UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

 

Investment Company Act file number

811-09153

 

Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

The Eaton Vance Building, 255 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts

 

02109

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip code)

 

Alan R. Dynner

The Eaton Vance Building, 255 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(617) 482-8260

 

 

Date of fiscal year end:

November 30

 

 

Date of reporting period:

November 30, 2006

 

 




Item 1. Reports to Stockholders




Annual Report November 30, 2006

EATON VANCE
MUNICIPAL
INCOME
TRUSTS

CLOSED-END FUNDS:

California

Florida

Massachusetts

Michigan

New Jersey

New York

Ohio

Pennsylvania



IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING

Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy ("Privacy Policy") with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:

•  Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.

•  None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer's account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers.

•  Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.

•  We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.

Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

In addition, our Privacy Policy only applies to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer's account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser's privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.

For more information about Eaton Vance's Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.

Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called "householding" and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.

Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.

If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at
1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.

Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.

Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio (if applicable) will file a schedule of its portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC's public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).

Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds' and Portfolios' Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance

 

2

 

 

 

Performance Information and Portfolio Composition

 

 

 

 

 

California

 

3

 

 

 

Florida

 

4

 

 

 

Massachusetts

 

5

 

 

 

Michigan

 

6

 

 

 

New Jersey

 

7

 

 

 

New York

 

8

 

 

 

Ohio

 

9

 

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

10

 

 

 

Financial Statements

 

11

 

 

 

Federal Tax Information

 

74

 

 

 

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

 

75

 

 

 

Board of Trustees’ Annual Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreements

 

77

 

 

 

Management and Organization

 

80

 

1




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

MANAGEMENT‘S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts (the “Trusts”) are closed-end Trusts, traded on the American Stock Exchange, which are designed to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and state personal income taxes, as applicable. This income is earned by investing primarily in investment-grade municipal securities .

Economic and Market Conditions

Third quarter economic growth slowed to 2 .0%, following the 2 .6% growth rate achieved in the second quarter . With higher mortgage rates in the market, led largely by the persistent Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) tightening, the housing market continued to soften, with building permits and existing home sales leading the way . However, energy prices declined significantly in the quarter, somewhat offsetting the impact of a weakening housing market . The economy continued to create jobs over the period, with the unemployment rate standing at 4 .5% as of November 30, 2006 .

Inflation expectations moderated with the lower energy prices, although the core Consumer Price Index - measured on a year-over-year basis – has demonstrated a slow but steady rise . The Fed, which raised short-term rates 17 times since June 2004, is currently in a pausing mode, awaiting further economic inputs to determine the future direction of interest rate moves . At November 30, 2006, the Federal Funds rate stood at 5 .25% .

Municipal market supply during the year ended November 30, 2006 was lower than it had been in the previous year . As a result, municipals have generally outperformed Treasury bonds for the year ended November 30, 2006, as demand has remained strong . At November 30, 2006, long-term AAA-rated, insured municipal bonds yielded 90% of U .S . Treasury bonds with similar maturities .*

For the year ended November 30, 2006, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index† (the “Index”), an unmanaged index of municipal bonds, posted a gain of 6 .12% . For more information about each Trust’s performance and that of funds in the same Lipper Classification,† see the Performance Information and Portfolio Composition pages that follow .

Management Discussion

The Trusts invest primarily in bonds with stated maturities of 10 years or longer, as longer-maturity bonds historically have provided greater tax-exempt income for investors than shorter-maturity bonds . Given the flattening of the yield curve for other fixed-income securities over the past 18 months — with shortermaturity yields rising more than longer-maturity yields — management felt that the long end of the municipal curve was a relatively attractive place to be positioned . However, given the leveraged nature of the Trusts, rising short-term rates have increased the distributions paid to preferred shareholders . As these costs have risen, the income generated by the Trusts has declined . Please see the Performance Information and Portfolio Composition pages that follow for a description of each Trust’s leverage as of November 30, 2006 .

Because of the mixed economic backdrop of contained inflation expectations, a weakened housing market and continued growth in the labor market, Trust management continued to maintain a somewhat cautious outlook on interest rates . In this environment, Trust management continued to focus on finding relative value within the marketplace – in issuer names, coupons, maturities and sectors . Relative value trading, which seeks to capitalize on undervalued securities, has enhanced the Trusts’ returns during the period .


*Source: Bloomberg L.P. Yields are a compilation of a representative variety of general obligations and are not necessarily representative of a Trust’s yield.

It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Trust shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.

The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund.

2




Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE IN FORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

15.99

%

Five Years

 

7.51

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

6.24

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

12.10

%

Five Years

 

9.28

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

7.43

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.49

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

7.62

 

 

Index Performance(4)

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

8.78

%

Five Years

 

7.05

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

6.00

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Trust performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson

Rating Distribution* (6),(7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

54.5

%

AA

 

3.5

%

A

 

23.4

%

BBB

 

7.4

%

Not Rated

 

11.2

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

·  Number of Issues:

 

88

·  Average Maturity:

 

22.6 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

9.6 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA

·  Average Call Protection:

 

8.2 years

·  Leverage:**

 

33%

 


**  The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effect of leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the share price at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 41.05% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 25, 20, and 14 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

3




Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

5.32

%

Five Years

 

7.76

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

5.49

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

9.84

%

Five Years

 

8.60

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

6.96

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.63

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

7.12

 

 

Index Performance(4)

 

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

 

Lipper Florida Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

7.63

%

Five Years

 

6.68

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.63

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson

Rating Distribution* (6), (7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

66.1

%

AA

 

3.5

%

A

 

12.8

%

BBB

 

3.5

%

CCC

 

0.6

%

Not Rated

 

13.5

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

·  Number of Issues:

 

86

·  Average Maturity:

 

24.8 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

7.1 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA

·  Average Call Protection:

 

7.0 years

·  Leverage:**

 

35%

 


**  The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market shareprice will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factorssuch as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effectof leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the shareprice at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 35.00% federal tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalentfigure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or soldthe securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that arein the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged andunleveraged funds. The Lipper Florida Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 17, 12, and 11 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively.Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of theTrust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financialstatements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

4




Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

5.72

%

Five Years

 

6.98

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

5.95

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

11.05

%

Five Years

 

9.11

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

7.04

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.28

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

6.95

 

 

Index Performance(4)

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

7.95

%

Five Years

 

7.29

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

6.09

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Trust performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: Robert B. Macintosh, CFA

Rating Distribution* (6), (7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

48.7

%

AA

 

14.5

%

A

 

17.2

%

BBB

 

11.8

%

CCC

 

1.1

%

Not Rated

 

6.7

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

·  Number of Issues:

 

61

·  Average Maturity:

 

27.4 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

13.0 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA

·  Average Call Protection:

 

10.8 years

·  Leverage:**

 

33%

 


**The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effect of leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the share price at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 38.45% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 46, 32, and 20 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

5




Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

9.88

%

Five Years

 

8.13

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

5.31

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

9.38

%

Five Years

 

7.70

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

6.51

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.72

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

7.56

 

 

Index Performance(4)

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index — Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

8.14

%

Five Years

 

6.98

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.97

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, CFA

Rating Distribution* (6), (7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

54.8

%

AA

 

11.8

%

A

 

13.1

%

BBB

 

12.3

%

BB

 

1.2

%

CCC

 

1.3

%

Not Rated

 

5.5

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

·  Number of Issues:

 

55

·  Average Maturity:

 

22.6 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

5.2 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA

·  Average Call Protection:

 

5.1 years

·  Leverage:**

 

35%

 


**The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effect of leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the share price at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 37.54% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 7, 6, and 5 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

6




Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

12.89

%

Five Years

 

9.23

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

6.35

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

13.28

%

Five Years

 

9.93

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

7.32

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.48

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

7.57

 

 

Index Performance(4)

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

Lipper New Jersey Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

9.30

%

Five Years

 

7.65

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

6.11

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Trust performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: Robert B. Macintosh, CFA

Rating Distribution* (6), (7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

47.9

%

A

 

12.8

%

BBB

 

30.5

%

B

 

1.5

%

Not Rated

 

7.3

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

·  Number of Issues:

 

67

·  Average Maturity:

 

23.5 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

9.5 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA-

·  Average Call Protection:

 

8.5 years

·  Leverage:**

 

34%

 


**  The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effect of leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the share price at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 40.83% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper New Jersey Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 13, 10, and 8 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

7




Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

10.28

%

Five Years

 

8.98

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

6.91

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

11.28

%

Five Years

 

9.78

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

7.63

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.64

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

7.66

 

 

Index Performance(4)

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

ipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

8.72

%

Five Years

 

7.25

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.90

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Trust performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA

Rating Distribution* (6), (7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

29.1

%

AA

 

19.5

%

A

 

27.8

%

BBB

 

10.5

%

BB

 

1.0

%

B

 

1.3

%

CCC

 

0.5

%

Not Rated

 

10.3

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

·  Number of Issues:

 

70

·  Average Maturity:

 

24.0 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

9.5 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA-

·  Average Call Protection:

 

9.3 years

·  Leverage:**

 

33%

 


**The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effect of leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the share price at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 39.45% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 18, 13, and 8 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

8




Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

8.27

%

Five Years

 

7.86

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

5.72

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

10.50

%

Five Years

 

8.70

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

6.69

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.73

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

7.87

 

 

Index Performance(4)

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

7.95

%

Five Years

 

7.29

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

6.09

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Trust performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, CFA

Rating Distribution* (6), (7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

54.7

%

AA

 

13.9

%

A

 

16.6

%

BBB

 

4.4

%

B

 

2.1

%

Not Rated

 

8.3

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

·  Number of Issues:

 

61

·  Average Maturity:

 

21.9 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

7.1 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA

·  Average Call Protection:

 

6.9 years

·  Leverage:**

 

35%

 


**  The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effect of leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the share price at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 39.88% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 46, 32, and 20 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

9




Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Trust Performance as of 11/30/06(1)

Average Annual Total Returns (by share price, American Stock Exchange)

 

 

 

One Year

 

4.44

%

Five Years

 

9.23

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

5.73

 

 

Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)

 

 

 

One Year

 

9.68

%

Five Years

 

8.33

 

Life of Trust (1/29/99)

 

6.58

 

 

Market Yields

Market Yield(2)

 

4.74

%

Taxable Equivalent Market Yield(3)

 

7.52

 

 

Index Performance(4)

Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

6.12

%

Five Years

 

5.40

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

5.25

 

 

Lipper Averages(5)

Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Classification – Average Annual Total Returns

 

 

 

One Year

 

8.11

%

Five Years

 

7.29

 

Life of Trust (1/31/99)

 

6.20

 

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or share price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Trust’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA

Rating Distribution* (6), (7)

By total investments


*    The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Trust’s rating distribution at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

AAA

 

57.0

%

AA

 

9.9

%

A

 

13.5

%

BBB

 

7.9

%

BB

 

1.8

%

CCC

 

2.4

%

Not Rated

 

7.5

%

 

Trust Statistics(7)

 

·  Number of Issues:

 

69

·  Average Maturity:

 

21.7 years

·  Average Effective Maturity:

 

6.4 years

·  Average Rating:

 

AA

·  Average Call Protection:

 

5.8 years

·  Leverage:**

 

35%

 


**  The leverage amount is Auction Preferred Shares at liquidation value as a percentage of the Trust’s total assets excluding assets and floating rate notes payable deemed held pursuant to FAS Statement 140. The Trust uses leverage through the issuance of preferred shares. Use of financial leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares).

(1) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in share price or net asset value with all distributions reinvested. The Trust’s performance at market share price will differ from its results at NAV. Although share price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at share price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Trust, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Trust’s shares, or changes in Trust distributions. Performance results reflect the effect of leverage resulting from the Trust’s issuance of Auction Preferred Shares. (2) The Trust’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last dividend paid per share of the fiscal year by the share price at the end of the fiscal year and annualizing the result. (3) Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 37.00% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. (4) It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. (5) The Lipper Averages are the average total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Trust. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 9, 7, and 5 funds for the 1-year, 5-year, and Life-Of-Trust time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. (6) As of 11/30/06. Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Trust. (7) As of 11/30/06. Portfolio holdings information includes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Trust holds a residual interest. See Note 1B to the Trust’s financial statements. Trust information may not be representative of the Trust’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.

10




Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 161.3%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Education — 11.2%      
$ 1,000     California Educational Facilities Authority,
(Dominican University), 5.75%, 12/1/30
  $ 1,036,040    
  2,770     California Educational Facilities Authority,
(Lutheran University), 5.00%, 10/1/29
    2,913,680    
  500     California Educational Facilities Authority,
(Pepperdine University), 5.00%, 11/1/29
    520,190    
  1,850     California Educational Facilities Authority,
(Santa Clara University), 5.00%, 9/1/23
    2,075,385    
  4,000     California Educational Facilities Authority,
(Stanford University), 5.125%, 1/1/31
    4,089,600    
  2,500     San Diego County, Certificates of Participation,
(University of San Diego), 5.375%, 10/1/41
    2,623,075    
            $ 13,257,970    
Electric Utilities — 2.3%      
$ 2,500     Chula Vista, (San Diego Gas), (AMT),
5.00%, 12/1/27
  $ 2,666,825    
            $ 2,666,825    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.4%      
$ 1,590     Tahoe Forest, Hospital District, Prerefunded to 7/1/09,
5.85%, 7/1/22
  $ 1,709,202    
            $ 1,709,202    
General Obligations — 4.3%      
$ 1,100     California, 5.25%, 4/1/30   $ 1,169,498    
  3,500     California, 5.50%, 11/1/33     3,863,405    
            $ 5,032,903    
Hospital — 25.4%      
$ 4,200     California Health Facilities Financing Authority,
(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 11/15/34
  $ 4,424,910    
  750     California Infrastructure and Economic Development,
(Kaiser Hospital), 5.50%, 8/1/31
    801,442    
  3,900     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Huntington Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/35
    4,092,699    
  1,750     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/36
    1,844,150    
  850     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 3/1/41
    893,316    
  3,100     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Kaiser Permanente), 5.25%, 3/1/45
    3,328,780    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Hospital (continued)      
$ 1,650     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Kaiser Permanente), 5.50%, 11/1/32
  $ 1,755,633    
  1,750     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Sonoma County Indian Health), 6.40%, 9/1/29
    1,855,647    
  1,500     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Sutter Health), 5.50%, 8/15/28
    1,628,940    
  1,500     Duarte, COP, (City of Hope),
5.25%, 4/1/24
    1,547,715    
  1,000     Stockton, Health Facilities Authority, (Dameron Hospital),
5.70%, 12/1/14
    1,035,300    
  410     Tahoe Forest Hospital District, 5.85%, 7/1/22     436,293    
  2,000     Torrance Hospital, (Torrance Memorial Medical Center),
5.50%, 6/1/31
    2,137,960    
  2,000     Turlock, (Emanuel Medical Center, Inc.),
5.375%, 10/15/34
    2,128,080    
  2,000     Washington Township Health Care District,
5.25%, 7/1/29
    2,064,120    
            $ 29,974,985    
Housing — 1.1%      
$ 753     Commerce (Hermitage III Senior Apartments),
6.50%, 12/1/29
  $ 807,921    
  431     Commerce (Hermitage III Senior Apartments),
6.85%, 12/1/29
    458,373    
            $ 1,266,294    
Industrial Development Revenue — 1.1%      
$ 1,250     California Pollution Control Financing Authority,
(Mobil Oil Corp.), (AMT), 5.50%, 12/1/29
  $ 1,276,762    
            $ 1,276,762    
Insured-Education — 7.3%      
$ 6,510     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola
Marymount University), (MBIA), 0.00%, 10/1/33
  $ 2,051,301    
  3,270     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pooled College
and University), (MBIA), 5.10%, 4/1/23
    3,394,685    
  3,000     California State University, (AMBAC),
5.00%, 11/1/33
    3,180,990    
            $ 8,626,976    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 15.8%      
$ 3,250     California Pollution Control Financing Authority,
(Southern California Edison Co.), (MBIA), (AMT),
5.55%, 9/1/31
  $ 3,430,342    
  2,500     California Pollution Control Financing Authority, PCR,
(Pacific Gas and Electric), (MBIA), (AMT),
5.35%, 12/1/16
    2,696,000    

 

See notes to financial statements
11



Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Electric Utilities (continued)      
$ 3,625     Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Power
System Revenues, (FSA), 4.625%, 7/1/37
  $ 3,719,178    
  1,995     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA),
5.25%, 7/1/29(1)(2)
    2,116,768    
  2,563     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Variable Rate,
6.79%, 7/1/29(3)(6)
    2,875,304    
  2,875     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA),
5.25%, 7/1/29(1)(2)
    3,050,476    
  500     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA),
9.095%, 7/1/16(3)(4)
    727,300    
            $ 18,615,368    
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.9%      
$ 5,130     Foothill/Eastern, Transportation Corridor Agency, (FSA),
Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 1/1/26
  $ 2,311,835    
  2,500     Los Angeles County, Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
(FGIC), Prerefunded to 7/1/10, 5.25%, 7/1/30
    2,678,300    
  1,500     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
Prerefunded to 1/1/08, 5.00%, 7/1/28(1)(2)
    1,538,843    
  420     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
Prerefunded to 1/1/08, Variable Rate,
7.315%, 7/1/28(3)(4)
    451,303    
            $ 6,980,281    
Insured-General Obligations — 17.3%      
$ 1,650     California, RITES, (AMBAC), Variable Rate,
9.611%, 5/1/26(3)(4)
  $ 2,010,443    
  7,000     Coast Community College District, (Election of 2002),
(FSA), 0.00%, 8/1/34
    1,707,230    
  4,825     Coast Community College District, (FSA),
0.00%, 8/1/35
    1,111,728    
  2,500     Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate,
8.462%, 7/1/27(3)(4)
    3,002,275    
  4,800     San Diego Unified School District, (MBIA),
5.50%, 7/1/24(1)(2)
    5,733,248    
  3,000     Simi Valley Unified School District, (MBIA),
5.00%, 8/1/28
    3,205,500    
  7,995     Sweetwater Union High School District, (Election 2000),
(FSA), 0.00%, 8/1/25
    3,613,020    
            $ 20,383,444    
Insured-Hospital — 6.2%      
$ 3,200     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Children's Hospital Los Angeles), (MBIA),
5.25%, 8/15/29(5)
  $ 3,351,264    
  3,735     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(Sutter Health), (FSA), 5.75%, 8/15/27(1)(2)
    3,967,168    
            $ 7,318,432    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates
of Participation — 9.6%
     
$ 6,500     Anaheim, Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue,
(Public Improvements), (FSA), 0.00%, 9/1/17
  $ 4,196,855    
  10,750     Anaheim, Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue,
(Public Improvements), (FSA), 0.00%, 9/1/25
    4,787,835    
  6,000     Anaheim, Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue,
(Public Improvements), (FSA), 0.00%, 9/1/28
    2,332,980    
            $ 11,317,670    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.0%      
$ 2,435     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/28
  $ 986,881    
  2,070     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/37
    559,894    
  3,170     San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District,
Sales Tax Revenue, (FSA), 4.25%, 7/1/36
    3,166,196    
            $ 4,712,971    
Insured-Transportation — 15.5%      
$ 5,000     Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 10/1/29
  $ 1,884,050    
  8,000     Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, (MBIA),
0.00%, 10/1/31
    2,760,800    
  1,400     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC),
5.00%, 7/1/45
    1,490,888    
  7,545     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC),
5.00%, 7/1/28(1)(2)
    7,753,921    
  750     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (CIFG),
5.25%, 7/1/41(1)(2)
    907,860    
  10,000     San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, (MBIA),
0.00%, 1/15/32
    3,433,800    
            $ 18,231,319    
Insured-Water Revenue — 5.3%      
$ 4,400     Los Angeles Department of Water and Power,
Water Revenue, (MBIA), 3.00%, 7/1/30
  $ 3,600,036    
  2,710     San Francisco City and County Public Utilities Commission,
(FSA), 4.25%, 11/1/33
    2,713,062    
            $ 6,313,098    
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 3.8%      
$ 4,000     Sacramento City Financing Authority,
5.40%, 11/1/20
  $ 4,514,080    
            $ 4,514,080    

 

See notes to financial statements
12



Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Other Revenue — 1.3%      
$ 1,425     California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
(East Valley Tourist Development Authority),
8.25%, 10/1/14(3)
  $ 1,541,522    
            $ 1,541,522    
Special Tax Revenue — 16.9%      
$ 1,500     Bonita Canyon Public Financing Authority,
5.375%, 9/1/28
  $ 1,519,755    
  1,545     Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority,
6.375%, 9/2/33
    1,593,776    
  1,665     Corona Public Financing Authority,
5.80%, 9/1/20
    1,668,680    
  200     Eastern California Municipal Water District, Special Tax
Revenue District No. 2004-27 Cottonwood,
5.00%, 9/1/27
    203,930    
  500     Eastern California Municipal Water District, Special Tax
Revenue District No. 2004-27 Cottonwood,
5.00%, 9/1/36
    508,655    
  1,590     Fontana Redevelopment Agency, (Jurupa Hills),
5.60%, 10/1/27
    1,669,627    
  500     Jurupa Community Services District, (Community Facilities
District No. 16), 5.30%, 9/1/34
    515,255    
  1,305     Lincoln Public Financing Authority, Improvement
Bond Act of 1915, (Twelve Bridges), 6.20%, 9/2/25
    1,375,079    
  420     Moreno Valley Unified School District, (Community School
District No. 2003-2), 5.75%, 9/1/24
    429,391    
  750     Moreno Valley Unified School District, (Community School
District No. 2003-2), 5.90%, 9/1/29
    767,033    
  2,460     Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority,
5.40%, 9/2/18
    2,575,694    
  995     Oakland Joint Powers Financing Authority,
5.50%, 9/2/24
    1,042,700    
  700     Rancho Cucamonga Public Financing Authority,
6.00%, 9/2/20
    734,685    
  1,325     San Pablo Redevelopment Agency,
5.65%, 12/1/23
    1,399,637    
  1,500     Santa Margarita Water District,
6.20%, 9/1/20
    1,609,110    
  250     Santaluz Community Facilities District No. 2,
6.10%, 9/1/21
    252,958    
  500     Santaluz Community Facilities District No. 2,
6.20%, 9/1/30
    506,360    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Special Tax Revenue (continued)      
$ 500     Turlock Public Financing Authority,
5.45%, 9/1/24
  $ 518,675    
  1,000     Whittier Public Financing Authority, (Greenleaf
Avenue Redevelopment), 5.50%, 11/1/23
    1,048,340    
            $ 19,939,340    
Transportation — 1.0%      
$ 1,170     Port of Redwood City, (AMT),
5.125%, 6/1/30
  $ 1,201,181    
            $ 1,201,181    
Water Revenue — 4.6%      
$ 5,500     Calleguas Las Virgenes, Public Financing Authority,
(MBIA), 4.25%, 7/1/32
  $ 5,407,105    
            $ 5,407,105    
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 161.3%
(identified cost $175,139,599)
  $ 190,287,728    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (11.3)%   $ (13,294,010 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (50.0)%
  $ (59,028,016 )  
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 117,965,702    

 

AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

CIFG - CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty North America, Inc.

