def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how
it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of
its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Promenade
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254
480.998.3478
www.htareit.com
|
Dear Stockholder:
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I invite you to attend the
2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Healthcare Trust of
America, Inc. The meeting will be held on December 8, 2010
at 9:00 a.m. local time, at The Westin Kierland
Resort & Spa, 6902 East Greenway Parkway, Scottsdale,
Arizona 85254. We look forward to your attendance.
Attached are the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
proxy statement. They describe the formal business to be acted
upon by the stockholders. At the annual meeting, we will present
a report on the status of our follow-on offering, our portfolio
of properties and other related matters. Our stockholders will
have an opportunity to ask questions at the meeting.
Update
I would also like to provide you with a brief update on some of
our key accomplishments to date. In 2009 and 2010, we have made
over $700 million in acquisitions. Today we have
approximately $2.0 billion of total assets with
approximately $1.8 billion of healthcare real estate
assets. We became fully self-managed in 2009. We have assembled
a highly qualified and dedicated group of employees who are
performance driven and focused on the growth and success of our
company. We are positioned to move quickly and efficiently to
take advantage of strategic opportunities, which we believe will
benefit our stockholders.
Added
Value
We continue to maintain a strong balance sheet, with a low level
of debt and a high level of cash. Our balance sheet reflects our
strength and helps drive our future. It has allowed us to be
opportunistic in troubled times, making key strategic
acquisitions with favorable pricing and credit terms. In
addition to growing through acquisitions, we have identified and
added value in other ways. As credit has become more available
and attractive, we have been able to refinance properties with
less expensive debt. We have focused on aggressive asset
management, with the objective of optimizing the performance of
our portfolio. Our movement to self management has generated
substantial net cost savings, approximately $24 million for
the 12-month
period from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. We
expect substantial additional cost savings going forward.
Unsecured
Credit Facility
We have entered into a credit agreement for an unsecured
revolving credit facility in the maximum principal amount of
$200 million with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
administrative agent, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Deutsche
Bank Securities Inc. as syndication agents. The facility has an
accordion feature, which may allow us to increase it in the
future. We believe this credit facility does two things. First,
we believe it reflects the financial strength of our company.
Second, the credit facility provides our company with the
ability to timely utilize corporate-level debt, if and when
needed, for strategic acquisitions and other corporate purposes.
Strategic
Opportunities
Looking forward, we are ready to advance our company to the next
stage of our life cycle. We have previously disclosed that we
intend to effect a liquidity event by 2013 and that we may
consider listing our shares on a national securities exchange, a
merger transaction, a sale of substantially all of our assets.
We have engaged J.P. Morgan Securities LLC to act as our
lead strategic advisor to assist us in exploring strategic
opportunities to maximize stockholder value and provide for
liquidity at the appropriate time.
We recognize the importance of being ahead of the curve,
prepared and proactive. Fortunately, we have the time and
flexibility to be creative and prudent with respect to each
potential strategic opportunity. We closely review each such
opportunity in terms of how and when it can best be used to
enhance value for our stockholders. We have the ability to
customize and time the implementation of any strategic
opportunity to be most beneficial to our company and our
stockholders.
Stockholder
Approvals
At the annual meeting, you are being asked to approve a number
of amendments to our charter. These amendments are intended to
prepare us for a potential listing in the future and to update
our charter. These amendments are described in detail in the
proxy statement.
The first group of amendments relate to a potential listing of
our shares on a national securities exchange. The key word here
is potential, as we have not made any decision about this
particular strategic opportunity or any other opportunities. We
have been and will continue to evaluate a number of strategic
opportunities, including a potential listing. We recognize that
the right strategic opportunity for our company depends on a
number of things, some within our control and some outside of
our control. Our objective is to focus on those things within
our control. Our number one priority is to grow our company and
stay focused on the fundamentals of our business.
Currently, we are taking steps, including proposing this first
group of amendments, to position our company so that we can act
timely, if and when we determine a particular strategic
opportunity is available to us and is in the best
interests of our stockholders. Our strategic advisors have
advised us, and your Board strongly recommends, that we amend
our charter now, rather than later, to provide for the
reclassification and conversion of our stock if and when we
decide to pursue a listing. This reclassification and conversion
of our stock is designed to establish a phased in liquidity
program.
We have a substantial number of shares outstanding. For a
successful listing, we will need to move our stock into the
public market in a way that minimizes the stock-pricing
instability that could result from concentrated sales of our
stock. A phased in liquidity program over a period of
18 months will place the substantial number of our
outstanding shares into the public market in stages, rather than
all at once. Our strategic advisors and our Board agree that we
need this phased in liquidity program as part of any listing
that we undertake to mitigate the risk of stock-pricing
instability. We have been advised that institutional investors
and other potential buyers of our listed stock will want such a
program in place. The program is intended to stabilize public
stock prices by having our stock enter into the public market
over time and in defined phases. I am sure you agree that a
listing or any other strategic opportunity needs to both
maximize the value of our shares as well as provide liquidity.
This first group of amendments is aimed at helping us achieve
these goals.
The second group of amendments includes, among other things,
changes to reflect that we are self-managed. All of the proposed
amendments to our charter are described in detail in the proxy
statement.
We are seeking your vote now to ensure that we are positioned
ahead of time to act quickly in the event our Board of Directors
determines at some point in the future that a listing is in the
best interests of our company and our stockholders. As I stated
above, a listing is only one of a number of strategic
opportunities that may be available to us. Please note we have
not made any decisions to proceed with a listing or any other
strategic opportunity at this time. Accordingly, we cannot
provide any assurances if and when one will occur.
We are also requesting that you consider and vote upon proposals
to re-elect our board of directors and to ratify our independent
registered public accounting firm for 2010.
Please
Vote
Your vote is very important. Regardless of the number of our
shares you own, it is very important that your shares be
represented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ACCORDINGLY, WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE
2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS IN PERSON, I URGE YOU TO
SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. You may do this by
completing, signing and dating the accompanying proxy card and
returning it via fax to
(781) 633-4036
or in the accompanying self-addressed postage-paid return
envelope. You also may authorize your proxy via the internet at
www.eproxy.com/hta or by telephone by dialing toll-free
(866) 977-7699.
Please follow the directions provided in the proxy statement.
This will not prevent you from voting in person at the 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but will assure that your vote
will be counted if you are unable to attend the 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
YOUR VOTE COUNTS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS
MATTER, AND FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF, AND INTEREST IN, OUR
COMPANY.
Sincerely,
Scott D. Peters
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Promenade 16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320 Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 480.998.3478
www.htareit.com
|
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., will be held
on December 8, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. local time, at The
Westin Kierland Resort & Spa, 6902 East Greenway
Parkway, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254, for the following purposes:
1. Charter Amendments. To consider and
vote upon the approval of six proposals to amend certain
provisions of our charter, including amendments to:
Listing
Related Amendments
(a) provide for the reclassification and conversion of our
common stock in the event our shares are listed on a national
securities exchange to implement a phased in liquidity program;
(b) provide that certain provisions of our charter will not
remain in effect in the event our shares are listed on a
national securities exchange;
Self-Management
Related and Other Amendments
(c) reflect that we are self-managed and no longer
externally advised or sponsored;
(d) require compliance with the Securities and Exchange
Commissions tender offer regulations under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any tender offer made for
our shares regardless of the size of the tender offer;
(e) address changes requested by state securities
administrators in connection with the registration of our
follow-on offering; and
(f) effectuate certain ministerial revisions and
clarifications.
2. Election of Directors. To consider and
vote upon the election of the six directors named in this proxy
statement, each for a term of one year and until his successor
is duly elected and qualifies;
3. Ratification of Auditors. To consider
and vote upon the ratification of the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2010; and
4. Other Business. To transact such other
business as may properly come before the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
These items are discussed in the accompanying proxy statement.
The proxy statement is made part of this notice. Our
stockholders of record on October 8, 2010 are entitled to
vote at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc. We reserve the right, in our sole
discretion, to adjourn or postpone the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to provide more time to solicit proxies for the
meeting. The proxy solicitation materials are being mailed to
stockholders on or about November 1, 2010.
Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials
for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on December 8, 2010:
The proxy statement, proxy card and 2009 annual report are
available at www.eproxy.com/hta.
Please sign and date the accompanying proxy card and return it
promptly by fax to
(781) 633-4036
or in the accompanying self-addressed postage-paid return
envelope, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. You
also may authorize a proxy electronically via the internet at
www.eproxy.com/hta or by telephone by dialing toll-free
(866) 977-7699.
Instructions are included with the proxy card. Your vote is
important to us and thus we urge you to get your ballot in
early. You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to its
exercise. If you attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
you may vote in person if you wish, even if you previously have
returned your proxy card or authorized a proxy electronically or
telephonically.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Kellie S. Pruitt
Kellie S. Pruitt
Secretary
HEALTHCARE TRUST OF
AMERICA, INC.
The Promenade
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254
Telephone:
(480) 998-3478
The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., or HTA, for use in voting at
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the annual meeting,
to be held on December 8, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. local
time, at The Westin Kierland & Spa, 6902 East Greenway
Parkway, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254, and at any adjournment or
postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the attached
notice. The proxy solicitation materials are being mailed to
stockholders on or about November 1, 2010.
The
following questions and answers relate to the 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
What
is the purpose of the meeting?
At the annual meeting, stockholders will consider and vote upon
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
six proposals to approve amendments to our charter;
|
|
|
|
the election of the six directors named in this proxy statement,
each to hold office for a one-year term expiring at the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is duly
elected and qualifies; and
|
|
|
|
the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP, or Deloitte, as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2010.
|
Management will also report on our accomplishments to date,
including the status of our current offering and our portfolio
of properties. Management will also respond to questions from
stockholders. In addition, representatives of Deloitte are
expected to be present at the annual meeting, will have an
opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and will be
available to respond to questions from the stockholders.
What
are the six proposals to approve amendments to the
companys charter?
Our Board of Directors is proposing that our stockholders
approve six amendments to our charter, which do the following:
Listing
Related Amendments
(a) provide for the reclassification and conversion of our
common stock in the event our shares are listed on a national
securities exchange to implement a phased in liquidity program;
(b) provide that certain provisions of our charter will not
remain in effect in the event our shares are listed on a
national securities exchange;
Self-Management
Related and Other Amendments
(c) reflect that we are self-managed and no longer
externally advised or sponsored;
(d) require compliance with the Securities and Exchange
Commissions tender offer regulations under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any tender offer made for
our shares regardless of the size of the tender offer;
(e) address changes requested by state securities
administrators in connection with the registration of our
follow-on offering; and
(f) effectuate certain ministerial revisions and
clarifications.
Why
are you proposing the reclassification and conversion of the
companys common stock in the event the companys
shares are listed on a national securities
exchange?
We have previously disclosed that we intend to effect a
liquidity event by September 20, 2013. Consistent with this
objective, we are currently evaluating alternatives for
maximizing stockholder value and providing liquidity to our
stockholders. We may consider, among other alternatives, listing
our shares on a national securities exchange, or a Listing, a
merger transaction, or a sale of substantially all of our
assets. These amendments are being proposed to prepare our
company in the event we decide to pursue a Listing.
We may determine that a Listing is in the best interests of our
stockholders for several reasons. These reasons include
(1) providing us with faster access to debt and equity
capital, (2) providing us with access to a lower cost of
capital, (3) making our shares and our operating
partnerships limited partner units more attractive
acquisition consideration and (4) providing liquidity, on a
phased in basis, to our stockholders. These reasons are
discussed in more detail under Proposal No. 1(A)
Amendments to Reclassify and Convert Our Common Stock Prior to a
Listing. In the event we determine it is in the best
interest of our stockholders to pursue a Listing, we may also
determine to conduct a concurrent underwritten public offering
of shares, or an Offering. We have determined that a key part of
any Listing
and/or
Offering that we undertake will be to have a phased in liquidity
program for our outstanding shares of stock.
To accomplish a phased in liquidity program, it is necessary to
reclassify and convert our common stock into shares of
Class A common stock and Class B common stock
immediately prior to a Listing. The shares of Class A
common stock would be listed on a national securities exchange.
The shares of Class B common stock would not be listed.
Rather, those shares would convert into shares of Class A
common stock and become listed in defined phases, over a defined
period of time. The amendments provide that all shares of
Class B common stock would convert into shares of
Class A common stock within 18 months of a Listing,
with individual classes of Class B common stock converting
into Class A common stock and becoming listed every six
months. The Board of Directors will have the right to accelerate
the timeframe for when each class of Class B common stock
converts into Class A common stock, but no shares will
convert earlier than six months following the date of Listing.
If we do make a determination to pursue a Listing, the ultimate
length of the overall phased in liquidity program and the timing
of each of the phases will depend on a number of factors,
including the timing of the Listing.
Our objective is to provide liquidity as soon as is reasonably
possible, without sacrificing valuation. We believe, and our
strategic advisors agree, that the reclassification and
conversion of our shares of common stock increases our ability
to maximize the success of a Listing and any concurrent Offering
both in the short and long term.
What
are the intended benefits of a phased in liquidity
program?
With a Listing, we believe that liquidity is one part of a two
part equation. The other part is valuation. Both parts are
needed. We believe that it is in the best interests of our
stockholders to have stable stock pricing in the short and long
term. We cannot control market forces. However, we can attempt
to structure a Listing to increase the likelihood of success for
our stockholders. The fact is we have a large company with a
substantial number of shares outstanding. As of October 20,
2010, there were approximately 184,597,324 shares of our
common stock outstanding. If we conduct a Listing without a
phased in liquidity program, all of our shares of common stock
would become listed at the same time and, therefore, could be
put up for sale in the public market. This could result in
concentrated sales of our common stock. Concentrated sales will
likely depress the trading price. The potential for concentrated
sales of our outstanding common stock could also make our shares
less attractive to institutional and other investors in any
concurrent Offering and reduce demand to buy stock
and/or
reduce the price investors are willing to pay. The phased in
liquidity program directly addresses this potential risk, and
therefore increases the likelihood of a successful Listing. With
a phased in liquidity program, we believe our shares will be
able to become traded in the public market without causing any
material disruption or imbalance in stock pricing.
2
Will
the reclassification and conversion impact my voting rights,
right to receive distributions or my proportional ownership
interest in the company?
No. The shares of Class B common stock and the shares of
Class A common stock will have the same voting rights and
right to receive distributions. Additionally, the
reclassification and conversion will have no immediate impact on
the proportional ownership interests of our stockholders prior
to the reclassification and conversion, except for any changes
as a result of the treatment of fractional shares.
How
will the reclassification and conversion of the companys
common stock impact stockholders?
The reclassification and conversion of our common stock are
conditioned upon and only take effect in the event we proceed
with a Listing in the future. If we pursue an alternative
strategic opportunity, the reclassification and conversion will
never become effective.
If a Listing does occur and the reclassification and conversion
of our common stock becomes effective, it will have a direct
impact on the liquidity of our shares of common stock, as
discussed below.
In the event of a Listing, the shares of our common stock owned
by our existing stockholders would be divided into multiple
classes. Initially, 25% of a stockholders shares would be
converted into shares of our Class A common stock, which
would be listed on a national securities exchange at the time of
the Listing. The remaining 75% of the stockholders shares
would be converted into three classes of our Class B common
stock that would not be listed on a national securities
exchange. Each of the classes of our Class B common stock
will then convert into Class A common stock in intervals
with all classes converting no later than 18 months
following the Listing Date. However, no classes of Class B
common stock will convert into Class A common stock prior
to six months following the Listing Date.
The impact of the reclassification and conversion of our common
stock is discussed in detail under
Proposal No. 1(A) Amendments to Reclassify and
Convert Our Common Stock Prior to a Listing and reflected
in the proposed Fourth Articles of Amendment and Restatement
included as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
How
will the reclassification and conversion be implemented upon a
Listing?
If there is a Listing and the reclassification and conversion
become effective, all of your outstanding shares of our common
stock will convert into shares of Class A common stock and
Class B common stock as described above and in more detail
in Proposal No. 1(A) Amendments to
Reclassify and Convert Our Common Stock Prior to a Listing
below. Currently, all of our shares of common stock are held in
uncertificated form and are reflected on the books of our
transfer agent, DST Systems, Inc. Upon a Listing, the conversion
of your shares would be effected electronically by our transfer
agent.
We expect that if we pursue a Listing, the listed shares would
be made eligible for the direct registration system,
which is similar to our current system of holding shares in
uncertificated form. Physical stock certificates would not be
issued unless requested by a stockholder. Every stockholder
would receive a notification of their holdings post-listing and
instructions for having their shares placed in a brokerage
account in the event the stockholder wants to make a sale. In
the event we determine to list our shares, we will work with our
transfer agent, your financial advisors and others to make sure
the reclassification and conversion is implemented as smoothly
as possible.
What
is the purpose of the other Listing related amendments to our
charter?
If we determine to pursue a Listing, these amendments are
intended to provide our directors and officers with greater
flexibility to operate our company and position us to be similar
to other publicly traded companies. Please see
Proposal No. 1(B) Amendments to Provide that
Certain Provisions of Our Charter Will Not Remain in Effect
After a Listing for more information regarding these
changes as well as the proposed Fourth Articles of Amendment and
Restatement included as Appendix A to this proxy
statement.
3
Are
there any other actions that may be undertaken by the company in
connection with a potential Listing or any other strategic
opportunity that the company might pursue?
We are committed to being proactive and taking steps that are
intended to create value for our stockholders. We anticipate
that we will be undertaking other actions in order to position
our company to access and implement potential strategic
opportunities. As discussed above, we have not decided to
proceed with any specific strategic opportunity at this time.
How
will the self-management related and other proposals to amend
the companys charter impact stockholders?
The impacts of the other four proposals to amend the
companys charter are described under Proposals 1(C),
1(D), 1(E) and 1(F) later in this proxy statement. The
descriptions of all of the proposed amendments to our charter
are qualified in their entirety by reference to the proposed
Fourth Articles of Amendment and Restatement to our charter
included in Appendix A to this proxy statement.
What
are the Board of Directors voting
recommendations?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the six proposals to amend our charter.
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES who are named in this proxy
statement for election as directors.
|
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of Deloitte as our
independent registered public accounting firm for 2010.
|
What
happens if additional proposals are presented at the annual
meeting?
Other than the matters described in this proxy statement, we do
not expect any additional matters to be presented for a vote at
the annual meeting. If other matters are presented and you are
voting by proxy, your proxy grants the individuals named as
proxy holders the discretion to vote your shares on any
additional matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.
Who is
entitled to vote?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
October 8, 2010, or the record date, are entitled to
receive notice of the annual meeting and to vote the shares of
common stock that they hold on that date at the annual meeting,
or any postponements or adjournments of the annual meeting. As
of the record date, we had 181,407,532 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote. You are
entitled to one vote for each share of common stock you held as
of the record date
What
constitutes a quorum?
If 50.0% of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote on the
record date are present at the annual meeting, either in person
or by proxy, we will have a quorum at the meeting, permitting
the conduct of business at the meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted to determine
whether a quorum is present. A broker non-vote
occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a
beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because
the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with
respect to that matter and has not received voting instructions
from the beneficial owner.
How do
I authorize a proxy to vote my shares at the annual
meeting?
You can authorize a proxy to vote your shares by mail, fax,
telephone or internet, following the instructions set forth
below and on the proxy card.
4
|
|
|
|
|
Mail Stockholders may authorize a proxy by
completing the accompanying proxy card and mailing it in the
accompanying self-addressed postage-paid return envelope.
Completed proxy cards must be received by December 7, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fax Stockholders may authorize a proxy by
completing the accompanying proxy card and faxing it to
(781) 633-4036
until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time on December 7,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Stockholders may authorize a proxy
by telephone by dialing toll-free at
(866) 977-7699
until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time on December 7,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet Stockholders may authorize a proxy
electronically using the internet at www.eproxy.com/hta
until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time on December 7,
2010.
|
Can I
revoke my proxy after I return my proxy card or after I
authorize a proxy by telephone or over the
internet?
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the proxy is
exercised at the annual meeting by:
|
|
|
|
|
delivering to our Secretary a written notice of revocation;
|
|
|
|
attending the annual meeting and voting in person (although
attendance at the meeting will not cause your previously granted
proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request);
|
|
|
|
returning a properly signed proxy card bearing a later date than
your first proxy card (if received before the annual
meeting); or
|
|
|
|
authorizing a later dated proxy using the telephone or internet
(if received before the deadline for telephone or internet
proxies).
|
If you hold shares of our common stock in street
name, you will need to contact the institution that holds
your shares and follow its instructions for revoking a proxy.
What
vote is required to approve each proposal that comes before the
annual meeting?
Charter amendments. To approve the proposals
to amend our charter, the affirmative vote of at least a
majority of all votes entitled to be cast must be cast in favor
of the proposals. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the
same effect as votes against the six proposals to amend our
charter.
Election of directors. To elect the director
nominees, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of
our common stock present in person or by proxy at a meeting at
which a quorum is present must be cast in favor of the proposal.
This means that a director nominee needs to receive more votes
for his election than withheld from or present but not voted in
his election in order to be elected to the Board of Directors.
Because of this requirement, withhold votes and
broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against each
nominee for director. If an incumbent director nominee fails to
receive the required number of votes for reelection, then under
Maryland law, he will continue to serve as a
holdover director until his successor is duly
elected and qualifies.
Ratification of auditors. To approve the
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte, the affirmative
vote of a majority of all votes cast at a meeting at which a
quorum is present must be cast in favor of the proposal.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no impact on the
proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte.
Will
my vote make a difference?
Yes! Your vote is needed to ensure that the proposals can be
acted upon. Unlike most other public companies, no large
brokerage houses or affiliated groups of stockholders own
substantial blocks of our shares. As a result, a large number of
our stockholders must be present in person or by proxy at the
annual meeting to constitute a quorum. AS A RESULT, YOUR
VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT EVEN IF YOU OWN ONLY A SMALL NUMBER OF
SHARES! Your immediate response will help avoid potential delays
and may
5
save us significant additional expenses associated with
soliciting stockholder proxies. We encourage you to
participate in the governance of HTA and welcome your attendance
at the annual meeting.
Who
will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the
meeting?
HTA will bear the entire cost of the solicitation of proxies
from its stockholders. We have retained Boston Financial Data
Services to assist us in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the annual meeting. We expect to pay approximately
$200,000 for such services. In addition to the mailing of these
proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be
made in person, by telephone or by electronic communication by
our directors and officers who will not receive any additional
compensation for such solicitation activities. We will also
reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for their reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding proxy solicitation materials to our
stockholders.
How do
I get additional copies of SEC filings?
Copies of HTAs financial reports, including its reports to
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, filed on
Forms 10-K
and 10-Q,
with financial statements and financial statement schedules but
without exhibits, are available without cost by sending your
written request to: Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., The
Promenade, 16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320,
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254, Attention: Secretary, or by calling
(480) 998-3478,
or by sending an
e-mail to
the following address: info@htareit.com. Copies of SEC
filings, including exhibits, can also be obtained free of charge
by clicking on SEC Filings under Investor
Relations on our website at www.htareit.com. This
website address is provided for your information and
convenience. Our website is not incorporated into this proxy
statement and should not be considered part of this proxy
statement. You can obtain a copy of any listed exhibit to a
Form 10-K
or
Form 10-Q
by sending your written request to our Secretary at the address
furnished above. We will furnish the copy upon payment of a fee
to reimburse our expenses.
SPECIAL
NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement contains both historical and
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based
on current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and
beliefs, including expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions
and beliefs about our company, the real estate industry and the
debt and equity capital markets. All statements other than
statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Forward-looking statements include information concerning
possible or assumed future results of operations of our company,
including statements about the following subjects: the benefits,
effects and results of the proposed reclassification and
conversion of our common stock; the possibility of consummating
a Listing
and/or an
Offering or any other strategic transactions, including
transactions that may provide liquidity to our stockholders; and
the public market for our shares following a Listing.
The forward-looking statements included in this proxy statement
are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in the forward-looking statements. Assumptions relating
to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other
things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and
future business decisions, all of which are difficult or
impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond
our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected
in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable
assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ
materially from those set forth in the forward-looking
statements. Factors which could have a material adverse effect
on our operations and future prospects include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
If current market and economic conditions do not improve or
worsen, our business, results of operations, cash flows,
financial condition and access to capital may be adversely
affected;
|
|
|
|
Our growth will partially depend upon future acquisitions of
properties, and we may not be successful in identifying and
consummating suitable acquisitions that meet our investment
criteria, which may impede our growth and negatively affect our
results of operations;
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
We depend on tenants for our revenue, and accordingly, lease
expirations, terminations
and/or
tenant defaults particularly by one of our large tenants, could
adversely affect the income produced by our properties, which
may harm our operating performance;
|
|
|
|
We face considerable competition in the leasing market and may
be unable to renew existing leases or re-let space on terms
similar to the existing leases, or we may expend significant
capital in our efforts to re-let space, which may adversely
affect our operating results;
|
|
|
|
Adverse market and economic conditions may negatively affect us
and could cause us to recognize impairment charges or otherwise
impact our performance;
|
|
|
|
We depend on key personnel, each of whom would be difficult to
replace;
|
|
|
|
Our failure to remain qualified as a REIT could adversely affect
our operations and ability to make distributions;
|
|
|
|
Economic and regulatory changes, including accounting standards,
that impact the real estate market generally;
|
|
|
|
The success of our real estate strategies and investment
objectives;
|
|
|
|
Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
Uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory
matters; and
|
|
|
|
Changes in the credit markets and the impact of such changes on
our ability to obtain debt financing.
|
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made.
Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements
to reflect the events or circumstances arising after the date as
of which they are made. As a result of these risks and
uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on the forward-looking statements included in this proxy
statement or that may be made elsewhere from time to time by, or
on behalf of, us.
7
PROPOSAL NO. 1
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO OUR CHARTER
Introduction
Our Board of Directors has declared the amendments to our
charter, as described below, advisable and directed that the
proposals to amend our charter be submitted for consideration at
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A form of the Fourth
Articles of Amendment and Restatement, marked to reflect the
changes to our current charter, is attached to this proxy
statement as Appendix A. This summary of the
provisions of the Fourth Articles of Amendment and Restatement
is qualified in its entirety by reference to
Appendix A. The Fourth Articles of Amendment and
Restatement amend the current charter to:
Listing
Related Amendments
(a) provide for the reclassification and conversion of our
common stock in the event our shares are listed on a national
securities exchange to implement a phased in liquidity program;
(b) provide that certain provisions of our charter will not
remain in effect in the event our shares are listed on a
national securities exchange;
Self-Management
Related and Other Amendments
(c) reflect that we are self-managed and no longer
externally advised or externally sponsored;
(d) require compliance with the SECs tender offer
regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, for any tender offer made for our shares regardless of
the size of the tender offer;
(e) address changes requested by certain state securities
administrators in connection with the registration of our
follow-on offering; and
(f) effectuate certain ministerial revisions and
clarifications.
Effectiveness
If any or all of the proposals to amend our charter are approved
by our stockholders, the Fourth Articles of Amendment and
Restatement reflecting the approved amendments will be filed
with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of
Maryland, or SDAT, and the amendment and restatement will be
effective upon the acceptance for record of the Fourth Articles
of Amendment and Restatement by the SDAT.
Appraisal
Rights
Under Maryland law and our charter, you will not be entitled to
rights of appraisal with respect to the proposed amendments to
our charter. Accordingly, to the extent that you object to the
proposed amendments to our charter, you will not have the right
to have a court judicially determine (and you will not receive)
the fair value for your shares of common stock under the
provisions of Maryland law governing appraisal rights.
8
PROPOSAL NO. 1(A)
AMENDMENTS TO RECLASSIFY AND CONVERT OUR COMMON
STOCK PRIOR TO A LISTING
(PHASED IN LIQUIDITY PROGRAM)
Background
Our Board of Directors is currently evaluating alternatives for
maximizing stockholder value and providing liquidity to our
stockholders. Our Board of Directors may consider, among other
alternatives, listing our shares on a national securities
exchange, or a Listing, a merger transaction, or a sale of
substantially all of our assets. Our Board of Directors may
determine that a Listing is in the best interests of our
stockholders for several reasons, including those discussed
below.
Faster Access to Capital. A Listing may
provide us with the ability to raise capital in both the debt
and equity markets more rapidly than we are able to raise
capital through our current follow-on offering. In our follow-on
offering, we are selling our shares of common stock on a best
efforts basis through our dealer manager and a network of
selling broker-dealers. It takes a long period of time to raise
a significant amount of offering proceeds through this method of
distribution. Our follow-on offering was originally scheduled to
last at least two years, to enable us to sell the maximum amount
of shares registered, and we have the option to extend for an
additional one-year period. If our shares were publicly traded
and the market value of our equity securities held by
non-affiliates was sufficient, we would be able to use a certain
short-form registration process with the SEC, referred to as a
shelf registration, that may enable us to raise
money through the capital markets within a few days or weeks
rather than months or years as under our follow-on offering. If
we were able to raise capital more quickly, it might allow us to
react more quickly to market conditions and potentially take
advantage of additional acquisition opportunities.
Lower Cost of Capital. A Listing may enable us
to raise capital at a cost that is less expensive to us than our
follow-on offering. In our current follow-on offering, we pay
selling commissions and dealer manager fees to the dealer
manager and selling broker-dealers. If our shares are traded on
a national securities exchange, we may not be required to pay
selling commissions or dealer manager fees or if we are required
to pay such fees or other underwriting compensation, we believe
they will likely be less than the fees we currently pay. We also
may be able to access additional sources of capital that may be
less expensive to us, such as unsecured notes. In addition,
during the offering period of our follow-on offering, we are
required to file prospectus supplements and post-effective
amendments to the registration statement for the offering in
order to disclose material information and developments to
potential investors. If we are able to use the SECs
short-form registration statement discussed above, the
information in such a registration statement is automatically
updated when we file reports on
Form 10-K,
Form 10-Q
and
Form 8-K,
thereby alleviating both the need to file ongoing prospectus
supplements and post-effective amendments and the associated
costs.
More Attractive Acquisition Consideration. If
our shares are publicly traded on a national securities
exchange, our shares may be more attractive to potential
acquisition targets or the owners of property that we may be
interested in acquiring. As a result, we may be able to use our
shares as acquisition consideration, which would enable us to
conserve cash. If our shares are publicly traded, it may also
make acquisitions of properties in exchange for limited partner
units in our operating partnership more attractive to property
owners. When a property owner contributes property to our
operating partnership in exchange for limited partner units, the
contribution is generally not taxable at that time. When the
operating partnership redeems the limited partners units,
the transaction is taxable. If we redeem the units for shares of
our stock, the owner may not have the cash necessary to pay the
taxes due. However, if our shares are listed on a national
securities exchange, the property owner can sell the shares to
obtain the cash needed to pay the taxes due. As a result,
listing our shares on a national securities exchange may make
our operating partnerships limited partner units more
attractive as acquisition consideration to potential property
sellers.
Phased In Liquidity for Stockholders. For the
reasons discussed above, our Board of Directors may determine
that a Listing is in the best interests of our company and our
stockholders independent of any liquidity that our stockholders
may obtain as a result of a Listing. Additionally, listing on a
national securities
9
exchange would ultimately provide our stockholders liquidity for
their shares of our common stock. We believe that liquidity
should be provided to our stockholders as part of a Listing
which is structured toward achieving stable and optimal stock
pricing. In the case of a Listing, the liquidity price is the
trading price on the national securities exchange where the
shares can be sold. Like everything else, this is subject to
supply and demand. If there is too much supply, then the price
will move downwards. The phased in liquidity program described
below is aimed at attempting to balance supply and demand.
Reclassification
and Conversion of Our Common Stock: Phased In Liquidity
Program
We have previously disclosed in the prospectuses for our public
offerings that we intend to effect a liquidity event by
September 20, 2013 and that we may consider, among other
alternatives, a Listing, a merger transaction, or a sale of
substantially all of our assets. We are proposing these
amendments to our charter now so that, (1) if our Board of
Directors determines that it is in our best interest to pursue a
Listing, which could potentially be executed with a concurrent
Offering, in the future, we will be positioned to act quickly,
and (2) such Listing will be structured in a way that we
believe is best suited for our company and our stockholders. If
this Proposal No. 1(A) is approved, then as part of
any Listing in the future, there will be a phased in liquidity
program. Under this program, liquidity would be provided to our
stockholders in stages. As discussed below, we believe a phased
in liquidity program is an important component of a successful
Listing, as it is directed toward both liquidity and valuation.
The reclassification and conversion of our shares of common
stock into shares of Class A common stock and Class B
common stock immediately prior to a Listing will operate to
create a phased in liquidity program. Simply put, this program
is aimed at providing stability and valuation, as part of
liquidity. This program is intended to maximize the success of a
Listing and any concurrent Offering in the short and long term.
