10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 1, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 000-18548
Xilinx, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0188631 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2100 Logic Drive, San Jose, California
|
|
95124 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(408) 559-7778
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Shares outstanding of the registrants common stock:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Shares Outstanding as of October 21, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
262,461,679 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
XILINX, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
555,209 |
|
|
$ |
619,666 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,672 |
|
|
$ |
1,214,403 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
200,564 |
|
|
|
213,260 |
|
|
|
423,696 |
|
|
|
421,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
354,645 |
|
|
|
406,406 |
|
|
|
746,976 |
|
|
|
792,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
105,774 |
|
|
|
96,578 |
|
|
|
211,791 |
|
|
|
191,062 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
88,681 |
|
|
|
87,174 |
|
|
|
185,077 |
|
|
|
171,232 |
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
199,806 |
|
|
|
183,752 |
|
|
|
403,842 |
|
|
|
362,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
154,839 |
|
|
|
222,654 |
|
|
|
343,134 |
|
|
|
430,673 |
|
Interest and other expense, net |
|
|
(8,598 |
) |
|
|
(3,484 |
) |
|
|
(16,409 |
) |
|
|
(8,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
146,241 |
|
|
|
219,170 |
|
|
|
326,725 |
|
|
|
422,059 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
19,955 |
|
|
|
48,275 |
|
|
|
46,065 |
|
|
|
92,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
126,286 |
|
|
$ |
170,895 |
|
|
$ |
280,660 |
|
|
$ |
329,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
264,006 |
|
|
|
260,151 |
|
|
|
264,853 |
|
|
|
267,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
267,927 |
|
|
|
263,286 |
|
|
|
273,009 |
|
|
|
270,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
XILINX, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
(In thousands, except par value amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011* |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
602,952 |
|
|
$ |
1,222,359 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,204,593 |
|
|
|
704,054 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
216,416 |
|
|
|
286,464 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
247,652 |
|
|
|
264,745 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
84,584 |
|
|
|
88,064 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
58,061 |
|
|
|
57,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,414,258 |
|
|
|
2,622,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
772,928 |
|
|
|
747,941 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(388,035 |
) |
|
|
(367,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
384,893 |
|
|
|
380,570 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
1,048,492 |
|
|
|
766,452 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
149,693 |
|
|
|
133,580 |
|
Acquisition-related intangibles, net |
|
|
40,296 |
|
|
|
26,896 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
230,167 |
|
|
|
210,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,267,799 |
|
|
$ |
4,140,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
84,186 |
|
|
$ |
99,252 |
|
Accrued payroll and related liabilities |
|
|
116,571 |
|
|
|
125,582 |
|
Deferred income on shipments to distributors |
|
|
72,504 |
|
|
|
99,763 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
94,188 |
|
|
|
43,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
367,449 |
|
|
|
368,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debentures |
|
|
899,803 |
|
|
|
890,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
433,491 |
|
|
|
403,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
income taxes payable |
|
|
48,874 |
|
|
|
45,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
25,768 |
|
|
|
17,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value (none issued) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Common stock, $.01 par value |
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,121,868 |
|
|
|
1,163,410 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,361,552 |
|
|
|
1,238,044 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
10,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,492,414 |
|
|
|
2,414,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,267,799 |
|
|
$ |
4,140,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Derived from audited financial statements |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
XILINX, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
280,660 |
|
|
$ |
329,482 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
27,094 |
|
|
|
24,938 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
8,036 |
|
|
|
3,686 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
30,666 |
|
|
|
30,541 |
|
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
(4,198 |
) |
Amortization of debt discount on convertible debentures |
|
|
7,732 |
|
|
|
6,266 |
|
Derivatives revaluation and amortization |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
|
|
6,531 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(7,928 |
) |
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
70,048 |
|
|
|
(294,031 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
17,271 |
|
|
|
(39,536 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
30,034 |
|
|
|
62,015 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(7,659 |
) |
|
|
(9,266 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
9,362 |
|
|
|
6,129 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(15,067 |
) |
|
|
34,839 |
|
Accrued liabilities (including restructuring activities) |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(4,218 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7,457 |
|
|
|
(12,408 |
) |
Deferred income on shipments to distributors |
|
|
(27,259 |
) |
|
|
13,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
437,278 |
|
|
|
146,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(2,287,016 |
) |
|
|
(1,307,889 |
) |
Proceeds from sale and maturity of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,514,431 |
|
|
|
920,628 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(31,417 |
) |
|
|
(33,444 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
(34,507 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(838,509 |
) |
|
|
(421,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(177,191 |
) |
|
|
(466,309 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through various stock plans |
|
|
51,891 |
|
|
|
45,554 |
|
Payment of dividends to stockholders |
|
|
(100,804 |
) |
|
|
(85,462 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debts, net of issuance costs |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
587,644 |
|
Purchase of call options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(112,319 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of warrants |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
46,908 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
7,928 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(218,176 |
) |
|
|
18,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(619,407 |
) |
|
|
(256,952 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,222,359 |
|
|
|
1,031,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
602,952 |
|
|
$ |
774,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
18,651 |
|
|
$ |
10,914 |
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
$ |
3,807 |
|
|
$ |
36,055 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
XILINX, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with United States (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim
financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and
should be read in conjunction with the Xilinx, Inc. (Xilinx or the Company) consolidated financial
statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended April 2, 2011. The interim financial statements are unaudited, but reflect all
adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, of a normal, recurring nature necessary to
provide a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations
for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2012 or any future period.
The Company uses a 52- to 53-week fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest March 31. Fiscal 2012
is a 52-week year ending on March 31, 2012. Fiscal 2011, which ended on April 2, 2011, was also a
52-week fiscal year. The quarters ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010 each included 13 weeks.
Note 2. Recent Accounting Changes and Accounting Pronouncements
In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company adopted the new authoritative guidance for revenue
arrangements with multiple deliverables. This guidance established a selling price hierarchy,
which allows the use of an estimated selling price to determine the selling price of a deliverable
in cases where neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available.
The adoption of this new guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company adopted the new authoritative guidance that
clarifies which revenue allocation and measurement guidance should be used for arrangements that
contain both tangible products and software, in cases where the software is more than incidental to
the tangible product as a whole. More specifically, if the software sold with or embedded within
the tangible product is essential to the functionality of the tangible product, then this software
as well as undelivered software elements that relate to this software are excluded from the scope
of existing software revenue guidance. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the authoritative guidance
that results in common principles and requirements for measuring and disclosing fair value, which
apply to all reporting entities that are required or permitted to measure or disclose the fair
value of an asset, a liability, or an instrument classified in a reporting entitys shareholders
equity in the financial statements. Some of the amendments clarify the FASBs intent about the
application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular
principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value
measurements. This guidance is to be applied prospectively. For public entities, this guidance is
effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the
Company is its fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Early application is not permitted. The Company does
not expect this new guidance to have significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued the authoritative guidance to improve the comparability, consistency,
and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other
comprehensive income. Under this guidance, an entity has the option to present the total of
comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive
income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements. The guidance is to be applied retrospectively. For public entities, this
guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2011, which for the Company is its first quarter of fiscal 2013. Early application is
permitted. This guidance does not affect the underlying accounting for components of other
comprehensive income, but will change the presentation of the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued the authoritative guidance that gives companies the option to
perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair
value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount and, in some cases, skip the two-step
impairment test for purposes of evaluating goodwill. The guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the Company is for its fiscal year 2013. Early
adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this new guidance to have significant impact on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Significant Customers and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Avnet, Inc. (Avnet), one of the Companys distributors, distributes the substantial majority of the
Companys products worldwide. As of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, Avnet accounted for 84% and
79% of the Companys total net accounts receivable, respectively.
5
Resale of product through Avnet accounted for 47% and 48% of the Companys worldwide net revenues
in the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively. For the second
quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2011, resale of product through Avnet accounted for 53%
and 52% of the Companys worldwide net revenues, respectively. The percentage of accounts
receivable due from Avnet and the percentage of worldwide net revenues from Avnet are consistent
with historical patterns.
Xilinx is subject to concentrations of credit risk primarily in its trade accounts receivable and
investments in debt securities to the extent of the amounts recorded on the consolidated balance
sheet. The Company attempts to mitigate the concentration of credit risk in its trade receivables
through its credit evaluation process, collection terms, distributor sales to diverse end customers
and through geographical dispersion of sales. Xilinx generally does not require collateral for
receivables from its end customers or from distributors.
One end customer accounted for 14% and 11% of net revenues for the second quarter of fiscal 2012
and 2011, respectively. One end customer accounted for 11% and 10% of net revenues for the first
half of fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company mitigates concentrations of credit risk in its investments in debt securities by
currently investing approximately 92% of its portfolio in AA or higher grade securities as rated by
Standard & Poors or Moodys Investors Service. The Companys methods to arrive at investment
decisions are not solely based on the rating agencies credit ratings. Xilinx also performs
additional credit due diligence and conducts regular portfolio credit reviews, including a review
of counterparty credit risk related to the Companys forward currency exchange contracts.
Additionally, Xilinx limits its investments in the debt securities of a single issuer based upon
the issuers credit rating and attempts to further mitigate credit risk by diversifying risk across
geographies and type of issuer.
As of October 1, 2011, approximately 1% of the Companys $2.79 billion investment portfolio
consisted of student loan auction rate securities and all of these securities are rated AAA with
the exception of $3.4 million that were downgraded to an A rating during fiscal 2009. While these
securities experienced failed auctions in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 due to liquidity issues
in the global credit markets, which have not been completely resolved as of October 1, 2011, the
Company has collected and expects to collect all interest payable on these securities when due.
Substantially all of the underlying assets that secure these securities are pools of student loans
originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), which are substantially
guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education. Because there can be no assurance of a successful
auction in the future, these student loan auction rate securities are classified as long-term
investments on the consolidated balance sheets. The maturity dates range from December 2027 to May
2046.
As of October 1, 2011, approximately 28% of the portfolio consisted of mortgage-backed securities.
All of the mortgage-backed securities in the investment portfolio were issued by U.S.
government-sponsored enterprises and agencies and are rated AA+ by Standard & Poors and AAA by
Moodys Investors Service.
The global credit and capital markets have continued to experience adverse conditions that have
negatively impacted the values of various types of investment and non-investment grade securities,
and have experienced volatility and disruption due to instability in the global financial system,
uncertainty related to global economic conditions and concerns regarding sovereign financial
stability. While general conditions in the global credit markets have improved, there is a risk
that the Company may incur other-than-temporary impairment charges for certain types of investments
should credit market conditions deteriorate or the underlying assets fail to perform as
anticipated. See Note 5. Financial Instruments for a table of the Companys available-for-sale
securities.
Note 4. Fair Value Measurements
The guidance for fair value measurements established by the FASB defines fair value as the
exchange price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an
exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When
determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be
recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which
Xilinx would transact and also considers assumptions that market participants would use when
pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and risk of
nonperformance.
The Company determines the fair value for marketable debt securities using industry standard
pricing services, data providers and other third-party sources and by internally performing
valuation analyses. The Company primarily uses a consensus price or weighted average price for its
fair value assessment. The Company determines the consensus price using market prices from a
variety of industry standard pricing services, data providers, security master files from large
financial institutions and other third party sources and uses those multiple prices as inputs into
a distribution-curve-based algorithm to determine the daily market value. The pricing services use
multiple inputs to determine market prices, including reportable trades, benchmark yield curves,
credit spreads and broker/dealer quotes as well as other industry and economic events. For certain
securities with short maturities, such as discount commercial paper and certificates of deposit,
the security is accreted from purchase price to face value at maturity. If a subsequent
transaction on the same security is observed in the marketplace, the price on the subsequent
transaction is used as the current daily market price and the security will be accreted to face
value based on the revised price. For certain other securities, such as student loan auction rate
securities, the Company performs its own valuation analysis using a discounted cash flow pricing
model.
6
The Company validates the consensus prices by taking random samples from each asset type and
corroborating those prices using reported trade activity, benchmark yield curves, binding
broker/dealer quotes or other relevant price information. There have not been any changes to the
Companys fair value methodology during the first six months of fiscal 2012 and the Company did not
adjust or override any fair value measurements as of October 1, 2011.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The measurements of fair value were established based on a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
the utilized inputs. This hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value framework
requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions
(inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. The guidance for fair value measurements
requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of
the following categories:
Level 1 Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
The Companys Level 1 assets consist of U.S. Treasury securities and money market funds.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
The Companys Level 2 assets consist of bank certificates of deposit, commercial paper,
corporate bonds, municipal bonds, U.S. agency securities, foreign government and agency securities,
floating-rate notes and mortgage-backed securities. The Companys Level 2 assets and liabilities
include foreign currency forward contracts.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are supported by little or no
market activity and that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or
liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation
techniques, as well as significant management judgment or estimation.
The Companys Level 3 assets and liabilities include student loan auction rate securities and the
embedded derivative related to the Companys debentures.