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by California municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 53.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.5% to 23.5% of total investments.

See notes to financial statements
13



Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

(1)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(2)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(3)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $10,608,147 or 9.0% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(4)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

(5)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

(6)  Security has been issued as an inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

See notes to financial statements
14



Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 162.9%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
  Security   Value  
Education — 1.6%      
$ 1,000     Volusia County, Educational Facilities Authority,
(Embry Riddle Aeronautical), 5.75%, 10/15/29
  $ 1,045,820    
            $ 1,045,820    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 4.7%      
$ 500     Capital Trust Agency, (Seminole Tribe Convention),
Prerefunded to 10/1/12, 8.95%, 10/1/33(1)
  $ 618,100    
  500     Florida Capital Projects Finance Authority, Student
Housing Revenue, (Florida University),
Prerefunded to 8/15/10, 7.75%, 8/15/20
    569,825    
  1,805     Lakeland Hospital System, (Lakeland Regional
Health System), 5.50%, 11/15/32
    2,001,492    
            $ 3,189,417    
Health Care-Miscellaneous — 0.2%      
$ 155     Osceola County Industrial Development Authority,
Community Provider Pooled Loan, 7.75%, 7/1/17
  $ 155,170    
            $ 155,170    
Hospital — 17.7%      
$ 2,000     Brevard County Health Facilities Authority,
(Health First, Inc.), 5.00%, 4/1/36
  $ 2,096,420    
  500     Highlands County, Health Facilities Authority,
(Adventist Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/36
    538,350    
  1,030     Jacksonville, Economic Development Authority,
(Mayo Clinic), 5.00%, 11/15/36
    1,094,993    
  1,250     Jacksonville, Economic Development Authority,
(Mayo Clinic), 5.50%, 11/15/36
    1,350,437    
  2,000     Orange County, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist
Health System), 5.625%, 11/15/32
    2,189,320    
  1,000     Orange County, Health Facilities Authority, (Orlando
Regional Healthcare), 4.75%, 11/15/36
    1,022,550    
  900     Orange County, Health Facilities Authority, (Orlando
Regional Healthcare), 5.125%, 11/15/39
    959,922    
  1,075     South Miami, Health Facility Authority Hospital Revenue,
(Baptist Health), 5.25%, 11/15/33
    1,135,426    
  1,400     West Orange Health Care District,
5.80%, 2/1/31
    1,493,436    
            $ 11,880,854    
Housing — 1.9%      
$ 650     Capital Trust Agency, (Atlantic Housing Foundation),
5.30%, 7/1/35
  $ 670,949    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Housing (continued)      
$ 585     Escambia County, Housing Finance Authority,
Single Family Mortgage, (Multi-County Program), (AMT),
5.50%, 10/1/31
  $ 604,428    
            $ 1,275,377    
Industrial Development Revenue — 3.8%      
$ 804     Broward County, Industrial Development Revenue,
(Lynxs Cargoport), (AMT), 6.75%, 6/1/19
  $ 832,514    
  1,000     Capital Trust Agency, (Fort Lauderdale Project), (AMT),
5.75%, 1/1/32
    1,052,320    
  650     Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines), (AMT),
6.30%, 6/1/23
    650,338    
            $ 2,535,172    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 9.5%      
$ 1,600     Burke County, GA, Development Authority, (Georgia
Power Co.), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.45%, 5/1/34
  $ 1,601,968    
  1,100     Guam Power Authority, (MBIA),
5.125%, 10/1/29
    1,150,479    
  2,750     Jupiter Island, Utility System, (South Martin Regional Utility),
(MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/28
    2,822,407    
  750     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA), Variable Rate,
6.79%, 7/1/29(1)(2)
    841,553    
            $ 6,416,407    
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 3.1%      
$ 650     Miami-Dade County, Professional Sports Franchise Facility,
(MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.25%, 10/1/30
  $ 779,116    
  1,250     Saint Petersburg, Public Utilities Revenue, (FSA),
Prerefunded to 10/1/09, 5.00%, 10/1/28
    1,312,000    
            $ 2,091,116    
Insured-General Obligations — 2.7%      
$ 1,500     Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate,
8.462%, 7/1/27(1)(3)
  $ 1,801,365    
            $ 1,801,365    
Insured-Hospital — 7.2%      
$ 1,000     Coral Gables, Health Facilities Authority, (Baptist Health
System of South Florida), (FSA), 5.00%, 8/15/29
  $ 1,065,370    
  1,000     Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority,
(Mayo Clinic Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 11/15/37
    1,030,120    
  1,350     Miami-Dade County, Health Facilities Authority,
(Miami Children's Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 8/15/26
    1,423,629    
  1,250     South Miami, Health Facility Authority Hospital Revenue,
(Baptist Health), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 11/15/33
    1,334,250    
            $ 4,853,369    

 

See notes to financial statements
15



Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Housing — 1.7%      
$ 1,100     Broward County, Housing Finance Authority, Multifamily
Housing, (Venice Homes Apartments), (FSA), (AMT),
5.70%, 1/1/32
  $ 1,132,923    
            $ 1,132,923    
Insured-Miscellaneous — 5.5%      
$ 3,500     Orange County, Tourist Development Tax, (AMBAC),
5.125%, 10/1/30
  $ 3,708,040    
            $ 3,708,040    
Insured-Other Revenue — 3.0%      
$ 2,000     Miami-Dade County, (Professional Sports Franchise),
(MBIA), 4.75%, 10/1/30
  $ 2,038,200    
            $ 2,038,200    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 20.1%      
$ 1,485     Cape Coral, Special Obligation, (MBIA),
4.50%, 10/1/36
  $ 1,502,003    
  970     Dade County, Special Obligation Residual Certificates,
(AMBAC), Variable Rate, 7.515%, 10/1/35(1)(3)
    1,022,778    
  2,100     Jacksonville, Sales Tax, (AMBAC),
5.00%, 10/1/30
    2,189,061    
  1,470     Miami Beach, Resort Tax, (AMBAC),
6.25%, 10/1/22
    1,876,190    
  3,040     Miami-Dade County, Special Obligation, (MBIA),
0.00%, 10/1/35
    732,610    
  5,000     Miami-Dade County, Special Obligation, (MBIA),
0.00%, 10/1/38
    1,022,800    
  5,610     Miami-Dade County, Special Obligation, (MBIA),
0.00%, 10/1/40
    1,031,174    
  1,395     Miami-Dade County, Special Obligation, (MBIA),
5.00%, 10/1/37
    1,432,079    
  3,300     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/35
    981,288    
  1,850     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC),
0.00%, 7/1/30
    687,053    
  1,000     Sumter Landing Community Development District,
(Recreational Revenue), (MBIA), 4.75%, 10/1/35
    1,037,730    
            $ 13,514,766    
Insured-Transportation — 30.5%      
$ 2,250     Florida Ports Financing Commission, (FGIC), (AMT),
5.50%, 10/1/29
  $ 2,368,598    
  4,500     Greater Orlando, Aviation Authority, (FGIC), (AMT),
5.25%, 10/1/18(4)(5)
    4,707,270    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Transportation (continued)      
$ 400     Hillsborough County Port District, (Tampa Port Authority
Project), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.00%, 6/1/26
  $ 425,184    
  2,000     Hillsborough County Port District, (Tampa Port Authority
Project), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.00%, 6/1/36
    2,133,340    
  500     Lee County Airport, (FSA), (AMT),
5.75%, 10/1/25
    538,705    
  650     Lee County Airport, (FSA), (AMT),
6.00%, 10/1/29
    706,063    
  500     Miami-Dade County, Aviation Revenue, (Miami
International Airport), (CIFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/38
    530,765    
  3,495     Miami-Dade County, Aviation Revenue, (Miami
International Airport), (CIFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/38(4)(5)
    3,710,047    
  3,750     Palm Beach County Airport System, (MBIA), (AMT),
5.00%, 10/1/34
    4,008,188    
  1,250     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (MBIA),
5.50%, 7/1/36
    1,426,363    
            $ 20,554,523    
Insured-Water and Sewer — 28.4%      
$ 1,000     Emerald Coast, Utility Authority Revenue, (FGIC),
4.75%, 1/1/31
  $ 1,041,540    
  3,795     Fort Lauderdale, Water and Sewer, (MBIA),
4.50%, 9/1/35
    3,848,054    
  2,000     Marco Island, Utility System, (MBIA),
5.00%, 10/1/33(6)
    2,121,560    
  1,500     Miami Beach, Storm Water, (FGIC),
5.375%, 9/1/30
    1,596,465    
  1,000     Okeechobee Utility Authority, (FSA),
5.00%, 10/1/25
    1,038,970    
  7,625     Port St. Lucie, Utility System Revenue, (MBIA),
0.00%, 9/1/32
    2,005,375    
  4,000     Sunrise, Utility System, (AMBAC),
5.00%, 10/1/28
    4,383,920    
  1,156     Tampa Bay, Water Utility System, (FGIC),
4.75%, 10/1/27(4)(5)
    1,178,338    
  1,844     Tampa Bay, Water Utility System, (FGIC),
Prerefunded to 10/1/08, 4.75%, 10/1/27(4)(5)
    1,900,727    
            $ 19,114,949    
Nursing Home — 1.6%      
$ 265     Orange County, Health Facilities Authority,
(Westminster Community Care), 6.60%, 4/1/24
  $ 276,220    
  735     Orange County, Health Facilities Authority, (Westminster
Community Care), 6.75%, 4/1/34
    767,414    
            $ 1,043,634    

 

See notes to financial statements
16



Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Senior Living / Life Care — 2.3%      
$ 1,500     Lee County, Industrial Development Authority,
(Shell Point Village), 5.50%, 11/15/29
  $ 1,546,035    
            $ 1,546,035    
Special Tax Revenue — 17.4%      
$ 95     Covington Park Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/21
  $ 97,391    
  500     Covington Park Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/31
    515,750    
  400     Dupree Lakes Community Development District,
5.00%, 11/1/10
    400,264    
  360     Dupree Lakes Community Development District,
5.375%, 5/1/37
    364,356    
  320     Heritage Harbor South Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 6.20%, 5/1/35
    344,218    
  250     Heritage Springs Community Development District,
5.25%, 5/1/26
    254,500    
  765     Heritage Springs Community Development District,
6.75%, 5/1/21
    782,021    
  340     New River, Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/13
    339,932    
  140     New River, Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 5.35%, 5/1/38
    140,662    
  350     North Springs, Improvement District, (Heron Bay),
5.20%, 5/1/27
    356,115    
  660     North Springs, Improvement District, (Heron Bay),
7.00%, 5/1/19
    674,665    
  1,000     River Hall Community Development District,
(Capital Improvements), 5.45%, 5/1/36
    1,017,950    
  490     Southern Hills Plantation I Community Development District,
5.80%, 5/1/35
    509,507    
  600     Sterling Hill, Community Development District,
6.20%, 5/1/35
    643,974    
  500     Stoneybrook West, Community Development District,
7.00%, 5/1/32
    536,655    
  1,000     Tisons Landing, Community Development District,
5.625%, 5/1/37
    1,031,730    
  820     University Square, Community Development District,
6.75%, 5/1/20
    872,349    
  450     Vista Lakes, Community Development District,
7.20%, 5/1/32
    484,614    
  725     Waterlefe, Community Development District,
6.95%, 5/1/31
    790,286    
  175     West Palm Beach, Community Redevelopment Agency,
(Northwood Pleasant Community), 5.00%, 3/1/29
    184,191    
  1,270     West Palm Beach, Community Redevelopment Agency,
(Northwood Pleasant Community), 5.00%, 3/1/35
    1,329,779    
            $ 11,670,909    

 


 
Value
 
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 162.9%
(identified cost $102,254,027)
  $ 109,568,046    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (10.1)%   $ (6,812,682 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (52.8)%
  $ (35,503,452 )  
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 67,251,912    

 

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

CIFG - CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty North America, Inc.

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Florida municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 81.0% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 3.9% to 28.4% of total investments.

(1)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $4,283,796 or 6.4% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(2)  Security has been issued as an inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

(3)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

(4)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(5)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(6)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

See notes to financial statements
17



Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 173.3%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
  Security   Value  
Education — 26.9%      
$ 500     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Belmont Hill School), 5.00%, 9/1/31
  $ 522,795    
  2,790     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Boston University), 5.45%, 5/15/59
    3,210,704    
  500     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Massachusetts College of Pharmacy), 5.75%, 7/1/33
    541,370    
  600     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Middlesex School), 5.00%, 9/1/33
    629,190    
  500     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Mount
Holyoke College), 5.25%, 7/1/31
    530,015    
  1,500     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Wheeler School), 6.50%, 12/1/29
    1,592,385    
  1,000     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Xaverian
Brothers High School), 5.65%, 7/1/29
    1,039,730    
  1,000     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Boston College), 5.125%, 6/1/33
    1,062,560    
  1,215     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 5.25%, 7/1/33
    1,483,770    
  265     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Williams College), 4.50%, 7/1/33
    269,224    
  500     Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, (Babson College),
5.25%, 10/1/27
    514,465    
  400     Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency,
(Belmont Hill School), 5.25%, 9/1/28
    410,820    
            $ 11,807,028    
Electric Utilities — 5.0%      
$ 1,000     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Devens
Electric System), 6.00%, 12/1/30
  $ 1,090,090    
  1,065     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Dominion Energy Brayton Point), (AMT),
5.00%, 2/1/36
    1,113,543    
            $ 2,203,633    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 4.6%      
$ 400     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Western
New England College), Prerefunded to 12/1/12,
6.125%, 12/1/32
  $ 457,552    
  1,000     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Winchester Hospital), Prerefunded to 7/1/10,
6.75%, 7/1/30
    1,102,620    
  1,000     Rail Connections, Inc., (Route 128 Parking), (ACA),
Prerefunded to 7/1/09, 0.00%, 7/1/20
    458,730    
            $ 2,018,902    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Health Care-Miscellaneous — 2.8%      
$ 510     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(MCHSP Human Services), 6.60%, 8/15/29
  $ 516,176    
  700     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Learning Center for Deaf Children), 6.125%, 7/1/29
    720,034    
            $ 1,236,210    
Hospital — 13.7%      
$ 1,000     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Biomedical Research Corp.), 6.25%, 8/1/20
  $ 1,095,250    
  1,000     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Baystate Medical Center), 5.75%, 7/1/33
    1,073,080    
  400     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Berkshire Health System), 6.25%, 10/1/31
    435,224    
  105     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Central New England Health Systems), 6.30%, 8/1/18
    105,442    
  1,100     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Covenant Health), 6.00%, 7/1/31
    1,204,775    
  2,000     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(South Shore Hospital), 5.75%, 7/1/29
    2,111,500    
            $ 6,025,271    
Housing — 11.1%      
$ 2,100     Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency,
4.75%, 12/1/48(1)
  $ 2,108,148    
  650     Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT),
5.00%, 12/1/28
    671,593    
  2,000     Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT),
5.10%, 12/1/37
    2,079,000    
            $ 4,858,741    
Industrial Development Revenue — 1.6%      
$ 695     Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, (American
Hingham Water Co.), (AMT), 6.60%, 12/1/15
  $ 696,640    
            $ 696,640    
Insured-Education — 20.9%      
$ 1,000     Massachusetts College Building Authority, (XLCA),
5.50%, 5/1/39(2)
  $ 1,255,100    
  1,000     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Boston University), (XLCA), 5.375%, 5/15/39
    1,206,230    
  1,365     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(College of the Holy Cross), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 9/1/32(3)(4)
    1,658,884    
  1,600     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Franklin W. Olin College), (XLCA), 5.25%, 7/1/33
    1,716,176    

 

See notes to financial statements
18



Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Education (continued)      
$ 1,700     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Berklee College of Music), (MBIA), 5.10%, 10/1/27(3)(4)
  $ 1,750,762    
  1,000     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Northeastern University), (MBIA), 5.00%, 10/1/29
    1,036,400    
  500     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(UMass-Worcester Campus), (FGIC), 5.25%, 10/1/31
    532,635    
            $ 9,156,187    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 1.8%      
$ 750     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA),
5.25%, 7/1/29
  $ 795,780    
            $ 795,780    
Insured-General Obligations — 13.5%      
$ 3,000     Massachusetts, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 8/1/30(3)(4)   $ 3,713,290    
  500     Plymouth, (MBIA),
5.25%, 10/15/20
    534,020    
  900     Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate,
8.462%, 7/1/27(5)(6)
    1,080,819    
  600     Salisbury, (XLCA),
4.25%, 8/1/30
    602,100    
            $ 5,930,229    
Insured-Miscellaneous — 4.8%      
$ 2,000     Boston Convention Center, (AMBAC),
5.00%, 5/1/27
  $ 2,097,020    
            $ 2,097,020    
Insured-Other Revenue — 8.2%      
$ 2,750     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (WGBH
Educational Foundation), (AMBAC), 5.75%, 1/1/42(7)
  $ 3,580,830    
            $ 3,580,830    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 6.4%      
$ 1,500     Martha's Vineyard Land Bank, (AMBAC),
5.00%, 5/1/32(7)
  $ 1,592,865    
  680     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/28
    275,597    
  385     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/37
    104,135    
  570     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC),
0.00%, 7/1/30
    211,687    
  3,250     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC),
0.00%, 7/1/45
    620,458    
            $ 2,804,742    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Transportation — 15.4%      
$ 1,020     Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Metropolitan
Highway System, (MBIA), 0.00%, 1/1/29
  $ 397,729    
  3,200     Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Metropolitan
Highway System, (MBIA), 5.00%, 1/1/37(3)(4)
    3,266,592    
  33     Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Metropolitan
Highway System, (MBIA), Variable Rate,
6.249%, 1/1/37(5)(6)
    35,414    
  3,000     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority,
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/28(3)(4)
    3,083,070    
            $ 6,782,805    
Nursing Home — 2.6%      
$ 500     Boston Industrial Development Authority,
(Alzheimer's Center), (FHA), 6.00%, 2/1/37
  $ 511,790    
  600     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority,
(Christopher House), 6.875%, 1/1/29
    622,458    
            $ 1,134,248    
Senior Living / Life Care — 3.5%      
$ 1,500     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency,
(Berkshire Retirement), 5.625%, 7/1/29
  $ 1,550,025    
            $ 1,550,025    
Special Tax Revenue — 5.5%      
$ 2,000     Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority,
(Sales Tax Revenue), 5.25%, 7/1/34
  $ 2,424,840    
            $ 2,424,840    
Transportation — 8.7%      
$ 2,700     Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority,
5.00%, 3/1/27(3)(4)
  $ 2,736,585    
  1,000     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority,
5.00%, 7/1/36
    1,062,160    
            $ 3,798,745    
Water and Sewer — 16.3%      
$ 2,000     Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust,
5.00%, 8/1/32
  $ 2,109,780    
  2,000     Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust,
5.25%, 8/1/33
    2,163,200    
  965     Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust,
5.375%, 8/1/27
    1,014,176    
  2,000     Massachusetts Water Resources Authority,
4.00%, 8/1/46
    1,866,020    
            $ 7,153,176    

 

See notes to financial statements
19



Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

  Value  
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 173.3%
(identified cost $70,167,838)
  $ 76,055,052    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 24.3%   $ (10,740,913 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (49.0)%
  $ (21,505,918 )  
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 43,874,888    

 

ACA - ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FHA - Federal Housing Administration

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Massachusetts municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 41.0% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.8% to 21.2% of total investments.

(1)  When-issued security.

(2)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

(3)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(4)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(5)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $1,080,819 or 2.5% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(6)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

(7)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover when-issued securities.