We have been advised by our strategic advisors and we believe
that a phased in liquidity program will increase the likelihood
of a successful Listing and any concurrent Offering. Our Board
of Directors may also approve other measures in the future that
it believes will improve the success of a Listing, such as stock
splits or stock combinations.
The phased in liquidity program will limit the number of shares
that may be traded immediately upon a Listing and for up to the
following 18 months. This phased in liquidity program is
intended to reduce concentrated sales of our common stock in the
public market. Concentrated sales of our common stock could
depress the trading price, negatively impacting the proceeds a
stockholder could receive upon the sale of shares of our common
stock. In addition, the potential for concentrated sales of our
common stock could make our shares less attractive to buyers in
any concurrent Offering. The reclassification and resulting
limitation on the number of shares that could be traded
immediately after a Listing could improve the share price
obtained in the Offering. This is intended to benefit our
current stockholders by maximizing the offering proceeds our
company may receive and lessening any dilution of our current
stockholders.
Even if our stockholders approve these amendments and a phased
in liquidity program becomes effective upon a Listing, we cannot
predict the price at which our shares will trade on a national
securities exchange and we cannot predict the price at which our
shares might be sold in any concurrent Offering. We cannot
provide you with any assurance that our shares will trade or be
sold at any minimum price level.
The conversion of your outstanding shares of common stock into
Class A common stock and Class B common stock and then
the eventual conversion of your shares of Class B common
stock into Class A common stock will provide you with
immediate liquidity upon a Listing with respect to 25% of your
shares with phased in liquidity for the remaining 75% of your
shares over an
18-month
period, as discussed in more detail below.
Our Board of Directors has not made a determination to pursue
a Listing or any concurrent Offering and may not do so in the
future. Even if our Board of Directors does determine that a
Listing or Offering are in our best interests, we may not be
able to complete the Listing or the Offering or may not be able
to do so in a timely manner or on terms that are favorable to
our stockholders.
10
Amendments
to Our Charter
To effectuate the reclassification and conversion of our common
stock as discussed above, we will need to amend our charter as
described below.
Reclassification
Our charter currently provides for up to
1,000,000,000 shares of common stock. If approved by our
stockholders, the amended charter will provide that immediately
prior to a Listing, all of our authorized
1,000,000,000 shares of common stock would be reclassified
to consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,000,000
|
|
shares of Class A common stock;
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
shares of Class B-1 common stock;
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
shares of Class B-2 common stock; and
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
shares of Class B-3 common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
1,000,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We refer to our
Class B-1,
Class B-2,
and
Class B-3
common stock collectively as Class B common
stock.
Conversion
Each share of our common stock issued and outstanding will
convert immediately prior to a Listing into the following:
|
|
|
|
|
1/4 of a share of our Class A common stock;
|
|
|
|
1/4 of a share of our
Class B-1
common stock;
|
|
|
|
1/4 of a share of our
Class B-2
common stock; and
|
|
|
|
1/4 of a share of our
Class B-3
common stock.
|
11
Stockholder
Shares after Reclassification and Conversion
Following the reclassification and conversion, 25% of each
stockholders previously outstanding shares of common stock
will be Class A common stock and 75% will be Class B
common stock. Of the 75% that will be Class B common stock,
25% will be
Class B-1,
25% will be
Class B-2,
and 25% will be
Class B-3.
The Class A common stock will be listed upon completion of
a Listing. The Class B common stock will be converted to
Class A common stock and become listed over time, in phases.
Class A
Common Stock
Shares of our Class A common stock will be identical to our
existing common stock, except that such shares of our
Class A common stock would be listed on a national
securities exchange upon a Listing.
Class B
Common Stock Conversion of Class B to
Class A
The shares of our Class B common stock will not be listed
on a national securities exchange. Rather, the shares of
Class B common stock would convert automatically into
shares of our Class A common stock, and become listed, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
In the case of the
Class B-1
common stock, six months following the date of the Listing, or
the Listing Date.
|
|
|
|
In the case of the
Class B-2
common stock, on the earlier of (x) 12 months
following the Listing Date, or (y) such earlier date as may
be determined by our Board of Directors, but not earlier than
six months following the Listing Date.
|
|
|
|
In the case of the
Class B-3
common stock, on the earlier of (x) 18 months
following the Listing Date, or (y) such earlier date as may
be determined by our Board of Directors, but not earlier than
six months following the Listing Date.
|
Effect on
Existing Stockholders
The reclassification and conversion of our common stock will not
become effective and will not have any impact on our shares of
common stock unless and until we successfully complete a Listing.
If a Listing does occur and the reclassification and conversion
of our common stock becomes effective, the proposed amendments
will not affect the voting or distribution rights of our
stockholders. In addition, there will be no immediate effect on
the current proportional ownership interests of our stockholders
except for any change as a result of the treatment of fractional
shares discussed below. However, in the event of a Listing, the
proposed amendments will have a direct impact on the liquidity
of our shares of common stock, as discussed in detail below.
In the event of a Listing, the immediate effect of the proposed
amendments to our charter will be to divide the shares owned by
our existing stockholders into multiple classes. Initially, 25%
of a stockholders
12
shares would be converted into shares of our Class A common
stock, which will be listed on a national securities exchange at
the time of the Listing. The remaining 75% of the
stockholders shares would be converted into shares of our
Class B common stock that would not be listed on a national
securities exchange. As a result, even though our shares of
Class A common stock could be traded on a national
securities exchange, our shares of Class B common stock
will not be traded.
The shares of Class B common stock will convert into shares
of Class A common stock and become listed over time in
intervals, with all outstanding shares converting and becoming
listed within 18 months of the Listing Date, or such
earlier dates as determined by our Board of Directors in its
sole discretion.
There will be no public market for the shares of Class B
common stock. Until the shares of Class B common stock
convert into Class A shares and become listed on national
securities exchange, they cannot be traded on a national
securities exchange. In addition, upon a Listing, we are
required to terminate our share repurchase plan. As a result,
after a Listing, our stockholders will have very limited, if
any, liquidity with respect to their shares of Class B
common stock. Further, the trading price per share of
Class A common stock when each class of Class B common
stock converts into Class A common stock could be very
different than the trading price per share of the Class A
common stock on the date of a Listing. As a result, stockholders
may receive less consideration for their shares than they may
have received if they had been able to sell immediately upon the
effectiveness of a Listing.
Examples
of Phased In Liquidity Program
As an example of how existing stockholders will be affected by
the proposed amendments to our charter, consider a hypothetical
stockholder who currently owns 4,000 shares of our common
stock. In the event our Board of Directors deems a Listing to be
in the best interest of our company and our stockholders and a
Listing occurs, the stockholders 4,000 shares of
common stock would convert automatically into:
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 shares of our Class A common stock; plus
|
|
|
|
1,000 shares of our
Class B-1
common stock; plus
|
|
|
|
1,000 shares of our
Class B-2
common stock; plus
|
|
|
|
1,000 shares of our
Class B-3
common stock.
|
All other existing stockholders, including our directors and
executive officers, would also have their shares of common stock
converted in the same proportion, so the
stockholders percentage ownership in us would remain the
same.
The stockholders shares of Class B common stock would
convert automatically into shares of our Class A as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Class B-1
common stock: six months following the Listing Date.
|
|
|
|
Class B-2
common stock: on the earlier of (x) 12 months
following the Listing Date, or (y) such earlier date as may
be determined by our Board of Directors, but not earlier than
six months following the Listing Date.
|
|
|
|
Class B-3
common stock: on the earlier of (x) 18 months
following the Listing Date, or (y) such earlier date as may
be determined by our Board of Directors, but not earlier than
six months following the Listing Date.
|
Set forth below are two examples of how this might work:
Example 1 Our Board of Directors allows the
shares of Class B common stock to convert into Class A
common stock without any acceleration of the conversion dates:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
Class B-1
common stock convert six months following the Listing Date;
|
|
|
|
Shares of
Class B-2
common stock convert 12 months following the Listing Date;
and
|
|
|
|
Shares of
Class B-3
common stock convert 18 months following the Listing Date.
|
13
Conversion
Timeline Example 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listing
|
|
|
6 mos.
|
|
|
12 mos.
|
|
18 mos.
|
25%
Class A
|
|
|
25%
Class B-1
converts to
Class A
|
|
|
25%
Class B-2
converts to
Class A
|
|
25%
Class B-3
converts to
Class A
|
Example 2 Our Board of Directors accelerates
the conversion dates on which the shares of Class B common
stock to convert into Class A common stock as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
Class B-1
common stock convert six months following the Listing Date;
|
|
|
|
Shares of
Class B-2
common stock convert 9 months following the Listing Date;
and
|
|
|
|
Shares of
Class B-3
common stock convert 12 months following the Listing Date.
|
Conversion
Timeline Example 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listing
|
|
|
6 mos.
|
|
|
9 mos.
|
|
12 mos.
|
25%
Class A
|
|
|
25%
Class B-1
converts to
Class A
|
|
|
25%
Class B-2
converts to
Class A
|
|
25%
Class B-3
converts to
Class A
|
Board of
Directors Discretion to Accelerate Conversion of Class B
Common Stock
As illustrated in the examples set forth above, our Board of
Directors will have some discretion to accelerate the date on
which each class of Class B common stock converts into
Class A common stock and will make this determination based
on what it believes to be in the best interests of our company
and our stockholders. However, all shares of Class B common
stock must convert within 18 months following the Listing
Date into Class A common stock, which we expect would be
listed on a national securities exchange at that time.
We expect that the determination by our Board of Directors of
whether any classes of Class B common stock will convert
into Class A common stock earlier than the dates set forth
in the proposed amendment will be made at or prior to a Listing.
Our Board of Directors will make this determination taking into
account the advice of our strategic advisors, including the
underwriters for any concurrent Offering, with respect to the
conversion dates that will best enable the underwriters to
market an Offering to potential investors and that will maximize
the trading price of our shares after Listing. In making its
determination, our Board of Directors will have to rely on a
number of assumptions, including certain assumptions about the
equity capital markets based on the information available to it
at that time. Actual results could turn out to be materially
different than those assumptions.
14
Comparison
of our Currently Outstanding Common Stock to our Class A
and Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
Public Market
|
|
None.
|
|
Listed on a national securities exchange.
|
|
None.
|
Voting Rights
|
|
One vote per share on all matters voted upon by our stockholders.
|
|
One vote per share on all matters voted upon by our stockholders.
|
|
One vote per share on all matters voted upon by our stockholders.
|
Distribution Rights
|
|
Entitled to such distributions as may be authorized from time to
time by our Board of Directors in its discretion.
|
|
Entitled to such distributions as may be authorized from time to
time by our Board of Directors in its discretion.
|
|
Entitled to such distributions as may be authorized from time to
time by our Board of Directors in its discretion.
|
Automatic Conversion
|
|
None currently.
If the amendment to our charter is approved, immediately prior to Listing, each share of common stock will convert automatically into 1/4 of a share of our Class A common stock and 1/4 of a share of each of our Class B-1, Class B-2, and Class B-3 common stock.
|
|
None.
|
|
Class B-1 common stock will convert into Class A common stock six months following the Listing Date.
Class B-2 common stock will convert into Class A common stock on the earlier of (x) 12 months following the Listing Date, or (y) such earlier date as may be determined by our Board of Directors, but not earlier than six months following the Listing Date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B-3 common stock will convert into Class A common stock on
the earlier of (x) 18 months following the Listing Date, or
(y) such earlier date as may be determined by our Board of
Directors, but not earlier than six months following the Listing
Date.
|
Reasons
for these Amendments to Our Charter
For the reasons described above and below, our Board of
Directors determined to amend our charter to provide for the
reclassification and conversion of the common stock immediately
prior to a Listing and to submit this amendment to stockholders
for approval.
In the event of a Listing, a significant number of shares of our
common stock could be offered for sale by our stockholders
immediately after any such Listing. As of October 20, 2010,
there were 184,597,324 shares of our common stock
outstanding, and we continue to issue shares in our follow-on
offering. As a result, there will be even more shares
outstanding if and when our Board of Directors determines that
we should pursue a Listing. If all or a substantial amount of
these shares were able to be traded immediately upon a Listing,
this would likely depress the trading price of our common stock
and could create pricing instability. In addition,
15
this potential for a decline in the price of our common stock
immediately following a potential Listing could decrease the
price per share that we would be able to obtain in an Offering,
if an Offering occurs. This would more likely than not
negatively impact our ability to raise equity capital in an
Offering (if an Offering were to occur) and in potential other
public offerings at attractive prices.
Our strategic advisors and our Board of Directors believe that,
in the event of a Listing, providing for the reclassification
and conversion of our common stock into shares that would become
listed over a period of time is critical to the potential
success of a Listing. Our Board of Directors believes this
phased in liquidity program can operate to lessen any decrease
in the trading price of our common stock caused by the large
number of shares of our stock that could be available for sale,
and, if we were to conduct a concurrent Offering, would make our
shares more attractive to potential buyers thereby allowing us
to achieve our potential capital raising objectives. Our Board
of Directors has also been advised by its strategic advisors
that having some flexibility to accelerate the timing of when
each class of Class B common stock will convert into
Class A common stock is important. However, our strategic
advisors and our Board of Directors believe that providing
definitive outside dates for when the shares of Class B
common stock will convert into common stock provides certainty
to the market and to our stockholders about their ultimate
liquidity.
Although the discussion in this proxy statement of the
information and factors considered by our Board of Directors is
believed to include the material factors considered by our Board
of Directors, it is not intended to be exhaustive and may not
include all of the factors that were considered. In reaching its
determination to approve and recommend the amendment to our
charter to provide for the conversion of the common stock, our
Board of Directors did not quantify or assign any relative or
specific weights to the various factors that it considered in
reaching its determination that the proposal is advisable and in
the best interests of the company and our stockholders. Rather,
our Board of Directors based its position and recommendation on
the totality of the information presented to, and factors
considered by, the Board of Directors. In addition, individual
members of our Board of Directors may have given differing
weights to different factors.
Treatment
of Fractional Shares
No fractional shares of common stock will be issued in the event
of the reclassification and conversion of our common stock.
Instead, stockholders who otherwise would own a fractional share
of a class of our common stock following the reclassification
and conversion would be entitled to receive cash in an amount
equal to the fair market value of such fractional share of
common stock, as determined by our Board of Directors.
Certain
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Conversion
of Our Common Stock
The following is a summary of certain material U.S. federal
income tax considerations in the event of the conversion of our
common stock as discussed above but does not purport to be a
complete analysis of all the potential tax considerations
relating thereto. This summary is based upon the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and
Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and judicial and
administrative decisions in effect as of the date hereof, all of
which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. It
addresses only stockholders who hold our common stock as capital
assets. This summary does not address stockholders subject to
special rules, including, but not limited to, financial
institutions, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies,
dealers in securities, foreign stockholders, stockholders who
hold their pre-conversion shares as part of a straddle, hedge,
or conversion transaction, and stockholders who acquired their
pre-conversion shares pursuant to the exercise of employee stock
options or otherwise as compensation. We have not sought any
ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
with respect to the statements made and the conclusions reached
in the following summary, and there can be no complete assurance
that the IRS will agree with these statements and conclusions.
This summary does not address other federal taxes (such as the
alternative minimum tax or gift or estate tax laws) and tax
considerations under state, local, foreign, and other laws. We
recommend that stockholders consult their tax advisors to
determine the federal state, local, foreign and other tax
consequences to them of the conversion in light of the
stockholders particular circumstances.
16
A stockholder generally will not recognize gain or loss on the
conversion of our common stock, except to the extent of cash, if
any, received in lieu of a fractional share interest. The
aggregate tax basis of the post-conversion shares received will
be equal to the aggregate tax basis of the pre-conversion shares
exchanged therefor (excluding any portion of the holders
basis allocated to fractional shares) and the holding period of
the post-conversion shares received will include the holding
period of the pre-conversion shares exchanged.
A holder of the pre-conversion shares who receives cash will
generally be treated as having exchanged a fractional share
interest for cash in a redemption that is subject to
Section 302 of the Code. The redemption will be treated as
a sale of the fractional share, and not as a distribution under
Section 301 of the Code, if the receipt of cash (a) is
substantially disproportionate with respect to the
holder, (b) results in a complete termination
of the holders interest, or (c) is not
essentially equivalent to a dividend with respect to the
holder, in each case taking into account shares both actually
and constructively owned by such holder (under certain
constructive ownership rules). A distribution is not essentially
equivalent to a dividend if the holder undergoes a
meaningful reduction in the holders
proportionate interest. If the redemption is treated as a sale,
the holder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference
between the portion of the tax basis of the post-conversion
shares allocated to the fractional share interest and the cash
received. If the redemption does not meet one of the
Section 302 tests, the cash distribution will be treated as
a distribution under Section 301 of the Code. In such case,
the cash distribution will be treated as dividend to the extent
of our earnings and profits, and then as a recovery of basis to
the extent of the holders tax basis in its shares (which,
for these purposes, may include the holders tax basis in
all of its shares or be limited to the holders tax basis
in its fractional share interest), and finally as gain from the
sale of stock.
Whether a holder who receives cash in lieu of fractional shares
will have a meaningful reduction in ownership will depend on all
of the facts and circumstances existing at and around the time
of the conversion, including the size of the holders
percentage interest in our common stock before and after the
conversion. In addition, if we issue shares pursuant to a public
offering and such issuance is treated as part of a firm
and fixed plan that includes the common stock conversion
and the fractional share redemptions, the dilution in ownership
resulting from such offering would be taken into account in
applying the Section 302 tests.
We recommend that stockholders consult their own tax advisors to
determine the extent to which their fractional share redemption
is treated as a sale of the fractional share or as a
distribution under Section 301 of the Code and the tax
consequences thereof.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
amendments to our charter to reclassify and
convert our common stock immediately prior to a Listing.
17
PROPOSAL NO. 1(B)
AMENDMENTS
TO PROVIDE THAT CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF OUR CHARTER
WILL NOT
REMAIN IN EFFECT AFTER A LISTING
The provisions of the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate
Investment Trusts adopted by the North American Securities
Administrators Association, or the NASAA Guidelines, apply to
REITs with shares of common stock that are publicly registered
with the SEC but are not listed on a national securities
exchange. In the event of a Listing, there are certain
provisions of our charter that will no longer be required to be
included pursuant to the NASAA Guidelines. If
Proposal No. 1(B) is approved by our stockholders,
certain provisions in our charter will not remain in effect
after a Listing, including but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Sections 5.2.2 and 5.3, which currently limit the voting
rights per share of stock sold in a private offering;
|
|
|
|
Section 5.5, which currently prohibits distributions in
kind, except for distributions of readily marketable securities,
distributions of beneficial interests in a liquidity trust or
distributions in which each stockholder is advised of the risks
of direct ownership of property and offered the election of
receiving such distributions;
|
|
|
|
Section 8.1, which places limits on incentive fees;
|
|
|
|
Section 8.2, which places limits on our organizational and
offering expenses;
|
|
|
|
Section 8.3, which places limits on our total operating
expenses;
|
|
|
|
Section 8.4, which places limits on our acquisition fees
and expenses;
|
|
|
|
Section 11.1 related to the requirement that a special
meeting of stockholders be called upon the request of
stockholders holding 10% of our shares entitled to vote;
|
|
|
|
Section 11.2 related to the restrictions on amending our
charter in certain circumstances without prior stockholder
approval;
|
|
|
|
Sections 11.5 and 11.6 related to inspection of our
stockholder list and receipt of reports;
|
|
|
|
Sections 12.2(c), 12.2(d) and 12.3 related to restrictions
on exculpation, indemnification and the advancement of expenses
to our directors; and
|
|
|
|
Article XIV related to prohibitions on
roll-up
transactions.
|
These changes will not have an impact on stockholders unless and
until our Board of Directors deems a Listing in the best
interests of our company and our stockholders and we
successfully complete a Listing. Our Board of Directors believes
that, in the event of a Listing, these changes will allow us to
operate in a manner similar to other publicly-traded REITs
without certain of the limitations required by the NASAA
Guidelines.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
amendments to our charter to cause certain
provisions of our charter no longer to be applicable upon a
Listing.
18
PROPOSAL NO. 1(C)
AMENDMENTS
TO REFLECT SELF-MANAGEMENT
We became a self-managed company in the third quarter of 2009
and the advisory agreement with our former advisor expired on
September 20, 2009. As a self-managed company, certain
provisions in our charter are no longer applicable. If
Proposal No. 1(C) is approved by our stockholders, our
charter will no longer contain references to our having a
sponsor or an advisor, as well as specific provisions relating
to such entities or referencing such entities, including but not
limited to the deletion of Article VIII,
Advisor and amendments to specific sections of
Article X, Conflicts of Interest,
Section XII, Liability Limitation and
Indemnification. In addition, new Article VIII,
Expenses will be added.
If Proposal No. 1(C) is approved, certain definitions
in our charter will be updated to reflect self-management,
including but not limited to, Acquisition Expense,
Acquisition Fee and Independent
Director. Other definitions will be deleted from our
charter, including Advisor, Advisory
Agreement, Competitive Real Estate Commission,
Initial Investments, Sponsor,
Termination Date and Termination Event.
On August 24, 2009, we amended our charter to change our
name from Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT,
Inc. to Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. We
did this in connection with our transition to self-management
and to reflect that we are no longer externally advised or
externally sponsored. We also changed the name of our operating
partnership from Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT
Holdings, L.P. to Healthcare Trust of America
Holdings, LP. If approved, our amended charter will
reflect the name change of our operating partnership.
Finally, if approved, our amended charter will define
Dealer Manager as Realty Capital Securities, LLC, or
such other person selected by our Board of Directors to act as
the dealer manager for an offering. Realty Capital Securities,
LLC is the dealer manager for our follow-on offering.
Our Board of Directors does not believe these changes will have
a material effect on us or our stockholders and believes that
such changes will more accurately reflect our corporate
structure.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
amendments to our charter to reflect
self-management.
19
PROPOSAL NO. 1(D)
TENDER
OFFER COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
Under the rules of the SEC, a person engaging in a tender offer
for less than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock,
which is commonly referred to as a mini tender
offer, is not required to comply with the provisions of
Regulation 14D of the Exchange Act, including the notice
and disclosure requirements. We believe that a requirement that
any tender offer, including a mini-tender offer,
comply with all of the provisions of Regulation 14D of the
Exchange Act (except that related offering documents are not
required to be filed with the SEC unless otherwise required by
the Exchange Act) will (1) better enable stockholders to
evaluate such offer by ensuring that they receive critical
information regarding the material terms of the offer, the
purposes of the offer and the offerors past transactions
in our securities and (2) better protect their investment
in us by ensuring that they have the right to (a) withdraw
any shares deposited with the offeror during the period the
offer remains open and (b) receive the highest
consideration per share paid to any other stockholder for shares
tendered in the offer.
If Proposal No. 1(D) is approved by our stockholders,
our charter will be amended to include a new Section 11.7,
which will require that any tender offer made by any person
regardless of the size of the tender offer and including any
mini-tender offer, comply with all of the provisions
of Regulation 14D of the Exchange Act, including the notice
and disclosure requirements (except that such notice and
disclosure documents are not required to be filed with the SEC
unless otherwise required by the Exchange Act). Among other
things, the offeror will be required to provide us notice of
such tender offer at least ten business days before initiating
the tender offer. If the offeror initiates a tender offer
without complying with the provisions set forth above, we will
have the right to redeem that offerors shares, if any, and
any shares acquired in the tender offer. In addition, the
noncomplying offeror will be responsible for all of our expenses
in connection with that offerors noncompliance.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
amendment to our charter to include tender
offer compliance requirements.
20
PROPOSAL NO. 1(E)
AMENDMENTS
REQUESTED BY STATE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS
We commenced a public offering of shares of our common stock on
March 19, 2010, which we refer to as the follow-on
offering. We were required to register the follow-on offering
with the SEC and, because our common stock is not listed on a
national securities exchange, the state securities regulators in
each state where we offer securities for sale. In offerings by
REITs subject to their regulation, many state securities
examiners apply the standards set forth in the NASAA Guidelines.
In connection with the registration of our follow-on offering,
certain state securities regulators requested that we amend our
charter in certain respects to conform to the NASAA Guidelines.
In response to these regulatory requests, we have recommended
the changes described below. Our Board of Directors does not
believe the changes will have a material effect on us or our
stockholders.
Heightened
Investor Suitability Standards
At the time our current charter was adopted on December 8,
2006, the NASAA Guidelines required that investors in our
initial public offering have: (1) a minimum annual gross
income of $45,000 and a minimum net worth, excluding home,
furnishings and automobiles, of $45,000; or (2) a minimum
net worth of $150,000, excluding home, furnishings and
automobiles. On May 7, 2007, the NASAA Guidelines were
revised to require that investors have: (1) a minimum
annual gross income of $70,000 and a minimum net worth,
excluding home, furnishings and automobiles, of $70,000; or
(2) a minimum net worth of $250,000, excluding home,
furnishings and automobiles. Although not set forth currently in
our charter, we have adopted these revised investor suitability
standards in connection with our follow-on offering. If
Proposal No. 1(E) is approved, we will amend
Section 5.8.1 of our charter to reflect the change to the
investor suitability standards set forth in the NASAA Guidelines.
Determination
of Suitability
Our charter currently provides that each person selling shares
on our behalf must make every reasonable effort to determine
that the purchase of our shares is a suitable and appropriate
investment for each investor. The NASAA Guidelines also impose
this obligation on sponsors of externally advised, non-listed
REITs. However, since we are self-managed and no longer have a
sponsor, a state securities administrator has requested that we
amend our charter so that our company assumes this obligation.
If Proposal No. 1(E) is approved, we will amend
Section 5.8.2 of our charter to reflect the obligation of
our company to make every reasonable effort to determine that
the purchase of our shares is a suitable and appropriate
investment for each investor. In making this determination, we
will rely on the representations made by each investor in their
subscription agreement, as well as the suitability
determinations made by participating broker-dealers and
financial advisors.
Minimum
Initial Investment Amount
Prior to the adoption of our current charter, no state
securities administrator required that we impose a minimum
initial investment amount. Although we require a minimum initial
investment of 100 shares, this minimum was not required to
be included in our charter. In connection with the registration
of our follow-on offering, a state securities administrator has
requested that we amend our charter to include a minimum initial
investment amount. As a result, if Proposal No. 1(E)
is approved by our stockholders, Section 5.8.3 of our
amended charter will require a minimum initial investment of
100 shares of our common stock until our shares are listed
on a national securities exchange.
Fee-Related
Provisions
Sections 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9 and 8.10 of our charter as
currently in effect, provide that we may pay certain fees to our
former advisor [u]nless otherwise provided in any
resolution adopted by our Board of Directors. A state
securities administrator has requested that we amend our charter
to remove this statement because it does not appear in the NASAA
Guidelines. As discussed above in Proposal No. 1(C),
we are also proposing to
21
delete certain sections of our charter that relate to fees and
expenses payable to our former advisor since we are no longer
externally advised and no longer pay, or will be obligated to
pay, these fees. If Proposal No. 1(C) and
Proposal No. 1(E) are approved by the stockholders, we
will amend our charter to remove that statement from the fee
related provisions that will remain in our charter, including
Section 8.1, Incentive Fees, Section 8.2,
Organizational and Offering Expenses Limitation and
Section 8.3, Total Operating Expenses. If
Proposal No. 1(E) is approved but
Proposal No. 1(C) is not approved, we will remove this
statement from all sections of our charter referenced above.
Appraisals
of Roll-Up
Transactions
A roll-up
transaction is a transaction involving our acquisition, merger,
conversion or consolidation, either directly or indirectly, and
the issuance of securities of a partnership, REIT, corporation
or similar entity, or a
Roll-Up
Entity, to stockholders. Our charter currently requires us to
obtain an appraisal of all of our assets in the event we engage
in a roll-up
transaction. A state securities administrator has requested that
we amend our charter to reflect additional mandates related to
roll-up
transactions set forth in the NASAA Guidelines. If this
Proposal No. 1(E) is approved by stockholders, we will
amend Article XIV of our charter to require that if any
such appraisal is included in a prospectus used to offer
securities of the
Roll-Up
Entity, such appraisal must also be filed with the SEC and the
state securities commissions as an exhibit to the registration
statement.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
amendments to our charter requested by state securities
administrators.
22
PROPOSAL NO. 1(F)
MINISTERIAL
REVISIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
If Proposal No. 1(F) is approved by our stockholders,
certain ministerial changes will be made to our charter either
for clarification purposes or to be consistent with the Maryland
General Corporation Law, the NASAA Guidelines or other
provisions in our charter. These include clarification of
certain defined terms and cross references, as well as
conforming language to the corresponding provision of the
Maryland General Corporation Law. Our Board of Directors does
not believe these ministerial revisions and clarifications will
have a material effect on us or our stockholders.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the
amendments to our charter to make certain ministerial revisions
and clarifications.
23
PROPOSAL NO. 2
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Background
The Board of Directors currently consists of six directors. Our
bylaws provide for a minimum of three and a maximum of
15 directors and that our directors each serve a term of
one year, but may be re-elected. The Board of Directors has
nominated Scott D. Peters, W. Bradley Blair, II, Maurice J.
DeWald, Warren D. Fix, Larry L. Mathis and Gary T. Wescombe,
each for a term of office commencing on the date of the 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders and ending on the date of the
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors
are duly elected and qualify. Each of Messrs. Peters,
Blair, DeWald, Fix, Mathis and Wescombe currently serves as a
member of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors
believes the nominees have played and will continue to play a
vital role in our management and operations, particularly in
connection with our transition to self-management and the
continued growth and success of our company.
Unless otherwise instructed on the proxy, the shares represented
by proxies will be voted FOR ALL NOMINEES who
are named below. Each of the nominees has consented to being
named as a nominee in this proxy statement and has agreed that,
if elected, he will serve on the Board of Directors for a
one-year term and until his successor is duly elected and
qualifies. If any nominee becomes unavailable for any reason,
the shares represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute
nominee designated by the Board of Directors. We are not aware
of any family relationship among any of the nominees to become
directors or executive officers of HTA. Each of the nominees for
election as director has stated that there is no arrangement or
understanding of any kind between him and any other person
relating to his election as a director except that such nominees
have agreed to serve as our directors if elected.
Information
about Director Nominees
Biographical
Information
The following table and biographical descriptions set forth
information with respect to the individuals who are our director
nominees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Term of Office
|
|
Scott D. Peters
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
|
|
Since 2006
|
W. Bradley Blair, II
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Independent Director
|
|
Since 2006
|
Maurice J. DeWald
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Independent Director
|
|
Since 2006
|
Warren D. Fix
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Independent Director
|
|
Since 2006
|
Larry L. Mathis
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Independent Director
|
|
Since 2007
|
Gary T. Wescombe
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Independent Director
|
|
Since 2006
|
Scott D. Peters has served as our Chairman of the Board
since July 2006, Chief Executive Officer since April 2006 and
President since June 2007. He served as Chief Executive Officer
of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, or our
former advisor, from July 2006 to July 2008. He served as the
Executive Vice President of Grubb & Ellis Apartment
REIT, Inc. from January 2006 to November 2008 and served as one
of its directors from April 2007 to June 2008. He also served as
Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of
Grubb & Ellis Company, our former sponsor, or
Grubb & Ellis, from December 2007 to July 2008, and as
Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of NNN Realty
Advisors, a wholly owned subsidiary of our former sponsor, from
its formation in September 2006 and as its Chairman of the Board
from December 2007 to July 2008. NNN Realty Advisors became a
wholly owned subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis upon its
merger with Grubb & Ellis in December 2007.
Mr. Peters also served as Chief Executive Officer of
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors from November 2006 to
July 2008, having served from September 2004 to October 2006 as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From
December 2005 to January 2008, Mr. Peters also served as
Chief Executive Officer and President of G REIT, Inc.,
having previously served as its Executive
24
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2004.
Mr. Peters also served as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of T REIT, Inc. from September 2004 to
December 2006. From February 1997 to February 2007,
Mr. Peters served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and a director of Golf Trust of America, Inc., a
publicly traded REIT. Mr. Peters received his B.B.A. degree
in Accounting and Finance from Kent State University in Kent,
Ohio.
W. Bradley Blair, II has served as an
independent director of our company since September 2006.
Mr. Blair served as the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chairman of the board of directors of Golf Trust of
America, Inc. from the time of its formation and initial public
offering in 1997 as a REIT until his resignation and retirement
in November 2007. During such term, Mr. Blair managed the
acquisition, operation, leasing and disposition of the assets of
the portfolio. From 1993 until February 1997, Mr. Blair
served as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and
General Counsel for The Legends Group. As an officer of The
Legends Group, Mr. Blair was responsible for all aspects of
operations, including acquisitions, development and marketing.
