UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
¨
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
 
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
 
OR
 
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ___________
 
¨
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 333-7480
INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Bachoco Industries
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
 
The United Mexican States
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
Avenida Tecnológico No. 401
Ciudad Industrial C.P. 38010
Celaya, Guanajuato, México
(Address of principal executive offices)

Daniel Salazar Ferrer
Avenida Tecnológico No. 401
Ciudad Industrial C.P. 38010
Celaya, Guanajuato, México
Telephone: (+011-52-461-618-3555)
Facsimile: (+011-52-461-611-6502)
Email: inversionistas@bachoco.net
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
American Depositary Shares, each representing twelve Series B Shares.
 
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
 
Indicate the number of outstanding Shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
Series B Capital Stock: 600,000,000 Shares
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
 
Yes ¨No x
 
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
Yes xNo ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
 
Yes xNo ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer ¨   Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
 
U.S. GAAP ¨  
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ¨ 
  Other x
 
If “Other has been checked in resonse to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the reigstrant has elected to follow:
 
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 ¨Item 18 x
 
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨No x

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 23 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by the court.
 
Yes ¨ No ¨
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
Page
PART I
   
       
 
ITEM 1.
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
1
 
ITEM 2.
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
1
 
ITEM 3.
Key Information
1
 
ITEM 4.
Information on the Company
10
 
ITEM 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
25
 
ITEM 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
39
 
ITEM 7.
Major Stockholders and Related Party Transactions
46
 
ITEM 8.
Financial Information
48
 
ITEM 9.
The Offer and Listing
50
 
ITEM 10.
Additional Information
53
 
ITEM 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
69
 
ITEM 12.
Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
70
       
PART II
   
     
 
ITEM 13.
Default, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
70
 
ITEM 14.
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
70
 
ITEM 15.
Controls and Procedures
71
 
ITEM 16.
[Reserved]
73
 
ITEM 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
73
 
ITEM 16B.
Code of Ethics
73
 
ITEM 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
73
 
ITEM 16D.
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
74
 
ITEM 16E.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
74
       
PART III
   
     
 
ITEM 17.
Financial Statements
74
 
ITEM 18.
Financial Statements
74
 
ITEM 19.
Exhibits
74
 
Index of Exhibits
75

i


Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. is a holding company with no operations other than holding the stock of its subsidiaries. On April 2, 2007, we changed our name from Industrias Bachoco S.A. de C.V. to Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V., by operation of law and amended article one of our by laws. Our principal operating subsidiary is Bachoco, S.A. de C.V. (“BSACV”), which owns the principal operating assets of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and accounted for 87.7% of consolidated total assets on December 31, 2007. References herein to “Bachoco,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “its” or the “Company” are, unless the context requires otherwise, to Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries as a whole.
 
We are incorporated under the laws of the United Mexican States (México), and all of our operations are in México. Our principal executive offices are located at Avenida Tecnológico No. 401, Ciudad Industrial C.P. 38010, Celaya, Guanajuato, México, and our telephone number is (011) (52) (461) 618-3555.
 
Presentation of Information
 
We publish our financial statements in Mexican pesos and present our financial statements in accordance with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (“Mexican FRS”). Until December 31, 2007, Mexican FRS required restatement of all financial statements to constant pesos as of the date of the most recent balance sheet presented.
 
Except as otherwise indicated, all data in both the financial statements included below in Item 18 (which together with the attached notes constitute the “Consolidated Financial Statements”) and the selected financial information included throughout this Form 20-F (this “Annual Report”) have been restated in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007.
 
As of January 1, 2008, we have adopted the changes to “Inflationary Effects” in accordance with the new released Mexican FRS. (Mexican FRS B-10) Due to the relatively low inflation that the country has consistently achieved during the past several years, a new accounting principle went into effect on January 1, 2008, which eliminates the recognition of inflationary effects in our financial information. Consequently, financial information corresponding to periods prior to December 31, 2007 is expressed in millions of Mexican Pesos with purchasing power as of December 31, 2007, while the financial information for periods after December 31, 2007, will be presented in current or nominal Mexican Pesos.
 
Mexican FRS differs in certain respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). For a discussion of certain significant differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to us, together with a reconciliation of operating income, net income and total stockholders’ equity to U.S. GAAP, and a condensed statement of cash flows under U.S. GAAP, see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The effect of price-level restatement under Mexican FRS has not been reversed in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
References herein to “U.S. dollars,” “U.S.$” or “$” are to the lawful currency of the United States of America. References herein to “pesos” or “Ps.” are to the lawful currency of México. This Annual Report contains translations of certain peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. Unless otherwise indicated, such U.S. dollar amounts have been translated from pesos at an exchange rate of Ps.10.92 to U.S.$1.00, the exchange rate on December 31, 2007.
 
As used herein, the term “tonnes” refers to metric tons of 1,000 kilograms (equal to 2,204.6 pounds) and the term “billion” refers to one thousand million (1,000,000,000). One square meter is equivalent to 10.764 square feet.

ii


Market Data

This Annual Report contains certain statistical information regarding the Mexican chicken, beef, egg, balanced feed (or “feed”), turkey and swine markets and our market share. We have obtained this information from a variety of sources, including the producers’ associations Unión Nacional de Avicultores (“UNA”), Consejo Nacional Agropecuario (“CNA”); Consejo Mexicano de Porcicultura (“CMP”), as well as Banco de México (“Mexican Central Bank”), Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentos (“Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fishing and Food” or “SAGARPA”) and publications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). The producers’ associations rely principally on data provided by their members. Information for which no source is cited was prepared by us on the basis of our knowledge of the Mexican chicken, egg, feed, turkey and swine markets and the wide variety of information available regarding these markets. The methodology and terminology used by different sources are not always consistent, and data from different sources are not readily comparable.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements in our periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Forms 20-F and 6-K, in our annual report to stockholders, in offering circulars and prospectuses, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by one of our officers, directors or employees to analysts, institutional investors, representatives of the media and others.
 
Examples of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) projections of revenues, income (or loss), earnings (or loss) per Share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items or ratios; (ii) statements of our plans, objectives or goals or those of our management, including those relating to new contracts; (iii) statements about future economic performance; and (iv) statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “target,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “forecast,” “guideline,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
 
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and a number of unexpected changes could cause actual results to deviate from our plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions. We recognize that the accuracy of our predictions and our ability to follow through on our intentions depend on factors beyond our control. The potential risks are many and varied, but include unexpected changes in:
 
 
·
economic, weather and political conditions;
 
 
·
raw material prices;
 
 
·
competitive conditions; and
 
 
·
demand for chicken, eggs, turkey, balanced feed and swine.
 
iii


PART I
 
ITEM 1.
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 2.
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 3.
Key Information
 
Selected Financial Data
 
The information set forth below is derived from Bachoco’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included in Item 18. In this disclosure, we explain the figures and year-to-year changes in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
In preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements, we followed Mexican FRS, which differ in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides a description of the main differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to us; a reconciliation from Mexican FRS to U.S. GAAP of total stockholders’ equity, net income and operating income, and a condensed statement of cash flows under U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Our financial statements were prepared pursuant to Bulletin B-10, as amended, and Bulletin B-12, both issued by the Mexican Institute of Public Accountants.
 
Bulletin B-10 is designed to account for the effects of inflation on financial disclosures by requiring us to:
 
 
·
restate non-monetary assets at current replacement cost or by using the Mexican National Consumer Price Index (“NCPI”), except for the biological assets (see Note 5 of the Financial Statement);
 
 
·
restate non-monetary liabilities using the NCPI;
 
 
·
restate the components of stockholders’ equity using the NCPI; and
 
 
·
recognize gains or losses in purchasing power that result from the monetary liabilities or assets that we hold.
 
Bulletin B-10 also requires restatement of all financial statements in constant pesos as of the date of the most recent balance sheet presented. Except as otherwise indicated, we have restated all financial information taken from the financial statements or derived from them, as explained below, in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. Bulletin B-12 requires that the statement of changes in financial position reconcile the differences between the restated historical balance sheet and the current balance sheet. The effects of price-level restatement under Mexican FRS have not been reversed in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
As of January 1, 2008, we have adopted the new standard related to “Inflationary Effects” in accordance with Mexican FRS. (Mexican FRS B-10). Due to the relatively low inflation that the country has consistently achieved during the past several years, a new accounting principle went into effect on January 1, 2008, which eliminates the recognition of inflationary effects in our financial information. Consequently, financial information corresponding to periods prior to December 31, 2007 is expressed in millions of Mexican Pesos with purchasing power as of December 31, 2007, while the financial information for periods after December 31, 2007, will be stated in current or nominal Mexican Pesos.
 
1


   
As of and for the year ended December 31,
 
   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
2007(2)
 
Income Statement Data
 
(millions of constant pesos as of December 31, 2007)(1)
 
(millions of
U.S.
dollars)
 
Mexican FRS:
                                     
Net revenues
  Ps. 
 12,616.6
  Ps. 
14,836.7
  Ps. 
15,617.7
  Ps. 
15,551.0
  Ps.
18,219.6
   
1,668.9
 
Cost of sales
   
10,263.4
   
12,032.42
   
11,234.2
   
12,053.0
   
14,477.9
   
1,326.2
 
Gross profit
   
2,353.2
   
2,804.3
   
4,383.5
   
3,498.0
   
3,741.8
   
342.7
 
Operating income
   
507.2
   
952.4
   
2,378.1
   
1,426.4
   
1,496.3
   
137.1
 
Comprehensive financing income (loss)
   
146.8
   
(79.8
)
 
(74.0
)
 
61.4
   
19.1
   
1.8
 
Majority net income
   
633.1
   
788.3
   
1,908.4
   
906.2
   
1,270.9
   
116.4
 
Majority net income per Share(3)
   
1.06
   
1.32
   
3.19
   
1.51
   
2.12
   
0.19
 
Majority net income per ADS(4)
   
12.66
   
15.8
   
38.2
   
18.1
   
25.4
   
2.3
 
Dividends per Share(5)
   
0.60
   
0.46
   
0.44
   
0.61
   
0.59
   
0.05
 
Weighted average Shares outstanding (thousands)
   
598,738
   
599,260
   
599,694
   
599,571
   
600,000
   
600,000
 
U.S. GAAP:
                                     
Majority net income
  Ps.
590.4
  Ps. 
825.9
  Ps. 
1,893.3
  Ps. 
895.5
  Ps. 
1,261.8
   
116.0
 
                                       
Statement of Financial Position Data
                                     
Mexican FRS:
                                     
Cash and cash equivalents
  Ps. 
1,841.5
  Ps. 
2,608.4
  Ps. 
3,419.9
  Ps. 
3,583.9
  Ps. 
3,039.9
   
278.5
 
Total assets
   
14,577.1
   
15,008.6
   
16,530.9
   
17,559.2
   
19,116.4
   
1,751.0
 
Short-term debt(6)
   
68.2
   
111.2
   
100.0
   
9.8
   
58.8
   
5.4
 
Long-term debt
   
109.0
   
80.9
   
56.0
   
35.5
   
50.8
   
4.6
 
Stockholders’ equity
   
11,805.2
   
12,132.7
   
13,502.7
   
14,102.9
   
15,127.2
   
1,385.7
 
U.S. GAAP:
                                     
Stockholders’ equity
   
11,772.7
   
12,144.7
   
13,499.0
   
14,053.2
   
15,017.7
   
1,381.0
 
                                       
Selected Operating Data
                                     
Sales volume (thousands of tonnes):
                                     
Chicken
   
655.4
   
733.0
   
773.0
   
773.7
   
837.2
       
Eggs
   
132.1
   
138.1
   
140.6
   
143.4
   
147.8
       
Swine and Others
   
8.5
   
9.1
   
9.6
   
8.9
   
16.1
       
Balanced Feed
   
316.2
   
320.7
   
389.6
   
484.4
   
438.8
       
Gross margin (%)
   
18.7
%
 
18.9
%
 
28.1
%
 
22.5
%
 
20.5
%
     
Operating margin (%)
   
4.0
%
 
6.4
%
 
15.2
%
 
9.2
%
 
8.2
%
     
Net margin (%)
   
5.0
%
 
5.3
%
 
12.2
%
 
5.8
%
 
7.0
%
     
Total employees
   
18,495
   
18,896
   
20,432
   
21,035
   
23,088
       
 
(1)
Except per share and per ADS amounts and operating data.
(2)
Peso amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars, solely for the convenience of the reader, at the rate of Ps.10.92 per U.S. dollar.
(3)
Net income per share has been computed based on the weighted average number of common Shares outstanding.
(4)
Net income per ADS has been computed by multiplying net income per share by twelve, to reflect the ratio of twelve Shares per ADS.
(5)
Dividends per share have been computed by dividing the total amount of dividends paid (in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007) by the weighted average Shares outstanding.
(6)
Includes notes payable to banks and current portion of long term debt.

2


Exchange Rates
 
The Mexican peso showed high levels of volatility during the first four months of 2003; it appreciated and remained stable during the middle of the year and increased its volatility in the last four months of the year. Overall, the peso declined in 2003.
 
In 2004, the Mexican peso showed volatility for the first four months of the year with a general trend to depreciate with respect to the U.S. dollar. In the following months, the Mexican peso fluctuated around the same level, it finished the year stronger against the dollar when compared to the exchange rate at the end of 2003.
 
During 2005, the Mexican peso continued showing volatility mainly at the beginning and at the end of the year, with a general trend to appreciate with respect to the U.S. dollar. At the end of 2005, the Mexican peso finished stronger against the U.S. dollar.
 
During 2006, the Mexican economy showed signs of stability with an annual inflation rate of 4.1%. After showing volatility during the first part of the year, the Mexican peso showed a reasonably stable peso-dollar exchange rate with a final depreciation of 1.6%, compared with the exchange rate at the end of 2005.
 
In 2007, the Mexican economy was stable overall, with an annual inflation rate of 3.8%, while the peso-dollar exchange rate at the year-end depreciated by 1.1% with respect to December 31, 2006.
 
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high, low, average and year-end exchange rates for the purchase and sale of U.S. dollars (presented in each case as the average between such purchase and sale rates):
 
   
Exchange Rate(1)
(in current pesos per U.S. dollar)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
High
 
Low
 
Average(2)
 
Year End 
 
2003  
   
11.41
   
10.11
   
10.79
   
11.24
 
2004  
   
11.64
   
10.81
   
11.29
   
11.15
 
2005  
   
11.41
   
10.41
   
10.89
   
10.63
 
2006  
   
11.46
   
10.43
   
10.91
   
10.80
 
2007  
   
11.27
   
10.67
   
10.93
   
10.92
 

(1)
The exchange rates are the noon buying rates in New York City for cable transfers in pesos as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “noon buying rate”).
 
(2)
Average of month-end rates for each period shown.
 
   
Exchange Rate(1) 
(in current pesos
per U.S. dollar)
 
Period
 
High
 
Low
 
December 2007 
   
10.92
   
10.80
 
January 2008 
   
10.97
   
10.82
 
February 2008 
   
10.82
   
10.67
 
March 2008 
   
10.85
   
10.63
 
April 2008
   
10.60
   
10.44
 
May 2008
   
10.57
   
10.31
 
 
3


(1)
The exchange rates are the noon buying rates in New York City for cable transfers in pesos as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

On May 30, 2008, the exchange rate for cable transfers in pesos as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was Ps.10.329 per $1.00 U.S. dollar.

Risk Factors
 
Risks Relating to México, Other Emerging Market Countries and the U.S. Economy
 
México has experienced adverse economic conditions
 
 
·
In 2003, GDP increased by 1.3% and the inflation rate was 3.98%.
 
 
·
In 2004, México’s GDP increased by 4.4% and the inflation rate was 5.19%.
 
 
·
In 2005, México’s GDP improved and increased by 3.0%, and the inflation rate was 3.33%.
 
 
·
In 2006, GDP increased by 4.8% while the inflation rate was 4.05%.
 
 
·
In 2007, GDP increased by 3.3% and the inflation rate was 3.8%.
 
Should the Mexican economy fall into a recession or if inflation and interest rates increase significantly, consumers may find it difficult to pay for the products we offer. This and other effects of recession or increased inflation and interest rates could have adverse consequences on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Depreciation or fluctuation of the peso relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
 
The single largest component of our cost of sales, our feed, is comprised partially of ingredients we purchase from the United States, where prices are denominated in U.S. dollars. In addition, the prices of ingredients we purchase in México may be influenced by U.S. commodity markets. Therefore, should the peso fall relative to the U.S. dollar, both the cost of our operations and our debt payments would increase. Any future depreciation or devaluation of the peso may result in further net foreign exchange losses.
 
 
·
In 2003, the peso depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 7.3% at year-end, and the average value of the peso against the U.S. dollar during 2003 was 10.5% lower than in 2002.
 
 
·
In 2004, the Mexican peso appreciated with respect to the U.S. dollar by 0.8% at year end, whereas the average value of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar was 4.4% lower, since the peso appreciated at the end of the year.
 
 
·
In 2005, the Mexican peso appreciated with respect to the U.S. dollar by 4.9% at the end of the year and also the average value of the Mexican peso was 3.6% higher.
 
 
·
In 2006, the Mexican peso was reasonably stable in its peso-dollar exchange rate with a final depreciation of 1.6%, compared to the end of 2005. The average value of the Mexican peso was 0.10% lower than the average of 2005.
 
 
·
In 2007, the Mexican peso remained reasonably stable in its peso-dollar exchange rate. According with the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, the peso was depreciated with respect to the U.S. dollar by 1.1% at year-end. The average value of the Mexican peso was 0.21% lower than the average of 2006.
 
4

 
Severe devaluation or depreciation of the peso may also result in disruption of the international foreign exchange markets and may limit our ability to transfer or to convert pesos into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making timely payments of interest and principal on our indebtedness. While the Mexican government does not currently restrict, and for many years has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer other currencies out of México, the government could institute restrictive exchange rate policies in the future. Currency fluctuations will probably continue to affect our revenues and expenses.
 
Furthermore, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the peso and the U.S. dollar will also affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of the peso price of our Shares (the “Shares” or “Series B Shares”) in the Mexican Stock Exchange and the price of American Depository Shares (“ADSs”) on the New York Stock Exchange. Because we pay cash dividends in pesos, exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by holders of American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) upon conversion of such cash dividends by the Depositary.
 
High levels of inflation and high interest rates in México could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
 
México has experienced high levels of inflation and high domestic interest rates in the past. The annual rate of inflation, as measured by changes in the National Consumer Price Index was 3.98% in 2003, 5.19% in 2004, 3.33% in 2005, 4.05% in 2006 and 3.76% in 2007. Inflation for the first four months of 2008 was 1.72% according to the Mexican Central Bank.
 
According to Bank of México the average interest rates on 28-day Mexican treasury bills, or Cetes, was 6.23%, 6.82%, 9.20%, 7.19% and 7.19% during 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. On June 6, 2008, the 28-day Cetes rate was 7.44%. High interest rates in México could adversely affect our costs. Our earnings may also be affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on our variable-rate debt instruments and beneficed by the interest we earn in our cash balance.
 
Political events in México could affect Mexican economic policy and our operations
 
In July 2006, we had a presidential election where Felipe Calderón was elected as the new President of México. President Calderón’s election initially met resistance from members of the political opposition in the form of legal challenges and protests. These protests could return as President Calderón seeks to enact his legislative agenda. We cannot predict the impact that future protests may have on the Mexican government or on business conditions in México. Although President Calderón’s party, the Partido Acción Nacional, or PAN, obtained a plurality of the seats in the Mexican Congress after the election, no party succeeded in securing a majority in either chamber of the Mexican Congress. The absence of a clear majority by a single party and the lack of alignment between the president-elect and the legislature are likely to continue until the next Congressional election in 2009. This situation may result in government gridlock and political uncertainty, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations. We cannot provide any assurance that future political developments in México, over which we have no control, will not have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
 
Developments in other emerging market countries may adversely affect our business or the market price of our securities
 
5


The market value of securities of Mexican companies is, to varying degrees, affected by economic and market conditions in other emerging market countries. Although economic conditions in such countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in México, investors’ reactions to developments in any of these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Mexican issuers. We cannot assure you that the market value of our securities will not be adversely affected by events elsewhere, especially in emerging markets.
 
Developments in the U.S. economy may adversely affect our business
 
Economic conditions in México are heavily influenced by the condition of the U.S. economy due to various factors, including commercial trade pursuant to the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”), U.S. investment in México and emigration from México to the United States. Events and conditions affecting the U.S. economy may adversely affect our business, results of operations, prospects and financial condition.
 
Risks Relating to our Organization
 
The chicken industry is characterized by long-term price declines and cyclical periods
 
The Mexican chicken industry, like the chicken industry in other countries, has been characterized by a long-term decline in prices in real terms. The industry has undergone cyclical periods of higher prices and profitability, followed by overproduction, leading to periods of lower prices and profitability. Real prices for eggs and swine in México have also declined over the long term and have varied cyclically. The market that we serve is subject to volatility with respect to supply, which affects prices. We cannot assure you that future cyclicality, excess supply and downturns in real prices will not adversely affect our results.
 
The price of feed ingredients is subject to significant volatility
 
The largest single component of our cost of sales is the cost of ingredients used to prepare feed, including sorghum, soybean meal, corn, fish meal, meat meal and, for certain chicken products, marigold extract. The price of most of our feed ingredients is subject to significant volatility resulting from weather, the size of harvests, transportation and storage costs, governmental agricultural policies, currency exchange rates and other factors. Given the long-term declining trends in real chicken prices, we may experience difficulty or delays in passing any increase in grain costs to customers. Accordingly, increases in the prices of the main ingredients used in the preparation of feed may have a material adverse effect on our margins and results of operations. Since we purchase many feed ingredients in U.S. dollars, from time to time we may acquire financial instruments to protect us against exchange rate fluctuations that may affect future purchases of feed ingredients.
 
Additionally, the prices of corn and soybean meal experienced high volatility in 2007 and through the first half of 2008. Prices of corn reached historically high prices worldwide, as a result of strong demand and consequently, lower inventories worldwide. We can offer no assurance that corn and soybean meal prices will not continue to experience strong volatility in the future. Such a continued increase in prices could adversely affect our profits.
 
Our operations depend on raising animals and meat processing, which are subject to risks such as disease, contamination and adverse weather conditions
 
Our operations involve raising animals and are subject to a variety of risks, including disease, contamination and adverse weather conditions. Chickens, in particular, are susceptible to infections by a variety of microbiological agents. Since 1983, the avian influenza virus (“AIV”) has been widespread in the United States and in México. During 2003, AIV was widespread in Asian countries and the United States. México, to avoid having the disease spread from the United States, imposed certain restrictions on the importation of chicken from affected U.S. states. The AIV was still present in Asian countries and the United States. In 2004 and 2005, AIV was still present in Asian countries and the United States. During 2004 and 2005, México has been eliminating some restrictions on the importation of chicken from certain U.S. states as the sanitary conditions in those states improve. In October 2005, México lifted importation restrictions on all U.S. states, except for 11 counties in the state of Texas. In 2007, Mexico lifted importation restrictions for those remaining 11 counties in the state of Texas.
 
6


In the past we have experienced limited outbreaks of various diseases that have resulted in higher mortality rates.
 
During 2005, there was an ample diffusion on the media worldwide of the widespread of a particular strain of AIV (H5N1), mainly in Asia and some European countries, which affected consumption of chicken in those countries. At the present time, this strain has not been found in the United States or in Latin America.
 
Meat and eggs are subject to contamination during processing and distribution. We do not believe that contamination of individual shipments during distribution would have a material adverse effect on our operations. Contamination during processing, however, could affect a larger number of our poultry products and therefore could have a more significant impact on operations.
 
In 2006 we experienced a loss of chickens at our Norwest Complex due to the effects of Hurricane Lane. Future hurricanes or other adverse weather conditions could result in additional losses of inventory and damage to our plants and equipment. Our facilities near México’s coast are most vulnerable to the risk of severe weather.
 
The use of nutritional supplements and the possibility of contamination expose us to risk of loss of consumer confidence in the chicken industry
 
To reduce contamination, we use specialized feedstock and nutritional supplements that have been approved by the Mexican government and meet international industry standards. We can offer no assurance, however, that in the future we will not be materially adversely affected by claims or consumer concerns arising out of the use of these products in raising our animals.
 
Our sales are entirely dependent on consumer preferences, and the loss of consumer confidence in the products sold by Mexican meat and egg producers as a result of disease, contamination or other reasons, even if not related to our own products, could have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations.
 
We face significant competition from other chicken producers in all of our geographic markets and product lines
 
According to the UNA, we are México’s largest chicken producer, but we face significant competition from other producers in all of the markets in which we sell our products. In 2007, we accounted for approximately 31.2% of total chicken production in México. There are two other major vertically integrated chicken producers in México, which together with Bachoco account for more than 55.0% of Mexican chicken production, with the balance distributed among approximately two hundred small- and medium-sized integrated and non-integrated producers.
 
Each of the two other major companies has substantial financial resources and strengths in particular product lines and regions. We expect to continue to face strong competition in every market, as our existing or new competitors are likely to broaden their product lines and extend their geographic coverage. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our performance will not be adversely affected by increased competition.

7


We face increased competition from U.S. producers
 
In January 2003, import quotas and most tariffs on poultry, eggs and swine were eliminated through NAFTA. Poultry producers in the United States have developed extremely low-cost production methods and have been successful in exporting primarily frozen and value-added poultry to other countries, especially in periods of overcapacity in the United States. As tariff barriers decline under NAFTA, U.S. producers can be expected to increase exports to México, which could have a material adverse effect on our performance.
 
In July 2003, the Mexican government imposed temporary restrictions on chicken leg quarters imported from the U.S. and both governments confirmed this safeguard in July 2003. The safeguard consists of a five-year limited poultry import measure. The measure, which became effective in 2003, includes quotas and an initial tariff of 98.8% on chicken leg quarters that will slowly decrease until it reaches 0% in 2008. On January 1, 2008, the safeguard was phased out.
 
We are a holding company with no substantial operations and depend on our subsidiaries for cash flow
 
We are a holding company with no substantial operations and, consequently, we are dependent on dividends and other payments from subsidiaries for virtually all of our cash flow, including cash flow to pay taxes, service debt, make equity investments, finance the growth of subsidiaries and pay dividends to stockholders. Together with Mexican law, our ability to pay dividends may, in the future, be limited by financial covenants in debt instruments that we, or our subsidiaries, may acquire.
 
Risks Relating to the ADS, and the Shares in the Mexican Market
 
The Robinson Bours family controls our management and their interests may differ from other security holders

Certain members of the Robinson Bours family hold the power to elect a majority of the members of our Board of Directors and have the power to determine the outcome of certain other actions requiring the approval of our stockholders, including whether or not dividends are to be paid and the amount of such dividends. The Robinson Bours family has established two Mexican trusts, which they control (“Control Trust”), that together hold 496,500,000 Shares outstanding on December 31, 2007.
 
Future sales of Shares by the controlling stockholders may affect prevailing market prices for the ADSs and the Shares trading at the Mexican Market.
 
The prevailing market prices for the ADSs and Shares could decline if either:
 
 
·
the Robinson Bours family were to sell substantial amounts of their Shares, whether
 
 
o
directly, or
 
 
o
indirectly, through the Mexican trusts through which they hold Shares; or
 
 
·
the perception arose that such a sale could occur.
 
8

 
The protection afforded to minority stockholders in México is different from that in the United States
 
Under Mexican law, the protection afforded to minority stockholders is different from those in the United States. In particular, the law concerning fiduciary duties of directors is not well developed, there is no procedure for class actions or stockholder derivative actions, and there are different procedural requirements for bringing stockholder lawsuits. As a result, in practice it may be more difficult for our minority stockholders of Bachoco to enforce their rights against us or our directors or our controlling stockholder than it would be for stockholders of a U.S. company.
 
Our bylaws restrict the ability of non-Mexican stockholders to invoke the protection of their governments with respect to their rights as stockholders
 
As required by Mexican law, our bylaws provide that non-Mexican stockholders shall be considered as Mexicans with respect to their ownership interests in Bachoco and shall be deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of their governments in certain circumstances. Under this provision, a non-Mexican stockholder is deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of its own government by asking such government to interpose a diplomatic claim against the Mexican government with respect to the stockholder’s rights as a stockholder, but is not deemed to have waived any other rights it may have, including any rights under the U.S. securities laws, with respect to its investment in Bachoco. If you invoke such governmental protection in violation of this agreement, your Shares could be forfeited to the Mexican government.
 
Our bylaws may only be enforced in México
 
Our bylaws provide that legal actions relating to the execution, interpretation or performance of the bylaws may be brought only in Mexican courts. As a result, it may be difficult for non-Mexican stockholders to enforce their stockholder rights pursuant to the bylaws.
 
It may be difficult to enforce civil liabilities against us or our directors, officers and controlling persons
 
We are organized under the laws of México, and most of our directors, officers and controlling persons reside outside the United States. In addition, all of our assets and their assets are located in México. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to affect service of process within the United States on such persons or to enforce judgments against them. This pertains also to any action based on civil liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws. There is doubt as to the enforceability against such persons in México, whether in original actions or in actions to enforce judgments of U.S. courts, of liabilities based solely on the U.S. federal securities laws.
 
Non-Mexican stockholders may not be entitled to participate in future preemptive rights offerings
 
Under Mexican law and our bylaws, if we issue new Shares for cash as part of a capital increase, we must grant our stockholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of Shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage in the Company (“preemptive rights”). We can allow holders of ADSs in the United States to exercise preemptive rights in any future capital increase only in one of the following two circumstances:
 
 
·
we file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to that future issuance of Shares; or

9


 
·
the offering qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
 
We make no promises that we will file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to allow holders of ADSs in the United States to participate in a preemptive rights offering. As a result, the equity interests of such holders in the Company may be diluted proportionately. In addition, under current Mexican law, it is not practicable for the depositary to sell preemptive rights and distribute the proceeds from such sales to ADS holders.
 
Corporate disclosure and accounting in México may differ from other countries
 
There may be less, or different, publicly available information about issuers of securities in México than is regularly published by or about issuers of securities in other countries with highly developed capital markets. In addition, due to country-by-country differences in accounting and other reporting principles and standards, our corporate disclosures may differ in content from disclosures made under other principles and standards, such as U.S. GAAP.
 
ITEM 4.
Information on the Company
 
General
 
Our legal name is Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V., and we frequently refer to ourselves commercially as Bachoco. We were incorporated in México on April 17, 1980. Our headquarters are located at Avenida Tecnológico No. 401, Ciudad Industrial 38010, Celaya, Guanajuato, México, telephone (52)(461) 618-3500 and (52)(461)618-3555. Our main product lines are: chicken, table egg, balanced feed and swine. At the present almost all of our production and almost all of our sales are made in México.
 
According to the UNA, we are the largest poultry producer in México. In 2007, we produced more than 9.0 million chickens per week and accounted for approximately 31.2% of total chicken production in México. As a vertically integrated producer, we control virtually all aspects of the production and distribution process, which enables us to exercise cost controls and to maintain high standards of quality, service and efficiency. With over 700 production and distribution facilities dispersed throughout México, our operations include the following:
 
 
·
preparing balanced feed;
 
 
·
breeding, hatching and growing chickens; and
 
 
·
processing, packaging and distributing chicken products.
 
Sales of chicken products accounted for 77.6% of our net revenues in 2007. Please also see the table under Item 5. “General—Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2007.”
 
We are also a significant producer of commercial balanced feed. We sell our feed both through distributors and directly to small producers. During 2007, we sold approximately 438,000 tonnes of balanced feed to external customers, which amounted to 8.0% of our total revenues for that year.
 
Currently, Bachoco is the second largest producer of table eggs products. In 2007, we sold approximately 147,700 tons. Table egg sales accounted for 9.6% of our net revenues in 2007.

10


As part of our other product lines we also sell swine on the hoof to meat packers for pork product production, miscellaneous poultry-related products, and we have recently entered into two new business lines: turkey and beef value-added products. In 2007, sales of swine and these other lines accounted for 4.8% of our net revenues.
 
The following table sets forth, for each of the periods presented, the volume of chicken, balanced feed, table eggs and swine that we sold:
 
   
Bachoco Sales Volume
(in thousands of tonnes)
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
       
Chicken 
   
655.5
   
733.0
   
773.0
   
773.7
   
837.2
 
Eggs 
   
132.1
   
138.1
   
140.6
   
143.4
   
147.8
 
Swine(1) 
   
8.5
   
9.1
   
9.6
   
8.9
   
16.1
 
Balanced Feed 
   
316.2
   
320.7
   
389.6
   
484.4
   
438.8
 
 
(1) Includes Swine, Turkey and Beef products.
 
In the Mexican poultry industry few producers operate in multiple regions. We believe we have the broadest geographic market coverage in the Mexican poultry industry and that we are one of the largest poultry suppliers in the México City metropolitan region (which accounts for a significant portion of overall Mexican chicken consumption). We currently compete in every major product category and channel of distribution for poultry products within the regions that we serve. We expect to continue to do so in order to meet growing consumer demand and needs.
 
Background and Ownership Structure
 
Founded in 1952 by the Robinson Bours family as a small commercial table egg operation in the state of Sonora, we grew by expanding our existing facilities and acquiring additional facilities from other poultry producers. In 1974, we established operations in Celaya, located in the agricultural region of Bajio, to begin serving the México City metropolitan region. Beginning in 1988, our management recognized the potential for growth in Mexican chicken consumption, as well as the advantages of a large, vertically integrated operation. As a result, we began to seek opportunities for geographic expansion and to increase production capacity and market share. We extended our market coverage (particularly in 1993 and 1994) by purchasing fixed assets and inventory from major regional producers that faced financial difficulties. Following each acquisition, we made substantial investments to apply our production and distribution methods and reap the benefits of vertical integration and economies of scale, improving the performance of the acquired facilities.
 
In April 1995, Robinson Bours stockholders created a trust (the “Control Trust”), the principal purpose of which was to hold a controlling interest in our Series B Shares. Before September 2006, our common stock (“Common Stock”) consisted of Series B Shares and Series L Shares of limited voting stock (“Series L Shares”) (collectively, the “Old Shares”). The Old Shares were grouped into units. Each unit (“Unit”) consisted of one Series B Share and one Series L Share. Each B Unit (“B Unit”) consisted of two Series B Shares.
 
In September 1997, we made an initial public offering of Units representing 17.25% of the outstanding Old Shares. Following such offering, the Control Trust held Units and B Units representing 68.0% of the outstanding Series B Shares.

11


In September 2006, we separate the UBL and UBB units trading on the Mexican Exchange into their component L and B Shares. The Series L Shares was converted into Series B Shares, on a one -to -one basis, thereby creating a single Share class, the Series B Shares, which represent our entire Common Stock This change did not modify the face value of the Shares. These Shares are trading on the Mexican stock market. The ADS still consist of twelve underlying Shares, but they are all Series B Shares, with full rights.
 
As of December 31, 2007, the Robinson Bours Stockholders owned B Shares representing 82.75% of the Series B Shares outstanding. As a result, the Robinson Bours Stockholders continue to have the power to control the Company.
 
Members of the Robinson Bours family, together with certain of our executive officers, hold a majority of the seats on our Board of Directors.
 
In November 1998, we approved a stock repurchase plan (the “Repurchase Plan”), which allows us to repurchase up to 3.0% of the total Shares outstanding and trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange (Bolsa Mexicana de Valores), in accordance with Mexican securities laws. To execute the Repurchase Plan, we created a reserve of Ps.321.6 million (expressed in nominal pesos), which reduced retained earnings on our balance sheet. As of May 31, 2008, we had repurchased no Shares.
 
During 2003, we implemented two important projects to expand the facilities at our Northwest Complex and Yucatán Peninsula Complex to increase production capacity in our chicken business. Both of these projects were completed by the end of the third quarter of 2004. These facilities are ideally suited for the expansion projects due to their sanitary status and their geographical location. Both complexes were expanded to increase capacity by approximately 50%, which will increase opportunities for potential future exports as well as for meeting consumer demand in those regions and in other regions in México. The new facilities in both complexes have been equipped with the best technology available.
 
In July 2004, we reached an agreement for renting the farms of UPAVAT and UPATEC, a small producer of table eggs in the state of Puebla, south of México City, with a capacity of about 0.75 million of lying hens. This operation allows us to start the production of table eggs in southern México.
 
On June 29, 2005, we acquired certain assets of Grupo Sanjor, a private poultry company located in the Yucatan Peninsula, with production of approximately 300 thousand chickens per week and 100 thousand table egg laying hens, which allow us to reinforce our leadership in this region of the country.
 
In December 2006, we acquired most of the assets and working capital of “Del Mezquital” to start a new complex in the State of Sonora, located in northern México, close to the border with the United States.
 
