payments in the future and certain troubled debt restructures (TDRs) are placed on non-accrual status.

The following table sets forth the detail, and delinquency status, of non-accrual loans and past due loans at June 30, 2012:


	Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans
	Non-Accrual Loans
2012	31-60 Days Past Due		61-90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		>90 Days Past Due and Accruing		Total Non- Accrual and Past Due Loans
Commercial
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Substandard		—		—		191,375		191,375		—		448,000		639,375

Total Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	191,375	$	191,375	$	—	$	448,000	$	639,375

Commercial Real Estate
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		—		304,388		304,388
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	5,808,987	$	5,808,987	$	2,160,060	$	3,482,538	$	11,451,585

Total Commercial Real Estate	$	—	$	—	$	5,808,987	$	5,808,987	$	2,160,060	$	3,786,926	$	11,755,973

Construction
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	1,862,035	$	1,862,035	$	1,219,528	$	—	$	3,081,563

Total Construction	$	—	$	—	$	1,862,035	$	1,862,035	$	1,219,528	$	—	$	3,081,563

Construction to Permanent
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,287,645	$	—	$	1,287,645

Total Construction to Permanent	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,287,645	$	—	$	1,287,645

Residential Real Estate
Substandard	$	—	$	371,920	$	3,557,095	$	3,929,015	$	—	$	—	$	3,929,015

Total Residential Real Estate	$	—	$	371,920	$	3,557,095	$	3,929,015	$	—	$	—	$	3,929,015

Consumer
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	993,741	$	993,741	$	—	$	—	$	993,741

Total Consumer	$	—	$	—	$	993,741	$	993,741	$	—	$	—	$	993,741

Total	$	—	$	371,920	$	12,413,233	$	12,785,153	$	4,667,233	$	4,234,926	$	21,687,312

The following table sets forth the detail, and delinquency status, of non-accrual loans and past due loans at December 31, 2011:


	Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans
	Non-Accrual Loans
2011	31-60 Days Past Due		61-90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		>90 Days Past Due and Accruing		Total Non- Accrual and Past Due Loans
Commercial
Special Mention	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	44,296	$	44,296
Substandard		—		—		289,560		289,560		—		947,847		1,237,407

Total Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	289,560	$	289,560	$	—	$	992,143	$	1,281,703

Commercial Real Estate
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	402,663	$	402,663
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		—		2,832,452		2,832,452
Substandard	$	—	$	443,259	$	6,670,730	$	7,113,989	$	2,223,816	$	3,515,848	$	12,853,653

Total Commercial Real Estate	$	—	$	443,259	$	6,670,730	$	7,113,989	$	2,223,816	$	6,750,963	$	16,088,768

Construction
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	135,000	$	135,000	$	1,243,579	$	1,717,999	$	3,096,578

Total Construction	$	—	$	—	$	135,000	$	135,000	$	1,243,579	$	1,717,999	$	3,096,578

Construction to Permanent
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,203,987	$	—	$	4,203,987

Total Construction to Permanent	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,203,987	$	—	$	4,203,987

Residential Real Estate
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	4,479,492	$	4,479,492	$	—	$	—	$	4,479,492

Total Residential Real Estate	$	—	$	—	$	4,479,492	$	4,479,492	$	—	$	—	$	4,479,492

Consumer
Substandard	$	—	$	—	$	993,742	$	993,742	$	—	$	—	$	993,742

Total Consumer	$	—	$	—	$	993,742	$	993,742	$	—	$	—	$	993,742

Total	$	—	$	443,259	$	12,568,524	$	13,011,783	$	7,671,382	$	9,461,105	$	30,144,270

These non-accrual and past due amounts included loans deemed to be impaired of $17.5 million and $20.7 million at June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. Loans past due and still accruing interest were $4.2 million and $9.5 million at June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011 respectively, and consisted of seven loans at June 30, 2012. All of the borrowers of said loans at June 30, 2012 continue to make interest payments, but are past maturity where payoff is pending or are in the process of being renewed.

The following table sets forth the detail and delinquency status of loans receivable, by performing and non-performing loans at June 30, 2012.


	Performing (Accruing) Loans
2012	31-60 Days Past Due		61-90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Performing Loans		Total Non- Accrual and Past Due Loans		Total Loans
Commercial
Pass	$	—	$	298,000	$	—	$	298,000	$	26,008,483	$	26,306,483	$	—	$	26,306,483
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		539,239		539,239		—		539,239
Substandard		—		500,000		—		500,000		4,394,848		4,894,848		639,375		5,534,223

Total Commercial	$	—	$	798,000	$	—	$	798,000	$	30,942,570	$	31,740,570	$	639,375	$	32,379,945

Commercial Real Estate
Pass	$	3,990,000	$	—	$	—	$	3,990,000	$	181,383,853	$	185,373,853	$	—	$	185,373,853
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		19,695,250		19,695,250		304,388		19,999,638
Substandard		394,137		—		1,907,661		2,301,798		18,090,828		20,392,626		11,451,585		31,844,211

Total Commercial Real Estate	$	4,384,137	$	—	$	1,907,661	$	6,291,798	$	219,169,931	$	225,461,729	$	11,755,973	$	237,217,702

Construction
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		3,135,953		3,135,953		—		3,135,953
Substandard		—		—		—		—		—		—		3,081,563		3,081,563

Total Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,135,953	$	3,135,953	$	3,081,563	$	6,217,516

Construction to Permanent
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,095,269	$	2,095,269	$	—	$	2,095,269
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard		—		—		—		—		4,905,002		4,905,002		1,287,644		6,192,646

Total Construction to Permanent	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	7,000,271	$	7,000,271	$	1,287,644	$	8,287,915

Residential Real Estate
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	127,325,306	$	127,325,306	$	—	$	127,325,306
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		5,313,385		5,313,385		—		5,313,385
Substandard		1,638,262		—		—		1,638,262		11,699,099		13,337,361		3,929,015		17,266,376

Total Residential Real Estate	$	1,638,262	$	—	$	—	$	1,638,262	$	144,337,790	$	145,976,052	$	3,929,015	$	149,905,067

Consumer
Pass	$	7,953	$	—	$	—	$	7,953	$	51,476,598	$	51,484,551	$	—	$	51,484,551
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		2,810,564		2,810,564		—		2,810,564
Substandard		—		—		—		—		423,999		423,999		993,742		1,417,741

Total Consumer	$	7,953	$	—	$	—	$	7,953	$	54,711,161	$	54,719,114	$	993,742	$	55,712,856

Total	$	6,030,352	$	798,000	$	1,907,661	$	8,736,013	$	459,297,676	$	468,033,689	$	21,687,312	$	489,721,001

The following table sets forth the detail and delinquency status of loans receivable, net, by performing and non-performing loans at December 31, 2011.


	Performing (Accruing) Loans
2011	31-60 Days Past Due		Greater Than 60 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Perfoming Loans		Total Non- Accrual and Past Due Loans		Total Loans
Commercial
Pass	$	10,971	$	—	$	10,971	$	25,504,826	$	25,515,797	$	44,296	$	25,560,093
Special Mention		—		—		—		1,714,995		1,714,995		—		1,714,995
Substandard		233,781		—		233,781		3,064,459		3,298,240		1,237,407		4,535,647

Total Commercial	$	244,752	$	—	$	244,752	$	30,284,280	$	30,529,032	$	1,281,703	$	31,810,735

Commercial Real Estate
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	162,670,173	$	162,670,173	$	402,663	$	163,072,836
Special Mention		1,915,504		—		1,915,504		22,263,802		24,179,306		2,832,452		27,011,758
Substandard		—		—		—		12,721,590		12,721,590		12,853,653		25,575,243

Total Commercial Real Estate	$	1,915,504	$	—	$	1,915,504	$	197,655,565	$	199,571,069	$	16,088,768	$	215,659,837

Construction
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Special Mention		—		—		—		9,210,344		9,210,344		—		9,210,344
Substandard		—		—		—		—		—		3,096,578		3,096,578

Total Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	9,210,344	$	9,210,344	$	3,096,578	$	12,306,922

Construction to Permanent
Pass	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	903,035	$	903,035	$	—	$	903,035
Special Mention		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Substandard		—		—		—		4,905,000		4,905,000		4,203,987		9,108,987

Total Construction to Permanent	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,808,035	$	5,808,035	$	4,203,987	$	10,012,022

Residential Real Estate
Pass	$	42,181	$	—	$	42,181	$	163,986,171	$	164,028,352	$	—	$	164,028,352
Special Mention		4,800,000		—		4,800,000		2,916,201		7,716,201		—		7,716,201
Substandard		—		84,225		84,225		11,800,585		11,884,810		4,479,492		16,364,302

Total Residential Real Estate	$	4,842,181	$	84,225	$	4,926,406	$	178,702,957	$	183,629,363	$	4,479,492	$	188,108,855

Consumer
Pass	$	1,459	$	—	$	1,459	$	47,136,590	$	47,138,049	$	—	$	47,138,049
Special Mention		—		—		—		3,303,727		3,303,727		—		3,303,727
Substandard		—		—		—		424,000		424,000		993,742		1,417,742

Total Consumer	$	1,459	$	—	$	1,459	$	50,864,317	$	50,865,776	$	993,742	$	51,859,518

Total	$	7,003,896	$	84,225	$	7,088,121	$	472,525,498	$	479,613,619	$	30,144,270	$	509,757,889

The following table summarizes impaired loans as of June 30, 2012:


	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
2012
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	18,167	$	250,893	$	—
Commercial Real Estate		7,927,165		8,755,486		—
Construction		2,946,562		2,946,592		—
Construction to Permanent		4,905,000		4,905,000
Residential		13,730,710		13,730,710		—
Consumer		993,742		993,742		—

Total:	$	30,521,346	$	31,582,423	$	—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	173,208	$	350,000	$	37,330
Commercial Real Estate		1,479,160		1,595,500		139,851
Construction		135,000		286,625		31,520
Construction to Permanent		1,287,645		1,425,000		110,045
Residential		669,691		669,691		30,291
Consumer		424,000		424,000		151,501

Total:	$	4,168,704	$	4,750,816	$	500,538

Commercial	$	191,375	$	600,893	$	37,330
Commercial Real Estate		9,406,325		10,350,986		139,851
Construction		3,081,562		3,233,217		31,520
Construction to Permanent		6,192,645		6,330,000		110,045
Residential		14,400,401		14,400,401		30,291
Consumer		1,417,742		1,417,742		151,501

Total:	$	34,690,050	$	36,333,239	$	500,538

Impaired loans consist of non-accrual loans, TDRs and loans that were previously classified as TDRs that have been upgraded.