From 1978 to 1993, Mr. Blair was the managing partner at
Blair Conaway Bograd & Martin, P.A., a law firm
specializing in real estate, finance, taxation and acquisitions.
Currently, Mr. Blair operates the Blair Group consulting
practice, which focuses on real estate acquisitions and finance.
Mr. Blair earned a B.S. degree in Business from Indiana
University in Bloomington, Indiana and his Juris Doctorate
degree from the University of North Carolina School of Law in
Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Maurice J. DeWald has served as an independent director
of our company since September 2006. He has served as the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Verity Financial Group,
Inc., a financial advisory firm, since 1992, where the primary
focus has been in both the healthcare and technology sectors.
Mr. DeWald also serves as a director of Mizuho Corporate
Bank of California, and as non-executive Chairman of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. Mr. DeWald also previously served
as a director of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, ARV Assisted
Living, Inc. and Quality Systems, Inc. From 1962 to 1991,
Mr. DeWald was with the international accounting and
auditing firm of KPMG LLP, where he served at various times as
an audit partner, a member of their board of directors as well
as the managing partner of the Orange County, Los Angeles
and Chicago offices. Mr. DeWald has served as Chairman and
director of both the United Way of Greater Los Angeles and the
United Way of Orange County, California. Mr. DeWald holds a
B.B.A. degree in Accounting and Finance from the University of
Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana and is a member of its Mendoza
School of Business Advisory Council. Mr. DeWald is a
Certified Public Accountant (inactive), and is a member of the
California Society of Certified Public Accountants and the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Warren D. Fix has served as an independent director of
our company since September 2006. He is the Chairman of FDW,
LLC, a real estate investment and management firm. Mr. Fix
also serves as a director of First Financial Advisors, First
Foundation Bank, Accel Networks and CT Realty Investors. Until
November of 2008, when he completed a process of dissolution, he
served for five years as the chief executive officer of WCH,
Inc., formerly Candlewood Hotel Company, Inc., having served as
its Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary since 1995. During his tenure with Candlewood Hotel
Company, Inc., Mr. Fix oversaw the development of a chain
of extended-stay hotels, including 117 properties aggregating
13,300 rooms. From July 1994 to October 1995, Mr. Fix was a
consultant to Doubletree Hotels, primarily developing debt and
equity sources of capital for hotel acquisitions and
refinancing. Mr. Fix has been and continues to be a partner
in The Contrarian Group, a business management and investment
company since December 1992. From 1989 to December 1992,
Mr. Fix served as President of The Pacific Company, a real
estate investment and development company. During his tenure at
The Pacific Company, Mr. Fix was responsible for the
development, acquisition and management of an apartment
portfolio comprising in excess of 3,000 units. From 1964 to
1989, Mr. Fix held numerous positions, including Chief
Financial Officer, within The Irvine Company, a major
California-based real estate firm that develops residential
property, for-sale housing, apartments, commercial, industrial,
retail, hotel and other land related uses. Mr. Fix was one
of the initial team of ten professionals hired by The Irvine
Company to initiate the development of 125,000 acres of
land in Orange County, California. Mr. Fix is a Certified
Public Accountant (inactive). He received his B.A. degree from
Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, California and is a
graduate of the UCLA Executive Management Program, the Stanford
Financial Management Program and the UCLA Anderson Corporate
Director Program.
25
Larry L. Mathis has served as an independent director of
our company since April 2007. Since 1998 he has served as an
executive consultant with D. Peterson & Associates in
Houston, Texas, providing counsel to select clients on
leadership, management, governance and strategy and is the
author of The Mathis Maxims, Lessons in Leadership. For
over 35 years, Mr. Mathis has held numerous leadership
positions in organizations charged with planning and directing
the future of healthcare delivery in the United States.
Mr. Mathis is the founding President and Chief Executive
Officer of The Methodist Hospital System in Houston, Texas,
having served that institution in various executive positions
for 27 years, including the last 14 years as CEO
before his retirement in 1997. During his extensive career in
the healthcare industry, he has served as a member of the board
of directors of a number of national, state and local industry
and professional organizations, including Chairman of the board
of directors of the Texas Hospital Association, the American
Hospital Association, and the American College of Healthcare
Executives, and has served the federal government as Chairman of
the National Advisory Council on Health Care Technology
Assessment and as a member of the Medicare Prospective Payment
Assessment Commission. From 1997 to 2003, Mr. Mathis was a
member of the board of directors and Chairman of the
Compensation Committee of Centerpulse, Inc., and from 2004 to
present a member of the board and Chairman of the Nominating and
Governance Committee of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., both
U.S. publicly traded companies. Mr. Mathis received a
B.A. degree in Social Sciences from Pittsburg State University
in Pittsburg, Kansas and a M.A. degree in Health Administration
from Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri.
Gary T. Wescombe has served as an independent director of
our company since October 2006. He manages and develops real
estate operating properties through American Oak Properties,
LLC, where he is a principal. He is also director, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Arnold and Mabel Beckman
Foundation, a nonprofit foundation established for the purpose
of supporting scientific research. From October 1999 to December
2001, he was a partner in Warmington Wescombe Realty Partners in
Costa Mesa, California, where he focused on real estate
investments and financing strategies. Prior to retiring in 1999,
Mr. Wescombe was a partner with Ernst & Young,
LLP (previously Kenneth Leventhal & Company) from 1970
to 1999. In addition, Mr. Wescombe also served as a
director of G REIT, Inc. from December 2001 to January 2008
and has served as chairman of the trustees of G REIT
Liquidating Trust since January 2008. Mr. Wescombe received
a B.S. degree in Accounting and Finance from California State
University in San Jose, California and is a member of the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and
California Society of Certified Public Accountants.
Board
Experience and Director Qualifications
Our Board of Directors has diverse and extensive knowledge and
expertise in industries that are of particular importance to us,
including the real estate and healthcare industries. This
knowledge and experience includes acquiring, financing,
developing, constructing, leasing, managing and disposing of
both institutional and non-institutional commercial real estate.
In addition, our Board of Directors has extensive and broad
legal, auditing and accounting experience. Our Board of
Directors has numerous years of hands-on and executive
commercial real estate experience drawn from a wide range of
disciplines. Each director has extensive knowledge and expertise
with respect to our company and has been actively engaged in the
governance of our company, having guided it through its
transition to self-management and continuing to oversee its
growth. Each director was nominated to the Board of Directors on
the basis of the unique skills he brings to the Board, as well
as how such skills collectively enhance our Board of Directors.
On an individual basis, our Board of Directors has determined
that:
|
|
|
|
|
Our Chairman, Mr. Peters, has 20 years of experience
in managing publicly traded real estate investment trusts and
brings insight into all aspects of our business due to both his
current role and his history with the company. His comprehensive
experience and extensive knowledge and understanding of the
healthcare and real estate industries has been instrumental in
the creation, development and launching of our company, as well
as our current investment strategy. In addition, Mr. Peters
has significant experience in leading companies through
successful exit strategies, including public listings, sales and
mergers, which we believe is critical to our future business
strategy.
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Blair provides broad real estate and legal experience,
having served a variety of companies in advisory, executive
and/or
director roles for over 35 years, including over
10 years as CEO, president and Chairman of the board of
directors of a publicly traded REIT. He also operates a
consulting practice which focuses on real estate acquisitions
and finance. His diverse background in other business
disciplines, coupled with his deep understanding and knowledge
of real estate, contributes to the quality guidance and
oversight he brings to our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
Mr. DeWald, based on his 30 year career with the
international accounting and auditing firm of KPMG LLP, offers
substantial expertise in accounting and finance. Mr. DeWald
also has over 15 years of experience as a director of a
number of companies in the healthcare, financial, banking and
manufacturing sectors.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Fix offers financial and management expertise, with
particular industry knowledge in real estate, hospitality,
agriculture and financial services. He has served in various
executive
and/or
director roles in a number of public and private companies in
the real estate, financial and technology sectors, for over
40 years.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Mathis brings extensive experience in the healthcare
industry, having held numerous leadership positions in
organizations charged with planning and directing the future of
healthcare delivery in the United States for over 35 years,
including serving as Chairman of the National Advisory Council
on Health Care Technology Assessment and as a member of the
Medicare Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. He is the
founding president and CEO of The Methodist Hospital System in
Houston, Texas, and has served as an executive consultant in the
healthcare sector for over ten years.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Wescombe provides expertise in accounting, real estate
investments and financing strategies, having served a number of
companies in various executive
and/or
director roles for over 40 years in both the real estate
and non-profit sectors, including almost 30 years as a
partner with Ernst & Young, LLP. He currently manages
and develops real estate operating properties as a principal of
a real estate company.
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ALL
NOMINEES named above for election as directors.
27
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table and biographical descriptions set forth
information with respect to our executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Term of Office
|
|
Scott D. Peters
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
|
|
Since 2006
|
Kellie S. Pruitt
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
|
|
Since 2009
|
Mark D. Engstrom
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Executive Vice President Acquisitions
|
|
Since 2009
|
For biographical information regarding Mr. Peters, our
Chief Executive Officer and President, see Information
about Director Nominees above.
Kellie S. Pruitt has served as our Chief Financial
Officer since May 2010, as our Treasurer since April 2009 and as
our Secretary since July 2009. She also served as our Chief
Accounting Officer from January 2009 until May 2010, as our
Assistant Secretary from March 2009 to July 2009 and as
Controller for a portion of January 2009. From September 2007 to
December 2008, Ms. Pruitt served as the Vice President,
Financial Reporting and Compliance for Fender Musical
Instruments Corporation. Prior to joining Fender Musical
Instruments Corporation in 2007, Ms. Pruitt served as a
senior manager at Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1995 to
2007, serving both public and privately held companies primarily
concentrated in the real estate and consumer business
industries. She graduated from the University of Texas in
Arlington, Texas with a B.A. degree in Accounting and is a
member of the AICPA. Ms. Pruitt is a Certified Public
Accountant licensed in Arizona and Texas.
Mark D. Engstrom has served as our Executive Vice
President-Acquisitions
since July 2009. From February 2009 to July 2009,
Mr. Engstrom served as our independent consultant providing
acquisition and asset management support. Mr. Engstrom has
22 years of experience in organizational leadership,
acquisitions, management, asset management, project management,
leasing, planning, facilities development, financing, and
establishing industry leading real estate and facilities groups.
From 2006 through 2009, Mr. Engstrom was the Chief
Executive Officer of Insite Medical Properties, a real estate
services and investment company. From 2001 through 2005,
Mr. Engstrom served as a Manager of Real Estate Services
for Hammes Company and created a new business unit within the
company which was responsible for providing asset and property
management. Mr. Engstrom graduated from Michigan State
University in East Lansing, Michigan with a B.A. degree in
Pre-Law and Public Administration and with a Masters Degree from
the University of Minnesota in Hospital and Healthcare
Administration.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Board of
Directors
The Board of Directors held 23 meetings during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009. Each of our directors attended at
least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of
the Board of Directors held during the period for which he
served as a director and the aggregate total number of meetings
held by all committees of the Board of Directors on which he
served during the periods in which he served.
Board
Leadership Structure
The Board of Directors believes it is important to select its
Chairman and the companys Chief Executive Officer in the
manner it considers in the best interests of the company at any
given point in time. The members of the Board of Directors
possess considerable business experience and in-depth knowledge
of the issues our company faces, and are therefore in the best
position to evaluate our needs and how best to organize our
leadership structure to meet those needs. Accordingly, the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions
28
may be filled by one individual or by two different individuals.
The Board of Directors believes that the most effective
leadership structure for the company at this time is for
Mr. Peters to serve as both our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Peters combined role as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer serves as a bridge between
the Board and management and provides unified leadership for
carrying out our strategic initiatives and business plans.
Director
Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meetings
Although we have no policy with regard to attendance by the
members of the Board of Directors at our annual stockholder
meetings, we invite and encourage the members of the Board of
Directors to attend our annual stockholder meetings to foster
communication between stockholders and the Board of Directors.
All six members of the Board of Directors attended the 2009
annual meeting of stockholders.
Contacting
the Board of Directors
Any stockholder who desires to contact members of the Board of
Directors may do so by writing to: Healthcare Trust of America,
Inc., Board of Directors, The Promenade,
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale,
Arizona 85254, Attention: Secretary. Communications received
will be distributed by our Secretary to such member or members
of the Board of Directors as deemed appropriate by our
Secretary, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in
the communication received. For example, if any questions
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing
matters are received, they will be forwarded by our Secretary to
the Audit Committee for review.
Director
Independence
We have a six-member Board of Directors. Our charter provides
that a majority of the directors must be independent
directors. One of our directors, Scott D. Peters, is
affiliated with us and we do not consider him to be an
independent director. Our remaining directors qualify as
independent directors as defined in our charter in
compliance with the requirements of the NASAA Guidelines. As
currently defined in our charter, the term independent
director means:
[A] Director who is not on the date of
determination, and within the last two years from the date of
determination has not been, directly or indirectly associated
with the Sponsor or the Advisor by virtue of (i) ownership
of an interest in the Sponsor, the Advisor or any of their
Affiliates, other than the Corporation; (ii) employment by
the Sponsor, the Advisor or any of their Affiliates;
(iii) service as an officer or director of the Sponsor, the
Advisor or any of their Affiliates, other than as a Director of
the Corporation; (iv) performance of services, other than
as a Director, for the Corporation; (v) service as a
director or trustee of more than three REITs organized by the
Sponsor or advised by the Advisor; or (vi) maintenance of a
material business or professional relationship with the Sponsor,
the Advisor or any of their Affiliates.
As discussed above under Proposal 1(C), as a result of the
completion of our transition to self-management in the third
quarter of 2009, we no longer have a sponsor or advisor. As a
result, our Board of Directors has approved an amendment to our
charter that deletes the references to Sponsor and
Advisor, including in the definition of independent
director.
Each of our independent directors would also qualify as
independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or
the NYSE, and our Audit Committee members would qualify as
independent under the NYSEs rules applicable to Audit
Committee members. However, our stock is not currently listed on
the NYSE.
Risk
Management
The Board of Directors and each of its committees play an
important role in overseeing the management of our
companys risks. The Board regularly reviews our material
risks and exposures, including operational, strategic,
financial, legal and regulatory risks. Management is responsible
for identifying the material risks
29
facing our company, implementing appropriate risk management
strategies that are responsive to our risk profile, integrating
consideration of risk and risk management into our
decision-making process, and promulgating policies and
procedures to ensure that information with respect to material
risks is transmitted to senior executives, as well as to our
Board of Directors and appropriate committees of our Board. Our
Board of Directors, through the work of our Audit, Compensation,
Nominating and Corporate Governance, Investment and Risk
Management Committees, provides Board level oversight of these
risk management activities.
The Risk Management Committee has primary responsibility at the
Board level for overseeing our risk management activities. The
Risk Management Committees responsibilities include
reviewing and discussing with management and our independent
auditors any significant risks or exposures faced by us, the
steps management has taken to identify, mitigate, monitor,
control or avoid such risks or exposures, and our underlying
policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. In
addition, the Audit Committee reviews the management of
financial risk and our policies regarding risk assessment and
risk management. The Compensation Committee reviews the
management of risks relating to our compensation plans and
arrangements. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
reviews the management of risks relating to compliance and our
corporate governance policies, while the Investment Committee
reviews acquisition and other investment-related risks.
Our Board of Directors is regularly informed regarding the risk
oversight discussions and activities of each of these Board
committees through the reports each committee delivers to the
full Board following each of its regular committee meetings. In
addition, members of management responsible for managing our
risk formally report to the full Board regarding enterprise risk
management annually and also provide informal updates
periodically throughout the year to the full Board and to
individual committees of the Board.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors may establish committees it deems
appropriate to address specific areas in more depth than may be
possible at a full Board of Directors meeting, provided that the
majority of the members of each committee are independent
directors. Our Board of Directors has established an Audit
Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, an Investment Committee and a Risk
Management Committee.
Audit Committee. Our Audit Committees
primary function is to assist the Board of Directors in
fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the
financial information to be provided to our stockholders and
others, the system of internal controls which management has
established, and the audit and financial reporting process. The
Audit Committee is responsible for the selection, evaluation
and, when necessary, replacement of our independent registered
public accounting firm. Under our Audit Committee charter, the
Audit Committee will always be comprised solely of independent
directors. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of
W. Bradley Blair, II, Maurice J. DeWald, Warren D.
Fix, Larry L. Mathis and Gary T. Wescombe, all of whom are
independent directors. Mr. DeWald currently serves as the
chairman and has been designated as the Audit Committee
financial expert.
The Audit Committee has adopted a written charter under which it
operates. The charter is available on our website at
www.htareit.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/.
The Audit Committee held eight meetings during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009.
Compensation Committee. The primary
responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to advise the
Board of Directors on compensation policies, establish
performance objectives for our executive officers, prepare the
report on executive compensation for inclusion in our annual
proxy statement, review and recommend to our Board of Directors
the appropriate level of director compensation and annually
review our compensation strategy and assess its effectiveness.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage outside
advisors to assist it in fulfilling these responsibilities. In
2009, the Compensation Committee engaged Towers Watson as its
independent compensation consultant. In this capacity, Towers
Watson reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and the
Compensation Committee directs Towers Watsons work. The
Compensation Committee has instructed Towers Watson to provide
it with advice regarding Mr. Peters compensation, as
well as compensation of other executive officers and
non-employee directors.
30
Under our Compensation Committee charter, the Compensation
Committee will always be comprised of a majority of independent
directors. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of
Messrs. Blair, DeWald, Fix and Wescombe, all of whom are
independent directors. Mr. Wescombe currently serves as the
chairman.
The Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter under
which it operates. Under its charter, the Compensation Committee
has authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to
subcommittees as the Compensation Committee may deem necessary
or advisable in its sole discretion. The charter is available on
our website at
www.htareit.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/.
The Compensation Committee held six meetings during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009. Additional information
regarding the Compensation Committees processes and
procedures for consideration of executive compensation is
provided in Compensation Discussion and Analysis
below.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committees primary purposes are to identify
qualified individuals to become members of the Board of
Directors, to recommend to the Board of Directors the selection
of director nominees for election at the annual meeting of
stockholders, to make recommendations regarding the composition
of our Board of Directors and its committees, to assess director
independence and the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, to
develop and implement corporate governance guidelines and to
oversee our compliance and ethics program. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of
Messrs. Blair, Fix and Mathis, all of whom are independent
directors. Mr. Fix currently serves as the chairman.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a
written charter under which it operates. The charter is
available on our website at
www.htareit.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four
meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
nominees for our Board of Directors recommended by stockholders.
Notice of proposed stockholder nominations for director must be
delivered not less than 120 days prior to any meeting at
which directors are to be elected. Nominations must include the
full name of the proposed nominee, a brief description of the
proposed nominees business experience for at least the
previous five years and a representation that the nominating
stockholder is a beneficial or record owner of our common stock.
Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent
of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as
a director if elected. Nominations should be delivered to:
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., Board of Directors, The
Promenade, 16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320,
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254, Attention: Secretary.
In considering possible candidates for election as a director,
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is guided by
the principle that each director should: (1) be an
individual of high character and integrity; (2) be
accomplished in his or her respective field, with superior
credentials and recognition; (3) have relevant expertise
and experience upon which to be able to offer advice and
guidance to management; (4) have sufficient time available
to devote to our affairs; (5) represent the long-term
interests of our stockholders as a whole; and (6) represent
a diversity of background and experience. We do not have a
formal policy for the consideration of diversity in identifying
nominees for director. However, in addition to the criteria set
forth above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
strives to create diversity in perspective, background and
experience on the Board as a whole when identifying and
selecting nominees for the Board of Directors.
Qualified candidates for membership on the Board of Directors
will be considered without regard to race, color, religion,
gender, ancestry, national origin or disability. The Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee will review the
qualifications and backgrounds of directors and nominees
(without regard to whether a nominee has been recommended by
stockholders), as well as the overall composition of the Board
of Directors, and recommend the slate of directors to be
nominated for election at the annual meeting. We do not
currently employ or pay a fee to any third party to identify or
evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating, potential
director nominees.
31
Investment Committee. Our Investment
Committees primary function is to assist the Board of
Directors in reviewing proposed acquisitions presented by our
management. The Investment Committee has the authority to reject
but not to approve proposed acquisitions, which must receive the
approval of the Board of Directors. The Investment Committee
also plays an active role in overseeing the management of our
portfolio, including budgeting and asset management. The
Investment Committee is currently comprised of
Messrs. Blair, Fix, Peters and Wescombe.
Messrs. Blair, Fix and Wescombe are independent directors.
Mr. Blair currently serves as the chairman.
The Investment Committee has adopted a written charter under
which it operates. The charter is available on our website at
www.htareit.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/.
The Investment Committee held 15 meetings during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009.
Risk Management Committee. Our Risk Management
Committees primary function is to assist the Board of
Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by
reviewing, assessing and discussing with our management team,
general counsel and auditors: (1) material risks or
exposures associated with the conduct of our business;
(2) internal risk management systems management has
implemented to identity, minimize, monitor or manage such risks
or exposures; and (3) managements policies and
procedures for risk management. The Risk Management Committee is
currently comprised of Messrs. Blair, DeWald and Mathis,
all of whom are independent directors. Mr. Mathis currently
serves as the chairman.
The Risk Management Committee has adopted a written charter
under which it operates. The charter is available on our website
at
www.htareit.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/.
The Risk Management Committee was formed in June 2009 and held
three meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
In the discussion that follows, we provide an overview and
analysis of our compensation programs and policies, the material
compensation decisions we have made under those programs and
policies with respect to our named executive officers, and the
material factors that we considered in making those decisions.
Following this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, under the
heading Compensation of Directors and Executive
Officers Executive Compensation you will find
a series of tables containing specific data about the
compensation earned in 2009 by the following individuals, whom
we refer to as our named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Peters, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board;
|
|
|
|
Kellie S. Pruitt, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer; and
|
|
|
|
Mark D. Engstrom, Executive Vice President
Acquisitions.
|
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Our objective is to provide compensation packages that take into
account the scope of the duties and responsibilities of each
executive consistent with self-management. The Compensation
Committee designed our new executive compensation packages to
reflect the increased level of responsibilities and scope of
duties attendant with our transition to and operation under
self-management. In addition, we strive to provide compensation
that rewards the achievement of specific short-, medium- and
long-term strategic goals, and that aligns the interests of key
employees with stockholders. The compensation packages for our
executives are designed to (1) achieve the right balance of
incentives, which fairly reward demonstrated value added
performance, and (2) promote and reward quality long-term
performance.
Another key priority for us today and in the future is to
attract, retain and motivate a top quality management team. In
order to accomplish this objective, the compensation paid to our
executives must be competitive in the marketplace. This is
especially important given our status as a self-managed company.
In furtherance of these objectives, we refrain from using highly
leveraged incentives that drive risky, short-term behavior. By
rewarding short-, medium- and long-term performance, we are
better positioned to
32
achieve the ultimate objective of increasing stockholder value.
To emphasize performance-based compensation, we also provide the
opportunity to earn additional compensation through annual
bonuses.
How We
Determined our Compensation Arrangements
We established the compensation packages for our named executive
officers based on the advice and recommendations of the
Compensation Committee and, with respect to our Chief Executive
Officer, independent consultants, with a view towards
emphasizing competitive, performance-based compensation. The
Compensation Committee intends for the level of cash- and
stock-based compensation paid to our executives to be consistent
with the compensation paid by a peer group of companies. The
Compensation Committee does not benchmark to a particular
percentile within the peer group, but rather uses the peer group
information to help guide its compensation decisions.
The Compensation Committee engaged an outside executive
compensation consultant, Towers Watson (formerly Towers Perrin),
to assist it in determining the compensation for our Chief
Executive Officer. At the request of the Compensation Committee,
Towers Watson provided input to the Compensation Committee on
the design and philosophy of our Chief Executive Officers
compensation package, and reported on the competitiveness of
such package in the marketplace. Towers Watson presented
information with respect to a peer group comprised of the
following companies:
|
|
|
HCP, Inc.
|
|
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
|
Health Care REIT, Inc.
|
|
Cogdell Spencer Inc.
|
Ventas Inc.
|
|
LTC Properties Inc.
|
Nationwide Health Properties Inc.
|
|
Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust Inc.*
|
Healthcare Realty Trust Inc.
|
|
Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc.*
|
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
|
|
|
With the exception of those companies marked with an asterisk
(*), the companies included in the peer group are publicly
traded healthcare REITs with median assets of about $1.9B. Those
companies marked with an asterisk (*) reflect selected
non-traded REITs that have made the transition to
self-management.
The Compensation Committee furnished to Towers Watson the NAREIT
2008 Compensation and Benefits Survey, or the NAREIT Survey,
including data from five healthcare companies (Cogdell Spencer
Inc., HCP, Inc., Healthcare REIT Inc., Nationwide Health
Properties Inc. and Ventas Inc.). In addition to information
related to the peer group identified above, Towers Watson
included information from the NAREIT Survey, as well as
compensation information from REITs of all sectors with total
capitalization within a range of $1B-2.99B, in its presentation
to the Compensation Committee.
In addition to the peer group information presented by Towers
Watson, the Compensation Committee reviewed a smaller peer group
comprised of HCP, Inc., Health Care REIT, Inc., Ventas, Inc.,
Nationwide Health Properties Inc. and Healthcare Realty Trust,
Inc. This group represents those companies that the Compensation
Committee considers to be most comparable to our company.
Taken as a whole, the data provided by Towers Watson, as well as
the Compensation Committees independent review of the
smaller peer group described above, allows the Compensation
Committee to double-check the compensation paid to
our Chief Executive Officer against what is typical in our
market.
In determining the compensation for Ms. Pruitt and
Mr. Engstrom, the Compensation Committee relied primarily
on the recommendations of Mr. Peters, as well as its
general understanding of the compensation paid to similar
positions within the peer group. The initial terms of
Ms. Pruitts and Mr. Engstroms compensation
packages were the result of negotiations between such executives
and Mr. Peters in connection with recruiting them to join
our company.
33
Elements
of our Compensation Program
During 2009, the key elements of compensation for our named
executive officers were base salary, annual bonus and long-term
equity incentive awards, as described in more detail below. In
addition to these key elements, we also provide severance
protection for our named executive officers, as discussed below.
Base Salary. Base salary
provides the fixed portion of compensation for our named
executive officers and is intended to reward core competence in
their role relative to skill, experience and contributions to
us. In connection with entering into the employment agreements,
the Compensation Committee approved the following initial annual
base salaries: Mr. Peters, $500,000; Mr. Engstrom,
$275,000; and Ms. Pruitt, $180,000. The Compensation
Committee approved an increase to Mr. Peters 2008
base salary in order to more closely align his base salary with
our peers. However, due to the Compensation Committees
focus on performance-based compensation, Mr. Peters
base salary approximates the lower end of the scale of base
salaries provided by our peer companies. To emphasize
performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee
designed Mr. Peters compensation package so that the
majority of his cash-based compensation may be earned through an
annual bonus after the Compensation Committees assessment
of his performance during the year.
As discussed above, the initial base salaries for
Ms. Pruitt and Mr. Engstrom were negotiated in
connection with their joining our company. Also as discussed
above, a key priority for us is to attract, retain and motivate
a top quality management team. In order to attract a high
caliber management team, the compensation packages offered must
be competitive within the market, as well as reflective of the
executives level of skill and expected contributions.
These were the guiding principles followed by Mr. Peters
and the Compensation Committee in negotiating the compensation
packages with Ms. Pruitt and Mr. Engstrom.
Annual Bonus. Annual bonuses reward and
recognize contributions to our financial goals and achievement
of individual objectives. In 2009, we did not have a formal
bonus program. Each of the named executive officers is eligible
to earn an annual performance bonus in an amount determined at
the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee for each year.
Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements,
Mr. Peters initial maximum bonus is 200% of base
salary. Mr. Engstroms and Ms. Pruitts
initial target bonus is 100% and 60%, respectively, of base
salary.
The Compensation Committee, together with Mr. Peters,
developed a broad list of goals and objectives for 2009. The
Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Peters the maximum bonus
payable to him under his employment agreement based on its
assessment of his performance during fiscal year 2009. In
reviewing his performance, the Compensation Committee concluded
that Mr. Peters accomplished, and in many cases, exceeded
such goals and objectives, which included:
|
|
|
|
|
effectively leading the expansion of the company, including
growing our portfolio through the acquisition of quality,
performing assets;
|
|
|
|
successfully negotiating substantial and creative value-added
transaction terms and conditions;
|
|
|
|
coordinating successful and competitive refinancing transactions
during a time of significant dislocations in the credit markets;
|
|
|
|
leading our successful transition to self-management;
|
|
|
|
recruiting and effectively supervising our employees;
|
|
|
|
implementing effective risk management at all key levels of the
company;
|
|
|
|
maintaining a strong balance sheet with ample liquidity;
|
|
|
|
coordinating the engagement of new, competitively-priced and
performance-driven property management companies for our
portfolio;
|
|
|
|
leading the extension of our initial offering for up to
180 days, successfully transitioning the dealer manager for
our initial offering to RCS and spearheading the registration of
the follow-on offering;
|
|
|
|
establishing and enhancing our relationships with commercial and
investment banks;
|
|
|
|
maintaining and actively enhancing our stockholder
first, performance- driven philosophy;
|
|
|
|
effectively establishing our independent brand name as an asset
to our company; and
|
|
|
|
facilitating an open and effective dialogue with our Board.
|
34
In addition to the annual bonus available under his employment
agreement, after an extensive review of the peer group
information and Mr. Peters performance in 2009, the
Compensation Committee also awarded Mr. Peters an
extraordinary bonus of $200,000. The extraordinary bonus
recognizes and rewards Mr. Peters for (i) his expanded
role and extraordinary efforts in providing demonstrated and
effective leadership to our company, and (ii) positioning
the company for continued success during recent unprecedented,
difficult economic times, and in the future.
The Compensation Committee relied primarily on the
recommendations of Mr. Peters in determining the bonus
amounts for Mr. Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt.
Mr. Peters based his recommendations on his
assessment of Mr. Engstrom and Ms. Pruitts
performance during 2009. For example, Mr. Peters considered
the number of successful acquisitions that Mr. Engstrom
negotiated and completed and his management of the
companys acquisitions team. Mr. Peters recommended a
bonus for Ms. Pruitt in excess of the target bonus provided
in her employment agreement because of her outstanding
performance and significant accomplishments during 2009,
including playing a key role in our transition to
self-management, establishing our corporate office and
infrastructure, building our accounting team and successfully
transitioning our investor services operations to DST Systems,
Inc. The Compensation Committee considered Mr. Peters
recommendations and approved the bonuses for Mr. Engstrom
and Ms. Pruitt.
Long-Term Equity Incentive
Awards. Long-term equity incentive awards are
an important element of our compensation program because these
awards align the interests of our named executive officers with
those of our stockholders and provide a strong retentive
component to the executives compensation arrangement.
Restricted stock and restricted stock units are the primary
equity award vehicles offered to our named executive officers.
The Compensation Committee reviewed the grant practices of the
peer group companies and awarded our named executive officers
equity awards with a value that is consistent with the equity
grants provided by the peer group.
Restricted stock has a number of attributes that makes it an
attractive equity award for our CEO. The vesting schedule
provides a strong retention element to Mr. Peters
compensation package if Mr. Peters voluntarily
terminates employment without good reason, he will forfeit his
unvested restricted stock. At the same time, Mr. Peters
retains the attributes of stock ownership through voting rights
and distributions. Given that there is no readily available
market providing liquidity for our common stock, and in light of
the limitation in our governing documents that poses an obstacle
to our withholding shares from the restricted stock when it
vests, the Compensation Committee designed Mr. Peters
award so that he could elect to receive a portion of the value
of the award in cash in order to satisfy his tax obligations. In
addition, in connection with entering into his new employment
agreement, Mr. Peters received a one-time signing-bonus of
50,000 shares of our common stock, of which Mr. Peters
elected to receive 25,000 fully-vested shares of our common
stock and a $250,000 cash payment. For additional information
regarding these grants, see the Grants of Plan-Based Award table
and the narrative following such table later in this proxy
statement.
We provide long-term equity incentive awards to Ms. Pruitt
and Mr. Engstrom in the form of restricted stock units.
Like restricted stock, the restricted stock units provide a
strong retention element to their compensation packages.
However, restricted stock units do not entitle the holder to
distributions.