See notes to financial statements
20



Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 161.4%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
  Value  
Education — 5.8%      
$ 1,250     Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Creative
Studies), 5.90%, 12/1/27
  $ 1,340,187    
  540     Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Hillsdale
College), 5.00%, 3/1/35
    564,160    
            $ 1,904,347    
Electric Utilities — 7.3%      
$ 1,250     Michigan Strategic Fund, (Detroit Edison Pollution Control),
5.45%, 9/1/29
  $ 1,320,400    
  1,000     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/31     1,069,220    
            $ 2,389,620    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 4.2%      
$ 500     Kent Hospital Finance Authority, (Spectrum Health),
Prerefunded to 7/15/11, 5.50%, 1/15/31
  $ 544,920    
  750     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Ascension Health
Care), Prerefunded to 11/15/09, 6.125%, 11/15/26
    811,185    
            $ 1,356,105    
General Obligations — 12.1%      
$ 500     East Grand Rapids, Public School District, 5.00%, 5/1/25   $ 523,560    
  500     Garden City School District, Prerefunded to 5/1/11,
5.00%, 5/1/26
    529,715    
  1,000     Manistee Area Public Schools, 5.00%, 5/1/24     1,047,120    
  750     Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Commonwealth
Guaranteed, 5.25%, 7/1/29
    811,050    
  1,000     White Cloud, Public Schools, Prerefunded to 5/1/11,
5.125%, 5/1/31
    1,047,110    
            $ 3,958,555    
Health Care-Miscellaneous — 0.7%      
$ 215     Pittsfield Township Economic Development Corp.,
(Arbor Hospice), 7.875%, 8/15/27
  $ 216,763    
            $ 216,763    
Hospital — 28.8%      
$ 500     Allegan Hospital Finance Authority, (Allegan General
Hospital), 7.00%, 11/15/21
  $ 537,525    
  125     Gaylord Hospital Finance Authority, (Otsego Memorial
Hospital Association), 6.20%, 1/1/25
    131,007    
  125     Gaylord Hospital Finance Authority, (Otsego Memorial
Hospital Association), 6.50%, 1/1/37
    131,217    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Hospital (continued)      
$ 560     Macomb County Hospital Finance Authority,
(Mount Clemens General Hospital), 5.875%, 11/15/34
  $ 596,602    
  500     Mecosta County, (Michigan General Hospital),
6.00%, 5/15/18
    515,965    
  1,000     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Central Michigan
Community Hospital), 6.25%, 10/1/27
    1,021,150    
  750     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health
System), 5.00%, 11/15/38
    789,975    
  1,000     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health
System), 5.25%, 11/15/46
    1,072,340    
  1,000     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (McLaren Healthcare),
5.00%, 8/1/35
    1,046,840    
  750     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Memorial Healthcare
Center), 5.875%, 11/15/21
    789,300    
  750     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Sparrow Obligation
Group), 5.625%, 11/15/36
    799,837    
  1,000     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Trinity Health),
6.00%, 12/1/27
    1,088,610    
  800     Saginaw Hospital Finance Authority, (Covenant Medical
Center), 6.50%, 7/1/30
    875,208    
            $ 9,395,576    
Industrial Development Revenue — 7.7%      
$ 1,000     Detroit Local Development Finance Authority, (Chrysler
Corp.), 5.375%, 5/1/21
  $ 1,018,100    
  800     Dickinson County Electronic Development Corp., (International
Paper Co.), 5.75%, 6/1/16
    861,784    
  625     Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines), (AMT),
6.25%, 6/1/26
    631,000    
            $ 2,510,884    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 8.7%      
$ 1,000     Michigan Strategic Fund Resource Recovery, (Detroit
Edison Co.), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.55%, 9/1/29
  $ 1,059,640    
  500     Michigan Strategic Fund, Resource Recovery, (Detroit
Edison Co.), (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/15/32
    532,580    
  1,200     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA),
4.75%, 7/1/33(1)(2)
    1,248,444    
            $ 2,840,664    
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 16.1%      
$ 1,000     Central Montcalm Public Schools, (MBIA), Prerefunded to
5/1/09, 6.00%, 5/1/29
  $ 1,057,600    
  2,000     Fenton Area Public Schools, (FGIC), Prerefunded to
5/1/08, 5.00%, 5/1/24
    2,041,280    

 

See notes to financial statements
21



Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded (continued)      
$ 2,000     Novi Building Authority, (FSA), Prerefunded to 10/1/10,
5.50%, 10/1/25
  $ 2,158,700    
            $ 5,257,580    
Insured-General Obligations — 17.4%      
$ 1,000     Brandon School District, (FSA), 4.50%, 5/1/33   $ 1,014,940    
  500     Brandon School District, (FSA), 4.50%, 5/1/35     507,080    
  1,520     Coopersville, Public Schools District, (FSA),
4.50%, 5/1/36
    1,541,523    
  650     Detroit, School District, (FGIC), 4.75%, 5/1/28     663,605    
  750     Detroit, School District, (FSA), 5.25%, 5/1/32     902,085    
  200     Eaton Rapids Public Schools, (MBIA), 4.75%, 5/1/25     203,074    
  700     Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 8.462%, 7/1/27(3)(4)     840,637    
            $ 5,672,944    
Insured-Hospital — 6.4%      
$ 1,000     Royal Oak, Hospital Finance Authority Revenue, (William
Beaumont Hospital), (MBIA), 5.25%, 11/15/35
  $ 1,054,090    
  1,000     Saginaw Hospital Finance Authority, (Covenant Medical
Center), (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/24
    1,049,020    
            $ 2,103,110    
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of
Participation — 4.2%
     
$ 4,300     Michigan State Building Authority, (FGIC),
0.00%, 10/15/30
  $ 1,381,977    
            $ 1,381,977    
Insured-Sewer Revenue — 3.2%      
$ 1,000     Detroit Sewer Disposal, (FGIC), 5.125%, 7/1/31   $ 1,051,810    
            $ 1,051,810    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 8.8%      
  455     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
Prerefunded to 1/1/08, Variable Rate,
7.315%, 7/1/28(3)(4)
    488,911    
  2,250     Wayne Charter County, (Airport Hotel-Detroit Metropolitan
Airport), (MBIA), 5.00%, 12/1/30
    2,375,325    
            $ 2,864,236    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Student Loan — 6.4%      
$ 1,000     Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority,
(AMBAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 3/1/31
  $ 1,056,040    
  1,000     Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority,
(AMBAC), (AMT), 5.50%, 6/1/25(5)
    1,047,810    
            $ 2,103,850    
Insured-Transportation — 12.8%      
$ 2,010     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AMBAC),
5.00%, 7/1/28(1)(2)
  $ 2,065,657    
  2,000     Wayne Charter County Airport, Residual Certificates, (MBIA),
(AMT), Variable Rate, 6.22%, 12/1/28(3)(6)
    2,099,980    
            $ 4,165,637    
Insured-Water Revenue — 5.3%      
$ 1,650     Detroit Water Supply System, (FGIC), 5.00%, 7/1/30   $ 1,717,403    
            $ 1,717,403    
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 0.8%      
$ 250     Puerto Rico, (Guaynabo Municipal Government Center Lease),
5.625%, 7/1/22
  $ 255,295    
            $ 255,295    
Transportation — 4.7%      
$ 1,500     Kent County Airport Facility, 5.00%, 1/1/25(1)(2)   $ 1,537,178    
            $ 1,537,178    
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 161.4%
(identified cost $48,753,606)
  $ 52,683,534    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (7.8)%   $ (2,539,281 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (53.6)%
  $ (17,501,653 )  
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 32,642,600    

 

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

See notes to financial statements
22



Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Michigan municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 55.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.0% to 19.3% of total investments.

(1)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(2)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(3)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $3,429,528 or 10.5% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(4)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

(5)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

(6)  Security has been issued as an inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

See notes to financial statements
23




Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 173.9%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
  Security   Value  
Education — 4.6%      
$ 3,250     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Stevens
Institute of Technology), 5.25%, 7/1/32
  $ 3,432,000    
            $ 3,432,000    
Electric Utilities — 9.2%      
$ 5,000     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.125%, 7/1/29   $ 5,303,400    
  1,500     Salem County, Pollution Control Financing,
(Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.), (AMT),
5.75%, 4/1/31
    1,613,025    
            $ 6,916,425    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.5%      
$ 3,935     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority,
(Princeton University), Prerefunded to 7/1/10,
5.00%, 7/1/20
  $ 4,107,235    
            $ 4,107,235    
General Obligations — 5.1%      
$ 3,500     Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority,
Commonwealth Guaranteed, 5.25%, 7/1/29
  $ 3,784,900    
            $ 3,784,900    
Hospital — 26.6%      
$ 100     Camden County Improvement Authority,
(Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/25
  $ 104,335    
  90     Camden County Improvement Authority,
(Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35
    93,424    
  100     Camden County Improvement Authority,
(Cooper Health System), 5.25%, 2/15/27
    106,363    
  2,750     Camden County Improvement Authority,
(Cooper Health System), 5.75%, 2/15/34
    3,004,182    
  1,035     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Atlantic City Medical Center), 5.75%, 7/1/25
    1,120,791    
  2,140     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Capital Health System), 5.25%, 7/1/27
    2,193,115    
  1,765     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Capital Health System), 5.375%, 7/1/33
    1,868,605    
  2,000     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Hackensack University Medical Center), 6.00%, 1/1/34
    2,135,380    
  450     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Hunterdon Medical Center), 5.125%, 7/1/35
    477,805    
  750     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Palisades Medical Center), 6.50%, 7/1/21
    838,432    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Hospital (continued)      
$ 2,000     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital),
5.75%, 7/1/31
  $ 2,143,740    
  1,450     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Saint Peters University Hospital), 6.875%, 7/1/20
    1,595,290    
  1,500     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(South Jersey Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/46
    1,569,000    
  1,900     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(St. Elizabeth's Hospital), 6.00%, 7/1/20
    1,958,235    
  600     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority,
(Trinitas Hospital), 7.50%, 7/1/30
    669,888    
            $ 19,878,585    
Industrial Development Revenue — 9.4%      
$ 1,000     Gloucester County, Improvements Authority, (Waste
Management, Inc.), (AMT), 7.00%, 12/1/29
  $ 1,079,100    
  3,000     Middlesex County, Pollution Control Authority,
(Amerada Hess), 6.05%, 9/15/34
    3,266,550    
  1,000     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(Anheuser-Busch), (AMT), 5.85%, 12/1/30
    1,011,610    
  750     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(Continental Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 9/15/29
    777,022    
  750     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(Continental Airlines), (AMT), 9.00%, 6/1/33
    934,162    
            $ 7,068,444    
Insured-Education — 14.7%      
$ 1,850     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority,
(Ramapo College), (AMBAC), 4.25%, 7/1/27
  $ 1,848,687    
  2,000     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority,
(Ramapo College), (AMBAC), 4.25%, 7/1/31
    1,986,360    
  890     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority,
(Richard Stockton College), (MBIA), 4.25%, 7/1/36
    887,739    
  1,300     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority,
(Rowan University), (MBIA), 4.50%, 7/1/31
    1,319,695    
  4,800     Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational,
Medical and Environmental, Residual Certificates,
(MBIA), 5.00%, 7/1/33(1)(2)
    4,991,232    
            $ 11,033,713    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 1.7%      
$ 1,250     Vineland, (Electric Utility), (MBIA), (AMT),
5.25%, 5/15/26
  $ 1,309,425    
            $ 1,309,425    

 

See notes to financial statements
24



Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 12.1%      
$ 330     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(FSA), Prerefunded to 5/1/09, Variable Rate,
8.348%, 5/1/17(5)(7)
  $ 370,646    
  3,750     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(FSA), Prerefunded to 5/1/09, 5.25%, 5/1/17(1)(2)
    3,903,963    
  4,500     New Jersey Turnpike Authority, (MBIA), Prerefunded
to 1/1/10, 5.50%, 1/1/30(1)(2)
    4,762,980    
            $ 9,037,589    
Insured-Gas Utilities — 6.9%      
$ 5,000     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (New Jersey
Natural Gas Co.), (FGIC), (AMT), 4.90%, 10/1/40
  $ 5,200,800    
            $ 5,200,800    
Insured-General Obligations — 11.1%      
$ 1,730     Bordentown Regional Board of Education, (MBIA),
4.25%, 1/15/33
  $ 1,728,564    
  125     Hudson County, Improvements Authority, (CIFG),
4.25%, 9/1/28
    124,729    
  2,000     Hudson County, Improvements Authority, (MBIA),
0.00%, 12/15/33
    629,640    
  3,500     Irvington Township, (FSA), 0.00%, 7/15/24     1,691,060    
  5,500     Irvington Township, (FSA), 0.00%, 7/15/25     2,540,670    
  750     Madison Borough Board of Education, (MBIA),
4.75%, 7/15/35
    784,253    
  931     Stafford Township, (MBIA), 3.00%, 7/1/30     775,234    
            $ 8,274,150    
Insured-Housing — 6.1%      
$ 3,390     New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, (FSA),
(AMT), 5.05%, 5/1/34
  $ 3,455,698    
  810     New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency,
Multifamily Housing, (FGIC), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/36
    841,104    
  230     New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency,
Multifamily Housing, (FSA), 5.75%, 5/1/25
    240,996    
            $ 4,537,798    
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of
Participation — 0.8%
     
$ 585     Gloucester County, Improvements Authority, (MBIA),
4.75%, 9/1/30
  $ 612,916    
            $ 612,916    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 15.3%      
$ 12,030     Garden Preservation Trust and Open Space and Farmland,
(FSA), 0.00%, 11/1/24
  $ 5,742,280    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue (continued)      
$ 7,100     Garden Preservation Trust and Open Space and Farmland,
(FSA), 0.00%, 11/1/27
  $ 2,969,930    
  6,000     Garden Preservation Trust and Open Space and Farmland,
(FSA), 0.00%, 11/1/25(3)
    2,737,980    
            $ 11,450,190    
Insured-Transportation — 13.1%      
$ 1,000     Delaware River Port Authority, (FSA), 5.625%, 1/1/26   $ 1,057,120    
  3,250     Delaware River Port Authority, (FSA), 5.75%, 1/1/26(4)     3,445,423    
  3,750     Newark Housing Authority, (Newark Marine Terminal),
(MBIA), 5.00%, 7/1/37(1)(2)
    3,975,713    
  1,280     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (CIFG), (AMT),
4.50%, 9/1/35
    1,295,642    
            $ 9,773,898    
Insured-Water and Sewer — 2.8%      
$ 5,000     Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, (MBIA),
0.00%, 9/1/27
  $ 2,093,250    
            $ 2,093,250    
Nursing Home — 2.8%      
$ 1,000     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Masonic
Charity Foundation), 5.50%, 6/1/31
  $ 1,074,330    
  955     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(Victoria Health), 5.20%, 12/20/36(5)
    1,029,729    
            $ 2,104,059    
Other Revenue — 6.3%      
$ 7,200     Children's Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement,
0.00%, 5/15/50
  $ 497,880    
  6,100     Children's Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement,
0.00%, 5/15/55
    220,332    
  950     Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 6.75%, 6/1/39     1,093,308    
  2,500     Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 6.75%, 6/1/39(1)(2)     2,877,125    
            $ 4,688,645    
Senior Living / Life Care — 3.2%      
$ 1,700     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(Fellowship Village), 5.50%, 1/1/25
  $ 1,738,318    
  675     New Jersey Economic Development Authority,
(Seabrook Village), 5.25%, 11/15/36(6)
    692,624    
            $ 2,430,942    

 

See notes to financial statements
25



Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Special Tax Revenue — 7.3%      
$ 750     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Cigarette Tax),
5.50%, 6/15/31
  $ 803,340    
  1,310     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Cigarette Tax),
5.75%, 6/15/29
    1,432,799    
  3,000     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Cigarette Tax),
5.75%, 6/15/34(1)(2)
    3,261,090    
            $ 5,497,229    
Transportation — 9.3%      
$ 4,800     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
5.375%, 3/1/28(1)(2)
  $ 5,711,760    
  1,175     South Jersey Port Authority, (Marine Terminal),
5.10%, 1/1/33
    1,235,936    
            $ 6,947,696    
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 173.9%
(identified cost $119,685,120)
  $ 130,179,889    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (23.1)%   $ (17,320,355 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (50.8)%
  $ (38,013,948 )  
Net Assets Applicable
to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 74,845,586    

 

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

CIFG - CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty North America, Inc.

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by New Jersey municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 48.6% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.1% to 21.6% of total investments.

(1)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(2)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(3)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

(4)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover when-issued securities.

(5)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $1,400,375 or 1.9% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(6)  When-issued security.

(7)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

See notes to financial statements
26



Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 174.4%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
  Security   Value  
Cogeneration — 1.3%      
$ 1,150     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Nissequogue
Cogeneration Partners Facility), (AMT), 5.50%, 1/1/23(6)
  $ 1,152,231    
            $ 1,152,231    
Education — 8.9%      
$ 1,000     Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency,
(Marist College), 5.00%, 7/1/20
  $ 1,049,980    
  1,145     Hempstead Industrial Development Agency, (Adelphi
University), 4.50%, 10/1/24
    1,163,732    
  450     Hempstead Industrial Development Agency, (Adelphi
University), 5.00%, 10/1/35
    476,833    
  4,980     Hempstead Industrial Development Agency, (Hofstra
University Civic Facilities), 5.00%, 7/1/33
    5,211,371    
            $ 7,901,916    
Electric Utilities — 13.3%      
$ 1,475     Long Island Power Authority, Electric System Revenue,
5.00%, 12/1/35
  $ 1,578,014    
  4,100     New York Power Authority, 5.25%, 11/15/40     4,325,746    
  1,500     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.125%, 7/1/29     1,591,020    
  2,000     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/31     2,138,440    
  2,100     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency,
(Keyspan-Port Jefferson), (AMT), 5.25%, 6/1/27
    2,216,382    
            $ 11,849,602    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 6.8%      
$ 200     New York City Industrial Development Agency,
(Ohel Children's Home), Prerefunded to 3/15/22,
6.25%, 8/15/22
  $ 212,360    
  4,385     New York Dormitory Authority, (Court Facility), Prerefunded
to 5/15/10, 6.00%, 5/15/39
    4,783,202    
  1,000     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Jefferson's
Ferry Project), Prerefunded to 11/1/09, 7.20%, 11/1/19
    1,105,300    
            $ 6,100,862    
General Obligations — 9.1%      
$ 6,000     New York City, 5.25%, 9/15/33   $ 6,462,180    
  1,500     Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Commonwealth
Guaranteed, 5.25%, 7/1/29
    1,622,100    
            $ 8,084,280    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Health Care-Miscellaneous — 5.9%      
$ 1,185     New York City Industrial Development Agency, (A Very
Special Place, Inc.), 5.75%, 1/1/29
  $ 1,190,605    
  1,300     New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Ohel
Children's Home), 6.25%, 8/15/22
    1,217,567    
  50     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency,
(Alliance of LI), 7.50%, 9/1/15
    54,069    
  100     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency,
(Alliance of LI), 7.50%, 9/1/15
    108,139    
  2,600     Westchester County Industrial Development Agency,
(Children's Village), 5.375%, 3/15/19
    2,667,288    
            $ 5,237,668    
Hospital — 17.3%      
$ 210     Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency,
(Women's Christian Association), 6.35%, 11/15/17
  $ 221,092    
  485     Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency,
(Women's Christian Association), 6.40%, 11/15/29
    509,400    
  1,250     Fulton County Industrial Development Agency,
(Nathan Littauer Hospital), 6.00%, 11/1/18
    1,271,712    
  2,500     Monroe County Industrial Development Agency,
(Highland Hospital), 5.00%, 8/1/25
    2,593,300    
  400     Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, (North Shore
Health System), 6.25%, 11/1/21
    437,016    
  2,700     New York City Health and Hospital Corp., (Health Systems),
5.25%, 2/15/17
    2,793,555    
  300     New York City Health and Hospital Corp., (Health Systems),
5.375%, 2/15/26
    316,605    
  1,500     New York Dormitory Authority, (Lenox Hill Hospital),
5.50%, 7/1/30
    1,583,910    
  2,000     New York Dormitory Authority, (Methodist Hospital),
5.25%, 7/1/33
    2,131,800    
  1,250     Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (St. Elizabeth
Medical Center), 5.75%, 12/1/19
    1,281,062    
  2,105     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility,
(Huntington Hospital), 6.00%, 11/1/22
    2,289,608    
            $ 15,429,060    
Housing — 8.7%      
$ 2,750     New York City Housing Development Corp.,
(Multi-Family Housing), 4.95%, 11/1/33
  $ 2,886,703    
  2,500     New York City Housing Development Corp.,
(Multi-Family Housing), (AMT), 4.875%, 11/1/39
    2,561,575    
  1,250     New York City Housing Development Corp.,
(Multi-Family Housing), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/24
    1,285,750    
  1,000     New York Mortgage Agency, (AMT), 4.70%, 10/1/31     1,013,300    
            $ 7,747,328    

 

