e6vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
August 5, 2010
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
Am Campeon 1-12
D-85579 Neubiberg/Munich
Federal Republic of Germany
Tel: +49-89-234-0
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- .
This Report on Form 6-K dated August 5, 2010, contains the Quarterly Report of Infineon
Technologies AG for the Companys third quarter of the 2010 fiscal year.
INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES AG
QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30, 2010
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
i
Interim Group
Management Report (Unaudited)
This interim group management report should be read in
conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and other financial information included elsewhere in
this report.
This interim group management report contains forward-looking
statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on
current plans, estimates and projections. Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we
undertake no obligation to update any of them in light of new
information or future events. Forward-looking statements involve
inherent risks and uncertainties. We caution you that a number
of important factors could cause actual results or outcomes to
differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statement.
On November 6, 2009, we closed the sale of the Wireline
Communications business to Lantiq, affiliates of Golden Gate
Private Equity Inc. (Lantiq). All assets and
liabilities of the Wireline Communications business to be
transferred are presented as Assets classified as held for
sale and Liabilities classified as held for
sale in our condensed consolidated statements of financial
position as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010;
the results of the Wireline Communications business and the gain
on the sale are both presented as Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes in our
condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods
presented.
The following were key developments in our business during the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010:
Financial
Results
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we reported
revenues of 1,209 million, an increase of
59 percent compared to revenues of 761 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting
increased demand as a result of the overall economic recovery.
All of our operating segments benefited from the general
economic recovery and the improved demand in the supply chain as
well as at end customers, in particular the Automotive and the
Industrial & Multimarket segments. Furthermore, the
strength of the U.S. dollar against the Euro contributed to
the increase in revenues. Revenues in the three months ended
June 30, 2010, were limited by capacity restriction either
at our own fabs or at our suppliers. Revenues for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 represented a 17 percent
increase over revenues of 1,035 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2010, mainly driven by the Wireless
Solutions segment and the strength of the U.S. dollar
against the Euro.
|
|
|
|
Our revenues increased by 47 percent from
2,172 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2009 to 3,185 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, mostly driven by the general economic
recovery and improved demand in the supply chain as well as at
end customers, only partially offset by less favorable foreign
currency rates, in particular between the U.S. dollar and
the Euro. All segments contributed to the increase in revenues.
|
|
|
|
Given the revenues in the first three quarters of the 2010
fiscal year and our expectation for the fourth quarter, we now
expect revenue growth in the 2010 fiscal year as a whole in a
mid to high 40s percentage compared to the 2009 fiscal
year.
|
|
|
|
The Segment
Result(1)
of all our operating segments significantly improved in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2009. The improvements
in Segment Result primarily reflect the increases in revenues.
Our production facilities are currently almost fully loaded,
reflecting ongoing demand. This resulted in a significant
decrease in idle capacity cost during the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2009. Increased costs in the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting cost increases after
cost savings from reduced working hours and unpaid leave in
prior year periods, only partially offset these effects.
Furthermore, we continued our strong cost discipline in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010. Due to hedging
activities and also increased U.S. dollar
|
(1) We
define Segment Result as operating income (loss) excluding asset
impairments, net, restructuring charges and other related
closure costs, net, share-based compensation expense,
acquisition-related amortization and gains (losses), gains
(losses) on disposals of assets, businesses, or interests in
subsidiaries, and other income (expense), including litigation
settlement costs.
1
|
|
|
|
|
denominated expenses, Segment Result did not benefit from the
currency changes in the three months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Results for the three months ended June 30, 2010
were as follows: Automotive Segment Result was positive
52 million (three months ended June 30, 2009:
negative 17 million), Industrial &
Multimarket Segment Result was positive 82 million
(three months ended June 30, 2009: positive
9 million), Chip Card & Security Segment
Result was positive 6 million (three months ended
June 30, 2009: positive 4 million), and Wireless
Solutions Segment Result was positive 24 million
(three months ended June 30, 2009: positive
19 million). The Other Operating Segment Result was
negative 1 million and Corporate and Elimination
Segment Result was at break even for the three months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to negative 2 million
and negative 13 million, respectively, for the three
months ended June 30, 2009. Compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2010, Automotive Segment Result increased
by 1 million, Industrial & Multimarket
Segment Result increased by 23 million, Chip
Card & Security Segment Result increased by
3 million, and Wireless Solutions Segment Result
increased by 15 million.
|
|
|
|
Segment Results for the nine months ended June 30, 2010
were as follows: Automotive Segment Result was positive
140 million (nine months ended June 30, 2009:
negative 138 million), Industrial &
Multimarket Segment Result was positive 185 million
(nine months ended June 30, 2009: positive
4 million), Chip Card & Security Segment
Result was positive 10 million (nine months ended
June 30, 2009: negative 5 million), and Wireless
Solutions Segment Result was positive 50 million
(nine months ended June 30, 2009: negative
54 million). The Other Operating Segment Result was
negative 14 million and Corporate and Elimination
Segment Result was negative 10 million for the nine
months ended June 30, 2010, compared to negative
10 million and negative 16 million,
respectively, for the nine months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Given the Segment Results in the first nine months of the 2010
fiscal year and our current expectations for the fourth quarter,
we now expect combined Segment Result margin to be a low teens
percentage of revenue for the full 2010 fiscal year, while at
the end of the 2009 fiscal year we had forecasted a 2010
combined Segment Result margin in the mid single-digits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our income from continuing operations before income taxes was
137 million in the three months ended June 30,
2010, an improvement of 158 million from a loss of
21 million in the three months ended June 30,
2009. This improvement primarily reflects the increased Segment
Result of our operating segments described above. For the nine
months ended June 30, 2010 our income from continuing
operations before income taxes was 187 million, a
significant improvement from a loss of 291 million in
the nine months ended June 30, 2009. This was achieved
notwithstanding the negative impact of 69 million as
a result of the deconsolidation of ALTIS Semiconductor S.N.C,
Essonnes, France (ALTIS), as described below, and a
lower financial result (financial income net of financial
expense).
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 was
5 million and 115 million, respectively.
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized an
income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, of
3 million, while we realized a loss from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes, of 388 million in
the nine months ended June 30, 2009, primarily reflected
charges in connection with Qimonda as further described below.
|
|
|
|
Primarily as a result of the developments described above, we
realized net income of 126 million and
271 million for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to net losses of
23 million and 685 million for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Our net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations was 576 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to 78 million in the
nine months ended June 30, 2009. This improvement primarily
reflects the increase of our results from continuing operations
excluding non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization and
losses resulting from the deconsolidation of ALTIS and continued
tight working capital management. Accordingly, free cash flow
from continuing operations, defined as net cash from operating
and investing activities from continuing operations excluding
purchases or sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets, for the nine months ended June 30, 2010
was 289 million, compared with 70 million
in the nine months ended June 30, 2009, notwithstanding the
deconsolidation of the cash of the ALTIS joint venture in the
amount of 88 million and significantly increased
investing activities during the current fiscal year.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, our gross cash position, defined as
cash and cash equivalents and
available-for-sale
financial assets, was 1,514 million, nearly unchanged
compared with 1,507 million as of September 30,
2009. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, we
repurchased and redeemed notional amounts totaling
448 million of our convertible subordinated notes due
June 2010 and repaid other debt in a net amount of
24 million. Overall, our net cash position, defined
as gross cash position less short-term debt and long-term debt,
improved by 451 million to 1,108 million
as of June 30, 2010, compared to 657 million as
of September 30, 2009.
|
Corporate
Activities in the Nine Months ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
The sale of our Wireline Communications business, one of our
former segments, to Lantiq closed on November 6, 2009 and
the majority of the purchase price was paid at that date in the
amount of 223 million, with up to an additional
20 million being payable nine months after the
closing date. We recognized a gain before tax of
110 million at the closing of the sale which was
adjusted to 111 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2010. Certain inventories in the manufacturing
supply chain at the date of closing could not yet be transferred
to Lantiq and are presented as assets held for sale in the
condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of
June 30, 2010. Prepayments in relation to those assets were
recognized and are presented within liabilities classified as
held for sale.
|
|
|
|
In late December 2009 we deconsolidated ALTIS, our joint venture
with IBM, following the waiver of our option to acquire further
voting shares in ALTIS from our joint venture partner. The
assets and liabilities of ALTIS as well as the non-controlling
interests in this previously consolidated subsidiary were
derecognized, and we recognized our interest in ALTIS as an
investment in an associated company at its fair value of zero.
We subsequently account for ALTIS using the equity method.
Furthermore, in the 2009 calendar year we entered into several
amendments to our agreements with IBM in respect of ALTIS, which
changed the output and cost allocation of ALTIS and certain
rights of the shareholders. Upon deconsolidation, cash and cash
equivalents decreased by 88 million and
non-controlling interests by 61 million. The total
operating loss recognized in connection with the deconsolidation
originally amounted to 81 million in the three months
ended December 31, 2009, which was adjusted in the three
months ended March 31, 2010 to 73 million, and
in the three months ended June 30, 2010 to
69 million; this is presented within other operating
expense. In addition, we received a dividend of
3 million from ALTIS in the three months ended
June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
In November 2009, we and the Korean company LS Industrial
Systems (LSIS) established the joint venture LS
Power Semitech Co., Ltd. (LS), which focus on the
development, production and marketing of molded power modules
for white goods applications. LSIS holds 54 percent and we
hold 46 percent of the joint venture, which has its
headquarters at the LSIS site in Cheonan, South Korea. We
contributed licenses of intellectual property as well as
technology and process know-how for our power module family
CIPOStm
(Control Integrated Power System), and existing
CIPOStm
back-end manufacturing equipment. We realized a gain of
3 million before tax from our contribution to the
joint venture, which is recognized in other operating income in
the nine months ended June 30, 2010. The investment in the
joint venture is accounted for using the equity method.
|
|
|
|
In June 2010 we redeemed the remaining outstanding amount of our
convertible subordinated notes due June 2010 with a notional
amount of 255 million. Before the redemption, we
repurchased notional amounts of 193 million of these
convertible subordinated notes for cash of
194 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2010. We realized a loss of 5 million before tax on
the repurchases, which was recognized as interest expense within
financial expense during the nine months ended June 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, we made
investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible
assets of 228 million, compared to
114 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2009. In particular, we invested in copper capacity at our
production site in Dresden, in our Power front-end capacities to
meet the continuously strong demand for automotive and
industrial applications. Since the end of December 2009,
production in front-end and back-end facilities has been running
nearly at full capacity, including the increased capacity.
Current utilization rates generally range between 90 and
100 percent, forcing us partly to push out new orders. In
light of the dynamic revenue growth, almost fully loaded
production facilities and planned development
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
milestones, we currently plan investments in property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets in our 2010 fiscal year to total
more than 400 million, compared to
154 million in the 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We settled a patent infringement lawsuits with Fairchild
Semiconductor International, Inc. (Fairchild) in the
three months ended December 31, 2009. The patents in the
suit and counter suit related to super-junction power
transistors, trench power MOSFETs and IGBT power transistors.
The lawsuit has been settled through a broad patent cross
license relating to semiconductor technology. As part of the
agreement, Fairchild made payments to Infineon.
|
|
|
|
In the three months ended June 30, 2010, we settled a
patent infringement lawsuit with Elpida Memory, Inc.
(Elpida), and we and Elpida dismissed of all pending
patent infringement cases. We initiated proceedings in February
2010, when we filed a complaint against Elpida and Elpidas
customers in the U.S. International Trade Commission
(ITC). Elpida subsequently filed two lawsuits in the
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. We and
Elpida have settled the dispute through a broad patent cross
license relating to semiconductor technology. The specific terms
and conditions of the license are confidential.
|
Revenue by
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Wireless
Solutions(1)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Corporate and
Eliminations(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes revenues of
1 million for the nine months ended June 30,
2009 from sales of wireless communication applications to
Qimonda.