Employment Agreements. As mentioned
above, in 2009, we entered into employment agreements with
Ms. Pruitt and Mr. Engstrom and a new employment
agreement with Mr. Peters. In considering the appropriate
terms of the employment agreements, the Compensation Committee
focused on the increased duties and responsibilities of such
individuals under self-management. Each of these executives has
played and will continue to play a major role in hiring,
supervising and overseeing our employees, the transition and
implementation of self-management and the post-transition
management of our company. In particular, as part of and as a
result of this transition, the role of Mr. Peters, as our
Chief Executive Officer and President, has been significantly
expanded on a number of levels. Each of the employment
agreements also specifies the payments and benefits to which
Messrs. Peters and Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt are
entitled upon a termination of employment for specified reasons.
For additional information regarding the potential severance
payments to our named executive officers, see Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control later in
this proxy statement.
35
REPORT OF
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. oversees our compensation
program on behalf of the Board of Directors. In fulfilling its
oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed
and discussed with management the above Compensation Discussion
and Analysis included in this proxy statement.
In reliance on the review and discussion referred to above, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in our
proxy statement on Schedule 14A in connection with our 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders be so included, which has been or
will be filed with the SEC.
This report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
by any general statement incorporating by reference our proxy
statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts. This report
is provided by the following independent directors, who
constitute the Compensation Committee:
Gary T. Wescombe, Chair
W. Bradley Blair, II
Warren D. Fix
Maurice J. DeWald
36
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Executive
Compensation
Summary
Compensation Table
The summary compensation table below reflects the total
compensation earned by our named executive officers for the
years ended December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2009.
We did not employ any other executive officer other than
Mr. Peters for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
($)(5)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(7)
|
|
($)
|
|
Scott D. Peters
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
504,753
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
4,935
|
|
|
|
2,834,688
|
|
Chief Executive
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
148,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
58,333
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
608,918
|
|
Officer, President and Chairman of the Board (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kellie S. Pruitt(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
168,942
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,022
|
|
|
|
546,964
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark D. Engstrom(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
252,403
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,589
|
|
|
|
788,992
|
|
Executive Vice President Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ms. Pruitt was elected as Chief Financial Officer in May
2010, Chief Accounting Officer in January 2009, Treasurer in
April 2009, and Secretary in July 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Engstrom was elected as Executive Vice
President Acquisitions in July 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects (a) $90,000 received pursuant to
Mr. Peters consulting arrangement with us from
August 1, 2008, through October 31, 2008, and
(b) $58,333 received as base salary pursuant to his 2008
employment agreement with us from November 1, 2008, through
December 31, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects the annual cash bonuses earned by our named executive
officers for the applicable year. |
|
(5) |
|
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted
to the named executive officers in the reported year, determined
in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC
Topic 718 Stock Compensation (ASC Topic 718). For
additional information regarding the grant date fair value of
awards of unrestricted stock, restricted stock and restricted
stock units, see Note 14, Stockholders Equity
(Deficit), to our consolidated financial statements, which are
included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on
March 16, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
Reflects two cash awards that Mr. Peters elected to
receive in lieu of a grant of shares of our common stock. Under
the first award, $125,000 was fully-vested on the date of grant
and $375,000 remains subject to vesting. Under the second award,
$250,000 was fully vested on the date of grant. See the Grants
of Plan-Based Awards table and the narrative following the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for additional information
regarding these awards. |
|
(7) |
|
Amounts included in this column for 2009 include payments for
100% of the premiums for health care coverage under our group
health plan for each of the named executive officers in the
following amounts: Mr. Peters, $4,935; Ms. Pruitt,
$3,022; and Mr. Engstrom, $4,935. Also includes for
Mr. Engstrom relocation expenses of $21,654. Such amounts
reflect the aggregate cost to us of providing the benefit. |
37
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
The following table presents information concerning plan-based
awards granted to our named executive officers for the year
ended December 31, 2009. All awards were granted pursuant
to our 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended, or the 2006 Incentive
Plan. The narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards
table provides additional information regarding the awards
reflected in this table.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table in Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
of Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
|
|
Stock or
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Units
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(7)
|
|
Mr. Peters
|
|
|
07/01/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Ms. Pruitt
|
|
|
07/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Mr. Engstrom
|
|
|
8/31/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects a restricted cash award that Mr. Peters
elected to receive in lieu of a grant of restricted shares.
There is no threshold, target or maximum payable pursuant to
this award; instead, the award vests based on
Mr. Peters continued service with us. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects a cash award. There is no threshold, target or maximum
payable pursuant to this award. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects a grant of 25,000 fully-vested shares of our common
stock. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects a grant of 50,000 restricted shares of our common stock. |
|
(5) |
|
Reflects a grant of 25,000 restricted stock units. |
|
(6) |
|
Reflects a grant of 40,000 restricted stock units. |
|
(7) |
|
Computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. |
Material
Terms of 2009 Compensation
We are party to an employment agreement with each of
Messrs. Peters and Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt. The
material terms of the employment agreements are described below.
Term. Mr. Peters employment
agreement is for an initial term of four and one-half years,
ending on December 31, 2013. Beginning on that date, and on
each anniversary thereafter, the term of the agreement
automatically will extend for additional one-year periods unless
either party gives prior notice of non-renewal.
Mr. Engstroms and Ms. Pruitts employment
agreement each has an initial term of two years, ending on
June 30, 2011. At our sole discretion,
Mr. Engstroms and Ms. Pruitts agreement
may be extended for an additional one-year term.
Base Salary and Benefits. The agreements
provide for the following initial annual base salaries:
Mr. Peters, $500,000; Mr. Engstrom, $275,000; and
Ms. Pruitt, $180,000. All salaries may be adjusted from
year to year in the sole discretion of the Compensation
Committee, provided that Mr. Peters base salary may
not be reduced. On May 20, 2010, the Board increased
Mr. Peters annual base salary to $750,000, and
increased Ms. Pruitts annual base salary to $225,000.
Both of these changes were effective May 20, 2010. The
agreements provide that each of the executives will be eligible
to earn an annual performance bonus in an amount determined at
the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee for each year.
Mr. Peters initial maximum bonus is 200% of base
salary. Mr. Engstroms and Ms. Pruitts
initial target bonus is 100% and 60%, respectively, of base
salary. On May 24, 2010, the Compensation Committee
increased Ms. Pruitts target bonus to 100% of her
base salary. Each executive is entitled to all employee benefits
and perquisites made
38
available to our senior executives, provided that we will pay
100% of the premiums for each executives health care
coverage under our group health plan. Mr. Engstrom also
received relocation expenses (up to a maximum of $30,000) in
connection with his move from Colorado to Arizona.
Equity Grants. Messrs. Peters and
Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt received equity grants in
connection with entering into their employment agreements. The
equity awards were granted under and pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the 2006 Incentive Plan. Pursuant to the terms of
his employment agreement, on July 1, 2009, Mr. Peters
was entitled to the following equity grants:
|
|
|
|
|
Fully-Vested
Shares. Mr. Peters was entitled
to receive a grant of 50,000 fully-vested shares. Pursuant to
the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Peters elected
to receive a $250,000 cash payment, in lieu of one-half of such
shares, and 25,000 fully-vested shares.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Restricted
Shares. Mr. Peters was entitled
to receive a grant of 100,000 restricted shares of our common
stock. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Peters elected to receive a restricted cash award in
lieu of 50,000 restricted shares, as described below. The
restricted shares vest as follows: 12,500 on July 1, 2009
(the date of grant); 12,500 on July 1, 2010; 12,500 on
July 1, 2011; and 12,500 on July 1, 2012, provided
Mr. Peters is employed by us on each such vesting date.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Restricted Cash
Award. As described above,
Mr. Peters elected to receive a restricted cash award in
lieu of 50,000 restricted shares. The restricted cash award is
equal to $500,000, the fair market value of the foregone
restricted shares on the date of grant, and is subject to the
same restrictions and vesting schedule as the foregone
restricted shares. Accordingly, the restricted cash award vests
as follows: $125,000 vested on July 1, 2009 (the date of
grant), $125,000 on July 2, 2010; $125,000 on July 1,
2011; and $125,000 on July 1, 2012, provided
Mr. Peters is employed by us on each such vesting date. On
May 20, 2010, the Board approved an amendment to
Mr. Peters 2009 restricted cash award to provide that
we will pay interest at the distribution rate paid by us on our
shares of common stock (currently 7.25%) on such award,
effective May 20, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Future Restricted Share Grants and Restricted Cash
Awards. Pursuant to the terms of his
employment agreement, as of July 1, 2009, Mr. Peters
was entitled to receive on each of the first three anniversaries
of the effective date of the agreement, an additional 100,000
restricted shares of our common stock, which will vest in equal
installments on the grant date and on each anniversary of the
grant date during the balance of the term of the employment
agreement, provided he is employed by us on each such vesting
date. As with the 2009 grant, Mr. Peters may in his sole
discretion elect to receive a restricted cash award in lieu of
up to one-half of each grant of restricted shares (i.e., up to
50,000 shares), which restricted cash award will be equal
to the fair market value of the foregone restricted shares and
will be subject to the same restrictions and vesting schedule as
the foregone restricted shares. On May 20, 2010, the Board
approved an amendment to Mr. Peters employment
agreement to (1) increase the number of restricted shares
Mr. Peters will receive on each of the first three
anniversaries of the effective date of his employment agreement
from 100,000 to 120,000; and (2) provide that we will pay
interest at the distribution rate paid by us on our shares of
common stock (currently 7.25%) on any future restricted cash
award(s) granted to Mr. Peters upon his election,
consistent with his employment agreement.
|
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, on
August 31, 2009, Mr. Engstrom received a grant of
40,000 restricted stock units. The restricted stock units will
vest and convert to shares of our common stock in equal annual
installments of
331/3%
each, on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date
of grant, provided he is employed by us on each such vesting
date.
Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, on
July 30, 2009, Ms. Pruitt received a grant of 25,000
restricted stock units. The restricted stock units will vest and
convert to shares of our common stock in equal annual
installments of
331/3%
each, on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date
of grant, provided she is employed by us on each such vesting
date.
Mr. Peters shares of restricted stock and restricted
cash award(s) and Mr. Engstroms and
Ms. Pruitts restricted stock units will become
immediately vested and, with respect to the restricted stock
units, convert to
39
shares of our common stock, upon the earlier occurrence of
(1) their termination of employment by reason of death or
disability, (2) their termination of employment by us
without cause or by the executive for good reason (as such terms
are defined in the employment agreement), or (3) a change
in control (as defined in the 2006 Incentive Plan).
Severance. Each of the employment agreements
also specifies the payments and benefits to which
Messrs. Peters and Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt are
entitled upon a termination of employment for specified reasons.
See Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control, later in this proxy statement, for a description
of these benefits.
Outstanding
Equity Awards
The following table presents information concerning outstanding
equity awards held by our named executive officers as of
December 31, 2009. Our named executive officers do not hold
any option awards.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)(5)
|
|
Mr. Peters
|
|
|
26,667
|
(1)
|
|
|
266,670
|
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
(2)
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
Ms. Pruitt
|
|
|
25,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Mr. Engstrom
|
|
|
40,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects restricted shares of our common stock, which vest and
become non-forfeitable in equal installments on each of
November 14, 2010, and November 14, 2011, provided
Mr. Peters is employed by us on each such vesting date. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects restricted shares of our common stock, which vest and
become non-forfeitable in equal installments on each of
July 1, 2010, July 1, 2011 and July 1, 2012,
provided Mr. Peters is employed by us on each such vesting
date. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects restricted stock units, which vest in equal annual
installments on each of July 30, 2010, July 30, 2011,
and July 30, 2012, provided Ms. Pruitt is employed by
us on each such vesting date. |
|
(4) |
|
Reflects restricted stock units, which vest in equal annual
installments on each of August 31, 2009, August 31,
2010, and August 31, 2011, provided Mr. Engstrom is
employed by us on each such vesting date. |
|
(5) |
|
Calculated using the per share price of shares of our common
stock as of the close of business on December 31, 2009,
based upon the price per share offered in our initial public
offering ($10). |
40
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table shows the number of shares acquired and the
value realized upon vesting of stock awards for each of the
named executive officers. Our named executive officers do not
hold any option awards.
Stock
Vested in Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
on Vesting
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Mr. Peters
|
|
|
13,333
|
(1)
|
|
|
133,330
|
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
(2)
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
Ms. Pruitt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Engstrom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects shares that vested pursuant to the terms of
Mr. Peters restricted stock grant on
November 14, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects shares that vested pursuant to the terms of
Mr. Peters restricted stock grant on July 1,
2009. |
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Summary of Potential Payments Upon Termination of
Employment. As mentioned earlier in
this proxy statement, we are party to an employment agreement
with each of our named executive officers, which provide
benefits to the executive in the event of his or her termination
of employment under certain conditions. The amount of the
benefits varies depending on the reason for the termination, as
explained below.
Termination without Cause; Resignation for Good
Reason. If we terminate the executives
employment without Cause, or he or she resigns for Good Reason
(as such terms are defined in the employment agreement), the
executive will be entitled to the following benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of Mr. Peters, a lump sum severance payment
equal to (a) the sum of (1) three times his
then-current base salary plus (2) an amount equal to the
average of the annual bonuses earned prior to the termination
date (if termination occurs in the first year, the bonus will be
calculated at $1,000,000), multiplied by (b) (1) if the
date of termination occurs during the initial term, the greater
of one, or the number of full calendar months remaining in the
initial term, divided by 12, or (2) if the date of
termination occurs during a renewal term after December 31,
2013, one; provided that in no event may the severance benefit
be less than $3,000,000;
|
|
|
|
in the case of Mr. Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt, a lump sum
severance payment equal to two times his or her then-current
base salary;
|
|
|
|
continued health care coverage under COBRA for 18 months,
in the case of Mr. Peters, or six months, in the case of
Mr. Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt, with all premiums paid by
us; and
|
|
|
|
immediate vesting of Mr. Peters shares of restricted
stock and restricted cash award(s) and Mr. Engstroms
and Ms. Pruitts restricted stock units.
|
Cause, as defined in the employment
agreements, generally means: (i) the executives
conviction of or entering into a plea of guilty or no contest to
a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or the intentional
commission of any other act or omission involving dishonesty or
fraud that is materially injurious to us; (ii) the
executives substantial and repeated failure to perform his
or her duties; (iii) with respect to Ms. Pruitt and
Mr. Engstrom, gross negligence or willful misconduct in the
performance of the executives duties which materially
injures us or our reputation; or (iv) with respect to
Ms. Pruitt and Mr. Engstrom, the executives
willful breach of the material covenants of his or her
employment agreement.
41
Good Reason, as defined in
Mr. Peters employment agreement generally means, in
the absence of his written consent: (i) a material
diminution in his authority, duties or responsibilities;
(ii) a material diminution in his base salary;
(iii) relocation more than 35 miles from Scottsdale,
Arizona; or (iv) a material diminution in the authority,
duties, or responsibilities of the supervisor to whom he is
required to report, including a requirement that he report to a
corporate officer or employee instead of reporting directly to
the Board. Good Reason as defined in
Ms. Pruitts and Mr. Engstroms employment
agreements, generally means, in the absence of a written consent
of the executive: (i) except for executive nonperformance,
a material diminution in the executives authority, duties
or responsibilities (provided that this provision will not apply
if executives then-current base salary is kept in place)
or (ii) except in connection with a material decrease in
our business, a diminution in the executives base salary
in excess of 30%.
Disability. If we terminate the
executives employment by reason of his or her disability,
in addition to receiving his or her accrued rights, such as
earned but unpaid base salary and any earned but unpaid benefits
under company incentive plans, the executive will be entitled to
continued health care coverage under COBRA, with all premiums
paid by us, for 18 months, in the case of Mr. Peters,
or six months, in the case of Mr. Engstrom or
Ms. Pruitt. In addition, Mr. Peters shares of
restricted stock and restricted cash award(s) and
Mr. Engstroms and Ms. Pruitts restricted
stock units will become immediately vested.
Death; For Cause; Resignation without Good
Reason. In the event of a termination due to
death, cause or resignation without good reason, an executive
will receive his or her accrued rights, but he or she will not
be entitled to receive severance benefits under the agreement.
In the event of the executives death,
Mr. Peters shares of restricted stock and restricted
cash award(s) and Mr. Engstroms and
Ms. Pruitts restricted stock units will become
immediately vested.
Non-Compete Agreement. Each of
Messrs. Peters and Engstrom and Ms. Pruitt entered
into a non-compete and non-solicitation agreement with us. These
agreements generally require the executives to refrain from
competing with us within the United States and soliciting our
customers, vendors, or employees during employment through the
occurrence of a liquidity event. The agreements also limit the
executives ability to disclose or use any of our
confidential business information or practices.
42
The following table summarizes the value of the termination
payments and benefits that each of our named executive officers
would receive if he or she had terminated employment on
December 31, 2009 under the circumstances shown. Such
severance benefits are currently being reviewed and analyzed by
our Compensation Committee and Board as part of their
comprehensive review of our overall compensation structure, as
discussed below under Comprehensive Ongoing Review of
Compensation Structure. The amounts shown in the tables do
not include accrued but unpaid salary, earned annual bonus for
2009, or payments and benefits to the extent they are provided
on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally
upon termination of employment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Cause or
|
|
without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
Cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
without
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
Reason
|
|
Death
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Mr. Peters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,448
|
|
Value of Unvested Equity Awards(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
641,670
|
|
|
|
641,670
|
|
|
|
641,670
|
|
Value of Unvested Restricted Cash Awards(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11,037,118
|
|
|
|
1,016,670
|
|
|
|
1,037,118
|
|
Ms. Pruitt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,402
|
|
Value of Unvested Equity Awards(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
617,402
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
257,402
|
|
Mr. Engstrom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,402
|
|
Value of Unvested Equity Awards(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
957,402
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
407,402
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a cash severance payment based on a termination
without Cause or a resignation for Good Reason. Such cash
severance is calculated using the following formula (as
discussed above) based on a termination date of
December 31, 2009: (a) the sum of (1) three times
his then-current base salary plus (2) an amount equal to
the average of the annual bonuses earned prior to the
termination date (if termination occurs in the first year, the
bonus will be calculated at $1,000,000), multiplied by (b)(1) if
the date of termination occurs during the initial term, the
greater of one, or the number of full calendar months remaining
in the initial term, divided by 12, or (2) if the date of
termination occurs during a renewal term after December 31,
2013, one. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents company-paid COBRA for medical and dental coverage
based on 2010 rates for 18 months, in the case of
Mr. Peters, or six months, in the case of Mr. Engstrom
and Ms. Pruitt. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the value of unvested equity awards that vest upon
the designated event. Pursuant to the 2006 Incentive Plan,
equity awards vest upon the executives termination of
service with us due to death or disability. Pursuant to the
employment agreements, equity awards vest upon the
executives termination by us without cause or their
resignation for good reason. Awards of restricted stock and
restricted stock units are valued as of year-end 2009 based upon
the fair market value of our common stock on December 31,
2009, the last day in our 2009 fiscal year ($10). |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the value of the unvested restricted cash award
(which Mr. Peters elected to receive in lieu of 50,000
restricted shares, as described above under Material Terms
of 2009 Compensation). |
|
(5) |
|
Represents a lump sum severance payment equal to two times the
executives then-current base salary. |
43
Summary of Potential Payments upon a Change in
Control. Pursuant to the 2006 Incentive Plan,
equity awards, and Mr. Peters restricted cash award,
vest upon the occurrence of a change in control of our company,
independent of whether the executive incurs a termination of
employment or receives any severance associated with such
termination. The 2006 Incentive Plan generally provides that a
Change in Control occurs upon the occurrence of any of the
following: (1) when our incumbent Board of Directors cease
to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors;
(2) except in the case of certain issuances or acquisitions
of stock, when any person acquires a 25% or more ownership
interest in the outstanding combined voting power of our then
outstanding securities; or (3) the consummation of a
reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, unless
(a) the beneficial owners of our combined voting power
immediately prior to the transaction continue to own 50% or more
of the combined voting power of our then outstanding securities,
(b) no person acquires a 25% or more ownership interest in
the combined voting power of our then outstanding securities,
and (c) at least a majority of the members of the board of
directors of the surviving corporation were incumbent directors
at the time of approval of the corporate transaction.
The following table summarizes the value of the payments that
each of our named executive officers would receive if a change
in control occurred on December 31, 2009, independent of
whether the executive incurs a termination of employment. Upon
the occurrence of a change in control followed by the
executives termination by us without Cause or his or her
resignation for Good Reason, the executive would also be
entitled to the severance benefits set forth above. Such change
in control benefits are currently being reviewed and analyzed by
our Compensation Committee and Board as part of their
comprehensive review of our overall compensation structure, as
discussed below under Comprehensive Ongoing Review of
Compensation Structure. Our named executive officers may
be entitled to additional compensation upon a change in control
as a result of this review.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Peters
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unvested Equity Awards(1)
|
|
$
|
641,670
|
|
Value of Unvested Restricted Cash Awards(2)
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
1,016,670
|
|
Ms. Pruitt
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unvested Equity Awards(1)
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
Mr. Engstrom
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unvested Equity Awards(1)
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the value of unvested awards of restricted stock and
restricted stock units, as applicable, which are valued as of
year-end 2009 based upon the fair market value of our common
stock on December 31, 2009, the last day in our 2009 fiscal
year ($10). |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the value of the unvested restricted cash award
(which Mr. Peters elected to receive in lieu of 50,000
restricted shares, as described above under Material Terms
of 2009 Compensation). |
Comprehensive
Ongoing Review of Compensation Structure
The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors are
conducting a comprehensive review of our compensation structure
to ensure it meets our primary objective to
incentivize and reward demonstrated performance by our
management and Board of Directors, which performance results in
added value to us and our stockholders, both in the short and
long term. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors
as a whole recognize that an effective compensation structure is
critical to our success now and in the future.
We recently determined that certain strategic opportunities and
initiatives should be undertaken and that our compensation
programs needs to be adjusted and amended to be consistent with
changes in our corporate strategies, different timeframes,
changes in scope of work, changes in the potential value and
application of previously contemplated incentive programs,
extraordinary performance and other factors. The Compensation
44
Committee and Board of Directors is reviewing and adjusting the
existing compensation program to ensure that performance
incentives are put in place consistent with our strategic
initiatives and the expected employee performance to achieve
these initiatives. A key element of the compensation review is
to look at our company today as a self-managed entity and to
take into account our future direction, including potential
future liquidity events, consistent with the best interests of
our stockholders. Our compensation structure needs to be both
competitive and focused on aligning the performance by our
executives and employees with a fair reward system. The
Compensation Committee has engaged Towers Watson &
Co., an independent compensation consultant, to assist and
advise the Compensation Committee with this review. The
Compensation Committee may also engage additional consultants as
part of this process. After such review is completed, the
Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors may make
changes to the current compensation structure, including,
without limitation, the establishment of performance
compensation based on early and mid-range liquidity and other
stockholder enhancement actions and changes to the employee
retention program discussed above.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2009, W. Bradley Blair, II, Maurice J. DeWald,
Warren D. Fix, Larry L. Mathis and Gary T. Wescombe,
all of whom are independent directors, served on our
Compensation Committee. None of them was an officer or employee
of our company in 2009 or any time prior thereto. During 2009,
none of the members of the Compensation Committee had any
relationship with our company requiring disclosure under
Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
None of our executive officers served as a member of the Board
of Directors or Compensation Committee, or similar committee, of
any other company whose executive officer(s) served as a member
of our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee.
Director
Compensation
Pursuant to the terms of our director compensation program,
which are contained in our 2006 Independent Directors
Compensation Plan, a
sub-plan of
our 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended, our independent directors
received the following forms of compensation during 2009:
Annual Retainer. Our independent directors
received an annual retainer of $50,000.
Annual Retainer, Committee Chairmen. The
chairman of each Board committee (including the Audit Committee,
the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, the Investment Committee and the Risk
Management Committee) received an additional annual retainer of
$7,500.
Meeting Fees. Our independent directors
received $1,500 for each Board meeting attended in person or by
telephone and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended in
person or by telephone. An additional $500 is paid to the
committee chair for each committee meeting attended in person or
by telephone. If a Board meeting was held on the same day as a
committee meeting, an additional fee was not be paid for
attending the committee meeting.
Equity Compensation. Upon initial election to
our Board of Directors, each independent director receives
5,000 shares of restricted common stock, and an additional
5,000 shares of restricted common stock upon his or her
subsequent election each year. The shares of restricted common
stock vest as to 20% of the shares on the date of grant and on
each anniversary thereafter over four years from the date of
grant.
Expense Reimbursement. We reimburse our
directors for reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings,
including committee meetings, of our Board of Directors.
Independent directors do not receive other benefits from us. Our
non-independent director, Mr. Peters, does not receive any
compensation in connection with his service as a director.
45
2009 Director
Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by our
independent directors for the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
in Cash
|
|
Awards
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)
|
|
W. Bradley Blair, II
|
|
|
110,500
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
160,500
|
|
Maurice J. DeWald
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Warren D. Fix
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Larry L. Mathis
|
|
|
94,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
144,000
|
|
Gary T. Wescombe
|
|
|
106,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock
awards granted to the directors, determined in accordance with
ASC Topic 718. For additional information regarding the grant
date fair value of awards of restricted stock, see Note 14,
Stockholders Equity (Deficit), to our accompanying
consolidated financial statements. On August 31, 2009, each
of the independent directors received 5,000 shares of
restricted stock. The aggregate number of shares of restricted
common stock held by each independent director as of
December 31, 2009 is as follows: Mr. Blair, 7,500;
Mr. DeWald, 7,500; Mr. Fix, 7,500; Mr. Mathis,
6,500; and Mr. Wescombe, 7,500. |
Key
Changes to the Independent Director Compensation Program for
2010
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors also
recently reviewed the compensation payable to our independent
directors. In conducting this review, the Compensation Committee
took into account, among other things, the substantial time and
effort required of our directors, the value to our company of
retaining experienced directors with a history at our company,
the successful completion of our transition to self-management,
and our overall financial strength and growth, as well as the
results of a 2008 NAREIT survey regarding director compensation
and a 2009 report from Towers Watson. On May 20, 2010,
based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, our
Board of Directors approved the following amendments to our
independent director compensation plan, all of which were
effective May 20, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Retainer for Committee Chairmen. The
chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an annual retainer
of $15,000. The chairman of each of the Compensation Committee,
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the
Investment Committee and the Risk Management Committee will
receive an annual retainer of $12,500. These retainers are in
addition to the annual retainer payable to all independent Board
members for Board service.
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation. Each independent director
will receive a grant of 7,500 shares of restricted common
stock upon each re-election to the Board.
|
|
|
|
Fees for Meetings on the Same Day. If an
independent Board members attends a meeting of the Board of
Directors and a committee meeting (in each case, whether in
person or telephonic) on a single day, he will be entitled to
receive a fee for both the Board of Directors meeting and
committee meeting attended.
|
46
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLANS
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2009 regarding compensation plans under which our equity
securities are authorized for issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Future
|
|
|
Number of Shares to be
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Issuance Under Equity
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Price of
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Outstanding Rights
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
65,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810,000
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to the
conversion of restricted stock units. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 1,810,000 shares available for issuance pursuant
to grants of full-value stock awards. |
|
(3) |
|
We do not maintain any equity compensation plans that have not
been approved by our stockholders. |
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table shows, as of October 20, 2010, the
number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by:
(1) any person who is known by us to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5.0% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock, (2) our directors, (3) our named executive
officers and (4) all of our directors and executive
officers as a group. The percentage of common stock beneficially
owned is based on 184,597,324 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of October 20, 2010. Beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally
includes securities over which a person has voting or investment
power and securities that a person has the right to acquire
within 60 days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owners(1)
|
|
Owned(2)
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Scott D. Peters
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kellie S. Pruitt
|
|
|
56,343
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark D. Engstrom
|
|
|
60,481
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
W. Bradley Blair, II
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Maurice J. DeWald
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Warren D. Fix
|
|
|
18,273
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Larry L. Mathis
|
|
|
20,525
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary T. Wescombe
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
|
|
|
425,622
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1.0% of our outstanding common stock. |
|
(1) |
|
The address of each beneficial owner listed is
c/o Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc., The Promenade,
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale,
Arizona 85254. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vested and non-vested shares of restricted common stock. |
47
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires each director,
officer, and individual beneficially owning more than 10.0% of a
registered security of the company to file with the SEC, within
specified time frames, initial statements of beneficial
ownership (Form 3) and statements of changes in
beneficial ownership (Forms 4 and 5) of common stock
of the company. These specified time frames require the
reporting of changes in ownership within two business days of
the transaction giving rise to the reporting obligation.
Reporting persons are required to furnish us with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms filed with the SEC. Based solely on a
review of the copies of such forms furnished to us during and
with respect to the year ended December 31, 2009 or written
representations that no additional forms were required, to the
best of our knowledge, all required Section 16(a) filings
were timely and correctly filed by reporting persons during
2009, except that Ms. Pruitts Form 3 was filed
late.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transition:
Self-Management
Upon the effectiveness of our initial offering on
September 20, 2006, we entered into an advisory agreement
with Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, our
former advisor, and Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors,
LLC, or GERI, and a dealer manager agreement with
Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc., our former dealer
manager. These agreements entitled our former advisor, our
former dealer manager and their affiliates to specified
compensation for certain services as well as reimbursement of
certain expenses.
In 2008, we announced that we were going to transition to become
a self-managed company. As part of our transition to self
management, on November 14, 2008, we amended and restated
the advisory agreement effective as of October 24, 2008, to
reduce acquisition and asset management fees, eliminate the need
to pay disposition or internalization fees, to set the framework
for our transition to self-management and to create an
enterprise value for our company. On November 14, 2008, we
also amended the partnership agreement for our operating
partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement
as amended, our former advisor had the ability to elect to defer
its right, if applicable, to receive a subordinated distribution
from our operating partnership after the termination or
expiration of the advisory agreement upon certain liquidity
events if specified stockholder return thresholds were met. This
right was subject to a number of conditions and had been the
subject of dispute between the parties, as well as monetary and
other claims.
On May 21, 2009, we provided notice to Grubb &
Ellis Securities that we would proceed with a dealer manager
transition pursuant to which Grubb & Ellis Securities
ceased to serve as our dealer manager for our initial offering
at the end of the day on August 28, 2009. Commencing
August 29, 2009, Realty Capital Securities, or RCS, an
unaffiliated third party, assumed the role of dealer manager for
the remainder of the offering period. The advisory agreement
expired in accordance with its terms on September 20, 2009.
Recently, on October 18, 2010, we and our former advisor
and certain of its affiliates entered into a redemption,
termination and release agreement, or the redemption agreement.
Pursuant to the redemption agreement, we redeemed the limited
partnership interest held by our former advisor in our operating
partnership, including rights to any subordinated distribution,
and we made a one time payment of $8.0 million dollars. In
addition, pursuant to the redemption agreement the parties
resolved all monetary claims and other matters between them, and
entered into various releases and other resolution provisions
with respect to the parties and related persons, including our
Chief Executive Officer and President, Scott D. Peters. We
believe that the execution of the redemption agreement
represents the final stage of our successful transition from
Grubb & Ellis and that the redemption agreement
further positions us to take advantage of potential strategic
opportunities in the future.
Former
Executive Officers
Two of our former executive officers, Andrea Biller and Danny
Prosky, were also executive officers and employees
and/or
holders of a direct or indirect interest in our former advisor
and GERI, which managed our former advisor, or their affiliated
entities. GERI owns a 75.0% managing member interest in our
former
48
advisor, and Grubb & Ellis Healthcare Management, LLC
owns a 25.0% equity interest. As of June 30, 2010,
Ms. Biller owned an equity interest of 18.0% of
Grubb & Ellis Healthcare Management, LLC.
Mr. Prosky and Ms. Biller resigned as officers of our
company on June 30, 2009 and July 10, 2009,
respectively.
Fees and
Expenses Paid to Former Affiliates
Offering
Stage
Selling
Commissions
Prior to the transition of the dealer manager function to RCS,
our former dealer manager received selling commissions of up to
7.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of
our common stock in our initial offering other than shares of
our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. Our former dealer
manager re-allowed all or a portion of these fees to
participating broker-dealers. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, we incurred $35,337,000 in selling
commissions to our former dealer manager.
Marketing
Support Fee and Due Diligence Expense Reimbursements
Our former dealer manager received non-accountable marketing
support fees of up to 2.5% of the gross offering proceeds from
the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering
other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP.
Our former dealer manager re-allowed a portion up to 1.5% of the
gross offering proceeds for non-accountable marketing fees to
participating broker-dealers. In addition, we reimbursed our
former dealer manager or its affiliates an additional 0.5% of
the gross offering proceeds to participating broker-dealers for
accountable bona fide due diligence expenses. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, we incurred $12,786,000 in marketing
support fees and due diligence expense reimbursements to our
dealer manager.