See notes to financial statements
27



Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Industrial Development Revenue — 16.1%      
$ 4,200     Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.),
5.25%, 10/1/35(1)(2)
  $ 5,008,318    
  1,500     New York City Industrial Development Agency,
(American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport),
(AMT), 8.00%, 8/1/12
    1,710,495    
  2,440     New York City Industrial Development Agency,
(Liberty-IAC/Interactive Corp.), 5.00%, 9/1/35
    2,550,825    
  1,000     Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency,
(Anheuser-Busch), 4.875%, 7/1/41
    1,028,070    
  2,500     Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency,
(Anheuser-Busch), (AMT), 6.25%, 12/1/34
    2,655,850    
  775     Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency,
(Senior Air Cargo), (AMT), 6.125%, 1/1/32
    825,460    
  550     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
(Continental Airlines), (AMT), 9.125%, 12/1/15
    573,485    
            $ 14,352,503    
Insured-Education — 6.3%      
$ 4,500     New York Dormitory Authority, (New York University),
(MBIA), 5.75%, 7/1/27(1)(2)
  $ 5,608,332    
            $ 5,608,332    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 2.8%      
$ 2,400     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (MBIA),
4.75%, 7/1/33(1)(2)
  $ 2,496,888    
            $ 2,496,888    
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 7.5%      
$ 3,000     New York City Cultural Resource Trust, (Museum of History),
(AMBAC), Prerefunded to 7/1/19, 5.75%, 7/1/29(1)(2)
  $ 3,192,060    
  3,400     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority,
(AMBAC), Prerefunded to 1/1/08, 5.00%, 7/1/28(1)(2)
    3,488,691    
            $ 6,680,751    
Insured-General Obligations — 2.5%      
$ 175     Brookhaven, (MBIA), 2.00%, 5/1/26   $ 126,023    
  1,750     Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 8.462%, 7/1/27(3)(4)     2,101,593    
            $ 2,227,616    
Insured-Hospital — 6.7%      
$ 5,000     New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan Kettering
Cancer Center), (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/23(5)
  $ 5,932,950    
            $ 5,932,950    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Other Revenue — 4.7%      
$ 4,000     New York City Industrial Development Agency,
(Queens Baseball Stadium), (AMBAC), 4.75%, 1/1/42
  $ 4,170,880    
            $ 4,170,880    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 11.2%      
$ 1,000     New York Convention Center Development Corp.,
(AMBAC), 4.75%, 11/15/45
  $ 1,038,500    
  2,975     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/28
    1,205,738    
  4,500     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/34
    1,392,345    
  11,625     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/37
    3,144,330    
  12,000     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 7/1/43
    2,501,520    
  1,800     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC),
0.00%, 7/1/30
    668,484    
            $ 9,950,917    
Insured-Transportation — 14.5%      
$ 4,645     Monroe County Airport Authority, (MBIA), (AMT),
5.875%, 1/1/17(1)(2)
  $ 5,352,195    
  2,735     Niagara Frontier Airport Authority, (Buffalo Niagara
International Airport), (MBIA), (AMT), 5.625%, 4/1/29
    2,874,540    
  3,500     Niagara Frontier Airport Authority, (Buffalo Niagara
International Airport), (MBIA), (AMT),
5.625%, 4/1/29(1)(2)
    3,678,588    
  950     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC),
5.00%, 7/1/45
    1,011,674    
            $ 12,916,997    
Insured-Water Revenue — 1.2%      
$ 1,000     Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, (Water
Services Corp.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/35
  $ 1,065,630    
            $ 1,065,630    
Other Revenue — 6.1%      
$ 1,285     Albany Industrial Development Agency Civic Facility,
(Charitable Leadership), 5.75%, 7/1/26
  $ 1,364,696    
  3,750     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority,
5.50%, 10/1/32(1)(2)
    4,056,000    
            $ 5,420,696    

 

See notes to financial statements
28



Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Senior Living / Life Care — 2.0%      
$ 1,450     Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency, (Wartburg
Senior Housing, Inc.), 6.20%, 6/1/29
  $ 1,495,414    
  250     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency,
(Jefferson's Ferry Project), 5.00%, 11/1/28
    262,353    
            $ 1,757,767    
Transportation — 18.7%      
$ 6,000     Metropolitan Transportation Authority of New York,
5.25%, 11/15/32
  $ 6,460,980    
  1,000     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT),
4.75%, 12/1/34
    1,036,270    
  2,600     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT),
4.75%, 6/15/33(1)(2)
    2,675,361    
  5,400     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey,
5.375%, 3/1/28(1)(2)
    6,425,730    
            $ 16,598,341    
Water and Sewer — 2.8%      
$ 2,365     New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority,
4.75%, 6/15/38
  $ 2,467,286    
            $ 2,467,286    
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 174.4%
(identified cost $142,984,334)
  $ 155,150,501    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (24.4)%   $ (21,680,774 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (50.0)%
  $ (44,500,000 )  
Net Assets Applicable
to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 88,969,727    

 

AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by New York municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 32.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.4% to 16.8% of total investments.

(1)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(2)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(3)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $2,101,593 or 2.4% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(4)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

(5)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

(6)  Security is in bankruptcy but continues to make full interest payments.

See notes to financial statements
29



Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 171.4%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
  Security   Value  
Cogeneration — 1.3%      
$ 385     Ohio Water Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal,
(Bay Shore Power), (AMT), 5.875%, 9/1/20
  $ 392,107    
  200     Ohio Water Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal,
(Bay Shore Power), (AMT), 6.625%, 9/1/20
    207,654    
            $ 599,761    
Education — 0.6%      
$ 269     Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Oberlin
College), 5.00%, 10/1/29(1)(2)
  $ 278,300    
            $ 278,300    
Electric Utilities — 3.5%      
$ 455     Clyde, Electric System Revenue, (AMT),
6.00%, 11/15/14
  $ 476,908    
  1,000     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/31     1,069,220    
            $ 1,546,128    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 23.8%      
$ 1,000     Delaware County, Prerefunded to 12/1/10,
6.00%, 12/1/25
  $ 1,100,730    
  1,000     Franklin County, (Cincinnati Children's Hospital),
Prerefunded to 5/1/09, 5.20%, 5/1/29
    1,057,110    
  1,530     Hamilton City School District, Prerefunded to 12/1/09,
5.625%, 12/1/24
    1,635,922    
  2,731     Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Prerefunded to
10/1/09, 5.00%, 10/1/29(1)(2)
    2,865,805    
  1,250     Parma, (Parma Community General Hospital Association),
Prerefunded to 11/1/08, 5.35%, 11/1/18
    1,302,925    
  1,750     Parma, (Parma Community General Hospital Association),
Prerefunded to 11/1/08, 5.375%, 11/1/29
    1,824,900    
  670     Richland County Hospital Facilities, (Medcentral Health
Systems), Prerefunded to 11/15/10, 6.375%, 11/15/22
    743,566    
            $ 10,530,958    
Hospital — 9.9%      
$ 550     Cuyahoga County, (Cleveland Clinic Health System),
5.50%, 1/1/29
  $ 594,852    
  600     Erie County Hospital Facilities, (Firelands Regional Medical
Center), 5.25%, 8/15/46
    640,590    
  1,500     Erie County Hospital Facilities, (Firelands Regional Medical
Center), 5.625%, 8/15/32
    1,620,405    
  590     Highland County, (Joint Township Hospital District),
6.75%, 12/1/29
    622,385    
  500     Miami, (Upper Valley Medical Center), 5.25%, 5/15/26     540,420    
  330     Richland County Hospital Facilities, (Medcentral Health
Systems), 6.375%, 11/15/22
    361,561    
            $ 4,380,213    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Housing — 8.2%      
$ 1,000     Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Residential Mortgage
Backed Securities), (AMT), 5.00%, 9/1/36
  $ 1,033,990    
  2,500     Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Uptown Community Partners),
(AMT), 5.25%, 4/20/48
    2,629,750    
            $ 3,663,740    
Industrial Development Revenue — 11.5%      
$ 1,385     Cleveland Airport, (Continental Airlines), (AMT),
5.375%, 9/15/27
  $ 1,390,665    
  1,300     Dayton, Special Facilities Revenue, (Emery Air Freight),
5.625%, 2/1/18
    1,351,922    
  2,250     Ohio Water Development Authority, (Anheuser-Busch),
(AMT), 6.00%, 8/1/38
    2,370,015    
            $ 5,112,602    
Insured-Education — 3.0%      
$ 1,250     University of Cincinnati, (FGIC), 5.25%, 6/1/24   $ 1,338,137    
            $ 1,338,137    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 5.1%      
$ 2,000     Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (MBIA),
0.00%, 2/15/25
  $ 928,320    
  3,000     Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (MBIA),
0.00%, 2/15/26
    1,332,480    
            $ 2,260,800    
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 14.0%      
$ 245     Cuyahoga County Hospital, (MBIA), Escrowed to Maturity,
5.125%, 1/1/29(3)
  $ 253,408    
  1,000     Lima City School District, (AMBAC), Prerefunded
to 12/1/10, 5.50%, 12/1/22
    1,092,490    
  495     Lima City School District, (AMBAC), Prerefunded
to 12/1/10, 6.00%, 12/1/22
    549,955    
  1,000     Ohio Higher Educational Facilities, (University of Dayton),
(AMBAC), Prerefunded to 12/1/10, 5.50%, 12/1/30
    1,082,220    
  3,000     University of Akron, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 1/1/10,
5.75%, 1/1/29(1)(2)
    3,221,325    
            $ 6,199,398    
Insured-General Obligations — 14.9%      
$ 2,455     Canal Winchester Local School District, (MBIA),
0.00%, 12/1/30
  $ 886,304    
  1,000     Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 8.462%, 7/1/27(4)(5)     1,200,910    
  1,200     Puerto Rico, (MBIA), 5.50%, 7/1/20(1)(2)     1,415,592    
  2,860     Springfield City School District, (Clark County),
(FGIC), 5.20%, 12/1/23
    3,093,691    
            $ 6,596,497    

 

See notes to financial statements
30



Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Hospital — 6.6%      
$ 255     Cuyahoga County, (Cleveland Clinic), (MBIA),
5.125%, 1/1/29
  $ 263,752    
  1,000     Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children's Hospital),
(FGIC), 5.00%, 5/15/32
    1,060,480    
  1,500     Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children's Hospital),
(FGIC), 5.125%, 5/15/28
    1,606,365    
            $ 2,930,597    
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates
of Participation — 9.3%
     
$ 1,500     Cleveland, Certificates of Participation, (Cleveland
Stadium), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 11/15/22
  $ 1,549,470    
  1,800     Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC),
5.125%, 6/1/24(1)(2)
    2,054,364    
  500     Summit County, (Civic Theater Project), (AMBAC),
5.00%, 12/1/33
    522,580    
            $ 4,126,414    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 13.7%      
$ 2,000     Delaware County Sewer District, (MBIA),
4.75%, 12/1/24
  $ 2,058,700    
  2,150     Hamilton County, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC),
0.00%, 12/1/28
    848,605    
  2,000     Hamilton County, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC),
5.25%, 12/1/32
    2,110,540    
  2,750     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority,
(AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/29
    1,065,818    
            $ 6,083,663    
Insured-Transportation — 13.5%      
$ 500     Cleveland Airport System, (FSA), 5.00%, 1/1/31   $ 518,375    
  1,000     Ohio Turnpike Commission, (FGIC), 5.50%, 2/15/24     1,201,240    
  1,000     Ohio Turnpike Commission, (FGIC), 5.50%, 2/15/26     1,207,980    
  3,000     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority,
(AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/28(1)(2)
    3,083,070    
            $ 6,010,665    
Insured-Water and Sewer — 3.4%      
$ 1,475     Marysville Wastewater Treatment System, (XLCA),
4.75%, 12/1/46
  $ 1,525,224    
            $ 1,525,224    
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 3.1%      
$ 1,300     Union County, (Pleasant Valley Joint Fire District),
6.125%, 12/1/19
  $ 1,369,069    
            $ 1,369,069    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Other Revenue — 7.3%      
$ 3,000     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority,
5.50%, 10/1/32(1)(2)
  $ 3,244,800    
            $ 3,244,800    
Pooled Loans — 11.5%      
$ 530     Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority,
(Myers University), 5.60%, 5/15/25
  $ 555,440    
  550     Ohio Economic Development Commission, (Ohio Enterprise
Bond Fund), (AMT), 4.85%, 6/1/25
    578,677    
  1,020     Ohio Economic Development Commission, (Ohio Enterprise
Bond Fund), (AMT), 5.85%, 12/1/22
    1,109,495    
  1,215     Rickenbacker Port Authority, Oasbo Expanded Asset Pooled
Loan, 5.375%, 1/1/32
    1,394,832    
  325     Summit County Port Authority, (Twinsburg Township),
5.125%, 5/15/25
    332,371    
  1,100     Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, 5.40%, 5/15/19     1,130,173    
            $ 5,100,988    
Special Tax Revenue — 5.1%      
$ 600     Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority,
7.00%, 12/1/18
  $ 664,272    
  1,400     Cuyahoga County, Economic Development, (Shaker
Square), 6.75%, 12/1/30
    1,581,412    
            $ 2,245,684    
Transportation — 2.1%      
$ 875     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority,
5.00%, 7/1/34
  $ 920,045    
            $ 920,045    
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 171.4%
(identified cost $69,999,061)
  $ 76,063,683    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (18.4)%   $ (8,173,778 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus
Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (53.0)%
  $ (23,504,441 )  
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 44,385,464    

 

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

See notes to financial statements
31



Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Ohio municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 48.7% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.0% to 18.4% of total investments.

(1)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(2)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(3)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

(4)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $1,200,910 or 2.7% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(5)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

See notes to financial statements
32



Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

Tax-Exempt Investments — 172.8%      
Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
  Security   Value  
Cogeneration — 5.3%      
$ 525     Carbon County Industrial Development Authority,
(Panther Creek Partners), (AMT), 6.65%, 5/1/10
  $ 552,006    
  500     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
(Northampton Generating), (AMT), 6.50%, 1/1/13
    508,800    
  500     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
(Northampton Generating), (AMT), 6.60%, 1/1/19
    505,750    
  675     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
(Resource Recovery-Colver), (AMT), 5.125%, 12/1/15
    685,165    
            $ 2,251,721    
Education — 1.5%      
$ 600     Philadelphia Higher Education Facilities Authority,
(Chestnut Hill College), 6.00%, 10/1/29
  $ 617,274    
            $ 617,274    
Electric Utilities — 3.1%      
$ 600     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
(Reliant Energy, Inc.), (AMT), 6.75%, 12/1/36
  $ 652,242    
  600     York County Industrial Development Authority, Pollution
Control, (Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.),
5.50%, 9/1/20
    639,018    
            $ 1,291,260    
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 13.1%      
$ 600     Allegheny County Industrial Development Authority,
(Residential Resources, Inc.), Prerefunded to 9/1/11,
6.50%, 9/1/21
  $ 666,624    
  1,500     Chester County Health and Educational Facility Authority,
(Devereux Foundation), Prerefunded to 11/1/09,
6.00%, 11/1/29
    1,614,330    
  925     Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority,
(Faulkeways at Gwynedd), Prerefunded to 11/15/09,
6.75%, 11/15/30
    1,016,159    
  1,500     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(Drexel University), Prerefunded to 5/1/09,
6.00%, 5/1/29
    1,585,680    
  600     Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development,
(Franklin Institute), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.20%, 6/15/26
    611,286    
            $ 5,494,079    
Hospital — 11.6%      
$ 750     Lancaster County, Hospital Authority, 5.50%, 3/15/26   $ 808,193    
  1,250     Lehigh County, General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley
Health Network), 5.25%, 7/1/32
    1,334,663    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Hospital (continued)      
$ 500     Monroe County, Hospital Authority, (Pocono Medical Center),
6.00%, 1/1/43
  $ 545,530    
  360     Montgomery County, Higher Education and Health Authority,
(Catholic Health East), 5.375%, 11/15/34
    388,508    
  850     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
(UPMC Health System), 6.00%, 1/15/31
    928,353    
  300     St. Mary Hospital Authority, (Catholic Health East),
5.375%, 11/15/34
    322,749    
  500     Washington County, Hospital Authority,
(Monongahela Hospital), 5.50%, 6/1/17
    535,695    
            $ 4,863,691    
Housing — 13.3%      
$ 1,260     Allegheny County, Residential Finance Authority,
Single Family Mortgages, 5.00%, 5/1/35
  $ 1,300,559    
  1,000     Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT),
4.70%, 10/1/37
    1,008,960    
  1,200     Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT),
4.875%, 4/1/26
    1,233,024    
  1,000     Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT),
4.90%, 10/1/37
    1,024,510    
  1,000     Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, (AMT),
5.15%, 10/1/37
    1,044,080    
            $ 5,611,133    
Industrial Development Revenue — 9.0%      
$ 500     New Morgan Industrial Development Authority,
(New Morgan Landfill), (AMT), 6.50%, 4/1/19
  $ 499,995    
  1,000     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
(Proctor & Gamble Paper Products Co.), (AMT),
5.375%, 3/1/31
    1,168,340    
  500     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
Solid Waste Disposal, (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT),
5.10%, 10/1/27
    526,140    
  1,550     Puerto Rico Port Authority, (American Airlines), (AMT),
6.25%, 6/1/26
    1,564,880    
            $ 3,759,355    
Insured-Education — 21.4%      
$ 1,900     Lycoming County, College Authority, (Pennsylvania College
of Technology), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 5/1/32(1)
  $ 2,030,853    
  1,000     Northampton County Higher Education Facilities Authority,
(Lafayette College), (MBIA), 5.00%, 11/1/27
    1,015,290    
  1,000     Pennsylvania Higher Education Facilities Authority,
(Bryn Mawr College), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 12/1/29
    1,046,200    
  2,000     Pennsylvania Higher Education Facilities Authority,
(State System Higher Education), (FSA), 5.00%, 6/15/24
    2,052,720    

 

See notes to financial statements
33



Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Education (continued)      
$ 1,000     Pennsylvania Higher Education Facilities Authority,
(Thomas Jefferson University), (AMBAC),
4.25%, 9/1/31(7)
  $ 980,430    
  1,800     Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical
and Environmental, (University of Puerto Rico), (MBIA),
5.00%, 7/1/33(2)(3)
    1,871,712    
            $ 8,997,205    
Insured-Electric Utilities — 14.3%      
$ 1,380     Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority,
Pollution Control, (FGIC), 4.75%, 2/15/27(2)(3)
  $ 1,432,642    
  1,801     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA),
5.25%, 7/1/29(2)(3)
    1,910,646    
  2,500     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FSA),
5.25%, 7/1/29(2)(3)
    2,652,897    
            $ 5,996,185    
Insured-Escrowed/Prerefunded — 16.1%      
$ 1,000     Allegheny County, Sanitation and Sewer Authority,
(MBIA), Prerefunded to 12/1/10, 5.50%, 12/1/24
  $ 1,082,220    
  650     Berks County Municipal Authority, (Reading Hospital and
Medical Center), (FSA), Prerefunded to 11/1/09,
6.00%, 11/1/29
    706,550    
  490     Dauphin County, General Authority, (Pinnacle Health
System), (MBIA), Prerefunded to 5/15/07,
5.50%, 5/15/27
    499,168    
  2,600     Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Oil Franchise Tax,
(AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 4.75%, 12/1/27
    2,637,674    
  595     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC),
Prerefunded to 1/1/08, Variable Rate,
7.315%, 7/1/28(4)(5)
    639,345    
  2,000     Westmoreland, Municipal Authority, (FGIC),
Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/15/19
    1,204,540    
            $ 6,769,497    
Insured-General Obligations — 8.7%      
$ 1,000     Butler, Area School District, (FGIC), 0.00%, 9/15/28   $ 395,700    
  2,000     Philadelphia, (FSA), 5.00%, 3/15/28     2,061,740    
  1,000     Puerto Rico, (FSA), Variable Rate, 8.462%, 7/1/27(4)(5)     1,200,910    
            $ 3,658,350    
Insured-Hospital — 13.5%      
$ 510     Dauphin County, General Authority, (Pinnacle Health
System), (MBIA), 5.50%, 5/15/27
  $ 518,900    
  500     Delaware County, Authority, (Catholic Health East),
(AMBAC), 4.875%, 11/15/26
    512,640    

 

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Insured-Hospital (continued)      
$ 1,500     Lehigh County, General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley
Health Network), (MBIA), 5.25%, 7/1/29
  $ 1,565,145    
  3,000     Montgomery County Higher Education and Health Authority,
(Abington Memorial Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/1/28
    3,071,610    
            $ 5,668,295    
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 2.5%      
$ 1,000     Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Public Auditorium
Authority, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 2/1/24
  $ 1,037,400    
            $ 1,037,400    
Insured-Transportation — 18.3%      
$ 1,000     Allegheny County, Port Authority, (FGIC),
5.00%, 3/1/29
  $ 1,048,940    
  2,050     Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, (FSA),
5.25%, 1/15/23(2)(3)
    2,458,137    
  800     Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, (FSA),
5.25%, 7/15/27(2)(3)
    952,648    
  1,005     Philadelphia, Parking Authority, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 2/15/29     1,044,778    
  1,800     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority,
(CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(2)(3)
    2,178,864    
            $ 7,683,367    
Insured-Water and Sewer — 8.8%      
$ 500     Delaware County Industrial Development Authority,
(Water Facilities), (FGIC), (AMT), 6.00%, 6/1/29
  $ 531,130    
  1,000     Philadelphia, Water and Wastewater, (FGIC),
5.00%, 11/1/31
    1,055,450    
  2,000     Pittsburgh, Water and Sewer Authority, (AMBAC),
5.125%, 12/1/31(8)
    2,122,320    
            $ 3,708,900    
Senior Living / Life Care — 7.0%      
$ 600     Bucks County Industrial Development Authority,
(Pennswood), 6.00%, 10/1/27
  $ 654,684    
  1,000     Cliff House Trust (AMT), 6.625%, 6/1/27(6)     715,280    
  500     Crawford County, Hospital Authority, (Wesbury United
Methodist Community), 6.25%, 8/15/29
    516,305    
  500     Lancaster County, Hospital Authority, (Health Center),
5.875%, 6/1/31
    535,225    
  200     Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority,
(Foulkeways at Gwynedd), 5.00%, 12/1/24
    208,448    
  300     Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority,
(Foulkeways at Gwynedd), 5.00%, 12/1/30
    311,964    
            $ 2,941,906    

 

See notes to financial statements
34



Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT'D

Principal Amount
(000's omitted)
 
Security
 
Value
 
Transportation — 5.3%      
$ 1,200     Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission,
5.00%, 7/1/28
  $ 1,262,808    
  165     Erie, Municipal Airport Authority, (AMT), 5.50%, 7/1/09     165,719    
  490     Erie, Municipal Airport Authority, (AMT), 5.875%, 7/1/16     496,287    
  270     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority,
(Amtrak), (AMT), 6.25%, 11/1/31
    291,119    
            $ 2,215,933    
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 172.8%
(identified cost $67,469,978)
  $ 72,565,551    
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (19.2)%   $ (8,060,536 )  
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (53.6)%
  $ (22,506,565 )  
Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 41,998,450    

 

AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.

AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.

CIFG - CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty North America, Inc.

FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

FSA - Financial Security Assurance, Inc.

MBIA - Municipal Bond Insurance Association

The Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by Pennsylvania municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at November 30, 2006, 60.0% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 3.0% to 20.8% of total investments.

(1)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

(2)  Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

(3)  Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Trust.

(4)  Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, the aggregate value of the securities is $1,840,255 or 4.4% of the Trust's net assets applicable to common shares.

(5)  Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at November 30, 2006.

(6)  Security is in default with respect to principal payments.

(7)  When-issued security.

(8)  Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover when-issued securities.

See notes to financial statements
35




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Statements of Assets and Liabilities

As of November 30, 2006

    California Trust   Florida Trust   Massachusetts Trust   Michigan Trust  
Assets  
Investments —  
Identified cost   $ 175,139,599     $ 102,254,027     $ 70,167,838     $ 48,753,606    
Unrealized appreciation     15,148,129       7,314,019       5,887,214       3,929,928    
Investments, at value   $ 190,287,728     $ 109,568,046     $ 76,055,052     $ 52,683,534    
Cash   $ 79,446     $     $     $ 157,894    
Receivable for investments sold     8,000                      
Interest receivable     2,309,152       987,014       1,180,982       737,057    
Total assets   $ 192,684,326     $ 110,555,060     $ 77,236,034     $ 53,578,485    
Liabilities  
Payable for investments purchased   $     $ 530,259     $ 137,190     $    
Payable for when issued securities                 2,100,000          
Payable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts     129,097       64,549       46,628       2,031    
Payable for open interest rate swap contracts     159,536       92,459       58,013       18,400    
Due to custodian           86,248       60,065          
Payable to affiliate for investment advisory fees     100,956       58,761       37,274       28,684    
Payable to affiliate for administration fee     28,845       16,789       10,650       8,196    
Payable to affiliate for Trustees' fees     1,453       1,115       282       278    
Interest expense and fees payable     211,636       45,176       97,671       51,937    
Payable for floating rate notes issued     14,962,215       6,830,000       9,243,333       3,265,000    
Accrued expenses     96,870       74,340       64,122       59,706    
Total liabilities   $ 15,690,608     $ 7,799,696     $ 11,855,228     $ 3,434,232    
Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends   $ 59,028,016     $ 35,503,452     $ 21,505,918     $ 17,501,653    
Net assets applicable to common shares   $ 117,965,702     $ 67,251,912     $ 43,874,888     $ 32,642,600    
Sources of Net Assets  
Common Shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized   $ 71,815     $ 42,574     $ 27,141     $ 21,163    
Additional paid-in capital     106,462,788       63,254,539       40,196,540       31,450,960    
Accumulated net realized loss (computed on the basis of identified cost)     (4,175,747 )     (3,527,206 )     (2,396,501 )     (2,909,506 )  
Accumulated undistributed net investment income     658,568       280,602       235,564       169,957    
Net unrealized appreciation (computed on the basis of identified cost)     14,948,278       7,201,403       5,812,144       3,910,026    
Net assets applicable to common shares   $ 117,965,702     $ 67,251,912     $ 43,874,888     $ 32,642,600    
Auction Preferred Shares Issued
and Outstanding (Liquidation
preference of $25,000 per share)
 
      2,360       1,420       860       700    
Common Shares Outstanding  
      7,181,488       4,257,408       2,714,063       2,116,294    
Net Asset Value Per Common Share  
Net assets applicable to common shares ÷ common shares issued and outstanding   $ 16.43     $ 15.80     $ 16.17     $ 15.42    

 

See notes to financial statements
36



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statements of Assets and Liabilities

As of November 30, 2006

    New Jersey Trust   New York Trust   Ohio Trust   Pennsylvania Trust  
Assets  
Investments —  
Identified cost   $ 119,685,120     $ 142,984,334     $ 69,999,061     $ 67,469,978    
Unrealized appreciation     10,494,769       12,166,167       6,064,622       5,095,573    
Investments, at value   $ 130,179,889     $ 155,150,501     $ 76,063,683     $ 72,565,551    
Cash   $     $ 514,750     $     $    
Receivable for investments sold     5,000       65,000       10,000       981,050    
Interest receivable     1,920,863       2,118,280       1,163,926       1,153,239    
Total assets   $ 132,105,752     $ 157,848,531     $ 77,237,609     $ 74,699,840    
Liabilities  
Payable for investments purchased   $     $     $     $    
Payable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts     78,857       110,557       40,515       3,002    
Payable for open interest rate swap contracts     101,523       119,652       61,639       597,088    
Payable for when-issued securities     687,008                   980,430    
Due to custodian     839,521             17,759       296,147    
Payable to affiliate for investment advisory fees     64,361       76,102       38,860       36,949    
Payable to affiliate for administration fee     18,389       21,744       11,103       10,557    
Payable to affiliate for Trustees' fees     1,115       1,115       282       283    
Interest expense and fees payable     229,394       282,727       111,557       120,753    
Payable for floating rate note issued     17,150,000       23,680,000       9,000,000       8,085,780    
Accrued expenses     76,050       86,907       65,989       63,836    
Total liabilities   $ 19,246,218     $ 24,378,804     $ 9,347,704     $ 10,194,825    
Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends   $ 38,013,948     $ 44,500,000     $ 23,504,441     $ 22,506,565    
Net assets applicable to common shares   $ 74,845,586     $ 88,969,727     $ 44,385,464     $ 41,998,450    
Sources of Net Assets  
Common Shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized   $ 46,215     $ 53,753     $ 28,293     $ 27,085    
Additional paid-in capital     68,598,222       79,783,608       42,034,341       40,248,831    
Accumulated net realized loss (computed on the basis of identified cost)     (4,521,580 )     (3,389,608 )     (3,887,007 )     (2,968,961 )  
Accumulated undistributed net investment income     358,330       491,116       212,592       196,012    
Net unrealized appreciation (computed on the basis of identified cost)     10,364,399       12,030,858       5,997,245       4,495,483    
Net assets applicable to common shares   $ 74,845,586     $ 88,969,727     $ 44,385,464     $ 41,998,450    
Auction Preferred Shares Issued
and Outstanding (Liquidation
preference of $25,000 per share)
 
      1,520       1,780       940       900    
Common Shares Outstanding  
      4,621,485       5,375,346       2,829,304       2,708,462    
Net Asset Value Per Common Share  
Net assets applicable to common shares ÷ common shares issued and outstanding   $ 16.20     $ 16.55     $ 15.69     $ 15.51    

 

See notes to financial statements
37



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statements of Operations

For the Year Ended November 30, 2006

    California Trust   Florida Trust   Massachusetts Trust   Michigan Trust  
Investment Income  
Interest   $ 9,458,407     $ 5,693,225     $ 3,634,168     $ 2,774,840    
Total investment income   $ 9,458,407     $ 5,693,225     $ 3,634,168     $ 2,774,840    
Expenses  
Investment adviser fee   $ 1,203,855     $ 704,751     $ 444,593     $ 344,125    
Administration fee     343,910       201,357       127,027       98,321    
Trustees' fees and expenses     8,027       6,183       1,537       1,527    
Legal and accounting services     42,275       37,400       33,580       35,491    
Printing and postage     22,972       11,474       7,677       5,600    
Custodian fee     105,449       65,125       43,360       36,275    
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees     110,993       68,074       47,532       37,956    
Preferred shares remarketing agent fee     147,500       88,750       53,750       43,749    
Interest expense and fees     548,033       354,491       322,114       144,715    
Miscellaneous     37,361       34,721       31,544       21,010    
Total expenses   $ 2,570,375     $ 1,572,326     $ 1,112,714     $ 768,769    
Deduct —  
Reduction of custodian fee   $ 22,249     $ 7,714     $ 5,388     $ 4,151    
Total expense reductions   $ 22,249     $ 7,714     $ 5,388     $ 4,151    
Net expenses   $ 2,548,126     $ 1,564,612     $ 1,107,326     $ 764,618    
Net investment income   $ 6,910,281     $ 4,128,613     $ 2,526,842     $ 2,010,222    
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)  
Net realized gain (loss) —  
Investment transactions (identified cost basis)   $ 2,258,381     $ 1,405,874     $ 252,166     $ 735,419    
Financial futures contracts     72,045       (123,426 )     135,112       142,340    
Net realized gain   $ 2,330,426     $ 1,282,448     $ 387,278     $ 877,759    
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —  
Investments (identified cost basis)   $ 5,386,869     $ 1,810,303     $ 2,289,124     $ 469,308    
Financial futures contracts     (226,220 )     (129,222 )     (117,765 )     (27,020 )  
Interest rate swap contracts     (159,536 )     (92,459 )     (58,013 )     (18,400 )  
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)   $ 5,001,113     $ 1,588,622     $ 2,113,346     $ 423,888    
Net realized and unrealized gain   $ 7,331,539     $ 2,871,070     $ 2,500,624     $ 1,301,647    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
from net investment income
  $ (1,714,344 )   $ (1,151,096 )   $ (659,654 )   $ (541,318 )  
Net increase in net assets from operations   $ 12,527,476     $ 5,848,587     $ 4,367,812     $ 2,770,551    

 

See notes to financial statements
38



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statements of Operations

For the Year Ended November 30, 2006

    New Jersey Trust   New York Trust   Ohio Trust   Pennsylvania Trust  
Investment Income  
Interest   $ 6,360,646     $ 7,724,198     $ 3,847,162     $ 3,828,740    
Total investment income   $ 6,360,646     $ 7,724,198     $ 3,847,162     $ 3,828,740    
Expenses  
Investment adviser fee   $ 762,568     $ 908,301     $ 465,231     $ 442,945    
Administration fee     217,876       259,515       132,923       126,556    
Trustees' fees and expenses     6,183       6,666       1,538       1,542    
Legal and accounting services     36,711       39,755       33,825       37,191    
Printing and postage     13,396       17,176       5,695       7,486    
Custodian fee     72,271       102,698       46,822       49,215    
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees     73,597       87,129       48,185       46,530    
Preferred shares remarketing agent fee     94,999       111,248       58,590       56,250    
Interest expense and fees     659,958       879,671       317,986       381,139    
Miscellaneous     32,358       18,072       33,329       22,019    
Total expenses   $ 1,969,917     $ 2,430,231     $ 1,144,124     $ 1,170,873    
Deduct —  
Reduction of custodian fee   $ 10,953     $ 12,102     $ 7,300     $ 4,006    
Total expense reductions   $ 10,953     $ 12,102     $ 7,300     $ 4,006    
Net expenses   $ 1,958,964     $ 2,418,129     $ 1,136,824     $ 1,166,867    
Net investment income   $ 4,401,682     $ 5,306,069     $ 2,710,338     $ 2,661,873    
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)  
Net realized gain (loss) —  
Investment transactions (identified cost basis)   $ 1,214,821     $ (99,718 )   $ 251,515     $ 673,073    
Financial futures contracts     251,389       (230,993 )     214,966       417,591    
Interest rate swap contracts                       (137,311 )  
Net realized gain (loss)   $ 1,466,210     $ (330,711 )   $ 466,481     $ 953,353    
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —  
Investments (identified cost basis)   $ 4,390,488     $ 5,557,032     $ 1,898,251     $ 1,437,297    
Financial futures contracts     (203,408 )     (108,801 )     (56,151 )     (3,447 )  
Interest rate swap contracts     (101,523 )     (119,652 )     (61,639 )     (597,088 )  
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)   $ 4,085,557     $ 5,328,579     $ 1,780,461     $ 836,762    
Net realized and unrealized gain   $ 5,551,767     $ 4,997,868     $ 2,246,942     $ 1,790,115    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
from net investment income
  $ (1,168,488 )   $ (1,327,665 )   $ (746,150 )   $ (741,184 )  
Net increase in net assets from operations   $ 8,784,961     $ 8,976,272     $ 4,211,130     $ 3,710,804    

 

See notes to financial statements
39



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

For the Year Ended November 30, 2006

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   California Trust   Florida Trust   Massachusetts Trust   Michigan Trust  
From operations —  
Net investment income   $ 6,910,281     $ 4,128,613     $ 2,526,842     $ 2,010,222    
Net realized gain from investment transactions
and financial futures contracts
    2,330,426       1,282,448       387,278       877,759    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments,
financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps contracts
    5,001,113       1,588,622       2,113,346       423,888    
Distributions to preferred shareholders —  
From net investment income     (1,714,344 )     (1,151,096 )     (659,654 )     (541,318 )  
Net increase in net assets from operations   $ 12,527,476     $ 5,848,587     $ 4,367,812     $ 2,770,551    
Distributions to common shareholders —  
From net investment income   $ (5,321,698 )   $ (3,097,975 )   $ (1,937,120 )   $ (1,485,284 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (5,321,698 )   $ (3,097,975 )   $ (1,937,120 )   $ (1,485,284 )  
Capital share transactions —  
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders   $     $     $ 48,702     $    
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions   $     $     $ 48,702     $    
Net increase in net assets   $ 7,205,778     $ 2,750,612     $ 2,479,394     $ 1,285,267    
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares  
At beginning of year   $ 110,759,924     $ 64,501,300     $ 41,395,494     $ 31,357,333    
At end of year   $ 117,965,702     $ 67,251,912     $ 43,874,888     $ 32,642,600    
Accumulated undistributed
net investment income included in
net assets applicable to common shares
 
At end of year   $ 658,568     $ 280,602     $ 235,564     $ 169,957    

 

See notes to financial statements
40



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

For the Year Ended November 30, 2006

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   New Jersey Trust   New York Trust   Ohio Trust   Pennsylvania Trust  
From operations —  
Net investment income   $ 4,401,682     $ 5,306,069     $ 2,710,338     $ 2,661,873    
Net realized gain from investment transactions
and financial futures contracts
    1,466,210       (330,711 )     466,481       953,353    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments,
financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps contracts
    4,085,557       5,328,579       1,780,461       836,762    
Distributions to preferred shareholders —  
From net investment income     (1,168,488 )     (1,327,665 )     (746,150 )     (741,184 )  
Net increase in net assets from operations   $ 8,784,961     $ 8,976,272     $ 4,211,130     $ 3,710,804    
Distributions to common shareholders —  
From net investment income   $ (3,349,864 )   $ (4,200,833 )   $ (2,018,766 )   $ (1,983,473 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (3,349,864 )   $ (4,200,833 )   $ (2,018,766 )   $ (1,983,473 )  
Capital share transactions —  
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders   $ 35,506     $     $     $ 37,735    
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions   $ 35,506     $     $     $ 37,735    
Net increase in net assets   $ 5,470,603     $ 4,775,439     $ 2,192,364     $ 1,765,066    
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares  
At beginning of year   $ 69,374,983     $ 84,194,288     $ 42,193,100     $ 40,233,384    
At end of year   $ 74,845,586     $ 88,969,727     $ 44,385,464     $ 41,998,450    
Accumulated undistributed
net investment income included in
net assets applicable to common shares
 
At end of year   $ 358,330     $ 491,116     $ 212,592     $ 196,012    

 

See notes to financial statements
41



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

For the Year Ended November 30, 2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   California Trust   Florida Trust   Massachusetts Trust   Michigan Trust  
From operations —  
Net investment income   $ 7,274,373     $ 4,312,380     $ 2,633,250     $ 2,104,211    
Net realized gain from investment transactions
and financial futures contracts
    2,019,988       (241,899 )     (26,706 )     (248,298 )  
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments
and financial futures contracts
    782,433       1,014,453       644,728       256,848    
Distributions to preferred shareholders —  
From net investment income     (1,102,773 )     (754,098 )     (392,797 )     (363,695 )  
Net increase in net assets from operations   $ 8,974,021     $ 4,330,836     $ 2,858,475     $ 1,749,066    
Distributions to common shareholders —  
From net investment income   $ (6,406,670 )   $ (3,850,086 )   $ (2,386,249 )   $ (1,845,027 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (6,406,670 )   $ (3,850,086 )   $ (2,386,249 )   $ (1,845,027 )  
Capital share transactions  
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders   $     $ 109,762     $ 261,722     $ 90,130    
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions   $     $ 109,762     $ 261,722     $ 90,130    
Net increase (decrease) in net assets   $ 2,567,351     $ 590,512     $ 733,948     $ (5,831 )  
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares  
At beginning of year   $ 108,192,573     $ 63,910,788     $ 40,661,546     $ 31,363,164    
At end of year   $ 110,759,924     $ 64,501,300     $ 41,395,494     $ 31,357,333    
Accumulated undistributed
net investment income included in
net assets applicable to common shares
 
At end of year   $ 867,512     $ 401,631     $ 313,742     $ 194,265    

 

See notes to financial statements
42



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

For the Year Ended November 30, 2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   New Jersey Trust   New York Trust   Ohio Trust   Pennsylvania Trust  
From operations —  
Net investment income   $ 4,683,176     $ 5,743,713     $ 2,836,869     $ 2,718,721    
Net realized gain from investment transactions
and financial futures contracts
    1,349,891       726,543       (648,550 )     (415,008 )  
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments
and financial futures contracts
    (251,423 )     573,200       495,857       690,441    
Distributions to preferred shareholders —  
From net investment income     (781,913 )     (873,271 )     (495,350 )     (487,092 )  
Net increase in net assets from operations   $ 4,999,731     $ 6,170,185     $ 2,188,826     $ 2,507,062    
Distributions to common shareholders —  
From net investment income   $ (4,033,521 )   $ (5,260,606 )   $ (2,551,147 )   $ (2,562,431 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (4,033,521 )   $ (5,260,606 )   $ (2,551,147 )   $ (2,562,431 )  
Capital share transactions  
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders   $ 110,426     $ 240,734     $ 111,872     $ 265,890    
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions   $ 110,426     $ 240,734     $ 111,872     $ 265,890    
Net increase (decrease) in net assets   $ 1,076,636     $ 1,150,313     $ (250,449 )   $ 210,521    
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares  
At beginning of year   $ 68,298,347     $ 83,043,975     $ 42,443,549     $ 40,022,863    
At end of year   $ 69,374,983     $ 84,194,288     $ 42,193,100     $ 40,233,384    
Accumulated undistributed net
investment income included in
net assets applicable to common shares
 
At end of year   $ 487,503     $ 718,918     $ 285,873     $ 271,851    

 

See notes to financial statements
43



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended November 30, 2006

    California Trust   Florida Trust   Massachusetts Trust   Michigan Trust  
Cash flows from operating activities  
Net increase in net assets from operations excluding distributions to preferred
shareholders from net investment income
  $ 14,241,820     $ 6,999,683     $ 5,027,466     $ 3,311,869    
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations
to net cash provided/(used) in operating activities:
 
Investments purchased     (51,205,902 )     (35,929,393 )     (17,154,714 )     (11,861,174 )  
Investments sold     54,891,697       42,023,421       16,272,962       13,470,898    
Net amortization of premium (discount)     (1,426,615 )     (295,549 )     (79,748 )     (114,897 )  
Interest receivable     215,072       177,669       (16,982 )     60,048    
Receivable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts     58,594       34,375       23,437       7,969    
Prepaid expenses     9,294       9,293       9,295          
Payable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts     129,097       64,549       46,628       2,031    
Payable to affiliate for Trustees' fees     215       147       57       46    
Payable for open swap contracts     159,536       92,459       58,013       18,400    
Payable for when-issued securities     (2,500,000 )     (1,972,180 )           (750,000 )  
Due to custodian           (438,953 )     (55,127 )        
Payable to affiliate for investment advisory fees     3,727       1,375       1,187       629    
Payable to affiliate for distribution and service fees     1,065       393       339       180    
Interest expense and fees payable     35,669       (33,394 )     35,172       (7,580 )  
Accrued expenses     30,931       10,651       8,694       7,118    
Net change in realized and unrealized (gain) loss on investments     (7,645,250 )     (3,216,177 )     (2,541,290 )     (1,204,727 )  
Net cash provided/(used) in operating activities   $ 6,998,950     $ 7,528,369     $ 1,635,389     $ 2,940,810    
Cash flows from financing activities  
Cash distributions paid for common shares net of reinvestments     (5,321,698 )     (3,097,975 )     (1,888,418 )     (1,485,284 )  
Change in auction preferred shares at liquidation plus cumulative unpaid dividend     5,397       3,452       2,683       1,653    
Proceeds from secured borrowings     1,850,000       2,330,000       910,000       800,000    
Repayments of secured borrowings     (2,200,000 )     (5,612,750 )           (1,846,560 )  
Distributions to preferred shareholders from net investment income     (1,714,344 )     (1,151,096 )     (659,654 )     (541,318 )  
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities   $ (7,380,645 )   $ (7,528,369 )   $ (1,635,389 )   $ (3,071,509 )  
Net increase in cash     (381,695 )                 (130,699 )  
Cash at beginning of period     461,141                   288,593    
Cash at end of period   $ 79,446     $     $     $ 157,894    
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:  
Noncash financing activities not included herein consists of
reinvestment of dividends and distribution of:
  $     $     $ 48,702     $    

 

See notes to financial statements
44



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended November 30, 2006

    New Jersey Trust   New York Trust   Ohio Trust   Pennsylvania Trust  
Cash flows from operating activities  
Net increase in net assets from operations excluding distributions to preferred
shareholders from net investment income
  $ 9,953,449     $ 10,303,937     $ 4,957,280     $ 4,451,988    
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations
to net cash provided/(used) in operating activities:
 
