Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2010

Registration No. 333-150999

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 6

TO THE

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

METALS USA HOLDINGS CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware		5051		20-3779274
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Primary Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

2400 East Commercial Blvd.

Suite 905

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308

(954) 202-4000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

 

William A. Smith II

Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

2400 East Commercial Blvd.

Suite 905

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308

(954) 202-4000

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

Copies to:

 

Andrew J. Nussbaum Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 51 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019 (212) 403-1000		LizabethAnn R. Eisen Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP 825 Eighth Avenue New York, New York 10019 (212) 474-1000

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As promptly as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box.  ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  ¨		Accelerated filer  ¨		Non-accelerated filer  x		Smaller reporting company  ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

Title of Each Class of Securities to Be Registered		Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)(2)		Amount of Registration Fee(2)(3)
Common Stock, $0.01 par value		$200,000,000		$7,860

(1)	Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, at a rate equal to $39.30 per $1,000,000 of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.

(2)	Includes shares of common stock which may be purchased by the underwriters to cover over-allotments, if any.

(3)

The registrant previously paid a registration fee of $21,400.00 with a registration statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-134533, initially filed on May 26, 2006. Pursuant to Rule 457(p) of the Securities Act, $7,860 of the previously paid registration fee is offset against the registration fee otherwise due for this registration statement.

 

 

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. Neither we nor the selling stockholders may sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

Subject to completion, dated March 5, 2010.

PROSPECTUS

Metals USA Holdings Corp.

Common Stock

 

 

This is an initial public offering of              shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Metals USA Holdings Corp. We are offering              shares of common stock, and the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus are offering              shares of common stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.

No later than 60 days following our receipt of the proceeds of this offering, we will make an offer to all holders of our senior floating rate toggle notes due 2012, including our affiliates, to repurchase the maximum principal amount of the notes that may be purchased out of the net proceeds of this offering, estimated to be approximately $             million, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the closing of the repurchase offer.

If the net proceeds of this offering are greater than the purchase price of the notes tendered by holders, we will use the balance of the net proceeds, if any, for general corporate purposes. Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. It is currently estimated that the initial public offering price per share will be between $             and $            . We have applied to list our common stock on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MUSA.”

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” on page 16 to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.

 

 

Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 

 

		Per Share			Total
Initial public offering price		$			$
Underwriting discount		$			$
Proceeds, before expenses, to Metals USA Holding Corp.		$			$
Proceeds, before expenses, to Selling Stockholders		$			$

To the extent that the underwriters sell more than              shares of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up to an additional              shares from us and an additional              shares from the selling stockholders at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discount.

 

 

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in New York, New York on             , 2010.

 

 

Prospectus dated                     , 2010.

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Prospectus

 

		Page
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY		1
SUMMARY HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA		13
RISK FACTORS		16
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		30
USE OF PROCEEDS		32
DIVIDEND POLICY		34
CAPITALIZATION		36
DILUTION		38
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA		40
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		43
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE		68
BUSINESS		70
MANAGEMENT		87
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS		108
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS		110
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS		113
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK		119
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE		124
MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS		126
UNDERWRITING		130
LEGAL MATTERS		134
EXPERTS		134
AVAILABLE INFORMATION		134
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-1

 

 

No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current as of this date.

Industry and Market Data

This prospectus includes industry data that we obtained from periodic industry publications and internal company surveys. Industry publications and surveys generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. In addition, this prospectus includes market share and industry data that we prepared primarily based on our knowledge of the industry and industry data. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. Statements as to our market position relative to our competitors are approximated and based on the above-mentioned third-party data and internal analysis and estimates and have not been verified by independent sources. Unless otherwise noted, all information regarding our market share is based on the latest available data, which in some cases may be several years old, and all references to market shares refer to both revenue and volume.

 

i

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

1

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

2

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

3

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

4

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

5

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

6

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

7

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

8

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

9

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

10

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

11

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

12

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

13

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

14

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

 

15

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below as well as the other information contained in this prospectus before investing in our common stock or deciding whether you will or will not participate in this offering. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In such a case, you may lose all or part of your original investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are heavily affected by changing metal prices. We believe metal prices are currently increasing from a low point in the cycle toward a new high point in the cycle (which may not continue).

Metals costs typically represent approximately 75% of our net sales. Metals costs can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control, including domestic and international economic conditions, labor costs, production levels, competition, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange rates. This volatility can significantly affect the availability and cost of raw materials for us and may, therefore, adversely affect our net sales, operating margin and net income. Our metal service centers maintain substantial inventories of metal to accommodate the short lead-times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers. Accordingly, using information derived from customers, market conditions, historic usage and industry research, we purchase metal in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers. Our commitments for metal purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. We have no substantial long-term, fixed-price purchase contracts. When raw material prices rise, we may not be able to pass the price increase on to our customers. When raw material prices decline, customer demands for lower prices could result in lower sale prices and, to the extent we reduce existing inventory quantities, lower margins. There have been historical periods of rapid and significant movements in the prices of metal both upward and downward. These changes can make it difficult for us to accurately forecast our results, which could cause us to have higher or lower levels of inventory than required or make expenditures that may not generate expected returns. Any limitation on our ability to pass through any price increases to our customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Changes in metal prices (which we believe are currently increasing but which may not continue) also affect our liquidity because of the time difference between our payment for our raw materials and our collection of cash from our customers. We sell our products and typically collect our accounts receivable within 45 days after the sale; however, we tend to pay for replacement materials (which are more expensive when metal prices are rising) over a much shorter period, in part to benefit from early-payment discounts. As a result, when metal prices are rising, we tend to draw more on the ABL facility to cover the cash flow cycle from our raw material purchases to cash collection. This cash requirement for working capital is higher in periods when we are increasing inventory quantities. Our liquidity is thus adversely affected by rising metal prices. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Operating and Investing Activities.”

Our operating results and liquidity could be negatively affected during economic downturns (which we believe we are currently experiencing) because the demand for our products is cyclical. We believe demand for our product is currently in the lower end of the cycle, although conditions have steadily improved throughout the latter half of 2009 but which may not continue.

Many of our products are used in businesses that are, to varying degrees, cyclical and have historically experienced periodic downturns due to economic conditions, energy prices, consumer

 

16

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

demand and other factors beyond our control. These economic and industry downturns have been characterized by diminished product demand, excess capacity and, in some cases, lower average selling prices for our products. The recent economic downturn and uncertainty about current global economic conditions pose risks as businesses in one or more of the markets that we serve, or consumers in one or more of the end-markets that our customers serve, may postpone purchases in response to tighter credit, negative financial news and/or declines in asset values, which could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products and services and on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Additionally, as an increasing amount of our customers relocate their manufacturing facilities outside of the United States, we may not be able to maintain our level of sales to those customers.

More recently, the decline in steel prices resulting from weakened demand and an oversupply of steel throughout the supply chain during the latter half of 2008 and first half of 2009 contributed to a significant decline in steel product shipments from metals service centers in the U.S in year-over-year comparisons. Reduced demand in a number of our markets combined with the foreign relocation of some of our customers could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our customers sell their products abroad, and some of our suppliers buy feedstock abroad. As a result, our business is affected by general economic conditions and other factors outside the United States, primarily in Europe and Asia. Our suppliers’ access to metal, and therefore our access to metal, is additionally affected by such conditions and factors. Similarly, the demand for our customers’ products, and therefore our products, is affected by such conditions and factors. These conditions and factors include enhanced imbalances in the world’s iron ore, coal and steel industries, a downturn in world economies, increases in interest rates, unfavorable currency fluctuations or a slowdown in the key industries served by our customers. In addition, demand for the products of our Building Products Group has been and is expected to continue to be adversely affected if the current state of the housing market continues to contract, since the results of that group depend on a strong residential remodeling industry, which in turn has been historically driven by an expansion in the broader housing market and relatively high consumer confidence.

We rely on metal suppliers in our business and purchase a significant amount of metal from a limited number of suppliers and termination of one or more of our relationships with any of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We use a variety of metals in our business. Our operations depend upon obtaining adequate supplies of metal on a timely basis. We purchase most of our metal from a limited number of metal suppliers. As of December 31, 2009, our top three metals suppliers represent a significant portion of our total metal purchasing cost. Termination of our relationship with either of these suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows if we were unable to obtain metal from other sources in a timely manner.

In addition, the domestic metals production industry has experienced consolidation in recent years. Further consolidation could result in a decrease in the number of our major suppliers or a decrease in the number of alternative supply sources available to us, which could make it more likely that termination of one or more of our relationships with major suppliers would result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Consolidation could also result in price increases for the metal that we purchase. Such price increases could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows if we were not able to pass these price increases on to our customers.

 

17

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Intense competition in our fragmented industry could adversely affect our profitability.

We are engaged in a highly fragmented and competitive industry. We compete with a large number of other value-added oriented metals processor/metal service centers on a regional and local basis, some of which may have greater financial resources than we have. The United States and Canadian metal service center industry generated $153 billion in sales from approximately 1,200 participants in 2008. Based on 2008 revenues the top 100 competitors represent approximately 47% of industry revenue. Metals USA is ranked ninth among this group based on 2008 revenues. We also compete, to a much lesser extent, with primary metals producers, who typically sell to very large customers requiring regular shipments of large volumes of metals. Because price, particularly in the ferrous flat rolled business, is a competitive factor we may be required in the future to reduce sales volumes to maintain our level of profitability. Increased competition in any of our businesses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our ability to retain our key employees is critical to the success of our business, and failure to do so may adversely affect our revenues and as a result could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are dependent on the services of our Chief Executive Officer and other members of our senior management team to remain competitive in our industry. We may not be able to retain or replace one or more of these key employees, we may suffer an extended interruption in one or more of their services or we may lose the services of one or more of these key employees entirely. Our current key employees are subject to employment conditions or arrangements that permit the employees to terminate their employment without notice. See “Management—Management Agreements with Metals USA and Related Stock Option Grants from Metals USA Holdings.” Other than a life insurance policy maintained by us on our Chief Executive Officer, for which we are the beneficiary, we do not maintain any life insurance policies for our key employees. If any of our key employees were not able to dedicate adequate time to our business, due to personal or other factors, if we lose or suffer an extended interruption in the services of any of our key employees or if any of our key employees were to terminate their employment it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, the market for qualified individuals may be highly competitive and we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel to replace or succeed members of our senior management or other key employees, should the need arise.

From time to time, there are shortages of qualified operators of metals processing equipment. In addition, during periods of low unemployment, turnover among less-skilled workers can be relatively high. Any failure to retain a sufficient number of such employees in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are subject to litigation that could strain our resources and distract management.

From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, lawsuits and other disputes arising in the ordinary course of business. These suits concern issues including product liability, contract disputes, employee-related matters and personal injury matters. It is not feasible to predict the outcome of all pending suits and claims, and the ultimate resolution of these matters as well as future lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows or reputation.

Environmental costs could decrease our net cash flow and adversely affect our profitability.

Our operations are subject to extensive regulations governing waste disposal, air and water emissions, the handling of hazardous substances, remediation, workplace exposure and other

 

18

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

environmental matters. Some of the properties we own or lease are located in areas with a history of heavy industrial use, and are near sites listed for clean up under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which we refer to as “CERCLA.” See “Business—Government Regulation and Environmental Matters.” CERCLA established joint and several responsibility for clean-up without regard to fault for persons who have arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at sites that have become contaminated and for persons who own or operate contaminated facilities. We have a number of properties located in or near industrial or light industrial use areas; accordingly, these properties may have been contaminated by pollutants which would have migrated from neighboring facilities or have been deposited by prior occupants. Some of our properties are affected by contamination from leaks and drips of cutting oils and similar materials. The costs of clean-ups to date have not been material. It is possible that we could be notified of such claims in the future. See “Business—Government Regulation and Environmental Matters.” It is also possible that we could be identified by the Environmental Protection Agency, a state agency or one or more third parties as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA or under analogous state laws. If so, we could incur substantial costs related to such claims, which could decrease our net cash flows and adversely affect our profitability.

Adverse developments in our relationship with our unionized employees could adversely affect our business.

As of December 31, 2009, approximately 166 of our employees (approximately 10%) at various sites were members of unions. We are currently a party to seven collective-bargaining agreements. Five expire in 2010, one expires in 2011 and one expires in 2013. Presently we do not anticipate any problems or issues with respect to renewing these agreements upon acceptable terms. However, no assurances can be given that we will succeed in negotiating new collective-bargaining agreements to replace the expiring ones without a strike. Any strikes in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See “Business—Employees” for a discussion of our previous negotiations of collective-bargaining agreements.

Our historical financial information is not comparable to our current financial condition, results of operations and cash flows because of our use of purchase accounting in connection with the Merger (which resulted in a new valuation for the assets and liabilities of Metals USA to their fair values) and the acquisitions of Port City, Lynch Metals and Allmet.

It may be difficult for you to compare both our historical and future results to our results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The Merger was accounted for utilizing purchase accounting, which resulted in a new valuation for the assets and liabilities of Metals USA to their fair values. This new basis of accounting began on November 30, 2005. In addition, the acquisition of Port City and Dura-loc Roofing Systems Limited, subsequently renamed Allmet, which we refer to as “Allmet” (collectively, which we refer to as the “2006 Acquisitions”), and the acquisition of Lynch Metals were, and we expect future acquisitions will be, also accounted for using purchase accounting and, therefore, similar limitations regarding comparability of historical and subsequent results could arise. Under the purchase method of accounting, the operating results of each of the acquired businesses, including the 2006 Acquisitions and Lynch Metals, are included in our financial statements only from the date of the acquisitions. As a result, amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes may not be comparable with those of prior periods.

 

19

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

We may not successfully implement our acquisition strategy, and acquisitions that we pursue may present unforeseen integration obstacles and costs, increase our leverage and negatively impact our performance.

We intend to continue to pursue our acquisition strategy, and we generally target one to two “bolt-on” acquisitions per year that will enhance our metal service center strategy. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates, and if we do identify suitable candidates, they may be larger than our historical targets. The expense incurred in consummating acquisitions of related businesses, or our failure to integrate such businesses successfully into our existing businesses, could affect our growth or result in our incurring unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to realize any anticipated benefits from acquisitions. We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions and may complete one or more significant acquisitions in the future. To finance an acquisition, we may incur debt or issue equity, both of which could be materially greater amounts than in connection with prior acquisitions. The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations. Some of the risks associated with our acquisition strategy, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, include:

 

Ÿ

potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management;

 

Ÿ

unexpected loss of key employees or customers of the acquired company;

 

Ÿ

conforming the acquired company’s standards, processes, procedures and controls with our operations;

 

Ÿ

coordinating new product and process development;

 

Ÿ

hiring additional management and other critical personnel;

 

Ÿ

encountering unknown contingent liabilities that could be material; and

 

Ÿ

increasing the scope, geographic diversity and complexity of our operations.

As a result of the foregoing, our acquisition strategy may not be successfully received by customers, and we may not realize any anticipated benefits from acquisitions.

We may not be able to sustain the annual cost savings realized as part of our recent cost reduction initiatives.

Since the fourth quarter of 2008, we have implemented approximately $50.0 million of annualized cost savings, a vast majority of which we believe are permanent reductions. The cost savings entail several elements, including reducing headcount by approximately 30%, modifying employee benefits, facility consolidation (primarily in our Building Products Group), reducing employee work hours and streamlining our delivery fleet. We may not be able to sustain all, or any part of, these cost savings on an annual basis in the future, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Metals USA Holdings is a holding company and relies on dividends and other payments, advances and transfers of funds from its subsidiaries to meet its dividend and other obligations.

Metals USA Holdings has no direct operations and derives all of its cash flow from its subsidiaries. Because Metals USA Holdings conducts its operations through its subsidiaries, Metals USA Holdings depends on those entities for dividends and other payments to generate the funds

 

20

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

necessary to meet its financial obligations, and to pay any dividends with respect to our common stock. Legal and contractual restrictions in the ABL facility, the indenture governing the Metals USA Notes, the 2007 Notes indenture and other agreements governing current and future indebtedness of Metals USA Holdings’ subsidiaries, as well as the financial condition and operating requirements of Metals USA Holdings’ subsidiaries, may limit Metals USA Holdings’ ability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries. The earnings from, or other available assets of, Metals USA Holdings’ subsidiaries may not be sufficient to pay dividends or make distributions or loans to enable Metals USA Holdings to pay any dividends on our common stock.

We may not be able to retain or expand our customer base if the North American manufacturing industry continues to erode through moving offshore or through acquisition and merger or consolidation activity in our customers’ industries.

Our customer base, including our Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group’s customer base, primarily includes manufacturing and industrial firms. Some of these customers operate in industries that are undergoing consolidation through acquisition and merger activity; some are considering or have considered relocating production operations overseas or outsourcing particular functions overseas; and some customers have closed as they were unable to compete successfully with overseas competitors. Our facilities are predominately located in the mid-western and southern United States. To the extent that these customers cease U.S. operations, relocate or move operations overseas to regions in which we do not have a presence, we could lose their business. In addition, acquirers of manufacturing and industrial firms may have suppliers of choice that do not include us, which could affect our customer base and sales.

We may face product liability claims that are costly and create adverse publicity.

If any of the products that we sell cause harm to any of our customers, we could be exposed to product liability lawsuits. If we were found liable under product liability claims, we could be required to pay substantial monetary damages. Further, even if we successfully defended ourselves against this type of claim, we could be forced to spend a substantial amount of money in litigation expenses, our management could be required to spend valuable time to defend against these claims and our reputation could suffer, any of which could harm our business.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness.

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. The Metals USA Notes, the ABL facility and our other outstanding indebtedness are expected to account for significant cash interest expenses in fiscal 2010 and subsequent years. Accordingly, we will have to generate significant cash flows from operations to meet our debt service requirements. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service and working capital requirements, we may need to seek additional financing; however, this insufficient cash flow may make it more difficult for us to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Furthermore, Apollo has no obligation to provide us with debt or equity financing and we therefore may be unable to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness.

Our substantial leverage exposes us to interest rate risk and could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and prevent us from meeting our obligations under our indebtedness.

We are highly leveraged. As of December 31, 2009, our total indebtedness was $468.3 million. We also had an additional $122.9 million available for borrowing under the ABL facility as of that date, but because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million. As of December 31, 2009, we had $468.1 million of indebtedness outstanding under the ABL

 

21

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

facility, the Metals USA Notes, the 2007 Notes and an Industrial Revenue Bond, which we refer to as “IRB,” and $0.2 million of junior indebtedness outstanding. We are required by the terms of the 2007 Notes to make an offer to all holders of the 2007 Notes, of which $161.1 million aggregate principal amount were outstanding as of December 31, 2009, within 60 days of the receipt of the proceeds of this offering to repurchase the maximum principal amount of the 2007 Notes that may be purchased out of the net proceeds, estimated to be approximately $             million, or $             million if the over-allotment option is exercised in full, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the closing of the repurchase offer. We cannot assure you that holders of the 2007 Notes will accept our offer. We will also continue to be subject to the covenants in the indenture governing the 2007 Notes if any 2007 Notes remain outstanding after the offer. See “Use of Proceeds.”

Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences for you, including:

 

Ÿ

it may limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow money, dispose of assets or sell equity for our working capital, capital expenditures, dividend payments, debt service requirements, strategic initiatives or other purposes;

 

Ÿ

it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our operations or business;

 

Ÿ

we may be more highly leveraged than some of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;

 

Ÿ

it may make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business or the economy; and

 

Ÿ

there would be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows if we were unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, as needed.

Our debt agreements impose significant operating and financial restrictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We are currently not able to satisfy certain negative covenants in our debt agreements that place a limitation on the incurrence of additional indebtedness.

The ABL facility and the indentures governing the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes contain various covenants that limit or prohibit our ability, among other things, to:

 

Ÿ

incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;

 

Ÿ

pay dividends on our capital stock or redeem, repurchase, retire or make distributions in respect of our capital stock or subordinated indebtedness or make other restricted payments;

 

Ÿ

make certain loans, acquisitions, capital expenditures or investments;

 

Ÿ

sell certain assets, including stock of our subsidiaries;

 

Ÿ

enter into sale and leaseback transactions;

 

Ÿ

create or incur liens;

 

Ÿ

consolidate, merge, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and

 

Ÿ

enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.

The indentures governing the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring additional debt, if we are unable to meet

 

22

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

defined adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges and consolidated total debt ratios (each, as defined by the applicable indenture). The covenants in the indentures require us to have an adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge ratio (measured on a trailing four-quarter basis and calculated differently from the FCCR as defined by the ABL facility) of 2.0 to 1.0 to incur “ratio” indebtedness and a consolidated total debt ratio of no greater than 4.75 to 1.0 to incur “ratio” indebtedness in connection with acquisitions. Based on the calculations for the trailing four quarters, we are not able to satisfy these covenants and incur additional indebtedness under these ratios, including for acquisition purposes, under our indentures.

As of December 31, 2009, our FCCR was 0.42. As of December 31, 2009 we had $122.9 million of additional borrowing capacity under the ABL facility, but because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million. Failure to comply with the FCCR covenant of the ABL facility can result in limiting our long-term growth prospects by hindering our ability to incur future indebtedness or grow through acquisitions. Should borrowing availability under the ABL facility fall below $45.0 million, we must maintain an FCCR of at least 1.0 to 1.0, measured on a trailing four-quarter basis.

The interest rate in respect of borrowings under the ABL facility is determined in reference to the FCCR calculated for the three immediately preceding months. Our FCCR as of December 31, 2009, as calculated for the purpose of determining the marginal rates related to borrowings under the ABL facility, will result in a higher marginal rate on a portion of our future borrowings under the ABL facility, although the impact on the weighted average facility rate will not be material.

Our inability to satisfy the terms of the negative covenants in our debt agreements do not, by themselves, constitute covenant violations or events of default. Rather, they are event-related restrictions that limit or prohibit the Company from taking certain corporate actions. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Covenant Compliance.”

The restrictions contained in the agreements that govern the terms of our debt could:

 

Ÿ

limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans;

 

Ÿ

adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, to enter into strategic acquisitions, investments or other capital needs or to engage in other business activities that would be in our interest; and

 

Ÿ

limit our access to the cash generated by our subsidiaries.

Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the ABL facility, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the ABL facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders under the ABL facility could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure the ABL facility on a first-priority lien basis. If the lenders under the ABL facility accelerate the repayment of borrowings, such acceleration could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In addition, we may not have sufficient assets to repay the 2007 Notes or the Metals USA Notes upon acceleration.

For a more detailed description on the limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financing Activities” and “Description of Certain Indebtedness.”

Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significantly more indebtedness which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The terms of the Metals USA Notes indenture, the 2007 Notes indenture and the ABL facility contain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness. These restrictions are subject to a

 

23

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

number of important qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Accordingly, we or our subsidiaries could incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $122.9 million available for additional borrowing under the ABL facility, including the subfacility for letters of credit, and the covenants under our debt agreements would allow us to borrow a significant amount of additional indebtedness. However, because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million. In addition, the Metals USA Notes indenture does not limit the amount of indebtedness that may be incurred by Flag Intermediate or Metals USA Holdings. Additional leverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and could increase the risks described in “—Our substantial leverage exposes us to interest rate risk and could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and prevent us from meeting our obligations under our indebtedness,” “—Our debt agreements impose significant operating and financial restrictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows” and “—Because a substantial portion of our indebtedness bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain prevailing short-term interest rates, we are vulnerable to interest rate increases.”

Because a substantial portion of our indebtedness bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain prevailing short-term interest rates, we are vulnerable to interest rate increases.

A substantial portion of our indebtedness, including the ABL facility and the 2007 Notes, bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain short-term prevailing interest rates. As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $241.8 million of floating rate debt under the 2007 Notes, the ABL facility and the IRB. We also had an additional $122.9 million available for borrowing under the ABL facility as of December 31, 2009, but because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million. Assuming a consistent level of debt, a 100 basis point change in the interest rate on our floating rate debt effective from the beginning of the year would increase or decrease our fiscal 2009 interest expense under the 2007 Notes, the ABL facility and the IRB by approximately $2.4 million. We use derivative financial instruments to manage a portion of the potential impact of our interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2009, we had $75.0 million of outstanding advances on the ABL facility, which represented approximately 16% of our total indebtedness, that were hedged under interest rate swap agreements. To some extent, derivative financial instruments can protect against increases in interest rates, but they do not provide complete protection over the longer term. If interest rates increase dramatically, we could be unable to service our debt which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Cash interest on the 2007 Notes will accrue at a rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to London Interbank Offered Rate which we refer to as “LIBOR,” plus a spread of 6.00%, which increases by 0.25% to 6.25% in the second year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes, by 0.50% to 6.50% in the third year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes, and by 0.75% to 6.75% in the fourth year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes. The spread increased to 6.25% on July 10, 2008 and to 6.50% on July 10, 2009. Assuming a LIBOR rate of                 % and the adjusted spread of 6.50% and assuming $             million of our 2007 Notes are repurchased with the proceeds of this offering, our annual interest expense would be reduced by $             million. We cannot assure you, however, that holders of our 2007 Notes will accept our offer to repurchase their notes. For each $1.0 million of 2007 Notes that remain outstanding our interest expense related thereto will be $            .

 

24

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Risks Related to an Investment in Our Common Stock and This Offering

There is no existing market for our common stock and we do not know if one will develop, which could impede your ability to sell your shares and depress the market price of our common stock.

Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to the development of an active trading market on The New York Stock Exchange or otherwise or how liquid that market might become. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling any of our common stock that you buy. The initial public offering price for the common stock will be determined by negotiations between us and the representative of the underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market following this offering. See “Underwriting.” Consequently, you may not be able to sell our common stock at prices equal to or greater than the price you paid in this offering.

Apollo controls us and its interests may conflict with or differ from your interests as a stockholder.

After the consummation of this offering, Apollo will beneficially own approximately     % of our common stock, assuming the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option. If the underwriters exercise in full their over-allotment option, Apollo will beneficially own approximately     % of our common stock immediately after the consummation of this offering. As a result, Apollo will continue to have the power to elect all of our directors and will have the ability to prevent any transaction that requires the approval of our board of directors or stockholders, including the approval of significant corporate transactions such as mergers and the sale of substantially all of our assets.