Other
Organizational and Offering Expenses
Our other organizational and offering expenses were paid by our
former advisor or its affiliates on our behalf. Our former
advisor was reimbursed for actual expenses incurred up to 1.5%
of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our
common stock in our initial offering other than shares of our
common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, we incurred $2,557,000 in offering
expenses to our former advisor and its affiliates.
Acquisition
and Development Stage
Acquisition
Fees
Pursuant to the advisory agreement, as amended effective as of
October 24, 2008, the acquisition fee payable to our former
advisor or its affiliate for services rendered in connection
with the investigation, selection and acquisition of our
properties was reduced from up to 3.0% to an amount determined
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for the first $375,000,000 in aggregate contract purchase price
for properties acquired directly or indirectly by us after
October 24, 2008, 2.5% of the contract purchase price of
each such property;
|
|
|
|
for the second $375,000,000 in aggregate contract purchase price
for properties acquired directly or indirectly by us after
October 24, 2008, 2.0% of the contract purchase price of
each such property, which amount is subject to downward
adjustment, but not below 1.5%, based on reasonable projections
regarding the anticipated amount of net proceeds to be received
in our offering; and
|
|
|
|
for above $750,000,000 in aggregate contract purchase price for
properties acquired directly or indirectly by us after
October 24, 2008, 2.25% of the contract purchase price of
each such property.
|
The advisory agreement also provided that we would pay an
acquisition fee in connection with the acquisition of real
estate related assets in an amount equal to 1.5% of the amount
funded to acquire or originate each such real estate related
asset.
49
In addition, the advisory agreement provided that our former
advisor or its affiliate was entitled to receive these
acquisition fees for properties and other real estate related
assets acquired with funds raised in our initial offering even
though such acquisitions were completed after the expiration of
the advisory agreement. These fees were payable if our former
advisor or one of its affiliates rendered services to us in
connection with the investigation, selection and acquisition of
properties or real estate related assets. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, we incurred $10,738,000 in acquisition
fees to our former advisor and its affiliates.
Reimbursement
of Acquisition Expenses
Our former advisor or its affiliates were reimbursed for
acquisition expenses related to selecting, evaluating, acquiring
and investing in properties. Acquisition expenses, excluding
amounts paid to third parties, could not exceed 0.5% of the
purchase price of the properties. The reimbursement of
acquisition fees and expenses, including real estate commissions
paid to unaffiliated parties, could not exceed, in the
aggregate, 6.0% of the purchase price or total development
costs, unless fees in excess of such limits were approved by a
majority of our disinterested independent directors. For the
year ended December 31, 2009, we did not incur any such
expenses to our former advisor and its affiliates.
Asset
Management Fee
Pursuant to the advisory agreement, as amended effective as of
October 24, 2008, the monthly asset management fee we paid
to our former advisor in connection with the management of our
assets was reduced from one-twelfth of 1.0% to one-twelfth of
0.5% of our average invested assets calculated as of the close
of business on the last day of each month, subject to our
stockholders receiving annualized distributions in an amount
equal to at least 5.0% per annum on average invested capital.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we incurred
$3,783,000 in asset management fees to our former advisor and
its affiliates.
Property
Management Fees
Our former advisor or its affiliates were paid a monthly
property management fee equal to 4.0% of the gross cash receipts
through August 31, 2009 from each property managed. For
properties managed by other third parties besides our former
advisor or its affiliates, our former advisor or its affiliates
were paid up to 1.0% of the gross cash receipts from the
property for a monthly oversight fee. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, we incurred $2,289,000 in property
management fees and oversight fees to our former advisor and its
affiliates.
Lease
Fees
Our former advisor or its affiliates, as the property manager,
received a separate fee for leasing activities in an amount
which could not exceed the fee customarily charged in arms
length transactions by others rendering similar services in the
same geographic area for similar properties, as determined by a
survey of brokers and agents in such area ranging between 3.0%
and 8.0% of gross revenues generated from the initial term of
the lease. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we
incurred $1,665,000 to Triple Net Properties Realty, Inc. and
its affiliates in lease fees.
On-site
Personnel and Engineering Payroll
For the year ended December 31, 2009, GERI incurred payroll
for on-site
personnel and engineering on our behalf of $1,827,000.
Operating
Expenses
We reimbursed our former advisor or its affiliates for operating
expenses incurred in rendering its services to us, subject to
certain limitations on our operating expenses. We could not
reimburse our former advisor or affiliates for operating
expenses that exceeded the greater of: (1) 2.0% of our
average invested assets, as defined in the advisory agreement,
or (2) 25.0% of our net income, as defined in the advisory
agreement, unless a majority of our independent directors
determined that such excess expenses were justified based on
50
unusual and non-recurring factors. For the 12 months ended
December 31, 2009, our operating expenses did not exceed
this limitation. For the year ended December 31, 2009, GERI
incurred on our behalf $35,000 in operating expenses.
Related
Party Services Agreement
We entered into a services agreement, effective January 1,
2008, with GERI for subscription agreement processing and
investor services. The services agreement had an initial one
year term and was automatically renewed for successive one year
terms. Since GERI is the managing member of our former advisor,
the terms of this agreement were approved and determined by a
majority of our directors, including a majority of our
independent directors, as fair and reasonable to us and at fees
charged to us in an amount no greater than the cost to GERI for
providing such services to us, which amount shall be no greater
than that which would be paid to an unaffiliated third party for
similar services. On March 17, 2009, GERI provided notice
of its termination of the services agreement. The termination
was to be effective September 20, 2009; however as part of
our transition to self-management, we worked with DST Systems,
Inc. to serve as our transfer agent and to provide subscription
processing and investor relations services which became
effective on August 10, 2009. Accordingly, the services
agreement with GERI terminated on August 9, 2009. For the
year ended December 31, 2009, we incurred $177,000 for
investor services that GERI provided to us.
Compensation
for Additional Services
Our former advisor or its affiliates were paid for services
performed for us other than those required to be rendered by our
former advisor or its affiliates under the advisory agreement.
The rate of compensation for these services had to be approved
by a majority of our Board of Directors, including a majority of
our independent directors, and could not exceed an amount that
would be paid to unaffiliated third parties for similar
services. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not
incur any such additional compensation.
Liquidity
Stage
Disposition
Fee
We paid no disposition fees to our former advisor under the
terms of our advisory agreement. In addition, we have no
obligation to pay any disposition fees to our former advisor in
the future.
Subordinated
Distribution upon Termination
Upon termination of the advisory agreement, other than a
termination by us for cause, our former advisor was entitled to
receive, subject to a number of conditions, a distribution from
our operating partnership in an amount equal to 15.0% of the
amount, if any, by which: (1) the fair market value of all
of the assets of our operating partnership as of the date of the
termination (determined by appraisal), less any indebtedness
secured by such assets, plus the cumulative distributions made
to us by our operating partnership from our inception through
the termination date, exceeded (2) the sum of the total
amount of capital raised from stockholders (less amounts paid to
repurchase shares pursuant to our share repurchase plan) plus an
annual 8.0% cumulative, non-compounded return on average
invested capital through the termination date. As of the
expiration of our advisory agreement on September 20, 2009,
no amounts were due based on the foregoing formula.
Pursuant to the terms of the amendment to the partnership
agreement dated November 14, 2008, our former advisor had
the ability to elect to defer its right, if applicable, to
receive a subordinated distribution from our operating
partnership after the termination or expiration of the advisory
agreement upon certain liquidity events if specified stockholder
return thresholds were met. As discussed above, pursuant to the
redemption agreement, we redeemed the limited partner interest
that our former advisor held in our operating partnership,
including all rights with respect to a subordinated distribution.
51
Certain
Conflict Resolution Restrictions and Procedures
In order to reduce or eliminate certain potential conflicts of
interest, our charter contains restrictions and conflict
resolution procedures relating to transactions we enter into
with our directors or their respective affiliates. These
restrictions and procedures include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We will not purchase or lease any asset (including any property)
in which our directors or any of their affiliates has an
interest without a determination by a majority of our directors,
including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise
interested in such transaction, that such transaction is fair
and reasonable to us and at a price to us no greater than the
cost of the property to such director or directors or any such
affiliate, unless there is substantial justification for any
amount that exceeds such cost and such excess amount is
determined to be reasonable. In no event will we acquire any
such asset at an amount in excess of its appraised value.
|
|
|
|
We will not sell or lease assets to any of our directors or any
of their affiliates unless a majority of our directors,
including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise
interested in the transaction, determine the transaction is fair
and reasonable to us, which determination will be supported by
an appraisal obtained from a qualified, independent appraiser
selected by a majority of our independent directors.
|
|
|
|
We will not make any loans to any of our directors or any of
their affiliates. In addition, any loans made to us by our
directors or any of their affiliates must be approved by a
majority of our directors, including a majority of our
independent directors, not otherwise interested in the
transaction, as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable,
and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between
unaffiliated parties.
|
|
|
|
We will not invest in any joint ventures with any of our
directors or any of their affiliates unless a majority of our
directors, including a majority of the independent directors,
not otherwise interested in the transaction determine the
transaction is fair and reasonable to us and on substantially
the same terms and conditions as those received by other joint
ventures.
|
|
|
|
We will not engage in any other transaction with any of our
directors or any of their affiliates unless a majority of the
directors, including a majority of the independent directors,
not otherwise interested in such transaction approve such
transaction as fair and reasonable to us and on terms and
conditions not less favorable to us than those available from
unaffiliated third parties.
|
52
PROPOSAL NO. 3
RATIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING
FIRM
Our Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche
LLP, or Deloitte, to be our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2010. A representative of Deloitte is expected to be present at
the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a
statement if he or she so desires. The representative also will
be available to respond to appropriate questions from the
stockholders.
Although it is not required to do so, the Board of Directors is
submitting the Audit Committees appointment of our
independent registered public accounting firm for ratification
by the stockholders at the annual meeting in order to ascertain
the view of the stockholders regarding such appointment as a
matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders should
not ratify the appointment of our independent registered public
accounting firm, the Audit Committee will reconsider the
appointment.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2010.
53
RELATIONSHIP
WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM;
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES
Deloitte has served as our independent auditors since
April 24, 2006 and audited our consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007.
The following table lists the fees for services billed by our
independent auditors for 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
1,221,000
|
|
|
$
|
448,000
|
|
Audit related fees(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees(3)
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,298,000
|
|
|
$
|
467,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees billed in 2009 and 2008 consisted of the audit of our
annual consolidated financial statements, a review of our
quarterly consolidated financial statements, and statutory and
regulatory audits, consents and other services related to
filings with the SEC, including filings related to our offerings. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit related fees consist of financial accounting and reporting
consultations. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax services consist of tax compliance and tax planning and
advice. |
Pre-Approval
Policies
The Audit Committee charter imposes a duty on the Audit
Committee to pre-approve all auditing services performed for us
by our independent auditors, as well as all permitted non-audit
services (including the fees and terms thereof) in order to
ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the
auditors independence. Unless a type of service to be
provided by the independent auditors has received
general pre-approval, it will require
specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
All requests or applications for services to be provided by the
independent auditor that do not require specific pre-approval by
the Audit Committee will be submitted to management and must
include a detailed description of the services to be rendered.
Management will determine whether such services are included
within the list of services that have received the general
pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will be
informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the
independent auditors.
Requests or applications to provide services that require
specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted
to the Audit Committee by both the independent auditors and the
principal financial officer, and must include a joint statement
as to whether, in their view, the request or application is
consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The chairperson of the Audit Committee has been delegated the
authority to specifically pre-approve de minimis amounts for
services not covered by the general pre-approval guidelines. All
amounts, other than such de minimis amounts, require specific
pre-approval by the Audit Committee prior to engagement of
Deloitte & Touche. All amounts, other than de minimis
amounts not subject to pre-approval, specifically pre-approved
by the chairperson of the Audit Committee in accordance with
this policy are to be disclosed to the full Audit Committee at
the next regularly scheduled meeting.
All services rendered by Deloitte for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were
pre-approved in accordance with the policies and procedures
described above.
Auditor
Independence
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the
above noted services is compatible with maintaining the
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firms independence and has concluded that the provision of
such services has not adversely affected the independent
registered public accounting firms independence.
54
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc. operates under a written charter adopted
by the Board of Directors. The role of the Audit Committee is to
oversee our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board
of Directors. Our management has the primary responsibility for
our financial statements as well as our financial reporting
process, principles and internal controls. The independent
registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing
an audit of our financial statements and expressing an opinion
as to the conformity of such financial statements with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
In this context, in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities,
the Audit Committee reviewed the 2009 audited financial
statements with management, including a discussion of the
quality and acceptability of the financial reporting and
controls of Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
The Audit Committee reviewed with Deloitte & Touche,
LLP, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the
conformity of those audited financial statements with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, their
judgments as to the quality and the acceptability of the
financial statements and such other matters as are required to
be discussed by the applicable auditing standards as
periodically amended (including significant accounting policies,
alternative accounting treatments and estimates, judgments and
uncertainties). The Audit Committee has received the written
disclosures from the independent registered public accounting
firm required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB) Ethics and Independence
Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees
Concerning Independence and discussed with the
independent registered public accounting firm its independence
within the meaning of the rules and standards of the PCAOB and
the securities laws and regulations administered by the SEC.
The Audit Committee discussed with Deloitte & Touche,
LLP the overall scope and plans for the audit. The Audit
Committee meets periodically with Deloitte & Touche,
LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results
of their examinations, their evaluations of internal controls
and the overall quality of the financial reporting of Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited
financial statements be included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on
March 16, 2010. This report is provided by the following
independent directors, who constitute the Audit Committee:
Maurice J. DeWald, Chairman
W. Bradley Blair, II
Warren D. Fix
Larry L. Mathis
Gary T. Wescombe
55
ANNUAL
REPORT
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 was mailed to
stockholders on or about April 30, 2010. Our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
is not incorporated in this proxy statement and is not deemed a
part of the proxy soliciting material.
CODE OF
BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or the
Code of Ethics, which contains general guidelines for conducting
our business and is designed to help directors, employees and
independent consultants resolve ethical issues in an
increasingly complex business environment. The Code of Ethics
applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer, controller and persons
performing similar functions and all members of our Board of
Directors. The Code of Ethics covers topics including, but not
limited to, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of
information, and compliance with laws and regulations.
Stockholders may request a copy of the Code of Ethics, which
will be provided without charge, by writing to Healthcare Trust
of America, Inc. at The Promenade, 16435 N. Scottsdale
Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254, Attention:
Secretary. If, in the future, we amend, modify or waive a
provision in the Code of Ethics, we may, rather than filing a
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
satisfy the disclosure requirement by posting such information
on our website, www.htareit.com, as necessary.
PROPOSALS FOR
2011 ANNUAL MEETING
Under SEC regulations, any stockholder desiring to make a
proposal to be acted upon at the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders must cause such proposal to be received at our
principal executive offices located at The Promenade,
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale,
Arizona 85254, Attention: Secretary, no later than July 4,
2011, in order for the proposal to be considered for inclusion
in our proxy statement for that meeting. Stockholders also must
follow the procedures prescribed in SEC
Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act. If a stockholder wishes to present
a director nomination or other business proposal at the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our bylaws currently require
that the stockholder give advance written notice to our
Secretary at our offices no earlier than June 4, 2011 and
no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on July 4,
2011. Any stockholder nominations or proposals not received by
us by July 4, 2011, will be considered untimely and, if
presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proxy
holders will be able to exercise discretionary authority to vote
on any such proposal to the extent authorized by
Rule 14a-4(c)
promulgated under the Exchange Act. We presently anticipate
holding the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in December 2011.
OTHER
MATTERS
We will mail a proxy card together with this proxy statement to
all stockholders of record at the close of business on or about
November 1, 2010. The only business to come before the
annual meeting of which management is aware is set forth in this
proxy statement. If any other business does properly come before
the annual meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof,
the proxy holders will vote in regard thereto according to their
discretion insofar as such proxies are not limited to the
contrary.
It is important that proxies be returned promptly. Therefore,
stockholders are urged to date, sign and return the accompanying
proxy card in the accompanying return envelope or by fax to
(781) 633-4036
or by telephone by dialing toll-free
(866) 977-7699
or by the internet at www.eproxy.com/hta.
56
APPENDIX A
HEALTHCARE
TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
FOURTH
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT
FIRST: Healthcare Trust of America,
Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Corporation),
desires to amend and restate its charter as currently in effect
and as hereinafter amended.
SECOND: The following provisions are
all the provisions of the charter currently in effect and as
hereinafter amended:
ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of the corporation (which is hereinafter called the
Corporation) is:
NNN
Healthcare/Office REIT Trust of America,
Inc.
ARTICLE II
PURPOSES AND
POWERS
The purposes for which the Corporation is formed are to engage
in any lawful act or activity (including, without limitation or
obligation, engaging in business as a real estate investment
trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
any successor statute (the Code)) for which
corporations may be organized under the general laws of the
State of Maryland as now or hereafter in force.
ARTICLE III
PRINCIPAL
OFFICE IN STATE AND RESIDENT AGENT
The address of the principal office of the Corporation in the
State of Maryland is
c/o CSC
Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 11 East Chase
StreetNational Registered Agents, Inc. of MD, 836
Park Avenue, Second Floor, Baltimore, Maryland
2120221201. The name and address of the
resident agent of the Corporation are CSC
Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 11 East Chase
StreetNational Registered Agents, Inc. of MD, 836
Park Avenue, Second Floor, Baltimore, Maryland
2120221201. The resident agent is a
Maryland corporation.
ARTICLE IV
DEFINITIONS
As used in the Charter, the following terms shall have the
following meanings unless the context otherwise requires:
Acquisition Expenses. The term
Acquisition Expenses shall mean any and all expenses
incurred by or on behalf of the Corporation, the
Advisor, or any Affiliate of
eitherits Affiliates in connection with
the selection, evaluation, andacquisition or
development of, and investment in, any Asset, whether
or not acquired, including, without limitation, legal fees and
expenses, travel and communications expenses, costs of
appraisals, nonrefundable option payments on property not
acquired, accounting fees and expenses, computer use related
expenses and title insurance premiums.
Acquisition Fee. The term
Acquisition Fee shall mean any and all fees and
commissions, exclusive of Acquisition Expenses, paid by any
Person to any other Person (including any fees or commissions
paid by or
A-1
to any Affiliate of the Corporation or the
Advisor) in connection with making or investing in
Mortgages or the purchase, development or construction of a
Property, including real estate commissions, selection fees,
Development Fees, Construction Fees, nonrecurring management
fees, loan fees, points or any other fees of a similar nature.
Excluded shall be Development Fees and Construction Fees paid to
any Person not affiliated with the Sponsor in
connection with the actual development and construction of a
project.
Advisor or Advisors
. The
term Advisor or Advisors shall mean the
Person or Persons, if any, appointed, employed or contracted
with by the Corporation pursuant to Section 8.1 hereof and
responsible for directing or performing the
day-to-day
business affairs of the Corporation and the Operating
Partnership, including any Person to whom the Advisor
subcontracts all or substantially all of such functions.
Advisory Agreement
. The
term Advisory Agreement shall mean the agreement
between the Corporation, the Operating Partnership and the
Advisor pursuant to which the Advisor will direct or perform the
day-to-day
business affairs of the Corporation and the Operating
Partnership.
Affiliate or Affiliated. The term
Affiliate or Affiliated shall mean, with
respect to any Person, (i) any Person directly or
indirectly owning, controlling or holding, with the power to
vote, ten percent or more of the outstanding voting securities
of such other Person; (ii) any Person ten percent or more
of whose outstanding voting securities are directly or
indirectly owned, controlled or held, with the power to vote, by
such other Person; (iii) any Person directly or indirectly
controlling, controlled by or under common control with such
other Person; (iv) any executive officer, director, trustee
or general partner of such other Person; and (v) any legal
entity for which such Person acts as an executive officer,
director, trustee or general partner.
Aggregate Share Ownership Limit. The
term Aggregate Share Ownership Limit shall mean not
more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of the outstanding
Shares.
Asset. The term Asset shall
mean any Property, Mortgage or other investment (other than
investments in bank accounts, money market funds or other
current assets) owned by the Corporation, directly or indirectly
through one or more of its Affiliates, and any other investment
made by the Corporation, directly or indirectly through one or
more of its Affiliates.
Average Invested Assets. The term
Average Invested Assets shall mean, for a specified
period, the average of the aggregate book value of the assets of
the Corporation invested, directly or indirectly, in equity
interests in and loans secured by real estate (including,
without limitation, equity interests in REITs, mortgage pools,
commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential
mortgage-backed securities), before reserves for depreciation,
bad debts or other non-cash reserves, computed by taking the
average of such values at the end of each month during such
period.
Beneficial Ownership. The term
Beneficial Ownership shall mean ownership of Shares
by a Person, whether the interest in Shares is held directly or
indirectly (including by a nominee), and shall include interests
that would be treated as owned through the application of
Section 544 of the Code, as modified by
Section 856(h)(1)(B) of the Code. The terms
Beneficial Owner, Beneficially Owns and
Beneficially Owned shall have the correlative
meanings.
Benefit Plan Investor. The term shall
have the meaning providing in
Section 2510.3-101
of the Department of Labor regulations or any successor
regulation thereto.
Board or Board of Directors. The term
Board or Board of Directors shall mean
the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
Business Day. The term Business
Day shall mean any day, other than a Saturday or Sunday,
that is neither a legal holiday nor a day on which banking
institutions in New York City are authorized or required by law,
regulation or executive order to close.
Bylaws. The term Bylaws
shall mean the Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended from time
to time.
Charitable Beneficiary. The term
Charitable Beneficiary shall mean one or more
beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust as determined pursuant to
Section 6.2.6 hereof, provided that each such organization
must be
A-2
described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code and
contributions to each such organization must be eligible for
deduction under each of Sections 170(b)(1)(A), 2055 and
2522 of the Code.
Charitable Trust. The term
Charitable Trust shall mean any trust provided for
in Section 6.2.1 hereof.
Charitable Trustee. The term
Charitable Trustee shall mean the Person
unaffiliated with the Corporation and a Prohibited Owner, that
is appointed by the Corporation to serve as Trustee of the
Charitable Trust.
Charter. The term Charter
shall mean the charter of the Corporation.
CodeClass A Common
Stock. The term
CodeClass A Common
Stock shall have the meaning as provided in
Article IISection 5.2.5 herein.
Commencement of the Initial Public
Offering. The
term Commencement of the Initial Public Offering
shall mean the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission
declares effective the registration statement filed under the
Securities Act for the Initial Public Offering.
Class B Common Stock. The term
Class B Common Stock shall have the
meaning as provided in Section 5.2.5 herein.
Class B-1
Common Stock. The term
Class B-1
Common Stock shall have the meaning as provided in
Section 5.2.5 herein.
Class B-2
Common Stock. The term
Class B-2
Common Stock shall have the meaning as provided in
Section 5.2.5 herein.
Class B-3
Common Stock. The term
Class B-3
Common Stock shall have the meaning as provided in
Section 5.2.5 herein.
Code. The term Code
shall have the meaning as provided in Article II herein.
Common Share Ownership Limit. The term
Common Share Ownership Limit shall mean not more
than 9.8% (in value or in number of Shares, whichever is more
restrictive) of the aggregate of the outstanding Common Shares.
Common Shares. The term Common
Shares shall have the meaning as provided in
Section 5.1 herein.
Competitive Real Estate
Commission. The
term Competitive Real Estate Commission shall mean a
real estate or brokerage commission paid for the purchase or
sale of a Property that is reasonable, customary and competitive
in light of the size, type and location of the Property.
Construction Fee. The term
Construction Fee shall mean a fee or other
remuneration for acting as general contractor
and/or
construction manager to construct improvements, supervise and
coordinate projects or to provide major repairs or
rehabilitations on a Property.
Constructive Ownership. The term
Constructive Ownership shall mean ownership of
Shares by a Person, whether the interest in Shares is held
directly or indirectly (including by a nominee), and shall
include interests that would be treated as owned through the
application of Section 318(a) of the Code, as modified by
Section 856(d)(5) of the Code. The terms Constructive
Owner, Constructively Owns and
Constructively Owned shall have the correlative
meanings.
Contract Purchase Price. The term
Contract Purchase Price shall mean the amount
actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase,
development, construction or improvement of a Property or the
amount of funds advanced with respect to a Mortgage, or the
amount actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase of
other Assets, in each case exclusive of Acquisition Fees and
Acquisition Expenses.
Corporation. The term
Corporation shall have the meaning as provided in
Article I herein.
Dealer Manager. The term Dealer
Manager shall meanNNNRealty
Capital Corp., a California corporation and an
Affiliate of the CorporationSecurities, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, or such other Person
selected by the Board to act as the dealer manager for an
Offering.
A-3
Development Fee. The term
Development Fee shall mean a fee for the packaging
of a Property, including the negotiation and approval of plans,
and any assistance in obtaining zoning and necessary variances
and financing for a specific Property, either initially or at a
later date.
Director. The term Director
shall have the meaning as provided in Section 7.1 herein.
Distributions. The term
Distributions shall mean any distributions of money
or other property, pursuant to Section 5.5 hereof, by the
Corporation to owners of Shares, including distributions that
may constitute a return of capital for federal income tax
purposes.
Effective Time. The term
Effective Time shall mean immediately prior to
Listing.
ERISA Investor. Any holder of Shares
that is (i) an employee benefit plan subject to
Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, as amended, (ii) a plan as defined in
Section 4975(e) of the Code (any such employee benefit plan
or plan as described in clause (i) or this
clause (ii) being referred to herein as Plan),
(iii) a trust which was established pursuant to a Plan, or
a nominee for such trust or Plan, or (iv) an entity whose
underlying assets include assets of a Plan by reason of such
Plans investment in such entity.
Excepted Holder. The term
Excepted Holder shall mean a Stockholder for whom an
Excepted Holder Limit is created by Article VI hereof or by
the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 6.1.7.
Excepted Holder Limit. The term
Excepted Holder Limit shall mean, provided that the
affected Excepted Holder agrees to comply with the requirements
established by the Board of Directors pursuant to
Section 6.1.7 and subject to adjustment pursuant to
Section 6.1.8, the percentage limit established by the
Board of Directors pursuant to Section 6.1.7.
Excess Amount. The term Excess
Amount shall have the meaning as provided in
Section 8.108.3 herein.
Exchange Act. The term
Exchange Act shall mean the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.
Gross Proceeds. The term Gross
Proceeds shall mean the aggregate purchase price of all
Shares sold for the account of the Corporation through an
Offering, without deduction for Selling Commissions, volume
discounts, marketing support fees and due diligence expense
reimbursement or Organizational and Offering Expenses. For the
purpose of computing Gross Proceeds, the purchase price of any
Share for which reduced Selling Commissions are paid to the
Dealer Manager or a Soliciting Dealer (where net proceeds to the
Corporation are not reduced) shall be deemed to be the full
amount of the offering price per Share pursuant to the
Prospectus for such Offering without reduction.
Indemnitee. The term
Indemnitee shall have the meaning as provided in
Section 12.2(c) herein.
Independent Appraiser. The term
Independent Appraiser shall mean a Person with no
material current or prior business or personal relationship with
the AdvisorCorporation or the Directors
and who is engaged to a substantial extent in the business of
rendering opinions regarding the value of Real Property
and/or other
Assets of the type held by the Corporation. Membership in a
nationally recognized appraisal society such as the American
Institute of Real Estate Appraisers or the Society of Real
Estate Appraisers shall be conclusive evidence of being engaged
to a substantial extent in the business of rendering opinions
regarding the value of Real Property.
Independent Director. The term
Independent Director shall mean a Director who is
not on the date of determination, and within the last two years
from the date of determination has not been, directly or
indirectly associated with the Sponsor or the
AdvisorCorporation or its Affiliates by virtue
of (i) ownership of an interest in the Sponsor, the
Advisor or any of their Affiliates, other than the Corporation;
(ii) employment by the Sponsor, the
AdvisorCorporation or any of
theirits Affiliates;
(iii) service as an officer or director of the
Sponsor, the Advisor or any of their Affiliates, other than as a
Director of the Corporation; (ivii) performance
of services, other than as a Director, for the Corporation;
(v) service as a director or trustee of more than
three REITs organized by the Sponsor or advised by the
Advisor;or (viiii) maintenance
of a material business or professional relationship with
the Sponsor, the AdvisorCorporation
or any of theirits Affiliates. A
business or
A-4
professional relationship is considered material if
the aggregate gross income derived by the Director from the
Sponsor, the AdvisorCorporation and
theirits Affiliates (excluding fees for
serving as a director of the Corporation or other REIT or real
estate program that is organized, advised or managed by the
Advisor orCorporation and its
Affiliates) exceeds five percent of either the Directors
annual gross income during either of the last two years or the
Directors net worth on a fair market value basis. An
indirect association with the Sponsor or the
AdvisorCorporation or its Affiliates shall
include circumstances in which a Directors spouse, parent,
child, sibling, mother- or
father-in-law,
son- or
daughter-in-law
or brother- or
sister-in-law
is or has been associated with the Sponsor, the
Advisor, any of their Affiliates or the Corporation
or its Affiliates.
Initial Date. The term Initial
Date shall mean the date on which Shares are first issued
in the Corporations Initial Public Offering.
Initial
Investment. The
term Initial Investment shall mean that portion of
the initial capitalization of the Corporation and the Operating
Partnership contributed by the Sponsor or its Affiliates
pursuant to Section II.A. of the NASAA REIT
Guidelines.
Initial Public Offering. The term
Initial Public Offering shall mean the
firstCorporations offering and
sale of Common Shares pursuant toan
effectivea registration statement filed under
the Securities Act., which became effective
with the SEC on September 20, 2006 (Commission File
No. 333-133652)
and terminated on March 19, 2010.
Invested Capital. The term
Invested Capital shall mean the amount calculated by
multiplying the total number of Shares purchased by Stockholders
by the issue price at the time of such purchase, reduced by the
portion of any Distribution that is attributable to Net Sales
Proceeds and by any amounts paid by the Corporation to
repurchase Shares pursuant to the Corporations plan for
the repurchase of Shares.
Joint Ventures. The term Joint
Ventures shall mean those joint venture or partnership
arrangements in which the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries
is a co-venturer or general partner established to acquire or
hold Assets.
Leverage. The term Leverage
shall mean the aggregate amount of indebtedness of the
Corporation for money borrowed (including purchase money
mortgage loans) outstanding at any time, both secured and
unsecured.
Listing. The listing of
thea class of Common Shares on
(i) the New York Stock
ExchangeNYSE, the American Stock Exchange, or
the Global Market or the Global Select Market of the Nasdaq
Stock Market (or any successor to such entities), or (ii) a
national securities exchange (or tier or segment thereof) that
has listing standards that the Securities and Exchange
Commission SEC has determined by rule are
substantially similar to the listing standards applicable to
securities described in Section 18(b)(1)(A) of the
Securities Act. Upon such Listing, thesuch
Common Shares shall be deemed Listed.
Market Price. The term Market
Price on any date shall mean, with respect to any class or
series of outstanding Shares, the Closing Price for such Shares
on such date. The Closing Price on any date shall
mean the last sale price for such Shares, regular way, or, in
case no such sale takes place on such day, the average of the
closing bid and asked prices, regular way, for such Shares, in
either case as reported in the principal consolidated
transaction reporting system with respect to securities listed
or admitted to trading on the NYSE or, if such Shares are not
listed or admitted to trading on the NYSE, as reported on the
principal consolidated transaction reporting system on which
such Shares are listed or admitted to trading or, if such Shares
are not listed or admitted to trading on any national securities
exchange, the last quoted price, or, if not so quoted, the
average of the high bid and low asked prices in the
over-the-counter
market, as reported by the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. Automated Quotation System or, if such system is
no longer in use, the principal other automated quotation system
that may then be in use or, if such Shares are not quoted by any
such organization, the average of the closing bid and asked
prices as furnished by a professional market maker making a
market in such Shares selected by the Board of Directors or, in
the event that no trading price is available for such Shares,
the fair market value of Shares, as determined in good faith by
the Board of Directors.
A-5
MGCL. The term MGCL shall
mean the Maryland General Corporation Law, as amended from time
to time.
Mortgages. The term
Mortgages shall mean, in connection with mortgage
financing provided, invested in, participated in or purchased by
the Corporation, all of the notes, deeds of trust, security
interests or other evidences of indebtedness or obligations,
which are secured or collateralized by Real Property owned by
the borrowers under such notes, deeds of trust, security
interests or other evidences of indebtedness or obligations.
NASAA REIT Guidelines. The term
NASAA REIT Guidelines shall mean the Statement of
Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts published by the
North American Securities Administrators Association, as may
be amended from time to time.