Investments purchased     (30,184,254 )     (40,850,808 )     11,424,825       (12,737,609 )  
Investments sold     29,956,037       41,717,011       (12,104,577 )     11,939,576    
Net amortization of premium (discount)     (839,638 )     (315,542 )     (236,546 )     (151,871 )  
Interest receivable     230,446       109,828       73,957       88,580    
Receivable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts     40,625       30,312       16,406       19,445    
Prepaid expenses     9,294       880       11,159          
Payable for daily variation margin on open financial futures contracts     78,857       110,557       40,515       3,002    
Payable to affiliate for Trustees' fees     147       631       57       61    
Payable for open swap contracts     101,523       119,652       61,639       597,088    
Payable for when-issued securities     687,008       (1,013,260 )           529,718    
Due to custodian     41,753             17,759       296,147    
Payable to affiliate for investment advisory fees     2,756       2,281       1,144       901    
Payable to affiliate for distribution and service fees     788       652       327       257    
Interest expense and fees payable           113,717             12,278    
Accrued expenses     9,984       10,684       8,167       6,998    
Net change in realized and unrealized (gain)/loss on investments     (5,605,309 )     (5,457,314 )     (2,149,766 )     (2,110,370 )  
Net cash provided/(used) in operating activities   $ 4,483,466     $ 4,883,218     $ 2,122,346     $ 2,946,189    
Cash flows from financing activities  
Cash distributions paid for common shares net of reinvestments     (3,314,358 )     (4,200,833 )     (2,018,766 )     (1,945,738 )  
Change in auction preferred shares at liquidation plus cumulative unpaid dividend     (620 )     (19,759 )     2,675       3,103    
Proceeds from secured borrowings           6,400,000             3,320,000    
Repayments of secured borrowings           (5,840,750 )           (4,145,172 )  
Distributions to preferred shareholders from net investment income     (1,168,488 )     (1,327,665 )     (746,150 )     (741,184 )  
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities   $ (4,483,466 )   $ (4,989,007 )   $ (2,762,241 )   $ (3,508,991 )  
Net increase (decrease) in cash           (105,789 )     (639,895 )     (562,802 )  
Cash at beginning of period           620,539       639,895       562,802    
Cash at end of period   $     $ 514,750     $     $    
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:  
Noncash financing activities not included herein consists of
reinvestment of dividends and distributions of:
  $ 35,506     $     $     $ 37,735    

 

See notes to financial statements
45




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    California Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 15.420     $ 15.070     $ 15.320     $ 14.590     $ 14.410    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.962     $ 1.013     $ 1.079     $ 1.079     $ 1.069    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     1.028       0.383       (0.227 )     0.682       0.155    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.239 )     (0.154 )     (0.079 )     (0.068 )     (0.110 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.751     $ 1.242     $ 0.773     $ 1.693     $ 1.114    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.741 )   $ (0.892 )   $ (1.023 )   $ (0.963 )   $ (0.934 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.741 )   $ (0.892 )   $ (1.023 )   $ (0.963 )   $ (0.934 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 16.430     $ 15.420     $ 15.070     $ 15.320     $ 14.590    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 15.050     $ 13.650     $ 15.160     $ 14.950     $ 13.660    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      12.10 %     8.72 %     5.35 %     12.31 %     8.10 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      15.99 %     (4.34 )%     8.60 %     17.06 %     1.84 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
46



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    California Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 117,966     $ 110,760     $ 108,193     $ 109,991     $ 104,703    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.79 %     1.78 %     1.78 %     1.78 %     1.82 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.49 %     0.33 %     0.20 %     0.23 %     0.35 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.28 %     2.11 %     1.98 %     2.01 %     2.17 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.77 %     1.76 %     1.77 %     1.78 %     1.80 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.12 %     6.52 %     7.10 %     7.17 %     7.44 %  
Portfolio Turnover     26 %     31 %     17 %     9 %     11 %  

 

†  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.18 %     1.16 %     1.15 %     1.15 %     1.16 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.32 %     0.22 %     0.13 %     0.15 %     0.22 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.50 %     1.38 %     1.28 %     1.30 %     1.38 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.16 %     1.15 %     1.15 %     1.15 %     1.15 %  
Net investment income(5)     4.03 %     4.26 %     4.61 %     4.64 %     4.73 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     2,360       2,360       2,360       2,360       2,360    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 74,997     $ 71,942     $ 70,849     $ 71,608     $ 69,366    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums on fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.012, decrease net realized and unrealized gains per share by $0.012, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.36% to 7.44% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.68% to 4.73%.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
47



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Florida Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 15.150     $ 15.040     $ 15.530     $ 14.730     $ 14.340    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.970     $ 1.013     $ 1.082     $ 1.096     $ 1.103    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     0.678       0.179       (0.450 )     0.775       0.358    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.270 )     (0.177 )     (0.087 )     (0.076 )     (0.118 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.378     $ 1.015     $ 0.545     $ 1.795     $ 1.343    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.728 )   $ (0.905 )   $ (1.035 )   $ (0.995 )   $ (0.953 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.728 )   $ (0.905 )   $ (1.035 )   $ (0.995 )   $ (0.953 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 15.800     $ 15.150     $ 15.040     $ 15.530     $ 14.730    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 14.180     $ 14.180     $ 15.250     $ 15.455     $ 14.400    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      9.84 %     6.98 %     3.80 %     12.65 %     9.93 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      5.32 %     (1.25 )%     5.76 %     14.67 %     15.18 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
48



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Florida Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 67,252     $ 64,501     $ 63,911     $ 65,902     $ 62,302    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.87 %     1.86 %     1.84 %     1.83 %     1.87 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.54 %     0.42 %     0.50 %     0.58 %     0.69 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.41 %     2.28 %     2.34 %     2.41 %     2.56 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.86 %     1.85 %     1.83 %     1.82 %     1.86 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.33 %     6.65 %     7.09 %     7.20 %     7.61 %  
Portfolio Turnover     33 %     15 %     4 %     15 %     14 %  

 

†  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.21 %     1.20 %     1.18 %     1.18 %     1.18 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.35 %     0.27 %     0.32 %     0.37 %     0.44 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.56 %     1.47 %     1.50 %     1.55 %     1.62 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.20 %     1.19 %     1.18 %     1.18 %     1.18 %  
Net investment income(5)     4.10 %     4.30 %     4.58 %     4.64 %     4.82 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     1,420       1,420       1,420       1,420       1,420    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 72,363     $ 70,423     $ 70,011     $ 71,412     $ 68,878    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums on fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.002, decrease net realized and unrealized gains per share by $0.002, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.60% to 7.61% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.81% to 4.82%.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
49



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Massachusetts Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 15.270     $ 15.090     $ 15.380     $ 14.350     $ 14.110    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.931     $ 0.973     $ 1.054     $ 1.091     $ 1.065    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     0.926       0.234       (0.251 )     0.982       0.218    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.243 )     (0.145 )     (0.070 )     (0.070 )     (0.106 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.614     $ 1.062     $ 0.733     $ 2.003     $ 1.177    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.714 )   $ (0.882 )   $ (1.023 )   $ (0.973 )   $ (0.937 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.714 )   $ (0.882 )   $ (1.023 )   $ (0.973 )   $ (0.937 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 16.170     $ 15.270     $ 15.090     $ 15.380     $ 14.350    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 14.920     $ 14.800     $ 16.810     $ 15.400     $ 15.510    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      11.05 %     7.02 %     4.90 %     14.33 %     8.50 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      5.72 %     (6.89 )%     16.71 %     5.91 %     15.16 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
50



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Massachusetts Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data          
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 43,875     $ 41,395     $ 40,662     $ 41,035     $ 37,795    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.88 %     1.88 %     1.87 %     1.86 %     1.97 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.77 %     0.52 %     0.30 %     0.34 %     0.53 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.65 %     2.40 %     2.17 %     2.20 %     2.50 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.87 %     1.87 %     1.86 %     1.86 %     1.94 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.01 %     6.29 %     6.97 %     7.27 %     7.55 %  
Portfolio Turnover     22 %     13 %     39 %     26 %     7 %  

 

††  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.24 %     1.24 %     1.22 %     1.21 %     1.24 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.51 %     0.34 %     0.19 %     0.22 %     0.34 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.75 %     1.58 %     1.41 %     1.43 %     1.58 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.24 %     1.24 %     1.22 %     1.21 %     1.22 %  
Net investment income(5)     3.98 %     4.15 %     4.55 %     4.72 %     4.77 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     860       860       860       860       860    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 76,024     $ 73,138     $ 72,281     $ 72,719     $ 68,951    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums on fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.005, decrease net realized and unrealized gains per share by $0.005, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.51% to 7.55% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.75% to 4.77%.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
51



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Michigan Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 14.820     $ 14.860     $ 15.240     $ 14.400     $ 14.490    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.950     $ 0.995     $ 1.072     $ 1.092     $ 1.085    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     0.608       0.010       (0.334 )     0.802       (0.109 )  
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.256 )     (0.172 )     (0.086 )     (0.072 )     (0.113 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.302     $ 0.833     $ 0.652     $ 1.822     $ 0.863    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.702 )   $ (0.873 )   $ (1.032 )   $ (0.982 )   $ (0.953 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.702 )   $ (0.873 )   $ (1.032 )   $ (0.982 )   $ (0.953 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 15.420     $ 14.820     $ 14.860     $ 15.240     $ 14.400    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 14.110     $ 13.500     $ 16.600     $ 15.635     $ 13.940    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      9.38 %     5.62 %     4.36 %     13.07 %     6.32 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      9.88 %     (13.87 )%     13.63 %     19.82 %     14.72 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
52



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Michigan Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 32,643     $ 31,357     $ 31,363     $ 31,963     $ 30,064    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.97 %     2.00 %     1.96 %     1.97 %     2.00 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.46 %     0.40 %     0.42 %     0.43 %     0.51 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.43 %     2.40 %     2.38 %     2.40 %     2.51 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.96 %     1.99 %     1.96 %     1.97 %     1.99 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.35 %     6.60 %     7.16 %     7.31 %     7.54 %  
Portfolio Turnover     22 %     14 %     5 %     8 %     13 %  

 

†  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.27 %     1.29 %     1.26 %     1.26 %     1.27 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.29 %     0.26 %     0.27 %     0.27 %     0.32 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.56 %     1.55 %     1.53 %     1.53 %     1.59 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.26 %     1.28 %     1.26 %     1.26 %     1.26 %  
Net investment income(5)     4.09 %     4.26 %     4.60 %     4.69 %     4.76 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     700       700       700       700       700    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 71,635     $ 69,796     $ 69,810     $ 70,664     $ 67,952    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums on fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.005, increase net realized and unrealized losses per share by $0.005, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.51% to 7.54% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.74% to 4.76%.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
53



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    New Jersey Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 15.020     $ 14.810     $ 15.190     $ 14.060     $ 13.880    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.953     $ 1.014     $ 1.082     $ 1.120     $ 1.098    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     1.205       0.238       (0.313 )     1.099       0.163    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.253 )     (0.169 )     (0.081 )     (0.071 )     (0.105 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.905     $ 1.083     $ 0.688     $ 2.148     $ 1.156    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.725 )   $ (0.873 )   $ (1.068 )   $ (1.018 )   $ (0.976 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.725 )   $ (0.873 )   $ (1.068 )   $ (1.018 )   $ (0.976 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 16.200     $ 15.020     $ 14.810     $ 15.190     $ 14.060    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 15.080     $ 14.030     $ 15.540     $ 15.415     $ 14.400    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      13.28 %     7.59 %     4.76 %     15.81 %     8.56 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      12.89 %     (4.22 )%     8.31 %     14.75 %     15.70 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
54



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    New Jersey Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 74,846     $ 69,375     $ 68,298     $ 69,500     $ 63,803    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.85 %     1.86 %     1.85 %     1.84 %     1.89 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.93 %     0.58 %     0.50 %     0.43 %     0.59 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.78 %     2.44 %     2.35 %     2.27 %     2.48 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.83 %     1.84 %     1.84 %     1.84 %     1.88 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.20 %     6.66 %     7.28 %     7.64 %     7.80 %  
Portfolio Turnover     23 %     46 %     52 %     28 %     25 %  

 

†  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.20 %     1.21 %     1.19 %     1.18 %     1.19 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.61 %     0.38 %     0.32 %     0.27 %     0.37 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.81 %     1.59 %     1.51 %     1.45 %     1.56 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.19 %     1.19 %     1.18 %     1.18 %     1.18 %  
Net investment income(5)     4.04 %     4.33 %     4.68 %     4.87 %     4.88 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     1,520       1,520       1,520       1,520       1,520    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 74,250     $ 70,651     $ 69,935     $ 70,724     $ 66,976    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums on fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.003, decrease net realized and unrealized gains per share by $0.003, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.78% to 7.80% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.87% to 4.88%.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
55



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    New York Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 15.660     $ 15.490     $ 15.810     $ 14.860     $ 14.280    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.987     $ 1.070     $ 1.126     $ 1.108     $ 1.114    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     0.932       0.243       (0.332 )     0.936       0.553    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.247 )     (0.163 )     (0.074 )     (0.068 )     (0.103 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.672     $ 1.150     $ 0.720     $ 1.976     $ 1.564    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.782 )   $ (0.980 )   $ (1.040 )   $ (1.026 )   $ (0.984 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.782 )   $ (0.980 )   $ (1.040 )   $ (1.026 )   $ (0.984 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 16.550     $ 15.660     $ 15.490     $ 15.810     $ 14.860    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 15.700     $ 14.990     $ 15.370     $ 15.460     $ 13.990    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      11.28 %     7.61 %     4.91 %     13.94 %     11.36 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      10.28 %     3.81 %     6.46 %     18.34 %     6.56 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
56



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    New York Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 88,970     $ 84,194     $ 83,044     $ 84,744     $ 79,589    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.82 %     1.81 %     1.78 %     1.77 %     1.86 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     1.03 %     0.57 %     0.32 %     0.40 %     0.54 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.85 %     2.38 %     2.10 %     2.17 %     2.40 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.80 %     1.80 %     1.78 %     1.77 %     1.86 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.22 %     6.72 %     7.23 %     7.21 %     7.64 %  
Portfolio Turnover     27 %     40 %     31 %     19 %     8 %  

 

†  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.19 %     1.19 %     1.16 %     1.15 %     1.18 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.68 %     0.37 %     0.21 %     0.26 %     0.34 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.87 %     1.56 %     1.37 %     1.41 %     1.52 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.19 %     1.19 %     1.16 %     1.15 %     1.18 %  
Net investment income(5)     4.09 %     4.42 %     4.71 %     4.68 %     4.84 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     1,780       1,780       1,780       1,780       1,780    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 74,983     $ 72,311     $ 71,659     $ 72,603     $ 69,714    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums on fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.002, decrease net realized and unrealized gains per share by $0.002, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.62% to 7.64% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.83% to 4.84%.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
57



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Ohio Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 14.910     $ 15.040     $ 15.070     $ 14.150     $ 14.070    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.958     $ 1.003     $ 1.081     $ 1.083     $ 1.107    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     0.800       (0.055 )     (0.011 )     0.913       0.036    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.264 )     (0.175 )     (0.091 )     (0.077 )     (0.109 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.494     $ 0.773     $ 0.979     $ 1.919     $ 1.034    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.714 )   $ (0.903 )   $ (1.009 )   $ (0.999 )   $ (0.954 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.714 )   $ (0.903 )   $ (1.009 )   $ (0.999 )   $ (0.954 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 15.690     $ 14.910     $ 15.040     $ 15.070     $ 14.150    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 14.610     $ 14.170     $ 16.750     $ 15.715     $ 14.730    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      10.50 %     5.10 %     6.71 %     13.92 %     7.49 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      8.27 %     (10.31 )%     13.96 %     14.12 %     15.59 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
58



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Ohio Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 44,385     $ 42,193     $ 42,444     $ 42,304     $ 39,507    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.92 %     1.91 %     1.91 %     1.90 %     1.96 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.74 %     0.54 %     0.29 %     0.29 %     0.46 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.66 %     2.45 %     2.20 %     2.19 %     2.42 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.92 %     1.90 %     1.90 %     1.88 %     1.87 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.31 %     6.57 %     7.23 %     7.37 %     7.84 %  
Portfolio Turnover     16 %     13 %     12 %     23 %     8 %  

 

†  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.25 %     1.24 %     1.23 %     1.21 %     1.23 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.48 %     0.35 %     0.19 %     0.19 %     0.29 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.73 %     1.59 %     1.42 %     1.40 %     1.52 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.24 %     1.23 %     1.22 %     1.20 %     1.17 %  
Net investment income(5)     4.08 %     4.25 %     4.64 %     4.69 %     4.91 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     940       940       940       940       940    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 72,223     $ 69,888     $ 70,153     $ 70,007     $ 67,032    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums on fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.005, decrease net realized and unrealized gains per share by $0.005, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.80% to 7.84% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.88% to 4.91%.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
59



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Pennsylvania Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)   $ 14.870     $ 14.890     $ 15.210     $ 14.260     $ 14.160    
Income (loss) from operations  
Net investment income   $ 0.983     $ 1.008     $ 1.076     $ 1.089     $ 1.059    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)     0.664       0.103       (0.301 )     0.884       0.039    
Distributions to preferred shareholders
From net investment income
    (0.274 )     (0.181 )     (0.092 )     (0.080 )     (0.111 )  
Total income from operations   $ 1.373     $ 0.930     $ 0.683     $ 1.893     $ 0.987    
Less distributions to common shareholders  
From net investment income   $ (0.733 )   $ (0.950 )   $ (1.003 )   $ (0.943 )   $ (0.887 )  
Total distributions to common shareholders   $ (0.733 )   $ (0.950 )   $ (1.003 )   $ (0.943 )   $ (0.887 )  
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 15.510     $ 14.870     $ 14.890     $ 15.210     $ 14.260    
Market value — End of year (Common shares)   $ 14.560     $ 14.660     $ 15.540     $ 15.980     $ 13.960    
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(4)      9.68 %     6.27 %     4.77 %     13.73 %     7.40 %  
Total Investment Return on Market Value(4)      4.44 %     0.39 %     4.07 %     22.05 %     16.77 %  

 

See notes to financial statements
60



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Financial Highlights

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

    Pennsylvania Trust  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006(1)    2005(1)(2)    2004(1)(2)    2003(1)(2)    2002(1)(2)(3)   
Ratios/Supplemental Data  
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000's omitted)   $ 41,998     $ 40,233     $ 40,023     $ 40,670     $ 38,027    
Ratios (As a percentage of average net assets applicable to common shares):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.94 %     1.97 %     1.91 %     1.92 %     1.95 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.93 %     0.44 %     0.24 %     0.19 %     0.36 %  
Total expenses(5)     2.87 %     2.41 %     2.15 %     2.11 %     2.31 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.93 %     1.95 %     1.91 %     1.92 %     1.95 %  
Net investment income(5)     6.53 %     6.69 %     7.18 %     7.35 %     7.48 %  
Portfolio Turnover     18 %     28 %     8 %     6 %     20 %  

 

†  The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable solely to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

Ratios (As a percentage of average total net assets):  
Expense excluding interest and fees(5)     1.25 %     1.27 %     1.23 %     1.23 %     1.22 %  
Interest and fee expense(5)(6)     0.60 %     0.28 %     0.15 %     0.12 %     0.22 %  
Total expenses(5)     1.85 %     1.55 %     1.38 %     1.35 %     1.44 %  
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(5)     1.24 %     1.26 %     1.22 %     1.23 %     1.22 %  
Net investment income(5)     4.21 %     4.30 %     4.61 %     4.69 %     4.68 %  
Senior Securities:  
Total preferred shares outstanding     900       900       900       900       900    
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)   $ 71,672     $ 69,708     $ 69,471     $ 70,193     $ 67,257    
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)   $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000    

 

(1)  Computed using average common shares outstanding.

(2)  As Restated — See Note 11.

(3)  The Trust has adopted the provisions of the revised AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began using the interest method to amortize premiums of fixed-income securities. The effect of this change for the year ended November 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.003, decrease net realized and unrealized gains per share by $0.003, increase the ratio of net investment income to average net assets applicable to common shares from 7.45% to 7.48% and increase the ratio of net investment income to average total net assets from 4.67% to 4.68%. Per-share data and ratios for the periods prior to December 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

(4)  Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Total return is not computed on an annualized basis.

(5)  Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

(6)  Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1B).

(7)  Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust's total assets, and dividing this by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

(8)  Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

See notes to financial statements
61




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1  Significant Accounting Policies

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (California Trust), Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust (Florida Trust), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust (Massachusetts Trust), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust (Michigan Trust), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust (New Jersey Trust), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust (New York Trust), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust (Ohio Trust), and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust (Pennsylvania Trust), (individually referred to as the Trust or collectively the Trusts) are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as non-diversified, closed-end management investment companies. The Trusts were organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts by an Agreement and Declaration of Trust dated December 10, 1998. Each Trust's investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income taxes and taxes in its specified state, as applicable. Each Trust seeks to achieve its objective by investing primarily in investment grade municipal obligations issued by its specified state.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by each Trust in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

A  Investment Valuation — Municipal bonds and taxable obligations, if any, are normally valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing service. Financial futures contracts and options on financial futures contracts listed on commodity exchanges are valued at closing settlement prices. Over-the-counter options on financial futures contracts are normally valued at the mean between the latest bid and asked prices. Interest rate swaps are normally valued on the basis of valuations furnished by a pricing service. Short-term obligations, maturing in sixty days or less, are valued at amortized cost, which approximates value. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are unavailable, and investments for which the price of the security is not believed to represent its fair market value, are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.

