Messrs. Brown, Connors and
Saucedo and Drs. Kovalchik, Sherman and Swinney have been engaged in their current occupations for more than five years. Mr. Connors previously served
as a director from December 1988 to July 1989. Dr. Swinney previously served as a director from 1989 to October 1995.
Board Committees and Attendance at
Meetings
The Board of Directors has
standing Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees.
Audit
Committee. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, which consists of Messrs. Brown, Connors and Saucedo (Chairman).
As more fully described in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company
and audits of its financial statements. The Audit Committee met ten times in 2005.
During 2005, the Audit Committee
consisted of three directors who are independent directors as defined under the listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market System. The
Companys Board of Directors adopted a revised Audit Committee charter on July 25, 2003.
The Board of Directors has
determined that Joseph R. Saucedo is an audit committee financial expert and is independent, as both those terms are defined by
Securities and Exchange Commission regulations.
Compensation
Committee. The Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee, consisting of Messrs. Brown, Connors and Saucedo, Drs.
Kovalchik (Chairman), Sherman and Swinney. The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors under the
listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market System. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of
Directors on July 25, 2003, a copy of which can be found on the Companys web site, www.icumed.com. The Compensation Committee, as more
fully described in the Compensation Committee Report, discharges the responsibilities of the Board of Directors relating to executive and director
compensation, and oversees incentive, equity based and other compensatory plans in which executive officers and key employees of the Company
participate, including authorization of the grant of stock options. The Compensation Committee met five times in 2005.
Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (the Nominating Committee) consists of Drs.
Kovalchik, Sherman (Chairman) and Swinney, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined is independent under the listing standards of the Nasdaq
National Market System. The Nominating Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2003, a copy of
which can be found on the Companys web site, www.icumed.com. The Nominating Committees role is to recommend to the Board of
Directors policies on Board composition and criteria for Board membership, to identify individuals qualified to serve as directors and approve
candidates for director and to recommend directors for appointment to committees of the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee also makes
recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the Companys corporate governance guidelines and codes of ethics and business conduct,
oversees internal investigations of conduct of senior executives, if necessary, and conducts evaluations of the performance of the Board of Directors.
The Nominating Committee, which was first appointed on October 17, 2003, met twice in 2005.
In evaluating and determining
whether to recommend a person as a candidate for election as a director, the Nominating Committee considers, among other things, relevant management
and/or industry experience; values such as integrity, accountability, judgment and adherence to high performance standards; independence pursuant to
the guidelines set forth in the listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market System; ability and willingness to undertake the requisite time
commitment to Board service; and an absence of conflicts of interest with the Company.
The Nominating Committee may
employ a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Nominating Committee will assess the need for particular
expertise on the Board of Directors, the upcoming election cycle of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board of Directors are expected due to
retirement or otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the
5
Nominating Committee will
consider various potential candidates for director that may come to the Nominating Committees attention through current directors, the
Companys professional advisors, stockholders or others.
The Nominating Committee will
consider candidates recommended by stockholders. The deadlines and procedures for stockholder recommendations of director candidates are the same as
those described below under Nomination of Directors and Stockholder Proposals. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons
proposing candidates, the Nominating Committee will make an initial analysis of the qualifications of any candidate recommended by stockholders or
others pursuant to the criteria summarized above to determine whether the candidate is qualified for service on the Companys Board before
deciding to undertake a complete evaluation of the candidate. Other than the verification of compliance with procedures and stockholder status, and the
initial analysis performed by the Nominating Committee, a potential candidate nominated by a stockholder will be treated like any other potential
candidate during the review process by the Nominating Committee.
The Nominating Committee has
approved the nominations of Jack W. Brown and Richard H. Sherman, M.D. for reelection as directors at the Annual Meeting. The Nominating Committee
considered the candidates past contributions to the Board of Directors, their willingness to continue to serve and the benefits of continuity in
the membership of the Board of Directors and determined that the reelection of the three candidates was appropriate.
The Board of Directors has
adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Officers, and a copy is available on the Companys website,
www.icumed.com.
During 2005, the Board met
fifteen times. Each director attended more than 75% of the total of all meetings of the Board and any committees on which he serves.
It is the policy of the Company
to invite and encourage all members of the board of directors to attend the annual meeting. In 2005, six directors attended the annual
meeting.
Communications with Board of Directors
The Companys Board of
Directors has an established process for stockholder communications. Stockholders may contact any of our Directors, including the Chairman, by writing
to them c/o ICU Medical, Inc. 951 Calle Amanecer, San Clemente, California 92673. Communications addressed to the Board of Directors will be reviewed
by the Secretary of the Company and directed to the Chairman of the Board for further review and distribution to certain or all members of the Board of
Directors, if and as appropriate. Communications addressed to individual directors will be forwarded directly to the named director. Stockholders may
also contact the Board by sending e-mail to ir@icumed.com.