The amended and restated investors rights agreement that we intend to enter into with Apollo and each of our management members, which we refer to as the “amended and restated investors rights agreement,” will provide that, except as otherwise required by applicable law, Apollo will have the right to nominate (a) four directors as long as Apollo owns (including shares of common stock issuable under the terms of any exchangeable securities issued by us) at least 30% but less than 50% of our outstanding common stock, (b) three directors as long as Apollo owns (including shares of common stock issuable under the terms of any exchangeable securities issued by us) at least 20% but less than 30% of our outstanding common stock and (c) two directors as long as Apollo owns (including shares of common stock issuable under the terms of any exchangeable securities issued by us) at least 10% but less than 20% of our outstanding common stock. In the event that the board of directors increases its size beyond nine members, Apollo’s nomination rights will be proportionately increased, rounded up to the nearest whole number. Thus, Apollo will continue to be able to significantly influence or effectively control our decisions. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement” and “Description of Capital Stock—Composition of Board of Directors; Election and Removal of Directors.”

The interests of Apollo could conflict with or differ from your interests as a holder of our common stock. For example, the concentration of ownership held by Apollo could delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination that you as a stockholder may otherwise view favorably. Apollo is in the business of making or advising on investments in companies and holds, and may from time to time in the future acquire, interests in or provide advice to businesses that directly or indirectly compete with certain portions of our business or are suppliers or customers of ours. They may also pursue acquisitions that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. Further, Apollo will realize substantial benefits from the sale of their shares in this offering. A sale of a substantial number of shares of stock in the future by funds affiliated with Apollo could cause our stock price to decline.

 

25

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Because all of the proceeds from this offering of our common stock may be used to repay the 2007 Notes, none or very little of such proceeds may be used to further invest in our business.

The 2007 Notes indenture requires that we make an offer to all holders of the 2007 Notes within 60 days of the receipt of the proceeds of this offering to repurchase the maximum principal amount of the 2007 Notes that may be purchased out of the net proceeds, estimated to be approximately $             million, or $             million if the over-allotment option is exercised in full, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the closing of the repurchase offer. As a result, none or very little of such proceeds may be used to further invest in our business. On February 19, 2010, the 2007 Notes traded at 84.75%, based on quoted market prices. See “Use of Proceeds.” If we experience a change of control and we do not redeem the Metals USA Notes, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Metals USA Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of The New York Stock Exchange rules and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.

Upon the closing of this offering, Apollo will continue to control a majority of our voting common stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of The New York Stock Exchange corporate governance standards. Under The New York Stock Exchange rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements, including:

 

Ÿ

the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consists of independent directors;

 

Ÿ

the requirement that we have a nominating/governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities;

 

Ÿ

the requirement that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and

 

Ÿ

the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the nominating/governance and compensation committees.

Following this offering, we intend to utilize the exemptions from The New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements, including the foregoing. As a result, we will not have a majority of independent directors nor will our nominating/governance and compensation committees consist entirely of independent directors and we will not be required to have an annual performance evaluation of the nominating/governance and compensation committees. See “Management.” Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of The New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Volatility in the market price of our common stock price may prevent you from being able to sell your common stock at or above the price you paid for your common stock. The market price for our common stock could fluctuate significantly for various reasons, including:

 

Ÿ

our operating and financial performance and prospects;

 

26

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Ÿ

our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry;

 

Ÿ

conditions that impact demand for our products and services;

 

Ÿ

future announcements concerning our business or our competitors’ businesses;

 

Ÿ

the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the “SEC”;

 

Ÿ

changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts who track our common stock;

 

Ÿ

market and industry perception of our success, or lack thereof, in pursuing our growth strategy;

 

Ÿ

strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

 

Ÿ

changes in government and environmental regulation;

 

Ÿ

general market, economic and political conditions;

 

Ÿ

changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

 

Ÿ

arrival and departure of key personnel;

 

Ÿ

the number of shares to be publicly traded after this offering;

 

Ÿ

sales of common stock by us, Apollo or members of our management team;

 

Ÿ

adverse resolution of new or pending litigation against us; and

 

Ÿ

changes in general market, economic and political conditions in the United States and global economies or financial markets, including those resulting from natural disasters, terrorist attacks, acts of war and responses to such events.

See “—Risks Related to Our Business.”

In addition, in recent years, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant impact on the market price of securities issued by many companies, including companies in our industry. The changes frequently appear to occur without regard to the operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our company, and these fluctuations could materially reduce our share price.

We have no plans to pay regular dividends on our common stock, so you may not receive funds without selling your common stock.

We have no plans to pay regular dividends on our common stock. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment of dividends, and other considerations that our board of directors deems relevant. The ABL facility and the indentures governing the 2007 Notes and the Metals USA Notes also include limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us. Accordingly, you may have to sell some or all of your common stock in order to generate cash flow from your investment.

Future sales or the possibility of future sales of a substantial amount of our common stock may depress the price of shares of our common stock.

We may sell additional shares of common stock in subsequent public offerings or otherwise, including to finance acquisitions. Our amended and restated articles of incorporation will authorize us

 

27

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

to issue             shares of common stock, of which             shares will be outstanding upon consummation of this offering. This number includes              shares that we are selling in this offering, which may be resold immediately in the public market. Of the remaining              shares,              or     % are restricted from immediate resale under the federal securities laws and the lock-up agreements between our current stockholders and the underwriters described in the “Underwriting” section of this prospectus, but may be sold into the market in the near future. These shares will become available for sale at various times following the expiration of the lock-up agreements, which, without the prior consent of the representative of the underwriters, is 180 days after the date of this prospectus (which period could be extended by the underwriters for up to an additional 18 days under certain circumstances). Immediately after the expiration of the 180-day lock-up period, the shares will be eligible for resale under Rule 144 or Rule 701 of the Securities Act subject to volume limitations and applicable holding period requirements. In addition, immediately following this offering, we intend to file a registration statement under the Securities Act registering 1,400,000 shares reserved for issuance under the 2005 Plan (of which                      shares will not be subject to the 180-day lock-up) and shares that are issuable under the incentive plan we may adopt prior to this offering.

We cannot predict the size of future issuances of our common stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of our common stock will have on the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock (including shares issued in connection with an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.

Our organizational documents may impede or discourage a takeover, which could deprive our investors of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares.

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may make it more difficult for, or prevent a third party from, acquiring control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions include:

 

Ÿ

a classified board of directors;

 

Ÿ

the sole power of a majority of the board of directors to fix the number of directors;

 

Ÿ

limitations on the removal of directors;

 

Ÿ

the ability of our board of directors to designate one or more series of preferred stock and issue shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval;

 

Ÿ

the sole power of our board of directors to fill any vacancy on our board, whether such vacancy occurs as a result of an increase in the number of directors or otherwise; and

 

Ÿ

advance notice requirements for nominating directors or introducing other business to be conducted at stockholder meetings.

The foregoing factors, as well as the significant common stock ownership by Apollo, could impede a merger, takeover or other business combination or discourage a potential investor from making a tender offer for our common stock, which, under certain circumstances, could reduce the market value of our common stock. See “Description of Capital Stock.”

You will suffer an immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value of the common stock you purchase.

Prior investors have paid substantially less per share than the price in this offering. The initial offering price is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of the outstanding common stock immediately after this offering. Accordingly, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $             per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), purchasers of common stock in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution of

 

28

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

approximately $             per share in net tangible book value of the common stock. See “Dilution,” including the discussion of the effects on dilution from a change in the price of this offering.

Any issuance of preferred stock could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our common stock, which could depress the price of our common stock.

Our board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock and to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of shares of preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the rights of our common stock. The potential issuance of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our common stock at a premium over the market price, and adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.

The additional requirements of having a class of publicly traded equity securities may strain our resources and distract management.

After the consummation of this offering, we will be subject to additional reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which we refer to as the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act.” The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control for financial reporting. These requirements may place a strain on our systems and resources. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are currently required to include a report of management on our internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K. After consummation of this offering, our independent public accountants auditing our financial statements must attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This requirement will first apply to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight will be required. This may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If we are unable to conclude that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are effective, or if our independent public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report as to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in future years, investors may lose confidence in our financial reports and our stock price may decline.

 

29

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” or “anticipates” or similar expressions that relate to our strategy, plans or intentions. All statements we make relating to our estimated and projected earnings, margins, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and financial results or to our expectations regarding future industry trends are forward-looking statements. In addition, we, through our senior management, from time to time make forward-looking public statements concerning our expected future operations and performance and other developments. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may change at any time, and, therefore, our actual results may differ materially from those that we expected. We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based upon many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and, of course, it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. All forward-looking statements are based upon information available to us on the date of this prospectus.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, which we refer to as “cautionary statements,” are disclosed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus, including, without limitation, in conjunction with the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus. All forward-looking information in this prospectus and subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Some of the factors that we believe could affect our results include:

 

Ÿ

supply, demand, prices and other market conditions for steel and other commodities;

 

Ÿ

the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices, including the cost of energy and raw materials;

 

Ÿ

the effects of competition in our business lines;

 

Ÿ

the condition of the steel and metal markets generally, which will be affected by interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations and general economic conditions;

 

Ÿ

the ability of our counterparties to satisfy their financial commitments;

 

Ÿ

tariffs and other government regulations relating to our products and services;

 

Ÿ

adverse developments in our relationship with both our key employees and unionized employees;

 

Ÿ

operational factors affecting the ongoing commercial operations of our facilities, including catastrophic weather-related damage, regulatory approvals, permit issues, unscheduled blackouts, outages or repairs, unanticipated changes in fuel costs or availability of fuel emission credits or workforce issues;

 

Ÿ

our ability to operate our businesses efficiently, manage capital expenditures and costs (including general and administrative expenses) tightly and generate earnings and cash flow;

 

Ÿ

our ability to pass through increases in our costs to our customers;

 

Ÿ

our substantial indebtedness described in this prospectus;

 

Ÿ

restrictive covenants in our indebtedness that may adversely affect our operational flexibility;

 

Ÿ

general political conditions and developments in the United States and in foreign countries whose affairs affect supply, demand and markets for steel, other metals and metal products;

 

30

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Ÿ

conditions in the United States and international economies;

 

Ÿ

our expectations with respect to our acquisition activity;

 

Ÿ

our ability to retain key employees; and

 

Ÿ

the costs of being a public company, including Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.

We caution you that the foregoing list of important factors may not contain all of the material factors that are important to you. In addition, in light of these risks and uncertainties, the matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus may not in fact occur. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on those statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

 

31

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

USE OF PROCEEDS

Assuming an initial public offering price of $             per share, which represents the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, our net proceeds from this offering are estimated to be approximately $             million after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses that will be paid out of the proceeds of this offering. We currently intend to use the net proceeds from the shares being sold by us in this offering, including any net proceeds from any sales of our common stock sold pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment, as follows:

 

Ÿ

approximately $             million to make an offer to all holders of our 2007 Notes to repurchase the maximum principal amount of the 2007 Notes that may be purchased out of the net proceeds of this offering, estimated to be approximately $             million, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the closing of the repurchase offer;

 

Ÿ

approximately $             million for estimated fees and expenses; and

 

Ÿ

any remaining net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes.

Under the terms of the indenture governing the 2007 Notes, we must offer to repurchase all of a holder’s 2007 Notes or a pro rata portion thereof. The 2007 Notes will be repurchased no earlier than 30 days nor later than 60 days from the date we commence the repurchase offer, which may be commenced no later than 60 days following our receipt of the proceeds of this offering. Prior to the commencement of the repurchase offer, we must irrevocably deposit the net proceeds of this offering with the trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and the proceeds must be invested in cash or cash equivalents to be held for the payment of the purchase price of the 2007 Notes. We cannot assure you that holders of the 2007 Notes, of which $161.1 million aggregate principal amount are outstanding as of December 31, 2009, will accept our offer. If the amount deposited is greater than the purchase price of the 2007 Notes tendered by holders, the trustee will deliver the excess to us immediately after the expiration of the repurchase offer. We will use the balance of the net proceeds, if any, for general corporate purposes, as described below.

Our affiliates, including Apollo, that are holders of the 2007 Notes may participate in the repurchase offer. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Repurchase Offer.” Assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us in connection with the offering, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $             per share would increase (decrease) the amount of proceeds from this offering by $             million, with a corresponding increase (decrease) in the repurchase offer made to holders of the 2007 Notes.

If the net proceeds of this offering, including any net proceeds from any sales of our common stock sold pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment, are greater than the purchase price of the 2007 Notes tendered in the repurchase offer, we will use any remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes. General corporate purposes includes working capital, the expansion of our production capabilities, research and development, purchases of capital equipment and potential acquisitions of businesses that we believe are complementary to our business. We have not determined the specific portion of any net proceeds to be used for these purposes, and the net proceeds from this offering have not been accounted for in our normal budgeting process. Although from time to time we evaluate possible acquisitions of companies and assets, we currently have no definitive commitments or agreements to make any acquisitions, and cannot assure you that we will make any acquisitions in the future. The amounts actually expended for these purposes may vary significantly and will depend on a

 

32

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

number of factors, including the amount of cash we generate from future operations, the actual expenses of operating our business, opportunities that may be or become available to us and the other factors described under “Risk Factors.” Notwithstanding the uses described above, we will retain broad discretion in the allocation of any remaining net proceeds after the purchase of the 2007 Notes tendered in the repurchase offer.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of our common stock by the selling stockholders, including with respect to any shares sold by the selling stockholders pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase additional shares. In the aggregate, the selling stockholders will receive approximately $             million of proceeds from this offering, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, or approximately $             million if the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full, assuming the shares are offered at $             per share, which is the midpoint of the estimated offering price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus.

The initial five interest payments on the 2007 Notes were paid solely in cash. For any interest period thereafter, we may elect to pay (1) interest entirely in cash or (2) PIK Interest or (3) Partial PIK Interest. On September 26, 2008, we made a permitted election under the indenture governing the 2007 Notes to pay all interest that was due on January 1, 2009, for the interest period beginning on October 1, 2008, and ending on December 31, 2008, entirely through PIK Interest. The January 1, 2009 PIK Interest payment amounted to $8.2 million. We have continued to make PIK interest payments subsequent to January 1, 2009. The April 1, 2009 PIK interest payment amounted to $5.6 million, the July 1, 2009 PIK interest payment amounted to $3.8 million, the October 1, 2009 PIK interest payment amounted to $3.5 million and the January 1, 2010 PIK interest payment amounted to $3.1 million. The Company must make an election regarding whether subsequent interest payments will be made in cash, through PIK Interest, or Partial PIK Interest, prior to the start of the applicable interest period. In the absence of such an election for any interest period, interest on the 2007 Notes will be payable according to the election for the previous interest period. As a result, the PIK Interest election is now the default election for future interest periods unless we elect otherwise not later than the commencement of an interest period.

Cash interest on the 2007 Notes will accrue at a rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 6.00%, which increases by 0.25% to 6.25% in the second year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes, by 0.50% to 6.50% in the third year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes, and by 0.75% to 6.75% in the fourth year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes. In the event PIK Interest is paid on the 2007 Notes, the then-applicable margin over LIBOR on 2007 Notes would increase by 0.75% for each period in which PIK Interest is paid. The 2007 Notes, including any notes issued to pay PIK Interest or Partial PIK Interest, mature on July 1, 2012. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financing Activities—2007 Notes.”

 

33

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

DIVIDEND POLICY

We do not currently anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, earnings, legal requirements, restrictions in our debt agreements and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. The terms of the indebtedness of Metals USA, our subsidiary, may also restrict it from paying cash dividends to us under some circumstances. See “Description of Certain Indebtedness,” and “Description of Capital Stock—Common Stock.”

On July 10, 2007, Metals USA Holdings used the net proceeds from the issuance of $300.0 million initial aggregate principal amount of the 2007 Notes as well as approximately $8.3 million of additional borrowings under the ABL facility, to redeem the 2006 Notes (for approximately $150.0 million plus accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $5.4 million) to pay a cash dividend of approximately $130.3 million to its stockholders, which include Apollo and certain members of management, to pay approximately $9.2 million to its stock option holders in order to equitably adjust such stock options to reflect such dividend, which include certain members of our management, which we refer to collectively as the “July 2007 dividend,” and to pay fees and expenses related to the offering of the 2007 Notes.

In connection with the July 2007 dividend, stock option holders were paid approximately $9.25 per share on outstanding options (an amount equal to the per-share amount of the July 2007 dividend), for a total of approximately $9.2 million. The cash payment to holders of outstanding options to acquire shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock was made to equitably adjust such option holders by the Metals USA Holdings board of directors pursuant to the exercise of its discretion to preserve the rights of options holders under the 2005 Plan. As a result of the cash payment on outstanding options, we were required to recognize $0.3 million of non-cash stock-based compensation expense, net of related tax effects, in the third quarter of 2007.

During December 2006, Metals USA Holdings issued $150.0 million initial aggregate principal amount of the 2006 Notes. On January 3, 2007, Metals USA Holdings used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2006 Notes, as well as $8.2 million of additional borrowings under the ABL facility, to pay a cash dividend of approximately $144.8 million to its stockholders, which include Apollo and certain members of our management, to make a cash payment (partially in lieu of the cash dividend) of approximately $4.2 million to its vested stock option holders, which include certain members of our management, and to pay fees and expenses related to the issuance of the 2006 Notes, including a $1.5 million non-recurring transaction fee to Apollo. We refer to such cash payment and the cash dividend collectively as the “January 2007 dividend.”

In connection with the January 2007 dividend, the outstanding employee stock options under the 2005 Plan were adjusted a second time. The combination of the reduction of the per share exercise price of the stock options and the cash payment to vested stock option holders was, on a per share basis, approximately equal to the per share amount of the dividend.

Because the payment of the January 2007 dividend resulted in the achievement of certain performance targets with respect to Apollo’s investment in Metals USA Holdings, the board of directors exercised its discretion under the 2005 Plan to vest all of the outstanding Tranche B options. In addition, the board of directors exercised its discretion to vest Tranche A options granted to directors affiliated with Apollo.

On January 3, 2007, the board of directors of Metals USA Holdings adopted our 2006 Deferred Compensation Plan. Our 2006 Deferred Compensation Plan was adopted in connection with the

 

34

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

January 2007 dividend, and credited to individual accounts established for stock option holders an amount equal to $6.56 per share on certain unvested options, for a total of $2.3 million. Payment of this liability was subject to continued employment for two years following the adoption date. The entire amount was paid in one lump sum on January 5, 2009, upon completion of such period.

 

35

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of December 31, 2009:

 

Ÿ

on a historical basis; and

 

Ÿ

on a pro forma basis to give effect to:

 

(a)

the issuance of              shares of our common stock to our existing stockholders immediately prior to the consummation of this offering;

 

(b)

the sale of approximately              shares of our common stock in this offering at the initial public offering price of $             per share, which represents the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, providing net proceeds to us from this offering (after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions) of approximately $             million; and

 

(c)

the application of the net proceeds as described in “Use of Proceeds.”

This table should be read together with “Use of Proceeds,” “Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the combined financial statements and notes to those statements, in each case, included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

		As of December 31, 2009
		Historical				Pro Forma(1)
		(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents(2)		$	6.0
Total debt:
ABL facility(3)		$	75.0
Metals USA Notes			226.3
2007 Notes(2)			161.1
Other long-term debt(4)			5.8
Total debt			468.2
Stockholders’ deficit:
Common stock(5)(6)			0.1
Additional paid-in capital			7.6
Retained deficit			(51.0	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(0.4	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		$	(43.7	)
Total capitalization		$	424.5

 

(1)

Assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us in connection with the offering, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $             per share would increase (decrease) cash and cash equivalents by $             million, additional paid-in capital by $             million, total stockholders’ equity by $             million and total capitalization by $             million.

(2)	Assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover remains the same, we currently intend to use approximately $             million of the net proceeds from the shares being sold by us in this offering to make an offer to all holders of our 2007 Notes to repurchase the

 

36

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

maximum principal amount of the 2007 Notes that may be purchased out of the net proceeds of this offering, estimated to be approximately $             million, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the closing of the repurchase offer. We cannot assure you that holders of the 2007 Notes will accept our offer, and even if they do, we expect that $             million of the 2007 Notes will remain outstanding.

(3)

As of December 31, 2009, the ABL facility provided for up to $625.0 million of senior secured revolving credit borrowings and letters of credit, subject to a borrowing base determined primarily by the value of our eligible receivables and eligible inventory, subject to certain reserves. As of December 31, 2009, we had eligible collateral of $211.9 million, $75.0 million in outstanding advances, $14.0 million in open letters of credit, and $122.9 million of borrowing availability, but because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million.

(4)	Consists of an IRB with $5.7 million principal amount outstanding as of December 31, 2009, which is payable on May 1, 2016 in one lump sum payment, and $0.1 million in vendor financing and purchase money notes.

(5)	shares authorized;             shares issued and outstanding, pro forma for this offering.

(6)	Upon consummation of this offering, there will be options to purchase              shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding under the 2005 Plan and there may be future issuances under the incentive plan we may adopt prior to this offering.

 

37

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

DILUTION

Dilution is the amount by which the offering price paid by the purchasers of the common stock to be sold in this offering will exceed the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock after this offering. Our net tangible book deficit as of December 31, 2009 was $             million, or $             per share of common stock. We have calculated this amount by:

 

Ÿ

subtracting our total liabilities from our total tangible assets; and

 

Ÿ

dividing the difference by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding.

If we give effect to the sale of              shares of our common stock by us in this offering at the assumed public offering price of $             per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us in connection with this offering, our pro forma net tangible book deficit as of December 31, 2009 would have been $             million, or $             per share. This amount represents an immediate dilution of $             per share to new investors. The following table illustrates this dilution per share:

 

					Per Share
Initial public offering price per share
Net tangible book deficit as of December 31, 2009		$
Increase in net tangible book value attributable to this offering(1)
Pro forma net tangible book deficit after this offering
Dilution to new investors					$

 

(1)	Net tangible book deficit is calculated by subtracting goodwill, identifiable intangibles, deferred tax assets and deferred financing costs from total net assets.

If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, our as adjusted net tangible book value will increase to $             per share, representing an increase to existing holders of $             per share, and there will be an immediate dilution of $             per share to new investors.

Assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us in connection with the offering, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $             per share would increase (decrease) the net tangible book value attributable to this offering by $             per share and the dilution to new investors by $             per share and decrease (increase) the as adjusted net tangible book deficit after this offering by $             per share.

 

38

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2009, as adjusted to give effect to this offering, the difference between the number of shares of our common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us, and the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by new investors, at the initial public offering price of $             per share, before deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us in connection with this offering:

 

		Shares Purchased				Total Consideration				Average Price per Share
		Number		Percent		Amount		Percent
		(in millions)				(in millions)
Existing stockholders
Existing option holders
New investors
Total

The foregoing table does not reflect proceeds to be realized by selling stockholders in this offering.

Assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us in connection with the offering, a $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $             per share would increase (decrease) the total consideration paid by new investors by $             million, the total consideration paid by all stockholders by $             million and the average price per share by $             per share.

The number of shares purchased is based on              shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2009. The discussion and table above exclude              shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options outstanding under the 2005 Plan and shares reserved for issuance under the incentive plan we may adopt prior to this offering. To the extent outstanding options are exercised, new investors will experience further dilution.

 

39

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

On May 18, 2005, Metals USA Holdings, Flag Acquisition and Metals USA entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger, which we refer to as the “Merger Agreement.” On November 30, 2005, Flag Acquisition, then a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flag Intermediate, merged with and into Metals USA, with Metals USA being the surviving corporation. Metals USA Holdings, Flag Intermediate and Flag Acquisition conducted no operations during the period May 9, 2005 (date of inception) to November 30, 2005.

We applied purchase accounting on the closing date of the Merger and, as a result, the merger consideration was allocated to the respective values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the Predecessor Company. As a result of the application of purchase accounting, the Successor Company balances and amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes are not comparable with those of the Predecessor Company. In addition, we have completed a number of acquisitions that may affect comparability of our financial results. The selected consolidated and combined financial data should be read in conjunction about the limitations on comparability of our financial results, including as a result of acquisitions. See “Summary Historical Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

After the consummation of the Apollo Transactions (as defined below), Metals USA Holdings, along with its consolidated subsidiaries, is referred to collectively in this prospectus as the “Successor Company.” Prior to the consummation of the Transactions, Metals USA, along with its consolidated subsidiaries, is referred to collectively in this prospectus as the “Predecessor Company.” We applied Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations,” (now codified into Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805) which we refer to as “SFAS 141,” on November 30, 2005, or the closing date of the Merger, and as a result, the Merger consideration was allocated to the respective fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the Predecessor Company. As a result of the application of purchase accounting, the Successor Company balances and amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes are not comparable with those of the Predecessor Company. In addition, we have completed a number of acquisitions that may affect comparability of our financial results.

As a result of purchase accounting for the Apollo Transactions, the Merger consideration was allocated to the respective fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the Predecessor Company. The fair value of inventories, property and equipment and intangibles (customer lists) was increased by $14.9 million, $118.6 million and $22.2 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Successor Company’s operating costs and expenses increased by $23.9 million ($10.8 million for cost of sales and $13.1 million of additional depreciation and amortization) as the inventory was sold and additional depreciation and amortization was recorded.

The “Apollo Transactions” collectively refers to:

 

Ÿ

the Merger;

 

Ÿ

Flag Acquisition’s issuance of the Metals USA Notes pursuant to a private placement, which Metals USA assumed pursuant to the Merger. In September 2006, Metals USA exchanged the Metals USA Notes for an equal principal amount of Metals USA Notes that were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the “Securities Act;”

 

Ÿ

the borrowings under the ABL facility on the date of the Merger;

 

Ÿ

the contribution by Apollo and certain members of management of Metals USA of $140.0 million to Metals USA Holdings, in exchange for common stock of Metals USA Holdings at the effective time of the Merger; and

 

40

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Ÿ

the other related transactions.

For a more complete description of the Apollo Transactions and the terms of the indebtedness incurred in connection therewith, see “Organizational Structure—Ownership and Corporate Structure,” “Organizational Structure—Description of the Apollo Transactions” and “Description of Certain Indebtedness.”

