Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-9309
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
54-0852979 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6850 Versar Center
Springfield, Virginia
|
|
22151 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (703) 750-3000
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.
|
|
|
Class of Common Stock
|
|
Outstanding at October 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
$.01 par value
|
|
9,623,080 |
VERSAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
2
VERSAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,596 |
|
|
$ |
6,017 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
33,191 |
|
|
|
29,500 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Notes receivable, current |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
Income tax receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
41,226 |
|
|
|
41,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
3,826 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,758 |
|
|
|
5,758 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
53,033 |
|
|
$ |
53,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
11,376 |
|
|
$ |
10,022 |
|
Accrued salaries and vacation |
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
5,999 |
|
|
|
7,363 |
|
Notes payable, current |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
20,897 |
|
|
|
21,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
22,258 |
|
|
|
23,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares
authorized; 9,598,649 shares and 9,585,474 shares issued;
9,351,720 shares and 9,340,280 shares outstanding |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
28,956 |
|
|
|
28,806 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (246,929 and 245,194 shares, respectively) |
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss; foreign currency translation |
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
30,775 |
|
|
|
30,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
53,033 |
|
|
$ |
53,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VERSAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
GROSS REVENUE |
|
$ |
33,284 |
|
|
$ |
29,296 |
|
Purchased services and materials, at cost |
|
|
16,158 |
|
|
|
14,474 |
|
Direct costs of services and overhead |
|
|
13,393 |
|
|
|
11,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE BASIC |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDNG BASIC |
|
|
9,341 |
|
|
|
9,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING DILUTED |
|
|
9,356 |
|
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
VERSAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
VERSAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
Loss on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
Loss on life insurance policy cash surrender value |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
Share based compensation |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
(4,037 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid and other assets |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
847 |
|
Decrease (increase) in inventories |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
(1,835 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in accrued salaries and vacation |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
743 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other assets and liabilities |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
Payments to settle earn-out obligations |
|
|
(1,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premiums paid on life insurance policies |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Receipts on notes receivable |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
2,596 |
|
|
$ |
1,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
VERSAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Versar, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries (Versar or the Company) contained in this report are unaudited but reflect all
normal recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for the fair
presentation of the results of the interim periods reflected. All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) have been omitted
pursuant to applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Therefore, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2011. The results of operations for the three-month periods
reported herein are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year. The
fiscal year end balance sheet data included in this report was derived from audited financial
statements. The Companys fiscal year is based upon a 52 53 week calendar, ending on the Friday
nearest June 30. The three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010 each
included 13 weeks. Fiscal year 2012 will include 52 weeks and fiscal year 2011 included 53 weeks.
NOTE B BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Companys business is currently operated through four business segments as follows:
Program Management, Environmental Services (previously referred to as Compliance and Environmental
Programs), Professional Services, and National Security. These business segments were segregated
based on the nature of the work, business processes, customer base, and the business environment in
which each of the segments operates. Each business segment has discrete financial information that
is used by the Chief Executive Officer (the Companys Chief Operating Decision Maker) in allocating
resources.
The Program Management business segment manages large complex construction and
telecommunication projects. The Environmental Services business segment provides regulatory,
environmental consulting and remediation support to several federal government and municipal
agencies. The Professional Services business segment provides outsourced personnel to various
government agencies providing the Companys clients with cost-effective resources. The National Security
business segment provides unique solutions to the federal government including chemical,
biological, radiological, and nuclear testing and evaluation and personal protective solutions.