Any communications directed to
the Board of Directors, the Chairman or any other member of the Board that allege or report any complaint or concern regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters will be immediately forwarded to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Complaints or concerns may be
reported in writing or by telephoning our Corporate Governance Hotline at 1-800-886-0868. All calls are confidential.
In the past year, the Board of
Directors did not receive any stockholder communications that it considered material and therefore took no action.
6
Executive Compensation
Compensation Committee Report
During 2005, the Compensation
Committee consisted of six directors who are not employees or former employees of, or consultants to, the Company. The Compensation Committee reviews
the performance of the Company and the Chief Executive Officer, sets performance objectives, establishes the compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer, recommends to the Board of Directors the compensation of the other executive officers and authorizes the grant of options to employees and
awards under the Companys 2005 Long-Term Retention Plan.
The Companys policy in
compensating executive officers is to establish methods and levels of compensation that will provide strong incentives to promote the profitability and
growth of the Company and reward superior performance and that are sufficiently competitive to attract, retain and motivate highly competent management
personnel. Compensation of executive officers includes base salary, performance-based incentive bonuses and stock-based programs, although as explained
below, use of stock-based programs has been substantially curtailed starting in 2005.
The Compensation Committee has
adopted an executive compensation policy which provides a base salary, incentive bonuses and stock options. Upon achievement of performance objectives,
officers other than Dr. Lopez could receive, in addition to base salaries, bonuses in amounts ranging from 20% to 33% of their base salaries, and
higher amounts in certain circumstances for unusual achievements. The Compensation Committee believes that incentive bonuses serve to align the
interests of the executive officers with the interests of the Companys stockholders.
The base salary paid to Dr. Lopez
in 2005 was set by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the Companys executive compensation policy at near the middle of the range of
total compensation paid to chief executive officers of companies that the Compensation Committee deemed to be comparable to the Company. Dr. Lopez was
granted options to purchase 100,000 shares in the first half of 2005. The executive compensation policy has set the incentive bonuses and the value of
stock options to be awarded to Dr. Lopez at a higher percentage of his base salary than that awarded to other officers. The Compensation Committee
believes that in view of the Chief Executive Officers overall responsibility for the success of the Company, it is appropriate that a larger
portion of his compensation be contingent on performance.
In 2005, the Compensation
Committee decided to substantially curtail the use of stock-based compensation because of changes to accounting rules to require expense for share
based payments to be recognized in the income statement. The Compensation Committee believes that if expense is to be recognized, it is more efficient
for the Company to use cash rather than shares of the Companys stock, and therefore expects increasing use of cash for incentive payments,
including awards under the Long-Term Retention Program.
April 7, 2006
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
Michael T. Kovalchik III, M.D.,
Chairman
Jack W. Brown
John J. Connors
Joseph R. Saucedo
Richard H. Sherman, M.D.
Robert S. Swinney, M.D.
7
Summary of Cash and Certain Other
Compensation
The following table shows the
compensation earned for the past three years by each of the Companys executive officers whose 2005 compensation exceeded $100,000 (the
named executive officers).
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
Long Term Compensation
|
|
Name and Position
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
Bonus (1)
|
|
Securities Underlying Options (#)(1)
|
|
All Other Compensation ($)
|
George A.
Lopez |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
550,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
85,089 |
(3) |
Chairman of
the Board,
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
(2) |
|
|
62,508 |
(3) |
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
(2) |
|
|
48,069 |
(3) |
|
Francis J.
OBrien |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(2) |
|
|
3,056 |
(4) |
Secretary,
Treasurer and
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(2) |
|
|
2,562 |
(4) |
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
|
|
|
27,750 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,500 |
(4) |
|
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
202,500 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,531 |
(4) |
Vice
President of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
140,009 |
(5) |
|
|
10,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,375 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
183,333 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,500 |
(4) |
|
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
(2) |
|
|
1,955 |
(4) |
Vice
President of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
(2) |
|
|
1,875 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
130,667 |
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,033 |
(4) |
|
Alison D.
