Smith Micro Software, Inc.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-26536
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
33-0029027 |
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
|
|
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER INCORPORATION OR |
ORGANIZATION)
|
|
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER) |
|
|
|
51 COLUMBIA, SUITE 200, ALISO VIEJO, CA
|
|
92656 |
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
|
|
(ZIP CODE) |
REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (949) 362-5800
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark if whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2).
YES o NO þ
As of July 28, 2006 there were 24,038,164 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (A) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
31,319 |
|
|
$ |
21,215 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts
and other adjustments of $376 (2006) and $439 (2005) |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
6,786 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
36,853 |
|
|
|
29,087 |
|
|
Equipment and improvements, net |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
15,039 |
|
|
|
9,288 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
4,093 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
56,800 |
|
|
$ |
42,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,186 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
5,383 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 24,038,000 and 22,147,000 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
60,444 |
|
|
|
50,880 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(9,051 |
) |
|
|
(11,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net stockholders equity |
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
38,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
56,800 |
|
|
$ |
42,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
DERIVED FROM THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 2005
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
3
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
NET REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
12,362 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
22,072 |
|
|
$ |
5,038 |
|
Services |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
|
12,555 |
|
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
22,440 |
|
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
5,226 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
Services |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Revenues |
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
8,605 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
13,835 |
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
3,754 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
11,358 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,083 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
2,894 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE, basic |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
SHARES OUTSTANDING, basic |
|
|
23,635 |
|
|
|
21,584 |
|
|
|
22,973 |
|
|
|
20,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE, diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
SHARES OUTSTANDING, diluted |
|
|
25,598 |
|
|
|
22,713 |
|
|
|
24,740 |
|
|
|
21,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
4
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
capital |
|
|
deficit |
|
|
Total |
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
22,147 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
50,880 |
|
|
$ |
(11,945 |
) |
|
$ |
38,957 |
|
Exercise of common stock options |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
Acquisition of PhoTags, Inc. |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,731 |
|
Non cash compensation recognized
on stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
Non cash compensation recognized
on Restricted Stock |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
24,038 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
60,444 |
|
|
$ |
(9,051 |
) |
|
$ |
51,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
5
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,894 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities, net of the effect of the acquisition of PhoTags, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts and other adjustments
to accounts receivable |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Provision for slow moving inventory |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash compensation related to stock options & restricted stock |
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating accounts, net of effect from acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
(651 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
9,865 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of PhoTags, Inc., net of cash received |
|
|
(2,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,393 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,786 |
|
Cash received from exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
20,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
10,104 |
|
|
|
21,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
21,215 |
|
|
|
8,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
31,319 |
|
|
$ |
29,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
6
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
7
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description
of Business Smith Micro Software, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) is a
diversified developer and marketer of communications and utilities software products and services.
The Companys strategic focus is to market and sell value-added wireless products targeted to the
original equipment manufacturers (OEM) market, particularly wireless service providers and mobile
phone manufacturers. The Company offers software products for Windows, Mac OSX, Unix and Linux
operating systems. The Company also offers wireless communication software products and services
to the enterprise market that include enhanced wireless security features.
On April 5, 2006, the Company acquired PhoTags, Inc. (PhoTags), a Delaware Corporation with
offices in Jerusalem, Israel (see Note 3). PhoTags is a leading developer and marketer of
revolutionary photo and music management technology. The companys pioneering product suite known
as Active Images turns any JPEG file into a self-contained multimedia messaging system, allowing
users to send text messages, music, sound files, documents and more all in a single JPEG file.
Among PhoTags product suite was Music Express, now known as QuickLink Music, an innovative music
management solution which assists users enhance the media-rich capabilities of listening to music
on their PCs. QuickLink Music allows users to simplify managing their music files, buy music from
an online store, manage music files on a PC. PhoTags Inc.s patented Active Images technology is
designed to easily add any type of metadata or media file to a JPEG Image. Watermarks, forms, text
messages, music, links to Internet sites, voice recordings, portable digital wallet information,
and even videos can all be stored in a JPEG image, and accessed on any device that has the Active
Image thin client application installed. This technology plays directly into Smith Micros strategy
of broadening its wireless product offerings and provides for the first time that carriers and
handset manufacturers can provide enhanced music and photo management technology that can reside
directly in the handset and on a consumers PC. In addition to broadening Smith Micros family of
mobility products, the PhoTags acquisition will help expand Smith Micros ability to serve OEM
customers in Europe and Asia through an international sales and support office now based in
Jerusalem, Israel that is now renamed Smith Micro Software, Israel.
On July 1, 2005, the Company acquired Allume Systems (Allume), which was a wholly owned
subsidiary of International Microcomputer Software, Inc. (see Note 4). Allume develops and
publishes award-winning software solutions that empower users in the area of information access,
removal, recovery, security, productivity and online distribution. Allumes flagship product is
StuffIt® Deluxe. StuffIt Wireless, a new and advanced technology that is patent pending by Allume
Systems, will compress an already compressed JPEG file by up to 30% more without loosing any of the
picture quality. This technology is particularly important to mobile phone manufactures who now can
store up to 30% more images and carriers who are interested in the reduction of utilized bandwidth.
In addition, StuffIt Wireless has been enhanced to also compress and decompress handset resources,
potentially reducing the cost to build handsets by reducing memory requirements. Other award
winning products include icSpyware & Anti-Phising Suite which targets spyware and phishing
intrusions, Internet Cleanup which removes spyware and detects and prevents intruders from access
to private information and Spring Cleaning® which cleans and optimizes computer operating systems.
Basis
of Presentation The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
reflect adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the
consolidated financial position of the Company at June 30, 2006, the consolidated results of its
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and its consolidated cash
flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
although the Company believes that the disclosures in the unaudited consolidated financial
statements are adequate to ensure the information presented is not misleading. These unaudited
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005. The results of operations of interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of future operating results. All intercompany amounts have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents generally consist of cash, government
securities and money market funds. These securities are all held in one financial institution and
are uninsured except for minimum FDIC coverage. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
balances totaling approximately $31.4 and $21.4 million, respectively, were uninsured. All have
original maturity dates of three months or less.
8
Accounts Receivable The Company sells its products worldwide. The Company performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company
maintains reserves for estimated credit losses, and those losses have been within managements
estimates. Allowances for product returns are included in other adjustments to accounts receivable
on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Product returns are estimated based on historical
experience and have also been within managements estimates.
Inventories Inventories consist principally of cables, CDs, boxes and manuals and are stated
at the lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company
regularly reviews its inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess and obsolete
inventory based primarily on managements forecast of product demand and production requirements.
At June 30, 2006 our inventory balance consisted of approximately $601,000 in assembled products
and $434,000 of components.
Equipment and Improvements Equipment and improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets,
generally ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Long Lived Assets The Company accounts for the impairment and disposition of long-lived
assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting
for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This statement addresses financial accounting and
reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for the disposal of long-lived assets. In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets to be held are reviewed for events or changes in
circumstances, which indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company
periodically reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets to determine whether or not an
impairment to such value has occurred. The Company has determined that there was no impairment at
June 30, 2006.
Goodwill The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective
January 1, 2002. As a result of the adoption, the Company is no longer required to amortize
goodwill. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 142, goodwill was amortized over 7 years. In accordance
with SFAS No. 142, the Company reviews the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill at
least annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The Companys
annual impairment testing date is December 31. Recoverability of goodwill is determined by
comparing the fair value of the Companys reporting units to the carrying value of the underlying
net assets in the reporting units. If the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be less
than the carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is deemed impaired and an impairment loss is
recognized to the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the difference between the
fair value of the reporting unit and the fair value of its other assets and liabilities. The
Company determined that it did not have any impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2005.
The carrying amount of the Companys goodwill was approximately $15,039,000 and $9,288,000 as
of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The Companys reporting units are equivalent
to its operating segments. At June 30, 2006 the amount of goodwill allocated to the products
segment is $14,704,000 and the amount of goodwill allocated to the services segment is $335,000.
At December 31, 2005 the amount of goodwill allocated to the products segment is $8,953,000 and the
amount of goodwill allocated to the services segment is $335,000.