The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The selected historical consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this prospectus. The selected historical financial data for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2005 to November 30, 2005, and as of December 31, 2005, for the Predecessor Company, and for the period from May 9, 2005 to December 31, 2005, and as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 for the Successor Company have been derived from the Successor Company’s audited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus. The Successor Company had no assets and conducted no operations from May 9, 2005 (date of inception) to November 30, 2005. The historical results set forth below do not necessarily indicate results expected for any future period, and should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

41

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

		Predecessor Company						Successor Company
		Period from January 1, 2005 through November 30,						Period from May 9, 2005 (Date of Inception) through December 31,				Years Ended December 31,
		2005						2005				2006				2007				2008				2009
		(in millions, except per share and shipments data)
Net Sales		$	1,522.1					$	116.9			$	1,802.9			$	1,845.3			$	2,156.2			$	1,098.7
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of operating and delivery, and depreciation and amortization)			1,189.3						92.5				1,371.8				1,418.8				1,612.9				890.1
Operating expenses(1)(2)			250.7						23.5				312.1				313.1				336.9				230.7
Operating income (loss)			82.1						0.9				119.0				113.4				206.4				(22.1	)
Other (income) expense:
Interest expense			12.0						4.1				54.6				87.0				87.9				63.5
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt			—						—				—				8.4				—				(92.1	)
Other (income) expense, net			(0.1	)					—				(0.7	)			(0.7	)			(0.2	)			0.2
Income (loss) before income taxes			70.2						(3.2	)			65.1				18.7				118.7				6.3
Provision (benefit) for income taxes			26.7						(1.2	)			25.8				4.8				46.1				2.8
Net income (loss)		$	43.5					$	(2.0	)		$	39.3			$	13.9			$	72.6			$	3.5
Income (loss) per share:
Income (loss) per share—basic			2.14						(0.14	)		$	2.80			$	0.99			$	5.16			$	0.25
Income (loss) per share—diluted			2.05						(0.14	)		$	2.79			$	0.96			$	4.99			$	0.25
Number of common shares used in the per share calculations:
Basic			20.3						14.0				14.1				14.1				14.1				14.1
Diluted			21.2						14.0				14.1				14.4				14.5				14.1
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Working Capital								$	453.7			$	713.6			$	506.3			$	699.0			$	279.1
Total assets(3)									795.3				1,127.0				959.0				1,088.2				627.8
Total debt, less current portion									472.9				754.9				855.0				942.6				468.2
Stockholder’s equity (deficit)									132.4				147.6				(125.6	)			(51.0	)			(43.7	)
Cash flow data:
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities		$	170.1					$	7.3			$	(45.7	)		$	119.2			$	78.4			$	243.9
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities			(15.8	)					(434.5	)			(61.0	)			(58.5	)			(7.7	)			(7.8	)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities			(120.7	)					438.5				251.2				(202.9	)			82.4				(396.8	)
Other operating data:
Shipments (in thousands of tons)			1,332						107				1,505				1,429				1,428				913
Capital expenditures		$	15.9					$	4.4			$	16.9			$	21.5			$	12.2			$	4.1

 

(1)

For the one-month period ended December 31, 2005, the Successor Company’s operating expenses increased by $5.2 million ($4.1 million for cost of sales and $1.1 million of additional depreciation and amortization) as the inventory was sold and additional depreciation and amortization was recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Successor Company’s operating expenses increased by $23.9 million ($10.8 million in the first quarter of 2006 for cost of sales as the inventory was sold and $13.1 million of additional depreciation and amortization). As a result of the application of purchase accounting, the Successor Company balances and amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements are not comparable with those of the Predecessor Company.

(2)

We incurred certain costs related to the Merger that were charged to the Predecessor Company’s selling, general and administrative expense during the period from January 1, 2005 to November 30, 2005. Such expenses of $15.8 million included $14.6 million paid by us on the closing date of the Merger to holders of 1,081,270 vested in-the-money options and holders of 45,437 restricted stock grant awards related to the long-term incentive compensation plan of the Predecessor Company. Additionally, we recorded expenses of $0.8 million related to severance costs and $0.4 million for other costs associated with the Merger.

(3)

The Merger was accounted for as a purchase, with the Successor Company applying purchase accounting on the closing date of the Merger. As a result, the merger consideration was allocated to the respective fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the Predecessor Company. The fair value of inventories, property and equipment and intangibles (customer lists) were increased by $14.9 million, $118.6 million, and $22.2 million, respectively.

 

42

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Readers should refer to “Risk Factors” for risk factors that may affect future performance. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with “Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data,” “Summary Historical Consolidated Financial Data,” “Consolidated Financial Statements” and related notes included elsewhere in the prospectus.

Overview

We believe that we are a leading provider of value-added processed carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum and specialty metals, as well as manufactured metal components. For the year ended December 31, 2009, approximately 92% of our revenue was derived from our metals service center and processing activities, which are segmented into two groups: Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group and Plates and Shapes Group. The remaining portion of our revenue was derived from our Building Products Group, which principally manufactures and sells aluminum products related to the residential remodeling industry. We purchase metal from primary producers that generally focus on large volume sales of unprocessed metals in standard configurations and sizes. In most cases, we perform the customized, value-added processing services required to meet the specifications provided by end-use customers. Our Plates and Shapes Group and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group customers are in the land and marine transportation, energy, aerospace, defense, electrical and appliance manufacturing, fabrication, furniture, commercial construction, and machinery and equipment industries. Our Building Products Group customers are primarily distributors and contractors engaged in the residential remodeling industry.

Selected Operational Information

Net sales.    We derive the net sales of our Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups from the processing and sale of metal products to end-users including metal fabrication companies, general contractors and OEMs. Pricing is generally based upon the underlying metal cost as well as a margin associated with customized value-added services specified by the customer. The net sales of our Building Products Group are derived from the sales of finished goods to local distributors and general contractors who are generally engaged in the residential remodeling industry.

Cost of sales.    Our Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups follow the normal industry practice which classifies, within cost of sales, the underlying commodity cost of metal purchased in mill form and the cost of inbound freight charges together with third-party processing cost, if any. Generally, the cost of metal approximates 75% of net sales for the Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups. Cost of sales for our Building Products Group includes the cost of raw materials, manufacturing labor and overhead costs, together with depreciation and amortization expense associated with property, buildings and equipment used in the manufacturing process. Amounts included within this caption may not be comparable to similarly titled captions reported by other companies.

Operating and delivery expense.    Our operating and delivery expense reflects the cost incurred by our Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups for labor and facility costs associated with the value-added metal processing services that we provide. With respect to our Building Products Group, operating costs are associated with the labor and facility costs attributable to the distribution and warehousing of our finished goods at our metal service center facilities. Delivery expense reflects labor, material handling and other third party costs incurred with the delivery of product to customers. Amounts included within this caption may not be comparable to similarly titled captions reported by other companies.

 

43

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Selling, general and administrative expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses include sales and marketing expenses, executive officers’ compensation, office and administrative salaries, insurance, accounting, legal, computer systems, and professional services and costs not directly associated with the processing, manufacturing, operating or delivery costs of our products. Amounts included within this caption may not be comparable to similarly titled captions reported by other companies.

Depreciation and amortization.    Depreciation and amortization expense represents the costs associated with property, buildings and equipment used throughout the company except for depreciation and amortization expense associated with the manufacturing assets employed by our Building Products Group, which is included within cost of sales. This caption also includes amortization of intangible assets.

Industry Trends

Metal Service Centers

Steel consumption in the United States remained relatively constant from 2000 through 2008, averaging approximately 123 million tons annually. Beginning in the third quarter of 2008, however, demand for steel and other metals began to deteriorate rapidly as the global financial crisis caused a significant contraction in industrial production world-wide. The reduction in demand for metals was compounded by widespread inventory destocking throughout the supply chain as industry participants looked to preserve liquidity by managing down their investment in working capital. Through the first eight months of 2009, service centers reported the lowest-ever inventory levels during the 32 years that this data has been collected for the industry. As a result, steel demand in the United States declined by almost half to approximately 64 million tons in 2009, forcing a number of domestic mills to operate at or even below 50% capacity utilization at certain points during the year.

We expect demand for steel to increase alongside improving general economic conditions. Despite growing optimism and generally improving business conditions, we believe metal service centers continue to maintain very modest inventory levels. Nonetheless, mills reported increased capacity utilization rates during the second half of 2009 and some even reported returns to historic operating levels in the first quarter of 2010. Domestic mill utilization rates increased to approximately 69% during the week ending February 20, 2010, from approximately 61% at the end of 2009. Steel prices, which had been in an almost steady decline since July 2008, began trending upwards as a result of increased demand for steel and higher raw material costs, principally iron ore and scrap metal, and pushed the price for benchmark Hot Rolled Coil steel above $600 per ton, an increase of more than 14% over the price of December 31, 2009. Although a number of domestic steel mills have announced their intention to increase capacity, we believe rising price trends are sustainable if producers maintain production commensurate with demand.

Our improving trend in order inquiry activity supports our belief that steel demand is increasing and economic recovery is on-going. With the exception of private non-residential construction, we believe that steel demand has entered into a recovery stage and will eventually return to historical consumption levels consistent with normal gross domestic product output (however, there can be no guarantee that it is entering a recovery stage). Additionally, the impact from federal stimulus legislation has not yet had a meaningful impact on the industry as actual spending continues to work through governmental channels. We believe that stimulus spending should have a meaningful impact on 2010 steel consumption and, in combination with basic economic recovery, domestic steel consumption should experience a year over year increase. However, there can be no guarantee that the demand increases or trends discussed in this section will continue.

 

44

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Building Products

The current state of the housing and mortgage markets continues to cause contraction in the home improvement remodeling industry. Research indicates that remodeling activity is pro-cyclical with both new residential construction and the broader economy, but remodeling lags homebuilding by several quarters. The high cyclicality of remodeling activity appears to be driven by discretionary improvements, similar to the products sold by our building products business, which are quite volatile. Improvement spending is expected to be much more cyclical and more sensitive to upturns and downturns in the general economy, whereas maintenance and repair spending is expected to be fairly stable over time.

While the pace of the decline in homeowner remodeling projects appears to be moderating, increased remodeling activity does not seem likely to materialize until further signs of recovery emerge in the broader housing market. Although lower financing costs are reducing the cost of financing home improvement projects, weak home prices and decreased cost recovery for most types of remodeling projects continue to discourage owners from pursuing upper-end improvements.

Product demand for the Company’s Building Products Group may be influenced by numerous factors such as interest rates, general economic conditions, consumer confidence and other factors beyond our control. Declines in existing home sales and improvement remodeling expenditures due to such factors could continue to significantly reduce the segment’s performance.

Cost Reduction Initiatives

Since the fourth quarter of 2008, we have implemented approximately $50.0 million of annualized cost savings, a vast majority of which we believe are permanent reductions. The cost savings entail several elements, including reducing headcount by approximately 30%, modifying employee benefits, facility consolidation (primarily in our Building Products Group), reducing employee work hours and streamlining our delivery fleet.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following financial information reflects our historical financial statements.

 

		Fiscal Years Ended December 31,
		2007				%		2008				%			2009			%
		(in millions, except percentages)
Net sales		$	1,845.3			100.0%		$	2,156.2			100.0%			$	1,098.7		100.0%
Cost of sales			1,418.8			76.9%			1,612.9			74.8%				890.1		81.0%
Operating and delivery			178.4			9.7%			186.1			8.6%				126.7		11.5%
Selling, general and administrative			112.3			6.1%			126.8			5.9%				85.1		7.7%
Depreciation and amortization			22.1			1.2%			21.3			1.0%				18.9		1.7%
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment			0.1			0.0%			(2.4	)		(0.1%	)			—		—
Impairment of assets			0.2			0.0%			5.1			0.2%				—		—
Operating income			113.4			6.1%			206.4			9.6%				(22.1)		(2.0%)
Interest expense			87.0			4.7%			87.9			4.1%				63.5		5.8%
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment			8.4			0.5%			—			—				(92.1)		(8.4%)
Other (income) expense, net			(0.7	)		0.0%			(0.2	)		0.0%				0.2		0.0%
Income before income taxes		$	18.7			1.0%		$	118.7			5.5%			$	6.3		0.6%

Results of Operations—Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to 2008

Net sales.    Net sales decreased $1,057.5 million, or 49.0%, from $2,156.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $1,098.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was

 

45

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

primarily attributable to a 36.1% decrease in volumes for our Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous and Plates and Shapes Product Groups, in addition to a 22.5% decrease in average realized prices. The decrease in volumes for our metal service center businesses was due to an abrupt slowdown in demand in our end-use markets, as the global recession significantly reduced shipment levels to virtually all of the sectors that we serve. Weak demand caused prices for many grades of steel to fall substantially, as steel producers in North America reduced prices and cut production to adjust to the lower order levels. During the year ended December 31, 2009, steel product shipments from metals service centers in the U.S. declined approximately 36% in year-over-year comparisons, according to data from the Metals Service Center Institute. Net sales decreased $32.8 million for our Building Products Group, driven by continued weakness in residential remodeling and the overall housing markets.

Cost of sales.    Cost of sales decreased $722.8 million, or 44.8%, from $1,612.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, to $890.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 36.1% decrease in volumes for our Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous and Plates and Shapes Product Groups, in addition to a 15.1% decrease in the average cost per ton for our metals service center businesses. Cost of sales decreased $28.0 million for our Building Products Group. We recorded $53.4 million of write-downs during the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $6.8 million of write-downs during the year ended December 31, 2008, for inventory lower of cost or market adjustments in our metal service center businesses as a result of price decreases and weak demand for steel products discussed above. Inventory tonnage on hand as of December 31, 2009 was 33.9% less than at December 31, 2008. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased from 74.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 81.0% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Steel prices have generally increased modestly during the latter half of 2009, and we expect this trend to continue as the overall economy improves (however, there can be no guarantee that this trend will continue).

Operating and delivery.    Operating and delivery expenses decreased $59.4 million, or 31.9%, from $186.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $126.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was a result of lower variable costs associated with decreased shipments. As a percentage of net sales, operating and delivery expenses increased from 8.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 11.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Selling, general and administrative.    Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $41.7 million, or 32.9%, from $126.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $85.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Lower variable costs of $21.1 million associated with decreased incentive compensation, in addition to lower salaries of $8.6 million achieved in connection with cost reduction initiatives, were the primary contributors to the period-over-period decrease. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 5.9% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 7.7% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Depreciation and amortization.    Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $2.4 million, or 11.3%, from $21.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $18.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to lower amortization of customer list intangible assets (which is recognized on an accelerated basis and decreases over the life of the assets) recorded in connection with the acquisitions completed in May 2006, the acquisition of Lynch Metals in July 2007, and the Merger.

Operating income (loss).    Operating income (loss) decreased $228.5 million, or 110.7%, from operating income of $206.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to an operating loss of $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily a result of the decrease in net sales discussed above. As a percentage of net sales, operating income (loss) decreased from 9.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to (2.0%) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

46

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Interest expense.    Interest expense decreased $24.4 million, or 27.8%, from $87.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $63.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily a function of reduced borrowings, in addition to lower average interest rates on our ABL facility, as well as debt extinguishments and a lower LIBOR base rate on the 2007 Notes. The weighted average outstanding balance on our ABL facility decreased from $384.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $180.1 million for the same period of 2009. The weighted average facility rate decreased from 4.31% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 2.95% for the year ended December 31, 2009. In addition, we repurchased $206.1 million face value of our debt in the open market during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Gain on debt extinguishment.    During the year ended December 31, 2009, we purchased $157.4 million principal amount of the 2007 Notes in the open market, resulting in a pretax gain of $78.5 million (net of unamortized deferred financing costs and original issue discount) on debt extinguishment.

Results of Operations—Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to 2007

Net sales.    Net sales increased $310.9 million, or 16.8%, from $1,845.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $2,156.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Results of operations for Lynch Metals, which closed in July 2007, were included for the entire year ended December 31, 2008, and as a result, accounted for $17.2 million of increased sales for the year. The remaining increase of $293.7 million was primarily attributable to an 19.3% increase in average realized prices for our Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous and Plates and Shapes Product Groups, partially offset by a net sales decrease of $26.4 million for our Building Products Group. In early 2008 global steel prices were at record highs, which contributed to the increase in average realized prices for our metal service center businesses in 2008 compared to 2007. Average selling prices began to decrease during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to lower customer demand and significant mill price reductions.

Cost of sales.    Cost of sales increased $194.1 million, or 13.7%, from $1,418.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, to $1,612.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Lynch Metals acquisition accounted for $10.6 million of additional cost of sales for the year. The remaining increase of $183.5 million was primarily attributable to a 15.4% increase in the average cost per ton for our Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous and Plates and Shapes Groups, partially offset by a decrease of $13.4 million in cost of sales for our Building Products Group. In addition, we recorded a $6.8 million write-down for inventory lower of cost or market adjustments during the fourth quarter of 2008 in our metal service center businesses as a result of volatility in steel prices during the latter half of the year. As a result of the rapid price decrease and an overall decline in demand, we elected to reduce inventory tonnage on hand, which resulted in the replacement cost of certain inventory items declining below their carrying cost as of December 31, 2008. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased from 76.9% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 74.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Operating and delivery.    Operating and delivery expenses increased $7.7 million, or 4.3%, from $178.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $186.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The acquisition of Lynch Metals accounted for $0.8 million of additional operating and delivery expenses for the year. The remaining increase was a result of higher variable costs of $6.9 million, which were primarily attributable to higher fuel and freight costs. As a percentage of net sales, operating and delivery expenses decreased from 9.7% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 8.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Selling, general and administrative.    Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $14.5 million, or 12.9%, from $112.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $126.8 million

 

47

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Lynch Metals acquisition accounted for $2.0 million of the increase while increased incentive compensation accounted for an additional $9.7 million of the increased selling, general and administrative expenses for the period. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $3.5 million, $3.0 million of which was recognized in the first quarter of 2007 due to the accelerated vesting of stock options in connection with the January 2007 dividend, and the remainder of which was recognized in the third quarter of 2007 in connection with the July 2007 dividend. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 6.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 5.9% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Depreciation and amortization.    Depreciation and amortization decreased $0.8 million, or 3.6%, from $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $21.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Lynch Metals acquisition accounted for $6.0 million of additional depreciation and amortization for the year. This increase was offset by a decrease of $6.8 million for the year, which resulted primarily from lower amortization of customer list intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisitions completed in May 2006 and the Merger.

Operating income.    Operating income increased $93.0 million, or 82.0%, from $113.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $206.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Lynch Metals acquisition resulted in a decrease of $2.2 million of operating income for the year. The remaining increase of $95.2 million resulted primarily from increased net sales, in addition to a $2.4 million gain we recognized on the sale of property and equipment. This increase was partially offset by a $5.1 million charge we recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 related to the impairment of goodwill and customer list intangible assets associated with our building products business. As a percentage of net sales, operating income increased from 6.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 9.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Interest expense.    Interest expense increased $0.9 million, or 1.0%, from $87.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $87.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in incremental interest expense when comparing the year ended December 31, 2008 to the same period of 2007 reflects the issuance of the 2007 Notes and redemption of the 2006 Notes in July 2007, which resulted in increased interest expense on the $150.0 million incremental borrowings. The effect of increased debt levels on interest expense was partially offset by lower average interest rates on our ABL facility. While the weighted average outstanding balance on our ABL facility increased $64.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 versus the same period of 2007, the weighted average interest rate decreased from 7.06% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 4.31% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

48

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Results of Operations by Segment

 

		Fiscal Years Ended December 31,
		Net Sales				%			Operating Costs and Expenses			%			Operating Income (Loss)				%			Capital Spending			Tons Shipped (1)
		(in millions, except percentages and tons shipped (1))
2009:
Plates and Shapes		$	523.0			47.6	%		$	537.8		48.0	%		$	(14.8	)		67.0	%		$	3.3		485
Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous			490.7			44.7	%			474.2		42.3	%			16.5			-74.7	%			0.5		435
Building Products			93.2			8.5	%			97.1		8.7	%			(3.9	)		17.6	%			—		—
Corporate and other			(8.2	)		-0.7	%			11.7		1.0	%			(19.9	)		90.0	%			0.3		(7	)
Total		$	1,098.7			100.0	%		$	1,120.8		100.0	%		$	(22.1	)		100.0	%		$	4.1		913
2008:
Plates and Shapes		$	1,161.2			53.9	%		$	990.5		50.8	%		$	170.7			82.7	%		$	8.6		837
Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous			882.9			40.9	%			804.7		41.3	%			78.2			37.9	%			2.2		601
Building Products			126.0			5.8	%			135.1		6.9	%			(9.1	)		-4.4	%			0.7		—
Corporate and other			(13.9	)		-0.6	%			19.5		1.0	%			(33.4	)		-16.2	%			0.7		(10	)
Total		$	2,156.2			100.0	%		$	1,949.8		100.0	%		$	206.4			100.0	%		$	12.2		1,428
2007:
Plates and Shapes		$	889.7			48.2	%		$	796.9		46.0	%		$	92.8			81.8	%		$	16.6		826
Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous			817.7			44.3	%			767.6		44.3	%			50.1			44.2	%			2.9		614
Building Products			152.4			8.3	%			152.7		8.8	%			(0.3	)		-0.3	%			1.6		—
Corporate and other			(14.5	)		-0.8	%			14.7		0.8	%			(29.2	)		-25.7	%			0.4		(11	)
Total		$	1,845.3			100.0	%		$	1,731.9		100.0	%		$	113.4			100.0	%		$	21.5		1,429

 

(1)	Shipments are expressed in thousands of tons and are not an appropriate measure for the Building Products Group.

Segment Results—Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to 2008

Plates and Shapes.    Net sales decreased $638.2 million, or 55.0%, from $1,161.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $523.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 42.1% decrease in shipments, in addition to a 22.3% decrease in average realized prices for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.

Operating costs and expenses decreased $452.7 million, or 45.7%, from $990.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $537.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 42.1% decrease in shipments for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. This segment recorded a $43.9 million write-down for inventory lower of cost or market adjustments during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Operating income (loss) decreased by $185.5 million, or 108.7%, from operating income of $170.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to operating loss of $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease primarily resulted from lower net sales which were driven by a decrease in shipments, in addition to the charges incurred to write-down the segment’s inventories

 

49

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

for the year ended December 31, 2009. Operating income (loss) as a percentage of net sales was (2.8%) for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to 14.7% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous.    Net sales decreased $392.2 million, or 44.4%, from $882.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $490.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 27.6% decrease in shipments, in addition to a 23.2% decrease in average realized prices, for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. Sales of non-ferrous metals accounted for 40% of the segment’s sales product mix during 2009, compared to 41% during 2008.

Operating costs and expenses decreased $330.5 million, or 41.1%, from $804.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $474.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in shipments of 27.6% in addition to a decrease in the average cost per ton of 21.6%. This segment recorded a $9.5 million write-down for inventory lower of cost or market adjustments during 2009. Operating costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales increased from 91.1% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 96.6% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Operating income decreased by $61.7 million, or 78.9%, from $78.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in sales discussed above, which were a primarily a function of lower shipments. Operating income as a percentage of net sales decreased from 8.9% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 3.4% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Building Products.    Net sales decreased $32.8 million, or 26.0%, from $126.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $93.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Softness in the residential remodeling market continued to produce period-over-period net sales decreases for our Building Products Group.

Operating costs and expenses decreased $38.0 million, or 28.1%, from $135.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $97.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales volume and a decrease in variable costs related to lower market demand, in addition to certain initiatives the segment has taken in response to the downturn in the housing and remodeling markets. Management has continued to focus on cost reduction in order to mitigate the impact of lower operating levels resulting from the market downturn. Operating costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased from 107.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 104.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Operating loss decreased by $5.2 million, or 57.1%, from $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating costs, which decreased at a rate greater than the decline in sales discussed above. Operating loss as a percentage of net sales decreased from 7.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 4.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Corporate and other.    This category reflects certain administrative costs and expenses management has not allocated to its industry segments. These costs include compensation for executive officers, insurance, professional fees for audit, tax and legal services and data processing expenses. The negative net sales amount represents the elimination of intercompany sales. The operating loss decreased $13.5 million, or 40.4%, from $33.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $19.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Lower variable costs of $4.5 million associated with decreased incentive compensation were the primary component of the decrease.

 

50

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Other cost reductions included $1.4 million of lower professional and consulting fees, and $1.0 million of lower costs attributable to employee benefit modifications.

Segment Results—Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to 2007

Plates and Shapes.     Net sales increased $271.5 million, or 30.5%, from $889.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $1,161.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to a 28.8% increase in average realized prices, in addition to a 1.3% increase in shipments for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007.

Operating costs and expenses increased $193.6 million, or 24.3%, from $796.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $990.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to a 25.2% increase in the average cost per ton, in addition to a 1.3% increase in shipments for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, this segment recorded a $5.8 million write-down for inventory lower of cost or market adjustments during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to a decline in replacement costs of certain inventory items below their carrying costs as of December 31, 2008. Operating costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased from 89.6% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 85.3% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Operating income increased by $77.9 million, or 83.9%, from $92.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $170.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in net sales and the decrease in operating costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales, as discussed above. Operating income as a percentage of net sales increased from 10.4% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 14.7% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous.    Net sales increased $65.2 million, or 8.0%, from $817.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $882.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Results of operations for the Lynch Metals acquisition, which closed in July 2007, were included for the entire year ended December 31, 2008, and as a result, contributed $17.2 million of additional net sales for the year ended December 31, 2008. The remaining increase was primarily due to an 8.7% increase in average realized prices, partially offset by a 2.5% decrease in shipments for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. Sales of non-ferrous metals accounted for 41% of the segment’s sales product mix for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to 48% for the same period of 2007.

Operating costs and expenses increased $37.1 million, or 4.8%, from $767.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $804.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The acquisition of Lynch Metals accounted for $19.4 million of additional operating costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008. The remaining increase of $17.7 million was attributable to an increase in the cost of raw materials of 5.9%, partially offset by a 2.5% decrease in shipments for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, this segment recorded a $1.0 million write-down for inventory lower of cost or market adjustments during the fourth quarter of 2008 due to a decline in replacement costs of certain inventory items below their carrying costs as of December 31, 2008. Operating costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased from 93.9% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 91.1% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Operating income increased by $28.1 million, or 56.1%, from $50.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $78.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Lynch Metals

 

51

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

acquisition resulted in a decrease of $2.2 million of operating income for the year. The balance of the increase was primarily attributable to the increase in net sales discussed above. Operating income as a percentage of net sales increased from 6.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 8.9% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Building Products.    Net sales decreased $26.4 million, or 17.3%, from $152.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $126.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Declines in the home improvement remodeling market, which were impacted by the continued downturn in the housing sector, contributed to the period-over-period net sales decrease for our Building Products Group.

Operating costs and expenses decreased $17.6 million, or 11.5%, from $152.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $135.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was due to lower operating costs and expenses associated with lower sales volumes, in addition to certain initiatives the segment has taken in response to the downturn in the housing and home improvement remodeling markets, including reductions in square footage under lease, standardization of sales center layouts, and manufacturing consolidation. Despite the decrease in sales volumes, operating costs and expenses as a percentage of net sales increased from 100.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 107.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in operating costs as a percentage of net sales is due in part to additional costs incurred during 2008 related to the closure of underperforming sales center locations and the discontinuance of certain product lines, as management has continued to focus on cost reduction in order to mitigate the impact of lower operating levels resulting from the market downturn. In July 2008, we sold our Houston, Texas manufacturing facility for $4.9 million in cash. We recognized a gain of $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 related to this sale. Total facility closure costs charged to operating expense during the year ended December 31, 2008, net of the gain on the sale of the Houston plant, amounted to $4.0 million.