Burcar |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
(2) |
|
|
0 |
|
Vice
President of Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
113,249 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
(2) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
(2) |
|
|
50 |
(4) |
(1) |
|
Bonus amounts are included in the year earned rather than the
year actually paid; a portion is paid in the following year. |
(2) |
|
Options to acquire shares of the Company. |
(3) |
|
Includes dollar value of life insurance premiums paid by the
Company, based on the cost of term life insurance, plus the dollar value, on an actuarial basis, of the net cash surrender value accruing to the Diana
Lopez Insurance Trust as owner of the life insurance policy on Dr. Lopez of $81,006 in 2005, $59,956 in 2004 and $45,569 in 2003 and Company matching
contributions under Section 401(k) retirement plan for employees of $4,083 in 2005, $2,562 in 2004 and $2,500 in 2003. |
(4) |
|
Company matching contribution under section 401(k) retirement
plan. |
(5) |
|
Paid after achievement of a designated goal set in
2001. |
Annual salary amounts for 2006
are: Dr. Lopez $500,000; Mr. OBrien $290,000; Mr. Costello $190,000; Mr. Riggs $231,000; Ms. Burcar $135,000.
Stock Option Grants
Options to purchase Common Stock
of the Company were granted in 2005 to employees under the ICU Medical, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan (2003 Plan), which provides for the
grant of options to purchase up to 1,500,000 shares. The exercise price of options granted under the 2003 Plan is the fair market value of the Common
Stock on the date of grant. All options granted under the 2003 Plan expire ten years from issuance and vest in equal annual amounts on the first,
second and third anniversary of issuance. The Company granted options to purchase 171,500 shares of Common Stock under the 2003 Plan in
2005.
8
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants
|
|
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates
of Stock Price Appreciation For Option Term
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying
Options Granted (#)
|
|
% of Total Options Granted to Employees
in 2005
|
|
Exercise or Base Price Per
Share ($/Sh)
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
5% ($)(1)
|
|
10% ($)(1)
|
George A. Lopez,
M.D. |
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
$ |
32.92 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
$ |
2,070,321 |
|
|
$ |
5,246,600 |
|
Francis J.
OBrien |
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
32.92 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
258,790 |
|
|
|
655,825 |
|
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
32.92 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
207,032 |
|
|
|
524,660 |
|
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
32.92 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
144,922 |
|
|
|
367,262 |
|
Alison D.
Burcar |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
32.92 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
103,516 |
|
|
|
262,330 |
|
(1) |
|
The rates of stock appreciation reflected in the table are
assumed solely for the purpose of compliance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the disclosure of executive
compensation. The Companys Common Stock has at times appreciated at rates substantially different than the assumed rates and at other times the
value of the Common Stock has declined. Neither the assumed appreciation rates nor the actual changes in the share value of the Companys common
stock since the dates of option grants are necessarily indicative of any future value of the Common Stock. The actual realizable value of the options
may be substantially greater or less than that reflected in the table depending on the actual changes in the share value during the options
terms. |
Stock Option Exercises and Holdings
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 2005 AND YEAR-END OPTION
VALUES
The following table contains
information about stock options of the Company exercised during 2005, and stock options held at December 31, 2005, by the named executive officers of
the Company. It excludes activity under the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Name
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired on Exercise
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Number of Unexercised Options at Year-End (#)
Exercisable/Unexercisable
|
|
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at
Year-End ($) Exercisable/Unexercisable
|
George A. Lopez,
M.D. |
|
|
|
|
335,707 |
|
|
$ |
9,022,679 |
|
|
|
2,875,389 / 16,667 |
|
|
$ |
66,802,936 / $108,919 |
|
Francis J.
OBrien |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
72,472 / 0 |
|
|
|
571,603 / 0 |
|
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
485,900 |
|
|
|
70,527 / 15,000 |
|
|
|
728,975 / 229,650 |
|
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
53,333 |
|
|
|
57,001 / 0 |
|
|
|
659,989 / 0 |
|
Alison D.
Burcar |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
25,000 / 0 |
|
|
|
295,886 / 0 |
|
9
Long Term Retention Plan Awards
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL
YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Stock Price-Based
Plans
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares, Units or Other Rights
(#)
|
|
Performance or Other Period Until
Maturation or Payment
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
George A.
Lopez |
|
|
|
* |
|
6
years |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
Francis J.
OBrien |
|
|
|
* |
|
6
years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
* |
|
6
years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
333,000 |
|
|
|
666,000 |
|
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
* |
|
6
years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
Alison D.
Burcar |
|
|
|
* |
|
6
years |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
On January 29, 2005, the Board of
Directors approved the 2005 Long Term Retention Plan. Under the Plan, the Compensation Committee shall periodically determine, after advice from and
consultation with the chief Executive Officer (CEO), the award to each participant, except that the Compensation Committee shall determine
the award to the CEO, without advice from or consultation with the CEO.
Awards are payable, except with
respect to the CEO, at the sole discretion of the CEO on the sixth anniversary of the award, or sooner if Dr. George A. Lopez ceases to be CEO. The
award to the CEO is payable at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee on the sixth anniversary of the award. To receive payment of an award,
a participant must be an employee of the Company at the time payment is due. The Maximum amounts of the awards may be up to 200% of the Target amounts
based upon increases in the price of the Companys common stock or market capitalization. The following awards were made on January 29, 2006: Dr.