Other Intangible Assets The following table sets forth the acquired intangible assets by
major asset class:
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased and
Licensed Technology |
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
|
|
(2,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
|
|
(2,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Software |
|
|
4-5 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
2,115 |
|
Distribution Rights |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
406 |
|
Customer Lists |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
831 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
741 |
|
Customer Agreements |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,388 |
|
|
$ |
(3,864 |
) |
|
$ |
4,524 |
|
|
$ |
7,123 |
|
|
$ |
(3,030 |
) |
|
$ |
4,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense on intangible assets was approximately $449,000 and $834,000
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Expected future amortization
expense is as follows: $736,000 for the remainder of 2006, $1,696,000 for the year 2007,
$1,121,000 for the year 2008, $522,000 for the year 2009 and $449,000 thereafter. Amortization
expense related to intangibles acquired in the Allume acquisition is calculated on a discounted
cash flow basis over five years for Capitalized Software, Distribution Rights and Customer Lists
and ten years for Trademarks. Amortization is calculated on a straight line basis over five years
for Customer Lists. Amortization expense related to intangibles acquired in the PhoTags
acquisition is calculated on a discounted cash flow basis over four years for Capitalized Software
and 18 months for Customer Agreements.
Revenue Recognition Software revenue is recognized in accordance with the Statement of
Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended, when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectibility
is probable. The Company recognizes revenues from sales of its software to Retail and OEM
customers or end users as completed products are shipped and title passes, or from royalties
generated as authorized customers duplicate the Companys software, if the other requirements of
SOP 97-2 are met. If the requirements of SOP 97-2 are not met at the date of shipment, revenue is
not recognized until these elements are known or resolved. Returns from Retail and OEM customers
are limited to defective goods or goods shipped in error. Historically, OEM customer returns have
not been significant. The Company reviews available retail channel information and makes a
determination of a return provision for sales made to distributors and retailers based on current
channel inventory levels and historical return patterns. Certain sales to distributors or
retailers are made on a consignment basis. Revenue for consignment sales are not recognized until
sell through to the final customer is established.
Product sales directly to end-users are recognized upon delivery. End users have a thirty day
right of return, but such returns are reasonably estimable and have historically been immaterial.
The Company also provides technical support to its customers. Such costs have historically been
insignificant.
Service revenues include sales of consulting services, web site hosting and fulfillment.
Service revenues are recognized as services are provided or as milestones are delivered and
accepted by our customers.
Sales Incentives Pursuant to the consensus of EITF 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given
by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Product), effective January 1,
2002, the cost of sales incentives the Company offers without charge to customers that can be used
in, or that are exercisable by a customer as a result of, a single exchange transaction is
accounted
10
for as a reduction of revenue. We track incentives by program and use historical redemption rates to estimate the cost of customer incentives. These
costs have historically been less than 10% of our revenues.
Software Development Costs Development costs incurred in the research and development of new software products and enhancements to existing
software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established. The Company considers technological feasibility to be
established when all planning, designing, coding and testing has been completed according to design specifications. After technological feasibility is established,
any additional costs are capitalized. Through June 30, 2006, software has been substantially completed concurrently with the establishment of technological feasibility; and,
accordingly, no costs have been capitalized to date.
Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement requires the recognition of deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The measurement
of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event the future consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and the tax bases of the
Companys assets and liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, SFAS No. 109 requires an evaluation of the probability of being able to realize the future benefits indicated
by such asset. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company currently has a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets. Based on the Companys assessment of all available evidence, the Company concluded that it is not more likely than not that its deferred tax assets will be realized. This conclusion is based primarily on our history of net operating losses
as compared to only a recent trend of profitable operations, the potential for future stock option deductions to significantly reduce taxable income, annual net operating loss limitations under Section 382 of the Code and the need to generate significant amounts of taxable income in future periods on a consistent and prolonged basis in order to utilize the deferred tax assets. The Company will continue to monitor all available evidence and reassess the potential realization of our deferred tax assets.
If the Company continues to meet our financial projections and improve our results of operations, or if circumstances otherwise change, it is reasonably possible that we may release all or a portion of our valuation allowance in the future. Any such release would result in recording a tax benefit that would increase net income in the period the valuation is released.
Net Income per Share Pursuant to SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, the Company is required to provide dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS).
Basic EPS amounts are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS amounts are based upon the weighted average number of
common and potential common shares outstanding. Potential common shares for diluted EPS include stock options, using the treasury stock method, of 1,963,000 and 1,129,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Potential common shares for diluted EPS include stock options, using the treasury
stock method, of 1,767,000 and 1,272,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively.
Fulfillment Services The Company currently holds consigned inventory for a customer, which is used to fulfill internet orders. As the Company does not hold title to the inventory, it is not recorded in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the Company receives cash for internet fulfillment orders which is paid out to the fulfillment customer on a monthly basis. Such cash
and the related payable are recorded on a net basis as the amounts are held for the benefit of this fulfillment customer. Revenue is recognized for fulfillment services as services are performed.
Segment Information The Company currently operates in two business segments: products and services. In addition, revenues are broken down into three units, Wireless and OEM Sales, and Consumer Sales and Enterprise Sales. The Companys Enterprise Sales unit includes Enterprise software products as well as consulting, fulfillment and hosting revenue.
The Company does not separately allocate operating expenses to these segments, nor does it allocate specific assets to these segments. Therefore, segment information reported includes only revenues and cost of revenues.
The following table shows the net revenues and cost of revenues generated by each segment:
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
Wireless & OEM Revenues |
|
$ |
10,115 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,237 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Consumer Revenues |
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Revenues |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
12,362 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
22,072 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Cost of Revenues |
|
|
5,226 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
7,136 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
2,703 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
13,617 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
4,292 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to individual customers and their affiliates which amounted to more than 10% of the
Companys net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, included
one OEM customer at 74.4% in 2006 and one OEM customer at 81.7% in 2005. Sales to individual
customers and their affiliates which amounted to more than 10% of the Companys net revenues for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, included one OEM customer at 72.5% in
2006 and one OEM customer at 71.6% in 2005.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from
those estimates.
Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income, as defined, includes all changes in equity (net
assets) during a period from non-owner sources. For each of the periods ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, there was no difference between net income, as reported, and comprehensive income.
12
2. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
On February 18, 2005, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain
institutional investors related to the private placement of 3,500,000 shares of our common stock,
par value $0.001 per share. The transaction closed on February 18, 2005 and the Company realized
gross proceeds of $22.4 million from the financing before deducting commissions and other expenses.
Offering costs related to the transaction totaled $1,613,000, comprised of $1,344,000 in
commissions and $269,000 cash payments for legal and investment services, resulting in net proceeds
of $20,786,000. The Company agreed to register for resale the shares of Common Stock issued in the
private placement. Such registration statement became effective on June 17, 2005. The agreement
provides for penalties of one percent (1%) of the purchase price per month should effectiveness of
the registration not be maintained.
3. ACQUISITION OF PHOTAGS INC.
On April 3, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) by and among the Company, Tag Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (Merger Sub), Tag Acquisition Corporation II, a Delaware
corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (Merger Sub II), PhoTags, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (PhoTags), Harry Fox, as Stockholders Agent, and certain stockholders of PhoTags,
that provides for, among other things, the merger of Merger Sub with and into PhoTags and,
immediately upon the completion thereof, the merger of PhoTags with and into Merger Sub II pursuant
to which PhoTags became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the Merger). The transaction
closed on April 5, 2006.
In connection with the Merger, the Company acquired the underlying technology of PhoTags, Inc.
which includes patented JPEG enhancements. As a result, the Company assumed $2,000,000 in
liabilities of PhoTags, which were paid at closing, and issued 384,897 shares of the Companys
common stock with an aggregate fair market value of $4,730,384 (based on a closing share price on
the closing date, April 5, 2006, of $12.29) as consideration for the purchase of all of the
outstanding shares of PhoTags. In addition, the Company agreed to pay an earn-out payment of up to
an additional $3,500,000 in either cash or the Companys common stock, at the Companys sole
election, if the PhoTags business line achieves certain milestones over a 15-month period beginning
April 1, 2006. As of June 30, 2006, approximately $300,000 in Wireless & OEM revenues have been
attributed to the acquisition. The Company estimates that $241,000 in direct costs (legal and
professional services) were incurred to close the transaction.
As part of the transaction, CDI, a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel and
a related party of PhoTags (CDI), agreed to grant the Company an option to acquire CDI for a
period of ten (10) years following the effective time of the Merger at a purchase price of $3,000.
The Merger is intended to constitute a reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and is subject to the requisite approval of PhoTags stockholders
and receipt of certain third-party consents to assignments of PhoTags customer contracts.
As part of the transaction, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as soon as reasonably practicable but no later than ninety (90) days after date
of the Merger Agreement covering the resale of the shares of the Companys common stock issued to
the stockholders of PhoTags.