B  Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Trusts sell a fixed-rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time the Trusts buy a residual interest in a special purpose vehicle's (which is generally organized as a trust) (the "SPV") assets and cash

flows set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation ("Inverse Floater"). The broker deposits a fixed-rate bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed-rate bond sold to the broker by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the fixed-rate bond purchased from the Trust, (the "Fixed-Rate Bond"). The SPV also issues floating-rate notes ("Floating-Rate Notes") which are sold to third-parties. The Trusts may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which a Trust agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Fixed-Rate Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating-Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Inverse Floater held by a Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating-Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Fixed-Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Trust, thereby collapsing the SPV. Pursuant to FAS Statement No. 140, the Trusts account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed-Rate Bond in their Portfolio of Investments, and accounts for the Floating-Rate Notes as a liability under the caption "payable for floating rate notes issued" in the Trust's "Statement of Assets and Liabilities". The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. At November 30, 2006, the Trusts investments were as follows:

Trust   Floating Rate
Notes Outstanding
  Interest Rate or
Range of Interest
Rates
  Collateral for
Floating Rate
Notes Outstanding
 
California   $ 14,962,215     3.46% – 3.48%   $ 25,068,284    
Florida   $ 6,830,000     3.52% – 3.55%   $ 11,496,382    
Massachusetts   $ 9,243,333     3.46% – 3.51%   $ 16,209,183    
Michigan   $ 3,265,000     3.46% – 3.52%   $ 4,851,278    
New Jersey   $ 17,150,000     3.48% – 3.88%   $ 29,483,862    
New York   $ 23,680,000     3.46% – 3.55%   $ 41,982,162    
Ohio   $ 9,000,000     3.46% – 3.52%   $ 16,163,256    
Pennsylvania   $ 8,085,780     3.46% – 3.52%   $ 13,457,546    

 

The Trusts' investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in inverse floating rate securities. The Trusts' investment policies do not allow the Trusts to borrow money for purposes of making investments. Management believes that the Trusts' restrictions on borrowings do not apply to the secured borrowings deemed to have occurred for accounting purposes pursuant to FAS Statement No. 140, which is distinct from legal borrowing of the Trusts to which the restrictions apply. Inverse Floaters held by the Trust are Securities exempt from registration under Rules 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.


62



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

C  Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.

D  Interest Expense — Interest expense relates to the Trusts' liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions by the Trusts. Interest expense is recorded as incurred.

E  Federal Taxes — Each Trust's policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt income, including any net realized gain on investments. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. At November 30, 2006, the Trusts, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryovers which will reduce each Trust's taxable income arising from future net realized gain on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of the distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Trusts of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The amounts and expiration dates of the capital loss carryovers are as follows:

Trust   Amount   Expires  
California   $ 1,325,797     November 30, 2007  
      2,239,451     November 30, 2008  
      995,999     November 30, 2012  
Florida     95,167     November 30, 2007  
      1,777,536     November 30, 2008  
      160,909     November 30, 2009  
      1,495,013     November 30, 2012  
      114,338     November 30, 2013  
Massachusetts     354,625     November 30, 2007  
      1,739,252     November 30, 2008  
      39,627     November 30, 2009  
      343,176     November 30, 2010  
Michigan     338,634     November 30, 2007  
      624,509     November 30, 2008  
      165,469     November 30, 2009  
      475,985     November 30, 2010  
      443,883     November 30, 2011  
      697,198     November 30, 2012  
      224,050     November 30, 2013  
New Jersey     1,033,585     November 30, 2007  
      3,178,038     November 30, 2008  
      262,308     November 30, 2009  
      177,350     November 30, 2011  

 

Trust   Amount   Expires  
New York     743,081     November 30, 2007  
      1,920,646     November 30, 2008  
      70,059     November 30, 2009  
Ohio   $ 1,191,097     November 30, 2007  
      643,577     November 30, 2008  
      850,745     November 30, 2009  
      764,355     November 30, 2012  
      588,403     November 30, 2013  
Pennsylvania     569,879     November 30, 2007  
      807,118     November 30, 2008  
      844,973     November 30, 2009  
      41,331     November 30, 2010  
      502,868     November 30, 2012  
      389,289     November 30, 2013  

 

In addition, each Trust intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income taxes when received by each Trust, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item for investors.

F  Financial Futures Contracts — Upon the entering of a financial futures contract, a Trust is required to deposit (initial margin) either in cash or securities an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price indicated in the financial futures contract. Subsequent payments are made or received by a Trust (margin maintenance) each day, dependent on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded for book purposes as unrealized gains or losses by a Trust. A Trust's investment in financial futures contracts is designed for both hedging against anticipated future changes in interest rates and investment purposes. Should interest rates move unexpectedly, a Trust may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss.

G  Options on Financial Futures Contracts — Upon the purchase of a put option on a financial futures contract by a Trust, the premium paid is recorded as an investment, the value of which is marked-to-market daily. When a purchased option expires, a Trust will realize a loss in the amount of the cost of the option. When a Trust enters into a closing sale transaction, a Trust will realize a gain or loss depending on whether the sales proceeds from the closing sale transaction are greater or less than the cost of the option. When a Trust exercises a put option, settlement is made in cash. The risk associated with purchasing put options is limited to the premium originally paid.


63



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

H  When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Trusts may engage in when-issued and delayed delivery transactions. The Trusts record when-issued securities on trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date.

I  Interest Rate Swaps — Each Trust may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, the Trust makes bi-annual payments at a fixed interest rate. In exchange, the Trust receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains and losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. The Trust is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. However, the Trust does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparty. Risk may also arise from the unanticipated movements in value of interest rates.

J  Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirements of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of or a plan of reorganization for an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.

K  Expense Reduction — Investors Bank & Trust Company (IBT) serves as custodian of the Trusts. Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, IBT receives a fee reduced by credits which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Trust maintains with IBT. All credit balances used to reduce the Trusts' custodian fees are reported as a reduction of total expenses in the Statements of Operations.

L  Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

M  Indemnifications — Under each Trust's organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to each Trust and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of each Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Trust enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. Each Trust's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Trust that have not yet occurred.

N  Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses are computed on the specific identification of the securities sold.

2  Auction Preferred Shares (APS)

Each Trust issued Auction Preferred Shares on March 1, 1999 in a public offering. The underwriting discounts and other offering costs were recorded as a reduction of capital of the common shares of each Trust. Dividends on the APS, which accrue daily, are cumulative at a rate which was established at the offering of each Trust's APS and have been reset every seven days thereafter by an auction.

Auction Preferred Shares issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2006 and dividend rate ranges for the year ended November 30, 2006 are as indicated below:

Trust   Preferred Shares
Issued and Outstanding
  Dividends Rate
Ranges
 
California     2,360     2.18% – 3.60%  
Florida     1,420     2.70% – 4.00%  
Massachusetts     860     1.20% – 4.35%  
Michigan     700     1.00% – 3.90%  
New Jersey     1,520     2.44% – 4.35%  
New York     1,780     2.35% – 3.60%  
Ohio     940     2.74% – 5.062%  
Pennsylvania     900     2.84% – 3.85%  

 

The APS are redeemable at the option of each Trust at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends on any dividend payment date. The APS are also subject to mandatory redemption at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if any Trust is in default for an extended period on its asset maintenance requirements with respect to the APS. If the dividends on the APS shall remain unpaid in an amount


64



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

equal to two full years' dividends, the holders of the APS as a class have the right to elect a majority of the Board of Trustees. In general, the holders of the APS and the Common Shares have equal voting rights of one vote per share, except that the holders of the APS, as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two members of the Board of Trustees. The APS have a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. Each Trust is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the APS as defined in each Trust's By-Laws and the Investment Company Act of 1940. Each Trust pays an annual fee equivalent to 0.25% of the preferred shares liquidation value for the remarketing efforts associated with the preferred auction.

3  Distributions to Shareholders

Each Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income, after payment of any dividends on any outstanding APS. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of realized capital gains, if any, are made at least annually. Distributions to preferred shareholders are recorded daily and are payable at the end of each dividend period. Each dividend payment period for the APS is generally seven days. The applicable dividend rate for Auction Preferred Shares on November 30, 2006 are listed below. For the year ended November 30, 2006, the amount of dividends each Trust paid to Auction Preferred shareholders and average APS dividend rates for such period were as follows:

Trust   APS
Dividend Rates
as of
November 30, 2006
  Dividends Paid
to Preferred
Shareholders
for the year ended
November 30, 2006
  Average APS
Dividend
Rates for the
year ended
November 30,2006
 
California     2.889 %   $ 1,714,344       2.91 %  
Florida     3.55 %     1,151,096       3.24 %  
Massachusetts     3.35 %     659,654       3.07 %  
Michigan     3.45 %     541,318       3.09 %  
New Jersey     3.35 %     1,168,488       3.07 %  
New York     3.40 %     1,327,665       2.98 %  
Ohio     3.45 %     746,150       3.18 %  
Pennsylvania     3.55 %     741,184       3.29 %  

 

The Trusts distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid in capital.

The tax character of distributions paid for the years ended November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2006 was as follows:

Year Ended 11/30/06   California   Florida   Massachusetts   Michigan  
Distributions declared from:  
Tax-exempt income   $ 7,036,042     $ 4,238,803     $ 2,596,774     $ 2,024,327    
Ordinary income           10,268             2,275    
Year Ended 11/30/05                  
Distributions declared from:  
Tax-exempt income   $ 7,509,443     $ 4,603,967     $ 2,778,926     $ 2,208,722    
Ordinary income           217       120          
Year Ended 11/30/06   New Jersey   New York   Ohio   Pennsylvania  
Distributions declared from:  
Tax-exempt income   $ 4,518,352     $ 5,528,109     $ 2,764,739     $ 2,721,593    
Ordinary income           389       177       3,064    
Year Ended 11/30/05                  
Distributions declared from:  
Tax-exempt income   $ 4,812,835     $ 6,133,877     $ 3,046,497     $ 3,049,523    
Ordinary income   $ 2,599                      

 

As of November 30, 2006, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis were as follows:

    California   Florida   Massachusetts   Michigan  
Undistributed Income   $ 686,584     $ 284,054     $ 241,482     $ 171,610    
Capital loss carryforward   $ (4,561,247 )   $ (3,642,963 )   $ (2,476,680 )   $ (2,969,728 )  
Unrealized gain/(loss)   $ 15,293,464     $ 7,297,003     $ 5,875,266     $ 3,968,746    
Other temporary
differences
  $ 12,298     $ 16,705     $ 11,139     $ (151 )  
    New Jersey   New York   Ohio   Pennsylvania  
Undistributed income   $ 372,278     $ 491,116     $ 217,033     $ 202,577    
Capital loss carryforward   $ (4,651,281 )   $ (2,733,786 )   $ (4,038,177 )   $ (3,155,458 )  
Unrealized gain/(loss)   $ 10,465,253     $ 11,359,379     $ 6,142,677     $ 4,678,978    
Other temporary
differences
  $ 14,899     $ 15,657       1,297     $ (3,563 )  

 

4  Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates  

The investment adviser fee, computed at an annual rate of 0.70% of each Trust's average weekly gross assets, was earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to each Trust. Except for Trustees of each Trust who are not members of EVM's organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to each Trust out of such investment adviser fee. For the year ended November 30, 2006, the fee was


65



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

equivalent to 0.70% of each Trust's average weekly gross assets and amounted to $1,203,855, $704,751, $444,593, $344,125, $762,568, $908,301, $465,231 and $442,945, for California Trust, Florida Trust, Massachusetts Trust, Michigan Trust, New Jersey Trust, New York Trust, Ohio Trust and Pennsylvania Trust, respectively. EVM also serves as the administrator of each Trust. An administration fee, computed at the annual rate of 0.20% of the average weekly gross assets of each Trust is paid to EVM for administering business affairs of each Trust. For the year ended November 30, 2006, the administration fee amounted to $343,910, $201,357, $127,027, $98,321, $217,876, $259,515, $132,923 and $126,556 for California Trust, Florida Trust, Massachusetts Trust, Michigan Trust, New Jersey Trust, New York Trust, Ohio Trust and Pennsylvania Trust, respectively.

Certain officers and Trustees of each Trust are officers of the above organization.

5  Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, other than U.S. Government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended November 30, 2006 were as follows:

California  
Purchases   $ 49,782,234    
Sales     53,467,029    
Florida  
Purchases   $ 36,459,652    
Sales     42,023,421    
Massachusetts  
Purchases   $ 19,391,904    
Sales     16,272,962    
Michigan  
Purchases   $ 13,470,898    
Sales     11,861,174    
New Jersey  
Purchases   $ 30,184,254    
Sales     29,476,852    
New York  
Purchases   $ 41,782,011    
Sales     40,850,808    

 

Ohio  
Purchases   $ 12,484,069    
Sales     12,109,577    
Pennsylvania  
Purchases   $ 12,920,626    
Sales     12,737,609    

 

6  Federal Income Tax Basis of Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of the investments owned by each Trust at November 30, 2006, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:

California  
Aggregate cost   $ 159,832,199    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 15,834,568    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (341,254 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 15,493,314    
Florida  
Aggregate cost   $ 95,328,427    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 7,459,055    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (49,436 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 7,409,619    
Massachusetts  
Aggregate cost   $ 60,861,383    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 5,984,957    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (34,621 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 5,950,336    
Michigan  
Aggregate cost   $ 45,429,886    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 4,049,273    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (60,625 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 3,988,648    
New Jersey  
Aggregate cost   $ 102,434,266    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 10,624,371    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (28,748 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 10,595,623    

 


66



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

New York  
Aggregate cost   $ 119,975,813    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 11,604,730    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (110,042 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 11,494,688    
Ohio  
Aggregate cost   $ 60,853,629    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 6,288,526    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (78,472 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 6,210,054    
Pennsylvania  
Aggregate cost   $ 59,200,703    
Gross unrealized appreciation   $ 5,379,125    
Gross unrealized depreciation     (100,057 )  
Net unrealized appreciation   $ 5,279,068    

 

7  Shares of Beneficial Interest

Each Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional $0.01 par value common shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in common shares were as follows:

    Florida  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006   2005  
Shares issued pursuant to the
Trust's dividend reinvestment plan
          7,185    
Net increase           7,185    
    Massachusetts  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006   2005  
Shares issued pursuant to the
Trust's dividend reinvestment plan
    3,132       16,386    
Net increase     3,132       16,386    

 

    Michigan  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006   2005  
Shares issued pursuant to the
Trust's dividend reinvestment plan
          5,779    
Net increase           5,779    
    New Jersey  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006   2005  
Shares issued pursuant to the
Trust's dividend reinvestment plan
    2,349       7,346    
Net increase     2,349       7,346    
    New York  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006   2005  
Shares issued pursuant to the
Trust's dividend reinvestment plan
          15,026    
Net increase           15,026    
    Ohio  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006   2005  
Shares issued pursuant to the
Trust's dividend reinvestment plan
          7,120    
Net increase           7,120    
    Pennsylvania  
    Year Ended November 30,  
    2006   2005  
Shares issued pursuant to the
Trust's dividend reinvestment plan
    2,527       17,414    
Net increase     2,527       17,414    

 

California Trust did not have any transactions in common shares for the years ended November 30, 2006 and 2005.

8  Financial Instruments  

The Trusts regularly trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of their investing activities to assist in managing exposure to various market risks. These financial instruments include futures contracts


67



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

and interest rate swap contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Trust has in particular classes of financial instruments and does not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.

A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at November 30, 2006 is as follows:

Futures Contracts

Trust   Expiration
Date(s)
  Contracts   Position   Aggregate
Cost
  Value   Net
Unrealized
(Depreciation)
 
California   03/07   188
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (21,462,186 )   $ (21,502,500 )   $ (40,314 )  
Florida   03/07   94
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (10,731,093 )   $ (10,751,250 )   $ (20,157 )  
Massachusetts   03/07   68
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (7,760,443 )   $ (7,777,500 )   $ (17,057 )  
Michigan   03/07   5
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (544,436 )   $ (545,938 )   $ (1,502 )  
New Jersey   03/07   115
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (13,124,278 )   $ (13,153,125 )   $ (28,847 )  
New York   03/07   161
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (18,398,718 )   $ (18,414,375 )   $ (15,657 )  
Ohio   03/07   59
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (6,742,387 )   $ (6,748,125 )   $ (5,738 )  
Pennsylvania   03/07   25
U.S. Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (2,856,373 )   $ (2,859,375 )   $ (3,002 )  

 

At November 30, 2006, the Trusts had each entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. whereby the Trusts make bi-annual payments at a fixed rate equal to 4.006% on the notional amount. In exchange, the Trusts receive bi-annual payments at a rate equal to the USD-BMA Municipal Swap Index on the same notional amounts. A summary of these agreements are as follows:

Interest Rate Swaps  

 

Trust   Effective
Date
  Termination
Date
  Notional
Amount
  Net Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
California   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 4,400,000     $ (91,697 )  
Florida   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 2,550,000     $ (53,143 )  
Massachusetts   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 1,600,000     $ (33,344 )  
Michigan   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 550,000     $ (11,462 )  
New Jersey   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 2,800,000     $ (58,352 )  
New York   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 3,300,000     $ (68,772 )  
Ohio   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 1,700,000     $ (35,428 )  
Pennsylvania   8/7/07   8/7/37   $ 1,600,000     $ (33,344 )  

 

At November 30, 2006, the Trusts had each entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Citibank, N.A. whereby the Trusts make bi-annual payments at a fixed rate equal to 3.925% on the notional amount. In exchange, the Trusts receive bi-annual payments at a rate equal to the USD-BMA Municipal Swap Index on the same notional amounts.

A summary of these agreements are as follows:

Interest Rate Swaps  

 

Trust   Effective
Date
  Termination
Date
  Notional
Amount
  Net Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
California   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 4,400,000     $ (67,840 )  
Florida   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 2,550,000     $ (39,316 )  
Massachusetts   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 1,600,000     $ (24,669 )  
Michigan   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 450,000     $ (6,938 )  
New Jersey   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 2,800,000     $ (43,171 )  
New York   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 3,300,000     $ (50,880 )  
Ohio   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 1,700,000     $ (26,211 )  
Pennsylvania   8/16/07   8/16/27   $ 1,600,000     $ (24,669 )  

 

At November 30, 2006, the Pennsylvania Trust had entered into an interest rate swap agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. whereby the Fund makes semi-annual payments at a fixed rate equal to 5.77% on the notional amount. In exchange, the Fund receives quarterly payments at a rate equal to the three month USD-LIBOR


68



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

on the same notional amount. A summary of this agreement is as follows:

Interest Rate Swaps  

 

Trust   Effective
Date
  Termination
Date
  Notional
Amount
  Net Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Pennsylvania     2/26/07       2/26/37     $ 5,000,000     $ (539,075 )  

 

At November 30, 2006, the Trusts had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover margin requirements on these contracts.

9  Overdraft Advances

Pursuant to the custodian agreement between the Trusts and IBT, IBT may in its discretion advance funds to the Trusts to make properly authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft by the Trusts, the Trusts are obligated to repay IBT at the current rate of interest charged by IBT for secured loans (currently, a rate above the Federal Funds rate). This obligation is payable on demand to IBT. IBT has a lien on the Trust's assets to the extent of any overdraft. At November 30, 2006, Florida Trust, Massachusetts Trust, New Jersey Trust, Ohio Trust and Pennsylvania Trust had payments due to IBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of $86,248, $60,065, $839,521, $17,759 and $296,147, respectively.

10  Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, ("FIN 48") "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109". FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective during the first required financial reporting period for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is currently evaluating the impact of applying the various provisions of FIN 48.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, ("FAS 157") "Fair Value Measurements". FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FAS 157 will have on the Trusts' financial statement disclosures.

11  Restatement Information

Subsequent to the issuance of its November 30, 2005 financial statements, the Trusts determined that the criteria for sale accounting in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 had not been met for certain transfers of municipal bonds during the fiscal years ended November 30, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and that the transfers should have been accounted for as secured borrowings rather than as sales. Accordingly, the Trusts have restated the financial highlights for each of the four years in the period ended November 30, 2005, to give effect to recording the transfers of the municipal bonds as secured borrowings, including recording interest on the bonds as interest income and interest on the secured borrowings as interest expense in the Statement of Operations.

California Trust
Financial Highlights
 

 

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.78 %     2.11 %     1.78 %     1.98 %     1.78 %     2.01 %     1.82 %     2.17 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.16 %     1.38 %     1.15 %     1.28 %     1.15 %     1.30 %     1.16 %     1.38 %  

 


69



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Florida Trust
Financial Highlights

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.86 %     2.28 %     1.84 %     2.34 %     1.83 %     2.41 %     1.87 %     2.56 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.20 %     1.47 %     1.18 %     1.50 %     1.18 %     1.55 %     1.18 %     1.62 %  

 

Massachusetts Trust
Financial Highlights

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.88 %     2.40 %     1.87 %     2.17 %     1.86 %     2.20 %     1.97 %     2.50 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.24 %     1.58 %     1.22 %     1.41 %     1.21 %     1.43 %     1.24 %     1.58 %  

 

Michigan Trust
Financial Highlights

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     2.00 %     2.40 %     1.96 %     2.38 %     1.97 %     2.40 %     2.00 %     2.51 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.29 %     1.55 %     1.26 %     1.53 %     1.26 %     1.53 %     1.27 %     1.59 %  

 


70



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

New Jersey Trust
Financial Highlights

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.86 %     2.44 %     1.85 %     2.35 %     1.84 %     2.27 %     1.89 %     2.48 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.21 %     1.59 %     1.19 %     1.51 %     1.18 %     1.45 %     1.19 %     1.56 %  

 

New York Trust
Financial Highlights

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.81 %     2.38 %     1.78 %     2.10 %     1.77 %     2.17 %     1.86 %     2.40 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.19 %     1.56 %     1.16 %     1.37 %     1.15 %     1.41 %     1.18 %     1.52 %  

 

Ohio Trust
Financial Highlights

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.91 %     2.45 %     1.91 %     2.20 %     1.90 %     2.19 %     1.96 %     2.42 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.24 %     1.59 %     1.23 %     1.42 %     1.21 %     1.40 %     1.23 %     1.52 %  

 


71



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT'D

Pennsylvania Trust
Financial Highlights

    For the Year Ended November 30,  
    2005   2004   2003   2002  
    Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated   Previously
Reported
  Restated  
Net assets applicable to common shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.97 %     2.41 %     1.91 %     2.15 %     1.92 %     2.11 %     1.95 %     2.31 %  
Net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares  
Expense Ratios:  
Total expenses     1.27 %     1.55 %     1.23 %     1.38 %     1.23 %     1.35 %     1.22 %     1.44 %  

 

While the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of November 30, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (not presented herein) have not been reissued to give effect to the restatement, the principal effects of the restatement would be to increase investments and payable for floating rate notes issued by corresponding amounts at each year, with no effect on previously reported net assets. The Statements of Operations for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (not presented herein) have not been reissued to give effect to the restatement, but the principal effects of the restatement would be to increase interest income and interest expense and fees by corresponding amounts each year, with no effect on the previously reported net increase in net assets resulting from operations.