In February 2007, we reached a business agreement with “Grupo Libra” a Company in the Northeast of México, that includes the buying of all their working capital and long term rent agreement of their facilities to strengthen our presence in that market.
 
In December 2007, we reached an agreement with “Grupo Agra,” a table eggs company located in the states of Nuevo Leon and Coahuila in Northeast Mexico. The agreement provides for leasing of their facilities, which include laying hens farms (with a capacity of approximately 1.0 million hens), a processing table eggs plant, distribution centers and the Agra brands. In addition, we acquired all of their working capital.

12


Business Strategy

Over the past decade, we have substantially increased our chicken production, establishing ourselves in every major product category and distribution channel for chicken and expanding to cover a geographic market in México that is more widespread than any other chicken producer. We have also increased the efficiency of our production process and built a reputation for the freshness of our chicken products and quality of our customer service.
 
The Mexican poultry industry has experienced considerable consolidation in recent years, in which we have participated. We continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of other poultry producers or production facilities from time to time and may pursue certain opportunities consistent with our business strategy.
 
The key elements of our business strategy are as follows:
 
 
·
Increased market penetration through expanded distribution. We have an extensive distribution network, supported by our own transportation fleet, superior knowledge of existing wholesale channels and strategically located cold storage warehouses and facilities. We have substantially increased our distribution routes during the past years. We plan to continue to develop and improve our distribution network and systems in every product category and throughout our expanded geographic coverage in México.
 
 
·
Increased service and market responsiveness. We seek to remain a leader in the Mexican poultry market by maintaining high standards of customer service and continuing to be responsive to the changing needs of varying market segments. As part of this strategy, we have structured our operations in such a way as to enable us to vary the size, weight, color and presentation of our chicken products, depending upon the particular demands of the market segment. In addition, we have decentralized order and sales services from our headquarters to our cold storage warehouses and facilities, which serve as midpoints in the distribution chain to wholesalers and local customers. This strategy allows us to stay closer to our customer base and to better cultivate growing customer segments, such as food-service operators, supermarkets and food wholesale clubs.
 
 
·
Low-cost production and operating efficiency. We are among México’s lowest-cost producers and distributors of chicken, due in part to economies of scale and vertically integrated operations. We pursue on-going programs to increase operating efficiencies and reduce operating costs.
 
 
·
Continued brand differentiation. We have developed a brand image for premium fresh chicken and table eggs in México. Building on the success of our branded products to date, we seek to continue to promote our brand name through billboards, packaging, special publicity campaigns and through development of brand loyalty among wholesale and retail distributors. At the end of 2007 and beginning of 2008, we launched Bachoco’s new image.
 
Capital Expenditures
 
Over the last three years, we have financed our capital expenditures with resources generated by our operations. We made the following capital expenditures during the last three years (nominal pesos):
 
 
·
In 2005, we made capital expenditures of Ps.805.3 million net, with which we:
 
 
o
continued to update our transportation fleet, farms, processing plants and feed mills;
 
13


 
o
increased the capacity and updated our rendering plants, which expenditures continue to the present; and
 
 
o
made the acquisition of certain assets of Grupo Sanjor.
 
 
·
In 2006, we made capital expenditures of Ps.863.2 million net, with which we:
 
 
o
continued to update our transportation fleet, farms, processing plants and feed mills, which expenditures continue to the present;
 
 
o
increased capacity, mainly for the production of live chickens and;
 
 
o
building of a new feed mill in the state of Aguascalientes.
 
 
·
In 2007, we made capital expenditures of Ps.991.7 million net, with which we:
 
 
o
began the construction of the new complex in the state of Sonora.
 
 
o
finished the construction of our new feed mill in the state of Aguascalientes;
 
 
o
increased capacity in the production of live chicken;
 
 
o
increased capacity of the secondary process at some of our processing plants; and
 
 
o
updated our transportation fleet, processing plants and feed mills.
 
Business Overview
 
Chicken Market
 
Mexican consumers value distinct characteristics in their chicken. Virtually all chicken sold by us and other major chicken producers in México is fresh. Fresh chicken is a central ingredient in many traditional Mexican dishes and it is the leading meat consumed in México according to data from the UNA. Traditionally, value-added chicken products, such as heat-and-serve products, frozen dinners, chicken nuggets and other similar foods, have found limited acceptance among Mexican consumers due to historical consumer preferences for fresh chicken.
 
In recent years, the value-added chicken products are growing rapidly; we participate significantly in the market and try to lead the supplying of these products. According to the UNA, value-added chicken products currently account for approximately 7.0% of the chicken sold in México.
 
Mexican consumers traditionally prefer chicken with pronounced yellow skin pigmentation, a characteristic found mainly in our public-market and supermarket-broiler chicken products that we attain by including marigold extract in our chicken feed. We have also noticed an increased demand for smaller, whole, fresh chicken from various fast-food outlets, principally chicken roasting shops (rosticerías), which have developed rapidly in México.
 
According to data obtained from the UNA, total Mexican chicken consumption per capita increased by 12.4% from 2003 to 2007. Chicken is the leading meat consumed in México, and it accounted for approximately 34.1% of all meat produced in México in 2007. The following table sets forth total Mexican production of chicken, pork and beef for 2003 to 2007:
 
14


Mexican Production of Chicken, Beef and Pork
(in thousands of tonnes)*(1)
 
   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Chicken
   
2,290
   
2,390
   
2,498
   
2,592
   
2,683
 
Beef
   
1,496
   
1,543
   
1,559
   
1,602
   
1,628
 
Swine
   
1,100
   
1,150
   
1,088
   
1,102
   
1,116
 

*(1)Source: UNA
 
The Mexican chicken industry, like chicken industries in other countries, is characterized by a long-term decline in real prices in real terms in conjunction with cyclical periods of higher profitability leading to overproduction followed by periods of lower prices and lower profitability.
 
In 2003, chicken prices decreased by approximately 4.0% over 2002, mainly due to an oversupply in domestic production that was present mainly in the second half of the year and a decrease in the purchasing power of the average consumer.
 
In 2004, chicken prices increased by approximately 6.7%, mainly as a result of an increase in the cost of the main feed ingredients worldwide, and a more normalized supply in México during the second half of the year.
 
In 2005, chicken prices decreased by approximately 1.7%, mainly as a result of a decrease in the cost of the main feed ingredients worldwide, and a strong oversupply during the last quarter of the year. We believe that Mexican chicken prices may decline further in real terms and that prices for chicken may also vary cyclically.
 
In 2006 prices declined 3.6% when compared to the previous year mainly as a result of an oversupply in the Mexican poultry market at the beginning of 2006.
 
During 2007, chicken prices increased by 5.5% as compared with 2006, due to increases in the price of the main feed ingredients and a strong demand for chicken.
 
We believe that changes in Mexican chicken consumption correlate closely with changing chicken prices and their effect on consumer purchasing power. Chicken per capita consumption increased 4.9% in 2003, 3.3% in 2004, 3.5% in 2005, 2.6% in 2006 and 2.5% in 2007.
 
Chicken Products
 
Six main product categories exist for fresh chicken in México: live, public market, rotisserie, supermarket broiler, chicken parts and value-added products.
 
“Live” chicken is delivered alive to small independent slaughtering operations or to wholesalers that contract with independent slaughtering operations for processing. The freshly slaughtered chicken is then sold to chicken shops and other specialized retailers for sale to consumers and in some areas is sold directly to consumers by the slaughterhouse. According to the UNA, live chicken accounts for approximately 26% by volume of the chicken sold by producers in México.
 
“Public Market” chicken is a whole broiler presented either uneviscerated or eviscerated, generally sold within 48 hours after slaughter in public markets throughout México, but primarily concentrated in the México City metropolitan region. According to the UNA, public market chicken accounts for approximately 21% by volume of the chicken sold by producers in México.
 

15


“Rotisserie” chicken is a whole broiler presented eviscerated and ready to cook. Rotisserie chicken is sold by wholesalers and directly by producers to small shops, stands (rosticerías or asaderos) and supermarkets, which cook the chicken and sell it whole and freshly cooked to the end-consumer, providing an economical form of fast-food. According to the UNA, rotisserie chicken accounts for approximately 28% by volume of the chicken sold by producers in México.
 
“Supermarket Broiler” chicken is a fresh whole broiler presented with the edible viscera packed separately. In most cases, it is sold directly by producers to supermarkets and, in some regions, to other independent food shops. Mexican consumers’ preference for freshness requires regular deliveries of chicken to supermarkets and other food shops. According to the UNA, supermarket broiler chicken accounts for approximately 7% of the volume of the chicken sold by producers in México.
 
“Chicken Parts” refers to cut-up fresh chicken parts sold wrapped in trays or in bulk principally to supermarket chains, the fast-food industry and other institutional food-service providers. Producers generally sell directly to the supermarket chains and deliver the chicken directly to the outlet. Sales to the institutional market often require customized cutting and presentation. According to the UNA, chicken parts account for approximately 11% by volume of the chicken sold by producers in México.
 
“Value-added Products” refers mainly to cut up fresh chicken parts with value-added treatment like marinating, breading and individual quantity frozen, sold mainly wrapped in trays principally to supermarkets and other institutional chains. Producers generally sell directly to the supermarket chains and deliver the chicken directly to the store. Sales to the institutional market often require customized cutting and presentation. According to the UNA, chicken parts account for approximately 7% by volume of the chicken sold by producers in México
 
We sell value-added chicken products mainly to supermarkets and other retailers. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the sales volume in tonnes and as a percentage of the total volume of chicken sold for each of our principal lines of chicken products:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2003
 
2004
 
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
   
Volume
 
% of Total
 
Volume
 
% of
Total
 
Volume
 
% of
Total
 
Volume
 
% of
Total
 
Volume
 
% of
Total
 
   
(thousands of tonnes, except percentages)
 
Public Market and Rotisserie
   
288.1
   
44.0
   
319.1
   
43.5
   
349.6
   
45.2
   
344.3
   
44.5
   
371.0
   
44.3
 
Supermarket Broiler, Chicken Parts and Other(1)
   
194.9
   
29.7
   
219.6
   
30.0
   
219.1
   
28.4
   
228.2
   
29.5
   
245.1
   
29.3
 
Live
   
172.5
   
26.3
   
194.4
   
26.5
   
204.3
   
26.4
   
201.2
   
26.0
   
221.2
   
26.4
 
Total
   
655.5
   
100.0
%
 
733.1
   
100.0
%
 
773.0
   
100.0
%
 
773.7
   
100.0
%
 
837.2
   
100.0
%

(1) “Other” comprises sales of value-added poultry products, viscera and other products.
 
Our product mix varies from region to region in México, reflecting different consumption and distribution patterns. Based on market demand, we believe that fresh, rather than frozen, chicken will continue to dominate the Mexican market. Furthermore, we believe that consumer demand for value-added fresh chicken products, such as rotisserie chicken, supermarket broilers and chicken parts, will increase over time. Accordingly, we continue to focus principally on producing fresh chicken, including value-added fresh chicken products.
 
Chicken Marketing, Sales and Distribution
 
We have developed an extensive distribution system that we believe is the largest and most modern of any chicken or egg producer in México. We use various distribution channels in every major product category to service different market segments. We use our own fleet to transport the majority of rotisserie chickens, supermarket broilers and other chicken products to our customers. We try to cooperate with existing distribution channels and do not compete with wholesale distributors, except in areas where we supply our own distribution capacity where needed for market penetration.

16


We distribute products from our nine processing plants (located in Celaya, Culiacán, Puebla, Lagos de Moreno, Coatzacoalcos, Mérida, Gómez Palacio, Monterrey and Hermosillo) to our cold-storage facilities and warehouses, which serve as a midpoint in distribution to wholesalers and local customers. From our cold-storage facilities, we service wholesalers (who in turn deliver to their customers) and transport certain products directly to supermarkets and food-service operations. Our distribution infrastructure includes 60 cold-storage warehouses and facilities and a large fleet of vehicles. The decentralized sales force permits us to remain attuned to developments in the regions we serve and to develop close relationships with customers.
 
We have expanded our distribution network, which now covers almost all of México:
 
·
During 2003, we implemented two important projects to expand the facilities at our Northwest Complex and Peninsula Complex to increase production capacity in our chicken business. These facilities are ideally suited for the expansion projects due to their sanitary status and their geographical location. Both complexes were expanded in the third quarter of 2004 by approximately 50%, which increased opportunities for future exports as well as for meeting consumer demand in those regions and in other regions in México.
 
·
During 2004, we finished our projects to expand the facilities at our Northwest Complex and Peninsula Complex.
 
·
In 2005, we acquired assets of Grupo Sanjor, a private producer of chicken and table eggs located in the Yucatán Peninsula.
 
·
At the end of 2006, we acquired assets of “Del Mezquital,” a private broiler producer located in the state of Sonora.
 
·
At the beginning of 2007, we reached a business agreement with “Grupo Libra,” a chicken producer located in northeast México. We also started to build a new complex in Hermosillo City.
 
In the following paragraphs, we provide a description of our marketing, sales and distribution strategies for each of our major chicken products.
 
·
Live Chicken – We sell live chicken primarily to wholesalers, which contract out the processing to independent slaughterhouses and then resell the processed product as public market chicken. To a lesser extent, we sell to small, independent slaughterhouses in the southeast, where live chicken continues to be the standard for consumption. Additionally, customers can purchase live chicken directly from us on our farms. However, we believe that the market as a whole is moving slowly away from live chicken.
 
·
Public Market Chicken – We believe that we are the largest producer of public market chicken in México. We regularly sell to more than 50 of the approximately 200 whole fresh chicken wholesalers operating in the México City region. Most of our wholesale customers rely primarily on us for public market chicken, although we have no exclusive supply agreements. Our principal focus in this market has been to provide superior distribution and service to selected wholesalers in order to maintain and further develop loyalty. Public market chicken is ordinarily sold to consumers without any packaging or other identification of the producer, but our distribution system encourages wholesalers to sell to retailers in containers from our own “Bachoco” trailers, reinforcing our reputation for freshness and efficiency of service and fostering brand loyalty among retailers. We believe we have developed excellent relationships with the wholesalers we serve.
 
17


·
Rotisserie Chicken–We sell rotisserie chicken directly to rosticerías, asaderos and supermarkets. We attribute the growth in our sales of rotisserie chicken in large part to the rapid growth of the market for freshly cooked chicken sold by rosticerías and asaderos and in the rotisserie sections of supermarkets. We expect this market to continue to grow because of an ever-increasing consumer demand for convenient, low-priced and high-quality fast food. Success in supplying rotisserie chicken depends on consistency and good service, and only larger producers with more modern processing facilities and distribution capacity can compete in this market. We expect to expand sales of rotisserie chicken by leveraging our increasingly developed transportation and distribution network.
 
·
Supermarket Broiler Chicken – We sell supermarket broilers, as well as chicken parts and eggs, directly to the principal supermarkets, convenience store chains and wholesale clubs in México. In order to build consumer loyalty for our supermarket broiler chicken, we emphasize our brand image as well as our superior service, reinforced by frequent delivery to ensure freshness. Each chain negotiates purchases centrally, but we deliver directly to every point of sale, ordinarily at least once every 48 hours. We believe that we lead the market in frequency of deliveries to supermarkets.
 
·
Chicken Parts – We sell chicken parts principally to supermarkets, using the same marketing strategy that we use for supermarket broiler chicken. We are also an important supplier of chicken parts to the growing franchise fast-food and institutional food-service industries. We continue to develop custom-cutting processes to help meet demand from fast-food and institutional customers for a wider variety of chicken parts.
 
·
Value-Added Products–Mexican consumers have a greater preference for fresh chicken than their U.S. counterparts. Frozen, heat and serve and other further processed poultry products make up only a small proportion of total Mexican poultry consumption today. Demand for these kinds of fresh products is growing rapidly. The potential for substantial growth in this market is large and we believe that our distribution network, our large market share for supermarket chicken sales, our brand name and our experience in a wide range of existing Mexican distribution channels will be important competitive strengths in this area.
 
Sales of our fresh value-added products increased approximately 10.3% over 2006 sales. We are moving to produce and introduce various value-added products in México, which we have developed in accordance with Mexican customer preferences. We will continue to do so, as this market grows.
 
Table Eggs
 
According to the UNA, México has one of the largest per capita consumption of table eggs in the world with 21.6 kilograms per capita a year a 2.3% decrease when compare to the previous year. This high level of consumption is due in part to the fact that eggs are among the cheapest sources of protein in México.
 
The Mexican table egg industry is more fragmented than the chicken industry but has experienced some degree of consolidation in recent years, including acquisitions made by us. According to the UNA, the ten largest producers of table eggs in México now account for approximately 43% of the market.
 

18


Eggs in México have traditionally been distributed in large 360-egg cases through wholesalers to retailers. The retailers, which are typically small grocery shops, sell the eggs by weight to consumers. At present, approximately 21% of the eggs sold in México are sold in packaged form, 9% are sold in processed form and approximately 70% are sold in bulk to wholesalers. The sales trend in recent years has been moving towards packaged and processed egg sales. We expect that the convenience, the development of brand loyalty and the growth of supermarket chains will contribute to the continuance of this trend toward packaged eggs.
 
Bachoco is the second largest producer of table eggs in México with approximately 9.0% of the market. We sell both brown and white eggs. We are the largest producer of brown eggs in México. Our marketing efforts for egg products focus on increasing our brand recognition.
 
The branded carton of brown eggs is a premium product in the Mexican market. We believe that brown eggs are less vulnerable to price fluctuations than white or unbranded eggs, because consumers perceive them to be of higher quality. Brown eggs command a small premium over white eggs.
 
In some regions, however, we have reallocated part of our production from brown eggs to white eggs due to local market preferences. Our marketing strategy in the eggs business is to gradually move from bulk to packaged white eggs. Packaged eggs are less vulnerable to price fluctuation and create brand loyalty.
 
In 2004, we started to build new farms to increase production capacity of table eggs in our Northwest Complex, at Mexicali, near the U.S. border. We completed this project in the second half semester of 2005.
 
In 2005, as part of the acquisition of Grupo Sanjor, we acquired some table egg farms located in the Yucatán Peninsula.
 
In December 2007, we reached an agreement with “Grupo Agra”, located in the states of Nuevo Leon and Coahuila in Northeast Mexico. The agreement provides for leasing of their facilities, which include laying hens farms with a capacity of approximately 1.0 million hens, a processing table eggs plant, distribution centers and the Agra brands. In addition, we acquired all of their working capital.
 
In 2007, we began to enter into foreign markets. We are testing our brand by selling table eggs in the southern US states with products produced in the US. This test will allow us to see how our brand is received and identify opportunities and strategies going forward.
 
We have designed our egg distribution system to transport eggs from our laying farms at Celaya, Los Mochis, Obregón, Mexicali, Tecamachalco, Mérida, Saltillo and La Laguna regions to customers in all sales regions. We sell packaged eggs directly to all of the principal supermarket chains in México, with daily deliveries directly to their outlets.
 
Seasonality
 
Our sales are moderately seasonal, with the highest levels of sales, in general, in the second and fourth quarter due to higher chicken consumption during the holiday season and lower sales levels earlier in the year during Lent (particularly in the week prior to Easter).
 
Balanced Feed
 
According to Consejo Nacional de Fabricantes de Alimento Balanceado y de la Nutrición Animal, A.C) (”CONAFAB”) , Mexican production of balanced feed increased from 22.1 million tonnes in 2001 to 25.2 million tonnes in 2006. In 2006, México was ranked the fourth largest producer of feed in the world and the second largest in Latin America.
 
19


Local production is composed of commercial and integrated manufacturers. Commercial manufacturers produce for the market, while integrated manufacturers mostly produce for themselves and occasionally for other producers. Integrated producers account for approximately 64.0% of total production. Imports of feed come almost entirely from the United States and represent approximately 1.2% of the total consumption in México.
 
We entered the feed business as a result of our acquisition of Grupo Campi at the end of 1999. We sell to small livestock producers and through a network of small distributors located mainly in central and southern México. We have benefited from economies of scale and synergies derived from producing feed both for our own internal consumption and for sale to third parties. Currently, we have four feed plants dedicated to produce balanced feed to third parties. We estimate that our balanced feed business comprises approximately 4.8% of the market share of the commercial (non-integrated) balanced feed business in México.
 
Swine
 
We purchase breeder swine live from the United States and breed them at facilities in Navojoa. We then raise swine to maturity at our farms in Celaya and three other locations in México. Mature swine is sold on the hoof to Mexican swine meat packers for the production of pork products. In 2003, swine prices began to recover, increasing by 7.0%, due mostly to the fact that there was very modest growth in domestic production and imports. In 2004, our swine prices increased by more than 20.0% as a result of an increase in the cost of feed ingredients and a more normalized supply and imports, and, during 2005, our swine prices decreased 9.0% due to larger supplies in the Mexican market which continued in 2006 where prices went down about 11.9%. In 2007, swine prices decrease 5.5% as a result of over-supply conditions in the swine market. Traditionally, Mexicans consume less swine products than chicken and eggs products.
 
Turkey and Prepared Beef Products
 
At the beginning of 2007, as a result the “Del Mezquital” and “Grupo Libra” agreements we introduced two new product lines: turkey and value-added beef and pork products. We do not raise either turkey or cattle; we only process these products.
 
In 2007, these products lines represented less than 1.0% of our total sales. However we see opportunities to grow these businesses by taking advantage of our distribution network.
 
Raw Materials
 
We purchase our breeding stock for broilers and layers from high-quality suppliers. All of our breeder swine currently come from one supplier, but we have changed suppliers from time to time and have numerous alternative sources of supply.
 
The largest single component of our cost of sales is the cost of ingredients used in the preparation of feed including, principally, sorghum, soy meal, corn, fish meal, meat meal, and for certain chicken products, marigold extract. The price of these ingredients is subject to significant volatility resulting from weather, the size of harvests, transportation and storage costs, governmental agricultural policies, currency exchange rates and other factors. To reduce the potential adverse effect of grain price fluctuations, we vary the composition of our feed to take advantage of current market prices for the various types of ingredients used.
 
20

 
Under NAFTA, the government eliminated the tariff on sorghum effective January 1, 1994, and eliminated tariffs on all other grains that we use, except corn, on January 1, 2003. Corn tariffs were eliminated on January 1, 2008. We expect these developments to allow us more flexibility in our cost of production as the cost of our ingredients more closely tracks prices in the international commodity markets.
 
Since the end of 2006, throughout all of 2007 and through the first months of 2008, prices of corn and soybean meal have experienced high volatility and have demonstrated historically high prices world-wide.
 
We take advantage of lower-cost feed ingredients from Mexican sources, when available. In 2007, we obtained approximately 36.4% of our total grain needs from the domestic market. We believe that the quality of local feed ingredients, particularly sorghum, is superior to that of imported feed ingredients. In addition, the use of local feed ingredients allows us to save on transportation costs and import duties. However, in southern México where Grupo Campi’s complexes are located, domestic crops and feed ingredients are limited. As such, these complexes use mainly imported grain. We may, from time to time, engage in hedging of our feed costs in the future.
 
Competition
 
Chicken
 
According to the UNA, we are México’s largest chicken producer. We face significant competition from other producers in all of the markets in which we sell our products. When combined with our two largest vertically integrated competitors, we account for approximately 56% of total Mexican poultry production; the balance is distributed among approximately two hundred small- and medium-sized integrated and non-integrated producers. The major producers, including Bachoco, have substantial cost advantages over smaller, non-integrated producers arising from economies of scale and control of feed preparation. To varying degrees, each of these companies has substantial financial resources and strengths in particular product lines and regions. We believe, however, that we have substantial competitive strengths over our competitors, including a broader range of chicken products and broader geographic coverage.
 
Furthermore, there are considerable barriers to entry into large-scale chicken production and distribution in México, including, among others, the consumer preference for fresh chicken, the weaknesses of transportation infrastructure and varying regional consumer preferences among the various product categories. The channels for distribution of chicken products, in particular, are highly specialized and varied, and they call for in-depth experience in market practices.
 
Nonetheless, we expect that we will continue to face strong competition in every market and that existing or new competitors are likely to broaden their product lines and to extend their geographic coverage.
 
Poultry producers in the United States have developed low-cost production techniques and have been successful in exporting primarily frozen and value-added poultry to other countries, especially in periods of overcapacity in the United States. As tariff barriers have declined under NAFTA, we have experienced increased competition from U.S. poultry producers. According to the UNA, in 2007, imports of poultry products decreased 13.7% in volume over imports in 2006. This decrease was caused by a better level of prices in others foreign markets.
 
We expect that competition from U.S. exporters could increase. However, Mexican consumer acceptance of frozen poultry products is still low, and we do not anticipate significant growth in the near future.
 
21

 
Table Eggs
 
We are one of the largest producers of table eggs in México, with approximately 6.5% of total Mexican egg production at the end of 2007.
 
Balanced Feed
 
Of the registered producers of feed in México, integrated firms produce approximately 64.4% of total production for their internal use, and the remaining 35.6% is produced for sale to third parties. We estimate a market share of approximately 4.8% in our feed product line.
 
Swine
 
The Mexican swine industry is highly fragmented, and no producer has more than 15.0% of the market. On December 31, 2007, we had less than 1.0% of the Mexican market share in swine. U.S. producers already compete in this market in México because tariff barriers on swine are moderate.
 
Mexican Regulation
 
Mexican Import Regulation and Price Controls
 
As required by NAFTA, the Mexican government eliminated all permanent quotas and tariffs on poultry, table eggs and swine in January 2003. With certain specific exceptions described below, there are now no quotas or tariffs on imports of poultry, eggs and swine from the United States. We expect the elimination of these trade protections to stabilize the level of imports over time and to permit improved private control over imports, which may result in increased competition from importers.
 
Import limits and short-term tariffs:
 
The Mexican government has put in place a number of short-term tariffs and import limits on poultry, eggs and swine:
 
·
In January 2003, the Mexican government announced a temporary safeguard to stabilize the flow of poultry imports, which included an initial tariff of 98.8% on imports of chicken leg quarters. This safeguard will decrease annually until it reaches 0% in 2008. All other chicken products from the United States, including whole chicken, chicken parts other than leg quarters and eggs, remain tariff-free.
 
·
According to the safeguard, for 2007, the tariff in effect was 19.8% for imports of chicken leg quarters above the quota of 104 thousand tonnes.
 
·
On January 1, 2008, the safeguard was phased out. This allows American producers to export any amount of chicken leg quarters free of tariffs to México.
 
In addition to NAFTA, México has entered into free trade agreements with several other countries including Chile, Europe, Colombia and Venezuela. Although such agreements may result in lower tariffs on our own products, we believe that imports from such countries will not increase substantially in the future due to high transportation and distribution costs.
 
Antitrust Regulations
 
The Ley Federal de Competencia Económica (“Mexican Economic Competition Law”), which took effect on June 22, 1993, regulates monopolies and monopolistic practices. Under this law, all companies (including Bachoco) are required to notify the Comisión Federal de Competencia (“Federal Competition Commission”) of all proposed transactions exceeding specified threshold amounts as set forth in the Mexican Economic Competition Law. The Federal Competition Commission can impose conditions on, and prevent or unwind, any such transactions by Mexican companies. We have complied with all requirements under this law.
 
22

 
Environmental and Sanitary Regulation
 
Our operations are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The principal laws are Ley General de Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección Ambiental (General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection—the “Environmental Law”) and Ley de Aguas Nacionales (“National Waters Law”). The Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, or “Semarnat”) administers the Environmental Law, and Comisión Nacional del Agua (“National Water Commission”) administers the National Waters Law.
 
The Environmental Law regulates water pollution, air pollution, noise control and hazardous substances. Semarnat can bring administrative and criminal proceedings against companies that violate environmental laws, and after certain administrative procedures, it also has the power to close non-complying facilities. Every company in México is required to provide Semarnat with periodic reports regarding compliance with the Environmental Law and the regulations thereunder.
 
The level of environmental regulation in México has increased in recent years, and enforcement of the law is improving. We expect this trend to continue and to intensify with international agreements between México and the United States.
 
In particular, Mexican environmental laws set forth standards for water discharge that are applicable to poultry processing operations. Our processing plants have water treatment facilities that comply with Mexican environmental standards. We are implementing other investment projects in anticipation of stricter environmental requirements in the future. We do not expect that compliance with those Mexican federal environmental laws or Mexican state environmental laws will have a material effect on our financial condition or performance.
 
The production, distribution and sale of chicken, eggs and swine are subject to Mexican federal and state sanitary regulations. The principal legislation is Ley General de Salud (“General Health Law”) and Ley Federal de Sanidad Animal (“Federal Animal Health Law”). The Federal Animal Health Law was enacted in 1993, and, since then, we have been working closely with Mexican authorities to develop regulatory standards and inspection methods for chicken processing. Currently, Mexican authorities do not monitor production or inspect products to the same degree as sanitary authorities in other countries, such as the USDA in the United States. However, we believe that we are in compliance with all applicable sanitary regulations.
 
Organizational Structure
 
We are a holding company with no operations other than holding the stock of our subsidiaries, all of which are incorporated in México, and engaging in transactions with our subsidiaries. Our principal operating subsidiary is BSACV, which owns our principal operating assets, and which accounted for 87.7% of consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2007, and 88.9% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007. All of our subsidiaries are directly owned by us in the percentage listed below. None of these subsidiaries have any subsidiaries of their own.
 
The following table shows our main subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:
 
23

 
   
Percentage Equity Interest
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Acuícola Bachoco, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Aviser, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Bachoco, S.A. de C.V. (“BSACV”)
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Bachoco Comercial, S.A. de C.V.
   
-
   
-
   
100
 
Campi Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Huevo y Derivados, S.A. de C.V.
   
97
   
97
   
97
 
Operadora de Servicios de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Pecuarius Laboratorios, S.A. de C.V.
   
64
   
64
   
64
 
Secba, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Sepetec, S. A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Servicios de Personal Administrativo, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Induba Pavos, S.A. de C.V.
   
-
   
100
   
100
 

In November 2004, the Company acquired all the Shares of Seceba, S.A. de C.V. from a related party for Ps.14.4 million. As of the date of acquisition, the figures of Secba, S.A. de C.V. have been consolidated with the Company’s figures. The excess of the purchase price paid over the book value of this investment amounted to Ps.0.3 million, which was recorded in other income.

In December 2006 and July 2007 we created Induba Pavos, S.A. de C.V. and Bachoco Comercial, S.A. de C.V. respectively. They are both 100% owned subsidiaries of Industrias Bachoco.
 
Property, Plants and Equipment
 
Our production and storage facilities are located throughout the regions we serve in order to ensure freshness and minimize transportation time and costs. The most extensive facilities are grouped in nine complexes that include farms and processing plants. The largest of our complexes is in Celaya, where we have broiler grow-out farms, a broiler processing plant and egg production farms. The complex at Culiacán includes broiler grow-out farms and a broiler processing plant, as do the complexes located in Puebla, Lagos de Moreno, Coatzacoalcos, Mérida, Hermosillo and Monterrey. There are smaller egg production farms at Los Mochis, Ciudad Obregón and Mexicali. In Gómez Palacio, Durango, we have a complex which consists of broiler grow-out farms, a broiler processing plant and egg production farms representing nearly half of our total egg production capacity.
 
The following table summarizes the types and number of each type of our production facilities as March 2008:
 
Bachoco Production Facilities
 
Type
 
Number
 
Chicken breeding farms 
   
152
 
Broiler grow-out farms 
   
481
 
Broiler processing plants 
   
9
 
Egg incubation plants 
   
22
 
Egg production farms 
   
109
 
Swine breeding farms 
   
1
 
Swine grow-out farms 
   
10
 
Feed mills 
   
17
 
Further process plants 
   
4
 

The Company repaired its Peninsula Complex on schedule and by the end of 2003 the complex had returned to the level of capacity maintained prior to sustaining the damage caused by Hurricane Isidore. In 2003, the Company implemented projects to expand the facilities at the Peninsula Complex as well as the Northwest Complex. Both complexes were expanded to increase capacity by approximately 50% by the third quarter of 2004. These projects were financed with internal resources generated by our own operations.
 
24

 
In 2003, the Company implemented projects to expand the facilities at the Peninsula Complex as well as the Northwest Complex. Both complexes were expanded to increase capacity by approximately 50% by the third quarter of 2004. These projects were financed with internal resources generated by our own operations.
 
On September 16, 2006, Hurricane Lane, hit the southern part of the state of Sinaloa affecting some of our chicken growing farms in that region. We were able to keep a proper supply to our customers in that region from our other complexes.
 
We operate 17 feed mills for our own chickens, feed sales to third parties and egg and swine operations. The total production capacity of our feed plants is approximately 380,000 tonnes per month. We estimate that we are the largest producer of animal feed in México.
 
Our other facilities include two poultry manure-processing plants. Our headquarters are located in Celaya Guanajuato, México, and we have 60 sales centers throughout the regions we serve. While we own most of our facilities, we lease a limited number of farms and sales centers. We also employ a network of contract growers.
 
Our fleet of trucks carries part of the feed from feed mills to farms, live chickens from farms to processing plants, day-old chickens from egg incubation plants to farms, eggs from farms to distribution centers and, ultimately, products from distribution centers to customers.
 
ITEM 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS, which differs in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides a description of the principal differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP, as they relate to us, and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of total stockholders’ equity, net income and operating income, a consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and a condensed statement of cash flows under U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
 
In accordance with Mexican FRS rules on price-level restatement of financial statements, the financial statements included with this disclosure recognize certain effects of inflation. In addition, the financial statements and, unless otherwise specified, the other financial data included herein are restated in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. The effects of price-level restatement in accordance with Mexican FRS have not been reversed in the reconciliation to U.S. GAAP.
 
General
 
In the following discussion we describe various trends and how they affected our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
 
Mexican Economic Conditions
 
In 2004, the Mexican economy showed signs of recovery; GDP growth was 4.4%, which was better than initial expectations. Interest rates on 28-day Cetes increased to an average of 6.8% for the year and an average of 8.5% in the last month of the year. Inflation increased to a rate of 5.2%, and the peso appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 0.8% at year-end.
 
25

 
In 2005, the Mexican economy was stable and GDP increased by 3.0%; the inflation rate was 3.3%, and rates on 28-day Cetes increased to an average of 9.2% for the year and an average of 8.2% during December 2005. The peso appreciated against the U.S. dollar by 4.9% at year-end.
 
In 2006 the Mexican economy showed signs of volatility during the first part of the year, before the presidential election. After the election the economy showed stability with an annual inflation rate of 4.1% and a reasonably stable peso-dollar exchange rate with a final depreciation of the peso against the dollar of 1.6%, as compared to the end of 2005, Rates on 28-day Cetes decreased to an average of 7.2% for the year.
 
In 2007 the Mexican economy was stable with an annual inflation rate of 3.8% and a final dollar-peso depreciation rate of the peso against the dollar of 1.1%, as compared to the end of 2006. Rates on 28 day Cetes had an average of 7.19% for the year.
 
In addition to the effects that the Mexican economy has on our business and results of operations, Mexican political events may significantly affect our operations and the performance of Mexican securities generally. See Item 3, “Key Information—Risk Factors.” A downturn in México’s economic conditions, civil unrest or other adverse social, political or economic developments in or affecting México could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, ability to obtain financing and prospects for future business.
 
The Mexican economy and financial and securities markets are, to varying degrees, influenced by economic conditions in other countries. Economic or financial conditions in one country or region may undermine investors’ confidence in other countries, such as México, and decrease the attractiveness of securities investments in such countries. See Item 3, “Key Information — Risk Factors.”.
 
Effects of Economic Conditions on the Company
 
Mexican economic conditions have had an important impact on México’s chicken market. Feed costs constitute a substantial portion of the cost of goods sold and are priced with reference to U.S. dollars. We use financial instruments to mitigate the cost of goods sold in currencies other than Mexican pesos. See Note 2-p of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
In 2003, average producer prices increased significantly by 10.6%, due primarily to an increase in raw materials prices during most of the year.
 
In 2004, average producer prices increased by 6.7%, due mainly to strong increases in the cost of feed ingredients, in particular soybean meal, and a moderate increase of supply in the Mexican market.
 
In 2005, average producer prices decreased by approximately 1.7%, mainly as a result of a decrease in the cost of the main feed ingredients worldwide, and a strong oversupply during the last quarter of the year.
 
In 2006, average producer prices decreased by approximately 3.0% mainly from oversupply conditions in the market during the first part of the year and as market conditions return to more normalized levels as compared with the first three quarters of 2005.
 
In 2007, average producer prices increased by approximately 10.0% mainly due to increases in the cost of raw materials and a balance between supply and demand in the market, particularly in the second and third quarter of the year.
 