A copy of the Merger Agreement has been filed under Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and with this Report on Form 10-Q.
The results of operations of the business acquired have been included in the Companys
consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Amortization related to the
acquisition was calculated based on an independent valuation for certain identifiable intangibles
acquired.
The total purchase price is summarized as follows (in thousands):
13
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
4,730 |
|
Acquisition related costs |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
6,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys preliminary allocation of the purchase price is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net |
|
|
3 |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
1,265 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
7,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
6,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
As the cost of the acquisition did not exceed 20% of the Companys net assets at the date
of the transaction, proforma information is not required.
4. ACQUISITION OF ALLUME INC.
On July 1, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
Allume, Inc. from International Microcomputer Software, Inc. (IMSI) for $10.6 million in cash and
397,547 restricted shares of its common stock. Allume, Inc. is a leading developer of compression
software solutions for JPEG, MPEG and MP3 platforms. A portion of the purchase price, including
$1,250,000 cash and shares of common stock having a market value of $750,000, was deposited in an
indemnity escrow to secure certain representations and warranties included in the Stock Purchase
Agreement. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $12.8 million, which includes $10.6
million cash paid, the 397,547 shares issued which have been valued using the average closing
market price of the Companys common stock over the two-day period before and after the sale was
announced and $316,000 of direct acquisition costs. The direct acquisition costs incurred to date
include $116,000 for legal and professional services, as well as a transaction fee of $200,000.
The results of operations of the business acquired have been included in the Companys
consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Depreciation and amortization
related to the acquisition were calculated based on the estimated fair market values and estimated
lives for property and equipment and an independent valuation for certain identifiable intangibles
acquired.
The total purchase price is summarized as follows (in thousands):
14
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration |
|
$ |
10,626 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
1,858 |
|
Acquisition related costs |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
12,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price is contingent upon a final calculation of Allumes net assets. If the
final net asset calculation is less than the minimum amount specified in the purchase agreement,
the purchase price will be adjusted downward accordingly. Any such adjustment will be recorded as
an adjustment to the cost of Allume Systems, Inc. and reflected in the final purchase price
allocation.
The Companys preliminary allocation of the purchase price is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
46 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net |
|
|
822 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
237 |
|
Property & Equipment |
|
|
67 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
244 |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
4,863 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
13,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
659 |
|
Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
12,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June
30, 2005 as if the acquisition had occurred January 1, 2005 are as follows (in thousands, except
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Proforma |
|
|
Historical |
|
|
Proforma |
|
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
|
$ |
5,178 |
|
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
|
$ |
9,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per share, basic |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) per share, diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding, basic |
|
|
21,584 |
|
|
|
21,982 |
|
|
|
20,629 |
|
|
|
21,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding, diluted |
|
|
22,713 |
|
|
|
21,982 |
|
|
|
21,901 |
|
|
|
22,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Pro forma adjustments have been applied to reflect the addition of amortization related
to the intangible assets and the fixed assets acquired and reduction in interest income as if the
acquisition had occurred at the beginning of such period presented. The pro forma adjustment for
amortization related to intangible assets acquired was $385,000 and $770,000 for the three and six
month pro forma periods ended June 30, 2005.
5. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION.
In July 2005, the Shareholders approved the 2005 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (2005
Plan), which replaced by the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (1995 Plan). All outstanding options
under the 1995 Plan will remain outstanding, but no further grants will be made under that Plan.
The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of non-qualified or incentive stock options to employees,
non-employee members of the board and consultants. The exercise price per share is not to be less
than the fair market value per share of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The Board
of Directors has the discretion to determine the vesting schedule. Options may be either
immediately exercisable or in installments, but generally vest over a four-year period from the
date of grant. In the event the holder ceases to be employed by the Company, all unvested options
terminate and all vested installment options may be exercised within an installment period
following termination. In general, options expire ten years from the date of grant.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which requires the measurement and
recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and
directors, including stock options based on their fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), which the
Company previously followed in accounting for stock-based awards. In March 2005, the SEC issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) to provide guidance on SFAS 123(R). The Company has
applied SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R).
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method as of and for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. In accordance with the modified prospective
transition method, the Companys financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to
reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R). Share-based compensation expense recognized
is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to
vest. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 includes compensation expense for
share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, December 31, 2005 based on
the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123.
In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company elected to attribute the value of
share-based compensation to expense using the straight-line method, which was previously used for
its pro forma information required under SFAS 123. Share-based compensation expense related to
stock options and restricted stock grants was $1.7 million and $2.4 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006, and was recorded in the financial statements as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Selling and Marketing |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Research and Development |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
General and Administrative |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stock Compensation Expense |
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
2,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the six months ended June 30, 2006 a total of 50,000 shares of Restricted Stock, with
a total value of $440,000, were granted to the Board of Directors. This cost will be amortized
over 12 months. In addition, 400,000 shares of Restricted Stock, with a total value $3.6 million,
were granted to key officers and employees of the Company. This cost will be amortized over 24
months.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, there was no share-based compensation
expense related to stock options recognized under the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB
25. In addition, there was no compensation expense for restricted stock grants as the Company had
not issued any restricted stock. Had compensation cost for the Companys stock options been
recognized based upon the estimated fair value on the grant date under the fair value methodology
prescribed by SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Companys net income and income per
share would have been as follows (in thousands):
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
Less: total stock based compensation |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as adjusted |
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Basic, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Fully Diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Fully Diluted, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
In the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, the Companys
calculations were made using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions: expected life, 48 months following the grant date; stock volatility, 81.7%
and 109%; risk-free interest rates of 4.95% and 3.79%; and no dividends during the expected term.
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement of operations pursuant
to SFAS No. 123(R) is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, expense for grants beginning
upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 will be reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS
No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated
based on historical experience.
A summary of the Companys stock option activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Ave. |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
# of Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,856,000 |
|
|
$ |
3.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
241,000 |
|
|
$ |
11.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,057,000 |
) |
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(117,000 |
) |
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2,923,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
33,508,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
474,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
6,259,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information regarding options outstanding as of June 30, 2006 is as follows :
17
\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
|
Options exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Range of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
prices |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
life (years) |
|
|
price |
|
|
exercisable |
|
|
price |
|
|
|
$ |
0.24 $0.50 |
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 $1.00 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.01 $2.00 |
|
|
|
612,000 |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.01 $4.00 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.56 |
|
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.07 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.01 $5.00 |
|
|
|
1,782,000 |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.95 |
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
|
|
$ |
5.01 $14.00 |
|
|
|
303,000 |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.38 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,923,000 |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
|
474,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2006 approximately 1,057,000 options have been exercised
with an intrinsic value of $14.3 million, resulting in cash proceeds to the Company of $2.6
million. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the six months ended
June 30, 2006 was $7.22. At June 30, 2006 there was $5.7 million of total unrecognized
compensation costs related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plan, which will be
recognized over a period not to exceed four years. At June 30, 2006, 2,172,000 shares were
available for future grants under the Stock Issuance / Stock Option Plan.
6. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments, which amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives Instruments and Hedging
Activities and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishment of Liabilities. SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133 to narrow the scope exception for
interest-only and principal-only strips on debt instruments to include only such strips
representing rights to receive a specified portion of the contractual interest or principle cash
flows. SFAS No. 155 also amends SFAS No. 140 to allow qualifying special-purpose entities to hold
a passive derivative financial instrument pertaining to beneficial interests that itself is a
derivative instrument. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this new Standard but
believes that it will not have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets
(SFAS No. 156), which provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset)
accounting. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement (1) requires an
entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation
to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2)
requires that a separately recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured
at fair value, if practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or
the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of separately recognized servicing
assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at initial adoption a one-time reclassification of
available-for-sale securities to trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights,
provided the securities reclassified offset the entitys exposure to changes in the fair value of
the servicing assets or liabilities; and (5) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and
servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the balance sheet and additional
disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156
is effective for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the beginning of
an entitys fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted in
certain circumstances. The Statement also describes the manner in which it should be initially
applied. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on its
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
18
In July 2006, the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting
and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. This interpretation prescribes a comprehensive
model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently in the
process of evaluating the expected effect of FIN 48 on its results of operations and financial
position.