Presented below is summary operating information for the Company for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010. The summary results are presented to the
Companys operating income level since the Company evaluates and measures the performance of its
business segments based on gross revenue, gross profit, and operating income.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
GROSS REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Management |
|
$ |
17,004 |
|
|
$ |
12,100 |
|
Environmental Services |
|
|
5,872 |
|
|
|
8,340 |
|
Professional Services |
|
|
3,513 |
|
|
|
2,976 |
|
National Security |
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
5,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,284 |
|
|
$ |
29,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Management |
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
Environmental Services |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
Professional Services |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
National Security |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,733 |
|
|
$ |
2,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Gross Profit is computed as gross revenue less (1) purchased services and materials,
at cost and (2) direct costs of services and overhead. |
NOTE C NOTES RECEIVABLE
In 2009, the Company provided interim debt financing to General Power Green Energy, LLC
(GPC) to fund certain GPC project startup costs. The project involves the construction of a 15
megawatt co-generation plant that burns landfill gas in turbine engines equipped with a steam
generation unit. At September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011, the note had a principal balance of
$550,000 and carried an annual interest rate of 12%. The note is secured by the assets of GPC.
Accrued interest on the note was approximately $123,000 and $103,000 at September 30, 2011 and July
1, 2011, respectively. The note and accrued interest were due in full on May 5, 2011. GPCs
management has been consistently working with the Company in a good faith effort to take the
necessary steps to repay the loan. GPC has expressed their belief that they will repay the entire
outstanding balance in as timely a manner as possible. Accordingly, the Company believes that the
full amount is realizable, and therefore as of September 30, 2011 management does not believe that
a reserve against the loan is necessary. The Company will continue to monitor this situation in
order to determine whether a change in facts or circumstances arises that would require the
recording of a reserve. The principal and accrued interest balances are included in the notes
receivable line item in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets. Additionally, the Company
received a 20% ownership interest in GPC in connection with providing the loan to GPC. No value
was recorded by the Company for this 20% ownership interest as of September 30, 2011 and July 1,
2011, as the value was determined to be immaterial. Management will continue to assess this
valuation periodically. As no significant influence can be exerted by the Company over GPC the
Company accounts for this interest using the cost method of accounting.
In July 2009, the Company provided a $750,000 loan to Lemko Corporation (Lemko) for the
purchase of long lead telecommunication equipment for several upcoming projects. The note bears
interest at a rate of 12% and was originally due May 31, 2010. On May 28, 2010, the Company
extended the maturity date of the loan to September 30, 2011 and Lemko agreed to equal quarterly
payments commencing on December 31, 2010 of $187,500 plus accrued interest. At September 30, 2011
and July 1, 2011, the outstanding principal on the Lemko note was $187,500 and $375,000,
respectively. Accrued interest on this loan was $7,000 and $12,000 at September 30, 2011 and July
1, 2011, respectively. On October 31, 2011, the Company agreed to further extend the maturity date
of the loan to November 30, 2011, subject to the following conditions: (1) Lemko will pay an
extension fee of $7,000 payable at the end of the extension, along with the
outstanding principal and any unpaid interest, (2) Lemkos interest rate will increase to 15%
from 12%, effective as of October 1, 2011, and (3) interest is due at the end of each month, with
the month of October 2011 interest paid on Monday, October 31, 2011. The Company believes that the
full amount is realizable and therefore as of September 30, 2011 management does not believe that a
reserve against the loan is necessary. The Company will continue to monitor this situation in order
to determine whether a change in facts or circumstances arises that would require the recording of
a reserve. Additionally, in connection with the May 28, 2010 extension of the loan agreement, the
Company received warrants from Lemko to purchase 182,400 shares of Lemko common stock with an
exercise price of $4.11 per share. The warrants expire on June 30, 2015. The Company has
determined the fair value of the warrants is immaterial and has not assigned a value to them.
8
Because the Company only has two notes receivable within its portfolio of financing
receivables, the methodology for determining the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the
review of specific facts and circumstances of each receivable and the respective borrowers,
including the inherent risk of the borrowers being private closely-held companies. During its
analysis of collectability, management assesses factors such as existing economic conditions of the
borrowers and the borrowers industries, each borrowers repayment history related to the notes,
and other external factors that may impact the repayment of the notes by the borrower. A reserve
against the notes receivable will be recorded when there is a specific risk of collectability. A
write-off of a note receivable will occur when it has been deemed uncollectable, based on
managements judgment. Managements collectability analysis has concluded that no allowance for
doubtful accounts is appropriate for these notes receivable as of September 30, 2011 and July 1,
2011.