Operating loss increased by $8.8 million from a loss of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to a loss of $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to the decline in net sales discussed above, which exceeded the rate of decline in operating costs and expenses. Operating loss as a percentage of net sales increased from 0.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 7.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Corporate and other.    This category reflects certain administrative costs and expenses management has not allocated to its industry segments. These costs include compensation for executive officers, insurance, professional fees for audit, tax and legal services and data processing expenses. The negative net sales amount represents the elimination of intercompany sales. The operating loss increased $4.2 million, or 14.4%, from $29.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $33.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to a $5.1 million charge we recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 related to the impairment of goodwill and customer list intangible assets associated with our building products business, which was recorded at the corporate segment. Goodwill and customer list intangible assets resulting from the Merger are assigned to reporting units solely for testing for impairment. Consequently, any impairment charges associated with these assets is recorded at the corporate segment. Increased incentive compensation accounted for an additional $2.4 million of selling, general and administrative expenses recorded at the corporate segment for the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of short-term liquidity are borrowings under the ABL facility and our cash flow from operations. We believe these resources will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next year. At December 31, 2009, we had $75.0 million drawn on the ABL facility, our borrowing availability was $122.9 million of which we could only borrow

 

52

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

$77.9 million because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009 and we had cash of $6.0 million. We anticipate that in connection with our offer to repurchase the 2007 Notes with the net proceeds of this offering, our interest expense will reduced by approximately $             per year. We, however, cannot assure you that our offer will be accepted. To the extent not accepted, the net proceeds of this offering will be available for general corporate purposes. Our borrowing availability fluctuates daily with changes in eligible accounts receivables and inventory, less outstanding borrowings and letters of credit. See “—Financing Activities” below. At February 26, 2010, we had $75.0 million drawn on the ABL facility, our borrowing availability was $141.2 million and we had cash of $6.1 million.

We generally meet long-term liquidity requirements, the repayment of debt and investment funding needs, through additional borrowings under the ABL facility and the issuance of debt securities. At December 31, 2009, our long-term debt consisted of $75.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the ABL facility, $226.3 million principal amount of the Metals USA Notes, $161.1 million principal amount of the 2007 Notes, an IRB with $5.7 million principal amount outstanding and $0.1 million in vendor financing and purchase money notes. We believe that cash flow from operations, supplemented by cash available under the ABL facility, will be sufficient to enable us to meet our debt service and operational obligations as they come due for at least the next twelve months.

With respect to long-term liquidity, we believe that we will be able to meet our working capital, capital expenditures and debt service obligations. Our ability to meet long-term liquidity requirements is subject to obtaining additional debt and/or equity financing. Decisions by lenders and investors to enter into such transactions with us will depend upon a number of factors, such as our historical and projected financial performance, compliance with the terms of our current credit agreements, industry and market trends, the availability of capital, and the relative attractiveness of alternative lending or investment opportunities.

Operating and Investing Activities

Although we do not produce any metal, our financial performance is affected by changes in metal prices. When metal prices rise, the prices at which we are able to sell our products generally increase over their historical costs; accordingly, our working capital (which consists primarily of accounts receivable and inventory) tends to increase in a rising price environment. Conversely, when metal prices fall, our working capital tends to decrease. Our working capital (current assets less current liabilities) decreased from $699.0 million at December 31, 2008 to $279.1 million at December 31, 2009.

Changes in metal prices also affect our liquidity because of the time difference between our payment for our raw materials and our collection of cash from our customers. We sell our products and typically collect our accounts receivable within 45 days after the sale; however, we tend to pay for replacement materials (which are more expensive when metal prices are rising) over a much shorter period, primarily to benefit from early-payment discounts that are substantially higher than our cost of incremental debt. As a result, when metal prices are rising, we tend to draw more on the ABL facility to cover the cash flow cycle from material purchase to cash collection. When metal prices fall, we can replace our inventory at lower cost and, thus, generally do not need to access the ABL facility as much to cover the cash flow cycle. We believe our cash flow from operations, supplemented with the cash available under the ABL facility, will provide sufficient liquidity to meet the challenges and obligations we face during the current metal price environment. Additionally, we intend to look for value-added businesses that we can acquire at reasonable prices. We intend to use cash flows from operations and excess cash available under the ABL facility to fund future acquisitions.

The following discussion of the principal sources and uses of cash should be read in conjunction with our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows which are set forth under “Consolidated Financial Statements.”

 

53

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2009

During the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $243.9 million. This amount was primarily attributable to decreases in accounts receivable and inventories. Changes in working capital during 2009 reflect the change in the business environment that began during the fourth quarter of 2008, when we began reducing inventory purchases as a result of weaker demand and declining prices. Our accounts receivable decreased due to lower sales levels in 2009.

Net cash used in investing activities was $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, and consisted of proceeds from sales of assets of $0.5 million offset by $4.1 million of capital expenditures and $4.2 million for the acquisition of VR Laser. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the most significant internal capital projects were expansion of our plate processing machinery and equipment at our Tulsa, Oklahoma and York, Pennsylvania Plates and Shapes facilities.

Net cash used in financing activities was $396.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, and consisted primarily of net repayments on the ABL facility of $293.0 million, in addition to repayments of other long-term debt of $105.9 million.

Year Ended December 31, 2008

During the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash provided by operating activities was $78.4 million. Through the first three quarters of 2008, we generated significant profits as global steel prices rose to record highs. Our increased profitability was the primary contributor to our cash flow from operations for 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we began to decrease our inventories in response to slackening demand and decreasing prices. Our fourth quarter 2008 reduction in working capital also contributed to cash flow from operations for the year.

Net cash used in investing activities was $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and consisted of proceeds from sales of assets of $9.5 million offset by $12.2 million of purchases of assets and $5.0 million of contingent consideration paid during 2008 in connection with the May 2006 acquisition of Port City. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the most significant internal capital project was the expansion of our New Orleans Plates and Shapes facility.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $82.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and consisted primarily of net borrowings on the ABL facility of $87.5 million, partially offset by $2.4 million of repayments of long-term debt and $2.7 million of deferred financing costs.

Year Ended December 31, 2007

During the year ended December 31, 2007, net cash provided by operating activities was $119.2 million. This amount was primarily attributable to reductions in working capital in connection with our inventory management, which seeks to optimize the cost tradeoff between holding inventory and incurring shortages.

Net cash used in investing activities was $58.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, and consisted primarily of $21.5 million of purchases of assets and $38.2 million for the acquisition of Lynch Metals. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the most significant internal capital project was the expansion of our Plates and Shapes facility in Waggaman, Louisiana.

 

54

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Net cash used in financing activities was $202.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, and consisted primarily of dividends paid to our stockholders of $288.5 million, in addition to repayments of long-term debt of $150.7 million ($150.0 million in connection with the repayment of the 2006 Notes) and net repayments on the ABL facility of $48.5 million, partially offset by $291.0 million of proceeds received from the issuance of the 2007 Notes.

Covenant Compliance

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA (as defined by the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility and the indentures governing the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes) is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude certain non-cash and non-recurring items. Adjusted EBITDA is not a defined term under GAAP and should not be used as an alternative to net income as an indicator of operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio

Under the ABL facility, the FCCR is determined on a rolling four-quarter period, often referred to as a last-twelve month period, by dividing (1) the sum of adjusted EBITDA of Metals USA minus income taxes paid in cash minus non-financed capital expenditures by (2) the sum of certain distributions paid in cash, cash interest expense and scheduled principal reductions on debt paid by Metals USA. The interest rate in respect of borrowings under the ABL facility is determined in reference to the FCCR, and should borrowing availability under the ABL facility fall below $45.0 million, we must maintain a FCCR of at least 1.0 to 1.0, measured on a trailing four-quarter basis. As of December 31, 2009, our borrowing availability under the ABL facility was $122.9 million, but because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million. In addition, the FCCR also is an important measure of our liquidity and affects our ability to take certain actions, including paying dividends to stockholders and making acquisitions.

Although the indentures governing the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes also contain covenants that restrict our ability to incur indebtedness and pay dividends based on our FCCR, the definition and application of the FCCR contained in the indentures differ from the definition and application of the FCCR in the ABL facility in that the numerator of the FCCR as defined in the indentures does not include cash income taxes or non-financed capital expenditures and the denominator of the FCCR as defined in the indentures does not include the sum of certain distributions paid in cash and scheduled principal reductions on debt, and separate FCCRs are required under certain circumstances. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Financing Activities.”

Because access to debt capital is currently and in the future will continue to be important to us, we believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting adjusted EBITDA are appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate compliance with the covenants in our debt agreements. Failure to comply with the FCCR covenant of the ABL facility can result in limiting our long-term growth prospects by hindering our ability to incur future indebtedness or grow through acquisitions. As of December 31, 2009, our FCCR was 0.42. As of December 31, we had $122.9 million of additional borrowing capacity under the ABL facility, but because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million.

The indentures governing the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring additional debt and making certain

 

55

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

acquisitions, if we are unable to meet defined adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge coverage and consolidated total debt ratios (each, as defined). The covenants in the indentures require us to have an adjusted EBITDA to fixed charge coverage ratio (measured on a trailing four-quarter basis and calculated differently from the fixed charge coverage ratio as defined by the ABL facility) of 2.0 to 1.0 to incur “ratio” indebtedness and a consolidated total debt ratio of no greater than 4.75 to 1.0 to incur “ratio” indebtedness in connection with acquisitions. Based on the calculations for the trailing four quarters, we are not able to satisfy these covenants and incur additional indebtedness under these ratios, including for acquisition purposes, under our indentures.

Our inability to satisfy the terms of the negative covenants in our debt agreements do not, by themselves, constitute covenant violations or events of default. Rather, they are event-related restrictions that limit or prohibit the Company from taking certain corporate actions. As of December 31, 2009, we were unable to pay dividends or incur any additional indebtedness as a result of our inability to satisfy the terms of the negative covenants in our debt agreements.

Limitations of Adjusted EBITDA

There are material limitations associated with making the adjustments to our earnings to calculate adjusted EBITDA and using such a non-GAAP financial measure as compared to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. For instance, adjusted EBITDA does not include:

 

Ÿ

interest expense, and, because we have borrowed money in order to finance our operations, interest expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue;

 

Ÿ

income tax expense, and because the payment of taxes is part of our operations, tax expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to operate; and

 

Ÿ

depreciation and amortization expense, and, because we use capital assets, depreciation and amortization expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue.

In addition, fixed charges should not be considered an alternative to interest expense.

 

56

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Below is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA:

 

		Historical
		Years Ended December 31,
		2007				2008				2009
		(in millions, except ratios)
Net income		$	13.9			$	72.6			$	3.5
Depreciation and amortization(1)			23.7				23.6				21.2
Interest expense			87.0				87.9				63.5
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt			8.4				—				(92.1	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes			4.8				46.1				2.8
Other (income) expense			(0.7	)			(0.2	)			0.2
EBITDA		$	137.1			$	230.0			$	(0.9	)
Covenant defined adjustments:
Stock options and grant expense(2)			4.8				1.1				0.4
Facilities closure(3)			0.7				4.0				2.1
Pension withdrawal liability(4)			2.0				—				—
Management fees and other costs(5)			1.5				1.9				1.2
Impairment of assets(6)			—				5.1				—
Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the ABL facility)		$	146.1			$	242.1			$	2.8
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment			0.1				(2.4	)			—
Provision for bad debts			1.7				3.1				2.9
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts on long-term debt			5.0				6.0				5.1
Deferred income taxes			(3.7	)			(3.1	)			32.1
Non-cash interest on PIK option			—				—				21.0
Interest expense			(87.0	)			(87.9	)			(63.5	)
Provision for income taxes			(4.8	)			(46.1	)			(2.8	)
Other income (expense).			0.7				0.2				(0.2	)
Facilities closure			(0.7	)			(4.0	)			(2.1	)
Pension withdrawal liability			(2.0	)			—				—
Management fees and other costs			(1.5	)			(1.9	)			(1.2	)
Other			0.2				—				—
Changes in assets and liabilities			65.1				(27.6	)			249.8
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		$	119.2			$	78.4			$	243.9
Fixed charge coverage ratio numerator(7)		$	103.2			$	197.9			$	15.8
Fixed charge coverage ratio denominator(7)		$	78.6			$	68.1			$	37.6
FCCR(7)			1.31				2.91				0.42

 

(1)	Includes depreciation for Building Products that is included in cost of sales.

(2)	Non-cash stock option and stock grant expense.

(3)

The amount for 2007 represents charges in the building products business for the closure of three facilities in 2007. The amounts for 2008 represent charges incurred for the closure of six facilities during 2008. The amount for 2009 represents charges to the building products business for severance costs and the closure of nine facilities, in addition to charges for the closure of one facility in our metal service center business.

(4)	This amount represents accrued expenses incurred in connection with the withdrawal of two of our operating facilities from a multi-employer pension fund.

(5)

Includes accrued expenses related to the management agreement we have with Apollo, pursuant to which Apollo provides us with management services, which will be terminated upon consummation of this offering. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Apollo Agreements.”

 

57

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

(6)	This amount represents non-cash impairment charges related to goodwill and customer list intangible assets associated with our building products business.

(7)	As defined by the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility and the indentures governing the Metals Notes and the 2007 Notes.

Assuming an initial public offering price of $             per share, which represents the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and the subsequent purchase of the maximum principal amount of the 2007 Notes out of the net proceeds of this offering (assuming the exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares in full), the FCCR under our ABL facility on a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2009 would have been                     .

Financing Activities

The ABL Facility

The ABL facility permits us to borrow on a revolving basis through November 30, 2011. Substantially all of our subsidiaries are borrowers under the ABL facility.

On July 1, 2008, we executed our option to increase the Tranche A Commitments by $100.0 million, which increased the total commitment from $525.0 million to $625.0 million. All other existing terms under the ABL facility remained unchanged. Costs incurred to exercise the option to increase the ABL facility totaled $2.4 million, and are being amortized over the existing term of the ABL facility.

On June 8, 2007, we executed the June 2007 amendment to the ABL facility, which increased the commitment from $450.0 million to $525.0 million, comprised of $500.0 million of Tranche A Commitments and $25.0 million of Tranche A-1 Commitments. Additionally, the June 2007 amendment reduced the borrowing cost on the Tranche A facility by 25 basis points, reduced the borrowing cost on the Tranche A-1 facility by 75 basis points and gave us the option to increase the Tranche A Commitments by $100.0 million. Costs incurred in connection with the June 2007 amendment totaled $1.6 million, and are being amortized over the existing term of the ABL facility, which expires November 30, 2011.

Borrowing Base.    The maximum availability under the ABL facility is based on eligible receivables and eligible inventory, subject to certain reserves. Our borrowing availability fluctuates daily with changes in eligible receivables and inventory, less outstanding borrowings and letters of credit. The borrowing base is equal to the lesser of (a) the aggregate amount of the Tranche A Commitments and the Tranche A-1 Commitments and (b) the sum of:

 

Ÿ

85% of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable;

 

Ÿ

the lesser of (x) 70% of the lesser of the original cost or market value of eligible inventory and (y) 90% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory; and

 

Ÿ

at all times prior to the termination of the Tranche A-1 Commitments, the sum of 5% of the net amount of eligible accounts receivable and 5% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory.

Initial borrowings under the ABL facility were used to repay the outstanding amounts drawn under our existing revolving credit facility and to fund other costs and expenses related to the Merger. The loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility provides for up to $15.0 million of swing-line loans and up to $100.0 million for the issuance of letters of credit. Both the face amount of any outstanding letters of credit and any swing-line loans will reduce borrowing availability under the ABL facility on a dollar-for-dollar basis.

 

58

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2009, we had $211.9 million of eligible collateral, $75.0 million in outstanding advances, $14.0 million in open letters of credit and $122.9 million of additional borrowing capacity, but because the FCCR was less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of December 31, 2009, we could only borrow $77.9 million. As of December 31, 2009, we had $6.0 million of cash.

At February 26, 2010, we had $230.2 million of eligible collateral, $75.0 million in outstanding advances, $14.0 million in open letters of credit and $141.2 million of additional borrowing capacity. As of February 26, 2010, we had approximately $6.1 million of cash.

Guarantees and Security.    Substantially all of our subsidiaries are defined as “borrowers” under the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility. The obligations under the ABL facility are guaranteed by Flag Intermediate and certain of our domestic subsidiaries and are secured (i) on a first-priority lien basis by our, the other borrowers’ and the guarantors’ accounts, inventory, cash and proceeds and products of the foregoing and certain assets related thereto and (ii) on a second-priority lien basis by substantially all of our, the other borrowers’ and the guarantors’ other assets, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens. Metals USA Holdings is not a party to the ABL facility, and indebtedness under the ABL facility is not guaranteed by Metals USA Holdings.

Interest Rate and Fees.    Interest is calculated based upon a margin (established within a specific pricing grid for loans utilizing Tranche A Commitments) over reference rates. The marginal rates vary with our financial performance as measured by the FCCR. The FCCR is determined by dividing (i) the sum of adjusted EBITDA (as defined by the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility) minus income taxes paid in cash minus non-financed capital expenditures by (ii) the sum of certain distributions paid in cash, cash interest expense and scheduled principal reductions on debt, and is calculated based on such amounts for the three immediately preceding fiscal periods.

The interest rates with respect to loans utilizing the Tranche A Commitments are, at our option, (i) the higher of (a) the prime rate of Credit Suisse in effect at its principal office in New York City and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%; plus, in each case, an applicable margin ranging between -0.25% and -0.50% as determined in accordance with the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility or (ii) the rate (as adjusted for statutory reserves) for Eurodollar deposits for one, two, three, six or, if agreed to by all lenders under the loan and security agreement, nine or twelve months, as selected by us, by reference to the British Bankers’ Association Interest Settlement Rates, plus an applicable margin ranging between 1.00% and 1.75% as determined in accordance with the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility. The interest rates with respect to loans utilizing the Tranche A-1 Commitments are, at our option, (i) the higher of (a) the prime rate of Credit Suisse in effect at its principal office in New York City and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%; in each case plus an applicable margin of 0.75% or (ii) the rate (as adjusted for statutory reserves) for Eurodollar deposits for one, two, three, six or, if agreed to by all lenders under the loan and security agreement, nine or twelve months, as selected by us, by reference to the British Bankers’ Association Interest Settlement Rates, plus an applicable margin of 2.75%.

A commitment fee is payable on any unused commitments under the ABL facility of 0.25% per annum. The applicable base rate and the effective LIBOR rate for the Tranche A Commitments and Tranche A-1 Commitments were 3.25% and 0.251%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009.

Certain Covenants.    The ABL facility contains customary representations, warranties and covenants as a precondition to lending, including a material adverse change in the business, limitations on our ability to incur or guarantee additional debt, subject to certain exceptions, pay dividends, or make redemptions and repurchases, with respect to capital stock, repay debt, create or incur certain liens, make certain loans or investments, make acquisitions or investments, engage in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales and sale lease-back transactions, and engage in certain transactions with

 

59

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

affiliates. In addition, the ABL facility requires a lock-box arrangement, which, as long as borrowing availability is greater or equal to $45.0 million and in the absence of default, is controlled by Metals USA. As long as our borrowing availability is greater than or equal to $45.0 million, we do not have to maintain a minimum FCCR. Should borrowing availability fall below $45.0 million, we must maintain an FCCR of at least 1.0 to 1.0. For purposes of determining covenant compliance, the FCCR is determined by dividing (i) the sum of adjusted EBITDA (as defined by the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility) minus income taxes paid in cash minus non-financed capital expenditures by (ii) the sum of certain distributions paid in cash, cash interest expense and scheduled principal reductions on debt, and is calculated based on such amounts for the most recent period of four consecutive fiscal quarters. As of December 31, 2009, our FCCR was 0.42.

Additionally, payments of management and consulting fees are limited to the greater of $3.0 million or 3% of adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility) provided borrowing availability equals at least $25.0 million. Further, distributions in respect of capital stock are limited to the payment of up to $25.0 million, plus $5.0 million for each full fiscal quarter (with any amount not used in any fiscal quarter being permitted to be used in succeeding fiscal quarters), plus 50% of cumulative consolidated net income or, if a loss, minus 100% of the amount thereof, plus 100% of the aggregate net proceeds received by us from certain sales and issuances of capital stock or from certain capital contributions, of dividends in any fiscal quarter provided that borrowing availability is greater than or equal to $50.0 million and the FCCR is at least 1.0 to 1.0.

The ABL facility contains events of default with respect to: default in payment of principal when due, default in the payment of interest, fees or other amounts after a specified grace period, material breach of the representations or warranties, default in the performance of specified covenants, failure to make any payment when due under any indebtedness with a principal amount in excess of a specified amount, certain bankruptcy events, certain ERISA violations, invalidity of certain security agreements or guarantees, material judgments or a change of control. In the event of default the agreement may permit the lenders to: (i) restrict the account or refuse to make revolving loans; (ii) cause customer receipts to be applied against borrowings under the ABL facility causing the Company to suffer a rapid loss of liquidity and the ability to operate on a day-to-day basis; (iii) restrict or refuse to provide letters of credit; or ultimately: (iv) terminate the commitments and the agreement; or (v) declare any or all obligations to be immediately due and payable if such default is not cured in the specified period required. Any payment default or acceleration under the ABL facility on amounts in excess of $15.0 million would also result in a default under the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes that would provide the holders of the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes with the right to demand immediate repayment.

Interest Rate Swaps.    In February 2008, $250.0 million notional amount of outstanding borrowings under the ABL facility were swapped from a floating LIBOR-based rate to a fixed rate. The swaps entitle us to receive quarterly payments of interest at a floating rate indexed to the three-month LIBOR and pay a fixed rate that ranges from 2.686% to 2.997%, converting a portion of the outstanding borrowings on our ABL facility from a floating rate obligation to a fixed rate obligation. Pretax realized gains and losses from derivatives which were recognized in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $6.8 million of additional interest expense, consisting of $4.8 million of settlements, and $2.0 million of changes in the fair value of derivatives. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps was $5.8 million at December 31, 2009, with $4.4 million classified as accrued liabilities and $1.4 million classified as other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

See “Description of Certain Indebtedness—The ABL Facility.”

 

60

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

The Metals USA Notes

On the closing date of the Merger, we received approximately $268.0 million of net cash proceeds from the sale of $275.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Metals USA Notes, after deducting expenses of the offering. Interest on the Metals USA Notes accrues at the rate of 11 ¹ /8% per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 and commenced on June 1, 2006. The Metals USA Notes will mature on December 1, 2015. We may redeem some or all of the Metals USA Notes at any time on or after December 1, 2010, at a predetermined redemption price plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. If we experience a change of control and we do not redeem the Metals USA Notes, we will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Metals USA Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.

Under the indenture governing the Metals USA Notes, we are required to pay interest on overdue principal at 1% per annum in excess of the above rate and are required to pay interest on overdue installments of interest at such higher rate to the extent lawful. The indenture governing the Metals USA Notes contains the covenants described under “—Covenant Compliance” above.

The Metals USA Notes indenture contains certain customary events of default, including (subject, in some cases, to customary cure periods thresholds) defaults based on (1) the failure to make payments under the Metals USA indenture when due, (2) breach of covenants, (3) cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, (4) bankruptcy events and (5) material judgments. We were in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we purchased $48.7 million principal amount of the Metals USA Notes in the open market, resulting in a pretax gain of $13.6 million (net of unamortized deferred financing costs) on debt extinguishment.

See “Description of Certain Indebtedness—The Metals USA Notes.”

2007 Notes

On July 10, 2007, we issued $300.0 million initial aggregate principal amount of the 2007 Notes due July 1, 2012. The 2007 Notes were issued at an initial issue price of 97% of the principal amount thereof, and original issue discount is being amortized to interest expense over the life of the 2007 Notes. The unamortized discount at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $2.6 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The 2007 Notes are senior unsecured obligations that are not guaranteed by any of Metals USA Holdings’ subsidiaries. As such, the 2007 Notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of Metals USA Holdings’ subsidiaries.

Metals USA Holdings must make an election regarding whether interest payments on the 2007 Notes will be made in cash or through PIK Interest prior to the start of the applicable interest period. Metals USA Holdings may elect to pay (1) interest entirely in cash or (2) PIK Interest, or (3) Partial PIK Interest. Cash interest on the 2007 Notes will accrue at a rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 6.00%, which increases by 0.25% to 6.25% in the second year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes, by 0.50% to 6.50% in the third year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes, and by 0.75% to 6.75% in the fourth year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes. In the event PIK Interest is paid on the 2007 Notes after the first four interest periods, the then-applicable margin over LIBOR on the 2007 Notes would increase by 0.75% for each period in which PIK Interest is paid. If Metals USA Holdings elects to pay any PIK Interest, Metals USA Holdings will increase the principal amount on the 2007 Notes or issue new 2007 Notes in an amount equal to the amount of PIK Interest for the applicable interest payment period to holders of the 2007 Notes on the relevant record date. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1. PIK Interest notes, resulting

 

61

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

from the conversion of interest into PIK notes, when paid will be treated as an operating activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in accordance with ASC 230.

The initial five interest payments on the 2007 Notes were paid solely in cash. Flag Intermediate provided funds to Metals USA Holdings to fund the initial five quarterly interest payments on the 2007 Notes, which were paid on October 1, 2007, January 2, 2008, April 1, 2008, July 1, 2008 and October 1, 2008 and which totaled $7.7 million, $8.4 million, $8.1 million, $6.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively.

On September 26, 2008, we made a permitted election under the indenture governing the 2007 Notes to pay all interest that is due on January 1, 2009, for the interest period beginning on October 1, 2008, and ending on December 31, 2008, entirely through PIK Interest. The January 1, 2009 PIK Interest payment amounted to $8.2 million. We have continued to make PIK Interest payments subsequent to January 1, 2009. The April 1, 2009 PIK Interest payment amounted to $5.6 million, the July 1, 2009 PIK Interest payment amounted to $3.8 million, the October 1, 2009 PIK Interest payment amounted to $3.5 million and the January 1, 2010 PIK Interest payment amounted to $3.1 million. The Company must make an election regarding whether subsequent interest payments will be made in cash, through PIK Interest, or Partial PIK Interest, prior to the start of the applicable interest period. In the absence of such an election for any interest period, interest on the 2007 Notes will be payable according to the election for the previous interest period. As a result, the PIK Interest election is now the default election for future interest periods unless we elect otherwise not later than the commencement of an interest period.