The following table summarizes impaired loans as of December 31, 2011:


	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
2011
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	210,091	$	581,974	$	—
Commercial Real Estate		4,444,315		5,174,124		—
Construction		1,243,579		1,247,627		—
Construction to Permanent		6,614,333		6,614,333		—
Residential		9,789,727		9,789,727		—
Consumer		993,742		1,038,640		—

Total:	$	23,295,787	$	24,446,425	$	—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	79,469	$	130,137	$	61,145
Commercial Real Estate		5,131,655		5,354,025		319,894
Construction		135,000		286,625		31,520
Construction to Permanent		2,494,654		2,634,000		498,254
Residential		5,196,516		5,196,516		197,478
Consumer		424,000		424,000		151,500

Total:	$	13,461,294	$	14,025,303	$	1,259,791

Commercial	$	289,560	$	712,111	$	61,145
Commercial Real Estate		9,575,970		10,528,149		319,894
Construction		1,378,579		1,534,252		31,520
Construction to Permanent		9,108,987		9,248,333		498,254
Residential		14,986,243		14,986,243		197,478
Consumer		1,417,742		1,462,640		151,500

Total:	$	36,757,081	$	38,471,728	$	1,259,791

The recorded investment of impaired loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $34.7 million and $36.8 million, with related allowances of $501,000 and $1.3 million, respectively.

Included in the tables above at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are loans with carrying balances of $30.5 million and $23.3 million that required no specific reserves in our allowance for loan losses. Loans that did not require specific reserves at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 have sufficient collateral values, less costs to sell, supporting the carrying balances of the loans. In some cases, there may be no specific reserves because the Company already charged-off the specific impairment. Once a borrower is in default, the Company is under no obligation to advance additional funds on unused commitments.

On a case-by-case basis, the Company may agree to modify the contractual terms of a borrower’s loan to remain competitive and assist customers who may be experiencing financial difficulty, as well as preserve the Company’s position in the loan. If the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and a concession has been made at the time of such modification, the loan is classified as a troubled debt restructured loan.

The following table presents the total troubled debt restructured loans as of June 30, 2012:


	Accrual				Non-accrual				Total
	# of Loans		Amount		# of Loans		Amount		# of Loans		Amount
Commercial Real Estate		1	$	233,817		2	$	4,315,060		3	$	4,548,877
Residential Real Estate		3		10,471,386		—		—		3		10,471,386
Construction		—		—		1		1,219,528		1		1,219,528
Construction to permanent		1		4,905,000		1		1,287,645		2		6,192,645
Consumer home equity		1		424,000		—		—		1		424,000

Total Troubled Debt Restructurings		6	$	16,034,203		4	$	6,822,233		10	$	22,856,436

The following table presents the total troubled debt restructured loans as of December 31, 2011:


	Accrual				Non-accrual				Total
	# of Loans		Amount		# of Loans		Amount		# of Loans		Amount
Commercial Real Estate		1	$	238,165		3	$	5,666,882		4	$	5,905,047
Residential Real Estate		3		10,506,751		—		—		3		10,506,751
Construction		—		—		1		1,243,579		1		1,243,579
Construction to permanent		1		4,905,000		2		2,494,654		3		7,399,654
Consumer home equity		1		424,000		—		—		1		424,000

Total Troubled Debt Restructurings		6	$	16,073,916		6	$	9,405,115		12	$	25,479,031

One loan was modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The following table summarizes loans that were modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the six months ended June 30, 2012.


	Six months ended June 30, 2012
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Relationships		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Commercial Real Estate		—	$	—		—	$	—
Residential Real Estate		1		4,661,109		1		4,661,109
Construction to permanent		—		—		—		—

Total Troubled Debt Restructurings		1	$	4,661,109		1	$	4,661,109

Substantially all of our troubled debt restructured loan modifications involve lowering the monthly payments on such loans through either a reduction in interest rate below market rate, an extension of the term of the loan, or a combination of these two methods. These modifications rarely result in the forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. In addition, we frequently obtain additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying commercial loans. If the borrower had demonstrated performance under the previous terms and our underwriting process shows the borrower has the capacity to continue to perform under the restructured terms, the loan will continue to accrue interest. Non-accruing restructured loans may be returned to accrual status when there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally six consecutive months of payments) and both principal and interest are deemed collectible.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, one of the troubled debt restructured loans was upgraded and is no longer classified as a troubled debt restructuring as compared to December 31, 2011. The upgrade was a commercial construction loan for $1.2 million where the bank received additional collateral. There was another troubled debt restructuring of a residential loan for $4.7 million that was upgraded to special mention due to increased liquidity of the borrower during the first quarter of 2012, which has since been downgraded to substandard, due to financial hardship of the borrower in the second quarter. One troubled debt restructuring had a payment default on a commercial real estate loan and is currently in OREO.

All troubled debt restructurings are impaired loans, which are individually evaluated for impairment.

Note 4: Deposits

The following table is a summary of the Company’s deposits at:


	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Non-interest bearing	$	71,722,494	$	65,613,374

Interest bearing
NOW		24,297,309		24,396,210
Savings		66,862,473		59,396,310
Money market		47,227,188		52,889,642
Time certificates, less than $100,000		179,310,667		198,207,998
Time certificates, $100,000 or more		132,675,624		144,405,859

Total interest bearing		450,373,261		479,296,019

Total Deposits	$	522,095,755	$	544,909,393

Included in time certificates are certificates of deposit through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) network of $0 and $1,361,544 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These are considered brokered deposits. Pursuant to the Agreement discussed in Note 10, the Bank’s participation in the CDARS program, as an issuer of deposits to customers of other banks in the CDARS program, may not exceed 10% of total deposits.

Note 5: Share-Based Compensation

The Company maintains the Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Stock Plan to provide an incentive by the grant of options, restricted stock awards or phantom stock units to directors and employees of the Company. The Plan provides for the issuance of up to 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock subject to certain Plan limitations. 2,045,654 shares of stock remain available for issuance under the Plan as of June 30, 2012. The vesting of options and restricted stock awards may accelerate in accordance with terms of the plan. The Compensation Committee shall make terms and conditions applicable to the vesting of restricted stock awards and stock options. Restricted stock grants vest in quarterly installments over a four year period from the date of grant. The Compensation Committee accelerated the vesting of the initial grant of restricted stock, whereby the first year of the tranche vested immediately. Stock options were granted at an exercise price equal to $2.20 based on a price determined by the Compensation Committee and all have an expiration period of 10 years. The fair value of stock options granted on January 24, 2012, was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: an expected life of 6.28 years utilizing the simplified method, risk-free rate of return of 1.28%, volatility of 61.29% and no dividend yield. The Company is expensing the grant date fair value of all share-based compensation over the requisite vesting periods on a straight-line basis.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded $53,497 and $133,128 of total stock-based compensation, respectively.

The following table is a summary of the Company’s non-vested stock options as of June 30, 2012, and changes therein during the period then ended:


	Number of Stock Options		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Contractual Life (years)
Outstanding—December 31, 2011		—	$	—	$	—		—
Granted		850,000		0.90		2.20		10
Exercised		—		—		—		—

Outstanding—June 30, 2012		850,000	$	0.90	$	2.20		10

Exercisable—June 30, 2012		—	$	—	$	—		—

Expected future stock option expense related to the non-vested options outstanding as of June 30, 2012, is $669,877 over an average period of 2.28 years.

The following is a summary of the status of the Company’s restricted shares as of June 30, 2012, and changes therein during the period then ended.


	Number of Shares Awarded			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		—		$	—
Granted		104,346			1.73
Vested		(25,715	)		1.73
Forfeited		—			—

Non-vested at June 30, 2012		78,631		$	1.73

Expected future stock award expense related to the non-vested restricted awards as of June 30, 2012, is $135,638 over an average period of 3.10 years.