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes the elimination of
revenues of 1 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2009 since these sales were not part of the
Qimonda disposal plan.
|
Revenues for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009,
were characterized by the worldwide economic and financial
crisis, which affected all our operating segments. Due to the
fast and general recovery of the economy in recent months, we
have seen a recovery of the revenues of all our operating
segments in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010.
Revenues of all operating segments also benefited from the
strength of the U.S. dollar against the Euro in three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive In the three months ended
June 30, 2010, segment revenues were
333 million, an increase of 127 million or
62 percent compared to 206 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2009. In the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, segment revenues increased by
327 million or 54 percent to
928 million, compared to 601 million in
the nine months ended June 30, 2009. These increases were
mainly driven by increased car production worldwide, together
with an increase in the proportion of manufactured cars with
higher semiconductor content.
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket In the
three months ended June 30, 2010, segment revenues were
373 million, representing an all time high, an
increase of 152 million or 69 percent compared
to 221 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2009. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010,
segment revenues increased by 313 million or
48 percent to 961 million, compared to
648 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2009. These increases were driven by strong demand for both
power and non-power products across industrial and multimarket
applications.
|
|
|
|
Chip Card & Security In the three
months ended June 30, 2010, segment revenues were
110 million, an increase of 28 million or
34 percent compared to 82 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2009. In the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, segment revenues increased by
39 million or 15 percent to
292 million, compared to 253 million in
the nine months ended June 30, 2009. These increases were
mainly driven by higher sales volume with payment, mobile
communications, government ID and trusted platform applications.
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Solutions In the three months ended
June 30, 2010, segment revenues were
346 million, an increase of 95 million or
38 percent compared to 251 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2009. In the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, segment revenues increased by
231 million or 35 percent to
883 million, compared to 652 million in
the nine months ended June 30, 2009. These increases
primarily reflect a further increase in demand from most major
mobile phone platform customers. Our innovative Ultra Low Cost,
Entry Phone, UMTS and HSPA solutions were positively received
and had strong market momentum.
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Segments Revenues of other
operating segments increased by 45 million from
1 million in three months ended June 30, 2009,
to 46 million in the three months ended June 30,
2010, and by 108 million from 11 million
in the nine months ended June 30, 2009, to
119 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2010, primarily reflecting revenues with Lantiq after the
closing of the sale of our Wireline Communications business.
|
Revenue by
Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
North America
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The regional distribution of revenues in the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2010 was largely unchanged compared
to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, other
than a shift between Asia/Pacific and North America, which
primarily reflects changes in the distribution channels of one
major customer. The increase of the revenue share of Germany in
the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2009, primarily reflects the revenues
with Lantiq, together with a higher demand for our renewable
energy, infrastructure and automotive products from German
customers.
Cost of Goods
Sold and Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
Percentage of revenue (gross margin)
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold increased in the three months ended
June 30, 2010 by 41 percent, or
228 million, to 789 million, compared to
561 million in the three months ended June 30,
2009, and by 19 percent to 2,098 million in the
nine months ended June 30, 2010, compared to
1,761 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2009. Our gross profit increased from 200 million in
the three months ended June 30, 2009, to
420 million in the three months ended June 30,
2010, or as a percentage of revenue from 26 percent to
35 percent, respectively. For the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, our gross profit was
1,087 million (representing 34 percent of
revenues) an increase of 676 million compared to
411 million (representing 19 percent of
revenues) for the nine months ended June 30, 2009. These
improvements primarily reflect higher sales volumes and the
corresponding positive effects of higher factory loading, which
resulted in lower idle capacity cost together with improved
product mix in our portfolio. All operating segments showed
improved gross margins in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009.
5
Research and
Development Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Capitalized development cost
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Percentage of Research and development expenses
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Research and development expenses totaled 147 million
and 413 million in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, an increase of
39 million and 63 million compared to
108 million and 350 million in the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively,
reflecting higher research and development activities throughout
all our operating segments, mainly in connection with a growing
number of customer projects. In addition, during the prior year
periods we realized cost savings from reduced working hours and
unpaid leave. As a percentage of revenues, research and
development expenses in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010 were down to 12 percent and
13 percent, respectively, compared to 14 percent and
16 percent for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009, respectively, reflecting the moderate
increase in research and development expenses compared to the
significant increase in revenues throughout all our operating
segments. Capitalized development cost increased in the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2009, throughout all our
operating segments, also reflecting increased activities in
research and development.
Selling, General
and Administrative Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
In absolute terms selling, general and administrative expenses
increased by 22 million and 40 million, to
121 million and 342 million, in the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared
to 99 million and 302 million in the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively,
primarily reflecting increased selling expenses due to higher
sales volumes in the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010, and the lower expense due to reduced working hours and
unpaid leave in the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009. The increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses, however, was lower than the increase in revenues, and
therefore as a percentage of revenues, selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased in total and throughout all
our operating segments in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010 to 10 percent and 11 percent,
respectively, compared to 13 percent and 14 percent
for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively.
Other Operating
Income and Other Operating Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(9
|
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
|
)
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
(1
|
|
) %
|
|
|
(1
|
|
) %
|
|
|
(3
|
|
) %
|
|
|
(3
|
|
) %
|
Other operating income for the three months ended June 30,
2010, remained almost unchanged compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2009, and decreased by 10 million
to 12 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2010, from 22 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2009. Other operating income for the nine months
ended June 30, 2009 included 10 million from
claims associated with the insolvency of BenQ. Included in other
operating income for the nine months ended June 30, 2010,
is a gain of 3 million from the contribution of
licenses and back-end equipment to LS.
6
Other operating expense for the three months ended June 30,
2010, increased by 6 million to 15 million
from 9 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2009, primarily reflecting certain asset
impairments totaling 5 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2010. Other operating expense for the nine
months ended June 30, 2010, increased by
48 million to 107 million from
59 million in the three months ended June 30,
2009, primarily in connection with the deconsolidation of ALTIS,
described above, and higher impairment charges while other
operating expense for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009, included among others a loss of
16 million we realized on the sale of the business of
Infineon Technologies SensoNor AS (SensoNor).
Operating Income
(Loss)
In the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 our
operating income was 140 million and
237 million, respectively, and improved significantly
compared to operating loss of 12 million and
278 million for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009, respectively, primarily reflecting improved
results of our operating segments as described below, and in
spite of the negative impact of the deconsolidation of ALTIS of
69 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2010.
Segment
Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Result development for our reporting segments was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Segment Result of the Automotive
segment was 52 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2010, an increase of 69 million from
negative 17 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2009. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010,
Segment Result increased by 278 million to
140 million, compared to negative
138 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2009. These increases reflect primarily improved gross margin
resulting from higher revenues and the corresponding positive
effects of higher factory loading which resulted in lower idle
capacity cost, partially offset by higher R&D spending in
connection with our 65-nanometer TriCore microcontroller and
integrated power-logic-products and higher selling expenses. In
addition, cost increased in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009, reflecting the lapse of cost savings from
reduced working hours and unpaid leave as in prior year periods.
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket Segment
Result of the Industrial & Multimarket segment was
82 million in the three months ended June 30,
2010, an increase of 73 million from
9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, Segment
Result increased by 181 million to
185 million, compared to 4 million in the
nine months ended June 30, 2009. These increases reflect
primarily improved gross margin resulting from higher revenues
and the corresponding positive effects of higher factory loading
which resulted in lower idle capacity cost, as well as the
benefits from continuous margin improvement measures. These
effects more than offset increased cost in later periods,
reflecting the lapse of cost savings from reduced working hours
and unpaid leave as in prior year periods.
|
|
|
|
Chip Card & Security Segment Result
of the Chip Card & Security segment was
6 million in the three months ended June 30,
2010, an increase of 2 million from
4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, Segment
Result increased by 15 million to
10 million, compared to negative 5 million
in the nine months ended June 30, 2009. These increases
reflect primarily improved gross margin resulting from higher
revenues and the corresponding positive effects of higher
factory loading which resulted in lower idle capacity cost and
which more than offset increased cost in the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2010
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009,
reflecting the lapse of cost savings from reduced working hours
and unpaid leave as in prior year periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Solutions Despite increased
research and development expenses to support a growing number of
customer project and platform developments as well as additional
hedging expenses, the strong revenue growth drove an increase of
Segment Result of the Wireless Solutions segment to
24 million in the three months ended June 30,
2010, representing an increase of 5 million compared
to 19 million in the three months ended June 30,
2009. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, Segment
Result increased by 104 million to
50 million, compared to negative
54 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2009, mainly driven by higher revenues, further productivity
gains and increased capacity utilization which resulted in lower
idle capacity cost. These positive effects more than offset
increased cost in the three and nine months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009, reflecting the lapse of cost savings from reduced working
hours and unpaid leave as in prior year periods.
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Segments Segment Result of
Other Operating Segments was negative 1 million and
negative 14 million in the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to negative
2 million and negative 10 million in the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
This deterioration primarily reflects those costs that remain
with us after the sale of the Wireline Communications business,
and which were previously allocated to the Wireline
Communications segment.
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations Segment Result in
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 was at break
even and negative 10 million, respectively, compared
to negative 13 million and negative
16 million in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009, respectively. These increases are primarily
due to reduced strategic idle capacity cost.
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of Segment Result
to our operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Total Segment Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
361
|
|
Adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, and other related closure cost, net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related amortization and gains (losses)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on disposal of assets, businesses, or interests
in subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Losses in connection with the deconsolidation of ALTIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Income
and Financial Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
3
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
Financial expense
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
%
|
In the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, financial
income was 4 million and 23 million,
respectively, representing a decrease of 16 million
and 77 million compared to 20 million and
100 million in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009, respectively. Included in financial income
8
for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 are gains
of 13 million and 61 million,
respectively, from the repurchases of our exchangeable
subordinated notes due August 2010 (which were fully redeemed in
the fourth quarter of the 2009 fiscal year) and our convertible
subordinated notes due and redeemed in June 2010. In addition,
gains of 1 million and 16 million from the
valuation of interest rate swaps are included in financial
income in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, while such gains are insignificant in the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2010.
In the three months ended June 30, 2010, financial expense
amounted to 12 million compared to
31 million the three months ended June 30, 2009.
In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, financial expense
amounted to 80 million, a decrease of
38 million compared to 118 million in the
nine months ended June 30, 2009. Interest expenses from
interest payments and the accretion of our subordinated
convertible notes due June 2010 and subordinated exchangeable
notes due August 2010 were lower in the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2009, reflecting the decreases of the
outstanding amounts of subordinated convertible notes due June
2010 and subordinated convertible notes due August 2010 as a
result of the repurchases we made since the beginning of the
2009 fiscal year, and the final redemption in June 2010 and
September 2009, respectively. Interest payments and accretion
for our subordinated convertible note due in 2014 which we
issued during the three months ended June 30, 2009,
partially offset this decrease. Losses on valuation changes and
sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets as a result of the financial crisis impacted
financial expense by 25 million in the nine months
ended June 30, 2009, but had almost no effect in the nine
months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in losses on
valuation changes and sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets was partially offset by a loss of
5 million on the repurchase of subordinated
convertible notes due June 2010 with notional amounts of
193 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2010.