7
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In instances where the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different
levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The
Companys assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its
entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or
liability. The following tables present information about the Companys assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Total Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
222,364 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
222,364 |
|
Bank certificates of deposit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
154,302 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
154,302 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,998 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9,998 |
|
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
136,474 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
136,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank certificates of deposit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
132,784 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
132,784 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
499,831 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
499,831 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
36,516 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
36,516 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
72,059 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
72,059 |
|
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
463,363 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
463,363 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
158,119 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
158,119 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
29,048 |
|
|
|
29,048 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
26,170 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
26,170 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
19,459 |
|
|
|
44,834 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
64,293 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
770,862 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
770,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
241,823 |
|
|
$ |
2,520,352 |
|
|
$ |
29,048 |
|
|
$ |
2,791,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts, net |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
Convertible debentures embedded derivative |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,007 |
|
|
$ |
5,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
241,823 |
|
|
$ |
2,516,907 |
|
|
$ |
27,041 |
|
|
$ |
2,785,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Total Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
275,596 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
275,596 |
|
Bank certificates of deposit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
79,984 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
79,984 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
485,315 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
485,315 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
29,998 |
|
|
|
99,974 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
129,972 |
|
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
161,970 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
161,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank certificates of deposit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
224,896 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
224,896 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
14,404 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
22,400 |
|
Foreign government and agency securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
384,428 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
384,428 |
|
Floating rate notes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
62,261 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
62,261 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
25,566 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
25,566 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34,950 |
|
|
|
34,950 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
16,913 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
16,913 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
7,941 |
|
|
|
45,570 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
53,511 |
|
Floating rate notes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
29,869 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
29,869 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
605,643 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
605,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts, net |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
327,939 |
|
|
$ |
2,245,588 |
|
|
$ |
34,950 |
|
|
$ |
2,608,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debentures embedded derivative |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
327,939 |
|
|
$ |
2,245,588 |
|
|
$ |
34,005 |
|
|
$ |
2,607,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Changes in Level 3 Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table is a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
30,636 |
|
|
$ |
61,725 |
|
|
$ |
34,005 |
|
|
$ |
60,796 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in interest and other expense, net |
|
|
(1,435 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
2,788 |
|
Sales and settlements, net (1) |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(5,350 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
27,041 |
|
|
$ |
62,520 |
|
|
$ |
27,041 |
|
|
$ |
62,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months ended October 1, 2011, $950 thousand of student loan
auction rate securities were redeemed for cash at par value. During the first six months
ended October 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010, $5.4 million and $450 thousand of student
loan auction rate securities, respectively, were redeemed for cash at par value. |
The amount of total losses included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized
gains or losses relating to assets and liabilities still held as of the end of the period was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other expense, net |
|
$ |
(1,435 |
) |
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,062 |
) |
|
$ |
(614 |
) |
As of October 1, 2011, marketable securities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs
were comprised of $29.0 million of student loan auction rate securities. Auction failures during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and the lack of market activity and liquidity required that the
Companys student loan auction rate securities be measured using observable market data and Level 3
inputs. The fair values of the Companys student loan auction rate securities were based on the
Companys assessment of the underlying collateral and the creditworthiness of the issuers of the
securities. Substantially all of the underlying assets that secure the student loan auction rate
securities are pools of student loans originated under FFELP, which are substantially guaranteed by
the U.S. Department of Education. The fair values of the Companys student loan auction rate
securities were determined using a discounted cash flow pricing model that incorporated financial
inputs such as projected cash flows, discount rates, expected interest rates to be paid to
investors and an estimated liquidity discount. The weighted-average life over which cash flows
were projected was determined to be approximately nine years, given the collateral composition of
the securities. The discount rates that were applied to the pricing model were based on market data
and information for comparable- or similar-term student loan asset-backed securities. The expected
interest rate to be paid to investors in a failed auction was determined by the contractual terms
for each security. The liquidity discount represents an estimate of the additional return an
investor would require to compensate for the lack of liquidity of the student loan auction rate
securities. The Company does not intend to sell, nor does it believe it is more likely than not
that it would be required to sell, the student loan auction rate securities before anticipated
recovery, which could be at final maturity that ranges from December 2027 to May 2046.
In March 2007, the Company issued $1.00 billion principal amount of 3.125% junior convertible
debentures due March 15, 2037 (3.125% Debentures) to an initial purchaser in a private offering.
As a result of repurchases in fiscal 2009, the remaining principal amount of the 3.125% Debentures
as of October 1, 2011 was $689.6 million. The fair value of the 3.125% Debentures as of October 1,
2011 was approximately $694.8 million, based on the last trading price of the 3.125% Debentures of
the period. The 3.125% Debentures included embedded features that qualify as an embedded
derivative, and was separately accounted for as a discount on the 3.125% Debentures. Its fair value
was established at the inception of the 3.125% Debentures. Each quarter, the change in the fair
value of the embedded derivative, if any, is recorded in the consolidated statements of income.
The Company uses a derivative valuation model to derive the value of the embedded derivative. Key
inputs into this valuation model are the Companys current stock price, risk-free interest rates,
the stock dividend yield, the stock volatility and the 3.125% Debentures credit spread over London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The first three inputs are based on observable market data and are
considered Level 2 inputs while the last two inputs require management judgment and are Level 3
inputs.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
As of October 1, 2011, the Company had non-marketable equity securities in private companies
of $12.5 million (adjusted cost, which approximates fair value). The Companys investments in
non-marketable securities of private companies are accounted for by using the cost method. These
investments are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis when they are deemed to be
other-than-temporarily impaired. In determining whether a decline in value of non-marketable
equity investments in private companies has occurred and is other than temporary, an assessment is
made by considering available evidence, including the general market conditions in the investees
industry, the investees product development status and subsequent rounds of financing and the
related valuation and/or Xilinxs participation in such financings. The Company also assesses the
investees ability to meet business milestones and the financial condition and near-term prospects
of the individual investee, including the rate at which the investee is using its cash, the
investees need for possible additional funding at a lower valuation and bona fide offers to
purchase the investee from a prospective acquirer. The valuation methodology for determining the
fair value of non-marketable equity securities is based on the factors noted above which require
management judgment and are Level 3 inputs. No material impairment loss on non-marketable equity
investments was recognized during the first six months of fiscal 2012 or 2011.
10
Note 5. Financial Instruments
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities as of the end of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
222,364 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
222,364 |
|
|
$ |
275,596 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
275,596 |
|
Bank certificates of deposit |
|
|
147,784 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
147,784 |
|
|
|
89,984 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
89,984 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
654,132 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
654,133 |
|
|
|
710,210 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
710,211 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
193,538 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
194,635 |
|
|
|
25,501 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
25,566 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
32,900 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(3,852 |
) |
|
|
29,048 |
|
|
|
38,250 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(3,300 |
) |
|
|
34,950 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
25,138 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
26,170 |
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
16,958 |
|
U.S. government and
agency securities |
|
|
146,037 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
146,350 |
|
|
|
206,052 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
205,883 |
|
Foreign government and
agency securities |
|
|
599,818 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
599,837 |
|
|
|
546,407 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
546,398 |
|
Floating rate notes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
91,927 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
92,130 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
758,995 |
|
|
|
13,429 |
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
770,902 |
|
|
|
598,046 |
|
|
|
8,984 |
|
|
|
(1,363 |
) |
|
|
605,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,780,706 |
|
|
$ |
16,529 |
|
|
$ |
(6,012 |
) |
|
$ |
2,791,223 |
|
|
$ |
2,598,791 |
|
|
$ |
9,496 |
|
|
$ |
(4,944 |
) |
|
$ |
2,603,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables show the fair values and gross unrealized losses of the Companys
investments, aggregated by investment category, for individual securities that have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for the length of time specified, as of October 1, 2011 and
April 2, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
29,634 |
|
|
$ |
(570 |
) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
29,634 |
|
|
$ |
(570 |
) |
Auction rate securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
29,048 |
|
|
|
(3,852 |
) |
|
|
29,048 |
|
|
|
(3,852 |
) |
Municipal bonds |
|
|
4,607 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
U.S. government and
agency securities |
|
|
93,586 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
93,586 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Foreign government and
agency securities |
|
|
24,974 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24,974 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
171,611 |
|
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
175,662 |
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
324,412 |
|
|
$ |
(2,120 |
) |
|
$ |
33,585 |
|
|
$ |
(3,892 |
) |
|
$ |
357,997 |
|
|
$ |
(6,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
44,982 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
44,982 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
6,129 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6,129 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Auction rate securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34,950 |
|
|
|
(3,300 |
) |
|
|
34,950 |
|
|
|
(3,300 |
) |
Municipal bonds |
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
108,464 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
108,464 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
Foreign government and agency
securities |
|
|
67,061 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
67,061 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Floating rate notes |
|
|
25,020 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
25,020 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
178,844 |
|
|
|
(1,356 |
) |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
179,938 |
|
|
|
(1,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
435,492 |
|
|
$ |
(1,627 |
) |
|
$ |
36,980 |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
$ |
472,472 |
|
|
$ |
(4,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reviewed the investment portfolio and determined that the gross unrealized losses
on these investments as of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011 were temporary in nature as evidenced
by the fluctuations in the gross unrealized losses within the investment categories. The aggregate of
individual unrealized losses that had been outstanding for 12 months or more was not significant as
of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, and was primarily related to failed auction rate securities
due to adverse conditions in the global credit markets during the past three years. The Company
neither intends to sell these investments nor concludes that it is more-likely-than-not that it
will have to sell them until recovery of their carrying values. The Company also believes that it
will be able to collect both principal and interest amounts due to the Company at maturity, given
the high credit quality of these investments and any related underlying collateral.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of marketable debt securities (bank certificates of
deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds, auction rate securities, municipal bonds, U.S. and
foreign government and agency securities and mortgage-backed securities), by contractual maturity,
are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have
the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
1,520,356 |
|
|
$ |
1,520,367 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
242,217 |
|
|
|
244,044 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
254,356 |
|
|
|
258,891 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
541,413 |
|
|
|
545,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,558,342 |
|
|
$ |
2,568,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain information related to available-for-sale securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
77,608 |
|
|
$ |
132,098 |
|
|
$ |
107,985 |
|
|
$ |
157,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains on sale of available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
$ |
3,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
4,356 |
|
Gross realized losses on sale of available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains on sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
3,650 |
|
|
$ |
1,071 |
|
|
$ |
4,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premiums on available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
3,262 |
|
|
$ |
1,561 |
|
|
$ |
5,575 |
|
|
$ |
3,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost of securities matured or sold is based on the specific identification method.
12
Note 6. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Companys primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage foreign
currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. As a result of the use of derivative financial
instruments, the Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts may
fail to meet their contractual obligations. The Company manages counterparty credit risk in
derivative contracts by reviewing counterparty creditworthiness on a regular basis, establishing
collateral requirement and limiting exposure to any single counterparty. The right of set-off that
exists with certain transactions enables the Company to net amounts due to and from the
counterparty, reducing the maximum loss from credit risk in the event of counterparty default.
As of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding forward currency
exchange contracts which are derivative financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
(In thousands and U.S. dollars) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Euro |
|
$ |
40,479 |
|
|
$ |
38,787 |
|
Singapore dollar |
|
|
62,809 |
|
|
|
52,782 |
|
Japanese Yen |
|
|
11,863 |
|
|
|
12,382 |
|
British Pound |
|
|
14,619 |
|
|
|
8,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,770 |
|
|
$ |
112,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the Companys strategy to reduce volatility of operating expenses due to foreign
exchange rate fluctuations, the Company employs a hedging program with a forward outlook of up to
two years for major foreign-currency-denominated operating expenses. The outstanding forward
currency exchange contracts expire at various dates between October 2011 and August 2013. The net
unrealized gain or loss, which approximates the fair market value of the above contracts, is
expected to be realized and reclassified into net income within the next two years.
As of October 1, 2011, 97% of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts were designated and
qualified as cash flow hedges and the effective portion of the gain or loss on the forward
contracts was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into net
income in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The estimated net
amount of the existing gains or losses as of October 1, 2011 that is expected to be reclassified
into earnings within the next 12 months was $2.1 million. The ineffective portion of the gain or
loss on the forward contract was included in the net income for all periods presented.
As of October 1, 2011, 3% of the forward foreign currency exchange contracts were designated and
qualified as fair value hedges, and the related realized and unrealized gain or loss on the forward
contracts was immaterial for all periods presented.
The Company may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge firm commitments
such as acquisitions and capital expenditures. Gains and losses on foreign currency forward
contracts that are designated as hedges of anticipated transactions, for which a firm commitment
has been attained and the hedged relationship has been effective, are deferred and included in
income or expenses in the same period that the underlying transaction is settled. Gains and losses
on any instruments not meeting the above criteria are recognized in income or expenses in the
consolidated statements of income as they are incurred.
The 3.125% Debentures include provisions which qualify as an embedded derivative. See Note 4.
Fair Value Measurements for more discussion about the embedded derivative. The fair value of the
embedded derivative was $2.0 million and $945 thousand as of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011,
respectively. The changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative were recorded to interest
and other expense, net, on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of income.
The Company had the following derivative instruments as of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011,
located on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, utilized for risk management purposes detailed
above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Contracts |
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
888 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
4,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
5,205 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
71 |
|
13
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the condensed
consolidated statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
in OCI on |
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
from Accumulated |
|
Amount of Gain |
(In thousands) |
|
(Effective portion of |
|
OCI into Income |
|
(Loss) Recorded |
Derivatives Types |
|
cash flow hedging) |
|
(Effective portion)* |
|
(Ineffective portion)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 1, 2011 |
Foreign exchange contracts (cash flow hedging) |
|
$ |
(8,187 |
) |
|
$ |
2,339 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended October 2, 2010
|
Foreign exchange contracts (cash flow hedging) |
|
$ |
6,620 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (fair value hedging) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended October 1, 2011
|
Foreign exchange contracts (cash flow hedging) |
|
$ |
(8,784 |
) |
|
$ |
5,103 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended October 2, 2010
|
Foreign exchange contracts (cash flow hedging) |
|
$ |
7,488 |
|
|
$ |
(523 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps (fair value hedging) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Recorded in Interest and Other Expense location within the condensed consolidated statements
of income |
Note 7. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The Companys equity incentive plans are broad-based, long-term retention programs that cover
employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company. These plans are intended to
attract and retain talented employees, consultants and non-employee directors and to provide such
persons with a proprietary interest in the Company.
Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to stock awards granted
under the Companys equity incentive plans and rights to acquire stock granted under the Companys
Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Stock-based compensation included
in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,312 |
|
|
$ |
2,594 |
|
|
$ |
2,579 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
8,103 |
|
|
|
7,341 |
|
|
|
14,590 |
|
|
|
14,545 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7,512 |
|
|
|
6,768 |
|
|
|
13,482 |
|
|
|
13,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,899 |
|
|
$ |
15,421 |
|
|
$ |
30,666 |
|
|
$ |
30,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first six months of fiscal 2012 and 2011, the tax benefit realized for the tax
deduction from option exercises and other awards, including amounts credited to additional paid-in
capital, totaled $6.5 million and $647 thousand, respectively.