26

 
As of December 31, 2007, we have an outstanding total indebtedness of Ps.109.6 million all denominated in Mexican pesos. In 2007, we had foreign exchange loss of Ps.3.4 million due to fluctuations of the peso against the U.S. dollar, as compared to a foreign exchange gain of Ps.40.8 million in 2006 and a foreign exchange loss of Ps.62.3 million in 2005.
 
Any erosion of the purchasing power of Mexican consumers may adversely affect demand for our products and, as a result, our net revenues and profitability. Inflation and changing prices affect our ability to raise prices as well as consumer demand, supplier prices and other costs and expenses, consumer purchasing power and competitive factors, all of which in turn affect our net revenues and operating results. Peso devaluations and high inflation levels could further adversely affect our operations and financial position.
 
Volume of Chicken Sold
 
The volume of our chicken sold decreased by 1.5% in 2003 and increased by 11.8%, 5.5%, 0.1% and 8.2% in each of 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
 
The decrease in volume in 2003 was mainly due to the effects of Hurricane Isidore on our Peninsula Complex, this situation affected our production during most of the year.
 
The increase in 2004 was due mainly to the completion of growing projects in our Northwest and Peninsula complexes, and productivity improvements in the rest of our operations.
 
The increase in 2005 was due mainly to productivity improvements achieved by the Company and the Sanjor acquisition in the second quarter of the year.
 
The increase in 2006 was due mainly to productivity improvements, offset by the negative effects of Hurricane Lane on our Northwest Complex during the second half of the year, and a reduction in yield as the Company moves to offering value-added products.
 
The 8.2% increase in the volume in 2007 was mainly due the business agreements entered into in 2007, domestic grow and productivity efforts.
 
Trends in Product Prices
 
Our results of operations are significantly affected by the cyclical and volatile nature of Mexican prices for chicken, feed, eggs and swine.
 
In 2003, the Company was affected by higher feed ingredient costs and oversupply conditions due to an increase in domestic production. The continued weakness of the Mexican economy affected the purchasing power of customers, and as a result the Company was unable to increase its prices. During 2003, our chicken prices decreased 2.7% primarily as a result of oversupply conditions in the domestic chicken market as well as a decrease in consumer purchasing power.
 
In 2004, our chicken prices increased by 6.4%, mainly as a result of an increase in the cost of our main feed ingredients which pushed the prices up in the industry, a moderate supply of chicken in the Mexican market, mainly in the second part of the year, and our commercial and marketing strategies.
 
In 2005, our chicken prices increased 1.6%, as a result of a strong demand in the first three quarters of the year, partially compensated by weak prices in the last quarter of the year.
 
In 2006, our chicken prices decreased 3.7% due to oversupply in the market, in the first part of the year, and a lower more normalized historical demand compared to 2005.
 
27

 
In 2007, our chicken prices increased 8.3% as a result of a stable market conditions and increases in the cost of our main raw materials.
 
Prices for feed tend to follow trends in prices of feed ingredients, which we discuss below.
 
In 2003, egg prices increased by 17.5%, mainly due to a reduced supply of this product in the market.
 
In 2004, egg prices increased by 7.3%, mainly due to an increase in the price of feed ingredients and a moderate supply during the first part of the year in the Mexican market.
 
In 2005, our egg prices decreased by 15.7% as a result of continued oversupply conditions in the Mexican market due to domestic production.
 
In 2006, our egg prices increased 3.9% compared to 2005, as a result of a more stable supply.
 
In 2007 our egg prices increased 18.5% as a result of a strong demand, particularly in the second half of the year.
 
Bachoco continues to work to improve its sales mix by increasing the mix of packaged product with brand identification with better profit margins.
 
In 2003, swine prices began to recover, increasing by 7.0%, due mostly to very modest growth in domestic production and imports.
 
In 2004, our swine price increased by 25.8% as there was only a moderate supply in the Mexican market.
 
In 2005, our swine prices decreased by 9.0% as imports into Mexico increased.
 
In 2006, our swine prices declined 11.9% as a result of greater competition from imports and a more fragmented Mexican market.
 
The same conditions in the swine market that were present in 2006 were also present in 2007, causing a 5.5% decline in our swine prices.
 
We believe that, among other factors, industry price competition may continue to exert downward pressure on chicken prices, and that prices for chicken, feed, eggs and swine are also likely to remain volatile and subject to cyclical variation. Due to the time needed to complete the chicken growth cycle, chicken producers generally cannot adjust production to respond immediately to cyclical variations, and, accordingly, in times of oversupply, prices may decline due to overproduction.
 
Trends in Prices of Feed Ingredients
 
The single largest component of our cost of sales is the cost of ingredients used to prepare feed, including sorghum, soybean meal, corn, fish meal, meat meal and, for certain chicken products, marigold extract. The prices of these feed ingredients are subject to significant volatility due to a number of variables, including, among other factors, weather, harvest size, transportation and storage costs, government agricultural policies and currency exchange rates. The price at which we may obtain feed ingredients from Mexican producers relative to U.S. producers is also subject to volatility depending on these variables.
 
28

 
At present, Mexican feed prices tend to parallel U.S. and international prices. In 2003, the percentage of grain purchased from domestic markets was 38%. In 2004, it was approximately 35%, in 2005 it was 30%, in 2006 it was 31.3% and in 2007 it was approximately 36.4%.
 
Due to low inventories worldwide at the end of 2003 and during most of 2004, soybean meal reached historically high prices worldwide. Consequently, the price of other sources of protein, including grain, increased. As a result, the cost of our feed increased substantially. It was not possible for us to pass these increases to our customers, leading us to poor results during the first part of the year. In the second part of the year, mainly in the last quarter, prices resumed more normalized levels, allowing us to improve our results. In 2005, prices of our raw materials were on the average lower compared to 2004; during the year prices were rather constant with a slight trend to increase during the second part of the year.
 
During the second part of 2006, and through 2007, international corn prices increased significantly as a result of lower inventories and increases in alternative uses of corn, such as ethanol production.
 
International grain prices also increased dramatically in 2007 reaching historically high prices worldwide in that year, due mainly to strong demand and alternative uses for grain such as ethanol production. Soybean meal prices alse increased, particularly in the second half of the year, due to strong demand, and lower inventories worldwide.
 
In recent years, reductions in tariffs under NAFTA have generally resulted in reductions of our costs of importing feed ingredients. Restriction on importing grain under NAFTA, began to phase out in the beginning of 2008.
 
Acquisitions & Dispositions
 
Our operations have been affected during the periods we discuss herein, by a series of acquisitions and production arrangements that we have made in recent years:
 
 
·
During 2003, we implemented two important projects to expand the facilities at our Northwest Complex and Peninsula Complex to increase production capacity in our chicken business. Both complexes were expanded to increase capacity by approximately 50% and were completed by the third quarter of 2004.
 
 
·
In July 2004, we reached an agreement for renting the facilities of UPAVAT and UPATEC, a small producer of table eggs in the state of Puebla, south of México City, with an annual capacity of about 0.7 million of lying hens.
 
 
·
In November 2004, the Company acquired all the shares of Secba, S.A. de C.V., from a related party for Ps.15.0 million. As of the date of the acquisition, the figures of Secba, S.A. de C.V. have been consolidated with the Company’s figures. The excess of the purchase price paid over the book value of this investment amounted to Ps. 0.3 million, and was recognized in other income.
 
 
·
In June 2005, the Company acquired certain assets of Sanjor, a private poultry company located in the Yucatán Peninsula, with production of approximately 300 thousand chickens per week and 100 thousand table egg laying hens, which allow us to reinforce our leadership in this region of the country.
 
29

 
 
·
In December 2006, the Company started operations at a new complex in the state of Sonora by acquiring the farms from and leasing the processing plant and feed mill of “Del Mezquital Alimentos” in accordance with our strategic plans.
 
 
·
In February 2007, the Company reached a business agreement with “Grupo Libra” a company located in northeast México. The agreement establishes a lease for the use of their facilities, which included breeders and chicken farms with a capacity of approximately 3.0 million chickens per cycle, along with a slaughter plant, and a processing center. In addition, Bachoco acquired all of Grupo Libra’s working capital and brands.
 
 
·
In December 2007, we reached an agreement with “Grupo Agra”, a table eggs producer company located in the states of Nuevo Leon and Coahuila in Northeast Mexico. The agreement provides for leasing of their facilities, which include laying hens farms with a capacity of approximately 1.0 million hens, a processing table eggs plant, distribution centers and the Agra brands. In addition, we acquired all their working capital.
 
Summary of Results of Operations
 
The following table sets forth selected components of our results of operations as a percentage of net revenues for each of the periods indicated:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
   
(percentage of net revenues)
 
Net revenues
   
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
Cost of sales
   
(71.9
)
 
(77.5
)
 
(79.5
)
Gross profit
   
28.1
   
22.5
   
20.5
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   
(12.8
)
 
(13.3
)
 
(12.3
)
Operating income
   
15.2
   
9.2
   
8.2
 
Comprehensive financing (cost) income
   
(0.5
)
 
0.4
   
0.1
 
Income tax and asset tax
   
(2.4
)
 
(3.9
)
 
(1.7
)
Net income
   
12.2
   
5.8
   
7.0
 

The following table sets forth, for each of the periods indicated, our net revenues of chicken, feed, eggs, swine and other products as a percentage of total net revenues in each period:
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
   
(percentage of net revenues)
 
Chicken
   
80.1
%
 
77.6
%
 
77.6
%
Feed
   
7.2
%
 
9.0
%
 
8.0
%
Eggs
   
8.7
%
 
9.2
%
 
9.6
%
Swine and Others
   
4.0
%
 
4.2
%
 
4.8
%
Total
   
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
30

 
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2007
 
General
 
In 2007, the Mexican economy showed signs of stability: GDP grew by 3.3%, the annual inflation rate was 3.8% and the peso-dollar exchange rates was reasonably stable with a dollar-peso depreciation rate of 1.1% at the end of the year, as compared to the end of 2006.
 
According to the UNA, the production volume of the Mexican chicken industry grew by approximately 3.5% in 2007. Consumer preference for healthier products, income increases per capita, and chicken as a low-cost protein alternative to other meat sources have all had a favorable effect on per capita poultry consumption in the country.
 
With respect to the egg industry, domestic production decreased by almost 5.3%, which contributed to a better balanced supply in the market particulary in the second half of the year.
 
We were able to increase our sales in all our main product lines. We sold our entire production and achieved an operating margin of 8.2%, which is lower than the 9.2% reached in 2006.
 
Net revenues
 
Net sales during 2007 were Ps. 18,219.6 million, 17.2% higher than the Ps. 15,551.0 million reported in 2006. This was due to an increase in sales in all of our business lines.
 
Chicken sales grew by 17.3% as compared to the sales in 2006. The increase was due to an 8.3% price increase, as a result of a balance between supply and demand in the chicken market for most of the year. Chicken volume grew by 8.2%, due to increases in capacity driven by the business agreements with the “Del Mezquital” and “Libra” companies, as detailed previously.
 
Table egg sales grew by 22.2% in 2007 as compared to sales in 2006, due to an 18.5% price increase, while volume grew by 3.1%. The sales increase was due to a stable supply in the Mexican table eggs industry, particularly during the second half of the year and more than 50% of our eggs being packaged under our brand name.
 
In 2007, balanced feed sales grew by 4.2%, while the volume of balanced feed sold decreased by 9.4% in comparison to 2006. Balanced feed price increased by 15.1% with respect to the prior year, driven by increases in the costs of raw materials.
 
We increased our pork sales by 24.3% in 2007, due to a 31.5% increase in volume sold while the price fell by 5.5% in comparison with 2006. This price drop was caused by a greater supply of these products in the Mexican market.
 
We recognized Ps.10.9 million in our 2007 revenue as a result of fair valuing part of the Company’s inventories, see Note 2-h, and 5-b in our audited financial statements.
 
31

 
Cost of sales
 
The consolidated cost of sales was Ps. 14,477.9 million, an increase of 20.1% with respect to the prior year, as a result of increases in the prices of raw materials, particularly grains, which are one of our main raw materials.
 
Gross profit
 
As a percentage of net sales, gross profit was 20.5% in 2007, compared to 22.5% reported in 2006. The decline was due primarily to the increase in the cost of sales, resulting of the increase in cost of our main raw materials.
 
Sales, general and administrative expenses
 
Operating expenses increased to Ps. 2,245.5 million in 2007, an 8.4% increase over the prior year, primarily as a result of the increase in the volume of sales. These expenses represented 12.3% of the Company’s sales, which was lower than the 13.3% reported in 2006.
 
Operating income
 
Consolidated operating income in 2007 was Ps. 1,496.3 million; 4.9% more than the Ps. 1,426.4 million reported in 2006. The operating margin was 8.2% in 2007, lower than the 9.2% reported in 2006.
 
Comprehensive cost of financing
 
Comprehensive financing income (cost) represents the net effect of interest expense, interest income, foreign exchange gain (loss) and gain (loss) on net monetary position, which arises from the effect of inflation on the average net balance of monetary assets and liabilities. We had a comprehensive financing income of Ps. 19.1 million primarily due to Ps. 177.3 million of net interest income. This result was lower than the Ps. 61.4 million reported in 2006.
 
Other income, net
 
Other income, net represented a net gain of Ps.69.6 million in 2007 as compared to a gain of Ps.18.4 million in 2006. Other income, net in both 2007 and 2006 was attributable mainly to sales of used equipment, income from governmental aid and miscellaneous services. See Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.
 
Income before income tax, asset tax, and minority interested
 
Income before income tax, asset tax, and minority interest was Ps, 1,585.0 million in 2007, Ps. 78.7 million more than Ps. 1,506.3 reported in 2006. In 2007, taxes recognized by the Company amounted to Ps. 312.7 million, a decrease with respect to the Ps. 599.6 million recognized in 2006, primarily due to a unique charge amount in deferred taxes recognized at the end of 2006, due to the tax rate increase that affected the poultry industry and consequently our Company in fiscal year 2007, see note 15-a of the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.
 
32

 
Net income
 
Net income was Ps. 1,272.2 million in 2007, 40.2% higher than the Ps. 907.1 million reported in 2006. Earnings per share of Ps. 2.12 (US$ 2.33 per ADR), compared to Ps.1.51 (US$ 1.66 per ADR) reported in 2006.
 
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2005 and 2006
 
General
 
In 2006, the Mexican economy showed signs of stability: GDP grew by 4.8%, an annual inflation was 4.1% and the peso-dollar exchange rates was reasonably stable with a final depreciation of 1.6% of the peso against the dollar at the end of the year, as compared to 2005.
 
According to the UNA, the production volume of the Mexican chicken industry grew approximately 3.7% in 2006. Consumer preference for healthier products, income increases per capita, and chicken as a low-cost protein alternative to other meat sources, have all had a favorable effect on per capita poultry consumption in the country.
 
With respect to the egg industry, domestic production increased by almost 1.3%, which contributed to the excess supply in the market during the year.
 
We were able to increase our sales volume in all our main product lines. We sold our entire production and achieved an operating margin of 9.2%.
 
Net revenues
 
Consolidated net revenues during 2006 amounted to Ps.15.6 billion, compared to $15.6 billion reported in 2005, a 0.4% decrease. This was mostly due to a decrease in the sales of chicken, our main product line.
 
Our chicken sales decreased by 3.5% due to a decrease in price of 3.6%, while volume increased smoothly by 0.1%, mainly as a result of an increase in supply in the chicken market as compared to the previous year.
 
Our revenues from egg sales increased by 5.9% in 2006, as a result of a 3.9% price increase, and 1.9 % increase in volume, due to more stable supply and prices in the year throughout the industry.
 
In 2006, there was a significant growth in sales of 25.4% of balanced feed, while the volume achieved 24.3% compared to 2005. This was the result of focused strategies that Bachoco has implemented in this line of business.
 
We recognized Ps.10.9 million in our 2006 revenue as a result of fair valuing part of the Company’s inventories, see Note 2-h and 5-b in our audited financial statements.
 
Cost of sales
 
The consolidated cost of sales in 2006 was Ps.12.1 billion, representing an increase over 2005 of Ps.0.82 billion, or 7.3%, as a result of higher costs in raw materials, particularly during the second half of the year.
 
33

 
Gross profit
 
Bachoco’s gross profit reached Ps.3.5 billion during 2006, a decrease of 20.2% compared with the previous year. Gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, was 22.5%, compared to 28.1% reached in 2005. The decline was mostly due to cost increase and a decrease in sales.
 
Sales, general and administrative expenses
 
Sales and administrative expenses in 2006 amounted to Ps.2.1 billion. This represents an increase of only 3.3% over 2005 and is mainly attributable to sales expenses due mainly to delivering product to more points of sales.
 
Operating income
 
Consolidated operating income in 2006 totaled Ps.1.4 billion, a decrease of 40% over the previous year’s results, largely due to a lower gross profit and higher operating expenses. The operating margin for the year was 9.2% compared to 15.2% in 2005.
 
Comprehensive cost of financing
 
Comprehensive financing income (cost) represents the net effect of interest expense, interest income, foreign exchange gain (loss) and gain (loss) on net monetary position, which arises from the effect of inflation on the average net balance of monetary assets and liabilities. Comprehensive financing cost had a positive impact (gain) of Ps.61.4 million in 2006, compared with a cost of Ps. 74.0 million in 2005.
 
This change was due mainly to a net gain in foreign exchange of Ps. 40.8 million due to a more efficiency in buying U.S. dollars needed for our normal operations and larger net interest income due to higher level of cash, partially offset by a higher loss on net monetary positions, since the inflation rate was higher in 2006.
 
Other income, net
 
Other income, net represented a net gain of Ps.18.4 million in 2006 as compared to a net expense of Ps.26.0 million in 2005. Other income, net in both 2006 and 2005 was attributable mainly to sales of used equipment, income from government supports and miscellaneous services. This variation was mainly due to better results of used equipment less amount of obsolete inventories, and larger government supports.
 
Income before provision for income tax, asset tax, employee profit sharing
 
Income before provision for income tax, asset tax, employee profit sharing and cumulative effect of accounting change decreased in 2006, from Ps.2, 278.2 million to Ps.1,506.3 million, due primarily to a decrease in operating income.
 
Net income
 
Net income for 2006 decreased to Ps.907.1 million compared to Ps.1, 910.3 million reached in 2005. This result includes a Ps.336.4 million decrease due to deferred taxes as a result of rate changes in the taxation of the Mexican agricultural and livestock sector, in place as of 2007. This change had no effect on the Company’s cash flow.
 
34

 
Income Tax, Asset Tax and Employee Profit Sharing, Year 2007
 
For a more detailed discussion on this topic, please see Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. We and each of our subsidiaries file individual tax returns and may be subject to different tax regimes.
 
In December 2004, a reduction in the 33% general income tax rate was approved, so that the rate was 30% in 2005, 29% in 2006 and 28% in 2007 and succeeding years.
 
The Simplified Regime taxed corporate income at a rate of 35% for 2002, with a gradual yearly decrease of one percent, until the tax rate was reduced to 29% in 2006; however, companies subject to the New Simplified Regime also received reductions on the above corporate rates, so that companies under this regime had an effective tax rate of 16% for 2004, 2005 and 2006.

As of January 1, 2006, the tax rate for taxpayers that pay income tax under the New Simplified Regime was determined by applying the reduction of 44.83% in 2006, to the regular income tax rates of 29%, resulting in the fixed rate of 16%.

In 2006 changes were made to Mexican Law that will increase the tax rate from 16% to 19% for 2007. This charge resulted in a debit of Ps.336.4 millions to income, reflected in deferred taxes.
 
As a result, the income tax rate under the New Simplified Regime was 19% in 2007.
 
In addition to income tax, we, along with our subsidiaries, are also subject to an alternative minimum tax known as “asset tax,” which is assessed on the average value of most assets, net of certain liabilities. The general asset tax rate was 1.25% in 2007, (1.8% in year 2006); BSACV is subject to a 0.848% rate pursuant to the New Simplified Regime (unchanged from the Simplified Regime). We benefit from special rules that exclude a number of assets from the asset tax and from tax incentives in connection with certain of our investments. We (together with our subsidiaries) are subject to asset tax if the amount of asset tax exceeds the computed income tax liability. Asset tax can be credited against income tax in subsequent years (up to ten years). The asset tax in 2005, 2006 and 2007 amounted to Ps.21.4 million, Ps.28.3 million and Ps.27.2 million, respectively. In each of the three years we credited against these amounts the income tax paid.
 
As of December 31, 2007, we had Ps.6.4 million in asset tax credits. See Note 15-b to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.
 
During 2007, a new tax reform was enacted and it abolished the asset tax effective in 2008 as discussed below.
 
In 2007, we recognized a total income tax and asset tax charge of Ps.312.7 million, (an effective income tax rate of 19.80%), compared to a total income and asset tax charge of Ps.599.1 million in 2006 and Ps.367.8 million in 2005. This amount was lower than the amount recognized in 2006 due to the recognition of deferred taxes in 2006 as a result of the tax rate increase on the Mexican poultry industry for 2007. (See Note 15-a to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
 
Neither Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. nor Bachoco, S.A. de C.V. have employees, but each of our other subsidiaries is required under Mexican law to pay employees, in addition to their compensation and benefits, profit sharing in an aggregate amount equal to 10% of such subsidiary’s taxable income subject to certain adjustments. According to the interpretation of Mexican FRS 4, employee profit sharing must be presented in the statements of income as an ordinary expense. Thus, effective 2007, we classified employee profit-sharing included it in the “other ordinary expenses” section of the income statement (in prior years it was disclosed as a single caption before net income). (See Notes 16 and 2-x to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
 
35

 
Flat-Rate Business Tax (FRBT or IETU in Spanish).
 
The Flat-Rate Business Tax (FRBT or IETU in Spanish) Law was published in the Official Gazette on October 1, 2007. This Law came into effect as of January 1, 2008 and abolished the Asset Tax Law.
 
The current-year FRBT is computed by applying the 17.5% rate to income determined on the basis of cash flows (as defined), net of authorized credits. The rate for 2008 is 16.5% and for 2009 is 17.0%.
 
FRBT credits derive principally from the unamortized negative FRBT base and salary credits and social security contributions, as well as credits derived from the deduction of certain investments, such as inventories and fixed assets, during the transition period, which began starting on the date on which the FRBT came into force.
 
FRBT shall be payable only to the extent it exceeds income tax for the same period. Should a negative FRBT base be determined because deductions exceed taxable income, there will be no FRBT payable. The amount of the negative base multiplied by the FRBT rate results in a FRBT credit, which may be applied against income tax for the same year or, if applicable, against FRBT payable in the next ten years.
 
Based on tax result projections, we consider that our Company will be subject to the payment of income tax in the following years. (See Note 15-c to our Consolidated Financial Statements).
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our working capital (current assets less current liabilities) increased year over year from Ps.5.7 billion on December 31, 2006 to Ps.6.5 billion on December 31, 2007. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities on December 31, 2007 was 5.4. Cash and cash equivalents were Ps.3.0 billion on December 31, 2007, representing a decrease of Ps.544.0 million from the previous year primarily due to increases in the working capital required by our operations and an increase in our level of capital expenditures.
 
Inventories were Ps.3.3 billion as of December 31, 2007, representing an increase of Ps.1.1 billion from the previous year, due mainly to larger inventories and higher cost of raw materials.
 
Total debt, including the current portion of long term debt, equaled Ps.109.6 million as of December 31, 2007, an increase of Ps. 64.14 million from December 31, 2006.
 
Stockholders’ equity increased to Ps.15.1 billion on December 31, 2007 from Ps.14.1 billion on December 31, 2006.
 
Long term debt on December 31, 2006 represented 0.3% of our capitalization, without change as compared to 0.3% on December 31, 2006.
 
In 2007, capital investments amounted to Ps.991.7 million, all of which were financed from resources generated from our own operations. These capital investments were used mainly to finance productivity projects, production growing capabilities and infrastructure maintenance to keep facilities in good operating conditions.
 
We are a holding company with no significant operations of our own. We will have distributable profits and cash to pay dividends only to the extent that we receive dividends from our subsidiaries, principally BSACV. The amount of dividends payable by our subsidiaries and us is also subject to general limitations under Mexican corporate law.
 
36

 
We expect to finance our capital expenditures and debt service obligations from our current liquidity and capital resources, cash flows and from additional borrowings from our existing sources of debt financing, although we will also consider other sources of debt financing if they are available on advantageous terms. For a discussion of our use of hedging instruments, please see Item 8 below.
 
Our major categories of indebtedness included the following:
 
As of December 31, 2007, we have Ps. 40.0 million in notes payable to banks.
 
Long term debt to banks, as of December 31, 2007, was Ps.50.8 million outstanding (excluding current portion). The weighted average interest rate on long term debt was 7.892%.
 
The following table summarizes certain contractual liabilities as of December 31, 2007. The table does not include short term debt, accounts payable or pension liabilities.
 
   
Payments Due by Period
(millions of constant pesos as of December 31, 2007)
 
                                       
Contractual Obligations
 
Total
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
2011
 
2012
 
Long-term debt 
  Ps. 
50.8
   
0.0
   
19.8
   
19.8
  Ps. 
7.5
  Ps. 
3.7
 
Operating leases 
   
310.9
  Ps. 
70.0
  Ps. 
62.7
  Ps. 
56.7
   
55.1
   
54.4
 
Total 
  Ps. 
361.7
  Ps. 
70.0
  Ps.
82.5
  Ps. 
76.5
  Ps. 
62.6
  Ps. 
58.1
 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements of the type that we are required to disclose under Item 5.E of Form 20-F.
 
Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP
 
The principal differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP, as they relate to us, concern (i) net cost of labor obligations (ii) capitalization of financing costs, (iii) biological assets and agricultural products valuation at fair value, and (iv) treatment of minority interest. Each of these differences also affects our balance sheet.
 
Our consolidated net income under U.S. GAAP was Ps.1, 893.3 million in 2005, Ps.895.5 million in 2006 and Ps.1, 261.8 million in 2007, compared to Ps.1, 910.3 million, Ps.907.1 million and Ps.1,272.2 million, respectively, under Mexican FRS. For further explanation, please see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Bachoco has applied Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.109, Accounting for Income Taxes, for all periods presented. In the Company’s case the application of the rule did not generate a reconciling difference in 2005, 2006 and 2007, therefore, there is no difference between Mexican FRS and US GAAP in those years.
 
The Company also adopted the requirements of Statement 144 on January 1, 2002 and has not identified any impairment adjustments to the carrying value of its long lived assets. 
 
37

 
Use of Estimates in Certain Accounting Policies
 
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates concerning a variety of matters. Some of these matters are highly uncertain, and the estimates involve judgments based on the information available to us. The discussion below identifies matters for which the financial presentation would be materially affected (a) if we relied on different estimates that we could reasonably use, or (b) if in the future we change our estimates in response to changes that are reasonably likely to occur.
 
The discussion below addresses only those estimates that we consider most important based on the degree of uncertainty and the likelihood of a material impact if we used a different estimate. There are many other areas in which we use estimates about uncertain matters, but the reasonably likely effect of changed or different estimates would not be material to our financial presentation.
 
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment
 
We estimate the useful lives of our property, plant and equipment in order to determine the amount of depreciation expense to be recorded in each period. The current estimates of useful lives are based on estimates made by an independent appraiser in 1996. Those estimates have been adjusted when applicable, based on historical experience with similar assets that we own. Accumulated depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment in 2007 amounted to Ps. 6,702.7 million. As applied to our 2007 financial results, the depreciation was Ps.571.4 million, or 3.1% of our net revenues. For further explanation, see Notes 2-i and 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Allowance for Productivity Declines
 
In estimating the inventory value of our breeder birds, swine and layers, we make allowances for productivity declines. We estimate such allowances based on expected future production and deduct them from inventories. The estimates of future production are based on standards for the breeder line and the performance of the most recent flocks. We refer to the standards provided by the company that sells us the breeder line in question. Each company that sells breeder lines publishes its own particular standards for its proprietary breeder line.
 
Inventory Valuation
 
Since January 1, 2003, for Mexican FRS purposes, our inventories are valued using market prices. According to Bulletin E-1, biological assets and agricultural products (the latter at the time of their harvesting) are to be valued at their fair value, net of estimated costs at point of sale. Also, the Bulletin establishes that, whenever the fair value cannot be determined in a reliable, verifiable and objective manner, the assets are to be valued at their production cost, net of accumulated impairment.
 
Poultry being fattened (less than 6.5 weeks old), incubatable eggs, pigs and laying hens, are valued at production cost since it is not possible to determine their fair value in a reliable, verifiable and objective manner.
 
Poultry being fattened from age 6.5 weeks to the time birds are ready for sale is valued at fair value net of estimated costs at point of sale, considering the sales price per kilogram of processed chicken at the date of valuation.
 
Laying hens are depreciated based on eggs produced using an estimated factor for productive useful life.
 
Processed chicken, turkey, beef and commercial eggs are valued at their fair value net of costs at point of sale, considering the sales price per kilogram of processed chicken and commercial eggs at the time such items are considered agricultural products; from this date, the valuation is considered to be cost up to the time of sale, not in excess of net realizable value.
 
38

 
For more details, see “Inventories and biological assets” in Note 2-h and 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
We periodically and systematically review the aging and collection of our accounts receivable. We consider that such accounts are those which are more than 60 days overdue or in litigation. See Note 2-g to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Pension Plan
 
We have a retirement plan in which all non-union workers participate. Pension benefits are based on the salary of workers in their final three years of service, the number of years worked and their age at retirement. See note 2-m in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

This plan includes:

- Defined contribution plan: This fund consists of employee and Company contributions. The employee contribution percentage ranges from 1% to 5%. The Company contribution ranges from 1% to 2% in the case of employees with less than 10 years’ seniority, and the same contribution percentage as the employee (5%) when the employee has more than 10 years’ seniority.

- Defined benefit plan: This fund consists solely of Company contributions and covers the Company's labor obligations with each employee. Seniority premiums and severance payments are paid to workers as required by Mexican labor law. We recognize the liability for pension benefits, seniority premiums and termination benefits (severance payments), based on independent actuarial computations using the projected unit-credit method and financial assumptions net of inflation.

ITEM 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees
 
Directors
 
The Board of Directors is responsible for the management of our business. The Board of Directors consists of an odd number of directors, never fewer than five, and corresponding alternate directors, each of whom is elected for a term of one year.
 
Before September 2006, holders of Series B Shares elected directors and alternate directors at a general ordinary stockholders’ meeting, while holders of Series L Shares had the right to appoint or elect two directors and two alternate directors to the Board of Directors.
 
Since September 2006, we have only Series B Shares with full voting rights.
 
Alternate directors are authorized to serve on the Board of Directors in place of directors who are unable to attend meetings or otherwise participate in the activities of the Board of Directors.
 
The following table identifies our directors, alternate directors, Honorary Chairman of the board and Secretary of the board as of June 2008, their positions and their years of service:
 
39

 
Name
 
Position
 
Years as a
Member of the
Board of Director
Enrique Robinson Bours Almada 
 
Honorary Chairman of the board
 
54
Mario Javier Robinson Bours Almada 
 
Life Honorary Shareholder Director
 
54
Francisco Javier R. Bours Castelo 
 
Chairman of the Board and Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
26
Eduardo Rojas Crespo 
 
Secretary of the Board
 
Since April, 2008
Jose Gerardo Robinson Bours Castelo
 
Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
Since April, 2008
Juan Bautista Salvador Robinson Bours 
 
Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
54
Arturo Bours Griffith 
 
Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
14
Jesús Enrique Robinson Bours Muñoz 
 
Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
14
Ricardo Aguirre Borboa 
 
Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
14
Octavio Robinson Bours Griffith 
 
Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
11
Jesús Rodolfo Robinson Bours Muñoz 
 
Proprietary Shareholder Director
 
6
José Eduardo Robinson Bours Castelo 
 
Alternate Director
 
14
Juan Salvador Robinson Bours Martínez 
 
Alternate Director
 
14
José Francisco Robinson Bours Griffith 
 
Alternate Director
 
14
Guillermo Pineda Cruz 
 
Alternate Director
 
14
Avelino Fernández Salido 
 
Independent Director
 
5
Humberto Schwarzbeck Noriega 
 
Independent Director
 
5
 
·
Enrique Robinson Bours Almada, Mario Javier Robinson Bours Almada and Juan Bautista Salvador Robinson Bours are brothers.
 
·
Francisco Javier R. Bours Castelo, José Gerardo Robinson Bours Castelo and José Eduardo Robinson Bours Castelo are sons of Mario Javier Robinson Bours.
 
·
Arturo Bours Griffith, José Francisco Bours Griffith and Octavio Robinson Bours are nephews of Enrique Robinson Bours Almada, Mario Javier Robinson Bours Almada and Juan Bautista Salvador Robinson Bours.
 
·
Jesús Enrique Robinson Bours Muñoz and Jesús Rodolfo Robinson Bours Muñoz are sons of Enrique Robinson Bours Almada.
 
·
Juan Salvador Robinson Bours Martínez is the son of Juan Bautista Salvador Robinson Bours.
 
·
Guillermo Pineda Cruz is the son-in-law of Enrique Robinson Bours Almada, and Ricardo Aguirre Borboa is the son-in-law of Juan Bautista Salvador Robinson Bours.
 
Our bylaws provide for the creation of an executive committee of the Board of Directors, which may exercise certain of the board’s powers in full, subject to certain limitations.
 
In April 2002, we announced the retirement of Mr. Enrique Robinson Bours Almada, Chairman of the board and co-founder of the Company. Mr. Bours led the Company for 50 years. The board named as his successor Mr. Javier Robinson Bours Castelo, Mr. Enrique Robinson Bours’s nephew. Mr. Bours Castelo has been at Bachoco for 26 years as a member of the board and served as Vice-Chairman for nine years. Mr. Bours Castelo was named Chairman of the board in 2002.
 
During the Annual Shareholder meeting on April 23, 2008 the Company announced the retirement of Mr. Mario Javier Robinson Bours Almada as a member of the Board of Directors and he was named as a Life Honorary Propriety Shareholder Director. Also during this meeting Mr. José Gerardo Robinson Bours Castelo was named as a Proprietary Shareholder Director in the place of Mr. Mario Javier Robinson Bours Almada.
 
40

 
In order to fully comply with current Mexican Corporate and Securities Market Laws as well as other recent regulatory amendments in the various markets in which Bachoco’s Shares are traded, we appointed a new Board of Directors at our ordinary stockholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2003. We ratified our Board of Directors at our stockholders’ meeting held on April 23, 2008.
 
Our board, as of June 2008, is composed of the following members:
 
Proprietary Shareholder Directors:
Francisco Javier R. Bours Castelo
Jose Gerardo Robinson Bours Castelo
Juan Bautista S. Robinson Bours Almada
Jesús Enrique Robinson Bours Muñoz
Jesús Rodolfo Robinson Bours Muñoz
Arturo Bours Griffith
Octavio Robinson Bours Griffith
Ricardo Aguirre Borboa

Alternate Directors:
José Eduardo Robinson Bours Castelo
Juan Salvador Robinson Bours Martínez
José Francisco Robinson Bours Griffith
Guillermo Pineda Cruz

Independent Directors:
Avelino Fernández Salido
Humberto Schwarzbeck Noriega

Life Honorary Chairman of the Board:
Enrique Robinson Bours Almada

Life Honorary Shareholder Director:
Mario Javier Robinson Bours Almada

Francisco Javier R. Bours Castelo, Chairman of the Board of Directors, has been a member of the board for 26 years, and has been Chairman since April 2002. Before that, he was Vice-Chairman for several years. Mr. Bours holds a degree in Civil Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores Monterrey (ITESM). He currently serves as Chairman of the boards of directors of the following companies: Grupo Megacable, S.A. de C.V., Congeladora Hortícola, S.A. de C.V., Inmobiliaria of Trento S.A. de C.V., Acuícola Boca S.A. de C.V., Agriexport S.A. de C.V., Industrias Boca, S.A. de C.V., and Promotora Empresarial del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.
 
Jose Gerardo Robinson Bours Castelo, Proprietary Shareholder Director, is member of the board since April, 2008. He previously served as Systems Manager. Mr. Bours, holds a degree in Computer Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores Monterrey (ITESUM). He currently serves as member of the following companies: Grupo Megacable, S.A. de C.V., Congeladora Hortícola, S.A. de C.V., Acuícola Boca, S.A. de C.V., Industrias Boca, S.A. de C.V. and Promotora Empresarial del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V. He is also Chairman of Fundación Mexicana para el Desarrollo Rural and Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey Campus Obregón.
 
41

 
Juan Bautista S. Robinson Bours Almada, Proprietary Shareholder Director, has been a member of the board for 54 years and is a co-founder of Industrias Bachoco S.A.B. de C.V.
 