19
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This report contains forward-looking statements regarding Smith Micro which include, but are
not limited to, statements concerning projected revenues, expenses, gross profit and income, the
competitive factors affecting our business, market acceptance of products, customer concentration,
the success and timing of new product introductions, the protection of our intellectual property,
and the need for additional capital. These forward-looking statements are based on our current
expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, managements beliefs, and certain
assumptions made by us. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, predicts,
potential, believes, seeks, estimates, should, may, will and variations of these
words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties
and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ
materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of
various factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to the following:
|
|
|
our ability to predict consumer needs, introduce new products, gain broad market
acceptance for such products and ramp up manufacturing in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
the intensity of the competition and our ability to successfully compete; |
|
|
|
|
the pace at which the market for new products develop; |
|
|
|
|
the response of competitors, many of whom are bigger and better financed than us; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully execute our business plan and control costs and expenses; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property and our ability to not infringe on the rights of others; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate Allume and PhoTags into our business model; |
|
|
|
|
our depressed market capitalization; and |
|
|
|
|
those additional factors which are listed under the section Risk Factors beginning on page 23. |
All forward looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us
on the date hereof. We do not undertake any obligation to revise or update publicly any
forward-looking statements for any reason.
OVERVIEW
Our business model is based primarily upon developing and marketing innovative software
solutions for the wireless industry. Our leading-edge mobility and music management products
simplify communications access over Wireless Wide Area Networks (WWANs) and Wireless Local Area
Networks (WLANs); our mobile media manager manages content from PC to mobile device and back; and
our compression technologies are well on the way to being established as industry standards.
Today, Smith Micro Software develops productivity and entertainment software solutions for an
expanding universe of customers. Our leading QuickLink® Mobile brands have long been products of
choice for wireless carriers and device manufacturers around the world.
These wireless carriers and device manufacturers (OEMs) generally incorporate our products
into their brands selling direct to individual consumers and in multiples to their enterprise
customers. Our products are utilized in many major wireless network installations throughout the
world to facilitate data communications via PC Cards, embedded network devices and mobile phones.
We began adding value to QuickLink Mobile with new features and security protocol enhancements
for secure enterprise level connectivity compliance, thus allowing enterprise users to move between
cellular networks and WLAN coverage securely. We
20
anticipate that this market will grow over the next several years as enterprise customers provide
wireless connectivity for their workforce.
In addition, late in 2005 Smith Micro began shipping its first music management software to
help manage the transfer of music files to a mobile device. Our launch of QuickLink Music is
expected to have a positive impact as we gain market-share within the wireless carrier space. As
with all our mobility solutions our product strategies revolve around driving wireless data usage
on our customers wireless networks.
Our business is primarily dependent upon the demand for wireless communications and
connectivity software. During the last three years, demand for these types of products has
fluctuated dramatically, and there has been a significant increase in price competition within our
industry.
We continue to invest in research and the development of wireless software products, and we
believe we have one of the industrys leading wireless product lines in terms of performance and
innovative features. Our unique out-of-the-box design focusing on ease-of-use further
differentiates our products and help to reduce support costs for our customers.
During 2006, we have maintained a sharp focus on our operating cost structure while ensuring
that we maintain our operating flexibility to support future growth in the industry. We measure
success by monitoring our net sales and gross margin dollars and operating cash flow. We believe
that there continues to be excellent growth opportunities within the wireless software marketplace
and we continue to focus on positioning Smith Micro to benefit from these opportunities.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statement of operations
data expressed as a percentage of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
98.5 |
% |
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
98.4 |
% |
|
|
94.0 |
% |
Services |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
41.6 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
Services |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
57.8 |
% |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
|
|
61.6 |
% |
|
|
83.4 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
|
50.6 |
% |
|
|
77.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Revenues
Total net revenues were $12.6 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $9.2 million, or 277.0% from 2005 to 2006.
Sales to individual customers and their affiliates which amounted to more than 10% of the Companys
net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, consisted of Verizon at 74.4% and
81.7% respectively. If our sales to this customer are reduced, it could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations. The current quarter results include approximately $2.1
million of net revenue attributable to the Allume acquisition.
Total net revenues were $22.4 million and $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $17 million, or 318.7% from 2005 to 2006. Sales
to individual customers and their affiliates which amounted to more than 10% of the Companys net
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, consisted of Verizon at 72.5% and 71.6%
respectively. The 2006 period includes approximately $4.5 million of net revenues attributable to
the Allume acquisition, which was completed in the third quarter of 2005.
We currently operate in two business segments: products and services. In addition, revenues
are broken down into three business units, Wireless and OEM, Consumer and Enterprise. Our
Enterprise unit sales include software products as well as consulting, fulfillment and hosting.
The following table shows the net revenues and cost of revenues generated by each segment (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Services |
|
Wireless & OEM |
|
$ |
10,115 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,237 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues |
|
|
12,362 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
22,072 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues |
|
|
5,226 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
7,136 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
2,703 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
13,617 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
4,292 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products. Net product revenues were $12.4 million and $3.2 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $9.2 million, or 288.9%,
from 2005 to 2006. Wireless and OEM sales increased $7.2 million, or 241.4%, as a result of the
continued success of the EVDO rollout by our carrier customers and the success of our Music
Essentials Kit product, which was launched in the fourth quarter of 2005. Consumer sales primarily
represent the sales of Allume products to distributors, retail customers and individuals. Allume
was acquired on July 1, 2005 (see Note 4 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements). Enterprise sales increased $47,000 or 151.6% as a result of the addition of Allumes
site license and enterprise sales of its Stuffit product line. Product revenues accounted for
98.5% of total revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with 95.5% of total
revenues in the comparable period of 2005.
Net product revenues were $22.1 million and $5.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $17.1 million, or 338.1%, from 2005 to 2006.
Wireless and OEM sales increased $12.6 million, or 272.9%, as a result of the continued success of
the EVDO rollout by our carrier customers and the success of our Music Essentials Kit product,
which was launched in the fourth quarter of 2005. Consumer sales primarily represent the sales of
Allume products to distributors, retail customers and individuals. Allume was acquired on July 1,
2005 (see Note 4 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Enterprise
sales increased $148,000 or 302.0% as a result of the addition of Allumes site license and
enterprise sales of its Stuffit product line. Product revenues accounted for 98.4% of total
revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with 94.0% of total revenues in the
comparable period of 2005.
22
Services. Service revenues were $193,000 and $151,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively, with an increase of $42,000 or 27.8%, from 2005 to 2006. Service revenues
accounted for 1.5% of total revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with 4.5% of
total revenues in the comparable period of 2005.
Service revenues were $368,000 and $322,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, with an increase of $46,000 or 14.3%, from 2005 to 2006. Service revenues accounted
for 1.6% of total revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with 6.0% of total
revenues in the comparable period of 2005.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin
Cost of Product Revenues. Cost of product revenues were $5.2 million and $476,000 in the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $4.8 million,
or 997.9%, from 2005 to 2006. Cost of product revenues as a percentage of product revenues was
42.3% and 15.0% for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Product gross margin as a percentage of product
revenues was 57.7% as compared to 85.0% for the year earlier period. Cost of product revenues for
the 2006 quarter includes $318,000 of amortization of intangibles associated with the acquisitions
of Allume and PhoTags and $9,000 of stock based compensation expense which is not included in 2005
expenses. Factoring out such amortization of intangibles and compensation expense, product gross
margin for the three months ending June 30, 2006 was 60.4%. The 24.6% pro-forma decrease from the
year earlier period is attributed to product mix, in particular the significant success of the
lower margin Music Essentials Kits in 2006.
Cost of product revenues were $8.5 million and $746,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $7.7 million, or 1033.4%, from 2005 to 2006.
Cost of product revenues as a percentage of product revenues was 38.3% and 14.8% for 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Product gross margin as a percentage of product revenue was 61.7% as compared to
85.2% for the year earlier period. Cost of product revenues for the 2006 period includes $585,000
of amortization of intangibles associated with the acquisitions of Allume and PhoTags and $15,000
of stock based compensation expense which is not included in 2005 expenses. Factoring out such
amortization of intangibles and compensation expense, product gross margin for the six month period
ending June 30, 2006 was 64.4%. The 20.8% pro-forma decrease from the year earlier period is
attributed to product mix and as noted above, significant sales of the lower margin Music
Essentials Kits in 2006.
Cost of Service Revenues. Cost of service revenues were $79,000 and $69,000 in the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $10,000 or 14.5%,
from 2005 to 2006. Cost of service revenues as a percentage of service revenues was 40.9% and
45.7% for 2006 and 2005, respectively. Cost of service revenues includes the cost of our
consulting personnel and the cost of hiring outside contractors to support our staff of consultants
and vary by contract.