14
The fair values of stock options and stock purchase plan rights under the Companys equity
incentive plans and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) were estimated as of the grant date using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Companys expected stock price volatility assumption
for stock options is estimated using implied volatility of the Companys traded options. The
expected life of options granted is based on the historical exercise activity as well as the
expected disposition of all options outstanding. The expected life of options granted also
considers the actual contractual term. The weighted-average fair values per share of stock options
granted during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was $8.03 ($6.72 for the second quarter of fiscal
2011) and for the first six months of fiscal 2012 was $7.87 ($6.72 for the first six months of
fiscal 2011), which were estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Expected life of options (years) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
The estimated fair values of restricted stock unit (RSU) awards were calculated based on the market
price of Xilinx common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the present value of dividends
expected to be paid on Xilinx common stock prior to vesting. The per share weighted-average fair
values of RSUs granted during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was $34.33 ($23.90 for the second
quarter of fiscal 2011) and for the first six months of fiscal 2012 was $34.13 ($23.91 for the
first six months of fiscal 2011), which were calculated based on estimates at the date of grant
using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Risk-free interest
rate |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Employee Stock Option Plans
A summary of the Companys option plans activity and related information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
April 3, 2010 |
|
|
31,026 |
|
|
$ |
30.51 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
$ |
26.36 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(5,704 |
) |
|
$ |
25.42 |
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired |
|
|
(2,698 |
) |
|
$ |
50.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
24,969 |
|
|
$ |
29.11 |
|
Granted |
|
|
57 |
|
|
$ |
33.58 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,959 |
) |
|
$ |
24.93 |
|
Forfeited/cancelled/expired |
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
|
$ |
36.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
20,723 |
|
|
$ |
28.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
17,613 |
|
|
$ |
29.35 |
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
20,837 |
|
|
$ |
30.08 |
|
The types of awards allowed under the 2007 Equity Plan include incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options, RSUs, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. To date, the
Company has issued a mix of non-qualified stock options and RSUs under the 2007 Equity Plan. The
mix of stock options and RSU awards changes depending upon the grade level of the employees.
Employees at the lower grade levels typically receive mostly RSUs and may also receive stock
options. Employees at the higher grade levels, including the Companys executive officers, receive
both stock options and RSUs. On August 10, 2011, the stockholders approved an amendment to increase
the authorized number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2007 Equity Plan by 4.5 million
shares. As of October 1, 2011, 15.7 million shares remained available for grant under the 2007
Equity Plan.
15
The total pre-tax intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months and six months ended
October 1, 2011 was $3.3 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The total pre-tax intrinsic value
of options exercised during the three months and six months ended
October 2, 2010 was $4.8 million and $6.4 million, respectively. This intrinsic value represents
the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the Companys common stock
on the date of exercise.
RSU Awards
A summary of the Companys RSU activity and related information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
April 3, 2010 |
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
21.70 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
$ |
25.14 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,192 |
) |
|
$ |
22.23 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
$ |
21.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, 2011 |
|
|
4,215 |
|
|
$ |
23.19 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
$ |
34.13 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
$ |
23.03 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
$ |
26.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
4,928 |
|
|
$ |
27.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the Companys ESPP, shares are only issued during the second and fourth quarters of each
fiscal year. Employees purchased 501 thousand shares for $13.3 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2012 and 958 thousand shares for $13.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The
per-share weighted-average fair values of stock purchase rights granted under the ESPP during the
second quarter of fiscal 2012 and 2011 were $9.37 and $7.82, respectively. The fair values of
stock purchase plan rights granted in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and 2011 were estimated at
the date of grant using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Expected life of options (years) |
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
The next scheduled purchase under the ESPP is in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. On August 10,
2011, the stockholders approved an amendment to increase the authorized number of shares reserved
for issuance under the ESPP by 2.0 million shares. As of October 1, 2011, 8.9 million shares were
available for future issuance.
Note 8. Net Income Per Common Share
The computation of basic net income per common share for all periods presented is derived from the
information on the condensed consolidated statements of income, and there are no reconciling items
in the numerator used to compute diluted net income per common share. The total shares used in the
denominator of the diluted net income per common share calculation includes 3.9 million and 4.6
million potentially dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding for the second quarter and the
first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, that are not included in basic net income per common
share. For both the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2011, the total shares used
in the denominator of the diluted net income per common share calculation includes 3.1 million
potentially dilutive common equivalent shares. Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares are
determined by applying the treasury stock method to the impact of incremental shares issuable
assuming conversion of the debentures, exercise of outstanding stock options, vesting of
outstanding RSUs and issuance of common stock under the ESPP.
16
Outstanding stock options, RSUs and warrants (see Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving
Credit Facility for more discussion of warrants) to purchase approximately 29.0 million shares for
both the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012 under the Companys stock award
plans were excluded from diluted net income per common share by applying the treasury stock method,
as their inclusion would have been antidilutive. These options, RSUs and warrants could be dilutive
in the future if the Companys average share price increases and is greater than the combined
exercise prices and the unamortized fair values of these options, RSUs and warrants.
Diluted net income per common share for all periods, other than the first six months of fiscal
2012, does not include any incremental shares assuming the conversion of $600.0 million principal
amount of 2.625% senior convertible debentures due June 15, 2017 (2.625% Debentures) and the 3.125%
Debentures (see Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility). The debentures
will have no impact on diluted net income per common share if the price of the Companys common
stock is below the conversion price of each debenture, because the principal amount of these
debentures will be settled in cash upon conversion. Prior to conversion, the Company includes the
effect of the additional shares that may be issued upon conversions using the treasury stock method
in the diluted net income per common share calculation, provided that the impact was not anti
dilutive.
The call options to purchase the Companys common stock, which the Company purchased to hedge
against potential dilution upon conversion of the 2.625% Debentures (see Note 10. Convertible
Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility), are not considered for purposes of calculating the
total shares outstanding under the basic and diluted net income per share, as their effect would be
anti-dilutive. Upon exercise, the call options would serve to neutralize the dilutive effect of the
2.625% Debentures and potentially reduce the weighted number of diluted shares used in per share
calculations.
Note 9. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method), or
market (estimated net realizable value) and are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
16,971 |
|
|
$ |
15,465 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
200,140 |
|
|
|
214,023 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
30,541 |
|
|
|
35,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
247,652 |
|
|
$ |
264,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit Facility
2.625% Senior Convertible Debentures
In June 2010, the Company issued $600.0 million principal amount of 2.625% Debentures to qualified
institutional investors. The 2.625% Debentures are senior in right of payment to the Companys
existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to
the 2.625% Debentures, including the 3.125% Debentures described below. The fair value of the
2.625% Debentures as of October 1, 2011 was approximately $675.0 million, based on the last trading
price of the 2.625% Debentures for the period. The 2.625% Debentures are convertible, subject to
certain conditions, into shares of Xilinx common stock at a conversion rate of 33.0164 shares of
common stock per $1 thousand principal amount of the 2.625% Debentures, representing an effective
conversion price of approximately $30.29 per share of common stock. The conversion rate is subject
to adjustment for certain events as outlined in the indenture governing the 2.625% Debentures but
will not be adjusted for accrued interest.
In connection with the issuance of the 2.625% Debentures, in June 2010 the Company entered into
interest rate swaps with certain independent financial institutions, whereby the Company paid a
variable interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR minus 0.2077%, and received interest income
at a fixed interest rate of 2.625%. In October 2010, the Company sold the interest rate swaps for
$30.2 million. In accordance with the authoritative guidance for the accounting of derivative
instruments and hedging activities issued by the FASB, the fair value of hedge accounting
adjustment at the time of the sale of $29.9 million is amortized as reduction to interest expense
over the remaining life of the 2.625% Debentures.
17
The carrying values of the liability and equity components of the 2.625% Debentures are reflected
in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Liability component: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of the 2.625% Debentures |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Unamortized discount of liability component |
|
|
(88,083 |
) |
|
|
(95,855 |
) |
Hedge accounting adjustment sale of
interest rate swap |
|
|
25,454 |
|
|
|
27,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value of the 2.625% Debentures |
|
$ |
537,371 |
|
|
$ |
531,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity component net carrying value |
|
$ |
105,620 |
|
|
$ |
105,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to the 2.625% Debentures was included in interest and other expense, net
on the condensed consolidated statements of income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Contractual coupon interest |
|
$ |
3,938 |
|
|
$ |
3,938 |
|
|
$ |
7,875 |
|
|
$ |
4,988 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
3,167 |
|
|
|
5,526 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense related to the
2.625% Debentures |
|
$ |
7,063 |
|
|
$ |
7,470 |
|
|
$ |
14,125 |
|
|
$ |
9,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To hedge against potential dilution upon conversion of the 2.625% Debentures, the Company also
purchased call options on its common stock from the hedge counterparties. The call options give the
Company the right to purchase up to 19.8 million shares of its common stock at $30.29 per share.
The Company paid an aggregate of $112.3 million to purchase these call options. The call options
will terminate upon the earlier of the maturity of the 2.625% Debentures or the last day any of the
2.625% Debentures remain outstanding. To reduce the hedging cost, under separate transactions the
Company sold warrants to the hedge counterparties, which give the hedge counterparties the right to
purchase up to 19.8 million shares of the Companys common stock at $42.91 per share. These
warrants expire on a gradual basis over a specified period starting on September 13, 2017. The
Company received an aggregate of $46.9 million from the sale of these warrants. In accordance with
the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on determining whether an instrument (or embedded
feature) is indexed to an entitys own stock, the Company concluded that the call options and
warrants were indexed to the Companys stock. Therefore, the call options and warrants were
classified as equity instruments and will not be marked to market prospectively. The net amount of
$65.4 million paid to the hedge counterparties, less the applicable tax benefit related to the call
options of $41.7 million, was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. The settlement
terms of the call options and warrants provide for net share settlement.
3.125% Junior Subordinated Convertible Debentures
In March 2007, the Company issued $1.00 billion principal amount of 3.125% Debentures to an initial
purchaser in a private offering. The 3.125% Debentures are subordinated in right of payment to the
Companys existing and future senior debt, including the 2.625% Debentures, and to the other
liabilities of the Companys subsidiaries. During fiscal 2009, the Company repurchased some of its
3.125% Debentures, resulting in approximately $689.6 million of debt outstanding in principal
amount as of October 1, 2011. The 3.125% Debentures are convertible, subject to certain conditions,
into shares of Xilinx common stock at a conversion rate of 33.1695 shares of common stock per $1
thousand principal amount of 3.125% Debentures, representing an effective conversion price of
approximately $30.15 per share of common stock. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment for
certain events as outlined in the indenture governing the 3.125% Debentures but will not be
adjusted for accrued interest.
18
The carrying values of the liability and equity components of the 3.125% Debentures are reflected
in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Liability component: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of the 3.125% Debentures |
|
$ |
689,635 |
|
|
$ |
689,635 |
|
Unamortized discount of liability component |
|
|
(327,735 |
) |
|
|
(329,941 |
) |
Unamortized discount of embedded derivative from date of
issuance |
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of liability component 3.125% Debentures |
|
|
360,425 |
|
|
|
358,190 |
|
Carrying value of embedded derivative component |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value of the 3.125% Debentures |
|
$ |
362,432 |
|
|
$ |
359,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity component net carrying value |
|
$ |
229,513 |
|
|
$ |
229,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to the 3.125% Debentures was included in interest and other expense, net
on the condensed consolidated statements of income and was recognized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Contractual coupon interest |
|
$ |
5,388 |
|
|
$ |
5,388 |
|
|
$ |
10,766 |
|
|
$ |
10,776 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Amortization of embedded derivative |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense related to the
3.125% Debentures |
|
$ |
6,570 |
|
|
$ |
6,493 |
|
|
$ |
13,113 |
|
|
$ |
12,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
In April 2007, Xilinx entered into a five-year $250.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit
facility with a syndicate of banks (expiring in April 2012). Borrowings under the credit facility
will bear interest at a benchmark rate plus an applicable margin based upon the Companys credit
rating. In connection with the credit facility, the Company is required to maintain certain
financial and nonfinancial covenants. As of October 1, 2011, the Company had made no borrowings
under this credit facility and was not in violation of any of the covenants.
Note 11. Common Stock and Debentures Repurchase Program
The Board of Directors has approved stock repurchase programs enabling the Company to repurchase
its common stock in the open market or through negotiated transactions with independent financial
institutions. In June 2010, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $500.0 million of common
stock (2010 Repurchase Program). The 2010 Repurchase Program has no stated expiration date.
Through October 1, 2011, the Company had used $280.4 million of the $500.0 million authorized under
the 2010 Repurchase Program, leaving $219.6 million available for future repurchases. The Companys
current policy is to retire all repurchased shares and debentures, and consequently, no treasury
shares or debentures were held as of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011.
During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company repurchased 5.9 million shares of common
stock in the open market for a total of $187.2 million under the 2010 Repurchase Program. During
the first six months of fiscal 2011, the Company repurchased 17.6 million shares of common stock
for a total of $466.3 million.
Note 12. Restructuring Charges
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company implemented restructuring measures designed
to consolidate its research and development activities in the U.S.
and to reduce its global
workforce by 46 net positions, or less than 2%. The Company has substantially completed this
restructuring plan in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company recorded total restructuring
charges of $3.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, which was predominantly related to
severance costs and benefits expenses. These charges have been shown separately as restructuring
charges on the condensed consolidated statements of income. Of the $3.4 million charges, the amount
that had not been paid as of October 1, 2011 was $2.0 million, which is expected to be settled by
the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
19
Note 13. Interest and Other Expense, Net
The components of interest and other expense, net are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
6,200 |
|
|
$ |
4,542 |
|
|
$ |
11,542 |
|
|
$ |
9,062 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(13,634 |
) |
|
|
(10,006 |
) |
|
|
(27,248 |
) |
|
|
(17,780 |
) |
Other income
(expense), net
|
|
|
(1,164) |
|
|
|
1,980 |
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,598 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,484 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,409 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
126,286 |
|
|
$ |
170,895 |
|
|
$ |
280,660 |
|
|
$ |
329,482 |
|
Net change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net
of tax |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
4,258 |
|
|
|
4,726 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains on available-for-sale securities,
net of tax, included in net income |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(2,126 |
) |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(2,449 |
) |
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on hedging transactions, net of
tax |
|
|
(8,120 |
) |
|
|
6,620 |
|
|
|
(8,719 |
) |
|
|
7,487 |
|
Net change in cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
119,337 |
|
|
$ |
178,177 |
|
|
$ |
276,513 |
|
|
$ |
339,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Accumulated unrealized gains on
available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
$ |
6,515 |
|
|
$ |
2,819 |
|
Accumulated unrealized gain (loss) on hedging
transactions, net of tax |
|
|
(3,496 |
) |
|
|
5,223 |
|
Accumulated cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
6,370 |
|
|
$ |
10,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15. Income Taxes
The Company recorded tax provisions of $20.0 million and $46.1 million for the second quarter and
the first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively, representing effective tax rates of 14% for both
periods. The Company recorded tax provisions of $48.3 million and $92.6 million for the second
quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2011, respectively, representing effective tax rates of
22% for both periods.
