e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 1-14771
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-2962824
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10 M Commerce Way, Woburn, MA 01801
(Address of principal executive offices)
(781) 994-4800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o |
|
Accelerated filer
o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
As of April 30, 2008, 13,987,528 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,835 |
|
|
$ |
7,080 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
Net investment in leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due in installments |
|
|
108,864 |
|
|
|
92,314 |
|
Estimated residual value |
|
|
11,567 |
|
|
|
9,814 |
|
Initial direct costs |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance lease payments and deposits |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
Unearned income |
|
|
(40,834 |
) |
|
|
(35,369 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(7,771 |
) |
|
|
(5,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in leases |
|
|
72,309 |
|
|
|
61,547 |
|
Investment in service contracts, net |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Investment in rental contracts, net |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
80,331 |
|
|
$ |
70,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
14,508 |
|
|
$ |
6,531 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
Capital lease obligation |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
17,795 |
|
|
|
10,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;
13,986,278 and 13,960,778 shares issued at March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
45,562 |
|
|
|
45,412 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
16,834 |
|
|
|
15,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
62,536 |
|
|
|
60,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
80,331 |
|
|
$ |
70,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Unaudited |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
2,033 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Service fees and other |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
9,248 |
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
Interest |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
6,978 |
|
|
|
5,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
13,974,904 |
|
|
|
13,860,534 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,160,139 |
|
|
|
14,072,449 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Unaudited |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from customers |
|
$ |
13,163 |
|
|
$ |
9,547 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(4,022 |
) |
|
|
(3,537 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Interest received |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,925 |
|
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in lease and rental contracts |
|
|
(17,177 |
) |
|
|
(10,138 |
) |
Investment in direct costs |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
Investment in property and equipment |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(17,553 |
) |
|
|
(10,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured debt |
|
|
18,648 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Repayment of secured debt |
|
|
(10,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from capital lease obligation |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
7,383 |
|
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,245 |
) |
|
|
(4,767 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
7,080 |
|
|
|
28,737 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
5,835 |
|
|
$ |
23,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned income, net of initial direct costs |
|
|
(4,939 |
) |
|
|
(2,033 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
Recovery of equipment cost and residual value |
|
|
8,088 |
|
|
|
4,232 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
Non-cash interest expense (amortization of debt discount) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
597 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
8,925 |
|
|
$ |
6,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value of stock issued for compensation |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
A. Nature of Business
MicroFinancial Incorporated (referred to as Microfinancial, we, us or our) operates
primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TimePayment Corp. and Leasecomm Corporation.
TimePayment is a specialized commercial finance company that leases and rents microticket
equipment and provides other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment during
2007 was approximately $6,500 while Leasecomm historically financed contracts of approximately
$1,900. We primarily source our originations through a nationwide network of independent equipment
vendors, sales organizations and other dealer-based origination networks. We fund our operations
through cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our line of credit.
B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements.
Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required
for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The results for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
full year ending December 31, 2008.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the microticket market and the individual size of
each transaction, we do not have a formal credit review committee to review individual
transactions. Rather, we developed a sophisticated, risk-adjusted pricing model and have automated
the credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with the proper
risk-adjusted pricing model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided we have
priced appropriately for the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of credits, we
experience a relatively high level of delinquency and write-offs in our portfolio. We periodically
review the credit scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system is making
appropriate credit decisions. Given the nature of the microticket market and the individual size
of each transaction, we do not evaluate transactions individually for the purpose of developing and
determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Contracts in our portfolio are not
re-graded subsequent to the initial extension of credit and the allowance is not allocated to
specific contracts. Rather, we view the contracts as having common characteristics and maintain a
general allowance against our entire portfolio utilizing historical collection statistics and an
assessment of current credit risk in the portfolio as the basis for the amount.
We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an
appropriate allowance for credit losses for our microticket transactions. We estimate the
likelihood of credit losses net of recoveries in the portfolio at each reporting period based upon
a combination of the lessees bureau reported credit score at lease inception and the current
delinquency status of the account. In addition to these elements, we also consider other relevant
factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool
analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant
factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. This combination of historical
experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current
factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. We
take charge-offs against our receivables when such receivables are deemed uncollectible which is
6
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
generally at 360 days past due where no contact has been made with the lessee for 12 months.
Historically, the typical monthly payment under our microticket leases has been small and as a
result, our experience is that lessees will pay past due amounts later in the process because of
the small amount necessary to bring an account current.
