e6vk
FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
CGG Veritas
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Republic of France
Tour Maine Montparnasse
33, avenue du Maine
75015 Paris
France
(33) 1 64 47 45 00
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this form is also thereby
furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)
Yes o No þ
(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
82 - .)
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document includes forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking
statements on our current views and assumptions about future events.
These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements
include, among others, the following factors:
|
|
|
the impact of the current economic and
credit environment; |
|
|
|
|
developments affecting our international operations; |
|
|
|
|
the social, political and economic risks of our global operations; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop an integrated strategy for CGGVeritas; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and delays in achieving synergies and cost savings; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate successfully the businesses or assets we acquire; |
|
|
|
|
any write-downs of goodwill on our balance sheet; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sell our seismic data library; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to foreign exchange rate risk; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to finance our operations on acceptable terms; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to the credit risk of customers; |
|
|
|
|
the timely development and acceptance of our new products and services; |
|
|
|
|
ongoing operational risks and our ability to have adequate insurance against such risks; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs in protecting intellectual property rights and exposure to
infringement claims by others; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in temporarily or permanently reducing the capacity of our fleet; |
|
|
|
|
changes in international economic and political conditions and, in particular, in oil and
gas prices; |
|
|
|
|
our clients ability to unilaterally terminate certain contracts in our backlog; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of competition; |
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures by the oil and gas industry and changes in demand for
seismic products and services; |
|
|
|
|
the seasonal nature of our revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the costs of compliance with governmental regulation, including environmental, health and
safety laws; |
|
|
|
|
our substantial indebtedness and the restrictive covenants in our debt agreements; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to access the debt and equity markets during the periods covered by the
forward-looking statements, which will depend on general market conditions, including the
ongoing crisis in the financial markets, and on our credit ratings
for our debt obligations; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to interest rate risk; and |
|
|
|
|
our success at managing the foregoing risks. |
-3-
We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this document might not occur.
Certain of these risks
are described in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2008 that we filed with the SEC on April 22, 2009. Our annual report on Form 20-F is
available on our website at www.cggveritas.com or on the website maintained by the SEC at
www.sec.gov. You may request a copy of our annual report on Form 20-F, which includes our complete
audited financial statements, at no charge, by calling our investor relations department at + 33 1
6447 3831, sending an electronic message to invrelparis@cggveritas.com or
invrelhouston@cggveritas.com or writing to CGG Veritas Investor Relations Department, Tour Maine
Montparnasse 33, avenue du Maine 75015 Paris, France.
-4-
Item 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
amounts in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
559.5 |
|
|
|
819.3 |
|
|
|
516.9 |
|
|
|
719.4 |
|
Trade accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
591.9 |
|
|
|
866.7 |
|
|
|
712.3 |
|
|
|
991.4 |
|
Inventories and work-in-progress, net |
|
|
218.0 |
|
|
|
319.2 |
|
|
|
287.9 |
|
|
|
400.7 |
|
Income tax assets |
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
90.7 |
|
|
|
102.2 |
|
|
|
142.2 |
|
Other current assets, net |
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
129.8 |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
141.2 |
|
Assets held for sale, net |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,528.0 |
|
|
|
2,237.3 |
|
|
|
1,728.4 |
|
|
|
2,405.5 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
151.9 |
|
Investments and other financial assets, net |
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
Investments in companies under equity method |
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
115.3 |
|
|
|
72.9 |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
752.1 |
|
|
|
1,101.3 |
|
|
|
822.4 |
|
|
|
1,144.5 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
828.8 |
|
|
|
1,213.7 |
|
|
|
820.0 |
|
|
|
1,141.2 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,977.0 |
|
|
|
2,894.9 |
|
|
|
2,055.1 |
|
|
|
2,860.1 |
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
3,753.5 |
|
|
|
5,496.2 |
|
|
|
3,905.8 |
|
|
|
5,435.6 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
5,281.5 |
|
|
|
7,733.5 |
|
|
|
5,634.2 |
|
|
|
7,841.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Current portion of financial debt |
|
|
124.7 |
|
|
|
182.5 |
|
|
|
241.5 |
|
|
|
336.1 |
|
Trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
205.9 |
|
|
|
301.5 |
|
|
|
282.2 |
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
Accrued payroll costs |
|
|
116.6 |
|
|
|
170.8 |
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
200.8 |
|
Income taxes liability |
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
|
Advance billings to customers |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
Provisions current portion |
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
145.4 |
|
|
|
212.9 |
|
|
|
173.3 |
|
|
|
241.2 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
713.5 |
|
|
|
1,044.7 |
|
|
|
1,003.2 |
|
|
|
1,396.2 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
146.4 |
|
|
|
214.3 |
|
|
|
223.8 |
|
|
|
311.5 |
|
Provisions non-current portion |
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
118.1 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
114.6 |
|
Financial debt |
|
|
1,364.5 |
|
|
|
1,998.1 |
|
|
|
1,296.3 |
|
|
|
1,804.0 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
1,623.7 |
|
|
|
2,377.4 |
|
|
|
1,632.4 |
|
|
|
2,271.7 |
|
Common stock 216,486,213 shares authorized and
150,993,469 shares with a 0.40 nominal value
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and
150, 617,709 at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,964.8 |
|
|
|
2,877.1 |
|
|
|
1,964.7 |
|
|
|
2,734.2 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,137.3 |
|
|
|
1,665.4 |
|
|
|
799.4 |
|
|
|
1,112.6 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(13.2) |
|
|
|
(19.2) |
|
|
|
(18.1) |
|
|
|
(25.1) |
|
Net income (loss) for the period Attributable
to the Group |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
332.8 |
|
|
|
463.1 |
|
Income and expense recognized directly in equity |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
(2.5) |
|
|
|
(3.5) |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(278.1) |
|
|
|
(407.3) |
|
|
|
(176.4) |
|
|
|
(245.5) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,907.1 |
|
|
|
4,256.9 |
|
|
|
2,960.1 |
|
|
|
4,119.6 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
Total shareholders equity and minority interests |
|
|
2,944.3 |
|
|
|
4,311.4 |
|
|
|
2,998.6 |
|
|
|
4,173.2 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
5,281.5 |
|
|
|
7,733.5 |
|
|
|
5,634.2 |
|
|
|
7,841.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the exchange rate of US$1.464 per
on the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the exchange rate of US$1.392 per
on the balance sheet date. |
See notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
-5-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per share data, amounts in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
691.6 |
|
|
|
1,062.2 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
517.3 |
|
|
|
738.4 |
|
|
|
692.0 |
|
|
|
1,062.7 |
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
(412.8) |
|
|
|
(587.4) |
|
|
|
(445.1) |
|
|
|
(683.7) |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
151.0 |
|
|
|
246.9 |
|
|
|
379.0 |
|
Research and development expenses, net |
|
|
(15.1) |
|
|
|
(21.5) |
|
|
|
(11.3) |
|
|
|
(17.4) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(52.9) |
|
|
|
(75.5) |
|
|
|
(59.5) |
|
|
|
(91.5) |
|
Other revenues (expenses), net |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(1.3) |
|
|
|
(2.0) |
|
Operating income before reduction of goodwill |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
174.8 |
|
|
|
268.1 |
|
Reduction of goodwill |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2.0) |
|
|
|
(3.0) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
172.8 |
|
|
|
265.1 |
|
Expenses related to financial debt |
|
|
(26.9) |
|
|
|
(38.1) |
|
|
|
(21.8) |
|
|
|
(33.4) |
|
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
(26.6) |
|
|
|
(37.6) |
|
|
|
(18.7) |
|
|
|
(28.6) |
|
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
(6.9) |
|
|
|
(9.5) |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
158.1 |
|
|
|
242.6 |
|
Deferred taxes on currency translation |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(4.6) |
|
|
|
(7.1) |
|
Other income taxes |
|
|
(4.3) |
|
|
|
(6.1) |
|
|
|
(47.5) |
|
|
|
(72.9) |
|
Total income taxes |
|
|
(1.7) |
|
|
|
(2.4) |
|
|
|
(52.1) |
|
|
|
(80.0) |
|
Net income from consolidated companies |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
106.0 |
|
|
|
162.6 |
|
Equity in income of investees |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
|
(0.9) |
|
Net income |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
105.4 |
|
|
|
161.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
150,629,662 |
|
|
|
150,629,662 |
|
|
|
137,687,693 |
|
|
|
137,687,693 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options |
|
|
366,871 |
|
|
|
366,871 |
|
|
|
596,184 |
|
|
|
596,184 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from free shares |
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
|
648,938 |
|
|
|
648,938 |
|
Adjusted weighted average number of shares and
assumed option exercises when dilutive |
|
|
151,239,533 |
|
|
|
151,239,533 |
|
|
|
138,932,815 |
|
|
|
138,932,815 |
|
Net earning per share attributable to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corresponding to the nine months ended September 30 in US dollars less the six months
ended June in US dollars. |
-6-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per share data, amounts in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
|
|
1,835.6 |
|
|
|
2,809.1 |
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
1,740.0 |
|
|
|
2,370.5 |
|
|
|
1,836.3 |
|
|
|
2,810.2 |
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
(1,320.6) |
|
|
|
(1,799.2) |
|
|
|
(1,233.3) |
|
|
|
(1,887.3) |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
419.4 |
|
|
|
571.3 |
|
|
|
603.0 |
|
|
|
922.9 |
|
Research and development expenses, net |
|
|
(45.1) |
|
|
|
(61.5) |
|
|
|
(35.5) |
|
|
|
(54.3) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(180.5) |
|
|
|
(246.0) |
|
|
|
(182.5) |
|
|
|
(279.4) |
|
Other revenues (expenses), net |
|
|
(69.3) |
|
|
|
(94.4) |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Operating income before reduction of goodwill |
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
|
169.4 |
|
|
|
394.2 |
|
|
|
603.2 |
|
Reduction of goodwill |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2.0) |
|
|
|
(3.0) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
|
169.4 |
|
|
|
392.2 |
|
|
|
600.2 |
|
Expenses related to financial debt |
|
|
(79.6) |
|
|
|
(108.5) |
|
|
|
(67.1) |
|
|
|
(102.7) |
|
Income provided by cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Cost of financial debt, net |
|
|
(77.9) |
|
|
|
(106.2) |
|
|
|
(59.8) |
|
|
|
(91.7) |
|
Variance on derivative on convertible bonds |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
(9.9) |
|
|
|
(13.2) |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Income of consolidated companies before income taxes |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