The difference between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and the Companys effective tax
rate is primarily due to income earned in lower tax rate jurisdictions, for which no U.S. income
tax has been provided, as the Company intends to permanently reinvest these earnings outside of the
U.S.
The Companys total gross unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2011, determined in accordance
with FASB authoritative guidance for measuring uncertain tax position, increased by $1.6 million in
the second quarter of fiscal 2012 to $84.0 million. Such increase relates to various matters
including the uncertainty over estimates and judgments made in calculating the research credit.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if realized in a future period, would favorably
affect the effective tax rate was $57.2 million as of October 1, 2011. It is reasonably possible
that changes to our unrecognized tax benefits could be significant in the next twelve months due to
tax audit settlements and lapses of statutes of limitation. As a result of uncertainties regarding
tax audit settlements and their possible outcomes, an estimate of the range of increase or decrease
that could occur in the next twelve months cannot be made.
The Companys policy is to include interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities within
the provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of income. The balance of accrued
interest and penalties recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 1, 2011
was $2.6 million. The increase of interest and penalties included in the Companys provision for
income taxes totaled $160 thousand and $348 thousand in the three and six months ended October 1,
2011, respectively.
20
The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal audits by taxing authorities for years through
fiscal 2007. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. state audits for years through fiscal 2004,
except for fiscal years 1996 through 2001 which are still open for audit purposes. The Company is
no longer subject to tax audits in Ireland for years through fiscal 2006.
Note 16. Commitments
Xilinx leases some of its facilities and office buildings under non-cancelable operating leases
that expire at various dates through October 2021. Additionally, Xilinx entered into a land lease
in conjunction with the Companys building in Singapore, which will expire in November 2035 and the
lease cost was settled in an up-front payment in June 2006. Some of the operating leases for
facilities and office buildings require payment of operating costs, including property taxes,
repairs, maintenance and insurance. Most of the Companys leases contain renewal options for
varying terms. Approximate future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal years |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2012 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
3,531 |
|
2013 |
|
|
6,425 |
|
2014 |
|
|
4,682 |
|
2015 |
|
|
2,888 |
|
2016 |
|
|
1,597 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate future rental income to be received, which includes rents from both owned and leased
property, totaled $9.1 million as of October 1, 2011. Rent expense, net of rental income, under
all operating leases was $521 thousand and $1.6 million for the second quarter and the first six
months of fiscal 2012, respectively. Rent expense, net of rental income, under all operating
leases was $1.4 million and $2.4 million for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal
2011, respectively. Rental income was not material for the second quarter and first six months of
fiscal 2012 or 2011.
Other commitments as of October 1, 2011 totaled $96.9 million and consisted of purchases of
inventory and other non-cancelable purchase obligations related to subcontractors that manufacture
silicon wafers and provide assembly and some test services. The Company expects to receive and pay
for these materials and services in the next three to six months, as the products meet delivery and
quality specifications. As of October 1, 2011, the Company also had $27.3 million of
non-cancelable license obligations to providers of electronic design automation software and
hardware/software maintenance expiring at various dates through July 2014.
The Company committed up to $5.0 million to acquire, in the future, rights to intellectual property
until July 2023. License payments will be amortized over the useful life of the intellectual
property acquired.
Note 17. Product Warranty and Indemnification
The Company generally sells products with a limited warranty for product quality. The Company
provides an accrual for known product issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated.
As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and the end of fiscal 2011, the accrual balance
of the product warranty liability was immaterial.
The Company offers, subject to certain terms and conditions, to indemnify certain customers and
distributors for costs and damages awarded against these parties in the event the Companys
hardware products are found to infringe third-party intellectual property rights, including
patents, copyrights or trademarks, and to compensate certain customers for limited specified costs
they actually incur in the event our hardware products experience epidemic failure. To a lesser
extent, the Company may from time-to-time offer limited indemnification with respect to its
software products. The terms and conditions of these indemnity obligations are limited by
contract, which obligations are typically perpetual from the effective date of the agreement. The
Company has historically received only a limited number of requests for indemnification under these
provisions and has not made any significant payments pursuant to these provisions. The Company
cannot estimate the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, that the Company may be
required to make as a result of these obligations due to the limited history of indemnification
claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular
claim and indemnification provision. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will not
incur any financial liabilities in the future as a result of these obligations.
21
Note 18. Contingencies
Patent Litigation
On December 28, 2007, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by PACT XPP Technologies, AG (PACT)
against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
(PACT XPP Technologies, AG. v. Xilinx, Inc. and Avnet, Inc. Case No. 2:07-CV-563). The lawsuit
pertains to eleven different patents and PACT seeks injunctive relief, damages including enhanced damages,
interest and attorneys fees. The lawsuit is currently scheduled to go to trial in December 2011.
The plaintiff alleged that it has suffered damages in the amount of approximately $53.0 million as a result of the alleged infringement and is requesting trebling of
damages as well as pre-judgment interest, attorneys fees and post-judgment royalties. The Company vigorously disputes its liability and the
damages claimed by plaintiff. At this time, the Company is unable to estimate its range of possible loss.
On July 30, 2010, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by Intellitech Corporation (Intellitech)
against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Intellitech
Corporation v. Altera Corporation, Xilinx, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Case No.
1:10-CV-00645-UNA). The lawsuit pertained to a single patent and Intellitech sought declaratory
and injunctive relief, unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees. On February 15, 2011,
the Company filed a lawsuit against Intellitech in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellitech Corporation, Case No. CV11-0699). The lawsuit
pertained to seven patents and a single trademark and the Company sought declaratory and injunctive
relief, unspecified damages, costs and attorneys fees. The parties reached a confidential
agreement to settle both actions and the lawsuits were dismissed with prejudice on October 18,
2011. The amount of the settlement did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
On February 14, 2011, the Company filed a complaint for declaratory judgment of patent
noninfringement and invalidity against Intellectual Ventures Management LLC and related entities
(Intellectual Ventures) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. On
September 30, 2011, the Company amended its complaint in this case to eliminate certain defendants
and patents from the action (Xilinx, Inc. v Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures
II LLC, Case No CV11-0671). The lawsuit pertains to five patents and seeks judgments of
non-infringement by Xilinx and judgments that the patents are invalid and unenforceable, as well as
costs and attorneys fees.
On February 15, 2011, Intellectual Ventures added the Company as a defendant in its complaint for
patent infringement previously filed against Altera Corporation (Altera), Microsemi Corporation
(Microsemi) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (Lattice) in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Delaware (Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Altera
Corporation, Microsemi Corporation, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Xilinx, Inc., Case No.
10-CV-1065). The lawsuit pertains to five patents, four of which Xilinx is alleged to be
infringing. Intellectual Ventures seeks unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees and the
proceedings are in their early stages. The Company is unable estimate its range of possible loss
in this matter at this time.
On October 17, 2011, Xilinx filed a complaint for patent non-infringement and invalidity and
violation of California Business and Professions Code
Section 17200 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California against Intellectual Ventures and related
entities as well as additional defendants (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures, LLC. Intellectual
Ventures Management, LLC, Detelle Relay KG, LLC, Roldan Block NY LLC, Latrosse Technologies LLC, TR
Technologies Foundation LLC, Taichi Holdings, LLC, Noregin Assets N.V., LLC and Intellectual
Venture Funding LLC Case No CV-04407).
On or about September 2, 2011, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by HSM Portfolio LLC and
Technology Properties Limited LLC (HSM/TPL) against the Company and seventeen other defendants in
the U.S. District of Delaware (HSM Portfolio LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC v. Fujitsu
Limited, et al., Case No. CV11-770). The lawsuit pertains to four patents, two of which Xilinx is
alleged to be infringing. HSM/TPL seek unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees and the
proceedings are in their early stages. The Company is unable to estimate its range of possible
loss in this matter at this time.
On or about September 15, 2011, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by Smart Foundry Solutions,
LLC (SFS) against the Company and eight other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Central
District of California (Smart Foundry Solutions, LLC v. Analog Devices, et al., Case No. CV-01396).
The lawsuit pertains to a single patent and has not been served on Xilinx as of the date of this
filing. SFS seeks injunctive relief, unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees and the
proceedings are in their early stages. The Company is unable to estimate its range of possible
loss in this matter at this time.
Other Matters
Except as stated above, there are no pending legal proceedings of a material nature to which the
Company is a party or of which any of its property is the subject.
Note 19. Business Combinations
During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company purchased certain assets and assumed certain
liabilities of Modelware, Inc., a privately-held company that provides Packet Processing solutions
in communications equipment, and Sarance Inc., a privately-held company that develops Ethernet and
Interlaken Intellectual Property (IP) solutions for the logic integrated circuits (IC) landscape.
Both acquisitions align with Xilinxs strategy for accelerating market growth and meet the
increasing demand from our wired communications customers to offer application specific IP. These
acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The aggregate financial
impact of these acquisitions was not material to the Company.
22
Note 20. Goodwill and Acquisition-Related Intangibles
As of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, the gross and net amounts of goodwill and of
acquisition-related intangibles for all acquisitions were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Amortization Life |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
149,693 |
|
|
$ |
133,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core technology, gross |
|
|
76,440 |
|
|
|
58,439 |
|
|
5.7 years |
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(42,751 |
) |
|
|
(39,789 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core technology, net |
|
|
33,689 |
|
|
|
18,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles, gross |
|
|
46,206 |
|
|
|
45,201 |
|
|
2.7 years |
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(43,599 |
) |
|
|
(42,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition-related intangibles,
gross |
|
|
126,646 |
|
|
|
109,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(86,350 |
) |
|
|
(82,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquisition-related intangibles, net |
|
$ |
40,296 |
|
|
$ |
26,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets for the three and six months ended
October 1, 2011 was $2.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively. There was no amortization expense
for acquisition-related intangible assets for the three and six
months ended October 2, 2010.
Based on the carrying value of acquisition-related intangibles recorded as of October 1, 2011, and
assuming no subsequent impairment of the underlying assets, the annual amortization expense for
acquisition-related intangibles is expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2012 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
2013 |
|
|
8,536 |
|
2014 |
|
|
7,918 |
|
2015 |
|
|
7,289 |
|
2016 |
|
|
6,742 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 21. Subsequent Event
On October 18, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per common
share for the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The dividend is payable on November 30, 2011 to
stockholders of record on November 9, 2011.
23
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The statements in this Managements Discussion and Analysis that are forward-looking, within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, involve numerous risks and
uncertainties and are based on current expectations. The reader should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated
in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including those risks discussed under Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this document. Often, forward-looking statements can be identified by
the use of forward-looking words, such as may, will, could, should, expect, believe,
anticipate, estimate, continue, plan, intend, project and other similar terminology, or
the negative of such terms. We disclaim any responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking
statement provided in this Managements Discussion and Analysis for any reason.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have
a significant impact on the results we report in our consolidated financial statements. The SEC
has defined critical accounting policies as those that are most important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and results of operations and require us to make our most difficult and
subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are
inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, our critical accounting policies include:
valuation of marketable and non-marketable securities, which impacts losses on debt and equity
securities when we record impairments; revenue recognition, which impacts the recording of
revenues; and valuation of inventories, which impacts cost of revenues and gross margin. Our
critical accounting policies also include: the assessment of impairment of long-lived assets
including acquisition-related intangibles, which impacts their valuation; the assessment of the
recoverability of goodwill, which impacts goodwill impairment; accounting for income taxes, which
impacts the provision or benefit recognized for income taxes, as well as the valuation of deferred
tax assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet; and valuation and recognition of stock-based
compensation, which impacts gross margin, research and development (R&D) expenses, and selling,
general and administrative (SG&A) expenses. For more discussion please refer to Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of Operations included in
our Form 10-K for the year ended April 2, 2011 filed with the SEC. We also have other key
accounting policies that are not as subjective, and therefore, their application would not require
us to make estimates or judgments that are as difficult, but which nevertheless could significantly
affect our financial reporting.
Results of Operations: Second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the
second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2011
The following table sets forth statement of income data as a percentage of net revenues for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
65.6 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Amortization of
acquisition-related intangibles |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
Interest and other expense, net |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Net Revenues
We sell our products to global manufacturers of electronic products in end markets such as wired
and wireless communications, aerospace and defense, industrial, scientific and medical and audio,
video and broadcast. The vast majority of our net revenues are generated by sales of our
semiconductor products, but we also generate sales from support products. We classify our product
offerings into four categories: New, Mainstream, Base and Support Products. The composition of
each product category is as follows:
|
|
|
New Products include our most recent product offerings and include the
Virtex®-7, KintexTM-7, Virtex-6, Virtex-5, Spartan®-6,
Spartan-3A and Spartan-3E product families. |
|
|
|
Mainstream Products include the Virtex-4, Spartan-3, Spartan-II and CoolRunner-II
product families. |
|
|
|
Base Products consist of our older product families including the Virtex, Virtex-E,
Virtex-II, Spartan, XC4000, CoolRunner and XC9500 products. |
|
|
|
Support Products include configuration products (PROMs), software, IP, customer
training, design services and support. |
These product categories, except for Support Products, are modified on a periodic basis to better
reflect the age of the products and advances in technology. Other than the addition of our 28-nm
products to the New Products category in this quarter, we have not made any modification since March
29, 2009, which was the beginning of our fiscal 2010. New Products include our most recent product
offerings and are typically designed into our customers latest generation of electronic systems.
Mainstream Products are generally several years old and designed into customer programs that are
currently shipping in full production. Base Products are older than Mainstream Products with
demand generated generally by the customers oldest systems still in production. Support Products
are generally products or services sold in conjunction with our semiconductor devices to aid
customers in the design process.
Net revenues of $555.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 represented a 10% decrease from
the comparable prior year period of $619.7 million. Net revenues for the first six months of
fiscal 2012 were $1.17 billion, a 4% decrease from the comparable prior year period of $1.21
billion. Revenue from New Products increased in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal
2012 versus the comparable prior year periods but was not sufficient to fully offset the declines
in Mainstream and Base Products. One end customer accounted for 14% and 11% of our net revenues
for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012, respectively.