Note 6: Income Taxes

The determination of the amount of deferred income tax assets which are more likely than not to be realized is primarily dependent on projections of future earnings, which are subject to uncertainty and estimates that may change given economic conditions and other factors. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position of the Company at June 30, 2012. The deferred tax position has been affected by several significant transactions in the past several years. These transactions include increased provision for loan losses, the levels of non-accrual loans and other-than-temporary impairment write-offs of certain investments, as well as a loss on the bulk sale of loans in 2011. As a result, the Company is in a cumulative net loss position at June 30, 2012, and under the applicable accounting guidance, has concluded that it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be able to realize its deferred tax assets and, accordingly, has established a full valuation allowance totaling $13.5 million against its deferred tax asset at June 30, 2012. The valuation allowance is analyzed quarterly for changes affecting the deferred tax asset. In the future, if the Company generates taxable income on a sustained basis, management’s conclusion regarding the need for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance could change, resulting in the reversal of all or a portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance.

An “ownership change” occurred with respect to the Company in 2010 for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Consequently, the Company’s ability to claim net operating loss carryforwards attributable to periods prior to the ownership change and certain recognized built-in losses and deductions (“pre-ownership change losses”) against income in years subsequent to the ownership change is limited. The amount of pre-ownership change losses that may be applied against income in a tax year subsequent to the ownership change is generally limited to the product of (x) the Company’s fair market value on the date of the ownership change and (y) the highest federal long-term tax-exempt rate in effect for any month in the three-month period ending with the calendar month in which the ownership change occurred, plus any unused capacity to claim pre-ownership change losses from prior years.

In 2011 the Company calculated the annual limitation on its use of pre-ownership change losses under Section 382 as a result of the 2010 ownership change as $284,000. The Company also determined that the amount of its pre-ownership change losses was $36.2 million. Based on that analysis and a 20-year carryforward period, the Company may utilize approximately $5.7 million of the pre-ownership change losses. Accordingly, the Company wrote-off approximately $10.4 million of deferred tax assets in 2011. The write-off of the deferred tax asset did not affect the consolidated financial statements as there was a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets.

Note 7: Income (loss) per share

The Company is required to present basic income (loss) per share and diluted income (loss) per share in its consolidated statements of operations. Basic income (loss) per share amounts are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method. The Company is also required to provide a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of both basic and diluted income (loss) per share.

The stock options and non-vested restricted stock awards did not have an impact on the diluted earnings per share. The following is information about the computation of income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:


Three months ended June 30, 2012	Net Income			Weighted Average Common Shares O/S		Amount
Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
Income attributable to common shareholders	$	345,282			38,381,988	$	0.01


Three months ended June 30, 2011	Net Loss			Weighted Average Common Shares O/S		Amount
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
Loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(7,175,368	)		38,362,727	$	(0.19	)


Six months ended June 30, 2012	Net Income			Weighted Average Common Shares O/S		Amount
Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
Income attributable to common shareholders	$	890,812			38,377,166	$	0.02


Six months ended June 30, 2011	Net Loss			Weighted Average Common Shares O/S		Amount
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
Loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(16,157,966	)		38,362,727	$	(0.42	)

Note 8: Other Comprehensive Income

Other comprehensive income, which is comprised solely of the change in unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, is as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012							Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
	Before Tax Amount		Tax Effect			Net of Tax Amount		Before Tax Amount			Tax Effect			Net of Tax Amount
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period	$	198,155	$	(75,299	)	$	122,856	$	306,842		$	(116,601	)	$	190,241

Reclassification adjustment for (losses) recognized in income		—		—			—		(8,042	)		3,056			(4,986	)

Unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities, net of taxes	$	198,155	$	(75,299	)	$	122,856	$	298,800		$	(113,545	)	$	185,255


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011							Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Before Tax Amount		Tax Effect			Net of Tax Amount		Before Tax Amount			Tax Effect			Net of Tax Amount
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period	$	453,931	$	(206,410	)	$	247,521	$	459,133		$	(208,387	)	$	250,746

Reclassification adjustment for gains recognized in income		—		—			—		—			—			—

Unrealized holding gains on available for sale securities, net of taxes	$	453,931	$	(206,410	)	$	247,521	$	459,133		$	(208,387	)	$	250,746

Note 9: Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheet. The contractual amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The contractual amount of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit represent the total amount of potential accounting loss should: the contracts be fully drawn upon; the customers default; and the value of any existing collateral becomes worthless. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments and evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Management believes that the Company controls the credit risk of these financial instruments through credit approvals, credit limits, monitoring procedures and the receipt of collateral as deemed necessary.

Financial instruments whose contractual amounts represent credit risk at June 30, 2012 are as follows:


Commitments to extend credit:
Future loan commitments	$	35,782,667
Home equity lines of credit		30,738,527
Unused lines of credit		37,402,837
Undisbursed construction loans		4,304,731
Financial standby letters of credit		7,000

	$	108,235,762

Standby letters of credit are written commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. Guarantees that are not derivative contracts are recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at their fair value at inception.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates, or other termination clauses, and may require payment of a fee by the borrower. Since these commitments could expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies, but may include residential and commercial property, deposits and securities. Based on the growth in the unfunded commitments, the bank has established a reserve of $26,000 as of June 30, 2012.

Note 10: Regulatory and Operational Matters

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory—and possibly additional discretionary—actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). In addition, due to the Bank’s asset profile and current economic conditions in its markets, the Bank’s capital plan targets a minimum 9% Tier 1 leverage capital ratio.

In February 2009 the Bank entered into a formal written agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Bank has appointed a Compliance Committee of outside directors and the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee must report quarterly to the Board of Directors and to the OCC on the Bank’s progress in complying with the Agreement. The Agreement requires the Bank to review, adopt and implement a number of policies and programs related to credit and operational issues. The Agreement further provides for limitations on the acceptance of certain brokered deposits and the extension of credit to borrowers whose loans are criticized. The Bank may pay dividends during the term of the Agreement only with prior written permission from the OCC. The Agreement also requires that the Bank develop and implement a three-year capital plan. The Bank has taken or put into process many of the steps required by the Agreement, and does not anticipate that the restrictions included within the Agreement will impair its current business plan.

In June 2010 the company entered into a formal written agreement (the “Reserve Bank Agreement”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Reserve Bank”). Under the terms of the Reserve Bank Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company are required to take appropriate steps to fully utilize the Company’s financial and managerial resources to serve as a source of strength to the Bank including taking steps to insure that the Bank complies with the Agreement with the OCC. The Reserve Bank Agreement requires the Company to submit, adopt and implement a capital plan that is acceptable to the Reserve Bank. The Company must also report to the Reserve Bank quarterly on the Company’s progress in complying with the Reserve Bank Agreement. The Agreement further provides for certain restrictions on the payment or receipt of dividends, distributions of interest or principal on subordinate debentures or trust preferred securities and the Company’s ability to incur debt or to purchase or redeem its stock without the prior written approval of the Reserve Bank. The Company has taken or put into process many of the steps required by the Reserve Bank Agreement, and does not anticipate that the restrictions included within the Reserve Bank Agreement will impair its current business plan.

The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were:


	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
June 30, 2012

The Company:

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	64,556		15.85	%	$	32,583		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		59,439		14.60	%		16,285		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)		59,439		9.13	%		26,041		4.00	%		N/A		N/A

The Bank:

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	62,935		15.43	%	$	32,630		8.00	%	$	40,787		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		57,819		14.18	%		16,310		4.00	%		24,465		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)		57,819		8.88	%		26,045		4.00	%		32,556		5.00	%

December 31, 2011

The Company:

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	63,658		15.22	%	$	33,469		8.00	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		58,377		13.95	%		16,735		4.00	%		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)		58,377		9.01	%		25,931		4.00	%		N/A		N/A

The Bank:

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	61,616		14.75	%	$	33,445		8.00	%	$	41,806		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		56,339		13.48	%		16,722		4.00	%		25,084		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)		56,339		8.69	%		25,929		4.00	%		32,411		5.00	%

Restrictions on dividends, loans and advances

The Company’s ability to pay dividends is dependent on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company. Pursuant to the February 9, 2009 Agreement between the Bank and the OCC, the Bank can pay dividends to the Company only pursuant to a dividend policy requiring compliance with the Bank’s OCC-approved capital program, in compliance with applicable law and with the prior written determination of no supervisory objection by the Assistant Deputy Comptroller. In addition to the Agreement, certain other restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. The approval of the OCC is required to pay dividends in excess of the Bank’s earnings retained in the current year plus retained net earnings for the preceding two years. As of June 30, 2012, the Bank had an accumulated deficit; therefore, dividends may not be paid to the Company. The Bank is also prohibited from paying dividends that would reduce its capital ratios below minimum regulatory requirements.

The Company’s ability to pay dividends and incur debt is also restricted by the Reserve Bank Agreement. Under the terms of the Reserve Bank Agreement, the Company has agreed that it shall not declare or pay any dividends or incur, increase or guarantee any debt without the prior written approval of the Reserve Bank and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation (the “Director”) of the Board of Governors.

Loans or advances to the Company from the Bank are limited to 10% of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus on a secured basis.