NOTE D DEBT
Line of Credit
At September 30, 2011, the Company had a line of credit facility with United Bank (the Bank)
that provided for advances up to $10 million based upon qualifying receivables. The line of credit
is subject to certain covenants related to the maintenance of financial ratios. These covenants
require a minimum tangible net worth of $17.5 million; a maximum total liabilities to tangible net
worth ratio not to exceed 2.5 to 1; and a minimum current ratio of at least 1.25 to 1. The Company
was in compliance with all covenants of the facility as of September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011.
Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at prime less 0.5% with a floor interest rate of
4.5% Failure to meet the covenant requirements gives the Bank the right to demand outstanding
amounts due under the line of credit, which may impact the Companys ability to finance its working
capital requirements. The Company had no borrowings under the line of credit facility during the
three month period ended September 30, 2011. The Company borrowed and repaid $27.2 million under
the line of credit during fiscal year 2011. The Company had no outstanding borrowings under this
line of credit at September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011.
At July 1, 2011 the line of credit had a maturity date of September 25, 2011, which was
subsequently extended to October 25, 2011. On October 25, 2011 the line of credit facility was
modified to further extend its maturity date to September 25, 2012 and increase available borrowing
capacity under the facility to $15 million.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had a letter of credit of approximately $0.5 million
outstanding under the line of credit facility which served as collateral for surety bond coverage
provided by the Companys insurance carrier against project construction work. The letter of
credit reduced the Companys availability on the line of credit. Availability under the line of
credit at September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011 was $9.5 million. On October 5, 2011 the Company
terminated the letter of credit.
Notes Payable
As part of the acquisition of Professional Protection Systems Limited (PPS) in January 2010,
the Company issued notes payable with principal amounts totaling $0.9 million, which are payable
quarterly over a two year period and bear interest of 5%. As part of the acquisition of ADVENT
Environmental, Inc. (ADVENT) in March 2010, the Company issued notes payable with principal
amounts totaling $1.75 million, which are payable quarterly over a two year period and bear
interest of 5%. At September 30, 2011, the outstanding principal balances of the notes payable
were approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million for PPS and ADVENT, respectively. At July 1,
2011, the outstanding principal balances of the notes payable were approximately $0.4 million and
$0.7 million for PPS and ADVENT, respectively. Additionally, the Company had insurance related
obligations of approximately $0.5 million at September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011, respectively.
The outstanding principal balances of the notes payable plus accrued interest and the insurance
obligations are included in the notes payable balances in the Companys Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
9
NOTE E NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share also
includes common stock equivalents outstanding during the period, if dilutive. The Companys common
stock equivalent shares consist of shares to be issued under outstanding stock options and unvested
restricted stock units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
9,341 |
|
|
|
9,258 |
|
Effect of assumed exercise of options and vesting
of restricted stock unit awards, known as the
treasury stock method |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
9,356 |
|
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010, options to purchase
approximately 165,000 and 332,000 shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the
comparison of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
NOTE F SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Restricted Stock Unit Activity
In November 2010, the stockholders approved the Versar, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the
2010 Plan), under which the Company may grant incentive awards to directors, officers, and
employees of the Company and its affiliates and to service providers to the Company and its
affiliates. One million shares of Versar common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2010
Plan. The 2010 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Through September 30, 2011, a total of 112,000 restricted stock units have been issued under the
2010 Plan. There are 888,000 shares remaining available for future issuance of awards (including
restricted stock units) under the 2010 Plan.