For the first six months of fiscal 2012, approximately 61% of our net revenues were from products
sold to distributors for subsequent resale to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) or their
subcontract manufacturers. As of October 1, 2011, we had $103.3 million of deferred revenue and
$30.8 million of deferred cost of revenues recognized as a net $72.5 million of deferred income on
shipments to distributors. As of April 2, 2011, we had $134.0 million of deferred revenue and
$34.2 million of deferred cost of revenues recognized as a net $99.8 million of deferred income on
shipments to distributors. The deferred income on shipments to distributors that will ultimately
be recognized in our consolidated statement of income will be different than the amount shown on
the consolidated balance sheet due to actual price adjustments issued to the distributors when the
product is sold to their end customers.
Net Revenues by Product
Net revenues by product categories for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012
and 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
New Products |
|
$ |
297.5 |
|
|
$ |
272.0 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
612.2 |
|
|
$ |
505.0 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Mainstream Products |
|
|
122.7 |
|
|
|
170.2 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
266.6 |
|
|
|
348.2 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Base Products |
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
240.2 |
|
|
|
310.6 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Support Products |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
555.2 |
|
|
$ |
619.7 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
1,170.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,214.4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues from New Products increased in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012
from the comparable prior year periods as a result of continued strong market acceptance of these
products, particularly for our 65-nanometer (nm) Virtex-5, 40-nm Virtex-6 and 45-nm Spartan-6
product families. We expect sales of New Products, as currently defined, to continue to grow
during this fiscal year as more customer programs enter volume production with our 40/45-nm
products and sales from our 28-nm products begin to increase.
Net revenues from Mainstream Products decreased in the second quarter and first six months of
fiscal 2012 from the comparable prior year periods. The decreases were primarily due to the decline
in sales of our Virtex-4 product family.
Net revenues from Base Products decreased in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012
from the comparable prior year periods. The decreases were mainly attributable to the decline in
buying activities in our older product families.
Net revenues from Support Products decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the
prior year period. The decrease was primarily related to a decrease in sales from our PROM
products. Net revenues from Support Products increased slightly in the first six months of fiscal
2012 compared to the prior year period due to an increase in sales from our PROM products as well
as software.
25
Net Revenues by End Markets
Our end market revenue data is derived from our understanding of our end customers primary
markets. We classify our net revenues by end markets into four categories: Communications,
Industrial and Other, Consumer and Automotive and Data Processing. The percentage change
calculation in the table below represents the year-to-year dollar change in each end market.
Net revenues by end markets for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012 and 2011
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% Change |
|
(% of total net revenues) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
in Dollars |
|
Communications |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Industrial and Other |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Consumer and Automotive |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Data Processing |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues from the Communications end market decreased in the second quarter and first six
months of fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year periods. The decreases were due to weaker sales
from both wired and wireless communication applications.
Net revenues from the Industrial and Other end market decreased (in terms of absolute dollars) in
the second quarter of fiscal 2012 versus the comparable prior year period. The decrease was largely
due to a decline in sales from test and measurement applications. Net revenues from the Industrial
and Other end market increased in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year
period. The increase was due to increased sales from industrial, scientific and medical
applications which more than offset weakness in defense and test and measurement applications.
Net revenues from the Consumer and Automotive end market decreased in the second quarter and first
six months of fiscal 2012 from the comparable prior year periods. The decreases were due to
decreased sales from audio, video and broadcast and consumer applications which more than offset
stronger sales from automotive applications.
Net revenues from the Data Processing end market were flat in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 as
strength in storage applications was offset by weaker sales from computing and data processing
applications. Net revenues from the Data Processing end market increased in the first six months
of fiscal 2012 from the comparable prior year period. The increase was primarily due to higher
sales from computing, data processing and storage applications.
Net Revenues by Geography
Geographic revenue information reflects the geographic location of the distributors, OEMs or
contract manufacturers who purchased our products. This may differ from the geographic location of
the end customers. Net revenues by geography for the second quarter and the first six months of
fiscal 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
161.4 |
|
|
$ |
186.5 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
342.6 |
|
|
$ |
378.4 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
172.0 |
|
|
|
218.0 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
388.6 |
|
|
|
422.1 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Europe |
|
|
161.7 |
|
|
|
160.9 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
322.1 |
|
|
|
315.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Japan |
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
117.4 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
555.2 |
|
|
$ |
619.7 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
1,170.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,214.4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues in North America decreased in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012
from the comparable prior year periods. The decreases were primarily due to weakness across most
end market segments including Communications, Industrial and Other and Consumer and Automotive.
26
Net revenues in Asia Pacific decreased in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012
from the comparable prior year periods. The decreases were primarily due to decreased sales from
the Communications end market with particular weakness coming from wireless communications
applications.
Net revenues in Europe were essentially flat in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared with the
prior year period. Net revenues in Europe increased slightly in the first six months of fiscal
2012 versus the prior year period as higher sales from the Industrial and Other and Data Processing
end market segments more than offset weaker sales from the Communications end market segment.
The increases in Japan for both the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012 from the
comparable prior year periods were driven by strength in the Industrial and Other end market.
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
354.6 |
|
|
$ |
406.4 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
747.0 |
|
|
$ |
793.0 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Percentage of
net revenues |
|
|
63.9 |
% |
|
|
65.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.8 |
% |
|
|
65.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin decreased by 1.7 and 1.5 percentage points in the second quarter and the first six
months of fiscal 2012, respectively, from the comparable prior year periods. This was driven
primarily by the mix of products within the New Product family, the growth year-over-year of
New Products family and lower sales from Mainstream and Base Products. New Products generally
have lower gross margins than Mainstream and Base Products as they are in the early stage of their
product life cycle and have higher unit costs associated with relatively lower volumes and early
manufacturing maturity.
Gross margin may be affected in the future due to mix shifts, competitive-pricing pressure,
manufacturing-yield issues and wafer pricing. We expect to mitigate any adverse impacts from these
factors by continuing to improve yields on our New Products and by improving manufacturing
efficiencies.
In order to compete effectively, we pass manufacturing cost reductions to our customers in the form
of reduced prices to the extent that we can maintain acceptable margins. Price erosion is common
in the semiconductor industry, as advances in both product architecture and manufacturing process
technology permit continual reductions in unit cost. We have historically been able to offset much
of this revenue decline in our mature products with increased revenues from newer products.
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
105.8 |
|
|
$ |
96.6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
211.8 |
|
|
$ |
191.1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Percentage of net
revenues |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
R&D spending increased $9.2 million, or 10%, for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the
same period last year. For the first six months of fiscal 2012, R&D spending increased $20.7
million, or 11%, compared to the same period last year. The increases were primarily attributable
to higher current period expenses related to our 28-nm development activities.
We plan to continue to selectively invest in R&D efforts in areas such as new products and more
advanced process development, IP cores and the development of new design and layout software. We
may also consider acquisitions to complement our strategy for technology leadership and engineering
resources in critical areas.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
$ |
88.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
$ |
171.2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
27
SG&A expenses increased $1.5 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and $13.9 million
during the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the same periods last year. The increases
were primarily due to higher legal expenses related to the current litigation (see Note 18.
Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. Financial
Information, for additional information) and higher compensation expenses and were partially offset by reduction in outside sales commission due to lower
revenues.
Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Amortization of
acquisition-related
intangibles |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the three and six months ended October 1, 2011 was related to the
intangible assets obtained from recent acquisitions during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and
first quarter of fiscal 2012. Prior to these recent acquisitions, the previous acquisition-related
intangibles had been fully amortized as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Stock-based compensation included
in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 10% increase in stock-based compensation expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared
to the same period in prior year was primarily related to higher expenses associated with
restricted stock units, as we granted more restricted stock unit at higher price in the current
fiscal year compared to the prior year. The higher expense from restricted stock unit was partially
offset by lower expenses related to stock option grant as we granted less stock options in the
current fiscal year compared to the prior year, and lower expenses related to the ESPP due to lower
number of shares expected to be issued. Total stock-based compensation expense for the first six
months of fiscal 2012 stayed flat from the same period of prior year as the increase in expense
from higher number of shares of restricted stock units granted with higher price in the current
fiscal year was essentially offset by lower number of shares granted in stock option and lower
number of expected shares to be granted in ESPP. We amortize our stock-based compensation using
straight-line method over the requisite service period of generally four years.
The impact of forfeiture true up and forfeiture rate estimates in the first six months of fiscal
2012 and 2011 reduced stock-based compensation expense by $6.6 million and $7.0 million,
respectively.
Restructuring Charges
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we implemented restructuring measures designed to
consolidate our research and development activities in the U.S. and
to reduce our global
workforce by 46 net positions, or less than 2%. We have substantially completed this restructuring
plan in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We recorded total restructuring charges of $3.4 million
in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, which was predominantly related to severance costs and
benefits expenses. These charges have been shown separately as restructuring charges on the
condensed consolidated statements of income. Of the $3.4 million charges, the amount that had not
been paid as of October 1, 2011 was $2.0 million, which is expected to be settled by the end of the
third quarter of fiscal 2012.
Interest and Other Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Interest and other expense,
net |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Percentage of net revenues |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
28
Our net interest and other expense increased by $5.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively, for
the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the same period last year.
The increases were primarily due to the impact of interest expenses and debt discount amortization
related to the 2.625% Debentures, which was accounted for as interest expense.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
$ |
92.6 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Percentage of net
revenues |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rates in all periods reflected the favorable impact of foreign income at
statutory rates less than the U.S. rate and tax credits earned.
The decreases in the effective tax rate in the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal
2012 as compared to the prior year periods included a decrease in taxes as a result of a change in
the geographic mix of profit before taxes and an increase in the amount of permanently reinvested
foreign earnings for which no U.S. taxes were provided.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically used a combination of cash flows from operations and equity and debt
financing to support ongoing business activities, acquire or invest in critical or complementary
technologies, purchase facilities and capital equipment, repurchase our common stock and debentures
under our repurchase program, pay dividends and finance working capital. Additionally, our
investments in debt securities are available for future sale.
The combination of cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments as of October 1,
2011 and April 2, 2011 totaled $2.86 billion and $2.69 billion, respectively. As of October 1,
2011, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1.81 billion and working capital
of $2.05 billion. As of April 2, 2011, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $1.93
billion and working capital was $2.25 billion.
Operating Activities - During the first six months of fiscal 2012, our operations generated net
positive cash flow of $437.3 million, which was $290.6 million higher than the $146.7 million
generated during the first six months of fiscal 2011. The positive cash flow from operations
generated during the first six months of fiscal 2012 was primarily from net income as adjusted for
noncash related items, decreases in accounts receivable, deferred income taxes, inventories, and
other assets, as well as an increase in income taxes payable. These items were partially offset by
a decrease in deferred income on shipments to distributors and accounts payable, as well as an
increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Accounts receivable decreased by $70.0
million at October 1, 2011 from the levels at April 2, 2011, due to lower revenues. Days sales
outstanding (DSO) decreased to 34 days at October 1, 2011 from 45 days at April 2, 2011. During fiscal
2011, we agreed to temporarily extend payment terms for Avnet, which increased our trade accounts
receivable balance and DSO throughout fiscal 2011 compared to our
historical level. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, Avnet returned to standard payment terms
and therefore our trade accounts receivable balance and DSO levels specific to Avnet subsequently
decreased. Our inventory levels were $17.1 million lower at October 1, 2011 compared to April 2,
2011. Combined inventory days at Xilinx and distribution decreased to 120 days at October 1, 2011
from 135 days at April 2, 2011. The combined inventory days as of April 2, 2011 and October 1, 2011
were relatively higher than usual due to build ahead of a number of legacy parts in response to the
previously planned closure of a particular foundry line.
For the first six months of fiscal 2011, the net positive cash flow from operations was primarily
from net income as adjusted for noncash related items, decreases in deferred income taxes and other
assets, as well as increases in accounts payable and deferred income on shipments to distributors.
These items were partially offset by increases in accounts receivable, inventories and prepaid
expenses and other current assets, as well as decreases in income taxes payable and accrued
liabilities.
Investing Activities - Net cash used in investing activities of $838.5 million during the first six
months of fiscal 2012 consisted of net purchases of available-for-sale securities of $772.6
million, $34.5 million for other investing activities and $31.4 million for purchases of property,
plant and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities of $421.7 million during the first six
months of fiscal 2011 consisted of net purchases of available-for-sale securities of $387.3
million, $33.4 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment and $1.0 million for other
investing activities.
29
Financing Activities - Net cash used in financing activities was $218.2 million in the first six
months of fiscal 2012 and consisted of $177.2 million of repurchase of common stocks and $100.8
million for dividend payments to stockholders, offset by $51.9 million of proceeds from the
issuance of common stock under employee stock plans and $7.9 million for the excess tax benefit
from stock-based compensation. For the comparable fiscal 2011 period, net cash provided by
financing activities was $18.1 million and consisted of $587.6 million of net proceeds from
issuance of the 2.625% Debentures, $46.9 million of proceeds from issuance of warrants, $45.6
million of proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock plans and $2.1 million for
the excess of the tax benefit from stock-based compensation, offset by $466.3 million of repurchase
of common stocks, $112.3 million for purchase of call options to hedge against potential dilution
upon conversion of the 2.625% Debentures and $85.5 million for dividend payments to stockholders.
Stockholders equity increased $77.8 million during the first six months of fiscal 2012. The
increase was primarily attributable to $280.7 million in net income for the first six months of
fiscal 2012, $51.9 million of issuance of common stock under employee stock plans, $30.7 million of
stock-based compensation, $6.5 million of excess tax benefit associated with stock option exercises
and $3.7 million of change in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred
tax liabilities. The increases were offset by $177.2 million of repurchase of common stocks, $100.8
million of payment of dividends to stockholders and $8.7 million of change in net unrealized gain
(loss) on hedging transaction.
Contractual Obligations
We lease some of our facilities, office buildings and land under non-cancelable operating leases
that expire at various dates through October 2021. See Note 16. Commitments to our condensed
consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. Financial Information, for a schedule of
our operating lease commitments as of October 1, 2011 and additional information about operating
leases.