335.3 |
|
|
|
513.0 |
|
Deferred taxes on currency translation |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
(4.7) |
|
|
|
(7.1) |
|
Other income taxes |
|
|
(13.3) |
|
|
|
(18.2) |
|
|
|
(111.8) |
|
|
|
(171.1) |
|
Total income taxes |
|
|
(5.0) |
|
|
|
(6.9) |
|
|
|
(116.5) |
|
|
|
(178.2) |
|
Net income from consolidated companies |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
218.8 |
|
|
|
334.8 |
|
Equity in income of investees |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Net income |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
221.2 |
|
|
|
338.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
213.5 |
|
|
|
326.7 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
150,797,818 |
|
|
|
150,797,818 |
|
|
|
137,498,471 |
|
|
|
137,498,471 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from stock-options |
|
|
320,760 |
|
|
|
320,760 |
|
|
|
692,047 |
|
|
|
692,047 |
|
Dilutive potential shares from free shares |
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
|
648,938 |
|
|
|
648,938 |
|
Adjusted weighted average number of shares and
assumed option exercises when dilutive |
|
|
151,361,578 |
|
|
|
151,361,578 |
|
|
|
138,839,456 |
|
|
|
138,839,456 |
|
Net earning per share attributable to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
1,55 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
1,54 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the period
of US$1.362 per . |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the period
of US$1.530 per . |
-7-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
amounts in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
|
221.2 |
|
|
|
338.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
222.4 |
|
|
|
303.0 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
237.2 |
|
Multi-client surveys amortization |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
204.4 |
|
|
|
186.2 |
|
|
|
284.9 |
|
Variance on provisions |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Expense & income calculated on stock-option |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
Net gain on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(1.4) |
|
|
|
(2.1) |
|
Equity in income of affiliates |
|
|
(5.3) |
|
|
|
(7.3) |
|
|
|
(2.4) |
|
|
|
(3.7) |
|
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
(2.8) |
|
|
|
(3.8) |
|
|
|
(5.5) |
|
|
|
(8.4) |
|
Net cash including net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
448.0 |
|
|
|
610.4 |
|
|
|
577.4 |
|
|
|
883.6 |
|
Less net cost of financial debt |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
106.2 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
Less income taxes expenses |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
178.3 |
|
Net cash excluding net cost of financial debt and income taxes |
|
|
530.9 |
|
|
|
723.5 |
|
|
|
753.8 |
|
|
|
1,153.6 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(60.5) |
|
|
|
(82.4) |
|
|
|
(100.9) |
|
|
|
(154.5) |
|
Net cash before changes in working capital |
|
|
470.4 |
|
|
|
641.1 |
|
|
|
652.9 |
|
|
|
999.1 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes receivables |
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
(118.5) |
|
|
|
(181.3) |
|
- change in inventories and work-in-progress |
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
(22.4) |
|
|
|
(34.3) |
|
- change in other currents assets |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
- change in trade accounts and notes payable |
|
|
(84.0) |
|
|
|
(114.4) |
|
|
|
(11.4) |
|
|
|
(17.4) |
|
- change in other current liabilities |
|
|
(59.0) |
|
|
|
(80.4) |
|
|
|
(12.0) |
|
|
|
(18.4) |
|
Impact of changes in exchange rate |
|
|
(14.4) |
|
|
|
(19.8) |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
472.2 |
|
|
|
643.4 |
|
|
|
528.7 |
|
|
|
809.1 |
|
INVESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchases of tangible and intangible assets (including
variation of fixed assets suppliers) |
|
|
(130.1) |
|
|
|
(177.3) |
|
|
|
(118.8) |
|
|
|
(181.8) |
|
Increase in multi-client surveys |
|
|
(191.8) |
|
|
|
(261.3) |
|
|
|
(283.4) |
|
|
|
(433.7) |
|
Proceeds from disposals of tangible and intangible |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Total net proceeds from financial assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Total net acquisition of investments |
|
|
(65.8) |
|
|
|
(89.6) |
|
|
|
(21.4) |
|
|
|
(32.7) |
|
Impact of changes in consolidation scope |
|
|
(2.0) |
|
|
|
(2.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variation in loans granted |
|
|
(4.0) |
|
|
|
(5.4) |
|
|
|
(5.5) |
|
|
|
(8.4) |
|
Variation in subsidies for capital expenditures |
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
|
(0.2) |
|
Variation in other financial assets |
|
|
(1.0) |
|
|
|
(1.5) |
|
|
|
(2.0) |
|
|
|
(3.1) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(393.3) |
|
|
|
(536.0) |
|
|
|
(421.7) |
|
|
|
(645.3) |
|
FINANCING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debts |
|
|
(177.6) |
|
|
|
(242.0) |
|
|
|
(18.1) |
|
|
|
(27.7) |
|
Total issuance of long-term debts |
|
|
243.5 |
|
|
|
331.8 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
Reimbursement on leasing |
|
|
(22.3) |
|
|
|
(30.4) |
|
|
|
(5.6) |
|
|
|
(8.6) |
|
Change in short-term loans |
|
|
(1.6) |
|
|
|
(2.2) |
|
|
|
(9.4) |
|
|
|
(14.4) |
|
Financial interest paid (3) |
|
|
(65.3) |
|
|
|
(89.0) |
|
|
|
(45.5) |
|
|
|
(69.6) |
|
Net proceeds from capital increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- from shareholders |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
- from minority interest of integrated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4) |
|
|
|
(2.1) |
|
Buying & sales of own shares |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(10.9) |
|
|
|
(16.7) |
|
Dividend paid to minority interest |
|
|
(2.6) |
|
|
|
(3.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financial activities |
|
|
(20.7) |
|
|
|
(28.2) |
|
|
|
(51.4) |
|
|
|
(78.7) |
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(15.6) |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(5.4) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
516.9 |
|
|
|
719.4 |
|
|
|
254.3 |
|
|
|
374.4 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
559.5 |
|
|
|
819.3 |
|
|
|
317.5 |
|
|
|
454.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.362 per (except cash and cash equivalents balances converted at the
closing exchange rate of US$1.464 per at September 30, 2009 and of US$1.392 per at
December 31, 2008). |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the
period of US$1.530 per (except cash and cash equivalents balances converted at the
closing exchange rate of US$1.430 per at September 30, 2008 and of US$1.472 per at
December 31, 2007). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes US$13.6 million related to issuing fees in the nine months ended September
30, 2009 (amendment of Term Loan B and issuance of senior notes due 2016). |
-8-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
amounts in millions of |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Net income from statements of operations |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
221.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(15.4) |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(3.1) |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
(10.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(22.1) |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Net gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(14.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.9) |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Net gain (loss) on actuarial changes on pension plan |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on foreign currency translation |
|
|
(104.8) |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of taxes |
|
|
(99.0) |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net comprehensive income for the period |
|
|
(62.0) |
|
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
(63.3) |
|
|
|
235.4 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
-9-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1Summary of significant accounting policies
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique-Veritas, S.A. (the Company) and its subsidiaries
(together, the Group) is a global participant in the geophysical seismic industry, as a
manufacturer of geophysical equipment and providing a wide range of services (seismic data
acquisition and related processing and interpretation software) principally to clients in the oil
and gas exploration and production business.
Given that the Company is listed on Euronext Paris and pursuant to European regulation
n°1606/2002 dated July 19, 2002, the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and its
interpretations as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These interim
consolidated financial statements are also in accordance with IFRS adopted by the European Union at
September 30, 2009 which are available on the following web site
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/ias_en.htm#adopted-commission.
These
interim consolidated financial statements have been authorized by the
Audit Committee for issue on November 6,
2009.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
The financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for certain
financial assets and liabilities that have been measured at fair value.
Critical accounting policies
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 - Interim Financial Reporting.
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the information
and disclosures required in the annual financial statements, and should be read in conjunction
with the Groups annual financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2008
included in its report on Form 20-F for the year 2008 filed with the SEC on April 22, 2009.
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the interim condensed consolidated
financial statements are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the Groups annual
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, except for the adoption of the following
new Standards and Interpretations:
IFRS 8 - Operating segments
IAS 1 revised - Presentation of Financial Statements (except amendment to IFRS5)
IAS 23 revised - Borrowing costs
IAS 32 Amendment - Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation
IFRS 2 Amendment - Vesting Conditions and Cancellations
2008 Annual Improvements to IFRS (excepted amendment to IFRS 5)
IFRIC 11 - IFRS 2 - Group and Treasury Share Transactions
IFRIC 13 - Customer loyalty programs
IFRIC 14 - IAS 19 - The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction
The adoption of these new standards and interpretations did not have any material impact on the
Groups interim financial statements.
The Group decided not to early adopt those Standards, Amendments and Interpretations that the
European Union adopted but that are optional until December 31, 2009, namely:
-10-
IFRIC
12 - Service Concession Arrangements - adopted by the European Union
in March 2009 and applicable on January 1, 2010
IFRIC 16 - Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation - adopted by the European Union in June 2009 and applicable on January 1, 2010
IAS 27 Amendment - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements - adopted by the European Union in June 2009 but applicable on January 1, 2010
IFRS 3R - Business Combinations - adopted by the European Union in June 2009 but applicable on January 1, 2010
IFRIC 15 - Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate - adopted
by the European Union in July 2009 but applicable on January 1, 2010
Amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement: Eligible Hedged Items Combinations - adopted by the
European Union in September 2009 but applicable on January 1, 2010.
At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the following Standards and
Interpretations were issued but not yet adopted by the European Union:
Amendments IFRS 5 (2008 annual improvements to IFRS)
Amendments to IFRIC 9 and IAS 39 - Embedded derivatives
IFRIC 17 - Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners
IFRIC 18 - Transfers of assets from customers
Amendment to IFRS7 - Improving disclosures about financial instruments
Amendment to IFRS2 - Group cash-settled share-based payment Transactions
Amendment to IAS32 - Classification of rights issues
The Group has not opted for the early adoption of these Standards, Amendments and
Interpretations and it is currently reviewing them to measure the potential impact on the interim
condensed consolidated financial statements. At this stage, we do not anticipate any significant
impact.