The terms of the ABL facility, as well as the indenture governing the Metals USA Notes, restrict Flag Intermediate and certain of its subsidiaries from making payments or transferring assets to Metals USA Holdings, including dividends, loans, or distributions. Such restrictions include prohibition of dividends in an event of default and limitations on the total amount of dividends paid to Metals USA Holdings. In the event these agreements do not permit Flag Intermediate to provide Metals USA Holdings with sufficient distributions to fund interest and principal payments on the 2007 Notes when due, Metals USA Holdings may default on the 2007 Notes unless other sources of funding are available. The amount available under the restricted payment provision contained in the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility was $68.2 million as of December 31, 2009. No amount was available under the restricted payment provision contained in the indenture governing the Metals USA Notes as of December 31, 2009.

On or after January 15, 2008, Metals USA Holdings may redeem some or all of the 2007 Notes at certain redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the redemption date. If Metals USA Holdings makes certain public offerings, sales or issuances of common stock, and does not redeem the 2007 Notes, it will be required to make an offer to repurchase the maximum principal amount of the 2007 Notes that may be purchased out of the proceeds thereof, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.

As described in “Use of Proceeds,” no later than 60 days following our receipt of the proceeds of this offering, we will make an offer to all holders of the 2007 Notes to repurchase the maximum principal amount of the 2007 Notes, of which $161.1 million aggregate principal amount were outstanding as of December 31, 2009, that may be purchased out of the net proceeds of this offering, estimated to be approximately $             million, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the closing of the repurchase offer. Our affiliates that are holders of the 2007 Notes may participate in the repurchase offer. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Repurchase Offer.” We cannot assure you that holders of the 2007 Notes will accept our offer. We will also continue to be subject to the covenants in the indenture governing the 2007 Notes if any 2007 Notes remain outstanding after the offer.

 

62

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

If Metals USA Holdings experiences a change of control and does not redeem the 2007 Notes, it will be required to make an offer to repurchase the 2007 Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.

Under the indenture governing the 2007 Notes, we are required to pay interest on overdue principal at 1% per annum in excess of the rates discussed above and are required to pay interest on overdue installments of interest at such higher rate to the extent lawful. The indenture governing the 2007 Notes contains covenants described under “—Covenant Compliance” above.

The indenture governing the 2007 Notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit Metals USA Holdings’ ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue disqualified or preferred stock, repurchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, pay dividends or make distributions to its stockholders, incur restrictions on the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends or to make other payments to Metals USA Holdings, transfer or sell assets, create liens, enter into transactions with affiliates, make investments or acquisitions, and merge or consolidate with other companies or transfer all or substantially all of its assets.

Our affiliates, which include Apollo, as well as our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, have purchased a portion of our 2007 Notes in the market. For the year ended December 31, 2009, interest paid on the 2007 Notes held by affiliates amounted to $11.6 million, and was paid entirely by PIK Interest. From time to time, depending upon market, pricing and other conditions, as well on cash balances and liquidity, we, our subsidiaries or affiliates may seek to purchase or sell some amount of the Metals USA Notes or additional amounts of the 2007 Notes. Any such purchases or sales may be made in the open market, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers or otherwise. The amounts of any such purchases or sales may be material.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we purchased $157.4 million principal amount of the 2007 Notes in the open market, resulting in a pretax gain of $78.5 million (net of unamortized deferred financing costs and original issue discount) on debt extinguishment.

See “Description of Certain Indebtedness—The 2007 Notes.”

Restricted Payments

Both the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility and the indentures governing the Metals USA Notes and the 2007 Notes contain restrictions as to the payment of dividends. The amount available under the restricted payment provision contained in the loan and security agreement governing the ABL facility was $68.2 million as of December 31, 2009. No amount was available under the restricted payment provision contained in the indenture governing the Metals USA Notes as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, Flag Intermediate and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Metals USA, had $141.1 million of total stockholder’s equity.

See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “—Covenant Compliance.”

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We were not engaged in off-balance sheet arrangements through any unconsolidated, limited purpose entities and no material guarantees of debt or other commitments to third parties existed at December 31, 2009.

 

63

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Contractual Obligations

We enter into operating leases for many of our facility, vehicle and equipment needs. These leases allow us to conserve cash by paying a monthly lease rental fee for the use of, rather than purchasing, facilities, vehicles and equipment. At the end of the lease, we have no further obligation to the lessor. We have varying amounts of open purchase orders that are subject to renegotiation/cancellation by either party as to quantity or price. Generally, the amounts outstanding relate to delivery periods of up to 12 weeks from the date of the purchase order.

Our future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2009 include the following:

 

					For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31,
		Total			2010			2011			2012			2013			2014			Beyond
											(in millions)
ABL facility(1)		$	75.0		$	—		$	75.0		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Purchase Orders			99.3			99.3			—			—			—			—			—
11 1/8 Senior Secured Notes Due 2015 (Metals USA Notes).			377.5			25.2			25.2			25.2			25.2			25.2			251.5
Senior Floating Rate Toggle Notes Due 2012 (2007 Notes)(2)…			163.7			—			—			163.7			—			—			—
IRB(3)			5.7			—			—			—			—			—			5.7
Other obligations(4)			7.5			0.7			0.7			0.6			0.6			0.6			4.3
Operating lease obligations			55.1			14.9			13.0			8.0			5.5			4.3			9.4
Total		$	738.8		$	140.1		$	113.9		$	197.5		$	31.3		$	30.1		$	270.9

 

(1)

The amounts stated do not include interest costs. The ABL facility bears interest based upon a margin over reference rates established within a specific pricing grid. The marginal rates will vary with our financial performance as measured by the FCCR. The applicable base rate and the effective LIBOR rate were 3.25% and 0.251%, respectively, on the December 31, 2009.

(2)

The 2007 Notes bear cash interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 6.00%, which increases by 0.25% to 6.25% in the second year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes, by 0.50% to 6.50% in the third year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes and by 0.75% to 6.75% in the fourth year of the issuance of the 2007 Notes. In the event PIK Interest is paid, the then-applicable margin over LIBOR on the 2007 Notes would increase by 0.75% for each period in which PIK Interest is paid. The effective LIBOR rate was 0.251% at December 31, 2009. Contractual obligations reflect estimated cash interest expense. In the event a PIK Interest election is made, PIK Interest associated with additional notes issued as a result of a PIK Interest election will be reflected in future periods once those notes have been issued. Estimated interest was calculated using a 3-month LIBOR forward curve, with the initial spread and increases to the initial spread for the applicable periods as discussed above. See “Use of Proceeds.”

(3)	The amounts stated do not include interest costs. The interest rate assessed on the IRB varies from month to month based on an index of mutual bonds, which was 0.44% on December 31, 2009.

(4)

Consists of junior indebtedness of approximately $0.2 million and a multiemployer pension fund withdrawal liability of approximately $7.3 million. Excludes payments for unrecognized tax benefits. Based on the contingent and uncertain nature of our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, we are unable to make an estimate of the period of potential settlement, if any, with respective taxing authorities.

 

64

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The result of this process forms the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We review our estimates and judgments on a regular, ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates due to changed circumstances and conditions.

The following accounting policies and estimates are considered critical in light of the potentially material impact that the estimates, judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies might have on our reported financial information.

Accounts Receivable.    We generally recognize revenue as product is shipped (risk of loss for our products generally passes at time of shipment), net of provisions for estimated returns. Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of trade accounts and notes receivable. Collections on our accounts receivable are made through several lockboxes maintained by our lenders. Credit risk associated with concentration of cash deposits is low as we have the right of offset with our lenders for the substantial portion of our cash balances. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are within several industries. Generally, credit is extended once appropriate credit history and references have been obtained. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and set credit limits based upon reviews of customers’ current credit information and payment history. We monitor customer payments and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that we have identified. Provisions to the allowance for doubtful accounts are made monthly and adjustments are made periodically based upon our expected ability to collect all such accounts. Generally we do not require collateral for the extension of credit.

Each month we consider all available information when assessing the adequacy of the provision for allowances, claims and doubtful accounts. Adjustments made with respect to the allowance for doubtful accounts often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to the allowance for doubtful accounts are inherent in the preparation of financial statements. The rate of future credit losses may not be similar to past experience.

Inventories.    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We conduct a lower of cost or market inventory valuation annually as of December 31 or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential write-downs. Our inventories are accounted for using a variety of methods including specific identification, average cost and the first-in first-out method of accounting. We regularly review inventory on hand and record adjustments for damaged and slow-moving inventory based on historical and current sales trends. Changes in product demand and our customer base may affect the value of inventory on hand which may require higher provisions for slow-moving inventory.

Adjustments made for damaged and slow-moving inventory often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to adjustments for damaged and slow-moving inventory are inherent in the preparation of financial statements. The rate of future losses associated with damaged or slow moving inventory may not be similar to past experience.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“ASC 105”), which establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as

 

65

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

the source of GAAP to be applied to nongovernmental agencies. ASC 105 explicitly recognizes rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. ASC 105 became effective for interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events” (“ASC 855”). The pronouncement modifies the definition of what qualifies as a subsequent event— those events or transactions that occur following the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued, or are available to be issued—and requires companies to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for determining that date. The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 855 in the second quarter of 2009, in accordance with the effective date.

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”). The pronouncement amends previous ASC 825 guidance to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in all interim as well as annual financial statements. This pronouncement was effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 and the Company adopted its provisions in the second quarter of 2009.

In April 2008, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). This pronouncement amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under previous ASC 350 guidance, thereby improving the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under ASC 350 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”). This pronouncement was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The Company has not acquired any intangible assets since adopting this pronouncement. As such, there has been no impact to the Company’s financial statements since the January 1, 2009 adoption date.

In March 2008, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), which expands the disclosure requirements in previous ASC 815 guidance about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. This pronouncement’s disclosure provisions apply to all entities with derivative instruments subject to the previous ASC 815 guidance. The provisions also apply to related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to this pronouncement must provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. Such disclosures, as well as existing required disclosures, generally will need to be presented for every annual and interim reporting period. This pronouncement was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we have included the expanded disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities within the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”), which replaces previous ASC 805 guidance. This pronouncement establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired in connection with a business combination. This pronouncement also establishes disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effect of the business combination. This pronouncement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year

 

66

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

that begins after December 15, 2008. The Company applied the provisions of ASC 805 in connection with the acquisition that closed during the first quarter of 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of our business, we are exposed to market risk, primarily from changes in interest rates and the cost of metal we hold in inventory. We continually monitor exposure to market risk and develop appropriate strategies to manage this risk. With respect to our metal purchases, there is no recognized market to purchase derivative financial instruments to reduce the inventory exposure risks. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of market risk relative to steel prices.

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the ABL facility and the 2007 Notes, both of which are subject to variable interest rates. As of December 31, 2009, outstanding borrowings under the ABL facility were $75.0 million. Based on the weighted average borrowings outstanding on the ABL facility during the year ended December 31, 2009, a one percent increase or decrease in the weighted average facility rate would have resulted in a change to pretax interest expense of approximately $1.8 million for the period.

As of December 31, 2009, the outstanding principal amount of the 2007 Notes was $161.1 million. Based on this amount, a one percent increase or decrease in the base rate would have resulted in a change to pretax interest expense of $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. At February 19, 2010, the 2007 Notes were traded at approximately 84.75% of face value, based on quoted market prices.

In February 2008, $250.0 million notional amount of outstanding borrowings under the ABL facility were swapped from a floating LIBOR-based rate to a fixed rate. The swaps entitle us to receive quarterly payments of interest at a floating rate indexed to the three-month LIBOR and pay a fixed rate that ranges from 2.686% to 2.997%, converting a portion of the outstanding borrowings on our ABL facility from a floating rate obligation to a fixed rate obligation. Pretax realized gains and losses from derivatives which were recognized in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $6.8 million of additional interest expense, consisting of $4.8 million of settlements, and $2.0 million of changes in the fair value of derivatives. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps was $5.8 million at December 31, 2009, with $4.4 million classified as accrued liabilities and $1.4 million classified as other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

$226.3 million aggregate principal amount of Metals USA Notes were outstanding at December 31, 2009, with a fixed interest rate of 11 ¹/8%. Changes in market interest rates will not impact cash interest payable on the Metals USA Notes. At February 19, 2010, the Metals USA Notes were traded at approximately 100.625% of face value, based on quoted market prices.

 

67

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Description of the Apollo Transactions

On May 18, 2005, Metals USA Holdings, Flag Acquisition and Metals USA entered into the Merger Agreement. On November 30, 2005, Flag Acquisition, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flag Intermediate, merged with and into Metals USA, with Metals USA being the surviving corporation. Flag Intermediate and Flag Acquisition conducted no operations during the period from May 9, 2005 (date of inception) to November 30, 2005. As a result of the Merger, all of Metals USA Inc.’s issued and outstanding common stock is held indirectly by Metals USA Holdings through Flag Intermediate, its wholly-owned subsidiary. Metals USA Holdings is a holding company and it has no assets, obligations, employees or operations other than those resulting from the Merger, the 2007 Notes and this offering. All of Metals USA Holdings’ operations are conducted by Metals USA. Metals USA Holdings was formed by Apollo. Investment funds associated with Apollo own approximately 93% of the capital stock of Metals USA Holdings (or approximately 91% on a fully diluted basis) as of December 31, 2009, and will beneficially own approximately     % of our common stock, assuming the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option. The remainder of the capital stock of Metals USA Holdings is held by members of our management. See “Principal Stockholders and Selling Stockholders.”

In connection with the Merger, (a) Metals USA entered into the ABL facility and (b) Flag Acquisition completed a private placement of $275.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Metals USA Notes, which Metals USA assumed pursuant to the Merger. In September 2006, Metals USA exchanged $275.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Metals USA Notes that were registered under the Securities Act for an equal principal amount of the Metals USA Notes issued in connection with the Merger.

In addition, at the effective time of the Merger, Apollo and certain members of management of Metals USA contributed $140.0 million to Metals USA Holdings Corp., in exchange for common stock of Metals USA Holdings Corp. The proceeds from the issuance of the Metals USA Notes, borrowings under the ABL facility and the equity investment by Apollo and our management members were used to pay the merger consideration to the previous equity holders of Metals USA to pay down certain existing debt of Metals USA and to pay transaction expenses related to the Merger, including $6.0 million of transaction fees paid to Apollo. For a more complete description of the indebtedness see “Description of Certain Indebtedness.”

 

68

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Ownership and Corporate Structure

The following diagram sets forth our ownership and organizational structure as of immediately following the completion of this offering (ownership percentages are given assuming the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional shares). The diagram below does not display all of our subsidiaries or indicate the amounts outstanding under the IRB.

 

69

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

BUSINESS

Company Overview

Metals USA, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on July 3, 1996, and began operations upon completion of an initial public offering on July 11, 1997. On May 18, 2005, Metals USA Holdings, Flag Acquisition, and Metals USA entered into the Merger Agreement. On November 30, 2005, Flag Acquisition, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flag Intermediate, merged with and into Metals USA, with Metals USA being the surviving corporation. Flag Intermediate and Flag Acquisition conducted no operations during the period from May 9, 2005 (date of inception) to November 30, 2005. As a result of the Merger, all of Metals USA Inc.’s issued and outstanding common stock is held indirectly by Metals USA Holdings through Flag Intermediate, its wholly owned subsidiary. Metals USA Holdings was formed by Apollo. Investment funds associated with Apollo own approximately 93% of the capital stock of Metals USA Holdings (or approximately 91% on a fully-diluted basis) as of December 31, 2009, and will beneficially own approximately     % of our common stock, assuming the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option. The remainder of the capital stock of Metals USA Holdings is held by members of our management. See “Principal Stockholders and Selling Stockholders.”

We are one of the largest metal service center businesses in North America and believe we are a leading provider of value-added metal processing and inventory management services. In 2009, we sold over 912 thousand tons of metal products, including processed carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum, red metals and manufactured metal components, to thousands of customers in the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Our national network of 34 service center facilities are strategically located in close proximity to our suppliers and customers in key geographic end markets. This geographically diverse network allows us to work closely with our customers to facilitate efficient and cost effective inventory management. In addition to our warehouse and distribution capabilities, we offer a wide range of value-added metal processing services. These value-added services, which include cutting, sawing, punching, shot blasting, surface grinding and drilling are recognized and desired by many end-users. Our ability to offer these and other value-added services allows us to earn a premium margin over the cost of metal.

Our portfolio of metal products and value-added services are sold to a diverse customer base across a range of end use markets. Our customers rely on us to supply a wide variety of metal products in numerous configurations ranging from unprocessed beams, coils and plates to custom-engineered and highly processed finished products. We believe our local, hands-on service, supported by the strength of our service center network, enables us to dependably meet the demands of this diverse group of customers. The principal markets for our products include metal fabrication, industrial machinery and equipment, electrical and appliance manufacturing, land and marine transportation, construction, energy, aerospace and defense. We believe our national service center network and broad portfolio of metal products and value-added services position us as a key intermediary between primary metal producers that generally sell large volumes in limited sizes and configurations and our customers, who generally require a greater level of service and support and purchase smaller quantities of customized products.

We are focused on leveraging our position in the value chain to maximize the margin earned over the cost of metal. This strategy is manifested through cost reduction, process improvement, and disciplined investment and growth initiatives. Since in the fourth quarter of 2008, we implemented a series of cost cutting measures that reduced our annual operating expenses by approximately $50 million. We believe a significant majority of these savings resulted from permanent reductions in our cost structure, which we expect to enhance our ability to generate higher earnings and increased cash flow throughout the economic cycle. To augment our organic growth initiatives, we selectively pursued and completed three acquisitions over the past three years for our service center business. The acquisitions of Port City, Lynch Metals and Philadelphia Plate, each as defined below, have expanded our value-added service offerings, further diversified our product mix and increased our

 

70

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

incremental exposure to targeted higher growth end markets. We believe this strategy, in combination with management’s demonstrated ability to manage metal purchasing and inventories to consistently meet our customers’ high expectations for service and reliability, provides us a solid foundation for future growth in earnings and cash flow and more stable operating profit per ton through the economic cycle.

Our Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups perform customized, value-added processing services to unimproved steel and other metals required to meet specifications provided by our customers in addition to offering inventory management and just-in-time delivery services, among others. These services enable our customers to reduce material costs, decrease capital required for raw materials inventory and processing equipment, and save time, labor, warehouse space and other expenses. The customers of our Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups are in the electrical and appliance manufacturing, fabrication, furniture, commercial construction, machinery and equipment, land and marine transportation, and energy and aerospace industries. Our Building Products Group manufactures high-value finished building products for distributors and contractors engaged in the residential remodeling industry.

Competitive Strengths

Value-Added Services Generate Premium Margins Over Metal.    Metal service centers generally earn a margin over the cost of metal, which provides stability to metal service centers’ cash flows relative to primary metal producers through pricing cycles. In addition to our warehouse and distribution capabilities, we offer our customers a wide range of value-added metal processing and inventory management services, which enable us to earn a premium margin over the cost of metal. Our ability to earn premium margins is further supported by an enhanced product mix across our metal service center business, which includes supplementing our core carbon offerings with non-ferrous volumes. Over the last several years, we have also taken steps to improve our ability to earn premium margins by increasing our exposure to higher growth end-markets including energy, infrastructure, and aerospace and expanding our service offerings through investments in our facilities and targeted acquisitions.

Platform for Strong Growth.    During the seven years ended December 31, 2009, we have spent approximately $139 million on growth initiatives, including approximately $45 million to grow our business organically and approximately $93 million for strategic acquisitions. Our growth initiatives have focused on broadening our mix of higher-margin products and services, such as value-added processing, inventory management services, and non-ferrous volumes. Our largest organic growth project during the last three years was an $18 million investment in our Plates and Shapes Group metal service center in Waggaman, Louisiana to capitalize upon the strong gulf coast marine market. This investment equipped this facility with additional value-added processing capabilities, such as blast, paint, laser and plasma cutting and press brake services.

In late 2005, we established and trained a dedicated acquisitions team that is responsible for identifying, evaluating, executing, integrating and monitoring acquisitions. This team has completed three strategic acquisitions for our metal service center business: (1) Port City in our Plates and Shapes Group that increased our plate processing capabilities to customers serving the oil field, construction equipment and refining industries, (2) Lynch Metals in our Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group that provides value-added, specialized aluminum products to customers who are predominantly manufacturers of air/heat transfer products specifically focused on aerospace, industrial and automotive applications and (3) Philadelphia Plate in our Plates and Shapes Group that further expanded our existing processing capabilities into the northeast region of the United States and to the marine and defense industries.

 

71

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

In addition to selectively pursuing growth projects, we utilized the significant cash flow generated from our operating activities during 2009 to repurchase $206 million face value of our debt at a substantial discount to par value, which improved our balance sheet flexibility going forward. We believe that our size and access to credit favorably positions us to take advantage of opportunities to complete additional value-enhancing investments and acquisitions as the North American service center industry continues to consolidate.

Skilled Inventory Management.    Inventory management is critical to metal service centers’ ability to balance investment in working capital, maintain cost competitiveness and meet customer needs for timely and often just-in-time delivery. Our purchasing practices follow a market driven inventory management framework that is designed to generate attractive returns on our inventory investment while reliably meeting customer demands irrespective of steel prices. Our Chief Executive Officer monitors and adjusts this framework on at least a weekly basis. Within this framework, inventory and processing services are tailored to the needs of individual customers at each of our metal service center locations. We believe our inventory management framework and flexible capital structure allow us to quickly react to changing metal prices and customer needs. Our information technology systems facilitate sharing inventory among our facilities, which helps us maximize returns and reliably satisfy our customers’ needs. In addition, our inventory management framework enhances our ability to generate earnings during rising metal price environments and free cash flow in declining metal price environments, which we demonstrated by generating record earnings in 2008 and record operating free cash flow in 2009. After dramatically reducing inventories in 2009 and changing the way we work with our suppliers, we believe that we will continue to effectively operate our business at substantially lower inventory levels going forward.

Lean Cost Structure.    We operate our business on a lean basis relative to our competitors and have one of the lowest relative non-metal cost structures in our industry. For example, we had a lower ratio of total operating expenses (excluding cost of sales) compared to revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 than a similarly situated peer group of public companies which consisted of Reliance Steel and Aluminum Co., Olympic Steel Inc., and A.M. Castle & Co. Since the fourth quarter of 2008, we have implemented approximately $50 million of annualized cost savings, the vast majority of which we believe are permanent reductions. The cost savings entail several elements including reducing headcount by approximately 30%, modifying employee benefits, facility consolidation (primarily in our Building Products Group), reducing employee work hours and streamlining our delivery fleet. The combination of our lean cost structure and skilled inventory management has allowed us to convert a high percentage of our earnings into free cash flow, resulting in $244 million of cash flow from operations over the year ended December 31, 2009. We have used this cash to deleverage our balance sheet by $476 million over the same period and complete the acquisition of Philadelphia Plate in early 2009.

Strong Relationships with Key Suppliers.    We are one of the largest domestic purchasers of steel and we have established strong relationships with large domestic and international metal suppliers. Because we are a significant customer of our major suppliers, we obtain volume discounts and historically have been able to obtain sufficient access to feedstock in periods of tight supply which we believe further enhances our standing with end users relative to our competitors, particularly those competitors that do not have such access. Our relationships with our metal suppliers also help us to optimize our inventory management because we believe that we can often purchase inventory with significantly shorter lead times relative to our competitors.

Diversified Customer Base, Products, Services and End-Markets.    Our business supplies a broad range of products to a large and diversified customer base (over 335,000 transactions to more than 14,000 customers in 2009) in a wide variety of end-markets and industries. For the year ended December 31, 2009, our average transaction size was approximately $2,950. We have sought

 

72

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

to enhance our position in stable growth industries that demand additional value-added services and reduce our exposure to more cyclical sectors. Through our organic growth projects and acquisitions, we have capitalized on opportunities to augment our existing product and service portfolio with high value-added products such as aluminum brazing sheet, armor plate, marine grade aluminum plate, and pressure vessel plate to service the aerospace, marine, defense, and oil and gas industries. Our broad portfolio of high-quality metal products and customized value-added services allows us to offer one-stop shopping to our customers. We believe the breadth of our portfolio provides a significant competitive advantage over smaller metal service centers, which generally stock fewer products and offer fewer services than we do. Moreover, many products and services in our broad range of offerings exhibit diverse and distinct cyclical trends. We believe that this diversity helps provide stability to our results during economic downturns and positions us well for an economic and volume recovery.

Experienced and Proven Management Team.    Our senior management team has on average over 27 years of metals industry experience and is supported by, in our opinion, a deep bench of management talent, including our division vice presidents and facility general managers, amongst others. Our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, C. Lourenco Goncalves, has 29 years of experience in the metals industry, including his terms as Chief Executive Officer of California Steel Industries (which we refer to as “CSI”), which had many of the same value chain dynamics as a metal service center, and as managing director, among other positions, of Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (which we refer to as “CSN”). Under Mr. Goncalves’ leadership our management team has executed a strategy that has significantly improved our earnings growth, cash flow stability, and competitiveness.

Strategy

Expand Value-Added Services.    We intend to continue to invest in capital projects that provide attractive returns and to continue to expand the value-added services we offer at each of our service center locations, a strategy we believe will both enhance our relationships with existing customers and help forge new customer relationships, both of which we believe will result in increased market share for us. Customers increasingly demand and are willing to pay a premium margin over the cost of metal for additional value-added services that facilitate more efficient inventory management and reduce total production costs. In addition, we typically experience an increased level of repeat business from customers who utilize our value-added services. Demand for these services generally remains strong

 

73

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

through most economic cycles. We believe that our operating expertise, organizational structure, high-quality facilities, scale, and our low cost and flexible capital structure enable us to reliably provide a full range of value-added services to our customers relative to our competitors, particularly smaller metal service centers.

Increase Sales of Higher Margin Products and Services.    The sale of higher margin products and services, which tend to have higher growth prospects and more stable demand, will continue to be one of our core strategies. We intend to continue executing on this strategy by increasing our core carbon offerings, non-ferrous volumes, and our sales of processed products. Focusing on this strategy has historically increased our margins, stabilized our earnings, and optimized our investment in working capital, and we expect this strategy will continue to benefit us in these areas. We anticipate that we will continue investing in and acquiring companies to maintain and expand our processing facilities, which we believe will enable us to increase market share.