Due to the nature of our business, we depend entirely upon subcontractors to manufacture our
silicon wafers and provide assembly and some test services. The lengthy subcontractor lead times
require us to order the materials and services in advance, and we are obligated to pay for the
materials and services when completed. As of October 1, 2011, we had $96.9 million of outstanding
inventory and other non-cancelable purchase obligations to subcontractors. We expect to receive
and pay for these materials and services in the next three to six months, as the products meet
delivery and quality specifications. As of October 1, 2011, we also had $27.3 million of
non-cancelable license obligations to providers of electronic design automation software and
hardware/software maintenance expiring at various dates through July 2014.
We committed up to $5.0 million to acquire, in the future, rights to intellectual property until
July 2023. License payments will be amortized over the useful life of the intellectual property
acquired.
In March 2007, we issued $1.00 billion principal amount of 3.125% Debentures. As a result of the
repurchases in fiscal 2009, the remaining principal amount of the 3.125% Debentures as of October
1, 2011 was $689.6 million. The 3.125% Debentures require payment of interest semiannually on
March 15 and September 15 of each year. In June 2010, we issued another $600.0 million principal
amount of 2.625% Debentures. The 2.625% Debentures require payment of interest semiannually on June
15 and December 15 of each year. See Note 10. Convertible Debentures and Revolving Credit
Facility to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. Financial
Information, for additional information about our debentures.
As of October 1, 2011, $48.9 million of liabilities for uncertain tax position and related interest
and penalties were classified as long-term income taxes payable in the condensed consolidated
balance sheet. Due to the inherent uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash outflows
associated with such liabilities, we are unable to reliably estimate the timing of cash settlement
with the respective taxing authorities.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
As of October 1, 2011, we did not have any significant off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined
in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash generated from operations is used as our primary source of liquidity and capital resources.
Our investment portfolio is also available for future cash requirements as is our $250.0 million
revolving credit facility entered into in April 2007 (expiring in April 2012). We are not aware of
any lack of access to the revolving credit facility; however, we can provide no assurance that
access to the credit facility will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.
Our credit facility is not reliant upon a single bank. There have been no borrowings to date under
our existing revolving credit facility.
30
We repurchased 5.9 million shares of our common stock for $187.2 million during the first six
months of fiscal 2012 (see Note 11. Common Stock and Debentures Repurchase Program to our
condensed consolidated financial statements, included in Part 1. Financial Information, for
additional information). We used $466.3 million of cash to repurchase 17.6 million shares of common
stock during the first six months of fiscal 2011. During the first six months of fiscal 2012, we
paid $100.8 million in cash dividends to stockholders, representing $0.38 per common share. During
the first six months of fiscal 2011, we paid $85.5 million in cash dividends to stockholders,
representing $0.32 per common share. On October 18, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a cash
dividend of $0.19 per common share for the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The dividend is payable
on November 30, 2011 to stockholders of record on November 9, 2011. Our common stock and
debentures repurchase program and dividend policy could be impacted by, among other items, our
views on potential future capital requirements relating to R&D, investments and acquisitions, legal
risks, principal and interest payments on our debentures and other strategic investments.
The global credit crisis has imposed exceptional levels of volatility and disruption in the capital
markets, diminishing liquidity and credit availability, and increased counterparty risk.
Nevertheless, we anticipate that existing sources of liquidity and cash flows from operations will
be sufficient to satisfy our cash needs for the foreseeable future. We will continue to evaluate
opportunities for investments to obtain additional wafer capacity, procurement of additional
capital equipment and facilities, development of new products, and potential acquisitions of
technologies or businesses that could complement our business. However, the risk factors discussed
in Item 1A included in Part II. Other Information and below could affect our cash positions
adversely. In addition, certain types of investments such as auction rate securities may present
risks arising from liquidity and/or credit concerns. In the event that our investments in auction
rate securities become illiquid, we do not expect this will materially affect our liquidity and
capital resources or results of operations.
As of October 1, 2011, marketable securities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs were
comprised of $29.0 million of student loan auction rate securities. The amount of assets and
liabilities measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as a percentage of the total
assets and liabilities measured at fair value were approximately 1% as of October 1, 2011. See
Note 4. Fair Value Measurements to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in
Part 1. Financial Information, for additional information.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio, which consists of
fixed income securities with a fair value of approximately $2.57 billion as of October 1, 2011.
Our primary aim with our investment portfolio is to invest available cash while preserving
principal and meeting liquidity needs. Our investment portfolio includes municipal bonds,
mortgage-backed securities, bank certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds,
student loan auction rate securities and U.S. and foreign government and agency securities. In
accordance with our investment policy, we place investments with high credit quality issuers and
limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer based upon the issuers credit rating. These
securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market interest rates
increase. A hypothetical 100 basis-point (one percentage point) increase or decrease in interest
rates compared to rates at October 1, 2011 would have affected the fair value of our investment
portfolio by less than $25.0 million.
Credit Market Risk
Since September 2007, the global credit markets have experienced adverse conditions that have
negatively impacted the values of various types of investment and non-investment grade securities.
During this time the global credit and capital markets experienced significant volatility and
disruption due to instability in the global financial system, uncertainty related to global
economic conditions and concerns regarding sovereign financial stability. While general conditions
in the global credit markets have improved, there is a risk that we may incur other-than-temporary
impairment charges for certain types of investments should credit market conditions deteriorate.
See Note 5. Financial Instruments to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in
Part 1. Financial Information, for additional information about our investments.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Sales to all direct OEMs and distributors are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts that are designated as hedges of anticipated
transactions, for which a firm commitment has been attained and the hedged relationship has been
effective, are deferred and included in income or expenses in the same period that the underlying
transaction is settled. Gains and losses on any instruments not meeting the above criteria are
recognized in income or expenses in the consolidated statements of income as they are incurred.
31
We enter into forward currency exchange contracts to hedge our overseas operating expenses and
other liabilities when deemed appropriate. As of October 1, 2011 and April 2, 2011, we had the
following outstanding forward currency exchange contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
(In thousands and U.S. dollars) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Euro |
|
$ |
40,479 |
|
|
$ |
38,787 |
|
Singapore dollar |
|
|
62,809 |
|
|
|
52,782 |
|
Japanese Yen |
|
|
11,863 |
|
|
|
12,382 |
|
British Pound |
|
|
14,619 |
|
|
|
8,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,770 |
|
|
$ |
112,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of our strategy to reduce volatility of operating expenses due to foreign exchange rate
fluctuations, we employ a hedging program with forward outlook of up to two years for major
foreign-currency-denominated operating expenses. The outstanding forward currency exchange
contracts expire at various dates between October 2011 and August 2013. The net unrealized gain or
loss, which approximates the fair market value of the above contracts, was immaterial as of October
1, 2011 and April 2, 2011.
Our investments in several of our wholly-owned subsidiaries are recorded in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar. As the financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated at each quarter
end during consolidation, fluctuations of exchange rates between the foreign currency and the U.S.
dollar increase or decrease the value of those investments. These fluctuations are recorded within
stockholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Other
monetary foreign-denominated assets and liabilities are revalued on a monthly basis with gains and
losses on revaluation reflected in net income. A hypothetical 10% favorable or unfavorable change
in foreign currency exchange rates at October 1, 2011 would have affected the annualized
foreign-currency-denominated operating expenses of our foreign subsidiaries by approximately $9.0
million. In addition, a hypothetical 10% favorable or unfavorable change in foreign currency
exchange rates compared to rates at October 1, 2011 would have affected the value of
foreign-currency-denominated cash and investments by less than $4.0 million.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. These controls and procedures are also designed to
ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Internal controls are procedures designed to provide reasonable
assurance that: transactions are properly authorized; assets are safeguarded against unauthorized
or improper use; and transactions are properly recorded and reported, to permit the preparation of
our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can
occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with its
policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. We continuously evaluate our
internal controls and make changes to improve them as necessary. Our intent is to maintain our
disclosure controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.
An evaluation was carried out, under the supervision of and with the participation of our
management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based upon the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have
concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended October 1, 2011
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Patent Litigation
On December 28, 2007, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by PACT XPP Technologies, AG (PACT)
against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
(PACT XPP Technologies, AG. v. Xilinx, Inc. and Avnet, Inc. Case
No. 2:07-CV-563). The lawsuit pertains to eleven different patents and PACT seeks injunctive relief, damages including enhanced damages, interest and
attorneys fees. The lawsuit is currently scheduled to go to
trial in December 2011. The plaintiff alleged that it has suffered damages in the amount of approximately $53.0 million as a result of the
alleged infringement and is requesting trebling of damages as well as interest, attorneys fees, and post-judgment royalties.
The Company vigorously disputes its liability and the damages claimed by plaintiff. At this time, the Company is unable to estimate its range of possible loss.
On July 30, 2010, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by Intellitech Corporation (Intellitech)
against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Intellitech
Corporation v. Altera Corporation, Xilinx, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation Case No.
1:10-CV-00645-UNA). The lawsuit pertained to a single patent and Intellitech sought declaratory
and injunctive relief, unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees. On February 15, 2011,
the Company filed a lawsuit against Intellitech in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellitech Corporation, Case No. CV11-0699). The lawsuit
pertained to seven patents and a single trademark and the Company sought declaratory and injunctive
relief, unspecified damages, costs and attorneys fees. The parties reached a confidential
agreement to settle both actions and the lawsuits were dismissed with prejudice on October 18,
2011. The amount of the settlement did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
On February 14, 2011, the Company filed a complaint for declaratory judgment of patent
noninfringement and invalidity against Intellectual Ventures Management LLC and related entities
(Intellectual Ventures) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. On
September 30, 2011, the Company amended its complaint in this case to eliminate certain defendants
and patents from the action (Xilinx, Inc. v Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures
II LLC, Case No CV11-0671). The lawsuit pertains to five patents and seeks judgments of
non-infringement by Xilinx and judgments that the patents are invalid and unenforceable, as well as
costs and attorneys fees.
On February 15, 2011, Intellectual Ventures added the Company as a defendant in its complaint for
patent infringement previously filed against Altera Corporation (Altera), Microsemi Corporation
(Microsemi) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (Lattice) in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Delaware (Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Altera
Corporation, Microsemi Corporation, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Xilinx, Inc., Case No.
10-CV-1065). The lawsuit pertains to five patents, four of which Xilinx is alleged to be
infringing. Intellectual Ventures seeks unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees and the
proceedings are in their early stages. The Company is unable estimate its range of possible loss
in this matter at this time.
On October 17, 2011, Xilinx filed a complaint for patent non-infringement and invalidity and
violation of California Business and Professions Code
Section 17200 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California against Intellectual Ventures and related
entities as well as additional defendants (Xilinx, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures, LLC. Intellectual
Ventures Management, LLC, Detelle Relay KG, LLC, Roldan Block NY LLC, Latrosse Technologies LLC, TR
Technologies Foundation LLC, Taichi Holdings, LLC, Noregin Assets N.V., LLC and Intellectual
Venture Funding LLC Case No CV-04407).
On or about September 2, 2011, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by HSM Portfolio LLC and
Technology Properties Limited LLC (HSM/TPL) against the Company and seventeen other defendants in
the U.S. District of Delaware (HSM Portfolio LLC and Technology Properties Limited LLC v. Fujitsu
Limited, et al., Case No. CV11-770). The lawsuit pertains to four patents, two of which Xilinx is
alleged to be infringing. HSM/TPL seek unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees and the
proceedings are in their early stages. The Company is unable to estimate its range of possible
loss in this matter at this time.
On or about September 15, 2011, a patent infringement lawsuit was filed by Smart Foundry Solutions,
LLC (SFS) against the Company and eight other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Central
District of California (Smart Foundry Solutions, LLC v. Analog Devices, et al., Case No. CV-01396).
The lawsuit pertains to a single patent and has not been served on Xilinx as of the date of this
filing. SFS seeks injunctive relief, unspecified damages, interest and attorneys fees and the
proceedings are in their early stages. The Company is unable to estimate its range of possible
loss in this matter at this time.
We intend to continue to protect and defend our IP vigorously.
33
Other Matters
From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and litigation matters that arise in the
ordinary course of our business. These include disputes and lawsuits related to intellectual
property, mergers and acquisitions, licensing, contract law, tax, regulatory, distribution
arrangements, employee relations and other matters. Periodically, we review the status of each
matter and assess its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal
proceeding is considered probable and a range of possible losses can be estimated, we accrue a
liability for the estimated loss. Legal proceedings are subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes
are difficult to predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only on the best
information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we continue to
reassess the potential liability related to pending claims and litigation and may revise
estimates.
The following risk factors and other information included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
risks to the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or
that the Companys management currently deems immaterial also may impair its business operations.
If any of the risks described below were to occur, our business, financial condition, operating
results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors from those previously disclosed in Part I,
Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2011.
Our success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products and failure to do so would
have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to develop and introduce new products that address
customer requirements and compete effectively on the basis of price, density, functionality, power
consumption and performance. The success of new product introductions is dependent upon several
factors, including:
|
|
|
timely completion of new product designs; |
|
|
|
ability to generate new design opportunities or design wins; |
|
|
|
availability of specialized field application engineering resources supporting demand
creation and customer adoption of new products; |
|
|
|
ability to utilize advanced manufacturing process technologies on circuit geometries of
28-nm and smaller; |
|
|
|
achieving acceptable yields; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain adequate production capacity from our wafer foundries and assembly and
test subcontractors; |
|
|
|
ability to obtain advanced packaging; |
|
|
|
availability of supporting software design tools; |
|
|
|
utilization of predefined IP of logic; |
|
|
|
customer acceptance of advanced features in our new products; and |
|
|
|
market acceptance of our customers products. |
Our product development efforts may not be successful, our new products may not achieve industry
acceptance and we may not achieve the necessary volume of production that would lead to further per
unit cost reductions. Revenues relating to our mature products are expected to decline in the
future, which is normal for our product life cycles. As a result, we may be increasingly dependent
on revenues derived from design wins for our newer products as well as anticipated cost reductions
in the manufacture of our current products. We rely primarily on obtaining yield improvements and
corresponding cost reductions in the manufacture of existing products, and on introducing new
products that incorporate advanced features and other price/performance factors that enable us to
increase revenues while maintaining consistent margins. To the extent that such cost reductions and
new product introductions do not occur in a timely manner, or to the extent that our products do
not achieve market acceptance at prices with higher margins, our financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected.