Cost of service revenues were $150,000 and $144,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively, representing an increase of $6,000 or 4.2%, from 2005 to 2006. Cost of service
revenue as a percentage of service revenues was 40.7% and 44.7% for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Cost of service revenues includes the cost of our consulting personnel and the cost of hiring
outside contractors to support our staff of consultants and vary by contract.
Operating Expenses
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating expenses by functional category and
as a percentage of total net revenues (in thousands):
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
$ |
2,293 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
$ |
4,166 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
$ |
809 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
3,754 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
6,399 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,227 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
% |
|
$ |
11,358 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
% |
|
$ |
4,140 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses were $2.3 million and $369,000 in
the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $1.9
million, or 521.4%, from 2005 to 2006. Our selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of
personnel costs, advertising costs, sales commissions and trade show expenses. These expenses vary
significantly from quarter to quarter based on the timing of trade shows and product introductions.
Selling and marketing expenses for the current period include $131,000 of amortization of
intangibles associated with acquisitions and $673,000 of stock based compensation expense which is
not included in 2005 expenses. Factoring out such amortization of intangibles and compensation
expense, selling and marketing expenses increased $1.1 million, or 303.5% from the prior year
quarter. While most of the increases in selling and marketing expenses were due to the Allume
acquisition, we also had a slight increase in headcount and increases in costs related to trade
shows and to product collateral concept and design. As a percentage of revenues, selling and
marketing expenses increased to 18.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 11.2% in the
six months ended June 30, 2005, as a result of the increase in absolute dollars spent.
Selling and marketing expenses were $4.2 million and $809,000 in the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $3.4 million, or 415.0%, from 2005 to
2006. Selling and marketing expenses for the current period include $249,000 of amortization of
intangibles associated with acquisitions and $904,000 of stock based compensation expense which is
not included in 2005 expenses. Factoring out such amortization of intangibles and compensation
expense, selling and marketing expenses increased $2.2 million, or 272.4% from the prior year
quarter. While most of the increases in selling and marketing expenses were due to the Allume
acquisition, we also had a slight increase in headcount and increases in costs related to trade
shows and to product collateral concept and design. As a percentage of revenues, selling and
marketing expenses increased to 18.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 15.1% in the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of the increase in absolute dollars spent.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $2.1 million and $697,000 in
the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $1.4
million, or 198.0%, from 2005 to 2006. Our research and development expenses consist primarily of
personnel and equipment costs required to conduct our software development efforts. We remain
focused on the development and expansion of our technology, particularly our wireless and
compression software technologies. Research and development expenses for the current period
include $401,000 of stock based compensation expense which is not included in 2005 expenses.
Factoring out such compensation expense, research and development expenses increased $979,000
million, or 140.6% from the prior year quarter. The increase in our research and development
expenses was primarily due to the addition of the Allume operations, increases to headcount and a
refocus of our consulting services to internal product development. Despite the increase in
absolute dollars, as a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 16.5%
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from 20.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2005, as a
result of the increase in sales.
Research and development expenses were $3.8 million and $1.4 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $2.4 million, or 169.3%, from
2005 to 2006. Research and development expenses for the current period include $652,000 of stock
based compensation expense which is not included in 2005 expenses. Factoring out such compensation
expense, research and development expenses increased $1.7 million, or 122.5% from the prior year
quarter. The increase in our research and development expenses was primarily due to the addition
of the Allume operations, increases to headcount and a refocus of our consulting services to
internal product development. Despite the increase in absolute dollars, as a percentage of
revenues, research and development expenses decreased to 16.7% for the six months ended June 30,
2006 from 26.0% in the six months ended June 30, 2005, as a result of the increase in sales.
24
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $2.0 million and $1.2
million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of
$868,000, or 74.8%, from 2005 to 2006. General and administrative expenses for the current period
include $618,000 of stock based compensation expense which is not included in 2005 expenses.
Factoring out such compensation expense, general and administrative increased $250,000, or 21.5%
from the prior year quarter. The increase in our general and administrative expenses is due to the
Allume acquisition and increases in headcount, legal and consulting expenses, partially offset by a
reduction in benefit costs. Despite the increase in absolute dollars, as a percentage of revenues,
general and administrative expenses decreased to 16.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2006
from 34.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2005, as a result of the increase in sales.
General and administrative expenses were $3.4 million and $1.9 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $1.5 million, or 77.5%, from 2005
to 2006. General and administrative expenses for the current period include $842,000 of stock
based compensation expense which is not included in 2005 expenses. Factoring out such compensation
expense, general and administrative increased $659,000, or 34.0% from the prior year quarter. The
increase in our general and administrative expenses is due to the Allume acquisition and increases
in headcount, legal and consulting expenses, partially offset by a reduction in benefit costs.
Despite the increase in absolute dollars, as a percentage of revenues, general and administrative
expenses decreased to 15.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 36.1% in the six months
ended June 30, 2005, as a result of the increase in sales.
Interest Income. Interest income was $265,000 and $214,000 in the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $51,000 or 23.8% from 2005 to 2006.
Interest income was $489,000 and $314,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, representing an increase of $175,000 or 55.7% from 2005 to 2006. Interest income is
directly related to our average cash balance during the period and varies among periods. On
February 18, 2005, we closed a private placement equity transaction, netting approximately $20.8
million in cash. We have not changed our investment strategy during the periods being reported on,
with our excess cash consistently being invested in short term marketable debt securities
classified as cash equivalents.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes was $33,000 and $8,000 in the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $25,000, or
312.5% from 2005 to 2006. The provision for income taxes was $72,000 and $8,000 in the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, representing an increase of $64,000, or 800.0% from
2005 to 2006. In all periods, the provision for income taxes relates to an accrual for alternative
minimum taxes which are expected to be owed on income as well as certain state minimum tax
payments. The Company has a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have financed operations primarily through cash generated from
operations and from proceeds of $18.1 million generated by our initial public offering in 1995. On
February 18, 2005, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement for the private
placement of 3,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock, $0.001 par value, at a price of $6.40
per share, resulting in aggregate gross cash proceeds to the Company of $22,400,000 and approximate
net cash proceeds to the Company of $20,786,000 after expenses. The transaction closed
simultaneously with the execution of the Purchase Agreement on February 18, 2005. C.E. Unterberg,
Towbin LLC, the placement agent for the transaction, received a cash fee equal to 6% of the
aggregate gross proceeds of the Private Placement.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.9 million and $356,000 in the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The primary source of operating cash in 2006 was the
net income, the non-cash stock based compensation expense and the collection of accounts
receivable, partially offset by the increase in inventory. The primary source of cash in 2005 was
the net income and increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, offset by the increase in
accounts receivable.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we used $2.4 million in investing activities,
consisting of primarily of the PhoTags acquisition ($2 million) and the purchase of office
equipment. In 2005, our capital expenditures consisted of purchases of office equipment in the
amount of $21,000.
We received $2.6 million in cash from the exercise of employee stock options during the six
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $191,000 during the comparable period of 2005.
At June 30, 2006, we had $31.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and $31.5 million of
working capital. Our accounts receivable balance, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and other
adjustments, was $4.2 million at June 30, 2006. We have no
25
significant capital commitments, and currently anticipate that capital expenditures will not vary
significantly from recent periods. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and cash
flow from operations will be sufficient to finance our working capital and capital expenditure
requirements through at least the next 12 months. We may require additional funds to support our
working capital requirements or for other purposes and may seek to raise additional funds through
public or private equity or debt financing or from other sources. If additional financing is
needed, we cannot assure you that such financing will be available to us at commercially reasonable
terms or at all.
Our corporate headquarters, which includes our principal administrative, sales and marketing,
customer support and research and development facilities, is located in Aliso Viejo, California.
We have leased this space through May 2009. Effective September 1, 2006, we have signed a new
lease to expand our corporate headquarters. This lease for additional space runs concurrently with
the original lease and will also expire in May 2009. We also lease approximately 7,700 square feet
in Watsonville, California under a new lease that expires September 30, 2010. We are currently
working on a new operating lease for our facility in Lees Summit, Missouri to replace the lease
that expired in June 2005.
As of June 30, 2006, we had no debt and no long term liabilities. The following table
summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
or less |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligation |
|
$ |
1,680 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
1,034 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Employment agreements |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,398 |
|
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
During our normal course of business, we have made certain indemnities, commitments and
guarantees under which we may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions.