Use of estimates
Significant estimates in preparing financial statements that could have a material impact on
the carrying values of assets and liabilities are:
|
|
|
Amortization of multi-client data library, |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and, if applicable, impairment of tangible and intangible assets, including
goodwill, |
|
|
|
|
Development costs, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of investments, |
|
|
|
|
Recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes, and |
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit plans. |
Judgments
The major accounting matters that are subject to management judgments, which have a material
effect on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognized in the interim condensed
consolidated financial statements, relate to:
|
|
|
Collectibility of accounts receivable, |
|
|
|
|
Recoverability of deferred tax assets, |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets and liabilities as part of the different purchase price allocations, |
|
|
|
|
Provision for contingencies, claims and litigations. |
Operating revenues
Operating revenues are recognized when they can be measured reliably, and when it is likely
that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity, which is at the
point that such revenues have been realized or are considered realizable. For contracts where the
percentage of completion method of accounting is being applied, revenues are only recognized
-11-
when the costs incurred for the transaction and the cost to complete the transaction can be
measured reliably and such revenues are considered earned and realizable.
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed to customers on a non-exclusive
basis. All costs directly incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing seismic
surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys. The value of our multi-client library is
stated on our balance sheet at the aggregate of those costs less accumulated amortization or at
fair value if lower. We review the library for potential impairment of our independent surveys on
an ongoing basis.
Revenues related to multi-client surveys result from (i) pre-commitments and (ii) licenses
after completion of the surveys (after-sales).
Pre-commitments Generally, we obtain commitments from a limited number of customers before
a seismic project is completed. These pre-commitments cover part or all of the survey area blocks.
In return for the commitment, the customer typically gains the right to direct or influence the
project specifications, advance access to data as it is being acquired, and favorable pricing. The
Company records payments that it receives during periods of mobilization as advance billing in the
balance sheet in the line item Advance billings to customers.
The Company recognizes pre-commitments as revenue when production is begun based on the
physical progress of the project.
After sales Generally, we grant a license entitling non-exclusive access to a complete and
ready-for-use, specifically defined portion of our multi-client data library in exchange for a
fixed and determinable payment. We recognize after sales revenue upon the client executing a valid
license agreement and having been granted access to the data. Within thirty days of execution and
access, the client may exercise our warranty that the medium on which the data is transmitted (a
magnetic cartridge) is free from technical defects. If the warranty is exercised, the Company will
provide the same data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of providing new magnetic cartridges is
negligible.
After sales volume agreementsWe enter into a customer arrangement in which we agree to grant
licenses to the customer for access to a specified number of blocks of the multi-client library.
These arrangements typically enable the customer to select and access the specific blocks for a
limited period of time. We recognize revenue when the blocks are selected and the client has been
granted access to the data and if the corresponding revenue can be reliably estimated. Within
thirty days of execution and access, the client may exercise our warranty that the medium on which
the data is transmitted (a magnetic cartridge) is free from technical defects. If the warranty is
exercised, the Company will provide the same data on a new magnetic cartridge. The cost of
providing new magnetic cartridges is negligible.
In exclusive surveys, we perform seismic services (acquisition and processing) for a specific
customer. We recognize proprietary/contract revenues as the services are rendered. We evaluate the
progress to date, in a manner generally consistent with the physical progress of the project, and
recognize revenues based on the ratio of the project cost incurred during that period to the total
estimated project cost. We believe this ratio to be generally consistent with the physical progress
of the project.
The billings and the costs related to the transit of seismic vessels at the beginning of the
survey are deferred and recognized over the duration of the contract by reference to the technical
stage of completion.
In some exclusive survey contracts and a limited number of multi-client survey contracts, the
Company is required to meet certain milestones. The Company defers recognition of revenue on such
contracts until all milestones that provide the customer a right of cancellation or refund of
amounts paid have been met.
|
|
|
Other geophysical services |
Revenues from our other geophysical services are recognized as the services are performed and,
when related to long-term contracts, using the proportional performance method of recognizing
revenues.
We recognize revenues on equipment sales upon delivery to the customer. Any advance billings
to customers are recorded in current liabilities.
|
|
|
Software and hardware sales |
We recognize revenues from the sale of software and hardware products following acceptance of
the product by the customer at which time we have no further significant vendor obligations
remaining. Any advance billings to customers are recorded in current liabilities.
-12-
If an arrangement to deliver software, either alone or together with other products or
services, requires significant production, modification, or customization of software, the entire
arrangement is accounted for as a production-type contract, i.e. using the percentage of completion
method.
If the software arrangement provides for multiple deliverables (e.g. upgrades or enhancements,
post-contract customer support such as maintenance, or services), the revenue is allocated to the
various elements based on specific objective evidence of fair value, regardless of any separate
allocations stated within the contract for each element. Each element is appropriately accounted
for under the applicable accounting standard.
Maintenance revenues consist primarily of post contract customer support agreements and are
recorded as advance billings to customers and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over
the contract period.
Goodwill
Group management undertakes at least an annual impairment test covering goodwill, intangible
assets and indefinite lived assets allocated to the cash generated units to consider whether
impairment is required.
In conjunction with the marine restructuring plan, the evaluation of the recoverable value of
the Services segment at December 31, 2008 was subject to a differential analysis at June 30, 2009.
This differential analysis aimed at considering the impact of the marine restructuring plan on the
recoverable value of cash generating units, with other assumptions made as of December 31, 2008
remaining unchanged (refer to note 11 of the consolidated financial statements in our 20-F for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008).
This analysis did not lead to any impairment in the interim condensed consolidated financial
statements as of June 30, 2009.
Multi-client surveys
Multi-client surveys consist of seismic surveys to be licensed to customers on a non-exclusive
basis. All costs directly incurred in acquiring, processing and otherwise completing seismic
surveys are capitalized into the multi-client surveys (including transit costs when applicable).
The value of our multi-client library is stated on our balance sheet at the aggregate of those
costs less accumulated amortization or at fair value if lower. We review the library for potential
impairment of our independent surveys on an ongoing basis.
We amortize the multi-client surveys over the period during which the data is expected to be
marketed using a pro-rata method based on recognized revenues as a percentage of total estimated
sales.
In this respect, we use five amortization rates: 50%, 65%, 75%, 80% or 83.3% of revenues
depending on the category of the surveys. Multi-client surveys are classified into a same category
when they are located in the same area with the same estimated sales ratio, such estimates
generally relying on the historical pattern.
For all categories of surveys and starting from data delivery, a minimum straight-line depreciation
scheme is applied over a five-year period, if total accumulated depreciation from the applicable
amortization rate is below this minimum level.
Multi-client surveys acquired as part of the business combination with Veritas and which have
been valued for purchase price allocation purposes are amortized based on 65% of revenues and an
impairment loss is recognized on a survey-by-survey basis in case of any indication of impairment.
Development costs
Expenditures on research activities undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or
technological knowledge and understanding are recognized in the income statement as expenses as
incurred and are presented as Research and development expenses, net.
Expenditures on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan or
design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, are capitalized
if:
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately identified and reliably measured, |
|
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
|
we have sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic benefits, either because it is
useful to us or through an existing market for the intangible asset itself or for its products. |
-13-
The expenditures capitalized include the cost of materials, direct labor and an appropriate
proportion of overhead. Other development expenditures are recognized in the income statement as
expenses as incurred and are presented as Research and development expenses, net.
Capitalized development expenditures are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and
impairment losses. We amortize capitalized developments costs over 5 years.
Research & development expenses in our income statement represent the net cost of development
costs that are not capitalized, of research costs, offset by government grants acquired for
research and development.
Note 2 Acquisitions and divestitures
In February 2009, Wavefield shares subject to the mandatory offer and the squeeze-out were
transferred to CGGVeritas, while compensation of 62 million for those shares was paid after the
objection period expired. As a result, the minority interests recognized as a financial debt of 62
million on our balance sheet at December 31, 2008 have been cancelled.
The preliminary goodwill determined as of December 31, 2008 has been revised for an additional
amount of 16.2 million, leading to a total goodwill of 25.0 million at September 30, 2009. Main
adjustments were related to Multifield assets, receivables and deferred tax liabilities on equity
acquired.
On January 8, 2009, Cybernetix conducted a 4 million share capital increase that was entirely
subscribed by Sercel Holding, bringing its stake to a total of 749,480 shares, representing 46.10%
of Cybernetixs share capital and 43.07% of its voting rights. The French financial markets
regulator (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) exempted Sercel Holding from the requirement to conduct
a tender offer for all shares when its holding exceeded 33.33%. The consideration for the share
capital increase was 2 million in cash and the incorporation of a 2 million cash advance granted
by Sercel Holding to Cybernetix in November 2008. Cybernetix is accounted for under the equity
method in our financial statements as we do not have the control.
On May 29, 2009, Statoil Hydro Venture AS exercised its put option with our subsidiary
Wavefield with respect to a 37% stake in Multifield for 2.9 million. As a result, our shareholding
in Multifield increased to 80.97%. Multifield is fully consolidated in our financial statements
since June 30, 2009.
Pursuant to the general meeting of Norfield ASs shareholders held on May 19, 2009, Wavefield
subscribed to a capital increase in Norfield for approximately 3.6 million by capitalizing an
outstanding long-term loan owed to it by Norfield. The capital increase was pro rata to the
shareholders existing interests in Norfield. As a result, Wavefields interest in Norfield
remained unchanged at 33%.
Note 3Financial debt
On May 21 and 27, 2009, we amended our US senior facilities agreement and our French
revolving facility agreement, respectively. These amendments, in line with our conservative
financial policy, were aimed mainly at increasing the Companys headroom under its financial
covenants.
In consideration of these amendments, we repaid US$100 million of our term loan B under the
US senior facilities and increased the applicable bank margin for all borrowings under the US
senior facilities and French revolving facility by 1.0%.
On June 9, 2009, we issued US$350 million principal amount of 91/2% senior notes due 2016. The
senior notes were issued at a price of 97.0% of their principal amount, resulting in a yield of
101/8%. The senior notes will mature on May 15, 2016.
-14-
We used the proceeds from the notes to replace cash used to repay US$100 million of our term
loan B facility on May 21, 2009 and to fund the three quarterly US$27.5 million amortization
payments due during the remainder of 2009 under our term loan B facility. We also used a portion of
the net proceeds to repay US$28 million of indebtedness outstanding under our CGGVeritas Services
(Norway) AS (formerly Exploration Resources) credit facility. The remaining net proceeds will be
used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of other indebtedness.