Jesús Enrique Robinson Bours Muñoz, Proprietary Shareholder Director, has been a member of the board for 14 years, having previously served as Production Director and Divisional Manager. Mr. Robinson Bours holds a degree in Engineering from the University of Arizona. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of San Luis Corporación S.A. de C.V., and Megacable S.A. de C.V.
 
Jesús Rodolfo Robinson Bours Muñoz, Proprietary Shareholder Director, has been a member of the board for 6 years. Mr. Robinson Bours previously served in the Company as Production Manager in the Northwest and Bajio divisions, Commercial Manager in Northwest Division and Purchasing Manager at the Bajio Division. Mr. Robinson Bours holds a degree in Agricultural Engineering from the University of Arizona. He has business experience in agriculture and raising livestock with Agrícola Monte Cristo S.A. de C.V., Agrícola Río Yaqui S.P.R. de R.L., Agrícola Nacapul S.P.R. de R.L. and Ganadera Cocoreña S.P.R. de R.L.
 
Arturo Bours Griffith, Proprietary Shareholder Director, has been a member of the board for 14 years. Mr. Bours Griffith completed professional studies at the University of Arizona. He is also Chairman of the board of Qualyplast, S.A. de C.V., and a member of the board of Megacable, S.A. de C.V., Promotora Empresarial del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V., and Taxis Aereos del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.
 
Octavio Robinson Bours Griffith, Proprietary Shareholder Director, has been a member of the board for 11 years. Mr. Robinson Bours holds a degree in Agricultural Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). He has experience in producing swine, and is also a member of the board of Choya, S.A. de C.V., and Granos Santa Fe, S.A. de C.V.
 
Ricardo Aguirre Borboa, Proprietary Shareholder Director, was also an Independent Director until April 2007. Mr. Aguirre has been a member of the board for 14 years. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the newspaper El Debate and he holds a degree in Agricultural Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). He has experience in agriculture and pork production. Mr. Aguirre Borboa is also member of the board of Gasolinera Servicios del Valle del Fuerte S.A. de C.V., Periódico el Debate de los Mochis, and Tepeyac Produce, Inc.
 
José Eduardo Robinson Bours Castelo, Alternate Director, has been a member of the board for 14 years. Mr. Robinson Bours holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). He was previously Commercial Director of Industrias Bachoco, a Senator of the Mexican Congress and is currently governor of the state of Sonora.
 
Juan Salvador Robinson Bours Martínez, Alternate Director, has been a member of the board for 14 years, and has served Bachoco as Purchasing Manager. Mr. Robinson Bours holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). His other appointments include Chairman of the board and CEO of Llantas y Accesorios, S.A. de C.V.
 
José Francisco Robinson Bours Griffith, Alternate Director, has been a member of the board for 14 years. He holds a degree in Civil Engineering from the Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara. Mr. Robinson Bours has worked at Bachoco as Engineering Manager, and is currently dedicated to agricultural operations.
 
Guillermo Pineda Cruz, Alternate Director, has been a member of the board for 14 years. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of Banamex and was a regional member of the Board of Directors of Grupo Financiero Serfín, Inverlat and Inverméxico. Mr. Pineda holds a degree in Civil Engineering from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM) and a master’s degree in Business Administration from the Instituto Tecnológico. y de Estudios Superiores de Sonora (ITSON). He co-founded Edificadora Pi-Bo, S.A. de C.V. in 1983 and is its President and CEO.
 
42

 
Avelino Fernández Salido, Independent Director, was named a member of the board on April 30, 2003. He is also a member of the board of Banco Nacional de México, BBVA Bancomer, and Banca Serfín. His business experience is in the marketing of grains.
 
Humberto Schwarzbeck Noriega, Independent Director, was named a member of the board on April 30, 2003. He holds a degree in economics from the Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM). He is currently CEO of Yeso Industrial de Navojoa S.A. de C.V. and Chairman of the Board of Promotora de Manufacturas S.A. de C.V.
 
Executive Officers
 
Our executive officers as of December 31, 2007 are set forth in the table below:
 
Name
 
Position
 
Age
Cristóbal Mondragón Fragoso
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
62
Daniel Salazar Ferrer
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
43
David Gastélum Cazares
 
Director of Sales
 
56
José Luis López Lepe
 
Director of Personnel
 
62
Rodolfo Ramos Arvizu
 
Technical Director
 
50
Ernesto Salmón Castelo
 
Director of Operations
 
45
Andres Morales Astiazaran
 
Director of Marketing and Value-added Products
 
39

Cristóbal Mondragón Fragoso, Chief Executive Officer, joined us in 1982 and assumed his current position in 2001. Previously, Mr. Mondragón served as Administration Manager, as Manager of Corporate Finance and as Chief Financial Officer. Before joining us, Mr. Mondragón worked as an accountant for three years. Later he joined La Hacienda, S.A. de C.V., where he held the positions of Auditor, Accountant, Head of Processing Systems, Audit Manager, Administration Manager and Comptroller. Mr. Mondragón holds an Accounting degree from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
 
Daniel Salazar Ferrer, Chief Financial Officer, joined us in 2000 and assumed his current position in January 2003. Previously, Mr. Salazar worked for four years as Chief Financial Officer at Grupo Covarrubias and as Comptroller at Negromex, a company of Grupo Desc. Mr. Salazar holds an Accounting degree from Universidad Tecnológica de México and a master’s degree in Business Administration from Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM).
 
David Gastélum Cazares, Director of Sales, joined us in 1979 and assumed his current position in 1992. Previously, Mr. Gastélum served as a pullet salesman in the states of Sonora and Sinaloa, National Sales Manager of Live Animals and Eggs, Manager of the Northwest Division, Manager of the México City Division and National Sales Manager. Before joining us, Mr. Gastelúm worked at La Hacienda, S.A. de C.V. as Technical Advisor and as Area Officer for the Southeast Division. Mr. Gastélum holds a degree in Veterinary Medicine from the school of Veterinary Medicine of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
 
José Luis López Lepe, Director of Personnel, joined us in 1993. Previously, Mr. López worked as a teacher in several institutions as well as with Grupo Condumex, where he was Director of Personnel. Mr. López holds a degree in Physics and Chemistry from the Escuela Normal Superior and a degree in Business Administration from Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.
 
43

 
Rodolfo Ramos Arvizu, Technical Director, joined us in 1980. Previously, Mr. Ramos held positions in the Egg Quality Control Training Program and in Poultry Management as well as serving as Supervisor of the Commercial Egg Production Training Program, Manager of Raw Material Purchasing and as a Director of Production. Mr. Ramos holds a degree in Agricultural Engineering from Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM).
 
Ernesto Salmón Castelo, Director of Operations, joined us in 1991 and assumed his current position in 2000. Previously, Mr. Salmón worked for Gamesa, S.A. de C.V. and for us as Sales Manager in Sonora, Northwestern Distribution Manager, Manager of the Processing Plant in Celaya, Southeastern Division Manager and Bajio Division Manager. Mr. Salmón holds a degree in Chemical Engineering from Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora and a master’s degree in Business Administration from Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM).
 
Andrés Morales Astiazaran, Director of Marketing and Value-added Products since July 2006. Before joining us, Mr. Morales worked during 4 years as Sales and Marketing Vice President in Smithfield Foods a U.S. Company with offices in Sonora, Mexico. Previously Mr. Morales worked for Bachoco as Marketing Manager, Manager of the Northeast division and then as National Manager of Bachoco. Mr. Morales holds an accounting degree from Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey (ITESM) and marketing courses by the universities of Northwestern University (Kellog), University of Chicago, ITESM and the IPADE (D1).
 
Statutory Auditor
 
According with the Mexican market security law, the Statutory Auditor is not required for public companies since June 2006. The activities of the Statutory Auditor will be performed by the Audit Committee.
 
Audit Committee
 
In January 2001, the Mexican Commission of Business Leaders (Consejo Coordinador Empresarial), with the support of the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (Mexican Banking and Securities Commission, or “CNBV”), issued a Código de Mejores Prácticas Corporativas (“Code of Best Practices”) for publicly traded Mexican companies, recommending certain actions with respect to various areas of corporate governance. Subsequently, the Securities Market Law was amended, effective June 2006, to require that all publicly traded Mexican companies have an audit committee.
 
The mandate of the Audit Committee is to establish and monitor procedures and controls in order to ensure that the financial information we distribute is useful, appropriate and reliable and accurately reflects our financial position. In particular, pursuant to our bylaws and Mexican law, among others, the Audit Committee must do the following:
 
 
(a)
Submit an annual report to the Board of Directors;
 
 
(b)
Provide the Board of Directors with its opinion on the matters that pertain to the Auditing Committee, in accordance with the Securities Market Law;
 
 
(c)
Inform the Board of Directors of the current condition of the internal controls and internal auditing system of the Company or of the entities it controls, including any irregularities detected;
 
 
(d)
Require the relevant directors and other employees of the Company, or of the entities it controls, to provide reports relative to the preparation of the financial information or any other kind of reports or information it deems appropriate to perform its duties;
 
44

 
 
(e)
Receive observations formulated by shareholders, Board members, relevant officers, employees and, in general, any third party with regard to the matters under the Audit Committee duties, as well as carry out the actions that, in its judgment, may be appropriate in connection with such observations;
 
 
(f)
Inform the Board of Directors of any material irregularities detected as a result of the performance of its duties and, as applicable, inform the Board of Directors of the corrective actions taken, or otherwise propose the actions that should be taken;
 
 
(g)
Call Shareholders Meetings and cause the items it deems pertinent to be inserted into the agendas of such Shareholders’ Meetings, and
 
 
(h)
Assist the Board of Directors in selecting candidates for audit and reviewing the scope and terms of the auditor’s engagement, as well as evaluate the performance of the entity that provides the external auditing services and analyze the report, opinions, statements and other information prepared and signed by the external auditor.
 
In order to fully comply with current Mexican Corporate and Securities Market Laws as well as other recent regulatory amendments in the various markets in which Bachoco’s Shares are traded, we named an audit committee during our annual ordinary stockholders’ meeting on April 30, 2003.
 
There were changes in the audit committee during the ordinary stockholder’s meeting held on April 25, 2007; Mr. Francisco Javier R. Bours Castelo is no longer a member of the audit committee and the audit committee is now comprised of the following members:
 
Avelino Fernández Salido (President)
Humberto Schwarzbeck Noriega
Ricardo Aguirre Borboa
 
Mr. Ricardo Aguirre Borboa represents the controlling shareholders and has no voting rights in the audit committee.
 
Compensation of Directors and Officers
 
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we paid approximately Ps.33.4 million in aggregate compensation to our directors and executive officers, for services they rendered in their respective capacities.
 
Board Practices
 
In 2001, we began to review our board practices to bring them into compliance with the recent requirements for companies listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange. As a result of this review, we have changed the composition of our board and appointed an audit committee. See “Directors” and “Audit Committee.”
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, we had approximately 20,432, 21,035 and 23,088 employees, respectively.
 
In 2007, approximately 62.4% of our employees were members of labor unions. Labor relations with our employees are governed by 59 separate collective labor agreements, each relating to a different group of employees and negotiated on behalf of each such group by a different labor union. As is typical in México, wages are renegotiated every year while other terms and conditions of employment are renegotiated every two years. We seek to attract dependable and responsible employees to train at each of our plants and facilities. We offer our employees attractive salary and benefit packages, including a pension and savings plan.
 
45

 
We believe that we have good relations with our employees. We have not experienced significant work stoppages as a result of labor problems.
 
Share Ownership
 
To the best of our knowledge, no individual director or managers holds share ownership of more than one percent of our Shares. At this time, we have not developed a share options plan for our employees.
 
Comparison of our Corporate Governance Rules and the Rules of the NYSE Applicable to U.S. Registered Companies
 
On November 4, 2003, the SEC approved the final corporate governance rules of the NYSE. According to such rules, foreign private issuers are subject to a more limited set of requirements regarding corporate governance than those imposed on U.S. domestic issuers. As a foreign private issuer, we must comply with four rules imposed by the NYSE:
 
 
·
prior to July 31, 2005, we must comply with the requirements set forth by the SEC concerning audit committees;
 
 
·
we must submit an annual Written Affirmation to the NYSE and an Interim Written Annual Affirmation each time a change occurs in the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee.
 
 
·
our CEO must promptly notify the NYSE in writing after any executive officer becomes aware of any material non-compliance with any of the applicable NYSE corporate governance rules; and
 
 
·
we must provide a brief description disclosing any significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. companies under NYSE listing standards.
 
A brief description disclosing the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. companies under NYSE listing standards is available in our webpage http://www.bachoco.com.mx/?p=94 
 
ITEM 7.
Major Stockholders and Related Party Transactions
 
Before September 2006, our Common Stock consisted of 450,000,000 Series B Shares and 150,000,000 Series L Shares. Holders of Series B Shares were entitled to one vote at any general meeting of our stockholders for each Series B Share held. Holders of Series L Shares were entitled to one vote for each Series L Share held, but only with respect to certain matters. We had UBL Units consisting of one Series B Share and one Series L Share and B Units consisting in two Series B Shares.
 
During the extraordinary meeting hold on April 26, 2006 Shareholders approved the Company’s plan to convert the Series L Shares into Series B Shares, with full voting rights, as well as the dissolution of UBL and UBB Units into their components Shares.

46


This process was completed in September 2006, and included two steps: separating the UBL and UBB Units trading on the Mexican Exchange into their component Shares and converting the Series L Shares into Series B Shares, thereby creating a single share class, the Series B Shares. These Shares are trading on the Mexican stock market. The ADS which trade on the NYSE still consist of twelve underlying Shares, but they are all Series B Shares, with full voting rights.
 
In April 1995, the Robinson Bours Stockholders created the Control Trust to hold certain Units owned by members of the Robinson Bours family. The Robinson Bours Stockholders, through the Control Trust and a separate trust established in connection with our 1997 initial public offering (the “Family Trust”),
 
Before September 2006, the Control Trust and the Family Trust was:
 
Title of Class
 
Identity of Group
 
Amount Owned
 
Percent of Class
 
               
Series B(1)
 
Control Trust and Family Trust
   
398,250,000
   
88.5
%
                     
Series L(2)
 
Control Trust and Family Trust
   
98,250,000
   
65.5
%
                     
All Classes(3)
 
Control Trust and Family Trust
   
496,500,000
   
82.8
%
 

(1)
Percentage is based on 450,000,000 Series B Shares, including 300,000,000 Shares not registered under Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
(2)
Percentage is based on 150,000,000 Series L Shares.
(3)   Percentage is based on 600,000,000 Shares.
 
As of December 31, 2006 the Control Trust and the Family Trust owned 496,500,000 Shares outstanding, (82.75%), all Series B Shares.
 
Apart from the ownership set forth above, at the end of April 2008, Fidelity Low Priced Stock Fund and Fidelity Management & Research Co. each own 5.03% of our Common Stock, representing a total of 2,515,000 and 2,515,200 shares respectively.
 
In November 1998, in accordance with rules established by the CNBV, we established a reserve in the amount of Ps.180.0 million in nominal pesos, for the repurchase of Shares. At the end of 2007, the Company had repurchased zero Shares.
 
During our stockholders’ meeting of April 23, 2008, we capped the share repurchase program for 2008 to a maximum amount of Ps.313.6 million. As of May 20, 2008, we had repurchased zero Shares.
 
The following table sets the percentages of the Shares held in México and other Countries as of December 31, 2007.
 
Year
 
Percentage
 
       
México
   
85.0
%
Other Countries
   
15.0
%
 
From the 100% of the total Shares of the Company we accounted for approximately 48 shareholders in the NYSE and 58 in the BMV.

47


Interest of Management in Certain Transactions
 
It is our policy not to engage in any transaction with or for the benefit of any stockholder or member of the Board of Directors, or any entity controlled by such a person or in which such a person has a substantial economic interest, unless (i) the transaction is related to our business and (ii) the price and other terms are at least as favorable to us as those that could be obtained on an arm’s-length basis from a third party.
 
We have engaged in a variety of transactions with entities owned by members of the Robinson Bours family, all of which we believe were consistent with this policy and not material to our business and results of operations. All of these transactions are described below. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to engage in similar transactions in the future.
 
We regularly purchase vehicles and related equipment from distributors owned by various members of the Robinson Bours family. The total amount spent on such purchases was Ps.58.6 million, Ps. 63.5 million and Ps.95.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The distribution of vehicles and related equipment is a highly competitive aspect of business in the areas in which we operate. We are not dependent on affiliated distributors and are able to ensure that the pricing and service we obtain from affiliated distributors are competitive with those available from other suppliers.
 
The Robinson Bours Stockholders own Taxis Aéreos del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V. (“TAN”), an air transport company that provides transportation for members of the Board of Directors to and from meetings at our headquarters in Celaya. We paid TAN Ps. 4.7 million, Ps.4.2 million and Ps.3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, for such transportation.
 
We purchased feed and packaging materials from enterprises owned by the family of Enrique Robinson Bours and the family of Juan Bautista Robinson Bours. The cost of such purchases was Ps.194.1 million, Ps.251.9.0 million and Ps.192.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
 
Our accounts payable to related parties totaled Ps.12.7 million and Ps.26.8 million as of ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. These transactions took place among companies owned by the same set of stockholders. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Neither we nor our subsidiaries have loaned any money to any of our directors or officers, controlling shareholders or entities controlled by these parties.
 
ITEM 8.
Financial Information
 
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Item 18. The financial statements were audited by an independent registered public accounting firm and are accompanied by an audit report.
 
The financial statements include a consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of income, consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity, and consolidated statements of changes in financial position and Notes relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with Mexican FRS, which differ in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides a description of the principal differences between Mexican FRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to us and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP of total stockholders’ equity, operating income and net income, a consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and a condensed cash flow statement under U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.

48


Legal Proceedings
 
We are a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that none of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
 
Dividends Policy
 
Pursuant to Mexican law and our bylaws, the declaration, amount and payment of annual dividends are determined by a majority vote of the shareholders, generally but not necessarily on the recommendation of the Board of Directors.
 
We declared and paid dividends in nominal pesos of Ps.239.1 million in 2005, Ps.353.9 million in 2006 and Ps.353.9 million in 2007.
 
Although there can be no assurance as to the amount or timing of future dividends, we expect to pay an annual dividend pro rata to holders of outstanding Shares in an amount up to approximately 20% of the prior year’s net income. The declaration and payment of dividends will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors and the shareholders, including debt instruments which may limit our ability to pay dividends.
 
Because we are a holding company with no significant operations of our own, we will have distributable profits and cash to pay dividends only to the extent that we receive dividends from our subsidiaries, principally BSACV. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will pay dividends or of the amount of any such dividends. BSACV, our principal operating subsidiary, could, in the future, enter into loan agreements containing covenants whose terms limit its ability to pay dividends under certain circumstances.
 
Mexican law requires that 5% of our net income each year (after profit sharing and other deductions required by Mexican law) be allocated to a legal reserve fund until such fund reaches an amount equal to at least 20% of our capital stock. Mexican corporations may pay dividends only out of earnings (including retained earnings after all losses have been absorbed or paid up) and only after such allocation to the legal reserve fund. The level of earnings available for the payment of dividends is determined under Mexican FRS.
 
Significant Changes in Accounting Practices
 
New Accounting pronouncements
 
The most important new accounting pronouncements that came into effect in 2007 are: Mexican FRS B-3, (Statement of Operation), Mexican FRS C-13, (Related Parties), Mexican FRS D-6, (Capitalization of the Comprehensive Cost of Financing), Mexican IFRS 4, (Presentation of Employee Profit Sharing in the Statement of Operation) and Mexican IFRS8, (Effects of the Flate-Rate Business Tax (FRBT)). For more detail see Note 2-x and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
The most important new accounting pronouncements that will come into effect in 2008 are: Mexican FRS B-2, (Statement of Cash Flows), Mexican FRS B-10 (Effects of Inflation), Mexican FRS D-3, (Employees Benefits), Mexican FRS D-4, (Taxes on Profits), Mexican FRS 5, (Accounting Recognition of the Additional Consideration Agreed at the Inception of a Derivative to Adjust the Instrument to its Fair Value), Mexican FRS 6, (Formally Designating a Hedge) and Mexican FRS 7, (Application of Comprehensive Income Item Generated by a Cash Flow Hedge on a Forecasted Purchase of a Non-financial Asset).

49


We consider that the application of the Mexican FRS 5, Mexican FRS 6 and Mexican FRS 7 will have no material effect on our financial position or results of operations. We will apply Mexican FRS B-10 by ceasing to recognize the effects of inflation in our financial information and we are analyzing the effect of Mexican FRS B-2, FRS D-3 and FRS D-4. For more detail see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
ITEM 9.
The Offer and Listing
 
On September 19, 1997, Bachoco commenced trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange through Units (each comprised of one Series B Share and one Series L Share),and on the New York Stock Exchange thought American Depositary Shares (“ADSs,” each comprised of six Units). The ADSs are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) issued by The Bank of New York, as Depositary under a Deposit Agreement among the Company, the Depositary and the holders from time to time of ADRs.
 
In September 2006, the Company separated the UBL and UBB Units into their components, and converted their Series L Shares into Series B Shares, on a one to one basis. Consequently, now all our Common Stock Shares are Series B Shares with full voting rights. This change had not modified the face value of the Shares.
 
On May 1, 2008, there were 7,654 thousands ADSs outstanding, representing 15.3% of the total Shares outstanding, which were held by five holders (including the Depositary Trust Company) with registered addresses in the United States.
 
The following tables set forth for each year from 2003 to 2007, for each quarter from 2006 and 2007 and for each complete month from December 2007 to May 2008, the high, low and close prices of the Shares on the Mexican Stock as reported by the Mexican Stock Exchange and the high, low and close price of the ADSs on the NYSE as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.
 
Mexican Stock Exchange
(Nominal pesos per Share)

Year
 
High
 
Low
 
Close
 
2003
   
9.65
   
7.00
   
9.45
 
2004
   
13.35
   
8.50
   
13.10
 
2005
   
20.70
   
12.22
   
17.25
 
2006
   
23.70
   
15.70
   
23.66
 
2007
   
30.96
   
20.00
   
28.60
 

New York Stock Exchange
(U.S.$ per ADS)
 
Year
 
High
 
Low
 
Close
 
2003
   
10.78
   
7.73
   
10.45
 
2004
   
14.19
   
8.8
   
14.19
 
2005
   
23.02
   
12.87
   
19.50
 
2006
   
29.00
   
16.33
   
29.00
 
2007
   
35.11
   
24.10
   
31.81
 

50


Mexican Stock Exchange
(Nominal pesos per Share)

Period
 
High
 
Low
 
Close
 
First Quarter 2006
   
17.25
   
15.70
   
15.95
 
Second Quarter 2006
   
19.10
   
15.85
   
18.50
 
Third Quarter 2006
   
20.00
   
16.90
   
20.00
 
Fourth Quarter 2006
   
23.66
   
18.70
   
23.66
 
First Quarter 2007
   
28.00
   
20.00
   
25.80
 
Second Quarter 2007
   
30.08
   
25.89
   
28.60
 
Third Quarter 2007
   
30.96
   
24.00
   
29.50
 
Fourth Quarter 2007
   
29.02
   
23.00
   
27.01
 

New York Stock Exchange
(U.S.$ per ADS)

Period
 
High
 
Low
 
Close
 
First Quarter 2006
   
19.58
   
16.33
   
17.43
 
Second Quarter 2006
   
20.90
   
17.30
   
18.29
 
Third Quarter 2006
   
22.45
   
17.97
   
22.25
 
Fourth Quarter 2006
   
29.00
   
20.65
   
29.00
 
First Quarter 2007
   
30.75
   
24.10
   
28.34
 
Second Quarter 2007
   
33.55
   
28.51
   
32.25
 
Third Quarter 2007
   
35.11
   
27.14
   
32.06
 
Fourth Quarter 2007
   
32.61
   
26.04
   
30.77
 

Mexican Stock Exchange
(Nominal pesos per Share)

Month
 
High
 
Low
 
Close
 
December 2007
   
29.02
   
26.91
   
28.60
 
January 2008
   
30.15
   
26.35
   
28.50
 
February 2008
   
28.50
   
22.00
   
26.00
 
March 2008
   
26.33
   
22.00
   
25.12
 
April 2008
   
25.56
   
22.11
   
25.05
 
May 2008
   
25.36
   
23.71
   
25.36
 

New York Stock Exchange
(U.S.$ per ADS)

Period
 
High
 
Low
 
Close
 
December 2007
   
32.61
   
30.00
   
31.81
 
January 2008
   
33.34
   
29.46
   
30.90
 
February 2008
   
29.53
   
27.39
   
29.30
 
March 2008
   
29.99
   
28.23
   
29.12
 
April 2008
   
29.25
   
27.80
   
29.03
 
May 2008
   
29.48
   
27.56
   
29.00
 
 
Trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange
 
The Mexican Stock Exchange, located in México City, is the only stock exchange in México. Founded in 1894, the Mexican Stock Exchange is organized as a corporation whose Shares are held by brokerage houses, which are currently the only entities allowed to own them. These brokerage houses are currently the only entities authorized to trade on the floor of the Mexican Stock Exchange. Trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange takes place principally through an automated inter-dealer quotation system known as SENTRA, which is open for trading between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., México City time, each business day. Each trading day is divided into six trading sessions with ten-minute periods separating each session. Trades in securities listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange can, subject to certain requirements, also be realized off the Exchange. Due primarily to Mexican tax considerations, however, most transactions in listed securities are effected through the Exchange. The Mexican Stock Exchange operates a system of automatic suspension of trading in Shares of a particular issuer as a means of controlling excessive price volatility, but under current regulations this system does not apply to securities such as the Units that are directly or indirectly (for example, through ADSs) quoted on a stock exchange outside México.

51


Settlement is effected two business days after a share transaction on the Mexican Stock Exchange. Deferred settlement, even by mutual agreement, is not permitted without the approval of the CNBV. Most securities traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange are on deposit with S.D. Indeval Institución para el Depósito de Valores, S.A. de C.V., (Central Securities Depository for the Mexican Securities Market, or “Indeval”), a privately owned central securities depositary that acts as a clearing house, depositary, custodian and registrar for Mexican Stock Exchange transactions, eliminating the need for physical transfer of securities.
 
The Mexican Stock Exchange is one of Latin America’s largest exchanges in terms of market capitalization, but it remains relatively small and illiquid compared to major world markets, and is therefore subject to greater volatility. There is no formal over-the-counter market for securities in México.
 
The market value of securities of Mexican companies is, to varying degrees, affected by economic and market conditions in other emerging market countries.
 
Market Regulation
 
The predecessor of the CNBV was established in 1946 to regulate stock market activity. The Ley del Mercado de Valores (“Securities Market Law”) of 1975, as amended, regulates the securities markets and brokerage houses and sets standards for the registration of brokers in the Intermediaries Section of the Registro Nacional de Valores e Intermediarios (National Registry of Securities and Intermediaries, or “RNVI”), such registration being a prerequisite to becoming a member of the Mexican Stock Exchange. Prior to registration in the RNVI, a brokerage house must be authorized by the Ministry of Finance upon the recommendation of the CNBV. Legislative provisions under NAFTA allow foreign securities firms in a NAFTA country to establish and control brokerage firms in México. There are several foreign brokerage houses authorized to operate in México. In addition, a number of other foreign brokerage firms have submitted preliminary applications to be authorized to operate on the Mexican Stock Exchange. The Securities Market Law also empowers the CNBV to regulate the public offering and trading of securities. The governing committee of the CNBV is composed of representatives of the Ministry of Finance, the Mexican Central Bank, the Comisión Nacional de Seguros y Fianzas (“National Insurance and Bonding Commission”), the Comisión Nacional del Sistema de Ahorro para el Retiro (“National Retirement Savings Fund Commission”) and the CNBV.
 
Under the Mexican Securities Market Law, the CNBV must be notified before stockholders of a company listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange effect one or more simultaneous or successive transactions resulting in the transfer of 10% or more of such company’s capital stock. The holders of the Shares being transferred in the transactions are also obligated to inform the CNBV of the results of the transactions within three days of completion of the last transaction, or that the transactions have not been completed. The CNBV will notify the Mexican Stock Exchange of such transactions, without specifying the names of the parties involved.

52


The CNBV and the Mexican Stock Exchange must also be notified in the event of any of the following contingencies:
 
 
·
on the following day of operation if any stockholder of a company listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange effects one or more transactions resulting in the ownership of more than 10% and less of 30% of capital stock;
 
 
·
on the following day of operation if any Related Person increases his ownership of the stock of a company; and
 
 
·
at least 15 days before the operation becomes effective if any stockholder of a company listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange undertakes in a Public Offering one or more transactions resulting in the ownership of more than 30% but less than 50% of capital stock.
 
In June 2006, the Ley del Mercado de Valores (“Securities Market Law”) was updated. Our bylaws were also updated accordingly, which are available in an English version, in our web page.
 
Some of the changes, among others are:
 
a)
We had to change our name from “Industrias Bachoco S.A. de C.V.” to “Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.”
 
b)
Defines more specifically the concept of “Control” or “Controlled”
 
c)
Defines and assigns specific duties to the General Director or CEO.
 
d)
Defines more precisely and widely the duties of the Board of Directors.
 
e)
Assign more ample responsibilities to the audit committee.
 
f)
The Statutory Auditor no longer exists for Public Companies, his duties were assumed by the Audit Committee.
 
ITEM 10.
Additional Information
 
Memorandum and Articles of Association
 
Information regarding the memorandum and articles of association was included in the Initial Registration Form F-1, submitted in September 1997. In April 2002, we made changes to our bylaws, which were reported in our annual report for year 2002. In December 2003 and January 2007 we made further changes, the most important are summarized below. An English translation of our bylaws was submitted with our annual report for year 2006 and is incorporated by reference herein and is also available on our web page www.bachoco.com.mx. Aside from these changes, the information contained in the Initial Registration Form F-1 is applicable to this Annual Report.
 
The discussion set forth below contains information concerning our capital stock and a brief summary of the material provisions of the bylaws and applicable Mexican law. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the bylaws and the applicable provisions of Mexican law.
 
General
 
The Company was incorporated on April 17, 1980 as a variable capital corporation (sociedad anónima de capital variable) under the laws of México. To fully comply with Mexican laws, the Company modified its name to Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. (sociedad anónima bursatil de capital variable) in April, 2007.

53


In 1995, our stockholders authorized the issuance of up to 15,525,000 additional Series B Shares and 15,525,000 additional Series L Shares, all constituting fixed capital, to be issued in connection with the global offering of Shares that took place on September 19, 1997 (the “Global Offering”).
 
On April 21, 1997 we restructured our capital by (i) declaring a four-to-one stock split of the 106,678,125 Series B Shares and 35,559,375 Series L Shares outstanding, (ii) converting 7,762,500 Series L Shares (on a post-split basis) into Series B Shares and (iii) combining all of the 434,475,000 Series B Shares and 134,475,000 Series L Shares outstanding (in each case, on a post-split basis) into 134,475,000 Units and 150,000,000 B Units. Each Unit consisted of one Series B Share and one Series L Share. Holders of Units were entitled to exercise all the rights of holders of the Series B Shares and Series L Shares underlying their Units. Each B Unit consisted of two Series B Shares. B Units entitle the holders thereof to exercise all the rights of holders of the Series B Shares underlying such B Units. Immediately prior to the Global Offering, our outstanding capital stock consisted of 434,475,000 Series B Shares and 134,475,000 Series L Shares, all of which were duly authorized, validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable.
 
Originally for a period of 10 years after the Global Offering, the Series B Shares will be issuable only in the form of Units and B Units, and the Series L Shares only in the form of Units. Commencing 10 years from the date of the Global Offering, Units will automatically separate into their component Series B Shares and Series L Shares, B Units will automatically separate into their component Series B Shares, and each Series L Share underlying the Units will automatically convert into one Series B Share.
 
During the annual shareholders meeting held on April 26, 2006, shareholders approved to proceed with the anticipated conversion of the Series L Shares into Series B Shares, which have full voting rights.
 
This conversion was effective in September 2006 and included two steps: separating the UBL and UBB Units currently trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange into their component Shares. The Series L Shares were converted into Series B Shares (on a one-to-one basis), thereby created a single share class, the Series B Shares, which represents all of our Common Stock. These Shares are currently trading on the Mexican Stock Market. Each ADS still consists of 12 underlying Shares, but they are all Series B Shares.
 
The Series B Shares had full voting rights and the Series L Shares had limited voting rights. Nevertheless the Series B Shares and the Series L Shares had the same economic rights. Each Series B Share entitled the holder thereof to one vote at any general meeting of the stockholders. The Series L Shares were entitled to vote only with respect to certain limited matters as described under “—Voting Rights and Stockholders’ Meetings.”
 
The Robinson Bours Stockholders have advised us that they intend to ensure that the Control Trust will hold at least 51% of the Series B Shares at any time outstanding. See “—Foreign Investment Legislation.”
 
Registration and Transfer
 
Series B Shares are evidenced by certificates in registered form, which may have dividend coupons attached. We maintain a registry and, in accordance with Mexican law, we recognize as stockholders only those holders listed in the stock registry. Stockholders may hold their Shares in the form of physical certificates (which, together with notations made in our stock registry, evidence ownership of the Shares) or through book entries with institutions that have accounts with Indeval.

54


Indeval is the holder of record in respect of Shares held through it. Accounts may be maintained at Indeval by brokerage houses, banks and other entities approved by the CNBV. Ownership of Shares maintained at Indeval is evidenced through Indeval’s records and through lists kept by Indeval participants. See “Description of American Depositary Receipts.”
 
In accordance with Article 130 of the Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles (“Mexican Corporations Law”), the Board of Directors must authorize any transfer of stock, or any securities based on such stock, when the number of Shares sought to be transferred in one act or a succession of acts, without limit of time or from one group of interrelated stockholders or stockholders who act in concert, constitutes 10% or more of the voting stock issued by the Company. If the Board of Directors refuses to authorize such a transfer, the Board must designate one or more purchasers of the stock, who must pay the interested party the prevailing price on the Mexican Stock Exchange. The Board must issue its resolution within three months of the date on which it receives the relevant request for authorization and in any case, must consider: (i) the criteria that are in the best interests of the Company, the Company’s operations and the long-term vision of the activities of the Company and its Subsidiaries; (ii) that no shareholder of the Company is excluded, other than the person that intends to acquire control of the financial benefits that may result from the application of the terms of this clause; (iii) that the taking of the Control of the Company is not restricted in an absolute manner; (iv) that the provisions of the Securities Market Law, with respect to acquisition public offerings, are not contravened; and (v) that the exercise of the patrimonial rights of the acquirer are not rendered without effect.
 
If any person participates in a transaction that would have resulted in the acquisition of 10% or more voting stock of the Company without having obtained the board’s prior approval, they must pay the Company a fine equal to the market value of the Shares.
 
Any person who participates in an act that violate the terms of Article 130 discussed in the preceding paragraph will be obligated to pay the Company a fine in an amount equal to the value of the Shares owned directly or indirectly by the stockholder, or the value of the Shares involved in the prohibited transaction, if such person does not own Shares issued by the Company. In the case of a prohibited transaction that would have resulted in the acquisition of 10% or more of the voting stock of the Company, the fine will be equal to the market value of those Shares, provided that board authorization was not obtained in advance.
 
According to our bylaws, a majority of the members of the Board of Directors must authorize in writing, by a resolution made at a Board of Directors’ meeting, any change in the control of the Company. Our Board of Directors has the right to decide if a person or a group of persons is acting for the purpose of acquiring control of the Company.
 
“Control” or “Controlled” means (i) to directly or indirectly impose decisions at the general meetings of shareholders, stockholders or equivalent bodies or to appoint or remove the majority of the directors, managers or equivalent officers; (ii) to hold title to the rights that directly or indirectly allow the exercise of votes with respect to more than fifty percent of the capital stock; or (iii) to directly or indirectly direct the management, the strategy or the principal policies of the Company, whether through the ownership of securities, by contract or otherwise.
 
Voting Rights and Stockholders’ Meetings
 
Each Series B Share entitles the holder thereof to one vote at any general meeting of the stockholders. Holders are currently entitled to elect all members of the Board of Directors.
 
Our bylaws provide that the Board of Directors shall consist of at least five members and no more than twenty one. Our board was reformed during our ordinary shareholders meeting held on April 23, 2007, and now consists of eight proprietary shareholder Directors and two independent Directors. The stockholders also appointed four alternate Shareholders Directors to the Board of Directors.

55


General stockholders’ meetings may be ordinary or extraordinary meetings. Extraordinary general meetings are meetings called to consider the matters specified in Article 182 of the Mexican Corporations Law and the bylaws, including changes in the fixed portion of the capital stock and other amendments to the bylaws, liquidation, merger, transformation from one type of corporate form to another, change in nationality and changes of corporate purposes.
 