Lopez $301,000; Mr. OBrien $200,000; Mr. Costello $200,000; Mr. Riggs $300,000; Ms. Burcar $100,000.
10
Performance Graph
The following graph shows the
total stockholder return on the Companys Common Stock based on the market price of the Common Stock from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2005 and
the total returns of the Nasdaq Stock Market National Market Tier Index and Common Stocks of a peer group selected by the Company for the same
period.
COMPARISON OF TOTAL RETURN FROM JANUARY 1, 2000 TO
DECEMBER 31, 2005
AMONG ICU MEDICAL, INC., THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET INDEX AND PEER GROUP
|
|
|
|
1/1/2000
|
|
12/31/2001
|
|
12/31/2002
|
|
12/31/2003
|
|
12/31/2004
|
|
12/31/2005
|
ICU Medical,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
147.7 |
|
|
|
185.7 |
|
|
|
170.7 |
|
|
|
136.1 |
|
|
|
195.2 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
91.1 |
|
Peer
Group |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
140.0 |
|
|
|
100.4 |
|
|
|
144.5 |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
198.4 |
|
Assumes $100 invested on January
1, 2000 in the Companys Common Stock, the Nasdaq Stock Market National Market Tier Index and the Peer Group.
The companies in the peer group
selected by the Company are Merit Medical Systems, Inc., Microtek Medical Holdings, Inc., ResMed, Inc., Utah Medical Products, Inc. and Vital Signs,
Inc. The basis for the selection of the companies in the peer group is that, like the Company, they are all small to mid-size producers of medical
products.
Directors Compensation
During 2005, the Company paid
directors who were not employees of the Company an annual retainer of $24,000, payable currently, an annual retainer of $12,000 payable on a deferred
basis, plus $1,000 per day for attendance at meetings of the Board and $500 if the meeting is conducted telephonically. Pay for attendance at meetings
of Committees of the Board is $750 per day and $375 if the meeting is conducted telephonically. Each Chairperson of a Committee of the Board also
receives an annual retainer of $5,000 plus additional pay for attendance at each meeting of the Committee of $750 per day and $375 if the meeting is
conducted telephonically.
In 2005, each Director received
grants of options to purchase 3,750 shares of Common stock of the Company under the 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan. The Board has suspended all
future grants of options to purchase common stock of the Company under the 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan.
11
Employment Agreements
The Company enters into
employment agreements with each named executive officer for semi-annual periods ending on June 30 and December 31, and they may be renewed for
successive six-month periods upon expiration, unless terminated. The agreements may be terminated by the Company on sixty days notice. They provide for
an annual base salary and a bonus payable in cash based on achievement of performance goals. Under the employment agreement with Dr. Lopez, he received
quarterly grants of options to acquire the Companys stock. Under employment agreements with the other officers, options to acquire the
Companys stock were awarded based on achievement of performance goals.
Grants of options under
employment agreements were suspended in 2004. The Committee approved grants of options to the officers in April 2004 and April 2005 unrelated to the
achievement of performance goals, and no options have been granted since April 2005. All options 2004 and 2005 vest six months from the date of
issuance.
The Company also has an agreement
with Dr. Lopez which generally provides that, in the event the Company undergoes a change in control, as defined, and his employment is terminated
involuntarily or, after certain negative changes in condition of employment occur, voluntarily within 24 months of a change in control, he will be
entitled to three times his annual salary and bonus, payment of bonus through the date of termination and continuation of benefits for three years, and
any stock options he holds will vest in full. In addition, if any payments are subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, he will be entitled to a gross up of payments to offset the effect of the excise tax. The Company will not be entitled to
a tax deduction for any payments made under the agreement that are subject to the excise tax.
Life Insurance
The Diana Lopez Insurance Trust
is the owner of a $3 million life insurance policy on Dr. Lopez. The Company has in the past advanced funds to pay the premium on the policy. The
Company has a collateral assignment entitling it to recover, generally from the value of the policy, all premiums paid on the policy. Because of
legislative changes, the Company has ceased paying premiums on the policy, and has not reached agreement with Dr. Lopez or the owner of the policy on
the disposition of the policy. The 2003 and 2004 premiums have not been paid. The total premiums paid to date are $479,000 and the net surrender value
of the policy is approximately $465,000. If no further premiums are paid and no other action is taken, the policy will lapse in approximately
twenty-three years, at which time it will have no value.