A summary of the activity in our allowance for credit losses for the three months ended March
31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(2,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs, net of recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net
income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that have an antidilutive effect on
net income per common share. At March 31, 2007, 1,115,188 options and 100,000 warrants were
excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect was
antidilutive. At March 31, 2008, 1,292,067 options were excluded from the computation of diluted
net income per share because their effect was antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
13,974,904 |
|
|
|
13,860,534 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock
options, warrants and restricted stock |
|
|
185,235 |
|
|
|
211,915 |
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computation of net income
per common share diluted |
|
|
14,160,139 |
|
|
|
14,072,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Employee Compensation
Under our 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, we reserved 4,120,380 shares of common stock for
issuance. In February 2008, we granted 10 year options to our executive officers to purchase
176,879 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.85 per share. The fair value of these
awards was $1.78 per share. The options were valued at the date of grant using the following assumptions:
expected life in years of 6.25, annualized
volatility of 41.30%, expected dividend yield of 3.70% and a riskfree interest rate of 2.66%.
The options vest over five years beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date. In
February 2007, we granted ten year options to our executive officers to purchase 40,188 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $5.77 per share. The fair value of these awards
7
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
was $2.08 per
share. The options were valued at the date of grant using the following assumptions: expected life
in years of 7, annualized volatility of 43.62%, expected dividend yield of 3.47%, and a risk-free
interest rate of 4.62%. The options vest on the fifth anniversary of their grant date. No options
were exercised or cancelled during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
On February 4, 2004, a new non-employee director was granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock
with a fair value of $3.17 per share. On August 15, 2006, a second new non-employee director was
granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $3.35 per share. In each case, the
restricted stock vested 20% upon grant and vests 5% on the first day of each quarter after the
grant date. As vesting occurs, compensation expense is recognized. As of March 31, 2008, 37,500
shares were fully vested between these two directors.
Information relating to our outstanding stock options at March 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
$12.31 |
|
|
359,391 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
|
|
359,391 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
13.54 |
|
|
40,609 |
|
|
|
.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.54 |
|
|
|
40,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.78 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.78 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.10 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.10 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
167,500 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
167,500 |
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
5.77 |
|
|
40,188 |
|
|
|
8.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
176,879 |
|
|
|
9.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,459,567 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
$ |
610,000 |
|
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
|
1,242,500 |
|
|
$ |
610,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the total share based employee
compensation cost recognized was $22,000 and $392,000, respectively.
For share-based liability awards, we recognize compensation cost equal to the greater of (a)
the grant date fair value or (b) the fair value of the modified liability when it is settled. As a
result of modifications to certain awards in 2005, some awards made under the plan had been
classified as share-based liability awards. As of March 31, 2007, our share-based liability awards
were fully vested. In April 2007, we modified certain exercise features of all our outstanding
share-based liability awards by restricting the settlement methods available to the option holders
and converted these awards to equity awards. As a result of our modifications, our cumulative
share-based compensation liability of $932,000 was reclassified in April 2007 to additional paid-in
capital.
We estimate the fair value of our stock options using a Black-Scholes valuation model,
consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123(R), SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 and our prior
period pro forma disclosures as prescribed by SFAS 123. Key input assumptions used to estimate the
fair value of stock options include the expected option term, volatility of the stock, the
risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield.
The fair values as of March 31, 2007, of the outstanding options classified as liability
instruments under SFAS 123(R) were estimated using expected lives of one to three years, annualized
volatility of 43%, an expected dividend yield of 3.86% and a risk free interest rate of 4.58%.
The expected life represents the average period of time that the options are expected to be
outstanding given consideration to vesting schedules; annualized volatility is based on historical
volatilities of our common stock; dividend yield represents the current dividend yield expressed as
a constant percentage of our stock price and the risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect on the measurement date for periods corresponding
8
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
to the expected life of the
option. At each subsequent reporting date, we are required to remeasure the fair value of our
share-based liability awards.
C. Notes Payable
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a new three-year $30 million line of credit with Sovereign
Bank based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. Outstanding borrowings bear interest at
Prime or at a London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.75% and are collateralized by eligible
lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets. Under the terms of the
facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed
at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan. At March 31, 2008 all of our loans
were Prime Rate Loans. The prime rate at March 31, 2008 was 5.25%. The amount available on our
line of credit at March 31, 2008 was $15,492,000. The line of credit has financial covenants that
we must comply with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of March 31, 2008, we were
in compliance with all covenants under the line of credit.