These include: intellectual property indemnities to our customers and licensees in connection with
the use, sale and/or license of our products; indemnities to various lessors in connection with
facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease; indemnities to vendors and
service providers pertaining to claims based on the negligence or willful misconduct; indemnities
involving the accuracy of representations and warranties in certain contracts; and indemnities to
directors and officers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State
of Delaware. We may also issue a guarantee in the form of a standby letter of credit as security
for contingent liabilities under certain customer contracts. The duration of these indemnities,
commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, may be indefinite. The majority of these
indemnities, commitments and guarantees may not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential
for future payments we could be obligated to make. We have not recorded any liability for these
indemnities, commitments and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our discussion and analysis of results of operations, financial condition and liquidity are
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions. On an on-going basis, we review our estimates to ensure
that the estimates appropriately reflect changes in our business or new information as it becomes
available.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant estimates
and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
26
Revenue Recognition Software revenue is recognized in accordance with the Statement of
Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended, when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectibility
is probable. We recognize revenues from sales of our software to OEM customers or end users as:
completed products are shipped and title passes; or from royalties generated as authorized
customers duplicate our software, if the other requirements of SOP 97-2 are met. If the
requirements of SOP 97-2 are not met at the date of shipment, revenue is not recognized until these
elements are known or resolved. Returns from OEM customers are limited to defective goods or goods
shipped in error. Historically, OEM customer returns have not exceeded the very nominal estimates
and reserves. Management reviews available retail channel information and makes a determination of
a return provision for sales made to distributors and retailers based on current channel inventory
levels and historical return patterns. Certain sales to distributors or retailers are made on a
consignment basis. Revenue for consignment sales are not recognized until sell through to the
final customer is established.
Product sales directly to end-users are recognized upon delivery. End users have a thirty day
right of return, but such returns are reasonably estimable and have historically been immaterial.
We also provide technical support to our customers. Such costs have historically been
insignificant.
Service revenues include sales of consulting services, website hosting and
fulfillment. We recognize service revenues as services are provided or as milestones are delivered
and accepted by our customers.
Accounts Receivable We sell our products worldwide. We perform ongoing credit evaluations
of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon payment history, the customers current credit
worthiness and various other factors, as determined by our review of their current credit
information. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers. We estimate
credit losses and maintain a bad debt reserve based upon these estimates. While such credit losses
have historically been within our estimated reserves, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to
experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. If not, this could have an adverse
effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill We have adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective
January 1, 2002. As a result of the adoption, we are no longer required to amortize goodwill.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 142, goodwill was amortized over 7 years. In accordance with SFAS
No. 142, we review the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill at least annually or
whenever events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment. Our annual impairment testing
date is December 31. Recoverability of goodwill is determined by comparing the estimated fair
value of our reporting units to the carrying value of the underlying net assets in the reporting
units. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be less than the carrying
value of its net assets, goodwill is deemed impaired and an impairment loss is recognized to the
extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the difference between the estimated fair value
of the reporting unit and the fair value of its other assets and liabilities. We determined that we
did not have any impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2005. Estimates of reporting unit fair
value are based upon market capitalization and therefore are volatile being sensitive to market
fluctuations. To the extent that our market capitalization decreases significantly or the
allocation of value to our reporting units changes, we could be required to write off some or all
of our goodwill.
Deferred Income Taxes We account for income taxes under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This statement requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
future consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns.
The measurement of the deferred items is based on enacted tax laws. In the event the future
consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and the tax bases of our assets and
liabilities result in a deferred tax asset, SFAS No. 109 requires an evaluation of the probability
of being able to realize the future benefits indicated by such asset. A valuation allowance
related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We currently have a full valuation allowance
on our deferred tax assets. Based on our assessment of all available evidence, we concluded that
it is not more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. This conclusion is
based primarily on our history of net operating losses as compared to only a recent trend of
profitable operations, the potential for future stock option deductions to significantly reduce
taxable income, annual net operating loss limitations under Section 382 of the Code and the need to
generate significant amounts of taxable income in future periods on a consistent and prolonged
basis in order to utilize the deferred tax assets. We will continue to monitor all available
evidence and reassess the potential realization of our deferred tax assets. If we continue to meet
our financial projections and improve our results of operations, or if circumstances otherwise
change, it is possible that we may release all or a portion of our valuation allowance in the
future. Any such release would result in recording a tax benefit that would increase net income in
the period the valuation is released.
Stock-Based Compensation We currently account for the issuance of stock options to employees
using the fair market value method according to SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment.
27
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments, which amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivatives Instruments and
Hedging Activities and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishment of Liabilities. SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 133 to narrow the scope exception for
interest-only and principal-only strips on debt instruments to include only such strips
representing rights to receive a specified portion of the contractual interest or principle cash
flows. SFAS No. 155 also amends SFAS No. 140 to allow qualifying special-purpose entities to hold
a passive derivative financial instrument pertaining to beneficial interests that itself is a
derivative instrument. We are currently evaluating the impact this new Standard but believe that
it will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets
(SFAS NO. 156), which provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset)
accounting. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The Statement (1) requires an
entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation
to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations; (2)
requires that a separately recognized servicing asset or servicing liability be initially measured
at fair value, if practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or
the fair value method for subsequent measurement for each class of separately recognized servicing
assets or servicing liabilities; (4) permits at initial adoption a one-time reclassification of
available-for-sale securities to trading securities by an entity with recognized servicing rights,
provided the securities reclassified offset the entitys exposure to changes in the fair value of
the servicing assets or liabilities; and (5) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and
servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the balance sheet and additional
disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. SFAS No. 156
is effective for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities as of the beginning of
an entitys fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted in
certain circumstances. The Statement also describes the manner in which it should be initially
applied. We do not believe that SFAS No. 156 will have a material impact on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2006, the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting
and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. This interpretation prescribes a comprehensive
model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. This statement is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently in the process of
evaluating the expected effect of FIN 48 on our results of operations and financial position.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Smith Micros financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents. At June 30, 2006, the
carrying values of our financial instruments approximated fair values based on current market
prices and rates.
It is our policy not to enter into derivative financial instruments. We do not currently have
any significant foreign currency exposure, as we do not transact business in foreign currencies.
As such, we do not have significant currency exposure at June 30, 2006.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
a) |
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We conducted an evaluation
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness |
28
|
|
|
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange
Act)) as of June 30, 2006. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have determined that our disclosure controls and
procedures have been designed and are being operated in a manner that provides
reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in our Exchange
Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure
controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily is required
to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures. |
|
|
b) |
|
Managements responsibility for financial statements. Our management is
responsible for the integrity and objectivity of all information presented in this
report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include
amounts based on managements best estimates and judgments. Management believes the
consolidated financial statements fairly reflect the form and substance of transactions
and that the financial statements fairly represent the Companys financial position and
results of operations for the periods and as of the dates stated therein. |
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of independent
directors, meets regularly with our independent registered public accounting firm, Singer
Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein LLP, and representatives of management to review accounting,
financial reporting, internal control and audit matters, as well as the nature and extent
of the audit effort. The Audit Committee is responsible for the engagement of the
independent auditors. The independent auditors have free access to the Audit Committee. |
|
|
c) |
|
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes
in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2006
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting. |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our future operating results are highly uncertain. Before deciding to invest in our common
stock or to maintain or increase your investment, you should carefully consider the risks described
below, in addition to the other information contained in this report and in our other filings with
the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Amendment No. 2 for the year ended December 31,
2004 and our subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. The risks and uncertainties described below
are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or
that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business operations. If any of these risks
actually occur, that could seriously harm our business, financial condition or results of
operations. In that event, the market price for our common stock could decline and you may lose all
or part of your investment.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate and cause the price of our common stock to fall.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and may
continue to vary from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are not within
our control. If our operating results do not meet the expectations of securities analysts or
investors, our stock price may decline. Fluctuations in our operating results may be due to a
number of factors, including the following:
29
|
|
|
the size and timing of orders from and shipments to our major customers; |
|
|
|
|
the size and timing of any return product requests for our products; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain or increase gross margins; |
|
|
|
|
variations in our sales channels or the mix of our product sales; |
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of a key customer; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to specify, develop, complete, introduce, market and transition to volume
production new products and technologies in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
the availability and pricing of competing products and technologies and the resulting
effect on sales and pricing of our products; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of new and emerging technologies; |
|
|
|
|
deferrals of orders by our customers in anticipation of new products, applications,
product enhancements or operating systems; and |
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions. |
A large portion of our operating expenses, including rent, depreciation and amortization is
fixed and difficult to reduce or change. Accordingly, if our total revenue does not meet our
expectations, we may not be able to adjust our expenses quickly enough to compensate for the
shortfall in revenue. In that event, our business, financial condition and results of operations
would be materially and adversely affected.