Note 4Common stock and stock options plans
As of September 30, 2009, the Companys share capital consisted of 150,993,469 shares, each with
a nominal value of 0.40.
New stock-option plans and performance shares allocation plan
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 1,327,000 stock options to 149
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including stock options to purchase a total
of 260,000 ordinary shares that were allocated to executive officers who were members of the
Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating
Officer). The exercise price of the stock options is 8.82. The stock options expire on March 15,
2017.
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 516,250 performance shares to 291
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including 46,250 performance shares that were
allocated to executive officers who were members of the Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer).
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 200,000 stock options to the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and 125,000 stock options to the Chief Operating Officer. Their exercise
price is 8.82. Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years of
the plan. Such vesting is subject to performance conditions based on the fulfillment of one of the
following objectives:
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the share price considering the SBF 120
index; |
|
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the ADS price considering the PHLX Oil
Services Sector SM (OSX SM) index; or |
|
|
|
|
a financial indicator of EBIT objective expressed in US$ and related to the target for
the annual variable part of the compensation of the executive officers. |
The options have an eight-year duration subject to the requirement, for all French residents,
to hold the resulting shares in registered form from their purchase date until March 16, 2013,
inclusive, except in limited cases listed in the plan regulations.
-15-
Consolidated statements of changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recognized |
|
Cumulative |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
shares |
|
Share |
|
paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
directly in |
|
translation |
|
shareholders |
|
Minority |
|
minority |
(Unaudited) |
|
issued |
|
capital |
|
capital |
|
earnings |
|
shares |
|
equity |
|
adjustment |
|
equity |
|
interest |
|
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions of euros, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
137,253,790 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
1,820.0 |
|
|
|
784.1 |
|
|
|
(3.9) |
|
|
|
(5.1) |
|
|
|
(248.4) |
|
|
|
2,401.6 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
2,425.6 |
|
|
Capital increase |
|
|
436,346 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213.5 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
221.2 |
|
Cost of share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
(1.4) |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Operations on treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.0) |
|
Actuarial gains and losses
of pension plans (1) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6) |
|
Financial instruments: change in fair value and
transfer to income
statement(2) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.6) |
|
Foreign currency
translation: change in fair
value and transfer to income
statement(3) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
Income and expense
recognized directly in
equity (1) + (2) + (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.6) |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
137,690,136 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
1,822.0 |
|
|
|
1,014.7 |
|
|
|
(14.9) |
|
|
|
(29.7) |
|
|
|
(201.3) |
|
|
|
2,645.9 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
2,684.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
150,617,709 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
1,964.7 |
|
|
|
1,132.2 |
|
|
|
(18.1) |
|
|
|
(2.5) |
|
|
|
(176.4) |
|
|
|
2,960.1 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
2,998.6 |
|
|
Capital increase |
|
|
375,760 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
Cost of share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6) |
|
|
|
(2.6) |
|
Operations on treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Actuarial gains and losses
of pension plans (1) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments: change in fair value and
transfer to income
statement(2) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Foreign currency
translation: change in fair
value and transfer to income
statement(3) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101.7) |
|
|
|
(101.7) |
|
|
|
(3.1). |
|
|
|
(104.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and expense
recognized directly in
equity (1) + (2) + (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
(101.7) |
|
|
|
(95.9) |
|
|
|
(3.1) |
|
|
|
(99.0) |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9) |
|
|
Balance at
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
150,993,469 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
1,964.8 |
|
|
|
1,169.9 |
|
|
|
(13.2) |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(278.1) |
|
|
|
2,907.1 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
2,944.3 |
|
|
-16-
Note 5 Trade accounts and notes receivable
At June 30, 2009 our trade receivables included a receivable of 97.2 million related to one
marine exclusive contract. This contract included a six-month payment term, with a six-month
extension option at the discretion of the customer and based on certain conditions. At September
30, 2009 we had received payment from the customer for the major part of the receivable. The
six-month extension option was not exercised.
Note 6Analysis by operating segment and geographic area
Financial information by operating segment is reported in accordance with the internal
reporting system and shows internal segment information that is used to manage and measure the
performance of CGG Veritas. We divide our business into two operating segments, geophysical
services and geophysical equipment.
Our geophysical services segment comprises:
|
|
|
Land contract: seismic data acquisition for land, transition zones and shallow water
undertaken by us on behalf of a specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Marine contract: seismic data acquisition offshore undertaken by us on behalf of a
specific client; |
|
|
|
|
Multi-client land and marine: seismic data acquisition undertaken by us and licensed to a
number of clients on a non-exclusive basis; and |
|
|
|
|
Processing & Imaging: processing and imaging and interpretation of geophysical data, data
management and reservoir studies for clients. |
Our equipment segment, which we conduct through Sercel Holding S.A. and its subsidiaries,
handles our manufacturing and sales activities for seismic equipment used for data acquisition,
both on land and offshore.
Inter-company sales between the two segments are made at prices approximating market prices
and relate primarily to equipment sales made by the geophysical equipment segment to the
geophysical services segment. These inter-segment sales, the related operating income recognized by
the geophysical equipment segment, and the related effect on capital expenditures and depreciation
expense of the geophysical services segment are eliminated in consolidation and presented in the
column Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables that follow.
Operating income of an industry segment represents operating revenues and other income from
ordinary activities less expenses of that segment. It includes non-recurring and unusual items,
which are disclosed in the operating segment, if material. General corporate expenses, which
include Group management, financing, and legal activities, have been included in the column
Eliminations and Adjustments in the tables that follow. The Group does not disclose financial
expenses or revenues by operating segment because these items are not followed by the segment
management and because financing and investment are mainly managed at the corporate level.
Identifiable assets are those used in the operations of each industry segment. Unallocated and
corporate assets consist primarily of financial assets, including cash and cash equivalents.
Due to the constant changes in work locations, the Group does not track its assets based on
country of origin or ownership.
The following tables present revenues, operating income and identifiable assets by operating
segment, and operating revenues by geographic area (by location of customers).
-17-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
Analysis by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated
customers |
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
496.0 |
|
|
|
195.6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
691.6 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
(30.4) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(9.1) |
|
|
|
- |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
142.6 |
|
|
|
(30.4) |
|
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
496.6 |
|
|
|
204.1 |
|
|
|
(9.1) |
|
|
|
691.6 |
|
Other income from ordinary
activities |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Total income from ordinary
activities |
|
|
404.1 |
|
|
|
143.6 |
|
|
|
(30.4) |
|
|
|
517.3 |
|
|
|
496.6 |
|
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
(9.1) |
|
|
|
692.0 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) (a) |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
112.7 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) (a) |
|
|
172.8 |
|
Equity in income (loss) of
investees |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.6) |
|
Capital expenditures (b) |
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
(11.2) |
|
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
(1.8) |
|
|
|
128.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
(c) |
|
|
121.2 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
(5.1) |
|
|
|
123.7 |
|
|
|
123.8 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
(3.6) |
|
|
|
125.8 |
|
Investments in companies under
equity method |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses of 7.6 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 9.3 million for the comparable period in 2008. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes investments in multi-client surveys of 47.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 94.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
capitalized development costs of 2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
and 4.2 million for the comparable period of 2008, in the Services segment. Capitalized
development costs in the Equipment segment were 0.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 0.6 million for the comparable period of 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes multi-client survey amortization of 61.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 73.8 million for the comparable period of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
(Unaudited) |
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
2008 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
(in millions of US$) |
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
570.9 |
|
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
|
761.8 |
|
|
|
300.4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,062.2 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
(42.8) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
(14.0) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
570.9 |
|
|
|
203.3 |
|
|
|
(42.8) |
|
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
|
762.7 |
|
|
|
313.5 |
|
|
|
(14.0) |
|
|
|
1,062.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
576.6 |
|
|
|
204.6 |
|
|
|
(42.8) |
|
|
|
738.4 |
|
|
|
|
762.7 |
|
|
|
314.2 |
|
|
|
(14.2) |
|
|
|
1,062.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
(12.1) |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
172.9 |
|
|
|
102.5 |
|
|
|
(10.3) |
|
|
|
265.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corresponding to the nine months ended September 30 in US dollars less the six month ended June
30 in US dollars. |
-18-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
(in millions of euros) |
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated
customers |
|
|
1,333.6 |
|
|
|
399.7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
1,321.0 |
|
|
|
514.6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,835.6 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
(72.6) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
(58.6) |
|
|
|
- |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
1,334.1 |
|
|
|
471.8 |
|
|
|
(72.6) |
|
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
1,321.6 |
|
|
|
572.6 |
|
|
|
(58.6) |
|
|
|
1,835.6 |
|
Other income from ordinary
activities |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1) |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Total income from ordinary
activities |
|
|
1,338.3 |
|
|
|
474.3 |
|
|
|
(72.6) |
|
|
|
1,740.0 |
|
|
|
1,321.4 |
|
|
|
573.6 |
|
|
|
(58.7) |
|
|
|
1,836.3 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
108.2 |
|
|
|
(37.9) |
|
|
|
124.5 |
|
|
|
254.4 |
|
|
|
180.7 |
|
|
|
(42.9 |
) (a) |
|
|
392.2 |
|
Equity in income (loss) of
investees |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Capital expenditures (b) |
|
|
346.6 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
(28.3) |
|
|
|
344.7 |
|
|
|
415.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
(23.8) |
|
|
|
406.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
(c) |
|
|
366.3 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
(14.9) |
|
|
|
372.4 |
|
|
|
339.4 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
(14.6) |
|
|
|
341.2 |
|
Investments in companies under
equity method |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
4,152.6 |
|
|
|
728.8 |
|
|
|
(243.6) |
|
|
|
4,637.8 |
|
|
|
4,140.2 |
|
|
|
688.6 |
|
|
|
(186.2) |
|
|
|
4,642.7 |
|
Unallocated and corporate assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,281.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,013.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes general corporate expenses of 27.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 32.2 million for the comparable period in 2008. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes investments in multi-client surveys of 191.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 283.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
capitalized development costs of 9.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 7.8 million for the comparable period of 2008 and capital leases of 22.7 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (none for the nine months ended September 30, 2008)
in the Services segment. Capitalized development costs in the Equipment segment were 1.2
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 1.8 million for the comparable
period of 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes multi-client survey amortization of 150.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 186.2 million for the comparable period of 2008. |
-19-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Nine months ended September30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
and |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
(in millions of US$) |
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
Adjustments |
|
(3) |
|
|
Services |
|
Equipment |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers |
|
|
1,816.6 |
|
|
|
544.8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
|
|
|
2,021.5 |
|
|
|
787.6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,809.1 |
|
Inter-segment revenues |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
(99.0) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
88.8 |
|
|
|
(89.8) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
1,817.3 |
|
|
|
643.1 |
|
|
|
(99.0) |
|
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
|
|
|
2,022.5 |
|
|
|
876.4 |
|
|
|
(89.8) |
|
|
|
2,809.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income from ordinary activities |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(0.2) |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from ordinary activities |
|
|
1,823.0 |
|
|
|
646.5 |
|
|
|
(99.0) |
|
|
|
2,370.5 |
|
|
|
|
2,022.1 |
|
|
|
878.1 |
|
|
|
(90.0) |
|
|
|
2,810.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
147.5 |
|
|
|
(52.0) |
|
|
|
169.4 |
|
|
|
|
389.3 |
|
|
|
276.6 |
|
|
|
(65.7) |
|
|
|
600.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate for the period of
US$1.3622 per in 2009 and of US$1.5303 per in 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollar amounts were converted at the average rate of US$1.3631 per for the Equipment segment. |
|
(3) |
|
Dollar amounts for the Consolidated total were converted at the rate of US$1.3624 per ,
corresponding to the weighted average based on each segments operating revenues. |
Revenues by geographic area
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by location of customers,
and the percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
North America |
|
|
105.8 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
150.8 |
|
|
|
188.1 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
289.1 |
|
Central and South Americas |
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
73.6 |
|
Europe, Africa and Middle East |
|
|
243.6 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
316.3 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
485.3 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
107.6 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
156.6 |
|
|
|
139.2 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
214.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
691.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,062.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corresponding to the nine months ended September 30 in US dollars less the six month ended June
30 in US dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ (1) |
|
North America |
|
|
348.6 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
474.9 |
|
|
|
547.6 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
837.9 |
|
Central and South Americas |
|
|
126.9 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
172.9 |
|
|
|
119.0 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
182.1 |
|
Europe, Africa and Middle East |
|
|
786.4 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
1,071.4 |
|
|
|
713.5 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
1,092.0 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
471.4 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
642.2 |
|
|
|
455.5 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
697.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
|
|
1,835.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,809.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average
exchange rate for the period of US$1.3624 per in 2009 and of US$1.5303
per in 2008. |
-20-
Note 7Other revenues (expenses)
Marine restructuring plan
Due to market conditions and marine overcapacity, we implemented a marine restructuring plan in
June 2009 that includes the de-rigging of seven seismic vessels and a redundancy plan. We made a
provision for 64.8 million as of June 30, 2009 for the total cost of the plan. During the third
quarter ended September 30, 2009, 8.8 million (US$12 million) of the provision were used.