During the three-month period ended September 30, 2011, the Company awarded 92,000 of
restricted stock units to its executive officers and certain employees. The awards vest over a
period of two years following the date of grant. Share-based compensation expense relating to all
outstanding restricted stock unit awards totaled approximately $59,000 and $31,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010, respectively. These expenses were included
in the direct costs of services and overhead and general and administrative lines of the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock Option Activity
No stock options were issued during the three months ended September 30, 2011. A summary of
activity for previously issued incentive stock options and non-qualified options for the three
month period ending September 30, 2011 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Optioned |
|
|
Price per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share price) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 1, 2011 |
|
|
249 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
202 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
2.10 yrs. |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
202 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
2.10 yrs. |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NOTE G OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
The Companys other current liabilities balance includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Earn-out obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
Payroll related |
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
Severance accrual |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
Other accrued and miscellaneous liabilities |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,999 |
|
|
$ |
7,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 1, 2011 the Company had liabilities of approximately $1.1 million and $0.2 million
under contingent earn-out obligations incurred in the acquisitions of ADVENT and PPS, respectively,
which were recorded within the Other Current Liability line item in the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheets. These earn-out obligations were settled during the three-month period ended
September 30, 2011 by making a cash payment for the amount accrued.
The asset retirement obligation was recorded by the Company in association with the estimated
clean-up costs for its chemical laboratory in the National Security business segment.
NOTE H INVENTORY
The Companys inventory balance includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
791 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE I INCOME TAXES
As of September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011, the Company had approximately $1.2 million in net
deferred income tax assets, which primarily related to temporary differences between financial
statement and income tax reporting. Such differences included depreciation, deferred compensation,
accruals and reserves. The Company regularly reviews the recoverability of its deferred tax assets
and establishes a valuation allowance as deemed appropriate. As of
September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011, the Company had $55,000 recorded as a valuation
allowance.
11
NOTE J RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARD
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an accounting standards
update with new guidance on annual goodwill impairment testing. The standards update allows an
entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair
value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If based on its qualitative assessment
an entity concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than
its carrying amount, quantitative impairment testing is required. However, if an entity concludes
otherwise, quantitative
impairment testing is not required. The standards update is effective for annual and interim
goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The
Company will implement this guidance with its next goodwill impairment test. The adoption of this
guidance will not have any impact on the Companys financial statements; however it will change the
Companys processes around its goodwill impairment testing.
NOTE K SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
As discussed in Note C Notes Receivable, on October 31, 2011, the Company agreed to extend
the maturity of its loan to Lemko to November 30, 2011, subject to certain conditions agreed to by
Lemko.
As disclosed in Note D Debt, on October 25, 2011, the Companys line of credit facility was
modified to extend its maturity date to September 25, 2012 and to increase the available borrowing
capacity to $15 million. Additionally, on October 5, 2011 the Company terminated its existing
letter of credit under the facility.
12
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
General Information
The following discussion and analysis relates to our financial condition and results of
operations for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and
other information disclosed herein as well as the Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended July 1, 2011, including the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed
therein. Unless this Form 10-Q indicates otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the terms
we, our, the Company, us, or Versar as used in this Form 10-Q refer to Versar, Inc. and
subsidiaries.
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which are subject to
risks and uncertainties in accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements typically include assumptions, estimates
or descriptions of our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by the
use of the words anticipate, will, believe, estimate, expect, intend, seek, or other
similar expressions. Examples of these include discussions regarding our operations and financial
growth strategy, projections of revenue, income or loss and future operations.
These forward-looking statements and our future financial performance may be affected by a
number of factors, including, but not limited to, the Risk Factors contained in Part I, Item 1A.,
Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2011. Actual
operations and results may differ materially from those forward-looking statements expressed in
this Form 10-Q.
Overview
We are a global project management company providing sustainable value oriented solutions to
government and commercial clients primarily in these four market areas: (1) Construction and
Construction Management, (2) Environmental Services and Sustainability, (3) Munitions Response, and
(4) Telecommunication and Technology Integration. We also provide tailored and secure solutions in
harsh environments and offer specialized abilities in rapid response, classified projects, and
hazardous material management.