We rely on independent foundries for the manufacture of all of our products and a manufacturing
problem or insufficient foundry capacity could adversely affect our operations.
Nearly all of our wafers were manufactured either in Taiwan, by United Microelectronics Corporation
(UMC), or in Japan, by Toshiba Corporation (Toshiba). In addition, the wafers for our older
products are manufactured in Japan by Seiko Epson Corporation (Seiko) and the wafers for some of
our newer products are manufactured in Taiwan, by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
Limited and in South Korea, by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Terms with respect to the volume and
timing of wafer production and the pricing of wafers produced by the semiconductor foundries are
determined by periodic negotiations between Xilinx and these wafer foundries, which usually result
in short-term agreements that do not provide for long-term supply or allocation commitments. We are
dependent on these foundries, especially UMC, which supplies the substantial majority of our
wafers. We rely on UMC and
34
our other foundries to produce wafers with competitive performance attributes. Therefore, the
foundries must be able to transition to advanced manufacturing process technologies and increased
wafer sizes, produce wafers at acceptable yields and deliver them in a timely manner. We cannot
guarantee that the foundries that supply our wafers will not experience manufacturing problems,
including delays in the realization of advanced manufacturing process technologies or difficulties
due to limitations of new and existing process technologies. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee the
foundries will be able to manufacture sufficient quantities of our products or continue to
manufacture a product for the full life of the product. In addition, weak economic conditions may
adversely impact the financial health and viability of the foundries and result in their insolvency
or their inability to meet their commitments to us. For example, in the first quarter of fiscal
2010, we experienced supply shortages due to the difficulties encountered by the foundries when
they had to rapidly increase their production capacities from low utilization levels to high
utilization levels because of an unexpected increase in demand. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2010 and first nine months of fiscal 2011, we also experienced supply shortages due to very strong
demand for our products and a surge in demand for semiconductors in general, which has led to
tightening of foundry capacity across the industry. The insolvency of a foundry or any significant
manufacturing problem or insufficient foundry capacity would disrupt our operations and negatively
impact our financial condition and results of operations.
We have established other sources of wafer supply for many of our products in an effort to secure a
continued supply of wafers. However, establishing, maintaining and managing multiple foundry
relationships require the investment of management resources as well as additional costs. If we do
not manage these relationships effectively, it could adversely affect our results of operations.
General economic conditions and the related deterioration in the global business environment could
have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
During the past three years, global consumer confidence eroded amidst concerns over declining asset
values, inflation, volatility in energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of
credit, rising unemployment, and the stability and solvency of financial institutions, financial
markets, businesses and sovereign nations, among other concerns. These concerns slowed global
economic growth and resulted in recessions in numerous countries, including many of those in North
America, Europe and Asia. Recent events have shown that the financial conditions of sovereign
nations, particularly in Europe, are of continuing concern as the sovereign debt crisis remains
unresolved. Recent events have also elevated concerns that macroeconomic conditions will worsen and
economic recovery will be delayed. These weak economic conditions have resulted in reduced
customer demand and had a negative impact on our results of operations for the second quarter of
fiscal 2012, the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010 and third and fourth quarters of fiscal
2009. If weak economic conditions persist or worsen, a number of
negative effects on our business could continue, including customers or potential customers
reducing or delaying orders, the insolvency of key suppliers, which could result in production
delays, the inability of customers to obtain credit, and the insolvency of one or more customers.
Any of these effects could impact our ability to effectively manage inventory levels and collect
receivables and ultimately decrease our net revenues and profitability.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by cyclical market patterns and a significant industry
downturn could adversely affect our operating results.
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and our financial performance has been affected by
downturns in the industry. Down cycles are generally characterized by price erosion and weaker
demand for our products. Weaker demand for our products resulting from economic conditions in the
end markets we serve and reduced capital spending by our customers can result, and in the past has
resulted in excess and obsolete inventories and corresponding inventory write-downs. We attempt to
identify changes in market conditions as soon as possible; however, the dynamics of the market in
which we operate make prediction of and timely reaction to such events difficult. Due to these and
other factors, our past results are not reliable predictors of our future results.
The nature of our business makes our revenues difficult to predict which could have an adverse
impact on our business.
In addition to the challenging market conditions we may face, we have limited visibility into the
demand for our products, particularly new products, because demand for our products depends upon
our products being designed into our end customers products and those products achieving market
acceptance. Due to the complexity of our customers designs, the design to volume production
process for our customers requires a substantial amount of time, frequently longer than a year. In
addition, we are dependent upon turns, orders received and turned for shipment in the same
quarter. These factors make it difficult for us to forecast future sales and project quarterly
revenues. The difficulty in forecasting future sales impairs our ability to project our inventory
requirements, which could result, and in the past has resulted, in inventory write-downs or failure
to timely meet customer product demands. In addition, difficulty in forecasting revenues
compromises our ability to provide forward-looking revenue and earnings guidance.
35
If we are not able to successfully compete in our industry, our financial results and future
prospects will be adversely affected.
Our programmable logic devices (PLDs) compete in the logic IC industry, an industry that is
intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change, increasing levels of
integration, product obsolescence and continuous price erosion. We expect increased competition
from our primary PLD competitors, Altera, Lattice and Microsemi, and from new market entrants. In
addition, competition from the application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) market and from the
application specific standard products (ASSP) market continues. We believe that important
competitive factors in the logic IC industry include:
|
|
|
product performance, reliability, quality, power consumption and density; |
|
|
|
adaptability of products to specific applications; |
|
|
|
ease of use and functionality of software design tools; |
|
|
|
availability and functionality of predefined IP logic; |
|
|
|
inventory and supply chain management; |
|
|
|
access to leading-edge process technology and assembly capacity; and |
|
|
|
ability to provide timely customer service and support. |
Our strategy for expansion in the logic market includes continued introduction of new product
architectures that address high-volume, low-cost and low-power applications as well as
high-performance, high-density applications. In addition, we anticipate continued pricing pressure
from our customers to reduce prices, which may outpace our ability to lower the cost for
established products. However, we may not be successful in executing these strategies.
Other competitors include manufacturers of:
|
|
|
high-density programmable logic products characterized by field programmable gate
arrays- (FPGA) type architectures; |
|
|
|
high-volume and low-cost FPGAs as programmable replacements for ASICs and ASSPs; |
|
|
|
ASICs and ASSPs with incremental amounts of embedded programmable logic; |
|
|
|
high-speed, low-density complex programmable logic devices; |
|
|
|
high-performance digital signal processing devices; |
|
|
|
products with embedded processors; |
|
|
|
products with embedded multi-gigabit transceivers; and |
|
|
|
other new or emerging programmable logic products. |
Several companies have introduced products that compete with ours or have announced their intention
to sell PLD products. To the extent that our efforts to compete are not successful, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
The benefits of programmable logic have attracted a number of competitors to this segment. We
recognize that different applications require different programmable technologies, and we are
developing architectures, processes and products to meet these varying
customer needs. Recognizing the increasing importance of standard software solutions, we have
developed common software design tools that support the full range of our IC products. We believe
that automation and ease of design are significant competitive factors in this segment.
We could also face competition from our licensees. In the past we have granted limited rights to
other companies with respect to certain of our older technology, and we may do so in the future.
Granting such rights may enable these companies to manufacture and market products that may be
competitive with some of our older products.
Recent events in Japan may adversely impact our business.
In March 2011, the northern region of Japan experienced a severe earthquake followed by a tsunami
and nuclear plant shutdown. These events caused significant damages in that region and have
adversely affected Japans infrastructure and economy. While Japan is a resilient country, and we
expect Japan to recover from this devastation, it is unknown when such recovery will occur.
Certain of our foundries and manufacturing plants in our supply chain are located in Japan and were
negatively impacted by the natural disasters, particularly as a result of disruptions to the
countrys power supply. For example, certain suppliers of wafers and substrates were temporarily
forced to halt production. While we secured alternate sources for these materials, there can be no
assurance that we will not experience the absence of components or supplies, delays in obtaining
their delivery or increases in prices in the future as the impact of the natural disasters in Japan
unfolds.
36
In addition, a number of our customers are located in Japan, which accounted for 10% of our revenue
in the first six months of fiscal 2012. As a result of the earthquake, we were temporarily unable
to ship product to customers located in the areas impacted by the natural disaster. Other
customers not located near the epicenter of the earthquake and customers based outside of Japan who
source other component parts from Japan may also be affected by the consequences of these natural
disasters. If adverse conditions persist, we may experience delay or cancellation of orders from
such customers, which would adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.
In addition, a nuclear power plant in the region was damaged and released radiation into the
atmosphere. The impact of this radiation is unknown at this time. If the consequences of the
radiation are more severe than currently anticipated, our customers and suppliers may be affected.
Any significant disruption of our suppliers and customers business in Japan could have an adverse
impact on our business.
Increased costs of wafers and materials, or shortages in wafers and materials, could adversely
impact our gross margins and lead to reduced revenues.
If greater demand for wafers is not offset by an increase in foundry capacity, or market demand for
wafers or production and assembly materials increases, or if a supplier of our wafers ceases or
suspends operations, our supply of wafers and other materials could become limited. Such shortages
raise the likelihood of potential wafer price increases and wafer shortages or shortages in
materials at production and test facilities and our resulting potential inability to address
customer product demands in a timely manner. For example, as a result of the March 2011 earthquake
in Japan, certain suppliers were forced to temporarily halt production, resulting in a tightening
of supply for those materials. Such shortages of wafers and materials as well as increases in
wafer prices or materials could adversely affect our gross margins and would adversely affect our
ability to meet customer demands and lead to reduced revenue.
We depend on distributors, primarily Avnet, to generate a majority of our sales and complete order
fulfillment.
Resale of product through Avnet accounted for 48% of our worldwide net revenues in the first six
months of fiscal 2012, and as of October 1, 2011, Avnet accounted for 84% of our total net accounts
receivable. To align with our strategic initiative to consolidate our distribution channel, in
fiscal 2011 we further strengthened our partnership with Avnet, and Avnet committed more personnel
and resources to our business. In return for these long-term commitments, we agreed to temporarily
extend payment terms for Avnet, which increased our trade accounts
receivable balance and DSO as of the end of our second and third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to
our historical level. Our trade accounts receivable balance and DSO levels specific to Avnet
decreased in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 when Avnet returned to standard payment terms, but
increased again as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2012 due to the timing of collections
from and credits issued to Avnet. Any adverse change to our relationship with Avnet or our
remaining distributors could have a material impact on our business. Furthermore, if a key
distributor materially defaults on a contract or otherwise fails to perform, our business and
financial results would suffer. In addition, we are subject to concentrations of credit risk in our
trade accounts receivable, which includes accounts of our distributors. A significant reduction of
effort by a distributor to sell our products or a material change in our relationship with one or
more distributors may reduce our access to certain end customers and adversely affect our ability
to sell our products.
In addition, the financial health of our distributors and our continuing relationships with them
are important to our success. Unpredictable economic conditions may adversely impact the financial
health of some of these distributors, particularly our smaller distributors. This could result in
the insolvency of certain distributors, the inability of distributors to obtain credit to finance
the purchase of our products, or cause distributors to delay payment of their obligations to us and
increase our credit risk exposure. Our business could be harmed if the financial health of these
distributors impairs their performance and we are unable to secure alternate distributors.
We are dependent on independent subcontractors for most of our assembly and test services, and
unavailability or disruption of these services could negatively impact our financial condition and
results of operations.
We are also dependent on subcontractors to provide semiconductor assembly, substrate, test and
shipment services. Any prolonged inability to obtain wafers with competitive performance and cost
attributes, adequate yields or timely delivery, any disruption in assembly, test or shipment
services, transitions to new service providers or any other circumstance that would require us to
seek alternative sources of supply, could delay shipments and have a material adverse effect on our
ability to meet customer demands. In addition, unpredictable economic conditions may adversely
impact the financial health and viability of these subcontractors and result in their insolvency or
their inability to meet their commitments to us. These factors would result in reduced net revenues
and could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.
A number of factors, including our inventory strategy, can impact our gross margins.
A number of factors, including yield, wafer pricing, product mix, market acceptance of our new
products, competitive pricing dynamics, geographic and/or market segment pricing strategies cause
our gross margins to fluctuate. In addition, forecasting our gross margins is difficult because a
significant portion of our business is based on turns within the same quarter.
37
Our current inventory levels are higher than historical norms due to our decision to build
incremental safety stock and to build ahead of a previously planned closure of a particular foundry
process line at one of our foundry partners. In the event demand does not materialize, we may be
subject to incremental obsolescence costs. In addition, future product cost reductions could have
an increased impact on our inventory valuation, which would then impact our operating results.
Reductions in the average selling prices of our products could have a negative impact on our gross
margins.
The average selling prices of our products generally decline as the products mature. We seek to
offset the decrease in selling prices through yield improvement, manufacturing cost reductions and
increased unit sales. We also continue to develop higher value products or product features that
increase, or slow the decline of, the average selling price of our products. However, there is no
guarantee that our ongoing efforts will be successful or that they will keep pace with the decline
in selling prices of our products, which could ultimately lead to a decline in revenues and have a
negative effect on our gross margins.
Because of our international business and operations, we are vulnerable to the economic conditions
of the countries in which we operate and currency fluctuations could have a material adverse affect
on our business and negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to our U.S. operations, we also have significant international operations, including
foreign sales offices to support our international customers and distributors, our regional
headquarters in Ireland and Singapore and an R&D site in India. In connection with the
restructuring we announced in April 2009, our international operations grew as we relocated certain
operations and administrative functions outside the U.S. Sales and operations outside of the U.S.
subject us to the risks associated with conducting business in foreign economic and regulatory
environments. Our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by
unfavorable economic conditions in countries in which we do significant business or by changes in
foreign currency exchange rates affecting those countries. We derive over one-half of our revenues
from international sales, primarily in the Asia Pacific region, Europe and Japan. Past economic
weakness in these markets adversely affected revenues. Sales to all direct OEMs and distributors
are denominated in U.S. dollars. While the recent movement of the Euro and Yen against the U.S.
dollar had no material impact to our business, increased volatility could impact our European and
Japanese customers. Currency instability and volatility and disruptions in the credit and capital
markets may increase credit risks for some of our customers and may impair our customers ability
to repay existing obligations. Increased currency volatility could also positively or negatively
impact our foreign-currency-denominated costs, assets and liabilities. In addition, any devaluation
of the U.S. dollar relative to other foreign currencies may increase the operating expenses of our
foreign subsidiaries adversely affecting our results of operations. Furthermore, because we are
increasingly dependent on the global economy, instability in worldwide economic environments
occasioned, for example, by political instability, terrorist activity or U.S. or other military
actions could adversely impact economic activity and lead to a contraction of capital spending by
our customers. Any or all of these factors could adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations in the future.