Recent Legislative Developments

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Act”) was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act is a significant piece of legislation that will continue to have a major impact on the financial services industry, including the organization, financial condition and operations of banks and bank holding companies. Management continues to evaluate the impact of the Act; however, uncertainty remains as to its operational impact, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Many of the provisions of the Act are aimed at financial institutions that are significantly larger than the Company and the Bank. Notwithstanding this, there are many other provisions that the Company and the Bank are subject to and will have to comply with, including any new rules applicable to the Company and the Bank promulgated by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, a new regulatory body dedicated to consumer protection. As rules and regulations are promulgated by the agencies responsible for implementing and enforcing the Act, the Company and the Bank will have to address each to ensure compliance with applicable provisions of the Act and compliance costs are expected to increase.

The Dodd-Frank Act broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessments. Under rules issued by the FDIC in February 2011, the base for insurance assessments changed from domestic deposits to consolidated assets less tangible equity. Assessment rates are calculated using formulas that take into account the risks of the institution being assessed. The rule was effective beginning April 1, 2011. This did not have a material impact on the Company.

On June 28, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board approved a final debit-card interchange rule. This primarily impacts larger banks and has not had a material impact on the Company.

It is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the yet to be written implementing rules and regulations will have on the Company. The financial reform legislation and any implementing rules that are ultimately issued could have adverse implications on the financial industry, the competitive environment, and our ability to conduct business. Management will have to apply resources to ensure compliance with all applicable provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and any implementing rules, which may increase our costs of operations and adversely impact our earnings.

Note 11: Fair Value and Interest Rate Risk

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in certain instances, there are no quoted market prices for certain assets or liabilities. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the asset or liability.

Fair value measurements focus on exit prices in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment.

The Company’s fair value measurements are classified into a fair value hierarchy based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The three categories within the hierarchy are as follows:

•

Level 1 Inputs—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

•

Level 2 Inputs—Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

•

Level 3 Inputs—Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

The fair value measurement level of an asset or liability within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lower level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, and for estimating fair value for financial and non-financial instruments not recorded at fair value, is set forth below.

Cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, short-term investments and accrued interest receivable and payable: The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. These financial instruments are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Available-for-Sale Securities: These financial instruments are recorded at fair value in the financial statements. Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models (i.e., matrix pricing) or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Examples of such instruments include U.S. government agency bonds and mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds. The prices for these instruments are obtained through an independent pricing service or dealer market participants with whom the Company has historically transacted both purchases and sales of investment

securities. Prices obtained from these sources include prices derived from market quotations and matrix pricings. The fair value measurements considered observable data may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. Management reviews the data and assumptions used in pricing the securities by its third party provider to ensure the highest level of significant inputs are derived from market observable data. Level 3 securities are instruments for which significant unobservable input are utilized. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Loans: For variable rate loans, which reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, carrying values are a reasonable estimate of fair values, adjusted for credit losses inherent in the portfolios. The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the period end rates, estimated by using local market data, at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities, adjusted for credit losses inherent in the portfolios. The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, nonrecurring fair value adjustments to collateral-dependent impaired loans are recorded to reflect partial write-downs based on the observable market price or current appraised value of collateral. Fair values estimated in this manner do not fully incorporate an exit-price approach to fair value, but instead are based on a comparison to current market rates for comparable loans.

Other Real Estate Owned: The fair values of the Company’s other real estate owned (“OREO”) properties are based on the estimated current property valuations less estimated selling costs. When the fair value is based on current observable appraised values, OREO is classified within Level 2. The Company classifies OREO within Level 3 when unobservable adjustments are made to appraised values. The Company does not record other real estate owned at fair value on a recurring basis.

Deposits: The fair value of demand deposits, regular savings and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of certificates of deposit and other time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities, estimated using local market data, to a schedule of aggregated expected maturities on such deposits. The Company does not record deposits at fair value on a recurring basis.

Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of borrowings under short-term repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values. The Company does not record short-term borrowings at fair value on a recurring basis.

Junior Subordinated Debt: Junior subordinated debt reprices quarterly and as a result the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value. The Company does not record junior subordinated debt at fair value on a recurring basis.

Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings: The fair value of the advances is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current Federal Home Loan Bank interest rates for advances of similar maturity to a schedule of maturities of such advances. The Company does not record these borrowings at fair value on a recurring basis.

Other Borrowings: The fair values of longer term borrowings and fixed rate repurchase agreements are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates for transactions of similar maturity to a schedule of maturities of such transactions. The Company does not record these borrowings at fair value on a recurring basis.

Off-balance sheet instruments: Fair values for the Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments (lending commitments) are based on interest rate changes and fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The Company does not record its off-balance-sheet instruments at fair value on a recurring basis.

The following table details the financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine fair value:


June 30, 2012	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of June 30, 2012
U.S. Government agency mortgage- backed securities	$	—	$	39,642,765	$	—	$	39,642,765
U.S. Government bonds		—		5,016,920		—		5,016,920
Corporate bonds		—		11,682,945		—		11,682,945

Securities available for sale	$	—	$	56,342,630	$	—	$	56,342,630


December 31, 2011	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance as of December 31, 2011
U.S. Government agency mortgage- backed securities	$	—	$	50,049,429	$	—	$	50,049,429
U.S. Government bonds				5,037,085		—		5,037,085
Corporate bonds		—		11,383,458		—		11,383,458

Securities available for sale	$	—	$	66,469,972	$	—	$	66,469,972

Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

The following tables reflect financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:


June 30, 2012	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance
Impaired Loans ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	4,168,705	$	4,168,705

Other real estate owned ⁽²⁾	$	—	$	—	$	288,144	$	288,144

December 31, 2011
Impaired Loans ⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	13,498,177	$	13,498,177

Other real estate owned ⁽²⁾	$	—	$	—	$	2,762,640	$	2,762,640

⁽¹⁾	Represents carrying value for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral.

⁽²⁾	Represents carrying value for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the property.

The Company discloses fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. Certain financial instruments are excluded from disclosure requirements and, accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and have not been reevaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair value of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than amounts reported on those dates.

The information presented should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the Company since a fair value calculation is only required for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to the wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other bank holding companies may not be meaningful.

The following is a summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments not measured and not reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):


		June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Hierarchy	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and noninterest bearing balances due from banks	Level 1	$	3,721	$	3,721	$	4,242	$	4,242
Interest-bearing deposits due from banks	Level 1		58,456		58,456		50,474		50,474
Short-term investments	Level 1		710		710		710		710
Other investments	Level 2		3,500		3,500		3,500		3,500
Federal Reserve Bank stock	Level 1		1,720		1,720		1,707		1,707
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	Level 1		4,344		4,344		4,508		4,508
Loans receivable, net	Level 3		483,858		491,095		501,477		511,648
Accrued interest receivable	Level 1		2,289		2,289		2,453		2,453

Financial Liabilities:
Demand deposits	Level 1	$	71,722	$	71,722	$	65,613	$	65,613
Savings deposits	Level 1		66,862		66,862		59,396		59,396
Money market deposits	Level 1		47,227		47,227		52,890		52,890
NOW accounts	Level 1		24,297		24,297		24,396		24,396
Time deposits	Level 2		311,986		317,852		342,614		347,246
FHLB Borrowings	Level 2		50,000		52,954		50,000		52,645
Securities sold under repurchase agreements	Level 2		7,000		7,683		7,000		8,173
Subordinated debentures	Level 2		8,248		8,248		8,248		8,248
Accrued interest payable	Level 1		1,096		1,096		949		949

The following are the methods and assumptions that were used to estimate the fair value of other financial assets and liabilities in the table above:

Cash and due from banks and interest deposits with banks: The carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the short maturity of these items.

Short term investments: The carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the short maturity of these items.

Other Investments: The redeemable carrying amount of this security, with limited marketability, approximates its fair value.

Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock: The redeemable carrying amount of these securities, with limited marketability, approximates their fair value.

Loans Receivable: The fair values of loans are estimated by discounting the projected future cash flows using market discount rates, primarily based on the Bank’s current offer rates on comparable products, which reflect credit and interest-rate risk inherent in the loan. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Fair values estimated in this manner do not fully incorporate an exit price approach to fair value, but instead are based on a comparison to current market rates for comparable loans.

Accrued interest receivable and payable: The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

Deposits: Current carrying amounts approximate estimated fair value of demand deposits, savings, money market and NOW accounts. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using the Bank’s current offer rates on comparable products of similar remaining maturities.

FHLB borrowings and securities sold under repurchase agreements: The fair values of the borrowings are estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using current market discount rates of financial instruments with similar characteristics, terms and remaining maturities.

Junior Subordinated Debt: There is no active market for the trust preferred securities issued by the Company’s capital trust. The carrying amount is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the frequency they reprice to market rates.

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

Off-balance sheet instruments

Loan commitments on which the committed interest rate is less than the current market rate were insignificant at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The estimated fair value of fee income on letters of credit at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was insignificant.

Note 12. Restructuring Charges and Asset Disposals

The Company recorded restructuring charges of $495,207 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $2,986,441 in the same period as last year. These costs are included in restructuring charges and asset disposals in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During 2011, the Company announced that it would be undertaking a series of initiatives that are designed to transform and enhance its operations. In order to strengthen the Company’s competitive position and return it to its goal of restored health and profitability, it executed one initiative to consolidate four branch locations and vacate other office space, and a second plan to reduce workforce by approximately 10% of employees.