Sports Promotion
The company sponsors a
competitive free-diving team that supports Dr. Lopezs participation in free-diving competitions. Dr. Lopez holds several records for depths
achieved in free-diving, that is, diving without underwater breathing equipment. The Companys name and logo are featured on the apparel and
equipment of the free-diving team, and the Company is prominently identified in videos and other records of competitions that the team enters. The
Company believes its corporate image is enhanced by publicity generated by the teams activities and that it should sponsor the free-diving team.
Expenses incurred to sponsor the free-diving team include costs of training trips and travel to competitions, accommodations and living expenses,
compensation to competition officials and tem members, equipment costs and boat charter expenses. In 2005, the Company incurred approximately $103,000
of expenses in sponsoring the free-diving team. Dr. Lopez receives no compensation for participation in the teams activities over and above his
normal compensation for service as the Companys Chief Executive Officer.
SELECTION OF AUDITORS
The Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company has selected McGladrey & Pullen LLP (McGladrey), as independent auditors of the Company for the year ending
December 31, 2006, and has further directed that management submit the selection of independent auditors for ratification by the
12
stockholders at the Annual
Meeting. McGladrey audited the Companys financial statements for the first time in 2005. Representatives of McGladrey are expected to be present
at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and respond to appropriate questions.
On May 26, 2005, Deloitte &
Touche LLP (Deloitte) resigned as the Registrants independent registered public accounting firm.
Deloittes report on the
Companys financial statements for either of the past two years did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
During the Companys past
two years and the subsequent interim period to the date of Deloittes resignation, there have not been any disagreements with Deloitte on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to
Deloittes satisfaction, would have caused Deloitte to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report,
and there have not been any reportable events as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K.
On May 26, 2005, the
Companys Audit Committee engaged McGladrey as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31,
2005.
The decision to change the
independent registered independent public accounting firm was approved by the Companys Audit Committee.
During the past two years and the
subsequent interim period up to its engagement, the Company has not (and no one on its behalf has) consulted with McGladrey on the application of
accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the
Companys financial statements, or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement as defined in paragraph 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation
S-K or reportable event as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K.
Fees Paid to Auditors
It is the policy of our Audit
Committee to have the engagement of our independent auditor to perform any audit or non-audit services approved in advance by the Audit Committee. Such
approval authority is delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee on behalf of the Audit Committee as permitted by the Audit Committee
Charter.
McGladrey was our independent
auditor in 2005. Fees billed by McGladrey in 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
2005
|
Audit fees
financial statements |
|
|
|
$ |
126,500 |
|
Audit fees
internal controls over financial reporting |
|
|
|
|
290,033 |
|
Audit related
fees |
|
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Tax
fees |
|
|
|
|
-0- |
|
All other
fees |
|
|
|
|
-0- |
|
13
Deloitte was our independent
auditor in 2004. Fees billed by Deloitte in 2004 and 2005 for services through the date of their resignation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
Audit fees
financial statements |
|
|
|
$ |
191,100 |
|
|
$ |
195,290 |
|
Audit fees
internal controls over financial reporting |
|
|
|
|
128,025 |
|
|
|
529,494 |
|
Audit related
fees |
|
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
Tax
fees |
|
|
|
|
49,452 |
|
|
|
65,286 |
|
All other
fees |
|
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
Audit related
services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEC
filings |
|
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
Accounting
consultation |
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
The engagement for all audit
related services was approved in advance by our Audit Committee.
Audit Committee Report
The Companys audited
consolidated financial statements are included in the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders and Form 10-K. The Audit Committee has reviewed and
discussed those financial statements with management of the Company and has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended. Further, the Committee has received the
written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by Independence Standards Board Standards No. 1, Independence Discussions
with Audit Committees, as amended, and has discussed the independent auditors independence with them. Based on these reviews and discussions,
the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Companys
Annual Report to Stockholders and Form 10-K.
April 7, 2006
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Joseph R. Saucedo, Chairman
John
J. Connors
Jack W. Brown
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE PERFORMANCE-BASED
BONUSES
On March 22, 2006, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee) approved the payment of performance-based cash bonuses (Performance
Bonuses) to Dr. Lopez and Mr. OBrien. The Performance Bonuses are to be paid for each of the five years ending December 31, 2006 through
2010 if the closing price of the Companys Common Stock on the last trading day of such year is equal to or higher than the target stock price
(Target Price) for such year established by the Committee. The Performance Bonuses are intended to satisfy the requirements for qualified
performance-based compensation of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Committee believes that
the Performance Bonuses will provide benefits to the stockholders by encouraging Dr. Lopez and Mr. OBrien to promote and strengthen the
Companys investor and public relations, which may lead to improved market performance of the Companys Common Stock. We are asking the
stockholders to approve the Performance Bonuses to satisfy one of the conditions for the Companys federal income tax deduction of the amounts
paid as Performance Bonuses.