Income from
Investments Accounted for Using the Equity Method
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method
for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 were
5 million and 7 million, respectively, an
increase from 2 million and 5 million for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively. This income consisted of our share in the net
income of Infineon Technologies Bipolar GmbH & Co. KG
(Bipolar), our equity method investment together
with Siemens AG, and our share in the net income of our in
November 2009 newly established joint venture LS with LSIS.
Additionally, income from investments accounted for using the
equity method for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was
positively impacted by a dividend of 3 million
received from ALTIS.
9
Income (Loss)
from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
The results of Qimonda and of the Wireline Communications
business are presented in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations as discontinued operations for the three months
and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, and consist
of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Qimonda(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of measurement to fair value less costs to sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses resulting from Qimondas application to open
insolvency proceedings
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Losses resulting from the realization of accumulated losses
related to unrecognized currency translation effects (primarily
upon deconsolidation and Qimondas sale of Inotera)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimondas share of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications Business Revenue
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax gain recognized on the sale of the Wireline
Communications business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Income tax expense on gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on the sale of the Wireline Communications business, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications share of discontinued operations,
net of income taxes
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No further information concerning
Qimondas condensed consolidated statements of operations
is available for the period from January 1, 2009 to
January 23, 2009, the date of the application by Qimonda to
commence insolvency proceedings. Due to the write down of
Qimondas net assets to zero as of September 30, 2008,
the operating losses of Qimonda for the period from
October 1, 2008 to January 23, 2009 did not affect the
consolidated net income of the Company, but instead were
eliminated via an offsetting partial reversal of previously
recorded impairments. Therefore, while the amounts of revenue
and costs and expenses in the table above exclude amounts for
the period from January 1, 2009 to January 23, 2009,
Qimondas share of the loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes of 399 million, is unaffected.
|
Qimonda
In the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, certain
adjustments to individual provisions for contingent liabilities
in connection with the insolvency of Qimonda were necessary to
reflect current developments in these matters. However, the net
impact of these adjustments on our condensed consolidated
statements of operations was only negative 4 million
and negative 5 million in the three and
10
nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Furthermore,
the completion of a tax audit led to an income tax benefit of
20 million in the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010 in relation to the Memory Segment and the
formation of Qimonda. During the nine months ended June 30,
2009, Qimonda-related amounts of 399 million included
in loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, which
consisted principally of the realization of accumulated foreign
currency translation losses of 188 million and
charges for provisions and allowances of 206 million
in connection with Qimondas insolvency. The realization of
accumulated currency translation effects, which were previously
recorded in equity, resulted mainly from Qimondas sale of
its interest in Inotera Memories Inc. (Inotera) to
Micron Technology, Inc. (Micron) in the three months
ended December 31, 2008, as well as the deconsolidation of
Qimonda in the three months ended March 31, 2009. In the
three months ended June 30, 2009, we adjusted our recorded
provisions and allowances by an additional 3 million.
As a result of the commencement of insolvency proceedings by
Qimonda we are exposed to certain potential liabilities in
connection with the Qimonda business which are described in more
detail in note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009 and 2010.
Wireline
Communications Business
In November 2009 we completed the sale of our Wireline
Communications business, one of our former segments, to Lantiq.
The majority of the purchase price was paid at closing in the
amount of 223 million, with up to an additional
20 million being payable nine months after the
closing date. We recognized a gain before tax of
111 million in connection with the closing of the
sale. Income tax expense attributable to this gain increased by
11 million to 15 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2010. We report the results of the
Wireline Communications business, as well as the gain on the
sale, as discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in our
condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods
presented.
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
therein: assets held for sale
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(79)
|
%
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
%
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100)
|
%
|
Total equity attributable to shareholders of Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, our current assets increased by
203 million or 7 percent compared with
September 30, 2009. This relates primarily to an increase
of 171 million in trade and other receivables,
primarily reflecting the increase in revenues, as well as an
increase in inventories by 91 million, primarily
driven by the ramp up of certain products at major mobile phone
manufacturers. This was despite continued tight working capital
management. These increases were partly offset by a decrease in
assets classified as held for sale of 88 million,
which reflects the closing of the sale of our Wireline
Communications business and transfer of the assets to Lantiq.
Our gross cash position, consisting of cash and cash equivalents
and
available-for-sale
financial assets, increased slightly by 7 million in
the nine months ended June 30, 2010 to
1,514 million at June 30, 2010 from
1,507 million at September 30, 2009. Net cash
provided by operating activities as well as
223 million of cash received from the sale of the
Wireline Communications business contributed positively to our
gross cash position. This was offset by the repayment of the
remaining outstanding amount of our convertible subordinated
notes due June 2010 of 255 million and earlier
repurchases of 193 million of notional amounts of
these notes as well as the deconsolidation of the cash and cash
equivalents of ALTIS of 88 million.
11
Non-current assets decreased by 50 million or
3 percent as of June 30, 2010 compared to
September 30, 2009. This decrease primarily results from a
120 million decrease in property, plant and
equipment, as capital expenditures during the first nine months
of the 2010 fiscal year were lower than depreciation.
Furthermore, the deconsolidation of ALTIS contributed to the
decrease in property, plant and equipment. This decrease was
partly offset by an increase in intangible assets due to
capitalized development costs and investments accounted for
using the equity method primarily in connection with the
formation of LS.
Total liabilities as of June 30, 2010 decreased by
65 million or 3 percent and amounted to
2,208 million compared to 2,273 million as
of September 30, 2009. Current liabilities decreased
slightly by 37 million or 2 percent while
non-current liabilities decreased by 28 million or
5 percent. The changes in current liabilities relate
primarily to the repayment of the remaining outstanding amount
of our convertible subordinated notes due June 2010 of
255 million and earlier repurchases of
193 million of notional amounts of these notes. This
was partially offset by increases in trade and other payables by
184 million, primarily from higher purchases of raw
materials and foundry wafers in light of higher production
levels as well as higher investments in our production
facilities. Furthermore, current provisions increased as a
result of increases in provisions for warranties and increases
in personnel provisions, among other things. In connection with
the insolvency proceedings of Qimonda, we reclassified
81 million from current provisions into other current
liabilities as of June 30, 2010, reflecting the settlement
with the European Commission and the agreement to settle with
indirect purchaser class plaintiffs (see note 15 to our
condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010). Included in
other current financial liabilities are foreign currency
derivatives of 47 million, an increase of
32 million compared to September 30, 2009,
primarily entered into to hedge a part of anticipated
U.S. dollar denominated revenues. Other changes in current
liabilities include the payment of the last installment of our
settlement with the U.S Department of Justice (DOJ)
(see note 15 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009 and 2010). The decrease in non-current liabilities as of
June 30, 2010, compared to September 30, 2009
reflects, among other things, transfers of 58 million
from long-term debt to short term debt.
Total equity as of June 30, 2010 increased by
218 million or 9 percent to
2,551 million compared to 2,333 million as
of September 30, 2009. This increase reflects net income of
271 million and other comprehensive income of
8 million in the nine months ended June 30,
2010, partly offset by the decrease in non-controlling interests
of 60 million, primarily resulting from the
deconsolidation of ALTIS.
Liquidity
Our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows show the
sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents during the
reported periods. They are of key importance for the evaluation
of our financial position.
Cash
Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by operating activities from continuing operations
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations was 576 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, an increase of 498 million
compared to 78 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2009, primarily as a result of the higher income.
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2010
reflected mainly income from continuing operations of
271 million, excluding non-cash charges for
depreciation and amortization of 299 million and
total operating losses from the deconsolidation of ALTIS of
69 million recognized during
12
the nine months ended June 30, 2010. Net cash provided by
operating activities from continuing operations in the nine
months ended June 30, 2010 was also positively impacted by
changes in operating assets and liabilities of
120 million due to a continued tight working capital
management, and negatively impacted by income taxes paid and
interest paid, net, in the total amount of 62 million.
Net cash provided
by (used in) investing activities from continuing
operations
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
was 259 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2010, and primarily relates to cash used for
investments in property, plant and equipment, intangible assets
and other assets in the total amount of 228 million,
as well as decreases in cash and cash equivalents of
88 million as a result of the deconsolidation of
ALTIS.
Net cash used in
financing activities from continuing operations
Net cash used in financing activities from continuing operations
was 479 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2010 and primarily relates to the repurchase of
notional amounts of 193 million of our convertible
subordinated notes due June 2010 and the repayment of the
remaining balance of 255 million of these notes at
the due date. This compares to repurchases of notional amounts
of 245 million of these notes and exchangeable
subordinated notes due August 2010 in the nine months ended
June 30, 2009, and other debt repayments, partially offset
by the issuance of 196 million of our convertible
subordinated notes due 2014 in the nine months ended
June 30, 2009.
Change in cash
and cash equivalents from discontinued operations
Net cash provided by discontinued operations amounted to
204 million for the nine months ended June 30,
2010, primarily reflecting net cash provided by investing
activities from discontinued operations of
220 million, which primarily relates to the cash
received at the closing of the sale of our Wireline
Communications business of 223 million in November
2009. Cash flow provided by operating activities from
discontinued operations from the Wireline Communication business
amounted to 34 million in the nine months ended
June 30, 2010 and relates to the period before the closing
of the sale and to subsequent net pay-outs of remaining current
liabilities, and was offset by payments made of
50 million with respect to potential liabilities in
connection with the insolvency of Qimonda, including the last
installment of the settlement with the DOJ during the first
quarter of the 2010 fiscal year.
Free Cash
Flow
We define free cash flow as cash flow from operating and
investing activities from continuing operations excluding
purchases or sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets. Since we hold a portion of our available
monetary resources in the form of readily
available-for-sale
financial assets, and operate in a capital intensive industry,
we report free cash flow to provide investors with a measure
that can be used to evaluate changes in liquidity after taking
capital expenditures into account. Free cash flow is not
intended to represent the residual cash flow available for
discretionary expenditures, since debt service requirements or
other non-discretionary expenditures are not deducted.
Free cash flow includes only amounts from continuing operations,
and is determined as follows from the condensed consolidated
statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Purchases (sales) of
available-for-sale
financial assets, net
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow was 289 million for the nine months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to 70 million for
the nine months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of
219 million. Free cash flow during the nine months
ended June 30, 2010 reflects primarily the increased net
cash provided by operating activities of 576 million
compared to 78 million for the same period in the
prior year, which was partly offset by the decrease in cash and
cash equivalents of 88 million from the
deconsolidation of ALTIS and higher net
13
cash used in investing activities for investments in property,
plant and equipment and intangible assets of
228 million compared to 114 million in the
same period last year. Not included in the free cash flow
determination are net sales of 28 million of
available-for-sale
financial assets, which are included in the net cash used in
investing activities for the nine months ended June 20,
2010 and therefore need to be subtracted to derive at the free
cash flow.
Net Cash
Position
The following table presents our gross and net cash positions.
Since we hold a portion of our available monetary resources in
the form of readily
available-for-sale
financial assets, which for IFRS purposes are not considered to
be cash, we report our gross and net cash positions
to provide investors with an understanding of our overall
liquidity. The gross and net cash position is determined as
follows from the condensed consolidated statements of financial
position, without adjustment to the IFRS amounts presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash position
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash position
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our gross cash position as of June 30, 2010, representing
cash and cash equivalents and
available-for-sale
financial assets, was 1,514 million, a slight
increase from 1,507 million as of September 30,
2009. Our gross cash position reflects positive cash flow from
operating activities from continuing operations of
576 million and cash of 223 million
received from the sale of our Wireline Communications business,
offset by repurchases of notional amounts of
193 million of our convertible subordinated notes due
June 2010 and repayments of 255 million of the
remaining outstanding amount of these notes at their due date,
as well as a 88 million reduction in cash and cash
equivalents resulting from the deconsolidation of ALTIS and
investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible
assets of 228 million.