Execute Strategic Acquisitions to Improve Our Business.    The North American metal service center industry is highly fragmented, which we believe provides us with opportunities to execute our core strategies through synergistic “bolt-on” acquisitions. We completed three accretive and strategic acquisitions, Port City and Philadelphia Plate for our Plates and Shapes Group and Lynch Metals for our Flat-Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group, all of which have benefited us financially, operationally and strategically through realization of cost synergies, increased value-added processing capabilities, reduced inventory levels, and increased cross selling opportunities. The combination of our track record of acquiring and successfully integrating acquisitions and our internal acquisition team’s industry relationships has resulted in proprietary deal flow being available to us and has helped us maintain an active pipeline of acquisition opportunities. We intend to continue to pursue acquisitions and we will generally target one to two “bolt-on” acquisitions per year that will enhance our metal service center strategy. We believe that we are well positioned to take advantage of acquisition opportunities in the fragmented service center industry because of our flexible capital structure, which we have significantly improved over the twelve months ending December 31, 2009 by generating cash flow from operations of $244 million and by repurchasing $206 million face value of debt at a substantial discount in open market transactions.

Maintain and Strengthen Our Strong Relationships with Suppliers and Customers.    As one of the largest metal service center businesses in the United States, we intend to use our relationships to leverage the opportunities presented by the consolidation of steel producers and the changing needs of our customers. Steel producers continue to seek long-term relationships with metal service centers that have access to numerous customers, while customers are seeking relationships with metal service centers that can provide a one stop, reliable source of both high-quality products and value-added services.

Continue Strong Focus on Inventory Management.    We will continue managing our inventory to maximize our returns, profitability and cash flow while maintaining sufficient inventory to respond to our customers’ demands. During the recent economic downturn we reinforced and strengthened our long-standing relationships with key suppliers, and as a result, we believe we will benefit from shorter lead times allowing us to operate with a lower investment in working capital going forward. In addition, we intend to further integrate our salespeople and operating employees into the operations of our customers to enhance our visibility into in-process orders and further improve our just-in-time delivery and customer service. Constant evaluation of our inventory management framework will allow us to continue supplying our customers reliably, even during periods of tight metal supply. We expect our inventory management framework will continue generating strong earnings during periods of rising metal prices and strong cash flow during periods of declining metal prices. Moreover, since industry wide service center inventories are near record low levels, we believe our inventory management framework will enable us to benefit disproportionately as compared to our competitors when end market demand begins to recover.

 

74

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Maintain High Free Cash Flow Generation and Conversion.    Senior management has implemented a strategy designed to maximize our profitability and cash flow. Part of this strategy included an annualized cost savings program of approximately $50 million, which we implemented beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, a vast majority of which we believe are permanent reductions to our cost structure. We believe this program will improve our ability to generate attractive margins and free cash flow throughout future economic cycles. We believe that we are a reliable supplier, especially of higher margin products and services, to our customers even in periods of tight supply. We believe that our reliability allows us to generate higher margins and more stable operating income through the business cycle. Moreover, we believe our inventory management framework, bolstered by our relationships with our metals suppliers, will stabilize earnings during periods of weakness. Our core business also requires minimal maintenance capital investment. We believe these strengths taken together underscore our ability to generate high levels of free cash flow, which will enable us to reinvest in our business, consummate future acquisitions, reduce debt, and achieve other corporate and financial objectives.

Segment Information

Our product groups are led by members of our senior management teams, who, on average, have over 27 years of experience and are supported by finance, purchasing and sales and marketing staff. This product-oriented organizational structure facilitates the efficient advancement of our goals and objectives to achieve operational synergies and focused capital investment. For additional industry segment information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations by Segment,” Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Metal Processing/Metal Service Center Businesses: Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups

Overview.    Companies operating in the metals industry can generally be characterized as primary metal producers, metal processors/metal service centers or end-users. Our Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups are metals processors/metal service centers. As such, we purchase carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum, brass, copper and other metals from producing mills and then sell our metal processing services and the metal to our customers, who are generally end-users. We believe that both primary metals producers and end-users increasingly seek to have their metals processing and inventory management requirement met by value-added oriented metals processors/metal service centers like us.

Metal service centers function as key intermediaries between the primary metals producers that produce and sell larger volumes of metals in a limited number of sizes and configurations and end-users, such as fabricators, contractors and OEMs, that require smaller quantities of more customized products delivered on a just-in-time basis. End-users incorporate processed metals into finished products, in some cases with little further modification.

In our Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups, we engage in pre-production processing of carbon steel, stainless steel, red metals and aluminum. We purchase metals from primary producers, maintain an inventory of various metals to allow rapid fulfillment of customer orders and perform customized processing services to the specifications provided by end-users and other customers. By providing these services, as well as offering inventory management and just-in-time delivery services, we enable our customers to reduce overall production costs and decrease capital required for raw materials inventory and metals processing equipment. The Plates and Shapes and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Groups contributed approximately 92% of our 2009 net sales and the substantial majority of our 2008 operating income.

 

75

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Plates and Shapes Group.    The Plates and Shapes Group processes and distributes a wide range of carbon steel products, including plate, structural beams, bars, angles and tubes. We believe we are one of the largest distributors of steel plates and structural beams in the United States. In 2009, we sold approximately 485 thousand tons of products through our network of 20 full line metal service centers dedicated to plates and shapes. Our Plates and Shapes Group service centers are located primarily in the southern and eastern regions of the United States, which provide access to the largest local markets for the products we sell. The majority of our Plates and Shapes Group metal service centers are equipped to provide value-added processing services and a substantial portion of our sales include value-added services prior to end-user delivery. These processing services include burning, blasting and painting (the process of cleaning steel plate by shot-blasting, then immediately applying a paint or primer), tee-splitting (the cutting of metal beams along the length to form separate pieces), cambering (the bending of structural shapes to improve load-bearing capabilities), leveling (the flattening of metals to uniform tolerances for proper machining), cutting (the cutting of metals to produce shapes under strict tolerance requirements), sawing, punching, drilling, beveling, surface grinding, braking (bending), shearing and cutting-to-length (the cutting of metals into pieces and along the width of a coil to create sheets or plates). We sell our products to a diversified customer base, including a large number of customers who purchase products in small order sizes. We believe our disciplined inventory management and hands-on service, backed by our national network of metal service centers, enable us to effectively meet our customers varied product and inventory management needs.

We earn a premium margin over the cost of metal by providing additional, value-added processing and inventory management services such as product marking, item sequencing, just-in-time delivery and kitting. Customers who require these products and services are primarily in the fabrication, public and private non-residential construction, machinery and equipment, land and marine transportation, and energy industries. In May 2006, we completed the acquisition of the Port City Metal Services business (which we refer to as “Port City”), a higher value-added plate facility located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, which has bolstered our presence in the construction and oil-field services sectors. In February 2009, we acquired substantially all of the operating assets of VR Laser, a carbon plate processor located in Philadelphia, PA (which assets we collectively refer to as “Philadelphia Plate”), which has expanded our presence in the northeastern United States and augmented our presence in the marine and defense sectors.

Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group.    The Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group processes and distributes flat rolled carbon (which we refer to as “ferrous”) and stainless steel, aluminum, brass and copper (which we collectively refer to as “non-ferrous”) in a number of alloy grades and sizes through 14 metal service centers located primarily in the mid-western and southern United States and focused on supplying OEMs across a range of attractive end markets. The Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group sold approximately 435 thousand tons of products in 2009; sales of ferrous and non-ferrous metal product accounted for approximately 60% and 40%, respectively, of the group’s annual sales volume. Substantially all of the products sold in this group undergo value-added processing including precision blanking (the process in which metal is cut into precise two-dimensional shapes), slitting (the cutting of coiled metals to specified widths along the length of the coil), shearing and cutting-to-length, punching and leveling.

The majority of the group’s products and services are sold to customers in the electrical and appliance manufacturing, fabrication, furniture, machinery and equipment, transportation and aerospace industries. In July 2007, we acquired Lynch Metals, Inc. and Lynch Metals of California, Inc. (which we collectively refer to as “Lynch Metals”), a metal service center business that provides specialized aluminum products and value-added services to customers who are predominantly manufacturers of air/heat transfer products specifically focused on aerospace, industrial and automotive applications. Many of our large customers purchase products through pricing arrangements

 

76

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

or other contractual agreements that specify the margin over the cost of metal. A substantial portion of these customers also contract with us to provide additional value-added processing and inventory management services such as product marking and labeling, just-in-time delivery and kitting, which enable us to earn added margin over the cost of metal.

Industry Overview.    Metal service centers comprise the largest single customer group for North American metal producers, purchasing approximately 35% of all the metals produced in the United States in 2008, compared to 20% in 1981. We believe this share increase has been driven by the service centers’ increasingly important intermediary role between the mills that manufacture large volumes of steel and other metals in limited lot sizes and configurations and the end-users, who purchase these metals in smaller volumes and often require additional inventory management and processing services. We believe consolidation among primary steel and aluminum producers over the last several years has expanded the demand for metal distribution and service centers, and in particular those service centers capable of providing additional value-added metal processing and inventory management services. Over 300,000 original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), contractors and fabricators nationwide rely on metal service centers for their primary supply of metal products and services. End-users generally purchase metal from service centers based on a margin over the cost of the metal. When customers require additional metal processing or inventory management services, value-added metal service centers such as ours earn an additional premium margin over the cost of metal.

By outsourcing their customized metal processing and inventory management needs, OEMs and other end-users have the potential to realize significant economic benefits by shifting the responsibility for pre-production processing to metal service centers and leveraging service centers’ just-in-time delivery and other inventory management services. These supply-chain services, which are not normally provided by primary metals producers, enable end-users to reduce input, labor and other production costs, shorten lead times, and decrease required investments in working capital, manufacturing and warehouse facilities. We believe that the long-term growth opportunities for metal service centers will continue to expand as both primary metal producers and end-users increasingly seek to outsource their metal processing and inventory management requirements to value-added metal service centers.

The service center industry remains highly fragmented, with approximately 1,200 companies competing in North America. According to Purchasing Magazine, the industry recorded net sales of approximately $153 billion in 2008, with the ten largest service centers accounting for less than 25% of the industry’s sales and the top 100 service centers generating 47% of industry-wide sales. We believe larger service center businesses with greater scale and financial flexibility, like ours, enjoy significant advantages over smaller service centers such as the ability to obtain higher discounts associated with volume purchases, the breadth of products and value-added services to meet the diverse needs of key end use markets, and the more sophisticated logistics capabilities necessary to serve national accounts.

The performance of the North American metals production and distribution industry is closely related to the overall level of United States industrial demand and the related consumption of steel and other metals, the ability of mills to balance production to meet demand, and metal prices. Steel consumption in the United States remained relatively constant from 2000 through 2008, averaging approximately 123 million tons annually. Beginning in the third quarter of 2008, however, demand for steel and other metals began to deteriorate rapidly as the global financial crisis caused a significant contraction in industrial production world-wide. The reduction in demand for metals was compounded by widespread inventory destocking throughout the supply chain as industry participants looked to preserve liquidity by managing down their investment in working capital. Through the first eight months of 2009, service centers reported the lowest-ever inventory levels during the 32 years that this data has been collected for the industry. As a result, steel demand in the United States declined by almost half

 

77

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

to approximately 64 million tons in 2009, forcing a number of domestic mills to operate at or even below 50% capacity utilization at certain points during the year.

We expect demand for steel to increase alongside improving general economic conditions. Despite growing optimism and generally improving business conditions, we believe metal service centers continue to maintain very modest inventory levels. Nonetheless, mills reported increased capacity utilization rates during the second half of 2009 and some even reported returns to historic operating levels in the first quarter of 2010. Domestic mill utilization rates increased to approximately 69% during the week ending February 20, 2010, from approximately 61% at the end of 2009. Steel prices, which had been in an almost steady decline since July 2008, began trending upwards as a result of increased demand for steel and higher raw material costs, principally iron ore and scrap metal, and pushed the price for benchmark Hot Rolled Coil steel above $600 per ton (as of February 19, 2010), an increase of more than 12% over the price as of December 31, 2009. Although a number of domestic steel mills have announced their intention to increase capacity, we believe rising price trends are sustainable if producers maintain production commensurate with demand.

Our improving trend in order inquiry activity supports our belief that steel demand is increasing and economic recovery is on-going. With the exception of private non-residential construction, we believe that steel demand has entered into a recovery stage and will eventually return to historical consumption levels consistent with normal gross domestic product output (however, there can be no guarantee that it is entering a recovery stage). Additionally, the impact from federal stimulus legislation has not yet had a meaningful impact on the industry as actual spending continues to work through governmental channels. We believe that stimulus spending should have a meaningful impact on 2010 steel consumption and, in combination with basic economic recovery, domestic steel consumption should experience a year over year increase. However, there can be no guarantee that the demand increases or trends discussed in this section will continue.

Products and Services.    We purchase our raw materials in anticipation of projected customer requirements based on interaction with and feedback from customers, market conditions, historical usage and industry research. Primary producers typically find it more cost effective to focus on large volume production and sale of metals in standard sizes and configurations to large volume purchasers. We process the metals to the precise length, width, shape and surface quality specified by our customers. Our value-added processes include:

 

Ÿ

Precision blanking—the process in which metal is cut into precise two-dimensional shapes.

 

Ÿ

Flame cutting—the cutting of metals to produce various shapes according to customer-supplied drawings.

 

Ÿ

Laser and plasma cutting—the cutting of metals to produce shapes under strict tolerance requirements.

 

Ÿ

Slitting—the cutting of coiled metals to specified widths along the length of the coil.

 

Ÿ

Blasting and painting—the process of cleaning steel plate by shot-blasting, then immediately applying a paint or primer.

 

Ÿ

Plate forming and rolling—the forming and bending of plates to cylindrical or required specifications.

 

Ÿ

Shearing and cutting to length—the cutting of metals into pieces and along the width of a coil to create sheets or plates.

 

Ÿ

Tee-splitting—the cutting of metal beams along the length to form separate pieces.

 

Ÿ

Cambering—the bending of structural shapes to improve load-bearing capabilities.

 

Ÿ

Sawing—the cutting to length of bars, tubular goods and beams.

 

78

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Ÿ

Leveling—the flattening of metals to uniform tolerances for proper machining.

 

Ÿ

Edge trimming—a process that removes a specified portion of the outside edges of coiled metal to produce uniform width and round or smooth edges.

 

Ÿ

Metallurgy—the analysis and testing of the physical and chemical composition of metals.

Our additional capabilities include applications engineering and other value-added processes such as custom machining. Using these capabilities, we use processed metals to manufacture higher-value components.

Once we receive an order, we select the appropriate inventory and schedule it for processing in accordance with the customer’s requirements and specified delivery date. Orders are monitored by our computer systems, including, in certain locations, the use of bar coding to aid in and reduce the cost of tracking material. We record the source of all metal shipped to customers. This enables us to identify the source of any metal which may later be shown to not meet industry standards or that fails during or after manufacture. This capability is important to our customers as it allows them to assign responsibility for non-conforming or defective metal to the mill that produced the metal. Many of the products and services we provide can be ordered and tracked through a web-based electronic network that directly connects our computer system to those of our customers.

We cooperate with our customers and tailor our deliveries to support their needs, which in many instances consist of short lead times, multiple daily deliveries, staged deliveries, or deliveries timed for immediate production. These “just-in-time” deliveries are defined by our customers and are generally intended to minimize their inventory investment and handling requirements.

While we ship products throughout the United States, most of our customers are located within a 250-mile radius of our facilities, thus enabling an efficient delivery system capable of handling a large number of short lead-time orders. We transport most of our products directly to our customers either with our own trucks for short-distance and/or multi-stop deliveries or through common or contract trucking companies.

We have quality control systems to ensure product quality and traceability throughout processing. Quality controls include periodic supplier audits, customer-approved quality standards, inspection criteria and metals source traceability. Eighteen of our 34 metal service center facilities have International Standards Organization, or “ISO”, 9002 certification.

Building Products Group

Overview.    The Building Products Group manufactures and sells roofing and patio products. We generally sell these products through a network of independent distributors and home improvement contractors. Our roofing products business manufactures and sells a high performance roofing product consisting of a pressed and stone-coated steel panel that mimics the appearance of traditional shake and tile roofing. Our roofing product is well suited for areas subject to threats of high winds, fires and hail storms. In May 2006, we acquired Duraloc Roofing Systems, Ltd., a Canadian-based competitor which we have re-branded as Allmet Roofing Products. This acquisition provided us with manufacturing capabilities on both the east and west coasts of North America. Our patio products business manufactures and sells building components used primarily for the erection of residential shade structures such as patio covers and enclosures. With facilities located throughout the southern and western regions of the United States, we believe we are one of only a few suppliers of patio products with national scale.

Notwithstanding recent conditions in the United States housing sector, we believe some signs, such as increases in sales of new and existing homes, indicate an improving outlook for the housing sector.

 

79

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Moreover, we believe that factors including an historically low interest rate environment and an aging American housing stock are generating significant pent-up demand for remodeling that should manifest itself when the housing sector rebounds (however, there can be no guarantee that demand for remodeling will increase or the timing of any such rebound). We believe that these factors support a strong long-term outlook for residential remodeling as a cost-effective alternative to new housing construction.

Raw Materials and Supply

In recent years, steel, aluminum, copper and other metals production in the United States has fluctuated from period to period as mills attempt to match production to projected demand. Periodically, this has resulted in shortages of, or increased ordering lead-times for, some products, as well as fluctuations in price. Typically, metals producers announce price changes with sufficient advance notice to allow us to order additional products prior to the effective date of a price increase, or to defer purchases until a price decrease becomes effective. Our purchasing decisions are based on our forecast of the availability of metal products, ordering lead-times and pricing, as well as our prediction of customer demand for specific products.

We obtain the overwhelming majority of our metals from domestic suppliers, which include Nucor Corp., North American Stainless, AK Steel, Arcelor Mittal, Steel Dynamics, and Gerdau Ameristeel. Although we have historically purchased approximately 10% to 15% of our raw material supplies from foreign producers, domestic suppliers have always been, and we believe will continue to be, our principal source of raw material.

Although most forms of steel and aluminum produced by mills can be obtained from a number of integrated mills or mini-mills, both domestically and internationally, there are a few products that are available from only a limited number of producers. Since most metals are shipped free-on-board and the transportation of metals is a significant cost factor, we generally seek to purchase metals, to the extent possible, from the nearest mill.

Steel producers have been undergoing rapid consolidation over the past five years. U.S. Steel, Nucor Corp. and Arcelor Mittal have acquired several of their domestic competitors, and international integrated producers have merged and consolidated operations. The result of this trend will be fewer integrated producers from which we can purchase our raw materials. We believe that global consolidation of the metals industry is beneficial to the metals industry as a whole by enhancing efficiency.

Sales and Marketing; Customers

We employ a sales force consisting of internal and external salespeople. Internal salespeople are primarily responsible for maintaining customer relationships, receiving and soliciting individual orders and responding to service and other inquiries by customers. Our external sales force is primarily responsible for identifying potential customers and calling on them to explain our services. We believe that our sales force is trained and knowledgeable about the characteristics and applications of various metals, as well as the manufacturing methods employed by our customers.

Our sales and marketing focus is on the identification of OEMs and other metals end-users that could achieve significant cost savings through the use of our inventory management, value-added processing, just-in-time delivery and other services. We use a variety of methods to identify potential customers, including the use of databases, direct mail and participation in manufacturers’ trade shows. Customer referrals and the knowledge of our sales force about regional end-users also result in the identification of potential customers. Once a potential customer is identified, our outside salespeople assume responsibility for visiting the appropriate contact, typically the purchasing manager or manager of operations.

 

80

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Nearly all sales are on a negotiated price basis. In some cases, sales are the result of a competitive bid process where a customer provides a list of products, along with requirements, to us and several competitors and we submit a bid on each product. We have a diverse customer base, with no single customer accounting for more than 4% of our net sales in each of the last three years. Our ten largest customers represented less than 14% of our net sales in 2009.

Competition

We are engaged in a highly fragmented and competitive industry. The United States and Canadian metal service center industry generated approximately $153 billion in 2008 revenues from approximately 1,200 different companies. Based on 2008 revenues the top 100 competitors represent approximately 47% of industry revenue. Metals USA is ranked ninth among this group based on 2008 revenues.

Markets are generally oriented on a regional and local basis. We have numerous competitors in each of our product lines and geographic locations. In every market we service we compete with various combinations of other large, value-added oriented metals processor/metal service centers some of which may have greater financial resources than we have, smaller metals processors/metal service centers and, to a much lesser extent, with primary metals producers, who typically sell to very large customers requiring regular shipments of large volumes of metals.

We compete with other companies on price, service, quality and availability of products. Our sales and services decisions are decentralized, providing local management the flexibility to quickly address local market conditions. Historically, we believe we have been able to compete effectively because of our high levels of service, broad-based inventory, knowledgeable and trained sales force, integrated computer systems, modern equipment, numerous locations, geographic dispersion, operational economies of scale and combined purchasing volume. Furthermore, we believe our liquidity and overall financial position affords us a good platform with which to compete with our peers in the industry.

Government Regulation and Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to a number of federal, state and local regulations relating to the protection of the environment and to workplace health and safety. In particular, our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations governing waste disposal, air and water emissions, the handling of hazardous substances, environmental protection, remediation, workplace exposure and other matters. Hazardous materials we use in our operations include general commercial lubricants and cleaning solvents. Among the more significant regulated activities that occur at some of our facilities are: the accumulation of scrap metal, which is sold for recycling; the generation of plant trash and other solid wastes and wastewaters, such as water from burning tables operated at some of our facilities, which wastes are disposed of in accordance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act using third-party commercial waste handlers; and the storage, handling, and use of lubricating and cutting oils and small quantities of maintenance-related products and chemicals, the health hazards of which are communicated to employees pursuant to Occupational Safety and Health Act-prescribed hazard communication efforts and the disposal or recycling of which are performed pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

Generally speaking, our facilities’ operations do not involve the types of emissions of air pollutants, discharges of pollutants to land or surface water, or treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste which would ordinarily require federal or state environmental permits. Some of our facilities possess authorizations for air emissions from paints and coatings, hazardous materials permits under local fire codes or ordinances for the storage and use of small quantities of combustible materials such as oils or paints, and state or local permits for on-site septic systems. Our cost of obtaining and complying with such permits has not been and is not anticipated to be material. Our

 

81

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

operations are such that environmental regulations typically have not required us to make significant capital expenditures for environmental compliance activities.

We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental and workplace health and safety laws and do not currently anticipate that we will be required to expend any substantial amounts in the foreseeable future in order to meet such requirements. However, some of the properties we own or lease are located in areas with a history of heavy industrial use, and are near sites listed on the CERCLA National Priority List. CERCLA establishes joint and several responsibility for clean-up without regard to fault for persons who have arranged for disposal of hazardous substances at sites that have become contaminated and for persons who own or operate contaminated facilities. We have a number of properties located in or near industrial or light industrial use areas; accordingly, these properties may have been contaminated by pollutants which would have migrated from neighboring facilities or have been deposited by prior occupants. Some of our properties are affected by contamination from leaks and drips of cutting oils and similar materials. The costs of clean-ups to date have not been material. We are not currently subject to any claims or notices with respect to clean-up or remediation under CERCLA or similar laws for contamination at our leased or owned properties or at any off-site location. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that we could be notified of such claims in the future. It is also possible that we could be identified by the Environmental Protection Agency, a state agency or one or more third parties as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA or under analogous state laws.

Management Information Systems

Both the Plates and Shapes Group and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group metal service centers use a system marketed and distributed specifically for the metal service center industry. During 2003, we completed a similar common-platform initiative in the Building Products Group. Some of our subsidiaries currently use electronic data interchange, through which they offer customers a paperless process with respect to order entry, shipment tracking, billing, remittance processing and other routine activities. Additionally, several of our subsidiaries also use computer-aided drafting systems to directly interface with computer-controlled metals processing, resulting in more efficient use of material and time.

We believe investment in uniform management information systems and computer-aided manufacturing technology permits us to respond quickly and proactively to our customers’ needs and service expectations. These systems are able to share data regarding inventory status, order backlog, and other critical operational information on a real-time basis.

Employees

As of December 31, 2009, we employed approximately 1,700 persons. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 166, or approximately 10% of our employees, at various sites were members of unions: the United Steelworkers of America; the Sheet Metals Workers Union; the International Association of Bridge, Structural, and Ornamental Ironworkers of America; and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Our relationship with these unions generally has been satisfactory. Within the last five years, we have not experienced any work stoppages at any of our facilities. We are currently a party to seven collective-bargaining agreements. Five expire in 2010, one expires in 2011 and one expires in 2013. Presently, we do not anticipate any problems or issues with respect to renewing these agreements upon acceptable terms. Historically, we have succeeded in negotiating new collective bargaining agreements without a strike and we expect to succeed in negotiating new collective bargaining agreements with respect to the agreements that expire in 2010.

From time to time, there are shortages of qualified operators of metals processing equipment. In addition, during periods of low unemployment, turnover among less-skilled workers can be relatively high. We believe that our relations with our employees are satisfactory.

 

82

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our ability to retain our key employees is critical to the success of our business, and failure to do so may adversely affect our revenues and as a result could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows” and “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Adverse developments in our relationship with our unionized employees could adversely affect our business.”

Vehicles

We operate a fleet of owned or leased trucks and trailers, as well as forklifts and support vehicles. We believe these vehicles are generally well maintained and adequate for our current operations.

Risk Management and Insurance

The primary risks in our operations are bodily injury, property damage and vehicle liability. We maintain general and vehicle liability insurance and liability insurance for bodily injury and property damage and workers’ compensation coverage, which we consider sufficient to protect us against a catastrophic loss due to claims associated with these risks.

Safety

Our goal is to provide an accident-free workplace. We are committed to continuing and improving upon each facility’s focus and emphasis on safety in the workplace. Our safety program includes regular weekly or monthly field safety meetings and training sessions to teach proper safety procedures. A comprehensive “best practices” safety program which has been implemented throughout our operations ensures that all employees comply with our safety standards, as well as those established by our insurance carriers, and federal, state and local laws and regulations. This program is led by the corporate office, with the assistance of each of our product group presidents, executive officers and industry consultants with expertise in workplace safety. We have experienced improvements in our safety record in four of the last five years. Furthermore, our annual bonus plan for our Chief Executive Officer, officers and managers is tied directly in part to our safety record.