14
Section 162(m)
Under Section 162(m) of the Code,
the Companys federal income tax deduction for a taxable year for compensation for services performed by each named executive officer listed in
the Summary Compensation Table on page 9 is generally limited to $1 million. However, compensation that qualifies under Section 162(m) as
performance-based does not count against the $1 million limit. One of the conditions that must be satisfied for compensation to qualify as
performance-based under Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the compensation arrangement must be disclosed to and approved by the
Companys stockholders. The material terms that must be disclosed and approved are the employees eligible to receive the compensation, a
description of the business criteria on which the performance goal is based and the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an employee on
achievement of the performance goal.
The employees eligible to be paid
Performance Bonuses are George A. Lopez, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Francis J. OBrien,
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The business criterion on which the performance goal is based is the price of the
Companys Common Stock. The maximum amounts of the Performance Bonuses that can be paid for any year on achievement of the performance goal are
$1,000,000 for Dr. Lopez and $500,000 for Mr. OBrien. Approval of the Performance Bonuses by the stockholders will constitute approval of each of
these terms for purposes of the approval required by Section 162(m). The Company will not pay any Performance Bonuses unless they are approved by the
stockholders.
Our Board recommends a vote
FOR approval of the Performance Bonuses.
Vote Required
Approval of the Performance
Bonuses requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal
at the Annual Meeting.
Payment of Performance Bonuses
The following summary of the
terms of the Performance Bonuses is qualified in its entirety by reference to the terms of the Performance Bonuses set forth in Appendix
A.
For each of the years ending
December 31, 2006 through 2010, the Committee will establish the amount of the Performance Bonuses to be paid to each eligible employee, subject to the
maximum amount described above for that employee, and the Target Price for such year. The Company will pay the Performance Bonuses for a year if the
Closing Price (as defined in Appendix A) for such year is equal to or higher than the Target Price for such year. The Company will not pay
the Performance Bonuses for any year if the Closing Price for such year is not equal to or higher than the Target Price for such year.
The conditions for payment of the
Performance Bonuses will be deemed to be met in the event of an acquisition of the Company in which holders of the Companys Common Stock receive
cash or other consideration for the Common Stock with a value equal to or higher than the Target Price for the year in which the acquisition is
completed. The Company will not pay the Performance Bonus for any year to Dr. Lopez if he is not serving as Chief Executive Officer of the Company or
to Mr. OBrien if he is not serving as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, in each case on the last trading day of such year unless the
conditions for payment of the Performance Bonuses are deemed to be met in connection with an acquisition of the Company.
2006 Compensation
For 2006, the Committee approved
compensation for Dr. Lopez consisting of base salary of $500,000, a bonus of up to $500,000 payable one-half at the end of the first six months of the
year and one-half at the end of the second six months, in each case at the discretion of the Committee, and a Performance Bonus of $550,000 as
described above, payable if the Target Price for 2006 is achieved. The Committee recommended and the Board approved compensation for Mr. OBrien
consisting of base salary of $290,000, a bonus of up to
15
$87,000 payable if certain performance goals are achieved, and a Performance Bonus
of $250,000 as described above, payable if the Target Price for 2006 is achieved. If all of the bonuses for 2006 are earned and paid, Dr. Lopezs
compensation for 2006 will exceed the $1 million limit for deductibility under Section 162(m) unless his Performance Bonus qualifies as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Mr. OBriens total compensation for 2006 is not likely to exceed $1
million.
In addition to the foregoing
amounts, however, Dr. Lopez and Mr. OBrien could, but are not expected to, receive compensation payments under our Long-Term Retention Plan
described above under Executive Compensation Long Term Retention Plan Awards. Payments under the Long-Term Retention Plan would not
qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Under an agreement described above under Executive Compensation
Employment Agreements, Dr. Lopez could, but is not expected to, receive additional compensation in connection with a change in control of
the Company that would not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Assuming that the Performance Bonuses qualify as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), they will be the only elements of compensation paid to Dr. Lopez and Mr. OBrien
for 2006 that will not count against the $1 million limit for deductibility under Section 162(m).
Federal Income Tax Considerations
All amounts paid pursuant to the
Performance Bonuses will be taxable income to the employee when received. Subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company will generally be entitled
to a federal income tax deduction in the amounts of the Performance Bonuses.
Stockholder approval is only one
of the conditions that must be satisfied to qualify the Performance Bonuses as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). We
anticipate that the Performance Bonuses will satisfy the other conditions to qualify for deductibility as performance-based compensation
under Section 162(m). If the Performance Bonuses are approved by the stockholders, however, they will be paid if earned regardless of the failure of
any other aspect of the Performance Bonuses to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m).