On March 3, 2011, the Company announced that it would consolidate four branches, effective June 2011, to reduce operating expenses. All customer accounts in the affected branches were transferred to nearby Patriot branches to minimize any inconvenience to customers. The consolidation of these branches resulted in an earnings charge of $1.8 million, which is comprised of lease termination expenses of $1.2 million, lease liabilities charges of $400,000, and severance payments of $200,000 to affected employees. In addition, there was a $600,000 write-off of leasehold improvements and other fixed assets for these branches that were closed.

In order to further reduce operating expenses, the Company announced on May 16, 2011 that it would be executing a workforce reduction plan with employees in the back office operational areas. There were a total of eighteen employees affected by this reduction. This initiative resulted in an earnings charge of $600,000, which is comprised exclusively of severance payments to affected employees.

On September 23, 2011, the Company subleased vacant office space at 900 Bedford Street, Stamford, CT, effective October 1, 2011 for a term of two years.

On March 30, 2012, the Company announced that it would close the NYC branch, effective June 2012, and executed a workforce reduction of back office personnel to further reduce operating expenses. There were twelve employees in total affected by this announcement. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, a restructuring charge of $495,207 was recorded, which was comprised of $445,429 for severance expenses for the branch and back office personnel, asset disposals of $39,445 and $10,333 in lease termination costs.

On June 29, 2012, the Company announced that it would be consolidating three more branches, effective September 2012 in its continued effort to reduce operating expenses.

Restructuring reserves at June 30, 2012 for the restructuring activities taken in connection with these initiatives are comprised of the following:


	Balance at December 31, 2011		Expenses		Cash payments			Non-cash charges			Balance at June 30, 2012
Severance and benefit costs 2011	$	64,132	$	34,616	$	(17,665	)	$	(2,994	)	$	78,089
Lease termination costs 2011		317,808		—		—			(72,404	)		245,404
Severance and benefit costs 2012		—		410,813		(359,537	)		—			51,276
Lease termination costs 2012		—		10,333		—			—			10,333
Asset disposals 2012		—		39,445		—			(39,445	)		—

Total	$	381,940	$	495,207	$	(377,202	)	$	(114,843	)	$	385,102

The restructuring reserves at June 30, 2012 are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Note 13: Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs,” was issued as a result of the effort to develop common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). While ASU No. 2011-04 is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP, it expands the existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and clarifies the existing guidance or wording changes to align with IFRS No. 13. Many of the requirements for the amendments in ASU No. 2011-04 do not result in a change in the application of the requirements in Topic 820. The Company adopted ASU No. 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 and it did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” requires an entity to present components of comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate consecutive statements. These amendments will make the financial statement presentation of other comprehensive income more prominent by eliminating the alternative to present comprehensive income within the statement of equity. As originally issued, ASU No. 2011-05 required entities to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component in the statement in which net income is presented and the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented (for both interim and annual financial statements). This requirement was deferred by ASU No.2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassification of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards”. ASU No. 2011-05 is effective for all interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2012 and elected to present comprehensive income in a separate consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

Item 2:

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

“SAFE HARBOR” STATEMENT UNDER PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

Certain statements contained in Bancorp’s public reports, including this report, and in particular in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may be forward looking and subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. These factors include, but are not limited to; (1) changes in prevailing interest rates which would affect the interest earned on Bancorp’s interest earning assets and the interest paid on its interest bearing liabilities; (2) the timing of repricing of Bancorp’s interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities; (3) the effect of changes in governmental monetary policy; (4) the effect of changes in regulations applicable to Bancorp and the Bank and the conduct of its business; (5) changes in competition among financial service companies, including possible further encroachment of non-banks on services traditionally provided by banks; (6) the ability of competitors that are larger than Bancorp to provide products and services which it is impracticable for Bancorp to provide; (7) the state of the economy and real estate values in Bancorp’s market areas, and the consequent effect on the quality of Bancorp’s loans, customers, vendors and communities; (8) recent governmental initiatives that are expected to have a profound effect on the financial services industry and could dramatically change the competitive environment of Bancorp; (9) other legislative or regulatory changes, including those related to residential mortgages, changes in accounting standards, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) premiums that may adversely affect Bancorp.

Although Bancorp believes that it offers the loan and deposit products and has the resources needed for continued success, future revenues and interest spreads and yields cannot be reliably predicted. These trends may cause Bancorp to adjust its operations in the future. Because of the foregoing and other factors, recent trends should not be considered reliable indicators of future financial results or stock prices.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and to disclose contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management has identified the accounting for the allowance for loan losses, the analysis of its investment securities and the valuation of deferred income tax assets, as Bancorp’s most critical accounting policies and estimates in that they are important to the portrayal of Bancorp’s financial condition and results. They require management’s most subjective and complex judgment as a result of the need to make an estimate about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. These accounting policies, including the nature of the estimates and types of assumptions used, are described throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

SUMMARY

Bancorp realized net income of $345,000 ($0.01 basic and diluted income per share) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, compared to a net loss of $7.2 million ($0.19 basic and diluted loss per share) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, Bancorp realized net income of $891,000 ($0.02 basic and diluted income per share) compared to a net loss of $16.2 million ($0.42 basic and diluted loss per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The primary reason for the increase in the quarterly comparison is the $1.7 million benefit from the provision for loan losses and lower operating expenses of $5.2 million. Restructuring charges of $127,000 were $2.9 million lower than the same period last year; associated with the branch closings and reduction-in- force, as discussed in Note 12. Bancorp’s net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was $4.4 million compared to $5.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Interest income and interest expense decreased by 12% and 9%, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The significant decline in interest income is due primarily to the lower interest rate environment and a high level of liquidity. The decline in interest expense is primarily due to the reduction of total deposits and substantially lower interest rates paid on term deposits.

Total assets decreased $21.5 million from $665.8 million at December 31, 2011 to $644.3 million at June 30, 2012. Cash and cash equivalents increased $7.5 million from $55.4 million at December 31, 2011 to $62.9 million at June 30, 2012. Securities decreased $10.3 million from $76.2 million at December 31, 2011 to $65.9 million June 30, 2012. The net loan portfolio decreased $17.4 million from $501.2 million at December 31, 2011 to $483.9 million at June 30, 2012. This decrease is primarily a result of a $66.4 million sale of residential loans, partially offset with loan growth of $27.5 million and $21.6 million in residential and commercial real estate, respectively. As a result of weak loan demand and currently high levels of balance sheet liquidity, the Bank continued to reduce its concentration in high costs of certificates of deposit. The overall cost of deposits decreased from 1.28% at December 31, 2011 to 1.24% at June 30, 2012. Deposits decreased $22.8 million from $544.9 million at December 31, 2011 to $522.1 million at June 30, 2012.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents increased $7.5 million, or 13%, to $62.9 million at June 30, 2012 compared to $55.4 million at December 31, 2011. This increase is primarily the result of the proceeds from the residential loan sale on March 29, 2012, which was deposited in short-term investments, and lower outstanding loan balances.

Investments

The following table is a summary of Bancorp’s available-for-sale securities portfolio, at fair value, at the dates shown:


	June 30, 2012		December 31 2011
U.S. Government bonds	$	5,016,920	$	5,037,085
U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities		39,642,765		50,049,429
Corporate bonds		11,682,945		11,383,458

Total Available-for-Sale Securities	$	56,342,630	$	66,469,972

Available-for-sale securities decreased $10.1 million, or 15%, from $66.5 million at December 31, 2011 to $56.3 million at June 30, 2012. This decrease is primarily due to the sale of $5.2 million of government agency mortgage-backed securities and principal pay downs of $4.9 million on mortgage backed securities.

Loans

The following table is a summary of Bancorp’s loan portfolio at the dates shown:


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Real Estate
Commercial	$	237,217,702		$	215,659,837
Residential		149,905,067			188,108,855
Construction		6,217,516			12,306,922
Construction to permanent		8,287,915			10,012,022
Commercial		32,379,945			31,810,735
Consumer home equity		53,587,509			49,694,546
Consumer installment		2,125,347			2,164,972

Total Loans		489,721,001			509,757,889
Premiums on purchased loans		223,853			231,125
Net deferred costs		586,866			622,955
Allowance for loan losses		(6,673,648	)		(9,384,672	)

Loans receivable, net	$	483,858,072		$	501,227,297

Bancorp’s net loan portfolio decreased $17.4 million, or 3%, from $501.2 million at December 31, 2011 to $483.9 million at June 30, 2012. The decrease is primarily a result of the $66.4 million residential loan sale, partially offset by new loan growth. Residential mortgages decreased by $38.2 million; and construction and construction-to-permanent loans decreased $6.1 million and $1.7 million respectively. Consumer installment loans decreased $40,000. These were partially offset by increases in commercial real estate loans of $21.6 million, consumer home equity loans of $3.9 million and commercial loans of $569,000.

At June 30, 2012, the net loan to deposit ratio was 93% and the net loan to total assets ratio was 75%. At December 31, 2011, these ratios were 92% and 76%, respectively.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established to provide for expected future losses based on the Bank’s loss history and the application of qualitative risk adjustment factors to compensate for estimated differences between anticipated potential losses and those predicted by the bank’s specific loss history. The allowance is established through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance for loan losses decreased $2.7 million from December 31, 2011 to June 30, 2012 primarily due to a reduction in loan balances, improved credit quality of the loan portfolio and a change in methodology in estimating the allowance as described more fully below. These factors resulted in a release of excess reserves of $2.6 million after net charge-offs of $152,000.