Due to all of the foregoing factors, and the other risks discussed in this report, you should
not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results as an indication of future
performance.
Although we have begun reporting backlog, our ability to predict our revenues and operating results
is extremely limited.
We have historically operated with little backlog because we have generally shipped our
software products and recognized revenue shortly after we received orders because our production
cycle has traditionally been very short. As a result, our sales in any quarter were generally
dependent on orders that were booked and shipped in that quarter. As our wireless business has
evolved, production cycle time for items such as data kits has increased to the point that orders
received towards the end of a quarter may not ship until the subsequent quarter. Additionally,
customers may issue purchase orders that have extended delivery dates that may cause the shipment
to fall in a subsequent quarter. These situations make it difficult for us to predict what our
revenues and operating results will be in any quarter. Therefore, the level of backlog is not
necessarily indicative of trends in our business. As of June 30, 2006, we had a backlog of
approximately $4.2 million.
We depend upon a small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenues.
In the past we have derived a substantial portion of our revenues from sales to a small number
of customers and expect to continue to do so in the future. The agreements we have with these
entities do not require them to purchase any minimum quantity of our products and may be terminated
by the entity or us at any time for any reason upon minimal prior written notice. Accordingly, we
cannot be certain that these customers will continue to place large orders for our products in the
future, or purchase our products at all. Our largest OEM customer accounted for 72.5% and 71.6% of
our net revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Our customers may acquire products from our competitors or develop their own products that
compete directly with ours. Any
30
substantial decrease or delay in our sales to one or more of these entities in any quarter would
have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, certain of our customers have in
the past and may in the future acquire competitors or be acquired by competitors, causing further
industry consolidation. In the past, such acquisitions have caused the purchasing departments of
the combined companies to reevaluate their purchasing decisions. If one of our major customers
engages in an acquisition in the future, it could change its current purchasing habits. In that
event, we could lose the customer, or experience a decrease in orders from that customer or a delay
in orders previously made by that customer. Further, although we maintain allowances for doubtful
accounts, the insolvency of one or more of our major customers could result in a substantial
decrease in our revenues.
Competition within our product markets is intense and includes numerous established competitors,
which could negatively affect our revenues.
We operate in markets that are extremely competitive and subject to rapid changes in
technology. Specifically, Microsoft Corporation poses a significant competitive threat to us
because Microsoft operating systems may include some capabilities now provided by certain of our
OEM and retail software products. If users are satisfied relying on the capabilities of the
Windows-based systems or other operating systems, or other vendors products, sales of our products
are likely to decline. In addition, because there are low barriers to entry into the software
market, we expect significant competition from both established and emerging software companies in
the future. Furthermore, many of our existing and potential OEM customers may acquire or develop
products that compete directly with our products.
Microsoft and many of our other current and prospective competitors have significantly greater
financial, marketing, service, support, technical and other resources than we do. As a result,
they may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements or to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products. There is
also a substantial risk that announcements of competing products by large competitors such as
Microsoft or other vendors could result in the cancellation of orders by customers in anticipation
of the introduction of such new products. In addition, some of our competitors currently make
complementary products that are sold separately. Such competitors could decide to enhance their
competitive position by bundling their products to attract customers seeking integrated,
cost-effective software applications. Some competitors have a retail emphasis and offer OEM
products with a reduced set of features. The opportunity for retail upgrade sales may induce these
and other competitors to make OEM products available at their own cost or even at a loss. We also
expect competition to increase as a result of software industry consolidations, which may lead to
the creation of additional large and well-financed competitors. Increased competition is likely to
result in price reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced margins and loss of market share.
Acquisitions of companies or technologies may disrupt our business and divert management attention
and cause our current operations to suffer.
We recently acquired all the outstanding capital stock of Allume Systems, Inc. (see note 4 of
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and, in April 2006, PhoTags, Inc.
(see note 3 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). We expect to
continue to consider acquisitions of complementary companies, products or technologies. As part of
any such acquisition, including that of Allume, Inc., we will be required to assimilate the
operations, products and personnel of the acquired businesses and train, retain and motivate key
personnel from the acquired businesses. We may be unable to maintain uniform standards, controls,
procedures and policies if we fail in these efforts. Similarly, acquisitions may cause disruptions
in our operations and divert managements attention from our companys day-to-day operations, which
could impair our relationships with our current employees, customers and strategic partners.
Acquisitions may also subject us to liabilities and risks that are not known or identifiable at the
time of the acquisition.
We may also have to incur debt or issue equity securities in order to
finance future acquisitions. The issuance of equity securities for any acquisition could be
substantially dilutive to our existing stockholders. In addition, we expect our profitability
could be adversely affected because of acquisition-related accounting costs and write offs. In
consummating acquisitions, we are also subject to risks of entering geographic and business markets
in which we have had limited or no prior experience. If we are unable to fully integrate acquired
businesses, products or technologies within existing operations, we may not receive the intended
benefits of acquisitions.
31
If the adoption of new technologies and services grows more slowly than anticipated in our product
planning and development, our future sales and profits may be negatively affected.
If the adoption of new technologies and services does not grow or grows more slowly than
anticipated in our product planning and development, demand for certain of our products and
services will be reduced. For example, our new QuickLink Mobile and QuickLink Enterprise products
provide notebook users with the ability to roam between wireless wide area networks (WWAN) and
Wi-Fi hot spots. Therefore, future sales and any future profits from these and related products
are substantially dependent upon the widespread acceptance and use of Wi-Fi as an effective medium
of communication by consumers and businesses.
Our products may contain undetected software errors, which could negatively affect our revenues.
Our software products are complex and may contain undetected errors. In the past, we have
discovered software errors in certain of our products and have experienced delayed or lost revenues
during the period it took to correct these errors. Although we and our OEM customers test our
products, it is possible that errors may be found in our new or existing products after we have
commenced commercial shipment of those products. These undetected errors could result in adverse
publicity, loss of revenues, delay in market acceptance of our products or claims against us by
customers.
Technology and customer needs change rapidly in our market, which could render our products
obsolete and negatively affect our revenue.
Our future success will depend on our ability to anticipate and adapt to changes in technology
and industry standards. We will also need to continue to develop and introduce new and enhanced
products to meet our customers changing demands, keep up with evolving industry standards,
including changes in the Microsoft operating systems with which our products are designed to be
compatible, and to promote those products successfully. The communications and utilities software
markets in which we operate are characterized by rapid technological change, changing customer
needs, frequent new product introductions, evolving industry standards and short product life
cycles. Any of these factors could render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable. In
addition, new products and product enhancements can require long development and testing periods as
a result of the complexities inherent in todays computing environments and the performance
demanded by customers. If our software markets do not develop as we anticipate, or our products do
not gain widespread acceptance in these markets or if we are unable to develop new versions of our
software products that can operate on future operating systems, our business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Delays or failure in deliveries from our component suppliers could cause our net revenue to decline
and harm our results of operations.
We rely on third party suppliers to provide us with services and components for our product
kits. These components include: compact discs; cables; printed manuals; and boxes. We do not have
long-term supply arrangements with any vendor to obtain these necessary services and components for
our products. If we are unable to purchase components from these suppliers or if the compact disc
replication services that we use do not deliver our requirements on schedule, we may not be able to
deliver products to our customers on a timely basis or enter into new orders because of a shortage
in components. Any delays that we experience in delivering our products to customers could impair
our customer relationships and adversely impact our reputation and our business. In addition, if
our third party suppliers raise their prices for components or services, our gross margins would be
reduced.
A shortage in the supply of wireless communication devices such as PC cards could adversely affect
our revenues.
32
Our products are utilized with major wireless networks throughout the world that support data
communications through the use of wireless communication devices such as PC cards. Since wireless
network providers generally incorporate our products into the wireless communication devices that
they sell directly to individual consumers, our future success depends upon the availability of
such devices to consumers at reasonable prices. A shortage in the supply of wireless communication
devices could put upward pressure on prices or limit the quantities available to individual
consumers which could materially affect the revenues that we generate from our products.
We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights,
which could negatively impact our revenues.
Our success is dependent upon our software code base, our programming methodologies and other
intellectual properties and proprietary rights. In order to protect our proprietary technology, we
rely on a combination of trade secret, nondisclosure and copyright and trademark law. We currently
own United States trademark registrations for certain of our trademarks and United States patents
for certain of our technologies, however, these measures afford us only limited protection.