The foregoing is only a summary
of certain federal income taxation considerations affecting employees and the Company related to the Performance Bonuses. It does not purport to be
complete and does not discuss state or local income tax laws applicable to any employee or the Company.
16
OTHER MATTERS
The Company knows of no other
matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented for action, the persons named in the accompanying proxy
intend to vote on such matters in their discretion.
ANNUAL REPORT
The Companys Annual Report
for the year ended December 31, 2005 is being mailed to all stockholders together with this Proxy Statement. The Companys Annual Report is also
posted on the Companys web site, www.icumed.com.
THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE, WITHOUT
CHARGE, A COPY OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INCLUDING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED SCHEDULES, FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION UPON REQUEST IN WRITING FROM ANY PERSON WHO WAS A HOLDER OF RECORD, OR WHO REPRESENTS IN GOOD FAITH THAT HE OR SHE WAS A BENEFICIAL OWNER,
OF COMMON STOCK OF THE COMPANY ON MARCH 27, 2006. ANY SUCH REQUEST SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY AT 951 CALLE AMANECER, SAN
CLEMENTE, CA 92673. THE COMPANYS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K IS ALSO POSTED ON THE COMPANYS WEB SITE,
WWW.ICUMED.COM.
NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS AND
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Any stockholder who intends to
nominate persons for election as directors at an annual meeting shall give timely written notice to the Secretary of the Company setting forth (a) as
to each nominee whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence
address of the nominee, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the nominee, (iii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the
corporation which are beneficially owned by the nominee and (iv) any other information concerning the nominee that would be required under the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee; and (b) as to the stockholder giving
the notice, (i) the name and record address of the stockholder and (ii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the Company which are
beneficially owned by the stockholder. Such notice shall include a signed consent of each such nominee to serve as a director of the Company, if
elected. The Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by the Company to determine the
eligibility for such proposed nominee to serve as a director of the Company. Any stockholder who intends to propose any business at a meeting shall
give timely written notice to the Secretary of the Company setting forth as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting (i) a
brief description of the business to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting the business at the meeting, (ii) the name and record
address of the stock holder giving the notice, (iii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the Company that are beneficially owned by the
stockholder, and by any other stockholders known by the stockholder giving the notice to be supporting the proposal and (iv) any material or financial
interest of the stockholder in such business. Either of the notices described above will be timely if it is delivered to or mailed and received at the
Companys executive offices not less than 50 days nor more than 75 days prior to the date of the annual meeting, unless the Company has given less
than 60 days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting, in which case the notice must be received by the Company not less than 10
days after notice of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the meeting was made. A proposal that a stockholder wants the Company
to include in the Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices by December 12, 2006
or if the date of the annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from May 12, then the deadline is a reasonable time before the Company begins to
print and mail its proxy materials, to be included in the Proxy Statement for that meeting, and all other conditions for such inclusion must be
satisfied.
17
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Companys officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of the Companys Common Stock to file
reports on prescribed forms regarding ownership of and transactions in the Common Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish
copies of such forms to the Company. Based solely on a review of the forms received by it, the Company believes that with respect to 2005 the following
Section 16(a) filings were not filed on a timely basis: one Form 4 filing for John J. Connors.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The cost of this solicitation of
proxies will be borne by the Company. Solicitations will be made by mail, telephone or telegram and personally by directors, officers and other
employees of the Company, but such persons will not receive compensation for such services over and above their regular salaries. The Company will
reimburse brokers, banks, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their reasonable
charges and expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of such stock.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Francis J. OBrien,
Secretary
18
Appendix A
ICU MEDICAL, INC.
PERFORMANCE-BASED BONUSES
For each of the years ended
December 31, 2006 through 2010, ICU Medical, Inc. (the Company) shall pay cash bonuses (Performance Bonuses) to George A. Lopez
(Lopez) and Francis J. OBrien (OBrien), currently the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, if the closing price of the Companys Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Stock Market on the last trading day of
such year as reported by The Wall Street Journal (the Closing Price) is equal to or higher than the target stock price (Target
Price) for such year established by the Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Companys Board of Directors. During the
first quarter of each such year, the Committee will establish the amount of the Performance Bonuses to be paid, which may not exceed $1,000,000 for
Lopez or $500,000 for OBrien, and the Target Price for such year. The Committee may not change either the Performance Bonus amounts or the Target
Price for any year after the last day of the first quarter of such year.
If the Closing Price for a year
is equal to or higher than the Target Price for such year, the Company shall pay the Performance Bonuses for such year to Lopez and OBrien no
later than January 10 of the next year. The Company shall not pay all or part of the Performance Bonuses for any year if the Closing Price for such
year was not equal to or higher than the Target Price for such year.