Note 8Commitments and contingencies
Capital expenditures, other commitments and contingencies
On May 29, 2009, CGGVeritas and Eidesvik amended their agreement to postpone the date of
delivery of two newly-built seismic vessels to the second half of 2011. Two loans, including one
convertible loan, were granted by CGGVeritas to Eidesvik for a total amount of 7.7 million.
Litigation and other risks
On July 7, 2008, we brought suit against Arrow Seismic ASA in order to seek compensation for
the loss we suffered (approximately U.S.$70 million at the date of the claim) following Arrow
Seismic ASAs withdrawal from negotiations for the construction of a 3D seismic vessel. The
negotiations were terminated after Arrow Seismic ASA was acquired by PGS. Discussions between us
and Arrow Seismic ASA were at such an advanced stage that, in the Groups view, the parties were
contractually committed. A judgement was rendered on April 8, 2009 in favour of Arrow Seismic ASA.
CGGVeritas has decided not to appeal.
On October 20, 2006, a complaint was filed against CGGVeritas subsidiary, Sercel Inc., in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that several
of Sercel Inc.s seismic data acquisition products that include micro electromechanical systems
(MEMS) infringe a U.S. patent allegedly owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff has requested a
permanent injunction prohibiting Sercel Inc. from making, using, selling, offering for sale or
importing the equipment in question into the United States. In addition, the plaintiff has
requested damages based on lost profits in the amount of U.S.$14,672,261 plus prejudgment interest
of U.S.$775,254. In the alternative, the plaintiff is requesting damages based on a reasonable
royalty in the amount of U.S.$6,185,924 plus prejudgment interest of U.S.$374,898. Sercel is
confident that the products in question do not infringe any valid claims under the patent in
question and intends to contest this claim vigorously. During 2008, the discovery process was
completed and the Court provided a claim construction opinion. The Court has found that three of
the seven of the patent claims are invalid for indefiniteness and one claim is not infringed. The
parties attended mediation on March 4, 2009, but the case was not settled. It was initially set for
trial in August 2009 and has been postponed to January 2010. We do not believe this litigation will
have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. Accordingly, we
have recorded no provision in our consolidated financial statements, except for the fees related to
preparing the defence.
Note 9Subsequent events
On October 9, 2009, we exercised the extension option of our time charter agreement with
Eidesvik for the seismic vessel Vantage. The time charter agreement was extended for a period of
two years starting April 2010 corresponding to a total commitment of approximately U.S.$15 million.
On October 30, 2009, we prepaid US$100 million of our term loan B facility, in addition to the
US$100 million prepaid on May 21, 2009.
-21-
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DE GÉOPHYSIQUE-VERITAS, S.A.
Item 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Group organization
We report financial information by operating segment in accordance with our internal reporting
system and the internal segment information that is used to manage and measure our performance. We
divide our business into two operating segments, geophysical services and geophysical equipment.
Our geophysical services segment comprises:
|
- |
|
Land contract: seismic data acquisition for land, transition zones and shallow water
undertaken by us on behalf of a specific client; |
|
|
- |
|
Marine contract: seismic data acquisition offshore undertaken by us on behalf of a
specific client; |
|
|
- |
|
Multi-client land and marine: seismic data acquisition undertaken by us and licensed
to a number of clients on a non-exclusive basis; and |
|
|
- |
|
Processing and Imaging: processing and imaging as well as interpretation of
geophysical data, data management and reservoir studies for clients. |
Our geophysical equipment segment, which we conduct through Sercel Holding S.A. and its
subsidiaries, comprises our manufacturing and sales activities for seismic equipment used for data
acquisition, both on land and offshore.
Factors Affecting Results of Operations
Geophysical market environment
Overall demand for geophysical services and equipment is dependent on spending by oil and gas
companies for exploration, development and production and field management activities. We believe
the level of spending of such companies depends on their assessment of their ability to efficiently
supply the oil and gas market in the future and the current balance of hydrocarbon supply and
demand.
The geophysical market has historically been extremely cyclical. We believe many factors
contribute to the volatility of this market, such as the geopolitical uncertainties that can harm
the confidence and visibility that are essential to our clients long-term decision-making
processes and the expected balance in the mid to long term between supply and demand for
hydrocarbons.
Due to market conditions and marine overcapacity, we implemented a restructuring plan in June
2009 to downsize our offshore fleet. This restructuring plan includes the de-rigging of seven
seismic vessels and a redundancy plan. We recorded a total cost for the restructuring plan of
approximately 65 million (US$87 million) in June. During the three months ended September 30,
2009, the Fohn and the Orion were decommissioned, following the decommissioning of the Harmattan in
May. We plan to de-rig two other 2D vessels in the fourth quarter 2009, following the completion
of a contract on which they are currently being used. Two additional 2D vessels are scheduled for
decommissioning in 2010 and will be used as source vessels until that time.
Foreign exchange fluctuations
As a company that derives a substantial amount of its revenue from sales internationally, our
results of operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
In order to present trends in our business that may be obscured by currency fluctuations, we
have translated certain euro amounts in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations into U.S. dollars. See Trend InformationCurrency
Fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, balance sheet data expressed in U.S. dollars have been converted
from euros at the exchange rate on
-22-
the relevant balance sheet date, and income statement data in U.S. dollars have been converted
from euros at the average exchange rate for the relevant year. The exchange rates as of December
31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 were U.S.$1.3917, and U.S.$1.464 respectively, per euro, and the
average exchange rates for the nine-month periods ended September, 2008 and 2009 were U.S.$1.530
and U.S.$1.362, respectively, per euro.
Acquisitions and divestitures
Wavefield-Inseis
On November 25, 2008, we launched a voluntary exchange offer to acquire 100% of the share
capital of Wavefield-Inseis ASA (Wavefield). We offered Wavefield shareholders one newly issued
CGGVeritas share for every seven Wavefield shares. A total of 90,480,237 shares were tendered in
the offer, representing 69.9% of the share capital of Wavefield. In consideration of the Wavefield
shares tendered to the offer, we issued 12,925,749 new shares on December 18, 2008. The fair value
of those issued shares amounted to 139.0 million.
On December 30, 2008, we launched a mandatory public offer for the remaining 38,903,024
outstanding shares (i.e., 30.1% of the share capital) as well as for the 2,892,875 shares that
could result from the exercise of stock options. The offer price calculated in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter VI of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act amounted to NOK 15.17 per share to
be paid in cash. At the end of this mandatory offer period, which expired on January 27, 2009, we
acquired 37,043,013 additional shares for a total of 98.6% of Wavefields share capital. We then
launched a squeeze-out process for the remaining outstanding shares of Wavefield at a price of NOK
15.17 per share to be paid in cash. As of February 13, 2009, we owned 100% of Wavefields share
capital. Wavefield was de-listed from the Oslo Bors on February 16, 2008.
The total consideration for the acquisition in our financial statements, including the
remaining 30.1% acquired in February 2009, was 206.6 million. Total direct transaction costs
related to the acquisition (including advisory fees and legal fees) amounted to 5.5 million and
were recognized as part of the cost of the acquisition.
Cybernetix
On January 8, 2009, Cybernetix conducted a 4 million share capital increase that was entirely
subscribed by Sercel Holding, bringing its stake to a total of 749,480 shares, representing 46.10%
of Cybernetixs share capital and 43.07% of its voting rights. The French financial markets
regulator (Autorité des Marchés Financiers) exempted Sercel Holding from the requirement to conduct
a tender offer for all shares when its holding exceeded 33.33%. The consideration for the share
capital increase was 2 million in cash and the incorporation of a 2 million cash advance granted
by Sercel Holding to Cybernetix in November 2008. Cybernetix is accounted for under the equity
method in our financial statements as we do not have the control.