Our net cash position as of June 30, 2010, defined as gross
cash position less short-term debt and current maturities of
long-term debt, and long-term debt, increased to
1,108 million, compared to 657 million as
of September 30, 2009, primarily reflecting the increase in
free cash flow and proceeds from the sale of the Wireline
Communications business described above.
Employees
The following table indicates the composition of our workforce
by function and region at the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
17,338
|
|
|
|
17,467
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
|
|
5,599
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
%
|
Sales & Marketing
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
%
|
Administrative
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
26,464
|
|
|
|
25,978
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
9,160
|
|
|
|
8,742
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
4,676
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
(27)
|
%
|
North America
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
%
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
11,803
|
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
26,464
|
|
|
|
25,978
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
During the first nine months of the 2010 fiscal year,
Infineons workforce decreased slightly as a result of the
sale of our Wireline Communications business and the
deconsolidation of ALTIS. This decrease was almost offset by
increases in employees as a result of higher capacity
utilization in our factories, in particular in Asia/Pacific.
Outlook
Industry
Environment
In the second quarter of the 2010 calendar year, the economic
recovery continued. There was modest but steady growth in most
advanced economies and strong growth in many emerging and
developing countries. According to the International Monetary
Fund, global recovery will continue through 2011 but downside
risks have risen sharply. Recent turbulence in financial markets
has cast a cloud over the outlook.
Global semiconductor market momentum remained strong in the
second quarter of the 2010 calendar year. Even stronger than
previously expected market growth was the primary reason behind
reputable market research firms increasing their 2010
semiconductor market forecast. iSuppli Corporation currently
projects growth in worldwide semiconductor revenues of
31 percent in calendar year 2010 and of 8 percent in
calendar year 2011.
Outlook for
the fourth quarter of the 2010 fiscal year and updated outlook
for the 2010 fiscal year
Outlook for the
fourth quarter of the 2010 fiscal year
Assuming a U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate of 1.30, we
expect revenues for the fourth quarter of the 2010 fiscal year
to increase sequentially by a high single-digit percentage.
Fourth quarter combined Segment Result margin should post an
increase of one to two percentage points from third quarter
levels.
The sequential increase in revenues is expected to be driven
mainly by the Wireless Solutions segment, with the
Industrial & Multimarket and Chip Card &
Security segments growing at a slower pace. Automotive revenues
are expected to stay approximately flat.
Updated outlook
for the 2010 fiscal year
Given the results of the first three quarters of the 2010 fiscal
year and the fourth quarter outlook, we are again raising our
guidance for the 2010 fiscal year as a whole.
We now expect full-year revenues to grow by a mid to high
40s percentage compared to the 2009 fiscal year, at an
assumed U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate of 1.30 for the last
quarter of the 2010 fiscal year. This compares to a previous
expectation of a high 30s percentage for sales growth.
Combined Segment Result margin is now expected to be a low teens
percentage of revenue.
After several quarters of fully loaded manufacturing facilities
and allocation across a wide range of products and in light of
continued high levels of order intake, we are increasing
guidance for investments. We now anticipate an amount of more
than 400 million for the 2010 fiscal year. This
compares to the previous 2010 guidance of more than
300 million and reported investments of
154 million in the 2009 fiscal year. We maintain our
guidance for depreciation and amortization at approximately
400 million for the 2010 fiscal year compared to
513 million in the 2009 fiscal year.
Risks and
Opportunities
We are exposed to a number of risks as a result of the high
volatility of the semiconductor business, its international
orientation and its wide product range. Such risks include, but
are not limited to, broader economic developments, including the
sustainability of recent improvements in the market environment;
trends in demand and prices for semiconductors generally and for
our products in particular, as well as for the end-products,
such as automobiles and consumer electronics, that incorporate
our products; the success of our development efforts, both alone
and with partners; the success of our efforts to introduce new
production processes at our facilities; the actions of
competitors; the continued availability of adequate funds; the
outcome of antitrust investigations and litigation matters; the
effects of currency fluctuations, primarily between the
U.S. dollar and the Euro; the outcome of Qimondas
insolvency proceedings, including potential liabilities related
to the Qimonda insolvency, including pending antitrust and
related securities law claims, the potential repayment of
governmental subsidies received, employee-
15
related contingencies and other matters; as well as the other
factors mentioned herein and those described in our Annual
Report on
Form 20-F
for the fiscal year 2009.
To minimize the negative impact of these risks, we continuously
optimize our company-wide risk and opportunity management
system. For more detailed information on risks and opportunities
and their potential effect on our business, financial condition
or results of operations, please refer to our Annual Report on
Form 20-F
for the fiscal year 2009.
In February 2009, the Deutsche Prüfstelle für
Rechnungslegung e. V. (DPR), a German
government-appointed private institution, began a routine review
of Infineons IFRS financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2008 (our first year of reporting under
IFRS). In the course of this review, we have responded to the
DPRs comments on a number of accounting issues. The only
remaining issue raised by the DPR relates to our accounting for
certain deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2008,
particularly with respect to our tax strategies and the
forecasting period for the utilization of tax credits that
formed the basis for the majority of our deferred tax assets.
The DPR issued a formal, conditional assessment in the three
months ended June 30, 2010, indicating that in their
opinion our accounting for certain deferred tax assets should be
changed, and has given us the opportunity to submit a written
response. We continue to maintain that we correctly accounted
for deferred tax assets in accordance with applicable
International Financial Reporting Standards and their
interpretations. We are in ongoing discussions with the DPR and
are preparing a formal response to the DPRs conditional
assessment. In the event that we are unable to reach an
agreement with the DPR in this regard, the review would be
continued by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority
(Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, or
BaFin). If the BaFin were also to determine that our
accounting for certain deferred tax assets should be changed, we
may be required to adjust our opening accumulated deficit to
reflect a partial reduction of the deferred tax assets recorded.
Such adjustment would reduce our total assets and
shareholders equity, but would have no impact on our
statement of operations or available tax loss carry-forwards and
tax effected credit carry-forwards, would require no cash
expenditure, and would not result in a breach of any financial
covenants under our outstanding lending facilities or bonds.
Moreover, we believe that, in light of our anticipated future
operating results, we will be able to utilize a significant
portion of our unrecognized deferred tax assets in future
periods. Consequently, we believe that the ultimate resolution
of this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our
operating results or cash position.
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Financial expense
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to shareholders of
Infineon Technologies AG (in Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to shareholders
of Infineon Technologies AG (in Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
3,915
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
(2,098
|
)
|
|
|
(2,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Financial expense
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to shareholders of
Infineon Technologies AG (in Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to shareholders
of Infineon Technologies AG (in Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation effects
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Net change in fair value of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(485
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other current financial assets
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Assets classified as held for sale
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Other current financial liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
Liabilities classified as held for sale
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Long-term provisions
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
2,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary share capital
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
7,433
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(5,940
|
)
|
|
|
(5,670
|
)
|
|
|
(6,969
|
)
|
Other components of equity
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity attributable to shareholders of Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Less: net loss (income) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Losses (gains) on sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Losses (gains) on sales of businesses and interests in
subsidiaries
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Losses in connection with the deconsolidation of ALTIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Losses (gains) on disposals of property, plant, and equipment,
and other assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Dividends received from associated companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Income tax received (paid)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Proceeds from sales of businesses and interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cash decrease from the deconsolidation of ALTIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Purchases of intangible assets, and other assets
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment, and other
assets
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in related party financial receivables and payables
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Principal repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments to minority interests
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
currency
|
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
attributable to
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
translation
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
cash flow
|
|
|
shareholders
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
adjustment
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
hedge
|
|
|
of Infineon AG
|
|
|
interests
|
|
|
equity
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2008
|
|
|
749,742,085
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
6,008
|
|
|
|
(5,252
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
749,742,085
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
6,041
|
|
|
|
(5,889
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2009
|
|
|
1,086,742,085
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
(5,940
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidation of ALTIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,086,742,085
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
(5,670
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
22
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes
to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of
Infineon Technologies AG and its consolidated subsidiaries
(Infineon or the Company) as of and for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010,
have been prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) and their interpretations
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB), and as adopted by the European Union
(EU). The accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements also comply with IFRS as issued by the IASB
and have been prepared in compliance with IAS 34,
Interim Financial Reporting. Accordingly,
certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted.
In addition, although the condensed consolidated statement of
financial position as of September 30, 2009 was derived
from audited financial statements, it does not include all
disclosures required by IFRS. The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with IFRS, as adopted by the EU, as of and for the
year ended September 30, 2009. The accounting policies
applied in preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements are consistent with those for the year
ended September 30, 2009.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments
necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All
such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results
of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of results for the full fiscal year.
The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent amounts and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ materially from those estimates.
All amounts herein are shown in Euro (or )
except where otherwise stated. Negative amounts are presented in
parentheses. The accompanying condensed consolidated statement
of financial position as of June 30, 2010, and the
condensed consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income and cash flows for the three and nine months then ended
are also presented in U.S. dollars ($), solely
for the convenience of the reader, at the rate of 1 =
$1.2291, the Federal Reserve noon buying rate on June 30,
2010.
Certain amounts in the prior period condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes have been reclassified to conform
to the current period presentation.
Standards and
Interpretations adopted as of October 1, 2009
In September 2007, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1,
Presentation of Financial Statements. The
revision is aimed at improving users ability to analyze
and compare the information given in financial statements. IAS 1
sets overall requirements for the presentation of financial
statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum
requirements for their content. The Company adopted the
amendment as of October 1, 2009. As a consequence the
Company renamed the balance sheet Statement of Financial
Position and introduced the new Statement of
Comprehensive Income, which presents all changes in
comprehensive income including other comprehensive income and
replaces the Statement of Income and Expense recognized in
Equity. Changes in equity are shown in a separate
Statement of Changes in Equity.
In January 2008, the IASB published the amended standards IFRS
3, Business Combinations (IFRS 3
(2008)), and IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements (IAS 27 (2008)). The
standards have been endorsed by the EU. Both standards have been
applied since October 1, 2009.
IFRS 3 (2008) reconsiders the application of acquisition
accounting for business combinations. Major changes relate to
the measurement of non-controlling interests, the accounting for
business combinations achieved in stages as well as the
treatment of contingent consideration and acquisition-related
costs. Based on the new standard, non-controlling interests may
be measured at their fair value (full-goodwill methodology) or
at the proportional fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. In business
23
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
combinations achieved in stages, any previously held equity
interest in the acquiree is remeasured to its acquisition date
fair value. Any changes to contingent consideration classified
as a liability at the acquisition date are recognized in profit
and loss. Acquisition-related costs are expensed in the period
incurred.
Major changes in relation to IAS 27 (2008) relate to the
accounting for transactions which do not result in a change of
control as well as for those leading to a loss of control. If
there is no loss of control, transactions with non-controlling
interests are accounted for as equity transactions not affecting
profit and loss. At the date control is lost, any retained
equity interests are remeasured to fair value. Based on the
amended standard, non- controlling interests may show a deficit
balance since both profits and losses are allocated to the
shareholders based on their equity interests.
Standards and
Interpretations Issued but Not Yet Adopted
In March 2009, the IASB issued Improving Disclosures
about Financial Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial
Instruments: Disclosures) which enhances disclosures
about fair value measurements of financial instruments and
liquidity risk. The standard requires more qualitative
disclosures about risks in connection with financial
instruments. The amendment will be effective for the Company in
its annual financial statements for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2010. The Company is evaluating the impact of
the amended IFRS 7 on its financial statements. The EU endorsed
the amendment to IFRS 7 in December 2009.