General meetings called to consider all other matters, including election of the directors, are ordinary meetings. An ordinary general meeting of the Company must be held at least annually during the four months following the end of the preceding fiscal year to consider certain matters specified in Article 181 and 182 of the Mexican Corporations Law, including, principally, the election of directors, the approval of the report of the Board of Directors regarding their company’s performance, the Company’s financial statements for the preceding fiscal year and the allocation of the profits and losses of the preceding year, and to approve the transactions that the Company or the entities that the Company controls intend to carry out, in terms of article 47 of the Securities Market Law, in one fiscal year, when such transactions represent 20% (twenty percent) or more of the consolidated assets of the Company, based on the figures corresponding to the closing of the immediately preceding quarter, independently of the manner in which such transactions are carried out, whether simultaneously or successively, but which due to their characteristics, may be considered as a single transaction. Holders of Shares, may vote at such Meetings.
 
Before September 2006, any holder of Series L Shares representing 10% or more of the outstanding capital stock had the right to appoint one member and one alternate member of the Board of Directors during a Shareholders’ meeting.
 
Under our bylaws, the quorum on first call for a general ordinary meeting is at least 50%. If a quorum is not available on first call, a second meeting may be called at which action may be taken by a majority of those present, regardless of the number of Shares represented at the meeting. On a second call, Ordinary General Shareholders’ Meetings will be considered validly held regardless of the number of common or ordinary Shares represented therein and the resolutions of such Meetings will be valid when passed by majority vote of the Common Stock therein.
 
The quorum on first call for a general extraordinary meeting or a special meeting is 75% of the outstanding Shares with voting rights on the matters to be addressed in that meeting. If a quorum is not available on first call, a second meeting may be called, provided that at least 50% of the outstanding Shares with voting rights on the matters to be addressed in that meeting are represented.
 
Our bylaws require the approval of holders of at least 95% of the outstanding Shares and the approval of the CNBV for the amendment of the controlling stockholders’ obligation under the bylaws to repurchase Shares and certain other provisions in the event of delisting. See “—Other Provisions—Repurchase in the Event of Delisting.”
 
For more detail see our bylaws on our webpage at www.bachoco.com.mx
 
Holders of ADRs are entitled to instruct the Depositary as to the exercise of the voting rights. See “Description of American Depositary Receipts—Voting of Deposited Securities.”
 
According to our bylaws, stockholders with a right to vote may ask to postpone a vote on any matters on which they believe they do not have enough information as defined by Article 199 of the Mexican Corporation Law. Stockholders with a right to vote, including a limited right to vote, and who hold at least 20% of the capital stock, may legally object to the decisions of a general stockholders’ meeting, with respect to matters in which they have rights, without the percentage established under article 201 of the General Law of Business Entities being applicable in such case.

56


Moreover, holders of Shares having voting rights, including limited or restricted voting rights or holders of Shares without voting rights that jointly or individually represent 5% (five percent) or more of the capital stock, may directly exercise the action of liability against the members and secretary of the Board of Directors, as well as against the relevant directors or executive officers. The exercise of such action will not be subject to the compliance with the requirements set forth under articles 161 and 163 of the General Law of Business Entities.
 
The Board of Directors, or its President or Secretary or the judicial authority, as applicable, must issue notices of calls of Shareholders’ Meetings. In addition, shareholders that jointly or separately represent at least 10% (ten percent) of the capital of the Company may request the President of the Board of Directors or the President of the Audit Committee to call a General Shareholder’s Meeting, without the percentage indicated under article 184 of the General Law of Business Entities being applicable for such purpose. If the notice of meeting is not issued within fifteen days after the date of the corresponding request, a Civil or District Judge of the Company’s domicile will issue such notice at the request of the interested parties that represent the requesting 10% (ten percent) of the capital, who must present their stock certificates for such purpose.
 
At least 15 days prior to the meeting, notice of the meeting must be published in the Diario Oficial de la Federación (“Official Gazette”) or in a newspaper of general circulation in México City. Stockholders’ meetings may be held without such publication provided that 100.0% of the outstanding Shares with voting rights on the matters to be addressed by such meeting are represented.
 
From the moment that a call for a stockholders’ meeting is made public, all the information related to the meeting must be available to the stockholders. In order to attend a stockholders’ meeting, a stockholder must request and obtain an admission card by furnishing, at least 24 hours before the time set for holding the stockholders’ meeting, appropriate evidence of ownership of Shares in us and depositing such Shares with our corporate secretary or with an institution authorized to accept such deposit. If so entitled to attend the meeting, a stockholder may be represented by proxy signed before two witnesses. Additionally, the stockholder may be represented at the stockholders’ meetings by a person named by proxy, on a printed form that we issue, which, under Mexican law, must identify our Company and indicate clearly the matters to be addressed in the meeting, with enough space for the instructions that the stockholder specifies. We are obliged to make information on the upcoming meeting available to the intermediaries in the stock market, for the time specified in Article 173 of the Mexican Law, in order to give the intermediaries time to send it to the stockholders they represent. The Secretary of the Board of Directors must verify that this requirement is met and report on this matter at the stockholders’ meeting. See “—Registration and Transfer.”
 
Members of the Board
 
Under the Mexican Corporations Law, a Board of Directors must conform to the following requirements:
 
(i)
The Board of Directors will be integrated by a minimum of 5 (five) and a maximum of 21 (twenty-one) principal members.
 
(ii)
At least 25% (twenty-five percent) of the members of the Board of Directors must be independent, in accordance with the terms of article 24 of the Securities Market Law.
 
(iii)
For each principal member, a substitute will be appointed, in the understanding that the substitutes of independent Board members must also be independent.

57


Besides from satisfying all of the requirements mentioned above, failure to meet these standards for any reason will not constitute grounds for judicial action challenging any act, contract, or agreement undertaken by the board, an intermediate committee or other delegated authority. Furthermore, such standards will not be mandatory for the validity or existence of such acts.
 
The Board of Directors must meet at least every three months at our address or any other place in México and on the dates that the board determines. Meetings previously scheduled in accordance with a schedule pre approved by the board do not need to be called. Meetings must be called by at least 25% of the members of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Secretary or the Alternate Secretary of the Board or the President of the Audit Committee. Members of the board must be notified via e mail or in writing at least five calendar days in advance of a meeting.
 
Statutory Auditor
 
According with the Mexican market law, the Statutory Auditor is not required for public companies since June 2006. The activities of the Statutory Auditor will be performed by the Audit Committee.
 
Dividend and Distributions
 
At the annual ordinary general stockholders’ meeting, the Board of Directors submits our financial statements for the previous fiscal year, together with a report thereon by the board, to the holders of Series B Shares for their consideration. The holders of Series B Shares, once they have approved the financial statements, determine the allocation of our net profits, if any, for the preceding year. They are required by law to allocate 5% of such net profits to a legal reserve, which is not thereafter available for distribution until the amount of the legal reserve equals 20% of our historical capital stock (before giving effect to the restatement thereof in constant pesos). As of December 31, 2007, our legal reserve fund was equal to at least 20% of our paid-in capital stock. Amounts in excess of those allocated to the legal reserve fund may be allocated to other reserve funds as the stockholders determine, including a reserve for the repurchase of our Shares. The remaining balance of net profits, if any, is available for distribution as dividends. No dividends may be paid, however, unless losses for prior fiscal years have been paid or absorbed.
 
Holders of Series B Shares and, accordingly, holders of ADSs will have equal rights, on a per Share basis, to dividends and other distributions, including any distributions we make upon liquidation. Partially paid Shares participate in any distribution to the extent that such Shares have been paid at the time of the distribution or, if not paid, only with respect to the proportion paid.
 
Changes in Capital Stock
 
An increase of capital stock may generally be affected through the issuance of new Shares for payment in cash or in kind, by capitalization of indebtedness or by capitalization of certain items of stockholders’ equity. An increase of capital stock generally may not be realized until all previously issued and subscribed Shares of capital stock have been fully paid. Generally, a reduction of capital stock may be effected to absorb losses, to redeem Shares, or to release stockholders from payments not made. A reduction of capital stock to redeem Shares is effected by reimbursing holders of Shares pro rata or by lot. Stockholders may also approve the redemption of fully paid Shares with retained earnings. Such redemption would be affected by a repurchase of Shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange (in the case of Shares listed thereon).
 
Except under limited circumstances, the bylaws require that any capital increase affected pursuant to a capital contribution be represented by new Series B Shares.

58


The fixed portion of our capital stock may only be increased or decreased by resolution of a general extraordinary meeting and an amendment to the bylaws, whereas the variable portion of our capital stock may be increased or decreased by resolution of a general ordinary meeting. See “Other Provisions—Fixed and Variable Capital.”
 
No resolution by the stockholders is required for decreases in capital stock resulting from exercise of our right to withdraw variable Shares or from our repurchase of our own Shares or for increases in capital stock resulting from our sale of Shares we previously purchased. See “Other Provisions—Purchase by the Company of its Shares” and “Other Provisions—Appraisal Rights.”
 
Preemptive Rights
 
Except in certain limited circumstances, in the event of a capital increase through the issuance of new Shares for payment in cash or in kind, a holder of existing Shares of a given Series at the time of the capital increase has a preferential right to subscribe for a sufficient number of new Shares of the same Series to maintain the holder’s existing proportionate holdings of Shares of that Series or, in the event of a capital increase through the issuance of limited-voting or non-voting stock only, to subscribe for a sufficient number of the Shares to be issued to maintain the holder’s existing proportionate holdings of our capital stock. Preemptive rights must be exercised within 15 days following the publication of notice of the capital increase in the Diario Oficial de la Federación (Official Gazette) or following the date of the stockholders’ meeting at which the capital increase was approved if all stockholders were represented at such meeting; otherwise, such rights will lapse. Under Mexican law, preemptive rights cannot be waived in advance by a stockholder, except under limited circumstances, and cannot be represented by an instrument that is negotiable separately from the corresponding share. The Robinson Bours Stockholders, including the Selling Stockholders, have waived all preemptive rights with respect to the Shares and the ADSs being offered in the Global Offering. Holders of ADRs that are U.S. citizens or are located in the United States may be restricted in their ability to participate in the exercise of preemptive rights. See “Description of American Depositary Receipts—Dividends, Other Distributions and Rights.”
 
Foreign Investment Legislation
 
Ownership by foreigners of Shares of Mexican companies is regulated by the Ley de Inversión Extranjera (“Foreign Investment Law”) and by the Reglamento de la Ley para Promover la Inversión Mexicana y Regular la Inversión Extranjera (“Foreign Investment Regulations”). The Ministry of Commerce and Industrial Development and the Foreign Investment Commission are responsible for the administration of the Foreign Investment Law.
 
The Foreign Investment Law reserves certain economic activities exclusively for the Mexican state and certain other activities exclusively for Mexican individuals or Mexican corporations, and limits the participation of foreign investors to certain percentages in regard to enterprises engaged in activities specified therein. Foreign investors may own up to 100% of the capital stock of Mexican companies or entities, except for companies (i) engaged in reserved activities as referred to above or (ii) with assets exceeding an amount to be established annually by the Foreign Investment Commission, in which case an approval from the Foreign Investment Commission will be necessary in order for foreign investment to exceed 49% of the capital stock. Mexican and non-Mexican nationals will be entitled to hold and to exercise the rights of holders. The Robinson Bours Stockholders have advised us that they intend to maintain a control position. Pursuant to our bylaws, foreigners may only own Shares up to 49%.
 
Other Provisions
 
Fixed and Variable Capital. As a sociedad anónima de capital variable, we are permitted to issue Shares constituting fixed capital and Shares constituting variable capital. The issuance of variable capital Shares, unlike the issuance of fixed capital Shares, does not require an amendment of the bylaws, although it does require approval at a general ordinary stockholders’ meeting.

59


In no case may the capital of the Company be decreased to less than the minimum required by law and any decrease in the shareholders’ equity must be registered in the Equity Variations Book that the Company will keep for such purpose.
 
Repurchase in the Event of Delisting. In the event of cancellation of the registration of the Company’s Shares in such Registry, whether at the request of the Company or by a resolution of the National Securities and Banking Commission under applicable law, the Company agrees to make a public offering for the acquisition of the total number of the Shares registered prior to the cancellation. The Company must contribute to a trust for at least six months, the necessary resources to purchase at the same price of the public offering, the Shares of the investors that did not attend or did not accept such offer, in case that after the public offering for purchase has been made and prior to the cancellation of the registration of the Shares that represent the capital stock of the Company or of other securities issued based on such Shares in the National Securities Registry, the Company had been unable to acquire 100% of the paid in capital stock.
 
Forfeiture of Shares. As required by Mexican law, our bylaws provide that our current and future foreign stockholders are formally bound to the Mexican Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (“Ministry of Foreign Relations”) to consider themselves as Mexican nationals with respect to our Shares that they may acquire or of which they may be owners, and with respect to the property, rights, concessions, participations or interests that we may own or rights and obligations that are based on contracts to which we are party with the Mexican authorities, and not to invoke the protection of their government under penalty, should they do so, of forfeiting to the Mexican State the corporate participation that they may have acquired. In the opinion of Galicia & Robles, S.C., our special Mexican counsel, under this provision a non-Mexican stockholder (including a non-Mexican holder of ADSs) is deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of his own government by requesting such government to interpose a diplomatic claim against the Mexican government with respect to the stockholder’s rights as a stockholder, but is not deemed to have waived any other rights it may have with respect to its investment in us, including any rights under U.S. securities laws. If the stockholder should invoke such governmental protection in violation of this agreement, its Shares could be forfeited to the Mexican State. Mexican law requires that such a provision be included in the bylaws of all Mexican corporations unless such bylaws prohibit ownership of capital stock by foreign investors.
 
Exclusive Jurisdiction. Our bylaws provide that legal actions relating to any conflict between our stockholders and us, or among the stockholders in connection with matters related to us, may be brought only in courts in México City. Therefore, our stockholders are restricted to the courts of México City.
 
Duration; The duration of our existence under our bylaws is indefinite.
 
Repurchase of our own Shares. We may repurchase our Shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange at any time at the then prevailing market price. Any repurchases will be charged to the Stockholders Equity as long as these Shares belong to the same Company or to the Capital Stock in the event that we convert these Shares to treasury stock, and in this last case no resolution of the stockholders’ meeting is required. At each annual ordinary Stockholder’s Meeting, the maximum amount of resources that may be used to repurchase Shares will be expressly defined. The Board of Directors will name the persons responsible for the operation of the repurchase process. The Shares that belong to the Treasury Stock or us can be resold among the public stockholders; in the latter case, no resolution of a stockholders’ meeting is necessary for an increase in capital. The economic and voting rights corresponding to such repurchased Shares may not be exercised during the period in which such Shares are owned by us, and such Shares are not deemed to be outstanding for purposes of calculating any quorum or vote at any stockholders’ meeting during such period.

60

 
Non-Subscribed Shares. With prior authorization of the CNBV, we may issue non-subscribed Shares provided that such Shares will be held by a depositary institution and that there is compliance with the conditions of Article 53 of the Ley del Mercado de Valores (“Mexican Securities Law”). In any extraordinary stockholders’ meeting at which this issuance of non-subscribed Shares is approved, the preference rights established by Article 132 of the Mexican Corporations Law must be respected. With a quorum at the meeting, the approval of the issuance will take effect, even with respect to stockholders that were not present at the meeting, such that we will be free to issue these Shares with no prior publication. When a minority of stockholders representing at least 25% of the voting capital stock, vote against the issuance of these Shares, such issuance can not be made. Any stockholder that votes against this issuance at the stockholders’ meeting will have the right to request that we sell its Shares before issuing the new non-subscribed Shares. In such event, we will have the obligation to sell first the Shares belonging to such stockholders, at the same price that the non-subscribed Shares are to be offered to the public.
 
Stockholder Conflicts of Interest. Under Mexican law, any stockholder that has a conflict of interest with respect to any transaction must abstain from voting thereon at the relevant stockholders’ meeting. A stockholder that votes on a business transaction in which its interest conflicts with that of ours may be liable for damages if the transaction would not have been approved without such stockholder’s vote.
 
Board Member Conflicts of Interest. Under Mexican law, any member of the Board of Directors who has a conflict of interest with us in any transaction must disclose such fact to the other members of the Board of Directors and abstain from voting. Any member of the Board of Directors who violates such provision may be liable for damages caused to us. Additionally, members of the Board of Directors and statutory auditors may not represent other stockholders at any stockholders’ meeting.
 
Appraisal Rights. Whenever the stockholders approve a change of corporate purpose, a change in our nationality or transformation from one type of corporation form to another, any stockholder entitled to vote on such change or transformation who has voted against it has the right to withdraw from us and receive the amount calculated as specified under Mexican law attributable to its Shares, provided such stockholder exercises its right to withdraw within 15 days following the adjournment of the meeting at which the change or transformation was approved. Under Mexican law, the amount that a withdrawing stockholder is entitled to receive is equal to its proportionate interest in our capital stock according to the most recent balance sheet that has been approved by an ordinary general meeting of stockholders.
 
Actions Against Directors. Under Mexican law, holders of Shares having voting rights, including limited or restricted voting rights or holders of Shares without voting rights that jointly or individually represent 5% (five percent) or more of the capital stock, may directly exercise the action of liability against the members and secretary of the Board of Directors, as well as against the relevant directors or executive officers. The exercise of such action, among others, will be subject to the compliance with the requirements set forth under the Mexican Law.
 
Audit Committee
 
Under our bylaws, the Board of Directors is required to create an Audit Committee under the terms and conditions outlined below:
 
The Audit Committee will consist of members of the Board of Directors. The President of the audit committee and a majority of the audit committee members must be independent, as independence is defined under the Mexican Securities Market Law.
 
The mandate of the audit committee is to establish and monitor procedures and controls in order to ensure that the financial information we distribute is useful, appropriate and reliable and accurately reflects our financial position. In particular, pursuant to our bylaws and Mexican law, among others, the Audit Committee must do the following:
 
61


 
·
Submit an annual report to the Board of Directors;
 
 
·
Provide the Board of Directors with its opinion on the matters that pertain to the Auditing Committee, in accordance with the Securities Market Law;
 
 
·
Inform the Board of Directors of the current condition of the internal controls and internal auditing system of the Company, or of the entities it controls, including any irregularities detected;
 
 
·
Require the relevant directors and other employees of the Company or of the entities it controls, to provide reports relative to the preparation of the financial information or any other kind of reports or information it deems appropriate to perform its duties;
 
 
·
Receive observations formulated by shareholders, Board members, relevant officers, employees and, in general, any third party with regard to the matters under his duties, as well as carry out the actions that, in its judgment, may be appropriate in connection with such observations;
 
 
·
Inform the Board of Directors of any material irregularities detected as a result of the performance of its duties and, as applicable, inform the Board of Directors of the corrective actions taken or propose the actions that should be taken;
 
 
·
Call Shareholders Meetings and cause the items it deems pertinent to be inserted into the agendas of such Shareholder’s Meetings, and
 
 
·
Assist the Board of Directors in selecting candidates for audit and reviewing the scope and terms of the auditor’s engagement, as well as evaluate the performance of the entity that provides the external auditing services and analyze the report, opinions, statements and other information prepared and signed by the external auditor.
 
See the Article35 of the Mexican Security Market Law for more detail.
 
Transactions that depart from the ordinary course of business, and which would be entered into by and between subsidiaries of the Company and its stockholders, with persons who form part of the management of the Company’s subsidiaries or with those with whom such persons maintain monetary ties or, if applicable, have a family relationship of consanguinity or affinity up to the second degree, a spouse or concubine; which represent the purchase or sale of 10% or more of assets; the granting of guaranties in an amount in excess of 30% of assets, as well as transactions other than the foregoing which represent more than 1% of the Company’s assets, shall be submitted for the opinion of the Company’s audit committee and for approval by the Company’s Board of Directors.
 
Material Contracts
 
Not applicable.

62


Exchange Controls
 
Ownership by foreigners of Mexican companies is regulated by the Foreign Investment Law and by the Foreign Investment Regulations. The Ministry of Commerce and Industrial Development and the Foreign Investment Commission are responsible for the administration of the Foreign Investment Law.
 
The Foreign Investment Law reserves certain economic activities exclusively for the Mexican Goverment and certain other activities exclusively for Mexican individuals or Mexican corporations and limits the participation of foreign investors to certain percentages in regard to enterprises engaged in activities specified therein. Foreign investors may own 100% of the capital stock of Mexican companies or entities, except for companies (i) engaged in reserved activities as referred to above or (ii) with assets exceeding an amount to be established annually by the Foreign Investment Commission in which case an approval from the Foreign Investment Commission shall be necessary in order for foreign investment to exceed 49% of the capital stock. Mexican and non-Mexican nationals will be entitled to hold and to exercise the rights of holders. The Robinson Bours Stockholders have advised us that they intend to maintain a control position of his shares. Pursuant to our bylaws, foreigners may only own Shares up to 49% of such Series.
 
Taxation
 
The following is a general summary of the principal U.S. federal tax consequences and the principal Mexican federal tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Shares or ADSs. This summary does not purport to address all material tax consequences that may be relevant to holders of Shares or ADSs, and does not take into account the specific circumstances of any particular investors, some of which (such as tax-exempt entities, banks, insurance companies, broker-dealers, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, partnerships and other pass-through entities, investors liable for the U.S. alternative minimum tax, investors that own or are treated as owning 10% or more of our voting stock, investors that hold Shares or ADSs as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or other integrated transaction and U.S. Holders (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar) may be subject to special tax rules. In addition, this summary is based in part upon the representations of the Depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement, and in any related agreement, will be performed in accordance with its terms.
 
For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is any beneficial owner of Shares or ADSs that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is:
 
 
1.
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
 
 
2.
a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia;
 
 
3.
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax without regard to its source; or
 
 
4.
a trust that is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and the control of one or more U.S. persons, or that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
 
If a partnership holds Shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership considering the purchase of Shares or ADSs should consult its own independent tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of investing in Shares or ADSs through a partnership.

63


Except where specifically described below, this discussion assumes that we are not a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.” This summary is based on the federal income tax laws and regulations of the United States and México, judicial decisions, published rulings and administrative pronouncements, all as in effect on the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change (and some changes may have retroactive effect) and different interpretations. Further, this discussion does not address U.S. federal estate and gift tax or the alternative minimum tax consequences of holding Shares or ADSs or the indirect consequences to holders or equity interests in partnerships (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that own Shares or ADSs. In addition, this discussion does not address the non-U.S., non-Mexican, state or local tax consequences of holding Shares or ADSs. Prospective purchasers of Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S., Mexican or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any non-U.S., non-Mexican, state or local tax laws.
 
A Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, and a Protocol thereto, between the United States and México (the “Tax Treaty”) took effect on January 1, 1994. The Tax Treaty was amended by a second Protocol signed November 26, 2002, the provisions of which took effect in part on September 1, 2003, and in part on January 1, 2004. The United States and México have also entered into an agreement concerning the exchange of information with respect to tax matters.
 
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders of ADRs evidencing ADSs will be treated as the beneficial owners of the Shares represented by those ADSs.

U.S. Federal Income Taxation
 
U.S. Holders
 
The following discussion is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders of our Shares and of ADSs that are U.S. Holders and that hold those Shares or ADSs as capital assets (generally, for investment purposes).
 
Taxation of Dividends
 
Cash dividends paid with respect to the Shares constituting the Shares or Shares represented by ADSs to the extent paid out of our earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles) will be included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary income on the day on which the dividends are received by the U.S. Holder, in the case of Shares, or the Depositary, in the case of Shares represented by ADSs, and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction allowed to corporations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). We do not currently maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Because these calculations are not made, distributions should be presumed to be taxable dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

64


A U.S. Holder will be entitled, subject to a number of complex limitations and conditions, to claim a U.S. foreign tax credit in respect of any Mexican income taxes withheld on dividends received on Shares or ADSs. U.S. Holders who do not elect to claim a credit for any foreign income taxes paid during the taxable year may instead claim a deduction in respect of such Mexican income taxes. Dividends received with respect to Shares or ADSs will be treated as foreign source income, subject to various classifications and other limitations. For purposes of the U.S. foreign tax credit limitation, foreign source income is separated into different “baskets,” and the credit for foreign taxes on income in any basket is limited to the U.S. federal income tax allocable to such income. Dividends paid with respect to Shares or ADSs generally will constitute “passive category income” in most cases. The U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concerns that parties to whom depositary shares such as the ADSs are released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. Holders of such ADSs. Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of Mexican income taxes described above could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury Department. The rules relating to computing foreign tax credits or deducting foreign taxes are extremely complex, and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own independent tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits with respect to any Mexican income taxes withheld.
 
Dividends paid in pesos will be included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day they are received by the U.S. Holder, in the case of Share, or the Depositary, in the case of Share represented by ADSs (regardless of whether such pesos are in fact converted into U.S. dollars on such date). If such dividends are converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt by the U.S. Holder or the Depositary, as the case may be, the U.S. Holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividends. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the treatment of foreign currency gain or loss, if any, on any pesos received which are converted into U.S. dollars on a date subsequent to receipt.
 
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, and provided that we are not a passive foreign investment company (as discussed below), dividends received by certain U.S. Holders (including individuals) prior to January 1, 2011 with respect to the Shares or ADSs will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if such dividends represent “qualified dividend income.” Dividends paid on the ADSs will be treated as qualified dividend income if (i) the ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States and (ii) we were not in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not in the year in which the dividend is paid, a PFIC. Under current guidance recently issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the ADSs should qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States so long as they are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, but no assurances can be given that the ADSs will be or remain readily tradable under future guidance.
 
Based on existing guidance, it is not entirely clear whether dividends received with respect to Shares will be treated as qualified dividend income, because the Shares are not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange. In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department has announced its intention to promulgate rules pursuant to which shareholders (and intermediaries) will be permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to establish that dividends qualify for the reduced rate of U.S. federal income taxation. Because such procedures have not yet been issued, we are not certain that we will be able to comply with them. U.S. Holders of Shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the reduced rate in the light of their own particular circumstances.
 
Distributions to U.S. Holders of additional Shares with respect to their Shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all of our stockholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. If holders of the ADSs are restricted in their ability to participate in the exercise of preemptive rights, the preemptive rights may give rise to a deemed distribution to holders of the Shares under Section 305 of the Code. Any deemed distributions will be taxable as a dividend in accordance with the general rules of the income tax treatment of dividends discussed above.
 
65


Taxation of Capital Gains
 
Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other taxable disposition of Shares or ADSs generally will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Shares or ADSs and the amount realized on the disposition. A U.S. Holder generally will have an adjusted tax basis in a Shares or an ADS equal to its U.S. dollar cost. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of Shares or ADSs will generally be long-term gain or loss if, at the time of disposition, the U.S. Holder has held the Shares or ADSs for more than one year.
 
Certain U.S. Holders, including individuals, are eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long-term capital gains. The deduction of a capital loss is subject to limitations under the Code.
 
Gain realized by a U.S. Holder on a sale or other disposition of Shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, if any Mexican withholding tax is imposed on the sale or disposition of the Shares, a U.S. holder that does not receive significant foreign source income from other sources may not be able to derive effective U.S. foreign tax credit benefits in respect of these Mexican taxes. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the foreign tax credit rules to their investment in, and disposition of, the Shares or ADSs.
 
Deposits and withdrawals of Shares by U.S. Holders in exchange for ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
 
Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules
 
A non-U.S. corporation generally will be classified as a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which, after applying look-through rules, either (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income, or (2) on average at least 50% of the gross value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions. The PFIC determination is made annually and generally is based on the value of a non-U.S. corporation’s assets (including goodwill) and composition of its income. In determining whether we are a PFIC, a pro rata portion of the income and assets of each subsidiary in which we own, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest by value is taken into account.
 
Based on current estimates of our income and assets, we do not believe that we were classified for our most recently-ended taxable year, or will be classified for our current taxable year, as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we intend to continue our operations in such a manner that we will not become a PFIC in the future, although no assurances can be made regarding determination of our PFIC status in the current or any future taxable year. If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder would be subject to special rules (and may be subject to increased tax liability) with respect to (a) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of Units or ADSs, and (b) any “excess distribution” made by us to the U.S. Holder (generally, any distribution during a taxable year in which distributions to the U.S. Holder on the Units or ADSs exceed 125% of the average annual distributions the U.S. Holder received on the Units or ADSs during the preceding three taxable years or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Units or ADSs). Under those rules, (a) the gain or excess distribution would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the Units or ADSs, (b) the amount allocated to the taxable year in which the gain or excess distribution is realized and to taxable years before the first day on which we became a PFIC would be taxable as ordinary income, (c) the amount allocated to each prior year in which the Issuer was a PFIC would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year and (d) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of U.S. federal income tax would be imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each prior year in which we were treated as a PFIC. In addition, a U.S. Holder generally would be required to annually file IRS Form 8621 to disclose ownership of an equity interest in a PFIC. Moreover, dividends that a U.S. Holder receives from us will not be eligible for the reduced U.S. federal income tax rates described above if we are a PFIC either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year (and instead will be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income).

66


Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential application of the PFIC rules to Shares or ADSs.
 
Non-U.S. Holders
 
The following discussion is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences to beneficial holders of Shares or ADSs that are neither U.S. Holders nor partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes (“Non-U.S. Holders”).
 
Subject to the discussion below under “U.S. Backup Withholding,” a Non-U.S. Holder of Shares or ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale of Shares or ADSs, unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the United States (and, if an applicable tax treaty requires, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment or fixed base of such Non-U.S. Holder) or (ii) in the case of gain realized by an individual Non-U.S. Holder, such holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
 
U.S. Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
 
In general, dividends on Shares or ADSs, and payments of the proceeds of a sale or other taxable disposition of Shares or ADSs, paid within the United States, by the U.S. payor or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries to a U.S. Holder are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding at a current rate of 28% unless the holder (i) establishes that it is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) with respect to backup withholding, provides an accurate taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is a U.S. person and that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. Payments made within the United States, by a U.S. payor or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries to a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to backup withholding tax and information reporting requirements if an appropriate certification is provided by the holder to the payor or intermediary and the payor or intermediary does not have actual knowledge or a reason to know that the certificate is incorrect.
 
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. The amount of any backup withholding withheld from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS. A U.S. Holder generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules that exceed its U.S. federal income tax liability by filing a timely refund claim with the IRS.
 
Mexican Taxation
 
Taxation of Dividends
 
Dividends, either in cash or in any other form, paid with respect to the Shares constituting the Shares or the ADSs will not be subject to Mexican withholding tax.

67


Taxation of Capital Gains
 
Gain on the sale or other disposition of ADSs by holders who are not Mexican Residents (as defined below) will not be subject to Mexican income tax. Deposits of Shares in exchange for ADSs and withdrawals of Shares in exchange for ADSs will not give rise to Mexican income tax.
 
Gain on the sale of Shares by a holder who is not a Mexican Resident (as defined below) will not be subject to Mexican tax if the transaction is carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange or other securities markets approved by the Mexican Ministry of Finance, and provided certain requirements set forth by the Mexican Income Tax Law are complied with. Sales or other dispositions of Shares made in other circumstances generally would be subject to Mexican tax, except to the extent that a holder is eligible for benefits under an income tax treaty to which México is a party of. Under the Tax Treaty, gain on the sale or other disposition of Shares by a U.S. resident (if eligible for benefits under the Tax Treaty) who is a holder of less than 25% of our capital stock during the twelve-month period preceding such sale or disposition will not be subject to Mexican tax, unless (i) 50% or more of the fair market value of our assets consist of “immovable property” (as defined in the Tax Treaty) situated in México, or (ii) such gains are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base of such U.S. resident in México.
 
For a holder that is not a Mexican Resident and that does not meet the requirements referred to above, gross income realized on the sale of Shares will be subject to a 5% Mexican withholding tax if the transaction is carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange. Alternatively, a holder that is not a Mexican Resident can choose to be subject to a 20% withholding rate on the net gain obtained, as calculated pursuant to Mexican Income Tax Law provisions.
 
The Mexican tax rules governing the taxation of gains of holders who are not Mexican Residents on dispositions of their Shares or ADSs were amended during 2002. Holders who are not Mexican Residents who disposed of their Shares or ADSs during 2003 should consult their own Mexican tax advisors on the Mexican tax treatment of such dispositions.
 
For purposes of Mexican taxation (Ley del Impuesto sobre la renta), an individual is a resident of México (a “Mexican Resident”) if he or she has established his or her home in México, unless he or she has resided in another country for more than 183 days, whether consecutive or not, during a calendar year and can demonstrate that he or she has become a resident of that country for tax purposes. A legal entity is a Mexican Resident if it has been incorporated under Mexican law. A company is also considered to be a Mexican Resident if its headquarters are located in México. A Mexican citizen is presumed to be a resident of México for tax purposes unless such person can demonstrate otherwise. If a person is deemed to have a permanent establishment or fixed base in México for tax purposes, such permanent person shall be required to pay taxes in México on income attributable to such permanent establishment or fixed base, in accordance with applicable tax laws.
 
Other Mexican Taxes
 
There are no Mexican inheritance, succession or similar taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of ADSs or Shares by holders that are not Mexican Residents; provided, however, that gratuitous transfers of Shares may in certain circumstances cause a Mexican federal tax to be imposed on the recipient. There is no Mexican stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of ADSs or Shares. Brokerage fees on securities transactions carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange are subject to a 15% valued added tax.
 
Documents on Display
 
The documents concerning us which are referred to in this document are available at the our company headquarters, located at Ave. Tecnológico No.401, Cd. Industrial, Celaya, Guanajuato, 38010, México, for any inspection required. Part of this information is available on our web page, at www.bachoco.com.mx.
 
68


ITEM 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
In the normal course of our business, we hold or issue various financial instruments that expose us to financial risks involving fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates. Also, we are exposed to commodity price risk in connection with fluctuations in the prices for our feed ingredients.
 
Currency Fluctuation
 
Our exposure to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates relates primarily to expenses which are denominated in U.S. dollars. Since we have liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars, we are exposed to foreign exchange losses when the peso declines in value against the U.S. dollar. The peso has been subject to significant volatility in the past and may be subject to significant fluctuations in the future.
 
All of our sales are priced in Mexican pesos, and we have significant expenses in U.S. dollars. A significant portion of our feed cost is priced in U.S. dollars, and other purchases may be influenced by U.S. dollar prices. A devaluation of the peso will accordingly affect our earnings. In addition, the Mexican peso exchange rate can directly and indirectly impact our results of operations and financial position in several respects, including potential economic recession in México resulting from a devalued peso.
 
We do not have debt denominated in U.S. dollars as of December 2007. We experienced foreign exchange losses of Ps.62.3 million in 2005, since we had more assets (cash and cash equivalents) than liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars, and in 2005 the Mexican peso appreciated during most of the year with respect to the U.S. dollar. We had a gain of Ps.40.8 million in 2006, due to the net position of our liabilities and assets. In 2007, we experienced a foreign exchange loss of Ps.3.4 million since the Mexican peso demonstrated low volatility during the year.
 
No assurance can be given as to the future valuation of the Mexican peso and how further movements in the peso could affect our future earnings.
 
We manage our exchange rate exposure primarily through management of our financial structure, specifically by maintaining most of our debt through long-term debt instruments. We engage in only limited hedging of our exposure to foreign exchange risk, since hedging instruments have historically not been economically feasible. We plan over a six-month period into the future and, depending on the expected uncertainty for that period, decide if it is economically advisable to purchase or sell any hedging instrument.
 
During 2006 and 2007, we have observed different strategies with respect to derivatives which involve call and put options in U.S. dollars.
 
At December 31, 2007, we maintained positions in several financial instrument derivatives. For details, please see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Based on our position in December 2007 (please see Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements), we estimate that a hypothetical 10% devaluation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar would result in losses of Ps.15.4 million and gains of Ps.78.6 million in our Foreign Exchange Results.
 
69


Interest Rates
 
Our earnings may also be affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on our variable rate debt instruments. As of December 31, 2007, we had borrowings of approximately Ps.109.6 million pursuant to variable rate debt instruments, representing approximately 0.6% of our total assets.
 
Based on our position on December 31, 2007, we estimate that a hypothetical interest rate variation of 0.5% on our Mexican peso denominated debt would result in increased interest expenses of approximately Ps.0.5 million per annum. Any such increase would likely be offset by an increase in interest income due to our significant cash and cash equivalent position.
 
Feed Ingredients
 
The largest single component of our cost of sales is the cost of ingredients used to prepare feed, including principally, sorghum, soy meal, corn, fish meal, meat meal and, for certain chicken products, marigold extract. The price of these ingredients is subject to significant volatility resulting, among other factors, from weather, the size of harvests, transportation and storage costs, governmental agricultural policies and currency exchange rates. In order to reduce the potential adverse effect of grain price fluctuations, we vary the composition of our feed to take advantage of current market prices for the various types of ingredients used.
 