Prior to obtaining the Sovereign line of credit, on September 29, 2004, we entered into a
three-year senior secured revolving line of credit with CIT Commercial Services, a unit of CIT
Group (CIT), under which we could borrow a maximum of $30 million based upon qualified lease
receivables. Outstanding borrowings bore interest at prime plus 1.5% or at the 90-day LIBOR plus
4.0%. On July 20, 2007, by mutual agreement between CIT and us, we paid off and terminated the CIT
line of credit without penalty.
D. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
We are subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. At this time,
it is not possible to estimate the ultimate loss or gain, if any, related to these lawsuits, nor if
any such loss will have a material adverse effect on our results of operation or financial
position.
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and, as a result, we have a pipeline of
applications that have been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to
lend does not become binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been
completed, including the receipt of the lease, supporting documentation and verification with the
lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is verified, we have no outstanding commitments to
lend.
E. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value. This statement establishes a fair value hierarchy about the
assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about
risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. The adoption of SFAS No.
157 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In February 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 159, including an amendment of FASB statement No. 115,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This statement provides
entities with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with the
objective to reduce both the complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility
in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS permits fair
value to be used for both the initial and subsequent measurements on a contract-by-contract
election, with changes in fair value to be recognized in earning as those changes occur. SFAS 159
also revises provisions of SFAS 115 that apply to available-for-sale and trading securities.
Statement 159 is effective as of the beginning of fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2007.
We have adopted the provisions under this statement but have chosen not to apply the provisions to
any assets or liabilities.
9
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
In March 2008, The FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB statement No. 133. This statement applies to all
derivative instruments and related hedge items accounted for under SFAS No. 133. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging
activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity
uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted
for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedge items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.
Management is currently evaluating SFAS No. 161 to determine if it will have a material impact on
the Companys future financial statements.
10
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following information should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Forward-Looking Information
Statements in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In
addition, words such as believes anticipates expects and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. We caution that a number of important factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by
us or on our behalf. Such statements contain a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not
limited to: our need for financing in order to originate leases and contracts; our dependence on
point-of-sale authorization systems and expansion into new markets; our significant capital
requirements; risks associated with economic downturns; higher interest rates; intense competition;
changes in our regulatory environment; the availability of qualified personnel, and risks
associated with acquisitions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our view only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to
publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We
cannot assure that we will be able to anticipate or respond timely to changes which could adversely
affect our operating results. Results of operations in any past period should not be considered
indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Fluctuations in operating results may
result in fluctuations in the price of our common stock. Statements relating to past dividend
payments or our current dividend policy should not be construed as a guarantee that any future
dividends will be paid. For a more complete description of the prominent risks and uncertainties
inherent in our business, see the risk factors included in our most recent Annual Report on Form
10-K and other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a specialized commercial finance company that provides microticket equipment leasing
and other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment during 2007 was
approximately $6,500 while Leasecomm historically financed contracts averaging approximately
$1,900. Our portfolio consists of point-of-sale (POS) authorization systems and other small
business equipment leased or rented primarily to small commercial enterprises.
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a new three-year $30 million line of credit with Sovereign
Bank based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. Outstanding borrowings bear interest at
Prime or at LIBOR plus 2.75% and are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security
interest in all of our other assets. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans,
unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically coverts
to a Prime Rate Loan.
In a typical lease transaction, we originate a lease through our nationwide network of
equipment vendors, independent sales organizations and brokers. Upon our approval of a lease
application and verification that the lessee has received the equipment and signed the lease, we
pay the dealer for the cost of the equipment, plus the dealers profit margin. In a typical
transaction for the acquisition of service contracts, a homeowner purchases a security system and
simultaneously signs a contract with the dealer for the monitoring of that system for a monthly
fee. Upon approval of the monitoring application and verification with the homeowner that the
system is installed, we purchase the right to the payment stream under that monitoring contract at
a negotiated multiple of the monthly payments from the dealer.