Until this quarter, the Bank had used a 12 quarter un-weighted average to calculate loss history. As of this quarter, the Bank implemented changes to the allowance methodology, resulting in a reduction of the allowance for loan losses of $1.1 million. In making this transition, the changes serve to update and enhance the methodology to reflect the direction of the current loan portfolio. The changes are threefold:

•

First, the Bank adopted a two year, instead of a three year, weighted average historical loss factor as the basis for the calculation of its historical loss experience. This is used to calculate expected losses in the ASC 450-20 pools prior to the application of qualitative risk adjustment factors. Weightings were allocated 59% to the last four quarters and 41% to the previous four quarters. This change was made to be more responsive to the changing credit environment. Net charge-offs have declined, especially in 2012 when they averaged $76,000 per quarter. This shorter average historical loss period will produce results more indicative of the current and expected behavior of the portfolio.

•

Second, the Bank adopted an Internal Risk Ratings Based (IRB) approach to calculating historical loss rates. This approach calibrates expected losses with actual risk assessment and equates the likelihood of loss to the level of risk in a credit facility rating. All loans are reviewed annually. Similarly, the Loan Committee can adjust a risk rating. Previously, loss history was applied to categories of loans and qualitative adjustments were apportioned by risk rating within the categories.

•

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due for payment unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer installment loans are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged off is reversed against interest income. Any interest paid on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis method until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Management considers all non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and loans that were previously classified as TDRs that have been upgraded, to be impaired. In most cases, loan payments that are past due less than 90 days, based on contractual terms, are considered collection delays and the related loans are not considered to be impaired. The Bank considers consumer installment loans to be pools of smaller balance homogeneous loans, which are collectively evaluated for impairment.

The changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods shown are as follows:


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
(Thousands of dollars)	2012			2011			2012			2011
Balance at beginning of period	$	8,461		$	12,208		$	9,385		$	15,374
Charge-offs		(91	)		(3,034	)		(193	)		(7,188	)
Recoveries		17			743			41			764

Net Charge-offs		(74	)		(2,291	)		(152	)		(6,424	)

Transferred to loans held-for-sale		—			—			—			(6,014	)
Provision charged to operations		(1,713	)		1,483			(2,559	)		8,464

Balance at end of period	$	6,674		$	11,400		$	6,674		$	11,400

Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period		0.02	%		0.48	%		0.03	%		1.28	%

Ratio of ALLL / Gross Loans		1.36	%		2.46	%		1.36	%		2.46	%

Based upon the overall assessment and evaluation of the loan portfolio, management believes the allowance for loan losses of $6.7 million, at June 30, 2012, which represents 1.36% of gross loans outstanding, is adequate under prevailing economic conditions, to absorb existing losses in the loan portfolio.

Non-Accrual, Past Due and Restructured Loans

The following table presents non-accruing loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing:


(Thousands of dollars)	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Loans past due over 90 days	$	4,235		$	9,461
still accruing
Non accruing loans		17,452			20,683

Total	$	21,687		$	30,144

% of Total Loans		4.42	%		5.91	%
% of Total Assets		3.37	%		4.53	%

Loans delinquent over 90 days and still accruing aggregating $4.2 million are comprised of seven loans, all of which have matured and continue to make payments. These loans are currently in the process of being renewed or paid off. Impaired loans, which are comprised of non-accruing loans, troubled debt restructured loans, and loans previously classified as TDRs that have been upgraded, increased by $1.9 million to $34.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and decreased $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Impaired loans are attributable to the lingering effects of the downturn in the economy, which has severely impacted the real estate market and placed unprecedented stress on credit markets. Residents of Fairfield County, Connecticut, many of whom are associated with the financial services industry, have been affected by the impact of the poor economy on employment and real estate values.

The $17.5 million of non-accrual loans at June 30, 2012 is comprised of 21 loans, for which a specific reserve of $349,000 has been established. In all cases, the Bank has obtained appraisal reports from independent licensed appraisal firms and discounted those values for estimated selling costs to determine estimated impairment. Of the $17.5 million of non-accrual loans at June 30, 2012 borrowers of 4 loans with aggregate balances of $6.0 million continue to make loan payments and these loans are current within one month as to payments.

Potential Problem Loans

In addition to the above, there are $47.9 million of substandard accruing loans comprised of 37 loans and $31.8 million of special mention loans comprised of 39 loans for which management has a concern as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present repayment terms. All but $5.0 million of the substandard accruing loans and all of the special mention loans continue to make timely payments and are within 30 days at June 30, 2012.

Other Real Estate Owned

The following table is a summary of Bancorp’s other real estate owned at the dates shown:


	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Residential construction	$	1,229,611	$	1,140,560
Commercial		—		1,622,080
Residential		288,144		—

Other real estate owned	$	1,517,755	$	2,762,640

The balance of other real estate owned at June 30, 2012 is comprised of two properties with an aggregate carrying value of $1.5 million that were obtained through loan foreclosure proceedings. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, two OREO properties were sold with an aggregate carrying value of $1.6 million.

Deferred Taxes

The determination of the amount of deferred income tax assets which are more likely than not to be realized is primarily dependent on projections of future earnings, which are subject to uncertainty and estimates that may change given economic conditions and other factors. A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. Management has reviewed the deferred tax position of Bancorp at June 30, 2012. The deferred tax position has been affected by several significant transactions in the past several years. These transactions include the change in ownership, in addition to, the increased provision for loan losses, the levels of non-accrual loans and other-than-temporary impairment write-offs of certain investments. As a result, the Company is in a cumulative net loss position at June 30, 2012, and under the applicable accounting guidance, has concluded that it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be able to realize its deferred tax assets and accordingly has established a full valuation allowance totaling $13.5 million against its deferred tax asset at June 30, 2012. The valuation allowance is analyzed quarterly for changes affecting the deferred tax asset. In the future, if the Company generates taxable income on a sustained basis, management’s conclusion regarding the need for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance could change, resulting in the reversal of all or a portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance.

Deposits

The following table is a summary of Bancorp’s deposits at the dates shown:


	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Non-interest bearing	$	71,722,494	$	65,613,374

Interest bearing
NOW		24,297,309		24,396,210
Savings		66,862,473		59,396,310
Money market		47,227,188		52,889,642
Time certificates, less than $100,000		179,310,667		198,207,998
Time certificates, $100,000 or more		132,675,624		144,405,859

Total interest bearing		450,373,261		479,296,019

Total Deposits	$	522,095,755	$	544,909,393

Total deposits decreased $22.8 million, or 4%, from $544.9 million at December 31, 2011 to $522.1 million at June 30, 2012. Interest bearing accounts decreased $28.9 million. This was primarily due to decreases in certificates of deposit (CD’s”) of $30.6 million and money market accounts of $5.7 million due to the low interest rate environment. These were partially offset by a $6.1 million increase in demand deposits primarily as a result of increases in official checks of $7.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in commercial checking accounts of $1.7 million.

Borrowings

At June 30, 2012, total borrowings were $65.2 million and are unchanged compared to December 31, 2011. In addition to the outstanding borrowings disclosed in the consolidated balance sheet, the Bank has the ability to borrow approximately $76.0 million in additional advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, including a $2.0 million overnight line of credit. The Bank has also established a line of credit at the Federal Reserve Bank.

The subordinated debentures of $8,248,000 are unsecured obligations of the Company and are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all present and future senior indebtedness of the Company. The Company has entered into a guarantee, which together with its obligations under the subordinated debentures and the declaration of trust governing the Trust, provides a full and unconditional guarantee of amounts on the capital securities. The subordinated debentures, which bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.15% (3.61160% at June 30, 2012), matures on March 26, 2033. Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, the Company began deferring interest payments on the subordinated debentures as permitted under the terms of the debentures. The deferral in the second quarter of 2012 represented the thirteenth consecutive quarter of deferral. The Company continues to accrue and charge interest to operations. The Company may defer the payment of interest until March 2014, and all accrued interest must be paid prior to or at completion of the deferral period.