However, this trend reversed in 2000, when only 45.0% of feed ingredients were purchased from local sources. The change occurred mainly because grain for the acquired Grupo Campi complexes is supplied from international markets due to a lack of domestic supply in southern México. In general, costs of domestic feed ingredients tend to follow the international markets, although cost adjustments do not occur simultaneously. In 2002 we purchased approximately 30.1% of grain from local sources. The percentage of grain purchased from domestic markets was 38.3%, 35.0%, 30.1%, and 31.3% in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. In 2007 we purchased approximately 36.4% of grain from local sources.
 
During 2007, grain reached historically high prices worldwide, due principally to strong demand and alternative uses of grain such as ethanol production. Soybean meal prices also increased, particularly in the second half of the year, as a result of strong demand coupled with lower supply than expected worldwide. This situation also extended into 2008.
 
Based on results for 2007, we estimate that a hypothetical variation of 10% in the cost of our feed ingredients would have an impact of 6.2% on total cost of sales.
 
ITEM 12.
Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
 
Not applicable.
 
PART II
 
ITEM 13.
Default, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
 
None.
 
ITEM 14.
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
 
None.

70


ITEM 15.
Controls and Procedures
 
We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2007. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon and as of the date of our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Effective control over financial reporting cannot, and does not, provide absolute assurance of achieving our control objectives. Also, any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
 
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, has been audited by Mancera, S.C., a member of Ernst & Young Global, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
 
Changes in Internal Controls
 
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting in the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
The Board of Directors and stockholders’ of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.
 
We have audited Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

71


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards, including the reconciliation to U.S generally accepted accounting principles, in accordance with Item 18 of Form 20-F. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards, including the reconciliation to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with Item 18 of Form 20-F, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America), the consolidated balance sheets of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and our report dated June 26, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
Mancera S.C.
A Member Practice of
Ernst & Young Global
 
C.P.C. José Sánchez González
 
72

 
ITEM 16.
 [Reserved]
 
ITEM 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
 
Currently, no member of our audit committee possesses all the characteristics included in the definition of an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of this Item 16A. We consider that the combined financial expertise of the members of our audit committee meet much of this requirement. Our audit committee has the authority and appropriate funding to obtain outside advice, as it deems necessary, to carry out its duties.
 
ITEM 16B.
Code of Ethics
 
We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16B of Form 20-F under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our code of ethics applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, controller and persons performing similar functions, as well as to other officers and employees. Our code of ethics is available free of charge upon request through our website www.bachoco.com.mx If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, controller and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address.
 
ITEM 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
 
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
 
The following table sets forth the fees billed to us in nominal pesos by our independent auditors, Mancera, S.C., independent registered public accountanting firm, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007:
 
   
Year ended December 31,
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
       
Audit fees
  Ps.
2,724,350
  Ps.
4,456,250
 
Audit-related fees
   
   
 
Tax fees
   
872,006
   
953,465
 
All other fees
   
   
 
Total fees
  Ps. 
3,596,356
  Ps.
5,409,715
 
 
Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by Mancera, S.C., in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and statutory and regulatory audits.
 
Tax fees in the above table are fees billed by Mancera, S.C. for services related to tax refund claims.
 
Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures
 
Our audit committee has not established pre-approval policies and procedures for the engagement of our independent auditors for services. Our audit committee expressly approves on a case-by-case basis any engagement of our independent auditors for audit and non-audit services provided to our subsidiaries or to us.
 
73

 
ITEM 16D.
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
 
Not applicable.

ITEM 16E.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
 
Not applicable.
 
PART III
 
ITEM 17.
Financial Statements
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 18.
Financial Statements
 
See the Audited Financial Statements including notes, incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 19.
Exhibits 
 
74


Index of Exhibits
 
Documents filed as exhibits to this Annual Report:
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
     
1.1
 
An English translation of the Bylaws (estatutos sociales) of Industrias Bachoco, S.A. de C.V. dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2007 (File No. 333-07950)).
     
2.1
 
Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, among Industrias Bachoco, S.A. de C.V., the Depositary and each Owner and Beneficial Owner from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder, including the form of American Depositary Receipt (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 on Form F-6 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 18, 2006 (File No. 333-07480)).
     
2.2
 
Trust Agreement, dated April 1, 1995, among Banco Internacional, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Prime Internacional, as trustee, and the stockholders of the Company named therein, together with an English translation, (incorporated by reference on our registration statement on Form F-1 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 1997 (File No. 333-7472)).
     
2.3
 
Trust Agreement, dated August 20, 1997, among Banco Internacional, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Bital, as trustee, and the stockholders of the Company named therein, together with an English translation, (incorporated by reference on our registration statement on Form F-1 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 1997 (File No. 333-7472)).
     
8.1
 
Subsidiaries of Industrias Bachoco S.A. de C.V.
     
12.1
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
12.2
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
13.1
 
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

75


SIGNATURE
 
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
 
   
By:
/s/ Daniel Salazar Ferrer
 
Daniel Salazar Ferrer
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
Date: June 30, 2008


 
INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Financial Statements

As of
December 31, 2006 and 2007
With Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1


INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

Content

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-3
   
Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
   
Balance Sheets
F-4
Statements of Income
F-5
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
F-6
Statements of Changes in Financial Position
F-7
Notes to the Financial Statements
F-8

F-2

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders of
Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and changes in financial position for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries at December 31 2006 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards which differ in certain respects from U.S. generally accepted principles (see Note 19).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated June 27 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 
Mancera, S.C.
A Member Practice of
Ernst & Young Global
 
Francisco José Sánchez González

Mexico City, Mexico
June 27, 2008

F-3


INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated balance sheets

(Thousands of constant Mexican pesos as of December 31, 2007)
   
December 31,
 
           
(Thousands of U.S. dollars )
 
           
(Note 2)
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
2007
 
ASSETS
                   
Current assets
                   
Cash and cash equivalents
 
Ps 
 3,583,891
 
Ps 
3,039,876
 
$
278,453
 
Accounts receivable:
                   
Trade, net
   
539,874
   
765,502
   
70,120
 
Value added and other recoverable taxes
   
330,490
   
440,945
   
40,391
 
Total accounts receivable
   
870,364
   
1,206,447
   
110,511
 
Inventories, net –Note 5
   
2,224,095
   
3,329,340
   
304,968
 
Biological current assets –Note 5
   
91,905
   
108,502
   
9,939
 
Derivative financial instruments– Note 9
   
-
   
123,503
   
11,313
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
98,119
   
129,582
   
11,870
 
Total current assets
   
6,868,374
   
7,937,250
   
727,054
 
                     
Property, plant and equipment, net –Note 6
   
9,835,895
   
10,256,239
   
939,474
 
Biological non-current assets –Note 5
   
515,118
   
575,413
   
52,708
 
Intangible assets from labor obligations–Note 13
   
22,232
   
28,341
   
2,596
 
Goodwill, net –Note 7
   
300,848
   
300,848
   
27,558
 
Other assets
   
16,772
   
18,333
   
1,679
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
Ps
17,559,239
 
Ps 
 19,116,424,
 
$
1,751,069
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                   
Current liabilities:
                   
Notes payable to banks –Note 8
 
Ps 
 -
 
Ps 
 40,000
 
$
3,664
 
Current portion of long-term debt –Note 8
   
9,708
   
18,844
   
1,726
 
Accounts payable
   
837,445
   
1,138,011
   
104,242
 
Related parties –Note 4
   
12,650
   
26,819
   
2,457
 
Income tax
   
45,390
   
-
   
-
 
Other taxes payable and other accruals –Note 11
   
243,573
   
243,429
   
22,298
 
Derivative financial instruments– Note 9
   
10,818
   
-
   
-
 
Total current liabilities
   
1,159,584
   
1,467,103
   
134,387
 
Long-term liabilities:
                   
Long-term debt –Note 8
   
35,494
   
50,757
   
4,649
 
Deferred income tax –Note 15
   
2,182,034
   
2,375,025
   
217,553
 
Labor obligations –Note 13
   
79,173
   
96,373
   
8,828
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
   
3,456,285
   
3,989,258
   
365,417
 
COMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Note 10
                   
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Note 14
                   
Majority stockholders’ equity:
                   
Capital stock
   
2,294,927
   
2,294,927
   
210,216
 
Paid-in capital
   
743,674
   
743,674
   
68,121
 
Reserve for repurchase company stock
   
159,455
   
159,455
   
14,606
 
Retained earnings
   
13,707,747
   
14,250,225
   
1,305,324
 
Net majority income of the year
   
906,186
   
1,270,941
   
116,418
 
Minimum seniority premium liability adjustment –Note 13
   
(916
)
 
(2,512
)
 
(230
)
Deficit from restatement of stockholders’ equity
   
(3,753,915
)
 
(3,735,254
)
 
(342,150
)
Derivative financial instruments–Note 9
   
370
   
98,922
   
9,061
 
Total majority stockholders' equity
   
14,057,528
   
15,080,378
   
1,381,366
 
                     
Minority interest
   
45,426
   
46,788
   
4,286
 
Total stockholders' equity
   
14,102,954
   
15,127,166
   
1,385,652
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
Ps 
 17,559,239
 
Ps 
19,116,424
 
$
1,751,069
 

See accompanying notes.

F-4


INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated statements of income

(Thousands of constant Mexican pesos, except per share amounts, as of
December 31, 2007)

   
Years ended December 31,
 
               
(Thousands of
 U.S. dollars)
 
               
(Note 2)
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
2007
 
                   
Net revenues
 
Ps 
 15,618,192
 
Ps
 15,550,965
 
Ps
     18,219,647
 
$
1,668,924
 
Cost of sales
   
(11,234,562
)
 
(12,052,986
)
 
(14,477,861
)
 
(1,326,176
)
Gross profit
   
4,383,630
   
3,497,979
   
3,741,786
   
342,748
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   
(2,005,544
)
 
(2,071,553
)
 
(2,245,522
)
 
(205,690
)
Operating income
   
2,378,086
   
1,426,426
   
1,496,264
   
137,058
 
                           
Comprehensive financing income (cost):
                         
Interest income
   
316,514
   
302,910
   
318,879
   
29,209
 
Interest expense and financing costs
   
(209,504
)
 
(131,852
)
 
(141,578
)
 
(12,969
)
Net interest income
   
107,010
   
171,058
   
177,301
   
16,240
 
Foreign exchange (loss) gain, net
   
(62,259
)
 
40,782
   
(3,351
)
 
(307
)
Loss on net monetary position
   
(118,724
)
 
(150,438
)
 
(154,814
)
 
(14,181
)
     
(73,973
)
 
61,402
   
19,136
   
1,752
 
                           
Other ordinary (expense) income, net –Note 16
   
(25,961
)
 
18,427
   
69,571
   
6,374
 
                           
Income before income tax, asset tax, and minority interest
   
2,278,152
   
1,506,255
   
1,584,971
   
145,184
 
Income tax and asset tax –Note 15
   
(367,833
)
 
(599,126
)
 
(312,745
)
 
(28,648
)
NET INCOME
 
Ps 
 1,910,319
 
Ps 
 907,129
 
Ps 
 1,272,226
 
$
116,536
 
                           
Majority net income
   
1,908,535
   
906,186
   
1,270,941
   
116,418
 
Minority net income
   
1,784
   
943
   
1,285
   
118
 
NET INCOME
 
Ps 
 1,910,319
 
Ps 
 907,129
 
Ps 
 1,272,226
 
$
116,536
 
                           
Weighted average shares outstanding  (in thousands)
   
599,694
   
599,571
   
600,000
   
600,000
 
                           
NET MAJORITY INCOME PER SHARE
 
Ps 
 3.18
 
Ps 
 1.51
 
Ps 
2.12
 
$
0.19
 

See accompanying notes.

F-5


INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity

Years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

(Thousands of constant Mexican pesos as of
December 31, 2007)

   
Number of shares of capital
stock
(thousands)
 
Capital
stock
 
Paid-in capital
 
Reserve for
repurchase of company stock
 
Retained
earnings
 
Net
income of
 the
year
 
Labor obligations
minimum liability adjustment
 
Deficit from restatement of
stockholders’ equity
 
Derivative financial instru-ments
 
Total
majority stockholders’ equity
 
Minority interest
 
 
Total
stockholders’ equity
 
                                                   
Balance at December 31, 2004
   
599,200
 
Ps 
 2,294,711
 
Ps
 723,116
 
Ps 
 170,917
  Ps
 11,656,919
 
Ps 
784,087
 
Ps 
(1,129
)
Ps 
( 3,541,472
)
Ps 
 -
 
Ps 
12,087,149
 
Ps 
45,879
 
Ps 
12,133,028
 
                                                                           
Transfer of prior year´s net income based on stockholders´meeting held in April, 2005.
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
784,087
   
(784,087
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Repurchase of stock
   
(920
)
 
(251
)
 
-
   
(11,462
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(11,713
)
 
-
   
(11,713
)
Sales of repurchased stock
   
800
   
222
   
2,954
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,176
   
-
   
3,176
 
Cash dividends paid
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(263,719
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(263,719
)
 
-
   
(263,719
)
Comprehensive income, net of tax
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,908,535
   
(2,207
)
 
(172,155
)
 
(92,374
)
 
1,641,799
   
487
   
1,642,286
 
Balance at December 31, 2005
   
599,080
   
2,294,682
   
726,070
   
159,455
   
12,177,287
   
1,908,535
   
(3,336
)
 
(3,713,627
)
 
(92,374
)
 
13,456,692
   
46,366
   
13,503,058
 
 
                                                                         
Transfer of prior year´s net income based on stockholders´meeting held in April, 2006.
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,908,535
   
(1,908,535
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Sales of repurchased stock
   
920
   
245
   
17,604
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
17,849
   
-
   
17,849
 
Cash dividends paid
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(378,075
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(378,075
)
 
-
   
(378,075
)
Comprehensive income, net of tax
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
906,186
   
2,420
   
(40,288
)
 
92,744
   
961,062
   
(940
)
 
960,122
 
Balance at December 31, 2006
   
600,000
   
2,294,927
   
743,674
   
159,455
   
13,707,747
   
906,186
   
(916
)
 
(3,753,915
)
 
370
   
14,057,528
   
45,426
   
14,102,954
 
 
                                                                         
Transfer of prior year´s net income based on stockholders´meeting held in April, 2007.
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
906,186
   
(906,186
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Cash dividends paid
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(363,708
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(363,708
)
 
-
   
(363,708
)
Comprehensive income, net of tax
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,270,941
   
(1,596
)
 
18,661
   
98,552
   
1,386,558
   
1,362
   
1,387,920
 
Balance at December 31, 2007 (Note 14)
   
600,000
 
Ps 
2,294,927
 
Ps
743,674
 
Ps
159,455159,455
 
Ps
14,250,225
 
Ps
1,270,941
 
Ps
 ( 2,512
)
Ps
(3,735,254
)
Ps 
98,922
   Ps
15,080,378
  Ps
46,788
 
Ps
15,127,166
 

See accompanying notes.

F-6


INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated statements of changes in financial position

(Thousands of constant Mexican pesos as of December 31, 2007)

   
Years ended December 31,
 
               
(Thousands of U.S. dollars) (Note 2)
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
2007
 
Operating activities
                         
Net income
 
Ps
1,910,319
 
Ps 
907,129
 
Ps 
1,272,226
 
$
116,536
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to resources provided by operating activities:
                         
Depreciation
   
497,819
   
537,383
   
571,393
   
52,340
 
Deferred income tax
   
1,068
   
346,110
   
169,716
   
15,547
 
Labor obligations, net period cost
   
40,505
   
37,464
   
42,112
   
3,857
 
     
2,449,711
   
1,828,086
   
2,055,447
   
188,280
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                         
Accounts receivable
   
(190,464
)
 
(51,435
)
 
(336,083
)
 
(30,785
)
Inventories and biological assets
   
(352,768
)
 
(535,933
)
 
(1,140,124
)
 
(104,437
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
(34,523
)
 
(11,081
)
 
(31,463
)
 
(2,882
)
Accounts payable
   
(25,527
)
 
364,813
   
300,566
   
27,531
 
Related parties
   
(168
)
 
6,002
   
14,169
   
1,298
 
Taxes payable and other accruals
   
137,953
   
(73,193
)
 
(45,534
)
 
(4,170
)
Labor obligations, plan contributions
   
(26,149
)
 
(27,576
)
 
(32,617
)
 
(2,988
)
Derivative financial instruments
   
-
   
(6,407
)
 
(35,769
)
 
(3,276
)
Resources provided by operating activities
   
1,958,065
   
1,493,276
   
748,592
   
68,571
 
                           
Financing activities
                         
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
   
185
   
-
   
40,000
   
3,664
 
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable to banks
   
176,405
   
-
   
40,000
   
3,664
 
Repayment of long-term debt and notes payable
   
(206,375
)
 
(104,836
)
 
(13,963
)
 
(1,279
)
Constant pesos effect on notes payable to banks and long term-debt
   
(6,194
)
 
(6,081
)
 
(1,638
)
 
(150
)
Cash dividends paid
   
(263,719
)
 
(378,075
)
 
(363,708
)
 
(33,316
)
Sales (repurchases) of Company’s own stock, net
   
(8,537
)
 
17,849
   
-
   
-
 
Resources used in financing activities
   
(308,235
)
 
(471,143
)
 
(299,309
)
 
(27,417
)
                           
Investing activities
                         
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment, net
   
(835,529
)
 
(856,227
)
 
(991,737
)
 
(90,843
)
Other assets
   
(2,709
)
 
(2,060
)
 
(1,561
)
 
(143
)
Resources used in investing activities
   
(838,238
)
 
(858,287
)
 
(993,298
)
 
(90,986
)
                           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
   
811,592
   
163,846
   
(544,015
)
 
(49,832
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
   
2,608,453
   
3,420,045
   
3,583,891
   
328,285
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
 
Ps 
3,420,045
 
Ps 
3,583,891
 
Ps 
3,039,876
 
$
278,453
 

See accompanying notes.

F-7


INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO, S.A.B. DE C.V.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the consolidated financial statements

Years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007

(Thousands of constant Mexican pesos as of
December 31, 2007, except per share amounts)

1. Organization and Business Activity

Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries (collectively “Bachoco” or the “Company”) was incorporated on February 8, 1980 and it is engaged in breeding, processing and marketing of poultry (chicken and eggs), swine and other products (principally balanced animal feed). Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. is the controlling company of a group of subsidiaries.

In June 2006, the new Securities Trading Act came into effect, which, among other provisions, established that corporations listed on the Mexican stock exchange must change their entity names from variable capital stock corporation (S.A. de C.V.) to variable capital stock market corporation(S. A. B. de C.V.); as of February 1, 2007, the Company’s name is Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V., in compliance with the aforementioned law.

On March 18, 2008, the accompanying financial statements and related notes were authorized by the Company’s Finance Director, Daniel Salazar Ferrer, for the Audit Committee and Board of Directors´approval and issuance.

2. Accounting Policies and Practices

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (Mexican FRS). The significant accounting policies and practices observed by the Company in the preparation of the financial statements are described below:

a) Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries.

The ownership interests of other stockholders in such subsidiaries are shown as minority interest.

Intercompany balances, investments and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The results of operations of the subsidiaries and affiliates were included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of the month following the acquisition.

F-8


The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the following consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007:
 
   
Percentage equity interest
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
 
%
 
%
 
 %
 
Acuícola Bachoco, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Aviser, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Bachoco, S.A. de C.V. (“BSACV”) (Consolidated)
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Bachoco, Comercial, S.A. de C.V
   
-
   
-
   
100
 
Campi Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Huevo y Derivados, S.A. de C.V.
   
97
   
97
   
97
 
Operadora de Servicios de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Pecuarius Laboratorios, S.A. de C.V.
   
64
   
64
   
64
 
Secba, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Sepetec, S. A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Servicios de Personal Administrativo, S.A. de C.V.
   
100
   
100
   
100
 
Induba Pavos, S.A. de C.V.
   
-
   
100
   
100
 

The main subsidiaries of the group are as follows:

- Bachoco, S.A. de C.V. (“BSACV”) (Consolidated)
This company is engaged in breeding, processing and marketing of poultry (chicken and eggs).

- Campi Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
- Acuícola Bachoco S.A. de C.V.
These companies are engaged in producing and marketing of balanced animal feed.

- Aviser, S.A. de C.V.
- Operadora de Servicios de Personal, S.A. de C.V.
- Secba, S.A. de C.V.
- Sepetec, S.A. de C.V.
- Servicios de Personal Administrativo, S.A. de C.V.
These companies are engaged in providing administrative and operative services to their related parties.

On December, 2006 and July, 2007, the subsidiaries Induba Pavos, S.A. de C.V. and Bachoco Comercial, S.A. de C.V. were incorporated. Both entities have 100% ownership from its holding company, Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. These entities are engaged to import and trading of turkey.

b) Revenue recognition

In conformity with International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) No. 18 “Revenues”.

Revenues are recognized when each of the following criteria is met:

- There is evidence of an arrangement.
- Delivery has occurred.
- The seller fixes or determines the prices with the buyer.
- Collectability is reasonably certain.

F-9


c) Recognition of the effects of inflation on financial information

The financial information recognizes the effects of inflation and therefore the amounts shown in the accompanying financial statements and in these notes are expressed in thousands of Mexican pesos with purchasing power at December 31, 2007. The restatement factor applied to the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 was 1.0796 and 1.0376, respectively, which corresponds to the annual rate of inflation from December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, respectively, through December 31, 2007, based on the Mexican National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) published by Banco de Mexico.

A summary of the key inflation accounting concepts and procedures is as follows:

- Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment were carried at replacement cost, determined annually by an independent appraiser, through 1996. The fifth amendment to bulletin B-10 Accounting Recognition of the Effects of Inflation on Financial Information (as modified), which is applicable to financial statements for periods beginning on or after January 1, 1997, disallows the use of appraisals. Based on such amendment, the Company restated the appraised value at December 31, 1996 and property, plant and equipment purchases since January 1, 1997 are carried at cost adjusted by the NCPI.

- Stockholders’ equity
Capital stock, paid-in capital, reserve for stock repurchase of Company’s own shares and retained earnings were restated using adjustment factors obtained from the NCPI.

- Net monetary gain (loss)
The net monetary gain (loss) represents the impact of inflation on monetary assets and liabilities. The net monetary gain (loss) of each year is included in the statements of income as a part of the comprehensive financing income (cost).

- Deficit from restatement of stockholders’ equity
The deficit from restatement of stockholders’ equity comprises the accumulated monetary position loss at the time the provisions of bulletin B-10 were first applied and the subsequent gain or loss from holding nonmonetary assets, principally inventories. Deficit from restatement of stockholders’ equity is originated when the replacement cost of these assets is lower than the cost of these assets restated by the NCPI.

d) Statement of Changes in Financial Position

Mexican accounting bulletin B-12, Statement of Changes in Financial Position, specifies the appropriate presentation of the statement of changes in financial position based on financial statements restated in constant Mexican pesos in accordance with bulletin B-10. Bulletin B-12 identifies the sources and applications representing differences between beginning and ending financial statement balances in constant Mexican pesos. The bulletin also requires that monetary and foreign exchange gains and losses not be treated as non-cash items in the determination of resources provided by operating activities.

e) Estimates in financial statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with MexFRS requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-10


f) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of bank deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than 90 days. Such investments are stated at acquisition cost plus accrued interest, similar to market value.

g) Allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company policy is to record an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances which are not likely to be recovered. Management considers that such accounts are those which are more than 60 days overdue or in litigation.

h) Inventories and biological assets

Inventories are recognized at historical acquisition cost and are valued using the average-cost method.

Inventories are restated using the specific-cost method. The stated value of inventories is not in excess of net realizable value. Cost of sales is restated to Mexican pesos with purchasing power at year-end by applying the same method as for inventories. The deficit from restatement of stockholders’ equity is comprised of the difference between the increase in the specific value of inventories and cost of sales, and the increase as measured based solely on the NCPI.

The allowance for decline in the productivity of breeder chickens and pigs is estimated based on expected future production.

-Agriculture
The financial statements recognize the requirements of MexFRS E-1, “Agriculture”, which establishes the rules for recognizing, valuing, presenting and disclosing biological assets and agricultural products.

Bulletin E-1 requires biological assets and agricultural products (the latter at the time of harvesting) to be valued at their fair value, net of the estimated costs at the point of sale. Bulletin E-1 also establishes that whenever the fair value cannot be determined in a reliable, verifiable and objective manner, the assets are to be valued at their production cost, net of impairment loss.

The Company’s biological assets consist of poultry in different stages, incubatable eggs and breeder pigs. Agricultural products are processed chicken, commercial eggs and commercial pigs.

Broiler chicks less than six weeks old, incubatable eggs, breeder pigs and laying hens are valued at production cost since it is not possible to determine their fair value in a reliable, verifiable and objective manner.

Broilers more than six week old through their date of sale are valued at fair value net of estimated point-of-sale costs, considering the price per kilogram of processed chicken at the valuation date.

Processed chicken and commercial eggs are valued at fair value net of estimated point-of-sale costs, considering the price per kilogram of processed chicken and commercial eggs at the time such items are considered as agricultural products. From such date through the date of sale, the fair value is considered to be the cost of processed chicken or commercial eggs, not in excess of net realizable value.

F-11


The Company is exposed to financial risks due to changes in the price of chicken. The Company estimates that the price of chicken will not fall significantly in the future; consequently, the Company has not entered into any derivative agreement or any other type of agreement to offset the risk of a drop in the price of chicken.

The Company reviews periodically the price of chicken so as to evaluate the need for a financial instrument to offset such risk.

In conformity with bulletin E-1, biological assets and agricultural products were classified as either current or non-current assets based on their availability and the business operating cycle.

i) Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost and then restated based on adjustment factors derived from the NCPI.

As of January 1, 2007, as a result of the adoption of MexFRS D-6 “Capitalization of the Comprehensive Cost of Financing”, the Company started the capitalization of the comprehensive financing cost incurred during the construction or installation of property, plant and equipment in process, which is subsequently restated by applying factors based on the NCPI. The amount of comprehensive financing cost to be capitalized is determined by applying the weighted average interest rate of financing to the weighted average of the investments in qualifying assets made during the qualifying period. In the case of foreign currency denominated financing, comprehensive financing cost includes the related exchange gains or losses.

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed on restated values using the straight-line method, based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets (see
Note 6).

The value of property, plant and equipment is reviewed whenever there are indications of impairment in their value. The related loss is determined based on the recoverable amount of the related asset, which is defined as the higher of the asset’s net selling price and its value in use. An impairment loss is recognized if the net carrying amount of the asset exceeds the recoverable amount.

For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, there were no indications of impairment in the Company’s fixed assets.

j) Leases

Leased property, plant and equipment arrangements are recognized as capital leases if a) the ownership of the leased asset is transferred to the lessee upon termination of the lease; b) the agreement includes an option to purchase the asset at a reduced price; c) the term of the lease is basically the same as the remaining useful life of the leased asset; or d) the present value of minimum lease payments is basically the same as the market value of the leased asset, net of any benefit or scrap value.

When the risks and benefits inherent to the ownership of the leased good remain mostly with the lessor, they are classified as operating leases and accrued rent is charged to income.

F-12


k) Goodwill

Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired at the purchase date.

Goodwill is recorded initially at acquisition cost and then restated using adjustment factors derived from the NCPI. Goodwill is subject to annual impairment testing.

At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company recognized no loss from impairment in the value of goodwill shown in the consolidated balance sheet.

l) Liabilities, provisions, contingent liabilities and commitments

Liability provisions are recognized whenever: (i) the Company has current obligations (legal or assumed) derived from past events, (ii) it is more likely than not that the liability will give rise to a future cash disbursement for its settlement and (iii) the liability can be reasonably estimated.

If the effect of the time value of money is material, provision amounts are determined as the present value of the expected disbursements to settle the obligation. The discount rate is determined on a pre-tax basis and reflects current market conditions at the balance sheet date and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as an interest expense.

Contingent liabilities are recognized only when it is probable they will give rise to a future cash disbursement for their settlement. Also, commitments are only recognized when it is probable they will generate a loss.

m) Pension plan, seniority premiums and severance benefits

The Mexican Institute of Public Accountants (IMCP) issued the revised MexFRS D-3, Labor Obligations, which came into force on January 1, 2005. The revised bulletin establishes additional new rules for the valuation, presentation and disclosure of “other post-retirement benefits” and the reduction and early extinguishment of such benefits. Bulletin D-3 also modifies the rules applicable to employee severance benefits.

Bachoco has a retirement plan in which all non-union workers participate. Pension benefits are determined based on the salary of workers in their final three years of service, the number of years worked and their age at retirement; this plan includes:

- Defined contribution plan: This fund consists of employee and Company contributions. The employee contribution percentage ranges from 1% to 5%. The Company contribution ranges from 1% to 2% in the case of employees with less than 10 years’ seniority, and the same contribution percentage as the employee (5%) when the employee has more than 10 years’ seniority.

- Defined benefit plan: This fund consists solely of Company contributions and covers the Company's labor obligations with each employee.

Seniority premiums and severance payments are paid to workers as required by Mexican labor law.

F-13


The Company recognizes the liability for pension benefits, seniority premiums and termination benefits (severance payments), based on independent actuarial computations using the projected unit-credit method and financial assumptions including effect of inflation.

n) Foreign exchange differences

Transactions denominated in foreign currency are recorded at the prevailing exchange rate on the day of the related transactions. Foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the prevailing exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Exchange rate differences determined from such date are charged or credited to income of the year.

See Note 12 for the Company’s foreign currency position at the end of each year and the exchange rates used to translate balances denominated in foreign currency.

o) Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income consists of the net income or loss for the year, plus the result from holding non-monetary assets, the tax effect of the items which are recorded directly in stockholders’ equity, the effective portion of the unrealized gain or loss on cash flow hedges, the minimum liability adjustment for labor obligations and the minimum effect of minority interest as required by MexFRS B-4, Comprehensive Income.

p) Derivative financial instruments acquired for hedging purposes

In order to reduce its financial risks, the Company uses derivative financial instruments as hedges against certain risks.
 
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risks and the price of corn and sorgum. The Company mitigates these risks through a program that includes the use of derivative financial instruments.

The Company’s policy establishes a range of hedging from 25% to 30% of its total U.S. dollar denominated transactions. The Company uses options and futures contracts to mitigate its exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on its short-term cash flows denominated in U.S. dollars (forecasted transaction). These instruments are not used for speculative purposes and the counterparties are major financial institutions.

The derivatives are recognized in conformity with the rules established in MexFRS C-10 and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and its related interpretations (US GAAP). When the company does not meet the requirements for hedge accounting, the fair value of the financial instruments are recorded directly in the income statement. ,

The Company has entered into the following agreements involving derivative financial instruments:

Options
Options are derivatives that give the buyer the right, albeit not the obligation, to buy or sell an asset (in this case dollars) at an established exercise price, known as the strike price, at a defined date in exchange for the payment of a premium. The issuer of the option is obligated to buy or sell when the option is exercised by the buyer. When the right that is acquired is the right to sell, the option is known as a put, when it is to buy, it is known as a call. In Bachoco’s case, the options entered into are of the European type; that is, they can only be exercised at the maturity date.

F-14


The options in more of the 90% of the cases do not involve the payment of a premium, as the instruments consist of both call and put options and the combination of the premiums payable and receivable is equal to zero. Under this plan, Bachoco acts as both the buyer and the seller and assumes rights (when it purchases) and obligations (when it sells) from these contracts.

Also, in conformity with SFAS 133, Implementation Issue No. G20, “Cash flow hedges: assessing and measuring the effectiveness of a purchased option used in a cash flow hedge”, when designating a purchased option (including a combination of options that comprise either a net purchased option or a zero cost collar) as hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to a particular rate or price (in this case exchange rate) beyond a specified level, an entity documents that the assessment of effectiveness will be based on total changes in the option's cash flows (that is, the assessment will include the hedging instrument's entire change in fair value—its entire gain or loss), rather than documenting that the assessment of effectiveness will be based on only the changes in the hedging instrument's intrinsic value as permitted by paragraph 63(a). For this type of instrument, the hedging ratio may be considered perfectly effective and, consequently, there will be no recognition of ineffectiveness in income, provided the certain criteria are met such as:
1. The critical terms of the hedging instrument (such as notional amount, underlying and maturity date, etc.) completely match the related terms of the hedged forecasted transaction.
2. The strike price (or prices) of the hedging option (or combination of options) matches the specified level (or levels) beyond (or within) which the Company’s exposure is being hedged.
3. The hedging instrument’s inflows (outflows) at its maturity date completely offset the change in the hedged transaction’s cash flows for the risk being hedged.
4. The hedging instrument can only be exercised on a single date (its maturity date).

In 2006, the Company followed G20, as a supplement to FRS, in regards to the measurement of effectiveness.

The Company meets with these criteria for zero cost collar derivative financial instruments and therefore, the Company’s contracts of this type of instrument are valued at their fair value at the beginning and later on a monthly basis, until their maturity. These instruments are recorded in other comprehensive income at their fair value as of December 31, 2006, rather than being reclassified to results of operations they are cancelled upon their maturity, as they are considered perfectly effective in accordance with G20. As of December 31, 2007, the Company did not follow G20 because it did not have such instruments.

For derivatives other than zero cost collar (the Company did not have such instruments at December 31, 2007) or those that are combination of call option, the Company determines the effective portion for such derivatives and records it in other comprehensive income, while the ineffective portion is recorded in income, as is established in bulletin C-10 and SFAS 133.

Effective in 2007, the Company entered into hedge transactions through ASERCA (Support and Services related to Agricultural Trading, which is a governmental entity related to the National Ministry of Agriculture and Farming), in order to monitor the availability of grains, like corn, sorgum and wheat. The Company has bought from a counterparty a combined instrument comprised of a future of a grain price and a put option. The future instruments will guarantee a future price of the grain. Otherwise, the put option has a strike price related to the future price agreement and both are based on the price of Chicago Board of Trade at a specific date. Additionally, the Company receives a 50% subsidy of the premium related to the put option from ASERCA.

F-15


As a result of this combined instrument Bachoco will obtain the best market price for the grain; therefore if the market price goes below of the future price contracted by Bachoco the strike price of the option will be paid and ASERCA will refund the difference between the strike price and the market price.

In 2007, the premium paid on behalf of the Company by ASERCA amounts USD 2,944 thousands. The Company can not predict whether these subsidies will be available in the future.

Futures
Futures are contracts that obligate two entities to exchange an asset or value (in this case grain) at a future date for a pre-established and agreed quantity, quality and price. In this type of contract, there is no premium payment, as there is only a gain or a loss for the Company when the market price of the grain exceeds the strike price (gain) or the market price falls below the price agreed to in the contract (loss). The Company engaged in futures contracts during 2006 and 2007. The Company holds deposits with some of its counterparties to guarantee the execution of its futures contracts. Such deposits bear market interest at market rates.

Assessment of effectiveness
The effectiveness of the Company’s hedges is determined at the time the financial derivatives are designated as hedges and is assessed on a periodic basis. Hedges considered as highly effective are those in which the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item are offset on a period-by-period or cumulative basis by changes in the fair value or cash flows of the financial derivative itself within a range of 80% and 125%.

In conformity with bulletin C-10 and SFAS 133, paragraph 30, the effective portion of a loss or gain on a cash flow hedge is recorded in comprehensive income net of related income taxes (stockholders’ equity) while the ineffective portion is recorded in results of operations.

q) Deferred taxes

The Company records deferred taxes on temporary differences between in the balance sheet accounts for financial and tax reporting purposes, using the enacted income tax rate at the balance sheet date, or the enacted rate that will be in effect at the time the temporary differences giving rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled.

The possibility of recovering deferred tax assets is evaluated periodically and, if necessary, a valuation allowance is created for those assets that are unlikely to be recovered.

Deferred employee profit sharing is recognized only on temporary differences considered non-recurring with a known turnaround time.

Asset tax is recorded as part of deferred taxes, after making the appropriate evaluation of its recovery.

As a result of the adoption of interpretation to MexIFRS8, Effects of the Flat-Rate Business Tax, as of October 2007, the Company has taken into account the provision related to the effects of deferred FRBT established in the interpretation (see Note 15).

F-16


r) Concentration of risk

The Company invests a portion of its surplus cash in cash deposits in financial institutions with good credit ratings and has established guidelines related to diversification and maturities that the Company believes maintains safety and liquidity. The Company has not experienced any losses on its cash equivalents. The Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of credit risks in its accounts receivable, because the Company’s customer base is diverse, thus spreading the credit risk.

s) Income statement presentation

Costs and expenses in the Company’s income statement are presented based on their function, since such classification allows for an accurate evaluation of both operating income and gross profit margins.

