OMB APPROVAL | ||
OMB Number: 3235-0058
|
||
Expires: April 30, 2009 |
||
Estimated average burden
hours per response ... 2.50 |
||
SEC FILE NUMBER | ||
CUSIP NUMBER | ||
(Check one): | þ Form 10-K o Form 20-F o Form 11-K o Form 10-Q o Form 10-D o Form N-SAR o Form N-CSR | |||||
For Period Ended: | December 31, 2007 | |||||
o Transition Report on Form 10-K | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form 20-F | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form 11-K | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form 10-Q | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form N-SAR | ||||||
For the Transition Period Ended: | ||||||
þ |
|||||
(a) | The reason described in reasonable detail in Part III of this form could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense; | ||||
(b) | The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition report on Form 10-K, Form 20-F, Form 11-K, Form N-SAR or Form N-CSR, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifteenth calendar day following the prescribed due date; or the subject quarterly report or transition report on Form 10-Q or subject distribution report on Form 10-D, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date; and | ||||
(c) | The accountants statement or other exhibit required by Rule 12b-25(c) has been attached if applicable. |
(1) | Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to this notification |
Richard J. Nagel, Jr. | (978) | 470-2900 | ||
(Name) |
(Area Code) | (Telephone Number) |
(2) | Have all other periodic reports required under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s) been filed? If answer is no, identify report(s). | |
Yes þ No o | ||
(3) | Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof? | |
Yes þ No o | ||
If so, attach an explanation of the anticipated change, both
narratively and quantitatively, and, if appropriate, state the
reasons why a reasonable estimate of the results cannot be made. |
||
Due to an additional investment in GWS in May 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for its investment in GWS from the cost method to the equity method of accounting. As a result, the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 have been retroactively restated to reflect the equity method of accounting, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. The following amounts have been restated in the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts): | ||
As Restated | As Previously Reported | |||||||
Other assets
|
$ | 5,691 | $ | 6,865 | ||||
Total assets
|
247,461 | 248,107 | ||||||
Retained earnings
|
133,405 | 134,579 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity
|
170,172 | 171,346 | ||||||
Other income (expense), net
|
5,092 | 4,092 | ||||||
Loss from equity method investee, net
|
321 | | ||||||
Net loss
|
(29,059 | ) | (29,738 | ) | ||||
Net loss per share basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.69 | ) | $ | (0.71 | ) |
2
VICOR CORPORATION |
||||||
Date
|
March 18, 2008 | By | /S/ RICHARD J. NAGEL, JR. | |||
Interim Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | ||||||
3