Substantially all leases originated or acquired by us are non-cancelable. During the term of
the lease, we are scheduled to receive payments sufficient to cover our borrowing costs, the cost
of the underlying equipment and
11
provide us with an appropriate profit. We enhance the profitability of our leases and
contracts by charging late fees, prepayment penalties, loss and damage waiver fees and other
service fees, when applicable. Collection fees are imposed based on our estimate of the costs of
collection. We only impose late fees on the first four months of late payments and are prohibited
from imposing compound late fees or from assessing late fees as a percentage of the total
outstanding late payments including outstanding late fees. The loss and damage waiver fees are
charged if a customer fails to provide proof of insurance and are reasonably related to the cost of
replacing the lost or damaged equipment or product. The initial non-cancelable term of the lease is
equal to or less than the equipments estimated economic life and often provides us with additional
revenues based on the residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease. Initial terms of
the leases in our portfolio generally range from 12 to 60 months, with an average initial term of
47 months as of December 31, 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note B to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and in Note B to the
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain accounting policies
are particularly important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of
operations. These policies require the application of significant judgment by us and as a result,
are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
the related disclosures. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, terms of
existing contracts, observance of trends in the industry, information obtained from dealers and
other sources, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable and appropriate
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies, including revenue recognition, maintaining the allowance for
credit losses, determining provisions for income taxes, and accounting for share-based compensation
are each discussed in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have reviewed and
determined that those policies remain our critical accounting policies and we did not make any
changes in those policies during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Results of Operations Three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2007
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
|
143.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,033 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
|
|
3,924 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
|
361 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(81.4 |
) |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
9,248 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
$ |
7,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the
gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs
incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross
lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned
lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the
interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the
leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.
Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $9.2 million, an increase of
$1.8 million, or 23.8%, from the three months ended March 31, 2007. The overall increase was due
to an increase of $2.9 million in income on financing leases and a $407,000 increase in fees and
other income partially offset by a decrease of $1.1
12
million in rental income, a decrease of $263,000 in interest income and a decrease of $102,000
in income on service contacts. The decline in rental income is primarily explained by attrition
rates in the two sources of rental income. One source is rental agreements that are originated and
cancellable on a monthly basis. The other is the rental income that is recognized at the end of
the lease term when a lessee chooses to keep the equipment and rents it on a monthly basis. Since
we resumed funding in 2004 following an interruption in our funding
sources, we have not originated any new rental contracts, and few lease
contracts have been eligible to convert to rental arrangements since they have not reached the end
of term. The decrease in interest income is a direct result of the decrease in cash and cash
equivalents on hand. In addition, we have not funded any new service contracts since we resumed
funding in 2004; therefore this segment of revenue is expected to continually decline.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
3,239 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
3,568 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.8 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining corporate
functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include commissions, service fees and
other marketing costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses
decreased by $329,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The decrease was primarily driven by reductions in compensation expense of
$218,000, amortization of debt closing costs of $76,000 and legal and professional fees of $69,000.
The $218,000 decrease of compensation expenses includes a $370,000 decrease in stock-based
compensation expense, which offset higher compensation costs resulting from headcount increases
over the comparable quarter in 2007.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
3,357 |
|
|
|
120.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses increased by $1.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007, while net
charge-offs decreased by 32.4% to $1.3 million. The provision was based on providing a general
allowance on leases funded during the period and our analysis of actual and expected losses in our
portfolio. The 90-day delinquent lease payments receivable on an exposure basis increased by 48.8%
to $13.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to $9.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 which required an incremental reserve of $1.8 million. Dealer funding
was $17.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to $10.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
$ |
59 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(70.6 |
) |
|
|
272 |
|
Amortization service contracts |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(53.0 |
) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
(50.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful
13
lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result of the renewal provisions of our
lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may elect to continue to rent the
leased equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is recorded at its residual value
and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the estimated life of a previously
leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical experience. In the event the contract
terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the remaining net book value is expensed.
We also offer a rental agreement, which allows the customer, assuming the contract is current
and no event of default exists, to terminate the contract at any time by returning the equipment
and providing us with 30 days notice. These assets are recorded at cost and depreciated over an
estimated life of 36 months. This term is based upon our historical experience. In the event that
the contract terminates prior to the end of the 36 month period, the remaining net book value is
expensed.
Service contracts are recorded at cost and amortized over their estimated life of 84 months.
In a typical service contract acquisition, a homeowner will purchase a home security system and
simultaneously sign a contract with the security dealer for monthly monitoring of the system. The
security dealer will then sell the rights to that monthly payment to us. We perform all of the
processing, billing, collection and administrative work on the service contract. The estimated
life is based upon the expected life of such contracts in the security monitoring industry and our
historical experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 84 month term,
the remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts decreased by $192,000 and amortization of service
contracts decreased by $70,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The decreases in depreciation and amortization are due to the decrease
in the overall size of our portfolio of rental equipment and service contracts as well as the fact
that a greater percentage of the assets are fully depreciated. Depreciation and amortization of
property and equipment increased by $29,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared
to the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest |
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
|
1,069.2 |
% |
|
$ |
13 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our senior credit facility. Interest expense increased by
$139,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months ended March 31,
2007. This increase resulted primarily from our increased level of borrowings. At March 31, 2008,
we had notes payable of $14,508,000 compared to notes payable of $24,000 at March 31, 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
$ |
687 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
31.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered
from future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is
more likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes
increased by $26,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2007. This increase resulted primarily from the $366,000 increase in pre-tax
income partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax
14
rate from 36.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to 31.4% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The decrease in the overall effective tax rate is primarily related to the release
of certain state reserves related to the expiration of statutes of limitation.