Although MexFRS B-3 Statement of income, does not require the presentation of operating income, this caption is shown in the income statement, since operating income is an important indicator used to evaluate the Company’s performance. Operating income consists of ordinary revenues and operating costs and expenses and thus excludes other ordinary income (expenses).

This presentation is comparable to the one used in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.

t) Net income per share

Net majority income per share has been computed based on majority net income and on the weighted average number of shares outstanding, as established in MexFRS B-14.

u) Financial information by segments

Requirements of bulletin B-5, Financial Information by Segments, issued by the IMCP, went into effect in April 2003. This bulletin establishes the rules for disclosing financial information by segment.

Financial information by segment is prepared based on a management’s approach, in conformity with bulletin B-5, considering a segment to be an operating component that is subject to risks and benefits that are different from other business segments.
 
The financial information by segment is disclosed in Note 17.

v) Convenience translation

United States dollar amounts as of December 31, 2007, shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, have been included solely for the convenience of the reader and are translated from Mexican pesos to US dollars as a matter of arithmetic computation only, at an exchange rate of Ps 10.917 to one U.S. dollar, which was the exchange rate at December 31, 2007. Such translation should not be construed as a representation that the Mexican peso amounts could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at this or any other rate. Figures shown in US Dollars do not represent the translation of the financial statements in accordance with US GAAP (SFAS 52 “Foreign Currency Translation”).

F-17


w) Reclassifications

Certain captions shown in the 2005 and 2006 financial statements as originally issued have been reclassified for uniformity of presentation with the 2007 financial statements.

The changes in these reclassifications were recognized retrospectively in the statement of income at December 31, 2005 and 2006, in conformity with MexFRS B-1, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. As of December 2005 and 2006, the employee profit sharing is charged to the statement of income, under the caption other income (expenses). The effects of the reclassifications are as follows:

Other ordinary (expenses) income net
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
Original amount
 
Ps 
 (22,504
)
Ps
22,789
 
Reclassified
   
(25,961
)
 
18,427
 

x) New accounting pronouncements

The most important new pronouncements that came into force in 2007 are as follows:

MexFRS B-3, Statement of Operations
MexFRS B-3 establishes the guidelines for classifying income, costs and expenses as either ordinary or non-ordinary and modifies certain MexFRS. The primary sections of the statement of income have been redefined to embody the concepts of “ordinary items” and the classification of income. Also, the caption Initial accumulated effect of accounting changes has been eliminated from the income statement, as established in MexFRS B-1, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.

MexFRS B-3 also allows entities to present costs and expenses in the statement of operations, based on their function or nature or a combination of both. MexFRS B-3 does not require the presentation of operating income in the statement of operations, but still allows for it when operating income is deemed to be an important indicator for evaluating a particular entity’s performance. When an entity does decide to include the operating income caption, MexFRS B-3 requires the disclosure of the items comprising such caption and a justification for its inclusion in the statement of income.

MexFRS C-13, Related Parties
This MexFRS broadens the definition of related parties to include the immediate family members of key management personnel or directors and funds derived from labor obligation plans, as well. MexFRS C-13 also requires the following disclosures:
1) the relationship between the controlling company and its subsidiaries, irrespective of whether transactions were actually carried out between them in the period; 2) the name of the direct controlling company and, when different from such, the name of the principal controlling company of the economic group to which the entity belongs;  3) compensations granted to the entity’s key management personnel or directors (in the case of public companies). Lastly, this standard allows entities to disclose that the pricing of its transactions carried out with its related parties are similar to prices that would be established for similar transactions between third parties, provided that such parity may be demonstrated.

MexFRS D-6, Capitalization of the Comprehensive Cost of Financing
MexFRS D-6 establishes that entities must capitalize comprehensive financing cost (CFC), which had been optional under the previous MexFRS C-6, Property, Plant and Equipment; this rule eliminated the choice to capitalize or not the comprehensive cost of financing.

F-18


Capitalizable CFC is defined as the amount attributable to qualifying assets that could have been avoided if such acquisition had not taken place, and includes in the case of Mexican peso denominated financing, interest and the net monetary position, and in the case of foreign currency denominated financing, it also includes exchange gains and exchange losses. Qualifying assets are defined as those assets acquired by an entity requiring a prolonged acquisition or construction period for their use, as well as assets that are to be sold or leased that require a prolonged period to be acquired or readied for sale or lease. The capitalization of the comprehensive cost of financing starts and continues provided the investments in the acquisition are actually being made, the activities required for conditioning the asset for sale or use are underway and interest is being accrued.

MexFRS D-6 establishes that the amount of capitalizable CFC will be determined based on the loans that were specifically use to acquire the qualifying assets, or if such identification can not be made, by applying the weighted average capitalization rate for financing to the weighted average of investments in qualifying assets made during the acquisition period. Financing with imputed interest cost may be capitalized against the cost of acquired assets, since the financing is recognized at its present value.

The adoption of MexFRS D-6 did not materially affect the comprehensive financing income as of December 31, 2007.

MexFRS 4, Presentation of Employee Profit Sharing in the Statement of Operations
The Interpretation to MexFRS 4 establishes, based on the result of the analysis of MexFRS B-3, MexFRS D-3 and MexFRS D-4, that employee profit sharing must be presented in the statements of income as an ordinary expense, then effective 2007, employee profit-sharing is classified and disclosed in “other ordinary expenses” into the income statement (prior years was disclosed as a single caption before net income). For comparative purposes this MexFRS is disclosed retroactively for 2005 and 2006. (See Note 16).

MexFRS 8, Effects of the Flat-Rate Business Tax (FRBT)
In December 2007, the CINIF issued the Interpretation to MexFRS 8, which is effective for years beginning on or after October 1, 2007. Such standard was created as a result of the need to clarify whether the flat-rate business tax should be treated as a tax on profits and to establish the guidelines for its accounting treatment.

MexFRS 8 establishes that the FRBT is a tax on profit and that for the year ended December 31, 2007, its effects should be recognized in conformity with the provisions of MexFRS D-4, Accounting for Income Tax, Asset Tax and Employee Profit Sharing, and as of January 1, 2008, in conformity with MexFRS D-4, Taxes on Profits. Based on the conclusions of this Interpretation, an entity must first determine whether its tax base generates FRBT payable or income tax payable. To do so, taxpayers should carry out financial projections to determine if their tax-on-profits base will be for income tax or FRBT. Based on the results of these projections, taxpayers will be able to plan in advance for either FRBT or income tax as it arises each year.

Entities that have determined that they will essentially pay FRBT must recognize the effects of deferred FRBT in their financial statements at December 31, 2007. This deferred tax must correspond to the temporary differences and FRBT credits existing in 2007 for which payment or recovery of FRBT is expected as of or after 2008. Therefore, those entities that have determined that they will essentially pay FRBT in the future must eliminate the deferred income tax asset or liability recognized at such date. These adjustments give rise to an expense or income that must be recognized in the 2007 statement of operations as part of the caption Taxes on profits or in stockholders’ equity when it relates to other comprehensive items.

F-19


In the determination of deferred FRBT asset or liability, taxpayers must consider that certain FRBT credits generate a deferred tax asset, provided that the law establishes the possibility of applying such credits against the FRBT of future periods. These credits must be reviewed at least once a year and written down for those portions for which there is uncertainty as to recoverability.

The deferred tax rate is the rate enacted and established in the tax provisions at the date of the financial statements or the rate that is expected to be in force at the time the deferred FRBT assets and liabilities will be realized (16.5% for 2008, 17% for 2009 and 17.5% for 2010 and subsequent years).

Deferred FRBT for the period must be recognized as a deferred tax expense or income in the income statement of the period as part of the tax on profits caption (in stockholders’ equity for those amounts associated with comprehensive income items) and as a non-current asset or long-term liability in the balance sheet. In the notes to the financial statements, the Company must disclose an analysis of the taxes on profits presented in the income statement, listing the amounts of payable and deferred FRBT. The entity must also mention the deferred FRBT related to other comprehensive items.

Under the FRBT Law, an entity must determine the amount of asset tax generated through 2007 that it will be able to recover as of 2008. Such amount must be recognized in the 2007 financial statements as a recoverable tax account and any amount of asset tax considered unrecoverable must be cancelled from the 2007 balance sheet and recognized as an expense in the statement of operations of the same period as part of the Taxes on profit caption. As of 2008, the balance of recoverable taxes must be reviewed on each financial statement closing date and written down when there is evidence that some amounts may not be recoverable after all.

The effects of adopting this new accounting pronouncement are described in Note 15.

3. Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable at December 31, 2006 and 2007, are shown net of an allowance for bad debts for $ 31,852 and $ 36,154, respectively.

4. Related Parties

The companies mentioned above are considered affiliates, as the Company’s stockholders are also stockholders in such companies.

a) A summary of related party accounts payable as of December 31, is as follows:

   
Relation
 
2006
 
2007
 
Vimifos, S.A. de C.V.
   
Affiliate
 
Ps 
 9,234
 
Ps
21,311
 
Maquinaria Agrícola, S.A. de C.V.
   
Affiliate
   
3,042
   
3,382
 
Autos y Accesorios, S.A. de C.V.
   
Affiliate
   
318
   
438
 
Llantas y Accesorios, S.A. de C.V.
   
Affiliate
   
56
   
1,168
 
 
       
Ps
12,650
 
Ps 
26,819
 

At December 31, 2006 and 2007, balances due to related parties correspond to unsecured current accounts that bear no interest and are payable within 30 days.

F-20

 
b) For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company had the following transactions with related parties:

   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Purchases of feed, raw materials and packing supplies
                   
Vimifos, S.A. de C.V.
  Ps 
 194,053
  Ps 
251,931
  Ps 
192,188
 
Qualiplast, S.A. de C.V.
   
-
   
-
   
634
 
                     
Purchases of vehicles, tires and spare parts
                   
Maquinaria Agrícola, S.A. de C.V.
   
16,229
   
17,585
   
47,155
 
Llantas y accesorios, S.A. de C.V.
   
11,341
   
12,289
   
23,349
 
Autos y Accesorios, S.A. de C.V.
   
30,994
   
33,585
   
14,985
 
Alfonso R. Bours, S.A. de C.V.
   
-
   
-
   
2,171
 
Distribuidora Automotriz los Mochis, S.A. de C.V.
   
-
   
-
   
8,095
 
                     
Airplane leasing expenses
                   
Taxis Aéreos del Noroeste, S.A, de C.V.
   
4,687
   
4,196
   
3,153
 

Sales and purchases transactions with related parties are made at markets prices, which are similar to other independent parties.

c) For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company paid approximately Ps.33.4 million in aggregate compensation to our directors and executive officers, for services they rendered in their respective capacities. The Company has not implemented a share options plan for executives or employees.

5. Inventories and biological assets

a) Inventories consist of the following:
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
Raw materials and byproducts
  Ps 
1,087,148
  Ps 
2,004,691
 
Medicine, materials and spare parts
   
356,397
   
369,337
 
Finished feed
   
42,694
   
56,608
 
     
1,486,239
   
2,430,636
 
Agricultural products:
             
Live chicken
   
565,879
   
667,022
 
Processed chicken
   
147,361
   
177,719
 
Commercial egg
   
24,616
   
22,551
 
Turkey
   
-
   
28,339
 
Beef
   
-
   
2,708
 
Others
   
-
   
365
 
     
737,856
   
898,704
 
Total
  Ps 
 2,224,095
  Ps 
3,329,340
 
 
F-21

 
b) Biological assets at December 31, 2006 and 2007 consist of the following:

   
2006
 
2007
 
Current biological assets:
             
Breeder pigs
  Ps 
 24,775
  Ps 
 32,464
 
Incubatable eggs for fattening
   
67,130
   
76,038
 
Total current biological assets
   
91,905
   
108,502
 
               
Non-current biological assets:
             
Laying and breeder hens
   
173,927
   
202,214
 
Incubatable eggs for laying hens
   
7,714
   
-
 
Pigs
   
25,231
   
27,280
 
Laying hens
   
521,044
   
577,043
 
Allowance for productivity declines
   
(212,798
)
 
(231,124
)
Total non-current biological assets
   
515,118
   
575,413
 
Total inventories and biological assets
  Ps 
 2,831,118
  Ps 
 4,013,255
 

The change in the historical value of biological assets and agricultural products to be presented at their fair value was Ps. 28,072 in 2005 (increase), Ps. 10,879 in 2006 (increase) and Ps. 10,882 in 2007 (increase). In 2005, 2006 and 2007, the effects were included as part of the caption Net revenue.

6. Property, Plant and Equipment

a) Property, plant and equipment consists of the following as of December 31:

   
Useful lives
(years)
 
 
2006
 
 
2007
 
Land
   
-
  Ps 
 811,584
  Ps 
 856,486
 
Buildings, farm structures and equipment
   
7-27
   
13,270,667
   
13,987,063
 
Office, furniture and equipment
   
3
 
 
218,498
   
227,183
 
Transportation equipment
   
6
   
1,159,922
   
1,162,747
 
           
15,460,671
   
16,233,479
 
Accumulated depreciation
         
(6,264,119
)
 
(6,702,709
)
Net
         
9,196,552
   
9,530,770
 
Construction in progress
         
639,343
   
725,469
 
Total
        Ps 
 9,835,895
  Ps 
 10,256,239
 

b) Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, was Ps 497,819, Ps 537,383, and Ps 571,393, respectively.

7. Goodwill

In 1999, goodwill was derived from the purchase of the shares of Grupo Campi, S.A. de C.V. in the amount of Ps. 367,135. At December 31, 2005 and 2006, accumulated amortization aggregates Ps. 66,287. As mentioned in Note 2 k), in 2006 and 2007, goodwill was not amortized derived from the adoption of bulletin B-7, Business Acquisitions. 

F-22


8. Notes Payable to Banks and Long-term Debt

a) Short-term notes payable to banks, as of December 31, consists of the following:
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
Unsecured notes payable to banks:
             
Denominated in Mexican pesos, interest rate: TIIE(1) FIRA(2) rate less 3.00 points
   
-
   
40,000
 
Total notes payable to bank
  Ps 
 -
  Ps
 40,000
 

The weighted average interest rate on short-term notes payable at December 31, 2006 and 2007 was 5.32%, and 4.93%, respectively. Average interest rates on short-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 were 5.25% and 4.68%, respectively.

b) Long-term notes payable to banks, as of December 31, consists of the following:

   
2006
 
2007
 
           
Long-term debt to banks:
             
Secured by equipment:
             
Denominated in Mexican pesos, repayable in monthly installments:
             
Through December, 2010, at CETES(3) rate plus 2 points
  Ps 
 41,089
  Ps 
 30,400
 
               
Unsecured:
             
Denominated in Mexican pesos, at TIIE(1) FIRA(2) rate less 3.30 points, with minimum rate of 2.90%, through December, 2010
   
4,113
   
39,201
 
Total
   
45,202
   
69,601
 
Less current portion
   
(9,708
)
 
(18,844
)
Total long-term debt
  Ps 
 35,494
  Ps 
50,757
 

(1) TIIE = Interbank Equilibrium Rate
(2) FIRA = Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relación con la Agricultura
(3) CETE = Certificados de la Tesorería

Weighted average interest rates on long-term debt at December 31, 2006 and 2007 were 8.58% and 7.80%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the Company’s total long term debt for the years ened as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 was 9.26%, and 7.92%, respectively.

The weighted average interest rate of the Company’s total debt at December 31, 2006 and 2007 was 6.67% and 6.75%, respectively.

c) At December 31, 2006 and 2007, unused lines of credit totaled Ps 835,918 and Ps 956,050, respectively. In 2006 and 2007, the Company did not pay any fee for unused lines of credit.

d) The book value of assets collateralizing long-term debt was Ps 145,438 at December 31, 2006 and Ps 137,857 at December 31, 2007.

e) Maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:

Year
 
Amount
 
2009
  Ps 
19,768
 
2010
   
19,769
 
2011
   
7,480
 
2012
   
3,740
 
 
  Ps
 50,757
 

F-23


9. Financial Instruments

The Company has entered into contracts with Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan and Fimat USA, LLC, to hedge U.S. dollar exchange rates and corn and sorgum for the Company’s projected cash expenditures for the period from January through December 2008.

A summary of instruments as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 is as follows:

2006
                 
Other
 
Ineffective
 
Derivatives financial
Instruments
   
Type
   
Posi-tion
   
Notional
Amount
   
Fair value
 
 comprehensive
 income
 
 portion
(income)
 
Financial Instruments – Hedging
Exchange rate options
   
Call
   
Short
  Ps 
161,719
  Ps 
(24,351
)
Ps 
(4,121
)
     
Exchange rate options
   
Call
   
Long
   
220,169
   
21,365
   
4,698
       
Exchange rate options
   
Put
   
Short
   
80,309
   
(47,394
)
 
(119
)
     
     
 
   
 
         
(50,380
)
 
458
       
Financial Instruments
Exchange rate options
   
Put
   
Long
   
160,785
   
30,552
   
-
  Ps 
30,552
 
Bean and soy futures
   
 
   
Long
   
3,181
   
2,143
   
-
   
2,143
 
Corn futures
   
 
   
Long
   
9,846
   
3,809
   
-
   
3,809
 
Bean and soy options
   
Call
   
Long
   
622
   
236
   
-
   
236
 
Bean and soy options
   
Put
   
Short
   
1,167
   
(216
)
 
-
   
(216
)
Corn options
   
Call
   
Long
   
2,967
   
3,305
   
-
   
3,305
 
Corn options
   
Put
   
Short
   
8,290
   
(267
)
 
-
   
(267
)
     
 
               
39,562
   
-
  Ps 
39,562
 
Total
                     
(10,818
)
 
458
       
Deferred tax effect
                     
2,055
   
(88
)
       
Total net of taxes                     Ps 
(8,763
)
Ps 
 370
            
 
2007
                 
Other
 
Ineffective
 
Derivatives financial
Instruments
 
Type
 
Posi- tion
 
Notional
Amount
 
Fair value
 
comprehensive
 income
 
portion
(income)
 
Financial Instruments – Hedging
Bean and soy futures
         
Short
  Ps 
2,469
  Ps 
(3,442
)
Ps 
(3,442
)
     
Bean and soy futures
         
Long
   
2,379
   
4,424
   
4,424
       
Corn futures
         
Short
   
167
   
(420
)
 
(420
)
     
Corn futures
         
Long
   
553
   
1,424
   
1,424
       
Bean and soy options
   
Call
   
Long
   
1,890
   
1,947
   
1,947
       
Bean and soy options
   
Put
   
Long
   
3,480
   
(255
)
 
(255
)
     
Corn options
   
Call
   
Long
   
2,870
   
3,815
   
3,815
       
Corn options
   
Put
   
Short
   
5,380
   
(226
)
 
(226
)
     
Corn options Acerca
   
Put
   
Long
   
48,438
   
99,310
   
99,310
       
Embedded corn futures
   
 
   
Long
   
16,356
   
15,549
   
15,549
         
     
 
   
 
         
122,126
   
122,126
       
Financial Instruments
Exchange rate options
   
Call
   
Long
   
49,500
   
9,424
   
-
  Ps 
9,424
 
Exchange rate options
   
Put
   
Long
   
7,500
   
429
   
-
   
429
 
Exchange rate options
   
Call
   
Short
   
8,500
   
(15,632
)
 
-
   
(15,632
)
Exchange rate options
   
Put
   
Short
   
85,000
   
(3,871
)
 
-
   
(3,871
)
Exchange rate forward
   
Call
   
Long
   
147,500
   
21,246
   
-
   
21,246
 
Exchange rate forward
   
Put
   
Short
   
120,000
   
(10,219
)
 
-
   
(10,219
)
                       
1,377
   
-
  Ps 
1,377
 
Total
                     
123,503
   
122,126
          
Deferred tax effect
                     
(23,466
)
 
(23,204
)
        
Total net of taxes
                    Ps 
100,037
  Ps 
98,922
          
 
F-24


As a part of the exchange rate strategy, there are certain financial derivatives to reduce the exchange rate risk in purchase transactions. There are contract agreements for call and put options for short-term hedge which cover assets of U.S. 367 thousand for 2006 and U.S.277 thousand for 2007, as well as liabilities of U.S. 233 thousand and U.S. 225 thousand for 2006 and 2007, respectively. These contracts resulted in a charge to the income statement by Ps 70,495 for 2006 and a credit by Ps 8,097 for 2007 included in the comprehensive cost of financing.

10. Commitments

a) The Company has entered into operating leases for certain offices, production sites, automotive and computer equipment. Most leases contain renewal options. Rental expense was as follows:

Year ended
December 31,
 
 
Amount
 
2005
  Ps 
 33,160
 
2006
   
30,762
 
2007
   
40,733
 

b) Future minimum annual rental payments under existing operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2007, are as follows:

Year ended
December 31,
 
 
Amount
 
2008
  Ps 
 69,989
 
2009
   
62,658
 
2010
   
56,671
 
2011
   
55,141
 
2012
   
54,447
 
2013 and thereafter
   
12,006
 
Total
  Ps 
 310,912
 

c) In 2005, 2006, and 2007 annual rental expense under operating leases was Ps. 139,597, Ps 124,028, and Ps 153,165, respectively.

11. Other taxes payable and other accruals

An analysis of other taxes payable and other accruals presented in the financial statements is as follows:

   
2006
 
2007
 
Expenses payable
  Ps 
 123,122
  Ps 
 91,981
 
IMSS, SAR and INFONAVIT
   
49,491
   
56,476
 
Other accounts payable
   
21,907
   
39,005
 
Trade advances
   
32,914
   
38,204
 
Employee profit sharing
   
5,254
   
5,756
 
Salaries payable
   
5,707
   
4,514
 
Tax payable
   
3,235
   
4,128
 
Payroll tax
   
971
   
2,637
 
Interest payable
   
972
   
728
 
Total
  Ps 
 243,573
  Ps 
 243,429
 
 
F-25


12. Foreign Currency Position

a) A summary of the Company’s assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars (the only foreign currency) as of December 31 is as follows:

   
(Thousands U.S. dollars)
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
Assets:
             
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
23,776
 
$
34,862
 
Advances to suppliers (included in inventories and property, plant and equipment)
   
39,001
   
37,116
 
     
62,777
   
71,978
 
Liabilities:
             
Accounts payable
   
(15,984
)
 
(14,148
)
Net long position
 
$
46,793
 
$
57,830
 

b) As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the exchange rate was Ps 10.82 and Ps 10.91 per dollar, respectively. At March 17, 2008, the date of the audit report on these financial statements, the exchange rate was $ 10.76 per U.S. dollar.

c) Assets from foreign origin included in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, were:

   
(Thousands of U.S. dollars)
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
Inventories
 
$
20,654
 
$
29,899
 
Property, plant and equipment
   
140,093
   
141,695
 

d) Imported raw materials, in thousands of U.S. dollars, were $ 416,974 in 2005, $ 483,278 in 2006 and $ 655,922 in 2007.

13. Labor Obligations

An analysis of the net period cost, reserve amounts and the assumptions considered in the pension plan, the seniority premium and severance obligation at December 31 is as follows:

   
Pension plan
 
Seniority Premium
 
Severance
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Net period cost:
                                                       
Labor cost
  Ps 
 10,798
  Ps 
 11,791
  Ps 
 15,429
  Ps 
 3,296
  Ps 
 3,781
  Ps 
 4,361
  Ps 
 9,143
  Ps 
 9,475
  Ps 
 9,191
 
Return on plan assets
   
(7,369
)
 
(8,395
)
 
(10,090
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Amortization of unrecognized prior past service costs
   
2,698
   
2,429
   
2,239
   
3,439
   
3,757
   
1,215
   
4,583
   
1,530
   
4,250
 
Interest cost
   
7,906
   
7,864
   
8,890
   
2,090
   
2,298
   
2,348
   
1,877
   
1,993
   
1,765
 
Net period cost
  Ps 
 14,033
  Ps 
 13,689
  Ps 
 16,468
  Ps 
 8,825
  Ps
 9,836
  Ps 
 7,924
  Ps 
 15,603
  Ps 
 12,998
  Ps 
 15,206
 
Loss from early extinguishment of obligations
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
 2,044
  Ps 
 941
  Ps 
 2,514
 
 
F-26


   
Pension plan
 
Seniority Premium
 
Severance
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
2006
 
2007
 
2006
 
2007
 
Labor Obligations:
                                     
Accumulated benefit obligation
  Ps 
 160,280
  Ps 
 186,865
  Ps 
33,063
  Ps 
 36,306
  Ps 
 31,936
  Ps 
 38,567
 
Current benefit obligation
   
99,220
   
124,592
   
28,202
   
30,821
   
31,036
   
38,567
 
 
                                     
Projected benefit obligation
   
189,355
   
199,333
   
49,098
   
56,601
   
36,053
   
42,895
 
Plan assets
   
(160,421
)
 
(182,017
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Unrecognized prior service cost
   
(22,971
)
 
(20,959
)
 
(6,930
)
 
(6,283
)
 
-
   
-
 
Transition liability
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(27,913
)
 
(23,198
)
Unrecognized net gains
   
36,756
   
48,415
   
(15,784
)
 
(21,490
)
 
7,223
   
(455
)
Unrecognized changes or improvements
   
(28,545
)
 
(27,322
)
 
104
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Net projected benefit obligation
   
14,174
   
17,450
   
26,488
   
28,828
   
15,363
   
19,242
 
Unfunded accumulated benefit obligation
   
4,624
   
15,960
   
33,063
   
36,307
   
31,936
   
38,567
 
 
                                     
Current net liability over net projected liability in some subsidiaries
   
-
   
4,049
   
6,575
   
7,479
   
16,573
   
19,325
 
Additional liability
   
-
   
(4,049
)
 
(6,575
)
 
(7,479
)
 
(16,573
)
 
(19,325
)
Intangible assets
   
-
   
4,049
   
5,659
   
5,967
   
16,573
   
18,325
 
Minimum labor obligation liability adjustment
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
-
  Ps 
916
  Ps 
 1,512
  Ps 
 -
  Ps 
 1,000
 
 
                                     
Change in benefit obligation:
                                     
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
  Ps 
 152,360
  Ps 
 189,355
  Ps 
 46,546
  Ps 
 49,097
  Ps 
 42,671
  Ps 
 36,053
 
Service cost
   
11,791
   
15,429
   
3,781
   
4,361
   
9,475
   
9,191
 
Interest cost
   
7,864
   
8,890
   
2,298
   
2,348
   
1,992
   
1,765
 
Actuarial differences
   
8,518
   
(12,587
)
 
2,339
   
6,379
   
( 6,077
)
 
9,726
 
Benefits paid
   
(1,554
)
 
(1,754
)
 
(5,867
)
 
(5,584
)
 
(8,803
)
 
(13,840
)
Changes to plan not applied
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(3,205
)
 
-
 
Increase for plan improvement
   
10,376
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
  Ps 
 189,355
  Ps 
 199,333
  Ps 
 49,097
  Ps 
 56,601
  Ps 
 36,053
  Ps 
 42,895
 

 
 
Pension plan
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
Changes in plan assets:
             
Plan assets at beginning of the year
  Ps 
 130,742
  Ps 
 160,421
 
 
             
Actual return on plan assets
   
8,395
   
10,090
 
Employer contribution
   
14,039
   
13,193
 
Actuarial differences
   
8,799
   
67
 
Benefit paid
   
(1,554
)
 
(1,754
)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
   
160,421
   
182,017
 
 
             
Funded status
   
(28,934
)
 
(17,316
)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain)
   
(36,758
)
 
(48,415
)
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)
   
22,971
   
20,959
 
Net amount recognized
  Ps 
(42,721
)
Ps 
(44,772
)

The Company used December 2005, 2006 and 2007 measurement date for pension plan, seniority premium, and December 31, 2006 and 2007 for the severance plan.

The transition liability, the prior service cost and plan changes, and actuarial differences assumptions will be amortized over a period ranging from 21 to 25 years (the average remaining working life of employees).

F-27


The asset allocation for the Company’s pension plan at the end of 2005, 2006 and 2007 and the target allocation for 2008 by asset category are as follows:
 
   
Percentage of plan at year end
 
Target
allocation
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
2008
 
Fixed-income securities
   
75
%
 
74
%
 
77
%
 
75
%
Fixed-variable income securities
   
25
%
 
26
%
 
23
%
 
25
%

Target asset allocations reflect its investment strategy of maximizing the rate of return on plan assets and the resulting funded status, within an appropriate level of risk.
 
The rates considered in the actuarial study in 2004, 2005 and 2006 are as follows:
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Labor obligations discount
   
5.25
%
 
5.25
%
 
5.25
%
Future salary increases
   
1.00
%
 
1.00
%
 
1.00
%
Return on assets
   
6.25
%
 
6.25
%
 
6.25
%

The information about the expected cash flow for the pension benefit plant and seniority premium is as follows:

   
Pension
plan
 
Seniority
premium
 
 
Severance
 
Expected benefit payment:
                   
2008
  Ps 
 6,972
  Ps 
 6,395
  Ps 
 8,215
 
2009
   
8,222
   
6,857
   
7,431
 
2010
   
9,482
   
7,145
   
7,002
 
2011
   
10,859
   
7,282
   
6,651
 
2012
   
11,957
   
7,369
   
6,303
 
2013-2017
   
76,959
   
37,704
   
27,856
 
Total
  Ps 
 124,451
  Ps 
 72,752
  Ps 
 63,458
 

The above table reflects the total benefits expected to be paid from the plan.

14. Stockholders’ Equity

a) In April 1997, Bachoco had a stock split and created so-called “BL” units, which consist of one series “B” share and one series “L” share, and so-called “BB” units, which consist of two series “B” shares. Series “L” shares have limited voting rights.

In September 2006, the Company separated the BL units into B and L shares and converted the series L shares into series B shares; consequently only one series remains (series B). All shares issued and outstanding shares have voting rights.

b) In 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company declared and paid cash dividends at nominal values of Ps 239,098, Ps 353,880 and Ps 353,880, respectively (Ps 263,719, Ps 378,025 and Ps 363,708, in constant Mexican pesos) or Ps 0.40, Ps 0.59 and Ps 0.59, respectively, per share in nominal pesos.

c) The Mexican Corporation Act requires that at least 5% of each year’s net income be appropriated to increase the legal reserve until such reserve is equal to 20% of capital stock issued and outstanding. The balance of the legal reserve at December 31, 2006 and 2007, included in retained earnings, was Ps 205,735.

F-28


d) The Company approved a stock repurchase plan in 1998, in conformity with the Mexican Securities Trading Act, providing a stock repurchase reserve for that purpose of Ps 180,000 (Ps 303,861 expressed in constant Mexican pesos) through the appropriation of retained earnings in 1998. During 2005 the Company repurchased 920 thousand shares for Ps 11,462. During 2006 and 2007, no shares were repurchased. In 2005, and 2006, the Company sold 800 thousand and 920 thousand of shares, respectively, previously repurchased; the sales value of latter was for Ps 2,954 and
Ps 17,604, respectively. In 2007 no shares were sold.

e) The Company is required to pay taxes on dividends distributed to stockholders only to the extent the payment made exceeds the balance of the “net tax profit account” (CUFIN), which is used to control earnings on which income tax has already been paid. Income tax paid on dividends refers to a tax payable by corporate entities and not by individuals.

The Company obtains the majority of its revenues and net profit from Bachoco, S.A. de C.V. (BSACV). For the years 2005 through 2007, pretax income of BSACV, represented between 90% and 94% of Bachoco’s consolidated pretax income.

Dividends on which BSACV has paid income tax will be credited to the Company’s “CUFIN” account and, accordingly, no further income tax will be paid when such amounts are distributed as dividends to the Company’s stockholders.

f) From 1999 through December 31, 2001, under Mexican income tax law, corporate taxpayers were extended the option of deferring payment of a portion of their annual corporate income tax, so that the tax payable will represent 30% of taxable income. The earnings on which taxpayers opted to defer payment of a portion of corporate income tax had to be controlled in the so-called “net reinvested tax profit account” (CUFINRE).

Since the Company opted for this tax deferral, earnings will be considered to be distributed first from the CUFINRE and any excess will be paid from the “net tax profit account” balance (“CUFIN”) so as to pay the 5% deferred tax. The option to defer a portion of the annual corporate income tax was eliminated effective January 1, 2002.

15. Income Tax, Asset Tax, and Flat-Rate Business Tax

a) Income tax

The Company and each of its subsidiaries file separate income tax returns. BSACV, the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, is subject to payment of corporate income tax under the provisions of the simplified regime, which is applicable to companies engaged exclusively in agriculture, cattle-raising, fishing, forestry and certain other activities the income tax law establishes that are exclusive when the companies obtain no more than 10% of their revenues from the production of processed products, with which rule BSACV has complied.

The simplified regime establishes that the taxable base for income tax is determined on revenues collected net of deductions paid. The tax rate for this regime was 16% in 2005, and 2006. In 2007 it was 19%.

The income tax reforms passed in December 2004 include the elimination, as from beginning in the 2006 fiscal year, of the taxable deduction of purchases so as to permit only the deduction of cost of sales. This reform is only applicable to the subsidiary Campi Alimentos S.A. de C.V. as it pays taxes under the general regime, while for BSACV it is not applicable, due to the fact that it pays taxes under the simplified regime.

In 2006 changes were made to Mexican tax law that as of 2007, will increase the tax rate from 16% to 19%. This change resulted in a charge of Ps. 336,376 to income, reflected in deferred taxes under “change in tax rates”.

F-29


b) Asset tax

As of January 1, 2007, asset tax rate is payable at the 1.25% rate and liabilities are no longer deductible from the asset tax base. Through December 31, 2007, the 1.8% asset tax was payable on the average value of most assets net of certain liabilities. The asset tax in 2005, 2006 and 2007 amounted to Ps 21,418, Ps 28,267 and Ps 27,189, respectively. In each of the three years the Company credited against these amounts the income tax paid.

The Company and its subsidiaries are required to pay asset tax if the amount of asset tax exceeds the computed income tax liability. Asset tax paid can be credited against income tax in subsequent years (up to ten years). At December 31, 2007, the Company had Ps 6,420 in asset tax credits.

Base year
 
Asset tax paid
 
Year of expiration
 
2004
  Ps 
10
   
2014
 
2005
   
3,258
   
2015
 
2006
   
3,152
   
2016
 
    Ps 
6,420
       

During 2007, a new tax reform was enacted and it abolished the asset tax effective in 2008.

c) Flat-Rate Business Tax (FRBT)

The Flat-Rate Business Tax (FRBT) Law was published in the Official Gazette on October 1, 2007. This Law will come into force as of January 1, 2008 and abolish the Asset Tax Law.

Current-year FRBT is computed by applying the 17.5% (16.5% for 2008 and 17% for 2009) rate to income determined on the basis of cash flows, as defined, net of authorized credits.

FRBT credits derive mainly from the unamortized negative FRBT base and salary credits and social security contributions, as well as credits derived from the deduction of certain investments, such as inventories and fixed assets, during the transition period starting on the date on which the FRBT came into force.

FRBT shall be payable only to the extent it exceeds income tax for the same period. In other words, to determine FRBT payable, income tax paid in a given period shall first be subtracted from the current FRBT of the same period and the difference shall be the FRBT payable.

Should a negative FRBT base be determined because deductions exceed taxable income, there will be no FRBT payable. The amount of the negative base multiplied by the FRBT rate results in a FRBT credit, which may be applied against income tax for the same year or, if applicable, against FRBT payable in the next ten years.

Based on tax result projections, the Company considers that it will be subject to the payment of income tax in the following years.

F-30


d) Income tax charged to results

For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, income tax charged (credited) to results of operations was as follows:

   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Current year income tax
  Ps 
 363,587
  Ps 
 250,519
  Ps 
 143,029
 
Current year asset tax
   
3,178
   
2,497
   
-
 
Deferred income tax
   
1,068
   
346,110
   
169,716
 
Total income tax
  Ps 
 367,833
  Ps 
 599,126
  Ps 
 312,745
 

e) Deferred income tax

On the basis of the financial projections for the next four years based on future computations and retrospectively, based on historical results, the Company considers that it will pay income tax, therefore, the new FRBT will not have effect on the Company’s financial information.