72




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts and Shareholders of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust, and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust, and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust (collectively, the "Trusts"), (constituting the Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts) as of November 30, 2006, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of each Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Trusts are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts' internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned at November 30, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust, and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust as of November 30, 2006, the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and their financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 11 to the financial statements, the financial highlights for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002 have been restated.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 22, 2007


73



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts as of November 30, 2006

FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)

The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2007 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar 2006. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in a Trust. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of a Trust's fiscal year end regarding exempt-interest dividends.

Exempt-Interest Dividends — The Trusts designate the following percentages of dividends from net investment income as an exempt-interest dividend.

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust     100.00 %  
Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust     99.76 %  
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust     100.00 %  
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust     99.89 %  
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust     100.00 %  
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust     99.99 %  
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust     99.99 %  
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust     99.89 %  

 


74




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN

Each Trust offers a dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) pursuant to which shareholders automatically have dividends and capital gains distributions reinvested in common shares (the Shares) of the same Trust unless they elect otherwise through their investment dealer. On the distribution payment date, if the net asset value per Share is equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be issued. The number of Shares shall be determined by the greater of the net asset value per Share or 95% of the market price. Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on the open market by the Plan Agent. Distributions subject to income tax (if any) are taxable whether or not shares are reinvested.

If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you will need to request that your shares be re-registered in your name with each Trust's transfer agent, PFPC Inc., or you will not be able to participate.

The Plan Agent's service fee for handling distributions will be paid by each Trust. Each participant will be charged their pro rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market purchases.

Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by writing to the Plan Agent at the address noted on the following page. If you withdraw, you will receive shares in your name for all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a participant elects by written notice to the Plan Agent to have the Plan Agent sell part or all of his or her Shares and remit the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.

If you wish to participate in the Plan and your shares are held in your own name, you may complete the form on the following page and deliver it to the Plan Agent.

Any inquires regarding the Plan can be directed to the Plan Agent, PFPC Inc., at 1-800-331-1710.


75



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts

APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN

This form is for shareholders who hold their common shares in their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your behalf. If you wish to participate in the Plan, but your brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on your behalf, you should request that your common shares be re-registered in your own name which will enable your participation in the Plan.

The following authorization and appointment is given with the understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and conditions of the Plan.

  Please print exact name on account

  Shareholder signature  Date

  Shareholder signature  Date

  Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.

YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE YOUR DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.

This authorization form, when signed, should be mailed to the following address:

  Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
c/o PFPC Inc.
P.O. Box 43027
Providence, RI 02940-3027
800-331-1710

Number of Employees

Each Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end, nondiversified, management investment company and has no employees.

Number of Shareholders

As of November 30, 2006 our records indicate that there are 55, 34, 56, 10, 69, 56, 48 and 65 registered shareholders for California Trust, Florida Trust, Massachusetts Trust, Michigan Trust, New Jersey Trust, New York Trust, Ohio Trust and Pennsylvania Trust, respectively, and approximately 2,966, 2,156, 1,364, 1,239, 2,390, 2,633, 1,641 and 1,581 shareholders owning the Trust shares in street name, such as through brokers, banks, and financial intermediaries for California Trust, Florida Trust, Massachusetts Trust, Michigan Trust, New Jersey Trust, New York Trust, Ohio Trust and Pennsylvania Trust, respectively.

If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust reports directly, which contain important information about a Trust, please write or call:

  Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
The Eaton Vance Building
255 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
1-800-225-6265

American Stock Exchange symbols

California Trust  CEV

Florida Trust  FEV

Massachusetts Trust  MMV

Michigan Trust  EMI

New Jersey Trust  EVJ

New York Trust  EVY

Ohio Trust  EVO

Pennsylvania Trust  EVP


76



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts

BOARD OF TRUSTEES' ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS

Overview of the Contract Review Process

The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund's board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not "interested persons" of the fund ("Independent Trustees") cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.

At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a "Board") of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the "Eaton Vance Funds") held on March 27, 2006, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Special Committee of the Board, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Special Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Special Committee held in February and March 2006. Such information included, among other things, the following:

Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses

•  An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds;

•  An independent report comparing each fund's total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds;

•  An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods;

•  Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices;

•  Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund;

•  Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund managed by it;

Information about Portfolio Management

•  Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed;

•  Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through "soft dollar" benefits received in connection with the funds' brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds;

•  Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;

•  The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;

Information about each Adviser

•  Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser;

•  Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts;

•  Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes;

•  Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions;

•  Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates;

Other Relevant Information

•  Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;

•  Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds' administrator; and

•  The terms of each advisory agreement.


77



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts

BOARD OF TRUSTEES' ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT'D

In addition to the information identified above, the Special Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve month period ended March 31, 2006, the Board met nine times and the Special Committee, the Audit Committee and the Governance Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met eight, twelve and five times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund's investment objective.

For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund's investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.

The Special Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Special Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Special Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.

Results of the Process

Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Special Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreements of the following funds:

•  Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust

•  Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust

•  Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust

•  Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust

•  Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust

•  Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust

•  Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust

•  Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust

(the "Funds"), each with Eaton Vance Management (the "Adviser"), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Special Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Special Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Special Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the advisory agreement for each Fund.

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services

In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Funds, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Adviser.

The Board considered the Adviser's management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by each Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Funds, and recent changes in the identity of such personnel. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser's 30-person municipal bond team, which includes seven portfolio managers and nine credit specialists who provide services to the Funds. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to each Fund in the complex by senior management.

The Board reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Association of Securities Dealers.


78



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts

BOARD OF TRUSTEES' ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT'D

The Board also considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.

After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective investment advisory agreements.

Fund Performance

The Board compared each Fund's investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, and five-year periods ended September 30, 2005 for each Fund in operation over such periods. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant information, the Board concluded that the performance of each Fund is satisfactory.

Management Fees and Expenses

The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including administrative fees, payable by each Fund (referred to collectively as "management fees").

The Board considered the financial resources committed by the Adviser in structuring the Fund at the time of its initial public offering. As part of its review, the Board considered each Fund's management fees and total expense ratio for the one year period ended September 30, 2005, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.

After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to each Fund that the management fees charged to the Fund for advisory and related services and the total expense ratio of the Fund are reasonable.

Profitability

The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser in providing investment advisory and administrative services to each Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser in connection with its relationship with the Funds.

The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.

Economies of Scale

In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and each Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board also considered the fact that the Funds are not continuously offered and concluded that, in light of the level of the Adviser's profits with respect to each Fund, the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule is not appropriate. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and each Fund.


79




Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts

MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION

Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (CEV), Eaton Vance Florida Municipal Income Trust (FEV), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Trust (MMV), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust (EMI), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Trust (EVJ), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Trust (EVY), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Trust (EVO), and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Income Trust (EVP) (collectively, the Trusts) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trusts' affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trusts are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. The "noninterested Trustees" consist of those Trustees who are not "interested persons" of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is The Eaton Vance Building, 255 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. As used below, "EVC" refers to Eaton Vance Corp., "EV" refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., "EVM" refers to Eaton Vance Management, "BMR" refers to Boston Management and Research and "EVD" refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVM. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.

Name and
Date of Birth
  Position(s)
with the
Trusts
  Term of
Office and
Length of
Service
  Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years
  Number of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen By
Trustee(1) 
  Other Directorships Held  
Interested Trustee                          
James B. Hawkes 11/9/41   Vice President and Trustee   Until 2007. 3 years. Trustee since 1998.   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EVC, BMR, EVM and EV; Director of EV; Vice President and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 170 registered investment companies in the Eaton Vance Fund Complex. Mr. Hawkes is an interested person because of his positions with BMR, EVM, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trusts.     170     Director of EVC  
Noninterested Trustee(s)                          
Benjamin C. Esty 1/26/63   Trustee   Until 2009. 3 years. Trustee since 2006.   Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration (since 2003). Formerly, Associate Professor, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration (2000-2003).     170     None  
Samuel L. Hayes, III (A) 2/23/35   Trustee and Chairman of the Board   Until 2007. 3 years. Trustee since 1998 and Chairman of the Board since 2005.   Jacob H. Schiff Professor of Investment Banking Emeritus, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. Director of Yakima Products, Inc. (manufacturer of automotive accessories) (since 2001) and Director of Telect, Inc. (telecommunications services company).     170     Director of Tiffany & Co. (specialty retailer)  
William H. Park 9/19/47   Trustee   Until 2008. 3 years. Trustee since 2003.   Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Asset Management Corporation (a holding company owning institutional investment management firms) (1982-2001).     170     None  
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40   Trustee   Until 2009. 3 years. Trustee since 2003.   Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center.     170     None  

 


80



Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts

MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT'D

Name and
Date of Birth
  Position(s)
with the
Trusts
  Term of
Office and
Length of
Service
  Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years
  Number of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen By
Trustee(1) 
  Other Directorships Held  
Noninterested Trustee(s) (continued)                          
Norton H. Reamer (A) 9/21/35   Trustee   Until 2008. 3 years. Trustee since 1998.   President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Asset Management Finance Corp. (a specialty finance company serving the investment management industry) (since October 2003). President, Unicorn Corporation (an investment and financial advisory services company) (since September 2000). Formerly, Chairman and Chief Operating Officer, Hellman, Jordan Management Co., Inc. (an investment management company) (2000-2003). Formerly, Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Corporation (investment banking firm) (2002-2003).     170     None  
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57   Trustee   Until 2009. 3 years. Trustee since 1998.   Professor of Law, University of California at Los Angeles School of Law.     170     None  
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43   Trustee   Until 2009. 3 years. Trustee since 2006.   Consultant and private investor.     170     None  
Principal Officers who are not Trustees                          

 

Name and
Date of Birth
  Position(s)
with the
Trusts
  Term of
Office and
Length of
Service
  Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years
 
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63   President and Vice President   President of CEV, FEV, EMI, EVY, EVO and EVP since 2005; Vice President of MMV and EVJ since 2004(2)   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 86 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.  
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57   President and Vice President   President of MMV and EVJ since 2005; Vice President of CEV, FEV, EMI, EVY, EVO and EVP; since 1998(2)   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 86 registered investment companies managed by EVM and BMR.  
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59   Vice President of EMI and EVO   Vice President of EMI since 2000 and EVO since 2005   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 71 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.  
Craig R. Brandon 12/21/66   Vice President of EVY   Since 2005   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 44 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.  
Thomas M. Metzold 8/3/58   Vice President of EVP   Since 2005   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 43 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.  
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57   Treasurer   Since 2005(2)   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 170 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.  
Alan R. Dynner 10/10/40   Secretary   Since 1998   Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of BMR, EVM, EVD, EV and EVC. Officer of 170 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.  
Paul M. O'Neil 7/11/53   Chief Compliance Officer   Since 2004   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 170 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.  

 

(1)  Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure.

(2)  Prior to 2005, Ms. Clemson served as Vice President of CEV and FEV since 1998, EMI, EVY and EVO since 2004 and EVP since 2000, Mr. MacIntosh served as Vice President of MMV and EVJ since 1998 and Ms. Campbell served as Assistant Treasurer of the Trusts since 1998.

(A)  APS Trustee


81



This Page Intentionally Left Blank



This Page Intentionally Left Blank



This Page Intentionally Left Blank




Investment Adviser and Administrator of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
Eaton Vance Management

The Eaton Vance Building
255 State Street
Boston, MA 02109

Custodian
Investors Bank & Trust Company

200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116

Transfer Agent and Dividend Disbursing Agent
PFPC Inc.

P.O. Box 43027
Providence, RI 02940-3027
(800) 331-1710

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP

200 Berkley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022

Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trusts
The Eaton Vance Building
255 State Street
Boston, MA 02109



147-1/07  CE-MUNISRC




Item 2. Code of Ethics

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.  The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, Samuel L. Hayes, III and Norton H. Reamer, each an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial experts.  Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp (specialty financial company). Previously he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (“UAM”) (a holding company owning institutional investment management firms).  Mr. Hayes is the Jacob H. Schiff Professor of Investment Banking Emeritus of the Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.  Mr. Reamer is the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Asset Management Finance Corp. (a specialty finance company serving the investment management industry) and is President of Unicorn Corporation (an investment and financial advisory services company).  Formerly, Mr. Reamer was Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Hellman, Jordan Management Co., Inc. (an investment management company) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Corporation (an investment banking firm), Chairman of the Board of UAM and Chairman, President and Director of the UAM Funds (mutual funds).

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

(a) –(d)

The following table presents the aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2006 by the registrant’s principal accountant for professional services rendered for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by the principal accountant during those periods.

Fiscal Years Ended

 

11/30/2005

 

11/30/2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit Fees

 

$

21,485

 

$

22,340

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit-Related Fees(1)

 

$

3,640

 

$

3,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees(2)

 

$

6,405

 

$

6,650

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees(3)

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

31,530

 

$

32,665

 

 


(1)                                  Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees and specifically include fees for the performance of certain agreed-upon procedures relating to the registrant’s auction preferred shares

(2)                                  Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation.

(3)                                  All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services.




(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”).  The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities.  As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees.  Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.

The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually.  The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.

(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.

(f) Not applicable.

(g) Thefollowing table presents (i) theaggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the registrant by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant’s fiscal years ended November 30, 2005 and November 30, 2006; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by the registrant’s principal accountant for the same time periods.

Fiscal Years Ended

 

11/30/2005

 

11/30/2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registrant

 

$

10,045

 

$

10,325

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eaton Vance(1)

 

$

184,983

 

$

66,100

 

 


(1)Certain subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp. provide ongoing services to the registrant

(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.




Item 5.  Audit Committee of Listed registrants

The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Norton H. Reamer (Chair), Samuel L. Hayes, III, William H. Park, Lynn A. Stout and Ralph E. Verni are the members of the registrant’s audit committee.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments

Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the “Fund Policy”), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Fund’s investment adviser and adopted the investment adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures (the “Policies”) which are described below.  The Trustees will review the Fund’s proxy voting records from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year.  In the event that a conflict of interest arises between the Fund’s shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such conflict until it consults with the Board’s Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund Policy.  The Board’s Special Committee will instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate course of action.

The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a company’s management to its shareholders and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy voting service (“Agent”), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and recordkeeping and disclosure services.  The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through the Agent.  The Agent is required to vote all proxies and/or refer then back to the investment adviser pursuant to the Policies.  It is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Agent.  The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating to mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination, liquidation and mergers contained in mutual fund proxies.  The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible transactions, except in the case of closed-end management investment companies.  The investment adviser generally supports management on social and environmental proposals.  The investment adviser may abstain from voting from time to time where it determines that the costs associated with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from exercising the right to vote or the economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.




In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of interest between the Fund’s shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and prospective corporate clients.  The investment adviser’s personnel responsible for reviewing and voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from a company included on that list to the personal of the investment adviser identified in the Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material conflict of interests exists.  If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.

Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Portfolio Management

Thomas M. Metzold is responsible for the overall and day-to-day management of the Trust’s investments.  Mr. Metzold has been an Eaton Vance portfolio manager since 1991 and is a Vice President of EVM and BMR.  This information is provided as of the date of filing of this report.

The following tables show, as of each Fund’s most recent fiscal year end, the number of accounts each portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets in the accounts managed within each category.  The table also shows the number of accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, if any, and the total assets in those accounts.

 

Number
of All
Accounts

 

Total Assets of
All Accounts*

 

Number of
Accounts
Paying a
Performance Fee

 

Total Assets of
Accounts Paying a
Performance Fee*

 

Thomas M. Metzold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Registered Investment Companies

 

11

 

$

7,127.9

 

0

 

$

0

 

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

 

0

 

$

0

 

0

 

$

0

 

Other Accounts

 

0

 

$

0

 

0

 

$

0

 

 


*In millions of dollars. For registered investment companies, assets represent net assets of all open-end investment companies and gross assets of all closed-end investment companies.

The following table shows the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by each portfolio manager as of the Fund’s most recent fiscal year end.

Portfolio Manager

 

Dollar Range of
Equity Securities
Owned in the Fund

 

Thomas M. Metzold

 

None

 

 




Potential for Conflicts of Interest.  The portfolio manager manages multiple investment portfolios.  Conflicts of interest may arise between a portfolio manager’s management of the Fund and his or her management of these other investment portfolios. Potential areas of conflict may include allocation of a portfolio manager’s time, investment opportunities and trades among investment portfolios, including the Fund, personal securities transactions and use of Fund portfolio holdings information.   In addition, some investment portfolios may compensate the investment adviser or sub-adviser based on the performance of the securities held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for a portfolio manager in the allocation of management time and investment opportunities.  EVM has adopted policies and procedures that it believes are reasonably designed to address these conflicts.  There is no guarantee that such policies and procedures will be effective or that all potential conflicts will be anticipated.

Portfolio Manager Compensation Structure

Compensation of EVM’s portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus, and (3) annual stock-based compensation consisting of options to purchase shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock and/or restricted shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock. EVM’s investment professionals also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to all EVM’s employees. Compensation of EVM’s investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect at or shortly after the October 31st fiscal year end of EVC.

Method to Determine Compensation. EVM compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the scale and complexity of their portfolio responsibilities and the total return performance of managed funds and accounts versus appropriate peer groups or benchmarks. Performance is normally based on periods ending on the September 30th preceding fiscal year end. Fund performance is evaluated primarily versus peer groups of funds as determined by Lipper Inc. and/or Morningstar, Inc. In evaluating the performance of a fund and its manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer and shorter periods. For funds that are tax-managed or otherwise have an objective of after-tax returns, performance is measured net of taxes. For other funds, performance is evaluated on a pre-tax basis. In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to risk-adjusted performance. For funds with an investment objective other than total return (such as current income), consideration will also be given to the fund’s success in achieving its objective. For managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis, based on averages or weighted averages among managed funds and accounts. Funds and accounts that have performance-based advisory fees are not accorded disproportionate weightings in measuring aggregate portfolio manager performance.

The compensation of portfolio managers with other job responsibilities (such as heading an investment group or providing analytical support to other portfolios) will include consideration of the scope of such responsibilities and the managers’ performance in meeting them.




EVM seeks to compensate portfolio managers commensurate with their responsibilities and performance, and competitive with other firms within the investment management industry. EVM participates in investment-industry compensation surveys and utilizes survey data as a factor in determining salary, bonus and stock-based compensation levels for portfolio managers and other investment professionals. Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of EVM and its parent company. The overall annual cash bonus pool is based on a substantially fixed percentage of pre-bonus operating income. While the salaries of EVM’s portfolio managers are comparatively fixed, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors as described herein. For a high performing portfolio manager, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may represent a substantial portion of total compensation.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

No such purchases this filing.

Item 10.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No material Changes.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of January 22, 2007, which is a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR, that, as of such date, the design and operation of such procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.




Such officers had previously become aware of a control deficiency relating to the operating effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2006, related to the review and analysis of the relevant terms and conditions of certain transfers of securities to determine whether the transfers  qualified for sale accounting under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,”  and had reevaluated disclosure controls and procedures and concluded that they were not effective at that date.  The Fund determined that this control deficiency represented a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting at November 30, 2006 as more fully described below in Item 11b.  Subsequent to November 30, 2006, but prior to the evaluation of the design and operation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures at January 22, 2007, the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were modified, as described in Item 11(b) below, to enhance the review and analysis of the relevant terms and conditions of transfers of securities in connection with inverse floating rate obligations in light of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140.

(b) Management of the Funds is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of controls.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“generally accepted accounting principles”).  Such internal control includes policies and procedures that provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of a Fund’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.




A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.  A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the Fund’s ability to initiate, authorize, record, process or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the Fund’s annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.  A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

Management has identified the following control deficiency that was determined to be a material weakness, as defined above, in the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting.  The Funds’ controls related to the review and analysis of the relevant terms and conditions of certain transfers of securities were not operating effectively to appropriately determine whether the transfers qualified for sale accounting under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.”  As a result of this weakness, the financial highlights for each of four years in the period ended November 30, 2005 were restated in order to appropriately account for such transfers of securities as secured borrowings and report the related interest income and expense.  In response to the identified control deficiency, management implemented certain modifications to its controls and control procedures that are designed to enhance their operating effectiveness.  There were no changes in registrant’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended November 30, 2006.  However, see above for discussion of a control deficiency identified for the year ended November 30, 2006, and for remedial actions.

Item 12. Exhibits

(a)(1)

Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2).

(a)(2)(i)

Treasurer’s Section 302 certification.

(a)(2)(ii)

President’s Section 302 certification.

(b)

Combined Section 906 certification.

 




Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson

 

 

Cynthia J. Clemson

 

 

President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

January 24, 2007

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:

/s/ Barbara E. Campbell

 

 

Barbara E. Campbell

 

 

Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

January 24, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson

 

 

Cynthia J. Clemson

 

 

President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

January 24, 2007