Furthermore, we rely primarily on shrink wrap licenses that are not signed by the end user and,
therefore, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Accordingly, it is
possible that third parties may copy or otherwise obtain our rights without our authorization. It
is also possible that third parties may independently develop technologies similar to ours. It may
be difficult for us to detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property and proprietary rights.
We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement as the number of trademarks,
patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights asserted by companies in our industry
grows and the coverage of these patents and other rights and the functionality of software products
increasingly overlap. From time to time, we have received communications from third parties
asserting that our trade name or features, content, or trademarks of certain of our products
infringe upon intellectual property rights held by such third parties. We have also received
correspondence from third parties separately asserting that our fax products may infringe on
certain patents held by each of the parties. Although we are not aware that any of our products
infringe on the proprietary rights of others, third parties may claim infringement by us with
respect to our current or future products. Infringement claims, whether with or without merit,
could result in time-consuming and costly litigation, divert the attention of our management, cause
product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements with third
parties. If we are required to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, they may not be on
terms that are acceptable to us. Unfavorable royalty or licensing agreements could seriously
impair our ability to market our products.
Our stock price is highly volatile. Accordingly, you may not be able to resell your shares of
common stock at or above the price you paid for them.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and is likely to
continue to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. These fluctuations have occurred
and may continue to occur in response to various factors, many of which we cannot control,
including:
|
|
|
quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations or new products by our competitors, customers or us; |
|
|
|
|
market conditions within our retail and OEM software markets; |
|
|
|
|
general global economic and political instability; |
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or investment recommendations by analysts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in investor perceptions; or |
|
|
|
|
changes in expectations relating to our products, plans and strategic position or those of our competitors or customers. |
33
In addition, the market prices of securities of high technology companies have been especially
volatile. This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many
technology companies. Accordingly, you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or
above the price you paid. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market
price of their securities have been the subjects of securities class action litigation. If we were
the object of a securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial losses and
divert managements attention and resources from other matters.
If we are unable to retain key personnel, the loss of their services could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future performance depends in significant part upon the continued service of our senior
management and other key technical and consulting personnel. We do not have employment agreements
with our key employees that govern the length of their service. The loss of the services of our
key employees would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Our future success also depends on our ability to continue to attract, retain and
motivate qualified personnel, particularly highly skilled engineers involved in the ongoing
research and development required to develop and enhance our communication software products as
well those in our highly specialized consulting business. Competition for these employees remains
high and employee retention is a common problem in our industry. Our inability to attract and
retain the highly trained technical personnel that are essential to our product development,
consulting services, marketing, service and support teams may limit the rate at which we can
generate revenue, develop new products or product enhancements and generally would have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, retaining key
employees during restructuring efforts is critical to our companys success.
We may need to raise additional capital in the future through the issuance of additional equity, or
convertible debt securities or by borrowing money, in order to meet our capital needs. Additional
funds may not be available on terms acceptable to us to allow us to meet our capital needs.
We believe that the cash, cash equivalents and investments on hand and the cash we expect to
generate from operations will be sufficient to meet our capital needs for at least the next twelve
months. However, it is possible that we may need or choose to obtain additional financing to fund
our activities. We could raise these funds by selling more stock to the public or to selected
investors, or by borrowing money. We may not be able to obtain additional funds on favorable
terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to curtail our
operations or other business activities significantly or to obtain funds through arrangements with
strategic partners or others that may require us to relinquish right to certain technologies or
potential markets. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt
securities, the ownership percentages of existing stockholders would be reduced. In addition, the
equity or debt securities that we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those
of the holders of our common stock. We currently have no established line of credit or other
business borrowing facility in place.
It is possible that our future capital requirements may vary materially from those now
planned. The amount of capital that we will need in the future will depend on many factors,
including:
|
|
|
the market acceptance of our products; |
|
|
|
|
the levels of promotion and advertising that will be required to launch our products
and achieve and maintain a competitive position in the marketplace; |
|
|
|
|
our business, product, capital expenditure and research and development plans and product and technology roadmaps; |
|
|
|
|
the levels of inventory and accounts receivable that we maintain; |
34
|
|
|
capital improvements to new and existing facilities; |
|
|
|
|
technological advances; |
|
|
|
|
our competitors response to our products; and |
|
|
|
|
our relationships with suppliers and customers. |
In addition, we may require additional capital to accommodate planned growth, hiring,
infrastructure and facility needs or to consummate acquisitions of other businesses, products or
technologies.
Our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected as a result of
legal, business and economic risks specific to international operations.
Each year, a percentage of our revenues are derived from sales to customers outside the United
States. This percentage can vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year. In
recent years this percentage has been less than 10%. We also frequently ship products to our
domestic customers international manufacturing divisions and subcontractors. In the future, we
may expand these international business activities. International operations are subject to many
inherent risks, including:
|
|
|
general political, social and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
trade restrictions; |
|
|
|
|
the imposition of governmental controls; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to different legal standards, particularly with respect to intellectual property; |
|
|
|
|
burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws; |
|
|
|
|
import and export license requirements and restrictions of the United States and each other country in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
foreign technical standards; |
|
|
|
|
changes in tariffs; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in securing and servicing international customers; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting receivables from foreign entities; and |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences. |
These conditions may increase our cost of doing business. Moreover, as our customers are
adversely affected by these conditions, our business with them may be disrupted and our results of
operations could be adversely affected.
The market price of our common stock may be adversely affected by the sale of significant numbers
of shares of our common stock by our principal stockholder.
A large block of shares is held by William W. Smith, Jr., our President and Chief Executive
Officer, who held 3,052,115 shares at July 31, 2006 which are eligible for resale under Rule 144.
Overall, our trading volume fluctuates widely and at times is relatively limited. The market price
for our common stock could decline as a result of the sale of a large number of the shares or the
35
perception that such sales may occur. The sale of a large number of our common stock also might
make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time
and at the prices that we deem appropriate.
We may be subject to regulatory scrutiny and may sustain a loss of public confidence if we are
unable to satisfy regulatory requirements relating to internal controls over financial reporting.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to perform an evaluation of our
internal controls over financial reporting and have our independent registered public accounting
firm attest to such evaluation on an annual basis. Compliance with these requirements can be
expensive and time-consuming. While we believe that we will be able to meet the required
deadlines, no assurance can be given that we will meet the required deadlines in future years. If
we fail to timely complete this evaluation, or if our auditors cannot timely attest to our
evaluation, we may be subject to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of public confidence in our
internal controls.
Provisions of our charter and bylaws and Delaware law could make a takeover of our company
difficult.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may discourage or prevent
a third party from acquiring us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. For
instance, our certificate of incorporation authorizes the board of directors to fix the rights and
preferences of shares of any series of preferred stock, without action by our stockholders. As a
result, the board can authorize and issue shares of preferred stock, which could delay or prevent a
change of control because the rights given to the holders of such preferred stock may prohibit a
merger, reorganization, sale or other extraordinary corporate transaction. In addition, we are
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and certain provisions of Delaware law may have
the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our control.
We may be subject to additional risks.
The risks and uncertainties described above are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely
affect our business operations.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On April 5, 2006, we issued an aggregate of 384,897 shares of our common stock to the
shareholders of Photags, Inc. in connection with our acquisition of Photags, Inc., which closed on
that date. The offer and sale of those securities were not registered under the Securities Act of
1933, or any state securities laws, in reliance on an exemption from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder..
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
An Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company was held on June 29, 2006. At the
Annual Meeting, the Stockholders voted as follows:
The Stockholders elected Thomas G. Campbell (with 19,427,410 votes for and 1,339,018
withheld) and Ted L. Hoffman (with 20,204,208 votes for and 562,220 withheld) as directors,
to hold office until the 2009 Annual Meeting, or until their successors are elected and
qualified.
36
In addition to Messrs. Campbell and Hoffman, the following directors will continue to
hold office: Samuel Gulko, William C. Keiper, William W. Smith, Jr. and Gregory Szabo.
The Stockholders elected to ratify the appointment of Singer, Lewak, Greenbaum and
Goldstein LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2006 (with 20,734,350 shares for, 26,173 shares against and 5,905
shares abstaining).
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 3, 2006, by and by and
among Smith Micro Software, Inc., Tag Acquisition Corporation, Tag
Acquisition Corporation II, Photags, Inc., Harry Fox, as
Stockholders Agent, and certain stockholders of Photags, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2006). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2006
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ William W. Smith, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
William W. Smith, Jr.
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2006
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Andrew C. Schmidt
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew C. Schmidt
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
37