In June 2009, the IASB amended IFRS 2, Share-based
Payment, to clarify its scope and the accounting for
group cash-settled share-based payment transactions in the
separate or individual financial statements of the entity when
that entity has no obligation to settle the share-based payment
transaction. The amendment will be effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after January 1, 2010. Therefore, for the
Company, the amendment will be effective for its fiscal year
beginning on October 1, 2010. The new guidance is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements. The EU endorsed the amendment in March
2010.
In November 2009 the IASB issued IFRS 9, Financial
Instruments, which prescribes the classification and
measurement of financial assets and completes the first phase of
the project to replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement. The new standard enhances
the ability of investors and other users of financial
information to understand the accounting of financial assets and
reduces complexity. IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine
whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair
value, replacing the many different rules in IAS 39. The
approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its
financial instruments (its business model) and the contractual
cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. IFRS 9 will
be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 2013 with earlier application permitted.
Therefore, for the Company, the new standard will be effective
for its fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2013. The EU
has not yet endorsed the new standard. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of IFRS 9 on its financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Divestitures and
Discontinued Operations
|
Sale of Molded
Module Assets and formation of the joint venture LS Power
Semitech Co., Ltd.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company entered
into a joint venture agreement with LS Industrial Systems
(LSIS), which closed on November 27, 2009, to
establish the joint venture LS Power Semitech Co., Ltd.
(LS). The joint venture operates in Korea and
elsewhere in Asia, and focuses on the development, production
and marketing of molded power modules for white goods
applications. LSIS holds 54 percent and the Company holds
46 percent of LS. The Company contributed licenses of
intellectual property as well as technology and process know-how
for the Companys power module family
CIPOStm
(Control Integrated Power System), and contributed existing
CIPOStm
back-end manufacturing equipment to LS. The Company realized a
gain of 3 million before tax from the contributions
to LS which was recognized in other operating income in the
three months ended December 31, 2009. The investment in the
joint venture is accounted for using the equity method.
24
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
ALTIS
ALTIS Semiconductor S.N.C., Essonnes, France (ALTIS)
is a joint venture between the Company and International
Business Machines Corporation, New York, USA (IBM),
with each having equal voting representation. The Company fully
consolidated ALTIS in accordance with IAS 27,
Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements until December 2009.
Following the waiver of its option to acquire further voting
shares in ALTIS from IBM (potential voting rights), the Company
deconsolidated ALTIS in late December 2009. The assets and
liabilities of ALTIS as well as the non-controlling interests in
this previously consolidated subsidiary were derecognized, and
the Company recorded its interest in ALTIS as an investment in
an associated company at its fair value of zero. The investment
in ALTIS is subsequently accounted for using the equity method.
Upon deconsolidation, cash and cash equivalents decreased by
88 million and non-controlling interests by
61 million. The total operating loss initially
recognized in connection with the deconsolidation amounted to
81 million, which was recognized in the three months
ended December 31, 2009. In the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 the operating loss
recognized was reduced by 8 million and
4 million, respectively, as a result of adjustments
to provisions caused by higher than expected loading, which
results in total operating loss recognized in connection with
the deconsolidation of ALTIS of 69 million, which is
presented within other operating expense. In addition, the
Company received a dividend of 3 million from ALTIS
in the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Furthermore, in the 2009 calendar year the Company entered into
several amendments to its agreements with IBM in respect of
ALTIS, which modified the output and cost allocation of ALTIS
and certain rights of the shareholders. Additionally, the
product purchase agreement with ALTIS was extended through May
2010. In preparation for a proposed sale of ALTIS, a wafer
supply agreement between ALTIS and the Company is in place from
June 2010.
At the end of June 2010, the Company and IBM received a binding
offer to sell their respective shares in ALTIS. In July 2010
further progress with regard to the sale of ALTIS was made. The
parties perform all necessary steps towards a closing of a sale.
Qimonda
discontinued operations
On January 23, 2009, Qimonda AG (Qimonda) and
its wholly owned subsidiary Qimonda Dresden GmbH & Co.
oHG (Qimonda Dresden) filed an application at the
Munich Local Court to commence insolvency proceedings. As a
result of this application, the Company deconsolidated Qimonda
and Qimondas subsidiaries in accordance with IAS 27,
Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements, during the second quarter of the 2009
fiscal year. On April 1, 2009, the insolvency proceedings
formally opened. Formal insolvency proceedings have also been
commenced by several additional subsidiaries of Qimonda in
various jurisdictions. The final resolution of the insolvency
proceedings, including the final disposition of the remaining
assets and liabilities of Qimonda, cannot be predicted at this
time. The Company faces certain contingent liabilities, and has
made certain related provisions, in connection with the
commencement of insolvency proceedings by Qimonda (see below).
During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, Qimonda-related
amounts of 399 million included in loss from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes consisted
principally of the realization of accumulated foreign currency
translation losses of 188 million and charges for
provisions and allowances of 206 million in
connection with Qimondas insolvency (see below). The
realization of accumulated currency translation effects, which
were previously recorded in equity, resulted mainly from
Qimondas sale of its interest in Inotera Memories Inc.
(Inotera) to Micron Technology, Inc.
(Micron) in the three months ended December 31,
2008 as well as the deconsolidation of Qimonda in the three
months ended March 31, 2009. In the three months ended
June 30, 2009, the Company adjusted its recorded provisions
and allowances by an additional 3 million. In the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, certain
adjustments to individual provisions for contingent liabilities
were necessary to reflect current developments in these matters,
However, the net impact of these adjustments on the
Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations
was negative 4 million and 5 million in
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010. Furthermore,
the completion of a tax audit led to an income tax benefit of
20 million
25
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 in
relation to the Memory Segment and the formation of Qimonda.
As a result of the commencement of insolvency proceedings by
Qimonda, the Company is exposed to potential liabilities arising
in connection with the Qimonda business, which include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is a named defendant in certain pending antitrust
and securities law claims. Qimonda is required to indemnify
Infineon, in whole or in part, for such claims, including any
related expenses. As a result of Qimondas insolvency,
however, the Company expects that Qimonda will not be able to
indemnify it for these claims. For more information on these
pending antitrust and securities law claims and their potential
impact on the Company, see note 15 (Commitments
and Contingencies Litigation and Government
Inquiries Antitrust Litigation,
Other Government Inquiries and,
Securities Litigation).
|
|
|
|
The Company is the named defendant in a lawsuit in Delaware in
which the plaintiffs are seeking to hold the Company liable for
the payment of severance and other benefits allegedly due from
Qimondas North American subsidiaries in connection with
the termination of employment related to Qimondas
insolvency. For more information on this suit, see note 15
(Commitments and Contingencies Litigation
and Government Inquiries Qimonda Employment
Litigation).
|
|
|
|
The Company faces potential liabilities arising from its former
participation in Qimonda Dresden. Before the carve-out of the
Qimonda business, the Company was a general partner of Qimonda
Dresden, and as such may in certain circumstances, as a matter
of law, be held liable for certain liabilities of Qimonda
Dresden that originated prior to the carve-out. These include,
among others, the potential repayment of governmental subsidies
as well as employee-related claims, including salaries and
social security contributions. The Company is in negotiations
with the Free State of Saxony and the Qimonda insolvency
administrator regarding these matters. The Company has recorded
a provision in connection with these matters, but disclosure of
the amount of the provision could seriously prejudice the
Companys negotiations regarding these matters.
|
|
|
|
The Company and its subsidiary Infineon Technologies Dresden
GmbH (Infineon Dresden) are subject to lawsuits by
approximately 80 former Infineon employees who were transferred
to Qimonda or Qimonda Dresden as part of the carve-out and who
seek to be re-employed by the Company. No court decision adverse
to Infineon or Infineon Dresden has been issued to date.
|
|
|
|
The Qimonda insolvency administrator has made a damages claim
against the Company asserting that Infineon, in its capacity as
a shareholder of Qimonda, indirectly influenced Qimondas
decision to sell its stake in Inotera and to enter into a cross
license agreement with the purchaser of the Inotera stake. The
claim does not state any specific facts. The Company is
examining the assertions made.
|
In addition to the matters described above, the Company may be
subject to claims by the insolvency administrator under German
insolvency laws for repayment of certain amounts received by the
Company from Qimonda, such as payments for intra-group services
and supplies, during defined periods prior to the commencement
of insolvency proceedings. The insolvency of Qimonda may also
subject the Company to other claims arising in connection with
the contracts, offers, uncompleted transactions, continuing
obligations, risks, encumbrances and other liabilities
contributed to Qimonda in connection with the carve-out of the
Qimonda business, as the Company expects that Qimonda will not
be able to fulfill its obligation to indemnify Infineon against
any such liabilities.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company
made total payments of 50 million in connection with
certain of the matters described above. This amount included,
among others, the final installment of 17 million in
connection with the U.S. Department of Justice
(DoJ) antitrust settlement, certain payments in
connection with employee-related matters, and the settlement
with the last of the U.S. DRAM purchasers who had chosen to
opt out of the class action settlement (see note 15).
Discussions are continuing with respect to certain additional
employee-related matters. As of June 30, 2010, the Company
reclassified 81 million from current
provisions into other current liabilities,
reflecting the settlement with the European Commission and the
agreement to settle with indirect purchaser class plaintiffs
(see note 15).
26
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
As of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010, the
Company recorded aggregate liabilities of 21 million
and 81 million, respectively, and provisions of
163 million and 58 million, respectively,
in connection with these matters. The recorded provisions are
primarily reflected within Current provisions, and
the remainder is recorded within Long-term
provisions. The recorded provisions reflect the amount of
those liabilities that management believes are probable and can
be estimated with reasonable accuracy at that time. There can be
no assurance that such provisions recorded will be sufficient to
cover all liabilities that may ultimately be incurred in
relation to these matters. Disclosure of individual amounts with
respect to these matters could seriously prejudice the
Companys legal or negotiating position, and therefore have
been omitted. No reasonable estimate can be made at this time
related to those potential liabilities that may be incurred, but
that are currently not viewed to be probable.
Moreover, the Company may lose rights and licenses (including
its right to sublicense) to Qimondas intellectual property
to which it is entitled to under the contribution agreement in
connection with the carve-out of the Qimonda business due to the
fact that the insolvency administrator has declared
non-performance of this agreement. The Company is evaluating the
scope of any potentially affected intellectual property, and is
in negotiations with Qimondas insolvency administrator
regarding a potential settlement of this matter. Any disclosure
of the Companys estimate of potential outcome could
seriously prejudice the position of the Company in this case.
In May 2010 the Company entered into an agreement with
Agência para o Investimento e Comércio Externo de
Portugal, E.P.E. (AICEP) and Nanium S.A. (formerly
Qimonda Portugal S.A.) that resolved all open issues in
connection with governmental subsidies received by Qimonda
Portugal S.A. prior to the carve-out of Qimonda.
Sale of
Wireline Communications Business discontinued
operations
On July 7, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement with Lantiq, affiliates of Golden Gate Private Equity
Inc. (Lantiq), pursuant to which it agreed to sell
the Wireline Communications business, one of the Companys
segments. The sale closed on November 6, 2009 and the
majority of the purchase price was paid at that date in the
amount of 223 million, with up to an additional
20 million of the purchase price being payable nine
months after the closing date. The Company recognized a gain of
110 million before tax at the closing of the sale
which was adjusted to 111 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2010. Income tax expense attributable to
this gain increased by 11 million to
15 million in the three months ended June 30,
2010, which resulted in a gain of 96 million after
tax. Certain inventories in the manufacturing supply chain at
the date of closing could not yet be transferred to Lantiq and
are presented as assets held for sale in the condensed
consolidated statement of financial position at June 30,
2010. Prepayments in relation to those assets were recognized
and are presented within liabilities classified as held for
sale. In July 2010, the inventories, which remained at Infineon
and were presented as assets held for sale, were transferred to
Lantiq. The settlement with the prepayments in relation to those
inventories, which are presented within liabilities in
connection with assets held for sale is expected to be finalized
by the end of the current fiscal year.