As of December 31, 2007, we had a liability of $450,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $170,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax
matters. As of March 31, 2008 we had a liability of $345,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $145,000 for accrued interest and penalties. Of these amounts, approximately $320,000
would impact our effective tax rate after a $170,000 federal tax benefit for state income taxes.
The decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits and interest is due to the release of $140,000 of
reserves related to expiration of state statutes of limitations offset by $10,000 in additional
accrued expense. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may
change significantly within the next 12 months; however at this time we are unable to estimate the
change.
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2004 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2002.
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $17.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of
$7.3 million or 72.3%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investment in service contracts and investment in
rental contracts increased from $107.5 million at December 31, 2007 to $125.2 million at March 31,
2008. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $2.7 million, or 43.5%, to $8.9
million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the three months ended March
31, 2007.
Exposure to Credit Losses
The amounts in the table below represent the balance of delinquent receivables on an exposure
basis for all leases, rental contracts, and service contracts in our portfolio. An exposure basis
aging classifies the entire receivable based on the invoice that is the most delinquent. For
example, in the case of a rental or service contract, if a receivable is 90 days past due, all
amounts billed and unpaid are placed in the over 90 days past due category. In the case of lease
receivables, where the minimum contractual obligation of the lessee is booked as a receivable at
the inception of the lease, if a receivable is 90 days past due, the entire receivable, including
all amounts billed and unpaid as well as the minimum contractual obligation yet to be billed, will
be placed in the over 90 days past due category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Current |
|
$ |
86,830 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
% |
|
$ |
75,528 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
% |
31-60 days past due |
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
61-90 days past due |
|
|
4,053 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Over 90 days past due |
|
|
13,385 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
9,205 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross receivables due in installments |
|
$ |
108,864 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
92,314 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our lease and finance business is capital-intensive and requires access to substantial
short-term and long-term credit to fund lease originations. Since inception, we have funded our
operations primarily through borrowings under our credit facilities, on-balance sheet
securitizations, the issuance of subordinated debt, free cash flow and our initial public offering
completed in February 1999. We will continue to require significant additional capital to maintain
and expand our funding of leases and contracts, as well as to fund any future acquisitions of
leasing companies or portfolios. In the near term, we expect to finance our business utilizing the
cash on hand and our line
15
of credit which matures in August 2010. Additionally, our uses of cash include the payment of
interest and principal on borrowings, selling, general and administrative expenses, income taxes
and capital expenditures.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, our primary sources of liquidity were cash
provided by operating activities and borrowings on our line of credit. We generated cash flow from
operations of $8.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to $6.2 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2007. At March 31, 2008, we had approximately $14,508,000
outstanding under our revolving credit facility and had available borrowing capacity of
approximately $15,492,000 as described below.
We used net cash in investing activities of $17.6 million during the three months ended March
31, 2008 and $10.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Investing activities
primarily relate to the origination of leases and the increase in cash used is consistent with our
focused and targeted sales and marketing effort.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $7.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and net cash used in financing activities was $672,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2007. Financing activities primarily consist of the borrowings and repayments of notes payable
and dividend payments.
We believe that cash flows from our existing portfolio, cash on hand, available borrowings on
our credit facility, and the completion of additional financing as required will be sufficient to
support our operations and lease origination activity in the near term. Given the tight credit
conditions in the current marketplace, it may be difficult for us to obtain additional low
cost capital. Our inability to obtain additional financing would significantly impact our ability
to grow the business.