Seismic vessels
On April 22, 2009, CGGVeritas Services exercised the purchase option on the seismic vessels
Fohn and Harmattan pursuant to their time charter agreements for 0.6 million each.
Multifield
On May 29, 2009, Statoil Hydro Venture AS exercised its put option with our subsidiary
Wavefield with respect to a 37% stake in Multifield for 2.9 million . As a result, our
shareholding in Multifield increased to 80.97%. Multifield is fully consolidated in our financial
statements since June 30, 2009.
Norfield AS
Pursuant to the general meeting of Norfield ASs shareholders held on May 19, 2009, Wavefield
subscribed to a capital increase in Norfield for approximately 3.6 million by capitalizing an
outstanding long-term loan owed to it by Norfield. The capital increase was pro rata to the
shareholders existing interests in Norfield. As a result, Wavefields interest in Norfield
remained unchanged at 33%.
Indebtedness
On May 21 and 27, 2009, we amended our US senior facilities agreement and our French
revolving facility agreement, respectively. These amendments, in line with our conservative
financial policy, were aimed mainly at increasing the Companys headroom under its financial
covenants. In consideration of these amendments, we repaid US$100 million of our term loan B
under the US senior facilities and increased the applicable margin for all borrowings under the
US senior facilities and French revolving facility by 1.0%.
On June 9, 2009, we issued US$350 million principal amount of 91/2% senior notes
due 2016. The senior notes were issued at a
-23-
price of 97.0% of their principal amount, resulting in a yield of 101/8%. The
senior notes will mature on May 15, 2016.
We used the proceeds from the notes to replace cash used to repay US$100 million of our term
loan B facility on May 21, 2009 and to fund the three quarterly US$27.5 million amortization
payments due during the remainder of 2009 under our term loan B facility. We also used a portion
of the net proceeds to repay US$28 million of indebtedness outstanding under our CGGVeritas
Services (Norway) AS (formerly Exploration Resources) credit facility. The remaining net proceeds
will be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of other indebtedness.
On October 30, 2009, we prepaid a further US$100 million of our term loan B facility.
New stock-option plans and performance shares allocation plan
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 1,327,000 stock options to 149
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including stock options to purchase a total
of 260,000 ordinary shares that were allocated to executive officers who were members of the
Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating
Officer). The exercise price of the stock options is 8.82. The stock options expire on March 15,
2017.
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 516,250 performance shares to 291
beneficiaries pursuant to a shareholders resolution, including 46,250 performance shares that were
allocated to executive officers who were members of the Executive Committee (excluding the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer).
On March 16, 2009, our Board of Directors allocated 200,000 stock options to the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and 125,000 stock options to the Chief Operating Officer. Their exercise
price is 8.82. Rights to these options vest by one-third during each of the first three years of
the plan. Such vesting is subject to performance conditions based on the fulfillment of one of the
following objectives:
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the share price considering the SBF 120
index; |
|
|
|
|
a share price performance objective relative to the ADS price considering the PHLX Oil
Services Sector SM (OSX SM) index; or |
|
|
|
|
a financial indicator of EBIT objective expressed in US$ and related to the target for
the annual variable part of the compensation of the executive officers. |
The options have an eight-year duration subject to the requirement, for all French residents,
to hold the resulting shares in registered form from their purchase date until March 16, 2013,
inclusive, except in limited cases listed in the plan regulations.
Backlog
Our backlog as of November 1, 2009 was U.S.$1.65 billion. Contracts for services are occasionally
modified by mutual consent and in certain instances are cancelable by the customer on short
notice without penalty. Consequently, backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of
actual operating results for any succeeding period.
-24-
Three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to three months ended September 30, 2008
Operating revenues
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by business line, and the
percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby, during each of the
periods stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
% |
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
% |
Land |
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
122.7 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
113.4 |
|
|
|
174.3 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Marine |
|
|
242.8 |
|
|
|
347.5 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
318.0 |
|
|
|
488.3 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Processing & Imaging |
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Total Services |
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
570.9 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
496.0 |
|
|
|
761.8 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Equipment |
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
195.6 |
|
|
|
300.4 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
731.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
691.6 |
|
|
|
1,062.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as the nine months ended September 30, in U.S.$, less the six months
ended June 30, in U.S.$. |
Our consolidated operating revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased
26% to 512.2 million from 691.6 million for the comparable period of 2008. Expressed in U.S
dollars, our consolidated operating revenues decreased 31% to U.S.$731.4 million in the three
months ended September 30, 2009 from U.S.$1,062.2 million for the comparable period of 2008.
Operating revenues for both of our segments decreased, reflecting weak market conditions.
Services
Operating revenues for our Services segment (excluding intra-group sales) decreased 19% to
400.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 496.0 million for the comparable
period of 2008, despite the addition of Wavefield in December 2008. In U.S. dollar terms, operating
revenues for our Services segment decreased 25% with good vessel utilization despite increasing
standby between contracts. Marine multi-client revenues decreased significantly following the
reduction of our multi-client investments, partly offset by strong processing performance.
Marine
Operating revenues from our Marine business line for the three months ended September 30, 2009
decreased 24% to 242.8 million from 318.0 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and 29% in
U.S. dollar terms) largely due to pressure on contract pricing and a decline in multi-client
sales. The Fohn and the Orion were decommissioned this quarter.
Contract revenues decreased 9% to 189.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
from 208.3 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 15% in U.S. dollar terms)
principally due to lower prices experienced in 2009 and the completion of backlog from 2008 with
higher margins. 86% of our high end 3D fleet operated on contract during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 65% for the comparable period of 2008. The fleet availability rate was
90%, including a 7% impact related to standby between contracts, and the production rate was 93%
for the three months ended September 30, 2009. We completed the industrys first Arctic Beaufort
Sea acquisition project and equipped one vessel with Nautilus technology for integrated acoustic
positioning and streamer control. Contract revenues accounted for 78% of marine revenues for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 65% for the comparable period of 2008.
Multi-client marine data library revenues decreased 51% to 53.8 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 from 109.7 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 54%
in U.S. dollar terms) principally due to reduced demand. Prefunding decreased 53% to 38.0
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 81.4 million for the comparable
period of 2008 (and decreased 57% in U.S. dollar terms), with a rate
of 112%. In Brazil, the
extension of our Santos cluster survey around the Tupi oil field discovery continued to progress
well, and we completed our offshore surveys in Australia and in the North Sea. After-sales
worldwide decreased 45% to 15.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 27.4
million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 49% in U.S. dollar terms).
-25-
Land
Operating revenues from our Land business line decreased 24% to 86.4 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, from 113.4 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and
decreased 30% in U.S. dollar terms).
Contract revenues decreased 30% to 59.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
from 85.0 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 35% in U.S. dollar terms),
mainly in North America as activity remained slow and gas prices continued to stagnate. We
operated 12 crews worldwide during the three months ended September 30, 2009 (including Argas
crews in Saudi Arabia and our large high-density contracts in Qatar and Oman, where we continue
to operate near record levels), compared to 19 for the comparable period of 2008. Contract
revenues accounted for 69% of land revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to 75% for the comparable period of 2008.
Prefunding increased 14% to 18.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from
15.8 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and increased 1% in U.S. dollar terms). The
increase was due to the strong interest in our Haynesville program, where we operated two crews
on the 3D Tri-Parish Line survey in Northern Louisiana. After-sales decreased 28% to 9.0 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 12.5 million for the comparable period of
2008 (and decreased 34% in U.S. dollar terms) due to soft gas prices.
Processing & Imaging
Operating revenues from our Processing & Imaging business line increased 10% to 70.8 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 64.6 million for the comparable period of 2008
(and increased 1% in US dollar terms), as the performance of, and demand for, our high-end
innovative imaging technologies, especially in the Gulf of Mexico, remained high. During the
third quarter of 2009, we were awarded a new dedicated client center in Brazil and two dedicated
center contracts were renewed, one in the Netherlands and one in France.
Equipment
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment decreased 30% to 142.6 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 from 204.1 million for the comparable period of 2008. In U.S. dollar
terms, revenues decreased 35% to U.S.$203.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
from U.S.$313.5 million for the comparable period of 2008. Sales of land equipment were
substantially impacted by the slump in seismic activity compared to the record levels experienced
in 2008, while sales of marine equipment declined to a lesser extent thanks to developing sales of
new products such as SeaRay and Nautilus.
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment (excluding intra-group sales) decreased 43% to 112.2
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 195.6 million for the comparable period
in 2008 (and decreased 47% in U.S. dollar terms).
Operating Expenses
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization, decreased 9% to 412.8 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 445.1 million for the comparable period of
2008, mainly due to the lower activity of our Marine business line and our Equipment segment. As a
percentage of operating revenues, cost of operations increased to 80% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from 64% for the comparable period of 2008. Amortization rates of our
multi-client library for the three months ended September 30, 2009 were higher at 75% than the rate
of 54% for the comparable period of 2008, mainly due to a different sales mix, with lower sales of
fully depreciated seismic data and a higher onshore contribution. Gross profit decreased 42% to
104.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 246.9 million for the comparable
period of 2008, representing 20% and 36% of operating revenues, respectively.
Research and development expenditures increased 34% to 15.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, from 11.3 million for the comparable period of 2008, representing 3% and
2% of operating revenues, respectively. This increase was mainly due to the change in the scope of
consolidation, with the addition of Wavefield.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding share-based compensation, increased
1% to 54.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 53.8 million for the
comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 6% in U.S. dollar terms). Because we assume that the
performance conditions of the 2008 performance share plan will not be met, the corresponding
compensation costs accrued have been reversed leading to a positive impact of 1.6 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009. Share based compensation costs were 5.7 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008.
As a percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and administrative costs increased to 10%
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 9% for the comparable period of 2008.
Other revenues amounted to 4.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 due to
gains on foreign exchange hedging
-26-
activities compared to expenses of 1.3 million for three months ended September 30, 2008.
Due to market conditions and marine overcapacity, we implemented a marine restructuring plan
in June 2009 that includes the de-rigging of seven seismic vessels and a redundancy plan. We made
a provision for 64.8 million as of June 30, 2009 for the total cost of the plan. During the
three months ended September 30, 2009, 8.8 million (US$12 million) of the provision were used.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our operating income was 40.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to operating income of 172.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of
the factors described above.