Financial Information about Segments

For information regarding revenues from external customers, measures of profit or loss and total assets for the last three years for each segment, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations by Segment,” Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Patents, Trademarks and Other Intellectual Property Rights

We own several U.S. patents, trademarks, service marks and copyrights. Certain of the trademarks and patents are registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and, in some cases, with trademark offices of foreign countries. We consider other information owned by us to be trade secrets. We protect our trade secrets by, among other things, entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees and implementing security measures to restrict access to such information. We believe that our safeguards provide adequate protection to our proprietary rights. While we consider all of our intellectual property to be important, we do not consider any single intellectual property right to be essential to our operations as a whole.

Seasonal Aspects, Renegotiation and Backlog

There is a slight decrease in our business during the winter months because of inclement weather conditions and the impact on the construction industry. No material portion of our business is

 

83

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts at the election of the government. Because of the just-in-time delivery policy and the short lead-time nature of our business, we do not believe the information on backlog of orders is material to an understanding of our business.

Foreign Operations

We do not have any material long-term assets or customer relationships outside of the United States. We have no material foreign operations or subsidiaries.

Research and Development

We do not incur material expenses in research and development activities but do participate in various research and development programs. We address research and development requirements and product enhancement by maintaining a staff of technical support, quality assurance and engineering personnel.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, lawsuits and other disputes arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe the resolution of these matters and the incurrence of their related costs and expenses should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows. While it is not feasible to predict the outcome of all pending suits and claims, the ultimate resolution of these matters as well as future lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or reputation.

Manufacturing and Facilities

Properties

As of December 31, 2009, we operated 20 metal service centers in the Plates and Shapes Group and 14 facilities in the Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group. These facilities use various metals processing and materials handling machinery and equipment. As of the same date, our Building Products Group operated four manufacturing plants where we process metals into various building products and 20 sales centers.

Many of our facilities are capable of being used at higher capacities, if necessary. We believe that our facilities will be adequate for the expected needs of our existing businesses over the next several years. Our metal service center facilities, Building Products sales centers and manufacturing plants, and administrative offices are located and described as follows:

OPERATING FACILITIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009

 

		Location		Square Footage		Owned/Leased
Plates and Shapes Group:
Northeast Plates and Shapes		Baltimore, Maryland		65,000		Leased
		Seekonk, Massachusetts		115,000		Owned
		Newark, New Jersey		81,000		Owned
		Langhorne, Pennsylvania		235,000		Leased
		Philadelphia, Pennsylvania		85,000		Owned
		Philadelphia, Pennsylvania		109,000		Leased
		York, Pennsylvania		109,000		Owned

 

84

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

		Location		Square Footage		Owned/Leased
South Central Plates and Shapes		Enid, Oklahoma		112,000		Owned
		Tulsa, Oklahoma		533,000		Leased
		Muskogee, Oklahoma(1)		229,000		Owned
		Cedar Hill, Texas		150,000		Owned
Mid-Atlantic Plates and Shapes		Oakwood, Georgia		206,000		Owned
		Greensboro, North Carolina		180,000		Owned
Ohio Valley Plates and Shapes		Canton, Ohio		110,000		Owned
		Ambridge, Pennsylvania		200,000		Leased
Southeast Plates and Shapes		Mobile, Alabama		246,000		Owned
		Jacksonville, Florida		60,000		Owned
		Waggaman, Louisiana		371,000		Owned
		Columbus, Mississippi		45,000		Owned
Southwest Plates and Shapes		Hayward, California		64,000		Leased
Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group:
		Anaheim, California		22,000		Leased
		Madison, Illinois		100,000		Owned
		Northbrook, Illinois		187,000		Owned
		Jeffersonville, Indiana		90,000		Owned
		Wichita, Kansas		43,000		Leased
		Walker, Michigan		50,000		Owned
		Liberty, Missouri		117,000		Leased
		Union, New Jersey		39,000		Leased
		Randleman, North Carolina		154,000		Owned
		Springfield, Ohio		105,000		Owned
		Wooster, Ohio		140,000		Owned
		Mesquite, Texas		55,000		Leased
		Germantown, Wisconsin		102,000		Owned
		Horicon, Wisconsin		120,000		Leased
Building Products Group:
Sales Centers		Birmingham, Alabama		12,000		Leased
		Phoenix, Arizona		111,000		Leased
		Hayward, California		24,000		Leased
		Ontario, California		28,000		Leased
		Jacksonville, Florida		17,000		Leased
		Leesburg, Florida		61,000		Leased
		Pensacola, Florida		48,000		Leased
		Stone Mountain, Georgia		14,000		Leased
		Louisville, Kentucky		22,000		Leased
		Kansas City, Missouri		16,000		Leased
		Las Vegas, Nevada		133,000		Leased
		Oklahoma City, Oklahoma		40,000		Leased
		Irmo, South Carolina		38,000		Leased
		Nashville, Tennessee		44,000		Leased
		Houston, Texas		155,000		Leased
		Longview, Texas		15,000		Leased
		Mesquite, Texas		55,000		Leased

 

85

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

		Location		Square Footage		Owned/Leased
		Weslaco, Texas		21,000		Leased
		Salt Lake City, Utah		23,000		Leased
		Kent, Washington		57,000		Leased
Manufacturing Plants		Brea, California		43,000		Leased
		Buena Park, California		168,000		Leased
		Groveland, Florida		247,000		Leased
		Courtland, Ontario		32,000		Owned
Administrative Locations:
Corporate Headquarters		Fort Lauderdale, Florida		4,500		Leased
Corporate Administration		Houston, Texas		13,000		Leased
Building Products Group		Houston, Texas		13,000		Leased
i-Solutions		Ft. Washington, Pennsylvania		4,000		Leased

 

(1)	This facility is subject to liens with respect to specific debt obligations, including IRBs.

 

86

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT

Our executive officers and directors as of the date of this prospectus are as follows. Each is a citizen of the U.S. unless otherwise indicated.

 

Name		Age		Position
Executive Officers:
C. Lourenco Goncalves		51		President and Chief Executive Officer
Robert C. McPherson, III		46		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Keith Koci		45		Senior Vice President—Business Development
Roger Krohn		56		President of the Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group
David A. Martens		57		President of the Plates and Shapes Group—West
William A. Smith II		42		Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Directors:
C. Lourenco Goncalves		51		Director, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Eric L. Press		44		Director
M. Ali Rashid		33		Director(1)
Matthew R. Michelini		28		Director
John T. Baldwin		53		Director(1)

 

(1)	Member of the Audit Committee of Metals USA.

C. Lourenco Goncalves, 51, has been President and Chief Executive Officer and one of Metals USA’s directors since February 2003 and President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Metals USA Holdings since May 1, 2006. Mr. Goncalves served as President and Chief Executive Officer of California Steel Industries, Inc. (“CSI”) from March 1998 to February 2003. From 1981 to 1998, he was employed by Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (“CSN”), where he held positions as a managing director, general superintendent of Volta Redonda Works, hot rolling general manager, cold rolling and coated products general manager, hot strip mill superintendent, continuous casting superintendent and quality control manager. Mr. Goncalves earned a masters of science degree in metallurgical engineering from the Federal University of Minas Gerais and a bachelor’s degree in engineering from the Military Institute of Engineering in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Robert C. McPherson, III, 46, became Senior Vice President of Metals USA on March 31, 2003, Chief Financial Officer of Metals USA on December 1, 2005 and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Metals USA Holdings on May 1, 2006. From August 2004 through November 2005, Mr. McPherson was President of the Building Products Group of Metals USA and from March 2003 to August 2004, Mr. McPherson was Senior Vice President, Business Development of Metals USA. Prior to joining us, Mr. McPherson was employed at CSI from 1989 until March 2003. Mr. McPherson served in a number of capacities at CSI, most recently having served as Treasurer and Controller from 1996 until 2003, Assistant Treasurer from 1992 until 1996, and as Cash Management Administrator from 1989 until 1992.

Keith Koci, 45 became Senior Vice President of Business Development of Metals USA on December 1, 2005 and of Metals USA Holdings on May 1, 2006. Mr. Koci joined us in August 1998 as a regional controller in the Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group, subsequently served as Corporate Director of Budgeting from August 2003 through May 2004, and then served as Vice President and Corporate Controller from May 2004 through November 2005. Mr. Koci is a certified public accountant licensed in the State of Texas. Prior to joining us, Mr. Koci was CFO and Controller for Optimum Nutrition Inc. from 1996 until 1998.

Roger Krohn, 56, became President of the Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group of Metals USA in November of 2003 and is responsible for the operations of our Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group.

 

87

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Mr. Krohn served as President of Krohn Steel Service Center from 1982 until 1998. After we acquired Krohn Steel Service Center in 1998, Mr. Krohn remained as President and General Manager of Metals USA until becoming President of the Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group in November 2003. After attending college, Mr. Krohn served seven years as a pilot in the U.S. Air Force, commissioned as an officer in 1975.

David A. Martens, 57, became President of the Plates and Shapes Group—West of Metals USA in 2005 and is responsible for the operations of our Plates and Shapes Western Region. From 1999 through 2005, Mr. Martens was Vice President of Metals USA’s Plates and Shapes South Central Region. Mr. Martens was employed at Singer Steel, Inc. from 1978 until it was acquired by Uni-Steel, Inc. in 1987. Mr. Martens served in a number of capacities at Uni-Steel, a company later purchased by Metals USA, including Executive Vice President from 1992 to 1997, and President from 1997 to 1999.

William A. Smith II, 42, became Vice President and General Counsel of Metals USA Holdings Corp. on August 10, 2009, and Secretary of Metals USA Holdings Corp. on August 17, 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Smith was employed at Cross Match Technologies, Inc., where he served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from July 2005 to August 2008 and as Director of Corporate Development from September 2006 to August 2008. From June 1999 until June 2005, Mr. Smith was an associate and then a partner of the international law firm DLA Piper, where he specialized in corporate law. Prior to joining DLA Piper, Mr. Smith practiced law in Seoul, Korea, where he represented and counseled multinational corporations engaged in a variety of domestic and international commercial transactions. While in law school, Mr. Smith served as a legal intern with the Committee on Ways and Means of the U.S. House of Representatives. Mr. Smith received a JD from Georgetown University Law Center and an AB from Georgetown University. He is admitted to the bar in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia and is certified by The Florida Bar as an Authorized House Counsel in the State of Florida.

Eric L. Press, 44, became a director of Metals USA Holdings on May 9, 2005 and a director of Metals USA on November 30, 2005. Mr. Press is a partner of Apollo. Prior to joining Apollo in 1998, Mr. Press was associated with the law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers, acquisitions, restructurings and related financing transactions. From 1987 to 1989, Mr. Press was a consultant with The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a management consulting firm focused on corporate strategy. Mr. Press has been engaged in all aspects of Apollo’s lodging, leisure and entertainment investment activities, as well as Apollo’s investments in basic industries and financial services. Mr. Press serves on the boards of directors of Prestige Cruise Holdings, Affinion Group, Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc., Innkeepers USA Trust, Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc., Athene Re and Verso Paper Corp. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of the Rodeph Sholom School in New York City. Mr. Press graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College with an AB in Economics, and from Yale Law School, where he was a Senior Editor of the Yale Law Review.

M. Ali Rashid, 33, became a director of Metals USA Holdings on May 9, 2005 and of Metals USA on November 30, 2005. Mr. Rashid is a partner of Apollo. He has been employed with Apollo since 2000. Prior to that time, Mr. Rashid was employed by the Goldman Sachs Group in the Financial Institutions Group of its Investment Banking Division. Mr. Rashid serves on the board of directors of Noranda Aluminum Holdings Corporation, Quality Distribution and Realogy Corporation. Mr. Rashid received an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business and graduated Magna Cum Laude and Beta Gamma Sigma from Georgetown University with a BS in Business Administration.

Matthew R. Michelini, 28, became a director of Metals USA Holdings on November 21, 2008. Mr. Michelini is an associate at Apollo. He joined Apollo in 2006. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Michelini was a member of the Mergers & Acquisitions group at Lazard Frères & Co. Mr. Michelini also serves

 

88

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

on the Board of Directors of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation. Mr. Michelini graduated from Princeton University with a BS in Mathematics and a Certificate in Finance.

John T. Baldwin, 53, became a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Metals USA Holdings on May 1, 2006 and a director of Metals USA on January 18, 2006. Mr. Baldwin served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Graphic Packaging Corporation from September 2003 to August 2005, and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Worthington Industries, Inc. from December 1998 to September 2003. He joined Worthington, a steel processor, in 1997 as Treasurer. Prior to Worthington, Mr. Baldwin served in various financial capacities at Tenneco Inc. in Greenwich, Connecticut, London, England and Houston, Texas. Mr. Baldwin is a graduate of the University of Houston and the University of Texas School of Law. Mr. Baldwin served on the Board of The Genlyte Group Incorporated, a lighting manufacturer, from March 2003 through January 2008 at which time he resigned from such Board upon the company’s purchase by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. in January, 2008, and was Chairman of the Audit Committee of The Genlyte Group Incorporated from April 2006 through January 2008.

There are no family relationships between any of our executive officers or directors.

The amended and restated investors rights agreement Metals USA Holdings expects to enter into with Apollo and each of our management members will provide that, within 180 days of the consummation of this offering, Apollo may nominate two additional members to our board of directors, and we will be required to increase the size of our board of directors at such time to nine and appoint such nominees to our board of directors. The amended and restated investors rights agreement will also provide that, except as otherwise required by applicable law, Apollo will have the right to nominate (a) four directors as long as Apollo owns (including shares of common stock issuable under the terms of any exchangeable securities issued by us) at least 30% but less than 50% of our outstanding common stock, (b) three directors as long as Apollo owns (including shares of common stock issuable under the terms of any exchangeable securities issued by us) at least 20% but less than 30% of our outstanding common stock and (c) two directors as long as Apollo owns (including shares of common stock issuable under the terms of any exchangeable securities issued by us) at least 10% but less than 20% of our outstanding common stock. In the event that the board of directors increases its size beyond nine members, Apollo’s nomination rights will be proportionately increased, rounded up to the nearest whole number. The amended and restated investors rights agreement will provide that, except as otherwise required by applicable law, we and the management members will take all action within their respective power to cause all such nominees to be included in the slate of nominees recommended by the board of directors to our stockholders for election as directors at each annual meeting of our stockholders and we will use all reasonable efforts to cause the election of each such nominee, including soliciting proxies in favor of the election of such nominees and appointing such nominees to fill vacancies. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement” and “Description of Capital Stock—Composition of Board of Directors; Election and Removal of Directors.”

Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted a “code of ethics” as defined by the applicable rules of the SEC, which has been posted on our Internet website, http://www.metalsusa.com.

Director Independence

The board of directors under current New York Stock Exchange listing standards and taking into account any applicable committee standards, has determined that Mr. Baldwin is an independent director, including as a member of our audit committee. Under current New York Stock Exchange

 

89

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

listing standards, Mr. Goncalves would not be considered independent under any general listing standards or those applicable to any particular committee due to his employment relationship with us, and Messrs. Rashid, Press and Michelini may not be considered independent under any general listing standards or those applicable to any particular committee, due to their relationship with Apollo, our largest stockholder. Upon completion of this offering Apollo will continue to own 50% or more of our common stock. Under New York Stock Exchange listing standards, we would qualify as a “controlled company” and, accordingly, be exempt from its requirements to have a majority of independent directors and a corporate governance and compensation committee composed of a majority of independent directors.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

Upon consummation of this offering, our audit committee will consist of Messrs. Baldwin,                      and                     . Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Baldwin qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and that each of Messrs. Baldwin,                      and                      are independent as independence is defined in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.

The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee are to oversee and monitor the following:

 

Ÿ

our financial reporting process and internal control system;

 

Ÿ

the integrity of our financial statements;

 

Ÿ

the independence, qualifications and performance of our independent auditor;

 

Ÿ

the performance of our internal audit function; and

 

Ÿ

our compliance with legal, ethical and regulatory matters.

Compensation Committee

The current members of the compensation committee are Messrs. Press and Rashid. The principal duties and responsibilities of the compensation committee are as follows:

 

Ÿ

to review, evaluate and make recommendations to our full board of directors regarding our compensation policies and establish performance-based incentives that support our long-term goals, objectives and interests;

 

Ÿ

to review and approve the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, all employees who report directly to our Chief Executive Officer and other members of our senior management;

 

Ÿ

to review and make recommendations to our board of directors with respect to our incentive compensation plans and equity-based compensation plans;

 

Ÿ

to set and review the compensation of and reimbursement policies for members of our board of directors;

 

Ÿ

to provide oversight concerning selection of officers, expense accounts, indemnification and insurance matters, and separation packages; and

 

Ÿ

to prepare an annual compensation committee report, provide regular reports to our board of directors, and take such other actions as are necessary and consistent with the governing law and our organizational documents.

 

90

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

We intend to avail ourselves of the “controlled company” exception under The New York Stock Exchange rules which exempts us from the requirement that we have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors.

Nominating/Governance Committee

The current members of the nominating/corporate governance committee are Messrs. Rashid and Michelini. The principal duties and responsibilities of the nominating/corporate governance committee are as follows:

 

Ÿ

to establish criteria for board and committee membership and recommend to our board of directors proposed nominees for election to the board of directors and for membership on committees of our board of directors; and

 

Ÿ

to make recommendations to our board of directors regarding board governance matters and practices.

We intend to avail ourselves of the “controlled company” exception under The New York Stock Exchange rules which exempts us from the requirement that we have a nominating/governance committee composed entirely of independent directors.

Executive Committee

The current members of the executive committee are Messrs. Goncalves and Rashid. The principal duties and responsibilities of the executive committee are as follows:

 

Ÿ

subject to applicable law, to exercise the powers and the duties of our board of directors between board meetings and while the board of directors is not in session; and

 

Ÿ

to implement the policy decisions of our board of directors.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview of compensation program.    Prior to February 9, 2007, including the entire year of 2006, the board of directors of Metals USA Holdings (currently consisting of the directors of Metals USA and Flag Intermediate), excluding Mr. Goncalves, made all compensation decisions, and as such had the responsibility of establishing and implementing, and monitoring compliance with the Company’s compensation philosophy. On February 9, 2007, the board of directors of Metals USA Holdings established a compensation committee to ensure that the total compensation and benefits paid to or provided to our named executive officers is reasonable, fair, and competitive (hereafter, said board of directors, excluding Mr. Goncalves, and the compensation committee (together with our board of directors where appropriate) are referred to as the “Compensation Committee”). We have also generally continued the compensation arrangements applicable to our named executive officers that were entered into in connection with the Merger.

Compensation philosophy and objectives.    The Compensation Committee believes an effective compensation program should be one that is designed to: attract and retain the best possible executive talent; tie annual and long-term cash and equity incentives to the achievement of measurable corporate, business unit and individual performance objectives; and align named executive officers’ incentives with the creation of stockholder value. To achieve these objectives, the Compensation Committee implements, maintains and monitors compensation plans which tie a substantial portion of the executives’ overall compensation to the achievement of established objective goals, including profitability, workplace safety and the efficient use of capital.

 

91

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Role of executive officers in compensation decisions.    The Compensation Committee makes all compensation decisions for the Chief Executive Officer and all decisions relating to equity- based compensation awards. The Compensation Committee, together with recommendations and input from the Chief Executive Officer, makes non-equity compensation decisions with respect to the other named executive officers.

On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Chief Executive Officer as compared with the achievement of the Company’s objective goals with respect to profitability, workplace safety and the efficient use of capital. The Compensation Committee, together with the Chief Executive Officer, annually reviews the performance of each individual executive as compared with the achievement of Company or operating division goals, as the case may be, together with each executive’s individual goals. The Compensation Committee can then exercise its discretion in making any adjustments or awards to the executives recommended by the Chief Executive Officer. Since 2006, the objective goals for each of the executive officers have paralleled those of the Chief Executive Officer.

Setting executive compensation.    Based on the above objectives and philosophies, the Compensation Committee has established annual and long-term cash and equity compensation components to motivate the executives to achieve, and hopefully exceed, the business goals established by the Company and to fairly reward such executives for achieving such goals. Neither the Compensation Committee nor management retained a compensation consultant in the last fiscal year or thus far in 2010 to review our policies and procedures with respect to executive compensation, and the compensation committee has not engaged in any type of compensation benchmarking.

Components of Executive Compensation

For fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, the principal components of compensation for our executives are described below:

Base salary.    We provide executives and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year. Base salaries are set to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of the executives in their respective roles. The executives’ current levels of base salary reflect their arms-length negotiations and agreements with the Company. Base salaries are reviewed annually and are adjusted from time to time to realign salaries to take into account individual responsibilities, performance and experience, including the terms of any agreements we have in place with such executive officers.

Performance-based executive incentive compensation plans.    An Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the “EICP”) was established by the board of directors of Metals USA Holdings in early 2006. The EICP establishes objectives for the calculation of annual cash bonuses for each executive, subject to Compensation Committee oversight and modification. The EICP provides for annual incentive bonuses which are intended to compensate officers for achieving or exceeding Company and/or operating group financial and operational goals and for achieving individual annual performance goals. Incentives under the EICP are paid in cash and are typically paid in a single installment in the first quarter following the completion of a given fiscal year.

Target bonuses are 110% of base salary for Mr. Goncalves and 70% of base salary for each of Messrs. McPherson, Krohn, Martens, Koci and Hageman. The EICP uses a sliding scale applied to objective performance targets with corresponding achievement levels. For Messrs. Krohn and Martens, these performance metrics are split between the Company’s achievement and that of the operating group which they lead.

The performance metrics and target performance levels that were established under the EICP in respect of fiscal 2009 for each executive were based on the achievement of certain EBITDA and safety

 

92

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

targets. Bonus potentials range from a low of zero with no upper limit. Target bonus as to 55% of each executive’s base salary (or 95%, in the case of Mr. Goncalves) was dependent on the achievement of EBITDA targets. For Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Koci and Hageman, those EBITDA targets were measured by Company performance, and for Messrs. Martens and Krohn those targets were measured in approximately equal parts by Company performance and by the performance of the Company’s Plates and Shapes Group and Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group, respectively, which we refer to as the “Group EBITDA.” Target bonus as to 15% of each executive’s base salary was dependent on the achievement of safety goals (as measured by the Company’s Total Recordable Incident Rate calculated in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines, which we refer to as “TRIR”), which, for Messrs. Martens and Krohn included the safety records of their respective Groups. The TRIR for a given period of time is equal to the total man hours worked during such period divided by 200,000 divided by the total number of “OSHA Recordable Injuries” (as defined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines) incurred. Under the terms of the EICP, for purposes of the portion of annual bonus payable in respect of the safety metric, TRIR of 2.5 would result in a bonus of 100% of the safety metric target. For purposes of the portion of the annual bonus payable under the EICP in respect of EBITDA targets, Company EBITDA of $160.0 million (and, in the case of Messrs. Martens and Krohn, Group EBITDA of $64 million and $35 million, respectively) would have resulted in payment of 100% of the bonus target dependent on that metric. No bonus in respect of the safety or EBITDA performance metric would have been payable if minimum performance levels were not achieved. Two-thirds of the 2009 incentive payment attributable to achievement of Company EBITDA targets in fiscal 2009 would have been paid in a single cash installment in the first quarter of 2010. The remaining one-third of the 2009 incentive payment attributable to achievement of Company EBITDA targets in fiscal 2009 remains subject to achievement of additional Company EBITDA targets during the first six months of 2010.

In 2009, minimum EBITDA targets were not achieved and therefore no bonus is payable for 2009 in respect of EBITDA performance. The Company will pay bonuses under the EICP in respect of safety performance in fiscal 2009 to each of Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Martens, Krohn, Koci and Hageman, the amounts of which are disclosed below in column (g) of the Summary Compensation Table. The EBITDA component and safety component of the bonus payments to Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Martens, Krohn, Koci and Hageman is set forth in the following table:

 

		EBITDA component of 2009 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation			Safety component of 2009 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation			Total 2009 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
C. Lourenco Goncalves		$	0		$	101,813		$	101,813
Robert C. McPherson III		$	0		$	50,499		$	50,499
Keith Koci		$	0		$	43,169		$	43,169
David A. Martens		$	0		$	57,348		$	57,348
Roger Krohn		$	0		$	44,521		$	44,521
John A. Hageman		$	0		$	17,941		$	17,941

For the Company’s fiscal year 2010, target annual bonus amounts continue to be 110% of base salary for Mr. Goncalves and 70% of base salary for Messrs. McPherson, Martens, Koci and Krohn. The 2010 performance metrics under the EICP have not yet been determined.

The Compensation Committee has reserved the right under the EICP to also pay “discretionary” bonuses. Such discretionary bonuses are paid if the Compensation Committee determines that a particular executive has exceeded the objectives and/or goals established for such executive or made a unique contribution to the Company during the year. In February 2009, a Supplemental Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (“Supplemental EICP”) was established for certain executive officers at

 

93

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Supplemental EICP provides for a cash incentive bonus payable in February 2011, based upon the achievement of a cumulative EBITDA target for fiscal years 2009 and 2010. The maximum amount that can be earned collectively by all executive officers in the plan is $498,750 (consisting of a maximum of $150,000 for Mr. Goncalves, $75,000 for Mr. McPherson, $37,500 for Mr. Hageman, $56,250 for Mr. Krohn, $67,500 for Mr. Martens, $56,250 for Mr. Koci, and $56,250 for others). The maximum amounts were determined by the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis. In order for any participant to achieve the maximum amount, cumulative EBITDA targets must be achieved for fiscal 2009 and 2010. If minimum cumulative EBITDA targets for fiscal years 2009 and 2010 are not achieved, there will be no cash payout.

Equity program; stock options and restricted stock.    Under the 2005 Plan, the Compensation Committee may make various types of awards with respect to Metals USA Holdings’ common stock. While Metals USA Holdings is a privately held company, its common stock, including any stock issued or obtained pursuant to the 2005 Plan, has transfer restrictions. The maximum amount of common stock that can be issued (or in respect of which awards can be issued) under the 2005 Plan is 1.4 million shares. Among other things, the Compensation Committee decides which of our executives, employees, directors or, with the consent of the Chief Executive Officer, consultants will receive awards under the 2005 Plan and the type of award made. In the case of stock options granted under the 2005 Plan, the Compensation Committee determines the strike price, vesting terms, and other applicable terms or conditions it may determine, in its sole discretion, provided such terms and conditions are allowed under the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan has two tranches of options: Tranche A and Tranche B. Tranche A options vest on a pro-rata basis over five years, have a term of ten years from date of grant, and expire if not exercised. Tranche B options, which include both a service and a performance condition, vest on the eighth anniversary of the date of grant or earlier depending on the achievement of certain performance targets, have a term of ten years from date of grant, and expire if not exercised. All of the awards of stock options and restricted stock granted to management under the 2005 Plan were granted on the effective date of the Merger, except for one. A March 17, 2006 award of stock options and restricted stock was received by Mr. Goncalves in connection with his exercise of certain of his options granted at the effective date of the Merger pursuant to the terms of such options. Awards granted to our board of directors were made in January 2006, at which time they were granted 40,000 non-qualified options to purchase shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock at fair market value which vest ratably over five years.