Net Assets. The term Net
Assets shall mean the total assets of the Corporation
(other than intangibles) at cost, before deducting depreciation,
reserves for bad debts or other non-cash reserves, less total
liabilities, calculated quarterly by the Corporation on a basis
consistently applied.
Net Income. The term Net
Income shall mean for any period, the Corporations
total revenues applicable to such period, less the total
expenses applicable to such period other than additions to
reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash
reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of the Assets.
Net Sales Proceeds. The term Net
Sales Proceeds shall mean in the case of a transaction
described in clause (i)(A) of the definition of Sale, the
proceeds of any such transaction less the amount of selling
expenses incurred by or on behalf of the Corporation, including
all real estate commissions, closing costs and legal fees and
expenses. In the case of a transaction described in clause
(i)(B) of the definition of Sale, Net Sales Proceeds means the
proceeds of any such transaction less the amount of selling
expenses incurred by or on behalf of the Corporation, including
any legal fees and expenses and other selling expenses incurred
in connection with such transaction. In the case of a
transaction described in clause (i)(C) of the definition of
Sale, Net Sales Proceeds means the proceeds of any such
transaction actually distributed to the Corporation or the
Operating Partnership from the Joint Venture less the amount of
any selling expenses, including legal fees and expenses incurred
by or on behalf of the Corporation (other than those paid by the
Joint Venture). In the case of a transaction or series of
transactions described in clause (i)(D) of the definition of
Sale, Net Sales Proceeds means the proceeds of any such
transaction (including the aggregate of all payments under a
Mortgage on or in satisfaction thereof other than regularly
scheduled interest payments) less the amount of selling expenses
incurred by or on behalf of the Corporation, including all
commissions, closing costs and legal fees and expenses. In the
case of a transaction described in clause (i)(E) of the
definition of Sale, Net Sales Proceeds means the proceeds of any
such transaction less the amount of selling expenses incurred by
or on behalf of the Corporation, including any legal fees and
expenses and other selling expenses incurred in connection with
such transaction. In the case of a transaction described in
clause (ii) of the definition of Sale, Net Sales Proceeds
means the proceeds of such transaction or series of transactions
less all amounts generated thereby which are reinvested in one
or more Assets within 180 days thereafter and less the
amount of any real estate commissions, closing costs, and legal
fees and expenses and other selling expenses incurred by or
allocated to the Corporation or the Operating Partnership in
connection with such transaction or series of transactions. Net
Sales Proceeds shall also include any amounts that the
Corporation determines, in its discretion, to be economically
equivalent to proceeds of a Sale. Net Sales Proceeds shall not
include any reserves established by the Corporation in its sole
discretion.
NYSE. The term NYSE shall
mean the New York Stock Exchange.
Non-Compliant Tender Offer. The term
Non-Compliant Tender Offer shall have the meaning as
provided in Section 11.7 herein.
Offering. The term Offering
shall mean any offering and sale of Shares.
Operating Partnership. The term
Operating Partnership shall mean
NNNHealthcare/Office REIT
Trust of America Holdings,
L.P.LP, a Delaware limited partnership,
through which the Corporation may own Assets.
A-6
Organizational and Offering
Expenses. The term Organizational and
Offering Expenses shall mean any and all costs and
expenses incurred by and to be paid from the assets of the
Corporation in connection with the formation, qualification and
registration of the Corporation, and the marketing and
distribution of Shares, including, without limitation, total
underwriting and brokerage discounts and commissions (including
fees of the underwriters attorneys), expenses for
printing, engraving, amending, supplementing, mailing and
distributing costs, salaries of employees while engaged in sales
activity, telephone and other telecommunications costs, all
advertising and marketing expenses (including the costs related
to investor and broker-dealer sales meetings), charges of
transfer agents, registrars, trustees, escrow holders,
depositories, experts, fees, expenses and taxes related to the
filing, registration and qualification of the sale of the Shares
under federal and state laws, including taxes and fees and
accountants and attorneys fees.
Person. The term Person
shall mean an individual, corporation, partnership, estate,
trust (including a trust qualified under Sections 401(a) or
501(c)(17) of the Code), a portion of a trust permanently set
aside for or to be used exclusively for the purposes described
in Section 642(c) of the Code, association, private
foundation within the meaning of Section 509(a) of the
Code, joint stock company or other entity and also includes a
group as that term is used for purposes of Section 13(d)(3)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and a group to which an Excepted Holder
Limit applies.
Preferred Shares. The term
Preferred Shares shall have the meaning as provided
in Section 5.1 herein.
Prohibited Owner. The term
Prohibited Owner shall mean, with respect to any
purported Transfer, any Person who, but for the provisions of
Section 6.1.1, would Beneficially Own or Constructively Own
Shares, and if appropriate in the context, shall also mean any
Person who would have been the record owner of Shares that the
Prohibited Owner would have so owned.
Property or Properties. The term
Property or Properties shall mean, as
the context requires, any, or all, respectively, of the Real
Property acquired by the Corporation, directly or indirectly
through joint venture arrangements or other partnership or
investment interests.
Prospectus. The term
Prospectus shall mean the same as that term is
defined in Section 2(10) of the Securities Act, including a
preliminary prospectus, an offering circular as described in
Rule 256 of the General Rules and Regulations under the
Securities Act, or, in the case of an intrastate offering, any
document by whatever name known, utilized for the purpose of
offering and selling Securities to the public.
Real Property. The term Real
Property shall mean land, rights in land (including
leasehold interests), and any buildings, structures,
improvements, furnishings, fixtures and equipment located on or
used in connection with land and rights or interests in land.
Reinvestment Plan. The term
Reinvestment Plan shall have the meaning as provided
in Section 5.10 herein.
REIT. The term REIT shall
mean a corporation, trust, association or other legal entity
(other than a real estate syndication) that is engaged primarily
in investing in equity interests in real estate (including fee
ownership and leasehold interests) or in loans secured by real
estate or both as defined pursuant to the REIT Provisions of the
Code.
REIT Provisions of the Code. The term
REIT Provisions of the Code shall mean
Sections 856 through 860 of the Code and any successor or
other provisions of the Code relating to real estate investment
trusts (including provisions as to the attribution of ownership
of beneficial interests therein) and the regulations promulgated
thereunder.
Restriction Termination Date. The term
Restriction Termination Date shall mean the first
day after the Initial Date on which the Board of Directors
determines that it is no longer in the best interests of the
Corporation to attempt to, or continue to, qualify as a REIT or
that compliance with the restrictions and limitations on
Beneficial Ownership, Constructive Ownership and Transfers of
Shares set forth herein is no longer required in order for the
Corporation to qualify as a REIT.
A-7
Roll-Up
Entity. The term
Roll-Up
Entity shall mean a partnership, real estate investment
trust, corporation, trust or similar entity that would be
created or would survive after the successful completion of a
proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction.
Roll-Up
Transaction. The term
Roll-Up
Transaction shall mean a transaction involving the
acquisition, merger, conversion or consolidation either directly
or indirectly of the Corporation and the issuance of securities
of a Roll-Up
Entity to the Stockholders. Such term does not include:
(a) a transaction involving securities of the Corporation
that have been for at least twelve months listed on a national
securities exchange; or
(b) a transaction involving the conversion to corporate,
trust or association form of only the Corporation, if, as a
consequence of the transaction, there will be no significant
adverse change in any of the following:
(i) Stockholders voting rights;
(ii) the term of existence of the
Corporation; or
(iii) Sponsor or Advisor
compensation; or
(iviii) the Corporations
investment objectives.
Sale or Sales. The term
Sale or Sales shall mean (i) any
transaction or series of transactions whereby: (A) the
Corporation or the Operating Partnership directly or indirectly
(except as described in other subsections of this definition)
sells, grants, transfers, conveys, or relinquishes its ownership
of any Property or portion thereof, including the lease of any
Property consisting of a building only, and including any event
with respect to any Property which gives rise to a significant
amount of insurance proceeds or condemnation awards;
(B) the Corporation or the Operating Partnership directly
or indirectly (except as described in other subsections of this
definition) sells, grants, transfers, conveys, or relinquishes
its ownership of all or substantially all of the interest of the
Corporation or the Operating Partnership in any Joint Venture in
which it is a co-venturer or partner; (C) any Joint Venture
directly or indirectly (except as described in other subsections
of this definition) in which the Corporation or the Operating
Partnership as a co-venturer or partner sells, grants,
transfers, conveys, or relinquishes its ownership of any
Property or portion thereof, including any event with respect to
any Property which gives rise to insurance claims or
condemnation awards; (D) the Corporation or the Operating
Partnership directly or indirectly (except as described in other
subsections of this definition) sells, grants, conveys or
relinquishes its interest in any Mortgage or portion thereof
(including with respect to any Mortgage, all payments thereunder
or in satisfaction thereof other than regularly scheduled
interest payments) of amounts owed pursuant to such Mortgage and
any event which gives rise to a significant amount of insurance
proceeds or similar awards; or (E) the Corporation or the
Operating Partnership directly or indirectly (except as
described in other subsections of this definition) sells,
grants, transfers, conveys, or relinquishes its ownership of any
other Asset not previously described in this definition or any
portion thereof, but (ii) not including any transaction or
series of transactions specified in clause (i) (A) through
(E) above in which the proceeds of such transaction or
series of transactions are reinvested by the Corporation in one
or more Assets within 180 days thereafter.
SDAT. The term SDAT shall
have the meaning as provided in Section 5.4
hereinmean the State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of Maryland.
SEC. The term SEC shall
mean the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Securities. The term
Securities shall mean any of the following issued by
the Corporation, as the text requires: Shares, any other stock,
shares or other evidences of equity or beneficial or other
interests, voting trust certificates, bonds, debentures, notes
or other evidences of indebtedness, secured or unsecured,
convertible, subordinated or otherwise, or in general any
instruments commonly known as securities or any
certificates of interest, shares or participations in, temporary
or interim certificates for, receipts for, guarantees of, or
warrants, options or rights to subscribe to, purchase or
acquire, any of the foregoing.
Securities Act. The term
Securities Act shall mean the Securities Act of
1933, as amended from time to time, or any successor statute
thereto. Reference to any provision of the Securities Act shall
mean such
A-8
provision as in effect from time to time, as the same may be
amended, and any successor provision thereto, as interpreted by
any applicable regulations as in effect from time to time.
Selling Commissions. The term
Selling Commissions shall mean any and all
commissions payable to underwriters, dealer managers or other
broker-dealers in connection with the sale of Shares, including,
without limitation, commissions payable to NNN Capital
Corpthe Dealer Manager.
Shares. The term Shares
shall mean shares of stock of the Corporation of any class or
series, including Common Shares or Preferred Shares.
Soliciting Dealers. The term
Soliciting Dealers shall mean those broker-dealers
that are members of the National Association of
Securities DealersFinancial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc., or that are exempt from broker-dealer
registration, and that, in either case, enter into participating
broker or other agreements with the Dealer Manager to sell
Shares.
Sponsor. The
term Sponsor shall mean any Person which (i) is
directly or indirectly instrumental in organizing, wholly or in
part, the Corporation; (ii) will control, manage or
participate in the management of the Corporation, and any
Affiliate of any such Person; (iii) takes the initiative,
directly or indirectly, in founding or organizing the
Corporation, either alone or in conjunction with one or more
other Persons; (iv) receives a material participation in
the Corporation in connection with the founding or organizing of
the business of the Corporation, in consideration of services or
property, or both services and property; (v) has a
substantial number of relationships and contacts with the
Corporation; (vi) possesses significant rights to control
Properties; (vii) receives fees for providing services to
the Corporation which are paid on a basis that is not customary
in the industry; or (viii) provides goods or services to
the Corporation on a basis which was not negotiated at
arms-length with the Corporation. Sponsor does
not include any Person whose only relationship with the
Corporation is that of an independent property manager and whose
only compensation is as such, or wholly independent third
parties such as attorneys, accountants and underwriters whose
only compensation is for professional services.
Stockholder List. The term
Stockholder List shall have the meaning as provided
in Section 11.5 herein.
Stockholders. The term
Stockholders shall mean the holders of record of the
Shares as maintained in the books and records of the Corporation
or its transfer agent.
Termination DateTendered
Shares. The term Termination
Date shall mean the date of termination of the Advisory
AgreementTendered Shares shall have the
meaning as provided in Section 11.7 herein.
Termination
Event. The
term Termination Event shall mean any termination of
the Advisor as advisor to the Corporation or the Operating
Partnership under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, other
than any termination for Cause (as defined in the
Advisory Agreement) and other than any termination of the
Advisory Agreement due to the occurrence of a Listing.
Total Operating Expenses. The term
Total Operating Expenses shall mean all costs and
expenses paid or incurred by the Corporation, as determined
under generally accepted accounting principles, that are in any
way related to the operation of the Corporation or to corporate
business, including advisory fees, but excluding (i) the
expenses of raising capital such as Organizational and Offering
Expenses, legal, audit, accounting, underwriting, brokerage,
listing, registration and other fees, printing and other such
expenses and tax incurred in connection with the issuance,
distribution, transfer, registration and Listing of the Shares;
(ii) interest payments; (iii) taxes;
(iv) non-cash expenditures such as depreciation,
amortization and bad debt reserves; (v) incentive fees paid
in compliance with the NASAA REIT Guidelines;
(vi) Acquisition Fees and Acquisition Expenses;
(vii) disposition fees on the Sale of Property; and
(viii) other fees and expenses connected with the
acquisition, disposition, management and ownership of real
estate interests, mortgage loans or other property (including
the costs of foreclosure, insurance premiums, legal services,
maintenance, repair, and improvement of property).
Transfer. The term Transfer
shall mean any issuance, sale, transfer, gift, assignment,
devise or other disposition, as well as any other event that
causes any Person to acquire Beneficial Ownership or
Constructive
A-9
Ownership, or any agreement to take any such actions or cause
any such events, of Shares or the right to vote or receive
dividends on Shares, including (a) the granting or exercise
of any option (or any disposition of any option), (b) any
disposition of any securities or rights convertible into or
exchangeable for Shares or any interest in Shares or any
exercise of any such conversion or exchange right and
(c) Transfers of interests in other entities that result in
changes in Beneficial or Constructive Ownership of Shares; in
each case, whether voluntary or involuntary, whether owned of
record, Constructively Owned or Beneficially Owned and whether
by operation of law or otherwise. The terms
Transferring and Transferred shall have
the correlative meanings.
2%/25% Guidelines. The term
2%/25% Guidelines shall have the meaning as provided
in Section 8.108.3 herein.
Unimproved Real Property. The term
Unimproved Real Property shall mean Property in
which the Corporation has an equity interest that was not
acquired for the purpose of producing rental or other operating
income, that has no development or construction in process and
for which no development or construction is planned, in good
faith, to commence within one year.
ARTICLE V
STOCK
Section 5.1 Authorized
Shares. The Corporation has authority to
issue 1,200,000,000 Shares, consisting of
1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value
per share (Common Shares), and
200,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value
per share (Preferred Shares). The aggregate par
value of all authorized Shares having par value is $12,000,000.
All Shares shall be fully paid and nonassessable when issued. If
Shares of one class are classified or reclassified into Shares
of another class pursuant to this Article V, the number of
authorized Shares of the former class shall be automatically
decreased and the number of Shares of the latter class shall be
automatically increased, in each case by the number of Shares so
classified or reclassified, so that the aggregate number of
Shares of all classes that the Corporation has authority to
issue shall not be more than the total number of Shares set
forth in the first sentence of this paragraph. The Board of
Directors, with the approval of a majority of the entire Board
and without any action by the Stockholders, may amend the
Charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate
number of Shares or the number of Shares of any class or series
that the Corporation has authority to issue.
Section 5.2 Common
Shares.
Section 5.2.1 Common
Shares Subject to Terms of Preferred
Shares. The Common Shares shall be subject to
the express terms of any series of Preferred Shares.
Section 5.2.2 Description. Subject
to the provisions of Article VI and except as may otherwise
be specified in the terms of any class or series of Common
Shares, each Common Share shall entitle the holder thereof to
one vote per share on all matters upon which Stockholders are
entitled to vote pursuant to Section 11.2 hereof. Shares of
a particular class of Common Shares shall have equal dividend,
distribution, liquidation and other rights, and shall have no
preference, cumulative, preemptive, conversion or exchange
rights. The Board may classify or reclassify any unissued Common
Shares from time to time in one or more classes or series of
Shares; provided, however, that, until Listing,
the voting rights per Share (other than any publicly held Share)
sold in a private offering shall not exceed the voting rights
which bear the same relationship to the voting rights of a
publicly held Share as the consideration paid to the Corporation
for each privately offered Share bears to the book value of each
outstanding publicly held Share.
Section 5.2.3 Rights
Upon Liquidation. In the event of any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up,
or any distribution of the assets of the Corporation, the
aggregate assets available for distribution to holders of the
Common Shares shall be determined in accordance with applicable
law. Each holder of Common Shares of a particular class shall be
entitled to receive, ratably with each other holder of Common
Shares of such class, that portion of such aggregate assets
available for distribution as the number of
A-10
outstanding Common Shares of such class held by such holder
bears to the total number of outstanding Common Shares of such
class then outstanding.
Section 5.2.4 Voting
Rights. Except as may be provided otherwise
in the Charter, and subject to the express terms of any series
of Preferred Shares, the holders of the Common Shares shall have
the exclusive right to vote on all matters (as to which a common
stockholder shall be entitled to vote pursuant to applicable
law) at all meetings of the Stockholders.
Section 5.2.5 Classification. At
the Effective Time, 700,000,000 Common Shares shall be
classified as Class A Common Stock (the Class A
Common Stock), 100,000,000 Common Shares shall be
classified as
Class B-1
Common Stock (the
Class B-1
Common Stock), 100,000,000 Common Shares shall be
classified as
Class B-2
Common Stock (the
Class B-2
Common Stock), and 100,000,000 Common Shares shall be
classified as
Class B-3
Common Stock (the
Class B-3
Common Stock and, together with the
Class B-1
Common Stock and
Class B-2
Common Stock, the Class B Common Stock).
Eighteen (18) months following the date of Listing of the
Class A Common Stock, all authorized but unissued shares of
Class B Common Stock shall automatically be reclassified as
Class A Common Stock.
Section 5.2.6 Conversion.
(a) At the Effective Time, each Common Share
which was issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be converted into 1/4 of a share of
Class A Common Stock, 1/4 of a share of
Class B-1
Common Stock, 1/4 of a share of
Class B-2
Common Stock, and 1/4 of a share of
Class B-3
Common Stock, the Class A Common Stock,
Class B-1
Common Stock,
Class B-2
Common Stock, and
Class B-3
Common Stock having the respective preferences, conversion and
other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms and
conditions set forth herein.
(b) The Class A Common Stock is not
convertible into or exchangeable for any other property or
securities of the Company. Each issued and outstanding share of
Class B Common Stock shall, automatically and without any
action on the part of the holder thereof, convert into one
(1) share of Class A Common Stock as follows:
(a) six (6) months following the date of Listing of
the Class A Common Stock, in the case of the
Class B-1
Common Stock; (b) the earlier of (x) twelve
(12) months following the date of Listing and (y) such
earlier date as may be determined by the Board, but not earlier
than six (6) months following the date of Listing of the
Class A Common Stock, in the case of the
Class B-2
Common Stock; and (c) the earlier of (x) eighteen
(18) months following the date of Listing of the
Class A Common Stock and (y) such earlier date as may
be determined by the Board, but not earlier than six
(6) months following the date of Listing of the
Class A Common Stock, in the case of the
Class B-3
Common Stock.
Section 5.2.7 General. Except
as set forth in Section 5.2.6, the Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock shall have identical
preferences, rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as
to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms
and conditions of redemption.
Section 5.3 Preferred
Shares. The Board may classify any unissued
Preferred Shares and reclassify any previously classified but
unissued Preferred Shares of any series from time to time, in
one or more classes or series of Shares; provided, however,
that, until Listing, the voting rights per Share
(other than any publicly held Share) sold in a private offering
shall not exceed the voting rights which bear the same
relationship to the voting rights of a publicly held Share as
the consideration paid to the Corporation for each privately
offered Share bears to the book value of each outstanding
publicly held Share.
Section 5.4 Classified
or Reclassified Shares. Prior to issuance of
classified or reclassified Shares of any class or series, the
Board by resolution shall: (a) designate that class or
series to distinguish it from all other classes and series of
Shares; (b) specify the number of Shares to be included in
the class or series; (c) set or change, subject to the
provisions of Article VI and subject to the express terms
of any class or series of Shares outstanding at the time, the
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers,
restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of
redemption for each class or series; and (d) cause the
Corporation to file articles supplementary with the
State Department of Assessments and Taxation of
Maryland
(SDAT). Any of the
terms of any class or series of Shares set or
A-11
changed pursuant to clause (c) of this Section 5.4 may
be made dependent upon facts or events ascertainable outside the
Charter (including determinations by the Board or other facts or
events within the control of the Corporation) and may vary among
holders thereof, provided that the manner in which such facts,
events or variations shall operate upon the terms of such class
or series of Shares is clearly and expressly set forth in the
articles supplementary or other charter document.
Section 5.5 Dividends
and Distributions. The Board of Directors may
from time to time authorize the Corporation to declare and pay
to Stockholders such dividends or Distributions, in cash or
other assets of the Corporation or in securities of the
Corporation or from any other source as the Board of Directors
in its discretion shall determine. The Board of Directors shall
endeavor to authorize the Corporation to declare and pay such
dividends and Distributions as shall be necessary for the
Corporation to qualify as a REIT under the Code; provided,
however, Stockholders shall have no right to any dividend or
Distribution unless and until authorized by the Board and
declared by the Corporation. The exercise of the powers and
rights of the Board of Directors pursuant to this
Section 5.5 shall be subject to the provisions of any class
or series of Shares at the time outstanding. The receipt by any
Person in whose name any Shares are registered on the records of
the Corporation or by his or her duly authorized agent shall be
a sufficient discharge for all dividends or Distributions
payable or deliverable in respect of such Shares and from all
liability to see to the application thereof. Until Listing,
distributions in kind shall not be permitted, except for
distributions of readily marketable securities, distributions of
beneficial interests in a liquidating trust established for the
dissolution of the Corporation and the liquidation of its assets
in accordance with the terms of the Charter or distributions in
which (i) the Board advises each Stockholder of the risks
associated with direct ownership of the property, (ii) the
Board offers each Stockholder the election of receiving such
in-kind distributions, and (iii) in-kind distributions are
made only to those Stockholders that accept such offer.
Section 5.6 Charter
and Bylaws. The rights of all Stockholders
and the terms of all Shares are subject to the provisions of the
Charter and the Bylaws.
Section 5.7 No
Issuance of Share Certificates. Until
Listing, the Corporation shall not issue share certificates. A
Stockholders investment shall be recorded on the books of
the Corporation. To transfer his or her Shares, a Stockholder
shall submit an executed form to the Corporation, which form
shall be provided by the Corporation upon request. Such transfer
will also be recorded on the books of the Corporation. Upon
issuance or transfer of Shares, the Corporation will provide the
Stockholder with information concerning his or her rights with
regard to such Shares, as required by the Bylaws and the MGCL or
other applicable law.
Section 5.8 Suitability
of Stockholders. Until Listing, the following
provisions shall apply:
Section 5.8.1 Investor
Suitability Standards. Subject to suitability
standards established by individual states, to become a
Stockholder in the Corporation, if such prospective Stockholder
is an individual (including an individual beneficiary of a
purchasing Individual Retirement Account), or if the prospective
Stockholder is a fiduciary (such as a trustee of a trust or
corporate pension or profit sharing plan, or other tax-exempt
organization, or a custodian under a Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act), such individual or fiduciary, as the case may be, must
represent to the Corporation, among other requirements as the
Corporation may require from time to time:
(a) that such individual (or, in the case of a fiduciary,
that the fiduciary account or the donor who directly or
indirectly supplies the funds to purchase the Shares) has a
minimum annual gross income of
$45,00070,000 and a net worth (excluding
home, furnishings and automobiles) of not less than
$45,00070,000; or
(b) that such individual (or, in the case of a fiduciary,
that the fiduciary account or the donor who directly or
indirectly supplies the funds to purchase the Shares) has a net
worth (excluding home, furnishings and automobiles) of not less
than $150,000250,000.
Section 5.8.2 Determination
of Suitability of Sale. The Corporation
and each Person selling Shares on behalf of the Corporation
shall make every reasonable effort to determine that the
purchase of Shares by Stockholders is a suitable and appropriate
investment for such Stockholder. In making this determination,
the Corporation or each Person selling Shares on behalf
of the Corporation shall ascertain that the prospective
A-12
Stockholder: (a) meets the minimum income and net worth
standards established for the Corporation; (b) can
reasonably benefit from the Corporation based on the prospective
Stockholders overall investment objectives and portfolio
structure; (c) is able to bear the economic risk of the
investment based on the prospective Stockholders overall
financial situation; and (d) has apparent understanding of
(1) the fundamental risks of the investment; (2) the
risk that the Stockholder may lose the entire investment;
(3) the lack of liquidity of the Shares; (4) the
restrictions on transferability of the Shares; and (5) the
tax consequences of the investment.
The Corporation or each Person selling Shares on behalf
of the Corporation shall make this determination on the basis of
information it has obtained from a prospective Stockholder.
Relevant information for this purpose will include at least the
age, investment objectives, investment
experiencesexperience, income, net
worth, financial situation, and other investments of the
prospective Stockholder, as well as any other pertinent factors.
The Corporation or each Person selling Shares on behalf
of the Corporation shall maintain records of the information
used to determine that an investment in Shares is suitable and
appropriate for a Stockholder. Each Person selling Shares on
behalf of the Corporation shall maintain these records for at
least six years.
Section 5.8.3 Minimum
Initial Investment. Until a Listing,
subject to certain individual state requirements, the minimum
initial investment shall be 100 Shares.
Section 5.9 Repurchase
of Shares. The Board may establish, from time
to time, a program or programs by which the Corporation
voluntarily repurchases Shares from its Stockholders;
provided, however, that such repurchase does not impair
the capital or operations of the Corporation. The
Sponsor, Advisor, members of the Board or any
Affiliates thereof may not receive any fees arising out of the
repurchase of Shares by the Corporation.
Section 5.10 Distribution
Reinvestment Plans. The Board may establish,
from time to time, a Distribution reinvestment plan or plans
(each, a Reinvestment Plan). Under any such
Reinvestment Plan, (i) all material information regarding
Distributions to the Stockholders and the effect of reinvesting
such Distributions, including the tax consequences thereof,
shall be provided to the Stockholders not less often than
annually, and (ii) each Stockholder participating in such
Reinvestment Plan shall have a reasonable opportunity to
withdraw from the Reinvestment Plan not less often than annually
after receipt of the information required in clause (i)
above.
ARTICLE VI
RESTRICTION
ON TRANSFER AND OWNERSHIP OF SHARES
Section 6.1 Shares.
Section 6.1.1 Ownership
Limitations. During the period commencing on
the Initial Date and prior to the Restriction Termination Date,
but subject to Section 6.3:
(a) Basic Restrictions.
(i) (1) No Person, other than an Excepted Holder,
shall Beneficially Own or Constructively Own Shares in excess of
the Aggregate Share Ownership Limit, (2) no Person, other
than an Excepted Holder, shall Beneficially Own or
Constructively Own Common Shares in excess of the Common Share
Ownership Limit and (3) no Excepted Holder shall
Beneficially Own or Constructively Own Shares in excess of the
Excepted Holder Limit for such Excepted Holder.
(ii) No Person shall Beneficially or Constructively Own
Shares to the extent that such Beneficial or Constructive
Ownership of Shares would result in the Corporation being
closely held within the meaning of
Section 856(h) of the Code (without regard to whether the
ownership interest is held during the last half of a taxable
year), or otherwise failing to qualify as a REIT (including, but
not limited to, Beneficial or Constructive Ownership that would
result in the Corporation owning (actually or Constructively) an
interest in a tenant that is described in
Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the
A-13
Code if the income derived by the Corporation from such tenant
would cause the Corporation to fail to satisfy any of the gross
income requirements of Section 856(c) of the Code).
(iii) Any Transfer of Shares that, if effective, would
result in Shares being beneficially owned by less than
100 Persons (determined under the principles of
Section 856(a)(5) of the Code) shall be void ab
initio, and the intended transferee shall acquire no
rights in such Shares.
(b) Transfer in Trust. If any
Transfer of Shares occurs which, if effective, would result in
any Person Beneficially Owning or Constructively Owning Shares
in violation of Section 6.1.1(a)(i) or (ii),
(i) then that number of Shares the Beneficial or
Constructive Ownership of which otherwise would cause such
Person to violate Section 6.1.1(a)(i) or (ii) (rounded up
to the nearest whole share) shall be automatically transferred
to a Charitable Trust for the benefit of a Charitable
Beneficiary, as described in Section 6.2, effective as of
the close of business on the Business Day prior to the date of
such Transfer, and such Person shall acquire no rights in such
Shares; or
(ii) if the transfer to the Charitable Trust described in
clause (i) of this sentence would not be effective for any
reason to prevent the violation of Section 6.1.1(a)(i) or
(ii), then the Transfer of that number of Shares that otherwise
would cause any Person to violate Section 6.1.1(a)(i) or
(ii) shall be void ab initio, and the
intended transferee shall acquire no rights in such Shares.
Section 6.1.2 Remedies
for Breach. If the Board of Directors or its
designee (including any duly authorized committee of the Board)
shall at any time determine in good faith that a Transfer or
other event has taken place that results in a violation of
Section 6.1.1 or that a Person intends to acquire or has
attempted to acquire Beneficial or Constructive Ownership of any
Shares in violation of Section 6.1.1 (whether or not such
violation is intended), the Board of Directors or its designee
shall take such action as it deems advisable to refuse to give
effect to or to prevent such Transfer or other event, including,
without limitation, causing the Corporation to redeem Shares,
refusing to give effect to such Transfer on the books of the
Corporation or instituting proceedings to enjoin such Transfer
or other event; provided, however, that any Transfers or
attempted Transfers or other events in violation of
Section 6.1.1 shall automatically result in the transfer to
the Charitable Trust described above, and, where applicable,
such Transfer (or other event) shall be void ab
initio as provided above irrespective of any action (or
non-action) by the Board of Directors or its designee.
Section 6.1.3 Notice
of Restricted Transfer. Any Person who
acquires or attempts or intends to acquire Beneficial Ownership
or Constructive Ownership of Shares that will or may violate
Section 6.1.1(a), or any Person who would have owned Shares
that resulted in a transfer to the Charitable Trust pursuant to
the provisions of Section 6.1.1(b), shall immediately give
written notice to the Corporation of such event, or in the case
of such a proposed or attempted transaction, give at least
15 days prior written notice, and shall provide to the
Corporation such other information as the Corporation may
request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such
Transfer on the Corporations status as a REIT.
Section 6.1.4 Owners
Required To Provide Information. From the
Initial Date and prior to the Restriction Termination Date:
(a) every owner of more than five percent (or such lower
percentage as required by the Code or the Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder) of the outstanding Shares, within
30 days after the end of each taxable year, shall give
written notice to the Corporation stating the name and address
of such owner, the number of Shares and other
Shares Beneficially Owned and a description of the manner
in which such Shares are held. Each such owner shall provide to
the Corporation such additional information as the Corporation
may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such
Beneficial Ownership on the Corporations status as a REIT
and to ensure compliance with the Aggregate Share Ownership
Limit, the Common Share Ownership Limit and the other
restrictions set forth herein; and
(b) each Person who is a Beneficial or Constructive Owner
of Shares and each Person (including the stockholder of record)
who is holding Shares for a Beneficial or Constructive Owner
shall provide to the Corporation such information as the
Corporation may request, in good faith, in order to determine
the
A-14
Corporations status as a REIT and to comply with
requirements of any taxing authority or governmental authority
or to determine such compliance.
Section 6.1.5 Remedies
Not Limited. Subject to Section 7.10
hereof, nothing contained in this Section 6.1 shall limit
the authority of the Board of Directors to take such other
action as it deems necessary or advisable to protect the
Corporation and the interests of its Stockholders in preserving
the Corporations status as a REIT.
Section 6.1.6 Ambiguity. In
the case of an ambiguity in the application of any of the
provisions of this Section 6.1, Section 6.2 or any
definition contained in Article IV, the Board of Directors
shall have the power to determine the application of the
provisions of this Section 6.1 or Section 6.2 with
respect to any situation based on the facts known to it. In the
event Section 6.1 or 6.2 requires an action by the Board of
Directors and the Charter fails to provide specific guidance
with respect to such action, the Board of Directors shall have
the power to determine the action to be taken so long as such
action is not contrary to the provisions of Article IV or
Sections 6.1 or 6.2. Absent a decision to the contrary by
the Board of Directors (which the Board may make in its sole and
absolute discretion), if a Person would have (but for the
remedies set forth in Section 6.1.2) acquired Beneficial or
Constructive Ownership of Shares in violation of
Section 6.1.1, such remedies (as applicable) shall apply
first to the Shares which, but for such remedies, would have
been Beneficially Owned or Constructively Owned (but not
actually owned) by such Person, pro rata among the Persons who
actually own such Shares based upon the relative number of the
Shares held by each such Person.