Operating income for our Services segment decreased 79% to 23.8 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to operating income of 112.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 (and decreased 81% in U.S. dollar terms).
Operating income from our Equipment segment decreased 38% to 25.2 million for three months
ended September 30, 2009 from 66.7 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 64% in
U.S. dollar terms).
Financial Income and Expenses
Cost of net financial debt increased 42% to 26.6 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009 from 18.7 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and increased 31% in U.S. dollar
terms). This increase was essentially due to (i) the issuance of US$350 million principal amount of
senior notes on June 9, 2009 partially offset by a repayment of US$100 million of our term loan B,
(ii) the change of scope of consolidation with the acquisition of Wavefield in December 2008 and,
(iii) less financial income generated by cash deposits.
Other financial expense was 6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to a financial gain of 4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 due to
currency fluctuations.
Income Taxes
Income tax expenses were 1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
52.1million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The effective tax rate for the third
quarter of 2009 was 24% compared to 33% for the comparable period of
2008. Before deferred taxes on currency translation, the effective
tax rate was 43% for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to 30% for the comparable period of 2008.
Equity in Income (Losses) of Affiliates
Income from investments accounted for under the equity method increased to 2.9 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 from a loss of 0.6 million for the comparable period of
2008 and corresponded essentially to our share in the income of Argas, our joint venture in Saudi
Arabia.
Net Income
Net income was 8.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 105.4
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the factors discussed above.
-27-
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2008
Operating revenues
The following table sets forth our consolidated operating revenues by business line, and the
percentage of total consolidated operating revenues represented thereby, during each of the
periods stated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Except percentages, in millions of |
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
% |
|
|
|
U.S.$(1) |
|
% |
Land |
|
|
266.3 |
|
|
|
362.8 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
340.8 |
|
|
|
521.5 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Marine |
|
|
847.6 |
|
|
|
1,154.6 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
788.5 |
|
|
|
1,206.6 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
Processing & Imaging |
|
|
219.7 |
|
|
|
299.2 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
191.7 |
|
|
|
293.2 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Total Services |
|
|
1,333.6 |
|
|
|
1,816.6 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
1,321.0 |
|
|
|
2,021.5 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Equipment |
|
|
399.7 |
|
|
|
544.8 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
514.6 |
|
|
|
787.6 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,733.3 |
|
|
|
2,361.4 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,835.6 |
|
|
|
2,809.1 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dollar amounts represent euros amounts converted at
the average exchange rates of U.S.$1.362, U.S.$1.362, and U.S.$1.363
for the Group, the Services segment and the Equipment segment per
in 2009, respectively, and of U.S.$1.530 per in 2008. |
Our consolidated operating revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 6%
to 1,733.3 million from 1,835.6 million for the comparable period of 2008. Expressed in U.S
dollars, our consolidated operating revenues decreased 16% to U.S.$2,361.4 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 from U.S.$2,809.1 million for the comparable period of 2008, with
lower operating revenues from both our Equipment segment and our Services segment, in line with
weaker market conditions.
Services
Operating revenues for our Services segment (excluding intra-group sales) increased 1% to
1,333.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 1,321.0 million for the
comparable period of 2008. Expressed in U.S dollars, operating revenues decreased 10% despite a
change of scope of consolidation with the acquisition of Wavefield in December 2008 and a strong
processing performance.
Marine
Operating revenues from our Marine business line for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
increased 8% to 847.6 million from 788.5 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and
decreased 4% in U.S. dollar terms).
Contract revenues increased 32% to 664.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
from 503.9 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and increased 17% in U.S. dollar terms)
principally due to the addition of the Wavefield vessels to the fleet in December 2008 and the
shift toward contract activity. The fleet availability and production rates were 90% and 91% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Contract revenues accounted for 78% of
marine revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 64% for the comparable
period of 2008.
Multi-client marine data library revenues decreased 36% to 183.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 from 284.5 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 43%
in U.S. dollar terms) principally due to reduced demand and a sharp decrease in after-sales in
the first three months of 2009. Prefunding decreased 41% to 115.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 from 196.6 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 48%
in U.S. dollar terms). After-sales decreased 22% to 68.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from 87.9 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 31% in
U.S. dollar terms) with low activity worldwide due to a drop in exploration expenditures in the
oil and gas industry as a result of economic conditions.
Land
Operating revenues from our Land business line decreased 22% to 266.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, from 340.8 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and
decreased 30% in U.S. dollar terms).
-28-
Contract revenues decreased 15% to 220.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
from 258.3 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 24% in U.S. dollar terms).
We operated 14 crews worldwide during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 20 for
the comparable period of 2008 as a result of reduced demand in North America. Contract revenues
accounted for 83% of land revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 76%
for the comparable period of 2008.
Prefunding, with a rate of 62%, decreased 35% to 22.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from 34.6 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 42% in
U.S. dollar terms). After-sales decreased 51% to 23.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from 47.2 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 57% in
U.S. dollar terms). Both prefunding and after-sales were affected by low activity in North
America as a result of reductions in expenditures by oil and gas companies due to low gas prices.
Processing & Imaging
Operating revenues from our Processing & Imaging business line increased 15% to 219.7 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 191.7 million for the comparable period of
2008 (and increased 2% in U.S. dollar terms) as demand for our high-end depth imaging
technologies remained high.
Equipment
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment decreased 18% to 471.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 from 572.6 million for the comparable period of 2008. In U.S. dollar
terms, revenues decreased 27% to U.S.$643.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
from U.S.$876.4 million for the comparable period of 2008. The softening demand for equipment was
essentially felt on the marine side during the first half of the year, but expanded to land sales
during the third quarter.
Operating revenues for our Equipment segment (excluding intra-group sales) decreased 22% to 399.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 514.6 million for the comparable period
in 2008 (and decreased 31% in U.S. dollar terms).
Operating Expenses
Cost of operations, including depreciation and amortization, increased 7% to 1,320.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 1,233.3 million for the comparable period of
2008, mainly due to a higher average U.S.$/ exchange rate and our changed scope of consolidation
with the acquisition of Wavefield. As a percentage of operating revenues, cost of operations
increased to 76% for the nine months ended September 31, 2009 from 67% for the comparable period of
2008 mainly due to the lower activity of our Marine business line and Equipment segment. Gross
profit decreased 30% to 419.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 603.0
million for the comparable period of 2008, representing 24% and 33% of operating revenues,
respectively.
Research and development expenditures increased 27% to 45.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, from 35.5 million for the comparable period of 2008, representing 3% and 2% of
operating revenues, respectively. This increase was mainly due to the change in the scope of
consolidation, with the addition of Wavefield.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding share-based compensation, increased
4% to 171.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 164.8 million for the
comparable period of 2008 mainly due to a higher average U.S.$/ exchange rate. In addition,
share-based compensation expense decreased to 9.0 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 from 17.7 million for the comparable period of 2008, notably due to the 2008
performance share plan, for which we assume that performance conditions will not be met.As a
percentage of operating revenues, selling, general and administrative costs were stable at 10%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Other expenses amounted to 69.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 mainly
due to the Marine restructuring plan implemented in June 2009 for a total amount of 65.0 million
(U.S$87.0 million). Other revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 amounted to 9.2
million and included primarily gains on foreign exchange hedging activities.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our operating income decreased 68% to 124.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, from 392.2 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 72% in U.S. dollar
terms) as a result of the factors described above.
-29-
Operating income for our Services segment decreased 79% to 54.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 from
254.4 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 79% in U.S. dollar terms).
Before restructuring costs accounted for in June 2009, operating income for our Services segment
was 119.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Operating income from our Equipment segment decreased 40% to 108.2 million for nine months
ended September 30, 2009 from 180.7 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and decreased 47%
in U.S. dollar terms).
Financial Income and Expenses
Cost of net financial debt increased 30% to 77.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 from 59.8 million for the comparable period of 2008 (and increased 16% in U.S. dollar
terms). This increase was mainly due to (i) the issuance of US$350 million principal amount of
senior notes on June 9, 2009 partially offset by the repayment of US$100 million of our term loan
B, (ii) the change of scope of consolidation with the acquisition of Wavefield in December 2008
and, (iii) less financial income generated by cash deposits.
Other financial expense was 9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to a financial gain of 2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 mainly due to
currency fluctuations.
Income Taxes
Income tax expenses decreased to 5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from
116.5 million for the comparable period of 2008. The effective tax rate for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 was 14% compared to 35% for the comparable period of 2008. Before
deferred taxes on currency translation, the effective tax rate was
32% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 33% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Equity in Income (Losses) of Affiliates
Income from investments accounted for under the equity method increased to 5.3 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 2.4 million for the comparable period of 2008 and
corresponded essentially to our share in the income of Argas, our joint venture in Saudi Arabia.
Net Income
Net income was 37.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to a net
income of 221.2 million for the comparable period of 2008 as a result of the factors discussed
above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital needs are for the funding of ongoing operations, capital expenditures
(particularly repairs and improvements to our seismic vessels), investments in our multi-client
data library and acquisitions (such as Veritas in 2007 and most recently Wavefield).
We intend to fund our liquidity needs through cash generated by operations, senior notes and
borrowings under our U.S. and French credit facilities. Our senior facilities consist of a term
loan B facility (U.S.$647.5 million outstanding as of September 30, 2009) with a 2014 maturity and
a U.S. revolving facility (U.S.$139 million outstanding as of September 30, 2009) with a 2012
maturity. The French revolving facility consists of a senior secured revolving facility with a 2012
maturity (U.S.$149 million outstanding as of September 30, 2009).
We believe that we are not subject to near-term liquidity constraints, given our liquidity
available as of September 30, 2009, our cash flow generation capability and prospects, and our
near-to mid-term debt repayment schedule.
Cash Flows
Operations
Net cash provided by operating activities was 472.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to 528.7 million for the comparable period of 2008. Before changes in
working capital, net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 decreased to 470.4 million from 652.9 million for the comparable period for 2008 mainly due
to the significant decrease of the net result. Changes in working capital had a favorable impact on
cash from operating activities of 1.8
-30-
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to a negative impact of 177.5 million for the comparable period for 2008.