The exercise price for the option awards is the fair market value of the stock of Metals USA Holdings on the date of grant, subject to certain adjustments after the grant date to preserve the proportional interests of the awards in the event of a change in capitalization. The fair market value is determined using a combination of discounted cash flows and financial metrics from companies with similar characteristics of Metals USA Holdings. No inside information was taken into account in determining the number of options previously awarded or the exercise price for those awards, and we did not “time” the release of any material non-public information to affect the value of those awards.

The Compensation Committee believes that the granting of awards under the 2005 Plan promotes, on a short-term and long-term basis, an enhanced personal interest and alignment of interests of those executives receiving equity awards with the goals and strategies of the Company. The Compensation Committee also believes that the equity grants provide not only financial rewards to such executives for achieving Company goals but also provide additional incentives for executives to remain with the Company. While we do not have any formal policies regarding executive security ownership requirements or recovery of performance-based awards, our equity awards are generally subject to the restrictions set forth in the Investor Rights Agreement as described in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—Investors Rights Agreement.”

In connection with the dividend of $25 million paid to our stockholders of record as of May 23, 2006, which we paid on May 24, 2006, which we refer to as the “May 2006 dividend,” and pursuant to

 

94

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

the 2005 Plan’s provisions of rights preservation, the Compensation Committee modified the outstanding employee stock options by reducing the per share exercise price by $1.78 to $8.22 (to $8.89, in the case of Mr. Goncalves’ March 17, 2006 grant) in order to maintain the participants’ rights proportionate with those prior to the dividend payment. In connection with the dividend paid to Metals USA Holdings’ stockholders in January 2007, the outstanding employee stock options under the 2005 Plan were adjusted a second time. The per share exercise price of the options granted on the effective date of the Merger was decreased by $4.22 to $4.00 and the per share exercise price of the options granted on March 17, 2006, to Mr. Goncalves was reduced by $4.89 to $4.00. Option holders received an amount equal to the excess of the per share amount of the dividend over the amount of such exercise price reduction as a cash payment with respect to shares underlying vested options and as a contribution to a non-qualified deferred compensation plan with respect to shares underlying unvested options, as more fully described below in the section entitled “—Non-qualified deferred compensation plan.” Because the payment of the second special dividend discussed above resulted in the achievement of the applicable performance targets, all of the outstanding Tranche B options under the 2005 Plan vested.

In connection with the dividend paid to Metals USA Holdings’ stockholders in July 2007, option holders received a cash payment equal to the per share amount of the dividend, approximately $9.25 per share subject to options, on all vested and unvested options held by the option holders.

Non-qualified deferred compensation plan.    As discussed above in the section entitled “—Equity program; stock options and restricted stock,” in connection with the January 2007 dividend and vesting of certain Metals USA Holdings’ options, the reduction in the exercise price for outstanding options was less than the amount of the dividend per share. Accordingly, a deferred compensation plan was created and an amount approximately equal to the excess of the amount of the dividend per share over $4.22 (in the case of Mr. Goncalves, $4.89) was credited to a deferred compensation account under the plan for holders of unvested options in respect of each share underlying such options. Holders of vested options received such amount in cash. Payment of a total of $2.3 million to our senior management under the deferred compensation plan was subject to continued employment for two years following the modification date (January 3, 2007). Such amount was paid in January 2009, in accordance with the terms of the deferred compensation plan.

The Compensation Committee made contributions to the deferred compensation accounts of certain named executive officers in 2008. The contributions were for the purpose of rewarding individual executive officers for their 2008 performance and for retention purposes. Total contributions amounted to $166,250, and are subject to continued employment through January 1, 2010. The Company contributed to the accounts of Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Hageman, Krohn, Koci and Martens. The amounts were determined by the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis.

401(k) plan.    Our executive officers are eligible to participate in our companywide 401(k) plan for salaried employees. Historically and through August 2009, the Company matched the first 2% of annual compensation contributed by participating employees. The Company indefinitely suspended its matching payments in September 2009 except with respect to participating employees to whom such matching payments constitute a contractual obligation pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement.

Perquisites and other personal benefits.    We provide the executives, including other employees generally, with perquisites and other personal benefits that we and the Compensation Committee believe are reasonable, competitive and which are consistent with the overall compensation program to enable us to attract and retain qualified employees for key positions. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the perquisites and other benefits provided to the executives, as well as the other employees.

 

95

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Tax treatment.    We consider the anticipated tax treatment of our executive compensation program when setting levels and types of compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the “Code,” generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation paid to a company’s chief executive officer or any of its other three most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Financial Officer in excess of $1 million in any year, with certain performance-based compensation being specifically exempt from this deduction limit. Compensation received under the EICP is performance-based, and therefore qualifies for the exemption from the deduction limit. In addition, compensation received in connection with stock and stock option awards granted under the 2005 Plan is also performance-based, and qualifies for the exemption from the deduction limit. As such, during 2008, none of our employees subject to this limit received compensation in excess of $1 million, other than performance-based compensation. Consequently, the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code did not affect the tax deductions available to us in connection with our senior executive compensation program for 2008, and we do not expect such requirements to affect the tax deductions available to us in connection with our senior executive compensation program for 2009.

Conclusion.    We believe that our compensation policies are designed to reasonably and fairly motivate, retain and reward our executives for achieving our objectives and goals.

We have reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Registration Statement on Form S-1, and we met and held discussions with the company’s management with respect to that portion of this Registration Statement on Form S-1. Based upon our review and discussions with management, we recommended to the Board of Directors the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis appearing in this Registration Statement on Form S-1.

Respectfully submitted,

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

M. Ali Rashid, Chairman

Eric L. Press

 

96

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by each of the named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

(a)		(b)		(c)			(d)			(e)			(f)			(g)			(h)			(i)
Name and Principal Position		Year		Salary			Bonus (1)			Stock Awards (2)			Option Awards (3)			Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4)			All Other Compensation (5)			Total
C. Lourenco Goncalves		2009		$	625,000		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	101,813		$	115,748		$	842,561
President and Chief Executive Officer		2008			625,000			112,750			—			—			1,172,250			42,572			1,952,572
		2007			600,000			—			—			—			540,916			5,918,878			7,059,794
Robert C. McPherson III		2009			310,000			—			—			—			50,499			16,872			377,371
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2008			310,000			—			—			—			358,236			19,116			687,352
		2007			300,000			—			—			—			178,295			804,514			1,282,809
Roger Krohn		2009			280,000			—			—			—			44,521			14,433			338,954
President Flat Rolled and Non-Ferrous Group		2008			280,000			—			—			—			327,497			18,762			626,259
		2007			280,000			—			—			—			206,302			746,276			1,232,578
David A. Martens		2009			270,000			—			—			—			57,348			12,486			339,834
President Plates and Shapes Group—West		2008			260,000			138,974			—			—			311,026			15,979			725,979
		2007			260,000			—			—			—			213,082			227,227			700,309
Keith Koci		2009			265,000			—			—			—			43,169			75,360			383,529
Senior Vice President - Business Development		2008			265,000			43,766			—			—			306,234			36,623			651,623
		2007			240,000			—			—			—			142,636			197,698			580,334
John A. Hageman(6)		2009			115,385			—			—			—			17,941			205,398			338,724
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer		2008			300,000			—			—			—			346,680			36,022			682,702
		2007			300,000			—			—			—			178,295			992,073			1,470,368
(retired)

 

(1)	The amounts in column (d) reflect the amount attributable to annual bonus paid to the named executive officers based on the discretion of the Compensation Committee, which is discussed further under “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

(2)	The amounts in column (e) reflect the fair value of stock awards granted in fiscal years ending December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of which there were no awards granted during those periods.

(3)	The amounts in column (f) reflect the fair value of option awards granted in fiscal years ending December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of which there were no awards granted during those periods.

(4)	The amounts in column (g) reflect the cash awards to the named executive officers under the EICP, which is discussed further under “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

(5)	The amounts in column (h) reflect the following for each named executive officer for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009:

 

Name		Total Perquisites and Personal Benefits
C. Lourenco Goncalves		$	115,748
Robert C. McPherson III			16,872
Roger Krohn			14,433
David A. Martens			12,486
Keith Koci			75,360
John A. Hageman			205,398

Perquisites and personal benefits consist of the following:

 

Ÿ

the amount attributable to Company payments for personal use of automobiles;

 

Ÿ

the amounts attributable to Company reimbursements for club dues payable by the named executive officer;

 

Ÿ

the amount of income taxes paid by the Company on behalf of the named executive officer for automobile allowances and club dues; and

 

Ÿ

the amounts attributable to Company reimbursements for medical insurance premiums and life insurance premiums.

 

None of the individual amounts attributable to each such perquisites or benefits exceeds the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites for each named executive officer, except for $75,413 paid to Mr. Goncalves attributable to Company reimbursements for club dues and the amount of income taxes paid by the Company for such dues, and $61,683 paid to Mr. Koci as reimbursement for actual relocation costs. The amount paid to John A. Hageman includes $184,616 of severance costs.

 

(6)	On May 14, 2009, John A. Hageman resigned from his position as Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Metals USA Holdings Corp. effective as of the same date.

 

97

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

(a)		(b)		(c)			(d)			(e)			(f)		(g)		(h)		(i)
		Grant Date		Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)									All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
Name				Threshold			Target			Maximum
C. Lourenco Goncalves		—		$	—		$	687,500		$	1,209,375		—		—		—		—
Robert C. McPherson III		—			—			217,000			376,650		—		—		—		—
Roger Krohn		—			—			196,000			340,200		—		—		—		—
David A. Martens		—			—			189,000			328,050		—		—		—		—
Keith Koci		—			—			185,500			321,975		—		—		—		—
John A. Hageman		—			—			210,000			364,500		—		—		—		—

 

 

(1)

The amounts shown in column (c) reflect the minimum payment level under the Metals USA Holdings’ Annual Incentive Bonus Plan for 2009, which was zero. The Plan did not have a maximum limit with respect to profitability objectives. For purposes of calculating the maximum presented in column (e), a 200% achievement level was assumed. It was not likely that a 200% achievement level would have been met, and it was not met for 2009. These amounts are based on the individual’s current salary and position, and do not take into account amounts attributable to Supplemental EICP grants, as discussed in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

The 2005 Plan

In connection with the Merger, Metals USA Holdings adopted the 2005 Plan, which was amended and restated by Metals USA Holdings on January 18, 2006, under which Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Krohn, Martens, Koci, Hageman and other management participants are eligible to receive awards of stock options for common stock of Metals USA Holdings. Pursuant to option agreements entered into that are subject to the terms of the 2005 Plan, Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Krohn, Martens, Koci and Hageman have been granted options under the 2005 Plan, effective at the effective time of the Merger, and Mr. Goncalves was granted additional options under the 2005 Plan on March 17, 2006. The number of options to be granted to each of Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Krohn, Martens, Koci and Hageman and the date of vesting and pricing of such options are more fully described below under “—Management Agreements with Metals USA and Related Stock Option Grants from Metals USA Holdings.” Under the 2005 Plan, awards may be granted to employees or directors of, or consultants to, us, or any of our subsidiaries, except that consultants may only receive awards with the consent of our Chief Executive Officer. The 2005 Plan has a term of ten years. The date of grant, vesting and pricing of options granted under the 2005 Plan are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee. In addition, Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Hageman, Krohn, Martens and Koci and a limited number of other management participants have also received awards of restricted shares of common stock of Metals USA Holdings granted under the 2005 Plan. Messrs. Goncalves, McPherson, Krohn, Koci, Martens and Hageman have been granted 39,600, 5,500, 4,900, 0, 1,600 and 8,000 restricted shares, respectively, pursuant to restricted stock agreements entered into at the effective time of the Merger that are subject to the terms of the 2005 Plan, all of which were fully vested as of December 31, 2009.

See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above and Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the 2005 Plan.

Management Agreements with Metals USA and Related Stock Option Grants from Metals USA Holdings

Each of Messrs. Goncalves, Hageman and McPherson has an employment agreement and each of Messrs. Krohn and Martens has a severance agreement with Metals USA.

Mr. Goncalves’ employment agreement.    Under his employment agreement, Mr. Goncalves serves as Metals USA’s President and Chief Executive Officer for an initial term of five years following

 

98

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

the effective date of the Merger. The initial term will automatically be renewed for successive one-year periods unless 90 days’ prior notice of termination is given by either party. In addition, Mr. Goncalves is a member of our board of directors. He receives an annual base salary of $625,000.

In addition, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Goncalves received two stock option grants at the effective time of the Merger to purchase shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share. The first grant was for options to purchase 407,960 shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock and expires ten years after the grant date. Pursuant to his stock option agreements, the options were classified as Tranche A options or Tranche B options. The Tranche A options cover 203,980 of the shares subject to the options, and 20% of these options vest and become exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date, except that vesting will accelerate on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of a sale of the Company and a termination without “cause,” a resignation for “good reason” (in each case as defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Goncalves’ death or disability after a sale of the Company. Tranche B includes the remaining 203,980 shares subject to this first grant of options and is fully vested. The second grant was for options to purchase 18,800 shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock and was fully vested as of the grant date and exercisable on or before March 30, 2006. Mr. Goncalves exercised his options subject to the second grant on March 17, 2006. Pursuant to his option agreement, upon such exercise on March 17, 2006, Mr. Goncalves received an additional grant of options to purchase 40,790 shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $10.67 per share. These additional options are allocated equally into Tranches A and B. The Tranche A options are subject to similar vesting specifications as the first grant of Tranche A options to purchase 407,960 shares of Metals USA Holdings discussed above, and the second grant of Tranche B options is fully vested.

In connection with the May 2006 dividend, the exercise price of the employee stock options granted on the effective time of the Merger was reduced to $8.22 and the exercise price of the options granted on March 17, 2006 was reduced to $8.89. In connection with the January 2007 dividend, the exercise price of the outstanding employee stock options under the 2005 Plan was adjusted a second time. The per share exercise price of the options granted on the effective time of the Merger was decreased by $4.22 to $4.00 and the per share exercise price of the options granted on March 17, 2006, was reduced by $4.89 to $4.00. With respect to his vested options, a cash payment was made to Mr. Goncalves approximating the excess of the dividend amount over the amount of such exercise price reduction (including as to all Tranche B options, which vested based on the achievement of the applicable performance metrics). With respect to his unvested options, an amount approximating the balance of the dividend was credited to a deferred compensation account, distribution of which was subject to continued employment through January 3, 2009, and which amount was paid in January 2009. In connection with the July 2007 dividend, Mr. Goncalves received on all of his vested and unvested options a cash payment of $9.25 per share underlying such options, an amount equal to the per share amount of the dividend. Further, Mr. Goncalves received a grant of 36,000 restricted shares at the effective time of the Merger and an additional 3,600 upon the exercise of the options to purchase 18,800 shares discussed above, which vested immediately. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Goncalves is provided employee benefits equal to or greater than those provided to him by us prior to the Merger. Upon Mr. Goncalves’ termination of employment by us “without cause” or by Mr. Goncalves for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the award agreement) or upon our election not to renew his employment, Mr. Goncalves will be entitled to receive the following severance payments and benefits: all accrued salary and bonus earned but not yet paid, a pro rata bonus for the year in which the termination occurs based on actual performance, a lump sum payment equal to twelve months of his base salary, monthly payments equal to one-twelfth of his annual base salary beginning with the thirteenth month following the date of his termination of employment, until the twenty-fourth month following his date of termination of employment (or if sooner, upon his material violation of the terms of his employment agreement), and the reimbursement for the cost of COBRA Continuation coverage for a period of up to eighteen months. Additionally, Mr. Goncalves will be

 

99

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

subject to certain restrictions on his ability to compete with us or solicit our customers or employees for two years after his termination. Mr. Goncalves’ employment agreement may also be terminated for cause.

Mr. Hageman’s employment agreement.    Under his employment agreement, Mr. Hageman served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer and administrative officer for an initial term of two years following the effective time of the Merger, which initial term was automatically renewed for successive one-year periods pursuant to the employment agreement. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Hageman received an annual base salary of $300,000 and was eligible for an annual bonus of 70% of his base salary if we achieved specified performance objectives.

In addition, at the effective time of the Merger, Mr. Hageman received a stock option grant to purchase 73,000 shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share that expires ten years after the grant date. Pursuant to his non-qualified stock option agreement, 36,500 of these options were classified as Tranche A Options and 20% of these options were to vest and become exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date, except that vesting would accelerate on the earlier of the one year anniversary of our sale and a termination “without cause”, a resignation for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the award agreement) or Mr. Hageman’s death or disability after our sale. The remaining 36,500 options were classified as Tranche B Options and are fully vested.

In connection with the May 2006 dividend, the exercise price of the employee stock options was reduced to $8.22. In connection with the January 2007 dividend, the exercise price of the outstanding employee stock options under the 2005 Plan was adjusted a second time. The per share exercise price of the options granted on the effective time of the Merger was decreased by $4.22 to $4.00. With respect to his vested options, a cash payment was made to Mr. Hageman approximating the balance of the dividend (including all Tranche B options, which vested based on the achievement of the applicable performance metrics). With respect to his unvested options, an amount approximating the excess of the amount of the dividend over the amount of such exercise price reduction was credited to a deferred compensation account, distribution of which was subject to continued employment through January 3, 2009, and which amount was paid in January 2009. In connection with the July 2007 dividend, Mr. Hageman received on all of his vested and unvested options a cash payment of $9.25 per share underlying such options, an amount equal to the per share amount of the dividend. In addition, Mr. Hageman received a grant of 8,000 restricted shares on the effective date of the Merger, which vested immediately.

Under the employment agreement, Mr. Hageman was provided employee benefits equal to those provided to him by us prior to the Merger. Upon his termination of employment by us without “cause” or by Mr. Hageman for “good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreement), or upon our election not to renew his employment, the employment agreement provided that Mr. Hageman would be entitled to the following severance payments and benefits: all accrued salary and bonus earned but not paid, a pro rata bonus for the year in which the termination occurs, his annual base salary for a period of eighteen months following his termination of employment or, at our election, a lump sum payment equal to eighteen months of annual base salary (such payments to cease (or be repaid by Mr. Hageman on a pro rata basis in the case of a lump sum payment) if he violates the terms of his employment agreement prior to such time), and the reimbursement for the cost of COBRA Continuation coverage for a period of up to eighteen months. Additionally, the employment agreement provided Mr. Hageman will be subject to certain restrictions on his ability to compete with us for eighteen months or solicit our customers or employees for two years after his termination of employment.

Mr. Hageman’s separation agreement and general release.    On May 14, 2009, Mr. Hageman resigned from his position as Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Metals USA Holdings

 

100

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Corp. effective as of the same date. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Hageman entered into a separation agreement and general release. Pursuant to such separation agreement and general release, Mr. Hageman is receiving 18 months of base salary, a pro-rata portion of his 2009 annual bonus, if any, based on actual performance, and reimbursement of the cost of COBRA continuation coverage for up to 18 months. In addition, the separation agreement provides that Mr. Hageman’s unvested stock options were forfeited as of his resignation date pursuant to their terms (and his vested options would remain outstanding pursuant to their terms, which generally provide that the options will expire 180 days following termination). Under the separation agreement, Mr. Hageman will be subject to certain restrictions on his ability to compete with us for eighteen months or solicit our customers or employees for two years after his termination of employment.

Mr. McPherson’s employment agreement.    Under his employment agreement, Mr. McPherson serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for an initial term of two years following the effective time of the Merger. The initial term will automatically be renewed for successive one-year periods unless 90 days’ prior notice of termination is given by either party. Mr. McPherson receives an annual base salary of $310,000 and is eligible for an annual bonus of 70% of his base salary if we achieve specified performance objectives.

In addition, at the effective date of the Merger, Mr. McPherson received a stock option grant to purchase 50,415 shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share that expires ten years after the grant date. Pursuant to his non-qualified stock option agreement, 25,207 of these options are classified as Tranche A Options, and 20% of these options will vest and become exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date, except that vesting will accelerate on the earlier of the one year anniversary of our sale and a termination “without cause”, a resignation for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the award agreement) or Mr. McPherson’s death or disability after our sale. The remaining 25,208 options are classified as Tranche B Options and are fully vested.

In connection with the May 2006 dividend, the exercise price of the employee stock options was reduced to $8.22. In connection with the January 2007 dividend, the exercise price of the outstanding employee stock options under the 2005 Plan was adjusted a second time. The per share exercise price of the options granted on the effective time of the Merger was decreased by $4.22 to $4.00. With respect to his vested options, a cash payment was made to Mr. McPherson approximating the excess of the amount of the dividend over the amount of such exercise price reduction (including all Tranche B options, which vested based on the achievement of the applicable performance metrics). With respect to his unvested options, an amount approximating the balance of the dividend was credited to a deferred compensation account, distribution of which was subject to continued employment through January 3, 2009, and which amount was paid in January 2009. In connection with the July 2007 dividend, Mr. McPherson received on all of his vested and unvested options a cash payment of $9.25 per share underlying such options, an amount equal to the per share amount of the dividend.

In addition, on the effective date of the Merger, Mr. McPherson received a grant of 5,500 restricted shares, which shares vested on the second anniversary of the Merger. Mr. McPherson is provided employee benefits equal to those provided to him by us prior to the Merger.

Upon Mr. McPherson’s termination of employment by us without “cause” or by Mr. McPherson for “good reason” (each as defined in the employment agreement) or upon our election not to renew his employment, Mr. McPherson will be entitled to receive the same severance payments as set forth in Mr. Hageman’s employment agreement and described above. Additionally, Mr. McPherson will be subject to certain restrictions on his ability to compete with us for eighteen months or solicit our customers or employees for two years after his termination of employment. Mr. McPherson’s employment agreement may also be terminated for cause.

 

101

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Mr. Krohn’s severance agreement.    Under his severance agreement, upon his termination of employment by us without “cause” or by Mr. Krohn for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the severance agreement), Mr. Krohn will be entitled to the following severance payments and benefits: his annual base salary for a period of twelve months following his termination of employment (such payments to cease if he violates any material terms of his severance agreement prior to such time) and the reimbursement for the cost of COBRA Continuation coverage for a period of up to twelve months. Additionally, Mr. Krohn will be subject to certain restrictions on his ability to compete with us for one year (or two years in the event that his employment is terminated for cause or he resigns without good reason) and to solicit our customers or employees for two years after his termination.

In addition, pursuant to a stock option agreement with Metals USA Holdings, Mr. Krohn received a stock option grant on the effective time of the Merger at the effective time of the Merger, to purchase 47,250 shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share that expires ten years after the grant date. Pursuant to his non-qualified stock option agreement, 23,625 of these options are classified as Tranche A Options, 20% of which vest and become exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date, except that vesting will accelerate upon our sale. The remaining 23,625 options are classified as Tranche B Options and are fully vested.

In connection with the May 2006 dividend, the exercise price of the stock options was reduced to $8.22. In connection with the January 2007 dividend, the exercise price of the outstanding employee stock options under the 2005 Plan was adjusted a second time. The per share exercise price of the options granted on the effective time of the Merger was decreased by $4.22 to $4.00. With respect to his vested options, a cash payment was made to Mr. Krohn approximating the excess of the amount of the dividend over the amount of such exercise price reduction (including all Tranche B options, which vested based on the achievement of the applicable performance metrics). With respect to his unvested options, an amount approximating the balance of the dividend was credited to a deferred compensation account, distribution of which was subject to continued employment through January 3, 2009, and which amount was paid in January 2009. In connection with the July 2007 dividend, Mr. Krohn received on all of his vested and unvested options a cash payment of $9.25 per share underlying such options, an amount equal to the per share amount of the dividend.

Further, pursuant to a restricted stock agreement with Metals USA Holdings, on the effective date of the Merger, Mr. Krohn received a grant of 4,900 restricted shares, which shares vested on the second anniversary of the Merger.

Mr. Martens’ severance agreement.    Under his severance agreement, upon his termination of employment by us without “cause” or by Mr. Martens for “good reason” as those terms are defined in the severance agreement, Mr. Martens will be entitled to the following severance payments and benefits: his annual base salary for a period of twelve months following his termination of employment (such payments to cease if he violates any material terms of his severance agreement prior to such time) and the reimbursement for the cost of COBRA Continuation coverage for a period of up to twelve months. Additionally, Mr. Martens will be subject to certain restrictions on his ability to compete with us for one year (or two years in the event that his employment is terminated for cause or he resigns without good reason) and to solicit our customers or employees for two years after his termination.

In addition, pursuant to a stock option agreement with Metals USA Holdings, Mr. Martens received a stock option grant, at the effective time of the Merger, to purchase 13,126 shares of Metals USA Holdings’ common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share that will expire ten years after the grant date. Pursuant to his non-qualified stock option agreement, 6,563 of these options are classified as Tranche A Options, 20% of which will vest and become exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date, except that vesting will accelerate upon our sale. The remaining 6,563 options are classified as Tranche B Options and are fully vested.

 

102

---

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

In connection with the May 2006 dividend, the exercise price of the employee stock options was reduced to $8.22. In connection with the January 2007 dividend, the exercise price of the outstanding employee stock options under the 2005 Plan was adjusted a second time. The per share exercise price of the options granted on the effective time of the Merger was decreased by $4.22 to $4.00. With respect to his vested options, a cash payment was made to Mr. Martens approximating the excess of the amount of the dividend over the amount of such exercise price reduction (including all Tranche B options, which vested based on the achievement of the applicable performance metrics). With respect to his unvested options, an amount approximating the balance of the dividend was credited to a deferred compensation account, distribution of which was subject to continued employment through January 3, 2009, and which amount was paid in January 2009. In connection with the July 2007 dividend, Mr. Martens received on all of his vested and unvested options a cash payment of $9.25 per share underlying such options, an amount equal to the per share amount of the dividend.

Further, pursuant to a restricted stock agreement with Metals USA Holdings, on the effective date of the Merger, Mr. Martens received a grant of 1,600 restricted shares, which shares vested on the second anniversary of the Merger.

Bonus Plan

See “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a discussion of our EICP.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options — Exercisable

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options — Unexercisable

Option Exercise Price

Option Expiration Date

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

Market Value of Shares or Units of Sto