Borrowings
We utilize our credit facilities to fund the origination and acquisition of leases that
satisfy the eligibility requirements established pursuant to the facility. Borrowings outstanding
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Unused |
|
|
Facility |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Unused |
|
|
Facility |
|
(dollars in 000) |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Capacity |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Capacity |
|
|
Amount |
|
Revolving credit
facility
(1) |
|
$ |
14,508 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
$ |
15,492 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,531 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
$ |
23,469 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,492 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,469 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The unused capacity is subject to the borrowing base formula. |
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a new three-year $30 million line of credit with Sovereign
Bank based on qualified lease receivables. Outstanding borrowings bear interest at prime or at
LIBOR plus 2.75% and are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all
of our other assets. As of March 31, 2008 the qualified lease receivables eligible under the
borrowing base exceeded the $30 million line of credit. The line of credit has financial covenants
that we must comply with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of March 31, 2008, we
were in compliance with all covenants under the line of credit. At March 31, 2008 all of our loans
were Prime Rate Loans. The prime rate at March 31, 2008 was 5.25%.
Prior to entering into the Sovereign facility, we had a three-year senior secured revolving
line of credit with CIT Commercial Services, a unit of CIT Group (CIT), where we could borrow a
maximum of $30 million based upon qualified lease receivables. Outstanding borrowings bore interest
at prime plus 1.5% for prime rate loans or at the 90-day London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus
4.0% for LIBOR loans. On July 20, 2007, by mutual agreement between CIT and us, we paid off and
terminated the CIT line of credit without penalty, and CIT released its security interests and
liens.
16
Dividends
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 we did not declare a dividend. During the three
months ended March 31, 2007 we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable to shareholders of record on
March 30, 2007. During the three months ended December 31, 2007 we declared a dividend of $0.05
payable on January 15, 2008 to shareholders of record on December 31, 2007.
On April 25, 2008 we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on May 15, 2008 to shareholders of
record on May 5, 2008.
Future dividend payments are subject to ongoing review and evaluation by our Board of
Directors. The decision as to the amount and timing of future dividends, if any, will be made in
light of our financial condition, capital requirements and growth plans, as well as our external
financing arrangements and any other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. We can give
no assurance as to the amount and timing of future dividends.
Contractual Obligations and Lease Commitments
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into various agreements, such as debt and operating lease agreements that
require future payments. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 we had borrowed $18.6 million
against our lines of credit and had repaid $10.6 million. The $14.5 million of outstanding
borrowings as of March 31, 2008 will be repaid by the daily application of TimePayment receipts to
our outstanding balance. Our future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases
are $237,000 annually for the years 2008 through 2010.
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and have a pipeline of applications that have
been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become
binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including but
not limited to the receipt of a complete and accurate lease document, all required supporting
information and successful verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is
successfully verified, we have no firm outstanding commitments to lend.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note E of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.
17
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The following discussion about our risk management activities includes forward-looking
statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. In the normal course of
operations, we also face risks
that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and
legal risk, and are not represented in the analysis that follows.
The implicit yield on all of our leases and contracts is on a fixed interest rate basis due to
the leases and contracts having scheduled payments that are fixed at the time of origination. When
we originate or acquire leases or contracts, we base our pricing in part on the spread we expect to
achieve between the implicit yield on each lease or contract and the effective interest rate we
expect to incur in financing such lease or contract through our credit facility. Increases in
interest rates during the term of each lease or contract could narrow or eliminate the spread, or
result in a negative spread.
Given the relatively short average life of our leases and contracts, our goal is to maintain a
blend of fixed and variable interest rate obligations which limits our interest rate risk. As of
March 31, 2008, we have repaid all of our fixed-rate debt and have $14.5 million of outstanding
variable interest rate obligations under our Sovereign line of credit.
Our Sovereign line of credit bears interest at rates which fluctuate with changes in the prime
rate or the LIBOR; therefore, our interest expense is sensitive to changes in market interest
rates. The effect of a 10% adverse change in market interest rates, sustained for one year, on our
interest expense would be immaterial.
We maintain an investment portfolio in accordance with our investment policy guidelines. The
primary objectives of the investment guidelines are to preserve capital, maintain sufficient
liquidity to meet our operating needs, and to maximize return. We minimize investment risk by
limiting the amount invested in any single security and by focusing on conservative investment
choices with short terms and high credit quality standards. We do not use derivative financial
instruments or invest for speculative trading purposes
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures: As of the end of the period covered by this report, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and
procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
Internal
control over financial reporting: During the first quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, no changes were made in
our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
18
Part II Other Information
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in certain legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted, we do not believe the ultimate
resolution of any existing matters will have a material effect on our results of operations or
financial position.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
For a discussion of the material risks that we face relating to our business, financial performance
and industry, as well as other risks that an investor in our common stock may face, see the factors
discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this
report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us
or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition or operating results.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits index
|
10.1* |
|
Compensatory Arrangements with Directors |
|
|
31.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MicroFinancial Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Richard F. Latour
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ James R. Jackson Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
20