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was 393.3 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2009 compared to 421.7 million for nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred purchases of tangible and
intangible assets of 130.1 million mainly for the Geowave Voyager seismic vessel delivered in
January 2009, streamers, Sercel Nautilus and SeaRay systems, compared to 118.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008.
We also invested 191.8 million in our multi-client library, mainly in the Gulf of Mexico and
Brazil, compared to 283.4 million in the comparable period of 2008. As of September 30, 2009,
the net book value of our multi-client data library was 565.7 million compared to 535.6 million
as of December 31, 2008.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we acquired the remaining 30% of Wavefield
for 62 million as part of the mandatory offer launched in December 30, 2008 and the squeeze-out
process closed on February 16, 2009.
Financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
20.7 million compared to 51.4 million for nine months ended September 30, 2008.
On June 9, 2009, we issued US$350 million principal amount of 91/2 % senior notes
due 2016. The senior notes were issued at a price of 97.0% of their principal amount, resulting
in a yield of 101/8%. The senior notes will mature on May 15, 2016.
We used the proceeds from the notes to replace cash used to repay US$100 million of our term
loan B facility on May 21, 2009 and to fund the three quarterly US$27.5 million amortization
payments due during the remainder of 2009 under our term loan B facility.
Net debt
Net debt as of September 30, 2009 was 936.2 million compared to 1,029.1 million at
December 31, 2008. The ratio of net debt to equity decreased to 32% as of September 30, 2009 from
35% as of December 31, 2008.
Net debt is the amount of bank overdrafts, plus current portion of financial debt, plus
financial debt, less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt is presented as additional information
because we understand that certain investors believe that netting cash against debt provides a
clearer picture of the financial liability exposure. However, other companies may present net
debt differently than we do. Net debt is not a measure of financial performance under IFRS and
should not be considered as an alternative to any other measures of performance derived in
accordance with IFRS.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net debt to financing items of the balance
sheet as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
December 31, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
124.7 |
|
|
|
241.5 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,364.5 |
|
|
|
1,296.3 |
|
Less : cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(559.5 |
) |
|
|
(516.9 |
) |
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
|
936.2 |
|
|
|
1,029.1 |
|
|
|
|
For a more detailed description of our financing activities, see Liquidity and Capital
Resources in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.
-31-
EBITDAS
EBITDAS for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 505.9 million compared to 751.2
million for the comparable period of 2008, representing 29% and 41% of operating revenues,
respectively.
We define EBITDAS as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization and share-based
compensation cost. Share-based compensation includes both stock options and shares issued under our
performance share allocation plans. EBITDAS is presented as additional information because we
understand that it is a measure used by certain investors to determine our operating cash flow and
historical ability to meet debt service and capital expenditure requirements. However, other
companies may present EBITDAS and related measures differently than we do. EBITDAS is not a measure
of financial performance under IFRS and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow
from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net income as
indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance
with IFRS.
The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDAS to Net cash provided by operating
activity, according to our cash-flow statement, for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions of euros) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
EBITDAS |
|
|
505.9 |
|
|
|
751.2 |
|
Other financial income (loss) |
|
|
(9.9) |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Variance on provisions |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Net gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(1.4) |
|
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Other non cash items |
|
|
(2.8) |
|
|
|
(5.5) |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(60.5) |
|
|
|
(100.9) |
|
Change in trade accounts receivable |
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
(118.5) |
|
Change in inventories |
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
(22.4) |
|
Change in other current assets |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
Change in trade accounts payable |
|
|
(84.0) |
|
|
|
(11.4) |
|
Change in other current liabilities |
|
|
(59.0) |
|
|
|
(12.0) |
|
Impact of changes in exchange rate |
|
|
(14.4) |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
472.2 |
|
|
|
528.7 |
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations
The following table sets forth our future cash obligations as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of euros) |
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5 |
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
2-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Debt |
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
1,234.7 |
|
|
|
1,344.1 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (not discounted) |
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
125.6 |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
131.2 |
|
|
|
202.1 |
|
|
|
151.0 |
|
|
|
160.6 |
|
|
|
644.8 |
|
Other Long-Term Obligations (bond interest) |
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
142.0 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
|
|
|
464.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
|
300.8 |
|
|
|
435.7 |
|
|
|
333.1 |
|
|
|
1,509.6 |
|
|
|
2,579.2 |
|
|
|
|
-32-
Reconciliation of EBITDAS to U.S. GAAP
Summary of differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP with respect to EBITDAS
The principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to our EBITDAS relate to the
treatment of pension plans, development costs and derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Pension plan
Pursuant to an exemption provided by IFRS 1 First-time adoption of IFRS, we have elected to
record unrecognized actuarial gains and losses as of January 1, 2004 to retained earnings. Under
U.S. GAAP, this exemption is not applicable, which generates a difference resulting from the
amortization of actuarial gains and losses recognized in statement of income.
Under IFRS, in accordance with IAS 19 Revised, actuarial gains or losses are recognized in the
statement of recognized income and expense (SORIE) attributable to shareholders.
Under U.S. GAAP, we apply Statement 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plan, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), effective
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006.
Gains or losses are amortized over the remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits under the plan, and therefore recognized in the income statement.
Development costs
Under IFRS, expenditure on development activities, whereby research findings are applied to a plan
or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes, is
capitalized if:
|
|
|
the project is clearly defined, and costs are separately identified and reliably
measured, |
|
|
|
|
the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, |
|
|
|
|
the Group has sufficient resources to complete development, and |
|
|
|
|
the intangible asset is likely to generate future economic benefits. |
Under U.S. GAAP, all expenditures related to research and development are recognized as an expense
in the income statement.
Derivative instruments and hedging activity
Under IFRS, long-term contracts in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are not considered to
include embedded derivatives when such contracts are routinely denominated in this currency
(primarily U.S. dollar) in the industry.
Under U.S. GAAP, such an exemption does not exist and embedded derivatives in long-term contracts
in foreign currencies (primarily U.S. dollar) are recorded in the balance sheet at fair value and
revenues and expenses with a non-U.S. client or supplier are recognized at the forward exchange
rate negotiated at the beginning of the contract. The variation of fair market value of the
embedded derivative foreign exchange contracts is recognized in the income statement in the line
item Other financial income (loss).
Provision for marine redundancy plan
Under IFRS, a provision for redundancy plan should be recognized when the entity has a detailed
formal plan for the restructuring, and has raised a valid expectation for those affected that it
will carry out the restructuring by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features
to those affected by it.
Under U.S. GAAP, termination benefits can be recognized only when those affected have rendered all
services required to receive benefits.
-33-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
Nine
months ended September 30, |
In millions of euros |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
EBITDAS as reported |
|
|
505.9 |
|
|
|
751.2 |
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on pension plan |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Cancellation of IFRS capitalization of development costs |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
Cancellation of redundancy provision |
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
EBITDAS according to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
520.9 |
|
|
|
746.4 |
|
|
|
|
Trend information
Currency fluctuations
Certain changes in operating revenues set forth in U.S. dollars in this current report on Form
6-K were derived by converting revenues recorded in euros at the average rate for the relevant
period. Such information is presented in light of the fact that most of our revenues are
denominated in U.S. dollars while our consolidated financial statements are presented in euros.
Converted figures are presented only to assist in an understanding of our operating revenues but
are not part of our reported financial statements and may not be indicative of changes in our
actual or anticipated operating revenues.
Our business faces foreign exchange risks because a large percentage of our revenues and cash
receipts are denominated in U.S. dollars, while a significant portion of our operating expenses and
income taxes accrue in euro and other currencies. Movements between the U.S dollar and euro or
other currencies may adversely affect our operating revenues and results. In the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, more than 80% of our operating revenues and approximately
two-thirds of our operating expenses were denominated in currencies other than euros. These
included U.S. dollars and, to a significantly lesser extent, Canadian dollars, Brazilian reals,
Australian dollars, British pounds and Norwegian kroner. In addition, a significant portion of our
revenues that were invoiced in euros related to contracts that were effectively priced in U.S.
dollars, as the U.S. dollar often serves as the reference currency when bidding for contracts to
provide geophysical services to the oil and gas industry.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate of the euro against such other currencies, particularly the
U.S. dollar, have had in the past and can be expected in future periods to have a significant
effect upon our results of operations. For financial reporting purposes, such depreciation of the
U.S. dollar against the euro negatively affects our reported results of operations since U.S.
dollar-denominated earnings that are converted to euros are stated at a reduced value. Since we
participate in competitive bids for data acquisition contracts that are denominated in U.S.
dollars, such depreciation reduces our competitive position against that of other companies whose
costs and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. An appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the
euro has the opposite effect. As a result, our sales and operating income are exposed to the
effects of fluctuations in the value of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. In addition, our exposure
to fluctuations in the U.S.$/euro exchange rate has considerably increased over the last few years
due to increased sales outside Europe. Based on our operations in 2008, and given the portfolio of
currencies during that year, a 10-cent variance of the U.S. dollar against the euro would have
affected our dollar equivalent-value operating income by approximately U.S.$50 million.
We attempt to match foreign currency revenues and expenses in order to balance our net
position of receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies. For example, charter costs
for our vessels, as well as our most important computer hardware leases, are denominated in U.S.
dollars. Nevertheless, during the past five years such dollar-denominated expenses have not equaled
dollar-denominated revenues principally due to personnel costs payable in euros.
In addition, to be protected against the reduction in value of future foreign currency cash
flows, we follow a policy of selling U.S. dollars forward at average contract maturity dates that
we attempt to match with future net U.S. dollar cash flows (revenues less costs in U.S. dollars)
expected from firm contract commitments, generally over the ensuing six months. Our average
forward U.S.$/ exchange rate was U.S.$1.36 per for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to U.S.$1.49 per for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
We do not enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for trading purposes.
-34-
Item 3: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
-35-
THIS FORM 6-K REPORT IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE PROSPECTUS CONTAINED IN CGG
VERITAS REGISTRATION STATEMENTS ON FORM S-8 (REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 333-150384 AND
NO.333-158684) AND SHALL BE A PART THEREOF FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED, TO THE
EXTENT NOT SUPERSEDED BY DOCUMENTS OR REPORTS SUBSEQUENTLY FILED OR FURNISHED.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CGGVeritas has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman
|
|
|
Compagnie Générale de Géophysique Veritas |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stéphane-Paul Frydman
|
|
|
Stéphane-Paul Frydman |
|
|
Group Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: November 10, 2009
-36-