As a result of the decision to dispose of the Wireline
Communications business, the Company reclassified those assets
and liabilities of its Wireline Communications business to be
transferred to Lantiq as assets held for sale in the
consolidated statement of financial position as of
September 30, 2009, pursuant to IFRS 5,
Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations. The results of the Wireline Communications
business as well as the gain on the sale are reported as
discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in the
Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations
for all periods presented.
Assets and
liabilities classified as held for sale
Assets and liabilities held for sale as of September 30,
2009 and June 30, 2010 are primarily composed of the book
values of assets and liabilities to be transferred to Lantiq in
connection with the sale
27
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
of the Wireline Communications business. At September 30,
2009 and June 30, 2010, the carrying amounts of the major
classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets classified as held for sale
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
The results of Qimonda and of the Wireline Communication
business presented in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations as discontinued operations for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 consist of the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of measurement to fair value less costs to sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses resulting from Qimondas application to open
insolvency proceedings
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Losses resulting from the realization of accumulated losses
related to unrecognized currency translation effects (primarily
upon deconsolidation and Qimondas sale of Inotera)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimondas share of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income (loss)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax gain recognized on the sale of the Wireline
Communications business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Income tax expense on gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on the sale of the Wireline Communications business, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications share of discontinued operations,
net of income taxes
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No further information concerning
Qimondas condensed consolidated statements of operations
is available for the period from January 1, 2009 to
January 23, 2009, the date of the application by Qimonda to
commence insolvency proceedings. Due to the write down of
Qimondas net assets to zero as of September 30, 2008,
the operating losses of Qimonda for the period from
October 1, 2008 to January 23, 2009 did not affect the
consolidated net income of the Company, but instead were
eliminated via an offsetting partial reversal of previously
recorded impairments. Therefore, while the amounts of revenue
and costs and expenses in the table above exclude amounts for
the period from January 1, 2009 to January 23, 2009,
Qimondas share of the loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes, of 399 million, is unaffected.
|
28
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The amount of financial income is as follows for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Valuation changes and gains on sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other financial income
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009 includes gains before tax of
13 million and 61 million, respectively,
as a result of the repurchase of convertible subordinated notes
due in June 2010 and subordinated exchangeable notes due in
August 2010. The latter were fully redeemed during the 2009
fiscal year.
The amount of financial expense is as follows for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Valuation changes and losses on sales
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other financial expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2010 includes a loss before tax of
0 million and 5 million, respectively, as
a result of the repurchase of convertible subordinated notes due
in June 2010.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and
income tax expense are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
In the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010,
the tax expense of the Company is affected by lower foreign tax
rates, tax credits and the need for valuation allowances on
deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions.
|
|
7.
|
Earnings (Loss)
Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) are calculated
by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is
calculated by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted
average number of ordinary shares outstanding plus all
additional
29
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
ordinary shares that would have been outstanding if potentially
dilutive instruments had been converted to ordinary shares.
The computation of basic and diluted EPS is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Numerator ( in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
155
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
non-controlling interests
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
attributable to shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to shareholders of Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (shares in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
basic(1)
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
diluted(1)
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
Basic earnings (losses) per share (in ):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) from continuing operations attributable to
shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes attributable to shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) attributable to shareholders of Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (losses) per share (in ):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) from continuing operations attributable to
shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes attributable to shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) attributable to shareholders of Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding basic and diluted for all
periods have been adjusted in accordance with IAS 33.27 as a
result of the capital increase completed in August 2009.
|
The weighted average of potentially dilutive instruments that
were excluded from the diluted earnings (loss) per share
computations, because the exercise price was greater than the
average market price of the ordinary shares during the period or
would have otherwise been anti-dilutive, includes
21.8 million and 15.2 million shares underlying
employee stock options for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2010, respectively, and 24.8 million and
15.7 million shares underlying employee stock options for
the nine
30
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Additionally, 83.0 million and 0 million ordinary
shares issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible
subordinated notes during the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2010, respectively, and 65.9 million and
84.0 million ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of
outstanding convertible subordinated notes during the nine
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively, were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share
as their impact would have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
8.
|
Trade and Other
Receivables
|
Trade and other receivables consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
Related parties trade
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, gross
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants receivable
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
License fees receivable
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Third party financial and other receivables
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Receivables from German banks deposit protection fund
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee receivables
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Trade and Other
Payables
|
Trade and other payables consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Related parties trade
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties financial and other payables
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Provisions consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Personnel costs
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Warranties and licenses
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Qimonda related
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Other
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amounts of provisions are reflected in the condensed
consolidated statements of financial position as of
September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for personnel costs relate to employee-related
obligations and include, among others, costs of incentive and
bonus payments, holiday and vacation payments, termination
benefits, early retirement, service anniversary awards, other
personnel costs, and related social security payments.
Provisions for warranties and licenses mainly represent the
estimated future cost of fulfilling contractual requirements
associated with products sold.
Qimonda related provisions comprise provisions for potential
liabilities in connection with the insolvency proceedings of
Qimonda (see note 3).
Other provisions comprise provisions for outstanding expenses,
penalties for default or delay on contracts, conservation and
waste management, asset retirement obligations, onerous
contracts, and for miscellaneous other liabilities.
Debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable to banks, weighted average rate 1.45%
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, 5.0%, due 2010
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to governmental entity, due 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, 7.5%, due 2014
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Unsecured term loans, weighted average rate 2.07%, due
2011- 2013
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Notes payable to governmental entity, due 2010
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term loans payable to banks consist primarily of
borrowings under the terms of short-term borrowing arrangements.
32
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, the
Company made cash repurchases of notional amounts of
3 million and 193 million, respectively,
of its convertible subordinated notes due June 2010 which
resulted in losses of 0 and 5 million,
respectively, before tax which were recognized in interest
expense. On June 7, 2010, the company fully redeemed the
remaining outstanding amount of 255 million of its
convertible subordinated notes due June 2010.
The Company has established independent financing arrangements
with several financial institutions, in the form of both short-
and long-term credit facilities, which are available for various
funding purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Nature of Financial
|
|
Purpose/
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Commitment Institution
|
|
intended use
|
|
facility
|
|
|
Drawn
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
general corporate purposes, working capital, guarantees
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Short-term
|
|
no firm commitment
|
|
working capital, cash management
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Long-
term(1)
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
project finance
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including current maturities.
|
The Company has transactions in the normal course of business
with equity method investees and related companies
(collectively, Related Parties). The Company also
has transactions with members of key management personnel, such
as Management and Supervisory Board members, solely related to
compensation in connection with their function.
The Company purchases certain of its raw materials from, and
sells certain of its products to, Related Parties. Purchases
from and sales to Related Parties are generally based on market
prices or manufacturing costs plus a
mark-up.
Related Party receivables consist primarily of trade, financial,
and other receivables from equity method investments and related
companies, and totaled 3 million as of each of
September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010.
Related Party payables consist primarily of trade, financial,
and other payables from equity method investments and related
companies, and totaled 15 million and
33 million as of September 30, 2009 and
June 30, 2010, respectively.
Related Party receivables and payables as of September 30,
2009 and June 30, 2010, have been segregated first between
amounts owed by or to companies in which the Company has an
ownership interest, and second based on the underlying nature of
the transactions. Trade receivables and payables include amounts
for the purchase and sale of products and services. Financial
and other receivables and payables represent amounts owed
relating to loans and advances and accrued interest at interbank
rates.
In the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, sales to
Related Parties totaled 0 million and
3 million, respectively, while purchases from Related
Parties totaled 18 million and 76 million,
respectively. In the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and
2010, sales to Related Parties totaled 2 million and
18 million, respectively, while purchases from
Related Parties totaled 77 million and
195 million, respectively.
33
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Information with respect to the Companys pension plans is
presented for German (Domestic) plans and non-German
(Foreign) plans.
The components of net periodic pension cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gain recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of past service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Curtailment gain recognized
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of past service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
Litigation and
Government Inquiries
U.S. Department
of Justice Matter
In September 2004, the Company entered into a plea agreement
with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) in connection with its investigation
into alleged antitrust violations in the DRAM industry. Pursuant
to this plea agreement, the Company agreed to plead guilty to a
single count of conspiring with other unspecified DRAM
manufacturers to fix the prices of DRAM products during certain
periods of time between July 1, 1999 and June 15,
2002, and to pay a fine of $160 million (plus interest) in
annual installments through 2009. The final installment of
$25 million plus interest (approximately
17 million) was paid in October 2009. The
price-fixing charges related to DRAM sales to six Original
Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) customers that
manufacture computers and servers. The Company has settled with
the OEM customers. In addition to those OEM customers, the
Company has settled with eight direct customers and the six
opt out plaintiffs described below.
Antitrust
Litigation
Subsequent to the commencement of the DOJ investigation, a
number of putative class action lawsuits were filed in
U.S. federal courts against the Company, its
U.S. subsidiary Infineon Technologies North America Corp.
(IF North America) and other DRAM suppliers by
direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and various
U.S. state attorneys general. The lawsuits allege
price-fixing in violation of the Sherman Act and seek treble
damages in unspecified amounts, costs, attorneys fees, and
an injunction against the allegedly unlawful conduct. In
September 2002, these federal cases were transferred to the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings as part of
a Multi District Litigation (MDL).
34
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
In September 2005, the Company and IF North America entered into
a definitive settlement agreement with counsel for the class of
direct U.S. purchasers of DRAM (granting an opportunity for
individual class members to opt out of the settlement). In
November 2006, the court approved the settlement agreement,
entered final judgment and dismissed the claims with prejudice.
Six entities chose to opt out of the class action settlement and
pursue individual lawsuits against the Company and IF North
America. The Company and IF North America have settled with all
six plaintiffs.
Approximately sixty additional cases were filed through October
2005 in numerous federal and state courts throughout the
U.S. These state and federal cases purport to be on behalf
of a class of individuals and entities who indirectly purchased
DRAM products in the U.S. during specified time periods
commencing in or after 1999. The complaints variously allege
violations of the Sherman Act, Californias Cartwright Act,
various other state laws, unfair competition law, and unjust
enrichment and seek treble damages in generally unspecified
amounts, restitution, costs, attorneys fees and
injunctions against the allegedly unlawful conduct.
Twenty-three of the state and federal court cases were
subsequently ordered transferred to the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California for coordinated and
consolidated pretrial proceedings as part of the MDL proceeding
described above. Nineteen of the twenty-three transferred cases
are currently pending in the MDL litigation. The pending
California state cases were coordinated and transferred to
San Francisco County Superior Court for pre-trial
proceedings. The plaintiffs in the indirect purchaser cases
outside California agreed to stay proceedings in those cases in
favor of proceedings on the indirect purchaser cases pending as
part of the MDL pre-trial proceedings.
In January 2008, the district court in the MDL indirect
purchaser proceedings granted in part and denied in part the
defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings directed
at several of the claims. In June 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals agreed to hear an appeal by the plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs have agreed to a stay of further proceedings in the
MDL indirect purchaser cases until the appeal is complete.