We are subject to the risks associated with conducting business operations outside of the U.S.
which could adversely affect our business.
In addition to international sales and support operations and development activities, we purchase
our wafers from foreign foundries and have our commercial products assembled, packaged and tested
by subcontractors located outside the U.S. All of these activities are subject to the uncertainties
associated with international business operations, including tax laws and regulations, trade
barriers, economic sanctions, import and export regulations, duties and tariffs and other trade
restrictions, changes in trade policies, anti-corruption laws, foreign governmental regulations,
potential vulnerability of and reduced protection for IP, longer receivable collection periods and
disruptions or delays in production or shipments, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Additional factors that could
adversely affect us due to our international operations include rising oil prices and increased
costs of natural resources. Moreover, our financial condition and results of operations could be
affected in the event of political conflicts or economic crises in countries where our main wafer
providers, end customers and contract manufacturers who provide assembly and test services
worldwide, are located. Adverse change to the circumstances or conditions of our international
business operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and changes in credit rating and in the market
values of our portfolio investments which could have a material adverse impact on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Our cash, short-term and long-term investments represent significant assets that may be subject to
fluctuating or even negative returns depending upon interest rate movements, changes in credit
rating and financial market conditions. Since September 2007, the global credit markets have
experienced adverse conditions that have negatively impacted the values of various types of
investment and non-investment grade securities. During this time, the global credit and capital
markets have experienced significant volatility and disruption due to instability in the global
financial system, uncertainty related to global economic conditions and concerns regarding
sovereign financial stability.
38
While general conditions in the global credit markets have improved, there is a risk that we may
incur other-than-temporary impairment charges for certain types of investments should credit market
conditions deteriorate or the underlying assets fail to perform as anticipated. Our future
investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or if the decline
in fair values of our debt securities is judged to be other than temporary. Furthermore, we may
suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have declined in market value
due to changes in interest rates or financial market conditions.
Our failure to protect and defend our intellectual property could impair our ability to compete
effectively.
We rely upon patent, copyright, trade secret, mask work and trademark laws to protect our
intellectual property. We cannot provide assurance that such intellectual property rights can be
successfully asserted in the future or will not be invalidated, violated, circumvented or
challenged. From time to time, third parties, including our competitors, have asserted against us
patent, copyright and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to us.
Third parties may attempt to misappropriate our IP through electronic or other means or assert
infringement claims against our indemnitees or us in the future. Such assertions by third parties
may result in costly litigation, indemnity claims or other legal actions, and we may not prevail in
such matters or be able to license any valid and infringed patents from third parties on
commercially reasonable terms. This could result in the loss of our ability to import and sell our
products. Any infringement claim, indemnification claim, or impairment or loss of use of our
intellectual property could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
We rely on information technology systems, and failure of these systems to function properly or
unauthorized access to our systems could result in business disruption.
We rely in part on various information technology (IT) systems to manage our operations, including
financial reporting, and we regularly evaluate these systems and make changes to improve them as
necessary. Consequently, we periodically implement new, or upgrade or enhance existing, operational
and IT systems, procedures and controls. For example, in the past we simplified our supply chain
and were required to make certain changes to our IT systems. Any delay in the implementation of, or
disruption in the transition to, new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, could harm our
ability to record and report financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis.
These systems are also subject to power and telecommunication outages or other general system
failures. Failure of our IT systems or difficulties in managing them could result in business
disruption. We also may be subject to unauthorized access to our IT systems through a security
breach or attack. We seek to detect and investigate any security incidents and prevent their
recurrence, but in some cases, we might be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects.
Our business could be significantly harmed and we could be subject to third party claims in the
event of such a security breach.
Earthquakes and other natural disasters could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse
affect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The independent foundries upon which we rely to manufacture our products, as well as our California
and Singapore facilities, are located in regions that are subject to earthquakes and other natural
disasters. UMCs foundries in Taiwan and Toshibas and Seikos foundries in Japan as well as many
of our operations in California are centered in areas that have been seismically active in the
recent past and some areas have been affected by other natural disasters such as typhoons. Any
catastrophic event in these locations will disrupt our operations, including our manufacturing
activities and our insurance may not cover losses resulting from such disruptions of our
operations. This type of disruption could result in our inability to manufacture or
ship products, thereby materially adversely affecting our financial condition and results of
operations. For example, as a result of the March 2011 earthquake in Japan, production at the
Seiko foundry at Sakata was halted temporarily, impacting production of some of our older devices.
In addition, suppliers of wafers and substrates were forced to halt production temporarily.
Disruption of operations at these foundries for any reason, including other natural disasters such
as typhoons, tsunamis, volcano eruptions, fires or floods, as well as disruptions in access to
adequate supplies of electricity, natural gas or water could cause delays in shipments of our
products, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. Furthermore, natural disasters can also indirectly impact
us. For example, our customers supply of other complimentary
products may be disrupted by a natural disaster and may cause them to
delay orders of our products.
If we are unable to maintain effective internal controls, our stock price could be adversely
affected.
We are subject to the ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (the Act). Our controls necessary for continued compliance with the Act may not operate
effectively at all times and may result in a material weakness disclosure. The identification of
material weaknesses in internal control, if any, could indicate a lack of proper controls to
generate accurate financial statements and could cause investors to lose confidence and our stock
price to drop.
39
We compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of, or inability to
attract, such personnel would harm us.
We depend on the efforts and abilities of certain key members of management and other technical
personnel. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to retain such personnel and
attract and retain other highly qualified personnel, particularly product engineers. Competition
for such personnel is intense and we may not be successful in hiring or retaining new or existing
qualified personnel. From time to time we have effected restructurings which eliminate a number of
positions. Even if such personnel are not directly affected by the restructuring effort, such
terminations can have a negative impact on morale and our ability to attract and hire new qualified
personnel in the future. If we lose existing qualified personnel or are unable to hire new
qualified personnel, as needed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could
be seriously harmed.
Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could adversely affect our financial condition and
operating results.
From time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise out of the
ordinary conduct of our business. Certain claims are not yet resolved, including those that are
discussed under Item 1. Legal Proceedings, included in Part II, and additional claims may arise
in the future. Results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Regardless of its
merit, litigation may be both time-consuming and disruptive to our operations and cause significant
expense and diversion of management attention and we may enter into material settlements to avoid
these risks. Should we fail to prevail in certain matters, or should several of these matters be
resolved against us in the same reporting period, we may be faced with significant monetary damages
or injunctive relief against us that would materially and adversely affect a portion of our
business and might materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
Our products could have defects which could result in reduced revenues and claims against us.
We develop complex and evolving products that include both hardware and software. Despite our
testing efforts and those of our subcontractors, defects may be found in existing or new products.
These defects may cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair or replacement costs,
divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts and harm our
relationships with customers. Subject to certain terms and conditions, we have agreed to compensate
certain customers for limited specified costs they actually incur in the event our hardware
products experience epidemic failure. As a result, epidemic failure and other performance problems
could result in claims against us, the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and would
likely harm our business. Our customers could also seek damages from us for their losses.
In addition, we could be subject to product liability claims. A product liability claim brought
against us, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly to defend. Product
liability risks are particularly significant with respect to aerospace, automotive and medical
applications because of the risk of serious harm to users of these products. Any product liability
claim, whether or not determined in our favor, could result in significant expense, divert the
efforts of our technical and management personnel, and harm our business.
In preparing our financial statements, we make good faith estimates and judgments that may change
or turn out to be erroneous.
In preparing our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the U.S., we must make estimates and judgments in applying our most critical accounting
policies. Those estimates and judgments have a significant impact on the results we report in our
consolidated financial statements. The most difficult estimates and subjective judgments that we
make concern valuation of marketable and non-marketable securities, revenue recognition,
inventories, long-lived assets including acquisition-related intangibles, goodwill, taxes and
stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience, input from outside
experts and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We also have other key accounting
policies that are not as subjective, and therefore, their application would not require us to make
estimates or judgments that are as difficult, but which nevertheless could significantly affect our
financial reporting. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. If these estimates
or their related assumptions change, our operating results for the periods in which we revise our
estimates or assumptions could be adversely and perhaps materially affected.
Our failure to comply with the requirements of the International Traffic and Arms Regulations could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Certain Xilinx space-grade FPGAs and related technologies are subject to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which are administered by the U.S. Department of State. The ITAR
governs the export and reexport of these FPGAs, the transfer of related technical data and the
provision of defense services, as well as offshore production, test and assembly. We are required
to maintain an internal compliance program and security infrastructure to meet ITAR requirements.
An inability to obtain the required export licenses, or to predict when they will be granted,
increases the difficulties of forecasting shipments. In addition, security or compliance program
failures that could result in penalties or a loss of export privileges, as well as stringent ITAR
licensing restrictions that may make our products less attractive to overseas customers, could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
40
Considerable amounts of our common shares are available for issuance under our equity incentive
plans and convertible debentures, and significant issuances in the future may adversely impact the
market price of our common shares.
As of October 1, 2011, we had 2.00 billion authorized common shares, of which 262.4 million shares
were outstanding. In addition, 50.3 million common shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to
our equity incentive plans and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 42.7 million common shares were
reserved for issuance upon conversion or repurchase of the convertible debentures and 19.8 million
common shares were reserved for issuance upon exercise of warrants. The availability of substantial
amounts of our common shares resulting from the exercise or settlement of equity awards outstanding
under our equity incentive plans or the conversion or repurchase of convertible debentures using
common shares, which would be dilutive to existing stockholders, could adversely affect the
prevailing market price of our common shares and could impair our ability to raise additional
capital through the sale of equity securities.
We have indebtedness that could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from
fulfilling our debt obligations.
The aggregate principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness as of October 1, 2011 was $1.29
billion (principal amount). We also may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our
indebtedness may:
|
|
|
make it difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including making
scheduled principal and interest payments on the debentures and our other indebtedness; |
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes; |
|
|
|
limit our ability to use our cash flow or obtain additional financing for future
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general business purposes; |
|
|
|
require us to use a portion of our cash flow from operations to make debt service
payments; |
|
|
|
limit our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and industry; |
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our less leveraged competitors; |
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions;
and |
|
|
|
require us to repatriate off-shore cash to the U.S. at unfavorable tax rates. |
Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend on our future performance, which will
be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are
beyond our control.
The call options and warrant transactions related to our 2.625% Debentures may affect the value of
the debentures and our common stock.
To hedge against potential dilution upon conversion of the 2.625% Debentures, we purchased call
options on our common stock from the hedge counterparties. We also sold warrants to the hedge
counterparties, which could separately have a dilutive effect on our earnings per share to the
extent that the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of
the warrants of $42.91 per share.
As the hedge counterparties and their respective affiliates modify hedge positions, they may enter
or unwind various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchase or sell our common
stock in secondary market transactions. This activity also could affect the market price of our
common stock and/or debentures, which could affect the ability of the holders of the debentures to
convert and the number of shares and value of the consideration that will be received by the
holders of the debentures upon conversion.
The conditional conversion features of the outstanding debentures, if triggered, may adversely
affect our financial condition and operating results.
Our outstanding debentures have conditional conversion features. In the event the conditional
conversion features of the debentures are triggered, holders of such debentures will be entitled to
convert the debentures at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders
elect to convert their debentures, we would be required to settle any converted principal through
the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. Even if holders do not elect to
convert their debentures, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all
or a portion of the outstanding principal of the debentures as a current rather than long-term
liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital. In addition, we
could be required to increase the number of shares used in our per share calculations to reflect
the potentially dilutive impact of the conversion.
41
Acquisitions and strategic investments present risks, and we may not realize the goals that were
contemplated at the time of a transaction.
We recently acquired technology companies whose products complement our products, and in the past
we have made a number of strategic investments in other technology companies. We may make similar
acquisitions and strategic investments in the future. Acquisitions and strategic investments
present risks, including:
|
|
|
our ongoing business may be disrupted and our managements attention may be diverted
by investment, acquisition, transition or integration activities; |
|
|
|
an acquisition or strategic investment may not further our business strategy as we
expected, and we may not integrate an acquired company or technology as successfully as
we expected; |
|
|
|
our operating results or financial condition may be adversely impacted by claims or
liabilities that we assume from an acquired company or technology or that are otherwise
related to an acquisition; |
|
|
|
we may have difficulty incorporating acquired technologies or products with our
existing product lines; |
|
|
|
we may have higher than anticipated costs in continuing support and development of
acquired products, in general and administrative functions that support such products; |
|
|
|
our strategic investments may not perform as expected; and |
|
|
|
we may experience unexpected changes in how we are required to account for our
acquisitions and strategic investments pursuant to U.S. GAAP. |
The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations, financial condition or cash flows, particularly in the case of a larger acquisition
or several concurrent acquisitions or strategic investments.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
On June 3, 2010, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $500.0 million of common stock
through the 2010 Repurchase Program. The 2010 Repurchase Program has no stated expiration date.
Through October 1, 2011, the Company had used $280.4 million out of the $500.0 million authorized
under the 2010 Repurchase Program, leaving $219.6 million available for future purchases.
The following table summarizes the Companys repurchase of its common stock during the second
quarter of fiscal 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Shares that May |
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
Under the Programs |
|
July 3, 2011 to August 6, 2011 |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
$ |
32.60 |
|
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
$ |
304,131 |
|
August 7, 2011 to September 3, 2011 |
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
29.56 |
|
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
250,130 |
|
September 4, 2011 to October 1, 2011 |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
28.89 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
219,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for the Quarter |
|
|
4,019 |
|
|
$ |
30.24 |
|
|
|
4,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with
the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and
are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long
as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend
the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with
the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these
interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability. |
Items 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable and have been omitted.
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
XILINX, INC.
|
|
Date: November 8, 2011 |
/s/ Jon A. Olson
|
|
|
Jon A. Olson |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
(as principal accounting and financial
officer and on behalf of Registrant) |
|
|
43