Section 6.1.7 Exceptions.
(a) Subject to Section 6.1.1(a)(ii), the Board of
Directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt (prospectively or
retroactively) a Person from the Aggregate Share Ownership Limit
and the Common Share Ownership Limit, as the case may be, and
may establish or increase an Excepted Holder Limit for such
Person if:
(i) the Board of Directors obtains such representations and
undertakings from such Person as are reasonably necessary to
ascertain that no individuals Beneficial or Constructive
Ownership of such Shares will violate Section 6.1.1(a)(ii);
(ii) such Person does not and represents that it will not
own, actually or Constructively, an interest in a tenant of the
Corporation (or a tenant of any entity owned or controlled by
the Corporation) that would cause the Corporation to own,
actually or Constructively, more than a 9.9% interest (as set
forth in Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code) in such tenant
and the Board of Directors obtains such representations and
undertakings from such Person as are reasonably necessary to
ascertain this fact (for this purpose, a tenant from whom the
Corporation (or an entity owned or controlled by the
Corporation) derives (and is expected to continue to derive) a
sufficiently small amount of revenue such that, in the opinion
of the Board of Directors, rent from such tenant would not
adversely affect the Corporations ability to qualify as a
REIT, shall not be treated as a tenant of the
Corporation); and
(iii) such Person agrees that any violation or attempted
violation of such representations or undertakings (or other
action which is contrary to the restrictions contained in
Sections 6.1.1 through 6.1.6) will result in such Shares
being automatically transferred to a Charitable Trust in
accordance with Sections 6.1.1(b) and 6.2.
(b) Prior to granting any exception pursuant to
Section 6.1.7(a), the Board of Directors may require a
ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, or an opinion of
counsel, in either case in form and substance satisfactory to
the Board of Directors in its sole discretion, as it may deem
necessary or advisable in order to determine or ensure the
Corporations status as a REIT. Notwithstanding the receipt
of any ruling or opinion, the Board of Directors may impose such
conditions or restrictions as it deems appropriate in connection
with granting such exception.
(c) Subject to Section 6.1.1(a)(ii), an underwriter
which participates in a public offering or a private placement
of Shares (or securities convertible into or exchangeable for
Shares) may Beneficially Own or
A-15
Constructively Own Shares (or securities convertible into or
exchangeable for Shares) in excess of the Aggregate Share
Ownership Limit, the Common Share Ownership Limit or both such
limits, but only to the extent necessary to facilitate such
public offering or private placement.
(d) The Board of Directors may only reduce the Excepted
Holder Limit for an Excepted Holder: (1) with the written
consent of such Excepted Holder at any time, or
(2) pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements
and undertakings entered into with such Excepted Holder in
connection with the establishment of the Excepted Holder Limit
for that Excepted Holder. No Excepted Holder Limit shall be
reduced to a percentage that is less than the Common Share
Ownership Limit.
Section 6.1.8 Increase
in Aggregate Share Ownership and Common Share Ownership
Limits. Subject to Section 6.1.2(a)(ii),
the Board of Directors may from time to time increase the Common
Share Ownership Limit and the Aggregate Share Ownership Limit
for one or more Persons and decrease the Common Share Ownership
Limit and the Aggregate Share Ownership Limit for all other
Persons; provided, however, that the decreased Common
Share Ownership Limit
and/or
Aggregate Share Ownership Limit will not be effective for any
Person whose percentage ownership in Shares is in excess of such
decreased Common Share Ownership Limit
and/or
Aggregate Share Ownership Limit until such time as such
Persons percentage of Share equals or falls below the
decreased Common Share Ownership Limit
and/or
Aggregate Share Ownership Limit, but any further acquisition of
Shares in excess of such percentage ownership of Shares will be
in violation of the Common Share Ownership Limit
and/or
Aggregate Share Ownership Limit and, provided further,
that the new Common Share Ownership Limit
and/or
Aggregate Share Ownership Limit would not allow five or fewer
Persons to Beneficially Own more than 49.9% in value of the
outstanding Shares.
Section 6.1.9 Legend. Any
certificate representing Shares shall bear substantially the
following legend:
The Shares represented by this certificate are subject to
restrictions on Beneficial and Constructive Ownership and
Transfer for the purpose, among others, of the
Corporations maintenance of its status as a Real Estate
Investment Trust (a REIT) under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and for certain
other purposes under the Code and the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). Subject to
certain further restrictions and except as expressly provided in
the Corporations Charter, (i) no Person may
Beneficially or Constructively Own Common Shares of the
Corporation in excess of 9.8% (in value or number of Shares) of
the outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation unless such
Person is an Excepted Holder (in which case the Excepted Holder
Limit shall be applicable); (ii) no Person may Beneficially
or Constructively Own Shares of the Corporation in excess of
9.8% of the value of the total outstanding Shares of the
Corporation, unless such Person is an Excepted Holder (in which
case the Excepted Holder Limit shall be applicable);
(iii) no Person may Beneficially or Constructively Own
Shares that would result in the Corporation being closely
held under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise
cause the Corporation to fail to qualify as a REIT; (iv) no
Person may Transfer Shares if such Transfer would result in
Shares of the Corporation being owned by fewer than
100 Persons; and (v) Beneficially Own Shares of the
Corporation that would result in 25% or more of any class of
Shares of the Corporation being Beneficially Owned by one or
more ERISA Investors. Any Person who Beneficially or
Constructively Owns or attempts to Beneficially or
Constructively Own Shares which cause or will cause a Person to
Beneficially or Constructively Own Shares in excess or in
violation of the above limitations must immediately notify the
Corporation. If any of the restrictions on transfer or ownership
are violated, the Shares represented hereby will be
automatically transferred to a Charitable Trust for the benefit
of one or more Charitable Beneficiaries. In addition, the
Corporation may redeem Shares upon the terms and conditions
specified by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion if
the Board of Directors determines that ownership or a Transfer
or other event may violate the restrictions described above.
Furthermore, upon the occurrence of certain events, attempted
Transfers in violation of the restrictions described above may
be void ab initio. All capitalized terms in this
legend have the meanings defined in the Corporations
Charter, as the same may be amended from time to time, a copy of
which, including the restrictions on transfer and ownership,
will be furnished to each holder of Shares of the Corporation on
request and without charge. Requests for such a copy may be
directed to the Secretary of the Corporation at its principal
office.
A-16
Instead of the foregoing legend, the certificate may state that
the Corporation will furnish a full statement about certain
restrictions on transferability to a stockholder on request and
without charge. In the case of uncertificated Shares, the
Corporation will send the holder of such Shares a written
statement of the information otherwise required on certificates
upon request.
Section 6.2 Transfer
of Shares in Trust.
Section 6.2.1 Ownership
in Trust. Upon any purported Transfer or
other event described in Section 6.1.1(b) that would result
in a transfer of Shares to a Charitable Trust, such Shares shall
be deemed to have been transferred to the Charitable Trustee as
trustee of a Charitable Trust for the exclusive benefit of one
or more Charitable Beneficiaries. Such transfer to the
Charitable Trustee shall be deemed to be effective as of the
close of business on the Business Day prior to the purported
Transfer or other event that results in the transfer to the
Charitable Trust pursuant to Section 6.1.1(b). The
Charitable Trustee shall be appointed by the Corporation and
shall be a Person unaffiliated with the Corporation and any
Prohibited Owner. Each Charitable Beneficiary shall be
designated by the Corporation as provided in Section 6.2.6.
Section 6.2.2 Status
of Shares Held by the Charitable
Trustee. Shares held by the Charitable
Trustee shall continue to be issued and outstanding Shares of
the Corporation. The Prohibited Owner shall have no rights in
the Shares held by the Charitable Trustee. The Prohibited Owner
shall not benefit economically from ownership of any Shares held
in trust by the Charitable Trustee, shall have no rights to
dividends or other Distributions and shall not possess any
rights to vote or other rights attributable to the Shares held
in the Charitable Trust.
Section 6.2.3 Dividend
and Voting Rights. The Charitable Trustee
shall have all voting rights and rights to dividends or other
Distributions with respect to Shares held in the Charitable
Trust, which rights shall be exercised for the exclusive benefit
of the Charitable Beneficiary. Any dividend or other
Distribution paid prior to the discovery by the Corporation that
Shares have been transferred to the Charitable Trustee shall be
paid with respect to such Shares to the Charitable Trustee upon
demand and any dividend or other Distribution authorized but
unpaid shall be paid when due to the Charitable Trustee. Any
dividends or Distributions so paid over to the Charitable
Trustee shall be held in trust for the Charitable Beneficiary.
The Prohibited Owner shall have no voting rights with respect to
Shares held in the Charitable Trust and, subject to Maryland
law, effective as of the date that Shares have been transferred
to the Charitable Trustee, the Charitable Trustee shall have the
authority (at the Charitable Trustees sole discretion)
(i) to rescind as void any vote cast by a Prohibited Owner
prior to the discovery by the Corporation that Shares have been
transferred to the Charitable Trustee and (ii) to recast
such vote in accordance with the desires of the Charitable
Trustee acting for the benefit of the Charitable Beneficiary;
provided, however, that if the Corporation has already
taken irreversible corporate action, then the Charitable Trustee
shall not have the authority to rescind and recast such vote.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Article VI, until
the Corporation has received notification that Shares have been
transferred into a Charitable Trust, the Corporation shall be
entitled to rely on its share transfer and other stockholder
records for purposes of preparing lists of stockholders entitled
to vote at meetings, determining the validity and authority of
proxies and otherwise conducting votes of stockholders.
Section 6.2.4 Sale
of Shares by Charitable Trustee. Within
20 days of receiving notice from the Corporation that
Shares have been transferred to the Charitable Trust, the
Charitable Trustee shall sell the Shares held in the Charitable
Trust to a Person, designated by the Charitable Trustee, whose
ownership of the Shares will not violate the ownership
limitations set forth in Section 6.1.1(a). Upon such sale,
the interest of the Charitable Beneficiary in the Shares sold
shall terminate and the Charitable Trustee shall distribute the
net proceeds of the sale to the Prohibited Owner and to the
Charitable Beneficiary as provided in this Section 6.2.4.
The Prohibited Owner shall receive the lesser of (1) the
price paid by the Prohibited Owner for the Shares or, if the
Prohibited Owner did not give value for the Shares in connection
with the event causing the Shares to be held in the Charitable
Trust (e.g., in the case of a gift, devise or other such
transaction), the Market Price of the Shares on the day of the
event causing the Shares to be held in the Charitable Trust and
(2) the price per share received by the Charitable Trustee
(net of any commissions and other expenses of sale) from the
sale or other disposition of the Shares held in the Charitable
Trust. The Charitable Trustee may reduce the amount payable to
the Prohibited Owner by the amount of dividends and
Distributions which have been paid to the
A-17
Prohibited Owner and are owed by the Prohibited Owner to the
Charitable Trustee pursuant to Section 6.2.3 of this
Article VI. Any net sales proceeds in excess of the amount
payable to the Prohibited Owner shall be immediately paid to the
Charitable Beneficiary. If, prior to the discovery by the
Corporation that Shares have been transferred to the Charitable
Trustee, such Shares are sold by a Prohibited Owner, then
(i) such Shares shall be deemed to have been sold on behalf
of the Charitable Trust and (ii) to the extent that the
Prohibited Owner received an amount for such Shares that exceeds
the amount that such Prohibited Owner was entitled to receive
pursuant to this Section 6.2.4, such excess shall be paid
to the Charitable Trustee upon demand.
Section 6.2.5 Purchase
Right in Shares Transferred to the Charitable
Trustee. Shares transferred to the Charitable
Trustee shall be deemed to have been offered for sale to the
Corporation, or its designee, at a price per share equal to the
lesser of (i) the price per share in the transaction that
resulted in such transfer to the Charitable Trust (or, in the
case of a devise or gift, the Market Price at the time of such
devise or gift) and (ii) the Market Price on the date the
Corporation, or its designee, accepts such offer. The
Corporation may reduce the amount payable to the Prohibited
Owner by the amount of dividends and distributions which has
been paid to the Prohibited Owner and are owed by the Prohibited
Owner to the Charitable Trustee pursuant to Section 6.2.3
of this Article VI. The Corporation may pay the amount of
such reduction to the Charitable Trustee for the benefit of the
Charitable Beneficiary. The Corporation shall have the right to
accept such offer until the Charitable Trustee has sold the
Shares held in the Charitable Trust pursuant to
Section 6.2.4. Upon such a sale to the Corporation, the
interest of the Charitable Beneficiary in the Shares sold shall
terminate and the Charitable Trustee shall distribute the net
proceeds of the sale to the Prohibited Owner.
Section 6.2.6 Designation
of Charitable Beneficiaries. By written
notice to the Charitable Trustee, the Corporation shall
designate one or more nonprofit organizations to be the
Charitable Beneficiary of the interest in the Charitable Trust
such that (i) Shares held in the Charitable Trust would not
violate the restrictions set forth in Section 6.1.1(a) in
the hands of such Charitable Beneficiary and (ii) each such
organization must be described in Section 501(c)(3) of the
Code and contributions to each such organization must be
eligible for deduction under each of Sections 170(b)(1)(A),
2055 and 2522 of the Code.
Section 6.3. Restrictions
on Ownership and Transfer of Shares by Benefit Plans.
Section 6.3.1. Ownership
Limitations. Notwithstanding any other
provisions in the Charter, if and to the extent that any class
or series of Shares do not constitute publicly offered
securities (as defined in
Section 2510.3-101
of the Department of Labor regulations, or any successor
regulation thereto), then Benefit Plan Investors may not, on any
date, hold, individually or in the aggregate, 25% or more of the
value of such class or series of Shares. For purposes of
determining whether Benefit Plan Investors hold, individually or
in the aggregate, 25% or more of the value of such class or
series of Shares, the value of Shares of such class held by any
director or officer of the Corporation, or any other Person who
has discretionary authority or control with respect to the
assets of the Corporation, or the Advisor or its
affiliates, as defined in the Plan Asset Regulations,
shall be disregarded.
Section 6.3.2. Remedies
for Violations by Benefit Plan Investors. If
the Board or its designee (including any duly authorized
committee of the Board) shall at any time determine in good
faith that (a) a Transfer or other event has taken place
that results in a violation of Section 6.3.1 or will
otherwise result in the underlying assets and property of the
Corporation becoming assets of any ERISA Investor or
(b) that a Person intends to acquire or has attempted to
acquire or hold Shares in a manner that will result in a
violation of Section 6.3.1 or will otherwise result in the
underlying assets and property of the Corporation becoming
assets of any ERISA Investor, the Board of directors or its
designee shall take such action as it deems advisable to
mitigate, prevent or cure the consequences that might result to
the Corporation from such Transfer or other event, including,
without limitation, refusing to give effect to or preventing
such Transfer or event through redemption of such Shares or
refusal to give effect to the Transfer or event on the books of
the Corporation or instituting proceedings to enjoin such
Transfer or other event.
Section 6.3.3. Information
on Benefit Plan Status. Any Person who
acquires or attempts or intends to acquire or hold Shares shall
provide to the Corporation such information as the Corporation
may request in order to determine whether such acquisition or
holding has resulted or will result a in violation of
Section 6.3.1 or otherwise has resulted or will result in
the underlying assets and property of the Corporation becoming
A-18
assets of any ERISA Investor, including the name and address of
any Person for whom a nominee holds Shares and whether the
underlying assets of such Person include assets of any Benefit
Plan Investor.
Section 6.4 Settlement. Nothing
in this Article VI shall preclude the settlement of any
transaction entered into through the facilities of the NYSE or
any other national securities exchange or automated inter-dealer
quotation system. The fact that the settlement of any
transaction occurs shall not negate the effect of any other
provision of this Article VI and any transferee in such a
transaction shall be subject to all of the provisions and
limitations set forth in this Article VI.
Section 6.5 Enforcement. The
Corporation is authorized specifically to seek equitable relief,
including injunctive relief, to enforce the provisions of this
Article VI.
Section 6.6 Non-Waiver. No
delay or failure on the part of the Corporation or the Board of
Directors in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a
waiver of any right of the Corporation or the Board of
Directors, as the case may be, except to the extent specifically
waived in writing.
ARTICLE VII
PROVISIONS FOR DEFINING, LIMITING
AND REGULATING CERTAIN POWERS OF THE
CORPORATION AND OF THE STOCKHOLDERS AND DIRECTORS
Section 7.1 Number
of Directors. The business and affairs of the
Corporation shall be managed under the direction of the Board of
Directors. The number of Directors of the Corporation (the
Directors) shall
be fivesix, which number may be
increased or decreased from time to time pursuant to the Bylaws;
provided, however, that the total number of Directors
shall not be fewer than three nor more than 15. A majority of
the Board will be Independent Directors except for a period of
up to 60 days after the death, removal or resignation of an
Independent Director pending the election of such Independent
Directors successor. The names of the Directors
who shall serve until the first annual meeting of stockholders
and until their successors are duly elected and qualify
are:
Scott D. Peters
W. Bradley Blair, II
Maurice J. DeWald
Warren D. Fix
Gary T. Wescombe
These Directors may increase the number of Directors and
fill any vacancy, whether resulting from an increase in the
number of Directors or otherwise, on the Board of Directors
prior to the first annual meeting of Stockholders in the manner
provided in the Bylaws.
The Corporation elects, at such time as it becomes
eligible to make the election provided for under
Section 3-802(b)
of the MGCL, that, except as may be provided by the
Board of Directors in setting the terms of any class or series
of Shares, any and all vacancies on the Board of Directors may
be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
remaining Directors in office, even if the remaining Directors
do not constitute a quorum, and any Director elected to fill a
vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the full term of the
directorship in which such vacancy occurred. Notwithstanding the
foregoing sentence, Independent Directors shall nominate
replacements for vacancies among the Independent Directors
positions.
Section 7.2 Experience. Until
Listing, each Director shall have at least three years of
relevant experience demonstrating the knowledge and experience
required to successfully acquire and manage the type of assets
being acquired by the Corporation. and
at least one of the Independent Directors shall have three
years of relevant real estate experience.
Section 7.3 Committees. The
Board may establish such committees as it deems appropriate, in
its discretion, provided that the majority of the members of
each committee are Independent Directors.
A-19
Section 7.4 Term;
Current Board. Except as may otherwise be
provided in the terms of any Preferred Shares issued by the
Corporation, each Director shall hold office for one year, until
the next annual meeting of Stockholders and until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualifies. Directors may be
elected to an unlimited number of successive terms. The
names of the current Directors who shall serve until the next
annual meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are
duly elected and qualify are as follows:
Scott D. Peters
W. Bradley Blair, II
Maurice J. DeWald
Warren D. Fix
Larry L. Mathis
Gary T. Wescombe
Section 7.5 Fiduciary
Obligations. The Directors and the
Advisorofficers serve in a fiduciary capacity to
the Corporation and have a fiduciary duty to the Stockholders of
the Corporation, including, with respect to the
Directors, a specific fiduciary duty to supervise the
relationship of the Corporation with the Advisor.
Section 7.6 Extraordinary
Actions. Notwithstanding any provision of law
permitting or requiring any action to be taken or approved by
the affirmative vote of the holders of Shares entitled to cast a
greater number of votes, any such action shall be effective and
valid if declared advisable by the Board of Directors and taken
or approved by the affirmative vote of holders of Shares
entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast
on the matter.
Section 7.7 Authorization
by Board of Stock Issuance. The Board of
Directors may authorize the issuance from time to time of Shares
of any class or series, whether now or hereafter authorized, or
securities or rights convertible into Shares of any class or
series, whether now or hereafter authorized, for such
consideration as the Board of Directors may deem advisable (or
without consideration in the case of a stock split or stock
dividend), subject to such restrictions or limitations, if any,
as may be set forth in the Charter or the Bylaws.
Section 7.8 Preemptive
Rights and Appraisal Rights. Except as may be
provided by the Board of Directors in setting the terms of
classified or reclassified Shares pursuant to Section 5.4
or as may otherwise be provided by contract approved by the
Board of Directors, no holder of Shares shall, as such holder,
have any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any
additional Shares or any other security of the Corporation which
it may issue or sell. Holders of Shares shall not be entitled to
exercise any rights of an objecting stockholder provided for
under Title 3, Subtitle 2 of the MGCL or any successor
statute unless the Board of Directors, upon the affirmative vote
of a majority of the Board of Directors, shall determine that
such rights apply, with respect to all or any classes or series
of stock, to one or more transactions occurring after the date
of such determination in connection with which holders of such
Shares would otherwise be entitled to exercise such rights.
Section 7.9 Determinations
by Board. The determination as to any of the
following matters, made in good faith by or pursuant to the
direction of the Board of Directors consistent with the Charter,
shall be final and conclusive and shall be binding upon the
Corporation and every holder of Shares: the amount of the net
income of the Corporation for any period and the amount of
assets at any time legally available for the payment of
dividends, redemption of Shares or the payment of other
Distributions on Shares; the amount of paid-in surplus, net
assets, other surplus, annual or other cash flow, funds from
operations, net profit, net assets in excess of capital,
undivided profits or excess of profits over losses on sales of
assets; the amount, purpose, time of creation, increase or
decrease, alteration or cancellation of any reserves or charges
and the propriety thereof (whether or not any obligation or
liability for which such reserves or charges shall have been
created shall have been paid or discharged); any interpretation
of the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting
powers or rights, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or
Distributions, qualifications or terms or conditions of
redemption of any class or series of Shares; the fair value, or
any sale, bid or asked price to be applied in determining the
fair value, of any asset owned or held by the Corporation or any
Shares; the number of Shares of any class of the Corporation;
any matter relating to the acquisition, holding and disposition
of any assets by the Corporation; or any other matter relating
to the business and affairs of the
A-20
Corporation or required or permitted by applicable law, the
Charter or Bylaws or otherwise to be determined by the Board of
Directors.
Section 7.10 REIT
Qualification. If the Corporation
elects to qualify for federal income tax treatment as a REIT,
The Board of Directors shall use its reasonable best
efforts to take such actions as are necessary or appropriate to
preserve the status of the Corporation as a REIT; provided,
however, if the Board of Directors determines that it is no
longer in the best interests of the Corporation to continue to
be qualified as a REIT, the Board of Directors may revoke or
otherwise terminate the Corporations REIT election
pursuant to Section 856(g) of the Code. The Board of
Directors also may determine that compliance with any
restriction or limitation on stock ownership and transfers set
forth in Article VII is no longer required for REIT
qualification. No Director, officer, employee or agent of the
Corporation shall be liable for any act or omission resulting in
the loss of tax benefits under the Code, except to the extent
provided in Section 12.2 hereof.
Section 7.11 Resignation;
Removal of Directors. Any Director may
resign by delivering notice to the Board of Directors, effective
upon delivery to the Board of Directors of such notice or upon
any future date specified in the notice. Subject to the
rights of holders of one or more classes or series of Preferred
Shares to elect or remove one or more Directors, any Director,
or the entire Board of Directors, may be removed from office at
any time, but only by the affirmative vote of at least a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast generally in the
election of Directors.
Section 7.12
. Ratification
of
the
Third
Fourth Articles of Amendment and Restatement by
the Independent Directors. These
ThirdFourth Articles of Amendment and
Restatement
will behave been reviewed
and ratified by a majority of the Independent Directors at
or before the firsta meeting of the
Board of Directors consisting of a majority of Independent
Directors.
ARTICLE VIII
ADVISORFEES;
EXPENSES
Section 8.1 Appointment
and Initial Investment of
Advisor. The Board is
responsible for setting the general policies of the Corporation
and for the general supervision of its business conducted by
officers, agents, employees, advisors or independent contractors
of the Corporation. However, the Board is not required
personally to conduct the business of the Corporation, and it
may (but need not) appoint, employ or contract with any Person
(including a Person Affiliated with any Director) as an Advisor
and may grant or delegate such authority to the Advisor as the
Board may, in its sole discretion, deem necessary or desirable.
The term of retention of any Advisor shall not exceed one year,
although there is no limit to the number of times that a
particular Advisor may be retained. The Advisor or its
Affiliates have made an Initial Investment of (i) $2,000 in
the Corporation and (ii) $200,000 in the Operating
Partnership. The Advisor or any such Affiliate may not sell this
Initial Investment while the Advisor remains a Sponsor but may
transfer the initial investment to other Affiliates. The Advisor
has also been granted a subordinated participation interest in
the Operating Partnership in connection with its capital
contribution.
Section 8.2 Supervision
of
Advisor. The
Board shall evaluate the performance of the Advisor before
entering into or renewing an Advisory Agreement, and the
criteria used in such evaluation shall be reflected in the
minutes of the meetings of the Board. The Board may exercise
broad discretion in allowing the Advisor to administer and
regulate the operations of the Corporation, to act as agent for
the Corporation, to execute documents on behalf of the
Corporation and to make executive decisions that conform to
general policies and principles established by the Board. The
Board shall monitor the Advisor to assure that the
administrative procedures, operations and programs of the
Corporation are in the best interests of the Stockholders and
are fulfilled. The Independent Directors are responsible for
reviewing the fees and expenses of the Corporation at least
annually or with sufficient frequency to determine that the
expenses incurred are reasonable in light of the investment
performance of the Corporation, its Net Assets, its Net Income
and the fees and expenses of other comparable unaffiliated
REITs. Each such determination shall be reflected in the minutes
of the meetings of the Board. The Independent Directors also
will be responsible for reviewing, from time to time and at
least annually, the performance of the Advisor and determining
that compensation to be paid to the Advisor is
A-21
reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of
services performed and the investment performance of the
Corporation and that the provisions of the Advisory Agreement
are being carried out. Specifically, the Independent Directors
will consider factors such as (i) the amount of the fee
paid to the Advisor in relation to the size, composition and
performance of the Assets, (ii) the success of the Advisor
in generating opportunities that meet the investment objectives
of the Corporation, (iii) rates charged to other REITs and
to investors other than REITs by advisors performing the same or
similar services, (iv) additional revenues realized by the
Advisor and its Affiliates through their relationship with the
Corporation, including loan administration, underwriting or
broker commissions, servicing, engineering, inspection and other
fees, whether paid by the Corporation or by others with whom the
Corporation does business, (v) the quality and extent of
service and advice furnished by the Advisor, (vi) the
performance of the Assets, including income, conservation or
appreciation of capital, frequency of problem investments and
competence in dealing with distress situations, and
(vii) the quality of the Assets relative to the investments
generated by the Advisor for its own account. The Independent
Directors may also consider all other factors that it deems
relevant, and the findings of the Independent Directors on each
of the factors considered shall be recorded in the minutes of
the Board. The Board shall determine whether any successor
Advisor possesses sufficient qualifications to perform the
advisory function for the Corporation and whether the
compensation provided for in its contract with the Corporation
is justified.
Section 8.3 Fiduciary
Obligations. The
Advisor shall have a fiduciary responsibility and duty to the
Corporation and to the Stockholders.
Section 8.4 Affiliation
and
Functions. The
Board, by resolution or in the Bylaws, may provide guidelines,
provisions or requirements concerning the affiliation and
functions of the Advisor.
Section 8.5 Termination. Either
a majority of the Independent Directors or the Advisor may
terminate the Advisory Agreement on 60 days written
notice without cause or penalty, and, in such event, the Advisor
will cooperate with the Corporation and the Board in making an
orderly transition of the advisory function.
Section 8.6 Disposition
Fees on Sale of
Property. Unless
otherwise provided in any resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors, the Corporation may pay the Advisor a disposition fee
upon the Sale of one or more Properties, in an amount equal to
the lesser of (i) one-half of the Competitive Real Estate
Commission, or (ii) three percent of the contracted for
sales price of such Property or Properties. Payment of such fee
may be made only if the Advisor provides a substantial amount of
services in connection with the Sale of a Property or
Properties, as determined by a majority of the Independent
Directors. In addition, the amount paid when added to all other
real estate commissions paid to unaffiliated parties in
connection with such Sale shall not exceed the lesser of the
Competitive Real Estate Commission or an amount equal to six
percent of the contracted for sales price of such Property or
Properties.
Section 8.78.1 Incentive
Fees. Unless otherwise provided in
any resolution adopted by the Board of Directors, The
Corporation may pay the Advisorany Person
an interest in the gain from the Sale of Assets, for which
full consideration is not paid in cash or property of equivalent
value, provided the amount or percentage of such interest is
reasonable. Such an interest in gain from the Sale of Assets
shall be considered presumptively reasonable prior to Listing
if it does not exceed 15% of the balance of such net
proceeds remaining after payment to Stockholders, in the
aggregate, of an amount equal to 100% of the Invested Capital,
plus an amount equal to at least six percent (6%)
of the Invested Capital per annum cumulative.
In The casepayment of
Incentive Fees to multipleAdvisors, such Advisor
and any of their AffiliatesPersons shall be
allowed such feesprovided that such fees
are distributed by a proportional method reasonably designed to
reflect the value added to the Corporations assets by each
respective Advisor or any
AffiliatePerson.
Section 8.88.2 Organizational
and Offering Expenses
Limitation. Unless otherwise provided
in any resolution adopted by the Board of Directors, the
Corporation shall reimburse the Advisor and its Affiliates for
Organizational and Offering Expenses incurred by the Advisor or
its Affiliates; provided, however, that The
total amount of all Organizational and Offering Expenses shall
be reasonable and shall in no event prior to Listing
exceed 15% of the Gross Proceeds of each Offering.
A-22
Section 8.9 Acquisition
Fees. Unless
otherwise provided in any resolution adopted by the Board of
Directors, the Corporation may pay the Advisor and its
Affiliates fees for the review and evaluation of potential
investments in Assets; provided, however, that the total of all
Acquisition Fees and Acquisition Expenses shall be reasonable,
and shall not exceed an amount equal to six percent of the
Contract Purchase Price, or, in the case of a Mortgage, six
percent of the funds advanced; provided, further, that a
majority of the Directors (including a majority of the
Independent Directors) not otherwise interested in the
transaction may approve fees and expenses in excess of this
limit if they determine the transaction to be commercially
competitive, fair and reasonable to the Corporation.
Section 8.108.3 Reimbursement
for Total Operating
Expenses. Unless otherwise provided in
any resolution adopted by the Board of Directors, the
Corporation may reimburse the Advisor, at the end of each fiscal
quarter, forPrior to Listing, the
Corporations Total Operating Expenses
incurred by the Advisor; provided, however, that
the Corporation shall not reimburse the Advisor at the end of
any fiscal quarter for Total Operating Expenses that, in
theduring anyfour consecutive fiscal quarters
then ended,shall not exceed the greater
of two percent2% of Average Invested
Assets or 25% of Net Income (the 2%/25% Guidelines)
for such year. The Independent Directors shall have the
responsibility of limiting Total Operating Expenses to amounts
that do not exceed the 2%/25% Guidelines unless they have made a
finding that, based on such unusual and non-recurring factors
that they deem sufficient, a higher level of expenses (an
Excess Amount) is justified. Within 60 days
after the end of any fiscal quarter of the Corporation for which
there is an Excess Amount which the Independent Directors
conclude was justified and reimbursable to the
Advisor, there shall be sent to the Stockholders a
written disclosure of such fact, together with an explanation of
the factors the Independent Directors considered in determining
that such Excess Amount was justified. Any such finding and the
reasons in support thereof shall be reflected in the minutes of
the meetings of the Board. In the event that the
Independent Directors do not determine that excess expenses are
justified, the Advisor shall reimburse the Corporation the
amount by which the expenses exceeded the 2%/25%
Guidelines.
Section 8.11 Reimbursement
Limitation. The
Corporation shall not reimburse the Advisor or its Affiliates
for services for which the Advisor or its Affiliates are
entitled to compensation in the form of a separate fee.
Section 8.4 Acquisition
Fees and Expenses. The total of all
Acquisition Fees and Acquisition Expenses shall be reasonable,
and prior to Listing shall not exceed an amount equal to 6% of
the Contract Purchase Price, or, in the case of a Mortgage, 6%
of the funds advanced; provided, further, that a majority
of the Directors (including a majority of the Independent
Directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction may
approve fees and expenses in excess of this limit if they
determine the transaction to be commercially competitive, fair
and reasonable to the Corporation.