Capital

Capital increased $1.2 million compared to December 31, 2011 primarily as a result of the net income earned of $891,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Bancorp’s off-balance sheet arrangements, which primarily consist of commitments to lend, decreased by $32.2 million from $140.4 million at December 31, 2011 to $108.2 million at June 30, 2012, due to decreases of $55.5 million in future loan commitments and $500,000 in financial letters of credit, partially offset by increases of $21.3 million in unused lines of credit and $2.5 million in undisbursed construction loans.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Interest and dividend income and expense

The following tables present average balance sheets (daily averages), interest income, interest expense and the corresponding yields earned and rates paid for major balance sheet components:


	Three months ended June 30,
	2012								2011
				Interest								Interest
	Average			Income/		Average			Average			Income/		Average
	Balance			Expense		Rate			Balance			Expense		Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Loans	$	479,545		$	5,812		4.85	%	$	472,761		$	6,539		5.53	%
Investments		67,849			458		2.70	%		77,569			568		2.93	%
Interest bearing deposits in banks		76,144			40		0.21	%		77,734			58		0.30	%
Federal funds sold		—			—		0.00	%		9,890			2		0.08	%

Total interest earning assets		623,538			6,310		4.05	%		637,954			7,167		4.49	%

Cash and due from banks		5,005								19,977
Premises and equipment, net		4,762								4,681
Allowance for loan losses		(8,449	)							(11,746	)
Other assets		26,890								27,842

Total Assets	$	651,746							$	678,708

Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	466,788		$	1,421		1.22	%	$	492,060		$	1,554		1.26	%
FHLB advances		51,319			354		2.76	%		50,000			424		3.39	%
Subordinated debt		8,248			75		3.64	%		8,248			71		3.44	%
Other borrowings		7,000			77		4.40	%		7,000			77		4.42	%

Total interest bearing liabilities		533,355			1,927		1.45	%		557,308			2,126		1.53	%

Demand deposits		62,056								59,022
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,141								5,629
Shareholders’ equity		51,194								56,749

Total liabilities and equity	$	651,746							$	678,708

Net interest income				$	4,383							$	5,041

Interest margin							2.81	%							3.16	%

Interest spread							2.60	%							2.96	%


	Six months ended June 30,
	2012								2011
				Interest								Interest
	Average			Income/		Average			Average			Income/		Average
	Balance			Expense		Rate			Balance			Expense		Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Loans	$	501,011		$	12,477		4.98	%	$	502,707		$	13,495		5.37	%
Investments		71,613			969		2.71	%		63,366			912		2.88	%
Interest bearing deposits in banks		57,480			51		0.18	%		88,443			120		0.27	%
Federal funds sold		0			—		0.00	%		9,945			6		0.12	%

Total interest earning assets		630,104			13,497		4.28	%		664,461			14,533		4.37	%

Cash and due from banks		4,999								20,038
Premises and equipment, net		4,345								4,824
Allowance for loan losses		(8,915	)							(13,615	)
Other assets		27,569								36,815

Total Assets	$	658,102							$	712,523

Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	473,274		$	2,938		1.24	%	$	524,418		$	3,419		1.30	%
FHLB advances		53,247			712		2.67	%		50,000			842		3.37	%
Subordinated debt		8,248			151		3.66	%		8,248			142		3.44	%
Other borrowings		7,000			154		4.40	%		7,000			153		4.39	%

Total interest bearing liabilities		541,770			3,955		1.46	%		589,666			4,556		1.55	%

Demand deposits		60,215								55,977
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,192								5,811
Shareholders’ equity		50,926								61,069

Total liabilities and equity	$	658,102							$	712,523

Net interest income				$	9,542							$	9,977

Interest margin							3.03	%							3.00	%

Interest spread							2.82	%							2.82	%

The following rate volume analysis reflects the impact that changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities had on net interest income during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), changes attributable to changes in rates (changes in rates multiplied by prior volume) and the total net change. The change resulting from the combined impact of volume and rate is allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.


	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
	2012 vs 2011									2012 vs 2011
	Increase (decrease) in Interest									Increase (decrease) in Interest
	Income/Expense									Income/Expense
	Due to change in:									Due to change in:
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
	(dollars in thousands)									(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Loans	$	92		$	(819	)	$	(727	)	$	(46	)	$	(972	)	$	(1,018	)
Investments		(67	)		(43	)		(110	)		113			(56	)		57
Interest bearing deposits in banks		(1	)		(17	)		(18	)		(36	)		(33	)		(69	)
Federal funds sold		(1	)		(1	)		(2	)		(3	)		(3	)		(6	)

Total interest earning assets		23			(880	)		(857	)		28			(1,064	)		(1,036	)

Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	(78	)	$	(55	)	$	(133	)	$	(337	)	$	(144	)	$	(481	)
FHLB advances		11			(80	)		(69	)		52			(182	)		(130	)
Subordinated debt		—			3			3			—			10			10
Other borrowings		—			—			—			—			—			—

Total interest bearing liabilities		(67	)		(132	)		(199	)		(285	)		(316	)		(601	)

Net interest income	$	90		$	(748	)	$	(658	)	$	313		$	(748	)	$	(435	)

For the quarter ended June 30, 2012, average interest earning assets decreased $14.4 million, or 2%, to $623.5 million from $638.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, resulting in interest income for Bancorp of $6.3 million compared to $7.2 million for the same period in 2011. Interest and fees on loans decreased $727,000 or 11%, from $6.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to $5.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. This decrease is primarily the result of lower average interest rates on new loan growth, partially offset by an increase of $6.8 million in the average balance of the loan portfolio. When compared to the same period last year, interest income on investments decreased by 19% due to an decrease of $9.7 million in the average balance of investments outstanding. Income on interest-bearing deposits in banks decreased 31% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2011, which is reflective of the decrease in the yields earned on excess funds.

Total interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 of $1.9 million represents a decrease of $199,000, or 9%, compared to interest expense of $2.1 million for the same period last year. This decrease in interest expense is the result of a decrease in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities. Average balances of interest bearing deposit accounts decreased $25.3 million, or 5%, which is comprised primarily of decreases in money market accounts and certificates of deposit of $22.9 million and $9.0 million respectively. These were partially offset by increases in savings accounts and NOW accounts of $5.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively. In addition, lower interest rates contributed to the overall decrease of $133,000 in interest expense on deposits. Average FHLB advances increased by $1.3 million, but lower interest rates resulted in a decrease of $70,000 in interest expense. Interest expense on the junior subordinated debt and borrowed funds increased by $4,000.

As a result of the above, Bancorp’s net interest income decreased $658,000, or 13%, to $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $5.0 million for the same period last year. The net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was 2.81% as compared to 3.16% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as a result of the various reasons mentioned above.

Interest and dividend income was $13.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, which represents a decrease of $1.0 million, or 7%, as compared to interest and dividend income of $14.5 million for the same period last year. This decrease was due primarily to lower interest rates, in addition to the $1.7 million decrease in the average balance of the loan portfolio, resulting in a decrease of $1.0 million in interest and fees on loans. This was combined with a decrease in interest rates on interest bearing deposits in banks, resulting in a decrease of $69,000, partially offset with an increase in interest and dividend income of $57,000 earned on investment securities. The average balance of the investment portfolio increased $8.2 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, total interest expense decreased $0.6 million, or 13%, to $4.0 million from $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in interest expense was due primarily to lower interest rates and a $47.9 million reduction in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, interest expense on the FHLB advances decreased $130,000 due to lower interest rates, when compared to the same period last year.

As a result of the above, net interest income decreased $435,000, or 4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $9.5 million as compared to $10.0 million at June 30, 2011. The net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 3.03% as compared to 3.00% for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Provision for Loan Losses

Based on management’s most recent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the provision for loan losses released from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $1.7 million due to the reduction of the loan balances, improved credit quality of the loan portfolio, and a change in the methodology in estimating the allowance, as previously discussed, compared to a charge of $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the provision for loan losses released from operations was $2.6 million compared to a charge to operations of $8.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to the $6.0 million charge related to loans transferred to held-for-sale in connection with the bulk loan sale in the first quarter of 2011. The allowance for loan losses decreased by $2.7 million from December 31, 2011 to June 30, 2012 due primarily to $2.6 million release of excess reserves after net charge-offs of $152,000.

An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is presented under “Allowance for Loan Losses.”

Non-interest income

Non-interest income decreased $255,000 from $710,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to $455,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. This is primarily due to interest received of $111,000 from federal tax refunds and an $80,000 gain on sale of loans in 2011. Fees and service charges on deposit accounts decreased $21,000 when compared to the same period last year. In addition, there were decreases in earnings on an equity investment and earnings on the cash surrender value of life insurance of $36,000 and $33,000, respectively. These were partially offset with an increase in mortgage brokerage referral fees of $21,000.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, non-interest income decreased $88,000, or 7%, to $1.2 million as compared to $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This decrease is primarily due to interest of $111,000 from federal tax refunds received in 2011, $73,000 lower fees and service charges on deposit accounts, $58,000 decrease in earnings on the cash surrender value of life insurance and a decrease of $31,000 in earnings on an equity investment. This was partially offset with an increase in gains on sale of loans of $184,000 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Non-interest expenses

Non-interest expenses decreased $5.2 million or 46% from $11.4 million to $6.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2011. This decrease is primarily due to lower restructuring charges of $2.9 million due to the consolidation of four branches and reduction- in-force of back office personnel initiated in the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to $127,000 related to the closing of one branch in the quarter ended June 30, 2012. Other real estate operation expenses decreased $758,000, primarily due to lower operating expenses and costs associated with managing and acquiring fewer properties. Salaries and benefit expense and occupancy expense decreased $464,000 and $157,000 respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period last year primarily due to the impact of the prior year’s reduction-in-force and branch closings. Professional and other outside services, which are comprised primarily of audit and accounting fees, legal services and consulting fees, decreased $381,000 from $1.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, to $854,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. Regulatory assessments decreased $166,000 primarily due to decreased FDIC premiums based on the lower assessment base.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, non-interest expense decreased $6.5 million, or 35% to $12.4 million from $19.0 million for the same period in 2011. This decrease was primarily due to lower restructuring charges and asset disposals of $2.5 million related to branch closings and reduction-in-force of back office personnel of $495,000 as compared to $3.0 million for the same period last year. Other real estate owned operations decreased $1.2 million due to fewer properties managed and gains recognized on the sale of two properties. Salaries and benefit expense and occupancy expense decreased $787,000 and $388,000 respectively, due to the impact of the restructuring activities mentioned above. In addition, professional and outside services and regulatory assessments decreased $647,000 and $368,000 respectively. Insurance expense also decreased $181,000.