Business Segments
Our operations in our various market areas are organized into four business segments as
described below.
Program Management Business Segment
This business segment performs Title I Design Services, Title II Construction Management
Services, Title III Construction, and other related engineering and construction type services both
in the United States and internationally. Title I Design entails a broad-range of expertise
including project scoping/development, cost estimation, value engineering, and feasibility studies.
Title II services involve construction oversight, configuration management, inspection, job site
evaluations, and construction documentation among other areas. Other related services include
system optimization, scheduling, and quality assurance/control involving engineering consultations.
Title III services are the actual construction services. Staff members in this business segment
also have national security clearances enabling Versar to provide services for classified
construction efforts.
We perform work in this segment for federal, local, and commercial clients. Examples of
federal work includes Air Force and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers construction and construction
management, quality assurance work, and personal services including life safety evaluations of fire
and electrical systems. Our work is also concentrated in the local/municipal marketplace where we
manage water and wastewater infrastructure projects.
This segment also continues to expand its business line via the pursuit of commercial and
defense projects related to telecommunications. The segment maintains joint relationships with
several firms designed to enhance our telecommunications opportunities. In addition, this segment
continues to expand and develop opportunities in energy/green initiatives in conjunction with the
Environmental Services business segment.
13
Environmental Services Business Segment
This business segment, which was previously referred to as Compliance and Environmental
Programs, provides full service environmental solutions and includes our remediation and
compliance, exposure and risk assessment, natural resources, Unexploded Ordinance (UXO) cleanup/Military Munitions Response Plans (MMRP), air, greenhouse gas, energy, and cultural resources
services. Clients include a wide-range of federal and state agencies. Some examples include the
following:
|
|
|
We have supported the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the past 25 years
providing a wide-range of mandated services involving exposure assessment and regulatory
review. Furthermore, we provide support to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, US Air Force,
US Navy and many local municipal entities assisting with environmental remediation and
compliance, biological assessments, and natural resource management. |
|
|
|
For more than 30 years, Versar has supported the states of Virginia, Maryland, New York,
Pennsylvania and Delaware on a variety of different projects. For example, we have
supported the State of Maryland in the assessment of the ecological health and natural
resources risk of the Chesapeake Bay. Versar continues to assess the Delaware River (PA,
NJ, and DE) and how it is affected by dredging programs. We assist several counties in
Maryland and Virginia with their watershed programs identifying impaired watersheds and
providing cost-effective solutions for their restoration programs. We provide energy
feasibility review, measurement and verification to the State of New York. |
The services in this segment have involved advisory, evaluative assessment, and implementation
of risk reduction measures for federal, state, local and commercial clients. Many of these services
are mandated by regulation.
Professional Services Business Segment
We provide onsite environmental management and professional services to Department of Defense
(DoD) installations and industrial facilities. Our onsite professional services are attractive
in the new economic environment as DoD shifts emphasis to its core military mission and begins to
downsize due to increasing budgetary pressure. Key outsourcing services we offer are:
|
|
|
Net Zero (energy secure and energy efficient DoD bases), sustainability and mission
program support |
|
|
|
Restoration and reuse of military bases |
|
|
|
Base realignment and closure (BRAC) support |
|
|
|
Pollution prevention (P2) and waste management |
|
|
|
Natural and cultural resources management services |
|
|
|
Public outreach and training services |
|
|
|
Biological and physical sciences support. |
This business segment provides a cost-effective solution to our clients in order to meet their
requirements. This segment is consistent with our philosophy of selling into government business
and supporting them in areas where their capabilities and capacities are lacking.