Section 8.5 Total
Fees and Expenses. The Independent
Directors are responsible for reviewing the fees and expenses of
the Corporation at least annually or with sufficient frequency
to determine that the expenses incurred are reasonable in light
of the investment performance of the Corporation, its Net
Assets, its Net Income and the fees and expenses of other
comparable unaffiliated REITs. Each such determination shall be
reflected in the minutes of the meetings of the Board.
ARTICLE IX
INVESTMENT
POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS
Section 9.1 Review
of Investment Policies. The Independent
Directors shall review the investment policies of the
Corporation with sufficient frequency (not less often than
annually) to determine that the policies being followed by the
Corporation are in the best interests of its Stockholders. Each
such determination and the basis therefor shall be set forth in
the minutes of the meetings of the Board.
Section 9.2 Certain
Permitted Investments. Until such
time as the Common Shares are ListedListing, the
following investment limitations shall apply:
(a) The Corporation may invest in Assets, as defined in
Article IV hereof.
A-23
(b) The Corporation may invest in Joint Ventures with
the Sponsor, Advisor, one or more Directors or
any Affiliate, only if a majority of Directors (including a
majority of Independent Directors) not otherwise interested in
the transaction, approve such investment as being fair and
reasonable to the Corporation and on substantially the same
terms and conditions as those received by the other joint
venturers.
(c) Subject to any limitations in Section 9.3, the
Corporation may invest in equity securities only if a majority
of Directors (including a majority of Independent Directors) not
otherwise interested in the transaction approve such investment
as being fair, competitive and commercially reasonable.
Section 9.3 Investment
Limitations. Until such time as the
Common Shares are ListedListing, the following
investment limitations shall apply. In addition to other
investment restrictions imposed by the Board from time to time,
consistent with the Corporations objective of qualifying
as a REIT, the following shall apply to the Corporations
investments:
(a) Not more than ten percent of the Corporations
total assets shall be invested in Unimproved Real Property or
mortgage loans on Unimproved Real Property.
(b) The Corporation shall not invest in commodities or
commodity future contracts. This limitation is not intended to
apply to futures contracts, when used solely for hedging
purposes in connection with the Corporations ordinary
business of investing in real estate assets and mortgages.
(c) The Corporation shall not invest in or make any
Mortgage unless an appraisal is obtained concerning the
underlying property except for those loans insured or guaranteed
by a government or government agency. In cases in which a
majority of Independent Directors so determine, and in all cases
in which the transaction is with the Advisor,
Sponsorofficers, Directors, or
any Affiliates thereof, such appraisal of the underlying
property must be obtained from an Independent Appraiser. Such
appraisal shall be maintained in the Corporations records
for at least five years and shall be available for inspection
and duplication by any Stockholder for a reasonable charge. In
addition to the appraisal, a mortgagees or owners
title insurance policy or commitment as to the priority of the
mortgage or condition of the title must be obtained.
(d) The Corporation shall not make or invest in any
Mortgage, including a construction loan, on any one property if
the aggregate amount of all mortgage loans outstanding on the
property, including the loans of the Corporation, would exceed
an amount equal to 85% of the appraised value of the property as
determined by appraisal unless substantial justification exists
because of the presence of other underwriting criteria. For
purposes of this subsection, the aggregate amount of all
mortgage loans outstanding on the property, including the loans
of the Corporation shall include all interest (excluding
contingent participation in income
and/or
appreciation in value of the mortgaged property), the current
payment of which may be deferred pursuant to the terms of such
loans, to the extent that deferred interest on each loan exceeds
five percent per annum of the principal balance of the loan.
(e) The Corporation shall not invest in indebtedness
secured by a mortgage on real property which is subordinate to
the lien or other indebtedness of the Advisor,
any officer, Director, the Sponsor
orany Affiliate of the Corporation.
(f) The Corporation shall not issue (A) equity
Securities redeemable solely at the option of the holder (except
that Stockholders may offer their Common Shares to the
Corporation pursuant to any repurchase plan adopted by the Board
on terms outlined in the Prospectus relating to any Offering, as
such plan is thereafter amended in accordance with its terms);
(B) debt Securities unless the historical debt service
coverage (in the most recently completed fiscal year) as
adjusted for known changes is sufficient to properly service
that higher level of debt; (C) equity Securities on a
deferred payment basis or under similar arrangements; or
(D) options or warrants to the
Advisor,officers, the Directors,
Sponsor or any Affiliate thereof except on the same
terms as such options or warrants are sold to the general
public. Options or warrants may be issued to Persons other than
the Advisor,officers, the
Directors, Sponsor or any Affiliate
thereof, but not at exercise prices less than the fair market
value of the underlying Securities on the date of grant and not
for consideration (which may include services) that in
A-24
the judgment of the Independent Directors has a market value
less than the value of such option or warrant on the date of
grant. Options or warrants issuable to the
Advisor,officers, the Directors,
Sponsor or any Affiliate thereof shall not
exceed ten percent of the outstanding Shares on the date of
grant. The voting rights per Share (other than any publicly held
Share) sold in a private offering shall not exceed the voting
rights which bear the same relationship to the voting rights of
a publicly held Share as the consideration paid to the
Corporation for each privately offered Share bears to the book
value of each outstanding publicly held Share.
(g) A majority of the Directors or of the members of a duly
authorized committee of the Board of Directors shall authorize
the consideration to be paid for each Asset, ordinarily based on
the fair market value of the Asset. If a majority of the
Independent Directors on the Board of Directors or such duly
authorized committee determine, or if the Asset is acquired from
the Advisoran officer, a
Director, the Sponsor or their Affiliates, such
fair market value shall be determined by a qualified Independent
Appraiser selected by such Independent Directors.
(h) The aggregate Leverage shall be reasonable in relation
to the Net Assets and shall be reviewed by the Board at least
quarterly. The maximum amount of such Leverage in relation to
Net Assets shall not exceed 300%. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Leverage may exceed such limit if any excess in borrowing over
such level is approved by a majority of the Independent
Directors. Any such excess borrowing shall be disclosed to
Stockholders in the next quarterly report of the Corporation
following such borrowing, along with justification for such
excess.
(i) The Corporation will continually review its investment
activity to attempt to ensure that it is not classified as an
investment company under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended.
(j) The Corporation will not make any investment that the
Corporation believes will be inconsistent with
itsobjectives of qualifying andobjective of
remaining qualified as a REIT unless and until the Board
determines, in its sole discretion, that REIT qualification is
not in the best interests of the Corporation.
(k) The Corporation shall not invest in real estate
contracts of sale unless such contracts of sale are in
recordable form and appropriately recorded in the chain of title.
(l) The Corporation shall not engage in the business of
underwriting or the agency distribution of securities issued by
other Persons.
ARTICLE X
CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
Section 10.1 Sales
and Leases to Corporation. The Corporation
may purchase or lease an Asset or Assets from the
Sponsor, the Advisoran officer, a Director or
any Affiliate thereof upon a finding by a majority of Directors
(including a majority of Independent Directors) not otherwise
interested in the transaction that such transaction is fair and
reasonable to the Corporation and at a price to the Corporation
no greater than the cost of the Asset to such Sponsor,
Advisorofficer, Director or Affiliate, or, if
the price to the Corporation is in excess of such cost, that
substantial justification for such excess exists and such excess
is reasonable. In no event shall the purchase price of any
Property to the Corporation exceed its current appraised value.
Section 10.2 Sales
and Leases to the Sponsor,
AdvisorOfficers, Directors or
Affiliates. An Advisor,
Sponsorofficer, Director or Affiliate thereof
may purchase or lease Assets from the Corporation if a majority
of Directors (including a majority of Independent Directors) not
otherwise interested in the transaction determine that the
transaction is fair and reasonable to the Corporation. In no
event shall the purchase price of any Property purchased from
the Corporation by an Advisor,
Sponsorofficer, Director or Affiliate thereof be
less than its current appraised value.
A-25
Section 10.3 Other
Transactions.
(a) The Corporation shall not engage in any other
transaction with the Sponsor, the Advisoran
officer, a Director or any Affiliates thereof unless a
majority of the Directors (including a majority of the
Independent Directors) not otherwise interested in such
transaction approve such transaction as fair and reasonable to
the Corporation and on terms and conditions not less favorable
to the Corporation than those available from unaffiliated third
parties.
(b) The Corporation shall not make loans to the
Sponsor, the Advisoran officer, a Director or
any Affiliates thereof except Mortgages pursuant to
Section 9.3(c) hereof or loans to wholly owned subsidiaries
of the Corporation. The Sponsor,
Advisor,officers, the Directors and any
Affiliates thereof shall not make loans to the Corporation, or
to joint ventures in which the Corporation is a co-venturer,
unless approved by a majority of the Directors (including a
majority of the Independent Directors) not otherwise interested
in such transaction as fair, competitive, and commercially
reasonable, and no less favorable to the Corporation than
comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.
ARTICLE XI
STOCKHOLDERS
Section 11.1 Meetings. There
shall be an annual meeting of the Stockholders, to be held on
such date and at such time and place as shall be determined by
or in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws, at which the
Directors shall be elected and any other proper business may be
conducted; provided that such annual meeting will be held upon
reasonable notice and within a reasonable period (not less than
30 days) following delivery of the annual report. The
holders of a majority of Shares entitled to vote who are present
in person or by proxy at an annual meeting at which a quorum is
present, may, without the necessity for concurrence by the
Board, vote to elect the Directors. A quorum shall be 50% of the
then outstanding Shares entitled to vote. Special meetings of
Stockholders may be called in the manner provided in the Bylaws,
including by the president or by a majority of the Directors or
a majority of the Independent Directors, and prior to Listing
shall be called by an officer of the Corporation upon
written request of Stockholders holding in the aggregate not
less than ten percent of the outstanding Shares entitled to be
voted on any issue proposed to be considered at any such special
meeting. Notice of any special meeting of Stockholders shall be
given as provided in the Bylaws, and the special meeting shall
be held not less than 15 days nor more than 60 days
after the delivery of such notice. If the meeting is called by
written request of Stockholders as described in this
Section 11.1, the special meeting shall be held at the time
and place specified in the Stockholder request; provided,
however, that if none is so specified, at such time and
place convenient to the Stockholders. If there are no Directors,
the officers of the Corporation shall promptly call a special
meeting of the Stockholders entitled to vote for the election of
successor Directors. Any meeting may be adjourned and reconvened
as the Board may determine or as otherwise provided in the
Bylaws.
Section 11.2 Voting
Rights of Stockholders. Subject to the
provisions of any class or series of Shares then outstanding and
the mandatory provisions of any applicable laws or regulations,
the Stockholders shall be entitled to vote only on the following
matters: (a) election or removal of Directors, without the
necessity for concurrence by the Board, as provided in
Sections 11.1, 7.4 and 7.11 hereof; (b) amendment of
the Charter as provided in Article XIII hereof, without the
necessity for the concurrence by the Board; (c) liquidation
or dissolution of the Corporation, without the necessity for the
concurrence by the Board; (d) merger or consolidation of
the Corporation, or the sale or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the Corporations assets; and
(e) such other matters with respect to which the Board of
Directors has adopted a resolution declaring that a proposed
action is advisable and directing that the matter be submitted
to the Stockholders for approval or ratification. Except with
respect to the foregoing matters, no action taken by the
Stockholders at any meeting shall in any way bind the Board.
Without the approval of a majority of the Shares entitled to
vote on the matter, the Board may not prior to Listing
(i) amend the Charter to materially and adversely
affect the rights, preferences and privileges of the
Stockholders; (ii) amend provisions of the Charter relating
to director qualifications, fiduciary duties, liability and
indemnification, conflicts of interest, investment policies or
investment restrictions; (iii) liquidate or dissolve the
Corporation other than before the initial investment in
A-26
property; (iv) sell all or substantially all of the
Corporations assets other than in the ordinary course of
business; or (v) cause the merger or reorganization of the
Corporation.
Section 11.3 Voting
Limitations on Shares Held by the Advisor,
Directors and
Affiliates. With respect to Shares owned by
the Advisor, any Director, or
any of their Affiliates, neither the Advisor, nor
such Director(s), nor any of their
Affiliates may prior to Listing vote or consent on
matters submitted to the Stockholders regarding the removal of
the Advisor,such Director(s) or any of their
Affiliates or any transaction between the Corporation and any of
them. In determining the requisite percentage in interest of
Shares necessary to approve a matter on which the
Advisor, such Director(s) and any of their Affiliates
may not vote or consent, any Shares owned by any of them shall
not be included.
Section 11.4 Right
of Inspection. Any Stockholder and any
designated representative thereof shall be permitted access to
the records of the Corporation to which it is entitled under
applicable law at all reasonable times, and may inspect and copy
any of them for a reasonable charge. Inspection of the
Corporations books and records by the office or agency
administering the securities laws of a jurisdiction shall be
provided upon reasonable notice and during normal business hours.
Section 11.5 Access
to Stockholder List. An alphabetical list of
the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the Stockholders,
along with the number of Shares held by each of them (the
Stockholder List), shall be maintained as part of
the books and records of the Corporation and prior to Listing
shall be available for inspection by any Stockholder or the
Stockholders designated agent at the home office of the
Corporation upon the request of the Stockholder. The Stockholder
List shall be updated at least quarterly to reflect changes in
the information contained therein. A copy of such list shall be
mailed to any Stockholder so requesting within ten days of
receipt by the Corporation of the request. The copy of the
Stockholder List shall be printed in alphabetical order, on
white paper, and in a readily readable type size (in no event
smaller than ten-point type). The Corporation may impose a
reasonable charge for expenses incurred in reproduction pursuant
to the Stockholder request. A Stockholder may request a copy of
the Stockholder List in connection with matters relating to
Stockholders voting rights, and the exercise of
Stockholder rights under federal proxy laws.
If the Advisoran officer or the Board
neglects or refuses to exhibit, produce or mail a copy of the
Stockholder List as requested, the
Advisorofficer and/or the Board, as the
case may be, shall be liable to any Stockholder requesting the
list for the costs, including reasonable attorneys fees,
incurred by that Stockholder for compelling the production of
the Stockholder List, and for actual damages suffered by any
Stockholder by reason of such refusal or neglect. It shall be a
defense that the actual purpose and reason for the requests for
inspection or for a copy of the Stockholder List is to secure
such list of Stockholders or other information for the purpose
of selling such list or copies thereof, or of using the same for
a commercial purpose other than in the interest of the applicant
as a Stockholder relative to the affairs of the Corporation. The
Corporation may require the Stockholder requesting the
Stockholder List to represent that the list is not requested for
a commercial purpose unrelated to the Stockholders
interest in the Corporation. The remedies provided hereunder to
Stockholders requesting copies of the Stockholder List are in
addition, to and shall not in any way limit, other remedies
available to Stockholders under federal law, or the laws of any
state.
Section 11.6 Reports. Prior
to Listing, the Directors, including the Independent
Directors, shall take reasonable steps
toinsureensure that the Corporation
shall cause to be prepared and mailed or delivered to each
Stockholder as of a record date after the end of the fiscal year
and each holder of other publicly held Securities within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which it
relates an annual report for each fiscal year ending
after the Commencement of the Initial Public Offering
that shall include: (i) financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles which are audited and reported on by independent
certified public accountants; (ii) the ratio of the costs
of raising capital during the period to the capital raised;
(iii) the aggregate amount of advisory fees and the
aggregate amount of other fees paid to the Advisor and any
Affiliate of the Advisor by the Corporation and including fees
or charges paid to the Advisor and any Affiliate of the Advisor
by third parties doing business with the Corporation;
(iv) the Total Operating Expenses of the
Corporation, stated as a percentage of Average Invested Assets
and as a percentage of its Net Income;
(viv) a report from the Independent
Directors that the policies being followed by the Corporation
are in the best interests of its Stockholders and the basis for
such determination; and (viv) separately
stated, full
A-27
disclosure of all material terms, factors and circumstances
surrounding any and all transactions involving the Corporation,
Directors, Advisors, Sponsorsofficers
and any Affiliate thereof occurring in the year for which
the annual report is made, and the Independent Directors shall
be specifically charged with a duty to examine and comment in
the report on the fairness of such transactions.
Section 11.7 Tender
Offers. If any Person makes a tender
offer, including, without limitation, a mini-tender
offer, such Person must comply with all of the provisions set
forth in Regulation 14D of the Exchange Act, including,
without limitation, disclosure and notice requirements, that
would be applicable if the tender offer was for more than five
percent of the outstanding Shares; provided, however,
that, unless otherwise required by the Exchange Act, such
documents are not required to be filed with the SEC. In
addition, any such Person must provide notice to the Corporation
at least ten business days prior to initiating any such tender
offer. If any Person initiates a tender offer without complying
with the provisions set forth above (a Non-Compliant
Tender Offer), the Corporation, in its sole discretion,
shall have the right to redeem such non-compliant Persons
Shares and any Shares acquired in such tender offer
(collectively, the Tendered Shares) at the lesser of
(i) the price then being paid per Share of Common Stock
purchased in the Corporations latest Offering at full
purchase price (not discounted for commission reductions or for
reductions in sale price permitted pursuant to the Reinvestment
Plan), (ii) the fair market value of the Shares as
determined by an independent valuation obtained by the
Corporation or (iii) the lowest tender offer price offered
in such Non-Compliant Tender Offer. The Corporation may purchase
such Tendered Shares upon delivery of the purchase price to the
Person initiating such Non-Compliant Tender Offer and, upon such
delivery, the Corporation may instruct any transfer agent to
transfer such purchased Shares to the Corporation. In addition,
any Person who makes a Non-Compliant Tender Offer shall be
responsible for all expenses incurred by the Corporation in
connection with the enforcement of the provisions of this
Section 11.7, including, without limitation, expenses
incurred in connection with the review of all documents related
to such tender offer and expenses incurred in connection with
any purchase of Tendered Shares by the Corporation. The
Corporation maintains the right to offset any such expenses
against the dollar amount to be paid by the Corporation for the
purchase of Tendered Shares pursuant to this Section 11.7.
In addition to the remedies provided herein, the Corporation may
seek injunctive relief, including, without limitation, a
temporary or permanent restraining order, in connection with any
Non-Compliant Tender Offer. This Section 11.7 shall be of
no force or effect with respect to any Shares that are then
Listed.
ARTICLE XII
LIABILITY
LIMITATION AND INDEMNIFICATION
Section 12.1 Limitation
of Stockholder Liability. No Stockholder
shall be liable for any debt, claim, demand, judgment or
obligation of any kind of, against or with respect to the
Corporation by reason of his being a Stockholder, nor shall any
Stockholder be subject to any personal liability whatsoever, in
tort, contract or otherwise, to any Person in connection with
the Corporations assets or the affairs of the Corporation
by reason of his being a Stockholder.
Section 12.2 Limitation
of Director and Officer Liability;
Indemnification.
(a) Subject to the conditions set forth under Maryland law
or in paragraph (c) or (d) below, no Director or
officer of the Corporation shall be liable to the Corporation or
its Stockholders for money damages. Neither the amendment nor
repeal of this Section 12.2(a), nor the adoption or
amendment of any other provision of the Charter or Bylaws
inconsistent with this Section 12.2(a), shall apply to or
affect in any respect the applicability of the preceding
sentence with respect to any act or failure to act which
occurred prior to such amendment, repeal or adoption.
(b) Subject to the conditions set forth under Maryland law
or in paragraph (c) or (d) below, the Corporation
shall indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary
determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification,
pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final
disposition of a proceeding to (i) any individual who is a
present or former Director or officer of the Corporation and who
is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by
reason of his or her service in that capacity,
or (ii) any
A-28
individual who, while a Director or officer of the Corporation
and at the request of the Corporation, serves or has served as a
director, officer, partner or trustee of such corporation, real
estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise and who is made or
threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his
or her service in that capacity or (iii) the
Advisor of any of its Affiliates acting as an agent of the
Corporation. The Corporation may, with the approval of
the Board of Directors or any duly authorized committee thereof,
provide such indemnification and advance for expenses to a
Person who served a predecessor of the Corporation in any of the
capacities described in (i) or (ii) above and to any
employee or agent of the Corporation or a predecessor of the
Corporation. The Board may take such action as is necessary to
carry out this Section 12.2(b). No amendment of the Charter
or repeal of any of its provisions shall limit or eliminate the
right of indemnification provided hereunder with respect to acts
or omissions occurring prior to such amendment or repeal.
(c) Prior to Listing, notwithstanding anything to
the contrary contained in paragraph (a) or (b) above,
the Corporation shall not provide for indemnification of a
Director, the Advisor or any Affiliate of the
Advisor (the Indemnitee) for any liability
or loss suffered by any of themhim or her
and the Corporation shall not provide that an Indemnitee be
held harmless for any loss or liability suffered by the
Corporation, unless all of the following conditions are met:
(i) The Indemnitee has determined, in good faith, that the
course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in the
best interests of the Corporation;
(ii) The Indemnitee was acting on behalf of or performing
services for the Corporation;
(iii) Such liability or loss was not the result of
(A) negligence or misconduct, in the case that the
Indemnitee is a Director (other than an Independent
Director), the Advisor or an Affiliate of the
Advisor or (B) gross negligence or willful
misconduct, in the case that the Indemnitee is an Independent
Director; and
(iv) Such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is
recoverable only out of Net Assets and not from the Stockholders.
(d) Prior to Listing, notwithstanding anything to
the contrary contained in paragraph (a) or (b) above,
the Corporation shall not provide indemnification for any loss,
liability or expense arising from or out of an alleged violation
of federal or state securities laws by such party unless one or
more of the following conditions are met: (i) there has
been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count
involving alleged material securities law violations as to the
Indemnitee, (ii) such claims have been dismissed with
prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction as
to the Indemnitee; or (iii) a court of competent
jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against the
Indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and
the related costs should be made, and the court considering the
request for indemnification has been advised of the position of
the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC
and of the published position of any state securities
regulatory authority in which Securities were offered or sold as
to indemnification for violations of securities laws.
Section 12.3 Payment
of Expenses. Prior to Listing, the
Corporation shall pay or reimburse reasonable legal expenses and
other costs incurred by an Indemnitee in advance of final
disposition of a proceeding only if all of the following
are satisfied: (i) the proceeding relates to acts or
omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services
on behalf of the Corporation, (ii) the Indemnitee provides
the Corporation with written affirmation of the
Indemnitees good faith belief that the Indemnitee has met
the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the
Corporation as authorized by Section 12.2 hereof,
(iii) the legal proceeding was initiated by a third party
who is not a Stockholder or, if by a Stockholder of the
Corporation acting in his or her capacity as such, a court of
competent jurisdiction approves such advancement, and
(iv) the Indemnitee provides the Corporation with a written
agreement to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the
Corporation, together with the applicable legal rate of interest
thereon, if it is ultimately determined that the Indemnitee did
not comply with the requisite standard of conduct and is not
entitled to indemnification. Any indemnification payment
or reimbursement of expenses will be furnished in accordance
with the procedures in
Section 2-418(e)
of the MGCL or any successor statute.
A-29
Section 12.4 Express
Exculpatory Clauses in Instruments. Neither
the Stockholders nor the Directors, officers, employees or
agents of the Corporation shall be liable under any written
instrument creating an obligation of the Corporation by reason
of their being Stockholders, Directors, officers, employees or
agents of the Corporation, and all Persons shall look solely to
the Corporations assets for the payment of any claim under
or for the performance of that instrument. The omission of the
foregoing exculpatory language from any instrument shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of such instrument and
shall not render any Stockholder, Director, officer, employee or
agent liable thereunder to any third party, nor shall the
Directors or any officer, employee or agent of the Corporation
be liable to anyone as a result of such omission.
ARTICLE XIII
AMENDMENTS
The Corporation reserves the right from time to time to make any
amendment to the Charter, now or hereafter authorized by law,
including any amendment altering the terms or contract rights,
as expressly set forth in the Charter, of any Shares. All rights
and powers conferred by the Charter on Stockholders, Directors
and officers are granted subject to this reservation. Except for
those amendments permitted to be made without Stockholder
approval under Maryland law or by specific provision in the
Charter, any amendment to the Charter shall be valid only if
approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes
entitled to be cast on the matter, including without limitation,
(1) any amendment which would adversely affect the rights,
preferences and privileges of the Stockholders and (2) any
amendment to Sections 7.2, 7.5 and 7.11 of
Article VII, Article IX, Article X,
Article XII and Article XIV hereof and this
Article XIII (or any other amendment of the Charter that
would have the effect of amending such sections).
ARTICLE XIV
ROLL-UP
TRANSACTIONS
In connection with any proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction prior to Listing, an appraisal of all of the
Corporations assets shall be obtained from a competent
Independent Appraiser. The Corporations assets shall be
appraised on a consistent basis, and the appraisal shall be
based on the evaluation of all relevant information and shall
indicate the value of the assets as of a date immediately prior
to the announcement of the proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction. The appraisal shall assume an orderly liquidation
of the assets over a twelve-month period. The terms of the
engagement of the Independent Appraiser shall clearly state that
the engagement is for the benefit of the Corporation and the
Stockholders. A summary of the appraisal, indicating all
material assumptions underlying the appraisal, shall be included
in a report to Stockholders in connection with a proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction. If the appraisal will be included in a
Prospectus used to offer securities of the
Roll-Up
Entity, the appraisal shall be filed with the SEC and the states
as an exhibit to the registration statement. In connection
with a proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction prior to Listing, the Person sponsoring the
Roll-Up
Transaction shall offer to Stockholders who vote against the
proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction the choice of:
(a) accepting the securities of a
Roll-Up
Entity offered in the proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction; or
(b) one of the following:
(i) remaining as Stockholders and preserving their
interests therein on the same terms and conditions as existed
previously; or
(ii) receiving cash in an amount equal to the
Stockholders pro rata share of the appraised value of the
net assets of the Corporation.
The Corporation is prohibited from participating in any proposed
Roll-Up
Transaction prior to Listing:
(a) that would result in the Stockholders having voting
rights in a
Roll-Up
Entity that are less than the rights provided for in
Sections 11.1 and 11.2 hereof;
A-30
(b) that includes provisions that would operate as a
material impediment to, or frustration of, the accumulation of
Shares by any purchaser of the securities of the
Roll-Up
Entity (except to the minimum extent necessary to preserve the
tax status of the
Roll-Up
Entity), or which would limit the ability of an investor to
exercise the voting rights of its securities of the
Roll-Up
Entity on the basis of the number of Shares held by that
investor;
(c) in which investors rights to access of records of
the Roll-Up
Entity will be less than those described in Sections 11.4
and 11.5 hereof; or
(d) in which any of the costs of the
Roll-Up
Transaction would be borne by the Corporation if the
Roll-Up
Transaction is not approved by the Stockholders.
THIRD: The amendment to and restatement
of the charter of the Corporation as hereinabove set forth has
been duly advised by the Board of Directors and approved by the
Stockholders of the Corporation as required by law.
FOURTH: The current address of the
principal office of the Corporation is as set forth in
Article III of the foregoing amendment and restatement of
the charter.
FIFTH: The name and address of the
Corporations current resident agent is as set forth in
Article III of the foregoing amendment and restatement of
the charter.
SIXTH: The number of directors of the
Corporation and the names of those currently in office are as
set forth in Article VII of the foregoing amendment and
restatement of the charter.
SEVENTH: The total number of shares of
stock which the Corporation had authority to issue immediately
prior to this amendment was 1,200,000,000, consisting of
1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value
per share, and 200,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value per share. The aggregate par value of all
authorized shares of stock having par value is $12,000,000.
EIGHTH: The total number of shares of
stock which the Corporation has authority to issue pursuant to
the foregoing amendment and restatement of the charter of the
Corporation is 1,200,000,000, consisting of
1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value
per share, and at the Effective Time (as defined in the
foregoing amendment and restatement of the charter), 700,000,000
will be classified as Class A Common Stock,
100,000,000 shares will be classified as
Class B-1
Common Stock, 100,000,000 will be classified as
Class B-2
Common Stock, and 100,000,000 will be classified as
Class B-3
Common Stock, and 200,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value per share. The aggregate par value of all
shares of stock having par value was $12,000,000.
NINTH: The undersigned Chief Executive
Officer acknowledges these Fourth Articles of Amendment and
Restatement to be the corporate act of the Corporation and as to
all matters or facts required to be verified under oath, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer acknowledges that to the
best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters and
facts are true in all material respects and that this statement
is made under the penalties for perjury.
A-31
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Fourth
Articles of Amendment and Restatement to be signed in its name
and on its behalf by its Chief Executive Officer and attested to
by its Secretary on
this day
of ,
2010.
|
|
|
ATTEST:
|
|
HEALTHCARE TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(SEAL)
|
Name: Kellie S. Pruitt
Title: Secretary
|
|
Name: Scott D. Peters
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|
A-32
HEALTHCARE TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
DECEMBER 8, 2010
PROXY CARD
Solicited by the Board of Directors
Please Vote by December 7, 2010
The undersigned stockholder of Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation,
hereby appoints Scott D. Peters and Kellie S. Pruitt, and each of them as proxies, for the
undersigned with full power of substitution in each of them, to attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. to be held on
December 8, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.
local time, at The Westin Kierland Resort & Spa, 6902 East Greenway Parkway, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254, and
any and all adjournments and postponements thereof, to cast, on behalf of the undersigned, all
votes that the undersigned is entitled to cast, and otherwise to represent the undersigned, at
such meeting and all adjournments and postponements thereof, with all power possessed by the
undersigned as if personally present. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice
of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and of the accompanying proxy statement, each of which is
hereby incorporated by reference, and revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to such
meeting.
The votes entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be cast as instructed below. The votes
entitled to be cast by the undersigned will be cast in the discretion of the proxy holder on any
other matter that may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof, including matters incident to its conduct or a motion to adjourn or postpone the meeting
to another time and/or place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be
Held on December 8, 2010: The proxy statement, proxy card and 2009 annual report are available
at www.eproxy.com/hta.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote For all Proposals. If this proxy is duly
executed and returned and no voting instructions are given, such proxy will be voted For
Proposal Nos. 1(A), 1(B), 1(C), 1(D), 1(E) and 1(F), For All Nominees named in Proposal 2, and
For Proposal No. 3.
1. |
|
For the proposed amendments to our charter: |
|
|
|
Listing Related Amendments |
|
|
|
(A) For the amendments to reclassify and convert our common stock immediately prior to a
listing on a national securities exchange. |
o For
o Against
o Abstain
|
|
(B) For the amendments to provide that certain provisions of our charter will not remain
in effect in the event our shares are listed on a national securities exchange. |
o For
o Against
o Abstain
|
|
Self-Management Related and Other Amendments |
|
|
|
(C) For the amendments to reflect self-management. |
o For
o Against
o
Abstain
|
|
(D) For the amendments to require compliance with the SECs tender offer regulations
under the Exchange Act for any tender offer made for our shares regardless of the size of
the tender offer. |
o For
o Against
o
Abstain
|
|
(E) For the amendments requested by state securities administrators. |
o For
o Against
o Abstain
|
|
(F) For ministerial revisions and clarifications. |
o For
o Against
o Abstain
2. |
|
For the election of the six directors listed below to serve until the 2011 annual meeting
of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. |
|
|
|
|
|
o For All Nominees
|
|
o Withhold All
|
|
o For All Except* |
(01) Scott D. Peters
|
|
(02) W. Bradley Blair, II
|
|
(03) Maurice J. DeWald |
(04) Warren D. Fix
|
|
(05) Larry L. Mathis
|
|
(06) Gary T. Wescombe |
|
|
|
* To withhold authority to vote for any individual
nominee(s) write the number of the nominee(s) in the
box to the right.
|
|
|
3. |
|
For ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. |
o For
o Against
o Abstain
Please check box at right if you plan on attending the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 8, 2010. o
You may obtain directions to attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Healthcare Trust
of America, Inc. by calling (480) 998-3478.
SIGN, DATE and RETURN:
When shares are held by joint tenants or tenants in common, the signature of one shall bind all
unless the Secretary of the company is given written notice to the contrary and furnished with a
copy of the instrument or order which so provides. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign
in full corporate name by an authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership
name by an authorized person.
Date:__________ / ____________________ /2010
Date:__________ / ____________________ /2010
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
You can authorize a proxy to cast your vote and otherwise represent you at the 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders in one of four ways:
MAIL: Please fold and return the completed signed proxy card in the accompanying self-addressed
postage-paid return envelope. Completed proxy cards must be received
by December 7, 2010.
FAX:
Fax the completed proxy card to (781) 633-4036 until 5:00
p.m. Pacific Standard Time on
December 7, 2010.
TELEPHONE: Call our toll-free number at (866) 977-7699 to authorize your proxy until 5:00 p.m.
Pacific Standard Time on December 7, 2010.
INTERNET: Authorize your proxy online at www.eproxy.com/hta until 5:00 p.m. Pacific
Standard Time on December 7, 2010.