Plaintiffs in various state court indirect purchaser actions
outside of the MDL have moved to lift the stays that were
previously in place. In March 2009, the judge in the Arizona
state court action issued an order denying plaintiffs
motion to lift the stay. In December 2009, the judge in the
Minnesota state court action issued an order denying
plaintiffs motion to lift the stay. In September 2009, the
court in the Arkansas state action issued an order directing the
parties to submit to mediation within ninety days, and granting
plaintiffs motion to lift the stay after the ninety day
period. The parties subsequently conducted a mediation on
December 7, 2009, but the case did not settle. In July
2009, the court in the Wisconsin state court indirect purchaser
action issued an order lifting the stay in the Wisconsin state
case. In October 2009, the court in the West Virginia state
court indirect purchaser action issued an order lifting the stay
in the West Virginia state case.
The state attorneys general of forty-one U.S. states and
territories have filed various suits against the Company, IF
North America and several other DRAM manufacturers on behalf of
governmental entities and consumers in each of those states who
purchased products containing DRAM beginning in 1998. The
plaintiffs allege violations of state and federal antitrust laws
arising out of the same allegations of DRAM price-fixing and
artificial price inflation practices discussed above, and seek
recovery of actual and treble damages in unspecified amounts,
penalties, costs (including attorneys fees) and injunctive
and other equitable relief. The various suits filed by these
attorneys general have been made part of the MDL proceeding
described above. Between June 2007 and December 2008, the state
attorneys general of eight states filed requests for dismissal
of their claims.
In October 2008, approximately ninety-five California schools,
political subdivisions and public agencies that were previously
putative class members of the multistate attorneys general
complaint described above filed suit in California Superior
Court against the Company, IF North America, and several other
DRAM manufacturers alleging DRAM price-fixing and artificial
price inflation in violation of California state antitrust and
consumer protection laws arising out of the alleged practices
described above. The plaintiffs seek recovery of actual and
treble damages in unspecified amounts, restitution, costs
(including attorneys fees) and injunctive and other
equitable relief. This suit is ongoing.
Infineon and certain other defendants have agreed to settle with
the indirect purchaser class plaintiffs and the attorneys
general in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The
settlement is subject to definitive
35
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
documentation, agreement on certain terms, including allocation
of any payments among various plaintiffs and state attorneys
general, court approval, and other contingencies. As part of the
settlement, the Company would pay approximately
$29 million. The Company has already recorded a provision
for this amount which was reclassified from current
provisions to current liabilities as of
June 30, 2010.
Between December 2004 and February 2005, two putative class
proceedings were filed in the Canadian province of Quebec, and
one was filed in each of Ontario and British Columbia against
the Company, IF North America and other DRAM manufacturers on
behalf of all direct and indirect purchasers resident in Canada
who purchased DRAM or products containing DRAM between July 1999
and June 2002, seeking damages, investigation and administration
costs, as well as interest and legal costs. Plaintiffs primarily
allege conspiracy to unduly restrain competition and to
illegally fix the price of DRAM. No reasonable estimated amount
can be attributed at this time to the potential outcome of the
putative class proceedings.
Other Government
Inquiries
In April 2003, the Company received a request for information
from the European Commission (the Commission)
regarding certain competitive practices of which the Commission
has become aware in the European market for DRAM products. The
Commission opened formal proceedings in February 2009. In May
2010 the Company entered into a settlement with the EU
Commission and has agreed to pay a fine of
57 million. The Company has already recorded a
provision for this amount which was reclassified from
current provisions to current
liabilities as of June 30, 2010.
In October 2008, the Company learned that the Commission had
commenced an investigation involving the Companys Chip
Card & Security business for alleged violations of
antitrust laws. In September and October 2009, the Company and
its French subsidiary received written requests for information
from the Commission. The Company is cooperating with the
Commission in answering the requests. No reasonable estimated
amount can be attributed at this time to the potential outcome
of this investigation.
On June 21, 2010, the Brazil Secretariat of Economic Law of
the Ministry of Justice (SDE) announced that it had
initiated an investigation related to alleged anticompetitive
activities within the DRAM industry. The SDEs Notice of
Investigation names the Company, various DRAM manufacturers and
certain executives, and focuses on the period from July 1998 to
June 2002. The SDEs Notice of Investigation is based on
the investigations carried out in the United States and in
Europe.
Securities
Litigation
Between September and November 2004, seven securities class
action complaints were filed against the Company and current or
former officers in U.S. federal district courts, later
consolidated in the Northern District of California, on behalf
of a putative class of investors that purchased the
Companys publicly-traded securities from March 2000 to
July 2004. The consolidated amended complaint alleges violations
of the U.S. securities laws and asserts that the defendants
made materially false and misleading public statements about the
Companys historical and projected financial results and
competitive position because they did not disclose the
Companys alleged participation in DRAM price-fixing
activities. The complaint also alleges that, by fixing the price
of DRAM, defendants manipulated the price of the Companys
securities, thereby injuring its shareholders. The plaintiffs
seek unspecified compensatory damages, interest, costs and
attorneys fees. In January 2008, the court denied a motion
to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs claims under
sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and dismissed the claim under
section 20A of the act with prejudice. In March 2009, the
court granted plaintiffs motion to certify a class of
persons who acquired the Companys securities between March
2000 and July 2004, including foreign purchasers who sold their
securities after June 2002. In April 2009, the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals granted the Companys petition to
immediately appeal the courts March 2009 order granting
class certification. In May 2009, the court issued an order
staying the case pending resolution of the Companys appeal
by the Ninth Circuit. No specified amount of damages has been
asserted by the plaintiffs. These matters are currently subject
to mediation.
The Companys directors and officers insurance
carriers have denied coverage in the securities class action
described above and the Company filed suit against the carriers
in December 2005 and August 2006. The Companys claims
against one D&O insurance carrier were finally dismissed in
May 2007. The claim against the other insurance carrier is still
pending.
36
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Patent
Litigation
In October 2007, CIF Licensing LLC (CIF), a member
of the General Electric Group, filed suit in the Civil Court of
Düsseldorf, Germany against Deutsche Telekom AG alleging
infringement of four European patents in Germany by certain
CPE-modems and ADSL-systems (the CIF Suit). Deutsche
Telecom has notified its suppliers, which include customers of
the Company, that a declaratory judgment of patent infringement
would be legally binding on the suppliers. In January 2008, the
Company joined the suit on the side of Deutsche Telecom. CIF
then filed suit against the Company alleging indirect
infringement of one of the four European patents. The Company is
part of a joint defense group consisting of Deutsche Telecom,
most of its suppliers and most of their respective suppliers.
The Company is contractually obligated to indemnify
and/or to
pay damages to its customers under certain circumstances
pursuant to its customer contracts. In July 2008, Deutsche
Telecom, the Company and the other defendants filed actions
contesting the validity of the four patents before the Federal
Patent Court in Munich. In October 2008, CIF also filed suit in
the Civil Court of Düsseldorf against Arcor
GmbH &Co KG, Hansenet Telekommunikation GmbH and
United Internet AG (all three, the New Defendants)
alleging infringement of the same four European patents. The New
Defendants have notified their suppliers of the suit. Three of
the proceedings at the Civil Court in Düsseldorf have been
stayed and the Company expects that they will only continue
after resolution of the pending Federal Patent Court actions. No
specified amount of damages has been asserted by CIF in these
suits. The forth proceeding is scheduled for February 24,
2011. The Federal Patent Court has scheduled court hearings for
two of the four validity actions (December 15, 2010 and
January 26, 2011). Any disclosure of the Companys
estimate of potential outcomes, if such amounts could reasonably
be estimated at this time, could seriously prejudice the
position of the Company in these suits.
In November 2008, Volterra Semiconductor Corporation
(Volterra) filed suit against Primarion, Inc., the
Company and IF North America (the Defendants) in the
U.S District Court for the Northern District of California for
alleged infringement of five U.S. patents
(Patents) by certain products offered by Primarion.
The Defendants denied any infringement and filed a counterclaim
against Volterra alleging certain antitrust violations, fraud on
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(U.S. PTO) and that the Patents are invalid.
The U.S. PTO granted the requested reexamination of all
Patents. In June 2009, the court ordered a stay in the case
regarding two of the Patents pending the completion of the
reexamination proceedings. In July 2009, Volterra filed motions
for a preliminary injunction and for partial summary judgment of
infringement. In September 2009, the court initially issued a
minute order granting Volterras motion for a preliminary
injunction and denying the motion for partial summary judgment
without prejudice. In November 2009, however, after another
hearing, the court finally dismissed Volterras motion for
a preliminary injunction. In May 2010, Volterra stipulated
non-infringement regarding one Patent. A trial date has been set
for January 2011. No specified amount of damages has been
asserted by Volterra and no reasonable estimated amount can be
attributed at this time to the potential outcome of the Volterra
claim. In January 2010, the Company filed a complaint against
Volterra in the District Court for the District of Delaware for
infringement of four of its U.S. patents.
In May 2009, Gregory Bender filed suit in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California, against four
companies, including IF North America, alleging infringement of
one U.S. patent by certain electronic products having a
buffered amplifier. No specified amount of damages has been
asserted by the plaintiff and no reasonable estimated amount can
be attributed at this time to the potential outcome of this
claim.
In February 2010, Infineon brought actions against Elpida Memory
Inc. (Elpida) and several of its customers before
the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), arguing that
Elpidas DRAM products infringe four of Infineons
U.S. patents relating to general processing technology. On
April 2, 2010 Elpida filed two patent infringement suits
against the Company and IF North America in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Elpida and Infineon reached a settlement agreement on
June 2, 2010 and all pending proceedings were withdrawn.
Qimonda
Employment Litigation
In April 2009, former employees of Qimondas subsidiaries
in the U.S. filed a complaint in the U.S. Federal
District Court in Delaware against the Company, IF North America
and Qimonda AG,
37
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
individually and on behalf of several putative classes of
plaintiffs. The suit relates to the termination of the
plaintiffs employment in connection with Qimondas
insolvency and the payment of severance and other benefits
allegedly due by Qimonda. The complaint seeks to pierce
the corporate veil and to impose liability on the Company
and IF North America under several theories, although the
plaintiffs do not specify a particular amount of damages
attributable to the Company, IF North America, or Qimonda AG. In
a decision issued June 29, 2010, the District Court denied
the Companys motion to dismiss and found that the
complaint adequately stated a claim for relief. The Court,
however, agreed to stay all proceedings until at least October
2010, pending developments in the Qimonda Subsidiaries
bankruptcy proceedings. The Company and IF North America dispute
the substantive allegations asserted in the Complaint, and if
the case proceeds they expect to defend the claims vigorously.
At this time no discovery has been commenced, and no reasonable
estimated amount can be attributed at this time to the potential
outcome of the claim.
The Company and its subsidiary Infineon Dresden are subject to
lawsuits by approximately 80 former Infineon employees who were
transferred to Qimonda or Qimonda Dresden as part of the
carve-out of Qimonda and who seek to be re-employed by the
Company. No reasonable estimated amount can be attributed at
this time to the potential outcome of any such claims.
Provisions and
the Potential Effect of these Matters
Provisions related to legal proceedings are recorded when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the associated
amount can be reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount
of loss is within a range of amounts and no amount within the
range is a better estimate than any other amount, the mid-point
of the range is accrued. As additional information becomes
available, the potential liability related to these matters will
be reassessed and the estimates revised, if necessary.