National Security Business Segment
We provide national security services primarily through the operations of our subsidiaries
GEOMET Technologies, LLC (GEOMET) and Professional Protection Systems Limited (PPS). The
National Security business segment operates in several markets which require ongoing services and
support and which have received funding priority. These services include:
|
|
|
Onsite range support services |
|
|
|
Chemical agent testing, equipment and related services. |
14
We hold a key UXO removal contract supporting one of the largest Air Force testing and
training ranges in the country and support (via a subcontract) a large DoD chemical warfare agent
testing center. We exclusively provide UXO cleanup services at Ft. Irwin, CA, which is the National
Training Center for DoD. This center is the size of Rhode Island and provides live fire training
for U.S. Army forces. We are also undertaking a large chemical warfare munitions destruction
project for the U.S. Army. The technology used to destroy the chemical warfare munitions is unique
and is being applied for the first time in the United States.
We continue to provide to first responders, a Disposable Toxicological Agent Protective System
(DTAPS®) Level B coverall chemical/biological protective suit, which is the first in the industry
to be certified by the Safety Equipment Institute (SEI) to the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) Class 2 standards. In addition, we own and operate the only declared Schedule
I chemical agent laboratory in the United States under the Chemical Weapons Convention, which is
overseen by the Department of Commerce. The laboratory provides cost-effective materials testing
services to the U.S. government and to private industries, particularly manufacturers of chemical
protective equipment and clothing.
Financial Trends
Fiscal year 2012 and beyond will continue to offer significant challenges. For the near-term,
it appears that the economy will continue to be challenged by reduced government funding, high
unemployment, a weak financial market, and debt reduction pressures that affect government spending
patterns at all levels. We believe that each of our business segments have the expertise to
address the challenges raised by these national economic issues and is positioned in the coming
year to address these concerns. This is because of value-driven economic metrics that are dictating
more efficient services for our clients, coupled with mandated government program areas that
utilize our services. Our broad range of project management skills will allow us to effectively
target areas where ongoing government expenditures (both domestically and internationally) will be
necessary, areas such as sustainable military range management, chemical de-militarization,
emergency response, and environmental assessments and remediation.
Specifically, we see the following three elements driving our strategy going forward:
|
|
|
Pursuit of larger contract opportunities. Our move to a large business, coincident with
development of a strong internal infrastructure and associated technologies, is allowing us
to focus on pursuing larger prime contract opportunities. |
|
|
|
Leveraging of our services. This will allow us to work efficiently in the new economic
environment whether that is selling of sustainable risk management utilizing our energy and
environmental skill-sets, or via effective use of our construction management skills in
relation to complex project oversight. |
|
|
|
Expanding our international footprint. While strong internationally in the construction
management business, incorporation of our non-construction services into our overseas
client-base will allow for replication of our proven domestic skills into the international
market and will help us meet growing overseas client needs. |
Due to the financial successes experienced in fiscal year 2011 and prior fiscal years, our
balance sheet is strong. We are well positioned with our cash balance on hand to handle challenges
resulting from the business downturn while we continue to pursue merger and acquisition activity.
As of the quarter ended September 30, 2011 we had $2.6 million of cash on hand and a working
capital balance of $20.3 million. We also continue to have access to a line of credit
that on October 25, 2011 was increased to $15 million.
15
Consolidated Results of Operations
The table below sets forth our consolidated results of operations for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS REVENUE |
|
$ |
33,284 |
|
|
$ |
29,296 |
|
Purchased services and materials, at cost |
|
|
16,158 |
|
|
|
14,474 |
|
Direct costs of services and overhead |
|
|
13,393 |
|
|
|
11,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
3,733 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $33.3 million, an increase of 14%
compared to $29.3 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. The increase resulted
from additional revenue generated in our Program Management business segment by revenues generated
from our Title II Construction Management Services projects and increased revenue from the Tooele
Chemical Demilitarization project in our National Security business segment, partially offset by a
decrease in revenue in our Environmental Services business segment due to delays in the receipt of
contract funding from the Federal, state, and municipal sectors on several projects.
Purchased services and materials for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $16.2 million, an
increase of 12% compared to $14.5 million experienced during the first quarter of the last fiscal
year. The increase was largely due to costs associated with our Title II Construction Management
Services projects.