LIQUIDITY

Bancorp’s liquidity ratio was 19% at June 30, 2012 compared to 24% at June 30, 2011. The liquidity ratio is defined as the percentage of liquid assets to total assets. The following categories of assets, as described in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are considered liquid assets: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, short-term investments and available-for-sale securities. Liquidity is a measure of Bancorp’s ability to generate adequate cash to meet financial obligations. The principal cash requirements of a financial institution are to cover downward fluctuations in deposit accounts and increases in its loan portfolio. Management believes Bancorp’s short-term assets provide sufficient liquidity to cover loan demand, potential fluctuations in deposit accounts and to meet other anticipated cash operating requirements.

CAPITAL

The following table illustrates Bancorp’s regulatory capital ratios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively:


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Tier 1 Leverage Capital		9.13	%		9.01	%
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		14.60	%		13.95	%
Total Risk-based Capital		15.85	%		15.22	%

The following table illustrates the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively:


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Tier 1 Leverage Capital		8.88	%		8.69	%
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		14.18	%		13.48	%
Total Risk-based Capital		15.43	%		14.75	%

IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or with the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. Notwithstanding this, inflation can directly affect the value of loan collateral, in particular, real estate. Inflation, or disinflation, could significantly affect Bancorp’s earnings in future periods.

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is defined as the sensitivity of income to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, commodity prices and other market-driven rates or prices. Based upon the nature of Bancorp’s business, the primary source of market risk is interest rate risk, which is the impact that changing interest rates have on current and future earnings. In addition, Bancorp’s loan portfolio is primarily secured by real estate in the company’s market area. As a result, the changes in valuation of real estate could also impact Bancorp’s earnings.

Qualitative Aspects of Market Risk

Bancorp’s goal is to maximize long term profitability while minimizing its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The first priority is to structure and price Bancorp’s assets and liabilities to maintain an acceptable interest rate spread while reducing the net effect of changes in interest rates. In order to accomplish this, the focus is on maintaining a proper balance between the timing and volume of assets and liabilities re-pricing within the balance sheet. One method of achieving this balance is to originate variable rate loans for the portfolio and purchase short-term investments to offset the increasing short term re-pricing of the liability side of the balance sheet. In fact, a number of the interest-bearing deposit products have no contractual maturity. Therefore, deposit balances may run off unexpectedly due to changing market conditions. Additionally, loans and investments with longer term rate adjustment frequencies are matched against longer term deposits and borrowings to lock in a desirable spread.

The exposure to interest rate risk is monitored by the Management Asset and Liability Committee consisting of senior management personnel. The Committee meets on a monthly basis, but may convene more frequently as conditions dictate. The Committee reviews the interrelationships within the balance sheet to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of risk. This Committee reports to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis regarding its activities. In addition to the Management Asset and Liability Committee, there is a Board Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which meets quarterly. ALCO monitors the interest rate risk analyses, reviews investment transactions during the period and determines compliance with Bank policies.

Quantitative Aspects of Market Risk

In order to manage the risk associated with interest rate movements, management analyzes Bancorp’s interest rate sensitivity position through the use of interest income simulation and GAP analysis. The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest sensitive.” An asset or liability is said to be interest sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period.

Management’s goal is to manage asset and liability positions to moderate the effects of interest rate fluctuations on net interest income. Interest income simulations are completed quarterly and presented to ALCO. The simulations provide an estimate of the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income under a range of assumptions. Changes to these assumptions can significantly affect the results of the simulations. The simulation incorporates assumptions regarding the potential timing in the repricing of certain assets and liabilities when market rates change and the changes in spreads between different market rates.

Simulation analysis is only an estimate of Bancorp’s interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time. Management regularly reviews the potential effect changes in interest rates could have on the repayment of rate sensitive assets and funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities.

The table below sets forth examples of changes in estimated net interest income and the estimated net portfolio value based on projected scenarios of interest rate increases and decreases. The analyses indicate the rate risk embedded in Bancorp’s portfolio at the dates indicated should all interest rates instantaneously rise or fall. The results of these changes are added to or subtracted from the base case; however, there are certain limitations to these types of analyses. Rate changes are rarely instantaneous and these analyses may also overstate the impact of short-term repricings. As a result of the historically low interest rate environment, the

calculated effects of the 100 and 200 basis point downward shocks cannot absolutely reflect the risk to earnings and equity since the interest rates on certain balance sheet items have approached their minimums, and, therefore, it is not possible for the analyses to fully measure the true impact of these downward shocks.


June 30, 2012
	Net Interest Income								Net Portfolio Value
Projected Interest Rate Scenario	Estimated Value		$ Change from Base			% Change from Base			Estimated Value		$ Change from Base			% Change from Base
+ 200		20,365		2,083			11.39	%		48,446		(5,035	)		-9.42	%
+ 100		19,504		1,222			6.69	%		51,207		(2,274	)		-4.25	%
BASE		18,282								53,481
- 100		18,084		(198	)		-1.08	%		59,948		6,467			12.08	%
- 200		18,067		(215	)		-1.18	%		74,287		20,806			38.90	%


December 31, 2011
	Net Interest Income							Net Portfolio Value
Projected Interest Rate Scenario	Estimated Value		$ Change from Base		% Change from Base			Estimated Value		$ Change from Base			% Change from Base
+ 200		20,987		1,169		5.90	%		48,458		(9,194	)		-15.95	%
+ 100		20,547		729		3.68	%		53,555		(4,097	)		-7.11	%
BASE		19,818							57,652
- 100		20,504		686		3.46	%		61,109		3,457			6.00	%
- 200		20,604		786		3.97	%		69,915		12,263			21.27	%

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures performed by Bancorp’s management, with the participation of Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer as of the end of the period covered by this report, Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures have been effective.

As used herein, “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of Bancorp that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Bancorp in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Bancorp in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to Bancorp’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in Bancorp’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation described in the preceding paragraph that occurred during Bancorp’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Bancorp’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION.

Item 1:

Legal Proceedings

Neither Bancorp nor the Bank has any pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, to which Bancorp or the Bank is a party or any of its property is subject.

Item 1A:

Risk Factors

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, there were no material changes to the risk factors relevant to Bancorp’s operations, which are described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 6:

Exhibits


No.		Description

2		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of June 28, 1999 between Bancorp and the Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1999 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

2.1		Securities Purchase Agreement by and among Patriot National Bancorp, Inc., Patriot National Bank and PNBK Holdings LLC dated as of December 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2009).

2.2		Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement by and among Patriot National Bancorp, Inc., Patriot National Bank and PNBK Holdings LLC dated as of May 3, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2010).

3(i)		Certificate of Incorporation of Bancorp, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1999 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

3(i)(A)		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. dated July 16, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(A) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

3(i)(B)		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. dated June 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(B) to Bancorp’s Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (commission File No. 000-29599)).

3(i)(C)		Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Bancorp’s current report Form 8-K dated October 21, 2010.

3(ii)		Amended and Restated By-laws of Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 1, 2010 (Commission File No. 000-29599))

4		Intentionally deleted


No.		Description

10(a)(1)		2001 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan of Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(1) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

10(a)(2)		2012 Stock Plan of Bancorp (incorporated by reference from Annex A to the Proxy Statement on Form 14C filed November 1, 2011.

10(a)(3)		Intentionally deleted

10(a)(5)		Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2008 among Patriot National Bank, Bancorp and Robert F. O’Connell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(5) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

10(a)(6)		Change of Control Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2007 among Robert F. O’Connell, Patriot National Bank and Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(6) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

10(a)(9)		License agreement dated July 1, 2003 between Patriot National Bank and L. Morris Glucksman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(9) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

10(a)(12)		2005 Director Stock Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(12) to Bancorp’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (Commission File No. 000 - 295999)).

10(a)(14)		Change of Control Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2007 among Philip W. Wolford, Patriot National Bank and Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(14) to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

10(a)(15)		Formal Written Agreement between Patriot National Bank and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(15) to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2009 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

10(a)(16)		Formal Written Agreement between Patriot National Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

10(a)(17)		Financial Services Agreement dated November 8, 2011 of Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a)(20) on the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated November 10, 2011.

10(c)		1999 Stock Option Plan of the Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 1999 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

14		Code of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10 -KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-29599).


No.		Description

21		Subsidiaries of Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999 (Commission File No. 000-29599)).

31(1)		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31(2)		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32		Section 1350 Certifications

101.INS#		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH#		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL#		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB#		XBRL Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE#		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF#		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

The exhibits marked with the section symbol (#) are interactive data files. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulations S-T, these interactive data files (i) are not deemed filed or part of a registration statement of prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language included in any such filings, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections; and (ii) are deemed to have complied with Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (“Rule 405”) and are not subject to liability under the anti-fraud provisions of the Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or under any other liability provision if we have made a good faith attempt to comply with Rule 405 and, after we become aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with Rule 405, we promptly amend the interactive data files.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. (Registrant)

By:		/s/ Robert F. O’Connell
		Robert F. O’Connell,
		Senior Executive Vice President
		Chief Financial Officer

		(On behalf of the registrant and as chief financial officer)

August 13, 2012