The component of the Company’s deferred income tax (assets) and liabilities are as follows:
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
Assets:
             
Accounts payable
  Ps 
(151,984
)
Ps 
(196,460
)
Labor obligations
   
(3,032
)
 
(8,082
)
Tax loss carryforward
   
(6,186
)
 
(4,613
)
     
(161,202
)
 
(209,155
)
Liabilities:
             
Inventories
   
330,483
   
420,993
 
Accounts receivable
   
229,851
   
396,437
 
Other provisions
   
2,491
   
269
 
Derivative financial instruments
   
-
   
23,204
 
Fixed assets
   
1,443,692
   
1,450,073
 
Effect due to change in tax rate
   
336,376
   
-
 
Additional liability from stockholders’ equity
   
6,529
   
288,591
 
     
2,349,422
   
2,579,567
 
Less:
             
Valuation allowance
   
6,186
   
4,613
 
Total deferred income tax liability, net
  Ps 
 2,182,034
  Ps 
 2,375,025
 

At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the deferred income tax liability determined by considering stockholders’ equity as a temporary item is greater than the amount determined using the assets and liabilities method. Due to the above, the Company recognized an additional liability of Ps. 290,214 in 2006 and Ps. 359,717 in 2007 in order to recognize the difference between deferred tax determined using the asset and liability method and by considering the stockholders’ equity as the only temporary item.

The most significant items that gave rise to a difference between the total amount of current year income tax and the current year deferred tax determined at the statutory rate are as follows:

   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
 
%
 
%
 
%
 
Statutory income tax rate
   
16.00
   
16.00
   
19.00
 
Effect of companies outside simplified regime
   
2.3
   
4.42
   
4.20
 
Effect of non-taxable items
   
( 2.2
)
 
( 3.04
)
 
( 3.40
)
Effect due to change in tax rate from 16% to 19% in 2007
         
22.27
       
Effective income tax rate
   
16.1
   
39.65
   
19.80
 
 
F-31


f) Net loss carryforward

At December 31, 2007, the Company has net loss carryforwards restated in accordance with the actual Mexican Tax Law, which can offset the future taxable income for the next ten years, as follows:

Net loss carryforward
 
 
Base year
 
Year of
expiration
 
Restated
amount
 
2001
   
2011
  Ps 
 16,092
 
2005
   
2015
   
229
 
 
        Ps 
 16,321 
 

g) Equity tax value

At December 31, 2006 and 2007, the tax value of the Company’s equity, which will not be subject to taxation, is comprised of the following:

   
2006
 
2007
 
Restated contributed capital (CUCA)
  Ps 
 1,877,344
  Ps 
 1,877,344
 
Net tax profit (CUFIN) and net reinvested tax profit (CUFINRE)
   
2,399,602
   
2,574,183
 
Total
  Ps 
 4,276,946
  Ps 
 4,451,527
 

16. Other ordinary income, expense net

As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, other ordinary income, expense net were as follows:

   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Other ordinary income:
                   
Sales of waste animals, raw materials, by-products and others.
  Ps 
 215,587
  Ps 
 206,528
  Ps 
 276,094
 
Tax incentives
   
9,054
   
32,379
   
73,054
 
Total other ordinary income
   
224,641
   
238,907
   
349,148
 
                     
Other ordinary expense:
                   
Cost of waste animals, raw materials, by-products and others.
   
(189,998
)
 
(182,324
)
 
(261,703
)
Employee profits sharing
   
(3,457
)
 
(4,362
)
 
(4,828
)
Other
   
(57,147
)
 
(33,794
)
 
(13,046
)
Total other ordinary expense
   
(250,602
)
 
(220,480
)
 
(279,577
)
Total other ordinary income net:
  Ps 
 (25,961
)
Ps 
 18,427
  Ps 
 69,571
 

Employee profits sharing

The Company and BSACV have no employees, but each of the subsidiaries of the Company that has employees is required under Mexican law to pay employees, in addition to their compensation and benefits, profit sharing in an aggregate amount equal to 10% of such subsidiary’s taxable income subject to certain adjustments.

Employee profit sharing is recorded as part of the other expenses caption.
 
F-32

 
17. Financial information by segments

The segments to be reported are focused by product line. Inter-segment transactions have been eliminated. Our Poultry segment is comprised of our chicken and egg products due to its similarity and to the fact that egg sales do not exceed 10% of total revenue for the years ended on December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. The information included under “Others” corresponds to pigs, balanced animal feed and other sundry sub-products. The required disclosures are shown below:

   
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005
 
   
Poultry
 
Others
 
Total
 
Net revenues
  Ps 
 13,871,147
  Ps 
 1,747,045
  Ps 
 15,618,192
 
Cost of sales
   
(9,740,992
)
 
(1,493,570
)
 
(11,234,562
)
Gross profit
   
4,130,155
   
253,475
   
4,383,630
 
Interest income
   
304,045
   
12,469
   
316,514
 
Interest expense and other financing costs
   
(209,129
)
 
(375
)
 
(209,504
)
Loss on net monetary position
   
(118,724
)
 
-
   
(118,724
)
Income tax and asset tax
   
(335,554
)
 
(32,279
)
 
(367,833
)
Majority net income
   
1,830,128
   
78,407
   
1,908,535
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
   
9,300,678
   
216,373
   
9,517,051
 
Total assets
   
15,836,258
   
694,647
   
16,530,905
 
Total liabilities
   
(2,838,443
)
 
(189,405
)
 
(3,027,848
)
Capital expenditures
   
835,529
   
-
   
835,529
 
Expenses not requiring cash disbursement:
                   
Depreciation
   
489,396
   
8,423
   
497,819
 

   
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
 
   
Poultry
 
Others
 
Total
 
Net revenues
  Ps 
13,486,020
  Ps 
 2,064,945
  Ps 
 15,550,965
 
Cost of sales
   
(10,220,870
)
 
(1,832,116
)
 
(12,052,986
)
Gross profit
   
3,265,150
   
232,829
   
3,497,979
 
Interest income
   
288,932
   
13,978
   
302,910
 
Interest expense and other financing costs
   
(129,506
)
 
(2,346
)
 
(131,852
)
Loss on net monetary position
   
(150,438
)
 
-
   
(150,438
)
Income tax and asset tax
   
(567,933
)
 
(31,193
)
 
(599,126
)
Majority net income
   
826,642
   
79,544
   
906,186
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
   
9,576,266
   
259,629
   
9,835,895
 
Total assets
   
16,833,872
   
725,367
   
17,559,239
 
Total liabilities
   
(3,321,636
)
 
(134,649
)
 
(3,456,285
)
Capital expenditures
   
856,227
   
-
   
856,227
 
Expenses not requiring cash disbursement:
                   
Depreciation
   
523,720
   
13,663
   
537,383
 

F-33


   
As of and for the year ended December 31,
2007
 
   
Poultry
 
Others
 
Total
 
Net revenues
 
$
15,885,828
   
Ps2,333,819
   
Ps18,219,647
 
Cost of sales
   
(12,353,458
)
 
(2,124,403
)
 
(14,477,861
)
Gross profit
   
3,532,370
   
209,416
   
3,741,786
 
Interest income
   
304,030
   
14,849
   
318,879
 
Interest expense and other financing costs
   
(133,913
)
 
(7,665
)
 
(141,578
)
Loss on net monetary position
   
(151,035
)
 
(3,779
)
 
(154,814
)
Income tax and asset tax
   
(280,792
)
 
(31,953
)
 
(312,745
)
Majority net income
   
1,203,149
   
67,792
   
1,270,941
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
   
9,986,129
   
270,110
   
10,256,239
 
Total assets
   
18,264,882
   
851,542
   
19,116,424
 
Total liabilities
   
3,798,656
   
190,602
   
3,989,258
 
Capital expenditures
   
987,322
   
4,415
   
991,737
 
Expenses not requiring cash disbursement:
                   
Depreciation
  Ps 
 556,188
  Ps 
 15,205
  Ps 
 571,393
 

Revenues from our poultry segment are analized as follows:

   
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005
 
   
Chicken
 
Egg
 
Total
 
Net revenues
  Ps 
 12,517,765
  Ps 
 1,353,382
  Ps 
 13,871,147
 
 
   
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
 
   
Chicken
 
Egg
 
Total
 
Net revenues
  Ps 
 12,053,293
  Ps 
1,432,727
  Ps 
 13,486,020
 
 
   
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2007
 
   
Chicken
 
Egg
 
Total
 
Net revenues
  Ps 
 14,135,242
  Ps 
1,750,586
  Ps 
 15,885,828
 

18. New accounting Pronouncements

The most important new pronouncements that will come into force in 2008 are as follows:

MexFRS B-2, Statement of Cash Flows
In November 2007, MexFRS B-2 was issued by the CINIF to replace MexFRS B-12, Statement of Changes in Financial Position. This standard establishes that the statement of changes in financial position will be substituted by a statement of cash flows as part of the basic financial statements. The main differences between both statements lie in the fact that the statement of cash flows will show the entity’s cash receipts and disbursements for the period, while the statement of changes in financial position showed the changes in the entity’s financial structure rather than its cash flows. In an inflationary environment, the amounts of both financial statements are expressed in constant Mexican pesos. However, in preparing the statement of cash flows, the entity must first eliminate the effects of inflation for the period and, accordingly, determine cash flows at constant Mexican pesos, while in the statement of changes in financial position, the effects of inflation for the period are not eliminated.

F-34


MexFRS B-2 establishes that in the statement of cash flows, the entity must first present cash flows derived from operating activities, then from investing activities, the sum of these activities and finally cash flows derived from financing activities. The statement of changes in financial position first shows the entity’s operating activities, then financing activities and finally its investing activities. Under this new standard, the statement of cash flows may be determined by applying the direct or indirect method.

The transitional rules of MexFRS B-2 establish that the application of this standard is prospective. Therefore, the financial statements for years ended prior to 2008 presented for comparative purposes, should include a statement of changes in financial position, as established by MexFRS B-12. The Company is analyzing the method to be applied as of January 1, 2008.

MexFRS B-10, Effects of Inflation
In July 2007, the CINIF issued MexFRS B-10, Effects of Inflation, which is applicable for years beginning on or after January 1, 2008 and replaces MexFRS B-10, Accounting Recognition of the Effects of Inflation on Financial Information. MexFRS B-10 defines the two economic environments in Mexico that will determine whether or not entities must recognize the effects of inflation on financial information: 1) inflationary, when inflation is equal to or higher than 26% accumulated in the preceding three fiscal years (an 8% annual average); and 2) non-inflationary, when accumulated inflation for the preceding three fiscal years is less than the aforementioned accumulated 26%. Based on these definitions, the effects of inflation on financial information must be recognized only when entities operate in an inflationary environment.

This standard also abolishes the use of the specific-indexation method for the valuation of imported fixed assets and the replacement-cost method for the valuation of inventories, thus eliminating the result from holding non-monetary assets. Therefore, at the date this MexFRS comes into force, entities which have recognized any accumulated result from holding non-monetary assets in their stockholders’ equity, under Retained earnings (accumulated deficit), must identify the realized and unrealized portions of such result.

The realized result from holding non-monetary assets must be reclassified to Retained earnings, while the unrealized portion must be maintained as such within stockholders’ equity, and reclassified to results of operations when the asset giving rise to it is realized. Whenever it is deemed impractical to separate the realized from the unrealized result from holding non-monetary assets, the full amount of this item may be reclassified to the Retained earnings caption.

The effect of the adoption of this standard on the Company’s 2008 financial statements shall be the Company’s ceasing to recognize the effects of inflation on its financial information and reclassifying the total amount of the result from holding non-monetary assets to retained earnings.

MexFRS D-3, Employees Benefits
On January 1, 2008, the new MexFRS D-3, Employee Benefits, issued by the CINIF, went into effect and replaced the old MexFRS D-3, Labor Obligations. The most significant changes contained in MexFRS D-3 are as follows: i) shorter periods for the amortization of unamortized items, with the option to credit or charge actuarial gains or losses directly to results of operations, as they accrue; ii) elimination of the recognition of an additional liability and resulting recognition of an intangible asset and comprehensive income item; iii) accounting treatment of current-year and deferred employee profit sharing, requiring that deferred employee profit sharing be recognized using the asset and liability method established under MexFRS D-4; and iv) current-year and deferred employee profit sharing expense is to be presented as an ordinary expense in the income statement rather than as part of taxes on profits.

F-35


The adoption of this standard in 2008 will require that both the additional liability and the related intangible asset and comprehensive income item be eliminated and that the unamortized items be carried to results of operations in a period not exceeding five years. The initial effect of the recognition of deferred employee profit sharing must be charged or credited to retained earnings with no effect on results of operations for the year ending December 31, 2008.

At the date of the audit report on these financial statements, management is evaluating what effect the observance of this accounting pronouncement will have on the Company’s results of operations and financial position. Such effects are expected to be material.

MexFRS D-4, Taxes on Profits
In July 2007, the CINIF issued MexFRS D-4, Taxes on Profits, which is applicable for years beginning on or after January 1, 2008 and replaces MexFRS D-4, Accounting for Income Tax, Asset Tax and Employee Profit Sharing. The most significant changes included in this standard with respect to MexFRS D-4 are as follows: i) the concept of permanent differences is eliminated, since the asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred taxes on all differences in balance sheet accounts for financial and tax reporting purposes, regardless of whether they are permanent or temporary; ii) since current-year and deferred employee profit sharing is considered as an ordinary expense, its treatment is excluded from this standard and is now addressed under MexFRS D-3; iii) asset tax is required to be recognized as a tax credit and, consequently, as a deferred income tax asset only in those cases in which there is certainty as to its future realization; and iv) the cumulative effect of adopting MexFRS D-4 is to be reclassified to retained earnings, unless it is identified with comprehensive items in stockholders’ equity not yet taken to income.

MexFRS 5, Accounting Recognition of the Additional Consideration Agreed at the Inception of a Derivative to Adjust the Instrument to its Fair Value
In November 2007, the CINIF issued the Interpretation to MexFRS 5, which is effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. This Interpretation is intended to clarify whether or not the additional consideration agreed at the inception of a derivative to adjust the instrument to its fair value should be amortized over the life of the hedge.

MexFRS C-10, Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, establishes that transaction costs and cash flows received or delivered to adjust the derivative to its fair value at the inception of the hedge (excluding premiums on options) must be amortized over the life of the hedge. However, Bulletin C-10 requires derivatives to be recognized at their fair value and consequently, under this bulletin, the additional consideration should not be amortized, since it is part of the value of the derivative.

This Interpretation clarifies that the additional consideration is part of the fair value of the derivative and, accordingly, it must be included in the value at which the derivative is initially recorded, which will be adjusted to its fair value in subsequent periods. Therefore, the additional consideration should not be amortized.

The effects of the change established by this Interpretation must be prospectively recognized, affecting the result of operations of the period in which it is effective. If the effect of the change is significant, the entity must make the related disclosure.

Whenever changes to outstanding derivatives are agreed and give rise to considerations similar to those described in this Interpretation, such considerations must be valued based on the procedure established in the Interpretation.

F-36


MexFRS 6, Formally Designating a Hedge
In November 2007, the CINIF issued the Interpretation to MexFRS 6, which is effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. This Interpretation is intended to clarify whether or not a derivative may be formally designated as a hedge on a date subsequent to its contract date.

MexFRS C-10, Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, requires the hedging relationship to be documented from the “inception of the hedge” to prevent the need for retrospective designation in the future. However, this bulletin fails to clarify the meaning of “inception of the hedge”.

The Interpretation to MexFRS 6 establishes that a derivative may be designated as a hedge at its inception date or contract date or at a subsequent date, provided that it meets the conditions established in MexFRS C-10 for such designation. Also, this standard establishes that the hedge accounting treatment must not commence until such time as the entity evaluates whether the instrument qualifies as and meets the conditions for hedge accounting.

When a derivative is designated as a hedge on a date subsequent to the agreement date, the related effects will only be recognized as of the date on which it first meets the formal conditions and qualifies for consideration as a hedge.

This Interpretation complements MexFRS C-10 with respect to the conclusion reached by the CINIF as to when a hedge may be formally designated.

MexFRS 7, Application of Comprehensive Income Item Generated by a Cash Flow Hedge on a Forecasted Purchase of a Non-financial Asset
In November 2007, the CINIF issued the Interpretation to MexFRS 7, which is effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2008. This Interpretation is intended to clarify whether or not the amount resulting from a cash flow hedge on a forecasted transaction, that is recognized in stockholders’ equity as part of comprehensive income, may be included in the cost of the non-financial asset whose value is being set by the hedge.

MexFRS C-10, Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, establishes that if the result of a hedge of a forecasted transaction gives rise to the recognition of an asset or liability, the associated gains and losses that were previously recognized in stockholders’ equity as part of Comprehensive income shall be reclassified to the earnings of the same period or periods in which the asset or liability is carried to income.

This standard clarifies that if a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge on a forecasted transaction, to set the price of the non-financial asset to the functional currency, the effect recognized in comprehensive income is considered a complement to the cost of the asset and, therefore, must be included in such cost.

Accordingly, MexFRS C-10 is complemented by the conclusion of the Interpretation to MexFRS 7.

The effect of the adoption of this Interpretation to MexFRS 7 must be recognized by reclassifying, at the Interpretation’s effective date, all relevant balances presented in Comprehensive income to the cost of the asset acquired.

Management considers that the application of the MexFRS 5, FRS 6, and FRS 7 will have no material effect on the Company’s financial position or on its results of operations.


F-37


19. Differences Between Mexican FRS and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (“MexFRS”), which differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

The Mexican and U.S. GAAP prior periods amounts, included throughout Note 18, are presented in constant Mexican pesos by using the 1.0376 and 1.0796 Mexican inflation factor, respectively. The reconciliation to U.S. GAAP does not include the reversal of the adjustments to the financial statements for the effects of inflation required under MexFRS because the application of bulletin B-10 represents a comprehensive measure of the effects of price level changes in the Mexican economy and, as such, is considered a more meaningful presentation than historical cost based financial reporting for both Mexican and US accounting purposes as permitted by the “Securities and Exchange Commission” (SEC).

The principal differences between MexFRS and U.S. GAAP, as they relate to us, are described below together with an explanation, where appropriate, of the method used to determine the adjustments that affect income and stockholders’ equity.

Cash flow information:
Under MexFRS, the Company presents consolidated statements of changes in financial position, as described in Note 2 d).

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95 (“SFAS 95”), Statement of Cash Flows, does not provide guidance with respect to inflation adjusted financial statements. In accordance with MexFRS, the changes in current and long-term debt due to re-expression in constant pesos, including the effect of exchange differences, is presented in the statement of changes in financial position in the financing activities section. Also, under U.S. GAAP non-cash investing activities are not reported in the Statement of Cash Flows, including the capitalization of debt; whereas under MexFRS non-cash transactions affecting the financial structure of an entity, such as converting debt into equity, must be presented separately in the statement of changes in financial position.

F-38


A consolidated statements of cash flows derived from information prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP would be as follows:

Cash Flow Information
 
Years ended December 31,
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
                   
Net income
  Ps 
 1,893,395
  Ps 
 895,570
  Ps 
 1,261,883
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                   
Depreciation
   
500,684
   
540,862
   
575,306
 
Deferred income tax
   
(2,126
)
 
330,982
   
168,405
 
Loss (gain) on net monetary position
   
118,414
   
149,825
   
154,765
 
Labor obligations, net period cost
   
40,505
   
58,155
   
44,619
 
 
   
2,550,872
   
1,975,394
   
2,204,978
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
                   
Accounts receivable
   
(214,857
)
 
(85,313
)
 
(375,590
)
Inventories and biological assets
   
(603,362
)
 
(780,452
)
 
(1,418,210
)
Prepaid expenses and other accounts receivable
   
(36,925
)
 
25,502
   
(74,556
)
Accounts payable
   
(9,645
)
 
392,321
   
338,084
 
Related parties
   
53
   
6,410
   
14,944
 
Other taxes payable and other accruals
   
148,024
   
(60,488
)
 
(35,827
)
Labor obligations, net
   
(58,474
)
 
(26,085
)
 
(37,610
)
Derivative financial instruments
   
-
   
(5,856
)
 
(36,131
)
Cash flows provided by operating activities
   
1,775,686
   
1,441,433
   
580,082
 
 
                   
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                   
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable to banks
   
176,590
   
-
   
80,000
 
Repayment of long-term debt and notes payable
   
(212,570
)
 
(107,324
)
 
(12,529
)
Cash dividends paid
   
(263,719
)
 
(378,075
)
 
(363,708
)
Repurchase (sale) of stock
   
(8,536
)
 
17,849
   
-
 
Cash flows used in financing activities
   
(308,234
)
 
(467,550
)
 
(296,237
)
 
                   
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
                   
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
   
(847,821
)
 
(904,300
)
 
(998,622
)
Other assets
   
(2,711
)
 
(2,696
)
 
(2,216
)
Cash flows used in investing activities
   
(850,532
)
 
(906,996
)
 
(1,000,838
)
 
                   
Effect of inflation accounting
   
194,673
   
96,959
   
172,978
 
 
                   
Net ( decrease ) increase in cash and cash equivalents
   
811,592
   
163,846
   
(544,015
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
   
2,608,453
   
3,420,045
   
3,583,891
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  Ps 
 3,420,045
  Ps 
 3,583,891
  Ps 
 3,039,876
 
 
F-39


Agriculture
The Company follows the requirements of the MexFRS E-1, Agriculture, which establishes the rules for recognizing, valuing, presenting and disclosing biological assets and agricultural products; it also establishes the treatment to be given to government subsidies on biological assets.

This bulletin establishes that biological assets and the agricultural products (the latter at the time of their harvesting) are to be valued at their fair value, net of estimated costs at point of sale. Also, the bulletin establishes that whenever the fair value cannot be determined in a reliable, verifiable and objective manner, the assets are to be valued at their production cost, net of accumulated impairment, if any.

In conformity with U.S. GAAP, under SOP 85-3 biological assets and agricultural products are to be valued at cost. Accordingly, the reconciliation between MexFRS and U.S. GAAP for 2005, 2006 and 2007 includes a reversal of the unrealized (gain) on valuation of biological assets and agricultural products at fair value, which gave rise to a decrease of
Ps (28,072), Ps. (10,879) and Ps (10,882), respectively.

Capitalized interest:
Under U.S. GAAP, interest on borrowings in foreign currencies or comprehensive cost of financing incurred during the qualifying construction period must be considered as an additional cost of qualifying constructed assets to be capitalized in plant, property and equipment and depreciated over the lives of the related assets. The amount of the capitalized comprehensive cost of financing for U.S. GAAP purposes was determined by applying the weighted average interest rate.

Under MexFRS in force through December 31, 2006, the Company did not capitalize the comprehensive cost of financing in the MexFRS financial statements. Starting January 1, 2007, although we adopted the policy of capitalizing the comprehensive result of financing on assets under construction, as a result of MexFRS D-6, we did not capitalize any comprehensive result of financing due to its immateriality as described in Note 2. The reconciling items for 2007, 2006 and 2005 show the capitalization of interest as required under U.S.GAAP.

Deferred income tax and deferred employee profit sharing:
As mentioned in Note 15, under MexFRS, deferred income tax is determined on all differences in balance sheets accounts for financial and tax reporting purposes, using the enacted tax rate at the balance sheet date, which also is in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“SFAS 109”), Accounting for Income Taxes.

As of December 31 2006 and 2007, the deferred tax liability is Ps 2,174,307 and
Ps 2,365,939, respectively, for US GAAP purposes. Current deferred tax liability is
Ps 497,282 and Ps 739,444 for 2006 and 2007 respectively. Under US GAAP, the balance sheet classification is based on the classification of the underlying item which gives rise to the deferred income taxes. Under MexFRS, the balance sheet classification is non-current.

The Company is required to pay employee profit sharing in accordance with Mexican labor law. Deferred employee profit sharing under U.S. GAAP is determined following the guidelines of SFAS No.109, while under MexFRS, the deferred consequences of employee profit sharing are determined only on temporary non-recurring differences with a known turnaround time. Our reconciliations between MexFRS and U.S. GAAP do not include deferred employee profit sharing as related amounts are not significant.

F-40


The deferred tax adjustment included in the net income and stockholders’ equity reconciliations also includes the effect of deferred taxes on all U.S. GAAP adjustments reflected in the reconciliation between MexFRS and U.S. GAAP.

Severance indemnities.
Under MexFRS, revised D-3, effective 2005, companies are required to recognize a severance indemnity liability calculated based on actuarial valuations. Similar recognition criteria under U.S. GAAP are established in SFAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Post-employment Benefits" which requires that a liability for certain termination benefits provided under an ongoing benefit arrangement such as these statutorily mandated severance indemnities be recognized in income when the likelihood of future settlement is probable and the liability can be reasonably estimated. MexFRS allows for the Company to amortize the transition obligation related to the adoption of revised MexFRS D-3 over the expected service life of the employees, (as from January 1, 2008 the transition obligation must be amortized at most in five years).
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the amount of past service cost to be amortized under MexFRS amounts to Ps 20,691 and Ps 2,507, respectively. These amounts were included in the US GAAP reconciliation of equity.

SFAS 158 “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)”:
This statement requires (1) recognition on the balance sheet of an asset for a defined benefit plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status, (2) measurement of a defined benefit plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and (3) recognition of the changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as a component of other comprehensive income in the year the changes occur.

In 2006 the Company adopted SFAS 158 for USGAAP reconciliation purposes

The incremental effects of adopting of this adoption on the individual line items as of December 31, 2006 on the consolidated US GAAP balance sheet is shown in the following table:
 
   
2006
 
   
Before
 
SFAS 158
 
After
 
Net projected benefit obligation (pension)
  Ps 
14,175
  Ps 
14,759
  Ps 
28,934
 
Net projected benefit obligation (seniority premium)
   
26,488
   
22,610
   
49,098
 
Net projected benefit obligation (Severance)
   
36,053
   
-
   
36,053
 
Minimum labor obligation liability adjustment (Seniority premium)
   
916
   
(916
)
 
-
 
 
        Ps 
36,453 
  Ps 
114,085
 

The components of the plan funded status that are reflected in the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

   
2006
 
   
Pension
plan
 
Seniority
premium
 
Severance
 
Total
 
Projected benefit obligation
  Ps 
189,355
  Ps 
49,098
  Ps 
36,053
  Ps 
274,506
 
Market value of plan assets
   
160,421
   
-
   
-
   
160,421
 
Under-funded defined benefit plan
  Ps 
28,934
  Ps 
49,098
  Ps 
36,053
  Ps 
114,085
 
 
F-41


   
2007
 
   
Pension
plan
 
Seniority
premium
 
 
Severance
 
 
Total
 
Projected benefit obligation
  Ps 
199,333
  Ps 
56,601
  Ps 
42,895
  Ps 
298,829
 
Market value of plan assets
   
182,017
   
-
   
-
   
182,017
 
Under-funded defined benefit plan
  Ps 
17,316
  Ps 
56,601
  Ps 
42,895
  Ps 
116,812
 

Effects of inflation accounting on U.S. GAAP adjustments:
To determine the net effect on the consolidated financial statements of recognizing the U.S.GAAP adjustments described throughout this Note, it is also necessary to recognize the effects of inflation on such adjustments as described in Note 2. These effects are taken into consideration in the preparation of U.S. GAAP reconciliations of net income and stockholders’ equity.

Goodwill
Beginning January 1, 2005, due to the adoption of MexFRS B-7, goodwill is no longer amortized, but rather is subject to periodic impairment valuations.

For US GAAP purposes, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in 2002. Up to December 31, 2004, the Company recognized and accumulated effect (increase in equity) of Ps. 58,716 for the non amortization of goodwill, under US GAAP.

In 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company performed the required impairment tests of goodwill and the tests did not result in an impairment charge.

Reporting comprehensive income
For US GAAP reconciliation purposes, the Company has adopted the SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” SFAS 130, which establishes rules for reporting and disclosure of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income consists of current year net income plus the following items applied to stockholders’ equity: the result from holding non-monetary assets net of taxes, the cumulative effect of deferred taxes, the effect of adopting SFAS158 and the effective portion of changes in the fair value of financial instruments.

Reclassification
Certain amounts were reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation.

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 (“SFAS 107”), “Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments,” under U.S. GAAP it is necessary to provide information about the fair value of certain financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The carrying amounts of cash and short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable , accrued liabilities and notes payable approximate fair values due to the short term maturity of these instruments.

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes:
In July 2006, the FASB issued the final interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48). The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007. This statement requires a company to recognize the financial statement impact of a tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination.

F-42


If the tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the tax effect is recognized at the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% (cumulative probability basis) likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

The Company applied the provisions of FIN No. 48 to all its tax positions under SFAS No. 109 upon initial adoption. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and did no result in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings at adoption.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

Fair value measurement (FASB Statement 157):
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for the measurement of fair value, and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement does not require any new fair value measures.

The statement is effective for fair value measures already required or permitted by other standards for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 157 beginning on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 is required to be applied prospectively, except for certain financial instruments. Any transition adjustment will be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting this standard on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39 (FSP FIN 39-1)
In April 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 39-1, which amends certain aspects of FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts - an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 10 and FASB Statement No. 105 (“FSP FIN 39-1”). FSP FIN 39-1 amends paragraph 10 of FIN 39 to permit a reporting entity to offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts, including amounts that approximate fair value, recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. Derivative instruments permitted to be netted for the purposes of the FSP include those instruments that meet the definition of a derivative in FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, including those that are not included in the scope of Statement 133 (for example, a financial guarantee, weather derivatives, etc.). The decision to apply the guidance of the FSP FIN 39-1 is an accounting policy decision and should be consistently applied.

The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early application permitted. A reporting entity should recognize the effects of applying this FSP as a change in accounting principle through retrospective application for all financial statement presented. If it is impracticable to apply the guidance in this FSP retrospectively for all financial statements presented, the reporting entity should disclose why it is impracticable and apply the guidance in this FSP retrospectively for as many consecutive prior financial statements as practicable.

F-43


Upon adoption of this FSP, a reporting entity is permitted to change its accounting policy to offset or not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements. The Company has not determined the effect of this new pronouncement.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“FAS 141(R)") which replaces FAS No.141, Business Combination. FAS 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of FAS 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting but FAS 141(R) changed the method of applying the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects.

FAS 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. FAS 141(R) amends FAS 109 such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of FAS 141(R) would also apply the provisions of FAS 141(R). Early adoption is not allowed. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.
 
“Noncontroling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements” SFAS No. 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51 (“FAS 160)"). FAS 160 amends ARB 51 to establish new standards that will govern the accounting for and reporting of (1) noncontrolling interest in partially owned consolidated subsidiaries and (2) the loss of control of subsidiaries. FAS 160 is effective on a prospective basis for all fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning, on or after December 15, 2008, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which will be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is not allowed. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

“Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” or SFAS 161
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (FAS 161). This new standard requires enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments, including those used in hedging activities. It is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

Hierarchy if Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or SFAS No. 162
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (FAS 162), which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

F-44

 
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an
 
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FASB Statement No. 159)
In February 2007 the FASB published SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial liabilities.” This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.

This statement does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. This Statement does not establish requirements for recognizing and measuring dividend income, interest income, or interest expense. This statement does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements included in SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, and SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. SFAS No. 159 will be effective for all fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this statement will have on its financial position, results of operations and disclosures, should the Company elect to measure certain financial instruments at fair value.

Summary of adjustments to reconcile MexFRS and U.S. GAAP

The following is a summary of net income adjusted to take into account certain material differences between MexFRS and U.S. GAAP.

   
Years ended December 31,
 
   
2005
 
2006
 
2007
 
Net income as reported under Mexican FRS
  Ps 
 1,910,319
  Ps 
 907,129
  Ps 
 1,272,226
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to U.S. GAAP:
                   
Biological assets and agricultural products valuation at fair value
   
(28,072
)
 
(10,879
)
 
(10,882
)
Interest cost capitalized
   
12,293
   
8,692
   
6,885
 
Depreciation of capitalized interest
   
(2,865
)
 
(3,479
)
 
(3,913
)
Net period cost due SFAS 112
   
-
   
(20,691
)
 
(2,507
)
Deferred income tax on US GAAP adjustments
   
3,194
   
15,128
   
1,310
 
Effect of inflation accounting on U.S. GAAP adjustments
   
310
   
613
   
49
 
 
                   
Minority interest
   
(1,784
)
 
(943
)
 
(1,285
)
Net income under U.S. GAAP
  Ps 
 1,893,395
  Ps 
 895,570
  Ps 
 1,261,883
 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (thousands)
   
599,694
   
599,571
   
600,000
 
Net income per share
  Ps 
 3.16
  Ps 
 1.49
  Ps 
 2.10
 
 
F-45


Classification differences:
There are certain other classification differences between MexFRS and US GAAP, as follows:

-Employee profit sharing expenses are presented as other expenses for MexFRS and as selling, general and administrative expenses for US GAAP.
-Tax incentives are presented as other income for MexFRS and as income taxes for US GAAP.

The reconciliation of the stockholders’ equity between MexFRS and US GAAP is as follows:

   
Years ended December 31
 
   
2006
 
2007
 
Majority stockholders' equity as reported under Mexican FRS
  Ps 
 14,057,528
  Ps 
 15,080,378
 
Adjustments to reconcile majority stockholders’ equity to U.S. GAAP:
             
 
             
Biological assets and agricultural products valuation at fair value
   
(84,502
)
 
(95,384
)
Accumulated differences between the financing cost capitalized for MexFRS and U.S. GAAP purposes
   
87,596
   
94,481
 
Accumulated depreciation on the above items
   
(16,682
)
 
(20,595
)
Net period cost due SFAS 112
   
(20,691
)
 
(23,198
)
Deferred income taxes on U.S. GAAP adjustments
   
7,727
   
9,086
 
Accumulated amortization of goodwill
   
58,716
   
58,716
 
SFAS 158 effect
   
(36,453
)
 
-(31,735
)
Majority stockholders’ equity as reported under U.S. GAAP
  Ps 
 14,053,239
  Ps 
 15,071,749
 

The effects of the above adjustments do not have any impact on minority interest.

F-46


The consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity in accordance with U.S. GAAP is as follows:

   
Capital stock
 
Paid in-capital
 
Stock repurchase reserve
 
Retained earnings
 
Other comprehensive income
 
Comprehensive
income
 
Total stockholders’ equity
 
Balance at December 31, 2004
  Ps 
 2,294,711
  Ps 
 723,116
  Ps 
 170,917
  Ps 
 12,498,927
  Ps 
 (3,542,601
)
      Ps 
 12,145,070
 
Repurchase of stock
   
(251
)
 
-
   
(11,462
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
   
(11,713
)
Sales of repurchased stock 
   
222
   
2,954
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,176
 
Cash dividends paid
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(263,719
)
 
-
   
-
   
(263,719
)
Comprehensive income:
                                           
Net income for the year
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,893,395
   
-
   
1,893,395
   
1,893,395
 
Components of other comprehensive income:
                                           
Deficit from holding of non monetary assets
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(172,155
)
 
(172,155
)
 
(172,155
)
Derivative financial instruments
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(92,374
)
 
(92,374
)
 
(92,374
)
Minimum labor obligations liability adjustment
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(2,207
)
 
(2,207
)
 
(2,207
)
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
                                 
(266,736
)
     
Comprehensive income
                                Ps 
 1,626,659
       
Balance at December 31, 2005
   
2,294,682
   
726,070
   
159,455
   
14,128,603
   
(3,809,337
)
       
13,499,473
 
Sales of repurchased stock
   
245
   
17,604
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
17,849
 
Cash dividends paid
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(378,075
)
 
-
   
-
   
(378,075
)
Comprehensive income:
                                           
Net income for the year
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
895,570
   
-
   
895,570
   
895,570
 
Components of other comprehensive income:
                                           
Deficit from holding of non monetary assets
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(40,288
)
 
(40,288
)
 
(40,288
)
Derivative financial instruments
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
92,744
   
92,744
   
92,744
 
Minimum labor obligations liability adjustment
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
2,420
   
2,420
   
2,420
 
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
                                 
54,876
       
Comprehensive income
                                Ps 
 950,446
       
Other comprehensive income SFAS 158 adoption
   
-
   
-
   
-
         
(36,454
)
 
-
   
(36,454
)
Balance at December 31, 2006
   
2,294,927
   
743,674
   
159,455
   
14,646,098
   
(3,790,915
)
       
14,053,239
 
Sales of repurchased stock
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Cash dividends paid
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(363,708
)
 
-
   
-
   
(363,708
)
Comprehensive income:
                                           
Net income for the year
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,261,883
   
-
   
1,261,883
   
1,261,883
 
Components of other comprehensive income:
                                           
Deficit from holding of non monetary assets
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
18,661
   
18,661
   
18,661
 
Derivative financial instruments
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
98,552
   
98,552
   
98,552
 
Other comprehensive income SFAS 158 effect
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,122
   
3,122
   
3,122
 
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
                                 
120,335
       
Comprehensive income
                                              Ps 
1,382,218
          
Balance at December 31, 2007
  Ps 
 2,294,927
  Ps 
743,674
  Ps 
159,455
  Ps 
15,544,273
  Ps 
(3,670,580
)
         Ps 
15,071,749
 
 
F-47