Direct costs of services and overhead for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 were $13.4 million,
an increase of 13% compared to $11.9 million experienced during the first quarter of the last
fiscal year. The increase was attributable to additional services required by the projects
lending to our revenue growth and increased direct labor utilization compared to the same period in
the previous fiscal year.
Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $3.7 million, an increase of 28%
compared to $2.9 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. The increase in gross
profit was primarily derived from improved performance in the Program Management business segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 were $2.4
million, an increase of 20% compared to $2.0 million during the first quarter of last fiscal year.
This increase primarily results from expenditures to enhance our information technology backbone in
preparation for our anticipated growth and expenditures to create a more efficient work
environment by moving significant amounts of our document management and technology collaboration
on-line.
16
Income tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $0.5 million, compared to $0.4
million in the first quarter of the last fiscal year. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012,
income before income taxes was $1.3 million
compared to $0.9 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. The effective tax
rates were approximately 37.4% and 41.1% for the first three months of fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The small decrease in the effective tax rate was a result of
nonrecurring adjustments in the prior year quarter related to acquired assets and liabilities.
Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $0.8 million, an
increase of 60% compared
to net income of $0.5 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. Net income per
share, basic and diluted, for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $0.09 compared to net income per
share, basic and diluted, of $0.06 during the first quarter of the last fiscal year.
Backlog
We report funded backlog, which represents orders for goods and services for which firm
contractual commitments have been received. As of September 30, 2011, funded backlog was
approximately $84 million, a decrease of 8% compared to approximately $91 million at September 24,
2010.
Results of Operations by Reportable Segment
The tables below set forth our operating results by reportable segment for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 24, 2010. The dollar amounts in the
four segment tables that follow are in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
Program Management |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
GROSS REVENUE |
|
$ |
17,004 |
|
|
$ |
12,100 |
|
Purchased services and materials, at cost |
|
|
8,896 |
|
|
|
7,220 |
|
Direct costs of services and overhead |
|
|
5,672 |
|
|
|
3,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Gross revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $17.0 million, an increase of 40%
compared to $12.1 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. This increase
primarily resulted from revenues generated by our Title II Construction Management Services
projects.
Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $2.4 million, an increase of 85%
compared to $1.3 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. This increase was a
result of increased revenue from our Title II work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
Environmental Services |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
GROSS REVENUE |
|
$ |
5,872 |
|
|
$ |
8,340 |
|
Purchased services and materials, at cost |
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
Direct costs of services and overhead |
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Gross revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $5.9 million, a decrease of 29%
compared to $8.3 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. This decrease was a
result of delays in receipt of contract funding from the Federal, state, and municipal sectors on a
number of projects. In particular, DoD funding has been reduced from the levels experienced during
first quarter of the last fiscal year.
Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $0.6 million, flat from a dollars
perspective compared to the first quarter of the last fiscal year, as the decrease in gross revenue
was offset by decreased costs due to increased efficiencies in operations, increased direct labor,
and reduced purchased services (pass-through revenues).
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
Professional Services |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
GROSS REVENUE |
|
$ |
3,513 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
Purchased services and materials, at cost |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Direct costs of services and overhead |
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
$ |
603 |
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Gross revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $3.5 million, an increase of 17%
compared to $3.0 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. This increase was a
result of organic growth at a number of current Army installations nationwide. As U.S. Army
government staff seeks to do more work with less staff, the workload has fallen upon the shoulders
of on-site contractors. Due to our strong reputation for on-site employee care and customer
responsiveness, the number of on-site staff provided by us has increased.
Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $0.6 million, an increase of 20%
compared to $0.5 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. This increase was a
result of the higher volume of work without increasing staffing levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three-Month Periods Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 24, |
|
National Security |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
GROSS REVENUE |
|
$ |
6,895 |
|
|
$ |
5,880 |
|
Purchased services and materials, at cost |
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
Direct costs of services and overhead |
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
3,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Gross revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $6.9 million, an increase of 17%
compared to $5.9 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. This increase was
largely a result of a full quarter of revenue in the current fiscal year from the Tooele Chemical
Demilitarization project in Utah, which commenced during the second quarter of the last fiscal
year, and higher revenue from the Ft. Irwin UXO Project.
Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2012 was $0.1 million, a decrease of 83% compared
to $0.6 million during the first quarter of the last fiscal year. This decrease was primarily a
result of the timing of costs versus the recognition of the related revenue on the Tooele Chemical
Demilitarization project.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our working capital as of September 30, 2011 was
approximately $20.3 million, an increase of
$0.7 million compared to working capital at July 1, 2011. In addition, our current ratio at
September 30, 2011 was 1.97 compared to 1.90 at July 1, 2011.
As discussed in Note D Debt, the Company has a line of credit facility with United Bank,
the maturity date of which was initially extended to October 25, 2011. On October 25, 2011 this
line of credit facility was modified to extend its maturity date to September 25, 2012 and to
increase the available borrowing capacity under the facility to $15 million. The Company had no
borrowings under the line of credit facility during the three month period ended September 30,
2011. On October 5, 2011 the Company cancelled its letter of credit of approximately $0.5 million
outstanding under the line of credit facility which served as collateral for surety bond coverage
provided by the Companys insurance carrier against project construction work which had been
completed.
We financed a portion of the fiscal year 2010 acquisitions of PPS and ADVENT through seller
notes of approximately $2.7 million in aggregate. At September 30, 2011, the principal balances of
the notes payable were approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. We anticipate
that the cash flows from PPS and ADVENT will continue to be sufficient to pay down the outstanding
principal and interest balances of these notes in the foreseeable future.
18
We believe that our current cash balance of $2.6 million, our anticipated cash flows from
operations, and the funds available from our line of credit facility will be sufficient to meet our
liquidity needs within the next fiscal year. Our expected capital requirements for the full fiscal
year of 2012 are approximately $1.1 million and will be funded through existing working capital.
These capital expenditures will be used primarily for upgrades to maintain our existing information
technology systems, equipment related to our range management projects, and upgrades to our
personal protective equipment manufacturing facility.
Critical Accounting Policies and Related Estimates
There have been no material changes with respect to the critical accounting policies and
related estimates as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1,
2011.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk |
We have not entered into any transactions using derivative financial instruments or derivative
commodity instruments and we believe that our exposure to interest rate risk and other relevant
market risk is not material.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
As of the last day of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
are effective, as of such date, to ensure that required information will be disclosed on a timely
basis in its reports under the Exchange Act.
Further, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in reports filed by us under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner to allow
timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are parties from time to time to various legal actions arising in the normal course of
business. We believe that any ultimate unfavorable resolution of these legal actions will not have
a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 our employees surrendered shares of common stock
to us to pay tax withholding obligations upon vesting of restricted stock units. The purchase
price of this stock was based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE Amex on the date
of surrender.
19
Purchase of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid Per |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement between Versar, Inc. and Cynthia A. Downes dated
September 8, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to that certain Current Report on
Form 8-K filed by the registrant on September 13, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Eleventh Modification Agreement between Versar, Inc. and United Bank dated October 25, 2011
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to that certain Current Report on Form 8-K filed by
the registrant on October 31, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certifications by Anthony L. Otten, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange
Rule 13a-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certifications by Cynthia A. Downes, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer pursuant to Securities Exchange Rule 13a-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by Anthony L. Otten, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by Cynthia A. Downes, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
The following financial statements from Versar, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language
(XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VERSAR, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ Anthony L. Otten
|
|
|
|
Anthony L. Otten |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ Cynthia A. Downes
|
|
|
|
Cynthia A. Downes |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
and Treasurer |
|
Date: November 9, 2011
21