Provisions with respect to these matters would be subject to
change in the future based on new developments in each matter,
or changes in circumstances, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
An adverse final resolution of any of the investigations or
lawsuits described above could result in significant financial
liability to, and other adverse effects on, the Company, which
would have a material adverse effect on its results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows. In each of these
matters, the Company is continuously evaluating the merits of
the respective claims and defending itself vigorously or seeking
to arrive at alternative resolutions in the best interest of the
Company, as it deems appropriate. Irrespective of the validity
or the successful assertion of the claims described above, the
Company could incur significant costs with respect to defending
against or settling such claims, which could have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
The Company is subject to various other lawsuits, legal actions,
claims and proceedings related to products, patents,
environmental matters, and other matters incidental to its
businesses. The Company has accrued a liability for the
estimated costs of adjudication of various asserted and
unasserted claims existing as of the date of the statement of
financial position. Based upon information presently known to
management, the Company does not believe that the ultimate
resolution of such other pending matters will have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial position,
although the final resolution of such matters could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations or cash flows in the period of settlement.
Qimonda
Matters
The Company faces certain contingent liabilities, and has made
certain related provisions, in connection with the commencement
of insolvency proceedings by Qimonda. As of September 30,
2009 and June 30, 2010, the Company recorded aggregate
liabilities of 21 million and 81 million,
respectively, and provisions of 163 million and
58 million, respectively, in connection with these
matters. The recorded provisions are primarily reflected within
Current provisions, and the remainder is recorded
within Long-term provisions. The recorded provisions
reflect the amount of those liabilities that management believes
are probable and can be estimated with reasonable accuracy at
that time. There can be no assurance that such provisions
recorded will be sufficient to cover all liabilities that may
ultimately be incurred in relation to these matters. For
detailed information on these matters see note 3.
38
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Other
Contingencies
On a group-wide basis the Company has guarantees outstanding to
external parties of 91 million as of June 30,
2010. In addition, the Company, as parent company, has in
certain customary circumstances guaranteed the settlement of
certain of its consolidated subsidiaries obligations to
third parties. Such third party obligations are or will be
reflected as liabilities in the consolidated financial
statements by virtue of consolidation. As of June 30, 2010,
such guarantees, principally relating to certain consolidated
subsidiaries third-party debt, aggregated
464 million, of which 196 million relate
to the subordinated convertible notes due 2014.
The Company has received government grants and subsidies related
to the construction and financing of certain of its production
facilities. These amounts are recognized upon the attainment of
specified criteria. Certain of these grants have been received
contingent upon the Company maintaining compliance with certain
project-related requirements for a specified period after
receipt. The Company is committed to maintaining these
requirements. Nevertheless, should such requirements not be met,
as of June 30, 2010, a maximum of 22 million of
these subsidies could be refundable. Such amount does not
include any potential liabilities for Qimonda related subsidies
(see note 3).
|
|
16.
|
Operating Segment
and Geographic Information
|
The Company reports its operating segment and geographic
information in accordance with IFRS 8, Operating
Segments. The Company uses Segment Result
as its performance measure in accordance with IFRS 8. See the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2009 for the detailed definition of Segment
Result.
The Companys core business is organized in four operating
segments: Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket, Chip
Card & Security, and Wireless Solutions:
Automotive
The Automotive segment designs, develops, manufactures and
markets semiconductors for use in automotive applications.
Together with its product portfolio, it offers corresponding
system know-how and support to its customers.
Industrial &
Multimarket
The Industrial & Multimarket segment designs,
develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and complete
system solutions primarily for use in industrial applications
and in applications with customer-specific product requirements.
Chip
Card & Security
The Chip Card & Security segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of security controllers
and security memories for chip card and security applications.
Wireless
Solutions
The Wireless Solutions segment designs, develops, manufactures
and markets a wide range of ICs, other semiconductors and
complete system solutions for wireless communication
applications.
In November 2009, the Company completed the sale of its Wireline
Communications business (see note 3). Segment Results for
all periods presented have been recast to be consistent with the
current reporting structure and presentation, as well as to
facilitate analysis of operating segment information.
39
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents selected segment data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Wireless
Solutions(1)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Corporate and
Eliminations(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes revenue of
1 million for the nine months ended June 30,
2009 from sales of wireless communication applications to
Qimonda.
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes the elimination of revenue
of 1 million for the nine months ended June 30,
2009 since these revenues were not part of the Qimonda disposal
plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Segment Result:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table provides the reconciliation of Segment
Result to the Companys income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Total Segment Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
361
|
|
Adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Restructuring charges, and other related closure cost, net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related amortization and losses
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Gains on disposal of assets, businesses, or interests in
subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Losses in connection with the deconsolidation of ALTIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Financial expense
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Income from investment accounted for using the equity method, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of revenue by geographic area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
North America
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers are based on the
customers billing location.
On August 2, 2010 the Company issued a press release
announcing the Companys discussions with interested
parties about a transaction concerning its segment Wireless
Solutions. A significant progress was made within these
discussions. The objective of a potential transaction is the
strategic development of the segment Wireless Solutions.
In July 2010, the inventories, which remained at Infineon and
were presented as assets held for sale, were transferred to
Lantiq (see note 3).
At the end of June 2010, the Company and IBM received a binding
offer to sell their respective shares in ALTIS. In July 2010
further progress with regard to the sale of ALTIS was made. The
parties perform all necessary steps towards a closing of a sale
(see note 3).
41
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
On August 4, 2010, Peter Bauer, formerly Spokesperson of
the Management Board, was appointed Chairman of the Management
Board with immediate effect, and Chief Financial Officer and
Labor Director Dr. Marco Schröter resigned from the
Management Board of Infineon Technologies AG with immediate
effect. Peter Bauer will serve as interim Chief Financial
Officer until a successor is appointed. The role of the Labor
Director, with responsibility for Human Resources, will be
transitionally assumed by Member of the Management Board
Dr. Reinhard Ploss.
42
Supplementary
Information (Unaudited)
Backlog
Most standard products are not ordered on a long-term,
fixed-price contract basis due to changing market conditions. It
is common industry practice to permit major customers to change
the date on which products are delivered or to cancel existing
orders. For these reasons, the Company believes that the backlog
at any time of standard products is not a reliable indicator of
future sales. Orders for customized products vary depending on
customer needs and industry conditions, capacity and demand,
while many customers request logistics agreements based on
rolling forecasts. As a result, the Company does not place too
much reliance on backlog to manage its business and does not use
it to evaluate performance. Due to possible changes in customer
delivery schedules, cancellation of orders and potential delays
in product shipments, the Companys backlog as of any
particular date may not be indicative of actual sales for any
later period.
Dividends
The Company has not declared or paid any dividend during the
three or nine months ended June 30, 2009 or 2010.
Employees
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had 25,978 employees
worldwide, including 5,599 engaged in research and development.
Market for
Ordinary Shares
The Companys ordinary shares are listed on the Regulated
Market (Prime Standard) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (FSE)
under the symbol IFX. On April 24, 2009, the
Company voluntarily delisted from the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE). The Companys American Depositary Shares currently
trade
over-the-counter
on the OTCQX International market under the symbol
IFNNY.
43
Infineons share price performance and key data were as
follows(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
+/− in %
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
+/− in %
|
|
IFX closing prices in Euro (Xetra)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
579
|
%
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
High
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
129
|
%
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Low
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
454
|
%
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
771
|
%
|
End of the period
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
110
|
%
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
110
|
%
|
IFX closing prices in U.S. dollars (NYSE/OTCQX)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
574
|
%
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
%
|
High
|
|
|
3.47
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
111
|
%
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Low
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
414
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
919
|
%
|
End of the period
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On July 20, 2009, our shares
began trading ex-rights, which rights related to the right to
subscribe for shares in the rights offering we commenced on such
date. The closing sales prices presented in this table are
adjusted to reflect the price of our shares ex-rights.
|
Financial
Calendar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results press release
|
Fiscal Period
|
|
Period end date
|
|
(preliminary)
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
November 16, 2010
|
Publication date
of the third quarterly report for the 2010 fiscal year:
August 5,
2010
Contact
information
Infineon Technologies AG
Investor Relations
Am Campeon 1-12
85579 Neubiberg/Munich, Germany
Phone: +49 89
234-26655
Fax: +49 89
234-9552987
E-Mail:
investor.relations@infineon.com
Visit
http://www.infineon.com/investor
for an electronic version of this report and other information.
44
Risk
Factors
We face numerous risks incidental to our business, including
both risks that are inherent to companies in the semiconductor
industry, and operational, financial and regulatory risks that
are unique to us. Risks relating to the semiconductor industry
include the cyclical nature of the market, which suffers from
periodic downturns and industry overcapacity. Our
production-related risks include the need to match our
production capacity with demand, and to avoid interruptions in
manufacturing and supplies. We may be exposed to claims from
others that we infringe their intellectual property rights or
that we are liable for damages under warranties. We are the
subject of governmental antitrust investigations and civil
claims related to those antitrust investigations, including
civil securities law claims. Financial risks include our need to
have access to sufficient capital and governmental subsidies,
and risks related to the resolution of Qimondas insolvency
proceedings and the liabilities we may face as a result of
Qimondas insolvency. Our regulatory risks include
potential claims for environmental remediation. We face numerous
risks due to the international nature of our business, including
volatility in foreign countries and exchange rate fluctuations.
Following Qimondas application to commence insolvency
proceedings, the Company may be exposed to a number of
significant liabilities relating to the Qimonda business,
including pending antitrust and securities law claims, potential
claims for repayment of governmental subsidies received, and
employee-related contingencies.
These and other material risks that we face are described under
the heading Risks and Opportunities in this
unaudited Interim Group Management Report and in further detail
in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
which we have filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. A copy of our most recent
Form 20-F
is available at the Investor Relations section of our website
http://ww.infineon.com/investor,
as well as on the SECs website,
http://www.sec.gov.
We encourage you to read the detailed description of the risks
that we face in this unaudited Interim Group Management Report
and in our
Form 20-F.
The occurrence of one or more of the events described could have
a material adverse effect on our Company and our results of
operations, which could result in a drop in our share price.
Forward-looking
Statements
This quarterly report includes forward-looking statements about
the future of Infineons business and the industry in which
we operate. These include statements relating to general
economic conditions, future developments in the world
semiconductor market, our ability to manage our costs and to
achieve our cost savings and growth targets, the resolution of
Qimondas insolvency proceedings and the liabilities we may
face as a result of Qimondas insolvency, the potential
disposition of our ALTIS joint venture, the benefits of research
and development alliances and activities, our planned levels of
future investment, the introduction of new technology at our
facilities, our continuing ability to offer commercially viable
products, and our expected or projected future results.
These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of
uncertainties, including broader economic developments,
including the sustainability of recent improvements in the
market environment; trends in demand and prices for
semiconductors generally and for our products in particular, as
well as for the end-products, such as automobiles and consumer
electronics, that incorporate our products; the success of our
development efforts, both alone and with partners; the success
of our efforts to introduce new production processes at our
facilities; the actions of competitors; the continued
availability of adequate funds; the outcome of antitrust
investigations and litigation matters; and the outcome of
Qimondas insolvency proceedings; as well as the other
factors mentioned herein, including under the heading
Risks and Opportunities in the unaudited Interim
Group Management Report, and those described in the Risk
Factors section of the Annual Report on
Form 20-F,
which we filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 8, 2009.
As a result, Infineons actual results could differ
materially from those contained in these forward-looking
statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. Infineon does not undertake
any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements in light of developments which differ from those
anticipated.
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
|
|
Date: August 5, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Dr. Franz Kirchmeier
|
|
|
|
Dr. Franz Kirchmeier |
|
|
|
Vice President External Reporting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Rudolf von Moreau
|
|
|
|
Rudolf von Moreau |
|
|
|
Corporate Counsel |
|
|