The Committee shall not establish
a Performance Bonus for any year, for Lopez if he is no longer serving as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, or for OBrien if he is no
longer serving as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The Company shall not pay all or part of the Performance Bonus for any year to Lopez if he is
not serving as Chief Executive Officer of the Company or to OBrien if he is not serving as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, in each case
on the last trading day of such year unless the conditions for payment of the Performance Bonuses are deemed to be met as provided below in connection
with an acquisition of the Company. The fact that either Lopez or OBrien shall be eligible to receive payment of a Performance Bonus for any year
shall not entitle him to continued employment or to continue to serve as Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, as the case may be, until
the last trading day of such year.
If no sales of the Companys
Common Stock are reported for the last trading day of any year, the Closing Price for such year shall instead be the closing price on the last
preceding trading day for which sales are reported, provided that if no sales are reported for the last ten trading days of such year, the Closing
Price shall be the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Common Stock on the last trading day of such year. If the Companys
Common Stock ceases to be traded or quoted on the Nasdaq National Stock Market, the Closing Price for any year shall be based on the closing price of,
or the high bid and low asked prices for, as the case may be, the Companys Common Stock on the primary stock exchange or quotation system on
which the Common Stock is traded or quoted (as determined by the Committee) or, if the Common Stock is not traded or quoted on an exchange or system,
the mean between the high bid and low asked prices for the Companys Common Stock quoted by a recognized securities dealer selected by the
Committee that regularly quotes the Companys Common Stock. If the Companys Common Stock is not traded or quoted on any established stock
exchange or established quotation system or regularly quoted by any recognized securities dealer on the last trading day of any year, there will be no
Closing Price for such year, and the Company shall not pay all or part of the Performance Bonus for such year unless the conditions for payment of the
Performance Bonuses are deemed to be met as provided below in connection with an acquisition of the Company.
In the event of an acquisition of
the Company by means of a merger, acquisition of assets or acquisition by means of a tender or exchange offer or otherwise of a majority of the Common
Stock of the Company in which holders of the Companys Common Stock receive cash or other consideration for the Common Stock, the conditions for
payment of the Performance Bonuses shall be deemed to be met, and they shall be paid
A-1
upon the completion of the
acquisition, if the value of the per share consideration received by holders of the Companys Common Stock in connection with the acquisition, as
determined by the Compensation Committee, is equal to or higher than the Target Price for the year in which the acquisition is
completed.
In the event of a stock dividend,
a stock split, a reverse stock split or a recapitalization of the Companys Common Stock, the Committee shall make an appropriate adjustment to
the Target Price established for the year in which such event occurs and determine the equity security of the Company to which the adjusted Target
Price will apply, in which event all references to Common Stock in the preceding paragraphs shall be deemed references to such equity
security.
The Company shall not pay any
Performance Bonuses unless the material terms of the performance goal under which they are to be paid, as defined in the Treasury Regulations under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, are disclosed to and approved by the stockholders of the Company before December 31,
2006 in accordance with such regulations. If the Committee changes the material terms of the performance goal for any year within the meaning of such
regulations, the Company shall not pay any Performance Bonuses for such year unless the revised material terms of the performance goal are disclosed to
and approved by the stockholders of the Company before December 31 of such year.
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares represented by this Proxy will be voted as directed herein, but if no directions are indicated,
will be voted FOR the election of all nominees of the Board of Directors and FOR Items 2 and 3. |
|
|
|
Please Mark Here for Address Change or Comments SEE REVERSE SIDE |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
Nominees: |
01 Jack W. Brown 02 Richard H. Sherman, M.D. |
|
ITEM 2. |
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY SELECTION OF
McGLADREY & PULLEN LLP AS AUDITORS FOR THE COMPANY |
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
WITHHOLD FOR ALL |
|
|
ITEM 3. |
APPROVAL OF PERFORMANCE-BASED BONUSES |
o |
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withheld for the nominee you list below: (Write that nominees name in the space provided below.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Choose MLink(sm) for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials,
investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to Investor ServiceDirect® at www.melloninvestor.com/isd
where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment.
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
Signature |
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or quardian, please give full title as such. |
FOLD
AND DETACH HERE
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone
voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes
the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
Internet
http://www.proxyvoting.com/icui
Use the internet to vote your proxy.
Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site. |
OR |
Telephone
1-866-540-5760 Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy.
Have your proxy card in hand when you call. |
|
Mail Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by
telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
ICU MEDICAL, INC.
The undersigned hereby
appoints George A. Lopez, M.D. and Francis J. OBrien, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with
power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided
on the other side, all the shares of ICU Medical, Inc. Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their
discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to
be held May 12, 2006 or any adjournment thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Meeting.
|
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
|
|
|
Address
Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 FOLD AND DETACH HERE 5